Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot prepared to embrace the uncomfortable truth
because this program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties enthusiasts, Second Amendment
defender and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin.
Hello, my friends, welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show.
Today is Friday, thank God it's Friday.
It's Friday, November the 17th, and we are going to be doing a
friendly Friday as we often do. I'll be bringing on my friend
Steven Friend. That's enough times to say the
word friend for the beginning of this day.
Folks, we're going to be getting into some interesting topics
today. We're going to be talking some
FBI stuff that just came out. Actually, many of you have this
instinct that that the deck is rigged.
You guys have seen Chris Ray talk, you've seen some of these
hearings, you've heard what the suspendables have had to say
about it. This one actually kind of
flipped my lid when I was sitting having lunch the other
day. This is came from a tweet that
came out of up. I think his name is Paul Sperry
on Twitter. And then I go and I read the
article and it's like, Oh my God, of course.
And in in many ways, I think we are at it an interesting tipping
point because so many things are starting to converge.
There is a convergence of whistleblowers and people that
didn't want to be whistleblowers but are forced into it.
There are people that are being revealed.
There are foyas that are coming out.
And all this stuff is starting to slowly, I feel like, turn the
tide at least for the ability of the American people to know what
the hell actually happened in the last couple years.
We had an awful lot of darkness in this country.
Some of it is the feeling of darkness and some of it is
actual like information that has been cloaked from you.
And as it comes out more and more, these lies are not going
to stand. We're going to talk a little bit
about what goes on with that. We've talked about why people
join the FBI. Obviously they they want to
enforce the FACE Act. What's that and why are they
doing it? We're going to we're going to
shed some light on it, I guess how thrilled Steve Friend was to
go out and arrest abortion protesters.
That's what I wanted to do when I enjoyed the FBI.
Obviously, that's probably what you guys would think FBI agents
spend their time doing. We got a couple other stories in
there. We're going to mix in just for
good fun. But before we do, let's say
thanks to one of the sponsors that we have.
How about we say thanks to Catholic Vote, who I'm going to
be having a meeting with just after the show ends.
There they are. What do we got?
Catholicvote.org, go to the website.
Couple things you can do. Number one, you can check out
the loop. That is a an outstanding source
of information. I'm going to pull up my loop
right now because I looked at earlier today.
I was reading an article just before we got it started.
There are 15 red states right now that have embraced ESG and
they have a whole article about it.
It's coming from the Blaze. Definitely worth your time to
read about that. Do you live in one of these red
states where they are enforcing ESG policies despite the fact
that you are generally A conservative dominated state?
Worth knowing Biden is famining some rumors that Gavin Newsom is
going to run for the White House with some weird statements he
said. Sometimes you wonder, is it just
because, as my buddy Dan says, he has a oatmeal brain?
Or is it because he actually thinks that is a good plan?
Whatever comes out of his mouth, God only knows.
And there's also a big piece on there about pro-life
organizations that are pushing to reauthorize a program known
as the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.
But that plan also offers a bunch of money to pro abortion
groups. Really, really weird.
There's some major conflict of interest when you start getting
involved in government. These are stories worth your
time in today's loop. You can also give to them.
If you click on the top right, you'll see there's an option to
give. They keep us rolling every
month. We appreciate you guys
supporting them. All right, unless we get any too
far too far into this thing, let's bring my buddy the real
Steve Friend. I need to change my camera view.
Ryan is actually at a protest right now or he's getting set up
for the protest that's happening in San Antonio.
Some of you guys know about this.
There's going to be a border invasion discussion, and we're
going to bring Steve on right here.
Let's do it. Boom 123.
The real Steve friend. There he is.
How you doing buddy? I'm doing good man.
I'm looking forward to a friendly Friday and a friendly
weekend. It's been a long week.
It has been a long week. You've been on the road.
You want to tell people what you've been doing and where
you've been traveling. Well, I this month has been
pretty travel travel heavy for me.
I was in Newnan, GA last weekend and had talked to a group up
there. There was about 45 people, but
it was probably like a 7 hour drive to get there.
And you show up and you're like oh man, you know, you hope it's
going to be like a concert venue.
But they were really receptive, extremely gracious host sold a
bunch of books for them. They were there to support me
and they were really activated, which is great because they're
one of the most conservative leaning counties outside of the
the general Atlanta area. I think they're they're sort of
hell bent on, I'm swinging that back the other direction.
And then yesterday I was up where my folks live in Savannah,
GA and addressed the ladies on the right group, which had me
for the second time. I was there about exactly a year
ago. So I gave sort of an update and
had the chance to talk about the the issues that I hope to bring
out at the hearing. When I testified.
They didn't really get a chance to and then also got to to drop
some ordinance on a sitting congressman, which is always a
good time. Tell me about this congressman
situation. Buddy Carter from Georgia's
first district, he was there because it's, you know, they're
on recess right now. So I think that they kind of
make a point of going around to groups and giving an update and
he was touting the passage of the continuing resolution and
the new speaker. And people are kind of just
receptive because he's a congressman.
So they think he's he's a one of the good guys.
And I had the opportunity to go up and say you guys passed a
continuing resolution that funds the Nancy Pelosi Congress budget
levels and everything that I'm talking about that's going on.
The FBI got funded. So what good are you?
You're essentially just there's no point in voting for your
party. It was why?
It was loudly received and and I think Buddy Carter at first was
nodding because he thought I was going to about to give him a
compliment. And then he got very upset.
And you know, know what, look, no ambition to do it.
But I thought for a second that guy's worried about his job
right now because I'm a hometown kid who might be coming for his
position and, you know, he's worried about his career
longevity. It's unbelievable that these
guys go out there and they just try to spin it.
I heard that George Santos say the same things.
Like, you know, we got to give some grace.
We got to give some grace. He's he's kind of effeminate
anyway, but he's like, we got to just give this new speaker like
he's a good guy. And this this it's like, no, he
was in Congress. It's not like he just showed up.
It's not like he was living somewhere else.
And when, Oh my God, now I'm in Congress, like, how do I do
this? It's like you put your name in
the hat for speaker. You were already in Congress.
You already knew what the promises that were made.
You knew what the problems that the country was facing were.
Get it done, dude. Like don't fund the government
in a way that we don't want you to fund it.
They're all so, so scared of seeing a government shutdown on
their watch because they it's somehow it's going to.
Fail that. That's it.
That's their only concern. They're still worried about what
happened in 1995. That was almost 30 years ago.
And, and when Newt Gingrich, you know, was the the, the Gingrich
who stole Christmas, news flash, they actually picked up seats in
the 1996 election. Even though Bob Dole didn't win
the presidential election, the House actually picked up seats.
So why don't you take a firm stand here and instead of
urinating our leg and telling us it's raining when they say, oh,
we're done giving the, the Christmas time omnibus package
and let's just say that's a $20 bill.
Well, now you're going to give me four $5 bills and tell me
that it's great. No, better the bottom line
because I gave $20. Over over a longer period of
time. But it's the same $20, correct?
It's unreal man. And that's because they think
that people are low information and just listless vessels who
will accept whatever they tell them because they have an R by
their name. And that's just unacceptable for
us. And and so we should expect more
from people who were supposed to be there fighting on our behalf.
Yeah, you might as well have the other side.
Let's actually, let's let's hold off on getting into the face
act. I want to do a different one.
First. I want to jump into this thing
because it's relevant to to members of Congress.
So how about we just pull this topic up here, This guy.
OK, I'm just going to read you this.
This is an older article from earlier this week, but we'll
read it anyway because you guys should keep track of what's
happening. We should try to give you some
of the updates that are going on in the world.
So this is from RedState, which is a great website.
If you guys are not following that, redstate.com.
Very easy to do. Shock records show that Adam
Schiff finance a $1.7 million Maryland home as a principal
residence. All right, I don't know what's
more shocking, that he has two residences and one of them's
$1.7 million and it's not in his home district or the fact that
he Claire's at his primary residence when he's supposed to
be representing, oh, California. OK, so a California Republican
House hopeful. He wants to be in the he wants
to be in the Senate. He wants to take Dai Fi's old
seat. He's running for California
Senate just just reported that his primary residence is in
Maryland in order to secure a mortgage rate that was of lower
interest. Because it's not a secondary
home, it's his primary home. Meaning that he either lied on a
federally issued loan document in 2003 to 2021 that he was not,
or he wasn't a resident of Burbank.
I, I don't know how this works. Apparently there's actually a
carve out and I'll, Steve, we'll get into this in just a second,
but apparently there's a carve out that that they've made for
themselves that they can basically declare whatever
residents they need because they need to be around DC so much
that it becomes like 51 plus percent.
So as long as they live 51% of the time near DC, then they can
actually be a primary resident there, but still represent the
home. Guys, if you have a problem with
this, this is the stuff you need to be voting on locally.
These rules are actually set up by the state of California and
in your case, wherever state you're from.
This is a, a little piece here from a House investigator, this
woman named Christine Bish BISH. She said, I filed A complaint
with the House Ethics Committee and I got an e-mail receipt.
They received my submission. I followed up with them and they
said they cannot give me any updates.
Well, that sounds like every single government agency I've
ever worked with as well. The congressman who was first
elected in 2000. So he's been there now 23 years,
23 years, and purchased, purchased this thing in Potomac,
MD in 2003 for $610,000. Man, that was a pricey house
back then, even $610,000 in 2003.
Holy moly. All right, so apparently the
house is worth 1.4, but he finance it for more than that.
That's always interesting. Anyway, there's an entire
article here about basically the fact that he's moved over.
But he says that, you know, his children have grown up in
Maryland. His daughter's a varsity
cheerleader at the local high school.
She graduated in the class of 2016.
That was seven years ago. I don't know why that's
relevant, but it is what it is. He's got another another son
who's at that same school, I guess, who's going to graduate.
Graduated already in 2021, so also already out.
Yeah. Competed in track and shop.
But like none of these things are relevant to any of this
stuff anyway. So here we go.
Congress people representing districts that they don't live
in. Seems like a problem.
Steve Friend, you got any issues with people that are basically
full time swamp residents but also get to go home and still
get to represent their states? Yeah.
And I think it's going to be interesting the fact that the
current occupant of the Dai Fi seat lives in Maryland and he's
seeking to take that seat from her and continue to live in
Maryland. Actually had a conversation with
a candidate who wants to primary Kevin McCarthy, and he doesn't
live in the district that McCarthy does.
And According to him, it's state by state.
But in California, you don't have to live in the district
that you actually represent. You just have to be a California
resident, OK, But you have to at least.
Be a California resident. Yes, yes.
But I'm theoretically you could live in Los Angeles and then run
for a district that's Sacramento because it's a soft seed or you
have a a better opportunity there to win.
Some people, yeah, could bag. Virtually, they'd bag.
They could virtually carpet bag. Why not?
Looks like you just kind of froze up on me for a second.
Or maybe it's on my end here. That's bizarre.
And I I'm wondering how many other states have that thing.
We should probably look into this folks.
If you happen to know in your area, if you can actually live
outside of the districts that you are in and if you're able to
literally add yourself into a, add yourself into a place where
you don't actually live. Very strange.
We're going to do another sponsor real quick.
Steve, I may have to have you come back in if you can hear me.
We lost you. So come on back to me now in a
minute. Just drop out and come on back.
So before that happens, folks, let's go ahead and say thanks to
a sponsor here. Let's do this one.
Let's do this one right here, my friend over at the Dash
dispensables.com. I'm wearing the shirt right now.
You guys can see it. That's Gerardo Boyle's company.
Yeah, it is the Dash suspendables.com.
Let me say that again, and more correctly, that is that is the,
oh, Boyle family company, the Dash dispensables.com.
Check out the shirts there. You guys can click through any
of the merch things. We're still waiting on a
shipment in of a bunch of the pins.
I know that has been a highly popular thing.
If you get the pins, then you can do three of them in the
cart. They will get you a free
shipping and they'll be 30 bucks instead of whatever the normal
price is worth your time. And yeah, I'm running right now.
Look at this. I'm wearing this one.
This is the Zelinsky special. Big fan of this guy.
If you need to go in front of Congress and ask for a bunch of
money for the suspendables, that's the way that you would do
it. Yeah, you could just get
yourself set up. We haven't heard a lot about
Zielinski for a little while here.
We haven't seen or heard much. I don't know where he went.
Maybe he's playing the what about what I called the other
day. Dick chops, something like that.
Or chopsticks. Chopsticks.
That's what I said. I was more clever yesterday than
I was today. Fair enough.
We're still waiting on Steve Friends that let me get us.
Just keep going. This is something I saw that was
in red state as well, and I think it's worth you guys taking
a look at. Pull the sucker up here.
You ever get the feeling that they're they're lying to you?
Here's another one. This is the lie.
Extensive crime study revealing FB is massive under reporting of
defensive gun use by legal gun owners.
This is the second thing from RedState.
I had two of these saved up the other day when Ryan was out
there and I wanted to bring them up but we just didn't get to it.
This was from Wednesday's show, so I'm just going to share with
you now. It's not a new article.
This goes back to October the 18th.
So this is actually last month, but we don't need to break news
in order to just understand what's happening here.
This is an article that says that the Crime Prevention
Resource Center, that's the CPRC, not a Chinese entity but
rather a crime prevention Resource Center, released the
results of an extensive study of FBI statistics and how crimes
are prevented by legally armed citizens.
That might be you. In fact, I saw there was an
entire discussion going on in the chat earlier about revolvers
or HK45. I don't know, maybe you guys
want to shoot 230 grain lead cannonballs down there subsonic.
Maybe you're into 357 magnum for some reason.
That was the chat discussion. I don't know what it had to do
with or how it came up, but I did see calibers in there and
weapon make. So in this finding, it should
not come as a surprise to you that the FBI has actually
massively under reported the statistics.
Now the numbers that they did are not that that big, but the
percentages of what they they failed to report are actually
fairly substantial. So Jeff Charles, who I follow on
Twitter and is worth a good follow.
He's a good libertarian type. He wrote about it.
So now this is something that's been kind of stretched out, but
the numbers themselves in 2014, they under reported the
statistics by 17.4 percent, 2015, by 24 percent, 2016.
It was an under reporting of 24%, 2017252018, roughly 24 and
a half, 25/20/19. It was almost 30%, 2020.
This is where it gets really interesting during that pandemic
time when we see something happening like oh we've got a
bunch of people buying guns that are first time gun owners,
people that have never owned guns before.
They did an under reporting of 37.7% in 2020 and that only got
worse, almost 50% under reporting in 2021.
That was right in the middle of the massive kind of wave of the
pandemic, 49% and 2022 another 41%.
I just got an update from Steve. He said, dude, the Internet is
out. I'm now going to walk around my
block and look for AT&T trucks. Yeah, I'm sure that's totally
coincidental. That's fine.
That's fine, Steve. We'll catch you another time.
Whenever Steve can come back in. He will folks.
The fact of the matter is that there's a broad tread line in
this particular article talking about how the FBI is under
reporting the the increasing and they are actually under
reporting more and more every year going from 2014 until the
current year. We don't have 2023 statistics
yet. That's pretty wild with 2022
being the only one that it dropped, but it's still a 40%
under reporting this. This makes people concerned.
Why? Because if you don't have the
statistics to be able to judge what's going on, then you're
going to have to rely on leftist statistics like people like
every town for gun violence or the moms that are demanding
action. Folks, can you just give these
moms some action? This is a this is a plea to
dads. If you're a father and you've
got a mom who's demanding action, you know what your job
is. That's what that's part of your
marital duties. Please do that so she's not out
there trying to get guns taken away from law abiding citizens.
There's nothing weirder to me than names like that.
Moms demand actions and if you've ever seen them, it's
always a mixed bag. They always have one or two like
really pretty moms that go up and they speak and they're
wearing like an orange shirt, which is hideous.
And it says something about, you know, that they're demanding
action. It's Moms demand Action MDA,
they're doing that. And then you've got like a bunch
of like ugly, not attractive moms that are kind of like
giving her the you go girls. I've been to these these
rallies. I've been to town halls with my
former congressman. It was one of the dumbest things
that I've ever done sitting there.
First of all, I had two what they called assault weapons
under Virginia law on my person because I was an FBI agent and I
carried a backpack AR15 into a weird meeting about gun control
just for the sake of it because I could.
And then I also carried my handgun, which could accept more
than a 20 round magazine in the state of Virginia that's
considered a assault weapon. And so I sat next to this mom
who got very upset that some other lady showed up and said,
you know, what you guys are saying is wrong and you don't
even know what a semi automatic is and you don't have the facts.
And basically your ignorance about guns are very, very
exposed right now. And so this lady leans over to
me and she's like, Can you believe her?
And I'm like, yeah, I can because she's correct.
She's actually correct. And she goes, she's really mad.
It's gross. These people are not informed.
They just have feelings. And these feelings are turned
out into political opinions that are actually voted on.
And then you have to deal with them mostly because they don't
have good information. They don't have good statistics.
And maybe you don't either because the FBI is in fact,
hiding that information from you, and you should have access
to it because you fund the FBI. Think about it.
When you pay your taxes, what are you paying for?
You're paying for federal roads. You're paying for the military.
You're paying for the common defense, the things that are
supposed to be provided for by our founding document.
And if you're going to have federal law enforcement, then in
theory, you should have federal law enforcement that actually
does what it should do, which is tell the truth.
Hey, Steve, friend, you find any AT&T trucks, you run them off.
Man, I ran around the block. I was looking for one of them.
I'm showing strong Internet signal in the house.
All devices up except for apparently my my laptop.
So which which streams to? Our show, Well, all you missed
out on is the fact that the FBI is hiding crime statistics about
defensive gun use, which is no surprise, probably to us.
How did you've had an interesting experience?
I think as well because mine was always that feds hate the idea
of people owning guns privately. Was that the same the same case
in the offices you worked in? Why, yes, yeah, I and it was
always a great test. It was a great test if if
somebody was going to be a bro or not, you would just go up and
be like, hey man, I'm I'm thinking about buying this gun.
And you would show them if they were like really kind of like
squirmy and not like. Why?
Why do you need to buy a gun? Because the the Bureau will
issue you guns. It's almost like the retarded
thing they show. You all the guns.
Yeah, yeah. Well, if the Army wanted me to
have a wife, the Army would have issued me a wife.
Like that's kind of the way that I hear that.
It's like it's a joke, except they were serious.
They seriously talked that way? Yes, there there was actually in
the in the Academy, people were just having conversations about
why does I don't think people should have guns.
That's that's not something and I'm like you're entering a field
where you were going to carry a weapon.
Theoretically, you are an advocate for the Second
Amendment because it's but they they looked at the other way
because you may want to swore allegiance to it you.
Actually swear allegiance to the to the founding document,
including the Bill of Rights. And, and you take that to the
next level where when I got moved over to domestic
terrorism, they tried to play it up in my mind.
They're like, oh, this is going to be great for you.
This is the, this is the crime, the criminal aspect of
terrorism. So you're, you're uniquely
qualified. And in your head you're like,
I'm dude, 98.6 temperature and two arms, 2 legs.
Like that's you're just plugging me in.
But they said the, the crimes you're really going to look for
are gun crimes. Like that's your that's your
primary focus. We're trying to get gun crimes
on people, which theoretically, like I'm, I'm, I'm an
absolutist. Your First Amendment absolutist.
I'm a Second Amendment absolutist.
I think that I should be able to have a Harrier jet and nukes
because the government has them. And you can say all you want
about all. I have a tradition of hunting
and I will need home defense. Yeah, that's true.
I need those because if I don't have them, the government's
going to come and shoot me in the face.
That's why I need them. I'm, I'm less interested in the
nuke thing just between us because I think that the storage
would be prohibited for me. But what I am really interested
in is tracked armored vehicles that you can either arm or carry
arms in and and that could be in the shape of a bulldozer if it
needs to be. My buddy was like whenever these
judges, and by the way, he may or may not work for a federal
agency and may or may not carry a badge and a gun.
He's like when these judges start stepping out of their
lanes and are stopping bills like you have in Florida.
Do you know what's going on in Florida with this injunction
that just happened for the the drag bill?
Did you see this? No this recent.
I've been out of the loop here for a couple days.
OK, so there was a law signed that said that you could no
longer allow drag shows where they were going to be children,
where the age of the child would be able to perceive that is
obscene. OK, That was a pretty common
sense idea. It goes back to even like,
consider the 1970's. The Motion Picture Association
of America said the government said we're going to regulate
these sexual scenes and swearing and violence, whatever or you
regulate yourselves and don't let kids under the age of 13, we
have APG 13 rating. Don't let kids under the age of
17 for rated R movies. And then there's a rated X
movie, which they don't do that anymore in theaters because you
can do it at home and on your phone.
But if you were going to do that, then that's what they
would have like actual like grossly sexual content.
And and so they had a a system, they were like, yeah, I got it.
OK. There are there are standards in
America and certain standards must be enforced for children.
Florida passed that for in person men dressed as women,
sexual dance shows. And there's an injunction that
was that was put in place by a District Court that said it
cannot be enforced statewide. And the the Court of Appeals
Circuit said, well, we don't want to touch that.
The Supreme Court said we don't either.
So they've backed away and they've allowed at this District
Court this this woman to this female judge.
I think it is to to basically allow an injunction across the
entire state because of one place called, I think it's
called something hamburgers. It's a hamburger joint that also
does drag shows. Sounds like a riot.
That sounds like something you would have as a weird lure that
nobody wants to go to it. And I don't want anything to do
with it. I'm sure that parents are not
going there, but straight up imagine that we can't have any
standards at all. And my buddies like, why are
there not like 100 dudes in bulldozers just driving through
that courthouse, just on all sides, just plowing the
courthouse off into the ocean. And I was like, oh, that's that
Seems like it's covered by the 2nd Amendment.
Actually owning a tract armored vehicle.
That's my long way of saying it. I, I mean, did you track on the,
the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade with their advertising?
It's going to be. I did not.
Oh, it's going to be a drag extravaganza.
Unapologetic, the whole thing. So the, the tradition where you
sit around and I never watched the Macy's Thanksgiving Day
Parade, but I think a lot of people do as a family.
They, they throw it on maybe in the background.
They don't want to watch the football game, but they, they're
eating. There's this weird sort of we,
we unusual food for Thanksgiving and we have to eat it at unusual
time. Like dinner's at 3:00.
It's just this odd. Yeah, it's the only time of the
year that you're like, hey, we're going to eat multiple
hours early. And I know we never have Turkey,
but we're going to have Turkey. Let's cook up an enormous bird
that we would never try to mess with once a.
Year, yeah, which is a very complicated and difficult dish
to actually prepare. Weird tradition it is.
I get it. I mean, it's like throwback
stuff. Every once in a while you should
do things that are unusual, that are like harkening back to an
old tradition. But like I I, I don't take the
risk of Turkey. We've been doing steak for
years, so we may get a nicer steak, but we're doing steak, I
think, and we do it on a grill because that's what makes sense
to me, I think. I think beef is today's is.
Hey, man. Today's Turkey.
I am, I'm weird. I, I, I like Turkey.
It's, it's my favorite. So my wife always does a really
good job. She's kind of got it locked in
now she knows what she's doing and and I don't think wife is
like. This I think I'm in favor of you
eating period. So if it's more than almonds,
like go with it. Are you getting a delay on your
end? What's going on on your side?
Do we lose you? We've lost Steve again.
He can't hear me. All right, Steve, I'm pulling
you out. I'm pulling you out.
Come back. You can't make this stuff up,
people. Oh, it's so good.
All right, well, I want to let me hit a sponsor and then we'll
come back and we'll bring Steve back and say, can you?
Are you just what are what are we doing today?
Your your quality is just dropped your audio.
Can you even hear me? I can now let me reset it.
I'll drop back in. I love doing a live show people,
because we get to see in real time exactly what sort of F re
that we would have been able to edit out and I don't want to
edit it out. I actually want you guys to
experience it too. It's good times.
Let's do one of the one of our folks over.
Let's talk about Patriot coolers.
I'm not even going to pull their website up because I have them
in front of me. Look at this.
I'm running multiple Patriot coolers today.
It's probably good because I need it.
We've got this 16 ounce desk Tumblr.
It's got coffee in it. I don't want to drink it just
yet, but I've got it. I got my backup over here.
This is the 19 out the other day.
I think I said it backwards. I said it the the wrong way, but
this is the bigger of the two. They don't look like it, but
this one will fit into your cup holder.
Check them out. It's Patriot coolers.com.
patriotcoolers.com use promo code Kyle.
Gets you 10% off. You can get yourself one of
these guys, which I have as well.
Steve, I'm taking you off for a second here.
Hold on a second buddy. You can do Patriot coolers for
this one here. Check this guy out.
This one says Patriot right there.
It's in the OD green or they all got the flag on them.
If you're not going to a Garrett store and getting the flags and
you're going to have a sub optimal Patriot cooler, but go
to their website, patriotcoolers.com.
patriotcoolers.com promo code Kyle, 10% off, 10% off and free
shipping if you spend more than 50 bucks.
So buy one for you, Buy one for a friend.
Holidays are coming up to make a great gift.
Nobody's going to be sad about it.
The packaging is outstanding. It is patriotic looking.
They have American flags on them.
They say Patriot on all corners and they packed them very
nicely. So check that sucker out.
Comes with a little Patriot cooler sticker.
If you're a sticker person or you want to give them to your
kids like I do. And then they stick them on
things and then your wife yells at you.
Maybe that's just in the Seraphin household, but I love
stickers and I have to give them to my kids otherwise I will put
them on my stuff. And she's always like, what are
you, 15? You 15?
You're putting your stickers on everything.
Yeah, basically, I'm a grown up with a grown up budget and still
sort of 15 years old. So there is that.
Steve dropped off again here. We're going to keep going.
Let's keep pushing. I want to bring up this next one
here. This is my #3 this man.
This one is really weird, folks. We had a, like I said, a tweet
that came out that called my attention to this.
I had no idea that there was going to be some overlapping
fields of fire. And this one right here, this
article here is written by Real Clear Investigations.
Most of this I'm going to read to you.
Most of the article I'm going to share with you because it's so
interesting to me. Paul Sperry's a writer over
there. He tweeted this out a couple
days ago. And this article is dated quite
a ways back, but it says that The Washington Post, their
national editor, Mattia Gold, has to recuse herself from any
coverage of the FBI or the DOJ over a personal conflict of
interest. OK.
And the conflict of interest is for her husband, a guy named
Jonathan, Jonathan Lesnar LENZNER.
Lesner was named the chief of staff over at the FBI.
Now, I'm going to tell you why that's relevant, but first we're
going to read a little bit about it.
So the Post spokesperson told Real Clear Investigation in the
papers, Managing Editor Steve Ginsburg will be overseeing DOJ
coverage and FBI coverage. Because this person is no longer
she's, she's not considered unobjective and she's not not
having any problem with her credibility.
They're just saying because of their standards, because they
have standards over there at the Washington Post, It's news to
you as well. They have every confidence in
her professionalism, but she's recused herself because her
husband actually works for one of those agencies.
Well, why is that interesting? Who is this guy Jonathan Lesnar?
And that's really where the story gets so interesting to me.
He has a very long history and connection to the Clintons.
You remember we were talking about that guy Jonathan Buma the
other day, on Wednesday, I think it was.
We're talking about how he accused the FBI of having a pro
Trump bias because you had those pro Trump guys like Andy McCabe,
whose wife was receiving money from Clinton cutouts.
You had those guys like Peter Strzok, who's a section chief
who was so pro Trump he was ready to like smell the Walmart
on the Trump supporters. You guys remember those people,
right? All those pro Trumpers that were
out there trying to cover up for Trump that were lying on FISA
applications and they were putting a a false FISA document
and affidavit in front of the court, literally altering the
text so that it meant the opposite of what was said.
Those people, those people, apparently those pro Trumpers
also have interesting ties to the Clintons.
Even at the chief of staff, which is going to be the person
who's in the office of the director, it says in this thing
gold, who's going to be, like I said, that editor for Washington
Post married Lesnar in 22,006. And this guy Lensner is the son
of the late private investigator Terry Lensner, who earned the
reputation as the Clinton's private CIA.
This is their quotation, not mine.
In digging up dirt on Clinton mistresses and other enemies, he
helped squash a series of things that that Hillary Clinton
famously called the bimbo eruption.
You guys might have remembered that from the 1990s.
So Hillary Clinton was involved in this as well.
And during that impeachment probe, Kenneth Starr called him
before the grand jury to testify about his aggressive
investigative work on behalf the president.
Now, that is the chief of staff of the FB is father.
And you say, well, they're not necessarily the same thing.
Well, it turns out that that John is also a Democrat and a
Clinton donor, and he donated at least $1700 to Hillary Clinton's
2016 campaign, according to the Federal Election Commission
records. And then he was appointed in
December of last year to be the chief of staff.
So that's no big deal. We've got Clinton donors that
are running it, even though we we are having this weird
allegation this, This is why all this stuff starts coming out and
you start realizing like, Oh my God, what is happening behind
the scenes? I had no idea that they had not
just the Andy McCabe, who was the deputy director and he was
the acting director, right. He was the number two.
And then for a while he was actually the number one.
He was the number one when one of my children were born.
They have a weird policy in the Bureau where you can actually
get a, a document signed by the FBI director.
It's like a, you know, congratulations on the birth of
your child kind of deal. And the director theoretically
signs it and they mail it to your office and you get it.
And it's like, you know, we're so happy for your family.
Kind of a neat thing. I didn't get one from comedy.
Maybe I did. I can't remember if I've got it
in an envelope somewhere. But I think we got one from Andy
McCabe when my second daughter was born, which is really weird
because he was the acting director.
I actually managed to see three FBI directors during my short
time at the FBI. Only six years.
We had three directors and one of them turned out to be someone
whose wife was getting money from the Clintons.
Of course, they hired this guy. Everyone always says, well,
Chris Wray, he's a, he's a Republican.
I mean, he was, he was nominated by President Trump.
It's like, well, he kind of got conned into that.
Sounds like you guys don't know the story of Chris Wray.
He was making $9.2 million as a fixer for for the swampy type
Republicans, including Chris Christie.
So if you don't want Chris Christie Cream's nomination,
maybe, maybe you think that he's not the kind of guy that you
would normally put in there. And maybe, maybe, just maybe if
Trump gets back into office, we can correct that failure,
absolute failure from late 2017 when Chris Wright came in.
But yeah, he appointed a Clinton donor.
Why wouldn't you? Why not?
I'm sure he just stood on the merits.
His political leanings had nothing to do with what was
going on. But this is quite interesting
and for me, looks like we got Steve Friend back, so I'm going
to bring him up here. Steve, have you notified
everybody what's going on outside?
Tell him to stay away. We're not talking anything bad,
just just fax. Yeah, just fax.
I mean look, they're they're going to do what they're going
to do right. I was just always six O 1 today
I thought it was OK but I guess at 10 Eastern I need to check on
my my Internet opsec at. Did you go do a run?
Nope. Steve's gone.
All right, bud, Friendly Friday will not be nearly as friendly,
but we lost the friend again. We can't make it up.
We'll figure this thing out. We'll get it done for next week.
Until that point, let's continue and press on because I want to
show you guys what I'm talking about when I say that they are
doing something shady. Let's look at this one right
here. This is from our friends over at
Judicial Watch. Many of you guys know Judicial
Watch, you're familiar with what they're about.
They are a Government Accountability advocacy group.
They work more on the political right than not, but not
necessarily. And, and Tom Fitton's the
president over there. He does a really good job of
putting things out there. I'm going to actually hide this.
Going to hide that piece right there.
OK. So Judicial Watch says FBI
records show that top officials were rushing to craft a response
to the leaked memo revealing the targeting of Catholics.
What memo was that? That's the one that yours truly,
an unnamed whistleblower within the FBI exposed, showing that
radical traditionalist Catholics, these are Latin Mass
Catholics, a pretty, pretty nice group of human beings if I've
ever met one, were being targeted for their potential
susceptible recruitment to white supremacy.
And we should say that one more time.
If you're new to our channel or you're not familiar with the
story, there's nothing more interesting to me than knowing
that the FBI looked at people who go to Latin Mass and believe
in traditional Catholicism, pre Vatican 2 Catholicism and said
those are the kind of people that are going to be joining the
white supremacist ranks and getting into what they called
racially motivated violent extremists.
Now, the words that the FBI says don't mean anything in real
life, but they are basically calling that's a euphemism for
white supremacy almost exclusively, just in the same
way that being a anti government, anti authority
violent extremist is a euphemism now for being a Trump supporter.
All really, really ugly. This is the stuff that we're
talking about. So what happened is this, and if
you're donating right now to Catholic vote, then you are
helping fund their FOIA request. They sent me the FOIA.
I was sworn to secrecy for a little bit until Judicial Watch
did this particular expose and put out their public statement.
Since they did this week, I can talk talk about it a little bit
more. I've read the 131 pages of
redacted information that came from the FBI.
So that's Part 1. And what do they have in here?
They've got all kinds of little, little tidbits.
It's almost exclusively not discussing how did we screw up,
how do we screw up, and what can we do to fix it.
They didn't do that at all. OK.
What they did do, what they did was they said how in the world
do we spin this and how can we prepare the document, which they
knew was going to eventually get requested by Congress for its
proper release to Congress, by redacting it in ways that are
appropriate and making it look less bad.
It is a 100% scrambling behind the scenes CYA fest in 131
pages. Now they have unbelievable
amounts of redactions to it. And I think I'm going to
actually be able to pull these up here and show you guys
exactly what I mean. So standby, we're actually
pulling up the web page here and I'm going to just going to do
the view. Here's the some of the stuff on
here. Let's see if we can scan
through. This is what it looks like when
the FBI sends you a FOIA document.
If you've never done this before, this is how it comes in.
So these again obtained under FOIA, the Freedom of Information
Act, which in theory is a sunshine law that allows you to
see what's going on in the government.
But in reality it's just government CYA non-stop.
And what you'll notice over on the far right hand side in all
the margins, B6B714, etcetera, etcetera.
This one says B6-3B7C-3. These are the exceptions to the
FOIA, which are kind of like government get out of jail free
cards that they can cover up names and actual information so
that they don't have to tell you the information that you are are
are authorized to get under law. They have to respond to you, but
they don't have to tell you everything and they can redact
it to the point where it is of no value whatsoever.
You'll notice they've redacted the name of the person from the
national press office and the phone number of the person at
the FB is national press office in the first piece of this this
particular return. Why do they do that?
Because even though that person is funded by federal government
monies and even though we are talking about someone who is a
public servant theoretically and swears allegiance to the
Constitution has no right, their their job is not classified.
The work they do is not classified.
Their their ability to be a private citizen.
Like they work in the press office for the FBI.
They literally respond to the Washington Examiner in this
case, the Daily Signal, which comes out of Heritage Foundation
in this case. They literally respond to people
in the press, but they never want their actual name cited.
Why is that? Like, why would that be a big
thing? Why would you not just say that
one of the FBI spokespersons and, and their phone number,
maybe you don't want to put that down.
You could. They probably shouldn't have
their specific phone number anyway when they're doing this.
But what you're seeing is all these different little tidbits.
And even with this garbage that we are seeing from them, from
the FBI, what we notice is the way that government emails are
structured, we can see how this is playing out.
So from redacted unknown and then in parentheses we see OPA,
that stands for the Office of Public Affairs and then the
government agency, FBI. If you're not familiar with
government emails, this is how they work.
OK, You'll look at another one. There's one named Tanya Urezza
or something that Ugo Reds, and that is DI.
That's the Director of Intelligence, FBI.
You see another one parentheses. RH, Stanley Medor, who I believe
is the special agent in charge. That's the field office that was
involved. RH is the Richmond field office.
Every FBI field office has two letter designations.
So you're seeing all these things.
CTD, Why was the counterterrorism division
informed? Who knows?
Inspection Division, that's also really fun.
And for me, some of the stuff tells you that there's spin
because there's a lot of Office of Public Affairs going on, but
they're also doing an internal investigation to find out who
was involved. That's what the inspection
division pieces there, and there's tons more of it.
OK, lest you think otherwise, these people did not care about
doing the right thing and exposing and saying, oh, my God,
somebody wrote a terrible document, which is what kind of
what Merrick Garland has said and what Chris Ray has said.
They say, oh, what? You know, we're aghast and we're
appalled and we, it was unacceptable and it was not
tolerable really, because all you guys did was figure out how
to play spin games. None of you were interested in
actually fixing the problem and saying, hey, we need to figure
out there's my article right there.
This article. They returned the article that
was publicly available because the FBI was sending it around,
just so you guys know. And then the inspection division
was beefing up their case because technically at that
point, the FBI still considered me an employee despite the fact
they hadn't paid me in, I don't know, six or eight months by
that time. And then of course in.
What was it, April of this year? I had to tell them that I, I
also break up with them, even though they'd already broken up
with me. There's another page here.
They're just adding people on. They're, they're panicking about
incoming media requests. So they're adding the Office of
General Counsel so they can figure out what their legal
grounds is. But once again, you see this
inspection division, the Suzanne Turner's on here.
It's very interesting to see how much they were scared of what
happened. And I think we're going to see
some more of these pieces in here.
So much of this stuff is not about doing the right thing.
That's not what these government agencies do and it's not how
FOIA is is viewed. They view it as an
inconvenience. And they, if you look, look how
many names are redacted here. I mean, these are virtually
useless. And there's some really funny
ones where they said, here's what our talking points are.
This is what we're going to discuss.
We'll see if we can pull down to where it says it.
They literally redacted entire emails that they sent.
Here's one in that contents. Here's a couple of things to
note with the situation. All redacted, that comes from
the deputy assistant director. That's the assistant to the to
the number two person in the director of intelligence, Pamela
Byron, whoever the heck that is. But they also say the product is
leaked. Of course.
No, the product wasn't leaked per SE.
It was actually submitted to Congress.
That's how we do these things. And we say this looks like a
violation of the 1st Amendment, a violation of rule, policy or
procedures. We talked about on Wednesday.
When you deal with this stuff, when you're dealing in this
world, you start finding out more and more that none of this
has to do with good faith efforts to try to clean things
up. They don't say, oh,
whistleblower said this is going on.
Oh, my God, it is going on. How do we make ourselves better?
It's never that. It's just never that.
Amusingly, they also added on Jason Jones, who's the Office of
General Counsel. He is, in fact, the general
counsel for the FBI. OK.
And then as you move further down this little list, you start
seeing that they started copying the chief of staff Lensner, and
he gets all thread, which I saw over and over again.
And of course that guy probably actually agrees with all this
stuff. Here's my buddy Larissa Knapp.
Some of you guys can see it on the if you're not watching on a
rumble screen, you're missing this Larissa Knapp.
She's the the executive assistant director of the
National Security Branch. So she's the top person in that.
And it's from her about media requests.
I just think it's really funny. They're all just forwarding
emails back and forth in a frantic frenzy.
And they basically provided no value for 131 pages of mostly
redacted. The only things that would have
been of interest were either referencing what was going on
and what they call the red side. So if you're seeing this on the
screen right now, it says EA DS follow up on EAD naps red side
e-mail. Please see the below contacts
from Pam, which of course is also redacted.
The red side is also known as the Simpranet if you're dealing
with if you're a military type person, but it is the up to
secret no foreign classification e-mail server.
The FBI usually calls it View net or Bureau net, and that is
where all the secret stuff is. So of course, if it's on the red
side, then it's not going to be susceptible to FOIA.
That's literally what they do in these cases.
They just go, hey, we're not going to have this conversation
on an open e-mail that's, you know, that is unclassified.
We're going to move it on to our classified server.
And even though it's unclassified, we're going to
shield it and hide it from you. Pretty awful, pretty ridiculous
and pretty crazy. We did get another message back
from Steve saying that he has full Internet running, but he's
not going to try to mess up the live stream.
And he's very upset because he drove home last night just so he
could do the show. We'll figure out what it is.
It may be on. It may be just a, a classic
technical glitch. You never know.
But we also don't believe that sort of thing here at the Kyle
Sheriff show. Not very often.
More of this stuff, folks. If you want to go to this page,
I will actually tweet out the the the Judicial Watch
statement. It's worth your time.
It's worth a quick read through it.
The best stuff in here is actually called out, in fact, by
this press release. And I'm going to go back and I'm
going to read that for you real quickly.
Let's see here. I think it is.
There it is. So, yeah, let me read this
really quickly because I think I think seeing it and knowing that
they were wounded will be the best piece of it.
There's a a little a little statement where one of the OR
one of the CTD folks and I've lost it.
Of course, I've scanned past it. He says the worst part about it
is that it was in fact self-inflicted.
It was an unforced error and something about them knowing
that they screwed it up. Here it is.
It's Ryan T Young. He's the executive assistant
director of the Intelligence branch, so he's on level with
Larissa Knapp. And our friend Jenny Moore,
who's no longer there, responds to this guy, Lensner once again.
And he says it's really not a good look.
Real frustrating when it's self-inflicted.
Then of course, he says, I'll be back in town in a couple days
and we'll figure out some steps. It's all CYA steps.
None of it is like, hey, maybe we should evaluate who we're
hiring. Maybe we should consider a
little bit more rigor in our process, which is kind of what
you heard. If you listen to these hearings,
you'd think that they were appalled and they wanted to fix
it. That is not the case.
That's because it is a basically
evil organization that's captured by these losers that
are out there and they're politically motivated.
And I'll just say it in plain and simple terms.
They're politically motivated. They do not care about their
servants to the Constitution. They don't care about the Bill
of Rights. They simply care about how does
it look for them and are they going to be able to get a big
job afterwards. And thank God that we have this
one lady who's married to the chief of staff just recusing
herself from the favorable puffing coverage.
Like, we're not going to see the same thing out of the Washington
Post for the FBI. Dangerous stuff when you're a
leftist. Just a couple days ago, you guys
would have been upset about the FBI in general.
I'm just saying, you used to know that law enforcement was
real, and then federal agents are a totally different animal.
Federal law enforcement cosplay as we call it here at the Kyle
Seraphin Show. Folks, you know what I'm talking
about. Don't name.
I just seen the chat says name your Wi-Fi FBI surveillance van.
Don't do that. That doesn't help anybody.
That just makes your neighbors laugh and it doesn't take the
threat seriously. Plus there's no reason for Wi-Fi
in a surveillance van. We can talk about surveillance
van another time with Steve Fred.
I think let's let's talk about our friends over at Pay for
Patriots. Really appreciate them.
I'm going to run my promo here because I need a quick breath
and I'm going to need a little bit more coffee before we finish
the sucker out. But for Patriots, for
patriots.com slash Kyle, check them out.
All right, you listen to the Kyle Seraphin show.
So you know that we don't think it's an if, but a when things
get bad in this country and when they get bad, you want to be
prepared. One of my good buddies says you
got two options. You can prepare or repair.
I recommend you prepare and you can go to
forthe#4patriots.com/kyle. You can check out all of their
survival goods, including their best selling survival food.
There is a thing called the rule of threes in the military.
It's a survival concept. It says that you can go for
three weeks without food, although I don't recommend it.
You can go for three days without water, although that
gets really rough. You can go for three minutes
without air, but you can't go for three seconds without hope.
Failure to plan is planning to fail.
Don't be that guy that doesn't know what to do if the lights go
out and you don't have a grocery store to go to.
That's not where the food comes from.
It should come from your pantry. They send me the 72 hour food
pack. We cook some up, kids ate it, no
problem. This is a victory.
Get it done by going to fourpatriots.com/kyle.
You can throw something in your truck, in your van, in your
minivan. Keep food where you are in case
you can't get to where your food is.
This is a real simple problem to solve.
It's easy, You throw a couple dollars at it and you can forget
about it. They're guaranteed for 25 years.
That's an awful lot of time for you to be solving this problem.
Go ahead and check it out for patriots.com/kyle or use promo
code Kyle, if you go to forpatriots.com.
Yeah, there it is. Check them out for
patriots.com/kyle. OK.
On top of that, we, we did promise you some face act
violation discussion. I am going to do that.
I'm going to pull the sucker up right now.
FACE act violation. You guys know what the FACE act
is? The free access to clinic
entrances that also protects churches but doesn't ever get
enforced that way. The FBI is is crowing about
this. Our buddy Steve Friend had a
tweet he wanted to cover down on it.
So we'll have to do it another time.
But moreover, this is something that they are crowing about. 9
defendants were convicted of federal conspiracy against
rights. This is such ugly garbage.
And the free access to clinic entrances act for offenses in
2020 in Washington DC. Couple things to talk about
there. How about the criminal assistant
director saying this one Face Act violations such as this one
are not taken lightly and they are serious crimes that endanger
people's physical safety and can be traumatizing for patients and
for staff. The FBI and our partners will
always work to protect every American's access to
reproductive health care services.
That's really saying the quiet part out loud, isn't it?
That's really what they're saying.
They're telling you that they want to make sure that they are
protecting abortion clinics far more than they're interested in
investigating vandalism to churches.
They shouldn't be doing either of these.
They're much bigger problems in this country.
But lest you think that these are actual dangerous people that
are doing dangerous things in a dangerous place, it was
committed in 2020. The investigations only happened
after Biden got in and that's something I'm sure it's a total
freaking coincidence that they were not interested in doing
face act investigations. Doesn't mean they weren't
floating them out there. But when I got to to Albuquerque
division when I was out in Las Cruces, I noticed that they they
had bumped up the the counterterrorism threat level
for anti abortion protesters to the number 3 tiered ban.
That was the number three priority for the
counterterrorism division despite the fact that they were
exactly 2. I've said this a bunch of times,
but there were only two abortion clinics in the entire state of
New Mexico. 1 was a surgical facility.
One simply gave out pills and it was in a tiny little town called
Anthony and their, their, their justification for this was the
fact that Texas had passed a heartbeat bill saying that you
could no longer do free abortions everywhere.
And that was going to drive a bunch of people in to get
abortions in New Mexico, which obviously was going to inspire a
bunch of violence. That was the logic.
If you believe that kind of stuff, then you should actually
probably work for the federal government.
They, they went out there, the people that they're talking
about, there were these dangers to the public that were blocking
accesses to clinic entrances was a 75 year old woman from
Kingston, MA. She was convicted in a bench
trial. The 9 defends that have been
have been convicted in the federal conspiracy against
rights. That means that you had to
conspire to deprive people of their constitutional liberties
by the way of which we sort of aside, we sort of know that has
been kicked back to the states. You don't have a constitutional
right, but there are multiple different defendants, men and
women aging from their from their teens all the way up into
their 70s and 80s. And they said violence and
physical obstructions that interfere with access to
reproductive health clinics violate the law.
That's what the that's what the assistant attorney general said
from the Civil Rights Division. And this conviction sends a
strong message by putting a 75 year old woman into jail.
It sends a strong message that criminal conduct against
abortion providers, they say reproductive health, but let's
say it really and patients will not be tolerated and the
perpetrators will be held accountable.
She also failed to mention, but you really meant it, that they
are diligently looking in to all those attacks on reproductive
centers that were crisis pregnancy centers run by
Christians. And they look forward to getting
some convictions in those. But it's very, very hard because
it was dark outside. And when it's dark, you can't
find people who have committed crimes.
Obviously it's too hard to find them.
There's no light. And if you can't see things, how
could you find out who they were?
Nevermind the fact that we found all the J Sixers that were
inside buildings. It's very hard to see in
buildings because there's a building in the way.
But they were able to drop a dragnet.
This, this hypocrisy is what you guys are feeling.
And some of it comes down to the fact that the chief of staff
used to be a or is a Clinton donor and a Clinton supportee
and a Democrat. And they have democratic
principles that are running this Bureau.
So lest you think our our fake friend Jonathan Buma, who very
well may be a real, I mean, he isn't an FBI agent.
We've talked to his supervisor. So we have some contacts to say
that he's a real guy. And he may really think that
that's going on, but he really seems to be maybe mentally ill
if that's the sort of thing that he took away from his time
working at headquarters. It makes no sense whatsoever to
me or anybody else that I've talked to because that's just
not the reality bit. And their actions are much
louder than words. They really are, folks.
You've been listening to the Kyle Seraphin show and we
appreciate it. Despite the technical
difficulties and the weirdness of not being able to have the
actual man Steve Friend on Friendly Friday, we've punched
through. We're going to have a nice
weekend. I hope you guys have a nice
weekend. I hope you have lovely weather
coming out there. We appreciate you guys giving us
thumbs up as you are watching on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
I think that this is the last day that we are going to be
doing the YouTube stream. There's only a few of you over
there and I see all six of you. That's how many people are
watching live on YouTube right now.
If you're watching live on YouTube and you are interested
in keep keeping with the show, please join us on
rumble.com/kyle Serif and come over to Rumble 1.
You'll like it. 2, the chat's great.
I seen all you guys, you're going, your guys are rocking and
rolling. And three, we don't want to put
content out there where the leftist sensors are getting
track of it and putting it onto a platform that's owned by
Google, which seems to be pretty evil and censors us anyway.
So we're done. I think we're done.
That'll be the end of it. We may have some new
announcements. We're going to probably be
streaming in a new place that you guys will like, been talking
to some folks. So you guys will see it coming
your way very soon. Stand by for a new announcement.
If you're on another platform you might want to watch.
We can do that. Until then, let's do a five star
review. You guys have been doing great.
We're just at that mark where it's going to be 800 probably by
the end of the day here today. This one is coming from old and
out of shape once again, says my go to podcast.
Kyle's become my go to podcast, the source of information from
someone who truly cares about America and great guests.
Some days I only have an hour in the car.
Kyle wins out. Appreciate all you're doing,
Greg. Greg, old and out of shape,
remember, your fitness and your survival are going to be
contingent on you being prepared.
So check out some of our sponsors, but more importantly,
also take care of yourself. Don't be old and out of shape.
You could be better than that. Go out and dig a hole like my
dad just did. What else we got?
That's about it. Follow Ryan Madda, he's going to
be down in San Antonio. If you guys want to keep track
of his social media and see what he is streaming at this protest,
the border invasion protest that's going on tomorrow in San
Antonio, TX. You can follow him at Ryan Madda
Media, Ryan Madda Media or follow him on true social at
Ryan Mana. And folks, we'll see you after
the week. Kent, we really do appreciate
you joining us here. We'll see you soon.
Be safe. God bless you.
That's it. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True
Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.