Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot prepared to embrace the uncomfortable truth.
Because this program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment
defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphim.
Hello my friends and welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show.
Today is Tuesday, it's August the 22nd.
I don't know why my voice sounds like it's going somewhere.
I woke up this morning and it just sounded a little gruffer so
bear with me on that. I also injured myself going for
a run yesterday when it was 1000° outside in Texas.
I was trying to get home faster and for some reason that
resulted in my soleus getting pulled on my right side.
I always like knowing that my shoes are too old, that the
padding is not working by my body letting me know with an
injury that's always a good way to start it off.
That being said, we've got an interesting show lined up for
you today. We're going to be talking about
15 minute cities. We're going to be talking about
mechanisms of control that are outside the United States.
Always interesting to hear what the global elites want us doing
and how they think we should be living.
And thank God they're out there telling us how to get it done
since we can't figure it out on our own.
The the World Economic Forum kind of an interesting animal
it, it disguises some actual decent work in there with the
sort of Bond villain level evil. So we're going to talk about
them. We're going to talk about more
on the two tiered system of justice in the United States.
We've been talking about that quite a bit.
The DOJ in the way that it operates, obviously focused on
the most important priorities of all Americans, making sure that
trans students are accommodated in schools from a federal level.
That seems like the thing that we're all worried about when we
wake up in the morning. We think, oh God, are the
students that are confused what to do with their genitals?
Are they going to be? Are they going to be properly
accommodated in this this oh so intolerant, intolerant and mean
society? Will we take care of them
properly? Never mind teaching reading,
writing, arithmetic. Never mind teaching the basic
skills, learning how to balance a checkbook or learning what to
do with your money. You're just going to be fine.
You're going to own nothing and you're going to be satisfied
because you'll have a scooter and maybe you can listen to your
iPhone in your Bluetooth that they're monitoring your thoughts
with. So that's fun.
We're also going to talk about migrants getting moved around
this country. I know my buddy Ryan Mata, who's
sitting over there on the ones and twos has been pretty
aggressive at running down and trying to figure out what is
happening with this migrant crisis on our border and some of
the movement there of. And the other question is, is
where do you store all these people which we continue to
bring in so many of them in this country.
We're going to talk a little bit about what happened in in New
York State. We had our whistle blower
discuss what happened in the New York City.
But the upstate New York people are actually not feeling the
wrath and the movement of these migrants.
And then I'll just tell you, COVID-19 round two, it is
coming. I hope you have set your face
like Flint I had. I hope you have set your feet
very firmly on the Terra Firma so you are ready to engage with
whatever comes your way. It's still you still have time.
There's still enough time to go to our Twitter page at Kyle
Serif and you can go and weigh in.
Think we've had about 8000 views on our survey.
What do we call the people that are still wearing masks and
still advocating for the masks? The so-called mask fascist right
now it's about 80 to 10 to 1080% are saying mask hole is the
winner. There's only about 10% or 11% of
you that think that dumb ass is the right answer and about 9 or
10% of you with a free response. So over 800, I think over 700
votes rather. So go out there and, and, and,
and weigh in. We'll, we'll, we'll give you the
results tomorrow. Think it's worth doing?
Before we get too far afield here, I want to say thanks to
our buddy Garrett O'boyle, who has been out doing some wild
work. Here we go.
It's the suspendables collection.
Do you know about the suspendables collection?
Do you know that you can get your very own suspendables
merch? You guys have been agitating in
the chat for the suspendables merch.
Here it is free the merch successful once again campaign
Here you go to thedashsuspendables.com.
It's just spelled the way that it sounds.
You can see it on the screen if you're watching and a handful of
these really interesting shirts. They get the PT shirt.
He's got the RU suspendable R hashtag the letter R, the letter
U suspendable. It's a question you should ask
yourself every day. And then the Zielinski Special,
just in case you happen to be going in front of Congress or
maybe even your City Council. You're going to a small venue
where you are going to be asking people for money that you have
no business getting. You can wear the Suspendables Z
Special, which is an OD green shirt with a suspendables badge
right there around the neckline. Just letting them know exactly
what you're about because you're really a warrior, even though
you're a weird homosexual actor from a third world corrupt
regime. You can ask for money too, just
like Zielinski. Good stuff and make
whistleblowers great again. So the suspendables merch, there
it is. Let's get started.
We'll come to some other sponsors little bit later on the
show. So ladies and gentlemen, let's
kick it off right now. We're going to be talking about
C40, the C40 experience, the 40 cities in the United in the
Color of the World, rather of which there are some American
cities. I think there's fourteen in the
US that want you to own next to nothing, and they want you to be
happy about it, right? If you would pull up our topic
#1 the C40 cities, we're going to get into it.
This is a global network of mayors.
This is who we really want leading things.
A couple of mayors elected in big cities that are going to get
together, and they are unifying in their action to confront the
climate crisis. And what are those cities?
They're cities like Buenos Aires, like Jakarta, like
London, like Shanghai, like Tel Aviv, Johannesburg, and so on,
but they're also American cities in there.
And what is their goal? Their goal is to tell you that
these 40 cities are going to try to reduce the global carbon
emissions by a significant percentage because they
constitute more than 20% of the global economy.
They all live in the same place. Even though cities are probably
the most efficient way to stack human beings, they can go ahead
and try to get people out of it. So let's let's dig into what
this website is. You can visit their website if
you want to explore what they're all about.
Although I don't always recommend it.
You can go to the letter C thenumber40.org. c40.org will
tell you about what they're into.
This is a World Economic Forum project that is trying to get
you green jobs, driving, driving equity.
That's always good sustainability and the secure
employment opportunities for these cities where people can
thrive. Their hashtag is green jobs.
Now that sounds like nothing could go wrong.
They're trying to transition things from oil fields to wind
farms so they can kill off all the eagles and maybe kill off
some of the whales if you're paying attention to what's been
going on in some of these areas. And let's let's just dig into
what it is that they say is the issue.
So they're talking about the future of urban consumption in a
world that is 1.5°C higher. They have an entire report at 68
pages. I cruised through it today to
try to get you the highlights so you don't have to do the same
sort of thing. It was assembled by a group
called Arab and also the University of Leeds, which I
believe is a British university. And they are talking about the
impact of urban consumption as it get.
As I said, probably the most efficient way to live is when
you stack human beings on top of other human beings.
So when you start putting people into apartment buildings, this
is the most efficient way to stack humans.
They have the least amount of distance they have to travel to
get their things. But there's also too many
humans, per the World Economic Forum.
And so how do we make them lesser?
We just reduce the number of things that they have.
Again, they want you to own nothing and be happy about it.
So they've got some main takeaways here in the executive
summary, new ways that you can measure your climate footprint.
The real key to every single government grift is that there
has to be a metric. They have to be able to measure
it, and then on top of that, they have to be able to reduce
that metric. Whether or not it makes sense is
sort of irrelevant. The FBI has been really good
about doing this, about their crime stats.
They just want to show you that they're doing something, so they
have to measure it. And the C40 cities, these are
the cities that there's actually 96 of them now.
They started off with 40. That was their goal, and they
actually doubled their goal. So that is a 200 plus percent
increase in cities that have pledged to do this illogical
thing. And the C40 cities are
representing 10% of the global. What is this emissions?
They call it GHG emissions, accounting for carbon based
consumption and emissions. And they are trying to make sure
that you will actually see this reduced not but just by 20-30,
but they're actually trying to get down to a 2050 goal where
they're going to reduce it by 87%.
So that's lovely. And the numbers that I saw are
actually pretty staggering. There was numbers of carbon
emissions that they were trying to drop.
They wanted us to go from like a 15.6 metric ton per person or
something to that effect. They wanted to drop to point
0.7. So if you just consider what
they would take for you to change your life by 2020 X,
that's what they're trying to talk about your consumption
levels, driving, traveling, purchasing different equipment
you would. They want you to drop that down
And that is so that we can avoid, here we go, climate
preggins, the global climate breakdown, the global climate
breakdown, because that's obviously coming.
When you believe in the Gaia principle, when you believe in
an Earth that we are subservient to, even though we are supposed
to be masters of our domain, even though we are supposed to
be stewards of it, they want us to reduce it.
Going to bring up a couple of these other fun little takeaways
here. It says while C40 cities have a
strong action plan in place to significantly cut emissions
produced directly within their geographic boundaries, emissions
measured by what is consumed within those cities are rising.
And if they are left unchecked, they will double by 2050, which
is why they have to do things. So what does the science say?
What does it tell us? The fun thing is when you read
this, this this particular scientific document or pseudo
scientific document, it looks like a market marketing
brochure. It's really nicely laid out.
There's lots of different colors and variations on it.
And the fun thing for me was they actually have what they
call the cone of uncertainty. Whenever you do projections into
the future, there's a cone of uncertainty of like how good
your projections can be. And so they show this is the
line if it left unchecked to 2050.
And what's really fun for me is it is a growth line that tops
out and seems to be reducing on its own just based on the way
the numbers are working right now.
And the reason is, is all of our efficient technologies, because
businesses are incentivized to do things in a way that is both
sustainable and is efficient. We actually have a market
incentive to make the globe cleaner, to be able to reduce
certain emissions if that is going to be favorable.
There's a certain government programs that are involved in
this. So it actually shows a growing
line until about 2035, then it flatlines out and it actually
dips slightly. So by 2045 to 2050, we're seeing
a a gentle global decline in emissions even by the Wefs, even
by the C40 organizations own projections.
And then when you look at their cone of uncertainty, what they
show is that it might reduce based on their ideas, but it
also may actually go up from that projected line that they've
already shown with no, with no touching it, without any
specific mitigation strategies, it might actually increase by
like 30%. So, so they might have an impact
of a 40% reduction, but they might have an impact of 30%
increase by dicking around with these these things.
There's nothing funnier to me than when they just have to go
like it's science and that means it's uncertain.
Of course, it's uncertain. This is the nature of it.
They're playing around with a single variable, this idea of
carbon emissions, and they don't actually know what it is.
If you want a good example of this, look at any time that the
Americans have gone in and meddled with foreign conflicts
where we don't understand all the barrels bulls at play.
We put the CIA in and you want to get rid of somebody from some
regime that's not favorable to us.
And then suddenly you end up with like, I don't know, the
Taliban or you end up with Saddam Hussein running Iraq.
It's, it's like, oh, we understood one variable.
We didn't like it. We started tweaking it a little
bit. And the result was something
that made no sense. It was actually the opposite of
what we were hoping to do. So we actually screwed up our
model. I mean, science is about trial
and error when you're trying to do trial and error by literally
billions of people and the way that they live.
And the possibility is, is you don't achieve the goal that you
were doing, which was of marginal, you know, material
value to the people in the world.
Anyway. I don't know.
You've added an awful lot of money, but this is clearly a
good path for a bunch of scientists that that feel
emotional about the globe. Like I said, the climate pagans,
as my buddy George Hill likes to call him.
So what are they trying to do? It says 27 C 40 cities have
already peaked in terms of production based emissions.
They've already peaked. In other words, they are on the
decline right now, doing nothing special except doing the things
that the market is asking for. Says consumption based emissions
account for the total climate, the total climate impact
accumulated around the world of goods and services allocated to
places where the end product is used or consumed.
There are 68 pages of this jargon, by the way, so let's go.
Let's follow their example here. Take a pair of jeans for
example. The climate impact includes the
GHG emissions that have resulted from growing and harvesting the
cotton used for the fabric, the CO2 emitted by the factory where
it was stitched together, the emissions from ships, trucks,
planes that are transporting it to the store.
Its impact also includes emissions from heating, cooling,
lighting, the store where the jeans were bought in, and the
CO2 emissions by the end consumer washing it and drying
it over its lifetime. Well, why stop there?
Why not just include the CO2 emissions from the motorcycle
that the guy was wearing it for? Because these jeans looked
really cool and he was being sold a motorcycle or even the
production of the scooter that he was riding around found in
and needed to wear jeans because he didn't want to scrape up his
leg while doing 13 miles an hour on a sidewalk that he rented
with his little swipe card there.
We could do all this stuff. I mean, if you want to go and do
minute analysis down to this microcosm that makes no sense,
you can do that all day long. It's it's out there, it's
available for you. But this sort of granularity
doesn't take into impact any sort of realistic things because
now you basically traced a pair of jeans, but you haven't
factored in any of the offset, the fact that the jeans are more
durable and they are, you know, not using petroleum products
because they were using cotton. You know, all these things.
There's always a cost to it. But if you just get really
minute and you focus on one single thing, which is to say
you're going to declare that we're all bad because of carbon,
which I was listening to a comedian the other day.
He said, you know, the whole thing about carbon dioxide being
an issue. Carbon dioxide is air for
plants. These are the same people that
are trying to tell us that there's a really big, important
and necessary piece of the rainforest.
Remember, these are the same people that were doing the Fern
gully in the 90s and they were telling us how bad we were for
cutting down trees and forests. And yet they want everybody to
live in these cities, which of course mean that they have to
flatten out areas and get rid of certain things.
There's no, there's no coherency in this leftist mindset.
They don't require a religion that actually agrees with
itself. What they require is obedience.
And that's what you're getting more and more of this stuff.
Look at a couple other things here.
By 20-30, the average per capita impact of urban consumption in
the C40 cities must, it must decrease by 50%.
Just listen to that one more time.
First of all, they are decreeing that the biggest cities in the
world decrease their consumption by 50%.
If you think that's going to fly in American cities, I will be
shocked to find that out. But they have this idea that
they are going to push this forward.
And we actually have a video for you.
I went out there and dug into it.
Amusingly, this was an unlisted YouTube.
If you had the link, you could get it.
But it's listed not in a way that was easily available to
find. I think it had like 15 or 20
views. So you probably haven't seen
this. If you'll pull up Video topic #3
Ryan, this is a piece that was initially billed as San
Francisco's 15 Minutes, obviously one of the the C40
cities. But this is just kind of their
little take on the way that they see it.
And you'll notice it's all big sweeping plans.
It's beautiful drone footage. What did it cost to put that up
in the air and transport that and move it across international
lines and ship it and all this stuff?
They never have any consistency in their values.
But here's San Francisco 15 Minute Cities video clip #3 if
you would. The.
There it is, plant based
resources coming to save us. All.
So right now that everybody is kind of seeing how pretty this
is, let's let's do a stop if you would.
Is there a way you can play that without any of the sound in the
background? We're going to talk over some of
these visuals because the stuff that they're doing is is really
funny. If we'll folks, I'm going to I'm
going to comment on this. If you watched on our rumble
channel, you obviously just saw some beautiful drone footage and
a bunch of sort of time lapse video and things like this.
But what's really fun about this, and you'll notice uplink
is the name of their other YouTube channel that you, you
can't find. They're, they're showing a
picture right now of, of, of roads that have existed in San
Francisco for 50 years, the famous Lombard St. if my memory
serves, it's the the twistiest Rd. in the world.
And they're talking about things without comparing apples to
apples. This is one of the fun pieces
when you start playing around with data.
So they're talking about they must deliver sustainable Urban
Development in this particular thing while they're increasing
quality of life and economic opportunities.
They go and they and they dig into this little piece where
they say that there are 70% of the world's population or 70% of
the emissions are coming out of cities, but they only constitute
3% of the land area. And so that's one of my favorite
little ways when you sort of move the needle, you think, Oh
my God, only 3% of the land area is where 70% of human emissions
come from. The percentage of people that
live near a coastline is also incredibly high if you look
across the entire world. Why is that?
Because there's abilities to ship.
Once you start getting inland, you start moving towards
deserts, you start moving into more inhospitable terrain.
It's much more topographically challenged.
You have mountains and things like this.
So if you look at where the light structure is, even if you
were to zoom back out on Earth and take a look at where people
live, they all live near the coastlines.
Of course, this is the easiest way for people to get around.
The interior of most countries are much closer to dark if they
are not completely dark in certain areas.
And the second thing is, is that people who concentrate in cities
concentrate that they are the biggest concentration of human
beings. So of course they, they are the
biggest amount of consumption and producing of carbon
emissions. Of course it makes sense.
That's where the biggest concentration of human beings
live. So they they compare landmass to
this to population in a way that is completely nonsensical.
But this is, you know, it's scary if you don't understand
anything. If you're one of these people
that we would say is the Dan Bongino calls them the stupid
smart people, you're like, oh, I can, I can compare numbers and
7% and 70%, how scary, What an awful thing.
We need to reduce those numbers. You know, 3% of people living in
one place should equal, you know, 3% of consumption.
That's not it. They're not comparing where the
populations are, population density and so on.
So these are just people who are trying to get you to do
something with scary numbers and they're hoping through bad
education. That the tax on math is, is that
you don't know how to do things. They always talk about the
lottery. If anybody's ever gone out and
bought a lottery ticket, and then you go home and you have
that fear of missing out because there's a, you know, $100
million Lotto jackpot. There's a $900 million Super
Bowl or Super Bowl jackpot or whatever they're called, and you
go, if I don't buy this ticket, I can't win that.
In fact, that used to be the slogan when I was a kid.
You got to play to win, right? But it's also a tax on people
that can't do math. If you look at any mathematics
professor, none of them will ever spend any money on a
lottery. And they're doing the same exact
thing. They're like, well, you have
this fear. It's an emotionally triggering
number, but has nothing to do with the reality of it.
The odds of you winning the lottery are, like, lower than
you being hit by lightning. So does it really matter if you
play if you're never going to be able to win, statistically?
Does somebody win? Of course they do.
Does somebody die from getting hit by lightning in the United
States every year? Yeah, a couple of people do.
Is it something you walk around and fear?
Not if you're a logical thinking person.
Not if you've ever lived around other people and you can just
think, hey, I don't even know anybody that's ever been struck
by lighting. Now everyone's going to sound
off in the chat that you know somebody who has.
I understand. That being said, these these
things are all attacks on people that are not educated, that have
an emotional response. They have an idea of what these
numbers mean, but they've never dug into it.
And of course, the idea that they villainize carbon dioxide,
which we are not even close to the highest carbon dioxide
levels that this planet has ever seen.
It's, it's, it's totally bizarre.
And this has been debunked in testimony in front of Congress
and farmers and so on. Like it's a requirement for us
to be able to do a lot of the growing that we have.
In fact, they are lower than they could be.
And if you drop the carbon dioxide lowers levels low
enough, you'll actually kill off all plant life, which means you
would result in the the death of almost all animal life as well.
So that's fun. But here's the really weird
thing about the World Economic Forum.
They're they're kind of an interesting pill.
And if we'll pull up topic #2 Ryan, if you can pull up topic
#2 there is a whole bunch of interesting things that are not
really awful that are in their website.
And This is why we have to have a nuanced perspective on things.
There's an article in there how they're using nonprofits with 3D
printing capabilities to give refugees hearing aids.
The picture that is shown on there, I don't know if you have
the ability to even show like a little bit lower on the screen,
right? But they're they're showing
these 3D printed. Give me one second, I got it.
Yeah, custom hearing aids, which is not a terrible thing to be
spending money on. There's rapidly advancing
technology, so these people are spending.
There you go. So that's kind of a cool little
graphic here. But this is a nonprofit that is
funded by WEF. It's working in Jordan for
people who have been refugees of a conflict zones.
And they're giving children specifically, which we can all
get behind, the idea that kids being able to hear would be
good. They're giving children hearing
aids. This is not a terrible thing.
And they're using new technologies.
So the idea of using technology to better humankind, that's
always been the way. But they're trying to sneak in
the carbon piece. They're trying to sneak into
control rather than bring the third world or the developing
world up, which is what you would hope.
And then everybody would eventually have like this
tailing off of a, you know, whatever consumption of, of raw
goods. What they're trying to do is
bring everybody down. In the meantime, they're trying
to tug on your emotions by talking about the technological
landscape and the innovations that are going on.
The only reason why people have the ability to create a
nonprofit in this particular what is called 3DP4 Me SO3DP4
me. The idea is, is that you have
people who have leisure time, who have technological
educations. They've been able to go out
there and meet all their basic needs.
They're not waiting to be killed off by animals.
They're not waiting to die because of the way that the the
world exists outside of their home.
And they can sit and think about really interesting capabilities
of our current technologies and advancing technologies in order
to help people who have very little.
And I would say refugee children are probably at the bottom of
the pile of people who have very little.
So using this sort of stuff as sort of the Trojan horse to say,
look, don't you think we're good?
They're trying to skew the way that you look at places like
World Economic Forum. Like I said, the Bond villains
don't always. They're not pure evil.
That's the most fun thing about the way that those movies were
always written. They're not pure evil.
Even though they have a diabolical plan.
They're offering something that is not awful and the end goal is
awful. I think that's what really,
really bad evil looks like in this world.
It looks like taking something that is that is a potential
great upgrade to humanity and then twisting it for awful
purpose. Imagine nuclear power being one
of those things, right? The ability to have power that
is clean and doesn't generate a bunch of pollution and do so
forever. But it also gives you the
capabilities of obliterating entire cities through nuclear
weapons, right? It's the, it's the, the 2 two
sides of that coin. More things, more things than
not live in that space. If we bring up topic number 2,
they have another really interesting or sorry topic #3
it's another little interesting piece of what's going on at WEF.
They're talking about antimicrobial resistance, the
ways that are antibiotics are getting less and less effective.
This is a real problem. It's a real worthwhile
discussion to be having. These are all done in this year.
So we're talking about the ability of, of our of our
population to not be able to use these life enhancing drugs.
One of the reasons that they speculate that life expectancy
has gone up so dramatically from the Civil War on.
If you guys remember, we showed a graph the other day, it was
like 35 to 40 years old in the 1850s.
And it has gone up to the point where our life expectancy in the
United States specifically is like around 80 years old.
At 79 and change, that's a dramatic increase.
And one of them is that basic infections will not and do not
kill you off. You don't get a skin infection
and fail to thrive. You don't get a skin infection
and literally just fall over dead because you had a scratch
that you didn't take care of. And this is a thing that exists
in other places. It's like outside the United
States, this is a real problem, the idea that basic infection
could take you out. Let me give you a small example.
We had a friend of my father's, He's an author.
He's a Catholic apologist, really interesting guy.
And he also does these books on hiking.
So I don't know how that works out, but he writes religious
apologies, which is to say defenses of Christianity.
But then he also writes these like hiking tour guide books.
And of course his name escapes right now.
I know his first name is Carl. And Carl was coming and talking
about going on a Grand Canyon hiking trip.
And so he goes down this goat trail or this donkey trail,
which was really rough. And he basically looked at it
all on the map and said, OK, this is the tarot I'm going to
do. It's going to three or four day
hike down to the bottom of the of the Grand Canyon and back up
to the top of the rim. And people do this everyday.
This is a pretty common thing. There's a whole season of times
when people go and hike the Grand Canyon.
Now, in Carl's case, he said he he slipped on some loose rock.
And the guy is, I don't know, maybe in his late 60s or maybe
he's in his early 70s. He's somewhere in that range.
So he's not a young guy, but he's fit and he's virile.
He looks built, very wiry, and he looks like a hiker, like
you'd expect. And so this guy goes out and
does this hike and about two days into it, he has a slide,
scratches up his leg pretty decently.
It's like, you know, not a deep cut, but it's a superficial cut
that allows things in through the barrier of his epidermis.
And he doesn't have all kinds of bandaging equipment.
He doesn't have like, you know, Bassetrace in this kind of deal.
So he just kind of cleans it off with what he's got.
It's got some dirt. It's got some things in there.
And he's in a place that he's not familiar with.
Whatever the microbiome is in the Grand Canyon is not similar
to where he lives outside of San Diego.
I think he lives outside of San Diego.
So he ends up getting an infection over the two or three
days coming back up and it gets to a really bad place where he's
got, you know, a swollen leg and he's unable to put weight on it.
And this is the potential of a life threatening infection
simply because he didn't have access to stuff that we would
think is really easy, but 100 years ago did not exist in the
1920s. They didn't have easy access to
some of these things. And the problem is when you
start killing off some of these micro microorganisms that they
adapt just the way that we have. And so the WEF is literally
talking about that. They are really getting into the
nitty gritty of how do we deal with this?
This is not a terrible thing to address, especially for a first
world nation, but they do so at the cost of shaming you and
telling you that you have to live with nothing, that you need
to own only three articles of clothing.
That's the big piece that came out here.
Three articles of clothing per year can be permitted for
everybody living in the C40 cities that agreed to this.
So I don't know how that's going to work for businesses.
You got to tell me what business is signing on to say yes, we are
voluntarily limiting our transactions to three articles
of clothing per person. They will be now only 700 miles
of round trip travel every three years at 1700 mile round trip
that we're going to tolerate and that you are going to
essentially not be able to go any further.
That they want to remove 60,000 parking spots in in Paris right
now in order to free up room for bicycles.
So, you know, if you want to step back in time and go to
bicycle powered life, if you want to go into a non automobile
powered life, I guess that's an opportunity.
But in many ways that is not a particularly American take on
things. There's a video that we put up
#5 Ryan, if you pull #5 this is kind of why I think there's
going to be resistance to this there, even though the lefties
sort of inherently know. We'll play the first probably
about what is it, a minute or two of this video.
This is about the cars in America and why I think they're
so fundamental. Actually, when I was in high
school, I wrote a book about this.
I was with my class. We wrote a book on the American
love affair with the automobile. And it's not because of the
automobile itself, and it's not because we just love internal
combustion engines, although some of you do, and your
motorheads, and I get that. I've lived with motorheads.
I know that that's a whole culture of subculture, but
there's something about freedom and the automobile that go hand
in hand with the American experience.
So if you'll play a video clip, what is it #5 let's take a look
at that and see what we got. And why use the Daguerre camera
to show that any picture of America without automobiles is
hopelessly out of date? Today, the automobile is part of
any American scene. Every man, woman and child in
America could go riding at the same time, and if we wanted to,
we could all ride in the front seat because there is a car or a
truck for every three persons. Almost 50 million motor
vehicles. How many are 50 million cars?
Bumper to bumper, they would stretch around the earth at the
equator 7 times the distance we drive our cars and trucks every
day would take us on five daily round trips to the sun.
But the real importance of the motor car is in the way it has
opened up New Horizons in our way of living.
And that brings up a very interesting fact about one out
of every seven American workers. Let's see what it is about that
one worker out of seven. Bear with me on this folks, this
is funny. 2345 6-7 Sir, what do you do for a living?
You've heard of T testers, haven't you?
Well, I'm a tooth tester. Yes, this man is a tooth tester.
He listens to automobile horns in a factory to be sure they are
tuned to the proper musical tone.
If anybody should ever ask you what the proper musical tone is,
it's E flat combined with G. OK, that's good right there.
I don't know why I really like that.
I found that this morning and I was like, what is the proper
musical tone for a car horn? Is that really a thing?
And then when you listen to it, that is the proper musical tone
for a car horn. It's just right.
It's E flat and G. So there you go.
There actually is that. And if you listen to the hopeful
tone, and I think that's really the piece that that really
catches me, the hopeful tone that goes on in that video, it
tells you they're not ashamed of building automobiles.
They're not ashamed of the the fact that if you were to take
all the automobiles would wrap around the equator 7 times or
the fact that all of our daily trips are 6 or 8 times back and
forth to the to the sun. You know, like that, the amount
of miles being driven. This is going back into the
1960s. So this is not modern by any
level. I'm sure it is significantly
more than that. And some of those are Priuses.
So some of you have to carry a purse when you have your cars.
But that being said, we have this hopeful tone about American
ingenuity, the freedom that it allows, and the fact that it's
created jobs and all these other kind of cool things.
This is American experience at its finest.
Americana in a big way was about an ever increasing wrap of
freedom, not about how we can tone down your ability to harm
the earth and how you can tone down your consumption so that we
can tie you up in a 15 minute city.
The idea, if you're not familiar with the concept of the 15
minute city, which is being alluded to your over and again,
is essentially that there is a 15 minute zone of travel that
you are permitted to live within and all the things that you need
will stay there. And you can just be a good
little surf and stay in that sort of bubble of 15 minutes in
all directions around you. Now, the problem with that
specifically is that you're talking about taking people from
this expansive ability to travel from sea to shining sea.
The Manifest Destiny that has always been kind of the classic
American, you know, driver of ingenuity and of capabilities
and people building rocket cars and wanting to go to the moon
and all these other spirits that are about freedom and about
expansion. And you were trying to draw a
artificial little bubble around it, tighten it down and say what
you've done is essentially bad. We are going to take that away.
Rather than raising up the developing world to the level of
freedom that Americans are living in, we're talking about
can we reduce American freedom to the level of basically a
primitive village, a 15 minute bubble that involves bicycles
and a little swipe card electric scooters that they can turn off
remotely anytime they want? And some of you guys are using
those things. And, you know, I've seen people
go to the airport. I was in Spokane, WA.
I watched a guy like travel on the highway, one of those silly
little scooters he was doing, you know, 18 miles an hour with
a backpack going to go fly off somewhere, some hippie kid.
That's fine. You want to be a hippie kid and
do that. But I've got kids.
I'm not trying to put a bunch of kids on a scooter like we're
living in Thailand and do a rickshaw, you know, trip and see
how many people we can fit on some small moped.
This is a country that doesn't need to do that.
We don't need to do that. What we need to do is allow
human ingenuity to be unleashed and move forward and so we can
continue to have more freedom, more experience of higher levels
of, of life on the planet for everybody.
If that's what we do. That's what America has been
really good at is exporting freedom.
And the capitalist sort of a machine that has been unleashed
has brought more capabilities like 3D printed hearing aids,
the places that have never been there before because all of our
basic needs are met. And people have the leisure and
the ability and the mental capacity to look beyond their
basic subsistence level piece and say, what is there out there
in the cosmos in the, you know, the experience of humanity that
I can bring up rather than how do I limit myself and go
downward? And that is essentially what
these things are about. And why would anybody want to go
downward? It doesn't seem like the Bill
Gates is of the world are giving up their private planes.
It doesn't seem like the John Kerry's the plastic faced guy
who looks like he should have been a John Kerry's face looks
like it should have been one of the masks from point break.
I don't know if anybody else sees that, but it's it's one of
these ideas that it's like, why in the world would you listen to
somebody who doesn't take their own advice?
There's no other place where you would do that.
And the fact that some of the leftists are willing to take
their, you know, their betters advice, that's a fundamentally
UN American idea too. Nobody wants to hear that.
Nobody wants you to limit what we're up to, what we're doing.
It's like going. To the doctor, it's like going
to a doctor that's overweight and unhealthy and then giving
you health advice. How frequent is that, though,
people? I mean, think about that.
Think about going into an ER, The number of ER nurses that
I've met that are overweight because the life that they're
living that is not healthy and they're how they're trying to
bring you back. It's the saddest thing you could
ever see. And if you actually look at a
lot of the ER doctors will be really, really fit.
They have a pretty good balance of like going out there and
making sure they work out and take care of themselves.
Because nobody wants to see a waddling Dr. coming up and
telling you like you're going to watch your cholesterol.
I'm like, dude, I could bench press you and you're huge.
So I don't want to hear that it you're.
Exactly right. Why do you think there's so
many? Why do you think there's so many
overweight nurses? I feel like that's like the
number one overweight profession.
Every nurse I meet is overweight.
It's because they're, well, it's, it's 2 terms.
It starts off they're young and they're fit and they're doing
their, their job. And then they basically spend
too much time at the job. This is something I saw all the
time. Break rooms are filled with
garbage food, easily consumable processed foods are the number
one thing that are being eaten. Like people are doing
microwavable, you know, noodles or they're, they're doing, you
know, Ho Hos and cupcakes or Donuts or whatever other crap
food is out there. So it's high sugar, it's high
demand because they are burning through calories by being on
their feet all day. And so they just grab whatever's
nearest and they get back to work it.
It comes from a pretty natural place.
If you sat down and had nurses, like required to take one hour
breaks where they could sit and eat prods like food that they
made themselves be a different animal.
But most of them are working 12 hour shifts.
So they're home for a couple hours.
They're slammed together, whatever they have into a lunch
box that's, you know, in a package or they're buying
something out of a vending machine in our cafeteria.
And none of that stuff is particularly good.
Our hospitals have some of the worst foods in the world.
If the WF really cared about like making things better,
they'd be working on making cafeteria food better and more
natural instead of more processed.
But that's not what we're doing. That's not what we're talking
about here. We're talking about basically
hiding this, this Trojan horse. The the outside of it looks
really good. It's a 3D printed earpieces and
it's helping people deal with, you know, antibiotic infections
and so on and how they're going to and move medicine forward.
And on the inside of that, the little nugget that they're
trying to get you is slavery to an idea that is essentially
climate paganism. It is worship of the planet
without an understanding. Nowhere in here do I see
anything about how we could increase the capabilities of
moving the message of faith or how people's moral actions could
be better. They don't talk about any of
this stuff. It's all about curtailing your
behavior and your consumption. Like I think ultimately the idea
of materialism doesn't really match with a lot of people's
idea of what's good. It's just going to show us weird
foods. There's your cafeteria foods.
It's actually almost always high sugar.
Think about how they give things like jello and other like really
quick processed sugary foods. They'll give an even to people
who are cancer patients. It's one of the things that
drives my buddies who are health nuts and, and nutrition types,
which drives them absolutely insane when they go into a
hospital and see a sick person and they are basically feeding
the disease by the food that is available to them, which is
really sad stuff. I want to kind of pivot over,
I'm going to show this is how the mainstream media covers our
type of, you know, take on this. There's a whole video about
this. This is a British television.
They wanted to let us know that what I'm telling you right now
is of course a conspiracy theory.
You'll queue up video #4 we can run that right now, homes.
The reality here in Oxford is distinctly different.
The conspiracy has conflated 2 plans, 1 long term intention to
spread facilities among neighborhoods, and one traffic
restriction trial due to be brought in next year, which we
use cameras and a permit system to track car journeys among
certain roads across the city and potentially fine people if
they use them too often. There are of course legitimate
questions as to how these schemes are implemented.
This is a traffic filter. And there will be 6 more of
these rolled out around the city.
Businesses, for example, reliant on drive through trade.
It's very much a message to visitors and shoppers.
You know people visiting our hotels and restaurants, you know
that Oxford is not accessible and you you have to stay out of.
Oxford. Oxford has included multiple
exemptions from the scheme, including for businesses, carers
and blue badge holders. Visitors will of course be able
to travel by other means, including public transport or
drive around the Ring Rd. to avoid the filters.
All right, that's good right there.
Criticism has also been levelled at the way the proposals have
been communicated. So if you guys saw they were
talking about what they call traffic filters, that looks
suspiciously like surveillance tools to me.
That looks like what it looks like in Beijing.
By the way, they have cameras everywhere pointed in all
directions, observing all the things, driver's license plates,
all the deals. And of course, there's always
exceptions. If you can afford it, if you're
a business, they're going to give you an exemption.
Isn't that the whole point of what they're trying to cut down?
They're trying to cut down. They're going to cut down the
customers, but not the actual business.
So they're they're they're paying some homage to the people
that are actually paying all the taxes, but they're not going to
let the customers come in unless they come in on buses and they
come in a way that's regulated. That's really interesting.
So if you notice, this woman is a science correspondent.
She's not an expert on anything. But she's going to just
basically say there are some concerns, but we're going to
just kind of brush over them and we're going to act like they're
not a big deal. And the woman who was actually
voicing those concerns was a representative of the businesses
in Oxford. This is not the Oxford being one
of the cities that is looking at this sort of this growth rate,
the c40.org plan. So you know what they're trying
to do. And then the other one was blue
badge holders. Did you notice that too?
They slipped it in their blue badge holders.
And then they go on. And when you can always avoid
the area until you can't, until the area gets so big that
there's no choice that you're stuck.
Basically, if you want to go places, you're going to have to
go and play by the rules. And that's always the way this
stuff works. The blue badge holders piece was
my favorite because that means you can basically buy your way
out of this. If you have enough money, you
can create the virtue. And this is something the United
States has made fun of at least since the like the late 60s.
There's these these billboards that used to be put up.
I saw it in an art appreciation class when I was a teenager.
And it said like, money creates taste.
You know, it's the idea that if you have enough wealth, you can
dictate what is the proper morality, the idea that if you
have enough to spend, then you can offset your vadnais with
your goodness. And that is the fundamental.
I mean, this is going back to the romance era.
This goes back a long, long ways.
This talks about how there is this sort of like white man's
burden, if you guys have ever heard that term.
This goes like this is long going back to the European
requirement for them to go and civilize parts of Africa and
other parts of the developing world.
The idea was is that they are given so much that they have
this noblesse oblige. They must go and help these
people that don't know any better, and they can do it with
a blue badge. In this case, they can.
It's the same concept that's been around for hundreds of
years. They're going to offset the evil
of them driving around in their, in their Lamborghini with a blue
badge, which means they've paid enough to justify that
privilege. And of course, people who have
that privilege, they can afford to have that privilege.
That's why it's just really interesting.
I'm going to bring up, we've got it on here, green aircraft.
So topic #5 this is actually another piece coming out of WEF.
Topic number 5 was it's, it's like if you go and you find all
the little pills that they put in here, it's the poison pill
that's built in, surrounded by it.
It says what is sustainability in aircraft aviation fuel and a
wire only .1% of flights powered by it.
And the answer is essentially it's not particularly effective.
It costs more to make and so they're going to basically not
use something that the market doesn't justify when you try to
push a technology that is not available for consumption.
There was actually a Ford guy, I didn't bring up the article, but
there was a guy who was a developer for Ford.
He was either a high level marketing exec or maybe he was
an engineering dude. He comes forward and he was
like, oh, I tried to take this road trip in our new Ford
Lightning EV, the electric vehicle and sitting around and
charging the thing forever. It, it wasn't particularly
effective. Ryan, were you the one telling
me that somebody had to sit for like 45 minutes trying to charge
up their their vehicle when they were trying to move on this
little road trip? Was that a conversation?
You and I, yeah, it was the yeah, it was the electric
Hummer. And the guy was sitting at like
he was trying to get off a Turnpike or whatever and it ran
out. One of the guys had he had a
generator in the back of his truck.
So he was stopped at the Turnpike.
Like, you know, you get off the Expressway and he must like ran
out of power. So we had the electric generator
in the back of his truck bed pulled over on the side of the
road charging his car with a gas powered generator.
And then another guy was the with the Hummer, I forget.
He drove like 300 miles and he was sitting for 45 minutes.
He had charged his his car halfway and he had spent like 76
dollars or something crazy. So it's more than it would have
spent to fill up a take of gas and he had to sit there for 45
minutes and you know, they had half a charge.
It's, it's the fundamental idea that you're going to basically
try to force innovation faster than it has been demanded by the
market. And then the science is actually
justifying, you know, there's a lot of pollution that happens by
building the batteries that go in the EV is there's, it's not
sustainable or reasonable for most people.
And even when the early Priuses were coming out, they were
talking about these things. Folks, you may remember this,
but one of the things that was really amusing about the Prius
is it was like, oh, it's going to change our lives.
It's this like hybrid electric thing and it's full of batteries
in the back and it's going to, you know, revolutionize the way
that we use fuel and everything else.
Well, most cars that are that are hybrids, these and or the
fully electric vehicles have something like a 90,000 or a
95,000 mile lifespan and that's way lower than most American
vehicles. In fact, I was doing some
research the other day on diesels because Ryan and I were
talking about whether it made sense to go and buy an older
diesel that they couldn't short circuit and, and cut out with
hacking. And one of the reasons why you
would do that is because the diesel engine runs between
400,000 and 1,000,000 miles. Just the way it's designed.
You pay a little bit more upfront, but then it lasts
forever and you don't have to actually go and replace your
vehicle. Gasoline powered vehicles in
America go anywhere from like 150,000 to 250,000 miles and
people get more out of them with good maintenance.
But that's kind of kind of like the the average spot, but the EV
basically tops out. It tops out at 90,000.
Like by the time it's ready to offset its carbon footprint from
making the battery and deal, you know, mining the cobalt and all
the other ugly processes that have to happen to create that
vehicle, you're tossing in the trash heap, it's going to get
scrapped and you're going to have to go buy another vehicle.
So it actually is, it's just, it's a facade, it's made-up.
It's, it's this poisonous. Hey, go ahead.
I found this video. Can I play it real quick?
It's only 40 seconds. Yeah, do it.
This is why. You don't buy the Hummer's the
problem. The charge stations are the
problem. I have no idea.
Fairly easy. We just increased our range to
98 miles after waiting around for 45 minutes.
But the real question, how much did it cost?
I am actually in shock right now.
I sat here for 41 minutes, it cost me $19.80 and we added an
additional 64 miles for $20. We'll sign up for that.
Expensive to charge an EV Plus we had to sit here for 41
minutes. It's a scam.
The whole thing is a scam. I am on.
I hate TikTok. I hate everything about TikTok.
People, if you're watching TikTok, shame on you.
But it it is, it's the reaction guy.
I could do with the guy's video because that was a value.
The guy underneath it that's pointing to it and yelling words
like facts without adding any value like pass, hard pass, not
interested. But it is one of the ways that
we find some of this information out.
And it's like, I don't want to go buy an electric Hummer.
If you guys want to go do it, please share your comments
below. You can DM me as well.
We'll bring you on the show and you can talk about how much you
love driving around in an electric vehicle that cost you
20 bucks to charge up and get another 60 miles of range.
It's, it's fully silly, but it's part of the virtue.
And if you can afford it, I guess so be it.
The best is when you're talking about putting a generator in the
back because a generator of a gas or a diesel generator that
you're carrying a small one, probably the least efficient way
to generate electricity. It's one of those things you use
that there's a reason why we're not all powering our houses that
way and there's not, you know, gas lines running to us.
The reason is, is because it inefficiently generates it, but
it's better than nothing. So you're going to go out there
have the most amount of emissions generated, the least
efficient way of using refined petrol chemicals to create
electricity to run your gas or your your electric powered
vehicle that you already spent a bunch of money on had the same
or better or more expensive transportation cost has all
these like, you know, housing requirements can, can blow up if
it gets too cold or if it gets water on it or if you get
flooded. It's just it's really amazing
that they're trying to pitch this and that you're somehow a
bad person if you've chosen not to do that.
I want like a 70s powered muscle car.
And there's there's the one that's sitting on the side of
the road. So if you're not watching the
rumble channel, you're missing. There's a dude with his
generator sitting in the back charging up his like Ford
lightning EV. He literally has, he's got his
generator plugged in to the the power cord right there and the
generator is sitting in the bed of the pickup truck.
There's just nothing sillier. It's the least efficient way of
doing it, but so be it. That's the way it goes.
I'm breaking things up a little bit differently.
So we want to say thanks. Right now we're going to kind of
break over to one of our sponsors, say thanks to a
Catholic vote. These are my friends over at
Catholic Vote. I see a lot of new faces in the
chat. So if you are new to the chat
and you have not seen or signed up for the loop, this is an
opportunity you can go over to catholicvote.org.
They sponsor our channel. They allow this thing to to
continue and give us the the funds to be able to keep
offering you a higher and higher level content product.
So sign up for the loop cost you nothing.
It's totally free. This is just a information, a
information distribution platform.
And the Loop has things like today, it says Trump's not going
to attend the debates. I think that's worth reading
about. Torrential rains hitting the
southwest from Tropical Storm Hillary, formerly known as
Hurricane Hillary, which may or may not have gotten rid of
30,000 emails in California. Nobody knows.
There's a judge blocking a child protection law, which is to say
they federal judge has temporarily blocked a new state
law banning medical providers from doing a trans surgeries on
kids. Think that's worth reading about
as well. California professor saying that
the new this is when it comes they always end up getting their
own. 6 California professors are suing the state over their
requirements for diversity, equity, inclusion, and
accessibility. I didn't know they've added a
letter but of course these acronyms always grow.
So a little bit about that and the fact that they think they
are unconstitutional under the 1st and the 4th 13th Amendment.
Couple other things. Conservative groups suing the
Biden administration. This is something we're going to
talk about in just a moment. So this is a good little pivot.
This is that that that system where we know that the the DOJ
is really interested in what Americans are about.
But a really great e-mail. Check them out.
Like I said, catholicvote.org, if you punch them in, just put
in your e-mail address and your zip code and they will give you
some timely information early in the morning getting you started
off. I know a lot of you have found
value in it and I've heard from you saying as much.
So thanks to Catholic vote. All right, so actually let's
pull something up. We are living in the bizarro
world and there's two little sort of related topics.
If you bring up topic number six for me, Ryan, this is going to
pivot away from the sustainability, the nonsense we
and this was most of the show obviously, because it's the
weirdest thing going on. But here's a here's a little
piece of the two tiered piece of justice.
So there's a Plainsfield woman who's charged with threatening
to shoot former President Trump and son Baron.
Now, you're going to be shocked to hear this because this is the
same exact threat that went down with the guy in Utah.
And what was the response to this particular woman?
I'll wait. She's not dead.
She was arrested. She was interviewed by the
Secret Service. Interviewed, not arrested in a
pre dawn raid, but interviewed. Knock on the door.
Hey, are you this lady? Hey, are these your mean tweets?
Are you the one that said you want to slam a bolt in the back
of the head of a young boy who's at a private school?
Are you the one who emailed this headmistress and said that you
wanted to go after this kid and his dad who's the former
president? Secret Service went and did the
interview like they do. And she's alive and well and
she'll face her charges the way it's supposed to be done.
You guys can already tell that this is not the same tier of
justice and so why would that be?
Why would we have a Justice Department that's going out and
doing something differently because the Justice Department
is not interested in handling this.
By the way, Secret Service answers to DHS, totally
different department, not answerable to Merrick Garland.
So what are the people that are answering to Merrick Garland
doing pull up topic #7 I'm sorry, not topic number seven.
Topic number. What is it, 8?
I think it's topic #8 there it is.
Virginia school district upholds the parental rights on trans
issues. So why in the world would the
Biden DOJ get involved? This is coming from Tyler
O'Neill at the Daily Signal. Highly recommend you reading
Daily Signal. They've got some really good
stuff. What they've got here is a story
about how the Justice Department has decided to intervene in a
Virginia school district adoption of Glenn Younkin's
policies. He's the governor of Virginia.
You'll remember these schools are funded by the state.
They don't need the federal government coming in and telling
them what to do. But in your classic federal
government overreach, in the the pretty typical movement, what we
see is the Justice Department seems to suggest that protecting
the constitutional rights of parents and students will lead
to hate crimes. This is what the America's first
legal advisor, Ian Pryor says when he was interviewed.
He says once again we're witnessing the top law
enforcement agency in America come unglued from reality and
unmoored from its core function, all in the name of opposing
anyone that doesn't approve its state approved messaging.
This is 100% correct. This is what is going on.
What you have is the Justice Department acting.
When we talk about weaponization.
It's not just using them to come after political opponents.
It's also lawfare. It's coming after people that
don't agree. They don't agree with your non
trans agenda that you're not sensitive enough to accommodate
.01% of the population in schools.
Although it continues to grow because the mental illness that
we are pushing by teachers, and in the meantime, the while
you're trying to figure out what you're going to do without them,
the Justice Department's going to come in and fight you.
They're going to come in and file federal lawsuits with
infinite money. So now we are pitting a state
with a lot of money against the federal resources, which is
basically infinite because they can keep printing the money.
This is, this is a lose, lose for the people who are
interested in seeing a Justice Department go after, you know, I
don't know, bad guys, kind of crazy people.
If we pull up topic #9 maybe the Justice Department could be
involved in handling the migrant crisis we have.
And the fact that we have migrants up in SUNY Buffalo,
that's the State University of New York system.
So that's a statewide. We talked about how they were
flooding over the streets. There were 90,000 plus living on
the streets in New York City. They got to go somewhere.
And so one of the opportunities that popped up was for them to
go and be housed in dormitories at SUNY Buffalo.
Well, that seems fine, except that parents are a little bit
worried about having unvetted completely uncleared military
age male migrants with a history of living in countries that were
violent, being trafficked across multiple borders, who already
have a history of breaking our US laws, going and living in the
dormitories with like, you know, if their baby girl who's 19
years old and going to college, that seems perfectly reasonable.
And why wouldn't they? Because if you see what happens,
we're going to scroll a little bit further down the story.
I'm going to read you the part that is the most interesting.
So give me one minute minute here.
We'll pull it up. I'm going to get my mouse.
Where's my mouse? There it is.
If we read the reason why these parents were outraged is because
just down the road, just down the road, had a highly alerting
interaction. It didn't stop this guy whose
name is Doctor Myron Glick. He is the founder of Jericho
Rhodes, which is a health, health Community Center and a
migrant shelter, He said We're living in a community where
there's prejudice. And the decision to boot all the
migrants out was made really, in my opinion, based on prejudice.
The decision came because parents were worried after they
were two sexual assaults 15 minutes down the road from
Buffalo in a town that's called Cheeka Waga.
There's some really fun names in New York, by the way, Cheeka
Waga. There was a there were two
different migrants accused of sexually assaulting people.
One was a mother who was raped in front of her three-year old
girl, a migrant from Venezuela. And another was a a guy that had
been involved in a sexual assault from the Democratic
Republic of Congo. So you have a Congolese
individual and a Venezuelan individual, both men, obviously
biological men that are charged with rape and sexual abuse,
unlawful imprisonment. One of a a mother in front of a
three-year old girl. The other one in front of a 27
year old woman who was working at a community agency to provide
services to yeah, that's right, migrants.
So it show their how grateful they were these two migrants who
have been, you know, they're illegal aliens that have come
into this country and been released under the Biden
administration. They are going and raping poor
women that are trying to help them out.
And for that reason, parents, rightly so, at SUNY New York or
SUNY Buffalo rather, are asking for these migrants not to live
in the dormitories with their children.
It seems like a pretty reasonable piece.
The fact that that is even controversial a little bit and
then someone wants to call that bigoted.
This is all about a virtue signal, has nothing to do with
what is reality. And it's the same way that we
see this sort of WEF kind of piece.
It is bigoted for you to have a high production, to live at a
higher standard than people in the third world, even though I
assure you the people in the third world would love to trade
places with you. They are not trying to reduce
their carbon footprint. They are trying to increase it
so they can live at a first world level.
That is the goal. That is the goal when you live
in less things. Think about anything along those
lines and you'll know. But this is a long history.
We actually talked, pulled a little video clip.
I've been trying to share with you guys some of my fun watching
the little house series with my kids.
And there is a a long history of the government not really being
interested in what's best for you.
We're going to play this little clip here.
I'll talk over in a second. It's a lot of quietness.
If you're not watching the Rumble channel, go watch this
little piece. It's I, I chopped out a lot of
the silence of it. But if you'll queue up video
clip number six, I think this will give you guys a good taste.
This is not a new idea. And what you're seeing are
soldiers riding up on horses. These are Union soldiers or
American, you know, military forces.
They're talking to Paul, handing him some written stuff.
I'm going to talk over as much as I have to, all right?
And I chopped out a lot of silence and sort of head
ringing, you know, head down. There's Ma.
She looks concerned. We have to get out.
What? Kansas Tribe petition
Washington, we have to get out. I don't understand.
The government drew a new line and we're on the wrong side, so
we have to go. Those blasted politicians in
Washington, it just said Hola, Kansas wasn't open up.
We never would have settled here.
And I'm leaving this on so you can see they pan over.
Obviously this is an idealized version of what's going on.
But look at that log cabin. Look at the the amount of time
it would take to build that thing with your bare hands and
then. You see, don't have any choice,
right? So heavy is red.
They have to leave the plow behind, right?
Pick up and go. All right, That's good enough,
Ryan. So, you know, just the concept
that political lines were drawn and they were telling you
whether you were good or bad or whether you were on the right
side of it or the wrong side of it.
This is not a new concept. This is not a new idea.
And the reason I bring that up is because we're about to deal
with yet another line that's going to be drawn.
It's going to be drawn in a, in a virtual way.
It's not going to be drawn in the same way that they did and
said, you know, how that Kansas is no longer open.
This is, this is a line about COVID-19.
And if you'll bring up that Breitbart article, which is
topic #10 Ryan, we're going to talk about this real quickly.
The Biden administration is now urging all Americans to go get a
coronavirus booster shot. I know many of you will not be
willing to comply with that. There's Joe Biden, there.
Is that even Joe Biden? Is that even the same Joe Biden
everyone keeps sending me these videos.
Joe Biden doesn't look like Joe Biden from the old days.
The ears, the face, the way that he talks, pretty weird.
Some of the same speech patterns.
But maybe that's not Joe Biden. I don't know.
The administration is urging Americans to go get this.
This is again, reporting by Breitbart says all Americans
will be urged by the Biden administration to get a
coronavirus booster this autumn ahead of what it claims will be
a new wave of infections. How do it know, as my
father-in-law used to say, how do it know Moderna and the other
coronavirus vaccines like Novax and Pfizer?
The German department of Biotech SE have all reportedly created
new versions of their shot and they are aimed at the XBB dot
1.5 sub variant. Are you guys scared of XBB 1.5
yet? Why not?
There's Doctor Fauci saying that we are going to have to all get
booster shots every year. That goes back to a tweet from
April of 2021. This is an interesting article
in so much as it just tells us it is coming down the pipe.
And of course, at the same time they are pushing RSV, which is
respiratory syncytial virus. They're shooting these shots for
little kids in the infants. They're saying you can go get
them and they will protect you from that absolutely minuscule
percentage of children that are affected by it.
I'm sure it's very real for those who are.
But there have always been some risk to being alive in this
world. And one of them is that that
there are diseases and there are good medicines and then there
are things that are being rushed and put on us.
And I cannot imagine that they've had 10 years to trust
this new booster shot. If you guys want to go get a
booster, knock yourself, outlet me, know how it goes.
Keep us updated. We're all very interested.
I know many of you are not interested in complying and they
are going to try to restrict you.
So again, like I said before, set your face like Flint, set
your feet firmly in the earth and be prepared to hold that
line. You get a second shot at this.
Not very many people do. Many of you held it the first
time. For those of you who did not and
feel like, hey, I think I gave up some ground, you can claw
your way back up and you can hold it right now.
That is your only option if you want to stay free.
It's a it's a dangerous world of that.
So before we before we shut it down, we want to say thanks to
our last sponsor. We do want to really appreciate
you guys. But before we do, let's say
thanks to Patriot coolers. I think we got a fun promo to
run. Ryan, you got some fun video of
you running around in the desert.
Let's get it here in Lagula, Texas.
Out here tracking illegal aliens that are crossing the border
behind us. Is the Rio Grande over there?
It's 105° out sweating my ass off.
Couldn't be hotter honestly. Backpack, gear, you name it.
The only way I'm staying hydrated is thanks to Kyle
Serafin and Patriot coolers. These 32 ounce American Pride
Patriot Tumblr has kept my drinks ice cold this entire
trip. You won't find a better guy or a
better company that supports American Patriot, that supports
our values, that's willing to go above and beyond to make sure
that the brave men and women, the whistleblowers that are
coming forward have a source of income.
They donate to veterans. They do it all.
They sponsor the Kyle Serafin podcast, and that's a company
that I want to be around. That's a company I want to
support. Visit patriotcoolers.com/kyle
Serafin and get 10% off the latest Patriot coolers,
tumblers, coolers, probably got some sweet merch, coffee mugs,
coffee cups, you name it. Grab yourself some, grab your
friends and family some. Support the show.
My name's Ryan Mehta. Catch you guys the next one.
I had the edited one. I forgot to play the edited 1.
Man, I want you to I want you to do all my voice overs your your
enthusiasm is very high. Here's my Patriot tumble right
here. It's sitting with me, folks.
You can go to patriotcoolers.com.
Use promo code Kyle. Kyle, you can click the link
that's in the show notes. That's below us.
It'll automatically populate that.
But check them out. And here is a here's a little
look at their their hard sided roto molded coolers, outstanding
products. Like I said, there's a lot of
benefits to being able to keep your ice.
One of the things is you don't need to generator per SE, it'll
just keep ice cold. That's just what it's designed
to do. It's a thermal insulator with a
high R factor. So check those out.
They say Patriot right on them. I like that bottle of whiskey on
there too. It made me, I think watching
this image a couple times inspired me to go out and buy a
bottle of whiskey, which I now have sitting on my countertop.
So, you know, don't let it lead you to more drinking.
I think my wife just sent me a whole thing about how alcohol is
is poison and we shouldn't be doing it, which she's probably
right. That being said, I think that's
enough for today, folks. You've been listening to the
Kyle Seraphin Show, which is streamed live at 9:30 Eastern
Time or 8:30 here in Central Texas in Texas America time.
We stream it from Liberty Hill. We want to thank all of you for
listening. I've seen a whole bunch of new
faces out there. I cannot call them all out.
We saw a new monthly subscriber jumped in to the channel to
support us. We do really appreciate that.
If you're on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin and you want to hit the
subscribe button, you can do that.
I think it's about a $5 subscription a month, just a
voluntary thing. You jump in and shows you that
you're supporting the channel. I believe we get at least 90% of
that. So we're very grateful for you
guys jumping in and supporting it.
It it keeps our cost down, helps us do more interesting stuff.
We've been talking about some additional content that we're
going to try to provide as well. In fact, we might even be live
streaming some of these things on the channel with what's going
on with the Trump arraignment. And we've got a, a traveling
correspondent who wants to go and stream to us.
So we'll keep it. We'll keep that going.
We want to read one of our five star reviews.
You guys are leaving those on Apple.
We are well over 660 right now. I think we're like 665.
Keep leaving them. Really appreciate it.
I will get to reading them as we go.
Today's is from Logan plant life.
Logan, are you one of the WF types?
Are you out there? Says Educational.
Kyle's episode on bumper sticker politics is excellent.
I learned a lot from every podcast, but this one was full
of great information. How sad that I have a Master's
degree in education, but The Federalist Papers were never
part of my required reading at any level of my education.
I am searching those out. Thank you for informing all of
us. Prayers to you, your family and
the birth of your newest addition prayer emoji.
We love it. Logan, thank you so much for the
prayers. We do appreciate that.
I know my wife appreciates it too.
We are still over the drop zone. Right now we are T -, 0 seconds
to drop. So any moment you will be seeing
some some canned content from us on the Kyle Seraphin show.
We are ready for the baby. Whenever, whenever Madeline
wants to show up, then she can do that and we are looking
forward to it. Folks, follow Ryan Matta at Ryan
Matta media. That's MATTA.
There he is. He's been producing the show.
We're really grateful for all of his great work.
He does an outstanding job, as you all recognize and has
stepped up the level of this podcast well beyond its weight,
well beyond the size of this channel.
I think it is a a highly professional operation, mostly
because of what Ryan's been bringing to the table.
So we do appreciate it. Don't forget to like this video
on the way out. If you hit the thumbs up down
there on the Rumble channel, it will turn green.
That lets you know and you can leave us a comment anything you
like and let us know. Dumb asks.
Mask Holes, what do you like? Go to the Twitter channel at
Kyle Serafin. There is, there is the result so
far, As you can see by a long margin right now, Mask Holes is
winning. Maybe it's because I placed it
up at the top. Anyway, folks, we look forward
to seeing you again tomorrow. Subscribe anywhere you like.
Oh, there we have one more thing, didn't we?
Topic #11 I forgot to show this. I want to let you guys know, the
audio downloads are still off the chain.
We just casually passed 3/4 of a million downloads on the audio
channel. So if you're not, but we're.
Going to give Chuck. Oh, he's back.
If you guys are not feeling the love on the audio channel, we
have just casually passed 750,000 downloads lifetime for
audio channel, most of which were this year minus about 6000
of them. So we are well over 750,000.
So we really appreciate all of you who are listening on Apple,
on Spotify, on iTunes, on iHeartRadio and so on.
If you want to take the Kyle Serfon show with you, you can do
it there. And we do have some love for
you. So we're just letting you know
I'm still tracking all those things.
We're getting more and more downloads there.
Feel free to share that with your friends.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, thanks so much.
We will see you again tomorrow. Have a great Tuesday.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin Show, streamed live
weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, True Social and Instagram at Kyle
Serafin.