Hey everybody, welcome. Back to the Elon Musk podcast.
This is a show where we discuss. The Critical.
Crossroads The Shape SpaceX, Tesla X The Boring Company.
And Neurolink. I'm your host, Will.
Walden, How will the 94 percent of federal employees who
currently work remotely respond? Well, they.
Discover their. Every keystroke and login could
soon be tracked. The answer may arrive sooner
than expected as Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy advance their
proposal for comprehensive federal worker surveillance.
Now, the Department of Government Efficiency, known as
DOGE, stepped into the spotlight this week as its newly appointed
leaders, Musk and Ramaswamy, presented their strategy to
Republican lawmakers during multiple closed door sessions on
Capitol Hill. The primary objective centers on
achieving $2 trillion in federal budget reductions through what
they term the elimination of government waste.
Now, Senator Joni Ernst from Iowa emerges as a central figure
in this developing story, having released a detailed 60 page
report examining the current state of government remote work.
The report presents striking statistics claiming that merely
6% of federal employees work full time in physical office
location. Ernst, who chairs the Senate
Doge Caucus, draws from her agricultural background to
criticize the current remote work situation, stating growing
up on a farm, I know what working from home really means.
But in Washington, working from home apparently means having a
field day. Now the repose.
The proposed remote act sponsored by Ernst, introduces
comprehensive monitoring software designed to track
federal employees computer activities.
This technology would maintain detailed records of network
traffic, login frequencies, online duration, and overall
digital engagement patterns for remote workers.
Legislation represents a direct response to concerns about
remote worker productivity and accountability.
Now, Elon Musk has amplified these concerns through social
media. On X, where he shared
particularly stark assessments of the situation, he said if you
exclude security guards and maintenance personnel, the
number of government workers who show up in person into 40 hours
of work a week is close to 1%. Almost no one now the
implementation of employee monitoring software mirrors
existing practices in the private sector.
Major corporations like JP Morgan, Barclays Bank, and
United Health Group already enjoy similar technologies to
monitor the remote workforce, tracking metrics down to
individual keystrokes and e-mail composition times.
Now, Elon Musk brings substantial personal experience
regarding remote work policies to his new advisory role as CEO
of Tesla. He previously mandated a minimum
40 hour in office work week, informing employees that failure
to comply would be interpreted as resignation.
This hardline stance continued on X after his acquisition,
where he required personal approval for any flexible work
arrangements. Now, the federal Office of
Management and Budget presents contrasting data in their August
2024 report spanning nearly 3000 pages.
Their analysis indicates that approximately half of federal
workers occupy full in person positions, such as healthcare
providers and food safety inspectors.
Among employees eligible for telework, 60% of their work
occurs at assigned office locations.
Now, House Speaker Mike Johnson has voiced strong support for
the DOGE initiatives despite their conflicting statistics.
Johnson continues to cite the disputed figure that only 1% of
federal workers maintain daily in person attendance,
demonstrating alignment with Musk and Ramaswamy's perspective
on federal workforce reform. Now, the potential impact of
these proposed changes extends beyond simple workforce
logistics, though. In their November Wall Street
Journal op-ed, Musk and Ramaswamy outlined the strategy,
stating requiring federal employees to come to the office
five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations
that we welcome. Ramaswamy has suggested even
more aggressive measures, proposing the elimination of 75%
of federal positions. Now, Musk frames the remote work
debate as both a productivity and moral issue.
He argues that office workers should not receive special
treatment regarding workplace flexibility when industrial and
service workers must physically report to their job sites.
Saying people should get off their God damn moral high horse
with their work from home BS now, Musk stated, adding that
the laptop class is living in La La land now.
The scope of Doge's actual authority remains uncertain,
though Douglas Holtz Eiken, former Congressional Budget
Office director and current president of the Center Right
American Action Forum, provided context in an interview with
Fortune's Jeff Colvin. They don't have any power,
Holstein explained, describing DOGE as essentially a very high
profile think tank focused on generating ideas rather than
implementing direct changes. The proposed monitoring system
would create unprecedented levels of oversight for federal
employees. Software would track network
activity, login patterns, and overall online engagement,
establishing a comprehensive digital surveillance framework
for the federal workforce. Now, federal employee unions and
workplace advocacy groups have yet to respond formally to these
proposals. Their eventual reaction could
shape the implementation timeline in specific details of
any new monitoring systems or return to office mandates.
Industry experts note that implementing such extensive
monitoring systems across federal agencies would require
substantial technological infrastructure and training
investments. These costs could offset some of
the intended budget savings, at least in the short term.
And the timing of these proposals coincides with broader
national discussions about workplace flexibility and
productivity measurements in the post pandemic era.
The federal government's approach to these issues could
influence private sector policies and practices.
Now, constitutional law experts have begun examining potential
privacy implications of their proposed monitoring systems.
Questions about federal workers reasonable expectations of
privacy while using government equipment may require legal
clarification, and this could take years to figure out.
And as the Trump administration prepares to take office, the
fate of the federal remote work policies remains uncertain.
Nobody knows what's going to go on this like.
They said before it's a high level think tank, they have no
power, and the success or failure of these initiatives
will likely depend on the complex interactions between
executive authority, legislative support and administrative
feasibility. Hey, thank you so much for
listening today. I really do appreciate your
support. If you could take a second and
hit this subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast
platform that you're listening on.
Right now I. Greatly appreciate it, it helps
out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode.
And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you
caught up quickly. And please, if you want to
support the show even more, go to patreon.com/stage Zero.
And please take care of yourselves and each other.
And I'll see you tomorrow.