Prepare to hear the truth from a real whistleblower, an American
Patriot, here's civil liberties, enthusiasts, Second Amendment,
Defender and indefinitely suspended FBI agent.
Kyle seraphin. Hello, my friends and welcome to
the Kyle Serafin, show, for Wednesday March 8th.
Today we're going to be talking about the American Rorschach
test and that's January 6th 2021.
So, recently Tucker Carlson on Fox News, released additional
footage things that have not been seen before, but like so
much in our polarized country in this polarized.
America, no one sees that information the same way and it
doesn't really matter whether you're looking at.
Jacob. Chan's Lee who was a man wearing
a viking headdress and body paint and parading around?
With an American flag or you're looking at Tariq Johnson who's a
former capital police officer suspended.
And then eventually resigned from his job for wearing a red
Maga hat on the same day. One of them was clearly a trump
supporter, the other was actually a Biden voter and yet
both of them got pretty awful treatment.
And I think a lot of it has to do with the polarization that's
going on in this country. The way that we are looking at
these things, the way that you look at the events on January,
6. 2021 likely is an indicator. How you see the rest of the
political landscape? Was it?
A riot was an Insurrection. I'd like everybody to kind of
have a unified position in to say that they went.
When they look at the events, they make sense within their own
mind that they eliminate cognitive dissonance and decide
based not just on their assumptions.
But on the facts and and have possess defensible positions,
that help them establish a way to talk to their neighbors about
it. That can be defended from all
sides. I actually just got out of a
Twitter space not too long ago and that was the topic of
conversation. I was being assailed from people
on the left and stating you know that I had certain assumptions
and the only way they can do that if your position is
reasonable and Justified is by putting words in your mouth.
So we have to be cautious about what people are saying actually,
and listen to what the words are.
And our, though the words that we actually are willing to
commit to additional, we're going to cover the arrest of
some antifa activist down in Atlanta.
We're going to cover the murder and kidnapping.
That is States citizens in Brownsville, Texas near the
border. There's some things that are
being discussed as far as the response to this type of
behavior, this sort of violence that we're seeing spilling, even
over into our side of the country and our elected
representatives are resistant to do something about it.
They are making either unjustified calls for Invasion
or they are defending the actions of inaction by the Biden
Administration. Want to kind of cover.
Some of those topics we're going to read them through the news
and and Kind of get to it, but let's start off right away.
What is a Rorschach test? What in the heck is that thing?
These are those classic ink blot tests that people have been
showing for a long time. I'm going to see if I can pull
one up here. If you're not on our Rumble
Channel, you can always look it up on your own and take a peek
Rorschach. Test is an ink blot that has
been used. I'm going to just read straight
out of here as a definition. It's a projective psychological
tests in which the subjects perceptions of ink blots again,
sort of like ink that is put on a folded piece of paper and
squished. Over its, they're almost always
symmetrical. They recorded and then analyzed
for psychological interpretation complex, algorithms or both.
What does that mean? It means that they're going to
try to determine people's personality traits and some of
the characteristics and emotional functioning based on
the way that they look at essentially a randomly squished
out ink on a piece of paper. And whether that thing is
valuable or not, I think that it is sort of an indication that we
bring our own assumptions and biases to To, you know, an
inanimate object, something that has a truth about it which is
that it may be nothing. And by looking at that thing and
our projections on it is supposed to tell us a little bit
about us January 6. Does that in a political way for
the American people right now? There's no question about it
that there are two views of it and and the Nuance positions are
far fewer and they are far less widely held.
I would say we've got half the country that calls it, a riot
that talks about There was a protest that devolved into a
riot, that's actually probably the more accurate statement for
most the people on the political, right?
And the political left is dead set on it, being an
Insurrection, an attempt to overthrow our government, you'll
hear people crying about it. We care more about democracy
than you do. Obviously, they obviously are
better human beings. They're making a moral argument.
And that this was some sort of an attempt at throwing the
country into chaos. So that, you know, the election
would not stand. I've talked to people that were
At January 6, I've talked to people who have investigated
people who were there. I don't think that it Bears, any
credibility. It doesn't hold any of the
weight that that they would like it to that.
Anybody was trying to overthrow the United States government.
And there's a reason why it's been such a tenuous argument
when it comes to the federal cases that are being argued
about it, on top of that. And probably more importantly,
there is a pretty strong problem with It's trying to pin this on
President Trump. Now I do think that the people
that have been attacked that showed up at January, 6 and are
being prosecuted pretty aggressively in a way that is
not common for the federal government.
I think that that is happening because they are serving as a
proxy for Trump, but I actually had someone argued directly last
night that Not only was it an Insurrection, but it's Trump's
fault for the Insurrection that he was the one that was so
called, commanding the troops. And I mentioned that he's not
the proximate cause of what went on that day.
Because if you was, and it was something that could be proven,
then they would have tried to argue that in court and they
have not. So I'm going to transfer over to
a another page here. We're going to read an article
from Miranda Divine Miranda, Divine obviously, a friend of
the suspend apples, and an excellent writer.
She has a piece in the New York Post.
That was dated from two days ago.
January 6, footage shows Capital cops escorting q and Angemon
through the senate floor and there's some interesting things
in here and I think When we scroll through the footage, says
newly-revealed footage from January 6.
This is obviously the Tucker Carlson release shows the
capitol police officers escorting.
Jacob, Chan's Lee, the big horned so-called q a shaman, who
has come to symbolize the riot. Now for those of you who recall
when it first came out, that was one of the early pictures at the
media fixated on the man had body paint on.
Like he was going to a professional football game.
He's wearing like this fuzzy coonskin hat with horns on it.
His body is painted and tattooed.
He's obviously A shirtless and wearing some kind of like
loincloth deal or some, I don't remember what the pants were but
he's got tribal tattoos and you know that came to symbolize the
sort of Anarchy in the mind of the left that this guy was
basically trying to overthrow the United States government.
It's an interesting take, I think it's fully insane and the
facts do not back this up. So as a our previous guest even
friend mentioned, there is no Ultra super secret.
Ability to overthrow the United States government by getting a
be horned shirtless man into the seat of the, the Speaker of the
House on the house floor that doesn't exist on the backside of
the Constitution. You know, you can watch National
Treasure again and it's not there.
Even if Nicholas Cage told us, it was that was a fiction.
There is not a place in the United States Constitution that
says, if you get your guy into this place like Tada, King me.
And then he now takes over the government and this was a
discussion that I got into Last night as well, even if, let's
say that the, the worst possibilities that have been
alleged about the the riders that were on on the capitol
grounds and made it into the United States Capitol.
Let's say they actually got whatever their worst mission
was. They were able to execute
members of Congress members of the Senate.
They were able to take out the vice president and a hang him
all which some people are yelling.
Apparently, let's say all those things did happen.
The government would persist, the United States government
would carry on. There is actually an entire
office devoted to the continuity of the federal government.
They've made shows about it, like designated Survivor and
things like this. But essentially, whenever most
of the important members of the United States government in, you
know, the elected representatives, get together,
there is always a plan for that thing not existing anymore.
If they were to wipe off the the United States Capitol off the
face of the map with a kinetic strikes, While the president was
giving the State of the Union Address, somebody would be able
to continue on and be able, there's a line of succession and
it's well documented. And that person is well defended
and they would be able to continue and make decisions on
behalf of the federal government.
And it would it would carry on there's entire bunkers and, and
store houses. And there's a significant amount
of equipment and money. That is dedicated to making sure
that that happens. I used to be stationed at
Kirtland Air Force Base. Base.
There is a big center for the continuity of government in the
state of New Mexico. They've got bunkers, they've got
radios. They've got fuel to last for an
incredibly long period of time. I used to watch trucks driving
into these Hollow mountains that were on the southern side of the
Sandia, mountain range. All part of the Kirtland Air
Force Base territory. But you can find these pictures
of these these these huge doors that they could drive, you know,
two semis side, by side into one coming out, one coming in
usually and you can find them on Like maps.
You can literally go to the Kirtland Air.
Force Base on a map on Google Earth.
You can scroll down to the east side of that particular Air
Force Base, and then start moving your way down the
mountain range. And when you get to the
southernmost mountains, there are two peaks.
Basically that are pretty low and they look like they might
even be man-made when you get up in the air and you fly in a
Blackhawk you can actually look down and they look very unlike
the others. I don't know if that's a natural
feature, if we just built those things up, but there's doors in
them on both. Both sides and then on the south
side and on the East and on the west, the north continues on in
the range. But as you look at those things,
you can see, like, there's there's big doorways and they
have an enormous bunker and Vault.
And in fact, when I was first assigned to Kirtland Air Force
Base and I think it was 2011, there was this big story.
It was a scandal really? That the somebody had been
siphoning off access to jp-8, which is the the jet propulsion
fuel that the Air Force uses and stockpile.
You know, for this sort of continuity of government for
continuity of military operations, in the case of a big
strike. And they had these enormous
tanks that were underground, and all these tanks were supposed to
have a certain amount of fuel. And they've been holding on to
it since World War Two and they cycle it in and so on.
And there was some ungodly amount of it missing.
I mean, it was like 5 million barrels or something crazy.
I don't know what have to look up the numbers.
It doesn't really matter and the whole the whole you know, bass
was a Twitter of who had stolen all this this fuel.
And then it turns out they did some some X-rays of the actual
tanks and found out that they were all leaking.
And so like the water was full of jp-8 and that there was a
Arsenic and other sort of poisons that were built into the
base water supply and had been for probably since 50 years or
so. So, you know these things exist.
I the evidence of them exist in these weird little stories like
that. There's a story about the day
before the Branch Davidian compound went up in Flames,
there was this doomsday playing, it's a 47 or a 757 that had
landed for some additional work and it had nothing to do with
anything that was going on in Waco.
But there's a base out there that actually service this
particular continuity of government plane, which is
supposed to be resistant to EMT emps and and other sort of
nuclear attacks and they can put somebody up in it and fly it
around for a long time. And so all these things exist so
that you can't have a Q&A on Shaman pop in and destroy the
federal government with his, with his Viking helmet.
It's just, it's just not the way that things are supposed to
work. There's some interesting things
that were revealed I think by Tucker Carlson when he showed
that video. The most interesting to me was
that he mentions. It was 921 and I think it was
actually ten to one in my count. But there's times when this guy
Jacob translate is walking down hallways with, you know,
massively outnumbered, by the Capitol Police.
And in this case, like before he got to the floor of, I believe
it was the house, but he might have been The door into the
Senate. There's like ten officers there
and they could have easily grabbed him and arrested him.
If that was something that they were interested in doing, and by
the way, he was not in the, I range of anybody that was with
him, he was all by himself, just walking around with his
bullhorn, and with his little, you know, spear device that had
an American flag on it and shirtless and his Viking helmet.
He's just cruising around the capital.
And so, if that is not exculpatory evidence, and I
believe it is, if that wasn't exculpatory and it wasn't shown
to this. Guy and his defense team and I
don't know who is his attorneys were whether they were going to
be public defenders or whether he was able to have something
Source privately. But you know that sounds like he
was denied due process. If you're not familiar with what
that process looks like, whenever the government brings a
case against you, you have a right to mount a credible
defense. And one of the things that you
have a right to is what's referred to as Brady material,
Brady material is things that would be detrimental to the
government's case. And it comes from a Supreme
Court decision from 1963. Brady versus Maryland, every law
enforcement officer knows this. Anybody who's ever produced
Discovery knows that you have to provide Brady and generally
speaking, if there's a significant amount of Brady
material, there is no reason to bring the case, if there is
something that actually gives a reasonable doubt in the mind of
the prosecutor, they won't even bring the case because the
minute you provide it. And in this case I think this is
pretty significant. There's a bunch of cops letting
this guy in two different. Areas of the building.
And at the very least it would it would raise a plausible
defense because the government has to prove their case Beyond A
Reasonable Doubt. So all you have to do is create
the so-called shadow of a doubt and I would say that seeing a
bunch of cops letting this guy roll around inside the capitol,
definitely gives me pause and it would probably give you pause if
you were a reasonable juror. Although I don't think that was
what was going on in Washington DC during any of these trials,
but a reasonable juror should look at this information and
they should Have a reasonable doubt, they should have a shadow
of a doubt that this guy may not be guilty.
Beyond, you know, all all question.
Because why was he allowed in there?
And once you introduce that question, it can dramatically
change the result. I think of an honest jury.
So, does this guy get a mistrial?
Does he get a? Does he get a appeal based on
this? That's going to somehow move it
into another venue. Where reasonable people can.
Look at it and say, we've got more questions.
I actually had somebody on Twitter in my DMs, Send me a
video supposedly of him entering the building.
And that's a question, you know, Tucker Carlson doesn't quite
answer. There's some debate about what
happened. It looks like some doors were
pushed open, but it looked like they were open from the inside.
They appear to have big magnetic locks on them and we've had
discussions about magnetic locks.
You know, my friends have who are around January 6
investigations, I know people in the public of had the same sort
of questions, you know, who opened the doors.
They're really like magnetic locks are incredibly hard to
open. And generally speaking are not
something you can open. If you're just a person and you
don't have breaching tools. And so, if those things were
opened and allowed to be opened, now, you would have the argument
that Not only was he allowed in, but then he was guided around,
that would be a serious wound to any governmental case for the
sort of charges that he had. As Tucker Carlson mentions.
They sort of look like, they're acting like tour guides, they're
showing him different places around the video, footage is
short and it's cherry-picked. Has no doubt about it.
So this is not a conclusive answer but it what it should do
is put enough shadow of a doubt that if we are honest people who
want to see you know, bad guys who knocked cops out, go to jail
and people who walked around and paraded in the building, may be
inappropriately slapped on the wrist and let go.
This guy got 41 months in jail, that's a long time in federal
prison. Considering some of the things
that happen when people don't do it and have to serve, I believe
80 or 85 percent of that. So that's going to be a
significant chunk, you know, 10%.
Life is 33 years old when this goes down, that seems like a big
problem. So that's one of the things that
I think is the obvious Rorschach test.
When people look at that, they were people that were on
television, like Network anchors.
And and guess on these panels sitting and saying shoot that
man, you know you should he should have been killed for the
actions that he did and they're not going to change their
opinion based on what they saw with the Tucker Carlson footage.
They're not going to change it at all.
That being said, I want to move to the other guy that was in
there. This, this name was caught up to
me at the first time I heard it was two days ago, friend who
works in a in a think tank in d.c. mentioned that this was
going to be happening. And so I wanted to be aware of
it. So I'm going to bring it up.
I'm going to actually play you the video and his name is Tariq
art. Eric Johnson, rather.
We're going to play it from Tucker Carlson's, quick
interview and we're going to discuss, like, how people see
that differently? So, here it is.
And let's get it going right now.
Maybe, of course, the internet's not going to agree with me.
So this is a police officer who had been suspended from the
capital police, he was there on January 6, we're going to see a
little bit of footage of him, and he mentions that he wore a
red Maga hat on that day and that that was probably a
life-saving thing for him. Here he is important, as not
getting the members of Congress and their staff to safety
footage. We reviewed seems to bolster
Johnson's account. The video shows Johnson
conducting the evacuation of senators from the chamber yet.
Tart Johnson was not rewarded for what he did.
He was punished a photo emerged of Johnson wearing a Maga hat
outside. The capital.
Now here's the app cost him his career, sometimes I look at it
and like thank you God for blessing me with this hat.
And sometimes I'm like, wow, I wish this had never came in my
life abiding. Voter Johnson, says he donned
the Hat in an effort to rescue fellow officers.
He believed were trapped in the building.
I figured if I had a hat on To be easier for me to navigate my
way through the crowd. It was so what we're seeing
right now in this footage is that essentially, this guy, Tara
Johnson is walking up the steps of the Capitol and people are
moving out of the way and they're being very deferential
to him. He's wearing a police uniform,
which I guess could be a problem.
You have to make a pretty strong argument that people would not
have listened to a police officer walking up there.
But it's a, it's a, at least a perspective that I think is
defensible, having been in big crowds and in a non-uniform role
and then seeing guys in uniform rolls, you do?
Get treated differently and he's just moving in.
He's got this red Maga hat on. That's, you know, it's
ill-fitting. And people are getting all the
way and letting them up there. And he said he did it for a
reason that makes perfect sense as a law enforcement officer
that he is trying to fulfill his duties by getting into the
building getting up where he needs to be.
And then evacuating members of the either the house or the
Senate. And we're going to see some
footage of him in a second. Walking people out of the, the
Senate chambers. I believe, Isla
self-preservation and the escalation and I needed to get
up those steps. I couldn't say, what would have
happened walking through that crowd without, but for the crime
of wearing a trump hat, Johnson found himself suspended.
Ultimately, he resigned from the force and lost his pension.
He now works part-time as a Furniture.
Mover Yogananda Pittman, meanwhile, thrived two days
after January 6, Nancy Pelosi elevated Pittman to acting chief
of the Capitol Police. So, they've got some pretty
unflattering pictures of this yoga Nama Pittman She is a
decidedly not fit female who is a was made the acting Chief.
You know, Tara Johnson looks like he's a pretty fit regular
dude who would be in a law enforcement role.
Looks like he can probably handle himself and
unfortunately, you know, he was suspended.
I think they didn't dwell on that very long, but when you get
suspended from one of these jobs, that's, that's my status
right now. So I imagine he was suspended
without pay in the same way, I'm actually in constant contact
with him, and I'm going to try to see We can have them on the
podcast. I'd like to have him.
Tell his whole story in a much longer form.
Having been on Tucker Carlson, it's a big audience and there's
no reason not to do it. But unfortunately the amount of
time you get on television is very short, even if they give
you a longer segments, it's only for a few moments.
And I bet we can get into a pretty interesting story about a
man that experience some bad treatment.
It's mentioned that he's a Biden voter.
So I think we'll talk about that just a second here.
But once again, people who act a certain way got a certain look.
And that look was all that it takes for For people to treat
them in very, very different ways.
Despite this guy having the same politics is probably the people
that that suspended him late. Last year, Pittman took a
high-paying job as the head of security at UC Berkeley, which
is right outside. Pelosi's congressional district.
Berkeley announced Pittman's hiring with unqualified praised
for her. Quote, steadfast commitment, to
social justice. Pittman herself boasted about
her heroic performance on January 6th her Department.
She said, quote save democracy See that day.
All right, that's probably enough of that.
What that tells us though, and I think it's one of those telling
pieces, save democracy as an awesome statement.
It's a thing that I heard from people on the left in these
Twitter space debates, which I've been involved in them,
going back to the original. Twitter files drop going back,
pretty much as far as I've been on social media.
And there is it this this statement that we're better
people the new and we care more about democracy than you.
And you know the whole point of What happened at January 6?
I believe I wasn't there, but the people that I've talked to,
I believe that their intentions were pure enough that they
thought there was something utterly wrong with the election
that we had in 2020 and they were there protesting at and
they were there letting people know that they were dissatisfied
with the fact that there wasn't a credible response from federal
law enforcement. I happen to have a little bit
more information about that knowing that people like the
Washington field office did not do those investigations the way
that they probably should have and they removed people that
they believe might be Trump voters.
There's a Example of a man who had something like nine children
or seven children Catholic guy who, you know, had a big family
and they immediately assume based on his family and his
religion that he was obviously a trump supporter and therefore he
was removed by this. Now, Infamous, a sack, a guy
named Timothy Tebow who didn't want any, filthy Trump
supporters on the squad. This guy had over a decade of
experience investigating election crimes.
So those are the people that you want doing that and when that
didn't happen. And you know, those of us inside
the bureau Were asking those questions in January of 2021?
It's like who's doing the investigations?
Why are there not investigation? Why are we not reassuring?
The American people that we are doing things in the right way at
the right time and the answer was always kind of like shut up
in color. I had a supervisor that went to
the mat and ask somebody. This is the woman who ended up
actually taking my security clearance and woman named
Jennifer Moore, he went and asked her the questions you know
on behalf of my squad working we're concerned.
What is going on with these investigations And and the
response that we got back was not satisfactory, there was no
information but he seemed like he'd basically been put in his
place and then shortly thereafter.
He received a transfer to the place you wanted to go.
He was able to leave Washington DC and and he was out, it was a
little bit after the time that I left.
So he got his office, you know, transfer about maybe two months
after I did and that was the end of it.
And I just, I never felt like it was a satisfactory answer given
to even the people that investigate and know the other
investigators. So that seems like a real
problem. I want to also read this little
piece here from from daily wire. This is Ryan savedra and it says
X Capitol Hill. Cop says supervisors went silent
during January 6, Riot and daunting the Maga hat cost him
his career. I'm not so much interested in
the Hat. Although I think that they would
just basically make the argument that it was a Hatch Act
violation that he made a political statement on duty as
somebody who's been in these big crowds.
I've been in all black and I've done, you know how to Black
Bandana on when it was appropriate to walk around and
be Observe that way, obviously, I was in a plain clothes role so
a little bit different animal, but sometimes you have to adapt
to the environment for safety. And so his claim would have to
be like really aggressively refuted and it sounds like his
voting history doesn't show that he was going to make that
statement. So it's a really nasty thing
that they did based on maybe just Optics.
Again, that Rorschach test that instant knee-jerk reaction, you
have a maggot hat on. You are the enemy of our group
here and our group here, is I guess this Pro Democrat.
You know, establishment situation.
What's also interesting is is today we found out or yesterday
rather we found out that the Mitch McConnell came down on the
side of the Capitol Police Chief and stated that this release of
these videos was very dangerous. I'll actually read you from his
thing, but he seems to be walking this party line that,
you know, the chief of the Capitol.
Police that Mitch McConnell that others in the in.
Leftist media. You know, talking point crowd
have all been saying the same thing.
And that thing that they are saying is is that it's really a
responsible to release this footage that it's Cherry Picked
and dangerous and that it's going to give away National
Security secrets and all those are essentially absurd.
If they were being honest, this would have all been released
under the January 6th committee that went on for all of last
year, through that theater and the most important part of it,
at least, from my position is they should have been giving
exclamatory evidence to the People who were being charged,
it's abhorrent. And then the last thing is is
that that unselect committee or the select committee, but I
guess Trump calls unselect. I think it's funny.
They didn't actually address the real security failures.
Like, who is to blame for the fact that they were not enough
Riot police and other you know, capable law enforcement entities
on the day on January 6th, where the heck were they?
I've made a consistent argument for the last probably four or
five months in public and I haven't been in public that So
that's most of the time that I've been there that that event
should have been listed as an nsse apparently.
Dan bonds, you know, did a whole podcast about this and I would
encourage you if you haven't heard it to go, look that up as
well. And nsse is a national special
security event, it is by law and by Statute, run by the Secret
Service and it is managed by DHS under executive orders and under
federal law like under the code of federal regulations.
And what that means is that they are the core Her back.
So that there is one primary agency and everybody else jumps
in on it. That means DC Metro PD would
jump in on it. The capital police would jump in
on at the FBI. The ATF, I'm trying to think of
what the other entities US Marshals would be there.
You would have a department of energy.
You would have the department of the Interior under the u.s.
Park police because most of the National Mall is considered
national park space. So all of these entities would
all get together. They have a big command post and
they deconflict and they send out. - teams and they put boats
in the water, they put helicopters in the sky and they
do it really big and they do it all the time in DC and one of
the reasons why people like it is because there's a lot of
money, there's a lot of money to be able to pay the overtime of
the the local police department. So they're 100% on board for it
and you know that also helps out because people can work overtime
and some of the other Federal Service as well.
So we're going to read this article real quick from from
daily wire. I've got to daily wire articles
here today. This one says a fired Capital
police officer who helped him Activate the capital during the
January 6, Right? Said the supervisors went dark
or went silent on the radio, and that he put on the hat, in order
to get to where he was going. He thought the crowd was hostile
and therefore, he pushed through it.
So Tara Johnson again, told Fox News that his bosses seemed
ill-prepared for the riot. Once again, this like, lack of
preparation is not common for a place that sees protests
including unruly protests and maybe not on a daily basis.
But on a weekly and certainly on a monthly basis, there are a lot
of protests that happened in d.c.
Most of them are unscripted and usually there's some sort of
announcement or social media awareness that they will happen.
He said he was trying to evacuate the Senate side of the
building as the crowd became increasingly hostile but
couldn't get an answer much less authorization.
That sounds like the supervisors basically, panicked went into
what we call vapor lock, I'd think and and didn't deal with
this. So he said I was the person that
thought I was going to. He said the person that I
thought was going to authorize the evacuation.
Didn't do it? Just stop responding.
In the fog of war in a chaotic situation which you often find
and this is something that I've been dealt with as a
surveillance Guy where we were doing an operation on something,
that was a sensitive Target, we knew there was gonna be a lot of
scrutiny over it and what you would do is you'd ask for
something and the answer was nothing coming back which was
essentially saying do what you think is best and that's what he
did in this case. So he was fired because he was
seen in this picture and the picture.
If you saw the website here as we pulled it up on the rumble
Channel you know he's got this Maga hats it.
I was that And a mask. He's got a face mask on and you
know, that's not a very right wing position these days, but
for whatever it is, he says, according to daily wire says he
voted for Joe Biden in 2020, and that his only priority there
because this is actually, the sworn duty of Capitol Police was
to get members of Congress and their staff to safety.
And the security footage that Tucker played basically
cooperated that. So it's hard to find fault with
someone doing that, but once again, if you are, are looking
at anybody in a maggot hat as an enemy, then that's what you're
going to see. I want to read the response to
the Tucker videos and obviously both of these things are part of
the videos that came out. This is the from the desk of the
chief, so will transition over here.
This is coming off the Twitter feed of one of the reporters.
I don't know who this reporter is here.
I'd like to give credit Possible investigative reporter for ABC
News. Has this particular thing.
So here we go. This is a letter from the desk
of the chief to be read at all roll calls and posted on all
bulletin boards and it's entitled, truth and Justice.
It's signed by Jay Thomas manager, who is the chief of
police with Capitol Police. So I'm going to skim through
some of this. I'm not going to hit all of it
but it says last night and opinion program I guess that's
Tucker Carlson aired commentary. That was filled with a defensive
and misleading. Conclusions about the January
6th attack. Remember the Rorschach test?
We're back to this thing. He has to see it one way.
So everything he's going to do is going to be framed.
That way, quote, the opinion program, never reached out to
the department to provide accurate context.
And quote, I don't think that matters like, who cares?
It's video, it's video footage, the video footage shows what it
shows and then Tucker Carlson. You know, he's a pretty
intelligent guy and he describes it in a way that I think is
accurate to what the video showed his conclusions to it.
Are not inaccurate. They may be incomplete, but
they're not wrong. That's certainly the truth.
It says, one false allegation, this one's kind of frustrating
to the suspend double crew. One false allegation is that our
officers helped the Riders and act as tour guides.
This is outrageous and false. This department stands by the
officers, in the videos that were shown last night.
I don't have to remind you how outnumbered our officers were on
January 6. Well, whose fault is that?
That seems like a thing that should be addressed.
That should like we failed, you would be the thing that a You
for take, especially because he wasn't even the guy that was in
charge, on that day. He said, I don't have to remind
you how outnumbered our officers were.
Those officers did their best to use the escalation tactics to
try to talk to Riders into getting each other, to leave the
building, okay? And then they use the cherry
picking claim because we're just going to do left as talking
points here. And then this is really
interesting because the medical examiner's report on on Capitol.
Police Officer, Brian sick, Nick said that he died of natural
causes and then made the sort of illogical jump.
And you know, this is not a thing that would be I don't
understand how this this corner put this down but wrote that it
was likely also contributed by the events that he took part in
on January 6. Well, either it was natural
causes or it wasn't, it's not relevant that you know we all
die of living living is one of those things that you don't get
out the other side of with everything intact.
And so I would say that everybody who dies of natural
causes did. So based on the events of their
life, this This commentary on there.
So anyway, he was ruled a line of duty death.
I have to believe that that was something that was done to help
his family and I think that's fine.
You know, giving him a line of duty death but then they created
this false narrative. So here's what it says.
Finally, this is a quote from the chief.
Again, the most disturbing accusation from last night was
that our late friend and colleague.
Brian sickness, death had nothing to do with his heroic
actions on January 6th. That's what natural causes
means. By the way, that means it had
nothing to do with January 6, like his life lived.
I think that the whole idea that he had Strokes, I don't know if
they were hemorrhagic Strokes, maybe that would lead to that,
but that would not be a natural causes, that'd be traumatic.
And if The Strokes ended up being something that were
obstructive, if he had a, they called ischemic stroke, that
basically led to stopping blood moving around.
Then what would that have to do with January 6?
Either it just what would it have to do with getting bear
sprayed and getting hit in the head with a fire extinguisher
when you had a helmet on, it's not logical, but this That, you
know, they're defending their perspective because they don't
need facts. They don't need, you know, they
don't need accuracy, they just need emotions.
And the emotion is, he was one of ours, which I sort of
understand. It says, the department
maintains as anyone with common sense would well, we might argue
there that had officer sick, not fought valiantly for days or
four hours on the day. He was violently assaulted sick.
Nick would not have died the next day.
So the department is going to say that he fought and then died
because of it. But you know, the medical
examiner's report It actually doesn't say that and if it says
that he died because of it on top of natural causes then one
of those things can be true in one cannot be.
It doesn't make any sense and I've read Coroner's reports, I
used to do death investigations in my last year in the bureau
and then he gives this sort of fighting statement to his men
and women saying you fought like hell on January 6 and you risked
your life to protect the Constitution and everything this
country stands for. I don't think they actually keep
the Constitution there. That's my understanding.
I thought it was a Miss Smith. Anything.
So maybe not that you along with our law enforcement Partners
saved every member of Congress and their staff.
Well, so there's a perspective, I don't think it's an accurate
perspective but that's somebody who's looking at that ink blot
and they've come up with the conclusion that democracy was
under attack. The Constitution was at risk.
No further information. And it doesn't really seem to be
backed by, you know, that really pesky thing like facts, the
possibilities of eliminating, all those things really tough.
I want to Pivot to some fun stuff that happened down in
Atlanta because I think I just learned something.
By watching this stuff. So the background is that there
is a training facility that is being constructed outside of
the, the city of Atlanta. And it's being called cop City
from everything I can gather. And essentially, there's a bunch
of money that's going to go in there going to build up some
like realistic training facilities and then they're
going to have access to it. I'm sure state federal and
locals will be able to go out and use it.
So that all seems like a good thing.
Now on paper, the left generally says that they don't like cops,
but they do want better training for cops.
They don't want to defund police and make them less.
But they don't want to give police any money, so they don't
have a unified position but not too long ago, maybe a month ago
or so. They were clearing out these
protesters who were in the area of where this cop said he is
going to be built this training facility and they were known as
Forest protectors if you want to believe what CNN had to say.
And one of these idiots who was in a tent or something to that
effect, or some sort of a temporary lodging took a potshot
at a cop, who was trying to clear him out and then was
killed for his troubles, and the police officer was Injured.
So this is not a place that's not with, you know, without
violence. This is a obviously a
contentious thing and Atlanta is not the same place as Portland.
And yet the attempts to sort of stop, this thing are still
ongoing. Now, there were 23 or so of them
of these protesters were arrested the other night.
I'm going to show you some video here.
If you're watching the rumble footage you're going to see it.
But there's no there's no actual.
What do you call it? There's no sound to this but
this is a Fleer image from looks like, probably a helicopter and
it is showing a seriously large number of people coming in.
So, in this case, white is hot. If you're not familiar with
looking at Fleer, you're looking at a zoom in and maybe some
cloud cover here, but there are maybe 100 on the on the right
side of the picture and then on the left side of the picture,
there's probably like a half dozen or so that are creeping
in. These are mostly black-clad
males and they are Marching around and they have set fire to
this. The piece of earth-moving
equipment or maybe a front loader or something like that.
So they had a expensive tractor that gets burned up, you can see
the Fleer image, it's just like burning hot and then the cops
actually backed off on this. So we've got a couple different
images. One of them is from the
helicopter. This one is a ground footage.
You see, cops basically like retreating and and they were
praised for doing what they did. In other words, they weren't
going to cause loss of human life.
It's probably appropriate. Although I don't think any of
these people could replace this equipment but there's a couple
of Earth moving pieces and And it looks like the cops are in
full Retreat because they're literally outnumbered, man,
they're outnumbered. Probably 15 to 1 or worse and
and then these clowns that are in there.
These, these Rider, you know, protester types have decided to
go on, you know, and they're all wearing black, they're all
throwing rocks and stuff at this thing, trying to take down some
kind of electrical system there like a big high voltage power
lines to but yeah, just destroying.
So you see the cops basically pull out and and leave that
space to these to these Riders until they come back in.
And Force and this video has 1.3 million views on it.
The funniest thing to me about all of it, I'll just call your
attention. If you're watching our channel
on the video, the Atlanta police department at Atlanta underscore
police is giving Ariel. Not Ariel like a, ER, but Ariel
AR iel, like The Little Mermaid. So the response to all these
people on Twitter are pictures of The Little Mermaid because
they mistakenly spelled The word wrong.
But you know, the number of people that came through and I
once again we're just showing a loop right now for a second, the
number of people there man that's got to be over 100.
There are so many people cruising down inside the fence
line in towards this Earth, moving equipment, it's pretty
incredible. And I think if you have a dozen
guys, in a couple of vehicles, like this is not the stand, you
want to make because the only way you do it is by just
executing people wholesale and that this probably doesn't
doesn't allow for a loss of life.
I bet you they're deadly force. Policy wouldn't cover it.
Not sure that even FBI would stand behind people doing that.
So it's worth noting. But what I do want to also point
out is this other daily wire article here, which I think is
relevant. So we're going to show actually,
they've got some pictures of the people in broad daylight so
they're marching through this Creek.
I didn't realize that they're marching and you can see how
many of them. There are says, Atlanta police
release aerial footage of training center, rioters.
So they show the footage. But this is the part that was
most interesting to me, I'm going to scroll down most of the
way said they did about a hundred fifty thousand dollars
worth of damage. That's pretty easy to imagine
base. On the the Earth moving
equipment cost and having seen what those things cost to having
buddies. That you know, that have paid
that kind of money to do it. So, the officers supposedly,
exercised restraint, we're seeing that in air quotes here
and use non-lethal enforcement to tuck the arrest of 35 people.
23 of those individuals face it. Domestic terrorism charges once
again, assign Atlanta is not the same as Portland they have now
killed. One of those people who was
trying to kill a cop. That's an interesting move and
then the second thing is you've got A of them facing these these
felony charges for domestic terrorism, literally charged
with terrorism under State Statute.
Pretty interesting could result in up to 35 years in prison, but
the piece that was really interesting to me, and I was
notified of it in multiple ways today, including people who have
written books about the splc. The far left nonprofit, Southern
Poverty, Law Center it. Confirmed that one of their
employees was in fact, arrested there.
Here's where it gets interesting for me the end I'm going to read
a quote directly from The splc spokesperson quote and employee
at the splc was arrested while acting and identifying as a
legal Observer on behalf of the national lawyers.
Guild, and LG the employee is an experienced legal Observer and
their arrest. It's actually his arrest and his
arrest is not evidence of any crime, but if heavy-handed law
enforcement intervention against protesters and the Governor
Brian Kemp said that they will not be tolerating to Mystic
terrorism. So that's all good.
But I think the thing that was most interesting to me I'm going
to pull up the next article. If you don't mind here.
This is the picture of the guy and his name is Thomas, Webb
Jurgen so Thomas Webb. Who is a clean-cut kid looks
actually like my youngest brother and kind of interesting
also, an attorney probably also pretty left-leaning, although
probably not dumb enough to get caught in something like this.
They mentioned that he was part of the national lawyers.
Guild also just sort of For those who follow daily wire the
best is that they talked about, you know, his work with the splc
and so on. And then if you get down to the
last paragraph, they mentioned last month, an FBI whistleblower
lie to document showing the FBI was investigating radical
traditional Catholics and showing that they were using the
splc as a source for naming hate groups.
So, another little interesting shout out daily wire still
tracking what we're up to, so that's fun.
But let's talk about the national lawyers.
Guild, I'm going to add some some personal flavor and spice
to this when my team was deployed to Portland.
In. I believe it was in September.
It was either September or early October but I'm pretty sure
September of 2020 of yeah, 2020 we went out there and we were
going to be observing the potential of federal crimes.
We were not necessarily assigned to a specific subject on all
days. But we did have subjects that we
were watching that were being accused of federal crimes that
had cases against them that were in the antifa, BLM movement, and
part of the riot scene that was going on for 100 nights and
days. And one of the things that was
immediately Parent is number one.
That antifa is not an idea. It's an organized group of
people because we dealt with organized groups all the time.
And the second thing was, is that despite the media
representation that there were these like nonpartisan, you
know, third-party legal Watchdog groups referred to as the
national lawyers Guild, that those people were actually
embedded with sympathetic to and part of the antifa organization
which wasn't organization. I have.
No qualms saying that and there was evidence of it and I'm going
to share that evidence with you like my personal.
Ants and I'm going to tell you that the FBI has it as well.
Alright. So the way that the national
lawyers, Guild identified themselves, was easier with
green shirts that said National lawyers, Guild on them and the
big letters and LG or they were green hats or both.
Now, one of the things that's most interesting to me as while
we were on a couple of our surveillance has.
We were watching unruly protest that got really, really strange
for those of us who have been in urban areas and done a lot of
surveillance, the members of this this unruly crew.
Would send what I would call scouts out that were they were
like, Parade route managers, they were on you, no Vespas and
bicycles, and they would go block off traffic and allow
people to start marching, they would drive up streets the wrong
way and just block things off wholesale and tell people to
move around and people did because they didn't want to run
over some, you know, fat chick on a Vespa which was one of the
people that were watching it turns out.
So that being the case, they had these marches going all over the
place there, you know, up and down certain streets.
And they'd go doubt the wrong way, down a one-way and it would
get blocked off by these people. Now, while we were out there
observing and we'd be posted back, you know, a block or two
blocks, whatever we are washing and sometimes we would see
people that would kind of creep past our vehicles.
There was one woman in particular, wearing a national
lawyers, Guild hat. It's a green hat.
And she was very notable because she had sort of large breasts
and no bra. I only say that because I had a
bunch of dudes who were in their 50s that have nothing better to
do than watch people. That's what we do all day.
A long and as they were watching this woman came up over and over
again. She was she was very obvious
because she would go running and you can just see men, know what
I'm talking about that. We have a sixth sense for
catching, that sort of thing, even in like rearview mirrors.
So this woman is back there. She's very, very obvious and
then she's holding, like a personal FR-S radio, FRS radios
are easily use their easily bought.
Any way you can get them at a Bass Pro Shop, you can get them
at a Walmart, you can get them off Amazon.
So on And the bureau had noted before I got there, that antifa
was accustomed to using FRS radios to move themselves around
and to do logistical support. And this woman with the nlg hat
on, who claimed to be a legal Observer, that was what that
statement was, that's what that hat was supposed to mean.
And who yelled at us about, you know, being a, you know, she was
observing for people's rights was using an FRS radio to call
out the license plates of the people that she believed were
quote, unquote, feds And that was their statement about it.
Now, the bureau captured all of this radio traffic, it's all
unencrypted, and it's public information because it's just
thrown across the airwaves. So they were gathering it in and
recording it as evidence of the larger conspiracy that was going
on in Portland. I've never heard anything done
with it. I've never heard a public
comment on it and I don't ever expect to see prosecution.
But what we did see was she would call out a license plate.
Wearing her green, National lawyers, Guild hat.
And then a security element from the antifa crowd would show up
wearing all black a black block. There was a woman that famously
showed up that was wearing. She was wearing a leather skirt
or like a pleather skirt and fishnet stockings and then like
a tactical vest and then four or five other guys wearing tactical
vests, I don't think they had body armor in them.
That wasn't my impression from looking at them, but I don't
know for a fact, but they all had this like, sort of silly
uniform that showed them to be this sort of element and then
they came out and harassed. A number of guys that were on my
team and also me They came out and did that to me, you know,
later on, on a different day. So, on multiple days, we witness
this Behavior. They would call out a license
plate number. We would get the the command
center or the command post for the FBI would call us up and
say, hey, they're calling a license plate.
Looks like it's fill in the blank vehicle.
You know, are one of you driving those vehicles and in the case
of like three of us, you know, a couple people got run off, they
said go ahead and move, so you don't, you know, expose your
position. So they would drive off and
we've been, you know, we got chased at one point, one of my
colleagues prior Marine. Now retired FBI agent was
driving, a Nissan Armada got cited and spotted by this woman
who he identified later on, in our actor action, and he went
driving off because the license plate was burned, which is what
we would say that they were, you know, they were made.
So he goes driving off, he gets chased by a bunch of people on
bicycles. That was the security element
and some guy on a motorcycle came up and join them.
So you have Nissan Armada five or six people on bicycles one,
motorcycle, and then three federal agents in No other
vehicles because we weren't going to let him just run off in
his own. We were going to make sure that
we stayed with him to make sure that he could safely elude them
and go somewhere else. So we followed you know and they
were running he would run lights, they would run lights,
they were going in against traffic wherever they needed to
to keep up with this guy. And eventually he just kind of
ran them off by just Cheerilee, outdistancing them, and driving
in a vehicle faster. He was, you know, one break Tap
Away from ending this security elements day, but chose not to
was probably the right move, but my point is, is that there is an
You're thinking action that these people have the same
tactics and the same support, the national lawyers, Guild in
Atlanta doing the same sort of violent and Tifa BS that we saw
in Portland. And I don't hear wide-spread
calls for running them all down or prosecutions or you know hang
all the insurrectionists. When they're out there doing the
same sort of thing. These are the same people that
were burning down a federal courthouse that were attacking
like most of the downtown of Portland from what I could I
could. See that all the windows were
boarded up. I mean, it was a captive State
and so many ways. And you just have this bizarre
Instinct where the left is more than happy to be very mad at a
guy. Wearing Viking horns and other
people as well, obviously, who went into the capital that broke
glass and did damage, which some of those things are felonies and
some of them are misdemeanors. A lot of them are probably
misdemeanors and you don't have that same outrage from them at
people that are quote unquote, on their team.
Again, the national Rorschach test is if Look at a crime.
Do you call it a crime? And January 6th is sort of the
differentiator between whether you do or don't what I keep
finding is that people on the right almost, all of them will
look at a crime and know that it's a crime and they say, look
you punched a cop, you should go to jail.
There are some of these things that don't raise to the level of
the FBI's, actual investigative requirements things that are
misdemeanors are not investigated by the FBI until
January 6th. So that should be a problem for
all thinking and honest people. But it isn't So, we have to just
kind of live in the world that we're in.
It is the way that it is, but that doesn't mean that we
shouldn't continue to push for good actions and good actions by
our politicians and by our fellow man.
The last one that I want to kind of cover here is a really wild
story of kidnapping and murder down at the Texas border.
So I'm going to switch over here, we're going to pull up the
Los Angeles Times and I'll read it so you don't have to.
But it says to kidnapped Americans found dead in Mexico
to others rescued and Return to the United States.
This was written by Kate litha command, Patrick McDonald on the
7th. So yesterday and updated in the
evening, they're updating from Mexico City.
I don't know why they're in Mexico City because Browns bill
is nowhere near that. But essentially what they're
saying is that two of the four United States citizens who were
kidnapped at gunpoint in northern Mexico, were found dead
on Tuesday. The Mexican authorities said
that the other two were rescued after an intense Manhunt that
renewed, the u.s. focus on violence at the southern border.
These things do happen every so often they're not incredibly
common for Americans to be kidnapped, but if they do
happen, it says, the Americans were located Tuesday Morning in
a small. Wooden house in a field outside
of the violent Border City of mataró switch.
I don't know that City very well but it's just outside of
Brownsville and that the Attorney General of the state
there, noted that there was one subject who had been detained a
guy named Jose Guadalupe N. I don't know if they're
breathing his last name or what 23 years old, who was guarding
the house with these two and the two survivors who made it back
home are Latavia McGee and Eric James William both of them had
they were in a van apparently that had North Carolina plates
and it got shot up and then two people were killed and then two
people were returned recently. So I want to talk just a little
bit about what that might mean. And then The responses to it.
That I think interesting, what it might mean is that they were
one of two things either. They were a mistaken, identity,
high possibility for that. They were in a very generic
white Chrysler minivan and could have been mistaken for somebody
else. The other possibility is that
they were involved in the drug trade and that they got in some
sort of scrimmage and didn't understand what they were
getting into on the wrong side of the border, both of those are
possible, I'm sure that we probably won't hear much more
about it unfortunately because it's not a very good name.
Before the by demonstration, but the FBI was called in.
Because this was a kidnapping case and it was an international
kidnapping case that's FBI territory.
I have friends who have worked these cases down in New Mexico,
you know, crossing the border either in the in New Mexico or
over the bridge of the Americas in El Paso.
And generally speaking, we generally find people and
they're generally alive as long as they're American citizens and
if they're not, then Anything could happen.
But in this case, it's interesting those names.
I'm gonna guess that Eric Eric James Williams and Latavia McGee
are probably black and they came from North Carolina.
So I don't know what the heck they were doing down there.
That doesn't mean that they shouldn't travel down there.
It just means it's an interesting data point.
It would make mistaken identity less likely only because the
people that are down in Brownsville are either Texans
who live in Texas, and I don't think they have a big black
population down there, and they have a pretty high Hispanic
population. So these people would probably
Stand Out visually, I don't think they'd be as easy to
mistake, but anything could happen and I couldn't say one
way or another, but if I was leaning 60/40 on one side of the
other I'm guessing that this was probably something we're going
to find out that was a maybe a business deal.
Gone bad. That's that's my educated
speculation on it. I'm open to being wrong shortly
and I'll correct it by m. The thing that's worth noting is
the United States government should be pushing to stop this
kind of thing on every level. Because we should not be
allowing the cartels to run our borders.
I think that Dan Bungie know who I talked to today for 15 or 20
minutes makes a very compelling case, that Biden is afford.
Agent is in, he is acting on behalf of foreign interests.
Not that he is a spy, or doing some sort of Espionage, but that
fact that he's actually using his influence to keep these
borders open and there's some compelling interest compelling
coincidences will call them that indicate that the cartels are
throwing money into the Biden crime, family as it's called,
you know. But the sort of a hunter Biden
experience, they are moving money into that pot through some
third parties. These Arco states that exist in
Eastern Europe. That's all really troubling
stuff, if that's the case. There's like I said, there's
some coincidences that need to be explained and are pretty
troubling and the by demonstration is not helping
themselves by leaving such an open border and leaving these
spaces. Open now, there's a left and a
right argument against allowing these borders to be open in this
way. And allowing the tar tells to
have this sort of American territory that they can control
the, the right-wing version of. It is a law-and-order version.
It's a Values of and saying that we don't want people, invading
our Sovereign Nation. I think that's pretty strong.
But even on the left, it's resulting in a lot of human
suffering on the people that are generally compassionate speaking
liberal types. You know.
There's a fairly strong argument stating that you're moving
people from One captive environment to another, they're
coming here and they're being trafficked, either for labor or
for sex. They're coming in here and they
have no access to law enforcement.
Many of them don't speak English and they don't know what the
rules are living in America, and they end up victims of some sort
of organized crime syndicate. It, whether it be MS, 13, or 18
Street, you know, or whatever these groups are, are working to
bring people over because then they have more people to do
whatever it is, that they are either extorting or trafficking
and so on. So, neither of these things are
good. Now, there's been some arguments
about talking, you know, there's Senators that are mouthing off
about we should, you know, name the drug cartels, as terrorist
organizations, and then be able to unlock some military tools.
I think, generally speaking, that's probably a good idea.
And then there's this little push.
Back saying, well we shouldn't do it because it will open up
Asylum claims in the United States.
If you listened to our podcast with Aaron Stephenson and with
Tara roads a week ago, Monday, you will know that the Biden's
Administration is already looking to open those floodgates
up and allow Asylum officers to make the decision instead of
immigration judges. And if that rule goes into
fruition, if it actually happens, then what we are going
to see is a Floodgate. It makes no difference whether
or not we call the cartels domestic terrorist.
The people are going to be getting their Asylum claims,
granted at a rate of about 85% if the numbers hold and there's
no reason to think that they won't.
So I'm going to just once again Circle back to this thing.
Like we look at the border, the border is just another thing
that if you probably believe that January 6 was a riot, then
you probably want them to close the border.
And if you think that January 6 was an Insurrection, then the
Border being open is good because we're such humanitarians
this Rorschach test is not going away.
It is an easy way. For us to analyze and look at
each other in one single event and sadly, it shows exactly how
divided America is. And that is just a, just a
crying shame at this point. All that being said, I hope that
we figure out our differences sooner than later and that we
can start seeing some common ground because this is not a
sustainable position. And I don't know that it goes
into 20 24 in a way that that doesn't involve more of these
dust Ops, like we saw on On January 6, because so many
people are getting fed up. Ladies and gentlemen, you have
been listening to the Kyle Serafin show.
I hope that you would please consider subscribing to our
show. If you haven't already, just
push that button on either. Rumble on Apple on Spotify.
On, I heart radio or wherever it is that you are listening to our
show. And if you did enjoy, what you
had to hear, please share this content with a friend, maybe
two, maybe 50. If you got 50 friends, you might
be more popular than I am. It's always appreciated.
It helps us grow both the audience and the number of
people who have access to some of the first hand Source
information, some of the inside, Baseball that I'm able to share
with you and a lot of our really good guests that come in on
Monday, and we do appreciate your feedback.
If you have an opportunity to leave us a five star review, on
Apple podcast, we do appreciate that as well.
We're up to 260 something last time I checked and I can't
access them because I don't have fill here for me, but generally
speaking, if you are listening to our podcast, you'll see
producer, Phil give us a library of one of those.
So we'll make sure we get that done on Friday show.
You've been listening to the Kyle Serafin show and we'll see
you all next time. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin. Show be sure to follow him on
Twitter and Truth at Kyle seraphin.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin.
Show be sure to follow him on Twitter and Truth at Kyle
seraphin.