Take a look behind the curtain with the real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serafin. Well, hello my friends, and
welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Today is Wednesday and it is February the 14th.
It is Valentine's Day and it is Ash Wednesday at the same time.
So that's an interesting thought.
Let me just let me put this out there.
Rachel Campos Duffy, who's a lovely person and a Catholic and
a mom of many. I think she has seven kids.
She just put a tweet out and I just saw it just before we went
live. She said Ladies, look up from
your phones. God is marking the good men
today, so isn't that a neat way to kind of combine the two days?
It's the beginning of Lent period of preparation for the
passion and the sacrifice of our Savior, but also today
celebrating love, which is not wrong.
And all those men with those little crosses, a little smudges
of ash on their foreheads, they're not wearing a ring.
Fair game. Y'all.
Just saying, interesting thought.
I like it. All right, so we got a big show,
a bunch of stuff that I want to cram in.
I told the folks in the chat already that we've got probably
2 hours worth of material that I'm going to cram in there into
an hour ish. An hour ish today.
And I appreciate you guys joining us.
If you're not joining us on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin, please
do so. You can always come over here if
you're watching us anywhere else.
What you're missing in those other places is a real live chat
that is quite vigorous and it grows every single day.
It gets grows in speed and it grows in quality and that we do
appreciate all those. Make sure you're giving us a
thumbs up on rumble. Give us a like because we do
appreciate it and let's get started.
First of all, I might as well say thanks to a sponsor and then
I'm going to give you a great Christian rebuttal to something
we played yesterday. So we're already off and
rolling. Let's go ahead and say thanks to
my friends over at Catholic Boat.
These are the folks that jumped in and knew that this podcast
might be something that you would like.
And they have been supporting us in a big, big way.
I'm very grateful for them. catholicvote.org.
They have their own podcast called The Loop Cast, which was
done yesterday. There was a really good one out
worth your time. They also make a loop e-mail.
The email's just fantastic news that you guys can't.
You can't find that quality for free e-mail to you every single
day anywhere else. And I've looked because that's
kind of what my business is right now.
Go to catholicvote.org, sign up for The loop.
Just put in your e-mail address, give me your zip code.
That'll help them to kind of tailor messaging and they will
send you an outstanding e-mail every morning, which I get all
the time, and today is no exception.
You guys can always support them financially if you choose to.
There's a green button that says to give, you don't have to be
Catholic to support Catholic vote.
They're not the Catholic Church. Even if you have a problem with
the Catholic Church, you probably don't have a problem
with Catholic people that want the same thing that you do.
That's faith, family and freedom.
These folks are in the fight for it and they do it in a in a
political way. They do it in a cultural way and
they're they're really just solidly good people that I
continue to meet their. Everybody that I've met from
Catholic Vote has just been a winner.
So I appreciate them supporting us and I would appreciate you
guys supporting them. Like I said, if nothing else,
just get their e-mail doesn't cost anything and you'll be in
good space. OK, so a Christian rebuttal to a
video we played the other day we we played that thing.
He gets us right, which is, I believe, leftist Marxist types
that are attempting to they're attempting to push
Christianity's vestiges and and and move their messaging and and
it comes from a fundamental lack of understanding of what
Christianity is. That's obviously why they do it.
But they think like, hey, we're not Christians, you're
Christians. We're going to hold you to a
standard that you should hold yourself to.
And this is the rebuttal. It's also a great song if you
guys don't know the song from INXS.
This comes from, I believe, 1988.
I've got another song from 1987 coming a little bit later on.
So we're going to just keep playing through.
We'll have an enjoyable series of of musical musical stylings
from the 80s coming out. Anyhow, this is a great pushback
against what was said, and if you're not watching on our
Rumble channel, you're gonna miss this entirely.
It'll be the same song, but you'll miss the the conversion
stories, which is what really what Jesus is about.
Don't ask me what you know is true.
Don't have to tell you. I love your precious heart.
I I was there. There you were.
There two worlds collided and they could never tear us apart.
We could live for 1000 years. There it is, man.
It's such a powerful song too. It doesn't matter who does.
Any version of it doesn't have to be the original NSX in XS.
Rather, the whole point there is not just that Jesus gets us,
it's that Jesus saves us. And that's what this video
pointed out showed conversion stories, pretty amazing
conversion stories of people who were former witches, people who
were abortionists, people who were transgender activists,
people who were lesbian activists in communities.
And they went around and what do they decide?
They found the better path. They found what it looks like to
be to be saved. And so that's really special.
It's a it's an important message.
I think today on this Ash Wednesday, when we remember that
we're all going to end up dying and we're all going to go back
into the dust from whence we came.
None of us are going to be here forever.
So what we do on this earth, it matters insomuch as what we put
ourselves into. And also, I would be totally
remiss in saying and not saying rather that I'm incredibly
grateful for my wonderful wife. Any man who knows when you step
into the arena, if you don't have a family and a wife behind
you, and any of you who have not had that experience, I highly
encourage you find it. Because love of my life is a
choice. She's the love of my life.
But but it's a choice every day. We don't just accidentally get
this mythical thing where you find magic, you work at it every
day and and you wake up every morning and make that decision.
So I hope all of you guys find that in your life.
For those of you who don't have it, it's a powerful thing.
It's one of the most powerful things that can move us forward.
All right, let's do some news that's I'm a pretty sentimental
guy. You guys might actually find
out, but we also have a lot going on in the world.
There was a tale of two cameras that we're going to discuss
today. One of them is a camera that
shows the ongoing silliness that happens in our in our
congressional houses. And another one is one that my
friend Steve Baker found. And if you haven't been
following the Twitter feed already this morning, I will
share it with you. Let's start with this.
This is CNN who might as well be a Co writer for the show.
It shows you this is just their main page.
I want you guys to get a taste of it.
What do they think is important? Five takeaways from the New York
high stakes special election. Yeah it's so high stakes that
it's going to be putting a Democrat in for 11 months.
That is a self-inflicted wound by our Republicans.
It's weakness that we that we've seen our Republicans sort of
take on. Nobody asked them to do it, they
just did it. They did to themselves.
So that's what they're talking about.
They also talk about in a much smaller way, the impeachment.
I think the impeachment is actually quite important and I
think it means more than than CNN would like you to believe.
You remember we covered it yesterday when they were talking
about how small and how pathetic it was that they failed.
That's why it was actually so important that they got this
thing done before they lost this, this very razor thin
majority that the GOP has. OK, so let's cover that story
right now. And I've got both CN, NS take on
it and Fox News take two opposing sources, if you will.
The key for the for the Republican side to remember is
that there are three dissenting votes.
Three people that should be counted on to to vote as a block
in this particular problem. And we've got Mike Gallagher,
who's who's hanging up his hat and no longer going to run for
office. Ken Buck.
Same story, Mcclintock in California.
They all bucked their party's trends and they sided with
Democrats. It's interesting they know
they're not going to have to run for re elections in in in red
areas and they've chosen to work against it.
But the fact of the matter is the the impeachment went
through. What I think is is is important
and worth noting is that Fox News is highlighting you had
dissenters on the Republican side.
We rarely see that on the Democrat side they tend to vote
as a bloc. They can whip their party
together for the votes that they require for all of the radical
policies and this is not that radical.
In fact, it would be my suggestion to you that
impeaching a Cabinet secretary for failing to do the single job
that he has is actually the most reasonable thing that's going
on. But it's a little bit bigger
than that to me. It's a little bit bigger because
this is the first time that a Cabinet secretary has been
impeached since 1876, the first time since 1876.
So we're going halfway back to the founding of this country or
the better way of half, half the way back to the founding of this
country. And that's good, because what we
keep seeing on the political left is new lows, if you will,
what they would call highs, but new lows of political theatrics
where they are willing to impeach not just once but twice
Donald Trump. That's the new low.
Never been done before. And so they're setting their own
sort of standards, and we need to hold them accountable to the
same rules in the same way that we would think that we would
think that the Rules for Radicals need to apply both
ways, we need to look at their playbook and use it.
And so this is good. Are they going to be able to
convict this guy in the Senate? No, of course not.
Are they going to air some dirty laundry?
They are, and that's all good too.
But the fact is, is we have to, we have to keep playing the game
that is being played against us. I mentioned the other day, the
Checkers, the chest sitting in the park and then the demolition
Derby coming through, somebody coming in in a monster truck and
smashing all the tables. The only way that you could stop
the monster truck that's smashing the tables is to bring
in an equal or bigger monster truck and go and turn it into
demolition Derby. You can't just let him run a
road rally through what you're playing.
An otherwise civilized game. This is not a civilized game
right now, so it's very important.
It's totally important that this happens.
And in doing so, we've got like a little video.
This is a victory. It's a weak victory, and you'll
notice just how little ceremony there needs to be.
This is like what should have been step 0 or -3.
But sure enough, they're getting it done.
We'll give credit where it's due.
Here's a quick video of the the tally of the vote that results
in the impeachment of Mayorkas. On this vote, the yeas are 214
and the nays are 213. The resolution is adopted and
three people cheered because three people cared enough 214 to
213. Now remember that vote was tied
last time and was didn't pass at 2:15, 2/15.
And once again, that tiny little majority has been undermined
because Republicans removed a member of their own party,
someone who voted in a conservative way.
You don't have to like George Santos as a person.
I actually personally find him quite funny.
He's he's pretty amusing. He's he's frank and he's he's
all the things that you would think he is.
And he shows up in Twitter spaces and he goes and he
interacts with the people and he mixes it up and he calls people,
you know, the way that they should be called.
And he swears like a regular person and all that actually is
is sort of charming because he is a regular guy.
He's a regular gay guy, but he's a regular guy and we get along
quite well. He also has this, that kid,
Derrick Myers was was attempting to bring him down Anyway, when
all the forces of evil kind of conspire against you, you don't
have to love the person. But the way that he voted was
great and they self-inflicted this wound.
They brought it on themself. And the result of it is is a
small triumph for Democrats. The upside is, is that we are
seeing some new quote, UN quote historics.
CNN calls it the they they said the the first cabinet member
impeached in 150 years and they're acting like that's
something horrible. It's actually pretty good.
That's what it's supposed to be. So let me read a little bit from
the CNN piece as well, because the way that they took it, the
results come one week after. They're gonna have to highlight
this. The stunning loss that the House
Republicans suffered when they last tried to impeach Mayorkas
and the GOP defectors and absences sank the initial floor
vote. That's why this had to be done,
folks. They failed, but they came back
and did it again. Usually what we're used to
seeing is Republicans give it a shot, it's theatrical.
And then they quit, right? They usually take their shot and
if it doesn't work out, then they move on.
They feel like they've gotten the sound bite that they needed.
They've showed that they had resolved, but there's just not
enough support for it. That cannot happen.
And so perhaps this is just a little bit of a turn of the
tide. There's also a lot of stuff
going on in the background. We're going to cover something a
little bit later on the show of just some of the like the evil
that's working. It's the most old evil.
It's personality conflicts. It has nothing to do with caring
about whether or not we have a a country that is functional.
There are people in in in politics that are there simply
to serve their own egos and we're going to discuss just a
little bit of that, a little bit of an inside look behind the
curtain for you guys. But this is what This is what
the spokesperson from DHS has to say.
Obviously, a party person who is representing mayorcas a
statement can't say it himself. House Republicans will be
remembered by history for trampling on the Constitution
for political gain rather than working to solve the serious
challenges at our border. Really.
Go F yourself. That's the answer that every
American should have. That's the answer that every
person in the GOP should have. Go F yourself trampling on the
Constitution. The Constitution for them is
something that they bring out only when it matters.
It's like somebody who has children ignores them all the
time and never spends any time like, you know, catering to them
or loving them or spending, you know, inequality, quality time
that they've set aside and then they want to parade them out for
political gain. It's the same kind of thing to
me, trampling on the Constitution.
Democrats talking about that is pretty disgusting.
It's pretty awful. And we can't trust them.
We shouldn't, so we won't. And.
And here's the other thing. Speaking of Democrats, it's
interesting because that vote was quite important, a historic
vote, 150 years. This hasn't been done.
The last time it happened was Civil War era 1876 or the
aftermath. But isn't it interesting that
what's really important for people in the Senate is Democrat
priorities? So here is alleged Republican
but an actuality, full Democrat. Mittens, Romney letting you know
what the most important thing that is going to be voted on,
it's going to be giving money away to, not America.
So priorities, we talked about it at the beginning of this
week. Vote we will soon take to
provide military weapons for Ukraine is the most important
vote we will ever take as United States Senators.
What? Let's say that one more time.
Because. Because what?
Vote We will soon take to provide military weapons for
Ukraine is the most important vote we will ever take as United
States Senators. How is that even possible?
To think I thought that was
reasonable. Stand up and say, who is feeding
this guy, that line who is writing these speeches?
The word treason gets thrown around an awful lot, and I don't
like it, but how about betrayal? That's betrayal when you've
signed up to be something, to to serve people as a
representative, and theoretically those people are
Americans. I don't think he represents
Ukraine, the the 51st state, and yet that's the most important
vote that he's ever going to take.
It's nauseating. It's it's it's it makes
everybody's head just spin. And so we need to share clips
like this of people saying this ridiculous nonsense.
We need to share it so that we know who these people are.
And then you need to go out and make sure they get primaried.
Obviously Romney's not coming back, but just there.
There's clips of these people all over the place and they
exist everywhere. And if we're not paying
attention now, I talked about stupidity.
Unfortunately, even though they did make this, this win, and
maybe they saw the clock was ticking, they did it just under
the wire because they're going to lose even one more of these
votes. This guy obviously would have
voted the other way. We just lost the seat for
Santos, and here's who won it, covered both by CNNN and by Fox,
a guy named Tom Scuzzi. Susie, you guys can correct my
pronunciation. I can't tell her less.
He's in the seat for 11 months. That's that.
Literally. Do you all know how short a
congressional term is? It's two years.
Some people don't realize this, that these these Congress people
that have been there forever, they run for election every two
years. Now it's important that they do
that, and it's the way it's set up, is that it makes it the
lower House of Congress. It's supposed to be a regular
turnover to represent the people.
So we couldn't let George Santos sit there for another 11 months
and just finish out his term and then let the voters decide.
We can't do that for everybody. That's crying about what's going
on in the Colorado Supreme Court.
Republicans are, are just as bad in this case.
They're removing somebody. He wasn't convicted of anything
just because it looks bad. Maybe he wasn't doing what they
wanted. I wonder when we start getting
Santos speaking a little bit more clearly about what happened
to him. Yeah.
Was he an imperfect vessel? Of course.
But that's the whole reason. That's the whole reason why we
have elections. You put somebody in and then now
you've got the special election, which has historically low
turnouts. It's always the way these things
work. And the Democrats were able to
flip the seat. Now, Santos was an anomaly.
He was able to flip a seat that, you know, hadn't been flipped in
over a decade, 5 terms. And then sure enough, we've got
this, this Democrat coming in and winning the special election
seat. It's troubling it, it ruins that
little razor thin majority. It makes the job of House
Republicans harder. And all he had to do was
basically go out there and and tie the the Republican who was
running against him, this woman named Mazzy Phillip or Phillip
just said, yeah, this is this is George Santos, two point O even
the Republicans don't want him. He's garbage.
She's garbage and kaboom. Now you've lost a seat.
Now you've given up an unforced air to make things weaker.
I don't get it. We got to play the same game.
That's why the impeachment vote was actually important.
Even if it's not going to result, even if it won't result
in anything close to, it's not going to even result in anything
close to a majority or it's not going to result in, you know, a
super majority happening. We're not going to get anything
done in this Congress. That's great.
It's OK. But you still have to.
You have to put the guy on the record and let it be known we're
going to go and reach deep into our bag and do stupid things as
well. It should be mutually assured
destruction, as we've talked about, and Steve Red is big fans
of that. Everybody should, should hurt
for that. All right, before we move on to
our next topic And we've got a bunch more to cover and we're
going to get deep and weird. And like I said, tale of two
cameras, 1 camera covers that house impeachment vote.
The other one covers a pipe bomber.
So stick around for that. Before we do, let's say thanks
to my sponsor over here at contingency medical.
Reach off camera here. Boom.
There's my contingency medical pack.
I'm keeping it up here. I spend so much time in this
desk, I might as well keep it with me.
Folks, if you have not gone to contingencymedical.com, you
should go there and check out. They've got an antibiotic pack
that is ready to keep you prepared for the eventuality.
At some point, we all get sick. I I hear these people, they're
like, oh, I've never been sick in 10 years.
I don't believe you. You just don't remember or you
were able to get better. And when that thing hits you,
because you're under stress and you're traveling and you don't
have time to go to a doctor, you don't want to go to a doctor,
you can't get access, you can't get an appointment, You're going
to go to emergency room. You can already prepare by going
to contingencymedical.com. Use the promo code.
Kyle. Contingency medical is going to
get you set up with a several doses, several different tracks
of different antibiotics plus antiemetics.
Those are the ones that stop nausea and vomiting.
That that is a game changer for me by the way, being having
access to Zofran in a bag that I have a prescription for so that
if I'm rolling suddenly it's like queasiness takes me out of
the game. I couldn't do the show if I was
queasy, I I I could do it with a with a fever.
I could do it with a headache. I could do it with a sinus
infection. I could not do it if I thought I
was going to vomit any moment. Check out
contingencymedical.com. Go in there, get evaluated.
You just put your medical history in just like any other
telehealth position, except they just send you the antibiotics in
advance and you hold on to them and dole them out when it makes
sense for you, when you think it's time and that you've
already seen the doctor. So you're good to go.
And they give you a bunch of different stuff.
They've got doxycycline in there, which is a broad
spectrum. They've got amoxicillin and so
on. Great, great company, great
pack. And we're really excited about
having them on. So make sure you guys check them
out. Again, contingencymedical.com
and the promo code is Kyle, so that you they know that we sent
you. All right, good enough.
Let's do, let's do this one because we're going to, we're
going to get there. We're getting to some Biden
corruption, which was the story of the day.
We talked about memory issues. How about the story real quick.
This comes from the Federalist Margot Cleveland writing it.
Biden's business partner claims that Joe wasn't involved in
telling after after he told the FBI that he was involved in the
businesses. Uh oh.
So some of the things are going to start to fall apart.
I saw a bunch of stuff trending about Tony Bobolinsky yesterday
and for whatever it's worth, let it be known some some
suspendables personal experience.
Tony Bobolinsky is a piece of shit of a human being.
He's not someone you want to hang your hat on.
But when people start telling the FBI one thing and then
changing their mind and telling them the other thing, that
actually is big news. This is Rob Walker talking.
Says Joe Biden was never part of anything we did.
That was Hunter Biden's former business partner Rob Walker, and
he told the Oversight Committee that during a closed door
interview in late January. The problem is, is that there
was a recording of him being interviewed by FBI agents that
says exactly the opposite. It's the first inconsistency,
the White House when the House investigators confronted him
about the statement that he had made, he had previously told an
IRS investigator and an FBI agent who went to his house in
Arkansas to question him, and he didn't know that they were
recording it. And there is in fact a
transcript of that which was just released.
It seems like a real problem. Isn't that the perjury thing?
Isn't this the false statements game?
When you make false statements to federal agents, aren't you
supposed to have people throw the book at you, General Flynn
style? How come it only happens on one
side, since during the interview the FBI agent asked Walker
whether Joe Biden had ever shown up at any meetings with CEFC,
the Chinese Communist energy conglomerate that Hunter and his
partner were soliciting business for, paid Walker's LLC
$3,000,000 in March of 2017. Walker later gave Hunter Biden
more than $1 million of that money.
And after telling agents that Joe Biden had come to The Four
Seasons to greet members of the CEFC delegation, the FBI agent
asked him if there were any times when he was in office or
did you hear Hunter say that he was setting up a meeting with
his dad while his dad was still in office?
And Walker said yes, OK, but then you have him denying that.
I certainly don't recall Hunter setting up any meetings with his
dad, he said. I would like to point out that I
believe that that there was a recording device I didn't know
about. Oops.
Look, man, in federal matters, the FBI doesn't have to tell you
that they are recording, and lying to them is still a crime
either way. So how about a little bit of
equal justice? That's what I would like to see.
I would just like to see a little bit of fundamental
fairness. It's good enough to to impeach
Trump over a phone call and over some phony January 6 claims, So
why not get it? Get Mayorkas as well.
I want to see what's good for the goose being good for the
gander. I want to see mutually assured
destruction. I want to see a little bit of
consistency. Wouldn't it be nice to have a
little bit of consistency from these folks?
Are we really going to see it? No, but we need to keep exposing
it. Meanwhile, the question of Joe
Biden's capabilities, his memory, his his ability to hold
on to facts, which we know is weak and terrible, he's really
bad at it. It comes up again, and it's
amazing to me. It's probably the worst job in
the world to be the White House spokesperson, Kareem Jean
Pierre, who I call Scishow Bob, just because of the haircut.
She looks like that. And she obviously was hired to
be a sideshow. Why?
Because she's a black lesbian. That's the most important thing
about her. Not that she's good at lying.
She's not good at lying. She's far worse than Jen Saki.
She's not nearly as sharp, but she will continue to throw it
out there in the world. And, you know, is a cognitive
test, a reasonable thing to ask of a president in this age
bracket who clearly has problems and was just a was just said
with that the special counsel won't seek charges or seek to
press charges because they think that he's a a daughtering old
man. They think that he's a kindly
elderly man who has a bad memory.
That seems reasonable. 86% of the people in America have
issues with his age and his memory.
Meanwhile, the White House spokespeople are going to
gaslight you about it. So we got a back-to-back.
This is KJP in the sideshow routine.
And then I'll play you some fun stuff from joke as well.
We all need a laugh midweek. It's weird.
Wednesday, Let's do this. Here we go.
Does the White House think that the the idea of the president
taking a cognition test, a cognitive test, as a part of
this physical is a legitimate idea, particularly just on the
heels of the Special Counsel Report?
More. Polling, as my colleague Selena
just mentioned, showing that many American people have
concerns about that. Look, I got this question last
week as well and I'm just going to say what the what doctor
O'Connor. It's kind of a what he said to
me about a year ago when the report came out last year.
Obviously on his physical, which is the president proves every
day how he operates, how he thinks, right.
But by dealing with world leaders, by making really
difficult decisions on behalf of the the American people, whether
it's domestic, whether it's national security.
And so he shows it every day on how he thinks, how he operates.
And so that is how that is how the doctor O'Connor sees it and
that's how I'm going to leave it.
What do you think about the idea of taking that kind of a test?
I believe for me you're asking me my personal opinion.
He is sharp. He is on top of things.
He when we have meetings with him, with his staff, he's
constantly pushing us, getting, trying to get more information.
And so that has been my experience with this president.
Anything else outside of that, I just shared with you what Doctor
O'Connor said to me. And so I'll just leave it there.
And he shared that a year ago. If you listen to the words that
she said, she said, that was a year ago that that was said.
So that's really good. A couple things.
Number one, you'll listen to just the sycophantic way that
the press corps asked their questions.
The question was, do you believe that it's legitimate for people
to be asking for a cognitive test?
That's not the question. The question is why is Joe Biden
not submitting to a cognitive test when he was just said that
he doesn't have the ability. And when a when a special
counsel said that he doesn't have the ability to to even
stand trial for obvious crimes, for sharing classified
information with people who had no need to know, had no
clearance, had no NDA on file his ghost writer and others.
So that's that's the question. The question is why is he not
taking one not do you think it's legitimate.
And then the second thing is she's talking about old
information which is pretty wild and then she said lastly which
we're going to go ahead and follow up on.
She said the American people can see every single day how capable
he is and how strong and Veer Island and how useful the the
things he has to say are and and the tough tough decisions he's
making left and right. All right.
So I just called this video Joe is effing retarded.
But we this is what we see. This is what we see KJP.
Beer brewed here. It is used to make the blue
beer. It is.
My memory is fine. The president of Mexico Sisi did
not want to open up the gate. A solid meeting with with the
and Meteron from Germany, I mean from France.
Looked at me and said, I said. Elderly man with a poor memory.
I said I'm going to be a present for everybody, whether I live in
a red state or a green state. I anyway.
I don't want to, I don't want to.
Making Roe V word the best way to get something done if you if
you hold near and dear to you that you like to be able to
anyway of Putin's kleptocracy. Yeah, 50,159 thousand billion
dollars LED. America is a nation that can be
defined in a single word. I was in the foot.
What am I doing here? One to?
Well meaning elderly man with a poor memory.
The. That's Western Landsman that you
saw the the tag on there. We'll give credit where it's
due. What a great video, what a great
montage. And also the the music is
perfect as well. What a confused old man.
Listen, if you want to get something done, you just what am
I talking about folks? If you're not following us on
rumble.com, please join us on rumble.com/kyle Serif and you
can do that and join the live chat, which is still going.
I see you guys did not like that.
Some people said that they're living in a green state of mind.
Not in a red state or a green state, but just a green state of
mind knowing that they want to puke because that's the guy
that's in charge of our country. Which is a weird thing to have.
That's a weird thing to have, that poor old dude, an elderly
man with a poor memory, theoretically the quote UN quote
leader of the free world. We don't believe it.
We can't believe it because the country keeps going.
He's not in charge, thankfully. If you want something done,
though, you got to get it done yourself.
That is something that we actually do believe.
Joe Biden may not be able to do it, but Steve Baker is able to
do it. And we have some really, really
important reporting. This is the second camera that
matters from today's opening. The Capitol Police diverted the
CCT cameras away from the DNC pipe bomb investigation.
All of them except one. This is coming from Blaze Media,
our friend Steve Baker, who I spoke with this morning, and
he's got more coming on this. Folks, this story is not over.
There's a little bit more to it as well.
The video that you recently saw Julie Kelly release was actually
part of Steve Baker's investigation.
It's the stuff that he had requested from members of the
GOP, by the way, theoretically conservatives.
And he was actually waylaid that his information was given to
Julie Kelly without her her asking for it.
It was, it was snuck over. So I like Julie Kelly.
I think she's good people. She called me about 6 times.
I couldn't get back to her, right.
We kept playing phone tag before that video that she dropped
showing the dog sniffing the area.
And there's no way that we're going to believe that a dog
missed, particularly a dog. Like that's their Super Bowl
people. A pipe bomb with black powder,
That's what they trained for everyday.
That's the dog. Super Bowl.
And we're supposed to believe that a dog got within a few feet
of that and didn't didn't understand that there was a
explosive device there. There's a lot more going on
here. And this video that we're going
to show you, I'm going to show you it in its entirety.
It's way longer than I would normally show.
Usually we do like a 92nd, maybe a 2 minute clip.
This thing is a little bit over three.
It's pretty important that we're going to share all of it.
It's a little bit over 3 minutes long.
All right, let me read from the story here a little bit 1st, and
then we'll come back to the story as well.
But they found one camera that the Capitol Police forgot about,
and that is what's pending. OK?
That's what's that's what's coming.
So among the most enduring unsolved mysteries surrounding
the events of January 6th at the US Capitol are pipe bombs
planted outside the offices of the Republican and Democrat
National Committees. In January.
Blaze was able to reveal that the individual who discovered
the device was in fact not a passerby, but a plainclothes US
police officer. This is dogged work by Steve
Baker. If you want it done, you got to
do it yourself. He has reviewed thousands of
hours of closed circuit cameras, he told me.
Basically the setup looks like they can see four cameras at a
time and they can run it Fast forward to the areas that they
want. And he has done a ton of that.
And he's also had extra eyeballs from the Blaze.
He's got analysts now assigned to him because he's working with
a large organization and they're able to report that there were
three US Capitol Police controlled surveillance cameras
that were reported at that building and two of them were
redirected from the scene. Before we talk about what that
means, I want to play the video itself.
This is Steve Baker, in his own words.
This is production by The Blaze. We are taking this directly from
their Twitter, I'm sorry, directly from their YouTube page
and it's a little bit long. As I said, it's 100% worth our
time. Tune into this and you'll listen
to my friend Steve Baker narrating it in his own words,
and then we'll go back to his story in just a second here,
'cause there's even more to this, the analysis that that at
the end is going to be relevant. First we got to see what they
did. Capital CCTV Camera #3173 was
the most important camera covering the DNC pipe bomb story
event. You've probably already seen
Thomas Massey's release of the video in which it appears that a
Capitol Police plainclothes officer has discovered the bomb
and has alerted the Secret Service and the Metro Police
officers that were on the scene. You've probably also already
seen the bomb sniffing dog, and you may have already also seen
the arrival of then Vice President-elect Kamala Harris's
motorcade. What you haven't seen is, well,
what somebody in the Capitol Police Command Center didn't
want us to see. And that's the actual
investigation of the bomb scene. What we're going to show you now
is how they hid that from us. What we were able to access from
the Capitol CCTV viewing room is how long that camera #3173 had
remained in that fixed position. We were able to go back as far
as December 28th of 2020, just eight days or so before the
events of January 6th. And from that review we could
see that the cameras positioning was in that fixed position for
days, weeks, months. But ultimately, it was only just
these very few minutes after the bombs discovery that that camera
began to move. The camera then began to move,
pan zoom in, looking for the bomb itself.
The one thing that we know for sure is that Camera 3173 was the
most crucial of all the cameras. It had the closest and the
clearest view of what law enforcement's response, what
their investigation, and ultimately the destruction and
detonation or the attempted detonation of the bomb would be
by the bomb squad robot. But inexplicably, and I'm
getting tired of using that word every single time we do one of
these investigations. But that seems to be the
keyword, when it's related to January 6th is that at
approximately 1:40 PM, camera #3173 was remotely directed away
from the scene at about a 90° angle, and then it remained in
this newly fixed position away from the investigation for the
rest of the day, or at least until midnight on January 6th.
Now, it might be assumed that this was an error, an accident,
an oversight. Maybe somebody bumped the
joystick on camera #3173 until we then review camera #8020.
As we are seeing the robot deployed down the street headed
towards the bomb, someone again directs camera 8020 away from
the investigation scene and then affixes it once again.
It seems like at a hard right 90° angle away from the
investigation. Once again, why would they turn
those cameras away from the investigative scene?
Who ordered those cameras to be turned away?
What were we not allowed to see? Stay tuned to Blaze Media for
those answers. All right, so the music is good.
This is what, an actual conspiracy?
Yeah. Joe.
Joe Durden, our in our chat just called it out.
That's what an actual conspiracy looks like.
There were three cameras that showed what went on.
Two of them were intentionally moved.
And if you if you guys didn't catch it while he was saying it
eight days prior to January 6th, Steve Baker went back eight days
and watched that camera and it didn't move for eight full days
for the first time that it was moved was just when there was
something of note and of interest to capture.
They go back to the piece here because it's really relevant and
and he did a great job covering it.
So at the bottom of the piece, if you guys go, you can sign up
for a Blaze. This is probably behind a
paywall. So I'm going to read it to you.
I've got access to it from not using the paywall.
A couple issues. Number one, we've lost comms.
The Secret Service has said that they were unable to to keep
track of the text messages and those were deleted and those are
gone. Why?
Thomas Massie, Congressman on Judiciary, said it was like
pulling teeth to get the 1st 7 minutes of the discovery of this
bomb. We should release all the video
and he thinks that the video of the attempted detonation of the
bomb should release as well. I'm going to tell you why that's
not happening in a second, which I happen to know from some
inside sources. We're not going to we're not
going to reveal anything but we are going to show you who it is
that's holding the stuff back. And it's for one of the dumbest
reasons right now. One possibility and 11
probability the cameras turn there is there is US Capitol
police footage or radio transmissions rather that show
that the bomb was command was reported to the command post for
USCP on one about 1:07 on that day. 4 minutes later you have
the plane clothes officer coming onto that view of the camera
3173, the same camera that they released the seven minute
footage of that Thomas Massie had to fight.
And it's a pen tilt zoom APTZ as Dan Bongino has covered many
different ways. You've seen Julie Kelly and
Darren, Darren BT over at Revolver doing the same thing.
The thing that's so interesting is that Steve has gone through
all of these cameras to find out that in fact one of them was in
fact missed. That's a big deal.
They thought they turned all of them away.
You can just imagine. We're talking about government
competency here. Two out of three ain't bad if
you're looking at it. And they move these things so
they are no longer able to see this stuff.
Why, Why would you turn away a camera from an active crime
scene, An investigation of an explosive device?
Well, Steve asked me that very question.
Couple things. I'm quoted in this article a
number of times. So I'm going to read you some of
the quotes that I've got only because I know where they're
coming from #1. The FBI spent a significant
amount of time telling the public that we had, quote, UN,
quote, viable devices. Did we not?
That they were being briefed to the American people in the news
media that these were dangerous explosives.
And at the same time they were briefing my surveillance team
who was following a person of interest tied to these bombs,
that they were not explosive devices, that they were inert
and that they were not dangerous to us?
Why would they do that? Why would they lie to the
American people? That's a big problem.
That's why I came forward with this information.
That's why I brought it to Congress.
That's why I've shared what I know.
Including the person of interest name that is with members of
Congress and their congressional investigators.
I brought it forward as a whistleblower disclosure as I am
allowed to do under law. Anybody who has any issues with
that there, you know FBI listening.
Yep, that's what I did deal with it.
The fact that it's getting reported, that's your problem.
You're the ones who weren't being honest.
Now you work a case differently whether you know there's a real
bomb or not and that's obviously the case.
You guys can just think about it.
It's called officer safety in the law enforcement world.
It's what sort of safety must you forgo in order to work the
case correctly and you're going to take on some risk always.
That's what being a law enforcement officer involves.
But more importantly, if you know that these are not real
bombs, you can get a lot closer to your subject.
You don't have to worry about a 300 foot minimum safe distance
and the possibility of having your team blown up trying to
get, you know, what may not be very important information.
That's why it's relevant to the people who did the work that I
did. Now, interestingly, we had guys
like Steve Dantuano, who was the assistant director in charge of
the Washington field office. We've talked about this before.
He went and testified in front of Judiciary, including Thomas
Massie. And he said people like, and
this is a direct quote, people like Kyle Serif and others that
are not a case agent have no knowledge of the case.
They have no knowledge of what happened in the case.
My response to him is that of course that's false.
I mean, maybe he's never worked cases.
I know he hadn't worked cases for a very long time by the time
he got into that position. But that's ridiculous.
It's what's called a case briefing, and anybody that's
ever worked as part of a task force, or that's ever been part
of a case that they didn't own but they were investigating as
one asset on a bigger team knows that.
A case briefing lets you know what is happening, what has been
done. And the reason you do it is
because you want to know what is important to the case agent when
you're out there with your eyes and ears on the streets.
It's standard for anybody doing surveillance work.
And if anybody is serious about working as a teammate, whether
you be on SWOT, whether you be on a search team, whether you be
on a surveillance operation, you have to know what the case agent
is looking for. So of course we got briefed on
it and it was our standard procedure.
I shared that with Steve as well.
Now, I know that Steve Dantwano was never on a surveillance
unit. He was too busy being a manager
and not working cases. That's obvious.
But it's totally illogical that he was not being briefed at
least as well as we were and maybe better.
So he's either incompetent or he's being deliberately obtuse
for Congress. I'm, I'm on record saying that,
Blaze. I'm saying it to you guys in a
in a verbal format. I don't know if Steve Dantuano
is is incompetent or if he is a liar, but either one of those is
possible. Neither one of those is
acceptable for FBI senior leadership.
That's what my problem with the FBI is you keep putting these
people in who are either willing to lie for the regime or are too
dumb to have the job. Now, we also just saw on those
videos a lot of movement in front of that so-called bomb.
It makes no sense when you have a high value protectee in there.
You wouldn't let children walk in front of it.
You wouldn't let strangers walk by.
You wouldn't let vehicles and buses drive past a potential
active explosive. You would never do that.
It's absurd. I did identify something to
Steve that I think is relevant. Whenever we see these things,
whenever someone tells you, imagine someone coming up to you
right now at your workplace or in your home knocking the door,
there's a bomb outside. There's three possible actions
that happen, especially if you believe that person.
And they're all known as sympathetic nervous responses.
The sympathetic nervous response is often called fight or flight.
I go to the main camp here, but fight or flight is incomplete.
There's actually 3 possibilities when you have a an epinephrine
dump, when you have a sympathetic response in your
nervous system, One is fight, two is flight. 3 and very, very
common in modern society is freeze.
People freeze all the time. And that is a possibility that
these people didn't even figure out what was going on, that they
were freezing. That's a possibility.
Or more likely, they were told to stand down.
And why do we think that? Because the way that they acted
doesn't look like the way law enforcement officers react when
they're told. Bomb, bomb, bomb.
That's how you say it. It doesn't make sense.
On top of that, what we have are two cameras panning away.
Now, why would you leave the cameras in place?
Because whenever you work a crime scene, anybody who's ever
done any crime scene work knows that you're supposed to keep a
log. Anybody who's ever watched the
CSI show knows that there's always someone standing there
with a clipboard. You seen it.
I watched the the the show, the fall on Netflix.
It's done pretty well. It's it's a Irish investigator I
believe coming in or they're working in Ireland and they're
from, they're from the UK and so they're doing this
investigation. But even in the UK, all western
sort of law enforcement works on the same principles.
Once you have a crime scene set up, then you have to control the
area. It becomes a controlled access
area. You really want one point in and
one point out and you want to know who comes in and when.
We want to know when they come in.
All right. So people log so and so.
Seraphin in ten O 1, Seraphin out 1015, even better if you
have a camera system that's actually able to to to track
that for you because then you can go, Oh my God, we've got
these fingerprints here and I don't know why they're there.
Or we have some DNA evidence that's here.
Or we've got something that was disturbed and I don't know when
it happened. And you run and you play the
tape back, you go, oh, we didn't get a complete log on scene.
That's not good for us. But the good news is we have
some backup record. So having a camera is great.
There's really only one reason that I can think of that makes
sense. And then the other reason is
nefarious. The one reason why you would
actually turn cameras away from dismantling a bomb like this
from an active crime scene that you are currently investigating
when you want all the information available and all
the things that the investigators may have missed.
The only reason that you would turn it away is if it was a
camera, one that was outside of your control.
In other words, it was owned by someone and you didn't have the
ability to seize it and you couldn't stop the distribution
of it. And on top of that, that's part,
Part A of that, Part B of that would be that you actually had a
classified or a law enforcement sensitive technique being used.
But as Steve Baker points out in this, they're using a bomb
disposal unit that has a water disruption technology.
It's widely known and taught. It's explicitly described in the
DHS security website of how they use or how they dismantle bombs.
So they haven't used a classified technique.
And I worked around EOD people when I was in the Air Force and
they have to go into a skiff and all the stuff they do in
training and all the things about current explosives and the
way they dismantle them, a lot of that stuff is classified on
purpose. It makes sense.
They don't want to give that information out to people.
But when you're dismantling something using a publicly
available and publicly described technology, you don't have to
hide this. And the second thing is, is US
Capitol Police owned access to this footage, They could easily
classify it right after the fact, no problem.
OK, so that that number one is out.
The other reason is nefarious. There's no other good reason
that you would not want to have video footage of your crime
scene. It's of value to you as a law
enforcement professional. Why would you deliberately take
away a document, a video record of what was done right or wrong
for the benefit of your case? So you could go back and say, oh
look, they missed this thing on that day that's nefarious.
I shared this with Dan Bongino this morning.
He just said, you know it, obviously it was an op and we're
all leaning more and more towards it.
This is more evidence that something was going on.
What that something is, is not immediately relevant or or
immediately obvious to us, but nefarious intent is the most
likely scenario. And This is why the pipe bomber
case is the least studied by the FBI.
We don't see arrest in it, we don't see real work happening,
and it leads the most most logical and thinking people
forget about Antifa in the crowd, forget about FBI sources
in the crowd. Those things happen in every
crowd, whether you like it or not.
This is the way it works in law enforcement.
Putting a source or putting an undercover asset into a place
like that is common. As I've mentioned to you guys
before, I was, quote UN quote undercover or low visibility
surveillance dressed up in all black, unmarked with radio and
body armor and weapon rolling around at Trump's inauguration
in 2017. It's common.
They put federal assets into the crowd to make sure that people
can have their First Amendment protected liberty to celebrate
or protest as they want. That's normal.
What is not normal is turning cameras that would give you more
information about the single most terroristic act that
happened on that day, and an FBI that is far too competent to not
be able to handle this. They're able to identify people
by their damn earlobes from pictures.
They're able to identify people from their cell phones walking
around, and we can't figure out who put a device that they
didn't even like. It was still intact when they
found it. Folks, Twitter spaces are are
interesting because I get so much value from other people
that have great experiences. And one of the gentlemen who
used to be on a JTTF and used to be on an explosive task force
was mentioning the fact that our our FBI, the same FBI same lab
division was able to get a partial VIN number off a piece
of exploded material from a a truck bomb in 1993.
Using technology that is now what 30 years old they were able
to get that and identify the truck which led to a contract
which led to the people which led to a died in the blind cheek
for the World Trade Center bombings in 1993.
And they had an unexploded device here a pristine
inoperable non explosive device that wasn't detected by dogs and
that we were seeing deliberate movement of these cameras away.
It's bizarro world and it makes no sense, no sense at all.
This is where the real cover up happens.
This is what's really the evil that's going on right there, OK?
If you don't take anything else away, all you need to do is know
what is logical and what is normal and what is not.
And when you don't have an explanation for what is not, we
have to use our educated guesses.
And that is that. This is for a intent that is not
benefiting the investigation. It bothers me.
It should bother you dramatically.
It should bother people in the Sedition Hunters.
It should bother Democrats who called January 6th an
insurrection. If you think that it was an
insurrection and our country was almost overthrown on that day,
don't you care about someone who's dropping random explosive
devices in an urban area that is 95% Democrat and the people that
are walking by vote the way that you do?
Don't you give a shit about people?
We can't let this thing go at all, at all.
We cannot let it go. We cannot let it fall.
And thank God Steve's out there. So for whatever it's worth,
there you go. That's some inside info that's
not coming anywhere else. I want to cover a couple other
stories Before we do. Let me say thanks to my friends
over at For Patriots and Guys. If you're thinking it's getting
bad, this is how you prepare, all right?
Prepare or repair the two options for patriots.com/kyle
again. The number four
patriots.com/kyle or promo code Kyle at checkout is how you guys
can get yourself hedged against God knows what.
Because we are dealing with some weird times.
We've got government agencies that are meant to investigate
bombs and they're doing the opposite.
We've got people that are inside our quote UN quote own house
that are on our own team that are not working to benefit the
team. They're working for their own
personal little vendettas and they're and and acting like
scorned women. That's a good time to have some
extra calories stacked up. That's a good time to make sure
that you have a little bit of power options to keep your
phones or your your radios charged.
And you can do that at fourpatriots.com/kyle.
Again the number four patriots.com promo code.
Kyle, two choices in life you can prepare or you can repair
and repair is always more expensive.
Just think about it how those people in the in some of the the
awful Soviet nations were like moving with with wheelbarrows
full of rubles, which I remember seeing when I was a kid.
And you know what I bet they would have loved for when their
currency meant something? That they could have traded it
for something of value at the time.
Get yourself squared away with some calories.
Stack them up. Prepare in some way or another.
And you guys can do so at fourpatriots.com slash.
Kyle, we're going to keep going with a little bit more of the
the stories. I told you.
I was going to cram a bunch in here.
I've got some more. How about this?
This is worth knowing. We talked about Lloyd Austin
going to the hospital. Apparently, he's going to step
out. He had a invasive procedure, a
prostate cancer and some other things.
So he's stepping out in his his replacement.
And the presumptive replacement is a woman named Doctor Kathleen
Hicks. This is coming from Armed Forces
Press. Defense Secretary, Austin's
presumptive replacement is a woke deep stater.
Wonderful. It doesn't mean that we
shouldn't be getting these people out the door.
Even though the Biden administration continued to back
Austin, Austin was already politically skating on cracked
thin ice due to the colossal failure in Afghanistan with the
military withdrawal. And predictably, he will resign.
His presumptive replacement is Hicks.
Very few are aware that Hicks is a woke, deep stator.
Her views on the Defense Department role is the Chief
Operating Officer. In other words, she thinks that
she should be formulating strategic plans and policy and
pushing out her woke agenda. Just a little thing to keep our
radar. Keep on our radar and we've got
a replacement. It's a female with a PhD, always
a great sign. We can always feel really good
about these folks and another ideological incline.
That doesn't mean that we shouldn't be pushing people out
the door. Just because you're not going to
be able to convict Alejandro Mayorkas in the Senate doesn't
mean he shouldn't be impeached. And just because we know that
we're going to get an equally bad or maybe even a worse person
as the Secretary of Defense doesn't mean that we shouldn't
be pushing these people out the door.
Let's mix it up, expose them. You know what it does.
It exposes their bench. Their bench is not infinite.
And we start getting into their, their weaker and weaker players.
So we'll keep pushing them. That's what needs to happen.
Just want you guys to have that on your radar and awareness and
Speaking of people that are weak and dumb and make terrible
decisions, I want you to like, imagine the timeline we are
living in where this is, this is something said by someone in
California. Her name is Barbara Lee.
We'll talk about her in just a minute.
She is auditioning now. That's the only way I would call
this is political theater. Here's your take on the minimum
wage. You're going to hear some words
and some lettering and some numbers that are not going to
make sense to you right away. Yes, she said $50.00 an hour.
You ready? Here we go.
You're calling for a $50.00 an hour federal minimum wage.
That's seven times the current national minimum wage of 7/25 an
hour. Can you explain how that would
be economically sustainable for small businesses?
You have 60 seconds. Of course, Let me say I owned
and ran a small business for 11 years.
I created hundreds of jobs, benefits, retirement benefits,
also healthcare benefits. I know what worker productivity
means, and that means that you have to make sure that your
employees are taken care of and have a living wage.
In the Bay Area, I believe it was the United Way came out with
a report that very recently 100 and seven, $27,000 for a family
of four is just barely enough to get by.
Another survey very recently 104,000 for a family of one,
barely enough to get by low income because of the
affordability crisis. And so just do the math.
Just do the math. Of course we have national
minimum wages that we need to raise to a living wage.
You're talking about $2025. Fine.
But I have got to be focused on what California needs and what
the affordability factor is when we calculate this wage.
That bell is really intense, by the way.
How about that? It sounds like they're having an
actual fight. Yeah.
Adam Schiff is on the stage there.
So Barbara Lee, she is running for Senate.
She would like to be a senator. She'd like to be one of the 100.
And she gives us an example of the fact that she used to run a
small business. Like what?
And that it's really expensive in the Bay Area.
And so we need a $50.00 an hour minimum wage.
Are we Are we completely out of our damn minds right now with
these people? Have we just lost all ability to
say anything that matters? Let me just bring up her website
right here. So that's Barbara.
Barbara Lee. Yeah, she's wonderful.
She's representing California's 12th, formerly the 13th, and
she's been there since 1998. So what does that tell us?
That tells us that she hasn't had a job running a small
business like she just cited in, you know, 25 years.
Maybe things have changed in the last 25 years.
Everything about technology. Think about where you were in
1998. Do you think any of the things
that you learned, whether it be in business or technology or,
you know, sort of the way that the world works?
Like what you're going to go with your 1998 level last time
you ran a business? Is there any single person out
here that thinks that paying people more money is going to
make things less expensive at the base level, you're going to
pay the incompetent and the people that barely can get a
job? Like at my first job, I made
like 3 bucks an hour. Yeah, it was a little bit more
than that. It was like, I don't know, 378
or something, but I worked in the baskin-robbins.
I was a kid. 50 bucks an hour to scoop ice cream.
Get out of here with that stupidity.
Put on your stupid Africa power mask.
Wear a plastic glove. That's what you're seeing on the
screen right now. She's wearing one of those food
handler gloves giving a black power fist.
Gross. So here we go.
I just pulled this from her own website because why not?
She's currently serving. Well, let's get to that in a
second. So she received her master's
degree in social work from UC Berkeley.
Oh, you wonder why. Specializing in psychiatric
social work. Great.
During her graduate work, she founded the Community Health
Alliance for Neighborhood Growth and Education Change, Inc, which
provided mental health services to the East Bay's most
vulnerable individuals. You remember that guy crapping
on the trash can that we saw in New York.
Do you know how common that is in the Bay Area at this point?
People just crapping on the street or in trash cans or into
planter boxes. Is that really the kind of
person that we think she? She didn't do a great job.
She didn't solve that problem. So she's moved on to bigger and
better problems. She wants to be in the Senate.
She represents the 12th District, which I showed you on
there. Let's, let's go to the top peeps
up here. She currently serves as the
ranking member on the Budget Committee and the powerful
Appropriations Committee, overseeing all federal
government spending. She's also the ranking member.
I'm sorry, she's the ranking member on just the State and
Foreign Operations subcommittee for the appropriations.
You guys know what that means. That means that she's one of the
people that decides the budgeting, or at least has a
significant impact on the amount of budget that the United States
spends on foreign places, and that she wants to go and join
her buddy and her colleague to do this thing.
The. Vote we will soon take to
provide military weapons for Ukraine is the most important
vote we will ever take as United States Senators.
She would like to continue to throw big money that way.
These are Democrat priorities. You want a person that thinks a
20? Sorry, a $50.00 an hour at
minimum wage makes any sense. There's no chance she's ever run
a business that makes any sense at all.
Just absolutely out to lunch. Let me talk about a business
that doesn't suck and then we'll we'll wrap up.
I got a couple more stories here.
We're not done yet. So folks, I told you we're going
to cram it in. Let's let's say thanks to
Patriot coolers, My buddies over there, I'm drinking out of it
today. It's keeping me fueled.
This is my 19 oz in black. My wife has a 19 oz in blue and
you're seeing the Seraphin family minivan cooler up on the
screen. Go to patriotcoolers.com.
Again, it's Patriot coolers.com. The promo code is Kyle.
It's 4 letters. Saves you 10%.
Seems like a pretty good deal. Easy to remember.
Our promo code across all of the platforms is always Kyle and
Patriot. coolers.com It's an American company.
They're based in Houston, TX. They're good people.
I got a family member that works alongside them in their one of
their sister companies. They say Patriot right on them.
They're good products. They work head to head with the
biggest names, but instead of saying Yeti or Lifetime or Igloo
or any of those things, they say patriot on them and I get
compliments every time someone sees.
We bring these to like, birthday parties.
If you guys are not using your coolers all the times, that's
because you're not being creative.
Go out there and use them. And if you're in the market for
a new one, if your old one looks ratty or it's not strong, it's
not holding ice or keeping things the way you want, Check
them out. And if you're in a market for a
Tumblr, you want to buy something for someone you love.
On this day that will last for a long time, check out a good and
durable product, stuff I've been using since 2007.
I've done 20 plus dates. I did 20 what we call
deployments with my Patriot coolers.
I carried them with me everywhere I went because
there's a couple things you need when you're doing surveillance,
and one of them is a cup of coffee.
You guys can watch the show more to learn about what the other
ones are. All right, let's keep getting
into this because there's a little bit more to it.
Big important story. I don't want to let this fall
down. It came out yesterday and he's a
suspendable, so we're going to cover it.
This is coming from just the news, John Solomon.
Let me just say also John Solomon's website
justthenews.com is the worst website.
I love their content, but man, the the website itself is
really, really bad. It's just like full of garbage
and it always pops up watchdog, presses, FBI on whistleblowers,
bid for outside employment. You guys remember my friend
Marcus Allen. I've been talking to him quite a
bit in the last couple days. He said the spirit is moving
people to to reach out to him. We are still keeping track of
our friends. We have not let anyone go,
whether it be Garrett or Marcus, and the money we raise for him
is still sitting in a in a nonprofit right now that we had
to create because we can't give it to him.
Why? Because he can't accept charity
and because what you're seeing on the screen, the FBI has made
unlawful decisions to aggravate Mr. Allens financial distress by
depriving him of other sources of income.
While he's been indefinitely suspended without pay, he's not
allowed to have a job. He has to resign if he wants to
get a job, otherwise they'll fire him for cause.
So he's just in this damn limbo that doesn't exist anywhere
else. The crux of the FB is unlawful
interference with Mr. Allen's ability to obtain other income.
Is this. Although the FBI suspended him
from all duties 2 years ago and has stated that its intention to
revoke his security clearance and never return him to a duty
status, it's simultaneously claims that he has to remain as
an as an employee subject for various FBI restrictions and
approvals are necessary for outside income.
The FBI claims are plainly contrary.
The FBI claim is plainly contrary to the statutory
definition of a federal employee.
It's the same reason why I had to actually quote UN quote,
resign from the FBI. These people are sick.
They're sick and they're evil and we have to hold them
accountable. And so like I said, if you
individually can make one of these people pay, then we have
to do it every single time. That's why impeachments are
necessary. It's why taking moving the ball
anywhere we can. And I'm seeing you guys are
worried in the chat. We don't worry.
Marcus is going to be taken care of.
We're going to figure it out. We're not going to fall.
Right now he's taking advice from attorneys not to take any
money. So we're holding on to it for
him and we'll give it when it's time.
And if I have to start individually like dropping off
bags of cash, so be it. You heard that IRS, I'll drop
off bags of cash. I don't care about what federal
law looks like if something is wrong and I don't care about
what the IRS tax penalties are going to look like, that's their
money. We raise it for them.
They're they're trying to fight the fight within the boundaries.
So that's what the suspendables do, is they do the right thing
in the right way for the right reasons.
And it is incredibly uncomfortable for them,
incredibly uncomfortable. And they're doing it not because
of, you know, anything other than it's the right thing to do.
And somebody has to hold these assholes to account.
There's no other way to do it. Congress could step in right
now, by the way, and they could pass a law, the most important
law that they ever voted on. I put my friends back in.
They could put Garretto Boyle and Marcus Allen.
We're going to hear some more suspendables.
I've been I found out the FBI walked out like 10 people in the
last month for all reasons that are stupid.
So we're not going to, we're not going to let these things drop.
I just want you guys to know we're out there, but I'm not
going to leave you on a crappy note feeling angry and sad.
We're going to do a little bit of fun.
First of all, you remember how we talked about that family.
Remember the the family that that told the state of
Massachusetts they were going to bring some people into their
their home and then an hour later they were dropping illegal
immigrants off at their doorstep?
How about this one? This is fun.
I just found this online. It's absolutely hilarious to me.
We have to have it. We're not going to get to the
dad jokes yet. We got something better than a
dad joke today. We got real jokes.
How about this family bringing an indentured service?
They Now when was the last time like rich white people started
letting you know poor black people come in and and work and
do the cooking and cleaning? This is so.
This is so obvious. Everyone wants one.
Everyone wants one of these people, whether they speak
English or not. Let's do this, bro.
You'll only see here in NBC 10 Boston, a migrant family from
Haiti is sharing their experience.
They're searching for shelter in the Boston area and then
recently found a host home in Brookline.
And now they're looking for jobs.
As NBC10's Erin Logan reports, they say these last few weeks
have been life changing and. It's been an emotional few weeks
for Wildande, Joseph and her husband first sleeping on the
floor at Logan Airport, then in Children's Hospital with their
two year old daughter who got very sick at the ATM.
She felt bad as any mother would.
Now things are looking much brighter as they've been
welcomed into Lisa Hillenbrand's Brookline apartment to Nina ES
Moy Alegre. Aura.
And La Manana says hi Lisa very. Good.
She says her daughter is very happy when she wakes up in the
morning. She says hi, Lisa, and everyone
starts the day smiling. It's a delight and it's really
fun having them. What I realized is there's so
much prejudice against refugees, mostly because people don't know
them. Lisa says she feels like she has
her own personal chef, as Will Donde loves cooking De Gusta la
occupacion. Seriously.
In fact, her goal is to open up her own.
The couple has their work permits, and they've been taking
English classes. They're open to work anywhere to
save money for their future. In the meantime, they're
enjoying their time with Lisa, their new friend for life, and
their daughter's new grandmother.
They are hard working. They want to learn, They want to
be successful and I feel great helping and I get to understand
the refugee crisis from the inside.
Lisa says she's so impressed by the number of people she's met
right here at Brookline town hall meetings who've been
stepping up and hosting families.
She's hopeful more will do the same in the coming days and
weeks in Brookline. Erin Logan, NBC, 10, Boston.
Hey liberal white lady, let some strangers in your house you know
nothing about and that should work really well.
She's like, oh, they're so great, they're so helpful.
That used to be called the White Man's Burden, by the way.
It is an utterly racist way to look at the world.
It's incredible that we are normalizing this thing.
What's really amazing is that Lisa, who's such a good person
that she now has a personal chef and some live in people.
She obviously is like a a crazy person that's who lets 4
strangers into their home. She doesn't appear to have a
husband so that seems like it worked out really well.
There's a a little AI response from what is it called Grok
which is the the AI platform that that does a bunch of like
background. It's kind of snarky on on
Twitter. This was the the question
someone said can a person in Massachusetts where where Lisa
lives can they kick someone out that they've invited to stay in
their home. And here's the answer.
In Massachusetts, a person cannot simply kick someone out
if they've invited them to stay in their home without following
the proper legal procedures. Interesting that there's a
catch. The state has very specific
eviction laws that must be followed, even for guests who
have overstayed their welcome. Under Massachusetts law, a
landlord must go through the court system to evict a tenant.
And if you want to evict that tenant applies to guess who've
established residency as well. If the guest has lived in the
home for more than 30 days or has received mail at the
address, they can be considered a tenant and they are then
protected by state tenant landlord laws.
To evict a guest who has overstayed their welcome, the
owner must need, they need to provide proper notice, follow
legal eviction procedures, and then the court will decide
whether or not the guest should be evicted or not.
This can take between one and four months.
Well, Lisa, you just lined yourself up with something quite
interesting. Folks.
This is the unseen consequence. Do you think Lisa looked into
landlord tenant relationships and what that looks like in her
little state? Probably not.
It's going to be fun. It's going to be fun.
How many of these people are going to jump into this fun
game? Let them have it.
I'm for it. Someone in the chat just said
they're a family now. Yeah, you're a family now.
You're a single crazy lady who is lonely and ghost white, and
you just invited 4 Haitians who don't speak your language and
you're going to get by with sign language while they quote, UN
quote, learn English, and start a restaurant.
Even though they're here illegally and they have no legal
status, they can't get loans, they can't rent property.
Knock yourself out. Now you're dealing with
squatters. Good times.
It's not just now, it just won't be for real landlords.
It'll be people bringing them into your own home.
Pretty amazing. So that should be a good time
and we should all sort of kick out of it in another way that I
think is also quite funny. And I can't help it.
The the best is when we have sort of the the red pills coming
from the left, the political left.
I'm going to show you this. This might be the most epic
Twitter feed. There's an Emily on Twitter that
shared this with me yesterday and it was amazing.
So here's a couple of little things from it.
So I'm going to lean back and read it.
It says if you're a leftist, you need to be working out.
This is a woman, by the way, who has some Arabic script and has
an Iranian flag or Palestinian flag, whatever you want to call
it. Sorry, she said.
If you're a leftist, you need to be working out four to five days
a week learning self-defense along with organizing with your
neighbors and in local communities for defense, food
sovereignty and community defense.
There's no excuse not to do something to strengthen your
body daily. Welcome to the conservative
movement, sweetheart. Now here's the reaction.
Are you ready? The reaction is this.
Body fascism isn't. Leftist exercise is great unless
you've had Covad recently and you don't want to disable
yourself for life. Don't push yourself five days a
week. OK?
More weakness if your if your leftism doesn't include disabled
people, then it's not leftism, Says somebody with a tranny flag
and dinosaurs in their thing, and then what's the best way to
get in touch with your neighbors?
I'm reclusive and socially anxious, but I recognize the
necessity of community organizing and building.
I'm also aware of the contradictions, but I'm
completely unsure of where to start or how to carry myself in
these interactions. It's just idiots.
It's foolishness. It's so fun and you can't help
it. Here's one more of them.
Ableists. Look when when the leftist start
red Pilling themselves by sharing all of our arguments
that you should organize, that you should get your food
together. I mean, they might might as well
go to fourpatriots.com and get themselves squared away.
Food sovereignty folks? How about that?
They're using leftist hilarious stuff.
There's nothing funnier. Was that Justice is blonde?
Are you Emily? I don't always know.
You guys go and use these different names sometimes.
So in any case, super fun, very amusing, and we're going to end
with something fun and amusing. It's not a dad joke per SE.
I think it's a real joke and you guys will appreciate this.
Have you noticed that we don't have bullies?
Do we need more bullies? Is that the answer?
Do we just need more bullies? Maybe this guy figured it out.
Eliminated bullies from schools, right?
And it's worse now. School shootings have gone up
since we've removed bullies. And you know what that tells me?
Bullies never did school shootings.
It's been nerds the whole time, dude.
You know how I know nerds are doing school shootings?
Who fucking writes A manifesto, dude?
Oh, I'm mad about it. Let me write it in my notebook.
What a bitch. Dude.
Pick up a ball and throw it at a kid smaller than you.
That's what you're supposed to do.
If we had bullies in the schools, a nerd would start
writing a manifesto, A bully would swat the pen out of his
hand and he'd be like, that's gay, and there'd be no school
shooting. Plus you.
Can't shoot up a school if you've been stuffed in a locker?
Look, my man's making a lot of sense.
You can't shoot up a school if you're stuffed in a locker.
And if you get something slapped out of your hand and they tell
you that's gay, then you know what this guy's speaking a lot
of truth sounds like he's probably raised in the same time
I was. A lot of the the window licking
crayon eaters that I dealt with in the military that were
enlisted had the same attitude. We used to have a game called
Beat It Nerd, which is that if you're walking around and you
had your water ball in your hand and people thought it was gay
for you to have a water bottle, and I'm just using that word
locally, yeah, they'd slap it on your hands and you look over and
you'd be like, what the Hell's wrong with you?
And they'd. Go beat it, nerd.
Because that's what we grew up with, just toxic masculinity.
So on this day, this day of love and this day as we prepare for
for for the coming of of Easter, let's let's remember, remember,
we might need some bullies. There's a reason why human
beings have always embraced some suffering and some hard stuff
And guys, not wrong. We had an awful lot less school
shootings when we had more people getting pushed into it.
We also had some really great business people come out of it.
They went from beat it nerd to beating the entire world.
So there's a There's a strong argument to be made.
This guy's got his, his, his facts in order.
I see no lies detected in that little comedic routine.
Anyway, a little thing for you guys to to laugh about as we go
into. We don't have to always be so
damn serious. So here it is, our five star
view of the day. Let's share it out there.
That's not the one I was looking for, is it?
How do we get that one? No, it's another Jumanji so TP
can't sue. Sorry, I I just read it's
Jumanji. Another one who liked the
Jumanji episode. Great Show is always enjoying
your analogies to current issues as it applies to in depth
thought of how to continue our fight.
Steve Baker there. That's why I brought this one up
here. Steve Baker is doing God's work
with exposing the deception of our justice system.
They claim to have high prosecution rates although
freezing the defendants funds so that they cannot pay for legal
assistance that forces them to plead guilty.
I feel this information needs to be investigated to see how many
of those guilty pleas were imposed on by were opposed upon
on the defendants keep up the Jag jokes they're entertaining.
Yeah, there's there's something to be said.
We're not dealing with a time of justice and when you deal with a
time of injustice, we have to fight back in any way possible.
And the way we fight back is with truth and with running,
running it all down. We have to go and have people
like Steve Baker exposing it. And we have to share things that
are information of value. TPH 14, I see you in the chat.
That's yours. Thanks so much for the Five Star
review, folks. You can leave your own at Apple
on the podcast app, or you can do it on Spotify.
You can do it on iHeartRadio anywhere that you listen to the
podcast. We appreciate you guys sharing
them and showing them. Hope you guys had some value out
of today. I know we went extra long, but I
felt like this was all important for today.
We'll see you again tomorrow. Happy Ash Wednesday.
Happy Valentine's Day. Bless all of you.
We'll see you in the morning. Thanks for listening The Kyle
Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True
Social, and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.