Hey. Everybody, welcome back to the
Elon Musk Podcast. This is a show where we discuss
the critical crossroads. The shape SpaceX.
Tesla X, The Boring Company, and Neuralink and I'm your host Will
Walden If you want uninterrupted episodes of the Elon Musk
podcast, please go to clubelon.supercast.com to find
out how, there's a link in the show notes.
So Open AI has robustly dismissed claims made by Elon
Musk in a recent legal battle, and they continue prosperity and
innovation post Musk, who departed in 2018.
The company refuted Musk's assertion that he was entitled
to credit for its achievements over the past six years.
In a legal retort to Musk's previous lawsuit, Open AI
described his accusations as lacking coherence and merit,
writing them as frivolous and fictional.
This marks the latest development in the escalating
legal confrontation between the two parties.
Now Musk, one of Open the Eyes founders in 2015, has charged
the organization with deviating from its initial nonprofit
ethos. He alleges that the company has
unfairly reserved its cutting edge AI technologies for select
private entities. Now this is against the
foundational principles of the organization, according to Elon
Musk. Now the dispute intensified
following a blog post by Open AI, which hinted at Musk's
dissatisfaction stemming from his absence in the company's
recent successes. The post also revealed past
communications from Musk, including a 2018 proposition to
integrate Open AI with Tesla to enhance competitiveness.
The suggestion that Open AI declined.
Now, Open AI's legal documents go a step further by accusing
Musk of fabricating a so-called founding agreement to support
his lawsuit aimed at furthering his own business interests.
They're calling him a liar, and the company firmly stated there
was no such agreement or any other contractual ties with Musk
concerning his financial contributions.
Now, the company's filing suggests that, contrary to
Musk's portrayal, he had actually advocated for a profit
oriented structure under his control, which he ultimately
abandoned upon disagreement. An Open AI now seeks to expose
these contradictions through the legal discovery process, and
Open AI has requested the court to classify this lawsuit as
complex, aiming to establish procedural safeguards,
particularly for the discovery phase.
This move shows that the company's concerns over
potential misuse of the discovery process by Elon Musk
could be damaging. Now Musk has ventured in the AI
domain with his own company, X AI.
Positioning it as a competitor to Open AI in this context
amplifies the stakes of the current legal dispute, with Musk
demanding unprecedented access to Open AS technology and the
research. A legal team representing Musk
has yet to respond to these recent developments, leaving the
tech community awaiting further clarification on the matter.
And hopefully we get some clarification about Musk, what
Musk is actually thinking here? Because if he thinks he's
entitled to work that other people did, then maybe against
his own best interests. For the discovery phase.
And amidst this endeavor to monetize ChatGPT chatbot, and
underlying AI technologies, Open AI faces numerous legal
challenges, including Musk's lawsuit and copyright claims
from various entities. The company has openly
criticized Musk's allegations, reinforcing its stance through
internal communications and public disclosures.
Now, Musk's lawsuit centers on a supposed founding agreement from
2015 envisioned to keep Open AI and nonprofit entity dedicated
to the betterment of humanity. He argues that Open AI's
actions, particularly the release of GBT 4 model without
full public disclosure, violates this principle, and Open AI
counters Musk's claims. By denying the whole existence
of any such founding agreement or any contractual obligations
towards Musk, the organization challenges the basis of Musk's
lawsuit as a mere strategic move to claim undue credit for the
work that others have done. Now, Musk's reliance on Open
AI's initial Certificate of incorporation to substantiate
his claims has been met with scepticism by Open AI, and that
shows that there's no real concrete agreement in Musk's
complaint. The complexity of the lawsuit,
involving intricate AI related issues and a historical context
spanning about 10 years nearly a decade, has LED Open AI to seek
special case management to streamline the proceedings.
Now, evidence suggested by Open AI indicates that Musk's initial
support for a for profit transition, which contradicts
his current portrayal as a staunch advocate for Open AI's
nonprofit status. Now Musk established XAI, and
the introduction of the Grok chat bot shows that he's still
interested in competing with Open AI.
He's interested in the AI field, of course.
With Tesla and his other ventures, It's complicating the
legal matters, and the competitive landscape between
Open AI and X AI is going to heat up.
Open A is legal defense shows that the company's ready to
fight Musk as well. The discovery phase might
actually be something interesting for all parties
involved. Hey, thank you so much for
listening today. I really do appreciate your
support. If you could take a second and
hit the subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast
platform that you're listening on right now, I greatly
appreciate it. It helps out the show
tremendously and you'll never miss an episode and each episode
is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly.
And please, if you want to support the show even more, go
to patreon.com/stage Zero and please take care of yourselves
and each other and I'll see you tomorrow.