1
00:00:00,100 --> 00:00:03,200
Fair dealing Fair. 
Dealing is a limitation and 

2
00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:04,800
exception to the exclusive, 
right? 

3
00:00:04,800 --> 00:00:08,700
Granted by copyright law to the 
author of A Creative work Fair. 

4
00:00:08,700 --> 00:00:10,700
Dealing is found in many of the 
common law. 

5
00:00:10,700 --> 00:00:13,800
Jurisdictions of the 
Commonwealth of Nations Fair, 

6
00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:17,100
dealing is an enumerated set of 
possible defenses against an 

7
00:00:17,100 --> 00:00:20,200
action for infringement of an 
exclusive, right of copyright. 

8
00:00:20,600 --> 00:00:24,000
Unlike the related United States
doctrine of fair use Fair. 

9
00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:27,200
Dealing cannot apply to any act,
which does not fall within one 

10
00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:29,800
of these categories. 
Although common law courts in 

11
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:32,600
Some jurisdictions are less 
stringent than others in this 

12
00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:36,300
Regard in practice. 
However, such courts might rule 

13
00:00:36,300 --> 00:00:39,500
that actions with a commercial 
character which might be naively

14
00:00:39,500 --> 00:00:42,500
assumed to fall into one of 
these categories or in fact, 

15
00:00:42,500 --> 00:00:45,900
infringement of copyright as 
Fair, dealing is not as flexible

16
00:00:45,900 --> 00:00:48,600
a concept as the American 
concept of fair use. 

17
00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:52,600
There are similar limitations 
and exceptions to copyright such

18
00:00:52,600 --> 00:00:55,800
as the right to quote, also in 
the Berne convention and in the 

19
00:00:55,800 --> 00:00:59,900
laws of civil law jurisdictions 
by country United. 

20
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:02,700
States. 
The parallel Concept in United 

21
00:01:02,700 --> 00:01:06,000
States, copyright laws, fair use
the term Fair. 

22
00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:08,800
Dealing has a different meaning 
in the u.s. it is a duty of full

23
00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:12,300
disclosure, imposed upon 
corporate officers, fiduciaries 

24
00:01:12,500 --> 00:01:15,800
and parties to contracts in the 
reported cases. 

25
00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:19,000
It usually arises in the context
of the implied, Covenant of 

26
00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:22,200
good, faith and fair dealing, 
which underlies the tort cause 

27
00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:26,600
of action for insurance. 
Bad faith Canada, the Canadian 

28
00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:29,800
concept of fair dealing is 
similar to that in the UK and 

29
00:01:29,900 --> 00:01:33,500
Australia, the fair dealing 
causes of the Canadian Copyright

30
00:01:33,500 --> 00:01:36,600
Act allow users to engage in 
certain activities relating to 

31
00:01:36,600 --> 00:01:40,900
research, private study, 
education parody, satire 

32
00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:44,600
criticism, review or news 
reporting with respect to 

33
00:01:44,600 --> 00:01:48,400
criticism review and news 
reporting the user must mention 

34
00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:50,800
the source of the material. 
Along with the name of the 

35
00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:54,000
author performer maker or 
broadcaster for the dealing. 

36
00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:58,000
To be fair prior to 2011, 
they're dealing in Canada, was 

37
00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:01,900
not definitely found to contain.
And for parity, unlike fair use 

38
00:02:01,900 --> 00:02:04,800
in the United States. 
But the Copyright Act has since 

39
00:02:04,800 --> 00:02:07,800
been amended to include parody 
and satire along with 

40
00:02:07,800 --> 00:02:12,200
educational use under its Fair, 
dealing Provisions, previously, 

41
00:02:12,400 --> 00:02:14,900
a Quebec Court of Appeal. 
In late, Productions of Auntie, 

42
00:02:14,900 --> 00:02:19,600
Sydney video V, Favreau August, 
4th 1999 had recognized. 

43
00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:22,600
That parity could potentially be
a critique, but it refused to 

44
00:02:22,600 --> 00:02:25,000
recognize the exception in that 
circumstance. 

45
00:02:25,500 --> 00:02:29,800
The 2004 ruling by the Supreme 
Court of Canada in CCH. 

46
00:02:29,900 --> 00:02:32,900
Limited V Law. 
Society of Upper Canada has gone

47
00:02:32,900 --> 00:02:36,500
far and clarifying, the concept 
of fair dealing in Canada, in 

48
00:02:36,500 --> 00:02:39,000
considering Fair dealing, the 
court makes the following 

49
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:42,500
General observation. 
It is important to clarify. 

50
00:02:42,500 --> 00:02:45,500
Some general considerations 
about exceptions to copyright 

51
00:02:45,500 --> 00:02:48,500
infringement. 
Procedure Lee a defendant is 

52
00:02:48,500 --> 00:02:50,900
required to prove that his or 
her dealing with the work has 

53
00:02:50,900 --> 00:02:53,300
been Fair. 
However, the fair dealing 

54
00:02:53,300 --> 00:02:56,000
exception is, perhaps more 
properly understood as an 

55
00:02:56,000 --> 00:03:00,200
integral part of the Copyright 
Act than simply a defense and At

56
00:03:00,200 --> 00:03:02,600
falling within the fair. 
Dealing exception will not be an

57
00:03:02,600 --> 00:03:06,500
infringement of copyright the 
fair dealing exception, like 

58
00:03:06,500 --> 00:03:09,200
other exceptions in the 
Copyright Act is a user's. 

59
00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:11,400
Right? 
In order to maintain the proper 

60
00:03:11,400 --> 00:03:14,100
balance between the rights of a 
copyright owner and users 

61
00:03:14,100 --> 00:03:16,200
interests. 
It must not be interpreted 

62
00:03:16,200 --> 00:03:19,400
restrictively. 
Furthermore, by taking a liberal

63
00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:22,200
approach to the enumerated 
purposes of the dealing, the 

64
00:03:22,200 --> 00:03:25,400
court has made Fair dealing, or 
flexible reducing the gap 

65
00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:28,400
between this provision and u.s. 
fair, use it. 

66
00:03:28,400 --> 00:03:31,500
Then establishes six. 
Apple criteria for evaluating 

67
00:03:31,500 --> 00:03:34,800
Fair dealing. 
The purpose of the dealing is it

68
00:03:34,800 --> 00:03:38,400
for research private study, 
criticism review or news 

69
00:03:38,400 --> 00:03:43,700
reporting or additionally, since
2011, education parody or satire

70
00:03:44,100 --> 00:03:46,800
it expresses that these 
allowable purposes should not be

71
00:03:46,800 --> 00:03:49,100
given a restrictive 
interpretation, or this could 

72
00:03:49,100 --> 00:03:53,200
result in the undue restriction 
of users rights in particular, 

73
00:03:53,400 --> 00:03:55,900
the court gave a large and 
liberal interpretation to the 

74
00:03:55,900 --> 00:03:59,400
notion of research stating that 
lawyers carrying on the business

75
00:03:59,400 --> 00:04:01,600
of law for Profit or conducting 
research. 

76
00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:05,300
The character of the dealing, 
how are the works dealt with? 

77
00:04:05,700 --> 00:04:07,600
Was there? 
A single copy or were multiple 

78
00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:11,100
copies made were these copies 
distributed widely or to a 

79
00:04:11,108 --> 00:04:15,000
limited group of people was the 
copy destroyed after being used.

80
00:04:15,400 --> 00:04:17,700
What is the general Practice in 
the industry? 

81
00:04:18,100 --> 00:04:21,300
The amount of the dealing, how 
much of the work was used? 

82
00:04:21,800 --> 00:04:25,200
What was the importance of the 
infringed work quoting trivial 

83
00:04:25,200 --> 00:04:27,500
amounts May alone? 
Sufficiently established Fair. 

84
00:04:27,500 --> 00:04:29,800
Dealing is there would not be 
copyright infringement. 

85
00:04:29,900 --> 00:04:33,400
At all, in some cases, even 
quoting the entire work, maybe 

86
00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:35,900
Fair dealing. 
The amount of the work taken 

87
00:04:35,900 --> 00:04:38,300
must be fair in light of the 
purpose of the dealing 

88
00:04:38,700 --> 00:04:41,200
alternatives. 
To the dealing was a non 

89
00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:44,700
copyrighted equivalent of the 
work available to the user with 

90
00:04:44,700 --> 00:04:48,000
the dealing reasonably necessary
to achieve the ultimate purpose.

91
00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:51,800
The nature of the work copying 
from a work that has never been 

92
00:04:51,800 --> 00:04:54,300
published could be more fair 
than from a published work and 

93
00:04:54,300 --> 00:04:56,700
that it's reproduction with 
acknowledgement could lead to a 

94
00:04:56,700 --> 00:04:59,800
wider public dissemination of 
the work, one of the goals of 

95
00:04:59,900 --> 00:05:03,300
Copyright law is however, the 
work in question was 

96
00:05:03,300 --> 00:05:05,800
confidential. 
This may tip the scales towards 

97
00:05:05,800 --> 00:05:09,000
finding that the dealing was 
unfair effect of the dealing on 

98
00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:12,800
the work, is it likely to affect
the market of the original work?

99
00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:15,200
Although the effect of the 
dealing on the market of the 

100
00:05:15,200 --> 00:05:17,500
copyright owner is an important 
factor. 

101
00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:20,400
It is neither the only Factor 
nor the most important factor 

102
00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:23,300
that a court must consider in 
deciding at the dealing is fair 

103
00:05:23,800 --> 00:05:26,900
though, the Supreme Court 
outlined these six criteria, it 

104
00:05:26,900 --> 00:05:30,200
noted that in some contexts 
factors other than those Listed 

105
00:05:30,200 --> 00:05:33,100
may be relevant in determining. 
Whether a particular dealing is 

106
00:05:33,100 --> 00:05:36,800
fair on June 2nd 2010. 
The government of Canada 

107
00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:41,100
introduced Bill C32 an act to 
amend the Copyright Act, a 

108
00:05:41,100 --> 00:05:43,200
summary of the changes proposed 
by this bill. 

109
00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:46,700
In terms of fair dealing notes 
that C32 expands the scope of 

110
00:05:46,708 --> 00:05:50,200
the fair, dealing exception at 
section 29 of the ACT to include

111
00:05:50,200 --> 00:05:53,500
new purposes, education parody 
or satire. 

112
00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:56,800
The stated aims of the revised 
Bill were also to permit 

113
00:05:56,800 --> 00:05:59,800
businesses Educators and 
libraries to make greater use. 

114
00:05:59,900 --> 00:06:02,300
Of copyright material and 
digital form. 

115
00:06:02,700 --> 00:06:06,200
Bill C32 had not passed by the 
time the minority conservative 

116
00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:09,300
government faced a vote of no 
confidence and subsequently fell

117
00:06:09,300 --> 00:06:14,600
on March 25th, 2011 on September
29. 2011, the bill was 

118
00:06:14,600 --> 00:06:18,400
reintroduced to the 41st 
Parliament is Bill C11 with the 

119
00:06:18,400 --> 00:06:21,000
backing of a majority, 
conservative government, this 

120
00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:23,800
version of the copyright 
modernization act as passed into

121
00:06:23,800 --> 00:06:26,500
law. 
Simply put the fair dealing 

122
00:06:26,500 --> 00:06:30,800
amendment in section 29 of Bill,
C11 expands the First criteria 

123
00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:34,100
for evaluating Fair dealing the 
purpose of the dealing to 

124
00:06:34,100 --> 00:06:36,700
include education and parody or 
satire. 

125
00:06:36,900 --> 00:06:41,400
In addition to research private 
study criticism and review in a 

126
00:06:41,400 --> 00:06:43,700
press release, on the government
of Canada's balance. 

127
00:06:43,700 --> 00:06:47,700
Copyright site, the honorable 
James, more minister of Canadian

128
00:06:47,700 --> 00:06:51,100
Heritage and official languages 
notes that the revamped Bill 

129
00:06:51,100 --> 00:06:53,600
delivers, a common-sense balance
between the interests of 

130
00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:57,100
consumers and the rights of the 
creative Community critics of 

131
00:06:57,100 --> 00:06:59,700
the bill point to excessively 
restrictive digital lock 

132
00:06:59,900 --> 00:07:02,800
Amendments that they claim will 
create a situation where people 

133
00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:05,500
are entitled to use. 
Copyrighted content, lawfully, 

134
00:07:05,500 --> 00:07:09,700
but prevented from doing so 
United Kingdom Under the 

135
00:07:09,700 --> 00:07:13,000
copyright designs and patents 
Act 1988. 

136
00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:16,700
CDP a fair, dealing is limited 
to the following purposes. 

137
00:07:16,900 --> 00:07:20,900
Research and private study, both
must be non-commercial criticism

138
00:07:20,900 --> 00:07:27,500
or review or quotation and news.
Reporting sections, 29 3178 as 

139
00:07:27,500 --> 00:07:29,700
well as parity caricature and 
Pasty. 

140
00:07:29,800 --> 00:07:34,000
Each section 38 and illustration
for teaching, although not 

141
00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:37,200
actually defined as a fair 
dealing incidental, inclusion of

142
00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:40,400
a copyrighted work in an 
artistic work, sound recording 

143
00:07:40,500 --> 00:07:43,600
film broadcast or cable. 
Program does not infringe 

144
00:07:43,600 --> 00:07:47,000
copyright. 
Since 2014, the UK has protected

145
00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:50,000
the fair dealing exceptions from
override by contracts or 

146
00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:53,300
contractual terms. 
And conditions contrary to the 

147
00:07:53,300 --> 00:07:57,500
often stated view the provisions
of section. 29 of the CDP a do 

148
00:07:57,500 --> 00:07:59,700
not State the amount of an in 
copyright work. 

149
00:07:59,900 --> 00:08:02,800
Maybe copy for the purposes of 
non-commercial research or 

150
00:08:02,800 --> 00:08:05,600
private study or two single 
copies of the work where the 

151
00:08:05,600 --> 00:08:08,600
copies are made by the 
researcher or student himself. 

152
00:08:09,100 --> 00:08:12,600
Such restrictions only apply to 
copies made by or on behalf of a

153
00:08:12,600 --> 00:08:17,500
librarian by virtue of S40 or by
a person other than the 

154
00:08:17,500 --> 00:08:21,000
researcher student himself who 
knows or has reason to believe 

155
00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:23,200
that it will result in copies of
substantially. 

156
00:08:23,200 --> 00:08:26,000
The same material being provided
to more than one person at 

157
00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:27,800
substantially. 
The same time in for 

158
00:08:27,800 --> 00:08:31,100
substantially the same purpose. 
For copying beyond the 

159
00:08:31,100 --> 00:08:34,200
boundaries of fair dealing 
universities and schools in the 

160
00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:37,500
UK obtain licenses from a 
national copyright Collective. 

161
00:08:37,600 --> 00:08:42,400
The UK copyright, licensing 
agency CLA under these licenses 

162
00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:44,700
multiple copies of portions of 
copyrighted. 

163
00:08:44,700 --> 00:08:47,200
Works can be made for 
educational purposes. 

164
00:08:47,700 --> 00:08:50,900
The UK was the only member state
of the European Union that did 

165
00:08:50,900 --> 00:08:52,800
not have a private copy 
exception. 

166
00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:56,000
Since the high court quashed, 
the relevant regulations in our 

167
00:08:56,100 --> 00:08:59,200
basket and others be Secretary 
of State for business 

168
00:08:59,400 --> 00:09:02,700
innovation. 
Ation and skills ewhc 2041 

169
00:09:02,700 --> 00:09:05,700
admin. 
Consequently now commonplace 

170
00:09:05,700 --> 00:09:08,800
activities such as format. 
Shifting saving ones music 

171
00:09:08,800 --> 00:09:11,900
contained in their CDs, on their
MP3, players or on their 

172
00:09:11,900 --> 00:09:15,100
smartphones are illegal. 
But in practice the government 

173
00:09:15,100 --> 00:09:16,100
does not enforce this.