Take a look behind the curtain with the real whistleblower in
American Patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this programme has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiasm, Second Amendment defender and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Hello, my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Today is Tuesday. It's October the 17th.
What a strange week when timeline we're living in.
Everything is strange right now. And I got sort of furious before
we got started because I started reading some of the articles
we're going to be discussing some of the news that's going
on. Today's article or today's
episode is entitled The Last Domino.
And in many ways this comes from a conversation that Ryan, Matt
and I had yesterday. He said, why in the world is it
that people all over the globe care about United States news?
Why are there people in Canada that are watching the show?
Some of you are in Canada right now, you're watching the show.
Why are there people in Japan? We're actually ranked in the
iTunes ratings in in Japan, in New Zealand.
My wife gives me a hard time if we slip out of the top 200 in
some of these countries just because it's funny to us, but
it's strange. Why are so many people paying
attention to U.S. news and what's going on?
And in many ways, I think we have to accept that the United
States is the last domino, and many of you may not realise just
how critical that fight is, that the potential for global
tyranny, the potential for showing that it can win it, it
happens right here in the United States.
This is the final battleground for many of them, because most
of the world has already given it up.
They've already lost. And if the US falls, so does a
lot of the Western society that we've sort of come to believe is
is permanent and is standard and is normal.
It's not. It's actually exceptional.
And Western exceptionalism. This is interesting because it
actually ties into why the Proud Boys became the Proud Boys and
how they actually came up with their name and what their their
original purposes were. But there was something very
important that has been happening in the last couple of
years and that that in that's a war against basic Western
freedoms which have not been around forever.
They are. They're a new concept and they
are a potentially conquerable concept.
That's scary stuff for those of us that want to see our kids
live up in a a more free America than we grew up in.
That doesn't look like the case right now.
We're certainly going to be fighting back on it.
Guys. I'm going to be sharing with you
a little bit about what happened in the in in this Trump trial.
Things that are that I think are absolutely madding and insane.
So we're going to be talking about First Amendment issues.
The 1st amendment I believe is the last boundary to get to the
Second Amendment and that is the last domino for freedom in this
world. I'm going to make my case.
You guys will decide whether or not it's successful in a little
bit here. Before we do that let's go and
start and say thanks to my friends over Catholic vote going
to put this up. This is the loop, you guys know
that you can go and check out the loop on their website
catholicvote.org. We're going to be covering a
little bit down on some of the the two tier justice system.
You may have seen that there were protesters out in front of
the White House yesterday. I've got some video of that.
And what we also know is that there's a 2 tier justice system
when it comes to the what's flashing on the screen right
there, 320 plus attacks on Catholic churches and pregnancy
centres. And the arrests are pretty
scant. The Justice Department is not
doing their job. If you want to support the work
of catholicvote.org, you simply can go to the website.
You can join the loop which gives you their email chain.
Good stuff in there. Almost every single morning
there's some news that is not being covered somewhere else.
But moreover, you can keep track of some of the injustice that
continues in this world when it comes to unfair enforcement of
the FACE Act, which we are going to cover down on.
I think in many ways, it's an attack on free speech on
purpose. And that is one of those
dominoes in order. In fact, Ryan, you got the, you
got the thumbnail. Can you throw the thumbnail up
for this show right now? I actually want to tell you guys
what this is. Look at this.
You got attacks on Donald Trump. You got Letitia James, who's
delegitimizing the the, the New York judiciary that the state
level. Then you have federal judges
doing it and then guns. That's the last sort of domino
there. I want you guys to keep that in
mind as we continue to talk through this.
If you haven't hit the like button yet on our rumble
channel, what are you waiting for?
You're going to make Eric Jason in our chat, our moderator.
He's going to have a conniption fit over there.
Help the man out, Give him a like, make sure that that is a
green button. Let's go ahead and get started
here. Let's launch into this ABC News
piece. I'm going to start by reading
something for it. So this is topic #1.
Ryan, if you pulled on the screen, I'm going to read from
the bottom of the article. It's always interesting when
they bury something at the bottom of the article and I just
want to read it verbatim because when it when I when I did read
it this morning, it made my stomach churn just a bit.
This is a quote from Trump's lawyer.
I'm sitting here thinking George Orwell would have a field day,
End Quote, with what the government is proposing.
This is the judge. Judge Chutkan says this quote.
Orwell would definitely have a field day.
Sarcastically. This was the the tone.
The judge then asked Lauro, a former career prosecutor
himself, answer whether or not such statements would be
appropriate from any defendant in any criminal case.
Quote What I want to do is answer my question as to why a
criminal defendant should be allowed to call a prosecutor a
quote, unquote thug, she said. Tell me how the word thug is
justified here. I want to read that again.
This is a judge appointed by Obama and she says, quote, What
I want you to do is answer my question as to why a criminal
defendant should be allowed to call a prosecutor a thug.
Tell me how the word thug is justified here.
How the word thug is justified here?
Like that's sticking in in my crawl right now.
And the response was, you may not like the word, but he's
entitled with the 1st Amendment to make those statements.
So her response was something to the effect of Mr Trump is a
criminal defendant, quote, he's facing 4 felony charges.
He must comply with the conditions of release.
He does not have the right to say and do exactly as he
pleases. He does not have the right to
say and do exactly as he pleases.
Are any of you getting concerned that a federal judge said those
words from the bench? Does that bother anybody?
I'm gonna read the 1st Amendment for you.
Maybe you guys have forgotten what it says.
I'm obviously this judge has two Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof. That's the freedom of religion
clause, or the abridging the freedom of speech.
That's it. No law respecting the abridging
of the freedom of speech, and then talks about the press and
the right of the people to peaceably assemble, petition the
government for a redress of grievances.
Congress shall make no law respecting the abridging of the
freedom of speech. Mr Trump is a criminal defendant
in our country. Many of you guys know this, but
he's innocent until proven guilty.
Are we done with that? Are we just done with the
innocent until proven guilty? You don't actually need due
process. This judge is already
adjudicated the case. Mr Trump Mr Trump is a criminal
defendant. He's facing 4 felony charges.
He must comply with the conditions of release.
He does not have the right to say or do exactly as he pleases.
It's quoted right here on NBC or ABC News.
Rather unbelievable. I mean, it's just truly
unbelievable. And you know what else is a
problem? She said.
Politics stops at the courthouse door.
OK, fine. So what?
That means nothing, Trump's attorney said.
There have been no threats or accusations by any witness.
It like it almost leaves me without the ability to respond
when someone says that you can't refer to the Justice Department
as the Department of Injustice, which is clearly political
speech and the federal government that we all pay for,
which is beholden to the First Amendment and the terms of the
Constitution. Their oath is not to anything
other than to abide by the civil liberties that they are like.
They are absolutely prohibited from infringing upon.
That's what their oath is. Federal prosecutors take the
same oath that I did, the same oath that all of our military
service members do. You cannot, you cannot break the
supreme law of the land when you have that oath, when you when
you when you swear and you are duty bound to uphold it.
And that's what's going on right now.
They said that he can't talk about the department of
Injustice. He can refer to Joe Biden as
Crooked Joe Biden if he wants. That would be OK.
They are literally from the bench.
This Judge Chuckin, who's a Jamaican born lawyer appointed
by Obama, is saying what a presidential candidate, someone
who was auditioning for the job of the highest, the highest job
in the land, the highest executive authority and and
she's saying what he can or can't say.
She's gonna suss that out. What law is she?
Is she citing, you think when the 1st amendment says that
Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech?
I don't get it. I don't understand how this this
is where this is where it goes, though.
OK, this is you have the right to say what you want.
You may be responsible for those words, but if those words are
not a federal crime, then what authority does she have to mess
with this at all? There is literally nothing that
he is saying that should be constituted as an actual threat.
They're not Interstate threats. There is no purview for this
judge to be involved in it. But he's he's been accused of
some crimes, so now he's lost his rights.
Unbelievable. I mean, I mean, truly, truly
unbelievable. You pull up topic #2.
This is what I would refer to as election interference.
Seems like the back of the day. The FBI used to deal with this
stuff. Oh, here it is.
It's the FBI's website. What does that say?
Election crimes and security. Voter suppression.
Intentionally deceiving disqualified voters to prevent
them from voting is voter suppression, and it's a federal
crime. There are many reputable places
that you can find polling locations and registration
information. It turns out he's not making
threats against election workers.
He's not saying anything false. He's making an opinion.
He's someone who is running for office in this country and he
can't speak out against his, his political opponents.
I see somebody in the chat just said EH cat said he's out on
bond. I don't care if he's out on bond
or not. He's instant till proven guilty.
Nobody gets to remove your First Amendment rights and the idea
that they would, they would remove some of these liberties.
This is really scary stuff. I talked to Owen Shroyer the
other day and we've had a long conversation about the fact that
all these J Sixers, this doesn't matter who it is.
Mark Ibrahim is under the same terms of release.
Everybody who was involved in J6 had their gun rights stripped
and then they get credible threats, death threats,
particularly the ones who are big public figures.
How in the world did we decide that?
The judge just decided that the conditions of their release like
they're innocent until proven guilty, or are they not?
We're letting people out all the time on state charges.
They are running around after being accused of, but not
convicted of violent, nasty stuff, including overwhelming
evidence when they're caught on the scene of a violent crime and
they're released. This is so bizarre.
This is just, this is an upside down world right now.
But they're arguing for it. The leftist media is arguing for
it. Pull up a topic #3.
They basically are saying the judge, Judge.
The judge is doing the right thing and Trump deserves it.
Here you go. The courts have treated Trump
with kid gloves. 1 Judge can stop that.
Judge Tanya Shuken has every reason to treat the former
president like any other defendant in his situation.
There is no history of any other defendant ever being like Donald
Trump. And if you watch my podcast and
you've been listening to this, you know that I have no special
love for Donald Trump. I'm not going to give him any
credit when he doesn't, but he should be like every other
defendant, which is to say, give me a freaking break.
You're going to control his speech.
You're going to say whether or not somebody who has never like,
it's so unprecedented, we've actually crossed the line of
insanity. We have crossed the line of
insanity. It was unprecedented to do the
raid at Mira Lago and do the do the search warrant there.
That should have been a consent search.
And it was a presidential records act, you know, dispute
that has happened with every single president.
But we took the entire force of the Justice Department.
We took my former colleagues at the Washington field office,
flew down in a jet and decided to go in and conduct an armed
search warrant raid on a former president's house.
That was insane. And we have just decided to just
trips off into the daisies of insanity since then.
It is, it is so unprecedented that we can't even get over the
historical nature of how insane this is.
Every single week. It's a new escalation in this.
They've basically just, you know, you talk about a slippery
slope argument. We've literally tumbled off the
top of the slippery slope and we are just running at full speed,
almost terminal velocity downward into crazy.
There's a reason why people are floating a Banana Republic flag
where it's the United States, but the stars have been replaced
with bananas. And there's a reason why I say
things like the country that I grew up in would invade this
country. There is no doubt in my mind.
There's no doubt in my mind. This is all unprecedented stuff.
Let's read this. This is from Glenn Kirschner and
MSNBC columnist who has an opinion piece saying that it's
time to take the gloves off. It's time to take the gloves off
on Donald Trump. Just, I just want you to just
think about that. What gloves are on?
You have a federal judge saying whether he can or cannot speak.
Unbelievable. On Monday, the District Judge
presiding over the prosecution alleging former Donald Trump,
Former President Donald Trump interfered with the 2020
presidential election by the way, he lost that right?
Is that what they tried to argue?
What was he interfering with? The peaceful transition of
power, which actually happened. It's so crazy they have to pin
everything on January 6th. But it all it does is just give
perfect credence to the fact that there was two systems of
justice in this country. That we are seeing two sets of
laws being enforced and that there is political favouritism
happening from my former employer, from the Department of
Injustice or as my buddy Garrett Boyle, who just joined the chat,
said, the Ministry of Justice. The Ministry of Justice, the The
funny thing about the word Ministry is that it means to
send. So they're sending justice, but
only to their preferred, preferred receivers.
So this guy is arguing that a so-called gag order on political
parties is going to stifle the the the presidential nominees
ability to speak. On the other hand, it's the kind
of hearing that is regularly conducted in courts throughout
the United States when the defendants are on pretrial
release engaged in conduct detrimental to the fair and
orderly administration of justice.
That is nonsense. There is nothing about this
trial that has anything to do. Donald Trump is a threat to 0
people. He is one of the most watched
people in the world. He can't get away with anything.
He has a Secret Service detail that is paid for by our tax
dollars that protects him from threats all over the place on a
regular basis. The guy is scrutinised every
second of every day and he has televised on everything he does.
If he went out and used a public restroom, you would know about
it. If he used a freaking Portage
on, you would know about it. And they're acting like he's
like every other criminal defendant.
There is no such thing. This has never happened at this
level. Forget the trial of the century
when I was a kid. That was OJ Simpson because he
was a TV figure. OJ Simpson was the trial of the
century. You guys remember that.
And now you've got Donald Trump out there, and he must be
treated like every other criminal defendant.
And he can't say words. It's it's it's a political
prosecution. And now this judge is trying to
limit political speech while the man is running for political
office. Is this not insane?
Have we just lost it? I mean, I just feel like we
have. They're worried about what he
posts on social media and they're saying that he's going
to undermine the confidence in the justice system and prejudice
the jury pool by referring to the DOJ, which he has been
talking about basically since he started running for office.
But certainly since he's gotten out of office recently and is
now rerunning, he talks about it as the Department of Injustice
because of what they're doing. It's their actions that have
predicated his speech, says. Last month, Special counsel Jack
Smith filed a motion seeking, quote, a narrowly tailed order
tailored order restricting Trump's prejudicial,
extrajudicial statements. What in the actual hell,
President. It's prejudicial, extrajudicial
statements. He urged the court to limit
Trump's speech, which would stop his inflammatory and misleading
comments. I'm sorry, did you notice
anything in the First Amendment says you're allowed to say
things that might be false, that might be untrue?
This whole movement, this entire movement towards restricting
speech towards censorship, which some of you are experiencing now
as you go on social media and you want to say a contradictory
opinion. Or maybe you have no opinion.
Maybe you're like Ryan Long yesterday and you haven't made
your Hamas slash Israel post yet, and you're wondering, oh,
what side do I come down on? Maybe I don't come down on any
side. Maybe that gets you censored
too. I've had people deeming me
saying that they've lost their accounts over, you know, long
term statements about what's been going on in the last week.
They've been just basically running like non stop running
their mouths and now they're they're kicked off their certain
social media platforms. Why in the world would a special
counsel who's paid for by our tax dollars be worried about
inflammatory and misleading statements that would, quote,
cause others to harass or harm perceived critics or
adversaries? Is Donald Trump saying anything
that's physically dangerous, that is in danger in the safety
of anybody, or the nebulous concept that he's going to
undermine confidence in the justice system or prejudice the
jury pool? Are you?
Are you out of your mind? The man is the most reported on
person in America, which makes him one of the most reported on
people in the world. Potentially the most reported on
person in the world. You could literally go to MSNBC,
NBC, ABC, CBS. You will find just before this
Israel and Palestine conflict kicked off, he was wall to wall
coverage every single day. There was always an article
above the fold on him. Every single day he's out there.
He was the president of this country and most of us have the
strong sensation that the that the election that happened was
was manipulated and what he said is basically that.
But now he is going to undermine and prejudice the jury pool.
This makes me want to puke. I don't understand what people
were involved in making this decision, who the people are
that are working for my former employer that are running these
investigations. But the idea that they haven't
just looked at themselves in the mirror and said what I'm doing
is dishonourable. I'm breaking my oath.
I'm now participating in tainted justice and I'm going to go
ahead and commit ritual suicide. How are they not going down the
line where they have to basically make a decision every
single day? Do I put on my shoes today or do
I hang it all up and hang myself up?
Because I'm absolutely disgusted with the amount of dishonour
that exists. Throw that back up there again,
Ryan. I'll go ahead and read it.
We had a rumble ranches come through here.
Whatever 007 just said. They're trolling us
relentlessly. But what do we do about it?
Yeah, the question is, what do we do about it?
We don't accept it. We keep speaking.
You exercise your First Amendment, you complain loudly
and publicly and unfortunately, whether you like Donald Trump or
not, and there's people that do when they don't, and I don't
actually care, you have to support what he is doing because
you actually have to support, just like I said yesterday, the
people who are pro Palestine have a right to March in this
country. People who want to dress up like
Nazis. However much you pour their
message, they have a right to express it.
And Donald Trump certainly has a freaking right to speak out and
say that he thinks that what is going on is an injustice, when
it is pretty clearly a concentrated and concerted
effort to remove him from the political process.
And they're failing. They've got to be scared
absolutely out of their minds because he keeps, he keeps
moving forward, he keeps gaining in the polls.
Americans, I said this earlier on, if they indict him, which
they obviously did the first time and the second time and the
third time in an unprecedented 4th time and we'll wait for
more. When they did that, I said they
basically ordained him as the GOP nominee.
If you guys are behind Ron DeSantis, I don't really care if
you're defined, If you love Vivek and and you love anybody
else, Tim, Scott, Nikki Haley, because you would really want to
go to war. You love Krispy Kreme Donuts, so
you're into Chris, Chris Christie.
Whatever you're into, it doesn't make a difference.
Donald Trump was ordained by the administrative state as the
Republican nominee simply because of the way they treated
him. They have made him the person to
beat and he's in it. The only way that he doesn't get
to run for president, and he can still do so from a gaol cell, by
the way, is if he's dead. Which is why people like Tucker
Carlson were speculating that's a possibility.
They're doing everything they can to assassinate this man in
the court of public opinion, and they continue to fail.
They but clown themselves by saying things that he said were
false, that he doesn't have a right to say it when they have
absolutely no grounds to stand on, none whatsoever.
Think about some of the wild criminal trials we've seen about
the guy that that ran over all those people in in Wisconsin,
that that Christmas parade, you know, and he was out there
speaking out, yelling in court. Did he, did he face additional
sensors for that? No.
And then in the meantime, you've got this kind of nonsense with a
gag order on a presidential candidate who's not supposed to
speak mean things about the administration or the DOJ, which
he is literally running against the DOJ right now.
Like, the DOJ is on the ballot, whether you like it or not,
inflammatory and insane. And in the meantime, we've got
all the other signal that is getting lost in the noise.
So we're going to go ahead and say thanks over here to who else
should we thank? Up.
We want to say, actually, I'm gonna throw this up here, folks.
Some of you actually buy these on a regular basis.
I had no idea how many people are regularly looking to go buy
stuff from my pillow. But if you want to go to
Michael's website, you want to support Michael, He's supporting
us. We get, we get a significant
percentage of you guys get a discount, and we get a
percentage of the proceeds from these sales.
I know he's got a thing going on right now with towels.
He's got a thing with pillows. Like, people love their stuff.
I do not love, Michael tells Pillows.
I'll just tell you I bought him. I sent him back.
But my folks sleep on the sheets.
I know every time I talk to one of my friends that go, I'm
wearing his slippers right now. If you want to do that, just use
promo code. Kyle, I'm not telling you to go
buy something you were going. But if you're thinking, hey, I'm
going to go support Michael and I want to go buy his stuff, you
can use my promo code instead of the others.
And we get credit for it and and it actually does send real
dollars. They made their first deposit to
us the other day which I was shocked to see.
So that MM Lindell pillow money is out there in the world.
Use promo code. Kyle, Kyle if you want to do it.
And yeah, you know what we had we we just started throwing up
on social media. They sent us.
Memes are actually really, really nice.
People had nice calls with him. All of his folks are super nice.
There's a reason why I'm sure why people love him and want to
support him. So if you want to do that, by
all means do it. We're going to bring back.
We're going to be telling you we just signed up again with a
Patriot Coolers. We had a little negotiation in
the background that they want to kind of permanently support us.
So we'll talk about them in a bit, but use that, use promo
code, Kyle. Pretty much everywhere nobody's
using promo code, Kyle. So we just we've we've captured
it. And then if you want to go to a
website and use it, I will let you know.
A handful of we're going to sign up with a couple of different
affiliate links and we appreciate you guys supporting
what the people that are supporting us we really do.
Let's pivot because there's other stuff going on other than
the destruction of free speech. That's obviously one of the
dominoes. We've also got stuff going on in
our legislature or rather we have nothing going on right now.
There's no one for speaker Jim Jordan is looking to take over.
So let's put on that number four, these are hot takes coming
from MSNBC again. You know I go to the leftist
news sources because I want to see what they're saying.
Let's do topic four. There it is.
Jim Jordan should be expelled from the House, not made the
speaker. This is coming up.
This is good stuff. Why not this.
This guy is all he's been weighing in on.
He's a he's a leftist hack. There's no other way around it.
This is Hayes Brown, opinion writer, editor that they're
mostly opinions over there at MSNBC says that he spent the
2020 election after mass spreading lies and plotting to
reverse its results. So now he's trying to become the
speaker and that's a big scary thing for them.
You look, they claim he's an anti established fire brand.
You want to know what the suspendable chat said this
morning because they expect that he'll probably get voted in and
we do. We do expect it will probably
get voted in. He's made his his bones this
last Congress on trying to expose the weaponization of the
federal government through his weaponization committee which
he's chairing as well as the judiciary.
And yet, have we seen any movement?
Have you guys seen any movement on this?
Is there any, like tangible results that any of you can?
Was it Kevin McCarthy? Was he the one thing that was
standing in the way? Is that it?
Because I don't believe that. Here's my prediction.
Jordan probably does get voted in, although he's he's
struggling. His votes are not there yet.
But if, let's say, he gets voted in, I expect to see a bigger
budget approved for the FBI. That's how much trust I have in
Jim Jordan. But that's not just Jim Jordan.
I'm not singling him out. Our entire Congress is weak.
I was in a space listening to George Santos last night talking
how we need a new war on terrorism.
Anybody want to go on a new war on terrorism?
You think George Santos? He was born in 1988 and was
pretty young when 911 happened and the Patriot Act was passed.
Who was lecturing us about what's going on in Congress and
how the world works? Like, really?
George Santos is gonna tell us we need a new War on Terror?
These are Republicans. These are people who have pretty
good conservative ratings. You guys want to send your
children off to war? I don't.
I certainly don't want to send my kids off to fight for Israel
or Palestine or Iran or Jordan. Like, really, Like it's been my
whole adult life. I was 19 years old when when the
planes hit the Twin Towers and my generation.
I'm 41. My generation has been basically
part of this war and many of you in the chat here have have paid
serious consequences. I know Eric Jason, who just
threw a $5 rant up their sand, smashed the like button.
You know, he paid a pretty tremendous price with his body.
There's a lot of my friends that still go down range, that are
still in the special operations community, that are that are
involved in protecting our freedom.
But do we really, do we really need to have another war on
terrorism? Did we not learn our lesson on
that? Like, what are we doing?
They're just looking for another excuse to start printing money.
I showed you Lindsey Graham yesterday, the slimy turd from
from South Carolina. He's not gonna get out there and
fight. I don't even know if, like, his
hands look manicured. I bet he doesn't have any
calluses on his hands. It's gonna be hard men that go
and pay the price for this kind of stuff.
So I'm just saying, you've got, if you've got MSNBC rallying
about him, they're scared about him because he's going to come
in and he's going to be more conservative than McCarthy
because McCarthy was a weasel about it.
But I have no faith. They described him as a
legislative terrorist in this piece, which is actually really
funny. And supposedly.
And they're referring to it as a failed weaponization committee.
Yeah, it is failed because it didn't do anything.
That's the whole point. I got people on social media
reaching out to me over and over again.
Hey, is what you're saying serious?
Is it real? Have they really done nothing
for you guys? Do you see my buddy Garrett
Boyle? Is he out there in the chat?
Instead of being at his job investigating bad guys, is he
out there running down real terrorists?
No. Nope.
He's sitting and making T-shirts, which we love him for
and he'll he'll keep doing it because it's something to do and
we are pushing back. He made this T shirt, but he's
not doing the job that he's trained to do.
Just like Steve friend, just like me, Just like Marcus Allen.
We're not investigating bad guys.
We're sitting here talking to you guys about how stupid this
is. They are in fact just pulling it
over on you. That's why we've been covering
all these things on how to be a sceptic.
You have to be a sceptic about all of it.
It's nonstop. It's nonstop.
The head fake. It's nonstop.
The fact that there's an opportunity cost to your
attention span and they're trying to distract you with so
much of it. So let's see, how how close is
this going to get us to a real war?
Well, topic #5, there you go. It's already there.
Daily wire already reporting on it.
What do they say? the United States has selected
2000 troops for potential deployment to support Israel.
Why? Why are we doing that?
Israel's got it under control. They're dealing with an internal
border dispute. As far as I can tell.
There may be a lot of atrocious things happening, but why do
U.S. troops need to get involved?
Because that's what they do, I guess.
I've got friends that are in the Marine Corps that are saying
that they are getting standby orders.
They're getting activated. I've got some questions into my
buddies who are at Fort Bragg asking what that's looking like.
Here you go. Defence officials reportedly
selected 2000 troops across the United States military to deploy
for potential deployment to support Israel in their war
against Hamas terrorists. Daily Wire, this is Brandon Dre
reporting on this over at Daily Wire.
We know Brandon Dre, he's a good guy.
According to the Wall Street Journal, U.S. officials said
that they have selected the people that are not intended to
serve in a combat role and no ground troops that engage in
close range battle have been put a prepare to deploy order.
That's not what I'm hearing. And they would help Israel as
advisers and medical support missions only in ground
operations in Gaza. Wow.
You guys know what happens when you start putting a combat
advisors into that role? That's a special operations sort
of euphemism for people who are engaged in combat but aren't
supposed to engage in combat but engage in combat.
People in the special operations community, whether they be
mostly, mostly it turns out to be army special forces guys,
foreign internal defence. That's usually what the mission
is called. Foreign internal defence if I
did, and that just means that they are so-called training, but
if they get engaged and they're allowed to engage as well, which
of course they do, so that's what they're saying.
And then you've got John Kirby saying he won't rule it out.
Pull up topic number six from Breitbart News.
John Kirby I've won't rule in or out if U.S. troops will help
free American hostages in the Israel Hamas conflict.
National Security spokesperson John Kirby.
This is the guy that lies about whatever his feelings are and he
cried about this conflict, but he's he's really excited about
the sacred right of the military to support abortion.
So that's really helpful. We're really, really helpful
about that. He said he would not rule out
U.S. troops being deployed in the ground to free hostages.
Well, that's how it starts, isn't it?
It always starts with getting Americans out.
How many boots on the ground are we going to put back in
Afghanistan to get the Americans out of Afghanistan that we left?
You guys remember that in August of 21, right before the Biden
administration rolled out the fact that they were going to
force guys like me and all my friends to try to take a
vaccine, to try to take off the heat from what they were
involved in, which is that they essentially had just left a
bunch of Americans and billions and billions of dollars of
military equipment. Many of you are asking there's
no way to validate whether or not the Taliban left equipment
somehow ended up in the hands of Hamas terrorists.
We don't know. But there's pipelines between
these these Arab States and they're generally aligned
terrorist types. We saw M fours with Acogs on
them being used in in Hamas videos.
So maybe did we fund it? Is that another fantastic move
by the Biden administration? They're not going to rule out
ground war. They may be using our our troops
to go free hostages in the Israel Hamas war, Senator Tom
Cotton said. Special operations forces should
be there. They have an obligation to get
Americans out, especially those we think are being held hostage.
Would we have US boots on the ground for that?
John Kirby says there's no plans or intention to put U.S. troops
on the ground, fight or, I'm sorry, on the ground to fight in
this fight between Israel and Hamas.
And then the CNN anchor said, well, what about to retrieve
Americans? And he says we're actively
trying to find out exactly where they are.
I mean, Shannon, we don't even know how many exactly.
We have a small handful, and we know there could be more than
that. That could be in different
groups. It could be moved around.
Would you rule out any possibility of the US forces
being involved in the ground there?
Of course. The answer is I.
What I won't do is roll anything in or out when it comes to
getting our hostages home. Yep.
Are we sending anybody into Afghanistan?
No. We saw freaking people that were
former soldiers. We saw former Marines.
We saw veterans in this country have to go into Afghanistan to
get the partners out that they knew that they had made sacred
obligations to. There's actually a like a
Netflix show about it now called The Covenant.
We left translators behind. We left people that assisted the
United States government and we certainly left American
citizens. Are we going in there?
We going back into Afghanistan? Screw it, right.
Isn't that the whole thing? Whenever you have a big problem,
just launch a war. I mean we saw all this stuff
happen in the 90s. That's the really crazy thing
about it. We saw all the stuff happen in
the 90s. And getting into war was one of
the ways that people were able to take the focus off this.
You know, a lot of people talk about 911 and the and the
insanity of that day, the day before it when they just
launched another Pentagon audit where they had lost what,
trillions of dollars? I mean this is just an ongoing
thing. It's just a cover up.
But the trillion is 3 trillion. Is that the number?
Yeah, they just did a recent one there.
They couldn't find 6 or 7 trillion.
So ongoing bad accountability by our government and they want
more authorities and they want to be able to muzzle your
speech. They want to be able to use your
speech. Like, I see this all as
connected. I see that the federal
government is all connected at all this route.
That doesn't mean that everybody is involved in some big
complicit plan. It's just an overarching trend
towards tyranny. We are arching aggressively
towards tyranny. And some of that is you need to
be distracted and you need to have your fighting age,
population of males involved in something other than paying
attention. What's really interesting is, is
so many of you are seeing through this right now.
You're seeing the head fake. You're seeing the opportunity
cost of your attention span being split, and you're not
losing it. And you're not listening to
voices like CNN, and you're not listening to MSNBC or Fox for
that matter. Who's gonna put Lindsey Graham
on and let him talk about how we're gonna go to war with Iran?
He was rattling about that, too. It's pretty incredible.
It really is. So we have to ask, is putting a
Jim Jordan in, is that a, is that an incrementally better
step than having no government at all.
I'm still in the no one for speaker camp by the way,
hashtag, no one, the number four speaker.
You can make that go if you actually type it in on Twitter
it will. It will actually give you a
click through because there are enough people that are saying no
one for speaker. Let them run out of money.
Let them run out so they can't do anymore damage because all
they want to do right now it seems like is infringe our
space. There it is.
Ryan Mattis got it in the chat. No one for speaker folks.
You can copy and paste that thing in O.
There's a couple of different people making arguments.
Let's do video #3. Let's throw that one up real
quick and let's see. This is from Alex's speed, but I
think this is Matt Gaetz talking about it.
Is this an incremental increase or not?
Run that video. Let's see what the argument is
for gates. Right now, I'm very excited
about Speaker Designate Jim Jordan.
The opposition to Jim Jordan has dwindled down to the single
digits. And if we are able to convince
just a few more colleagues to go with the rest of the Republican
Congress and getting Jim Jordan the speakership, I don't think
there'll be a single viewer of Greg Kelly reports who doesn't
appreciate the upgrade that we made at the position of Speaker
of the House. I think you're going to see it
right away in our oversight work, subpoenas that were
bottled up are going to get out the door.
I think we're going to be able to finally get a subpoena.
The Hunter Biden and my hope is that we'll be able to put some
downward pressure on all of this spending.
I just saw a report today that you know, we had 10s of
thousands of Americans just this past month go into bankruptcy,
up 18% from a year ago. Biden Nomics isn't working for
people in the House of Representatives.
Is the only institution in our federal government that people
can place any hope in. When you look at the Schumer
controlled Senate and an administration spending more
money, more weaponized against our fellow Americans.
So Jim Jordan will be a great and inspiring.
Leader, we got a little more work to do, but we feel like we
got the wind at our back, so there you go.
That's the argument in favour of, he said.
He wants to put a little bit more downward pressure on
spending. You know what put a lot of
downward pressure on spending. No spending.
The continuing resolution that is out there, when that runs
out, there is no more spending. The government agencies aren't
funded. You want to do something strong?
How about that? I want to hear from Tom Fitton,
who runs Judicial Watch. Listen to what Tom Fitton has to
say because he's actually nailing all the points.
You can have a Jim Jordan speaker if that's what it comes
down to. But is he going to do the things
that matter? Maybe.
Maybe not. Tom Fitton's approach.
Listen to the things he's saying, the exact same things we
are. Go ahead, throw that up.
If even McCarthy initially had taken his view, this is my line
and I'm not going to back away. If you want government funded,
you're going to have to stop attacking the civil liberties of
Donald Trump, or destroying our sovereignty through this
invasion, or destroying the 1st Amendment rights of millions of
Americans by censorship. And if you share my views, you
need to let your members of Congress know.
I don't know if they're gonna be there over the weekend, but call
them at 202-225-3121. Because that's what you know.
It's not so much the what this who the speaker is.
I guess you know the personality matters, the leadership
qualities matter. But what are they gonna do once
they're in the office? What's the expectation of the
caucus? And the expectations, in my
view, are too low, you dear voter.
And dear citizen, your job is to elevate the expectations and let
them know what you expect them to do.
And it can't be the same old, same old.
Yeah. I think Tom Fitton gets more
sleep at night than I do because he's a little bit less upset
about it. But he said exactly the same
things. I saw that video and I was like,
oh, Tom Fitton has the exact same take on this that I do.
It's not about downward pressure, it's about making
demands. It's about defund things that
are going to take away the civil liberties, defund the entire DC
court system if you have to. I don't care.
DC doesn't care. They don't want to prosecute
criminals. I've had guys that we went in
and we serve search warrants. We left weed on scene, by the
way, which is a federal crime, but it was, quote, unquote,
decriminalised in that area. Even though we were there for a
drug charge, we left weed on scene.
We had a guy that admitted to having two firearms even though
he had a first felony conviction going back to 1985.
This happened in 2016, this, this search warrant that we
served, OK, the guys got 20 years worth of felony histories
and as the law says, he can't possess A firearm.
He owned guns that he wasn't allowed to have, that he bought
illegally and he was possessing illegally and he had access to
illegally next to his bed. And he brought them and told us
exactly where they were admitted they were his.
He was never prosecuted in DC. Meanwhile, you're going to
criminalise the speech of the president, the former president
of the United States defund all that.
Just pull the money out of the judiciary.
I don't care what happens, give them $1.00, just like our friend
Colton Moore said the other day. They can do the same sort of
things in in Georgia and they need to be doing it at a local
level. How about on a national level?
How about the GOP steps up and says you're infringing on the
civil liberties, you're infringing on the rights of
Americans to be able to even just live in their their country
and not have it invaded by foreigners.
You are telling people who work for the United States Border
Patrol they can't even do their flipping jobs.
How about you get hands off on that?
Otherwise, you get no money at all.
How about you get no money at all until you prove otherwise?
That'd be alright. Tom Fitton's correct.
But what's Jim Jordan say about it?
Sounds like he just wants to get more money so we can just get
after this Israel war, Man, he really wants to get after it
too. Why don't you play that clip #5?
We'll just see what that's all about.
How many votes are you willing to go through tomorrow?
Are you going to get a speaker? Tomorrow, the American people
deserve to have their. Congress, the House of
Representatives working and they can't have that happen to get a
speaker. So we need to do that, plus we
need to be helping. Like or or.
There's friend and closest ally Israel.
We need to help them as well. He's going over and over again
tomorrow. You expect multiple roll call.
Well, look good walking into the conference.
I feel even better now. We got a few more people wanna
talk to listen to and then we'll have a vote tomorrow.
Would you be opposed to? Really.
Did you hear that one? That's really good.
Would you be opposed to to putting Ukrainian money along
with Israel? A Did you catch that as they
were running out? That's what the press is really
doing. They're just doing cop cover for
a bunch of massive aid packages and spending bills that throw
money to people that are not you.
Incredible. This is what the 4th the 4th
estate does. The 4th branch of government is
supposed to keep the other ones accountable.
Yes, it's. I'm putting that in air quotes.
It's not a real branch of government.
Our press actually used to try to hold the powerful
accountable. Apparently democracy dies in
darkness. Not that we have a democracy,
but don't tell the Washington Post that.
And in the meantime, like they're advocating, can we just
get some more money to Ukraine? Like how much money are these
people sending out their own freaking pockets?
Do they want to send their own check?
Like you can do it right now. There are plenty of Ukrainian
based charities that you can throw your money away in and see
that it goes absolutely nowhere. It's not going to result in more
guns or bombs or less casualties at the front or anything else.
You can certainly do that. By the way, where is the
Ukrainian war coverage? Did we just drop them like a
like a like a bad date? Just dropped him off right
there. We even take him all the way
home. We just kicked him out of the
curb. We're like, yeah, we're close
enough. Oh, you live in the same city.
Here you go. You're out.
No more Ukraine money. No one's talking about that
right now except that one reporter who really wants to
just have some Ukrainian kickbacks going on.
Unreal. It's really unreal to watch this
stuff. And so we're trying to suss out
what's the signal and what's the noise.
You know, that looks like when you have a radio broadcast,
there's a signal that's being sent.
The noise is the the background, the static, the microwave
radiation that's in the way, the things that are gussying up the
signal as you try to tune it in. Some of you have never had a an
analogue dial and and actually gone after an RF frequency.
We were trying to tune it in manually.
We're trying to get to the signal.
And the signal is they want to spend a bunch of money.
They want to send our troops. They want to distract us.
Everybody talks about a unit party.
Like I don't see the Republicans doing any sort of real, real
advocacy on behalf of the things that I care about, and probably
not for you either. Are they worried about America?
No, they're worried about Israel and sending troops over there
and money over there to the American people.
Really deserve to have a a Congress that's in session.
I think we deserve a Congress that's not in session ever for a
long time. Let's just take some breaks.
Let's take a deep break and deep breath and just say, hey, we're
just going to see what happens for a little while.
No federal government intervention.
Maybe stop screwing it up and Matt Gates's argument.
Even though I like Matt Gates a lot, Matt Gates is going to get
one of our pins. I like Matt Gates a lot, but his
statement was we need to push down on spending.
How about we need to stop it just for a little bit?
Let's just put a little pause on that national debt just for a
couple of days. That'd be nice.
No new spending. That's my avocation.
I I guarantee you that you would not see a major change in your
life if the federal government was not operational.
Most of you know that that would be the case.
And even if they were to close down the national parks, which
Obama did as sort of a like a slap back in the face to show
people, oh, you love freedom, well, you can't go into your
national parks if they don't fund the national parks.
You can walk right past the gates.
You just may have to walk a little further and you can still
enjoy all the beautiful nature out there in the world.
Just saying, let's consider that as a real thing.
And what does this all come down to?
What does it come down to? We stop speech.
We're going to put forward more so they can distract you.
And for me, like I said, it comes down to that last domino.
We're going to talk about that in just one second.
First, I want to tell you guys we mentioned earlier, so let's
do it again. Go to thedashexpendables.com,
the dash suspendable.com you get your access to.
What is it? It's the merch store.
It's the suspendable merch store run by our friend Garrett
O'boyle. Yes, you can check that out.
And you can get the merch bundle, which we've told you
about. If you want to just get 3 pins.
If you just want to support somebody, have something small
come in. It's a flat rate.
There's free shipping on it. If you add three to the card,
you're going to get it for 30 bucks.
Promo code, Kyle, you might even get it for a little bit less.
I think it just takes 10% off the top.
So that's just so we can track what's going on there.
And you know who's wearing one of those Expendables pens?
You know who's wearing one of those?
Let's see here if I got a picture of this.
Boom. Our buddy Owen Shroyer.
Look at that. He sent us a picture the other
day, it said. Still sporting it.
Very proud. So we got we got our buddy over
at Infowars wearing it. That's good stuff.
Check out the dash. Suspend tables.com support.
GOB actual. Yep.
And you can find a shirt like this.
I don't know if he's gonna make anymore of these are the limited
edition last line strength. This was his thing he was making
when he was a police officer. You know, Garrett was a cop.
He was in the military. He served in the infantry in the
Army and then an FBI agent and indefinitely suspended.
Still allegedly an FBI employee. Go figure.
All right, so what's the final domino on all this stuff?
They go after free speech. They want to tie up your money.
They want to type your attention.
They want to tell you that the speaker of the House matters in
some way. When it really doesn't to you,
it really doesn't. So what's to come after?
How about this? You guys remember the day of
jihad? I don't have the red lights up
anymore. I took down the day of jihad
lights. You can.
I promise you. Look, there it is.
The day of jihad lights are gone.
But the day of jihad never happened in this country.
Why do you think that was, Ryan? You gotta you got an instinct on
why we didn't have like some sort of massive terror attack
that just broke out on Friday the 13th.
Yeah, because it would be overwhelmingly obvious that it
was Garrett Merrick, Garland, Chris Ray and the rest of their
fault. What do you think?
No, I don't think that's it. Although it would be their fault
because they're too busy going after Catholics.
They're going after parents, school boards.
I think it's because you threaten the country that has
100 million gun owners. What do you think of that?
Like something like 25% of this country owns guns.
Except. It's a little bit more logical.
I own 1/4 of the guns. I don't know who owns the other
3/4 of the 100 million out there, right?
But guys, they decided they were going to come after a country
and then they decided wait a minute, that's a death wish.
Do you remember what happened when there was a draw Muhammad
contest in Garland, TX and we had a couple of ISIS fighters
decide that they were to go out there and teach, teach those
Texans lessons. You can't draw the Prophet
Mohammed. They got shot before they even
made out of their car. They got killed by an off duty
cop with a revolver on his ankle.
The cop got shot back too, but he lived.
Those two guys didn't make it and they had AK's.
You're going to come up against Americans who are armed and
pissed off and have experience in war.
This country is full of not soft targets.
There's an awful lot of soft targets.
But man, you don't know what they are.
If you're out there in the general public, general
population and you think that these terrorist guys thought
that was a good idea? No.
So where did they go? They stabbed a teacher in
France. We saw that.
And then we saw let's go ahead and pull up topic 9, if you
would. This is coming from CNN's
reporting. There was an attack in Brussels
too. Did you guys see this?
So the police shoot. This is the my favourite.
When they do these headlines it it cracks me up.
Police shoot dead suspected gunman.
Was he dead before they shot him You think Ryan or was he?
He was shot dead. Man, they don't have.
I don't know. How about how about police
killed gunman? I don't think they were
suspected gunmen. If they were shooting people
anyway accused of killing two Swedes in Brussels.
So OK anyway the gunmen were were were killed right?
Supposedly. Or a gunman rather.
Is it plural? Yeah single.
They they they killed a guy in in Brussels who apparently went
after this soccer qualifier. There was a Euro cup game 2024
Euro qualifier Belgium hosting Sweden.
Two people were killed and they shot this guy dead.
But why did this person do it. This is a guy who claimed that
he was going to be he was inspired by ISIS, Islamic State
and he was shot dead. Why would you do it in Sweden?
Why didn't they come to the United States, where we heard it
was going to be, where we have all this money and we're part of
the war machine? They're claiming it was because
of this really, really dangerous spate of Koran burnings that's
going on in Sweden and Denmark. You know, it's funny.
The Danes and the Swedes are a little pissed off.
They want their country back. They don't really like it.
So they're burning the Koran in protest.
That's free speech, right? You're allowed to do that.
You can burn a Bible if you want in this country.
You can burn an American flag. How quickly would you be
condemned if you were burning the Koran?
Because people are scared. Because they're scared of this
kind of recourse. I don't know, Maybe that's the
move. Maybe you just trigger it.
I I don't wanna disrespect anybody's book, but it's also
just paper. The words in there may mean
something, but you're allowed to have that speech.
In America. We all defend that.
Those of us who had that oath defend the right of you to do
something that we think is important.
Like I said, dressed like a Nazi, burn the Koran, burn the
Bible, put the Bible into an outhouse.
Whatever it is that makes you happy, you're actually allowed
to do that. It's not illegal.
It may be inflammatory, but it's not illegal.
Just like Trump speaking out about the Department of
Injustice. All these things are there, but
I'm telling you gun ownership is a big game changer and it is the
thing they come after. So we're seeing two major moves
right now. One, the Supreme Court is going
soft on it. They are, they are allowing the
Biden administration to continue enforcing a rule on quote
unquote ghost guns, which is already a political talking
point. That's going to be.
What topic is that? That's going to be under CNN.
So that's going to be topic number what, 8.
And then there's something going on in Connecticut right now.
Maybe I didn't even give you this one, right.
This one is going on in Connecticut.
They just passed their biggest piece.
Go ahead and back to the Connecticut one, the one you
just had a second. There it is.
Yep. They enacted their biggest
sweeping gun control motion since Sandy Hook.
You remember that the the do something attitude that was
going on because of Sandy Hook. You you stand on the backs of
dead children and you say, oh, do something.
We have to outlaw the gun. And imagine if the theory was,
is like, oh, there's too much speeding, we have to outlaw the
car. There's too many drunk drivers.
We have to ban the car. Not the person who's drunk
behind the wheel, not the person who's either mentally ill or
deranged or has some sort of terrorist idea.
It's not that person that we're going to try to go after.
We're going to go after the actual tool.
And I read the Second Amendment too.
It's pretty clear there's not much to it other than you
shouldn't infringe upon it. So if there is a supremacy
clause and the US Constitution does ban you from doing such
things like this, if you can have federal law that supersedes
the state laws, shouldn't be that.
You just can't. You can't get involved.
You cannot pass laws that infringe on this.
I don't know why we keep accepting it, but sure enough,
Connecticut's most ride wide ranging gun control measure
since the 2013 laws enacted after Sandy Hook take place on
Sunday. They just got it.
They went into effect proponents vowing that they're going to
pursue more gun legislation despite the legal challenges.
Yeah, so they signed a new law in which is probably going to be
at bans open carrying a firearm and prohibits the sale of more
than three handguns within 30 days.
Why? What right do they have to limit
the number of handguns you could buy?
And you know that Connecticut has been an open carry state
since the beginning, since it since its inception, right?
This is the beginning. This is the birth place of
American liberty. Connecticut and firearm
manufacturers are leaving because they're voting away
their own civil liberties. They can't see how dangerous it
is, but it is the last one. You get rid of the Second
Amendment, the 1st Amendment falls.
You have no ability to speak freely because there is no.
There is no barrier that stands in the minds of those who would
do evil against the the general population.
And now you're going to be 100% dependent on the state to come
protect you. And do you think the state is
going to protect you in a fairway?
Because I don't. It says we will not take a break
and we cannot stop now. We will continue to pass life
saving laws until we end gun violence in Connecticut.
Is that right? That's the.
That's Jeremy Stein, the executive director of
Connecticut Against Gun Violence.
They're against gun violence. But guns don't cause violence.
People cause violence every single time.
It's so old and it's so boring that we have to keep saying the
same things. But these people don't ever
stop. I'm actually a member of Moms
Demand Action on their. I get their text messages and
instead of them actually sending me what the moms are demanding,
which is what I was actually interested in, they just send me
every town for gun safety, which is Bloomberg's organisation, to
try to get guns banned. And you know, they're like, oh,
how do we, how do we get rid of guns?
And I just said something like, hey, how do we make sure that
the poor people in bad neighbourhoods, black and brown
people who have lower income because they're
disproportionately affected by violence, how do we make sure
that they have guns? Most of the roots of gun control
fall into very racist categories.
It's not like they have a problem with everybody having
guns. They've expanded to that.
But historically speaking, they went after cheap guns and guns
that poor people could buy. The people who were most likely
to be affected by by physical violence were the ones that they
actually targeted. It's always interesting when you
go back to those roots. Maybe we could turn some of
these clowns against it. They're so rooted in their
ideology, they can't actually see that there's cognitive
dissonance between the two subjects.
It's like, oh, you want to protect black and brown people
And it's all about diversity, is it?
And why are you trying to take guns from people?
Like a 60 year old black woman who lives by herself in a shitty
neighbourhood? She's been there forever.
She just wants to make sure that she doesn't die in their sleep.
And the police aren't gonna get there fast enough because
they're too busy dealing with other stuff.
I mean, that's who you're taking the guns out of the hands of.
You're not gonna take the guns from guys like me.
I've already got my guns. You guys should, too.
If you're not buying guns, I don't know what you're doing.
That's there's it's not it's not a it's not disposable income
that you're throwing out there. This is a necessity.
Just like you have to be able to speak freely.
You have to be able to exercise that right, Ryan?
You just buy a gun the other day.
Sure did. My friend sure did you pending
AR15 coming into your house. I sure am, my friend.
Thanks to you. Look, there's I got another one.
I'm getting ready to order next week.
That's right. Look people, there are cheap
ways to exercise this liberty. If you don't own a firearm, you
haven't been able to train on it.
You should do so. It's really inexpensive
considering what your opportunity cost is.
If you can't buy one in the future, what's 5 or 600 bucks
right now? Go to something like a Palmetto
State armoury. I don't get any money from them,
but they're cheap and they're good.
They're effective. Like the the cost has come down
on gun ownership, particularly when our dollar is worth as
little as it is right now. I mean, figure out what the the
many of you guys got these stimulus cheques during 2020 and
21. Like a lot of us, just dump that
straight into ammo. I was like, oh, you want to give
me money? I'll just turn it into ammo.
I'll bring that back in here. That's fine.
We gave some to our church. This just not the ammo.
The Bunny, I'm just saying exercise your civil liberties.
That's the last domino that that's being attacked and the
Supreme Court is actually doing a thing right now.
They just said that the Biden administration is able to
continue enforcing ghost gun regulations, ghost guns, so
called. This is CNN reporting.
So it's going to be politically charged, untraceable homemade
guns. There has been a historical
precedent in this country to be able to build your own weapons,
but they they've demonised things.
You remember how we talked about how it wasn't about the Catholic
Church, it wasn't about radical traditional Catholics who go to
a Latin Mass. It was always about Christian
conservatives in general, but all Christians.
It was always a way they try to find a fringe topic and they're
like, you're not a person that goes out and build your own
guns, are you? That's trying to avoid a
background check? Maybe I am.
How many guns have I built? Several.
I built several of these so called ghost guns.
And you know what? I wouldn't trust my life to
them. But you should have a right to
do so. There were no noted dissents to
the order. They continued to allow the
Biden administration to go after these things.
So our Supreme Court is falling down on the job and not
understanding that shall not be infringed is simple language and
it doesn't need anymore. There was a vote back in August
5 four. The court sort decided with the
Biden administration on a challenge brought by a group of
manufacturers. What they've done is they've
taken a bunch of people and put them out of business.
There are a lot of people that built up industries selling
things that have been historically legal.
They have no serial numbers and they don't have background
cheques because they're not guns, but they have all the
things that would take for you to build the guns.
This is a really slippery slope. Again, they've done the same
thing with silencers or suppressors in this country
where they said the tools that are used to build a suppressor
are in fact the suppressor. That's what happens when you
allow the Chevron doctrine to go along, when you allow, which by
the way, maybe on, you know, on the docket for next year.
But when you allow the federal government and the
administration of government to be decided by the people in
government, not our legislatures, who's too busy
sending money to Ukraine or Israel or whatever it is they do
when you allow them to be the quote unquote expert, That's the
trust the experts thing. How many of you guys have become
untethered from the trusty experts game?
You don't trust the science, you don't trust the institutions,
you don't trust the mainstream media.
You don't trust our our government to do its own.
There he has Ryan's one vote in favour.
I know the rest of you are as well.
We all lost faith in this because they've proven that they
are not worthy of our trust and you shouldn't trust the Supreme
Court to be able to legislate like we need to have this thing
removed. There's no reason that an agency
who has a vested interest in expanding laws so they have more
purpose and reason to exist should be the ones that are
interpreting law and making rules that are completely
illogical. Anybody who follows the gun
debate can see that's the last slippery slope that they are
trying to infringe on. It's the reason why your your
gas stove would be on the docket.
Why? Because the EPA has decided that
carbon dioxide is a is a, you know, within their purview as a
wasteful gas, as a problem. It's it's just a creeping
ability for the federal government to get an agenda
passed. And the federal government not
supposed to have an agenda. It's supposed to enact what is
passed by our representation. And they do not do it right now.
It scares the heck out of me. Now let's see the two tiers of
it, because they're worried about gun violence, but they're
certainly not worried about enforcing other rules.
Let's play this video right now. If you guys have seen this
video, number six, this is what happened outside of the White
House maybe yesterday. It was within the last couple of
days and look at this insurrection against the United
States Secret Service. Do you remember all the cries
and all the Pearl clutching that went on after January 6 because
they was involved with people that were yelling at cops and
trying to get over barricades? Let's look at this one real
quick. Let's run video number six and
we're going to talk about the double standard.
There it is. OK, What are they doing?
They're screaming. They're trying to fight with
cops. They're trying to get things.
They're trying to get their way. They're really mad about
Palestine or something like that.
Do you see these people getting dragged over the fence line and
arrested? Are they going to all have FBI
SWAT teams kicked down their door?
Because I don't think so. Why would that be?
Why do we have these double standards?
Maybe it's because conservatives are on the docket.
And the last line for freedom is that your ability to speak and
after that, your ability to own firearms.
Those are it. That's it.
That's what we've got. Those are the lines.
We're at that line right now. Let's bring up the number 10, if
you would, a topic #10. This is from ABC News.
I found this very interesting. This is a woman who admitted to
in Wyoming burning an abortion clinic.
She's facing 20 years in gaol. I'm gonna read you this article.
She said. She had anxiety and nightmares
that led her to spider fire at Wyoming's only full service
abortion clinic. It's set back to facilities
opening. There was nobody there.
It was under construction. She had anxiety and nightmares
and that's why she went and burned it.
That sounds like a mental illness to me, right?
But she went out there and she was sentenced to 20 years.
Or she could be sentenced to 20 years for burning the
Wellsprings. Oh, it's always Wellspring and
Interesting Health Access Facility in Casper.
They always have these weird names, don't they?
Don't say anything about, like, abortion clinic.
They're reproductive health facilities, she said.
She knew right afterwards that what she had done was wrong.
She admitted to it. She's basically pleading for
mercy. The fire happened in May of
2022, before the clinic was even open.
It caused extensive damage, which required more remodelling.
Knocked back the opening for a year.
How many babies did she save doing that, you think?
Probably quite a few, she admitted.
She broke in. She poured gasoline around
inside the building. It's kind of like a pretty
aggressive movement. She lived on fire.
She was a mechanical engineering student and she showed no signs
of anti abortion views on social media, but told the
investigators that she did in fact oppose abortion.
This is what the ATF is busy doing.
They're running after her. She used a rock to break a glass
window and went in, poured gasoline all over the place and
burned it. OK, how about we pull up what
they've been doing on the pregnancy crisis centres around
the country since the Dobbs attack.
This is coming from our friends over at Catholic Vote topic #11.
Let's pull this one up real quick.
Hmm. What does that say?
That says that there have been 88 attacks just since May of
2022 when this woman went out there and did that. 88 attacks
since the leak of the Supreme Court opinion that ended up
overturning Roe V Wade. The Dobbs decision They've gone
after Pregnancy Resource Centres and Pro Life Groups.
They've been attacked and vandalised. 88 of them.
OK, I'm gonna read you some of the places these happened.
Austin, TX. Frederick, MD.
Portland OR. Bangor, ME.
Manassas, VA, Denton, TX. Kaiser, Oregon, Madison, WI.
It's all over the country. It happened in Michigan and
California, in Alabama and Florida and Alaska, In Iowa, in
Washington, DC, these attacks have happened everywhere.
North Carolina, New York State, Buffalo, NY, Colorado.
I'm just scanning through here, 88 of them across the entire
country. Tennessee, New Hampshire, you
name it, anywhere out there, it's been done.
Louisiana. So I'm seeing all these
different places where they've had these attacks and you know
what we see from the, from the DOJ, Civil Rights Division pull
up that that piece from the Justice Department right there.
Number topic #12. Want you guys to see the
disproportionate level criminality Recent cases of
violence against reproductive health care providers, The 1st
120234 defendants right now charged with civil rights
conspiracy and face Act violations for targeting a
pregnancy resource centre in Florida in 2022.
So that's one of them. The defendants vandalised the
facility and spray painted threats.
If abortions aren't safe, neither are you.
We're coming for you. The defendants conduct
intimidated reproductive healthcare providers and damage
the Pregnancy Resource Centre. OK, so four.
They've got 4 arrests in one place in Florida for face Act
violations. Every single Ryan, can you
Scroll down that? Every single, every one of them
eight conspiracies. These were people that were
blockading, blockading. No violence.
They were just blockading an abortion clinic.
The next 111 defendants charged for a blockade in Nashville, TN
Reproductive Healthcare facility, That's an abortion
clinic. Several of them came from out of
state, God forbid. Next 110 defendants.
A conspiracy to to conspire against rights and face act
violations for a 2022 blockade in District of Columbia.
A blockade. Again, not violence.
Not vandalism. Not burning.
Things you see in the scroll here on the screen.
You see this over and over and over.
They're all Planned Parenthood had super glue in the locks to
try to keep people out of it. These things are pretty darn low
level. You've got one here where
defendant was assaulted with an escort.
Oh, guess what? 2022 defendant indicted.
That's Mark Howe. That's Mark Hawk written right
there at the top of the screen. A defendant was indicted for
face act violation in the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania, and he assaulted a Pennsylvania area Planned
Parenthood clinic escort. No, he pushed down a man that
was saying ridiculous and gross things to his son.
It's interesting they left that up in there.
That's they didn't say who it was because that's that's pretty
atrocious. Many of you guys know the story
of Mark, how he's been interviewed on my podcast, and
his story is absolutely egregious and he's going to be
featured in the new Dinesh Dsouza movie talking about his
experience of DOJ coming after him.
Just look at the scroll. All of these are fact violations
about people damaging abortion clinics.
None of them deal with the 88 violations that have happened
since the Dobbs decision. In just the last year you got
exactly 4 people charged with the threats and the vandalism
and the threats of violence and the actual physical property
damage that have been done to these things.
Go to catholicvote.org if you want to see their scrolling
banner. Action will tell you this is an
ongoing thing. They keep track of them, They
have a good counter. It is a useful resource for you
if you want to go out there and be able to make arguments about
the two tiered system of justice.
They're keeping track of this one thing very, very well.
That's why we like it. And we talked about police date.
I want to play you guys a little, a little touch.
I want you guys to consider going out and getting tickets to
it. It's going to be on the 23rd.
It's coming up in just a week here. 23rd and 25th is going to
be the live showing. It's going to be in theatres, in
a private screening setting. I'm going to explain how it kind
of works in just one second. Let's go and run this video
clip, a video #2. This is one they just sent me.
They said here's a little shot of Kyle Serafin in the the movie
Police State. So I'll give you guys a taste of
it here too, exclusively being shown right here on the Kyocera
show. Go ahead and run video two.
In the Richmond field office there was an intelligence
product that goes out. They claimed that people who
attend the Latin Mass are potentially white supremacists
is because they disagreed with a pro choice stance.
They didn't like abortion. They wanted borders that were
secure and therefore legal immigration stance.
That's not radical traditionalist Catholics that go
to a Latin Mass. That's all Christians and most
conservatives roughly half this country.
These are anti government violent extremists and they must
be dealt with. Police State Tickets sold only
on policestatefilm.net Again Police State film.net.
You can go and get tickets there.
It's going to be available for October 23rd and 25th in a
theatre near you, most likely some of you do not live near
them or you've got situations like me.
We've got little kids, we don't go to theatres anymore.
I don't got time. On October 27th there is going
to be a streaming premiere and we're going to do a red carpet
thing. So this is backwards for most
things in Hollywood. If you think about the way they
do it, what do they do? First?
They, they show a premiere where all the the superstars or
whatever it is or the people that are involved in the film
and all the executive producers get to invite their guests and
they do that and they release it to a very small audience and the
screeners and the people that vote for the Academy.
And then afterwards it's done in either limited or a larger
theatre release. And then it goes out to video.
We're doing it differently. We being Dinesh Desouza and the
production crew here, They've done it backwards because this
film is for you. It's not for screeners and it's
not for the Academy and it's not for the Hollywood establishment.
And that's not what they're trying.
They're doing it exactly backwards from what they do with
those guys. Their first releasing it to
theatres where you can go see it in a private screening.
They're then releasing it to video so you can see it in a
streaming premiere, which is going to happen just a couple
days later on. Like I said, October 27th would
be the first day you can get involved in that.
There's going to be some interviews and stuff like that.
I'm going to be participating in that as well.
So I'm just talking to them on the back end.
We're gonna be doing some interviews with folks that are
part of it, the production and that are part of the the premier
team and the production team for that movie.
And then lastly, there's like a VIP thing that's happening at
Malaga and I'm going to be there for that.
And so is Steve Friend. And so it's Gerardo Boyle.
So is George Hill, our friend Sonia Bosco.
The suspenders are all going to be showing up doing that.
Ryan's going to be travelling down with us too, right Ryan?
There he is. Somewhere.
Yes, Sir. Man looking forward to it.
I'm stoked we're all going to go down and see the the in person
piece. It is a a big screen release for
a reason. It's good in a big screen.
This is a you know full production value thing but if
you have to watch it at home on the streaming October 27th, I
know many of you are curious if that's the case.
So that's where it is October 27th.
The film the film website is Police State Film Very Easy
Police State film.net and ET. You can check out my social
media. You can take out Dan Bongino
social media. You can check out Dinesh
Dsouza's Steve friends. We're all putting out there in
in a big way. We need this thing to be
successful. And so since we found out that
the FBI is so scared of this, they actually did a Newsweek
piece another the same people that were leaking the story
about how they were going after Trump supporters.
Newsweek did a hit piece on this calls a bunch of the claims
allegedly, even though many of these things have been actually
adjudicated, they have no, you know, they watched the film and
they came away with it. They didn't cite me and they
didn't cite Steve. I don't know if they're scared
of the suspenders, but they didn't want to go do that.
They didn't put that in there. And also, our friend Miranda
Devine wrote a good piece about it in the New York Post very
recently. So all these things are out
there. Check out Police State film.net.
Police State film.net. If you want to get tickets or if
you want to do the advanced copy, I believe you can actually
buy the streaming premier access as well, which will be really
fun. I think my folks are gonna be
watching it on the small screen because they can't find it in
the little town they live in. Many of you guys will be in that
same scenario. So go ahead and do that.
And there's Excalibur showing that there's going to be a
virtual premiere. Yeah, The Warrior Studio Box
Office. I don't know what that is, but
somehow I'm going to that Excalibur.
I will be there. So thanks for throwing that into
the chat. If you are not watching us on
the chat, you are missing out on that.
Folks, That's our show for the day.
We're going to do more of it tomorrow.
As usual. I want to say thanks.
I'm going to put a shameless plug in.
We're over 755 star reviews on Apple.
I would love it if you guys went and clicked on the link in the
show description and left us another one.
We very much appreciate all these.
I read almost all of them and we are able to get them on the show
1 at a time. This one's a little bit complex.
It's from AG 321. I'm going to read it to you
because it looked like a G321. Put some real time into this.
Esoteric truths, the hole in the ceiling.
We've read one from AG 321 before, but this is a new one
for me. An esoteric truth means a hidden
truth and represents one's intention.
One's intention is always an active verb, IE to conceal, to
obfuscate, to reveal, to share, to expose, to educate and to
inform. Kyle Serafin's approach is to
expose the lies, the partial truths which are more dangerous
than the complete lie, and to reveal the hidden truths, to
share complete truths. We live in a room with a hole in
the ceiling and every once in a while when something passes over
that hole, we question what was that?
Someone lifts us up, Kyle Serafin, Steve Friend, Garrido
Boyle and as our heads pop through the hole we see a whole
new world that is evolution and that is the Kyle Seraphin Show
#susceptibles will Save the Republic.
God bless, Godspeed, man, God bless and Godspeed to you, AG
321. I really appreciate the amount
of thought that goes into these things.
It is a really interesting concept to imagine that there is
a hole in the ceiling that everyone doesn't see.
I know that I have other people that are poking my head through
the whole, and I'm happy to help show some of this stuff.
I'm just looking for. What is that narrative?
And a lot of this stuff is actually inspired, not because
I'm so brilliant or anything along those lines, but I wake up
in the morning and I feel compelled to tell you a story
that I'm being revealed, you know, as I sleep.
So I think that's the Holy Spirit.
That's why we have Catholic vote as one of our sponsors.
That's why they are keeping us moving forward because this
really has been sort of a religious experience.
All of this has. And the only reason that we're
still standing and that we are not victims at that police
state, which you just saw the trailer for, is specifically
because I do think God is on our side.
That's, that's my personal belief.
I've had that conversation with many people offline, and many of
them feel like they're in a place right now where God is
asking him to do something. If you think that's the case for
you, we appreciate you guys writing the reviews, sharing it
out there, sharing the show and being part of our audience.
It does make a huge difference. So thank you to all of you.
I really do. I mean, that today, today is one
of those really weird days where you look out there, do you
think, how in the world is all this stuff happening at once?
It feels concentrated and the pushback is going to involve
something that is more than human pushback.
And we are the last domino here in this free society where we
can worship as we choose. So I hope that you guys continue
to do those things. Continue to share the show if
you are on our rumble channel right now, if you're watching
this after the fact, make sure that the green light button is
hit that moves up in the rankings.
That seems petty, but it actually is one of those things
that has moved the show forward and looks like how many people
we got watching right now. Ryan.
Over 1000 people, we've moved from where we were just hoping
to get 100 people to watch a set of time.
Now over 1000, watch it live. There are many others on
Facebook that are streaming it. There are people over on
YouTube. There are people that are on
Twitter that watch it for now X. So all of you folks, you guys
are the reasons that we do the show.
We're very grateful for it. Follow Eric Jason, our moderator
on True Social. Follow Ryan Matta, Ryan Matter
Media on Twitter and follow at Kyle Serafin on all the places
that you normally do. We really appreciate you guys
and see you tomorrow. Don't forget to like on the way
out the door. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin Show streamed live Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays
on rumble.com/kyle Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter and True
Social at Kyle Serafin.