1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:03,200
All right, so we're diving into 
this whole consideration thing 

2
00:00:03,280 --> 00:00:08,480
in contract law, like what 
actually makes a promise legally

3
00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:11,080
Dinding? 
Yeah, it's more than just like a

4
00:00:11,080 --> 00:00:13,240
friendly agreement. 
Right, right. 

5
00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:16,280
We've got this lecture and it's 
pretty fascinating. 

6
00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:19,040
What are your initial thoughts? 
Well, it seems like 

7
00:00:19,160 --> 00:00:22,720
consideration is really at the 
core of a contract, like it's 

8
00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:25,440
what makes it enforceable. 
Enforceable. 

9
00:00:25,440 --> 00:00:28,520
OK, so it's not just about good 
intentions. 

10
00:00:28,520 --> 00:00:31,480
Not exactly. 
It's more about this exchange, a

11
00:00:31,480 --> 00:00:34,720
quid pro quo. 
Something of value has to change

12
00:00:34,720 --> 00:00:35,480
hands. 
OK. 

13
00:00:35,480 --> 00:00:37,480
So it's like the price of the 
promise, right you? 

14
00:00:37,480 --> 00:00:40,160
Could say that is what each 
party brings to the table, and 

15
00:00:40,160 --> 00:00:42,840
it doesn't have to be perfectly 
equal in value either. 

16
00:00:42,840 --> 00:00:46,280
Oh interesting, so even if I 
agree to like wash your car for 

17
00:00:46,280 --> 00:00:49,800
100 bucks and my car washing 
skills are questionable? 

18
00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:52,240
The contract's still good. 
The promise to wash the car, 

19
00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:54,320
that's the consideration. 
The law doesn't care if you got 

20
00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:55,440
a good deal. 
Makes sense. 

21
00:00:55,440 --> 00:00:59,760
So are there like specific rules
for what counts as valuable? 

22
00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:02,280
Oh, absolutely. 
There are key elements that make

23
00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:05,040
consideration valid, like legal 
sufficiency. 

24
00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:07,200
Legal sufficient. 
Basically, it means the 

25
00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:11,640
consideration has to have some 
legal value, even a tiny amount.

26
00:01:11,960 --> 00:01:14,640
There's this concept called the 
Peppercorn theory. 

27
00:01:14,840 --> 00:01:17,640
Peppercorns like the spice. 
Exactly. 

28
00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:20,720
Even a single peppercorn can be 
a valid consideration. 

29
00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:23,360
It's not about the amount, but 
that something is being 

30
00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:26,320
exchanged so. 
Even if it's symbolic, as long 

31
00:01:26,320 --> 00:01:28,240
as both sides agree it has 
value. 

32
00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:30,280
It counts. 
It's about that mutual 

33
00:01:30,280 --> 00:01:33,680
understanding that something is 
being given in return for the 

34
00:01:33,680 --> 00:01:34,680
promise. 
Got it. 

35
00:01:34,960 --> 00:01:36,360
So what doesn't count? 
Well. 

36
00:01:36,360 --> 00:01:38,880
One big one is past 
consideration. 

37
00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:41,880
Meaning like if you did me a 
favor a month ago and now I 

38
00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:44,560
offer to pay you, that's not 
binding because the action 

39
00:01:44,560 --> 00:01:46,320
happened before the promise. 
So. 

40
00:01:46,360 --> 00:01:50,920
I can't like create a contract 
after the fact based on past 

41
00:01:50,920 --> 00:01:52,520
favors. 
Not usually. 

42
00:01:52,520 --> 00:01:55,280
The consideration needs to be 
part of the current bargain. 

43
00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:56,760
You know, happening in real 
time. 

44
00:01:56,760 --> 00:01:58,280
The past is the. 
Past OK makes sense. 

45
00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:02,120
So legal sufficiency, no Past 
favors anything else. 

46
00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:04,560
Well, the consideration can't be
illusory either. 

47
00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:07,160
Illusory. 
Meaning vague or optional. 

48
00:02:07,200 --> 00:02:09,759
Like if I say I'll wash your car
if I feel like it, that's not 

49
00:02:09,759 --> 00:02:12,520
really a solid promise. 
It's got to be a real commitment

50
00:02:12,520 --> 00:02:14,720
then, not just a maybe. 
Exactly. 

51
00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:17,280
There needs to be a genuine 
obligation, something you're 

52
00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:20,400
actually bound to do. 
OK, starting to see how this all

53
00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:24,360
adds structure to agreements, 
makes them more predictable. 

54
00:02:24,360 --> 00:02:27,160
Yeah, exactly. 
It's about making promises mean 

55
00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:30,160
something in a legal sense. 
This is really interesting. 

56
00:02:30,160 --> 00:02:33,400
I'm starting to see 
consideration everywhere I look 

57
00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:35,800
now. 
It really is woven into so much 

58
00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:38,960
of contract law. 
So where do we go from here? 

59
00:02:39,080 --> 00:02:41,280
What else do we need to 
consider, so to speak? 

60
00:02:41,560 --> 00:02:44,440
Well, there are some situations 
where things get a bit more 

61
00:02:44,440 --> 00:02:48,720
nuanced, like what happens when 
traditional consideration might 

62
00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:51,360
be missing. 
Now that sounds intriguing. 

63
00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:53,880
Are there like loopholes or 
exceptions? 

64
00:02:53,880 --> 00:02:57,640
Not exactly loopholes, but legal
doctrines that help address 

65
00:02:57,640 --> 00:03:01,080
those tricky situations, like 
promissory estoppel. 

66
00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:03,080
Promissory estoppel? 
That sounds intense. 

67
00:03:03,080 --> 00:03:05,560
It's actually a pretty important
concept, especially when someone

68
00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:08,760
relies on a promise to their 
detriment, even if there wasn't 

69
00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:10,280
a formal exchange of 
consideration. 

70
00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:12,200
OK, I'm all ears. 
Think of it this way. 

71
00:03:12,720 --> 00:03:16,320
Imagine a landlord makes a 
verbal promise to a tenant about

72
00:03:16,320 --> 00:03:19,720
a long term lease, and the 
tenant based on that promise 

73
00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:22,840
goes ahead and spends a lot of 
money renovating the space. 

74
00:03:23,440 --> 00:03:26,840
Then the landlord backs out. 
Oh no, that's awful. 

75
00:03:26,840 --> 00:03:29,360
It is, and that's where 
promissory estoppel might come 

76
00:03:29,360 --> 00:03:32,840
in, because even though it 
wasn't a formal contract, the 

77
00:03:32,840 --> 00:03:35,160
tenant relied on that promise 
and took action. 

78
00:03:35,680 --> 00:03:37,840
So the court might step in and 
make the landlord honor the 

79
00:03:37,840 --> 00:03:38,960
promise. 
Exactly. 

80
00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:41,000
It's all about preventing 
someone from being unfairly 

81
00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:43,680
disadvantaged when they 
reasonably relied on another 

82
00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:46,320
person's word. 
So it's about fairness, even if 

83
00:03:46,320 --> 00:03:49,240
all the legal ices weren't 
dotted and TS crossed. 

84
00:03:49,240 --> 00:03:51,320
You got it. 
It's a way of ensuring that the 

85
00:03:51,320 --> 00:03:53,880
legal system doesn't allow one 
party to take advantage of 

86
00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:55,360
another. 
That's good to know. 

87
00:03:56,080 --> 00:03:57,160
OK. 
So we've got promissory 

88
00:03:57,160 --> 00:04:00,000
estoppel. 
What other tricky situations are

89
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:02,280
out there? 
Another important concept is 

90
00:04:02,280 --> 00:04:05,120
mutuality of obligation. 
Mutuality. 

91
00:04:05,440 --> 00:04:08,440
It's all about making sure that 
both parties are actually bound 

92
00:04:08,440 --> 00:04:11,120
by the agreement. 
Both sides need to have some 

93
00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:13,680
skin in the game. 
So if one side's promise is 

94
00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:15,840
vague or iffy. 
The whole thing might fall 

95
00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:18,240
apart. 
Imagine someone promises to 

96
00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:22,040
deliver goods, but the buyer 
says I'll pay if I feel like it.

97
00:04:22,760 --> 00:04:25,840
That's not true mutuality. 
Because the buyer isn't really 

98
00:04:25,840 --> 00:04:27,800
obligated to do anything. 
Right, There's no real 

99
00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:30,920
commitment. 
The law wants to see a genuine 

100
00:04:30,920 --> 00:04:34,640
exchange of promises where both 
sides are bound. 

101
00:04:34,840 --> 00:04:37,560
So it's about ensuring both 
sides have made concrete 

102
00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:38,440
commitments. 
Exactly. 

103
00:04:38,440 --> 00:04:41,200
It's about balance and making 
sure the agreement is actually 

104
00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:43,320
enforceable. 
This is all making a lot more 

105
00:04:43,320 --> 00:04:48,000
sense now, but how does this 
play out in real life, like in 

106
00:04:48,000 --> 00:04:51,280
the contracts we see every day? 
Great question. 

107
00:04:51,560 --> 00:04:53,840
Let's take a look at how 
consideration functions in 

108
00:04:53,840 --> 00:04:57,520
different types of contracts, 
from options to employment, even

109
00:04:57,520 --> 00:04:59,080
real estate. 
OK, now we're getting to the 

110
00:04:59,080 --> 00:05:00,760
good stuff. 
I'm ready for some examples. 

111
00:05:00,760 --> 00:05:02,440
Let's start with option 
contracts, OK? 

112
00:05:02,520 --> 00:05:03,920
Option contracts, What are those
again? 

113
00:05:04,120 --> 00:05:08,080
It's basically where one party 
has the right, but not the 

114
00:05:08,080 --> 00:05:11,560
obligation to do something like 
buying a property within a 

115
00:05:11,560 --> 00:05:13,240
certain time frame, right? 
Right. 

116
00:05:13,240 --> 00:05:15,720
But for that option to be 
enforceable, there needs to be 

117
00:05:15,720 --> 00:05:18,720
separate consideration for it. 
So it's you're buying the right 

118
00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:22,080
to make a decision later, and 
that right has a price tag. 

119
00:05:22,160 --> 00:05:25,880
Precisely, imagine you want to 
buy a house but need time to get

120
00:05:25,880 --> 00:05:29,160
financing. 
You could give the seller say 50

121
00:05:29,160 --> 00:05:31,600
bucks for the option to buy it 
within six months. 

122
00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:34,120
And that 50 bucks is the 
consideration. 

123
00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:38,600
Exactly, it binds the seller to 
keep the offer open even if 

124
00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:40,680
someone else comes along with a 
better offer. 

125
00:05:40,920 --> 00:05:42,720
Smart. 
It's like putting a hold on the 

126
00:05:42,720 --> 00:05:44,720
deal while you sort things out. 
Exactly. 

127
00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:48,040
It's all about tailoring the 
consideration to the specific 

128
00:05:48,040 --> 00:05:50,240
situation. 
Now how about employment 

129
00:05:50,240 --> 00:05:51,640
contracts? 
OK, employment. 

130
00:05:51,640 --> 00:05:53,120
Contracts, those are definitely 
important. 

131
00:05:53,120 --> 00:05:57,000
And consideration is key in 
several ways, especially when it

132
00:05:57,000 --> 00:06:00,520
comes to non compete clauses. 
Non competes those agreements 

133
00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:02,960
where you can't work for a 
competitor after you leave a 

134
00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:04,400
job. 
That's the one. 

135
00:06:04,760 --> 00:06:08,200
And for them to be enforceable, 
there usually needs to be some 

136
00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:11,680
new consideration given 
something beyond just continued 

137
00:06:11,680 --> 00:06:13,640
employment. 
So your boss can't just suddenly

138
00:06:13,640 --> 00:06:15,520
add a non compete and expect you
to sign it. 

139
00:06:15,640 --> 00:06:17,800
Not usually, no. 
There has to be something of 

140
00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:21,560
value exchanged for the employee
agreeing to that restriction, 

141
00:06:21,960 --> 00:06:24,560
like a bonus, a promotion, stock
options. 

142
00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:27,080
So it's a trade off. 
The employee gets something 

143
00:06:27,080 --> 00:06:29,640
extra, the employer gets Peace 
of Mind. 

144
00:06:29,760 --> 00:06:32,400
You got it. 
Both sides get something out of 

145
00:06:32,400 --> 00:06:33,840
the deal. 
That's what makes it 

146
00:06:33,840 --> 00:06:36,760
enforceable. 
And finally, let's not forget 

147
00:06:36,760 --> 00:06:40,080
about real estate contracts. 
Oh yeah, those earnest money 

148
00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:42,800
plays a big role there. 
It does, and it's not just a 

149
00:06:42,800 --> 00:06:46,560
good faith gesture, it's legally
binding consideration. 

150
00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:50,600
That deposit shows the seller 
that the buyer is serious. 

151
00:06:50,600 --> 00:06:52,280
It's like putting your money 
where your mouth is. 

152
00:06:52,280 --> 00:06:55,960
Exactly, It adds accountability 
and helps make sure both parties

153
00:06:55,960 --> 00:06:58,560
are committed to the deal. 
I'm seeing consideration 

154
00:06:58,560 --> 00:07:01,360
everywhere now. 
It's fascinating how it all ties

155
00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:03,520
together. 
It really is the glue that holds

156
00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:07,000
agreements together, make sure 
things were fair and ultimately 

157
00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:09,280
that promises are kept. 
Wow, We've covered a lot of 

158
00:07:09,280 --> 00:07:12,280
ground already, but we've only 
just scratched the surface of 

159
00:07:12,280 --> 00:07:13,600
this whole consideration thing, 
right? 

160
00:07:13,600 --> 00:07:14,160
That's. 
Right. 

161
00:07:14,320 --> 00:07:17,880
There's a whole history of legal
thinking and landmark cases that

162
00:07:17,880 --> 00:07:19,600
have shaped how we understand it
today. 

163
00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:23,000
OK, then let's dive into that. 
I'm ready to go deeper into the 

164
00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:26,960
legal history of consideration. 
What are some of the cases that 

165
00:07:26,960 --> 00:07:29,880
have had the biggest impact? 
Well, we can't talk about 

166
00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:33,520
consideration without mentioning
Hammer V Sidway, the one about 

167
00:07:33,520 --> 00:07:36,080
the nephew who gave up his vices
for a big payout. 

168
00:07:36,480 --> 00:07:39,960
Yes, the classic example of how 
giving up a legal right can 

169
00:07:39,960 --> 00:07:42,320
count as consideration. 
Exactly. 

170
00:07:42,480 --> 00:07:44,880
Hammer V Sidway is a foundation 
case, really. 

171
00:07:45,080 --> 00:07:47,800
It showed that consideration 
doesn't always have to be 

172
00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:52,120
something tangible like money. 
Sometimes it's about giving up 

173
00:07:52,120 --> 00:07:54,680
something you're entitled to do.
It's a good reminder that 

174
00:07:54,680 --> 00:07:57,640
contracts are about more than 
just money, they're about 

175
00:07:57,640 --> 00:08:00,640
promises and the value we place 
on different actions. 

176
00:08:00,640 --> 00:08:03,440
Absolutely. 
Now another case that had a huge

177
00:08:03,440 --> 00:08:06,360
impact is Williams V Rafi Bros 
and Nichols. 

178
00:08:06,800 --> 00:08:10,320
This one brought in the idea of 
practical benefit as valid 

179
00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:11,880
consideration. 
Practical benefit. 

180
00:08:11,920 --> 00:08:13,920
OK, now you've got my attention.
Tell me more. 

181
00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:17,440
It involved a contractor who was
behind schedule on a project. 

182
00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:21,400
The client, worried about 
penalties for the delay, offered

183
00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:24,080
extra money to finish on time. 
So they were basically trying to

184
00:08:24,080 --> 00:08:26,320
avoid getting penalized. 
Exactly. 

185
00:08:26,600 --> 00:08:29,320
Later, the client tried to back 
out of paying the extra, 

186
00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:32,520
claiming there was no new 
consideration for the promise. 

187
00:08:32,600 --> 00:08:35,400
Oh wow, so they wanted the work 
done but didn't want to pay? 

188
00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:37,840
Pretty much. 
But the court sided with the 

189
00:08:37,840 --> 00:08:41,720
contractor, saying the client 
received a practical benefit by 

190
00:08:41,720 --> 00:08:45,520
avoiding those penalties. 
So even if there's no new thing 

191
00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:49,840
being exchanged, if one party 
gets a real world advantage. 

192
00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:53,880
That can be valid consideration.
Williams V Rafi Burz and Nichols

193
00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:56,760
was a game changer because it 
recognized those real world 

194
00:08:56,760 --> 00:08:59,160
benefits, even if they're not 
spelled out in the contract. 

195
00:08:59,320 --> 00:09:01,560
That makes sense. 
OK, what's the last case on our 

196
00:09:01,560 --> 00:09:03,320
list? 
Let's talk about Ricketts V 

197
00:09:03,320 --> 00:09:06,040
Scott Hawthorne. 
It's a perfect example of 

198
00:09:06,040 --> 00:09:10,160
promissory estoppel in action. 
Remember, that's where a promise

199
00:09:10,160 --> 00:09:12,760
can be enforced even without 
traditional consideration, 

200
00:09:12,760 --> 00:09:15,680
because someone relied on it. 
Right, like that landlord tenant

201
00:09:15,680 --> 00:09:17,640
example we discussed. 
Exactly. 

202
00:09:17,920 --> 00:09:20,600
In Ricketts Feast Hawthorne, a 
grandfather promised his 

203
00:09:20,600 --> 00:09:24,080
granddaughter financial support 
so she could quit her job, even 

204
00:09:24,080 --> 00:09:25,600
though there wasn't a formal 
contract. 

205
00:09:25,840 --> 00:09:28,880
The court upheld the promise 
because she relied on it to make

206
00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:31,520
a major life change. 
So even though it's basically a 

207
00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:35,120
gift, the grandfather's actions 
made it binding. 

208
00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:37,960
Precisely. 
Ricketts V Scothorn shows how 

209
00:09:37,960 --> 00:09:41,280
promissory estoppel protects 
people from unfair outcomes when

210
00:09:41,280 --> 00:09:45,040
they trust a promise, even if it
lacks traditional consideration.

211
00:09:45,640 --> 00:09:48,360
These cases are fascinating. 
They really show how the law 

212
00:09:48,360 --> 00:09:51,480
adapts to real life. 
But before we wrap things up, I 

213
00:09:51,480 --> 00:09:54,400
have one more question. 
Is consideration viewed 

214
00:09:54,400 --> 00:09:56,080
differently in other parts of 
the world? 

215
00:09:56,600 --> 00:09:59,760
Like do other legal systems have
different approaches? 

216
00:09:59,880 --> 00:10:01,800
Great question. 
While consideration is a 

217
00:10:01,800 --> 00:10:05,120
cornerstone in common law 
systems like the US and UK, 

218
00:10:05,560 --> 00:10:07,280
other traditions have different 
approaches. 

219
00:10:07,560 --> 00:10:09,680
So what do they use instead of 
consideration? 

220
00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:13,320
Many civil law systems use the 
concept of cause instead. 

221
00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:16,800
It's similar in that it looks at
the reason for the contract, but

222
00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:19,920
it focuses more on the party's 
intentions and motivations. 

223
00:10:19,920 --> 00:10:23,200
So it's less about a strict 
exchange and more about ensuring

224
00:10:23,200 --> 00:10:25,280
there's a legitimate purpose 
behind the agreement. 

225
00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:27,320
You got it. 
It's about ensuring the contract

226
00:10:27,320 --> 00:10:31,280
has a solid foundation, not just
an empty promise or a whim. 

227
00:10:31,520 --> 00:10:33,320
That's interesting. 
So even though the specifics 

228
00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:36,920
might differ, the goal is still 
to make sure contracts are made 

229
00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:40,440
with genuine intentions and have
a valid reason for existing. 

230
00:10:40,720 --> 00:10:43,240
Absolutely. 
And even within common law, 

231
00:10:43,240 --> 00:10:45,240
there's a trend toward more 
flexibility. 

232
00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:48,520
For example, the Uniform 
Commercial Code, which governs 

233
00:10:48,520 --> 00:10:51,480
many business transactions, 
allows for contract 

234
00:10:51,480 --> 00:10:54,920
modifications without new 
consideration as long as changes

235
00:10:54,920 --> 00:10:57,560
are made in good faith. 
Makes sense, especially in 

236
00:10:57,560 --> 00:10:59,360
business where things change 
quickly. 

237
00:10:59,560 --> 00:11:02,200
You got it. 
The law is constantly evolving 

238
00:11:02,200 --> 00:11:05,000
to keep up with how we interact 
and make agreements. 

239
00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:07,880
Well, I think we've officially 
reached the bottom of our deep 

240
00:11:07,880 --> 00:11:11,440
dive into consideration. 
And wow, who knew something as 

241
00:11:11,440 --> 00:11:14,440
seemingly simple as a promise 
could have so much depth? 

242
00:11:14,800 --> 00:11:18,080
Right consideration might seem 
straightforward at first, but as

243
00:11:18,080 --> 00:11:20,680
we've seen, there's a whole 
world of history and and legal 

244
00:11:20,680 --> 00:11:23,600
thinking behind it. 
And to think this is all from 

245
00:11:23,600 --> 00:11:26,920
just one lecture. 
Imagine how much more there is 

246
00:11:26,920 --> 00:11:28,600
to learn. 
It's really just the beginning. 

247
00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:32,320
To our listener, we hope this 
deep dive has sparked your 

248
00:11:32,320 --> 00:11:35,600
curiosity about the law. 
Maybe it's even got you thinking

249
00:11:35,600 --> 00:11:37,320
about the promises in your own 
life. 

250
00:11:38,040 --> 00:11:40,360
Have you ever stopped to 
consider the elements of 

251
00:11:40,360 --> 00:11:43,240
consideration? 
Are there agreements you're part

252
00:11:43,240 --> 00:11:46,040
of that are more legally binding
than you realized? 

253
00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:49,080
Remember, a little legal 
knowledge can go a long way. 

254
00:11:49,280 --> 00:11:52,080
It can help you navigate your 
world with more confidence and 

255
00:11:52,080 --> 00:11:53,640
understanding. 
Well said. 

256
00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:57,320
OK, so we were talking about how
consideration can get a bit 

257
00:11:57,320 --> 00:11:58,720
tricky. 
Right, right. 

258
00:11:58,720 --> 00:12:00,840
Like what happens when the 
traditional kind of 

259
00:12:00,840 --> 00:12:03,880
consideration isn't there? 
Well, there are these legal 

260
00:12:03,880 --> 00:12:06,880
doctrines that come into play. 
Promissory estoppel, for 

261
00:12:06,880 --> 00:12:09,040
example. 
Promissory estoppel sounds 

262
00:12:09,040 --> 00:12:11,040
pretty serious. 
It is, but it's also about 

263
00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:12,760
fairness. 
You know, Like, imagine a 

264
00:12:12,760 --> 00:12:15,720
situation where someone relies 
on a promise even if there 

265
00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:18,000
wasn't a formal exchange of 
consideration. 

266
00:12:18,080 --> 00:12:19,480
OK, I'm following, give me an 
example. 

267
00:12:19,680 --> 00:12:24,280
Let's say a landlord promises a 
tenant a long term lease, but 

268
00:12:24,280 --> 00:12:27,840
it's just a verbal agreement, 
nothing written down, and the 

269
00:12:27,840 --> 00:12:32,200
tenant based on that promise 
goes and invests a ton of money 

270
00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:34,480
renovating the space. 
Oh, I see where this is going. 

271
00:12:34,600 --> 00:12:38,040
Then the landlord backs out, 
says Nope, never promised you 

272
00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:40,520
anything in writing. 
That's terrible, all that money 

273
00:12:40,520 --> 00:12:42,040
wasted. 
Exactly. 

274
00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:44,800
That's where promissory estoppel
might kick in. 

275
00:12:45,680 --> 00:12:48,560
The tenant relied on that 
promise, took action and 

276
00:12:48,560 --> 00:12:51,280
suffered a real loss. 
So the court could force the 

277
00:12:51,280 --> 00:12:54,240
landlord to honor the promise 
even if it wasn't part of a 

278
00:12:54,240 --> 00:12:55,880
formal contract. 
That's the idea. 

279
00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:59,160
It's about preventing injustice,
you know, making sure one person

280
00:12:59,160 --> 00:13:00,400
doesn't take advantage of 
another. 

281
00:13:00,560 --> 00:13:03,040
Makes sense. 
So promissory is Dopple is all 

282
00:13:03,040 --> 00:13:06,200
about protecting people who 
reasonably rely on a promise, 

283
00:13:06,600 --> 00:13:08,640
even if all the legal boxes 
weren't checked. 

284
00:13:08,640 --> 00:13:10,560
Exactly. 
It's about ensuring fairness. 

285
00:13:10,560 --> 00:13:12,120
OK, promissory is dopple. 
Got it. 

286
00:13:12,680 --> 00:13:15,120
What other tricky situations do 
we need to be aware of? 

287
00:13:15,120 --> 00:13:16,560
Well. 
There's also this concept called

288
00:13:16,560 --> 00:13:20,120
mutuality of obligation. 
Mutuality of obligation, OK. 

289
00:13:20,280 --> 00:13:23,120
It basically means that both 
sides of the agreement have to 

290
00:13:23,120 --> 00:13:27,560
be genuinely bound by it. 
Both parties need to have skin 

291
00:13:27,560 --> 00:13:30,400
in the game, so to speak. 
Right, it can't be 1 sided. 

292
00:13:30,400 --> 00:13:33,320
Exactly. 
If one side's promise is vague 

293
00:13:33,320 --> 00:13:35,960
or conditional, the whole 
contract might fall apart. 

294
00:13:36,120 --> 00:13:38,320
Gotcha. 
Like if someone promises to 

295
00:13:38,320 --> 00:13:42,520
deliver goods but the buyers all
I'll pay if I feel like. 

296
00:13:42,520 --> 00:13:45,200
It exactly. 
That's not real mutuality. 

297
00:13:45,200 --> 00:13:48,160
The buyer isn't truly obligated 
to do anything. 

298
00:13:48,240 --> 00:13:49,920
Right, it's all up in the air. 
Exactly. 

299
00:13:50,280 --> 00:13:54,760
The law wants to see a true 
exchange of promises where both 

300
00:13:54,760 --> 00:13:57,880
sides are held accountable. 
So it's about ensuring that both

301
00:13:57,880 --> 00:13:59,880
parties have made concrete 
commitments. 

302
00:13:59,960 --> 00:14:01,520
You got it. 
That's what makes the agreement 

303
00:14:01,520 --> 00:14:03,640
enforceable. 
OK, this is all making a lot 

304
00:14:03,640 --> 00:14:07,240
more sense, but how does this 
work in practice? 

305
00:14:07,840 --> 00:14:09,840
Like in the contracts we 
encounter everyday. 

306
00:14:10,440 --> 00:14:11,840
That's the big question, isn't 
it? 

307
00:14:11,840 --> 00:14:14,840
Let's look at how consideration 
actually plays out in different 

308
00:14:14,840 --> 00:14:18,000
types of contracts. 
Yes, let's give me some real 

309
00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:19,920
world examples. 
All right, let's start with 

310
00:14:19,920 --> 00:14:21,840
option contracts. 
You know those agreements where 

311
00:14:21,840 --> 00:14:25,880
one party has the right, but not
the obligation to do something? 

312
00:14:26,080 --> 00:14:27,480
Right, right. 
Like buying a house within a 

313
00:14:27,480 --> 00:14:29,560
certain time frame, but you're 
not required to. 

314
00:14:29,560 --> 00:14:31,520
Exactly. 
But for that option to be 

315
00:14:31,520 --> 00:14:35,000
legally valid, there has to be 
separate consideration given for

316
00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:36,800
it. 
So it's like you're paying for 

317
00:14:36,800 --> 00:14:38,360
the right to make a decision 
later on. 

318
00:14:38,400 --> 00:14:40,720
Precisely. 
Imagine you're interested in 

319
00:14:40,720 --> 00:14:43,600
buying a house but need some 
time to figure out financing. 

320
00:14:44,160 --> 00:14:48,600
You could offer the seller a 
small sum, say $50.00, for the 

321
00:14:48,600 --> 00:14:51,480
option to buy the house within, 
let's say six months. 

322
00:14:51,600 --> 00:14:53,600
And that $50 is the 
consideration. 

323
00:14:53,600 --> 00:14:56,320
Exactly. 
That binds the seller to keep 

324
00:14:56,320 --> 00:14:59,640
the offer open for you even if 
someone else comes along with a 

325
00:14:59,640 --> 00:15:01,080
better offer. 
That's pretty clever. 

326
00:15:01,080 --> 00:15:02,960
It's like putting a temporary 
hold on the deal. 

327
00:15:03,080 --> 00:15:07,040
Exactly, it just shows how 
consideration can be flexible 

328
00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:10,520
adapted to different situations.
Now, what about employment 

329
00:15:10,520 --> 00:15:12,760
contracts? 
Employment contracts, those are 

330
00:15:12,760 --> 00:15:15,560
definitely important. 
And consideration plays a key 

331
00:15:15,560 --> 00:15:19,400
role, particularly when it comes
to non compete clauses. 

332
00:15:19,400 --> 00:15:22,960
You mean those things where you 
can't go work for a competitor 

333
00:15:22,960 --> 00:15:25,080
after you leave a job? 
Exactly. 

334
00:15:25,080 --> 00:15:29,040
And for them to be enforceable, 
there typically needs to be some

335
00:15:29,160 --> 00:15:32,400
new consideration offered, not 
just continued employment. 

336
00:15:32,720 --> 00:15:36,240
So your boss can't just spring 
and non compete on you out of 

337
00:15:36,240 --> 00:15:38,040
the blue. 
Not usually, no. 

338
00:15:38,040 --> 00:15:40,640
There needs to be something of 
value exchanged. 

339
00:15:40,680 --> 00:15:44,640
It could be a bonus, a 
promotion, extra stock options, 

340
00:15:44,640 --> 00:15:46,640
something like that. 
So it's like you're giving up 

341
00:15:46,640 --> 00:15:49,720
something, the right to work for
certain companies, but you're 

342
00:15:49,720 --> 00:15:51,480
getting something in return. 
Exactly. 

343
00:15:51,480 --> 00:15:53,280
It's a trade off that makes it 
enforceable. 

344
00:15:53,880 --> 00:15:56,120
And finally, let's talk about 
real estate contracts. 

345
00:15:56,120 --> 00:15:59,400
Oh yeah, those are big ones. 
Earnest money comes into play 

346
00:15:59,400 --> 00:16:00,520
there, right? 
It does. 

347
00:16:00,520 --> 00:16:03,320
And that earnest money that 
deposit a buyer puts down? 

348
00:16:03,560 --> 00:16:06,840
It's not just a good faith 
gesture, it's considered legally

349
00:16:06,840 --> 00:16:09,400
binding consideration. 
Right, it shows you're serious 

350
00:16:09,400 --> 00:16:11,120
about buying the property. 
Exactly. 

351
00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:13,280
It shows commitment. 
It's not just talk. 

352
00:16:13,440 --> 00:16:15,760
I see it adds that extra layer 
of accountability. 

353
00:16:15,840 --> 00:16:18,440
Absolutely. 
It helps ensure both sides are 

354
00:16:18,440 --> 00:16:21,000
approaching the deal seriously. 
This is all incredibly 

355
00:16:21,000 --> 00:16:23,800
insightful. 
It's amazing how consideration 

356
00:16:23,880 --> 00:16:26,720
and is woven into so many 
different aspects of contract 

357
00:16:26,720 --> 00:16:29,520
law. 
It really is the glue that holds

358
00:16:29,520 --> 00:16:33,000
agreements together, makes them 
fair and enforceable. 

359
00:16:33,680 --> 00:16:36,320
Ultimately, it helps ensure that
promises are kept. 

360
00:16:36,440 --> 00:16:39,760
Wow, we've covered a lot of 
ground, but I feel like we've 

361
00:16:39,760 --> 00:16:42,080
only scratched the surface. 
You're right, there's so much 

362
00:16:42,080 --> 00:16:44,520
more to explore. 
We've talked about the basic 

363
00:16:44,520 --> 00:16:47,800
elements of consideration, some 
of the trickier scenarios, and 

364
00:16:47,800 --> 00:16:50,160
even how it applies in real 
world contracts. 

365
00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:53,280
But there's a whole history of 
legal thinking behind this 

366
00:16:53,280 --> 00:16:57,080
concept, landmark cases that 
have shaped how we understand it

367
00:16:57,080 --> 00:16:59,480
today. 
OK, now I'm really intrigued. 

368
00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:01,920
Let's dive into that legal 
history. 

369
00:17:02,440 --> 00:17:04,960
What are some of the cases that 
have had the biggest impact? 

370
00:17:05,240 --> 00:17:06,440
All right. 
So we're going to get into some 

371
00:17:06,440 --> 00:17:09,400
legal history now talking about 
some of the landmark cases that 

372
00:17:09,400 --> 00:17:11,720
have shaped how we understand 
consideration. 

373
00:17:11,720 --> 00:17:13,800
OK, let's do it. 
What are some of the big ones, 

374
00:17:13,800 --> 00:17:15,480
the ones that have really made a
difference? 

375
00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:18,160
Well, you can't talk about 
consideration without bringing 

376
00:17:18,160 --> 00:17:20,720
up him or V Sidway. 
Oh yeah, that's the 1:00 to and 

377
00:17:20,720 --> 00:17:22,960
the nephew, right? 
The one who gave up all his bad 

378
00:17:22,960 --> 00:17:25,160
habits for a bunch of money. 
That's the one. 

379
00:17:25,599 --> 00:17:28,319
Hammer V Sidway is like a 
foundation case for 

380
00:17:28,319 --> 00:17:32,360
consideration because it really 
solidified this idea that giving

381
00:17:32,360 --> 00:17:36,400
up a legal right can be just as 
valid as any other form of 

382
00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:37,560
consideration. 
Right. 

383
00:17:37,680 --> 00:17:40,200
It's not always about money or a
physical object. 

384
00:17:40,200 --> 00:17:42,480
It can be about giving up 
something you're entitled. 

385
00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:45,200
To exactly it really broadened 
our understanding of what 

386
00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:48,280
consideration can be. 
OK, so Hammer V Sidway got the 

387
00:17:48,280 --> 00:17:50,960
ball rolling. 
Yeah, what other big cases 

388
00:17:50,960 --> 00:17:53,120
should we know about? 
Well, another one that's super 

389
00:17:53,120 --> 00:17:56,560
important is Williams V Rafi 
Bros and Nichols. 

390
00:17:57,000 --> 00:18:00,280
This one introduced the concept 
of practical benefit as valid 

391
00:18:00,280 --> 00:18:02,120
consideration. 
Practical benefit. 

392
00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:04,760
OK, I'm listening. 
So in this case, you had a 

393
00:18:04,760 --> 00:18:07,640
contractor who was hired to do 
some work, but they were falling

394
00:18:07,640 --> 00:18:10,080
behind schedule. 
Sounds like trouble. 

395
00:18:10,320 --> 00:18:13,360
It was the client was worried 
about being hit with penalties 

396
00:18:13,360 --> 00:18:16,760
for the delay, so they offered 
the contractor extra money to 

397
00:18:16,760 --> 00:18:18,560
finish on time. 
OK, makes sense. 

398
00:18:18,840 --> 00:18:20,160
They wanted to avoid those 
penalties. 

399
00:18:20,160 --> 00:18:23,880
Exactly, but later on the client
tried to back out of paying that

400
00:18:23,880 --> 00:18:26,120
extra money. 
Oh come on, that doesn't seem 

401
00:18:26,160 --> 00:18:27,360
fair. 
They got what they wanted, 

402
00:18:27,600 --> 00:18:29,960
right? 
They argued that there was no 

403
00:18:29,960 --> 00:18:32,720
new consideration for the 
promise of extra payment. 

404
00:18:32,880 --> 00:18:35,680
So they were trying to get out 
of paying for a service that 

405
00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:39,160
they clearly benefited from. 
Yep, but the court actually 

406
00:18:39,160 --> 00:18:42,840
sided with the contractor. 
They recognized that the client 

407
00:18:42,840 --> 00:18:46,720
received a practical benefit 
from the contractor finishing on

408
00:18:46,720 --> 00:18:49,520
time because they were able to 
avoid those penalties. 

409
00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:52,880
So even though there wasn't a 
new tangible thing being 

410
00:18:52,880 --> 00:18:56,480
exchanged, the client still got 
a real advantage from the 

411
00:18:56,480 --> 00:18:59,200
situation. 
Exactly, and that's why Williams

412
00:18:59,200 --> 00:19:01,440
V Rafi Bros and Nichols was such
a big deal. 

413
00:19:01,840 --> 00:19:05,000
It expanded our understanding of
consideration to include these 

414
00:19:05,000 --> 00:19:07,840
more practical, real world 
benefits that might not be 

415
00:19:07,840 --> 00:19:09,960
explicitly spelled out in a 
contract. 

416
00:19:10,040 --> 00:19:11,720
I see. 
So it's not always about a 

417
00:19:11,720 --> 00:19:15,240
strict quid pro quo exchange. 
It's about recognizing when one 

418
00:19:15,240 --> 00:19:18,240
party gets a real advantage, 
even if it's not something you 

419
00:19:18,240 --> 00:19:19,560
can hold in your hand. 
Right on. 

420
00:19:19,880 --> 00:19:21,840
OK, Ready for one more case? 
Hit me with it. 

421
00:19:21,880 --> 00:19:24,640
All right, this one's a classic.
It's called Ricketts V Scothorn,

422
00:19:24,680 --> 00:19:27,720
and it perfectly illustrates the
idea of promissory estoppel, 

423
00:19:27,720 --> 00:19:30,520
which we talked about earlier. 
Oh yeah, that's where a promise 

424
00:19:30,520 --> 00:19:34,160
can be enforced even without 
traditional consideration if 

425
00:19:34,160 --> 00:19:36,080
someone relied on it to their 
detriment. 

426
00:19:36,160 --> 00:19:39,240
Exactly so in this case, a 
grandfather promised his 

427
00:19:39,240 --> 00:19:41,840
granddaughter that he would give
her money so she could quit her 

428
00:19:41,840 --> 00:19:43,400
job. 
Oh, that's sweet. 

429
00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:46,640
It was, but even though there 
was no formal contract, the 

430
00:19:46,640 --> 00:19:49,160
court decided to enforce the 
promise. 

431
00:19:49,480 --> 00:19:51,440
Why? 
Because the granddaughter quit 

432
00:19:51,440 --> 00:19:52,960
her job based on the promise? 
Yep. 

433
00:19:53,280 --> 00:19:56,320
She relied on her grandfather's 
word and made a major life 

434
00:19:56,320 --> 00:19:59,760
decision based on that promise. 
So the court basically said. 

435
00:20:00,360 --> 00:20:04,000
Hey, even though this was a gift
promise, the grandfather created

436
00:20:04,000 --> 00:20:06,960
a situation where it would be 
unfair not to enforce it. 

437
00:20:06,960 --> 00:20:09,800
That's exactly it. 
Ricketts V Scarthorne is a great

438
00:20:09,800 --> 00:20:13,200
example of how promissory 
estoppel acts as a safety net to

439
00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:15,880
protect people from getting 
burned when they reasonably rely

440
00:20:15,880 --> 00:20:19,520
on a promise, even if all the 
legal IS weren't dotted and T's 

441
00:20:19,520 --> 00:20:21,200
crossed. 
I'm starting to realize that 

442
00:20:21,200 --> 00:20:23,840
consideration is a lot more 
nuanced than I initially 

443
00:20:23,840 --> 00:20:26,440
thought. 
It's not just about a simple 

444
00:20:26,440 --> 00:20:28,560
exchange of goods or services. 
You got it. 

445
00:20:28,600 --> 00:20:30,200
There are all sorts of factors 
at play. 

446
00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:32,960
Well, before we wrap up, I'm 
curious. 

447
00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:36,880
Is this whole consideration 
thing just a common law thing, 

448
00:20:37,280 --> 00:20:41,040
or do other legal systems around
the world handle it differently?

449
00:20:41,960 --> 00:20:44,840
That's a great question. 
While consideration is super 

450
00:20:44,840 --> 00:20:48,200
important in common law systems 
like here in the US and over in 

451
00:20:48,200 --> 00:20:50,800
the UK, other legal traditions 
have different ways of 

452
00:20:50,800 --> 00:20:53,040
approaching contract formation. 
Interesting. 

453
00:20:53,040 --> 00:20:55,720
So what do they use instead of 
consideration? 

454
00:20:55,720 --> 00:20:58,880
Like how do they make sure that 
promises are legally binding? 

455
00:20:59,160 --> 00:21:02,560
Well, a lot of civil law systems
use the concept of cause 

456
00:21:02,560 --> 00:21:05,440
instead. 
It's similar to consideration in

457
00:21:05,440 --> 00:21:08,560
that it looks for a reason 
behind the contract, but it 

458
00:21:08,560 --> 00:21:12,120
focuses more on the party's 
intentions and motivations. 

459
00:21:12,360 --> 00:21:15,240
Oh, so it's less about a strict 
quid pro quo exchange and more 

460
00:21:15,240 --> 00:21:17,440
about understanding the 
underlying purpose of the 

461
00:21:17,440 --> 00:21:18,600
agreement? 
Exactly. 

462
00:21:18,600 --> 00:21:20,760
They want to make sure there's a
good reason for the contract to 

463
00:21:20,760 --> 00:21:23,760
exist and that the parties are 
entering into it in good faith. 

464
00:21:23,880 --> 00:21:25,840
So even though the legal 
frameworks might be different, 

465
00:21:26,120 --> 00:21:29,720
the goal is still the same to 
ensure that contracts are based 

466
00:21:29,720 --> 00:21:32,600
on genuine intentions. 
They just have different ways of

467
00:21:32,600 --> 00:21:34,080
getting there. 
Fascinating. 

468
00:21:34,720 --> 00:21:37,040
Well, I think we've officially 
covered all the bases on 

469
00:21:37,040 --> 00:21:39,400
consideration. 
We've explored the basic 

470
00:21:39,400 --> 00:21:43,000
elements, delved into some 
tricky situations and even 

471
00:21:43,000 --> 00:21:45,360
looked at how it's handled in 
different legal systems around 

472
00:21:45,360 --> 00:21:47,200
the world. 
We really went deep. 

473
00:21:47,400 --> 00:21:49,560
We did. 
And to think this all started 

474
00:21:49,560 --> 00:21:53,680
with just one lecture. 
It's amazing how much depth and 

475
00:21:53,680 --> 00:21:56,280
complexity there is to something
that seems so simple on the 

476
00:21:56,280 --> 00:21:57,600
surface. 
It's true. 

477
00:21:57,880 --> 00:22:00,720
Consideration is one of those 
legal concepts that's full of 

478
00:22:00,720 --> 00:22:03,360
surprises. 
Well, to our listener, we hope 

479
00:22:03,360 --> 00:22:06,240
you've enjoyed this deep dive 
into the world of consideration.

480
00:22:06,840 --> 00:22:09,200
Maybe you've learned something 
new, or maybe it's even got you 

481
00:22:09,200 --> 00:22:11,600
thinking about your own 
experiences with contracts and 

482
00:22:11,600 --> 00:22:13,520
promises. 
We hope you'll keep exploring 

483
00:22:13,520 --> 00:22:16,400
these ideas and keep learning 
about the fascinating world of 

484
00:22:16,400 --> 00:22:18,640
the law. 
That's right, until next time, 

485
00:22:18,880 --> 00:22:20,240
keep those brains buzzing.