Are you familiar with FBI special agents?
Kyle Serpen? I'm familiar with the name.
Is that? Yes, I'm familiar with the name.
Familiar with the name, familiar with the name.
Let's bring in Kyle Serafin. He's the FBI whistleblower who
helped expose government censorship of our First
Amendment rights. Now, we only have this memo
because a recently suspended FBI agent called Kyle Serafin
brought it to the public. And we're grateful that he did.
Kyle, thank you so much for joining us tonight.
He's the host of something that strangely is called with Kyle
Serafish. Kyle Serafi, I can't thank you
enough for speaking out. I knew you guys were out there
and I knew it was just a matter of time.
But you got a lot of guts putting your face and your name
to this. You're doing a service on behalf
of the American people. And from the bottom of my
cracked and broken heart, sometimes, thank you very much.
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Wow, wow.
OK, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show.
Today's Wednesday. It's December the 11th and we
are rolling live over on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
We are on kyleseraphin.com. We are at X at Kyle Seraphin.
I'm amped up today, guys. I don't, I don't know why.
It may have something to do with the fact that my wife adjusted
the grind of our coffee maker, which we're going to be talking
about coffee in just a second. Adjusted the grind so I didn't
just get coffee out of the French press this morning.
I got that thing that I I called a slurry.
I don't know if that's what you guys call it too, but it's when
the grind is so fine that you're drinking the grounds.
We are amped up. OK, so we're going to name
Daniel Penny the man of the year.
Time magazine actually thinks that Kamala Harris might be the
man of the year, but we're a little bit more sensible over
here on the Kyle Sarapan show. So we're going to start with,
let's see, we're going to go and get into a little bit of the
kind of conspiratorial nonsense that people are going down the
rabbit hole with this guy Luigi with the squeegee Mangiano.
We're going to talk about him. We're going to talk about
hypocrisy. We can't help it because that is
what the the mainstream you get coffee so thick it's chewy.
Thank you. The chat coming through with
exactly what I'm feeling right now.
A lot of that and then I've got some fun videos and I actually
have you have to stick around to the end.
If you are listening on the audio.
Do not miss the last three minutes of today's show because
I am going to put something in your ear that is going to make
your Christmas bright. That is my promise to you and I
challenge you to find it wrong. If you think that I am mistaken,
please put it in the comments below as we get going.
But let's go ahead and start off with a thanks again.
We'll just thank coffee companies and let's start with
Blackout Coffee for bringing it here.
Listen, folks going to tell you about a company that is shaking
up the coffee world, It's Blackout coffee.
It's not your typical run-of-the-mill brew from a
corporate giant that doesn't share your values.
Blackout Coffee is bold, unapologetic and truly America
first. This month, Blackout Coffee is
making it easier than ever to give the gift of amazing coffee
or cocoa or tea and more. That's right, Blackout Coffee is
running sales all month long so that you can fill those
stockings. Make the gift basket bright.
Whether it's a bag of their premium roasted coffee,
delicious hot cocoa, or a box of specialty teas, you will find
something perfect for everyone on your list.
Coffee is the gift that you can always use.
Let's not forget the gear. They've got mugs and shirts and
so on. In fact, their logo is a gear,
so that makes it look right. This is stuff that's designed to
make a statement. Let people know that you're
enjoying a great cup of coffee that looks as good as it tastes.
Don't wait. Head over to
blackoutcoffee.com/kyle. blackoutcoffee.com/kyle right
now. That should automatically give
you the promo code Kyle. Stock up for the holidays.
Grab the gifts for those who will actually get to use it.
Support a company that stands for the values that you you
believe in. blackoutcoffee.com/kyle.
Use that promo code Kyle for up to 20% off your order.
You will not be disappointed. We've got some in the mail right
now. I keep checking at the front of
the at the door to see if the box is there yet because I get
excited about receiving packages.
Let's get into it now.
All right, all right, All right, all right, All right.
OK. So we're going to settle into
this. We're going to be talking about
the suspected CEO killer Luigi Mangiano.
He's got a fun name to say. He comes from a wealthy family.
All of these things. And that means, well, it
couldn't be. If he's a very smart guy who was
a valedictorian of his high school class, how could he have
been caught so easily? I'll remind you that most people
are caught, like, within minutes of doing stupid things.
Like they shoot somebody, their buddy calls the cops, turns them
in for the reward money. Yeah, of course.
Most people who are not good at doing crimes because they don't
do crimes all the time get caught when they do crimes.
This is a basic thing. It doesn't have to be more
confusing than this. But we're going to actually hear
a lot of folks say it. I listen to a little clip on on
Twitter on X Dan Bongino saying something's not right.
Why? Based on what?
People who don't do crimes are not good at doing crimes, folks,
The thing is this, once you've done it, it can haunt you
forever. The evidence that you've left,
the trail that you put behind you will follow you and the
people that are supposed to go look for it will do that.
This was a high profile murder in a city like New York where
they have unlimited capabilities of resources.
They have a huge Police Department, they have a massive
FBI office there. They have a huge presence of the
United States Marshall Service. All of these people can run out
there and get after this. I even saw people like Tracy
Bean saying either this guy is insane or there's something else
going on here. Why?
Because he did this. I'm going to play the video.
We'll just play it. Look, people who kill people
probably are not all right? And so is this a little bit
strange? Yeah.
But this is Altoona, PA. This is not some big city where
they have extra body armor to throw on everybody and they
think someone's going to assassinate folks that are
getting taken in for either their initial appearance or for
their plea. This, this is not that crazy.
Like people say all kinds of wild stuff when they're in
custody. You usually don't see it.
That's all. One, it doesn't make a clip.
Two, you don't have the interest in it, but like sitting in the
back of the car with somebody or driving them anywhere.
Like you're taking them to jail, you're taking them in for for
confinement, you're taking them in for an interrogation.
People do weird things in custody because it's a totally
unnatural experience. And imagine this, you're a kid
in your 20s. You've you've gotten some
injury. You get really pissed off, you
decide to go do something. Does this mean this guy's
guilty? Absolutely not.
OK, Absolutely not. It means that he's innocent
until proven guilty. But there's some strong evidence
there, and you're seeing it on the screen.
That's the actual the picture of the security Cam footage from
the McDonald's that captured him sitting there eating a hash
brown, probably figuring out what the hell have I done?
How the hell am I going to get out of this mess?
I've done it, now what? Anyway, this is the video that
is making people say like there's something more to it.
Why? Because he's yelling things that
sound like a guy who would go out there and kill someone over
ideology. That's what he sounds like to
me. Insult the intelligence of the
American people experience. You're completely out of touch
and you're insulting the intelligence of the American
people and their lived experience.
What does that even mean? That doesn't mean anything.
That just means you're yelling something because you have a
press corps there. You're yelling something because
you did theoretically an action that was based on ideology and
then you have like, ideology you want to yell about.
It makes perfect sense to me. In any case, nothing about that
is unusual. The fact that someone decided to
print a 3D gun and go and do a suppression, you know, and, and
kill somebody on the street in New York, that's weird.
It truly is. But this is how people get
caught. The minute you walk away, we'll
call it right of bang. OK, so the action happens.
And then to the right of that, he had a getaway plan, I'm sure,
which we saw he got on a bike and he went there.
But once you're out of the area, all of the chain of evidence
continues to follow you. So for all of the the the idea
that he was this mastermind, which is what people keep kind
of acting like that he was this like, you know, almost pro.
He was like a semi pro assassin. You leave evidence like bullets
behind really things that may or may not have fingerprints on
them. You're going to have the
striations from the the rounds that hit the guy you were on
camera where the actual assassination took place.
If this is the kid that they actually, if they have the line
of evidence that that runs it to there, there's unlimited
evidence that's going to connect him.
And then he had the things on and people, people don't get rid
of. Like where would you get rid of
a fake ID? If you were smart, you would
take pieces of the gun and you'd throw it, you know, over the
couple, you know, dozens of miles between the the place
where the crime took place and where you ended up getting
caught in Pennsylvania. That's what you would do.
You'd ditch it into fields, you ditch it into lakes.
You wouldn't go straight into Central Park and drop it in the
lake where they had the the NYPD dive team looking for it.
There's ways to do these things, but you'd have to be smart
enough to realize what is and what is not going to get you
jammed up. And you probably have to have a
familiarity with law enforcement.
You know who also knows how to get away with crimes?
People who do crimes all the time.
It's way harder to find that. It's rare that somebody has got
enough information from watching something on TV to figure out
how actual crimes are actually solved.
Just saying. So most people have the same
awareness of, of let's say like the law and order crowd or the
SVU type crowd. It's just, it's just not the way
that real crimes are solved. They're they're solved because
people around you see you. It's because you showed your
face somewhere. If you look, he showed his face
like a week prior. The minute that you do an action
like that, everything that you've done in any bubble that
they can expand out to is going to be under scrutiny.
Most people just don't have the awareness how to do that.
And what was this cover story? What was this cover for action?
It doesn't seem like it was really there.
Just saying it doesn't have to always be a conspiracy.
Somebody said this online the other day and I think it's true.
It's a it's anonymous Twitter account that runs underneath the
name Publius. But the, the, the, the ability
to, to convince the American people that everything is a
conspiracy, kind of Alex Jones thing.
They're always trying to lie to you.
That is the Kansas City shuffle that has been taken, that is
undertaken and is being used in a weaponized fashion.
The information operation we talked the other day about sort
of like, you know, Assad's plane being downed and everybody ran
with it. Why?
Because we need that dopamine hit of thinking that we
discovered the thing that nobody else saw.
Everybody wants to be a detective.
Everybody wants to be Sherlock Holm.
Everybody wants to see those, those red strings in their mind
connecting the dots. I'm just going to tell you don't
have the facts. This is why I don't get that
deep in the weeds on a lot of this stuff.
Even the things that look kind of shady.
It's like I'm not in a position to know that and neither are
you. So don't worry about it.
Let's just figure out the things that we can actually deal with.
Let's figure out the narratives that we can actually debunk
because we know these people are lying.
That's all. It's hard.
It's hard because like, we're constantly being lied to.
In any case, I'll read a little bit of this.
He he was sitting at a table with a laptop and a backpack.
He was wearing a brown medical mask, a brown beanie.
Sorry. He was wearing a blue medical
mask, a, a, a blue beanie, a dark jacket.
And then he's sitting there eating and, and somebody
apparently looked over and said, doesn't that guy look like the
shooter from New York, one of the regulars in the McDonald's?
You're wondering like, oh, well, this guy like hates corporate
stuff. And he's like this, you know,
kind of clean living fanatic, like what's he doing in a
McDonald's? People go to things that are
familiar and they also go to places that they think nobody
would find them. The problem with places like
McDonald's is that they are frequented by people who pay
attention to the news, who have nothing else going on.
They're sitting there on a, on a, you know, on a, on a Tuesday
morning and they're going, that guy looks familiar.
I've been watching the news. I'm sitting here scrolling on my
phone on Twitter, and it's everywhere.
And sure enough, maybe I'll ask somebody about it.
Look, people get caught because of dumb mistakes all the time.
That's regular. It's standard.
It's the way of the world. OK?
The one thing that is interesting, because we've been
talking about assassinations, particularly of this guy,
remember that there was this thing that happened in this
country, we had a couple of assassination attempts on the
guy who's about to be the president.
And so with very little fanfare and actually deep in the weeds,
I found this on CB s s website today.
There's a House task force, which of course had both
Republicans and Democrats on it. And they have just released
their final report on the Trump assassination attempts.
So the guy you're seeing on the screen is, is Jason Crow.
He's Democrat. I think he's out of Colorado, if
that sounds right to me, to double check.
Again, they're talking about the situation with Matthew Crooks.
They're talking about the situation that happened in Mar a
Lago, the golf course and all that nonsense.
It's 180 pages. Yet another reason why members
of Congress are more than happy to spend all their time doing
things. And what do they do?
They do things they're not actually really that good at per
SE. For the most part.
They hire like former FBI agents.
If you guys don't know people that didn't work, the kind of
crimes that we're talking about, they generally don't hire like
local or retired state police officers.
I don't know why they just don't.
They hire people that are from former federal law enforcement
backgrounds that don't necessarily work these types of
cases. In any case, it was made-up of
seven Republican, 6 Democrats, looked into all these sort of
assassination conspiracies, went out there and tried to find what
is the singular moment that allowed this kid, Thomas Crooks,
Thomas Matthew Crooks, close enough to take a potshot at the
the future president of the United States.
And you're going to be shocked to find out.
And the answer is essentially a cultural failure. the US Secret
Service has the exact same problem that we've been talking
about from the beginning. They didn't unearth some big
conspiracy, not for lack of wanting to, although they didn't
have some people that probably should have been on there,
right? They didn't have former Seals.
They didn't have guys who had a background as snipers or even
people that had a background and serious investigations.
You had a bunch of congressmen that just kind of showed up to
get their name on the report. But the end of the day, I don't
think they're wrong. I think there is a failure in
federal law enforcement and in federal protective service,
which is that they think that they're going to win.
They think because they've never been tested, they haven't been
tried. You don't need something more
complicated than that. And what they said is that
there's an this, this, this built in sensation that if you
bring something to light, then you will pay for it.
If you call out your agency, whether you're an FBI agent,
whether you're someone for the US Marshall Service as a as a
deputy Marshall, if you are somebody at the ATF, if you work
for the DEA, you bring that forward and you are going to eat
the consequences. The problem is not what your
agency is doing is that you recognize that your agency has
flaws. That rings pretty true to me and
it actually hits me pretty close to home because that has been my
personal experience and that has been the experience of the
suspendables. God forbid you stand in front of
the class and say you are all wrong.
What you are doing is a mistake. You are not following your
constitutional oath, You are assuming things that should not
be assumed, and you are putting our mission in jeopardy.
The minute you do that, you are the enemy.
You are the problem. I'm going to give you guys some
more examples of that soon, but nothing is more.
Maybe ironic in this exact moment when we are getting that
report saying that the culture is the failure it, it reminds me
of the Durham report, which I always go back to.
You remember Durham report comes out and everybody was looking
for all these indictments. What it said was something that
was so obvious to those of us who has worked inside the FBI
and what was wrong. What it said was, is that no
policy, no procedure and no federal law would correct the
problem with the FBI. It is a culture problem.
It is a it is if you do not hire the right men and women to do
the job, then you will have failure.
They will fail to do the right thing.
Given that moment, my speech to anyone coming into Quantico, if
I was ever given the opportunity to do so, would go something to
the effect of one day someone is going to ask you to violate your
oath to the Constitution out of loyalty to this institution.
And if you take this job, you better be in the position to say
I will honor my oath to the Constitution first.
It is your first responsibility. It is your first job, it is the
only one, and you may lose your job over it.
If you are not prepared to lose your job in order to take this
job, then you do not deserve this job.
Period. That has been the message that
the suspendables came up with. What is really funny, ironic and
disgusting is that Eric Swalwell, who seems to be a very
detestable kind of Weasley character, a guy who is a sort
of a test balloon for a lot of Democrat ideas.
Can we float these things out there and see if they catch
wind? Why?
Because he has a lot of notoriety, because there's a lot
of skeletons in that man's closet.
And for all of the court of like the people talking about, oh, he
slept with a Chinese spy and the Fang Fang thing, he really
wasn't in a position to know very much.
He was being, let's say he was being cultivated, I think, as an
asset, but I don't think that he was actually the asset that
everyone thinks he was. But there's probably some
compliment on him from that time.
Assuming that they had any shame, assuming that they had
any scruples, assuming that the Democrats actually held anyone
to the standard that we would hold ourselves to.
And that assumption would be false.
By the way, right here's Eric Swalwell encouraging FBI agents,
the line prosecutors of the DOJ, to disobey any orders that they
believed to be unlawful. It's a little late for that, my
friend. It's a little late for that
because we already know they did.
And we know they did because I called them to the carpet on
this. I called Spencer Evans, who was
the deputy assistant director of the human resource department of
the FBI. He is now the assistant director
of human resources. He is on the list of people that
needs to be addressed for his COVID tyranny.
And what I said was there's no reason for you to enforce
something that will be sorted out in the courts and will go in
our favor. And he chose to do the wrong
thing anyway, even though there was plenty of reasons to hide
behind it and just say, why don't we just let the courts
sort this out? And they did, By the way, the
5th Circuit put a nationwide injunction on Biden's vaccine
mandate. So we already know that members
of the FBI and certainly members of the DOJ are willing to push
forward against and and and institute unlawful, illegal
orders. So isn't it interesting that
suddenly when it's now valuable to the Democrat Party, they're
going to have scruples and standards?
I've got multiple examples of this.
So allow me to prove the case. But we'll start off with this
Eric Swalwell clip. He was on MSNBC with, I think,
Chris Hayes talking about this. Enjoy.
Hypocrisy at its finest. I worked across from Cash Patel
on the House Intel Committee and, and he was a loyalist to
Devin Nunez and did everything to be a Wrecking Ball there.
And he blindly followed the orders of Nunez and essentially
Trump. And he'll do the same at the
FBI. But to the agents at the FBI and
the DOJ prosecutors, I say this, I was a prosecutor once, You
know, I had an oath to upkeep to the Constitution and to the
court. And you're not helpless.
You do not have to follow illegal orders.
And the American people, while they want to see the cost of
their goods and groceries come down, they do not want us to
look. Like Russia or China.
And so it's going to depend on the men and women at the FBI and
the DOJ to stand tall and to show the courage that, you know,
really LED them to join the ranks of those forces.
And I still have trust that they will be a firewall as well.
I work a firewall. You say You notice the one thing
he didn't say in that particular little diatribe there?
He said he was a loyalist. He said he'll be a Wrecking
Ball. What he didn't say is that the
conclusions that he came to were false.
Being a Wrecking Ball and a loyalist have nothing to do with
the accuracy of the thing that you discover.
I was a Wrecking Ball to my own case occasionally.
In fact, that's the thing that I would encourage FBI agents to
do. Turn around, look skeptically at
everything that you were asked to do and everything that you
were in trying to prove and try to disprove it.
It will make your case stronger. And if you do disprove it, you
should be proud, you should be happy.
Nothing wrong with that. But that evidence of resistance
or the the inclination to resist, we already know that the
FBI agents out there are willing to break the law.
We've seen it. And they're certainly willing to
violate long standing traditions of staying out of the the 1st
Amendment. That's where your oath belongs.
I make the argument here all the time, but I'll make it again.
If you sign up for government service, particularly in the
enforcement end, if you are a state or a federal law
enforcement officer, if you are sworn to uphold the
Constitution, you are not trying to uphold the Article 1 powers
of the legislature or the Article 2 powers of the
executive. And make sure that those things
play out according to the way that our founding fathers wrote
them. That's not your job.
Your job is to make sure that you and your agency and your
ability to project federal or state power on the people abides
by the Bill of Rights, the leash that the inhibition that the
government is supposed to experience and not come after
you. It's very critical that that's
where your oath lies. They're not there.
Look at this. This is a really interesting
story. This is coming from a website
that I hadn't heard before. It's a sub stack, essentially.
This is called Spy Talk and it seems like it reprints over on
Substack. You can be a paid subscriber,
blah blah blah. All right, so the story is this
FBI intimidating visits to Discord leak story.
FBI agents told a former Army officer to delete his months old
spy talk story. So again from this blog that he
posted over on LinkedIn because it then became something that
they were aware of. There's a lot of former FBI
agents on LinkedIn. If you're not aware of, there's
a lot of them out there that will go and cry to their old
masters and, and, and, you know, try to serve what they think is
the public good. So what we're seeing here is a
secret. It's a picture of a document
marked Secret RELIDO that's released to, It's a release to
sort of control secret. The S is for secret.
So that is this is a theoretically a secret document
analysis. It's now been exposed all over
the place. We are showing it because it's
part of this story and because we have the right to publish
things that have been exposed if it's in the public interest.
It's months old. It goes back to April this year.
OK Paul Kobaugh, a 66 year old former United States Army
information warfare expert. I don't know what that means, if
he was in fact an expert or not, but that's what they're claiming
here. Spent much of his retirement
years writing books about political warfare, posting
articles by others that he has and follows on LinkedIn this
week. This is actually coming up on
actually that's two years old, that story.
So this is actually a year old story that was just brought to
our attention. So bear with me.
I'm just showing you an example. This week the FBI took notice of
those articles posted back in April.
Agents from the Bureau San Antonio office, which is the one
closest to me, visited the veteran at his home on Wednesday
and asked him to delete articles from the so-called Discord
leaks. A massive trove of highly
classified and highly classified is probably secret is not highly
classified in my world, but whatever highly classified
documents that a low level Air Force National Guard enlisted
guy has been charged with stealing and posting on social
media. The story goes on to say that
essentially the agents went and knocked on the door.
They tried to do a what's called a knock and talk.
When they went to do the knock and talk, he didn't answer
'cause he and his wife were busy.
They left a business card. There's a picture of the
business card and the and the officer.
Sorry, the agent wrote. Please contact me, press 0, ask
for an operator to connect, direct you to me directly.
He spends his time in a Home Office where he's the vice
president of a group called Narrative Strategies, AUS based
think tank and a consultancy that specialize in non kinetic
aspects of conflict. Which is to say that he's still
involved in that world and he also operates this sort of spy
talk, occasional writing articles and working on books.
The agent said specifically, we need you to take it down.
When they met him in person, they said they believed I may
have posted something that had classified markings on it.
That's totally irrelevant, by the way.
Case law is not new in this case.
We'll talk about United States versus New York Times in just a
minute. The agent told him I'd like to
examine your phone for any other replicas of classified
documents. Stupidly, this man actually
agreed to that. You guys know the rule.
ABCD, if the FBI shows up at your your house, you should
always be closing the door. ABCD, you don't share this kind
of stuff, but that's what they did.
And when he asked about it, they said, oh, this is part of the FB
is counterintelligence project maybe.
So maybe they need to go out there and try to mitigate risk.
But you can't ask a journalist to take some things down.
And This is why you can't. New York Times Co, NYT Co versus
the United States. You guys can find this.
It'll be on our it'll be over on the local page.
This is a 19711971 decision. Southern District of New York
attempting to stop to have an injunction against the printing
of the Pentagon Papers. Do you understand I just said
this, 1971 that predates every single FBI agent that happens
that happens to be on duty right now.
This got decided long before they became FBI agents, long
before. And it's taught at the FBI
Academy. Ask me how I know.
This addresses the problem what's called prior restraint.
This is a big deal right now because judges are trying to
engage in prior restraint on a regular basis.
They're trying to get people to self censor, saying what you're
doing might be getting you on the wrong side of the law.
No, this is what the case says, that you have a right to publish
it if it's in the public's interest, including things that
are classified, as long as you were not the one who was asking
for that to be to happen. If you were not incentivizing,
which is, by the way, the claim against Julian Assange.
If you're not incentivizing people to go out and access
these documents on your behalf if someone happens to bring you
something, you could publish stolen and hacked and classified
documents if they're in the public interest.
And the only way way that you wouldn't be able to do it are
some very narrow parameters which are pretty narrowly
defined. And the New York Times won this
case. This is Pulitzer Prize type
stuff. When you actually expose it, the
government tries to hide between Section 973 of the Espionage
Act. This was the stuff that was
cited at the time. But I'm putting the decision up
here for you and I encourage you to go make yourself familiar
with New York Times, the United States.
It's not new case law, but it is important.
It means that you have the right to publish things.
I'm going to read you just from the opinion section here, if
that's OK. The Supreme Court heard
arguments from the executive branch, the Times, the
Washington Post, the Justice Department on July the 25th and
26th of 1971, along with the issue of how the Times obtained
the documents, which was being investigated by a federal grand
jury elsewhere. The real issue for the court was
whether or not there was a sufficient justification for
prior restraint, which would be a suspension of the newspapers
First Amendment rights to freedom of the press.
You know, the thing that you swear allegiance to as an FBI
agent. The 1st Amendment states that no
federal law can be made abridging the freedom of the
press, but there are a few landmark cases in the 20th
century that did establish precedents creating exceptions
to that rule when they were a clear and present danger.
Essentially, you have to put someone's life in danger.
There has to be a grave and probable danger and that was not
met here and the government has to meet the burden of showing
justification for the imposition of such a restraint and failed
to do so. 6 Justices concurred with the opinion, and the
Supreme Court upheld the right of the newspapers to publish the
material. There are multiple concurring,
including by Hugo Black folks. The fact of the matter is, is
that this should have never come in front of anybody because you
do not have the right as a federal government employee to
try to stop the press from publishing things.
Period, end of story. The exceptions are very, very
small. It doesn't stop these people.
It doesn't stop them even a little bit.
It gets me hot about this stuff. I really do.
It gets pissed. It pisses me off.
Let's talk about something. Speaking of like, if I'm running
this hot right now, probably some of you guys are too.
You've got a bunch of stuff going on.
You've got a a busy schedule. So we're going to pivot over,
say thanks to our friends over at the Wellness company, and
then we're going to get deeper into some of the sort of like, I
don't know what it is. It's like gossipy type material
at this point. All right, folks, All right, so
the holidays are here. That means that sick season
means that you might be running a little bit quick and running
tired. Sinus infection, strep throat,
upper respiratory hacking, coughing.
Everyone is traveling. They're all passing around.
I get it. Let's do a little bit more of
the kind of the weird Wednesday thing that's kind of like the
heavy meat of it. We're going to get into
something a little bit lighter. Kind of, let's talk about this
sort of, I don't know, tabloid type story.
This is being covered by the the New York Post.
So that's a really good place for it.
Other people picked it up as well.
Donald Trump has tapped Kimberly Gilfoy to serve as the United
States ambassador to Greece after they split up.
They being Don Junior and Kimberly Gilfoy and people are
like, that's the art of the deal.
What's darker than that? They had a, an engagement.
I actually didn't know if they were engaged or married.
I never really did. But I've never actually seen
them together when I was even at Mar a Lago.
I think they've been kind of separated for quite a while.
It is what it is. The New York Times, the New York
Post, the Washington Post, all these people are running these
stories. Why?
Because they're really excited to see anything that is kind of
like personal. And so the idea is, is that, you
know, they broke up. So he's sending her overseas.
No, I'm sure this was a good move for her.
It's she's a nice lady. I've met her in person a few
times. I've also dealt with her on her
podcast. She's always been very nice to
us. So congratulations to Miss
Gilfoy. I think that's probably an
interesting post. I hope it is.
I hope that the two of them get on and they're always shutting
and then they're showing John Junior who's running around with
somebody new. And now at this point, people
will always be fascinated with sort of the Trump kids.
It is not quite the same, for whatever it's worth.
It's just not the same when it's on the left because there's all
kinds of political like, how about running around with like
child prostitutes? That seems like a real problem.
You don't see that kind of stuff running front page when we're
talking about Hunter Biden. But because we're talking about
Don Junior, he's got the same name as the future president.
They got to go in and get after him and share all this kind of
stuff. The other thing that they've
been trying to do is dirty up all the cabinet pits.
You guys have been aware of this.
We've seen some really good movements on the Hill where
folks have been meeting with guys like Cash.
They've been meeting with Pete Hegseth.
They've been meeting with Tulsi Gabbard, take your pick, and
kind of moving the needle. We had this initial outburst
against one thing where everyone kind of acts outraged, then they
kind of forget about it. So we're seeing this.
This is a kind of a good piece from ABC saying that the
pressure that the MAGA types, that's you, most of you, and
even the people that are just in the conservative camp.
We just want to see Donald Trump get the people that he he asked
for. Not all of them are our favorite
choices. That's going to be objectively
true. We just want to see him get the
cabinet that he wants so he can do the things that he said he
would do, whatever that looks like.
Because Donald Trump gets a chance to pick his cabinet.
That's what we thought. ABC News reporting that MAGA
pressure on senators over the Trump cabinet picks are showing
early signs of paying off. We've seen pictures all over the
place, Senators like Joni Ernst, Lindsey Graham, people that have
basically highlighted themselves as potential problems in these
confirmation hearings. They all seem to be stepping in
line. They're all getting the things
that they need. They're getting the the light
touch. They're getting an opportunity
for a photo op. I'm seeing positive things all
over Twitter. Going to going to resist my
general urge to just crap on people.
I will crap on Mitch McConnell in a second here because he's
1000 years old. But everybody else seems to be
kind of stepping up. They said their first piece and
then they get to have the meeting and then they get to
negotiate whatever it is that they're looking for, whatever
they're trying to have happen. And that's all kind of going the
right way. That's not bad.
There are people that don't know how to play the game, or at
least they forgot that the Internet exists.
I guess generally what happens is you come out really strong on
something and then someone comes in and you just say, aha, yes,
yes, I've had my my mind changed because I had this very
important meeting where some negotiation happens.
That's politics. There's some sort of compromise.
What happens when you say things that you can't walk away from?
What happens when you say the things that will never be unsaid
and then the people that you work with do them?
Adam Schiff might be the best example.
We we showed like our number one hateable, who might be Eric
swalwell #2 hateable's got to be Adam Schiff.
He might be the number one. He's weak, he's frail, he's
effeminate. He says things that he's
absolutely shameless in. And we continue to see this
stuff. So I'm going to play you kind of
a super clip of Democrats saying the one thing that they wanted,
they wanted to see Donald Trump held accountable.
Now, the fact that he's out here doing his things, we all don't
care. We don't care if he sends
Kimberly Gilfoy to Greece. We don't care if he appoints one
of his, his son's father in law's into a foreign post.
We don't care. It doesn't matter.
None of that matters because they lost their credibility over
things like this. This is a compilation of
Democrats and Democrat activists and mouthpiece in the media
trying to basically tell you we need to indict Donald Trump
because we have to defend the democracy.
And then suddenly they've got and blanket pardons are only for
the corrupt. So let's just hear it from their
own mouth. Have you ever heard of somebody?
Getting a preemptive. Pardon.
Who was innocent of all crime? Who's just an innocent person?
Have you ever heard of that? Just somebody getting a blanket
pardon and they're an innocent person.
But no, it's the president's own family.
It's people that have been covering up for the president in
addition to his own family. Is there an innocent explanation
for someone to seek pre emptive pardons for family members?
Would you do that if you knew you were innocent and just
worried about outside forces? The the answer to that is going
to be no. If you haven't done anything
wrong, you sit there and go. What do you need a pre emptive
pardon for this? This clip actually goes on
further. So I cut away from it.
I'm going to play you a shorter version of it showing just just
Adam Schiff encouraging the indictment of it shows you a
time stamp. So it's 2018, the first clip,
2019 and then 2024. This is put out by the maze and
the account over on X, which is a really good compilation clip.
You'll see them kind of go across.
But if you're listening and you're trying to figure out
like, what's the what's the catch here?
The catch is he does it in 2018, in 2019.
And then after Donald Trump is coming back in, he has a new
position, you know, a new perspective.
None of these people, they're all unburdened by what has been,
I guess. I guess that's the upside to it.
We're going to get a little bit more into sort of the resistance
that is being cultivated right now in a second.
But enjoy this little sort of mash up of just, can you just
eat your own words? By the way, he looks exactly the
same in the last six years. That guy has a lot of either
makeup or Botox or he just lives a pampered indoor lifestyle.
On the day Donald Trump leaves office, the Justice Department
may indict him very strongly in favor of indicting the president
when he is out of office, I don't think.
The incoming president should be threatening his political
opponents with jail time. That's not the kind of talk we
should hear from the president in a democracy.
We have a Republic. We keep telling you it's not a
democracy, so we don't really care.
Isn't it interesting though? They always find their standards
whenever it's going to benefit them, and they always ignore
them when it's going to go and attack them.
So there's that. Speaking of standards, remember,
your job is to do exactly what the federal government wants you
to do unless the federal government is controlled by the
other party, and then you better resist, Resist over and over
again. Democratic governors are quietly
preparing extensive plans to counter, AKA resist Donald
Trump. This is coming from CNN, the
most trusted source in propaganda, diplomatic,
depressed as they've been in public, a small group of
Democratic governors are deep into the behind the scenes
preparations and deliberations. Sounds like a insurgency.
It sounds kind of like sedition. They want to balance the
politics of pushing back on what they expect from Donald Trump on
their next turn in the White House.
They've been pouring over Project 2025, Project 25, so
that they can go after Donald Trump's blueprint and see if
they can stop it. They're going to be studying
what their executive powers allow, what the state powers
that allow, and they've been making really, really good
decisions, as you guys know. They want to make sure that life
is just better for you, the people.
They're going to try to fix the problems that were created under
the BITE administration. One of those was inflation.
You guys might remember we had kind of an inflation issue.
I also think that they don't understand anything about how
the economy works. They continue to prove this.
Here's Kathy Hochul solving the problem of inflation in the
state of New York, and she is doing so by giving away the
money that the government collected back to you.
She's going to buy votes and buy taxpayers with their own money.
Tell me how this solves inflation.
Enjoy this one. This is pretty hard to watch by
the way. Think about how much money they
spent on the stupid press conference in the signs too.
Just just say it in my. Budget Next month they will send
you a check to buy your groceries for a month or
whatever you want to spend it on.
And if you're an individual earning up to $150,000 a year,
it's $300.00. What does that look like?
All right, how about that when we're individual?
Now, if you're filing jointly and you have a family, you need
a little more, right? Families are expensive.
How about this 500 dollars $500? 500 smackaroos.
How about this? You know what that vibe is?
Is it just that people in New York are not used to being
humans, that they just elect these automatons?
Do you remember when the, when, who was it?
It wasn't Bloomberg, it was the other guy.
He's he's, he's eating like French fries.
He's like, are you trying to tell me that if I go get this
shot, I get this delicious hamburger and these French
fries? I get to, I get to eat this like
mediocre ass food. Is that what you're trying to
tell me? Look at these, look at this,
this amazing check I'm going to send you for 500 smackeroos.
Your life is going to be your life's going to be so much
better. That's what's in our budget.
We're going to give you the money that we took from you, but
we spent all the time processing it and doing this, this fluff
job that we're doing on ourselves.
Gross. At least the priorities are
correct, right? Here's another good one of
priorities. So like I said, This is why
they're losing because they're spending time doing ridiculous,
stupid nonsense. How about this?
Democrats are calling for action on law enforcement selling
restricted weapons. And you're not going to you're
not going to believe this. But This is why I had to use the
story including weapons of war that have been sold illegally in
23 states, Puerto Rico and Washington, DC, based on a study
found by House Democrats. And in a letter that they wrote
to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and
Explosives, they said that they found dozens of law enforcement
officials accidentally or illegally selling firearms that
they're not allowed to sell. And it was led by Democrat
Robert Garcia of California, which is a communist state.
It was sent off to the ATF director, Steve Deidelbach, who
doesn't know anything about guns by his own admission.
It was co-authored and joined in this letter by Dan Goldman, who
is a big loser and doesn't need guns because he has people that
carry them for him on the screen.
What you're seeing right there is an FNFS 2000.
It is a hideously stupid looking plastic bull pup design 556 with
a very cheap Vortex little optic on the top of it.
It is a 1X magnification tube. Yeah, God forbid, by the way,
that's legal in anywhere that you can be in America except in
the communist areas. But that is a weapon of war.
It's not select fire. So it's really not.
And the thing that they said is that there has been some
reporting suggesting there may be serious systemic
vulnerabilities in the current machine gun sought off shotgun
and rifle regulations and enforcement mechanisms which
jeopardize public safety by enabling the proliferation of
dangerous weapons into the hands of international traffickers and
organized crime groups. They said breathlessly as they
held onto for the prairies. Tell it to Randy Weaver a holes.
They have been enforcing stupid laws on stupid things about not
weapons of war for since 1934. Short barreled shotguns, This is
the thing. Sawed off shotguns.
Do you guys really think that? Like that's the threat?
Do you know how big a shotgun is?
Even if you sawed off, it's going to be like 18 inches long.
How many people can conceal that?
One guy, One guy that I investigated in my history with
the FBI, he was 6 foot 7 or 6 foot eight.
He weighed £350. He looked like a professional
wrestler. He could have concealed a short
barreled rifle. That's about it and it's bull
put by the way, that thing has a 16 inch barrel that they're
showing on the screen, so they don't even know what the hell
they're talking about. It's incredible.
Anyway, Speaking of not knowing what the hell they're talking
about, it's got a little taste of some of the things.
There's been some reaction to the verdict that's gone on
because Daniel Penny was acquitted.
We cover that the other day. I just want to let you know the
ladies over on The View are unhappy.
And my favorite comedian, Whoopi Goldberg, who was in famous
movies like Karina Karina, she used to be funny.
She wasn't really that funny, was she?
Probably not. She was in Sister Act Sister Act
was good, had some great songs to it.
That was peak Whoopi Goldberg. That's where she should have
stayed. Anyway, now she's really upset
because a guy who just saw the judicial system work against all
expectation and odds was able to be acquitted by a New York jury
of doing a thing that he should have never been charged with.
And she's pissed that he went out and had a beer and walked
away. OK, suck it in, folks.
It's view time. Here we go.
There's been polarizing reaction to this verdict as well.
I don't know, I I don't know that seeing them celebrating in
a bar made me comfortable. You know.
I mean, you killed a guy, the man is dead.
And maybe you just, you take the celebration home.
You don't do it outside. But that's just me.
Don't listen to anything I say. How do we, how do we talk about
something that we're so ignorant of, we don't really know
anything about? While we're talking about it,
let's talk about self-defense. Let's talk about my friends over
at Shield Arms. You guys can go ahead and check
them out at shieldarms.com promo code.
Kyle, I've got some weapons that are being built over there right
now as we speak. I can't talk about it, but I
will show them to you soon. I imagine they may be here in
time for Christmas. shieldarms.com.
They are the maker of the magazines that I carry every
single day. Actually, I've got a next one
here. This is from a pistol caliber
carbine. Let me just pull this up on the
screen. Boom, look at this.
They're very well made. They make these, these extension
butt plates. If you want to get them for your
for your regular, you know, double stack Glock mags, you
want to get them for the the compact carry ones.
If you want to look into a high quality weapon for someone that
you love a shooter in your life, you will not find a a much nicer
arm for the money and you get 10% off by using my promo code
Kyle. Do check them out by all means
you'll enjoy it. You'll appreciate it.
The ladies on the view will cry very, very difficult.
If you want to carry a capable weapon system, the one thing you
can do is you can upgrade your trigger.
You can upgrade the ability to change magazines and you should
upgrade the capacity of said magazine.
You can do that over at Shield arms dot com promo code Kyle.
Let me pull them off the screen right now.
OK, OK. That vibe that Whoopi just had,
I'm very upset that they went and had a beer.
It reminded me of a scene from my favorite television program,
maybe my favorite television program ever, which was really,
really good inside baseball of how things work at the LAPD, at
least how it worked in the 70s. And they did a great show called
Bosch. Many of you have seen it.
The people who made it are kind of libs.
But this is one of those scenes. They're talking about having a
beer after after killing a man and men blow off steam
differently because violence and adrenaline and all the other
things and having names in the law enforcement world.
It's kind of a dark thing if you get involved in that.
And, and soldiers and Marines and sailors and airmen have the
same experience. They just have a different way
of dealing with trauma. And there is a trauma in taking
life. Let me show you a little scene
from Bosch. Then we're going to get into why
I think Daniel Penny is man of the year.
And I'm going to close with that.
And it's still got that Christmas thing, so do not
forget. All right, check this out.
Scene from Bosch from the courtroom in the first episode.
I'm not spoiling it anything, detective.
How many people have you killed? I don't know.
You don't know how many people you've killed.
How is that possible? I was in the military first Gulf
War re upped after 9-11. I did a tour in Afghanistan, you
saw. Combat I did.
Were you? In the Army, yes.
Infantry Special. Forces Special.
Forces. So one might say you're an
experienced, highly trained killer with a body count too
large to remember your honor. Objection Objection.
Miss Chandler, please save the ad hominem character attacks for
closing arguments where they belong.
Yes, your. Honor, I apologize.
What about as a police officer? How many people have you killed
in the line of duty? 5 S killing Mr. Flores was not a
unique experience for you. Objection.
Your Honor, withdrawn. Detective, that night after you
shot and killed Mr. Flores, what did you do?
Standard. Protocol.
I did an interview and a walkthrough at the scene with an
FID detective in my league Rep OK, So he talks about what he
does with the the LAPD investigators, which is to say
that he stays on scene. He gets interviewed by FID,
which he's going to explain in just a second that he goes
through with the Liebrec. So you actually have, you know,
a representative. By the way, you should have a
representative if you talk to the police, even if you are the
police. I'm just saying that's the same
thing that happened to Daniel Penny.
He remained on scene. He was questioned by the
officers. He didn't get legal counsel.
That was a big mistake and obviously resulted in a lot more
problems for him. But I'm glad that it worked out
in his favor and when it is all said and done and he's been
cleared, he went out and had a beer with his attorneys.
Carry on because this is this is where it's going to get
interesting. The K party back at Division.
I spoke to other FID detectives and they also took my statement
FI. D Force.
Investigation Division. He's in an.
LAPD tradition after the killing of a suspect to go out that
night or the next with other officers, have a drink or two.
I wouldn't. Call it a tradition, but it's
been. Known to happen.
Sometimes to blow off steam to blow.
Off Steam? Understandable.
All that adrenaline. Did a gathering of this kind
occur after you shot and killed Roberto Flores?
Yes. Do you recall the name of the
bar El? Compadre and were there.
Other officers there with you that night?
Yes. Does this kind of gathering have
a name within the department? It's called AK Party.
AK Party. And would you please tell us
what the K stands for? Kill.
You attended a kill party to celebrate the shooting of Mr.
Flores. It wasn't a.
Celebration, all right, And that's what it looks like, OK,
That's the kind of the vibe. That's the that's the thing that
Whoopi Goldberg is doing. If you watch the show, you
realize that it was a justifiable shoot.
The guy drew a weapon. Listen, same thing Jordan Neely,
he presented an imminent danger of death or serious physical
injury. It's very important.
Prior to that acquittal, he released this video and I want
to show it to you guys. There are two pieces of evidence
#1 is what he said before he was acquitted and #2 is what he said
after, because he just did an interview with Fox News.
And that's why he gets my man of the year and he ends up in the
honorary category of suspendables because I do think
the man said what men are supposed to do.
And it is so critical. Enjoy this real quick East
Village. From Manhattan, so I take the
subway multiple times a day. In this instance I was coming
from school. I got out of class around 2:15
and I took the I was at J Street.
Metro Tech took the Uptown F train at 2nd Ave.
A man came on, stumbled on, he was appeared to be on drugs.
The doors closed and he ripped his jacket off and violent and
threw it at the people sitting down to my left.
I was listening to music at the time and he was yelling so I
took my headphones out to hear what he was yelling.
And the three main threats that he repeated over and over was
I'm going to kill you. I'm prepared to go to jail for
life and I'm willing to die. That's it.
That's an imminent danger. When that someone looks like
they are unhinged, when they look like they are presenting
themselves as an imminent danger of death or serious physical
injury to another person or to yourself, then you can act under
the Constitution, The thing that law enforcement officers are
supposed to swear to the end. That's it.
That's just there's nothing more to it.
It should have never gone anywhere and it tells you how
gross it is. The one thing that I think is so
commendable because he's come out and done some press, which
he probably doesn't want to do based on listening to him, I
believe him. I think that he's been very
straightforward and he's mechanical in his delivery.
He reminds me of all the infantry types that I know when
things are talking, when they're talking about the thing that
they had to do, they have a black and white way of
explaining it. So here he is talking to Fox,
and the biggest piece of it is the reveal that he drops, saying
whether he would do this thing again, knowing the consequences,
I mean. I'm not a confrontational
person. I don't really extend myself and
I think this type of thing is very uncomfortable.
All this attention and limelight is I'm very uncomfortable and I
would prefer without it. I didn't want any type of
attention or praise or and I still don't the guilt I would
have felt if someone did get hurt, if if he did do what he
was threatening to do, would never be able to live with
myself. And I'll, I'll take a million
court appearances and people calling me names and people
hating me just to keep one of those people from getting hurt
or killed. Time magazine Man of the Year.
Yes, they are in fact considering Donald Trump and
Kamala Harris and a couple of others, but this is the man of
the year in my book. They would never have the balls
to actually name it. That is an honorable instinct
say that I would take on all of this again just to make sure I
know that women and children and other men that are not as strong
as me are not going to face down death or serious physical injury
because someone refused to act. That is the nature of what the
suspendables have always stood for.
It's the nature of what men in Western society stood for.
It's the reason why young men step into the gap and fight
things like World War One and World War 2.
Whether they are righteous or not in the cause, the instinct
to do so is righteous to the to protect your fellow man, to step
up and know that there is something that is demanded of
you because you're a person of strength.
We hear this about every single superhero story we've ever heard
of. They all come from the same
place. Great power, great
responsibility. That is an American virtue and
value. How sad that people on the left
wanted to smear this man. It just tells you a lot about
the kind of people that they are.
It tells you a lot about the way that they operate.
They are not serious people. They are fake.
They are fraudulent. They masquerade with fake
virtue. I've got this fun little moment.
Let me just see if I can throw. Let's see if I can work this
together. First of all, Mitch McConnell
fell. He's got a bruise on his face.
He's got a thing on his lip. So some of these people that are
on our side supposedly are not people that we want there.
It's not virtuous to stay there when you're in your 80s.
Get the hell out. I wanted to throw that on there
only because I wanted you guys to see not looking good.
He's got a wrist brace on. And we, you know, we haven't
heard a lot about the glitch in a while, but it's out there.
On top of that, some really good things have happened.
We've seen that the DOJ, which went after guys like Mark How,
who also stood up and did the thing you'd expect protected his
own child, but would have protected other children as
well. Strong men being strong is not a
crime. And luckily, we're seeing that
the Department of Justice is going to get Harmeet Dillon as
the, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, the
AAG under the civil rights division, which the, the, the
leftist media is going to call the storied civil rights
division. The weaponized is more accurate
right now. She's going to fight DEI,
supposedly. No, I think she's going to
actually just return it to doing the job it's supposed to do,
protecting civil liberties. Harmey Dillon is a champ.
I've spoken to her personally when I had my problems.
She gave me a, a consultation on the phone, which is a nice thing
to do for someone who's got the kind of national prestige she
does. She's a, she's absolutely a
great choice. And so we've had some good
choices. We've had some OK choices.
We've had some and we've had some out of the park choices.
And this is one of the out of the park choices.
So if you didn't know that Harmeet Dhillon has been tapped
to be an AAG at Justice. She's going to step, step away
from her firm. It's great for her firm and guys
like Ron Coleman who work at her firm too in New York.
It's awesome. It's awesome for America to see
this kind of stuff. OK, let me let me pivot to the
kind of the difference between that because they're going to
attack everybody. This is why they lost.
They can't figure it out. I'm going to give you a
difference between the type of people that surrounded Donald
Trump and the type of people that surrounded Kamala Harris.
Harris was surrounded by actors and fakes, not Daniel Penny
types, not like real human beings, but frauds.
So here is a little version of Mindy and Kamala, 2 Indian
ladies. Remember, there's some Indian
people in the orbit of Donald Trump that have been popping up.
Here's some fake fakeness. I'm going to play you just a
little bit of that and then we're going to get into the
anecdote to it, which my wife shared with me yesterday.
And. Today we are cooking, but we
have a very special guest. Very special.
Senator Kamala Harris. Hi, guys.
Wait. So here's what I want to know,
OK. Is it?
Respectful to call. I should be calling you Senator
Harris, right? No, you should not.
That's not on my birth certificate.
OK. Kamala, yes, please.
OK, because. The Indian and me.
I feel like my parents, my dad will watch this.
Just don't call me. Auntie, OK.
I won't. That's so genuine.
They totally didn't just, like, play that out.
That's what acting looks like. It's like drunk mom wine acting
nastiness. Gross.
Here is a really genuine reaction, by the way, something
kind of funny when someone makes fun of you or is like lampooning
your personality and you can take it.
That's amazing. Vivek Ramaswamy, one of the
reasons why he was so successful in the campaign trail from a guy
with a name like Ramaswamy, which most Americans would be
like, who the hell is this to? Most of you couldn't tell
whether it was Vivek or Vivek. I'm told it's Vivek.
It rhymes with cake. That's what I was told.
So it's like, cool, got it. His people were awesome.
He's kind of awesome. I've dealt with him face to
face, you know, man on man. I like him a lot.
I like that he's personable. And this is a real human
reaction of someone lampooning you, which you can't get set up
for. How do you not love it?
The people that are in Trump's orbit are just a different kind
of breed, it seems so far. So that's what I liked.
Even the people that I don't know, I'm giving them the
benefit of the doubt because of stuff like this.
There's a video of you out there.
I didn't realize you have an accent and I want to show you
this. I just want to Give your opinion
on that. Let's see it.
No, mom, I'm going to be first. But but Trump is so he's so gay
ahead, gay ahead, man. But I tell them, I went to
Harvard, I went to here. They look at me like, OK, that's
really funny. Hey, Vivek.
Hey. Hey, man.
How are you? Yeah.
Promise, Mommy. Good to meet you.
Yeah.
What brings you to this part of town?
Where are you from? I'm, like, down the street,
actually. Oh, that's fantastic.
So. So.
So what do you do? I'm a student.
I want to play basketball. It's fantastic.
So when you have, you know, you can be a cornerback, you can be
a wide receiver. It doesn't really matter.
The great thing about a meritocracy is if you're really
good, you're going to make millions of dollars.
It's really good. Oh, my gosh.
Yeah. So this guy might have a future
career. Is that not you?
I mean, I wish I was in my 20s. That guy's pretty good.
Yeah. So maybe when when they're
looking for people to mock me on SNL, he'd be a pretty good.
I think he'd be pretty good. I'm going to tell you, if you
did a video with him and you brought him here, you'll get
like 30 million views. 100%. Why?
Because it's genuine. And yes, and if you can say
that, you know that you're going to be mocked on SNL already and
then like you're sort of down with that as opposed to being
the star of SNL right before you lose the presidential election.
It's a big difference. All right, that's what we got
for the day. I will not leave you without a
sort of cleanse to your palate. I promised you something that
will make your Christmas merry and bright.
I don't think I'm overselling this.
This is the best Christmas cover song maybe ever made.
For all of you out here that remember the 90s, that's most of
my audience. I'm fairly confident you
remember this. This is going to tickle your
heartstrings. It'll be in your head for the
rest of the day. I will apologize in advance.
No, I'm not sorry. I'm just kidding.
You're going to enjoy this. I will put it over on locals as
well, and you can follow the account which is called, I think
it's called I Ruined It. I'll tell you at the end of it
what the name of this this little group is.
This is Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer.
The red nosed reindeer had a very shining nose and if you
ever saw it, you wouldn't even say it glows.
I love the other reindeer, used to laugh and call him names.
They never let Rudolf Dawn in any reindeer games in one foggy
Christmas Eve. Oh, Santa, came to say, can you
take me higher to the square? Snowman sea?
Can you take me higher? Show the list where slave bells
rain. All right, it's by a it's by an
account over on Instagram called There, I ruined it.
You can also follow them over on XI, encourage you to do so.
They got my follow. That thing is amazing.
Like who doesn't love Creed? If you don't, I think you hate
America. There's something wrong with
you. That's our weird Wednesday for
the day. I hope that was something
special. I kind of want the whole album
done that way. It's epic folks, don't eat your
coffee grounds. You're going to be coming at it
with the energy that I did. If you're listening over on
Apple on Spotify, on iHeartRadio and the others, make sure that
you have subscribed that you're being notified and that you
share this episode with a friend.
If each of you share it with one friend will double the audience
overnight, and I'd really appreciate if you guys did.
I think we're having a lot of fun over here.
And if you haven't joined the live chat, you're missing out on
the best live chat on Rumble and on X.
You should jump in. You should just put them on the
screen for a second. There they are in all their
glory. This just scrolls past the whole
time that I'm talking. So I do appreciate all of you,
all that are out there. God bless you, have a wonderful
beautiful day. I look forward to seeing you
again tomorrow and go out there and sing some Take Me Higher,
Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer for the rest of the day, just
brighten everybody's Christmas. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth
Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.