1
00:00:07,840 --> 00:00:11,000
Welcome to Flight Global Focus, 
your essential podcast for 

2
00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:15,040
trusted aviation insight. 
I'm US Aerospace Managing Editor

3
00:00:15,040 --> 00:00:18,080
John Hemmerdinger, and this week
we're looking at some recent 

4
00:00:18,120 --> 00:00:21,120
propulsion sector developments 
in different parts of the globe,

5
00:00:21,400 --> 00:00:23,720
Europe, Russia and right here in
the USA. 

6
00:00:24,080 --> 00:00:27,560
These developments involve some 
familiar but also some less 

7
00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:30,960
familiar power plants and a mix 
of conventional and 

8
00:00:30,960 --> 00:00:34,760
unconventional technologies. 
With me is European Aerospace 

9
00:00:34,760 --> 00:00:38,320
editor Dominic Perry, who has 
been learning about Rolls Royce 

10
00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:41,200
exploration of hydrogen power. 
Hello, Dominic. 

11
00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:44,600
John, glad to be here. 
Yeah, Thank you for being here. 

12
00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:48,840
I also have with me Air 
Transport Editor David Kaminsky 

13
00:00:48,840 --> 00:00:51,840
Morrow. 
And he has an update about 

14
00:00:52,040 --> 00:00:55,400
starting us off with some 
Russian power plants, progress 

15
00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:58,400
that's being made with a 
domestic engine programme there 

16
00:00:58,400 --> 00:01:00,880
that David's been covering. 
David, why don't you tell us 

17
00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:06,240
about that? 
Hello John. 

18
00:01:06,480 --> 00:01:10,680
The situation in Russia has 
obviously been very difficult 

19
00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:14,040
with the country's aerospace 
industry labouring under 

20
00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:16,880
international sanctions, but 
there it does seem to have been 

21
00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:20,120
some progress in the last couple
of weeks. 

22
00:01:20,120 --> 00:01:25,600
The Avid Vigatel PD8, which is 
part of the family of engines. 

23
00:01:25,600 --> 00:01:30,680
The PD is a Russian abbreviation
for prospective engine and the 

24
00:01:30,680 --> 00:01:35,120
number 8 signifies the 8 tonne 
8000 kilogramme thrust level. 

25
00:01:35,560 --> 00:01:40,880
That engine's been developed for
the Yakovlev SJ100, which is an 

26
00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:47,160
import substituted version of 
the Superjet 100 with some of 

27
00:01:47,160 --> 00:01:50,720
its all of its foreign systems 
replaced by domestic ones. 

28
00:01:50,960 --> 00:01:55,880
And that includes replacing the 
previous Franco Russian Sam 146 

29
00:01:55,880 --> 00:02:00,440
engines and United Engine 
Corporation, which is which is 

30
00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:01,880
developing. 
That power plant has just 

31
00:02:01,880 --> 00:02:05,880
completed certification testing 
for the PD8, which has been 

32
00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:10,000
flown on various SJ100 
prototypes as as well as the 

33
00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:14,800
Elysian 76 test bed and it's 
spent about 1400 hours airborne 

34
00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:18,840
PD eights. 
It's brought in some new 

35
00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:22,680
technologies like materials for 
turboline blades, which offer 

36
00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:24,880
greater resistance to high 
temperatures. 

37
00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:28,920
And it's been undergoing the 
kind of kind of demanding tests 

38
00:02:28,920 --> 00:02:31,000
that you'd expect for for engine
development. 

39
00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:36,720
So icing and bird strike the 
blade out, test water ingestion,

40
00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:38,160
hail ingestion and so on and so 
on. 

41
00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:41,760
With all that completed, it's 
now a matter of submitting the 

42
00:02:41,760 --> 00:02:46,240
documents to Rosaviazia, which 
is the Russian Federal Oversight

43
00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:49,320
Authority, and waiting for a 
certification decision. 

44
00:02:49,920 --> 00:02:52,680
That's a significant step 
because Russia's planning to use

45
00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:57,480
the PD8 not only for the SJ 100,
but also for a RE engineering 

46
00:02:57,480 --> 00:03:01,880
programme on the amphibious area
of 200 firefighting aircraft. 

47
00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:06,000
Yeah, David, the PD 8, that's a 
family of engines and a larger 

48
00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:09,680
version is pretty critical to 
Russia's main civil airline 

49
00:03:09,680 --> 00:03:10,800
project. 
Do I have that right? 

50
00:03:10,960 --> 00:03:14,120
How's that going? 
Well, yes, the, the, the PD 8 is

51
00:03:14,120 --> 00:03:18,120
like the younger brother, if you
like of the, of the PD 14, which

52
00:03:18,120 --> 00:03:21,840
is the medium sized version. 
And that engine's designed for 

53
00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:27,960
the MC21 narrow body, which is 
kind of Russia's answer to the 

54
00:03:27,960 --> 00:03:31,040
to the A320. 
Yeah, the engine was originally 

55
00:03:31,040 --> 00:03:33,800
intended as an optional 
alternative to the Pratt and 

56
00:03:33,800 --> 00:03:39,480
Whitney geared turbofan, the PW 
1400 G, but sanctions have 

57
00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:41,320
obviously put the kibosh on that
plan. 

58
00:03:42,080 --> 00:03:46,120
The PD 14's already been 
certified, but because of the 

59
00:03:46,120 --> 00:03:49,440
sanction situation, the MC21 
programme has had to undergo its

60
00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:53,880
own import substitution effort 
and that's delayed entry into 

61
00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:57,360
service. 
So although the MC21 first flew 

62
00:03:57,360 --> 00:04:01,760
with the PD14 engines back in 
December 2020, the airframe and 

63
00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:04,880
engine combination still hasn't 
achieved certification. 

64
00:04:04,880 --> 00:04:07,840
Only about 1/3 of the 
certification flights have been 

65
00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:10,160
completed. 
And that's according to the head

66
00:04:10,160 --> 00:04:14,360
of state technology firm Rostek,
Sergei Chernozov, who's who's 

67
00:04:14,360 --> 00:04:17,120
just had the unenviable task of 
telling the Russian President 

68
00:04:17,120 --> 00:04:21,079
Vladimir Putin that the MC21 
certification has been pushed 

69
00:04:21,079 --> 00:04:25,160
back again to next year. 
Incidentally, he also mentioned 

70
00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:28,280
that the SJ 100 is about 80% of 
the way through it's 

71
00:04:28,280 --> 00:04:30,440
certification flights and 
they're still aiming for 

72
00:04:30,440 --> 00:04:33,720
certification this year. 
Yeah, David, interesting it. 

73
00:04:33,760 --> 00:04:37,920
It seems a bit premature to talk
about the future when these 

74
00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:41,840
engines are not certified yet, 
at least not with the aircraft 

75
00:04:41,840 --> 00:04:43,640
that they're going to be 
powering. 

76
00:04:43,640 --> 00:04:46,920
But are there any other 
developments in the pipeline 

77
00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:48,800
coming out of Russia, engine 
developments? 

78
00:04:49,560 --> 00:04:50,800
Yeah. 
Well, I think the, I think the 

79
00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:55,640
most notable future programme is
kind of the big belly goat 

80
00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:59,560
graph, if you like, of the PD 
family, which is the PD-35. 

81
00:04:59,840 --> 00:05:02,120
And that's a proposed high 
thrust variant. 

82
00:05:02,360 --> 00:05:05,160
And that would be quite a 
substantial development for the 

83
00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:08,360
domestic civil engine industry 
because even though Russia has 

84
00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:13,560
built wide body aircraft like 
the Ilish in 86 and 96, it's not

85
00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:17,160
really built an equivalent to 
the engines that you'd find on 

86
00:05:17,160 --> 00:05:19,840
the big Boeing and Airbus wide 
body twins. 

87
00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:23,840
There's been work on technology 
and core demonstrators for the 

88
00:05:23,840 --> 00:05:28,000
PD-35, but the engine at the 
moment is really a solution 

89
00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:31,080
looking for a problem. 
There's no specific application 

90
00:05:31,080 --> 00:05:35,560
for it. 
The proposed COMAC C929, which 

91
00:05:35,560 --> 00:05:40,040
is like a Chinese 777 if you 
like, had been a possibility but

92
00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:44,960
that seems to have faded now 
that the C929 is becoming very 

93
00:05:44,960 --> 00:05:49,080
much a Chinese driven project 
rather than the original Russian

94
00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:53,000
Chinese partnership. 
The other prospect is an engine 

95
00:05:53,000 --> 00:05:57,280
that's called the PD 26 and that
emerged as a potential power 

96
00:05:57,280 --> 00:06:00,720
plant last year when United 
Aircraft drew up initial 

97
00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:05,480
proposals for a twin engine wide
body family around the size of 

98
00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:07,840
Boeing 787. 
Thanks David. 

99
00:06:07,880 --> 00:06:12,280
I had mentioned at the top of 
the programme that Rolls Royce 

100
00:06:13,160 --> 00:06:18,040
it's experiments with hydrogen 
fuel and Dominic has been 

101
00:06:18,040 --> 00:06:23,040
looking into that lately. 
I believe there was a, a test 

102
00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:24,360
recently. 
Dom what? 

103
00:06:24,640 --> 00:06:26,800
What can you tell us? 
Yeah, that's right. 

104
00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:30,280
So Rolls Royce has been looking 
at the potential of hydrogen 

105
00:06:30,280 --> 00:06:33,200
combustion since about 2021, 
probably before that. 

106
00:06:33,200 --> 00:06:37,520
But this is the the latest, 
latest set of projects in the 

107
00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:42,760
research and innovation space. 
And this latest ground run was 

108
00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:44,440
really the culmination of that 
effort. 

109
00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:49,440
So how many engines has Rolls 
Royce run on hydrogen? 

110
00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:53,240
Do we know? 
Yeah, I mean it is just three or

111
00:06:53,240 --> 00:06:55,800
although you could look at it 
the other way around and 

112
00:06:56,000 --> 00:06:57,880
actually it's run three, which 
is a great achievement. 

113
00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:03,680
So the first of those was an AE 
2100, which is the engine that 

114
00:07:03,680 --> 00:07:09,920
powers the C130 aircraft, the 
Lockheed Martin transport. 

115
00:07:10,040 --> 00:07:13,760
Oddly enough that that engine 
has a an interesting history of 

116
00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:17,800
that particular engine in that 
it was used prior to these tests

117
00:07:18,200 --> 00:07:22,080
for an I'll fated programme 
called EFAN X which was going to

118
00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:23,880
be run with Airbus before it got
cancelled. 

119
00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:26,240
So it's nice they they have 
found a decent use for it. 

120
00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:29,560
Anyway. 
They ran that particular engine 

121
00:07:29,560 --> 00:07:31,960
in 2022 at Boscombe Down in the 
UK. 

122
00:07:32,440 --> 00:07:36,040
It was relatively rudimentary, 
so the engine itself was 

123
00:07:36,040 --> 00:07:40,200
obviously as sophisticated as it
gets, but a lot of the equipment

124
00:07:40,200 --> 00:07:44,080
around it, the fuel system for 
example, was more an industrial 

125
00:07:44,080 --> 00:07:48,720
rather than aerospace grade. 
So that should be seen as a 

126
00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:52,080
concept demonstrator. 
Can we run an engine on hydro? 

127
00:07:52,080 --> 00:07:53,960
Can we run a modern engine on 
hydrogen? 

128
00:07:53,960 --> 00:07:57,960
So with that out of the way, 
this was followed by a Pearl 15.

129
00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:01,240
It was tested in Darwitz in 
Germany where it's built. 

130
00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:05,000
So the Pearl 15 is business jet 
engine and they wanted to test 

131
00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:09,040
the non propulsive functions 
that normally run on kerosene or

132
00:08:09,040 --> 00:08:12,640
jet fuel, cooling the oil 
system, moving hydraulic 

133
00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:15,720
components, that sort of thing 
in order to check that that 

134
00:08:15,720 --> 00:08:19,120
would still work without any 
kerosene in the system so that 

135
00:08:19,120 --> 00:08:22,040
there was no hidden fuel tank 
that was secreted away somewhere

136
00:08:22,040 --> 00:08:24,360
in the engine. 
And the last engine is another 

137
00:08:24,360 --> 00:08:28,000
Pearl 15, which this time was 
run at NASA's test site in 

138
00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:31,240
Stennis in Mississippi, which 
incorporate a lot of the 

139
00:08:31,240 --> 00:08:34,520
learnings and the modifications 
from those earlier tests. 

140
00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:36,840
What kind of modifications are 
we talking? 

141
00:08:36,840 --> 00:08:40,480
About they are mostly to the 
combustion system, the fuel 

142
00:08:40,480 --> 00:08:42,720
nozzles and the combustor can as
they put it. 

143
00:08:43,240 --> 00:08:45,720
It's almost a cliche, but 
everyone knows that hydrogen 

144
00:08:45,720 --> 00:08:49,000
burns very readily. 
I mean think Hindenburg clearly,

145
00:08:49,440 --> 00:08:52,440
but it also burns in a different
way to jet. 

146
00:08:52,760 --> 00:08:55,800
So the flame speed, how fast 
that flame spreads, is much 

147
00:08:55,800 --> 00:08:58,800
quicker. 
So a lot of the testing was 

148
00:08:58,800 --> 00:09:01,800
about how you control the 
combustion process, not simply 

149
00:09:01,800 --> 00:09:03,960
answering the question, can we 
burn hydrogen? 

150
00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:05,600
Because the answer is clearly 
yes. 

151
00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:07,600
Right. 
And and how long did the test 

152
00:09:07,600 --> 00:09:08,560
last? 
So. 

153
00:09:08,560 --> 00:09:11,640
The test of that particular 
engine, the runtime, was 

154
00:09:11,640 --> 00:09:14,600
actually a few 10s of hours as 
Rolls Royce put it. 

155
00:09:14,960 --> 00:09:18,000
But that doesn't really account 
for the multiple rig tests and 

156
00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:20,320
other research. 
It's run in the UK and elsewhere

157
00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:25,240
simply to get to that point. 
So it was very much backed by 

158
00:09:25,240 --> 00:09:27,880
all that research. 
So I think when they came to run

159
00:09:27,880 --> 00:09:30,200
the engine, they they were 
fairly confident that it would 

160
00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:32,800
behave in the way that they 
expected. 

161
00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:36,080
And the feedback from Rolls 
Royce was very much, it did do 

162
00:09:36,080 --> 00:09:38,360
that. 
It behaved just as the forecast 

163
00:09:38,360 --> 00:09:42,560
predicted, Yeah. 
I wonder what this means in 

164
00:09:42,560 --> 00:09:46,800
terms of a potential launch of a
new engine, a hydrogen engine by

165
00:09:46,800 --> 00:09:49,480
Rolls Royce? 
Does this bring them closer it? 

166
00:09:49,520 --> 00:09:54,320
Brings them closer, but I don't 
think they are sufficiently 

167
00:09:54,320 --> 00:09:58,240
close that they could do it now.
Roles is carrying out a lot of a

168
00:09:58,240 --> 00:10:02,560
lot more research to optimise 
the combustion system and other 

169
00:10:02,560 --> 00:10:04,880
parts of the engine to account 
for the differences between 

170
00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:07,840
hydrogen and jet fuel. 
And there are other technologies

171
00:10:07,840 --> 00:10:10,920
that need to be developed or 
adapted, changing the coatings 

172
00:10:10,920 --> 00:10:13,800
and components to increase their
durability in that hydrogen 

173
00:10:13,800 --> 00:10:15,760
environment. 
It's also worth pointing out 

174
00:10:15,760 --> 00:10:18,120
there's no demand yet for such 
an engine. 

175
00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:23,040
The wider infrastructure 
investment, green hydrogen 

176
00:10:23,040 --> 00:10:26,040
production and distribution 
still hasn't really kicked off 

177
00:10:26,520 --> 00:10:29,880
and there remains a question 
mark about whether it can be 

178
00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:35,000
used, or maybe rephrase that, if
it will be used as a future 

179
00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:39,040
aviation fuel. 
So the best way to to view Rolls

180
00:10:39,040 --> 00:10:42,120
Royce's efforts is that it's 
preparing for the future, if 

181
00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:44,240
that's the direction the 
airframers decide to go. 

182
00:10:44,640 --> 00:10:48,640
Dom, let me ask you this. 
Would we know or do we know if 

183
00:10:48,640 --> 00:10:51,880
this is a technology or power 
plant that might be on something

184
00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:54,600
like Airbus had talked about 
their hydrogen? 

185
00:10:54,920 --> 00:10:55,840
What? 
What was it called? 

186
00:10:55,840 --> 00:10:59,120
E You'll know the name 0. 
E Is there 0? 

187
00:10:59,160 --> 00:11:01,840
E So is it? 
Is it is that still on life 

188
00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:05,200
support? 
Well. 0 E is progressing. 

189
00:11:05,240 --> 00:11:09,800
Not as quickly as it was, very 
much with the slower than 

190
00:11:09,800 --> 00:11:12,120
expected infrastructure 
development in mind. 

191
00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:17,040
But the first 0 E aircraft won't
use hydrogen combustion. 

192
00:11:17,280 --> 00:11:19,920
Airbus thinks it will use 
hydrogen fuel cells. 

193
00:11:20,640 --> 00:11:24,480
So Rolls Royce's research, which
while beautifully illiterative, 

194
00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:27,320
is useful. 
Don't expect to see that 

195
00:11:27,320 --> 00:11:32,400
technology in service before 
let's say 2045, probably later. 

196
00:11:32,920 --> 00:11:35,280
Right. 
All very interesting and it 

197
00:11:35,280 --> 00:11:40,160
brings me to GE. 
Of course GE has a number of 

198
00:11:40,720 --> 00:11:43,560
next generation technologies 
that they've been working on. 

199
00:11:43,560 --> 00:11:46,240
They've looked at hydrogen also,
but they're, they're also 

200
00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:48,640
working on some other things 
like the open rotor. 

201
00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:53,120
But I was at GE in Cincinnati 
this week and they, they held a 

202
00:11:53,120 --> 00:11:55,240
press conference. 
It was actually in their 

203
00:11:55,360 --> 00:11:58,560
Evendale facility, which is just
outside Cincinnati, but it's a 

204
00:11:58,560 --> 00:12:02,160
big leap centre development 
centre and a testing centre. 

205
00:12:02,960 --> 00:12:05,520
And we had a tour of the 
facility and spoke to some of 

206
00:12:05,520 --> 00:12:08,640
their executives and they 
weren't discussing too much of 

207
00:12:08,640 --> 00:12:12,040
the next generation stuff, but 
they were talking a lot about 

208
00:12:12,040 --> 00:12:17,560
LEAP and that's the engine for 
A320 Neos and for 737 Max, the 

209
00:12:17,560 --> 00:12:21,520
GE and Safran produce under the 
CFM partnership. 

210
00:12:21,920 --> 00:12:26,400
The focus really was the 
durability issues. 

211
00:12:26,400 --> 00:12:29,840
Now we've all heard about the 
durability problems affecting 

212
00:12:29,840 --> 00:12:33,480
next generation engines and and 
leaps have been affected. 

213
00:12:33,480 --> 00:12:36,160
Of course, Pratt and Whitney's 
GTF has been affected 

214
00:12:36,480 --> 00:12:40,120
potentially, arguably much to A 
to a larger degree. 

215
00:12:40,400 --> 00:12:45,640
But what we have had is blade 
degradation and this comes 

216
00:12:45,720 --> 00:12:48,440
primarily in regions that are 
hot and dusty. 

217
00:12:48,840 --> 00:12:51,840
Those are the Middle East. 
They can be some places in India

218
00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:55,160
or Asia. 
And GE has been introducing some

219
00:12:55,160 --> 00:12:58,120
durability improvements that 
they say are really actually now

220
00:12:58,120 --> 00:13:01,120
taking hold. 
The dust issue is interesting 

221
00:13:01,120 --> 00:13:04,280
because GE and the others have 
been dealing with dust problems,

222
00:13:04,560 --> 00:13:07,920
of course for years. 
And they made the point that the

223
00:13:07,920 --> 00:13:12,080
GE 90, which is several 
generations ago had some 

224
00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:14,800
durability issues in the very 
beginning of the programme. 

225
00:13:14,800 --> 00:13:19,720
And, and then GE came out with 
the GENX and that had some 

226
00:13:19,720 --> 00:13:24,200
significant dust ingestion 
durability problems when it was 

227
00:13:24,200 --> 00:13:28,760
first introduced. 
Now GE they're making a point of

228
00:13:28,760 --> 00:13:32,800
stressing that they've done all 
this dust ingestion tests, which

229
00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:36,160
is where they have a turbofan in
a test cell and they have these 

230
00:13:36,160 --> 00:13:40,200
in Evendale, Ohio. 
And they they have developed a 

231
00:13:40,840 --> 00:13:44,240
dust that mimics what's found in
the Middle East, is self 

232
00:13:44,240 --> 00:13:47,560
developed by GE and they 
injected into the engine and 

233
00:13:47,560 --> 00:13:49,360
they see how the engine 
performs. 

234
00:13:49,360 --> 00:13:53,320
Now those tests are ongoing, but
GE does know that these types of

235
00:13:53,320 --> 00:13:56,280
tests have have really led to 
significant improvements in 

236
00:13:56,280 --> 00:13:59,480
their wide body engines, 
particularly the GE and X. 

237
00:13:59,600 --> 00:14:02,320
And what it's allowed to do is 
that they can develop new parts 

238
00:14:02,320 --> 00:14:06,640
that allow the engines to go 
much longer between required 

239
00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:09,440
removal from wing and 
maintenance overhauls. 

240
00:14:09,720 --> 00:14:12,520
But clearly a wide the body 
engine isn't quite the same as a

241
00:14:12,520 --> 00:14:16,040
narrow body engine. 
How does that work? 

242
00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:19,480
Tie into the reliability 
improvements plan for the leap, 

243
00:14:19,720 --> 00:14:22,800
Yeah. 
The leap is it's ongoing. 

244
00:14:23,360 --> 00:14:26,160
The problem happens because this
dust gets sucked into the low 

245
00:14:26,480 --> 00:14:28,080
rather the high pressure 
turbine. 

246
00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:32,440
And the temperatures in there 
can cause the components to 

247
00:14:32,480 --> 00:14:35,440
degrade, especially when 
susceptible to dust. 

248
00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:38,760
Now these engines have what 
engineers called cooling pads. 

249
00:14:39,080 --> 00:14:41,800
And this is colder air that's 
within the turbine that is 

250
00:14:41,800 --> 00:14:44,920
supposed to cool the blades and 
the other components to a 

251
00:14:44,920 --> 00:14:47,720
temperature at which they will 
not melt or not degrade. 

252
00:14:47,960 --> 00:14:51,000
But those cooling pads are 
incredibly complex and when 

253
00:14:51,000 --> 00:14:54,080
they're not exactly perfectly 
right, that's when you get the 

254
00:14:54,080 --> 00:14:57,640
blade problems. 
G ES point is that all the 

255
00:14:57,640 --> 00:15:01,600
testing they did on the GENX and
the testing that they're now 

256
00:15:01,600 --> 00:15:05,880
doing on the leaps, the dust 
testing has given them what they

257
00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:10,120
described as a a complete or 
nearly complete understanding of

258
00:15:10,120 --> 00:15:11,720
what's happening within the 
engines. 

259
00:15:12,080 --> 00:15:14,880
One of the their head of 
technology said that they have 

260
00:15:14,880 --> 00:15:18,880
cracked the code in 
understanding what happens and 

261
00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:22,600
we're dealing with tolerances 
that are minuscule, the width of

262
00:15:22,600 --> 00:15:26,680
a human hair and how they direct
these cooling paths with with 

263
00:15:26,680 --> 00:15:29,280
the geometry of the blades and 
the holes in the blades. 

264
00:15:29,640 --> 00:15:35,080
So they are saying that Leap 
durability is improving. 

265
00:15:35,200 --> 00:15:39,720
Their head of commercial 
aircraft engines, Muhammad Ali 

266
00:15:39,960 --> 00:15:45,080
says that the Leap 1A, that's 
the A320 version, A320 Neo. 

267
00:15:45,320 --> 00:15:49,560
He says that engine, that 
engines durability is now on par

268
00:15:49,560 --> 00:15:56,040
with where CFM 56 was when the 
CFM 56 was in its first few 

269
00:15:56,040 --> 00:16:00,640
years of service. 
And he says that the Leap will 

270
00:16:00,640 --> 00:16:05,600
meet the CFM 56's ultimate 
durability record. 

271
00:16:05,800 --> 00:16:10,840
Now that engine, the CFM 56 is 
sort of a standard setter, 

272
00:16:10,840 --> 00:16:14,360
standard bearer. 
It is known for incredible 

273
00:16:14,360 --> 00:16:16,880
reliability. 
I've had airline CE OS tell me 

274
00:16:16,880 --> 00:16:19,600
that the new generation engines 
will will simply never be as 

275
00:16:19,600 --> 00:16:22,800
reliable as the CFM 56. 
The pressures are too high, the 

276
00:16:22,800 --> 00:16:26,200
temperatures are too high, which
of course improve fuel 

277
00:16:26,200 --> 00:16:29,040
efficiency, but those high 
temperatures and pressures also 

278
00:16:29,040 --> 00:16:31,680
cause parts to degrade. 
GE is saying that's not the 

279
00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:34,600
case. 
They say give us time, wait and 

280
00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:38,280
see and be patient and your 
engines will have that same 

281
00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:39,640
level that's. 
Interesting. 

282
00:16:40,160 --> 00:16:43,560
I had an airline chief executive
tell me once that the industry 

283
00:16:43,560 --> 00:16:48,560
had been spoilt by the CF 756, 
that it was too good, and that 

284
00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:52,440
anything following it was all 
automatically doomed to to come 

285
00:16:52,440 --> 00:16:55,920
in to be judged as a lesser 
engine against that one. 

286
00:16:56,240 --> 00:17:00,040
Wasn't there also an issue with 
cooking on fuel nozzles of the 

287
00:17:00,040 --> 00:17:01,520
Leap engines? 
That's right. 

288
00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:07,200
Cooking and this issue has been 
ongoing for several years. 

289
00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:11,480
And when the engines are shut 
down, there is still some level 

290
00:17:11,480 --> 00:17:15,680
of or some amount of fuel either
in the nozzles or around the 

291
00:17:15,680 --> 00:17:20,560
fuel nozzles in the combustor. 
And the residual latent heat 

292
00:17:20,560 --> 00:17:24,440
within the engine causes that 
fuel to evaporate. 

293
00:17:25,000 --> 00:17:29,840
And what's left is coke and it 
can coat the nozzles. 

294
00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:34,360
And there were several instances
in which LEAP engines on a 321 

295
00:17:34,360 --> 00:17:38,360
Neos had suffered power 
reductions, unanticipated 

296
00:17:38,360 --> 00:17:41,280
uncommanded power reductions 
several years, I think it was in

297
00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:47,040
20, I think it was in last year.
And so this has proved to be a 

298
00:17:47,040 --> 00:17:49,560
problem. 
Now fixing this problem requires

299
00:17:49,560 --> 00:17:54,320
replacing the fuel nozzles at 
intervals that we don't exactly 

300
00:17:54,320 --> 00:17:59,200
know, but that seem to be fairly
frequent if not very frequent. 

301
00:17:59,560 --> 00:18:02,480
And to fix it, you do not need 
to remove the engine from the 

302
00:18:02,480 --> 00:18:06,080
wing, but it does require that 
operators take the engines out 

303
00:18:06,080 --> 00:18:10,520
of service for several days to 
to perform to perform the work. 

304
00:18:10,920 --> 00:18:15,720
GE in 2024 released a what they 
described as a fix or at least 

305
00:18:15,720 --> 00:18:17,360
just something that helps 
address the problem. 

306
00:18:17,680 --> 00:18:20,360
It's called a reverse bleed 
system and it's been described 

307
00:18:20,360 --> 00:18:25,960
as me as a a high tech fan that 
blows colder air back into the 

308
00:18:25,960 --> 00:18:31,400
engine after shutdown and hence 
addresses the problem of fuel 

309
00:18:31,400 --> 00:18:34,680
evaporation or minimises the 
fuel evaporation, minimises the 

310
00:18:34,680 --> 00:18:39,120
cooking. 
That same reverse bleed system 

311
00:18:39,120 --> 00:18:43,720
is now in development and nearly
complete for the Leap 1B, which 

312
00:18:43,720 --> 00:18:48,360
powers the 737 Max. 
And apparently this year it's 

313
00:18:48,360 --> 00:18:49,920
going to be rolled out for the 
Leap 1B. 

314
00:18:50,360 --> 00:18:52,760
So good news for Leap operators 
then. 

315
00:18:53,440 --> 00:18:57,000
One of the interesting things 
that GE and Saffron are working 

316
00:18:57,000 --> 00:19:00,960
on through CFM is obviously the 
RISE Open Rota programme. 

317
00:19:01,120 --> 00:19:03,040
Was there any mention of that 
during your visit? 

318
00:19:03,640 --> 00:19:06,440
Yeah. 
Curiously, there was, I think no

319
00:19:06,440 --> 00:19:12,800
mention of it at all. 
And during previous visits to GE

320
00:19:12,920 --> 00:19:15,480
in recent years, that's been the
focus. 

321
00:19:15,960 --> 00:19:19,920
Now why there was no mention of 
it, I don't know. 

322
00:19:20,560 --> 00:19:24,800
It could be that GE is is 
focusing or choosing to focus 

323
00:19:24,920 --> 00:19:27,520
and choosing to stress 
durability. 

324
00:19:27,520 --> 00:19:31,640
And in fact they they said that 
word about 100 times during the 

325
00:19:31,640 --> 00:19:34,040
visit. 
So they clearly want operators 

326
00:19:34,040 --> 00:19:38,520
to be happy with with what's out
there now, which makes sense 

327
00:19:38,520 --> 00:19:45,440
because there has been a mood 
among some customers that GE and

328
00:19:45,440 --> 00:19:48,800
Pratt and Whitney also better 
fix the current problems before 

329
00:19:48,800 --> 00:19:51,600
they start talking to us about 
future technology. 

330
00:19:52,240 --> 00:19:55,320
So that could be it. 
The rise, of course, has been 

331
00:19:55,600 --> 00:19:59,680
top of mind for GE otherwise. 
And as an open rotor, they say 

332
00:19:59,680 --> 00:20:01,480
it'll be something like 20% more
efficient. 

333
00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:03,960
They've been working with 
Saffron and developing 

334
00:20:04,000 --> 00:20:09,560
demonstrators, and technology is
still several years away from. 

335
00:20:10,560 --> 00:20:13,000
And we're talking twenty 30s for
introduction on the next 

336
00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:17,160
generation narrow body if it 
happens, which is a big question

337
00:20:17,160 --> 00:20:20,440
mark. 
So it is possible now that GE is

338
00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:26,840
saving some rise news for the 
upcoming Farnborough Air Show or

339
00:20:26,840 --> 00:20:29,760
maybe we won't hear much about 
it then we don't know. 

340
00:20:29,760 --> 00:20:31,120
But Farnborough would be the 
time. 

341
00:20:31,120 --> 00:20:32,760
So we will keep an eye out for 
it. 

342
00:20:33,000 --> 00:20:34,000
Great. 
Thank you, John. 

343
00:20:34,280 --> 00:20:36,360
Thank you, Dom, and thank you 
David. 

344
00:20:36,360 --> 00:20:38,440
Also, pleasure. 
John, thanks very much. 

345
00:20:42,240 --> 00:20:44,120
And that's it for us. 
You've been listening to Flight 

346
00:20:44,120 --> 00:20:46,800
Global Focus, which is a 
production of Flight Global with

347
00:20:46,800 --> 00:20:49,920
editing by Lucy Johnson. 
If you want to get in touch with

348
00:20:49,920 --> 00:20:52,360
us or for commercial 
opportunities related to the 

349
00:20:52,360 --> 00:20:56,280
podcast, please e-mail podcast 
at flightglobal.com. 

350
00:20:56,760 --> 00:20:59,280
Listen, rate, review and 
subscribe wherever you get your 

351
00:20:59,280 --> 00:21:01,240
podcast. 
I'm John Hemmerdinger for Flight

352
00:21:01,240 --> 00:21:03,640
Global Focus. 
Join us next week for more in 

353
00:21:03,640 --> 00:21:06,560
depth analysis covering the 
latest developments in airlines,

354
00:21:06,560 --> 00:21:08,040
defence and aerospace.
