Spacex's recent decision to refly a Super Heavy booster
could be the most important moment in the company's history.
But what exactly makes this step so important now?
On a quiet Thursday morning in South Texas, a thunderous roar
cut through the air. A Super Heavy Booster 14 came
back to life in 9:40 AM local time.
Fire erupted from beneath the behemoth rocket as it stood
anchored to the ground at Spacex's Starbase launch site.
This was the first time the company had ever fired a flight
proven Super Heavy. The eight second static fire
test marked a key turning point not only for the booster itself,
but for the entire SpaceX Starship program.
Booster 14 had already flown once during a test flight in
January. But instead of being retired or
sent back to the Rocket Garden, the rocket was refurbished on
site, outfitted with parts from previous missions, Frankenstein
back together and prepared for return to action.
Now, SpaceX confirmed that this very same booster will be part
of the upcoming Starship launch. They said the 1st Super Heavy
reuse will be a step towards our goal of 0 touch replay.
That's what they posted on X Now.
SpaceX said 29 of boosters 33 Raptor engines had already flown
before, which is not only a technical miracle but also a
logistical achievement. Developing and operating 33
methane fueled engines in tandem is already absolutely stunningly
complex, and reusing most of them it's still managing to make
the system perform is an engineering feat that's godly.
Each of these engines contributes to the rocket's
staggering 17,000,000 lbs of thrust, twice as much as NASA's
Saturn 5, which took people to the Moon.
Now, this accomplishment is essentially important.
This accomplishment is especially important right now
because the other half of the Starship rocket, the upper
stage, has been struggling. The last two flights of
Starship's upper stage ended in failure, explosions around 8
minutes into the missions, now at roughly the same phase of the
flight, leaving engineers with more questions and answers.
And that's while booster development is accelerating.
The ship itself remains an unsolved puzzle, even as parts
of the Starship system move forward.
The recent string of failures has slowed the overall program.
In both the January and March test flights.
The upgraded upper stage, which is Block 2 now, lost engine
power and began to tumble out of control.
And each time, it disintegrated midair before reaching its
intended splashdown zone, scattering debris across the
ocean near the Bahamas and Turks and Caicos.
These repeated failures didn't just end those specific flights.
So they blocked SpaceX from testing one of the key
innovations of Block 2 it's reinforced heat shield.
Now, without a successful reentry attempt, engineers can't
validate whether the redesigned tiles will survive the intense
thermal forces of reentry now. This leaves a critical element
of the system unproven and adds more uncertainty to future
missions. But despite the upper stage
setbacks, Spacex's progress with booster reusability is advancing
faster than many have expected. Now, compared to Falcon 9, which
required extensive refurbishment and logistics between flights
early in its development, Super Heavy is being turned around
much more efficiently. Falcon 9's first reuse booster
had to be shipped back and forth across the whole country for
months of testing. Super Heavy, by contrast, was
readied for reflight in less than 90 days and never left its
home sweet home at Starbase, Texas.
That's partially because Falcon 9 was never designed for fast
reusability from the start. Lesson learned from that earlier
program have been built directly into the design of the Super
Heavy rocket. This means that instead of
transporting the rocket thousands of miles for repairs
and inspections, SpaceX can conduct everything, Testing,
refurbishing, reassembly, just within a few miles of the launch
site. Just cart it down there.
Another difference is how these boosters are recovered.
Falcon 9 lands vertically on drone ships using landing legs.
Super Heavy, however, skips the legs entirely.
No legs on this thing, and instead it's caught by massive
mechanical arms called chopsticks that are mounted
directly on the launch tower. This allows for a quicker turn
around and eliminates the need for landing gear systems, which
can be vulnerable to damage and also add a lot of weight.
There's a much higher degree of difficulty with Super Heavy
though. It's bigger, more powerful, and
far more complex, and over 400 feet tall When stacked with the
Starship upper stage, this rocket towers above every launch
system in the history of humankind.
It's also equipped with more engines than any other rocket
ever built. That means there are more
systems that need to work perfectly together.
And despite those challenges, though, Super Heavy's
performance has been stable. SpaceX has launched 8 integrated
Starship test flights so far, and since the failure on the
debut flight, all 7 subsequent Super Heavy boosters have
successfully lifted off. Of the last four attempts the
recover the booster 3 succeeded. This consistently contrasts
sharply with the upper stages recent track record, which has
now failed on two consecutive launches.
But why does this all matter? First, there's a simple fact
that making Starship reusable is the foundation of Elon Musk's
long term goal to send humans to Mars.
And without a reusable system, launching regular missions to
deep space becomes cost prohibitive.
Every successful reused test cuts down the potential cost of
future launches and moves the technology closer to practical,
affordable deep space. Then there's the role of
Starship in US space policy. NASA is relying on SpaceX to
deliver a crude lunar landing using Starship under its Artemis
program. But that's not a single rocket
launch. It's a massive orchestration
involving U to 10 inorbit refueling launches to to off
Starship before it heads to the moon.
And if SpaceX can't reliably reuse the Super Heavy booster
and the upper stage, it won't be able to fly often enough to meet
this demand. Another important piece
Starlink. SpaceX plans to use Starship to
launch heavier next generation Starlink satellites, improving
its global Internet service. Now these satellites are too
large to fit inside Falcon 9's payload fairing.
So until Starship becomes a reliable launch system, these
upgrades remain on hold. And the FAA recently signed off
on Spacex's internal investigation into the January
failure, and the company concluded the vibrations during
flight were stronger than anticipated, leading to stress
that damaged engine components and caused a fire.
That fire disabled key systems and LED to the loss of control,
and SpaceX implemented 11 specific changes to prevent the
same problem from repeating. However, the cause of March's
failure remains similar. The investigation is still a
little bit open, and although early signs suggest a very
similar failure point and without a known fix to the upper
stages issues, it's unclear when SpaceX can move forward with
full end to end testing. The company had initially aimed
for up to 25 Starship launches in 2025.
Now, that goal looks increasingly unlikely.
Now, Starship continues to struggle and may only fly a
handful of times in the next 12 months.
The delays don't just affect SpaceX.
NASA has billions of dollars tied up in contracts that depend
on Starship performing. If refuelling tests are pushed
to 2026, as Musk has suggested, the timeline for landing
astronauts on the moon also slips.
And that domino effect could delay future Artemis missions,
forcing NASA to rethink how it plans its deep space exploration
goals. At present, SpaceX has not
released a target date for Starship's ninth flight.
The upper stage assigned to that mission remains inside the Star
Base facility right now. Its next milestone will be a
static fire test of its engines, followed by inspections and
final preparations. Only then will SpaceX move the
ship to the pad and mounted a top booster 14 for a full stack
test. The sequence is clear, though,
but the outcome isn't. If the next flight fails again,
SpaceX may have to pause launches altogether until it can
identify and fix the root cause. If it succeeds, it will allow
engineers to finally test the heat shield and perhaps move
closer to orbital recovery. Until then, SpaceX continues its
high wire act, pushing the most complex rocket ever bill closer
to reusability while also still wrestling with the challenges of
its upper stage failures. Hey, thanks for watching today.
I want to take a second and I want to make a deal with you.
If you'd like Starship content and you want to continue getting
Starship content in your feed, I want you to do something for
free. Just hit the subscribe button
like button and leave an emoji down below.
And this is my promise to you about this.
Let's make this deal, you and me.
I'm going to continue making content for the next 10 years.
Never behind a paywall. That's all I ask from you, a
subscribe. I've been doing this for five
years. I just want to sub.
That's it takes a second and you're going to get more content
about Starship in your feed, not just from me, but from other
Starship creators out there. So thank you for that.
Also, please take care of yourselves and each other and I
will see you in the next one.