Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower in
American Patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this programme has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Well, hello my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Today is Tuesday. It's the first day of the week.
For many of you it is January the 2nd.
We are off and rolling in 2024. Give me those thumbs up in the
live chat here we had some weird things.
I actually just tried to refresh my rubber page and I couldn't
see it. So if you guys are having
issues, make sure you guys refresh.
And if you're joining us, I see we got about 60 or 70 people out
there on Twitter. If you guys want to join the
live chat where people are going back and forth, you can do so on
rumble.com/kyle Serafin. Again, that's rumble.com/kyle
Serafin should be able to click right through on there.
Open up the live chat. There's a dozen of dozens.
Dozens generally gets up to like hundreds of you.
No demon voice today, folks. I've done a couple of
troubleshooting things to make sure we get going.
We got a pretty interesting show, I think, and I should have
changed the name of it before we started going.
I started it off with something like they just don't understand,
but I actually don't think it's that they don't understand.
What I think is going on here is that the gaslight burns eternal.
That is what is going on in 2024.
It is going to be 100% gaslight all the time, pedal to the
metal, just like our first story is going to cover down on pedal
to the metal. But they just cannot grasp the
reality that we do not trust them.
We the American people, we the average person, no interest no
interest in what they're selling and they continue to write
stories about how they cannot believe that we don't believe
them. It's actually kind of fun I
guess that's sort of like in the meta world.
Let let's let's start off first with my friends over at 4
Patriots. I want to just talk down like I
said if we're going to be dealing with people that don't
put out honest information anything is possible including
power grid failures including logistical failures including
supply chain. You got to make sure that you're
prepared for a disaster and an emergency.
The the website is for Patriots. The number four patriots.com for
Patriots com. You guys can go in there and
check out the survival bundles. I keep showing you the same ones
because these are the ones that you're gonna get when you go to
fourpatriots.com/kyle. That's where it starts off.
Start off with something cheap. Get yourself a a $30 survival
food pack. Get yourself ready so that you
have calories for a couple of days to buy yourself time to
figure out whatever your plan is going to be.
If you guys want to get deep into the survival thing, they've
got all kinds of stuff, whether it be power and solar and water.
And if you're a camper and RV person, it's a great time for
you to go out there and you know, sort of try out test run
all of your equipment. FT Exit, if you will.
As you had one of our guests talk about anybody who's in the
military know a field training exercise, you should always do
it for patriots.com/kyle. Or if you're running around on
their website, you can use the promo code Kyle, Kyle, Check
them out and let's get rolling on today's show.
The first thing I wanted to bring up pretty wild.
I actually didn't hear about this until just recently.
Now, of course, I'm seeing it all over the place on Twitter
because it takes a little while for real news to philtre
through. Or does it?
This was front and centre on CNN's web page today.
A deadly car crash outside of New Year's Eve concert in
Rochester, NY. Where is Rochester's?
In Upstate, Right, It's up near where that other car exploded.
But that car was definitely, definitely not terrorism.
You guys remember that? This one apparently says it's
being investigated as domestic terrorism.
The driver allegedly left a suicide note and a journal.
Huh. Suicide note and a journal.
Have we ever seen someone do something kind of kooky crazy?
Left a suicide note and a journal?
And then it definitely, definitely wasn't terrorism.
We wouldn't be talking about little kids getting shot by a
transgender lunatic, right? That's not terrorism.
That's just somebody had a bad day.
And in this case we're talking about, apparently there's a
domestic terrorism subject allegedly left a suicide note
and journal in his hotel room. The suspect has been identified
as Michael Avery from Syracuse families, been interviewed by
interviewers or investigators rather, on the Joint Terrorism
Task Force, the FBI's Buffalo office.
That's the exact same people that investigated that bridge.
That's weird. I don't know.
How do they decide that it's terrorism related?
When they were able to dismiss it in 24 hours, they they
dismissed the other one that went flying.
You remember the the Flying Bentley, The the Airborne
Bentley that was doing the Dukes of Hazard peace.
How come those people were immediately ruled not terrorists
right away this one was There's actually a video of the of of
the aftermath of whatever this crash looked like.
I don't know where you decided that this thing is a a terrorist
activity. I don't know how that gets done
but I've got a video queued up here and I actually threw
side-by-side CNN's mobile web page.
So you can see not only are they wanting to show you about this
deadly terrorist crash, which is obviously as you guys are, I
correctly identifying in the chat and he must have some sort
of conservative tie, right. The second thing is, is they
wanted you to know that the respiratory viruses are surging
in the United States. You could die.
That is the that is the headline.
That is the little preview headline on the top of this.
It says something about Israel and Gaza, respiratory viruses,
Fear, fear, fear. And then also fear, fear, fear,
domestic terrorism. You guys want to see this video
real quick. We'll talk over it because it's
just looks like it's a rear dashcam video you can see right
now if you're watching there goes a truck that is on fire.
Apparently the reason this was ruled a a terrorist attack and
you're going to see the guy, the passenger actually get out on
fire is what it looks like, which is pretty awful to watch.
It's not exactly graphic considering what we see on TV
these days, but that person decided they were not going to
hang out there very long whatever this rear, this rear
camera is and there it is burning.
So interestingly enough this deadly crash which was
supposedly terrorism, was decided that it was terrorism.
Why? Because they had a bunch of
gasoline canisters, a dozen gas canisters in the back of the
vehicle that was a pickup truck. Maybe they were just
transporting gas to generators. Maybe they thought they were
doing a Y2K situation and that was the end of the end of days
coming, right? But instead we've decided it's a
terrorist attack. Even though we had a Bentley
absolutely explode. I've never seen a car explode,
even that impact. You guys have seen race cars,
right? They have, They have, they have
double walled gas tanks. So they don't do that sort of
thing. That's sort of like a 70s and
80s sort of model. Like the new gas tanks don't
explode. I wouldn't imagine a Bentley
would be ready to explode, but all that stuff just makes me It
just says we don't trust whatever it is you're selling
us. And if CNN is the number one
purveyor of telling us that there's a domestic terrorism
attack, watch out folks, because this, like I said, this year, is
going to be lit. There's no question in my mind
we're gonna be getting an awful lot of really weird stuff.
I also saw this video, which was online, and I wanted to share it
with you. This was a congressional hearing
with the a senior member of the EPA, which is absolutely my my
least favourite organisation, just behind the FBI and the ATF.
These people destroy businesses. They seem to be an absolute
menace to American prosperity. They don't want manufacturing
jobs happening here. And apparently they are arming
their enforcement division. With what military grade stuff
this stuff is. This is actually pretty
interesting. I don't know how this actually
goes down, but stand by. Let's see if we can take a look
at. This we wanna go in two
different areas real quick because the EPA is purchasing
millions of dollars worth of advanced combat equipment.
And I and I heard a little bit about this earlier on a on a
slightly different question. And a lot of this includes night
vision. And and so why does the EPA need
military equipment? Well, and and I'll give the same
answer I gave before, I need to really look into this particular
issue and the reasoning behind our enforcement arm making these
purchases. I'd like to give an honest
answer. So I'd love to get back to you
on that. So you're not going to war
against anyone, right? Listen, there's no one to go to
war against. I believe that our permitted and
regulated constituency are partners and we're trying to do
these things together. I guess it.
I just want you to know, how are Americans supposed to feel about
an agency, you know? Because a lot.
Of us feel like that our rights are always trampled on and and
especially when you're stocking up on weapons so you know I
would love to have some sort of detailed answer into.
That especially if if, if there is no war on the horizon for the
EPA. Absolutely.
Yeah, I'd love to get like a real answer about that.
Does this guy go to the Chris Ray school of.
I'm not going to tell you anything and I'm gonna do it
with a smile and I'm going to act like I just answered your
question by telling you that I will get back to you never.
That I'm never going to get back to you.
That I'm not going to tell you the truth.
Why does the EPA need night vision?
Why are they picking up a bunch of equipment from from former
military operations If you guys don't understand, there's a
there's an entire programme, decommissioned military stuff
and also not decommissioned but no longer needed.
I guess it's a way to to continue to pump the budget.
So they give it to either local and federal and state law
enforcement and then the military can get cooler and
newer stuff. Except we kind of know those of
us who have in the military know that we're not always getting
that cool stuff. Somebody's getting it.
Maybe they're just buying it, putting in boxes, which is what
the FBI used to love to do. I used to actually go over into
the warehouse for our surveillance team and they would
have all the equipment for the entire country.
They would have all the equipment all boxed up, brand
new cameras, cutting edge Nikon stuff, whatever.
And we couldn't have it because it wasn't time to hand it out
yet. They would wait until it was
like a year or two old and it was no longer cutting edge.
Then they would give it to us. They had it the whole time.
They could have shipped it out to everybody, but they didn't.
That's kind of like federal logic.
But the idea that they're going to need to have night vision,
like are we doing enforcement actions at night in the EPA?
Even the FBI, which is a legitimate, like law enforcement
agency, theoretically, right? It's not.
We talked about that. But if you were to even say
somebody with law enforcement, you would at least believe that
the FBI has it. They've got SWAT teams, they've
got tactical teams and so on. They're not even allowed.
They're not even allowed to make entry into a home under night
vision, which is good by the way.
That's good. You actually should be in a law
enforcement role, not going in like an operator team that's
ready to grab a high value target.
Your job should be to identify yourself very clearly, to
operate in, you know, very plain view.
I actually don't think they should be wearing camouflage at
all. I've made the argument that
almost all tactical teams, whether they be state, local,
federal, should all be wearing high viz police markings like
with retro reflective gear and either neon orange or neon
green. We know who you are, so there's
no guess. It's not like it's either the
safety dance guys showed up outside my house or it's a
tactical team. But we shouldn't be wondering
like who are these dudes in pyjamas?
Is this the militia that decided to take over our neighbourhood?
Are these a bunch of scumbags that are wearing balaclavas and
face masks? Is that acceptable?
I don't think so, because they actually have a duty almost all
the time to knock and announce. They almost always have to knock
and announce. So night vision is a good for
surveillance. It's actually not that great,
folks. As someone who has done
surveillance with night vision professionally for thousands of
hours, I've done day and night basically.
Once it gets night, your best shot is really good.
Binoculars with really large objective lenses, sitting as
close as you can to the subject and you can get closer when it
gets dark, you should be able to positively identify them with
white light. That means you gotta set up
where people are coming through St lights and you should be able
to document some of the stuff. Night vision just doesn't really
do it for criminal investigations.
Now if you're trying to see like Inns and outs, how many people
are inside of an area or something, that's a little
different. But if you're trying to identify
and you're doing like strong criminal investigations, not the
actual, we're going to take this thing down.
We want to know how many adult males are moving around or if
they have weapons. That's a different animal.
Again, why on earth do we need an EPA that is loaded up with
all the stuff? And they do have enforcement.
That's the other thing that should tell us.
It should tell every single person out there, if there's a
government agency, they actually have armed law enforcement.
It's just not for the IRS. Even though many of you guys
found out the IRS has a very decent sized contingent of armed
people. The FBI, the ATF, all of DOJ has
people like that. US Marshalls, right?
And then you can just keep, you can keep going down the list.
Like the Commerce Department has armed 18 Elevens 1811 is my old
job. So special Agent is not the job.
Criminal investigator is the job.
And an 1811 series. They're armed and tonnes of
federal agencies have them, including the EPA, who
apparently, like I said is now buying night vision.
Pretty weird, pretty strange thing.
Let's let's throw a quick thank up to my to my friends over at
Catholic Vote. I'm just gonna kind of work them
in here. There it is.
You guys, check out the loop. Today's loop I didn't even get a
chance to look at because I got so sidetracked about the gas
lighting thing. I will be reading it when I'm
done here. If you're not getting the loop,
you're missing out. Go to catholicvote.org.
You can just put in your email address and zip code.
You can hit. Look me in.
You will get the best one minute email of your day to be able to
scroll through the headlines and see what is going on in this
country. Things that you care about.
Catholic Vote is leading the fight for faith, family and
freedom, in that order as we talked about yesterday.
God, Family, medium, equals country in this case, and a free
country is what we should be rooting for.
These guys are in in the legislative battle and in the
lawfare space, and they are keeping track of what is and
what is not happening in a fairway.
They're also suing the FBI with some aggressive foias, trying to
figure out what sort of sourcing and what sort of recruitment was
going on in Catholic churches and Christian churches more
generally. You guys want to check them out.
catholicvote.org, big fans and our friends.
They do keep the lights on here and we're very grateful for what
they do. If you're watching us on
rumble.com right now, give us a thumbs up, make sure you're
giving us a like on there. I actually am not able to reload
it, so they might be messing with my profile right now.
Something really cool. Can I just brag on Rumble for
just a minute you guys? We're pretty small channel,
we're growing every day because of what you guys do and really
grateful for that. But I assure you that like my
interactions with YouTube have been absolutely garbage.
They're all automated. They're all to like at Nobody
Robot when I reach out to rumble like within a few hours, but
generally speaking it's inside of an hour.
I will get an email back from them saying hey, we're working
on whatever it is. And one of the things we did is
we asked them to move the Amrad podcast which is coming up later
today and I highly recommend you guys check it out.
Go to rumble.com/AMR ADP ODM RAD Pod for the American Radicals
podcast and I set up that Channel because I have
familiarity with it. You guys are probably sure like
you look out there. I'm pretty decent at running the
video mix and I've been setting up all of our channels and doing
all of our work. So I set that up.
I created the intro for it for the guys and I said basically
like, here you go gentlemen like off often, often running.
When we did that, I immediately realised it was gonna be kind of
an additional workload and a burden that I didn't necessarily
always have time for. So I was trying to figure out
what that look like and I reached out to him.
I said can you guys just migrate the Amrad podcast over to Steve
Friends account? Would you guys do that?
Would you be willing to just take it cut, paste, you know,
control alt or whatever it is? Copy, Control C, Control VI to
look there. Yeah.
And move it over onto SD friend's profile and let him set
up his own stuff. And they were like, we don't
really actually have a programme or we don't really have a
protocol to mitigate and migrate 1 channel from one username to
another. And I said, well, OK And they
said would you give us a week or two to try to work on it and
just check back on Monday? And I was like, yeah.
Then on Monday they didn't do it.
And I was like, man, alright, we may have to just create a new
name on January 1st. When I woke up yesterday, I
logged into my Rumble account set at the stream like we always
do. Guess what?
They moved it. They cut it, cut it and paste it
or whatever the heck they did. They took all the followers and
they sent it over to the Amrat pod so that Steve, Friend and
Gargoyle can set up their own streams.
That is so cool. That's just such a like a cool
user friendly and like creator friendly.
I hate that term. But you know, let's use it for
what it is. The people that are actually
creating content, getting really fast feedback and then creating
a process simply because little old me asked them really, really
nice and I didn't drop any names.
Just in case you guys wondering, I went straight through the
regular online awesome. So I I I highly recommend that
you guys are checking out Rumble specifically if you're not using
it. What you're missing out on is
one really good customer service to the fact that they actually
care about what we're trying to accomplish here and that's
that's kind of amazing. The the two big, the two big
groups, the Googles like they don't care.
But this one, what a neat thing and now they know how that do
that. I imagine they've actually
created that ability. So if people are going to create
a content and then they're going to spin it off, like if they
have a family of shows, really neat, really neat stuff.
So I'm appreciative of them. I just wanted to say that out
loud because I don't think that gets said enough.
Alright let's get into the deepest parts of all this crazy
gaslighting. Apparently you guys are gonna be
shocked to find this out. Apparently, Donald Trump is
still being supported by Republicans.
Can you imagine, Can you imagine that Donald Trump?
Can you imagine thinking that Donald Trump would not be
supported by Republicans? This is the Washington Post
reporting here. This article is entitled How
Trump Clawed Back from Distress to Dominate the Republican
Favourite. Was he Ever really not going to
be the Republican favourite? Did anyone ever think that?
I mean, it was a small possibility, I guess, when he
first went, went public with his announcement a little early on.
But how insane, how insane would it be to think that he had a
moment of vulnerability right after the midterms and he and he
and he might not make it. And I'll tell you why they're
gaslighting you using a little Catholic Boat coffee mug here,
alright? In a moment of vulnerability
after the midterms, the former president turns his criminal
indictment into a rallying cry and benefited from a disciplined
campaign, stalled opposition, and Biden's weakness?
At least they're acknowledging the weakness there.
I think that is at least of value.
The thing that actually got me the most interested is this.
There's a little quote in here. 13 months on the cusp of 2024,
Donald Trump stepped through the mist of a fog machine into a
roaring arena in New Hampshire, where, as in every early state,
he holds a wide lead over GOP rivals before thousands of
cheering fans. And he marvelled at how he had
built an advantage in the face of 91 criminal charges.
Here's where they got to get it, because they got to stab him.
You're going to stick it in right here.
What is it? Paying hush money to adult film
stars to mishandling classified materials and trying to overturn
the 2020 election? Of course they have to
editorialise in their so called reporting and analysis piece.
They're, you know, they wouldn't be, they wouldn't be the
Washington Post if they didn't do this.
But it is interesting that they are setting it up like it's so
crazy that he has any support and of course he has support.
What they don't realise is the thing that they did created that
support even more feverishly. Because when you tell someone
you can't vote for this guy, look how very, very bad he is.
And all the things he said are basically like they suck.
They're doing, they're liars and and they are, they're reporting
things dishonestly like they just they cannot wrap their
heads around. It shocks me that that is the
case even today, but it still continues to be the case.
And moreover, another poll came out.
This is also Washington Post and I think this one is probably the
most scary for our for our leftist media.
OK, this one is entitled Republican loyalty to Trump and
rioters climbs 3 years after the January 6th attack.
We need to push this to our elected officials that are
trying to run away from the January 6th debacle.
There is a reason why I will not let the story go.
It was obvious to me working in the Washington field office that
this was never going to be fair and that it was wrong that what
happened is not the way that it was portrayed in the media.
That was pretty clear for anybody who lived in DC, if
you're being honest. But what's very interesting
about this particular article is, and this was called to my
attention by Julie Kelly, who has just been absolutely
tireless. So if you guys are not following
Julie Kelly on All the Socials, it's usually Julie Underscore
Kelly Two, I believe. Julie Kelly tweeted out one of
these. I'm going to cover a couple of
these polls, but they're absolutely shocked, The writers
of this particular article. This is Rachel Weiner, Scott
Clement and Emily Guskin. They're shocked that the polls
that come from Washington Post University of Maryland is
trending in favour of sympathy towards people who were involved
in January 6. And that should not shock
anybody. It should be a readjustment of
what should have been the the accurate understanding of that
day. Because what we started off with
was a bunch of people showed up to overthrow the government and
where we're at right now is a whole bunch of government
interference was happening in there and those people had some
legitimate and valid concerns, which I think is absurd not to
think. And the the vast, vast majority
of that crowd was not violent. This is what some of the little
pieces I want to read out of here.
Republicans increasing loyalty to the former president comes as
he simultaneously campaigns for reelection and fights criminal
charges over his attempt to stay in power after losing in 2020.
Do you guys know how we know that he didn't attempt to stay
in power after losing in 2020 because he got on the helicopter
and he flew off? Anything that says otherwise is
not revisionist history, it's insanity.
It's truly nuts to think that the man was trying to stay in
power, when in fact what he did was turn over power and leave.
Regardless of how unfair or weird or whatever sort of wonky
things were not being investigated, it was over.
And he left on the day he was supposed to leave on time, and
now he's running again. He has so little faith in the
American system that he's actually running again in
another election. Imagine that.
Like, imagine how insane you have to be to hold on to these
crazy ideas. But they cannot handle, they
cannot handle the idea that he didn't do what they said, that
their messaging campaign is slowly falling apart in the face
of overwhelming evidence. And did some people fight cops
and need to go to gaol? Absolutely.
That's a ridiculous thing to claim otherwise.
Are all the people that are locked up in in the DC gaol?
Are they all, you know, wonderful patriots who did
nothing wrong? No, they're not.
There are some people in there that are scum.
In fact, I know some are scum, and some of the people in the
January 6th movement know they are.
They don't talk about them in a wide way because they're worried
about discrediting the movement overall.
But a lot of people got locked up for nonviolent things like
walking around and parading, and that is like insane.
And then the idea that they were going to push this conspiracy,
You want to talk about it? Mercy theory.
Whether the DC jury agrees or not, I have no interest in DC
juries. If you've ever lived in DC, you
have no faith in a DC jury. I don't think the people in DC
make any sense. And and honestly, there's a
reason why they're not a state. I don't think people should
necessarily live in DC It's a terrible place, #1.
It's awful. I've done so much surveillance
there and I hate every part of it.
I despise Washington, DC So every one of you that are like,
hey, like, you know, wouldn't it be great for you to get in the
Trump, you know, regime and get in there and help set up the
administration and fix the FBI? Like, can I do it from from
Idaho? Can I do it from Montana?
Cause I don't. I'm not interested.
I'm not interested in going back to DC.
I hated it. I spent five years trying to get
out of DC from the first day that we were assigned there, the
first time that we went and bought a house, I was like, oh,
this is awful. And then from everything else it
was no fun. Republicans are now less likely
to believe this is what they're so shocked about.
At the Washington Post. Republicans are less likely to
believe January 6th. Participants were, quote
unquote, mostly violent, less likely to believe that Donald
Trump bears responsibility for the attack, and they are less
likely to view Joe Biden's election as a as a legitimate
than they were in December of 2021.
Well, of course, because in 2021 we had a full on blitz, a gas
lighting and sanity. All they did was push narrative.
Here's what's kind of fun. You gotta love the leftist
academics that are working at the University of Maryland at
the Centre for Democracy and Civic Engagement.
I can just tell you, I don't know anything about this guy
other than that. And if you're the director for
the Centre for Democracy and Civic Engagement, like you're a
socialist and you're a totalitarian, that's just the
nature of what people who claim to be interested in democracy
are about. They are interested in tyranny.
He wrote quote. This is a guy named Michael
Hammer. He wrote quote.
From a historical perspective, these results would be chilling
to many analysts. Oh no, there's a baseless
conspiracy theory that's been promoted heavily in the right
wing. What is it?
It said Some said their views changed because they now believe
the right was instigated by law enforcement to suppress
political dissidents, which is a baseless conspiracy theory.
Is it though? Is that baseless?
Baseless would mean that there is no foundational beliefs that
could be even remotely tied in to understanding that that is a
logical outgrowth. Well, we know for a fact that
there were tonnes of sources coming from multiple different
government agencies that they were people from Fort Meade that
were on the ground. There were people there that
were part of a counterterrorism unit that were on the ground.
We know that the FBI had people from multiple field offices that
were both sources and and UC's and they don't want to expose
who they are. I'm sure DHS had a had a tonne.
I almost swore. Sorry, it's it's crazy to think
that that is a baseless conspiracy.
It's not a conspiracy. It is a it's a possibility that
we don't have enough information to decide on.
That's not baseless. That means still debated.
Maybe would be fine, but these people cannot accept that over
1/3 of Americans believe that Biden was illegitimately
elected. That's really fun stuff.
So let's pull that up and let me just throw some.
Here we go. Slightly fewer Republicans now
say that Biden's 2020 election was legitimate than they did in
2021. OK, so let's see.
In 21 December versus now two years later, what do we see?
Overall, adults in the United States have said 69% in 21 said
that Biden was legitimately elected 62%.
Now he's lost 7.7% of the population according to this
survey, which is only 1000 people in The margin of error is
4 percentage points. So it actually could be worse.
It could be that only 58% of people think that Biden was
legitimately elected. Let's go to Republicans.
It went from 39% to 31%. It's a ± 4.
So it could be as little as 4%. It could be as big as like 13%
change. That's a big swing.
So you know, and that's also not a very good accuracy margin for
a poll, for whatever that's worth.
Independence decline from 72 to 64, and Democrats decline from
94 to 91. That's a margin of error, which
could be basically it it may have actually increased, but it
could have decreased by close to 10%.
So what's wild about these is that every single poll tracks
that more people across the country think that Joe Biden's
election was illegitimate. Why would they think that?
Why would you think that Joe Biden's election was not
legitimate? There's really only one reason.
It's because he's not a good candidate in the same way that
Hillary Clinton was not a good candidate.
He had an overwhelming support by people who weren't thinking
and loved the base, and independents couldn't have liked
him very much. He wasn't great and he
campaigned from his basement. He never went out and did
anything. And everywhere President Trump
went, love him or hate him, the man had enormous rallies and
tonnes of people are incredibly loyal.
Many of you are incredibly loyal.
As you guys know, I don't love any politicians.
I could care less about any of them.
I'm only interested in the outcomes.
I'm only interested in what they do for me, my family and you,
the American people. That's what I care about.
But Trump was objectively better than what Biden's doing right
now. They won't let you think that
though. They're not gonna play that
game. They do not play it even a
little bit. Let me grab a couple of these
other little little holes, because these are fun.
Fewer Republicans think that the the J6 protesters were were
mostly violent. It used to be that only 1/4 of
people thought that. Now it's less than 20%.
So less than 1/5 of people think that they were mostly violent.
Overall, people in America declined every single one of
these numbers. Democrats by the smallest
amount, Independents by a pretty small amount.
Overall, US adults by a slightly larger amount.
People across the board, every single one of these polls trends
showing that less people believe that it was what they say it
was. This is a a single poll showing
the narrative slipping. That's what it means.
Because every single one of these things which are slanted
to say like, hey, don't you think that January 6 was really
terrible and President Trump's really bad guy and he's the, you
know, he's like Alexander with the terrible, awful, no good,
very bad presidency. Hmm.
No, everybody's slipping a little bit less, A little bit
less. People are thinking that, which
means you're also getting a pollster asking, they say the
plus or minus is 4%. I mean, if you guys have ever
done one of these polls other than me who boldly answers them
like most aggressively as possible, Most people don't do
that because talking to a stranger on the phone, they
don't know if it's if it's Emily Guskin from the from the
Washington Post or if it's some dude from the Centre for
Democracy and Civic Engagement or if it's the FBI just calling
the vet them, which I do get those messages from you all.
I don't think the FBI doing any polling right now.
Just so you know, another one fewer Republicans now say that
Trump bears responsibility for the attacks on the Capitol.
It's actually not just Republicans.
Republicans went from 20, seven, 7% to 14%.
So, like, they've lost 50%. It's 50% of people who in the
Republican Party have any belief that Donald Trump bears this
responsibility. But overall, the American adult
population, according to this survey, slipped 7%.
Less people think that Donald Trump was responsible than the
capital. Think about how scary that is
for the narrative that he created an insurrection that we
need to remove him from the ballot.
Because you have 14th Amendment violator.
Because that's what they're doing.
Democrats slept by 6%, independence slipped by 1%.
Independents tend to mirror like sort of like the US national
average. It looks like there's far less
independence these days as we kind of find out man, I would
have been in the independent category, I would have been one
and I would be like no I. But the question is this, did he
bear responsibility? I would have been in the no, he
never did in the 1st place. It was pretty obvious, like the
guy wasn't even there. The breach of the capital
happened before he was done speaking.
Shouldn't that shouldn't that be relevant?
Shouldn't we be actually, like relevant about all these kind of
things? You'd think, which is why
they're marching out some of the wild stuff that's out there and
they're marching out these these ladies who are in the former
Trump administration. I've almost played this for you
guys yesterday. Didn't mean to slip it up, but
let's throw this in. This is part of the messaging
campaign that has to happen. You have to say like, we're
losing the narrative. Send out pretty ladies from the
Bush, from the, from the former Trump administration.
So here you go, fundamentally. A second Trump term could mean
the end of American democracy as we know it, and I I don't say
that lightly. We all witnessed him trying to
steal a democratic election before and going to historic and
unconstitutional lengths to do so.
And and that just shows that he's willing to basically break
every barrier to get into power and to stay into power.
But also I'm. I'm very concerned about what
the term would actually look like.
We don't need to speculate what a second Trump term would look
like because we already saw it play out to this day.
He still doubles down on the fact that he thinks that the
election was stolen and fraudulent and then his rhetoric
has just gotten increasingly erratic.
I mean, he is literally called for things like doing away with
parts of the Constitution, wanting to weaponize the DOJ to
enact revenge on his political enemies.
The fact. That he feels that he needs to
lean into being a dictator alone shows that he is a weak and
feeble man who has no sense of character and integrity and has
no sense of leadership. That is a truly incredible clip.
I would almost play it again, but I know most of you guys
would probably barf. They'd probably be far too much
for you to handle over there in the live chat, so I don't want
to do that to you. But let me speak softly about
the pretty ladies that are dressed up nicely and they have
lovely makeup. And they are telling you that we
already know what a Trump presidency would look like
because we already saw it and it resulted in their feelings.
These are people that worked for Trump, and none of them, like
none of them can honestly say that the things that they
claimed happened, happened. And then he's going to do away
with parts of the Constitution like he did last time, like he
was going to lock Hillary up. Like, look, I would have been
thrilled if they locked up Hillary only because I wanna see
accountability happen at all levels.
And if I had done what Hillary Clinton had done, if I was like,
oh, like I'm an FBI employee, like I got a top secret
clearance. I'm gonna go set up my server to
receive a mirror of all my secret classified emails.
And I'm going to go through there.
And then I'm going to take the stuff from the FBI net and the
session and I'm going to go and I'm going to forward those all
over. Forget, forget symphonette and
air gapping. I'm going straight to Kyle's
laptop. Then I'm going to go set up a
server in my bathroom, like all the crazy and things that that
went on there for that happen. People have gone to gaol for
longer for less. Some of them would still be
serving sentences if they had done what Hillary Clinton had
done 100% and that was broadly felt by people who were in the
FBI that I knew. And I think that is slowly just
disappeared as everybody just forgotten about that.
The the whole commies, my homey thing.
Guys, if you did not watch yesterday's show, I will tune
you into a very specific section of it. 7 1/2 minutes in to 24
1/2 minutes in. Go watch that section.
Go take whatever that is that 15 minutes or so.
Go watch it 18 minutes. Go watch that and understand
what the FBI is and what the FBI is not.
It's captured for a lot of reasons, one of which is its
geographic location for headquarters, one of which is
the culture of the people that they were creating and they're
bringing in and the fact they've moved to intelligence, away from
from criminal enforcement. But the idea that Hillary
Clinton didn't do something wrong like he did, But guess
what he didn't do? He didn't weaponize the DOJ.
He didn't do that. We had to wait for Biden to do
that. We had to wait for Biden to come
in to target and make the biggest investigation in
history. And it was right on the heels of
telling everybody that there was going to be a compliance purge.
I see all these things together. We'll do a whole show on what's
going on in the military right now because the civilian service
was always going to come first and the military service was
always going to follow on secondly.
It had to be that way because military members are under like
a significant more threat and scrutiny under the UCMJ, the
universal code of military justice.
Like that could put them in gaol doing what I did and saying no,
I'm not going to get this shot. Like I would lose my job.
And so inevitably, that is a lower consequence than I'm gonna
be thrown in the Brig somewhere and I'm not going to be able to
get out. It was always going to be that
way. The civilian service comes
first. That makes sense.
We're civilian, you know, moving and a civilian controlling
military. But the idea that the Biden
administration did not weaponize DOJ and really all government
and do a compliance purge, you are out of your effing minds,
little girls. You're crazy.
There's no other way to say it. What they did was they found
proxies in the vaccine mandate to find out who are the people
that are conservative, who are the people we need to get rid
of, who are the people that are going to object to tyranny.
And they found him, right. That's what the susceptibles
are. That's what the the FBI
Expendables are. There's an entire group called
Feds for Medical Freedom. Now they're called Feds for
freedom. They're a bunch of federal
employees. I'm in multiple lawsuits.
I was always in lawsuits. I announced it to my.
You know, this is one of the reasons why you get thrown out
The. I you go, hey, do I need to
announce that I'm in a lawsuit against the attorney general and
they're like, just don't talk about it at work or whatever.
It's like I'm just letting you know.
I feel like the policy requires me to notify you.
And it was obvious to me right away that the things that were
going on there were a compliance purge that they were trying to
figure out who would object, Who would be the people that say you
can't load these people into box cars, we're not going to do it.
And who was gonna be the good Americans?
Who was gonna be the ordinary men?
The reserve Police Battalion 101?
Can't talk about this stuff highly enough.
I called it a purge very early on.
You heard Jim Jordan talk about it as a purge.
And then you've seen recent whistleblowers coming out and
saying exactly what it was. They found proxies like military
service and religious observation to be stand-ins for
conservatives and they went to eliminate them.
And of course guys like me and Gerardo Boyle were at the top of
that list because we were also whistleblowers, like forget the
people that were gonna just be watched.
And we gotta maintain a control of these people, which, by the
way, they got compliance by telling the swab their noses.
The ones that were really dangerous were the ones that
were willing to do whistleblowing activity.
Imagine if you have an organisation that is bent on
compliance. That's what they're interested
in. The FBI's always been that, by
the way. And then you find out people
say, hey, well, I'm not gonna comply.
Now you're watching them and they go, not only am I not gonna
comply, but I'm gonna expose some of this evil crap you guys
are up to. Boom, You're done.
That's what the susceptibles got created on.
That's what they did to Steve, friend.
That's what they did to me. That's what they did to Garrett.
There's a half dozen others that you guys don't know the names
of, but they've gone out there and done it.
They went out cancelled people because they knew that they
would take action by word or deed.
They had already shown that they were a liability to the FBI.
And these ladies are out here trying to act like Joe Biden is
not that person. Are you out of your flipping
minds, ladies? Have you not seen the red
speech? Have you not seen what's
happened in this country When it comes to like, prosecuting
conservatives? Rules for Radicals always accuse
others of what you are doing yourself, right?
Like, these are old playbooks. It's not news to you.
But the gaslighting burns eternal and I should have
changed the name. And I may even change the name
of this episode because that's what we're about.
It is so true and it's so bizarre.
Let's talk about somebody who's not involved in that, who's
decided to jump in with us right away.
Early on, when this podcast was fledgling, we didn't have people
watching. We didn't have 100,000 followers
on Twitter and all that. So let's say thanks to my
buddies over at Patriot Coolers, you guys can go to
patriotcoolers.com if you're on Twitter right now.
If you're on X, you can follow them at Patriot Coolers.
Use promo code Kyle for any purchases.
Kyle, you'll save 10%. You'll get, you'll get free
shipping. I'm.
I don't know if they know how to change that up.
They only want to offer 10%. I told him to give him my 5% so
we'll figure out. Maybe start doing some
giveaways. I'd like to do that.
I'll try to coordinate something with them where we could do a
giveaway of like a a cooler every month or two or something
like that. I don't know.
We'll figure out how to do it. Maybe just do a blind drawing
out of the hat of people who bought it.
But check out patriot coolers.com promo code cow.
I like to just like think of ideas while I'm talking to you
guys on the show while we're doing it live use promo code
Kyle, you guys can check out the drink Ware.
You can check out the soft sided coolers which are actually
really great option. They are what they called radio
welded, I think is what they call those the seams that
basically mount, that don't leak.
I really like stuff that's made that way.
I'm a gear whore on that kind of thing and I like jackets that
have radio welded pockets. You guys are like arteries
people. They have the same kind of
technology there. They're lightweight.
I used to carry these with me actually.
They're the soft sided cooler that you see that's in the
picture right there. I used to carry one just like
that on surveillance whenever I would travel and I would fill it
up with ice and then I would throw all my yoghurts and all my
frozen fruits and all that kind of stuff in there and I would be
able to have like a little more, you know, mini portable smoothie
machine with me more than you needed to know.
But I've been using products like this, and I've been using
their coolers for quite a long time.
I've got the 2017 model sitting on the desk, which I need to
return to my wife. I've got the 2022 model sitting
right here. This is a 32 ounce in OD green.
If you guys are not familiar, check out all their stuff.
Promo code. Kyle.
All right, let's keep rolling. Let's rock'n'roll.
OK, so the gaslighting springs eternal.
It continues to burn. We've got a couple of other
things on there. There's something kind of fun
coming out of the New York Times today, and I think you guys will
find it interesting. I think it will be.
I think it will not surprise you, but it is an interesting
sort of harbinger of what's to come.
How about this? They're reporting on the the the
British economy. It's, quote, unquote, not
working. There's two reasons for it.
The local planning authorities can block new construction for
years, and the power grid cannot accommodate new connections.
When I heard that if you took away the Britain's economy is
not working. Here's two reasons why.
If you just read the following statement, Are you ready?
The power grid cannot keep up with demands for connections,
and local planning authorities block new constructions for
years. Imagine the United States.
Where would that be? Would that be New York?
Would that be Massachusetts? Would it be California?
Of course. The exact same problems that
happen everywhere come when government gets in your business
like the EPA getting night vision and decided to come in
force you. Or when the government cannot
get out of the way and do the only job that it has, which is
to basically shore up infrastructure and solve the
problems that are shared by all people.
How do we get electrical lines here?
How do we get power here? You know, the building permits
are not meant to hold up things and wait for you to to to meet
whatever demands of the city are.
Their job. Is is like, OK, Are you creating
a danger? You know, carry on?
Are you going to damage other people around you by what you're
doing? Are you going to have a
nightclub that's right next to a nursery that you know, keeps
track of babies at night or something?
I don't know, like, are you going to infringe on the civil
liberties of the people next to you?
If not, like, good speed, do whatever you need to do.
Should you have a shooting range that's indoors that's right next
to something that, like, is a very sound sensitive area?
Probably not like, you know, shooting ranges in urban areas
are kind of sketchy unless they're in a basement somewhere.
So those are the things that the permits are supposed to be
about. They're not supposed to be
about. Then we roadblock your
construction and oftentimes is it based on the ideology?
Are you a transgender clinic that needs to be built up here
and you're the first of your kind?
And in Wyoming and Casper, well, let's just green like that right
through OHP. Are you trying to do a crisis
pregnancy centre where you're trying to try to talk women out
of abortions and into adoptions? We can't do that.
We cannot do that. It will not be appropriate.
It's very interesting that they are showing that this is a
problem in Britain, because in some ways the things that we see
in Britain are actually harbingers of what's to come in
the United States, and we can already see them in the leftist
areas where they are working. If you ever listened to Tommy
Robinson, I had the privilege of sitting in the space and
listening to him talk. All of his concerns are 100%
interested. He's 100% worried about the same
sort of things in Britain because they're all coming here
and many of them are already here.
Just found that interesting for you.
I think you guys can appreciate it.
It's not just the the economic version of it though, because
our government is so captured. I've got a fun video for you.
I entitled this one Trannies in Space.
You guys will understand why in one moment.
Let's let's consider that the the capture is not just local
government. And obviously the enemy is The
bigger the government, the more dangerous it is, the more
overreach it will have. And here's a great example of
just full insanity on full display, telling you that mental
illness is necessary in our military because what if it's
also brilliant? What if?
What if mental illness is also brilliant?
We're not talking about John Nash here in A Beautiful Mind,
we're talking about people whose minds are pretty disordered.
So check this out. Inclusion is a national security
imperative. Wait, no, it's not.
Let me just start there. No, it's not.
Inclusion is not a national security imperative.
That's false. So everything after this I don't
really care about. But a dude in address telling me
that the you have to accept me as part of national security,
That's crazy. I've worked in the Air Force and
I've worked in national security with the FBI.
Both of those things are false. Let's just keep playing.
Sorry, I had to interact there. There she is.
Inclusion is a national security imperative.
We fight today and we are gonna fight in the future using brain
power and. If that.
Brain who's gonna revolutionise the way we fight in space?
We fight in cyber, just happens to be in a trans body.
You should want them all serving alongside me.
For us it is absolutely critical to drive our future success as
an organisation and potentially on the battlefield.
Yikes. I know you guys are barfing.
I'm. I'm throwing a lot at you guys
today. When I said there she is.
I meant the button on my on my stream deck.
Under no circumstances do I think that dude who's a stand
in, why do they all look like Buffalo Bill?
Am I the only one who sees this, All the trans people and there's
no such thing as a trans body. That's a man's body.
Did you guys see the pictures on social media?
If you haven't looked, go back and look at my go look at my
timeline on Twitter, I said. Caption this photo.
The dude looks like he's like 6-5 and 260, and he's got like
this little guy who looked kind of like Thomas Massey, which is
kind of strange wearing like a Coast Guard or a public health
uniform. And he's like trying to pin and
the guy has to, like, bend over to get the shoulder pinned on.
They just pinned Lieutenant Colonel on this dude who looks
huge and he's in the Space Force.
Just remember we had Matthew Lohmeyer on our show and that
man in woman face got his rank, got to promote beyond Matthew
Lohmeyer. That's who's taking the spots.
We joke about the idea in the sustentables chat in the
background where you guys can't see it.
We joke about the idea that someone took our badges and gave
them to tranny agents. That literally happened in
Washington field office. There is a trans.
A female pretending to be a man, literally for all accounts, is
actually kind of a cute female. Seen pictures and she's got
like, you know, curly bouncy hair or whatever.
And she just wears a men's suit. And I pin that, says he him,
What are we talking about here? Like, how lost are we as a
country where that's the case? But the good news is, the good
news is, is that we're not totally lost because we've
actually got a system of at least partially federalist stuff
going on. And here it is, New York Times.
They're actually not real thrilled about this, but this is
what's going on. They expect significant debates
on AI and gender and guns and all the things that matter to
you most in the state legislatures.
In the coming coming weeks and months of 2024, the most
contentious issues in the country will dominate the
agendas of state legislators who are returning to work in the
coming days and weeks. That's what they say.
This is Rick Rojas reporting it. Yes, New York Times.
Now, just now. I just need you guys to
celebrate that because that is where it's supposed to be done.
He actually says something in here that's not tragic.
He says consensus has yet to emerge, but Congress can look to
the state legislatures often refer to as the laboratories of
democracy. I assume that he says it that
way. I don't know why it came from
somebody who was at the the the Brennan Centre for Justice,
which is not a nonpartisan, it's a leftist think tank, a poverty
think tank and law think tank. Give me a break.
The Brennan Centre for Justice is full leftist.
Only the New York Times would call them nonpartisan.
But these laboratories of democracy for inspiring or
inspiration of regarding how to address opportunities and
challenges posed by AI. That's the same thing about guns
every single these should all be legislated locally.
If you guys look the Second Amendment is pretty clear shall
not infringe. The federal government shouldn't
do it. The state governments they want
to do it just move out of there. They're like hey, you can't
bring your guns to town, Johnny Cash.
Well, if you can't bring the guns to town I'm not going to be
in that town. You can vote with your feet.
That's the way it's supposed to be.
There's supposed to be 50 different independent
laboratories where we all figure out what the best ideas are.
And then the ones that are like, it seems like South Dakota is
having a pretty good time with this problem.
Maybe we should do it. They're doing OHP.
Texas has got this figured out in some places.
Maybe California is the best thing, like if you want the most
tyranny or if you want your children to be chopped up and
generally mutilated and you go, oh, I want to go move to the
place where that happens. And maybe everybody else should
pick that up too. If we could just convince them
that California, New York or Texas and Idaho and Montana or
whatever are the right answer, then that's what you do.
And if they don't come to consensus, you go live in a
state that does the things that you want.
You got 50 different options. Roll the dice.
There's cops on both sides. There's mountains in the middle,
you guys. It's see the shining sea.
Shouldn't you be able to figure out which one you want to do and
let the states figure it out? That's kind of what they just
did with abortion. That's actually a win that if
you don't want to deal with it, you can find yourself on the
area or in the area that you want to live.
Democrats don't like that. They're massively federalistic.
They think that the the the federal government should run
everything and if need be, as I mentioned yesterday, they are
smarter than you, so that's why they're gonna do it by Fiat and
that's the real danger. That's why the gas lighting must
spring eternal. So the last topic that I had for
you, the last thing I wanted to bring up, was what it really
comes down to for them. Well, let's do it.
Let's do a Sam Harris video. I don't know why I thought this
video was interesting, but Sam Harris is kind of saying the
same things. He really doesn't like the fact
that you guys have free speech on Twitter and he thinks that he
should be the one who tells you which are the appropriate people
to talk about and what are their appropriate opinions to have.
Again, if they can't dictate it to you, you know it's not going
to work out. So here's Sam Harris kind of
telling us the way it's supposed to work, the way that he
believes that social media you shouldn't associate with people
that are less than you. I love associating with people I
don't agree with. I may quit at some point in
time, but man, how else you gonna change people's minds?
You're Sam Harris. He's just kind of like an
elitist trash talking to Jordan Peterson and look at.
What Twitter has done to Elona's life, right.
It's just, yeah, you know, Elon used to be a friend.
You know, I think somebody I I knew reasonably well.
Um. You know his.
Engagement with Twitter has been catastrophic for him as a
person, from my point of view. I mean, it's just, it's clearly
a compulsion. Compulsion.
I mean, he was so addicted to it that he felt he needed to buy
the platform. But it is a you know his use of
it has been so irresponsible and produced such but forget about
the harm he's produced in other people's lives and and and and
nothing I'm saying now relates to changes he's made to the
platform. I mean that's that's a separate
thing that we can talk about. You know, I've always been
agnostic as to whether or not he could actually improve Twitter
as a as a platform and he may yet wind up doing that.
But I'm just talking about the way he has personally used it as
a user of the platform and the way he's interacted with people
and boosted the signal, boosted massively.
Profiles of anonymous Q Anon lunatic trolls, right?
I mean, he's he's been completely cavalier in who he
interacts with, all the while knowing that anyone he boosts
suddenly gets, you know, a million followers and and has a
platform that they otherwise couldn't imagine having.
He's not using his power and authority the way that Sam
Harris thinks is appropriate. And that is unacceptable because
Sam Harris is part of the elite. He's part of the elite group of
people that know how to think and you don't know how to think.
And whatever Elon Musk, you know, he, he became a
billionaire, obviously by complete accident.
He just won the billionaire lottery.
He's not a thinker. He doesn't know anything.
And so thank God there's people like Sam Harris out there,
right, that can tell him how to think and how to how to use his
power and his money and his influence.
I mean, the balls on these people, it's absolutely galling.
It was catastrophic for him as a person.
Yeah. I think Elon Musk was totally
devastated by Sam Harris's opinion.
I can't believe people still talk to this guy.
That's the thing that's so interesting to me.
Why do they still talk to Sam Harris like he's relevant?
My wife used to be kind of on the, like I said, she was a
liberal but not a leftist. She was able to see reason and
all the time we never had any problems.
We just didn't agree on certain things and now we pretty much
agree on everything. And she changed her own opinion.
She self radicalised on all this stuff.
But the wild thing is, is that like, she listens to Sam Harris
and she was like, why do people even listen to him?
He's a moron. He just says complicated
sentences that sound like they mean something, but they don't.
And I think she's right. I think a lot of things my wife
says are right. That won't shock you.
It shouldn't shock you. But let's play with what, what?
What this is really all about, The whole gaslighting.
It comes down to this. Here it is CNN, my favourite.
You guys know how much I love CNN?
OHP man, The question is this, Are you better off than you were
three years ago? John Avalon at CNN.
It's an opinion. Damn right it's an opinion.
He's a senior political analyst and anchor and his opinions are
his own in this particular situation.
So he throws back to 1980. Of course, you know how many
people in the Biden administration are going to do a
like a rate Ronald Reagan comparison?
I don't know why. Because Ronald Reagan was old
maybe, and Biden is 1000 years old and he acts like it.
At least Ronald Reagan was smart.
Ronald Reagan famously asked. Intelligent debate audience, are
you better off than you were four years ago?
And that was a hammer blow to then President Jimmy Carter's
reelection hopes. It was all over and Ronald
Reagan took office and was the president when I was born.
Now, with the 2024 insight, that's the same essential
question. Are you better off at the end of
Donald Trump's term, or are you better off at the beginning now
that that Biden has had a couple of years on it?
Think back three years ago and he's going to give you the
litany of problems that you forgot that you were suffering
from with no context whatsoever. 3 years ago, January of 2021,
the US was suffering from then the deadliest month of the
COVID-19 pandemic, which we know were fake numbers.
They would eventually claim more than 1.1 million American lives
are worse than the per capita developed in the developing
world, even though we had all these tools that these people
who are leftists were pushing. Because the government is run by
people on the political left, whether there's a Republican
president or not. Employment was at 6.7%, spiking
to nearly 15% at the start of the pandemic, which means it was
declining because it was artificial and the number had
savaged and salvaged by trillions of dollars in
bipartisan spending. So we spent all kinds of money.
So yes, Donald Trump spent too much money.
That's what they said for this fake urgency.
Ain't that something? Most indelibly, we had a
president who, for the first time in American history,
conspired. Did he ever get proved?
Have they proved any conspiracy with Donald Trump?
Not yet. He's been charged with it,
though, to overturn the election.
So they're going out here and doing a messaging campaign on
the lie that he needed to stay in power, contrary to the
Constitution, the tradition of peaceful transfer of power, even
though he actually did transfer power, resulting in the cap
attack on the US capital by his supporters.
A lot of questions there, which we covered earlier, that that
narrative is slipping. That's why they're pushing it.
What about the economy? Bipartisanship has been
persuasive, and it distorts the perception that's otherwise
straightforward. Someone said that we're in a
silent economic depression, OK, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
He goes on to talk about how great has Joe Biden been.
The American economy is a world leader.
I just want you guys to think about your lives and what's
going on. The American economy is a world
leader. It's recently described by the
Economist as a marvel to behold, with inflation declining faster
than our allies. Yeah, because they inflated it
really quickly and now it's slowly going down.
By the way, inflation declining doesn't mean that we are.
We are getting less, we are less, uh, inflated.
It just means that there is the rate of inflation is actually
less. So we are still being inflated.
Our currency is still being devalued, just at a slower rate
than it was beforehand and heading towards the vaunted soft
landing that seemed mythical to many observers.
So wild here. He created 14,000,000 jobs in
three years, averaging 400,000 jobs per month.
Most of those jobs are part time, and many of them are just
people getting their jobs back because they got laid off
because of artificial BS. Democrat policies that were at
the state level amazingly contrast that with 176,000 jobs
per month under Trump during his first three months in office.
You mean like when the economy was normal and he didn't have
this, like fake pandemic that lost 20 million jobs.
It's unbelievable. So this all goes on.
All I want you to say is, are you better off now than you were
three years ago? And I want you to consider,
would you have ever seen this video under Donald Trump?
Find everything you need today, yeah?
Great. OK.
Yeah. Oh.
God. Everything OK, ma'am?
It's just. That you're only scanned a few
items and it's already 60 bucks. I'm so scared.
OK, I'm a. Trained, professional, Man, I've
scanned a lot of groceries. I need you to stay with me.
It's just that. My in laws are in town and they
wanna charcuterie board. This isn't gonna.
Be easy. So I need you to be brave.
Alright. What's your name?
Patricia. Trish.
Alright, I need you to take a deep breath.
We're about to do the cheese. Oh my God, the numbers are going
up so fast. Why do we have to be a balder?
Sandals don't look up. There.
It only makes it worse. Keep your eyes on me, OK?
Can you just scared something less expensive?
I can't. But let's not forget it's the
little things that add up. Alright, now brace yourself.
I'm about to do the mixed nuts. Ohy.
God, I'm gonna pass out, OK? Bite down on this, Patricia.
Get ready. I'm gonna do the cured meats.
Stop. I can't do this anymore.
It's too late. There's a line behind you.
OK, you're locked in. I'm not.
Strong enough, I know it. Looks like a lot right now, But
I promise you, you're gonna get home and you're gonna wonder
what did I even buy? You've got this.
Patricia, get ready. I'm gonna weigh the grapes.
What have you done to me? You suck.
You're. Totals 200 and 5784.
You gotta dig deep. This is the hardest part,
Patricia. It's time to pay.
Build high attack. I need you to be.
Strong Dig deep, Patricia and search your card.
And search. Your card, Patricia.
You got this. You got this.
You're doing it, Patricia. That's the way.
Here you are, ma'am. A healthy bundle of groceries.
Can I take them home? Yeah.
Yeah, you have to, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah.
OK, alright. Do you guys remember all those,
like, high grocery video parodies that were going on
under Donald Trump? That's so good.
Anyway, that's uncomfortable to know that that's how silly that
is. Like, obviously it's not the
same as childbirth, but man, the cost have certainly gone up,
have they not? And to act like it's anything
other than that, we just have to ask, are you better off than you
were three years ago? CNN thinks you were they just
think everything is great. Apparently they must make an
awful lot of money and they are not feeling the same world that
the people that I deal with and everybody who thinks that having
100,000 followers on Twitter means that you're some kind of
big timer you still you still shop at Walmart and look for
deals. So anyway hope you guys
appreciated that. I'll try to give you guys a
little bit of levity at the end of the game.
One more I have a public service announcement because I keep
having some of you guys kind of put these these tweets out and
and on true social and you're letting us know like hey check
it out. Yeah, I got my pin.
I got my suspendable pit, guys. This is the way that the that
it's worn, it's worn. Eagle Down is a public service
announcement for all of you out there.
The eagle is down, folks. That's the way you hand it to
somebody. If you give somebody a
suspendable pin and you want them to wear it on their jacket
like I wear on all the the public service or the the public
statements that I go make and I'm going to be doing something
in Long Island, New York, I think it's called Patriots Day.
I'm waiting for them to tell me what the heck it's called.
But I'm flying out to New York for January 6.
We're doing a fundraiser. I'm just going to give a speech
about how this weaponized government is really not.
It's an issue. It shouldn't be.
We're seeing that that narrative is trending.
But man, the eagle is down. That's how you hand it over.
The eagle is down. And let's go to the merch store
while we're talking about that. So you guys can see, but this is
the way it supposed to be. You guys correct each other, fix
each other online, Aaron Stevenson told me.
I had to fix that thing out there.
So here we go. Suspendable store.
The merch store which is going to be the the sweatshop the
Oboyle family sweatshop is the dash sustentables.
Again that's the dash sustentables.com.
The dash sustentables.com. It looks like the night OPS
bundle is sold out but they actually still do have the hats
of which I have one still sitting over here and it's a
good looking hat and it's actually really comfortable and
maybe more of a summer hat or those of you who live in the
South. You guys want a trucker hat?
Pretty cool. I I have the black multicam like
you see picture there. Big fan of that and I've been
trying not to sweat, so I've been wearing it less than I want
to. It's like a dress hat for me.
I have a that's that's how I've gone.
That's how formal I've gone. I go from wearing a suit to
wearing a dress. Baseball truckers hat.
Go figure. The dash disponibles.com.
If you use my promo code, which is Kyle, it saves you money.
It doesn't help anybody except you.
So that's why we gave it to you. Just a couple bucks off.
It'll save you 10% whenever you guys want to go buy that and
support the O'boyle family again.
The Eagles down, folks. The Eagles down.
That's what it is. Lastly, we'll throw this up here
real quick. You guys can go to
mypillow.com/kyle if you're going to go and do something and
buy a My Pillow product. Go to mypillow.com/kyle promo
code Kyle at the My Pillow website and they will get you
hooked up with all the same deals as everybody else.
Do not forget the Amrat Podcast. That's Amrad Pod.
It's rumble.com/amrat Pod you're watching here on Kyle Saracens
Rumble channel. This is the Kyle Serafin show.
It is rumble.com/kyle Serafin. I didn't add a show in it.
There's nothing. There's no hyphens.
Those are all fake accounts. We're trying to get them
removed. Again, rumble.com/kyle Sarafin
if you want to watch the videos, if you missed out on any of
those things, if you heard something on the audio channel
and you're like, man, that sounded funny.
Or that's not a terrible. I wanna see those people go to
the Rumble Channel, give us a thumbs up.
And lastly, I will read because This is why you guys help us
continue to grow. Here is today's Five Star
review. It's from Gino Gringo.
No Gino Ringo. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to call
you Gringo. Gino Ringo.
Sensible and smart Five stars. Get the inside scoop on the
state of the American surveillance state cultural
observations and some old fashioned common sense with
former FBI agent Kyle Serafin. And guests.
If you care about freedom, don't miss this one.
Thanks, Gina. We appreciate that and we will
keep sending it your way. We will do so again tomorrow.
Like I said, check out the Armed Podcast.
We'll see you again tomorrow at 0930 Eastern Time.
That's 8:30 here in Texas, America on the Kyle Seraphin
Show. God bless you all.
See you tomorrow. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth,
Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.