Take a look. Behind the curtain, with a real
whistleblower, an American patriot, prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties.
Enthusiast, Second Amendment defender and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Well, hello my friends, and
welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Wednesday. It is February 21st.
I got a little bit of housekeeping, housekeeping stuff
up front #1 If you went looking for yesterday's show during the
day and you couldn't find it, I apologize.
I didn't watch to see that rumble somehow deleted the show.
Yeah, so there's two versions right now of episode 247 and one
of them is just a 2 minute intro that just says that the show is
coming. I don't know where it went.
I I saw it load, I saw it go into the replay mode so that it
was available to anybody. And then I started getting
comments last night as I was going to bed saying that the the
show was gone. And sure enough, they were
correct. So I restreamed it last night.
So it's underneath Replay, and if you're looking for that, you
can find it that way. And I appreciate your patience.
And I also like, by all means you guys can let me know.
You may not know this, but you can actually directly contact me
through the show at kyleserafin.com.
Again, it's just my name. You'll find that I'm pretty easy
that way. I'm at Kyle Serafin on all the
social media platforms and I have Open DMS.
Even though I don't respond to everybody, I do have Open DMS on
Twitter X and and then I'm also at Kyle Serafin on Truth.
And I'm at kyleserafin.com. You guys can send me messages
there. I get the wildest stuff.
Some of it is amazing. Some of it is just really
loving, bringing fawning praise, which is far too gracious for me
and and it makes me blush and I share it with my buddies, the
the suspendables chat that we have in the background and they
all go like, man, that's really intense.
And then some of it is fully crazy where it's like some
random Rothschild child person is trying to kill me.
And if you're listening to me right now, you know I'm talking
about and Chris Ray is behind it and there's a illegal implant in
my head, man, there's an awful lot of mental illness in this
country. And and honestly, the Internet
is one of the worst things for mental illness.
It makes me sad that it's out there.
But all right, before we get too deep into that, if you guys are
watching us anywhere else, if you're watching us on X, if
you're watching this on YouTube, which recently blocked our
episode from Monday for a 22nd piece of video, join us on
Rumble. Come to rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin, You're seeing it there on the screen.
I need to make that less transparent, don't I?
Come to rumble.com/kyleseraphin and join the live chat, which I
continue to see all of you guys up first thing in the morning
and talking. And everybody always comments.
All the new chatters always say this is the best chat on Rumble.
So for whatever it's worth you guys, the pitch has been made
and if you want to support the channel you can go to follow on
the chat button underneath it, it says follow.
If you click it, it'll give you a red that shows you that you
can in fact subscribe to it. If you want to do that, actually
let me show it. I can actually throw that on the
screen right here. Check this out.
There we go. This is what it looks like if
you were to go and hit the subscribe button.
It just gives you the option. It shows you that you're going
to get some badges. You get a red name highlight,
which I just did with my friends over at amrad, and you guys can
subscribe. It's 5 bucks a month.
It comes directly to us. So if you guys want to support
the channel, you can do so right there.
OK, we'll take that down. And let's say thanks to a
sponsor who keeps this thing going.
We just brought them on this month.
Our newest sponsorcontingencymedical.com.
In fact, my buddy Sean Whitman reached out to me yesterday.
He's like, hey, what's that medical company that you deal
with? Because I'm going to order up
some antibiotics and be prepared.
Great decision, great decision by my buddy Sean.
And he was like, of course. And by the way, give me your
promo code. And I'm like, it's always the
same. It's Kyle.
Kyle is the promo code, contingency medical.com is where
you go. Check it out.
And what do you get? You get a telehealth visit with
a physician in your state that's going to evaluate your medical
history. It's super easy.
It probably took me 5 minutes. 5 minutes tops.
You type in your medical history.
Anything that's significant that the doctor needs to know about
your medical allergies and so on.
If you're like me, it's NNKDA. No known drug allergies if
you're in the business and then they will send you one of these
guys. The cost is roughly $300.00.
There's a little bit of a discount with my promo code.
And yeah, you've got multiple courses of antibiotics.
The thing that I like most because they are a contingency
based company is they give you the primary thing that you might
use for an animal bite or Cellulitis or urinary tract
infection. Then they give you a secondary
option of what it is. And you've got multiple courses
of each type of antibiotics with the exception of azithromycin,
which is kind of like AZ Pak. If you guys are familiar with
the Z Pak, that's seven days of azithromycin medicine.
They give you a six day supply of azithromycin in the
contingency back. They're not expensive, but what
you're getting is you're getting medical support, you're getting
telehealth and you are taking your medical control back into
your own hands, which I absolutely love because we are
being lied to constantly, whether it be by the
pharmaceutical companies, whether it be by the healthcare
industry, whether it be by the news media or by our government
propaganda. And that's what we're going to
talk about today. Today's topics, which I've been
cramming in since about 6:00 AM this morning, we're talking
about repetition, propaganda and the American boogeyman, which is
Russia. Now, I want you to do a little
experiment. Those of you in the chat, those
of you who are listening to this after the fact, you guys can do
it in your head. I want you to think about the
famous television show The Brady Bunch.
OK, The Brady Bunch. You got it in your head.
You can picture it. This is the story.
The man and lady, right. OK.
Think of the first character that comes to your mind and type
it in the chat. If you're sitting in there right
now, I'm going to come back to it.
But the first character that you can think of when you think of
the Brady Bunch, who is it? Let's just see what we've got.
I'm just curious. It's a little N equals just a
few experiment that we're going to play and.
And while we do that, let's go ahead and talk about something
that is quite serious. Quite serious.
Yeah, I'm starting to see it. You guys are starting to come in
with the Marsha, that's why, and you'll know why in a second
here. This is a serious story.
It's a sad story and it's an awful story.
It is far too prominent. I I used to do a show called
Roll Call, which many of you guys may know.
I was doing it with my friend Alfa Luna, and it's now being
done by Sal Greco, which is awesome.
Those are two really good people.
They're both cops. That makes the most sense for
me. A cop show about cops.
But we would always read from the officer Down memorial page.
You can go to Officer Down, ODMP, Officer Down, Memorial
Page, odmp.org. OK.
And in doing so, you will be able to see the most recent
police officer, first responder who was killed in the line of
duty. And sometimes it's traffic
accidents and sometimes it's a medical emergency, and often
times it's adversarial action, being shot, run over, killed,
whatever by some criminal subject.
Most of you, by the way, are saying Marsha and a couple of
you saying Jan, which, yeah, because they were, both of those
were pretty clear. ODMP is a good site.
I used to visit it every single day when I was at the FBI
Academy. And they update sort of the
sacrifice that our law enforcement officers have to
make. And this is all going to
actually stream together with the Russia boogeyman thing.
You guys will see in a second we're being fed this narrative.
This is an incredibly sad story. And I wanted to just pay homage
to these, these gentlemen who gave their lives trying to
protect what turned out to be a young girl and a mother who made
a phone call, a 911 call. And they did what you hope would
happen when you call 911 as someone is in the middle of a
sexual assault of your child and you're a female and you're
smaller. So this is coming out of KARE
11, local news gunman identified in the shooting of Burnsville
first responders. And it says that he was
prohibited from possessing guns in 2020.
Shannon Gooden, This is the guy who actually is now dead, who
instigated this and killed three first responders, all three
young men who I'm going to tell you are legitimate heroes.
They are the people that answered the call for their
community. And as we are reminded, anyone
who's willing to lay down their life for their friend and their
neighbor, that's the highest form of love and service.
I think we can all pretty much agree on that.
I'm going to read the story because I wanted to get into it.
Then we're going to get into the spin on it, which is not
nothing. And then I will press on.
Multiple law enforcement sources and the next door neighbors on
Monday revealed the identity of the man who killed 2 police
officers and an EMT. My understanding is that he
wasn't just an EMT, he was a paramedic, which makes a big
difference to those of us that are in the field.
Paramedic who was also SWAT qualified so that he could serve
alongside SWAT teams. He volunteered for a much more
hazardous duty to be able to be on the armed responses.
For those of you that are not familiar, and this is worth just
a little breakaway, most EMS services will not go into a hot
zone or even a warm zone where there is still active violence.
In fact, that's part of the basic training that you get when
you go through as a paramedic or as you go through as an EMT.
You learn the first priority is scene safety.
That means safety for you and your team, and you won't go in
there if it'll expose you and your team to harm or violence.
That's not terrible, by the way. It's not a terrible bit of
training. It actually is good at self
preservation and you want to make sure the people who are
capable of dealing with violence are there, but very few.
They're starting to get this this thing that's called Rescue
Task Force. It's been moving along for about
the last five to eight years or so.
Maybe a little longer, I can be corrected on that.
But there's a concept that you would actually embed non
tactical medics who understand how tactics work and they get
into the the stack, the column of officers that are going to go
in with guns and Shields and whatever else and address
violence so that they can be the first people and they can cut
the time of response to the victims that are on the ground
potentially. Now a lot of this comes out of
stuff like what we saw the Pulse nightclub shooting.
There were 40-9 people that died that day.
And one of the things that I learned as I did the after
action with trauma surgeons who debriefed and went through the
the post mortems of all the people that died, a lot of those
people, like 7 of the 49, that's a very high percentage of people
could have been saved simply by moving them off the wall.
And I've covered this on a show a long time ago, but we have a
lot, much bigger audience now. It's worth talking about.
Those individuals literally shrunk down in fear.
And they did. As we talked about the other
day, there's fight, flight and freeze.
They did what was called the freeze instinct.
This is still an overreaction. It's an amygdala hijack.
Just remember that in your head where your body gets taken over
by the limbic system and the sympathetic nervous response is
failure. It just goes into what we would
call the black, where you are no longer able to process any
threats or any decision making. And so you just freeze.
And these people froze in a place that actually obstructed
their own airway. Then they passed out from the
shock and the trauma of what had happened to them.
But they didn't die from bleeding out.
They actually died from positional asphyxiation, which
is to say they actually suffocated themselves by keeping
their head low and their body small, trying to avoid gunfire.
And by going in with medics with the a SWAT team that is doing an
immediate response. You could literally pull these
people off the wall. You could pull them off the
wall, put them in the recovery position.
And that alone would have saved their lives.
Seven lives of the 49, with no medical intervention, just
physical movement. It's worth knowing that that's
real. And so kudos to this department
in Minnesota, which is called Burnsville.
And a little kind of personal note, one of my buddies is a
he's a trainer, He's been on the show.
His name is Peter Johnson, and we'll have him on again soon.
Peter Johnson actually used to work for this agency.
He reached out to me right away and they knew within a few
minutes that that this everything about the shooter
that you are now hearing reported days later, which is a
shame. It was actually reported
immediately to folks who knew and they had the opportunity to
do it. OK, so the medical examiner has
confirmed the identity of Gooden.
That's the guy who died. He got died to a gunshot to the
head. He killed himself.
It was a suicide. Like so many of these people,
the reason why you rush into an active shooter scenario is
because when confronted by armed men, and it is primarily men,
that's all I'm going to say. Like, yes, there are some women
in law enforcement, of course, but overwhelmingly SWAT teams
and responses to this are men. And when they rush in, the first
thing that happens is subjects do one of two things.
They're either killed in a standing gunfight by superior
capabilities and training, or they kill themselves, which is
most likely, and that's what the folks who are cowards will
always do. Now, the interesting piece about
the story is that the 38 year old was prohibited from
professing A firearm. He had a second degree felony in
2008, which was an assault with a deadly weapon on which he was
convicted. These are the kind of people
there are very few people that I don't think should have gun
rights in this country. But if you choose to abuse that
tool in a crime of violence, it's one of the few that I
actually support the removal of that particular right.
OK, if you're a white collar criminal, I think you should
have your gun rights restored. In 2019, eleven years after that
conviction, he went and petitioned the court to restore
his firearm rights. He said.
I would like to be able to protect not only myself but my
family as well. I completed an anger management
course as well as a parenting course.
Now the story that I've heard, and I've not been able to
substantiate this anywhere else, that this man was actually
involved in an active physical sexual assault against a 14 year
old girl who was not his own. It was the the daughter of the
woman that he was living with or married too hard to say.
And so was actually attacking a child.
And that's what the 911 call resulted in.
We've got a little bit of video clips of the local news trying
to make sense of something that many of you will easily be able
to understand. I'm going to play this for you
real quick because I want you to understand this is always the
pivot. It's like, oh, our gun laws
didn't work. Maybe we need more laws.
Listen to this local news coverage real quick.
In the aftermath of the shooting, one of the biggest
questions for investigators is how did the gunman get all those
weapons used to kill the three first responders?
Kara Levin's Lou Ree Goose joins us with the latest on the
investigation. Lou Shannon Gooden was banned
from having guns because of an assault conviction and a judge
denied his appeal to have his firearm rights restored.
So the question remains, who helped him stock his arsenal
used on 1st responders early Sunday morning?
I will say there were multiple firearms recovered from inside
of the residence. The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension is investigating how 38 year old Shannon Gooden
was able to obtain multiple guns, rifles and handguns, as
well as a lot of ammunition to use to kill two Burnsville
police officers and a paramedic. Gooden, seen here on a Facebook
video shooting an air rifle, was barred from possessing firearms
after a 2007 felony assault conviction.
After finishing probation, the charge was lowered to a
misdemeanor, but the judge still specified he could not possess
guns in 2020. Gooden appealed to have his gun
rights restored and included character references from three
friends, including his girlfriend and mother of two of
his kids, whose sources tell CARE 11 News was the one who
called 911 early Sunday morning to report child abuse.
In her letter, she wrote. Family is everything to him and
that's why these rights are so meaningful to him.
The judge denied the appeal. It was very scary being with
him. Gooden's ex-girlfriend and
mother of three of his children, Naomi Torres, says she had no
idea Gooden had those weapons. I found out about the guns
yesterday. Court documents say Gooden was
trying to force Torres to pay him more child support for their
three kids, despite the fact he made well over $100,000 as an
auto painter. In a hearing today, the judge
dismissed the case because of Gooden's death, giving Torres
full custody. I've been in contact with the
woman who called 911. She had two kids with Gooden.
She's not ready to talk yet, but she said she and her kids are
safe with family members right now.
All right. So there you go.
So what are we hearing? A couple things.
Number one, they have no idea how the gun laws failed to keep
somebody from buying guns. It's almost as if somebody
that's willing to do something violent with a firearm and
someone that's willing to break laws is also willing to break
other laws. It turns out that it makes
perfect sense that these things are not the problem.
Now, one of the issues is, and this is something that I found
almost immediately when I went online, the responses to this
particular situation is this. I think this is also a problem.
Now there's a lot of things that are being repeated.
Many of you know the name Marsha as the 1st and the most top of
mind aware Brady Bunch character because that is one of the
famous repetitive phrases that comes from that show.
Marsha, Marsha, Marsha. It's repeated three times.
There are memes, there are gifts.
You can find it online. It is all over the place if you
type. In fact, some drag queen
actually decided to name himself Marsha, Marsha, Marsha simply
because of the name recognition that that pattern has.
Now what you're seeing on the screen right now, something I
pulled off Twitter. It's a it's a course that is
draft. I actually validated some of the
stuff that the population densities are correct and I
think the homicide numbers are as well.
They've they've amalgamated some of them, 'cause they don't break
it out in the Uniform Crime Report in this way.
But this is from the 2022 Minnesota Uniform Crime Report.
These are the things that get reported to the FBI and what
you're seeing are homicides in 2022 for the entire state and
they break it down by population.
This is a correlation by the way this is not causation but it is
often misconstrued to act like this is a cause and what you're
seeing on the top line are 72% of the homicides and the
population versus population set of blacks is 3 point 6.4 rather
I actually did the the the poll for the most recent version of
it and it's like 6.6. So it's that's that's actually
correct. Black citizens of or black
citizens and and and counted people in the population in
Minnesota constitute little bit less than 7% and then the rest
of it obviously is about 93%. The number of total homicides
they're talking about the offenders, known offenders 72%
are black, 28% are white, Hispanic, Asian, Native
American, everything else that you list race wise.
But the real problem here that I have with that statistic is that
we're actually just taking 2 semi related things like, oh,
like our gun laws didn't work, let's have more gun laws.
It's equally weak thinking to say that 6.6% of the population
or 6.4% of the population is, is responsible for 3/4 of the
murders. That may be true, but it's a
very, very small fraction of that 6.6%.
But we are constantly being told two things.
There's two things that are being told one side or the
other. On the conservative side, I hear
this all the time. It's like a very, very small
fraction of the population is responsible for the bulk of
violent crimes and murders. What they leave out in context,
which is incredibly important, is it's an incredibly small
subset of that 6.6%, and the number one victim of those
people are people who look like them.
It is not a black on white genocide that is happening.
They're not black people stalking down and killing white
people. But then the other side of the
coin is that you also hear a lot of this academic nonsense where
you actually encourage that sort of violence.
So people are hearing things that they want to hear.
It's important, but it's a propaganda message.
I've got a couple of little videos here that I want to play
from you. They're atrocious.
They represent a fringe minority, but they have the
loudest voices because they sound really good and they do
something that triggers a fear instinct in your brain to think
illogically. If you were to logically think
about it, there are a couple of competing facts.
Like I said, the number one thing is, is that you are most
likely to experience some sort of physical violence from people
that you already know, that you already live around.
And the odds are, as Steve and I talked about, Steve friend and I
talked about the other day, they probably look like you, they
think like you, they sound like you.
They probably vote like you because they live where you live
because that's who has proximity to you.
The number of sharks, lone wolf predators, that are going to
sneak into a community and commit a random act of violence
against someone that is not like you is very, very small.
However, we have this media kind of March of this kind of, and
I'm going to call it propaganda because even though these people
are horrific, they're incredibly rare and they also are generally
speaking impotent when it comes to actually doing this.
But listen to this clip. This is from AC Span Book Review
in 2005. I'll give you a little context
on this guy in just one second. And the one idea is how we are
going to exterminate white people.
Because that, in my estimation, is the only conclusion I have
come to. We have to exterminate white
people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.
Now, I don't care whether you clap or not, but I'm saying to
you that we need to solve this problem because they are going
to kill us and I will leave on that.
So we have to just set up our own system.
And stop playing and get very serious and not be diverted all.
Right. So that Guy Cambone, he actually
died in December of this year of last year, rather so recently
diseased. He died and he wanted people to
attend his funeral. Apparently his family did.
And you're not allowed to wear white.
So that's a racist. That's a person that is racist,
that that has lived a racist life.
The problem is, is that the other side of the coin is that
people are willing to highlight crappy and ridiculous voices
like this. That person is a fringe.
I've never met anyone like that in my entire life, not even
close. And the only people that I have
met that were in that sort of even close to that category,
that were even, like I say adjacent to that category were
radicalized by stupid thoughts like this.
The other side is that some of you are going to hear this guy
and you're going to say, Oh yeah, I've read all these
articles too. Why have you read them?
They're fringe, academic garbage, and yet and they all
kind of focused at the same time, right when Donald Trump
was coming into office. Most of these are 2016 to 2018.
I I looked these pieces up for you guys, but listen to this
little piece that I found. It's kind of like a amalgamation
clip on Twitter. Equally garbage.
Equally bullshit as well. CNN professor asks when is it OK
to kill whites? New York professor says having a
white nuclear family promotes white supremacy.
Professor tweets that white people should commit mass
suicide. College professor says kill
cops, kill all white people and kill the straights.
Professor says all I want for Christmas is white genocide.
Georgetown professor says all white people are racist.
Trinity College professor calls white people inhuman.
Let them fucking die. College professor says believing
in hard work is a white ideology.
College professor says white people are conditioned to commit
mass murder. A professor equates math with
white privilege. A professor says white
supremacist patriarchy is responsible for the Vegas
shooting. Professors hold a white racism
course at FGCU. USC professor calls for
Holocaust against All white people.
All right. That's about as much of that as
I can tolerate. There's plenty of those
headlines. Those are all like the the
number in total is less than 50 total headlines about this.
It is incredibly rare to hold that ridiculous belief and many
of them do it. Why?
Because they're going to get publicity just like that.
And the second thing is, is the more that we we discussed that
sort of thing and people hear it and they think, well, that that
must be the way that some people think.
I want you to also take whatever you're seeing on social media
and in the news and then ping it against your actual real life
experience when you go to, let's say I did that yesterday, the
YMCA, all right. There are people who look in
every way that go to any of your churches, of your schools, of
your your workplaces. This is not the way that people
actually think. It is a fringe, fringe minority
and yet it's been normalized. Why?
Because there's this big push to act like it's something that
actually does exist. And I'm going to cover down a
little bit more on the story that we were just talking about
a moment ago because it's worth doing.
This is the the AP. What have they done?
They said two of officers and one first responder killed at
the scene. The suspects dead.
They cover down. They never mentioned race.
They never discussed even the names of the heroes who should
be people that we are honoring today in this country that we
should see our president going and calling out by name just
like we should see the people in Kansas City called out.
But what what we see is a concentrated after the media to
keep things quiet is that though we always wonder, are they lying
to us? Is it on purpose?
I think it is, but I think it's for a different reason than
maybe we both assume. And then lastly, because we are
going to pay a little bit of tribute to these gentlemen.
From left to right on the screen right now what you see is police
officer Paul Emstrand. Elmstrand was one of the
responding officers, the fire medic, firefighter, paramedic in
the middle. His name is Adam Finseth and he,
like I said, unarmed, but chose to to be part of this response,
the sort of rescue task force. And then Matthew Rouge, I hope
that is pronouncing his name. All three of these men are
heroes and they are actually called out in this piece by CNN
of all folks. And so thankfully we have that.
What they all try to avoid though is everybody other than
the local news doesn't want to really discuss the fact that we
were talking about someone who was a convicted felon that owned
firearms that happened to be black.
And so you have this sort of interesting narrative and I've
seen all of it discussed. The fact of the matter is, is
that people who are criminals that are willing to hurt people
that are near them, including it sounds like raping his own
daughter or attempting to rape his own daughter.
That's what the call was about. When that happens, we are
dealing with a fringe minority of people who are, as Steve
Friend likes to call system disruptors that no matter what
you do, the system is, is something that they are going to
fight against. And the cost is 3 wonderful.
I don't know anything about their personal lives other than
the fact that they were willing to give their life in that job.
And that is the highest calling that you can have as a man who
signs up to be a protector. That's what the badge is
supposed to mean when it's not upside down, that you will use
it like a shield to go in and fight against evil and doing
something to your own child and needing a 911 call and having
outside responders who never met you have never seen you, but
they've already agreed that they will forfeit their life should
that come up. Most people haven't taken that
stand and thought about it. And these guys put this guy
down. So he was not able.
They they were able to confront him to the point where he was no
longer able to go after and have any more victims.
The last piece that I will show you is that it always comes down
to the same thing for the political left, which is
nauseating. And that is this.
The answer to something that is horrible and a sacrifice by
heroes is that we need more laws.
Because when you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
And when your job is legislation and expanding the state's power
base, then everything you do is going to do that.
This is a predictable response for most of us who follow this
kind of thing. But this is your, your Minnesota
Governor, Tim Waltz saying that we need to push the legislature
to expand safe storage laws, which is to say that guns must
be in, they must be in safes. This man was already prohibited
by law from having firearms. None of that's going to change
any of it. None of that's going to do
anything whatsoever. Luckily, this article also this
is from the local CBS paper, actually calls out those three
heroes that we talked about, Matthew, Paul and Adam, for the
work that they did and they also name the individual not by race,
but they named him Shannon Gooden.
There are actually videos of him talking about how he wanted to
pretend like he was shooting at white people.
That video that you saw in the black and white with him raising
the air rifle was in fact him saying some horrific things
about how I'm going to pretend like I'm shooting white people.
By the way, he's joined by his friend who is a white kid or
white young man. Really bizarre, really strange
and disordered behavior, but not representative of anybody except
himself. He represents himself and one
criminal who chose to do something evil.
We're going to push on to this because this is all going to
actually relate in the end. I want to say thanks to my
friends over at for Patriots. You guys know how to get there.
It's the number four, the word patriots.com/kyle.
Or you can just go to forpatriots.com and use promo
code Kyle at checkout. This is a an interesting time,
2024, there's no question about it, that we are going to be
facing potential food shortages, that we are going to be facing
interruptions to the status quo. And we are obviously already in
the middle of this information war.
We hope that the information war does not become a kinetic war.
But if it does, one of the things that you know is that an
army must travel on its stomach. And you as a one man army who
defends your home or as a one woman army who is in charge of a
household. You know that if you have
calories, you are going to be in better shape to be able to do
all the things that you need to do, to be able to think, to be
able to make good decisions, to be able to reflect on what it is
that you are getting and what sort of garbage needs to be
thrown out. And in order to do that you need
to have those calories stored. So get yourself in a place of
less fear by hedging against the uncertainty with emergency food,
maybe some emergency power. Go to four, the number four
patriots.com, again, fourpatriots.com.
And the promo code is Kyle. Now, one of the things you'll
notice too, because we do advertising on the show, do we
not? We advertise for a couple of our
sponsors. The people that support it is we
talk about repetition. That's the other thing.
The Marsha, Marsha, Marsha, the Russia, Russia, Russia.
All of these things will come back to play in just a little
bit. I am going to follow up on that.
But I want you to remember repetition is important in
marketing. In fact, when I used to sell
airtime for radio station, my marketing manager would come
down and he was like, look, you can basically get and I've done
classes on this. Anybody who's ever been in sales
knows this. You can basically motivate one
type of person to do 1 action at one place.
That's what you're going to be able to get.
And that's why whenever you listen to a radio broadcast and
they say call 1800, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Call one the worst ones or they'll say call 1800, you know,
just for men. And then they'll have you'll
visit justformen.com or e-mail us at justformen@gmail.com or
whatever. That is nonsense.
Whatever they do, if they give you 3 messages and they don't
repeat the one, you won't remember it, just like you can
remember. Oh, it's contingency medical.
Oh, it's for patriots. Oh, the promo code is always
Kyle. There's a reason why we do that,
because that's the way our brains are programmed to
remember things that are repeated.
And not only that, but there's actually a psychological side of
shortcut to making us believe that those things are true.
And we're going to get there, I promise you.
I want to talk about the Russia piece.
We've got some, Some really. Let's start off with a little
simple piece from from our friend.
And by that I mean that facetiously.
Adam Schiff, who is one of the worst.
And then we're going to get in sort of the deepness.
This is a collage, sort of a montage, if you will, of Adam
Schiff being a despicable, dirty liar.
But he's saying something over and over again with no facts, no
facts whatsoever. And it turns out everything he's
saying is false. And yet, there's a significant
portion of the population, which we will show you a little bit
too, who believe that what he said is obviously true.
Why He was in a media that media format that they believe has
some authority. There are plenty of these sort
of boomer types out there that think if it's on TV, it must be
true because there's standards, right?
They must be vetted. It turns out that's not true.
They can say anything they want as long as it's not
inflammatory, like offensive. Listen to listen to this guy.
The Russians offered help, which we know they did.
The campaign accepted help, which we know they did.
The Russians then delivered help, which we know they did.
There is circumstantial evidence of collusion.
The case is more than that, and I can't go into the particulars,
but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.
So you've said on more than one occasion that you've seen ample
evidence of the Trump campaign's Russia collusion.
Last March, you said you had more than circumstantial
evidence of treasonous collusion with Russia.
I've certainly, certainly said that there's ample evidence of
collusion. Can you agree that there has
been no evidence of collusion, coordination or conspiracy that
has been presented thus far between the Trump campaign and
Russia? No, I don't agree with that at
all. I think there's plenty of
evidence of collusion or conspiracy.
But we do know this. The Russians offered help.
The campaign accepted help. The Russians gave help, and the
president made full use of that help.
And that is pretty damning, reviewing the evidence that I.
All right. Russia help, Russia help.
Russia help. Did you hear that device that he
was using? It's very, it's very capable of
of transmitting a simple message.
Russia help Trump. Russia help Trump.
He said it over and over again. He kept saying Russia.
He kept saying collusion. These are words that are
repeated. You guys saw it earlier this
week. We talked about the word
gratuitous. Well, it's gratuitous.
It's gratuitous. It's gratuitous.
How do they come up with this idea?
Because when you repeat something, forget about
repeating the lie. Repeat any information, it
becomes much harder to dislodge in the human brain.
What I'm showing you on the screen right now is an article
that comes out of USA TODAY, which is kind of like one of
these, like milk, toasty, kind of garbagey, left wing.
You know, they used to be a newspaper.
That used to be they would bump up their subscription numbers or
their their distribution numbers by giving them out free to
everybody that went to a hotel. Some of you remember that.
I actually have this, like very, this very clear memory of seeing
AUSA Today on the ground of the floor of a hotel that my family
and I had gone to it like in the 90s.
And it said the mob is dead. It was a big headline, OK?
And the mob is dead is something that stayed in my head.
But of course there's a mob. There's still a mob.
It's just interesting. I just remember seeing that.
And it was like USA TODAY was that sort of they they sound
authoritative. They have the words USA.
It's happening right now. In any case, what you're seeing
is President Biden's going to hit Russia with major sanctions
in response to the death of Navalny.
We talked about Navalny the other day.
He's claimed Putin is responsible.
Is he, though? Is that, is there any evidence
or do we just going to say it because you're actually going to
hear it from Mika Brzezinski later on.
Same story. Putin is responsible.
I mean, maybe he is, but she doesn't know that.
She's not able to confirm it. I'm fairly confident that Joe
Biden can't either. Something that happened in a
Russian prison north of the Arctic Circle is probably not
something that the US President is able to confirm in short
notice without like an awful lot.
Unless they know for a fact that he didn't do it and something
else happened there. That's also a possibility.
What you're seeing on the screen though?
Warnings and insurance and uk.gov or gov.uk rather foreign
travel advice for Russia the the the Ministry for whatever it is.
The the version of the State Department that the the UK has
says they advise against all travel to Russia.
They've got warnings and insurance.
They've got entry requirements self safety and so on and so
forth. The best for me is that it says
advise against all travel and they just highlighted all of
Russia and red it's the it's the no go zone.
It's the danger zone. By the way Ukraine is not listed
in that warning. For whatever it's worth, if
you're looking at the map on here, you're seeing that the the
UK's foreign whatever Foreign Office is allowing and saying no
problem for people to be able to travel to Ukraine or Poland or
Belarus or any of this or Finland.
But anywhere, anywhere, literally anywhere.
Even the parts that border China or Mongolia or Kazakhstan or
anything else, any of those parts are no go zones if it's in
Russia. And one of the latest updates
that they have most recently updated on 15 February 2024, but
the most recent update and tiny print appear on the screen that
you're seeing is information on legislative restrictions which
restrict or target the LGBT, the LGBT plus community in Russia
under their safety and security page.
So that's that's the the real dangerous thing.
If you want to visit Russia and you are a member of this diverse
coalition of lesbians, bisexuals, gays or transgender
people or the plus, whatever that is, then you must be
concerned. And so I don't know what
fraction of the population is concerned about the sort of
thing or if they just don't want to go there because of Russian
policies. Very, very interesting to me
that that's the scare tactic that they've got out there.
Let's store some other ones on the screen because there's a
bunch. These come from U.S. news and
World Report, also very authoritative and sounding.
Another is an Israeli paper and they have the same story.
You guys heard this earlier, the explainer nukes in space, Nukes
in space. What have Russia and the United
States said about nukes in space?
And their source is Reuters, which is also lefty.
OK, And what do they say about nukes in space?
They basically are going to go on to talk about their
unidentified sources, meaning nobody in the US saying that
Russia has developed space based anti satellite nuclear weapons.
Didn't we talk about this under Reagan?
Wasn't that like a discussion about Reagan space based
weapons, Star Wars? But Vladimir Putin said he
opposes nuclear weapons in space and Moscow has flatly denied the
US assertions. That being said, we can't trust
The Dirty Russians, right? That's the way that this works.
When you have a boogeyman, you can say anything you want about
them. And the worst thing is always
assumed to be true. Now they ask these questions,
which is always good journalism. Who said what, when and what
would such a weapon mean? And what does the US say about
it? Because obviously the US is the
authority. We're the good guys.
Remember, we have to be the US now.
Now, the entire United States apparently believes this based
on the statement the US believes Russia's developing.
I mean, no. Apparently unnamed sources that
we don't even have the ability to to determine who they are, is
developing space based anti satellite nuclear weapon
technology whose detonations could disrupt everything from
military comms to phone based ride services.
Oh shoot, your Uber would be interrupted by these Russian
nukes in space. I mean this is all fear porn.
It doesn't mean that the capabilities don't exist.
It means that why are we writing about them now?
This goes back to like that that that movie Goldeneye, which was
from when, like when I was a kid, they made a video game out
of it. This goes back into probably in
the little, like mid and late 80s as far as like sort of the
the scare tactics of this concept.
So why today? Because Russia's our boogeyman
and we got to give all these different reasons why they're
ever so scary. There's no question in my mind
that's the push. Here's another one.
This one is coming from PBS government funded, PBS NewsHour.
And what do they say? They're saying that in fact, the
United States not giving money to Ukraine.
The fact that they're Americans who believe that America should
handle America's problems first. The America First crowd is
actually showing a softening stance on Russia.
And everybody knows if you're aligned with Russia, then you're
very, very, very bad. You're a bad person because
Russia, Russia, Russia, Right. Repeat it.
And then you've got literally a quote in there coming from Ron
Johnson saying I don't like this reality.
Vladimir Putin is an evil war criminal, but Vladimir Putin
will not lose this war. And so that's often stand saying
the reality which is that Russia has far superior capabilities
than Ukraine if there are not foreign boots on the ground if
we don't put soldiers there which I'm obviously seems to be
the push that is going on. This is a softened stance on
Russia and that's happened ever since.
Who is it Oh yeah Donald Trump. So I got a little video here.
This is because Kamala Harris recently visited Russia I'm
sorry visited Germany and this is a woman wearing a hijab
telling us that you know the Europeans are really really
concerned about Donald Trump and you know that the Europeans are
a good standard too. I mean, if the Europeans say it,
then we should probably believe it.
Because why? Because the United States funds
their their their military support and and funds most of
NATO. I don't know.
But this lady apparently thinks that we should listen to her
because the Europeans are concerned.
And that's why Donald Trump is ever so bad.
He's scaring our allies, which we, you know, depend on for
having allies apparently. Anyway, here's a little quick
video. There certainly will be a lot of
eyes on her in Munich, both I think in terms of the the
international platform, big foreign policy speech she'll be
giving, but also in terms of private meetings.
What I will say is that, you know, I've travelled with her on
a number of other trips and she is generally well received in
international venues. You know, one thing I will say
is that I hear a lot. I know Republicans are trying to
focus on the president's age. Donald Trump is no spring
chicken himself, just a few years younger than than
President Biden. But the number one thing I've
heard from folks that Europe is very, very rattled by the
comments that Trump made. And so to them, the question of
age no doubt important. But the question of having a
reliable partner who is not going to say yes, let Russia
potentially attack an ally, is paramount to them.
They just don't know that they have a trustworthy friend in the
United States. And you know, as as a former
German ambassador told me, they are very, very worried and
watching closely what happens here in American politics in
November. They're so worried.
And so therefore we should do what the the what the Europeans
think, what the German ambassador thinks is that's how
we should do, that's how we should vote.
I guess if that is an authoritative source to you,
then maybe that means something to you, the idea of being part
of the community of nations or being an international, you
know, citizen, if that's important, if that's more
important to you than being an American, then sure, then you
should do that. The Dan Goldman who is decidedly
hateable and has one of the more punchable faces in Congress who
personally I have a a vendetta against simply because he was a
piece of garbage to my friends when they testified.
He's a moron, but he's drawing this very straight, simple
parallel If you are a if you are Republican, then you're doing
the work of Russia because you're so stupid.
You would obviously be investigating our, our rightful
president who is beyond any questions who can't be
discussed. Because he obviously did nothing
wrong. There's no evidence of him doing
anything wrong. Just imagine that nonsense if
you believe it. And here we go, as you ready Dan
Goldman? Not only is there no evidence of
any wrongdoing by President Biden, but it now appears as if
the House Republican majority is being used by Russia to
interfere in the 2024 election on behalf of Donald Trump.
If they continue with this investigation, they are simply
doing the work of Vladimir Putin to help Donald Trump win an
election in November. That's where we are, Donald.
That's where we are. We are at a place where Dan
Goldman is saying that if you support Donald Trump, then you
are supporting Russia, and Russia is very, very bad, and
everyone knows that. You have to understand that
Russia is bad, and as long as you do, then you will know that
you are bad and you are pro Russia and pro Putin.
If you like Donald Trump, repeat, repeat, repeat.
Here's Joe Biden doing it. Time and again, Republicans show
they're a party of chaos and disunion.
This is not your father's Republican Party.
They shout about a problem, but then do nothing to solve the
problem. The bottom line is Republicans
have to decide who did they serve.
This I'm not. This is not hyperbole.
Who did they serve, Donald Trump or the American people?
And there it is. And one of you in the chat,
Bizarro, just called it out. Spot on.
What about China? Yeah, what about China, the
country that is legitimately our biggest geopolitical foe?
What about the actual country that is infiltrating with
hundreds of thousands of students on student visas that
are involved in all kinds of things called technology
transfer, which is a stealing our stuff and reverse
engineering it. Copyright infringement, IP,
intellectual property infringement, capable of of
doing absolutely, you know, like catastrophic damage to our
infrastructure because they've been out there scouting it out
and finding our weaknesses. Do you know how weird it would
be? Imagine this.
Imagine a delegation of Russian scientists and politicians came
and they wanted to go and run around in your community and
they wanted to go see your water treatment plant.
And they wanted to see the electrical power grid and they
wanted to see your garbage and your waste disposal.
They wanted to see your telecom. They wanted to take a visit and
see the the public safety buildings that show where your
911 dispatch is and how you guys actually handle your law
enforcement communications. Do you think that that would get
favorably looked upon? Would people go, oh, well,
they're a bunch of Russians. They just want to come and see
our stuff like, yeah, of course, Glasnoes, perestroika, openness,
let's show them all that stuff. You think that would happen?
Every one of those things that I just described happens not just
in the United States at large, which it does.
It happens right outside the nation's capital, in the
counties that feed and and house the majority of the federal
government's workforce. The Chinese have done that.
They have send in delegations that go and do observations,
open source recording and looking into every single thing
that makes the society all around the Northern Virginia and
the the Maryland that what they call the DMV, the DC, the
Maryland, Virginia area. They've all done this, no
questions asked. And when I brought it up to
those people because that was part of my job when I used to
work counterintelligence, when I brought it up like hey, why on
earth are you showing our biggest geopolitical foe and a
legitimate threatening nation. Why are you showing them all of
our stuff, our infrastructure? Why are you giving them access
to our our GIS information, our our mapping.
Why are you showing them how all of our things work?
And they're like, oh, I don't know.
I was like, did we get any benefit out of it?
As a taxpayer, I want to know, as an FBI agent, I'm really
curious. But as a taxpayer, are we
getting any benefit from sending Chinese delegations?
And they're like, well, they've offered to let us come out that
way and see their stuff. And have you done it?
And if you had embedded members of the US State Department or
embedded members of the the CIA or recruits from the CIA to go
do that, Have you, have you had intelligence assets that have
been infiltrated and gone over and look at Chinese
infrastructure, too? Oh, you haven't.
You never done that ever. There's no possibility that
there's going to be any benefit to the American taxpayers that
live in your county. None.
We give it away. But Russia.
Russia. Russia, right.
Just imagine you will absolutely and have no problem allowing
just a a crapload of Chinese scientists and recruited state
assets rolling around through your infrastructure.
You will not ever see that happening with Russians because
we've I we've got this Cold War mentality we talked about the
other day. It never really ended.
There are a lot of people in power that still look at Russia
as our biggest foe, despite the fact that it is radically
changed, probably for the better, you know, compared to
the Soviet Union. I don't want to live there.
They're not my friends, but I'm not scared of them, not in the
same way that I worry about China.
Why? Because I can realistically look
at the threat and I can see how dangerous that really looks
like. It's not good.
So all of those things to be say, how about we end up with a
sort of the best piece of propaganda here, And that's what
we're really talking about. We're talking about propaganda
repetition. Let's do this one.
Donald Trump continues to make the death of Russian opposition
leader Alexei Navalny about himself, but not about the man
who killed him. Not not about Vladimir Putin.
He refuses still to condemn Vladimir Putin, who poisoned him
once and and it didn't work. And finally he killed him.
In a recorded town hall that aired on Fox News last night,
Trump was asked about the money he now owes after being found
liable for massive fraud in New York State, and he said that was
a quote form of Navalny. Trump did call the opposition
leader quote very brave while answering a separate question,
but again failed to condemn Russian President Vladimir
Putin, who most believed to be behind Navalny's death.
They. They actually couched that in a
different way as they got into the segment.
First they said he was responsible for the death, Then
they said he's the guy that killed him.
And then they were like who most believe.
If you want your propaganda just like unvarnished, unpolished and
done by the dumbest people, then you go watch Joe Scarborough on
MSNBC and you watch Morning Joe. I don't understand how these
idiots. So I just said how these idiots
on TV, Yeah, I don't know how they're on TV either.
I don't know. Who wants to go hear that
garbage, non thinking partisan mouthpieces.
These people are 100% throwing out propaganda.
They have to. That's their job.
They might even believe it. They seem like they're pretty
empty as vessels. They remind me of Derek, the
Derek Zoolander movie you guys have seen.
Zoolander, like what we need is a model is a vacuous empty
vessel we just pour our thoughts into.
That's what the evil, whatever conglomerate of fashion industry
people do in that movie. And it's the same.
It's the same idea I just, I have to look at Mika Brzezinski.
Looks like she's never had an original thought in her mind,
and every single thought she's ever been given by somebody else
seems like the best idea she's ever had.
I don't know. An intellectual lightweight.
She can't even pronounce the the, the name Navalny.
There's AY on the end of it. Navalny really just made it.
Made it what? You wanted it because it sounds
better to you, or because you don't care, or because nobody
listens to anything. Like I get I get names wrong all
the time, but that one's pretty easy.
I'm just saying as far as Russian names go, Navalny,
pretty easy. Couple little other things here
of the propaganda piece. This is also kind of fun for me.
This is something that was pushed out real recently.
Did you guys see it here about this?
That Russia, this is how you know they're so bad, is that
they actually arrested a dual Russian U.S. citizen.
They went after a woman who lived in Los Angeles.
Can you believe it? Are you outraged?
If you have pearls, will you please clutch them for me?
All of you. The FSB in the central year, old
city of whatever. Yeah, Kitterenberg.
They said that it quote, UN quote, suppress the illegal
activities of a 33 year old woman, a resident of Los Angeles
with dual citizenship and they've taken her into custody.
Well, that sounds awful. She's an American citizen and a
Russian citizen, and the and the FSB arrested her.
Oh. So they said that the unnamed
woman was proactively collecting funds that were subsequently
used to purchase tactical medical items, equipment and
means of destruction and ammunition for the Ukrainian
armed forces. So wait a minute.
So she's a Russian citizen and AUS citizen that's actively
supporting the Ukrainian war effort, which is fighting
against the country that she's a citizen of.
You know what would happen if you were in the United States
and you were like, I don't know, a dual Iraqi, an American
citizen or a dual American and Somali citizen, and you were
sending your money over to, like, groups that were actively
fighting against U.S. soldiers. Yeah, that's called treason.
That's what it's called. We wouldn't do anything about it
because we're weak. The Russians have no problem
doing that. And I don't blame them.
I I mean, just the audacity of deciding that you live in Los
Angeles and you're going to fly back to Russia and raise money
for Ukraine, that seems like a dumb move.
If you're dumb, bad things happen to you.
That's pretty universal in this country, in this world, even if
you, if you do dumb things, then you will experience sort of the
the end of the dumb. And here's the last little piece
that I think is quite fun because yeah, we just can't even
get our our propaganda facts straight.
This one is an article that came out of.
Let me see which one this one was from, because there's a
couple of them. Hundreds.
Which one was this? This is the Russian arrest that
comes from France 24, which is a decent news site.
Yeah, whatever. It doesn't make a difference.
So hundreds of Ukrainian troops are trying to recognize what it
what the news source. This was New York Times.
That's where it comes from. Hundreds of Ukrainian troops
feared captured a missing and chaotic retreat.
So the Ukrainians are losing and the Russians have taken all
these evil prisoners. But then at the same time, the
US Department of Defense has an official coming out and saying
on an official website that, hey, this is from DoD News,
without US funding, Ukraine's defense will likely collapse.
It will be all over because Ukraine can't support itself.
Meanwhile, Reuters is reporting that Russia lacks the ammunition
production facilities to continue the the Ukraine war.
So I don't know what it is. The the answer is we're getting
bombarded by garbage saying that Russians can't survive this war
that, you know, Ukraine is about to win. the United States
government is actually telling us in no uncertain terms that
without our money they're going to fall apart.
And apparently, if you don't support giving all that money
over, then you're pro Russia. Or you might just be someone
like me who cares about America as a number one.
And the most important piece of it is, is that universally,
like, if it's none of our business and it can't support
its own effort even a little bit, the Russians are going to
win. That's just the, like, the law
of numbers. The Russians don't tend to lose
conflicts that way. They just throw as much as they
need to until it's all over. All right, I've got one kind of,
like, illuminating video that I found.
This made me kind of a little bit happy.
This is a video with Sam Harris, who is awful, Bill Maher, who is
not genuine, and this woman named Catherine Mary Catherine
Hamm. Now she's a CNN contributor.
She's over at town hall as well and as a conservative but not a
Republican per her, I think that resonates with me.
We're about the same age as well.
She's a pretty intelligent, reasonable voice going on Bill
Maher to just blow the minds of libs that can't get it together.
So we'll play a little bit of this clip.
There's it's a much longer clip if you guys want to look it up,
Sam Harris, Bill Maher and Mary Catherine Hamm.
But she's talking about the original sin, which is the lie
of Russiagate, and they can't compute.
It's worth listening to just to know that even as you try to
debunk things in real time, it won't work.
The original sent from both media and the intelligence
agencies and and and federal law enforcement is the Russia gate
stuff. And the reason that so many in
the party, and I'm here as the translator because I'm not one
of them, but so many in the party accept so much of Donald
Trump's behavior is because the Russia stuff was a lie.
No, it wasn't. Well, it wasn't all a lie.
It was not all a lie. You guys have been are you going
to do Steel dossier on me? No, no, no.
Some of the steel dossier was true.
Okay. You know this like we did
Mueller report for three years. Yes.
And Mueller never said he was innocent.
And the whole time I'm like guys, I don't think he's a
Russian plant. And everyone on CNN said is
looking at me like I'm crazy. And at the end, we get to not
much there, there. No, there was quite a bit.
There was a lot there. There was collusion.
We never had before. It was unprecedented that a
president would do that. He just did it in public because
he's insane. You do?
All right, so he's insane. But is he insane or is he evil?
Which one is it? Does he not know what's going
on? There's a lot more to that clip.
And you guys, it's all very good.
In fact, I may repost it later on today because it's just a
good, it's a good debunking. But the most important thing for
me was the resistance to things that are actually true as they
just show the the, the, the newspaper on there saying
Mueller finds no conspiracy, there's no conspiracy, there's
no collusion. Despite the fact that we heard
Adam Schiff say it for years, we heard Dan Goldman say it for
years, we're now seeing new reporting.
Sorry. We're seeing new reporting of
old information by public and Schellenberger and so on of
stuff that, you know, my friend Tracy Bean has been talking
about for literally years about how this is all garbage and how
Devin Nunez had debunked it. Cash Patel had debunked it.
This was all garbage. But Russia, Russia, Russia is
the brights talking point. That's how you know that it's
garbage. Whenever you hear Russia now,
we're all prone to think it's probably nonsense and the people
on the left are resistant to the actual facts of what is actually
true and going on when I do, thanks to my buddies over at
Patriot Coolers. And then I've got a couple of
more videos here that will be kind of fun.
Here it is. Patriotcoolers.com will repeat
the name patriotcoolers.com. We don't even need to have a
product on the desk today. Promo code is Kyle to save 10%
if you spend 50 bucks or more, which many of you guys do.
I actually can see all the the things that are used on the
promo code and most of you decide you know what, 50 bucks
is the right number. Get you the free shipping, save
that whatever couple bucks it is to get it there.
They ship fast, they ship from America and they're a great
company based out of Houston, TX Patriot coolers.com.
You can follow them on social media at the same name at
Patriot coolers and you guys can tag me if you guys pick up any
of their stuff. All their products look better
in real life than they even do on the website.
Usually people do looks kind of like hero shots of the product
and then you get it and you're like kind of looks OK.
All the patriot cooler stuff looks better in life.
It looks better on your counter or in your car or at the water
park. When I go take my kids anywhere
you go, just saying check out Patriot coolers.com.
If you were in the market for a Tumblr to keep your beverages
hot or cold. If you're in the market for like
a canteen or one of these guys, which I still have up here
because it's super heavy, keep the 64 ounces of water because
while I'm sitting at the desk, I tend to be here for a very long
time. Check out Patriot coolers.com,
the promo code. Kyle, Kyle, like I said, save
yourself 10% and support our good sponsors there.
If you get into the market for any of those cooler products and
we are moving into the nice weather again where you're going
to be outdoors and needing to stay hydrated.
So it's all there, Mary Catherine Hamm says it.
But it's actually there, in a very unsexy sort of way, of
presenting it in a hearing. The hearing came forward because
we had a guy whose name was Durham.
The Durham report followed the Mueller report, and it found in
more, I think, unvarnished terms.
The reality, it wasn't there. Let's hear it in his own words.
Mr. Durham, did you see evidence of collusion between Russia and
the Trump campaign in 2016? Yeah, so the American public
that has been pulled this hoax for years, it was just that, a
hoax. Is that correct?
Her investigation showed that there were a lot of failures in
the FBI and how they did this investigation that did not
disclose reveal information or evidence concerning any
conspiracy or collusion between Mr. Trump and Russian
authorities. Long let's sum it up, Vice
President Biden and President Obama knew about it.
Hillary fabricated it, the FBI orchestrated it, and the media
sold it to the public and it's still out there.
The question is who watches the Watchmen?
The FBI has become a praetorian guard here, protecting the
nation's capital, but not the people of the United States of
America. It is going to be up to us as
Republicans and solely us as Republicans starting on this
Judiciary Committee to get accountability to the FBI in the
United States of America. So there you go.
It's pretty straightforward and I think that's all debunks the
garbage. And yet these people won't hear
it and they're not going to be able to hear it.
They refuse to hear it on purpose.
I wanted to give you guys a quick update too, because it's
always nice when somebody responds from Rumble and I got
an e-mail back from Rumble support, so no need to to bother
them today. But this literally just came in
a few minutes ago. As we went live, it said, hey
Kyle, we checked with our developers and it looks like
there was an issue yesterday that affected some of the live
streams or VODSI don't know what that is.
The video is not recoverable by our developers, unfortunately.
So if you're looking for yesterday's show again, you're
going to have to go to the thing that has parenthetically replay,
because I did restream it again. It's the easiest way to get it
back up and that looks like it's working just fine.
So anyway, thanks to Rumble for being accountable and for being
quick. Look, I pay them like 10 bucks a
month to be able to be on their service.
You don't have to pay them anything, but I do.
And yeah, Video on demand. There you go.
Somebody just said that in the chat.
I appreciate that. Sr.
Yeah, long and short of it is, is that they, they're
responsive. So that's really great.
It's nice to see a company do that.
So where's all this leave us? That's the question.
Where does it leave us? It leaves us right here.
There's a when you go look for repetition, when you look for
propaganda and you look for why that happens.
There are in fact studies on it. This is not an unstudied field.
This is not a field that nobody's ever heard of before.
Fact some of the some of the information I found when I was
looking through there's this this social media comment about
about how this reminds me of Operation Paper Clip.
You know, and I was looking I was like really does it.
And then I looked and I even the even the name Operation Paper
Clip, which many of you know as the way that the United States
brought over Nazis into this country and they brought a bunch
of Nazi scientists and they were supposed to help us, you know
win World War 2 and fight against the Japanese.
But then suddenly the war ends in in August of 45 and then
suddenly they continue the program.
And so they kept these guys over here working.
Apparently, it wasn't even called Operation Paper Clip.
It was called Project Overcast. Operation Paper Clip was not a
name. I don't know where the name
comes from, but they said it's a misnomer.
They said this is actually coming from the the National Air
and Space Museum that we just got the wrong name and we all
know it because it's all been said over and over again.
So this is actually coming from from the National Library of
Medicine, the the National Center for Biotechnology
Information, which is a good sort of thing to have our
research into. And these two scientists studied
what is called the effects of repetition frequency on the
illusory truth effect. Illusory truth.
I'm just going to read from you some of the stuff here.
I put the abstract up on because it's worth looking at.
Repeated information is often perceived as more truthful than
new information. Let that sink in for a second.
Why do they do this thing? Because if they repeat things
that are true, it'll debunk and replace the old false
information. And more importantly, if you
repeat information that is false, it will be harder to
unroot than actual new information that is in fact
truthful. Repeated information is often
perceived as more truthful than new information.
This finding is known as the illusory truth effect.
It's typically thought to occur because repetition increases
processing fluency. As your brain takes in that
information, each time it does it, it's actually assigning a
value to it. And because fluency and truth
are frequently correlated in the real world, people use
processing fluency as a marker for truthfulness.
This is a deeply interesting concept for those of us that
look at propaganda and and many of us on the show.
We're doing it for a living, right?
I do it for a living and you guys are doing it every morning
as you listen to it. We're listening for what is
true. And what we are trying to debunk
is that that illusory truth effect, which is to say, the
more you hear it, the more likely it is to be true.
But that is human nature. It's hardwired into us.
That's how gaslighting works. That's how indoctrination works.
As many of you are pointing out in the chat at this exact
moment, that's what a big lie is.
You repeat it and people believe it because they've heard it.
Although the illusory truth effect is a robust phenomenon,
almost all studies examining it have only used three or fewer
repetitions. So that's a limited way of
addressing it. So in this experiment they
basically repeated things between 9 and 27 times to try to
figure out what was going on. And their interest was in the
theoretical understanding of the illusory truth effect having on
advertising, politics and the propagation of so-called fake
news. Quite interesting scrolling down
a little bit further, not everything we believe is true.
And then here's another good one according to a recent survey of
teachers in Great Britain and the Netherlands.
So those are very different looking places, although you
know they're, they're not physically connected, 48% and
46% respectively. So roughly the same percentage
believed falsely that people only use 10% of their brain,
which led to a misconception that a little bit of brain
damage is not that important. How many of you have heard
people repeat that we only use 10% of our brains?
If we could just unlock the other 90%, we could move objects
with our minds, right? Not true.
Obviously all of our brain is being used.
We're just not using all of our brain all of the time because
the amount of calories it would take to fund that machine would
be too much. But our brain doesn't you that's
like saying that you're only using, you're only using like
30% of your car when you're driving.
Well, you're not using all the gears are you?
And you're not using all the seats all the time, right.
It's just a fundamental like it's a miss framing and and
we're all susceptible to it. In fact, many of you out there
probably heard that for the first time are like, oh, like
we, we don't use 10% of our brain maybe at any given time,
but that doesn't mean we don't like there's there's plenty of
you, you even know this Here's even a funnier thing.
Imagine seeing you've seen some of these color-coded brain scans
where people are actually thinking and they show different
parts of the brain lighting up. Do you do you believe that's
because they're only using 10% of it?
Like the whole brain will light up at some point in time.
It's being used at different times.
And what they're trying to do with all this propaganda, which
is highly effective, is a concept that's known as a a
Malygdala highlight. Sorry, I got to say it one more
time, Amygdala hijack. That's when your emotion takes
over and you stop thinking. This is what we're trying to
short circuit with this show and much of the independent media
that is going on right now, they're trying to, we're trying
to get away, although many people still take advantage of
it. That's what a lot of the the
thumbnails that you will click on.
It's amygdala porn. You're like, oh, that sounds
scary. Oh, oh, that confirms my bias.
Or oh, that's the thing that I feel really passionate about.
I'm emotionally committed to whatever they're about to say.
It's actually why Dom La Cree has been really successful on
Twitter, if you're familiar with this guy.
He basically says something that is false, and then he goes out
and tries to prove that it's true with varying degrees of
accuracy and with varying sort of ethics to it.
However, it's an incredibly effective technique to hijack
the limbic system to get your body into fight, flight or fear,
to play into the negative emotion and get you to to
essentially not think in a in a reasonable or a rational way.
I found this other little piece here.
I think I have a picture of it. Yeah, this is fun.
This is coming from Propaganda Critic, which is apparently a
it's a new source that is looking into advertising, things
like that says propagandists Right?
Which is the same as advertisers and media that are trying to get
an idea across you. Propagandists use repetition to
further discussion when convincing members of the in
Group, the specific group that are opposing sides cannot think
rationally interesting. Why would that be?
Why would we want to believe that the other people can't
think rationally? Because then we just don't waste
our time on trying to confront. This is the entire purpose of
the 1st Amendment, by the way. We're supposed to get together
and have discussions and try to suss out what is true.
Oh, you heard that? That doesn't sound right.
OK, well, this is what I heard if you match them up together.
Was there any evidence of any of this stuff?
Social media is actually one of the best ways to divide us,
which is why that Mike Bence interview recently with Tucker
Carlson has been so powerful for people.
When used as a tool of truth, it's incredibly capable of
breaking up narratives that are given by propagandist.
When used as a tool of propagandist, it is amazingly
capable of siloing us off into dehumanized and foolish echo
chambers where we no longer look at the other side as potentially
people who can be converted. Isn't that something?
Isn't that worth knowing? If you are a white person and
you think that black people are really dangerous, like, then
your human experience won't show that to be the case.
And if you're a black person, you think white people are out
there to exterminate you, That also won't turn out to be the
case. Both of those are false.
Both of those help silo people away.
Both of those cause racial iniquity and strife, and they
were all debunked because some of us live through the 90s.
That's it. Like the 90s are enough to show
you that that was nonsensical. And even in the middle of that,
they played up enormous race riots that happened, places like
Los Angeles, a lot of it based on false narrative.
Even here, if you're looking on the screen, what you're now
seeing is a a piece from the Rand Corporation.
Got to love Rand talking about that.
This is going back to 2016, just as Trump was about to come into
office, right? He was running against Hillary
Clinton at that time, the Russian fire hose of falsehood
propaganda method, why it might work and had options on how to
counter it. And their big thing that they
have highlighted in there is that since the incursion into
Georgia in 2008, if not before then, there's been a remarkable
evolution in Russia's approach to propaganda.
How about United States propaganda that Russia is still
big, a big, scary enemy? That's a big piece.
The Russian boogeyman is, in fact, I think, propaganda.
It's not nearly as dangerous as it looks like it is, and we're
using it. And the opportunity cost of
paying attention to Russia is a failure to address China.
The new approaches on full display during the country's
2014 annexation of the Crimean Peninsula, which we heard a
little bit about in this Tucker interview about his take on why
that was. We haven't heard a lot of it
since or since before that rather it continues to
demonstrate support ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Syria
and the pursuit of the nefarious and long term goals of Russia's
near abroad and against NATO allies.
Well, that's one way of framing that thought, is it not?
But the other way of saying it is, is that NATO continue to
encroach in areas that Russia kind of thought was like off
limits. And wouldn't you respond the
same way and just wouldn't you also want to arrest somebody
that's doing material support for your actual enemy that
you're engaged in a war with? Whether or not it's a just war,
if you're a country and you're defending what you're allowed to
do, which is, you know, fund a war effort.
I guess if that's the if that's the goals of Russian
nationalism, which we are not Russian.
So we don't have a say in that. Why would we have any say?
Why would we demand an independent autopsy like we
talked about of Novalny? And why on earth would we think
that someone who was giving money to their enemy, that's the
way they see it. That's the perspective they come
from. She's AUS citizen who's doing
something that she shouldn't do. And then she went to Russia
foolishly. It's not like they came to the
United States and arrested her or that we extradited her over
for that. She went back there and was
arrested in a small town. Look, do dumb things.
Dumb things happen to you. That seems pretty
straightforward. In any case, a little taste here
of an interesting lie. And what happens when you debunk
them. The reason they won't let you
say things that are true, just like Bill Maher was resisting
it, I have a little piece here. This is a totally different
animal. But we have to believe if you're
on the political left, if you're on CNN, that Donald Trump not
just is pro Russia, but also that he's a big fraudster.
He's really dangerous and everything he does is a fraud.
And this is a really fun little exchange where you're going to
see about a minute into the answer, Kevin O'Leary, who's
this guy? Mr. Wonderful or was the Shark
Tank guy we talked about the other day.
He's actually trying to say what he wants to say about fraud and
about how real estate works, of which this woman is not an
expert. That's why you invite on an
expert. But pushing an expert while
they're in the middle of their their discussion, it might make
for good TV, and it might make your people who are, you know,
dead set on one narrative believe it because you're
repeating falsehoods. But, you know, God forbid new
information changed the narrative a little bit.
Here we go. Wouldn't there be many companies
who would not want to do business or loan money to people
like yourself or investors if they know that they can get away
with fraud and there's no recourse to protect them?
Excuse me? What fraud?
I don't this is not about Trump anymore.
When you get a developer, when you get a developer that builds
a building and he says it's worth $400 million and he wants
to borrow 200 million from a bank, which happens every day
everywhere on earth, including every American city, every
developer's an entrepreneur. They shine the light on their
building and they say it's worth 400.
The bank does its own due diligence, as was done in this
case, because they're very good at it.
The banks are very good and they say no, it's worth 300, we're
only going to loan you 150 million.
That haggling has gone on for decades.
That's how it works. And then in this case, even the
bank that was supposedly defrauded testified and said we
didn't lose anything. We want to do business with this
guy again. We'd like to, but the judge said
no, no, no, no, no, no. Let's penalize this developer
for 355,000,000 and we're going to do that.
Let's penalize all the developers all across America.
They've all done the same thing. All of them should go to jail
and we should stop building buildings.
That's what the message is from New York.
Even the governor herself is concerned about what this looks
like to investors all around the world.
It's not just US, domestic. All around the world, people are
talking about what happened here.
You really think people want to invest money in New York after
this? How about we go somewhere else?
I think there are people who would.
I don't want to cut you off, but I I want to converse with you
and say I it's only because I want to have a conversation with
Kevin as opposed to just having you because you're a lawyer.
You're a lawyer. You understand exactly what I'm
talking about. I got to tell you, I'm.
I'm respectable for a number of reasons, Kevin.
I'm respectable for a number of reasons.
Is she respectable at all? No, She can't listen to new
information. Once again, repeated information
is often perceived as more truthful than new information.
She's unable to take in novel information and go, that's
interesting. You're an expert in this.
That's why we asked you to be on.
Instead, she has to try to shut him down and say, look, I don't
want to cut you off. And he's like, well, you did.
And she was like, yeah, but I want to have a conversation.
No, that's not how this works. That's not how bringing on,
quote, UN quote experts, somebody who has a lot more
expertise than you do. If you're an expert on
something, then you comment on it.
And if you're not and you're smart enough to stay in your own
lane, then you won't get in stuff in areas where you're
going to be talking about things you know.
No idea, you have no concept of. And this woman is unable to take
in new information because of the repeated information is
perceived as more truthful. And she's been listening to the
same sources over and over and over again.
I don't know why that makes for interesting TV to any of you,
but that's the reason why I do the interviews the way that I
always do them. That's why I let people come in
and talk. If I don't agree with them, I'll
push them when they're done saying it.
Finish out your thought, allow yourself to bake.
And here's the other reason. When she does that, there are
two things that I know are true. #1 She's unable to process the
new information, which is potentially more truthful than
the repeated information. And the second thing is, she has
no faith or trust in her audience.
None. And that's the other reason why
I have no problem with someone coming in and saying something I
don't agree with. I let it happen all the time.
Do you know why that happened? I don't let it happen.
I participate in an interview in a way that when you hear
something that you know is untrue, you will also be able to
discern fact from fiction because you're aware of this
amygdala hijack. You're aware of the concept of
the illusory truth effect. You're aware of these concepts
even if you didn't know their names.
And so you don't get, you don't get taken into them.
That's why we like doing this show.
That's why many of you are listening here.
It's specifically because it's not valuable to try to interrupt
somebody who has something to say, let them say their piece.
And if it doesn't stand on its own legs, then we know where it
is. Here's a little, probably 90
seconds from my buddy Mike Benz who I'm going to get back on the
show at some point in the near future talking about how this
concept of this is the end of democracy.
This is the last time this will ever happen.
We may never have an election again.
The things you're hearing about Donald Trump, it's so old.
He just released this video in the last, I don't know, 2448
hours. And he's talking about The Dirty
tricks that we talked about. Same thing we talked about in
those chairs sitting behind me. The same thing we talked about
about sort of the Pitbull, orca, Rottweiler, you know, dragon of
the CIA doing evil things. You can't let it in our house.
But they're using those techniques that they've used
overseas for years, perfected and honed into a perfectly
weaponized way, into unbelievably capable propaganda.
And it's being used now in our home front.
And that is essentially that is the real existential threat.
I don't mean that in a amygdala popping way.
I mean that in a if you do not allow the tool, if you're going
to allow the tools that are used in statecraft overseas that we
used to manipulate other countries to be manipulated
against our own population, you've now weaponized our
government against ourselves. Oh, kind of like we've always
been talking about. That's literally the formation
of the suspendables. Here we go right now, real
quick. I just saw Liz Cheney clip
posted by Representative Dan Bishop, and it had her
describing Trump's run for president in 2024 as potentially
the last election in American history.
This echoes a long line of foreign policy establishment
apex predators who are all now suddenly in unison championing
this framing of Trump as a dictator, as an authoritarian.
This is obviously stuff they've recycled from before, but it's
all sort of converging right now.
And you know, this attack on democracy, dictator,
authoritarian thing, and especially this framing of it
being the last election. If we don't stop it now, you
have to recognize the trick here and go all the way back to the
beginning. The framing techniques they're
using right now are the same ones used in 1948 at the very
dawn of the creation of the Central Intelligence Agency to
create a predicate for dirty tricks.
I'll talk about what those dirty tricks are going to be, but just
a quick history lesson here. The the CIA was created under
the national 1947 National Security Act and the very first
thing it did to rig an election overseas was to rig the 1948
Italian election which was the first democratic election after
World War 2. You know after Mussolini had
been had been gored and and suddenly Italy was torn between
a Euro Atlanticist Western backed political candidate for
president and a Soviet backed communist sympathetic president.
And the and the Central Intelligence Agency with support
from the state Department and certain private interests and
and certain interests within Italy itself ranging from the
Sicilian mob who are our national security state had
partnered with because they were persecuted by by Mussolini.
So the so so Italian St. muscle was used as a sort of makeshift
resistance movement within Italy.
We kept those networks with with the with the underground and
with media institutions and propaganda institutions.
We we bribed, cajoled stuffed ballot boxes.
The whole the whole dirty, dirty works that you could possibly
do. There's plenty more to this.
Mike Benz is a great follow. If you're not following him on
Twitter, I highly recommend it. Go to Mike Benz Cyber.
It's at Mike. Mike Bend, Benz Cyber.
Follow him. Love Mike.
Just an encyclopedic knowledge. As he walked around you, you
heard him. He was just walking around on
the street with a iPhone. That's his favorite thing to do.
I despise doing that format. I like sitting in my chair.
I like to have my thoughts. When I drive up to a drive
through, I have to turn off the radio.
When I used to do radio calls on surveillance, I have to turn off
the radio. I can't have any additional
noises. I like to focus on one thing
really hard. Mike is able to do a bunch of
stuff at once. It like walk around and talk and
give his rants and they're fantastic.
And that one, talking about The Dirty tricks bag that the CIA,
you know, was using. Even in the late 1940s in Italy,
partnering with Street Muscle, partnering with with propaganda
ministers, property, you know, working with different news
outlets and so on, simply to get their preferred outcome, all of
those things sounds an awful like what happened in the last
couple years when you saw things like, I don't know, Antifa,
doing St. muscle gangs and they were out there intimidating
people. And that it'll get worse.
The Clower Piven sort of effective, it'll get worse
unless you make it give us enough power to be able to do
what we want. All these things, they're all
old tricks. They've all been used before.
Whether they're being used by the same people is another
argument, and I'm not here to have that with you just yet
today. But what I am telling you is
there's obvious evidence that these things work and that's why
they're done and that's why repetition has to be done all
the time. They have to continue to repeat
it because they need to get that seated in, get that illusory
truth effect so that you will no longer be able to take a new
information. Because once you've heard it
enough, now you're going to discount novel and accurate
information that debunks the previous narrative.
Hence so much of the stuff. I mean, there's a million
examples January 6th and and Nancy Pelosi said we have to
preserve the narrative of that day.
What are they doing? Repeat, repeat, repeat, Continue
to shovel it in and make sure the people are not able to
assess new information at its value.
Speaking of some new information, I want to say
thanks to my buddies over at Catholic Vote.
We're going to wrap this thing up for the day.
Catholic vote. Just today's loop leads off with
an interesting story about the LGBT group demanding an apology
from the Cathedral. Yeah, you heard the one that we
did on Monday talking about the so-called mother of horrors,
this trans atheist activist getting a a funeral at Saint
Patrick's Cathedral. And we're sad for them.
Of course they're now playing the victim saying that they are,
they've been mocked and and that it's really sad and everybody's
really mean to them. Guys.
You can follow Catholic vote and support what they do and their
outstanding information, which continues to come in.
My buddy Josh Mercer is the one who edits over there and does a
great job. It's catholicvote.org.
You can fill in your e-mail address and get the loop or you
can follow them on social media. They're doing a lot much more
active social media push and I I encourage you guys to do that.
They they come with from a slant, but the slant is really
obvious. It's right in the name.
They're Catholic. They're Christians.
They care about truth, family, freedom.
And and that's what we're about here as well.
So check out Catholic Vote. It's at Catholic Vote or
catholicvote.org. I can say those the same because
it's the same name both places. catholicvote.org at Catholic
Vote on Twitter. If you guys want to get a good
news source that just really does put out some good
information. Really appreciate that.
All right, folks, we appreciate you guys and that's why we read
the five star reviews. There's been a lot of great
conversation that I've been seeing kind of running through
the chat. I'm able to read more of it when
we got more videos. Here's a five star review from
Poo Poo Sannicnic. Really.
Poo Poo Send Nick. Nick.
OK, says. Ah, the fresh air, five stars.
Truth is invigorating. God bless KS.
I'll be I'll be KS today. You know what?
The truth is invigorating. It's harder to find it, it's
harder to deal with it, and it's sometimes it unroots things that
we would like to believe, but that's OK.
Truth is supposed to be a little bit uncomfortable.
We have to lean into being wrong sometimes, and partially wrong
other times. Guys follow us on
rumble.com/kyle Serif, and if you're not doing so already, we
really appreciate all of your support.
Make sure you've hit a thumbs up.
If you listen to this point and you have not done so already,
make sure you've done a thumbs up.
Giving us a like and that actually does make a big
difference in the way that these channels are done.
The reason that I think Rubble cares when I write them an
e-mail is because my channel has so many of you given the thumbs
up and I'm really appreciative and grateful for you.
Have a wonderful Wednesday. It is a weird one out there
today. We'll finish up this week
strong, but go into your your hump day, especially those of
you who are feds who have a shorter week.
I hope you enjoy it. Be safe.
Love your neighbors. Be nice.
All right. All those things.
All right. God bless you.
We'll see you again tomorrow. Thanks for listening to The Kyle
Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True
Social, and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.