1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:03,000
The United States government has
officially designated a leading 

2
00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:06,720
American artificial intelligence
company a supply chain risk to 

3
00:00:06,720 --> 00:00:10,040
national security. 
Which is a label they usually 

4
00:00:10,040 --> 00:00:13,400
save for foreign adversaries. 
We are talking about the exact 

5
00:00:13,400 --> 00:00:16,520
same classification used for 
Huawei and ZTE. 

6
00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:19,640
The Department of War has 
effectively placed a Do not 

7
00:00:19,640 --> 00:00:22,360
touch order on Anthropic. 
That sounds like a lot more than

8
00:00:22,360 --> 00:00:24,080
just a cancelled contract. 
Oh, it is. 

9
00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:27,600
It's an absolute blacklist. 
It prohibits military 

10
00:00:27,600 --> 00:00:31,080
contractors, suppliers, 
basically any partners from 

11
00:00:31,080 --> 00:00:33,120
conducting commercial activity 
with the company. 

12
00:00:33,160 --> 00:00:36,240
If the government can blacklist 
a domestic company for refusing 

13
00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:39,840
to remove safety guardrails from
its software, does the private 

14
00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:43,160
sector actually retain any 
control over how its technology 

15
00:00:43,160 --> 00:00:46,120
is used in warfare? 
That is the multibillion dollar 

16
00:00:46,120 --> 00:00:48,480
question here. 
And this whole thing didn't 

17
00:00:48,480 --> 00:00:50,000
start in some corporate 
boardroom. 

18
00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:53,760
It started with a specific 
military operation, specifically

19
00:00:53,760 --> 00:00:57,240
the raid in Caracas to capture 
Nicolas Maduro, right? 

20
00:00:57,520 --> 00:00:59,840
Operation absolute resolve. 
Exactly. 

21
00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:03,520
According to reports, the US 
military utilized Anthropic's 

22
00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:07,080
model CLAWED during the planning
and execution of this operation.

23
00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:11,280
Now Anthropic doesn't have a 
direct contract to sit in the 

24
00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:14,800
situation room. 
The integration happened through

25
00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:17,040
Palantir. 
We should probably clarify 

26
00:01:17,040 --> 00:01:20,000
Palantir's role here, because 
they aren't just, you know, a 

27
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:22,360
simple database company. 
No, no. 

28
00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:25,080
Think of Palantir as as the 
operating system for Modern 

29
00:01:25,080 --> 00:01:26,920
Warfare. 
They have this platform called 

30
00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:30,880
the Maven Smart system. 
It ingests satellite imagery, 

31
00:01:30,880 --> 00:01:34,800
drone feeds, intercepted 
communications, basically all 

32
00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:37,800
the messy data of war. 
And it synthesizes it into a 

33
00:01:37,800 --> 00:01:40,520
coherent picture for the 
commanders on the ground. 

34
00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:42,040
Right. 
And they were running clawed 

35
00:01:42,040 --> 00:01:44,960
inside that ecosystem to help 
process all that information. 

36
00:01:44,960 --> 00:01:46,960
The mission itself was 
technically a success. 

37
00:01:46,960 --> 00:01:49,400
I mean, the administration got 
what they wanted, but the 

38
00:01:49,400 --> 00:01:51,200
friction actually started 
afterward. 

39
00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:53,680
Yeah, it started because 
Anthropic asked a question. 

40
00:01:54,080 --> 00:01:57,520
Following the operation, company
leadership allegedly inquired 

41
00:01:57,520 --> 00:02:00,560
whether their technology had 
been utilized in the raid, and 

42
00:02:00,560 --> 00:02:03,360
that inquiry triggered an 
immediate alarm at the Pentagon.

43
00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:05,880
Why though? 
I mean, if I sell a product, 

44
00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:09,039
asking how it was used seems 
pretty standard. 

45
00:02:09,280 --> 00:02:12,080
Not when you were dealing with 
classified operations. 

46
00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:17,080
But Anthropic felt they had to 
ask because of constitutional 

47
00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:19,200
AI. 
Let's use plain English for 

48
00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:21,400
that. 
What exactly is Constitutional 

49
00:02:21,400 --> 00:02:23,760
AI? 
Sure, so most AI models are 

50
00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:27,040
trained on massive amounts of 
Internet text and then just fine

51
00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:29,840
tune to be helpful. 
Anthropic takes a totally 

52
00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:32,000
different approach. 
They give the model a 

53
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:35,200
constitution, a specific set of 
ethical principles it has to 

54
00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:36,880
follow. 
Like rules against generating 

55
00:02:36,880 --> 00:02:38,560
harm or things like that. 
Exactly. 

56
00:02:38,560 --> 00:02:42,160
Rules like do not help kill 
people, do not violate privacy, 

57
00:02:42,160 --> 00:02:45,720
do not create hate speech. 
The model essentially checks its

58
00:02:45,720 --> 00:02:48,440
own output against this 
Constitution before it even 

59
00:02:48,440 --> 00:02:51,200
responds. 
So to know if the model actually

60
00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:54,240
followed its own constitution, 
the company needs to know what 

61
00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:56,360
it was doing. 
Yes, they need a degree of 

62
00:02:56,360 --> 00:02:58,960
transparency to ensure their 
ethical guidelines aren't being 

63
00:02:58,960 --> 00:03:01,720
violated, and the Pentagon 
viewed this request for 

64
00:03:01,720 --> 00:03:04,040
transparency as a massive 
liability. 

65
00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:06,280
Because it's an operational 
security issue for them. 

66
00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:08,800
Right. 
They saw a private vendor in San

67
00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:11,600
Francisco claiming they had the 
right to audit a military 

68
00:03:11,600 --> 00:03:14,120
operation. 
To the generals, that just looks

69
00:03:14,120 --> 00:03:17,080
like a vendor trying to exercise
veto power over national 

70
00:03:17,080 --> 00:03:19,800
security decisions. 
They see a tool they bought and 

71
00:03:19,800 --> 00:03:22,960
the tool maker wants to verify 
if it was used to hurt someone. 

72
00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:26,320
And that friction LED directly 
to the ultimatum. 

73
00:03:26,640 --> 00:03:30,480
The Pentagon, led by Secretary 
Pete Hegseth, issued a directive

74
00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:33,680
to all AI vendors. 
The rule was very simple. 

75
00:03:34,360 --> 00:03:38,000
AI vendors must allow their 
tools to be used for all lawful 

76
00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:40,160
purposes. 
All lawful purposes. 

77
00:03:40,160 --> 00:03:44,160
That phrase does a lot of heavy 
lifting, but Anthropic refused 

78
00:03:44,160 --> 00:03:46,960
to agree to that broad language.
They did. 

79
00:03:46,960 --> 00:03:50,480
They insisted on maintaining 2 
very specific red lines in their

80
00:03:50,480 --> 00:03:53,480
contract, regardless of whether 
the government called it lawful 

81
00:03:53,480 --> 00:03:54,920
or not. 
What were the 2 lines? 

82
00:03:55,080 --> 00:03:58,200
1st, The AI cannot be used for 
mass domestic surveillance of 

83
00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:00,920
American citizens. 
OK, that seems straightforward. 

84
00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:03,080
And the second. 
Second, it cannot be used for 

85
00:04:03,080 --> 00:04:05,280
fully autonomous weapons. 
Wait, hold on, let me just make 

86
00:04:05,280 --> 00:04:07,640
sure I have this straight. 
What is the specific definition 

87
00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:09,680
of an autonomous weapon in this 
context? 

88
00:04:09,880 --> 00:04:13,000
We are talking about systems 
that select and engage targets 

89
00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:16,600
without human intervention. 
In military terminology, it's 

90
00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:18,959
lethal autonomous weapons 
systems. 

91
00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:23,280
Meaning the software processes 
the sensor data, identifies a 

92
00:04:23,280 --> 00:04:26,800
human being as a target, and 
authorizes the strike. 

93
00:04:26,880 --> 00:04:29,680
Yes, all without a person ever 
pressing a button. 

94
00:04:29,840 --> 00:04:32,840
So Anthropic basically said we 
will not build the software that

95
00:04:32,840 --> 00:04:34,280
decides who dies. 
Correct. 

96
00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:37,240
The government's counter 
argument is that lawful use 

97
00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:40,600
already covers those concerns. 
They argue that if an action is 

98
00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:43,960
legal under the Constitution, a 
private company has no right to 

99
00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:46,720
block the government from using 
its procured tools to execute 

100
00:04:46,720 --> 00:04:49,160
it. 
But we if the Pentagon says 

101
00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:51,960
lawful use is the only standard 
they will accept, and they 

102
00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:54,720
refuse to sign a ban on 
autonomous weapons, are they 

103
00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:58,560
admitting they plan to use them?
That is the real Gray area, the 

104
00:04:58,560 --> 00:05:01,400
Pentagon spokesperson stated. 
They have no interest in mass 

105
00:05:01,400 --> 00:05:04,400
surveillance or autonomous 
weapons without human oversight 

106
00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:06,320
right now. 
They actually called those fears

107
00:05:06,320 --> 00:05:08,800
fake. 
However, they refuse to sign a 

108
00:05:08,800 --> 00:05:11,160
contract that explicitly forbade
it. 

109
00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:14,320
Exactly. 
Their position is entirely about

110
00:05:14,320 --> 00:05:18,200
operational flexibility. 
They on a you they cannot have a

111
00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:20,680
Terms of Service agreement 
overriding a commander's 

112
00:05:20,680 --> 00:05:22,960
decision in the field 5 or 10 
years from now. 

113
00:05:23,440 --> 00:05:26,120
And Anthropic is saying the 
technology just isn't safe 

114
00:05:26,120 --> 00:05:28,480
enough for that. 
That is their core argument. 

115
00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:31,200
They point out that current 
large language models 

116
00:05:31,200 --> 00:05:32,880
hallucinate. 
They make up facts. 

117
00:05:33,160 --> 00:05:35,280
They misinterpret context 
entirely. 

118
00:05:35,280 --> 00:05:37,480
Which is a known issue across 
the industry. 

119
00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:40,560
Yes. 
So Anthropic believes relying on

120
00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:44,120
them for autonomous killing is 
reckless and mass surveillance 

121
00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:47,560
violates fundamental rights. 
They view these strictly as 

122
00:05:47,560 --> 00:05:50,080
safety issues. 
While the administration argues 

123
00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:53,440
that lawful is the only standard
that matters and what corporate 

124
00:05:53,440 --> 00:05:55,840
policies cannot constrain the 
military? 

125
00:05:55,840 --> 00:05:58,200
Exactly. 
OK, let's pause here to reset 

126
00:05:58,200 --> 00:06:00,600
the pace. 
Usually when a company says no 

127
00:06:00,600 --> 00:06:02,880
to the government, they just 
lose the contract. 

128
00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:04,120
They don't get the money. 
Right. 

129
00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:06,880
You walk away, you lose the 
revenue, maybe your stock dips a

130
00:06:06,880 --> 00:06:10,120
bit, but you just continue doing
business with everyone else. 

131
00:06:10,120 --> 00:06:12,800
But the administration didn't 
just cancel the contract in this

132
00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:16,040
case, they went much further. 
They absolutely did. 

133
00:06:16,280 --> 00:06:19,640
President Trump ordered all 
federal agencies to immediately 

134
00:06:19,640 --> 00:06:23,200
cease using Anthropics 
technology, and then Secretary 

135
00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:25,840
Hegseth followed up by 
designating the company a supply

136
00:06:25,840 --> 00:06:29,320
chain risk under 10US Code 
Section 3252. 

137
00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:33,640
I want to focus on that specific
statute, NUS Code section 3252. 

138
00:06:33,640 --> 00:06:36,200
What does that actually mean? 
This is a statute designed 

139
00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:39,560
specifically to prevent 
espionage and sabotage by 

140
00:06:39,560 --> 00:06:43,080
foreign enemies. 
It is the exact legal tool used 

141
00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:47,000
to ban Huawei and ZTE because of
fears they were funneling data 

142
00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:48,600
straight to the Chinese 
Communist Party. 

143
00:06:48,800 --> 00:06:51,520
So it implies the company is an 
active threat to the integrity 

144
00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:54,320
of the nation's defense. 
Yes, and applying it to an 

145
00:06:54,320 --> 00:06:56,760
American firm for a contract 
dispute is entirely 

146
00:06:56,760 --> 00:06:58,720
unprecedented. 
It acts as a corporate death 

147
00:06:58,720 --> 00:07:00,200
penalty in the federal sector 
because. 

148
00:07:00,200 --> 00:07:02,640
It's not just the Pentagon that 
has to top using them now. 

149
00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:04,800
Exactly. 
It effectively forces any 

150
00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:06,480
company that wants to work with 
the military. 

151
00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:10,080
Companies like Boeing, Lockheed 
Martin or Palantir to strip 

152
00:07:10,080 --> 00:07:12,560
Anthropic out of their own 
internal workflows. 

153
00:07:12,560 --> 00:07:15,800
So if I'm an engineer at 
Lockheed Martin and I use Claude

154
00:07:15,840 --> 00:07:19,000
to write code or summarize 
technical documents for my daily

155
00:07:19,000 --> 00:07:21,320
work. 
You are now a liability. 

156
00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:26,160
Lockheed Martin cannot risk its 
massive government contracts by 

157
00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:29,640
harboring a designated supply 
chain risk in its software 

158
00:07:29,640 --> 00:07:31,760
stack. 
They have to RIP it completely 

159
00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:34,080
out. 
There's a massive contradiction 

160
00:07:34,080 --> 00:07:37,200
in the order itself though. 
It claims Anthropic is a 

161
00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:40,040
security risk, but 
simultaneously mandates they 

162
00:07:40,040 --> 00:07:43,440
continue providing services for 
a six month transition period. 

163
00:07:43,600 --> 00:07:46,760
Which really highlights that 
this isn't about espionage. 

164
00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:50,800
Think about it, if Huawei was 
actively spying on the Pentagon,

165
00:07:50,800 --> 00:07:54,040
you wouldn't say, OK, keep the 
routers plugged in for six more 

166
00:07:54,040 --> 00:07:55,400
months while we find a 
replacement. 

167
00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:57,080
Right, you would cut the line 
immediately. 

168
00:07:57,080 --> 00:07:59,880
You would sever it that second. 
So that tells us they need the 

169
00:07:59,880 --> 00:08:01,760
tech. 
They absolutely need the tech, 

170
00:08:01,760 --> 00:08:03,520
they just don't want the rules 
that come with it. 

171
00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,200
Keeping them on for six months 
admits that the government is 

172
00:08:06,200 --> 00:08:08,000
highly dependent on these 
models. 

173
00:08:08,120 --> 00:08:10,040
So this designation is just a 
power play. 

174
00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:13,360
Completely. 
It threatens Anthropics entire 

175
00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:16,400
enterprise ecosystem and its 
projected IPO. 

176
00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:18,880
It signals to the rest of 
Silicon Valley that 

177
00:08:18,880 --> 00:08:21,560
noncompliance comes with an 
existential cost. 

178
00:08:21,640 --> 00:08:24,480
And almost immediately, another 
company stepped in to take 

179
00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:27,800
advantage. 
Yes, hours after the ban on 

180
00:08:27,800 --> 00:08:32,280
Anthropic was announced, open 
AICEO, Sam Altman announced a 

181
00:08:32,280 --> 00:08:35,360
new agreement. 
The pivot was instant open AI 

182
00:08:35,360 --> 00:08:38,000
stepped right into the vacuum. 
They announced an agreement to 

183
00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:41,480
deploy open AI models on the 
Department of War's classified 

184
00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:43,600
networks. 
Here's the part that is really 

185
00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:46,440
confusing to me. 
Open AI claims they have the 

186
00:08:46,440 --> 00:08:50,040
exact same red lines as 
Anthropic regarding surveillance

187
00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:53,160
and autonomous weapons. 
Publicly, yes, their safety 

188
00:08:53,160 --> 00:08:55,120
guidelines prohibit the exact 
same things. 

189
00:08:55,120 --> 00:08:59,080
So if they have the same red 
lines, why did the Pentagon ban 

190
00:08:59,080 --> 00:09:02,560
one and sign the other? 
Why is Anthropic a security risk

191
00:09:02,560 --> 00:09:05,760
and Open AIA trusted partner? 
It comes down to the mechanism 

192
00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:08,240
of enforcement. 
Anthropic wanted strict 

193
00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:11,520
contractual prohibitions. 
They wanted a written veto in 

194
00:09:11,520 --> 00:09:13,680
the deal that they could enforce
legally. 

195
00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:16,720
Open AI adopted A layered 
approach instead. 

196
00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:19,360
What does a layered approach 
actually mean in this context? 

197
00:09:19,360 --> 00:09:22,840
It means they are relying on a 
cloud only deployment structure 

198
00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:25,320
and the government's own 
interpretation of the law. 

199
00:09:25,560 --> 00:09:28,360
Open AI agreed to the All Lawful
Use standard. 

200
00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:31,440
So they are effectively betting 
that the government won't define

201
00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:34,000
mass surveillance or autonomous 
weapons as lawful. 

202
00:09:34,280 --> 00:09:35,760
Correct. 
Altman stated that the 

203
00:09:35,760 --> 00:09:38,720
department agrees domestic 
surveillance is illegal, so they

204
00:09:38,720 --> 00:09:42,480
didn't need to fight over it. 
Open AI integrated their safety 

205
00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:45,320
stack into the deployment rather
than demanding external 

206
00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:48,720
oversight of specific missions. 
So Anthropic wanted the 

207
00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:52,000
government to sign a paper 
saying we promise not to do X, 

208
00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:55,320
Open AI said. 
We know X is illegal, so we 

209
00:09:55,320 --> 00:09:57,680
don't need you to sign a paper. 
Essentially, yes. 

210
00:09:58,200 --> 00:10:00,400
They gave the Pentagon the 
lawful use language they 

211
00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:03,200
demanded while assuring the 
public that their technical 

212
00:10:03,200 --> 00:10:05,120
architecture prevents the bad 
stuff. 

213
00:10:05,200 --> 00:10:08,000
It sounds like Open AI gave the 
Pentagon an optical win. 

214
00:10:08,040 --> 00:10:11,280
And a contractual 1 The Pentagon
gets to say we don't bow to 

215
00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:14,720
terms of service and Open AI 
gets the massive contract. 

216
00:10:14,880 --> 00:10:18,360
During this entire fallout, the 
administration publicly attacked

217
00:10:18,360 --> 00:10:21,560
Anthropic as a radical left and 
woke company. 

218
00:10:21,960 --> 00:10:24,080
The record really contradicts 
that characterization. 

219
00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:27,240
Though Anthropic is funded by 
major corporate players like 

220
00:10:27,240 --> 00:10:31,640
Amazon and Google, their CEO 
Dario Amadei has publicly stated

221
00:10:31,640 --> 00:10:35,040
that AI is existentially 
important for National Defense. 

222
00:10:35,040 --> 00:10:37,400
He's not exactly a pacifist. 
Far from it. 

223
00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:41,160
He has explicitly stated he 
supports helping the US military

224
00:10:41,160 --> 00:10:45,360
defeat autocratic adversaries. 
He even admitted in interviews 

225
00:10:45,520 --> 00:10:48,800
that autonomous weapons might 
eventually be necessary. 

226
00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:51,320
Wait, really? 
So what is his actual objection?

227
00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:54,440
His objection is entirely that 
the current technology isn't 

228
00:10:54,440 --> 00:10:57,920
safe enough yet. 
He argues that LLMS hallucinate 

229
00:10:57,920 --> 00:11:01,200
and make unpredictable errors 
and therefore shouldn't be 

230
00:11:01,200 --> 00:11:04,160
making keel decisions today. 
That seems like a technical 

231
00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:05,920
argument, not a political one. 
Exactly. 

232
00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:08,880
It suggests the woke label is 
just political cover. 

233
00:11:09,120 --> 00:11:12,200
The real issue here is the 
sovereign AI doctrine. 

234
00:11:12,200 --> 00:11:14,480
Meaning what? 
The administration is 

235
00:11:14,480 --> 00:11:17,720
establishing that the state, not
private labs, is the final 

236
00:11:17,720 --> 00:11:19,680
arbiter of how technology is 
deployed. 

237
00:11:20,040 --> 00:11:22,960
It is a fundamental shift from a
safety first model to a 

238
00:11:22,960 --> 00:11:25,440
deployment first mandate. 
They are worried about falling 

239
00:11:25,440 --> 00:11:27,040
behind. 
They are looking straight at 

240
00:11:27,040 --> 00:11:29,040
China. 
The argument is that if American

241
00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:31,520
companies are permitted to 
constrain the military with 

242
00:11:31,520 --> 00:11:34,680
safety guardrails, the United 
States will lose the advantage 

243
00:11:34,680 --> 00:11:37,920
to an adversary that operates 
without any such constraints. 

244
00:11:38,040 --> 00:11:41,040
They want the tech to be totally
subservient to national security

245
00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:44,800
objectives. 
This supply chain risk, does it 

246
00:11:44,800 --> 00:11:48,040
stop at the Pentagon? 
No, the General Services 

247
00:11:48,040 --> 00:11:51,120
Administration has already 
terminated Anthropics One Gov 

248
00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:54,040
deal. 
That means agencies totally 

249
00:11:54,040 --> 00:11:58,120
outside the military, like the 
Department of Energy or the EPA,

250
00:11:58,160 --> 00:12:01,520
might have to stop using Quad. 
It it effectively chills the 

251
00:12:01,520 --> 00:12:04,480
entire market for them. 
It forces every company to make 

252
00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:06,560
a hard choice. 
If you want to do business with 

253
00:12:06,600 --> 00:12:09,960
the US government in any 
capacity, you cannot use the 

254
00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:12,960
Risk software. 
It consolidated power strictly 

255
00:12:12,960 --> 00:12:15,320
around the vendors who agree to 
the government's terms. 

256
00:12:15,760 --> 00:12:18,440
To wrap this up, Anthropic held 
the line on their terms of 

257
00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:22,320
service and was designated a 
National Security Risk Open AI 

258
00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:24,760
aligned with the government's 
legal framework and became the 

259
00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:26,560
primary partner for the 
military. 

260
00:12:26,760 --> 00:12:29,520
The main take away here is that 
the Silicon Valley consensus, 

261
00:12:29,520 --> 00:12:32,400
this era where companies felt 
they could dictate ethical terms

262
00:12:32,400 --> 00:12:34,440
to the government, is 
effectively dead. 

263
00:12:34,840 --> 00:12:37,360
The government has demonstrated 
it is entirely willing to use 

264
00:12:37,360 --> 00:12:40,640
the full weight of executive 
power to ensure AI companies are

265
00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:42,880
subservient to national security
objectives. 

266
00:12:43,560 --> 00:12:47,480
If you're not subscribed yet, 
take a second and hit follow on.

267
00:12:47,480 --> 00:12:49,880
Whatever a you're using, it 
helps us keep making this. 

268
00:12:49,880 --> 00:12:50,880
We appreciate you being here.
