Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower in
American Patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this programme has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Well, hello my friends, and
welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Guess that should hit the record on the backup here.
Ladies and gentlemen, thanks so much for joining us.
Today is Monday. It's January the 8th and I think
we had a fairly consequential weekend because we had the
anniversary of January the 6th. Now I commemorated said thing by
flying out to New York, which is not my favourite thing to do.
I am not a big fan of going to New York in general.
I don't like being behind enemy lines, but I did so because we
had a fundraiser for the Stand in the Gap Foundation and it
benefited folks like Sarah Maccabees family who has a
husband in gaol in prison. And so I wanted to make sure
that we were there to commemorate it and to try to
help them out. I'm gonna try to boost this out.
I just heard a little bit of you guys soon.
I try to follow you guys up. So there we go, we got a little
bit more sound. What I want to tell you guys is
that I think January 6th, which should be something that we kind
of can all agree on, was one thing.
I actually did a show on this while back.
I was thinking about this while I'm sitting in the shower and
what I realised is that I've kind of gotten away from this.
The idea that the January 6th day the the moments of that day
were were an American Rorschach test that still holds so true,
it still holds true today. The American Rorschach test.
If you're not familiar with Rorschach test, it's the ink
blot. You fold it in half.
You open it up and then a psychologist asks you, hey tell
me what you see. And what you see is supposed to
tell us something about who you are and the way that you see
things and the way that you see the the events of January 6th
with all the information that are that are out there.
There's all kinds of stuff going backwards.
I watch people like Ryan Riley talking about the Sedition
Hunters and how people were being really awful and saying
they wanted to get in there and hang congressman.
Then you see the other side of the coin and you see people
showing peaceful protesters that are just out there in the world
doing their thing. All of this stuff.
It should tell us that there's a mixture of things that happened
on January 6th. It's a mixed bag.
It's not all one thing and not all the others.
And so oftentimes the Rorschach tests, the game is like, oh, do
you see like an elephant in the clouds or do you see, you know,
a man holding an umbrella? If you can see both of those,
then you can probably see something closer to true.
And right now, the political right is running 1 narrative in
some ways. The political left is running
another that is basically antithetical to that.
And the truth is somewhere in the middle, which is why I
really appreciated being on this trip this weekend.
I got to see Steve Baker in person.
That's fantastic. And Steve's got some really neat
stuff. We talked kind of offline where
the prying eyes of government technology could not be involved
in it, and I think you guys are gonna see some things coming
out. They've debunked even more of
the January 6th narrative. This is very important, I think,
for those families that are involved in it.
But more importantly, it's important for America because
the Democrats have decided they're going to run on this.
January 6th was the worst day in American history narrative, and
I've said the word narrative about 8 times since we got
started. We're going to start with that
right after we say thanks to a sponsor, and I want to do that
real quickly. Let's do 4 patriots.
Our friends over at 4 Patriots have a series of emergency
preparedness deals available for you.
If you go to four the number 4 Patriots with an S on theend.com
fourpatriots.com/kyle or just use the promo code Kyle and you
can see some of the things on the screen right now, what
you'll see is a 72 hour food pack.
This is like basically the cheapest hedge against disaster
that you could have. The cheapest hedge is 30 bucks,
72 hours worth of calories. Buy yourself a few minutes, a
few days of thinking time in in an adjuster.
Basically the the worst thing you could do is be without hope
and a plan and having something like this is going to be able to
change that for you. Like it's a $30 purchase.
Most of you guys are probably doing $30 purchases if you have
to go and buy 2 cups of coffee these days.
We're going to talk about that a little bit later on, but check
out for the number four patriots.com/kyle or for
patriots.com using promo code Kyle and see what's out there
that you need to prepare. Fill up the holes in your life
that you're not being caught unawares, that you're not
prepared. And if you're watching us on
rumble.com/kyle Serafin again, you can find that it's pretty
easy. I'm always using the promo code
Kyle and the username Kyle Serafin.
I don't get too creative about it, but if you're there, give us
a thumbs up on rumble. If you're sitting there watching
and we do appreciate it, let's get started right away.
I mentioned the word narrative a dozen times already now, so here
it is. Let's talk about narrative.
This is the definition, the dictionary definition.
Narrative. It's a noun, plural narratives.
A spoken or written account of connected events.
A story. OK, that doesn't sound nearly as
probable when we get into what it can also be.
Some of the secondary definitions is the way that we
tend to use it right now, because January 6 is as much a
narrative, a sort of a concentrated oral history, which
has all the flaws and failings of human beings.
You tell the story. There are thousands of
individual personal stories. There may be hundreds of
thousands of people who saw it, and most of those people,
upwards of 90%, maybe upwards of 95% of those people saw a
peaceful protest asking for a redress of grievances as they
are constitutionally allowed. And a small number of people
under 5000. It might be less than that.
It's probably less than 3000. We're involved in something that
was kinetic and physically violent.
Whether they started or not is not really relevant.
That's not really my world. There are people like Steve
Baker who are out there telling you he said that the first blood
was drawn by protesters. Now, whether those were
instigated protesters or not is another animal, but the
protesters were the first ones to get violent.
And then what happened with the police in different areas all
happened differently. And all these different
sections, everybody who is in part of their own little oral
history, who has their own version of the narrative, they
all saw something different. But what we're seeing from the
political left, most of which were not there on that day,
where they were, you know, behind closed doors and running
off. This is the definition that's
most relevant to you on the screen, a representation of a
particular situation or process, in such a way as to reflect or
to conform to an overarching set of aims or values to conform to
an overarching set of aims or values.
And that I think is exactly what we're talking about when we're
looking at messaging and the way that the way that the Democratic
Party representatives, the folks that are running for office
right now, particularly the president, but it goes all the
way down to even some of the lower elected officials even in
state houses. What they are doing is pushing
narrative. It's not true.
It's not necessarily false. It's an overarching set of
principles or aims or values. They are looking to forward an
agenda and that agenda doesn't have to talk about everything.
One of the things that Steve Baker and I discussed when we
talked about Ryan Riley off the line, you know, just kind of
sitting at a table in a lobby, was that Ryan Riley is very good
at reporting things that are true.
What he doesn't do is the mitigating factors that also
existed. He doesn't want to say the
context for which things have been shared.
So one of his tweets that I saw and I, and I'm, I'm going to
delay, I'm going to be on this, the entire show, back and forth,
this whole January 6th thing because it is the, the plank
that the Democratic Party wants to hang out for you.
So we might as well talk about it in detail.
One of the things that Ryan Riley said is that, look, they
said we're looking for you, you paedophiles, and we're gonna
hang whoever is involved in that, we're gonna find you.
But what you don't hear is him captioning the rest of the
audio, which says we're not here to hurt you, we're just
Americans who lost our jobs. We're here to peacefully
petition for a redress of grievances, stating the words
that are actually in the Constitution, in the Bill of
Rights. And so it's an incomplete, it's
true, but incomplete. If you were a fact checker, you
would say it lacks context. That's the that's the political
left's favourite thing to do. Lacks context, So that seems
problematic. If we're a country that is
interested in truth and in quote unquote democracy or a
democratic process, even if we're a constitutional Republic,
if we're interested in these things, should we not be trying
to get closer to accurate statements?
Should we not be trying to get closer to things that are in
fact true? I would.
I would propose that we should. That's the right way to do it.
I'm going to show something to you that kind of changed my
perspective on something. It was a good read readjustment
because we have a lot of time away from it.
I refer to this as a 2021 January 2021 vibe with 2024
sobriety. OK, when you break these Bullet
points out the reason why there were hundreds of thousands of
people on the National Mall on January 6/20/21 and the reason
why this country had such a feeling of unrest.
The reason why I felt like it was always going to be a trap,
which I'm fairly confident it was.
We just saw Tucker. Representative Higgins said it
impractically that he believes it was a trap.
Now he has access to more information than you and I do.
I hope that he's correct. I hope that he has receipts,
that he has evidence to back it up.
The way that he spoke sounds like he did, and he comes from a
law enforcement background, so that actually feels pretty good.
I'm looking forward to seeing it.
Unfortunately for most of us, investigations take time.
They cannot be done quickly if they are done correctly.
And so for people to call it a insurrection and to start
pushing out the narrative right away, it always made me think it
was false. And that should make you think
it was false, too. If someone tells you something
just happened and we've got all the facts, look, there's a
reason why Dan Bongino, who is a former investigator who has an
investigative mindset, who was a police officer and a federal
agent, understands the concept of the Bongino rule is not
specifically a Dan Bongino concept.
It's like, OK, something happened.
Let's figure out what it was. Let's figure out what that thing
is. That Bongino rule, which he
quotes all the time. And I absolutely love it.
I've texted him when things happen, I say, hey, Bongino rule
in effect, And he always kind of smirks about it.
We wait, we look into things. Some investigations could be
done very quickly, certain things, like there was a
shooting at an apartment complex.
Who was it? Who got hurt?
Who got, you know, who survived, who saw it?
That's the end of that. It's not very complicated.
When you start putting hundreds of thousands of people stories
together, it's going to inevitably take time.
And the left doesn't want that right now.
The political left, they want to just stick on the same drum that
they've been beating since the first few days after the events
that happened on January 6, which was a riot, which was also
a peaceful protest, which were people who got out of hand and
also people who showed up and did what they're allowed to do.
That's the American Rorschach test.
That's the way that if you see it as one or the other, it's
problematic. It's very problematic because
you're not taking into account how much was there and how long
it takes to actually assess all these things.
Here's what changed my my mind a little bit about the way I've
been looking at it, and this comes from Charlie Kirk, who you
guys may know from Turning Point USA.
Going to throw some of the highlights on the screen here.
I'm going to read almost the entire tweet and not to
plagiarise it. I wanted to give 100% credit, so
I even put a picture of him up in here.
I want to hit a lot of the bullet points that he mentioned
because they're very relevant. I think they're very relevant to
the way that we look at this. We have to remember when we deal
with law enforcement shootings, our use of force, when we deal
with any of these types of investigations on the way things
happen, what we do is we assess whether the person at that time
was reasonable for what somebody at that time would know.
It's relevant what the law enforcement officer got in the
911 call when they're dispatched.
It's relevant what they knew about the subject before they
showed up on scene. It's relevant that somebody
claimed that there was a firearm involved or there wasn't.
The things like this are all part of it because they
reasonable officer in the same circumstances should be expected
to act reasonably and in the same way.
I think this is a great reframe, Charlie Kirk says.
Imagine being in President Trump's shoes for a moment on
January 6th. When you get word that the
capital is being swarmed you consider that you were a near
lock to be a two term president in February of 2020 you
delivered one of the best economies seen for three years
after before China unleashed a lab grown virus virus rather on
the planet. And you warn the states
repeatedly of mass mail in ballots but the Democrats forced
them to go through. These are all true things.
We know that was true. We know it was problematic at
the time you watched this election officials came to COVID
fear Mary and relaxed election integrity measures which
violated election laws and state constitutions.
This happened in multiple when we see something that says, Oh,
well, I actually had a discussion with a Reuters
reporter who was a little bit advocacy.
He was, he was doing advocacy. He was asking questions.
Maybe you could call them challenging questions.
But if you ask me, he was trying to push his his narrative, which
is fine. And when he said things like,
well, you know, every single court case that that that was
brought against the election integrity, they all failed.
That's why Trump wasn't able to challenge them.
And I said, well, you have to be honest about this if you're
gonna be serious. And there's two things that
happen. Number one, they were found not
to have standing. You couldn't prove that election
fraud happened. So therefore, your civil case
showed you did not have standing.
That's not the same thing, if we're being honest about it,
which I'd like people at Reuters to be.
And the second thing is, is that they were procedural errors,
which is to say the legal team behind Trump is not perfect and
did a bunch of things that failed.
People brought cases that were not either represented the right
way. The SOP's were not followed for
that local court because they were familiar with them.
And when those things happened, there were failures.
Courses. I mean, court cases get kicked
out for procedural errors all the time, so that's also
relevant. But that doesn't mean that there
was not something going on, that there was not something amiss
during those days. I think Charlie Kirk says it.
He says you witnessed 51, quote, unquote, intelligence officials.
These are former former intelligence officials,
intelligence community, senior level folks colluding with big
tech to censor a bombshell story about a laptop that directly
implicated Joe Biden. That is still being fought right
now another quote you you you campaigned tirelessly.
This is also really relevant. This is this is what people saw
versus what people felt they saw Donald Trump crisscrossing the
country doing sold out arenas historic enthusiasm.
I think that's probably accurate.
There are people that were everywhere turning out for
Donald Trump. And then you had who Joe Biden
hiding in a basement which he covers in a second you're up
your opponent. This is also relevance why I
threw it on the screen. Your opponent is a two time
failed candidate disqualified for plagiarism once who barely
survived the primary. He was getting destroyed by
people like Tulsi Gabbard. He was getting destroyed by
people like what's our other favourite guy over there?
Oht Yeah Kamala Harris guy you know accused of racism and a
bunch of other things cause he's an old dude who basically barely
was there and he looked like an empty vessel and then he doesn't
leave the basement during the primary season.
Here's the things that bothered me the most because I just
wanted. I just wanted to look at facts
as Donald Trump wins the and I I didn't Fact Check this number so
if this is inaccurate you guys double check.
But it says he won 74,222,958 votes which was more than any
presidential candidate has ever won 74,222,000 votes and
exceeded every single thing that ever happened.
But somehow you learned that in this election, for the first
time in 120 years, you had the highest percentage of turnout
and the most people have voted by a record 20 million.
Not even close. That is a huge amount of people
to have turned out the largest turnout in U.S.
History breaking previous records by 20 million votes,
twice the number of people that live in the city of New York
turned out to vote in this country.
That's pretty amazing. 140 million people voted and made it
the highest turn out in 120 years.
And yet somehow you lose by 42,000 votes in three states
that had significant election regular regularities, Dropbox
scandals, controversies, and despite winning practically
every barrel bellwether state and county.
One of the things that I actually mentioned to the to the
guys at Reuters, I said, look, here's a real problem I have
when you say that Biden won by the margin that he did, which
was pretty incredible with the he had the most number of votes
ever. He was the theoretically the
most popular U.S. President to be ever elected.
But we already had that person. First it was Barack Obama, and
after that it became Donald Trump.
That was with the numbers. And what we saw was is that Joe
Biden supposedly beat both of those men from his basement.
Despite getting the lowest number of county wins, he won
less counties than Barack Obama did and got more votes overall.
That looks really weird. And so when he said, do you
think the election was stolen? I said I don't know, but I have
an instinct that it didn't go the way that it was supposed to.
And I also have an instinct the FBI didn't investigate it, which
they did not. And the statement that he made,
you know, he basically was trying to defend it.
I said I don't know if it was stolen or not.
I definitively, I don't have the proof and neither do you.
That's what I said. And neither do you folks.
We all have an inkling of what what, what did or did not
happen. But what I also know is, is that
people who were conservative and they used a proxy for
conservatives just knowing how many children you had.
There was a gentleman who retired from the FBI.
He had been on the Election fraud task Force in Washington
field office for over 10 years. He had something north of eight
children, which is a stand in a proxy for someone who's a
religious person. That's almost always the case.
And if you're religious, you must be conservative.
That's the thinking of the FBI. And he was removed by Timothy
Tebow, who was the assistant special agent in charge, who was
eventually walked out for his political standings and the
things that he did to violate to violate FBI policies.
And yet, did we have another investigation turned over?
No, it did not happen. And they turned over power.
And then for everyone who wants to claim that Donald Trump's aim
was to stay in the White House, I know that it wasn't him
because he left the White House. I can look at history and decide
that and so can you. So that's very troubling to me.
Again, when you hear Biden say things like we truth, we we
choose truth over facts. The facts are is that they're
very troubling. The truth is, whatever they've
been able to get people to repeat over and over and over
again, let me do a sponsor real quick.
I want to say thanks to my friends over at Patriot Coolers
who actually allow us to continue doing this sort of
thing. Where did my huh, it went away.
I can see it on one side, but it looks like the IT doesn't pop
over onto the screen here. So let me just say I've got it
sitting on my desk right now. This is the 16 ounce.
It is my preferred home beverage carrier, a double walled
stainless steel with stars on the bottom.
You can actually hear it. You've got the you've got our
distressed American flag from the O'boyle family.
Sweatshop Outstanding products. Go to patriotcoolers.com.
Use the promo code Kyle. It will get you 10% off.
If you buy two of them or so, you're going to get free
shipping. Definitely do that.
patriotcoolers.com. The promo code is Kyle and you
can follow them on social media if you like.
They've got great stuff As far as the the the media type
product images and stuff go to there.
It's at Patriot coolers that are on True Social and they're also
on Truth. They're also on X and if you
were to tag me and them you'll probably see your your pictures
boosted. Some of you guys have sent me
stuff and I've tagged them on it because I like seeing it.
I really do. Every time I see one of their
products I go like man that's a really good looking.
That's a good looking bug. That's a good looking cooler.
They're hard sided. Coolers are far more attractive
to me than something like a Yeti.
It maybe it's just the square design and and the masculine
kind of sit, but it also is more modular so it's able to sit in
places and they have really thoughtful things on them like
you can actually swap out the those little rubber stoppers
that will actually keep the thing locked down.
They've got holes in them so you can actually secure them and
lock things up. Definitely worth your time.
Patriot. coolers.com Use promo code Kyle Alright, let's let's I
just talked about this at the breakfast table.
This might blow your minds. It won't.
I I should say that again. It will not blow your mind, but
it might surprise you to learn that Barack Obama.
The formerly most popular president before Donald Trump's
election. And then whatever happened in
2020, Barack Obama just won his fifth Emmy.
He's got 5 Emmys. Like when I said that to my
wife, she was like, do these men just need validation so badly
that they just should have God? And I said they don't need God,
they have themselves. This seems to be the case.
Here it is. Barack Obama Wins Creative Arts
Emmy for Outstanding Narrator on the I guess the documentary
Working What We Do All Day. This is coming from CNN.
I had no idea that he'd won five Emmys, and it reminded me that
Cuomo won an Emmy for doing COVID briefs that were based on
fantasy that were based on false statements that were not true.
Isn't that incredible? Is it not incredible to think
that Obama had previously won another one for an Outstanding
narration in 20? Was it 2022 for the National
Parks documentary they did on Netflix?
Now he's got this one, a four part miniseries.
It's like, why? Why do these people get awarded
it? It just tells you in so many
ways. Like when I was a kid, there
were two people that won Emmys. It was like really good news
broadcasters and then also like the garbage from soap operas who
were, you know, melodramatic actors and actresses.
You know, that's kind of, that's just kind of what it is.
And now you have a former president who's out there in the
political sphere in many ways is still doing a lot of directing
and and leading of the Democrat Party.
It's not like he stepped away quietly and didn't do anything.
I just remembered in the chat, Yeah, he got a Nobel.
He got a Nobel Prize as well. These people are this guy's
award winning. For doing what?
For just showing up that that bothers me in so many ways.
Only because that we're supposed to have a meritocracy in this
country. In theory, you would be looking
at a country that is serious when they say the best of us get
promoted on, not like the most charismatic here, but the most
accomplished. And in many ways, I think Barack
Obama accomplished one of the worst things that's ever been
done. He accomplished something that I
had talked about with the Reuters guy and the thing that
he accomplished was is that he brought racism back to America
as a forefront topic after we had basically moved on from it.
We've been over it. We said racism.
We're done with that. We don't care what you look
like. We care what you do.
We care what you say. Most of the things that I
remember watching when I was a kid, and many of you will as
well, hanging with Mr. Cooper, Fresh Prince of Belair, sister
sister Moisha. You know how about die Hard Like
it didn't matter. The the lead characters often
were black but had nothing to do with being black.
They were family people. They were relatable because they
were in high school. You know, all these people that
we remember growing up with, I don't remember them being
specifically, like hired because they were black.
They were just hired because they were interesting and they
told a good story. And the story was Fresh Prince
of Bel Air was not about a black family, necessarily.
It was actually about rich versus poor, which is a very
American sort of story and narrative.
You know, hanging with Mr. Cooper was about a cool teacher.
It didn't matter that he happened to have darker skin.
That was irrelevant. Barack Obama changed that in
many ways. And now he's getting awards for
his narrations about work, something that doesn't seem like
he actually probably knows much about, at least the work that
most people who are in this country have to do, where their
hands end up calloused. I'm in a strange scenario in my
life for the first time, like, I have less calluses on my hands
than I'm than I'm ever used to. I used to do a lot of shovel
work. I've done manual labour.
I've lifted a bunch of trays and served a bunch of food.
I've, you know, cooked. I've also said at a desk and
done this. And I was with FBI when I was
doing that. At least I tried to do the most
outdoor job possible. It's very weird to me that
people who are so elitist have decided to tell us what work is
and get an Emmy for it. I mean, is that not it kind of.
It kind of breaks it down for you in a way that you may not
have otherwise experienced. Bizarre, totally bizarre to me
and beyond beyond comprehension that it's his 5th, but I just
wanted you to know that his award winning performances are
performances. They're not necessarily anything
of substance. I don't think anybody would say,
oh, you were on television. Cuomo is a great example of
this. So anyway, I wanted to bring
that up. Let's let's get into something
deeper here, because there's a lot of things that have been
pushed around. This is the most interesting
pushback, someone that many of us will not have a lot of
respect for. Do not much think very highly of
this guy, Bill Barr. He was the the last attorney
general under Trump's four years and he says here from just the
news, this is John Solomon's outfit.
He says Bill Barr stated the Justice Department went too far
in prosecuting Jay six capital riot cases.
Some people, such as those who assaulted police officers and
broke into the capital, should be prosecuted for J6.
And then obviously others probably should not.
Well, that actually is exactly the position that I've been
holding. It took him this long to say it.
That was the case right away. And I had that conversation with
the Reuters reporter on Saturday night on January 6th.
He says they went too far and charging more than 1200 people
that it'd be interesting to note if they were done with at 1200
was the end of it. It is not.
It's the beginning. And I'm going to play you a clip
from Matthew Graves that says that he says, like everything
the the left does, They did, I think, go too far.
In the same way that they pushed the racial narrative.
It was like they got to the top of the hill, they were
victorious and then they just kept going, he said.
I think they cast their net far too broadly and they've been
hounding people that really just walked into the doors in the
capital and hung around. I think they took it too far.
We don't need to get too deep into this story to know that one
Bill Barr is in fact correct, and many of us should think the
same way. And more importantly, and most
importantly perhaps, this is the standard when you are a leftist,
when you are a progressive, it isn't about getting to a
Victoria's point. For them, the journey is the
reward and the reward is always pushing forward.
So what they did on racial equality in this country or some
of the other things, they literally marched all the way up
to the top of the hill. They got to the precipice up
here. They're at the crux of the
situation now. People are no longer looking at
race. They can accept people for their
value as human beings. We have the Martin Luther King
junior, the content of the character being evaluated, your
skill set and what you bring to America.
Amazing. I mean it was a great time, late
90s, early 2000s was really incredible even with the 9/11
and everything else. People in this country looked
around and and and I think that we reached maybe the the, the
high point for almost all of the American values that we all hold
dear. And then.
And then they kept pushing. And then it's like, not only do
you have to allow gay people to be gay in public, but we also
have to make a thing that is marriage be something that they
deal with. We all have to internalise and
call something that is not. We have to call it what they
call it. We have to use the same term.
Why wouldn't? Why was civil union a problem?
Because they wanted to be able to make it on par with.
Then they need you to celebrate it because you celebrate
marriage in other places. Why don't you celebrate these
and so on? And the same thing about race
which to the what it's actually gotten a backlash.
There's a guy named Adam Coleman that we've had him on the show
and I like him very much and I think he's very sensible And and
I said the saddest thing for me is watching otherwise capable
people get hired and the assumption is the default
assumption is that they're like one of these diversity equity
inclusion type hires that they're a diversity higher
simply because their skin colour because what they've done is
they've cheapened it for people who have darker skin who are
otherwise listed. You know, previously we used to
call them minorities, but these people that are diversity
candidates, they're undermined by the system even if they're
highly competent, even if they would otherwise rise to the top.
Now the good news is that we're as Americans on the on the
political right, that are relatively conservative and want
to judge the individual based on their individual abilities.
We're pretty much give them the. It's like, OK, well, I wasn't
sure what to think about you when I saw you, which is a
terrible thing. That's actually prejudice and
the left created that. But you know, if you're
confident, then I'll be like, oh, you're confident the end,
That's good. But what a, what a sad thing
that the default position is actually moved to a very
negative. And the default position for the
people on the political left is that if you were involved in
January 6th, then you are a terrorist.
And that's too far and it's wrong and we shouldn't have to
deal with that. But we do.
That's currently where we sit. Alright, I want to cover the
speech. I want to cover a couple little
videos here because we've got a bunch of them.
And let's bring out the first one.
Number one, how about Matthew Graves in his own words?
I'll play this for you. You will love it.
It will be your favourite. This guy is amazing.
He is the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.
And I'm going to get a little bit of nuanced information for
you all about why it's so relevant the way that he has it.
He has ultimate authority on what sort of prosecutions
happen. And he's also, you know, in the
same little space as the AG. Let's throw this thing out for
you. Let's get a little taste of his
own words of saying what they did and what they didn't do.
I'm gonna break it down for you. Here we go.
And what happened inside of the building?
An important note when it comes to our prosecutions about those
who remained outside the building, we have used our
prosecutorial discretion to primarily focus on those who
entered the building are those who engaged in violent or
corrupt conduct on capital grounds.
But if a person knowingly entered the restricted area
without authorization, they had already committed a federal
crime. Make no mistake, thousands of
people occupied an area that they were not authorised to be
present in, in the first place. Alright, so the sound dropped on
my end, but I've heard them say this in a number of times and
it's pretty it's probably just as good that I don't have to get
sick to my stomach listening to it.
One of the things that he just said is that anybody that was in
the area had already violated the federal law, even if it
wasn't a marked area. Is that not Trump problematic?
And they just celebrated the number of arrests they've done.
And he said they primarily focused on one thing over the
other. Primarily, they were interested
in people who were violent and who went in and did property
destruction. Primarily, but not exactly, not
exclusively. Do you know the other thing that
they been doing? They've been slowly moving the
needle, going after smaller journalists until they're going
to be able to go after bigger journalists who covered the
story in a way that was not favourable to DOJ.
Here's the big deal. Here's where it really gets
strange with Matthew Graves. Matthew Graves had the
opportunity to take these cases one of two ways.
When you are in the District of DC, which many of you guys know,
I spent five years working there.
And so I got a pretty good idea of what it looks like.
You can bring cases in what's called Superior Court.
That's essentially like going to local court.
That is the court handle DC in the same way a state court
would, OK, And they have the same United States attorneys or
at least the same office will take the information and they
will bring it to the lower court, Superior Court and they
will charge it. And I've had court cases thrown
out there because they were low level and they didn't matter.
It was a gun charge on a felon who had felonies going back into
the 1980s and they didn't push it forward.
Why do they not do it? Because there's rapists and
murderers and carjackers and people that are beating out of
their girlfriends and stealing cars from, I don't know,
whatever, Congress people, FBI agents.
And so when that's the case, you know, they prioritise, It's
like, OK, violent crime is more important.
You broke a window at this building.
Don't do that. Here's a $2000 fine.
Like, go away or please, please plea out to a misdemeanour and
get out of my courtroom. Don't waste my time.
But instead what he does, he took him to the District Court.
The District Court is the federal courts that we think
about in other places. When you go in most states, you
have either a state court or you have the federal courts.
Federal courts in DC are called district courts.
And in the District of DC, they charged all of the J Sixers.
In that way, they elevated misdemeanours, charged them with
felonies, and pushed them into a way that was not currently done
ever novel. It was a novel way to come after
this prosecution. They also set up K squads that
specifically only handle January 6th stuff.
Steve Friend is sort of the expert on this.
This is his policy wonk sort of side.
But he went after this very deeply and I saw it from working
there. They changed the protocols that
should bother people. When you change the protocols
for an event that was not a change.
Now I'm 100% behind people who broke windows and fought cops
facing some consequences. Totally.
That's a reasonable take. But what's also reasonable is I
was there in 2020 when BLM protesters and members of Antifa
decided to do things like put President Trump in the bunker
and burn a church that had been there and was known as the
church. The president's right across
street from the White House. When they went on the White
House lawn and they had to step up and put all this different
information there, they had to put all these anti scale fences
and they had to clean all the graffiti off because these
people lost their damn minds. Did they break things?
Yes. Did they destroy federal
property? Yes.
Were they treated the same way? No, and those are almost apples
to apples, or they are oranges to oranges.
At the very least, they are oranges to Mandarin oranges.
They are still in the same citrus family if you were to
compare these things. So to say that they are not the
same is ridiculous. And I say that as someone who
was there and saw people investigating and I knew people
that got hurt. I knew people that went to
January 6th and and you know, worked on Ashley Babbitt and I
also know people that got hit in the head with bricks outside of
the White House. So either we're fair or we're
not. And when you're not fair, what
you get is exactly what it looked like where people saw a
fundamental difference and a a changing of the playbook.
And it's not right now. Why would you change the
playbook? Maybe because this is the wife
of Matthew Graves. This is the woman who is married
to him and this is what he listens to all day.
You know, I almost feel bad for the guy, except he made this
choice himself. Let me give you a little video.
This is not concurrent, but this is Fatima Grapes, his his
spouse. No.
What is that sake? It's our reproductive freedom
that is at stake. It is our civil rights that are
stake. It is our health care access
that is upstate. And we are not going back to the
days where women were considered a preexisting condition.
We know Judge Kavanaugh's record.
We know Trump's promises. We know the list that he picked
from which was tainted from the beginning.
And if we all join together, we will win this fight.
So yeah, some of you saw that the Bernie Sanders sitting in
the back there, so Barney Sanders, obviously pretty far
left candidate or character. But you also heard that woman
and she shrieking. I dropped the decibel level on
that clip, by the way, by about 30%.
And she's still like she's screaming into a microphone,
doesn't understand how microphones work.
Kim Wexler is correct in the chat.
But yeah, that Lady and her hot take on what's going on, that
they're gonna make out women a preexisting condition again or
some other kind of insanity. That's the woman that he lives
with. So that's a political activist
house. That's a house where people
think things that are not common in America.
That's extremism and we now have someone married to an extremist
who is running these cases. And it is not standard.
It's not standard across the country.
It's not the way that people in the United States overwhelmingly
think, but she's pretty wild and she I'm sure she pushes the
envelope. Like, imagine living with that.
You'd have to just comply in some ways.
You couldn't just like handle that.
And all that has led to sort of where we're at right now with
this speech that happened. He was gonna do it on January
6th, but he did it on January 5th cause it was really cold and
he's really old and he didn't want to have to deal with that.
But here's Joe Biden talking about what he thinks is
important in this country and it is not normal.
And we got a couple articles. We're going to talk about it.
So here we go. Here's Joe Biden in his own
words. One desperate act available to
him? Violence of January the 6th.
Since that day, more than 1200 people have been charged with
assault on the capital. Nearly 900 of them have been
convicted or pled guilty Collectively.
To date, they have been sentenced to more than 840 years
in prison. What's Trump done?
Instead of calling on criminals, he's called these extra these
Insurrectionist Patriots. They're patriots, and he
promised to pardon them if he returns to office.
Trump said that there was a lot of love on January the 6th.
The rest of the nation, including law enforcement, saw a
lot of hate and violence. One Capitol Police officer
called it a mediaeval battle. That same officer called while
rape was called vile, racist names, He said he was more
afraid. Yeah, I'm over here shaking my
head about it. How about this?
840 years of total prison time have now been accomplished by
this DOJ. And he gets an applause break.
And they cheered. They cheered for 840 years of
prison for people, many of whom had no violence accusations.
They were literally marching around doing something that
seems pretty intense. That seems like a pretty
polarised thing. Remember when he was saying that
unity was on the ballot and decency was on the ballot?
In fairness, and I don't remember whatever it is that he
does, it's really hard to watch this man.
First of all, I don't know what sort of drugs they pump him up
with, but he's really pissed when they do.
I don't know what that cocktail is, but it doesn't seem to make
him any nicer. And people have said that he
wasn't very nice to begin with. So you're getting a lot of that
old man screaming at the sky vibe, but on top of it, they
keep yelling things about democracy.
They keep yelling things about, you know, the evils that went on
on that day. And you've got this guy
celebrating prison terms for his political opponents.
Is that normal? Is that what happens?
It's just not that's not the America that I've ever lived in.
I want to show you guys something that some of the
coverage of this the. But yeah, let's let's go to some
coverage from Steve Friend actually because he wrote a
tweet about this that I think is totally relevant.
Look at this. You want to act like this is not
partisan, that this is not motivated by politics and
imagery and narrative. The FBI arrested three January 6
subjects on Saturday, two days ago on Saturday.
We're talking about the federal government.
Me just read the the FBI Tampa field office.
They they put out this. It says the FBI executed federal
arrest warrants early this morning at a ranch in Groveland,
FL, which is in Lake County. The subjects were taken into
custody. They were January 6th fugitive.
There's a guy named Jonathan Pollock.
There's a woman named Olivia Pollock and then Joseph Daniel
Hutchinson the third. The defendants are scheduled to
appear today in federal court in Ocala, FL.
No further details about their capture are going to be shared.
Steve Friend points out very specifically, this is Saturday.
I don't think he got as deep as it could be done.
What happened is, and I guarantee, I will absolutely
guarantee, that they did not get the criminal complaint that
morning or the day before. At the end of the day, before it
was too late, they got that criminal complaint days earlier,
most likely. That's what we've seen for every
single J6 subject, so I will say almost conclusively that that
will be the case. When it comes out, I will be
absolutely shocked to find out if they got it sworn out because
they got breaking information on Saturday morning and had to get
on Saturday. The reason that they arrested
these people on Saturday, I'm willing to stake my reputation
on this one, is because they needed three fugitives who had
been gone for three years on January 6th itself.
They needed to make a statement. The FBI is not done with this.
They are still going after people and they are going to get
the arrests on the anniversary of this day.
That is not an accident. The federal government does not
do arrest operations on Saturday pretty much ever, with the
outside exception of some very exigent circumstances.
I give the example. I wrote one criminal complaint
when I was in Albuquerque, Albuquerque division out of Las
Cruces. I wrote one and the reason was,
is that we had a guy who said he was gonna kill federal judges.
He was let out of gaol. And then he said he was gonna
kill judges. So we went and got him.
We went and locked him up. We wrote a criminal complaint.
The judge sworn off on it. I had to swear that we actually
arrested him before we had everything done based on
probable cause. We heard all the things.
Then we had the complaints worn out and got the warrant even
after the fact. That's all actually on the up
and up. We had probable cause to believe
he was involved in it. Then we swore it out in front of
a judge. And then we went later on and
they did a grand jury. That's how it works.
It's very straightforward. That was the only time.
The exigent circumstances is we had a dude who was previously in
gaol who had made recorded phone calls stating he was going to
kill specific federal judges. And then when they let him out
of gaol that day, I went and got him and my people went and got
him rather some my my teammates. I wrote up the complaint.
That's pretty straightforward. You think that was going on for
these people? Were they a threat hanging out
there in the middle of nowhere in Florida trying to just like
be on the lamb and not be arrested for January 6th stuff?
No. And do they need to be arrested
on Saturday? Did not.
They did it very specifically. How about this one right now
Cause I saved this from the other day.
This popped up earlier. This is a CBS reporter whatever
anchor type talking about the pipe bomber.
Have we just memory hold that thing?
Are we not interested in that? Shouldn't every single resource
be going after this? I'm going to play it for you.
Just it's fun to listening to people who are at least making
an interesting point that we haven't solved any of these
problems. Today.
The Department of Justice marking the three year time span
since January 6th talked about its investigation.
It is broad. It is unprecedented and it has
had many, many successes. But there's this matter still.
The pipe bomb. The pipe bombs placed three
years ago tomorrow in neighbourhoods outside the
Republican National Committee and Democratic National
Committee. Three years later they have not
found the person, even though they have offered a half,
$1,000,000 reward for information leading to the
suspects capture. And even though the Department
of Justice again today said those pipe bombs quote, could
have seriously injured or killed innocent bystanders, and they
say in so many words, the suspect may still be a danger,
they're still inviting tips, and three years later they're still
not there. In congressional testimony late
in 2023, Republican member of Congress, speaking to the former
Capitol Police chief, said it is just simply surprising with all
the intelligence, with all the cameras, with all the security
and police around Capitol Hill, that they haven't found their
person. And today, when speaking to
reporters three years later, the Department of Justice just
didn't entertain questions about the pipe bombs.
And even though they did lengthy public interviews one year after
January 6th about the search for the Pipe bomber, they haven't
done them since. They've rejected her request to
do them last year and didn't take those questions today.
Which leaves open the possibility that after an
unprecedented success in the largest investigation in U.S.
history, the Department of Justice leaves itself vulnerable
to criticisms. Yeah, buts about this, alright.
The pipe Bomber situation is going to evolve in the next
couple days, but certainly in the next couple of weeks and you
guys are going to know more things than anybody has known.
It is coming out. Steve Baker has already got it.
He's already got the tapes. He's already seen things about
it. We talked about it over this
weekend. It's inconvenient, but it is
going to do things to the government's narrative, which I
keep saying. If you guys are just joining us
here on rumble.com/kyle Serafin, we appreciate you being with us.
Give us a thumbs up and like in there if you're in the live
chat. But more importantly, what I
want you to know is that what you may have missed earlier is
we're talking about narrative, and the narrative is going to
get debunked about the Pipe bomber, about what it was and
was not. It's coming.
It really is. And some of these things are
very problematic. There's things that we know,
that we have known from the beginning that these were not
real devices. There's some proof of that now.
I will let Steve be the guy who kind of shares it with you.
But I knew this right away because people who were in the
render safe programme for the FBI bomb squad told us these
were not real devices. They were inert.
They were bomb like. I've said it multiple times.
Bomb like had some sort of things that might trigger a dog.
They looked like training devices.
Many people who know what a training ID would look like.
That's what a training ID looks like.
And the materials in there supposedly were tied to Homeland
Security. I don't have substantiation on
that. That's been reported to us, to
me, to Steve, friend, to Garrett, etcetera.
And oh, there's more. It's coming out and it's going
to debunk a lot of the things that are thought.
It doesn't mean that somebody who did this shouldn't be
caught. Why is that not the most
important resources put out there?
That should be where you focused all of your resources.
Forget the people. That broke a window.
And that's very problematic for me.
I'm going to give you a last little piece of Biden messaging.
There's only so much we can handle, but it's worth knowing
they refer to democracy, which they continue to do.
Democracy is the tyranny of the majority, which we talk about
here very often. If you were talking about
democracy, you're not talking about the American Republic.
And yet they think it is now a sacred cause.
Hear this out. OK, continue on with this.
The narrative continues. Only I think what you saw today
was the president kick off the year with the reminder of the
very clear stakes of this election, telling the American
people what this election is going to be about.
And that's whether or not democracy will remain the sacred
cause of the United States of America.
Alright, let's do the speech. You guys got it.
That's in. That's nauseating as in as it
is. But let's talk about the speech
itself. Let's talk about the way that it
was covered. Let's go first to Politico.
We might as well Politico covered down on this particular
speech saying he blasts Trump as despicable.
A danger to democracy. You guys heard it.
It's our sacred cause, Democracy according to them.
They invoke January 6th. The president provided the
strongest takedown to date of his predecessor.
I'm gonna show you another piece.
Don't worry, we'll do a balance on this.
I've got something from The Hill.
Written by Jonathan Turley, President Biden on Friday
declared that defending democracy from extremist forces
that fueled the January 6th insurrection 3 years ago was the
Naked Nation sacred cause and one that would be at the heart
of his reelection bid. Imagine focusing your entire
political career on a few hours on a day before you were elected
or before you were inaugurated in all right, Pretty incredible.
And amusingly, Joe Biden talks about the Insurrection Act and
the fact that he was going to try to put troops out there and
do all these wild things. The most crazy thing about this
speech to me is, is that Donald Trump did not put troops in the
streets, but Joe Biden, or at least the people who were about
to do the inauguration of Joe Biden did.
Because I was there on January 20th and 21st and so on the the
weeks after January 6 when they locked down Washington DC, they
erected anti scale fencing. They put in 10,000 National
Guardsmen who should have probably been there on January
6th to at least control things and make things go functional so
that everybody could handle their their First Amendment
liberties in a way that was appropriate and didn't infringe
on anyone else's liberties. But instead of doing that, what
they did was they let something happen.
It appears because there's a number of instances where the
intelligence failures you just heard about on the CBS clip,
those failures led to an ability to exercise a very disgusting
and tyrannical take, he says. In what resembles an unofficial
campaign kickoff, Biden took square aim at his likely general
opponent, general election opponent Donald Trump,
denouncing his efforts to remain in power in 2020.
Unleashing the strongest language yet against the once
and possibly future foe, Biden tore into his predecessor,
deeming Trump despicable and a danger to the nation he once
LED. Whether democracy is America's
sacred cause is still the most urgent question of our time.
You guys hear where it's coming from.
You heard it in a spokesperson. That was a comms director that
was speaking previously. The choice is clear.
Donald Trump's campaign is about him, not America, not you.
Donald Trump's campaign is obsessed with the past and not
the future. He's willing to sacrifice our
democracy to put himself in power.
He then went on to talk about the past and Donald Trump and
his personal takes on Donald Trump, which is what we're going
to talk about real quickly here because from The Hill, Jonathan
Turley, This is an opinion piece entitled Joe Biden is no George
Washington and Valley Forge proved it.
I think that's a wonderful title.
That's what happens when you have intelligent people writing
instead of whatever we just saw from Politico.
And apparently John, during that speech, he said this is like
something out of a fairy tale, bad fairy tale, which which
Turley says is the most accurate observation of the entire
address kicking off his 2024 campaign.
The speech was a masterpiece of contradiction.
I know you guys are are dying, so I'm.
I'm bringing this to you, all right?
It was a masterpiece of contradiction.
Biden started by denouncing how Donald Trump's campaign was only
about him and obsessed about the past.
And then he spent virtually the entire speech obsessing about
Donald Trump and the past. January 6th of 2021.
I threw it on the screen because it's a good little quote.
It was an early indication of the Orwellian character of the
speech facing the lowest polling numbers of any modern president.
But on Biden attempted to a constructive substitution.
Democracy is on the ballot, he said, So voters should not have
to vote for him. They just see Biden and they
should read it as quote unquote democracy.
The Democrats really love this word democracy even though we do
not have one, even though they will have.
They will bend over backwards into pretzels to be able to try
to substitute that word for a constitutional Republic that
operates on federalist principles but also is tempered
by anti federalist bills of rights.
Anti federalists are people who thought the federal government
should not be too strong and not be able to infringe on your
civil liberties. It turns out they were probably
correct at the end. The Bill of Rights was the
compromise to get the anti federalists into the table to
sign off on the US Constitution right?
If we understand history we know that democracy was a problem.
They knew it was a problem, the tyranny of the majority.
The reason that we had things like the Electoral College which
are somewhat elitist is because people make bad decisions
individually and as a group. It should take an overwhelming
super majority to do things at a federal level because the
federal government should not have broad sweeping powers which
we've all failed and let it get through.
That's where it's at now. So Turley says it will require
more than an active substitution of the voting booth.
It would actually require a willful act of blindness.
In fact, dozens of Democrat officials have sought to remove
126 Republicans from Congress on the same basis.
And even as Biden was telling citizens to vote Democrat to
preserve, quote unquote democracy, a Democratic activist
seeking to remove a GOP Congress person from the ballot was doing
so in a nearby Pennsylvania district.
His speech would have been more credible if he had joined
principal Democrat politicians who have announced the
nationwide effort. They denounced it, but instead
he kept quiet on that. He's calling it, you know, he's
focusing on one individual and he's, you know, won't say
anything about court packing and a bunch of other things.
This this is actually a really good article.
It's worth your time. You can find it for free at the
Hill. Type in Joe Biden.
There's no George Washington. And read that for yourself.
Like I said, worth your time. I would go there and and read
all of it, because it's a very sober take on it.
It's not emotional, but it is true.
And on top of all this stuff, we're seeing ultimate failures.
We're seeing failures left and right.
And those failures, it turns out we're predictable.
You guys remember what I said when we had a speaker contest
and they were to figure who's gonna be the Speaker of the
House? And I told you no one for
speaker is better. How about this one?
How about that? Does that bother you?
You should be upset. This actually came out of the
loop and and I found it on Newsmax, but I'm gonna read
something from Daily Wire. The House and the Senate leaders
have reached a spending deal, $1.59 trillion in government
spending, a breakthrough to avert the shutdown, which will
be pending in eight days. The members of the House Freedom
Caucus actually went and evaluated.
They said it's actually higher than that.
It's like 1.68. We're gonna spend a tonne of
money to kick the can down the down the line.
It's a continuing resolution and the messaging that has come down
from those powers that be the people that are in the
Republican powerhouses that want to maintain influence.
The talking point crowd have said that they're going to get
behind Speaker Johnson and they are going to pass this
continuing resolution and they are going to back all this
money. We desperately need a government
shutdown. The fact that our government,
that our Congress has passed less bills than ever, should be
considered a victory for Americans.
And instead what we are doing is we are looking at it like
somehow that is a failure for them not to just keep printing
money and sending it out to causes that are absurd.
I told you no one for Speaker was the answer.
If no one is in the Speaker's chair, they can't bring any
bills forward. Nobody can vote on them, and it
doesn't make a difference. Then we don't lose any money.
We spend about $10 million a year, a month on the
congressional salaries and all the staffers and all that
nonsense. We operate the building, but
those people can't get anything done.
Brilliant. Best case scenario, Founders
would have loved that. The founders of this country
would have loved that. They would have just sent him
home. Collect your money again.
House Freedom Caucus saying it actually is gonna cost 1.658
trillion, not the 1.59 because they're using Washington math
and it's actually a spin job, as if the American people care the
difference between 1.65 and 1.59 trillion.
We're talking about trillions with a T Whoa, that is so much
ridiculous. Money for just a few months is
what we're talking about there. That should bother the living
hell out of you. Billions and billions of dollars
written for all kinds of non defence, discretionary funding,
all kinds of stuff, when instead they should be solving problems
and they're not. But they're gonna, they're going
out as a victory. The Democrats are actually
winning, even though they are the minority.
And that's because the the Senate is pushing it and the
president will sign it. And so we lose.
The American people lose every single time.
And meanwhile lest we lest we be outdone, they're actually going
to tout this as a total victory. You've got, you've got Janet
Yellen, right? She's going to tell you that
actually the economy is really good and so you should vote
Biden on on the merits. Here it is.
Here's Jenny Ellen telling you things that you guys didn't
realise. People are founding new
businesses and spending money like having a great time.
Check this out. This is your bank account is
lying to you. They're spending in ways that
suggest they're happy with their financial circumstances.
We're seeing a huge number of new businesses being formed that
an investment in American businesses that suggest
confidence in the future of the economy.
I think those are all good signs.
OK, you heard it, folks. So you're lying to yourself,
your lying eyes in your bank account and whatever's been
going on and the prices that you see, that's your, you know,
that's just your imagination that's on you.
And I'm sorry that you feel that way, lest you think that this is
all made up. Like I said, narrative, acting,
Emmys, all of these things go together.
You guys, should we just do a video of acting?
And then we'll cleanse the palette?
I promise you. I do have something that's kind
of funny and fun, but I I'd be remiss if we didn't play this
guy. This is Michael Phone.
He was a incredibly important part of the January 6th
narrative. He also has neck tattoos, has
got previous allegations of racial discrimination in his
previous gigs. He seems like a real winner.
He is actually fighting for the thing that Joe Biden said he was
when he was trying to get elected.
He still running this gambit on the sole of the American people.
Are you ready for nausea? This is a clip comes from MSNBC.
Guys, name is Cap. What's his name?
Capehart. Capehart.
I don't know if he's gay or he's just a feminine, but this is one
of the worst bit of actings. There's no Emmy for this.
Stand by, here comes. Grab your bags.
Do you think that there's a risk here of disenfranchising voters?
I think the biggest risk of disenfranchising voters happened
on January 6th, when Donald Trump tried to steal the
presidency from the American people.
Make no mistake, that is exactly what he intended to do.
We are a country of laws and of constitutions.
There are qualifications for office.
So for example, if a lot of voters wanted to vote for Arnold
Schwarzenegger they wouldn't be able to do so because he is
disqualified from morning for president under the United
States Constitution. I miss mark my clips but that
was equally bad and will also make you feel sick.
Sorry about that. I'm sorry about your blood
pressure for all of you that are watching that.
And of course I'll get you guys the the Kaplan piece or the K
part one from the none. He basically just says he's
trying to sell books and that's really important.
Alright. So that's as much as we can
handle. I love it when someone tells you
that that Donald Trump they know what the motive of Donald Trump
was on a day and then they saw him execute that motive by doing
the opposite of what they said that they are basically are not
going to take what actually happened as evidence.
They're actually just going to do it with their fantasies.
Say, this is a dangerous thing. Totally gross, totally weird,
totally backwards and we're running towards the end of our
time here. But I do want to thank you guys
for your attention. I saw we had almost a record
chat here from from folks coming in on on rumble.com/caesar.
If you guys have never visited us before, thanks so much.
Make sure you're following the channel.
Make sure you give us a thumbs up and a like in the live chat.
And also let's do a couple of quick thank yous.
How about folks doing a five star review?
I got one right here for you. Give me one moment to pull it up
on the screen and here we go. Coming from our apple, this is
an Asian Oakie. I don't know why I like that so
much but Asian Okie has a nice ring to it if you guys know.
I went to the University of Oklahoma.
It's a five star view that says clear headed discussion.
I hope that's what today was. Love hearing you and your guests
discuss current events from a security professional.
Try to come at it from a professional angle.
Try to comment from a sober place.
We do need to take down some of this.
We need to take down some of this big emotional rhetoric.
We need to take it down a notch and make sure that people can
can just relax and kind of see each other as Americans and not
some of this all wild stuff. And I do want to say thanks to
Up True Breed for the $100 rumble rant.
It just says blessed because heroin and America, America,
America 100% agree with you, with the America part of it.
And I'm grateful for you guys being here and supporting all
this stuff. We're living in wild times,
folks and the only way we're going to do it is by seeing
things for what they are trying to cut through the nonsense, try
to stop being as as charged as the other team, the other, the
political left wants to do. So I've got something that will
take you down just a little notch, just a little something
funny. Sometimes when you're doing, you
know some very serious tasks, you get, you know, chased off
and you follow a squirrel. That's what we say.
Oh, squirrel. There it is.
Let me give you guys a little squirrel.
And then we'll we'll show you the merch door and then we'll
walk out of here. So let's do a squirrel.
Take a deep breath. This squirrel is you know he's
got it harder than you think about the Eagles.
Man. My girl took all my nuts and all
my babies for raccoon. Now she's got rabies.
But I don't even care that I'm all alone cause I got the birds
and the bees treat me at home. You dogs bitch trying to bark at
me. You couldn't bark if you born on
the side of the tree. Yo.
So it's done baby. Let's go.
I love putting nuts up inside my mouth.
When I grab this mic, I'm spit them out.
What? I'll cut that part because I'm
feeling like I'm running and I got to get away and I gotta
watch out for the birds prey because the hawk and eagle eat
my people. Why is this world so nuts?
And Eve, there it is man. The Hawks and the Eagles trying
to eat his people. At least you guys don't have to
deal with that right? Just because Joe Biden wants to
lock up some of your friends down there.
We're trying to take it easy. I want to say also big thanks to
Carlisle or Carly. Is that right Carly?
For another $50 and saying I love the show Thanks Colin.
Crew 100% we're we're grateful for all of you.
Honestly we do this cause it's fun for you and fun for me and I
get to at least have a little bit of detox.
My blood pressure is lower because of the way that you guys
are out there listening to this all that.
Alright, so let me say also while we're doing blood pressure
things let's make sure we keep the blood pressure up.
Over at the Oboyle family sweatshop guys go to the dash
ingles.com the dash expendables.com and you'll be
able to buy a a cool looking hoodie just like this one.
Or you could buy any of our susceptibles merch.
That's going to keep Garrett Boyles family moving.
It's going to keep the kids fingers worked to the nubs.
They need to understand the value of hard work.
Apparently starting a new business.
We're one of those new businesses Janet Yellen was
talking about. I guess so there it is.
You guys can check out the pins. A lot of people see those in
public and they're like hey man, where can I get the pin.
You can get the pin at the dash expendables.com the merch store.
You can get three of them. 30 bucks.
You can use promo code. Kyle KYLEKYLE will save you like
10% there as well. That's just a little discount.
So we're tracking where it's coming from in case case Garrett
actually ends up getting other sponsorships in there.
And it doesn't sound like there's more Sherpa hoodies.
I think they were real pain in the butt for Garrett to print.
But send him an email, let him know what you want.
There's a contact form on the website as well.
You can reach out to GOB Actual on either True Social or on X,
or you can hit him up on the website
the-dontforgetthe-sustentables.com and check out the merch for all
the kind of fun stuff in there. Lastly, I'll just say thanks to
my buddies over at Catholic Vote who sponsored the programme, who
underwrite our lifestyle here and are keeping us going.
I'm actually going to go out to a a retreat with them and meet
some of the folks that are are helping kind of.
Work behind the scenes and put together the Loop and stuff like
that. So check out the Loop guys.
Go to catholicvote.org. Feel free to give to them
generously. If you were so interested in
maintaining America's Catholic advocacy, which is to say a
universal Christian Church position on faith, family and
freedom, the Loop is probably the best one minute email you'll
ever get. Check out catholicvote.org.
And that's it for us today. It really is.
I'm very appreciative of being back in my saddle.
It was an interesting trip to New York.
I'm glad to be back home, and I look forward to seeing you guys
again tomorrow. God bless you.
Be safe out there. And, you know, don't forget
about the American Rorschach test.
The narrative is strong, but we can still overcome it.
See you soon. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth,
Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.