Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower in
American Patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this programme has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Saraf. Hello my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Today is Monday, It is December 4th, and I'm in kind of an
adventure mood. It was the first Sunday of
Advent. We like the purple candle.
And so I don't know today I I got into this idea that we were
going to talk about something that's kind of strange a little
bit, a little bit out of the news, but it is always news,
particularly in this time of year.
And the question is this, how does the Motion Picture
Association of America and men adopting and and creating in
vitro babies, how are they related?
That was something that's come up.
My wife and I had this interesting discussion in the
kitchen yesterday and that is the the genesis of today's show,
which might get us cancelled from everyone except the
sponsors that we have picked up. I think many of you will
appreciate that there might be a little bit risk of of talking
about this kind of stuff, which is pretty sad even on rumble.
So we'll find out. We're going to test the limits
of what their free speech platform has to say about it.
But essentially my my argument is this, the MPAA, which dates
back to 1922, when that was created and when it was
eventually adopted into widespread use in 1968, they
they came up with a rating system that would help parents
decide what was appropriate to show their children.
The fact that we did that then told us that we focused on
children as the end goal, that children were the end result.
And today we are completely upside down where adults are the
focus and what is best for adults is the reason why people
do things. And that that flip in our
cultural values has resulted in an objectively worse scenario
for children, whether it be child trafficking at the border
or whether it be the exploitation of the unborn, our
focus on abortion in this culture.
So this is a cultural show today.
It's going to be a little bit spicy and I think you guys will
really appreciate it or you will never watch the show again and
that is OK too. If you are watching anywhere
other than rumble.com/kyle Serafin, you are missing out on
the live chat. I scrolled up and read something
and then as I looked over, I noticed that I had paused the
chat for a few seconds and there were over 99 chat comments that
were sitting in there. So it's just flying through.
If you're not joining us on rumble.com/kyle Sarah and you
are missing out on an outstanding community of people
that will be discussing both the show and whatever else you guys
get into today, I'm going to give you some things to think
about, so I appreciate all of you being there.
If you're there, go ahead and hit the like button.
Make sure you move this up on the leaderboard.
Let them know that you would enjoy this content if you do.
If you don't, then you can give us a dislike too.
I guess there's a couple of feds that always want to do that.
So without too much further ado, I want to say thanks to our
sponsor that allows us to do things like this that bring us
programming unafraid and willing to push through in this time of
year. catholicvote.org. Go to catholicvote.org.
We will do some over the next couple of days.
We're going to be starting to highlight all of those, those
Catholic heroes of the year that Catholic vote is called out of,
which I am in one of the brackets.
That is a Sweet 16 style thing. We'll show you those again,
we're going to do kind of a little profile on each one of
them. I want you guys to know who's in
the running, mostly because there are some fantastic people
that are being highlighted by catholicvote.org.
Again, you can go through and get the loop every single day,
which you should. They've covered some of these
stories. You can even see as Ryan is
scrolling on there talking about a pro-life clinic, check them
out and you can also give to them on the top right hand side
of the website the little green button there.
It is the only one that's highlighted.
You can either do a monthly or one time donation if you want to
support Catholic vote. You don't have to be Catholic,
you're not making a donation to a church.
This is an organisation of laypeople, which is to say non
ordained, non clerical. They are not part of the
Catholic clergy, they are simply Catholic people that want better
things in this world and they are in the fight for faith,
family and freedom. All things that are very
important to me as a lay Catholic person, someone who
goes to that church. But I'm not affiliated with the
Catholic Church in any way. Many of you guys know that.
All right, so, so let's get right into it.
First of all, there's this ongoing sort of meme culture on
the web. It's all over the place on
Twitter, It's on other social medias like Instagram and so on.
And everybody always asks, how did you get radicalised.
Now we've taken that. Those of us that are in this,
whether you're a radical traditional Catholic, whether
you're a militia violent extremist according to the FBI,
because you have a Betsy Ross flag on the wall like we do,
whether you just love America and the way that America used to
be. The idea is, is that somehow
because you like things the way they were 20305080 years ago,
maybe all of human history until just a few minutes ago, that
you're somehow a radical. And so I think the political
right has sort of adopted that amusing sort of idea that you're
a radical now because you like things the way they were and the
way that they always have been. And I found this in my feed.
I think I'll share it with you. You guys remember that ultimate
radical Mr Mr. Rogers? He's a pretty radical guy.
He radicalised a lot of us. This is a fun little meme video.
If you guys are not watching this, what you're missing is the
question is who radicalised you? It's that sort of NPC, the non
player character. It's a greyed out sort of
generic leftist asking the classic Nordic man, the guy with
the blonde beard and the and the hair and and this is the
response, Ryan, if you want to play, that's going to be video
#2. Let's run this thing real quick.
And so is my boys are boys. From the beginning.
If you were born a boy, you stay a boy.
Girls are girls right from the start.
If you were born a girl, you stay a girl and grow up to be a
lady. Everybody's fancy.
Everybody's fine. Your body's fancy, and so is
mine. Only girls can be the mommies.
Only boys can be the daddies. Yes, Sir.
Everybody's fancy. Everybody's fine.
Your body's fancy and so. And so is mine.
There it is. Everybody's fancy and
everybody's fine. It's just simple stuff.
It's basic biology. We didn't need to get so
complicated. We didn't need to try to pretend
like we were gods, but that is what human beings do.
In many ways, this is a modern day sort of parable.
It's the story of the Tower of Babel.
When man tries to to reach the peaks that God exists in, then
you get to experience sort of the humility of being a human at
a much lower level. That's kind of what I think is
going on here. Let's start right into the
history lesson. Let's just talk about the MP AA.
I don't know why this was the thing that I was inspired to to
bring up when I was talking to my wife.
We were talking about gay men either creating or adopting
children. And this is where my mind went.
So go ahead and pull up that first topic there, Ryan.
We're going to get into it. This is just Wikipedia.
There's nothing crazy about this, folks.
These are the ratings. Now.
Many of you guys are familiar with them, and I think that over
the years we've actually gotten really bad about keeping them.
They're not what they used to be.
They have actually moved a lot and they have allowed many more
things under G and PG and PG13 than used to be allowed.
But that's OK. The generally speaking G was
supposed to be for all ages that there and this is literally
listed all ages admitted nothing would offend parents for viewing
by children. That means that there actually
is a code. There actually used to be a
code. It goes back pre 1968 was called
the Hays code of what you may show and what you were advised
not to show. And that's the way this was
originally set up. And the reason that the MPAA
came up with a Hayes code and eventually came up with the MPAA
guidelines was that they were under threat of censorship by
the federal government. Said, if you're going to show
smut, if you're going to show things without any warnings,
then we're going to start censoring you.
And the folks in Hollywood said, well, we'd rather do it
ourselves. We would rather take it on the
burden and we would rather create an objective standard so
as not to have children in and and to add moral depravity into
the visual. You know sort of learning
centres of these little human sponges that we call children.
And so we will give them an objective rating of what's out
there and then from there parents will make the decision
and and and that allows you to go in and you can actually take
the PG rating says that parental guidance is suggested.
It's not required. PG13 says that you should be
checking out and then R actually says restricted unless you bring
your parent. Now you can be one of those
parents who brings your young child to the Terminator or
Aliens. Like my wife tells me she saw at
a very young age on their TV. She came in and you know they
sat her down and she watched the scariest movies that ever
existed in the 80s and the 90s and you're allowed to do that.
But that's the parents choice. That's the idea is that the the
parent would be in powered with this information.
PG was supposed to be the guidance was encouraged.
They were supposed to be some stuff that may not be
appropriate for young children. We sort of just now.
I think if you guys think the way I do that G and PG and even
PG13 is like whatever can my 5 year old watch PG13 probably
shouldn't, it's probably not great.
Then again, many of your households, we've sort of
slipped in some of our standards as the way that we talk and the
way that things are because of the Internet and the speed at
which communication happens. I think kids grow up faster
because of we let them grow up faster.
All that being said, PG was something that meant something
PG13 and then are. But the things that I'm most
interested in are the the more explicit stuff, which anybody
who knows, having lived in the 90s, the early 2000s, and now,
if you're at least 25 or 30 years old, and especially those
of us who are older than that, you can look into the way that
the society has changed. We've changed dramatically in
what we're willing to tolerate and what is actually considered
decent in in open society. And so there used to be a rating
that was called X. You remember X.
That was the thing that if you were a young boy in your teens
that you were trying to figure out if you could get an X rated
movie. I remember going to a house
party when I was in high school and they played I think Debbie
Does Dallas or something, which was horrible.
It was a horrible movie. It was, it was grainy and
difficult to watch. And I don't remember there being
a plot. I just remember being in the
background and thinking like what a what a, just an
indication of depravity that this house party was playing
this and they used to have that X rating And then it turns out
that the MPA actually created something was called NC 17.
Some of you will remember that switch over.
It actually happened in 1990. I didn't know it at the time
that it switched over, but I knew that they were somehow, you
know, the same but they were distinctly different.
And the reason was essentially that the MPA did not have a
trademark or a copyright on the X rating.
The pornographic industry took that over.
And so they became, you know, how do we brand it in our own
way. And they came up with a brand of
NC 17 which was that no child admitted under the age of 17.
That was a hard restriction. You couldn't get in parent or
otherwise. So there there were these
standards that existed and they exist less and less.
I was watching a a film of you know show is called I think the
Justice League pets. Somebody will correct me in the
chat. Maybe there was this it's got
the rock in it. I think it sounds like Chris
Kevin Hart maybe was in there was a number of different sort
of big name film actors that had done this.
Batman and Superman and all these other Aquaman and stuff
like that. And what was her name?
The lady with the lasso. What's the lady with the lasso?
I cannot think of her. Wonder Woman, Wonder Woman,
there you go. And so all the superheroes and
they end up with these pets and it's like how do they get these
pets? They got these pets because of
super dogs. Got dog named Crypto, which is
right up your alley, right? I know you're a crypto guy.
This was actually about the planet Krypton.
But in any case, all these these these super pets, whatever, one
of them was a turtle and the turtle would keep swearing,
which was really, really bizarre for a PG13.
Now, even bleeping out the swear word, I would think would be
kind of a movement in the standards we're seeing them move
objectively. The the, the, the turtle would
say I can't see, hold on. I wonder if I have this swearing
here. Do we have it?
I think I've got it right here. It says that, you know, I can't
see and you say it over. It doesn't matter.
I still can't see. And so we even know what the
bleep is supposed to be. Even kids know in context what
that is supposed to be, that there's a swear word there, and
even that might be over and it actually was showing on the
subtitles that it was bleeped out.
All that's being said is there's this erosion of standards and
we're we're more and more OK with sort of using children in
the culture war. We're using children as not the
goal of protection, but we're using them in a way that they
are actually an accessory. They're just they're sort of in
the way, they're a tool that is being used either by the
political left, the political right, and and they're being
manipulated in a way that I think is really disgusting and
dangerous. I'm gonna show you something.
My wife slipped under the door. This is bizarre and this is
going to get where we're going here.
This is a magazine that we get at our house for kids.
It's called High Five. You guys may have seen this
before. If you have little kids, you
probably seen it. It's done by Highlights.
It's a kids magazine and this is one of those things that when
you see it, you can't Unsee it. As parents, we're always on the
lookout for things that are inappropriate for our kids, even
in childhood magazines. Look at this.
It's a story under fiction. It's an easy reader for young
kids to learn how to read. One sock, two socks.
It's a story about missing socks.
And if you look on the wall where the where the dad is
sitting there with his two little kids and they're, you
know, decidedly, you know, darker skinned parents, there's
two dads sitting in A-frame photograph right up here.
OK, let's see if we can get this thing to focus.
Yeah, we can see it. Like, why?
Why would we need this? And how does that even, How did
that become a thing where a child's magazine, like High Five
and Highlights would show that, you know, this is the same thing
as putting something like that, like Ranger Rick, which I
remember reading when I was a little kid.
It's like they're trying to reinforce their own bad
behaviour and that they've made really bad decisions.
So they need to soften the blow so the kids don't get picked on
because of their bad decision making.
We're not, we're not in a place where the kid is the focus.
The focus is what the kid brings to the adult.
And I I was able to just type in a couple of different search
terms And we came up with this article, which goes back to
1999, now 24, almost 25 years ago.
And I'm going to just kind of walk you guys through a little
bit of a weird history here before we pull that up.
And. And.
And you were correct pulling that up, Ryan, that's my fault.
Let me let me pull up something that made me realise that this
was connected. If you'll pull up the article
from Collider, this is a woman named Lisa Lehman, November 3rd
of 2023. This was very current.
What I typed in was MPAA. And then I said something to the
effect of, you know, get rid of it or or delete or it's
obsolete. And what I got was, of course,
collider.com with this Lisa Lehman character says it's time
to put the MPAA rating system out of its misery.
It's an outdated dinosaur for eras.
It's time that we put it out to pasture.
And you guys are never going to believe why that would be.
It's not appropriate to have the MPAA rating system, which was
designed to protect children, because in July of 2023 this
year, Ira Sachs put out a film called Passages which has two
extended sequences depicting explicit onscreen sex between
two men, which got it in NC 17 MPAA rating.
And that rating means that most theatres won't carry it and many
stores won't carry physical copies of it on their shelves.
Oh, you mean like police state? That's interesting in it.
In essence, the NC 17 rating is a death sentence for many
movies. This is her writing here, hence
why it's so avoided by features. And what her argument is, is
that that this film is too taboo because it shows 2 explicit gay
scenes of two men having gay sex.
And that means that it's really, really bad for queer people,
that it's created a problem and a burden on people who are queer
or queer lined or whatever the heck that means, she said.
There's the fact that queerness and female sexual pleasures also
something that irks the MPA board and it inspires movies to
get MC 17. So anything that has this, it,
it turns out it's actually just inappropriate sexual explicit
material. There's a there's a number of,
let's say this article is actually worth your time, folks,
if you actually, maybe we'll put it out there, maybe I'll get out
there because it's actually really good.
It says it's an obvious example of discrimination against queer
people and women, making the MPAA ratings board a worrisome
creation. It's a worrisome action.
It's bigoted, it's homophobic and therefore it should go.
It completely ignores the entire reason why that thing exists.
So let's go back to 1999 here. Before we dig into that topic,
let's do one more of our sponsors.
Let's talk about someone who has been with us and probably
probably will not cancel is based on this sort of thing.
Our friends over at Patriot Coolers got one set on the desk
right now. I've got it filled with
stickers. My wife hates that I do this,
but I put on some stickers from the Gargoyle Sweatshop.
If you guys haven't seen these, the last line stuff sack the
upside down American flag. They're all out there, including
one that I don't actually always get, but it is a the Joker
Patriot coolers.com. Use promo code.
Kyle get you 10% off. They are a fantastic company.
We use them for my daughter's birthday.
We used our our big cooler right there, the 50 quart, took it
out, filled it full of ice. It works just like any other
rotomolded cooler, except it says Patriot on the side instead
of Yeti or Lifetime or something like that.
And they support the Kyle Serafin show and they support
military veterans. They've got values that are more
aligned with what you are most interested in.
Good company, great tool. I'll tell you this too.
The feet, the rubber stoppers on the feet, on those things.
I've got a Yeti as well and I've been able to move that thing
around on on picnic tables and stuff.
I actually thought that I had this thing weighing down way
harder than it actually was when I tried to pick it up because I
was dragging it laterally and it wouldn't move.
I mean the the feet gripped into the the picnic table.
We had it on so well that it wouldn't actually allow it to
even come up until I lifted it straight up first to be able to
break that sort of attention. Really nice if you want
something to stay put and be sturdy and stable and it is very
well designed. So check out Patriot
coolers.com. Use that promo code.
Kyle will get you those 10% off free shipping over 50 bucks.
That's going to be on all the different, all the different
cooler products makes a great Christmas present.
This is the season for that sort of thing.
If you guys are, and it'll last you for a very long time.
The really nice thing is to all of their hardware.
It's easily replaceable. You can actually buy replacement
hardware should you wear out the things like the rubber.
They may not wear out for a very long time, I imagine, just based
on the the, the durability of the product in general.
But you can always replace them, which is kind of nice.
It's thoughtful. You have to go replace
everything because something like a hinge died out on you.
And if you've ever dealt with that on like a cheaper Coleman
or something like that, you know I'm talking about.
All right, 1999 The Guardian. I found this article very
interesting. Gay couple pays for surrogate
moms. Twins.
It was the only option left, they say, braving criticism from
adoption workers and family campaigners.
So the interesting thing here are several fold #1.
They're braving criticism, which means that the Guardian is
already supporting this particular type of behaviour.
It says The gay couple expecting twins by an American surrogate
yesterday brushed aside criticisms of their decision to
pay a family, to pay to create a family.
Here's part one These families always either have a lot of
money or a lot of resources. This particular group, these two
men, a person named Barry and a person named Tony Barlow and
DeWitt, they they spent £200,000 to bypass British laws.
Notice this also. They're bypassing the British
laws and where do they go? They go to a third world nation.
They go to the United States in order to do that.
We're going to find that there's examples of this happening in
other places as well over time. There are a millionaire gay
couple who've been together for 11 years and they live in a
Grecian bungalow. They provided sperm to,
fertilise 4 different donor eggs to each, and then had them
implanted in a woman named Rosalyn Bellamy, who was a
married mother of with four sons.
The twins are already named, even though this was in
September and the babies weren't due until December.
Aspen and Saffron. They were born in California,
where the couple also have a home and then they will be
brought to Britain after the year.
The Searcy deal, which was revealed in Women's Own Weekly,
talk about that Women's own magazine.
It's like literally the opposite of what women are doing.
There's so many spaces that women have basically cut out
their own value for this sort of agenda.
It drew criticism from adoption workers and so on and so forth.
There's a whole British agency on adoption and fostering saying
that there was a considerable evidence that single people and
same gender relationships may be able to make really good
families. And so why don't we try it out?
However, this is the real key that doesn't get talked about
nearly enough, and we've sort of just bypassed this as part of
the argument. Removing a child from the mother
can have a great impact because there is a unique bond that is
formed between them. Anyone who has a child and is a
father, any mother, knows that there is a difference between
moms and dads. There's always been a difference
between moms and dads, and it's an important difference.
I made a a show a couple weeks back that got a comment from my
own father. And I said something to the
effect of is like, I'm, I'm a pretty good dad, but I'm a
terrible mother. And he kind of bristled at that.
And he said, you know when my when your mom wasn't around that
I was able to maintain the household and everything ran the
same way. We had all the same things
happening. I say that there's a lot more
chaos when I'm running around and every dad is going to be
able to execute household chores at a different level.
Some of them are better than others.
Some of them are going to be more on track.
Some of them know the schedule better.
I know when my kids go and take naps, but I don't necessarily
know what they always have for lunch because I may be working
or I'm not around Anyway, Long and short of it is, we all have
sort of different degrees of it. But I will.
I will stand on my statement that the greatest dad in the
world is also a terrible mom. Because mothers are different.
Because mothers have a different skill set.
They have a different set of just physiologically they're
different. Even an infant knows the
difference between laying on her mother or his mother's chest and
and fathers, it's different. It feels different regardless of
what Pete Buttigieg and and Chastain buddies want you to
believe. There is a massive difference
and the babies know it. And all of this stuff kind of
leads me to this sort of disgusting thing that we've left
out, that it's not about the people.
Every single thing in this article is talking about whether
or not these gay men can get Aspen and Sage.
Is that what the names are? That's really obnoxious too,
isn't it? Aspen and saffron.
Sorry. Yeah, they really need to get
these babies home so that they can live their best life.
And it's about what that child is going to bring to the adult
and very little about what the adults are bringing to the
child's life. It says you have got some people
here from a right wing family group called Family Focus says
that they have no right to be parents.
Biologically, that's true. Historically, that's always been
the case. There was no way for that to
happen. There's more and more evidence
that homosexual parenting can have a negative impact on
children. This is going back 1999.
You can actually say those things back then.
And they made the claim that this is a human right for a
child to be brought up by a male and a female.
But the couple is purchasing and deliberately orphaning the child
from their mother. I have not heard that term
before, orphaning a child from their mother.
Isn't that something we should be thinking about?
Isn't it about what the children are about?
Isn't that the reason why we used to have ratings and why
they want to get rid of it? Because they've moved the focus.
They've completely moved the focus away.
Now go for 10 years. We're going to start with a
video that happens 10 years later.
Now between 1999 and 2010, a a tectonic shift happened in the
world, especially Western society.
And this has moved from being a novel idea where people could
criticise it in a meaningful way to where it's celebrated in
open. And we're going to play this
video real quick. This is video #1.
Ryan, let's go and play this. I'm going to cut it off at some
point. Works.
I don't know how long we're gonna run it, but I want you to
get to see just how this story is covered.
Then we'll go ahead and read some articles about it as well
from the Daily Mirror. So let's go and do video #1.
Me to Adam Miller and and Kyle Bond known each other seven
years, been going out together how long And just over 2 years.
And he had a civil partnership earlier earlier this year.
Yeah, right. So now you want to start the
family, but the way the way you do is gonna, you know, there's
an element of controversy in a civil partnership at the best of
times. But you you really seem to be
trying to to push the push the envelope as far as controversies
concern. Tell us what you're going to do,
what you're planning to do. Well, basically we've decided,
you know, we've been together awhile now we've just, you know,
become recently married and we've just decided that it's
time that we start a family. You know, we can provide a good
upbringing for a child and as much love as a strike, but you
don't want, you don't want any old baby.
Though I know we don't do anything by half, so some people
would maybe suggest adopting or fostering, but actually you're
taking this one step further. So we did look into fostering
and we've always wanted our biological children and we've
always wanted them to look like us.
So we looked like a a proper family.
So what we've done is we're going to have a surrogate,
obviously to incubate our baby, so to speak, because obviously
we haven't got room or anything. And we're going to have a friend
of mine that's donating her eggs so she can give us some eggs to
use. And then basically we're gonna
have the baby made through IVF and there's a boy or girl.
OK for you. And well, we're picking a boy
first. But you can't do that, can you?
The you just you you get, you get what you are lucky enough to
get a boy or a girl. Why specify boy?
Well, that's the thing you see over in Los Angeles where we're
having the treatment done. We can actually pick the sex.
So we're going to select a boy first, then we're going to have
a girl after and then we're going to have to win.
And if you got you be telling me you want to just specific hair
colour, eye colour. Now, yeah, we're gonna go for a
baby boy and at the moment the names Preston, but that could
change so many times. But it's gonna have dark hair
and blue eyes and that is only, you know if that's happened,
what happens. It's not 100% guaranteed at all,
but that's that's what we would prefer because we want the
children to look like us, so we that we look like in complete
family. So, well, they'll be
biologically related to us and then they will look like us.
So we will look like a complete family and that's the sort of
thing we want to do. So a couple things that are
being said in the chat at this exact moment.
Number one, you guys also honed in on the fact that the baby
will be made and be incubated and this is not, this is not the
way that we talk about children. Also that we are going to
select, we're going to select the sex.
They're going to, they're going to go and have in vitro
fertilisation, they're going to fertilise the number of eggs
with their sperm and they're going to be able to create these
these embryos and then they're going to select based on sex,
which means that we're going to be casting some of them off.
That's also interesting. There's a there's a real dark
sort of cost to IVF and anybody who's gone and done any of the
looking on this, I think live action does really good and
Abolition Rising does a good talk on this as well.
What they're talking about has nothing to do with the child,
has nothing to do about about providing a wonderful home for a
child that needs it. They're going to create an
accessory, an accessory that looks and makes them look like a
proper family. Their words, not mine.
They want to select a boy first because that's what they're most
interested in. And I want you to think about
every time that you've ever had a conversation with your friends
and family who have children, especially a pregnant wife.
When that happens, the question is, do you want a boy or a girl?
And the correct answer, you know, I would prefer this.
I would prefer that our, our, our daughters have a brother.
I would prefer there's all kinds of little instincts on it.
But the end of the day, if you really had to nail down almost
any parent down, I've never heard anybody really say I'm
going to be disappointed if I have one of the other.
The answer is always, I want a healthy baby.
That's the correct answer. If you don't know what the
correct answer is and you have a pregnant spouse right now and
you guys haven't found out the sex of your baby, that's the
that's the correct answer. I want a healthy baby.
The end. That's what you should be aiming
for. That's what your hope is.
That's what your prayer is. And even if not, we had a very
interesting experience going through our OBGYN where they
were asking us about the, the prenatal screening.
They do, they do all these screenings that they can charge
you for. So they love the idea of it.
And they were asking my wife and she was like, you know, why is
it important? And they're like, well, you can
make a decision about the pregnancy if you find out that
the baby may have some defects. And she was like, what sort of
decisions? And they're really, really
hesitant to say, well, you could, you could, you could
terminate the pregnancy. She was like, you're asking me
if I'm going to select my child and if my child is not healthy,
then I'm going to have an abortion.
Is that what you're offering? And they're like, they're very
uncomfortable about it because they know how ridiculous that
sounds from 20 years ago. Today, it sounds normal to
people. But even 20 years ago, that
would have been absurd. And so I think we may have had
the screenings on our first daughter.
I don't, because we didn't know any better what was being
offered or why, and that didn't happen.
After that, we didn't do it again.
Because why? Well, what am I gonna do with
this information? Nothing.
We're going to have a baby and then we're going to love her or
him and take care of them. Now we have 4.
And the other thing is really interesting to show you a video
a little bit later on. I find that people who are
selecting and creating and making a by the way, this was
gonna cost them $100,000. You wanna go ahead and pull up
that article here from the Daily Mirror a gay couple to spend
$100,000 creating designer baby. OK, now when you're creating a
designer baby, it's not about you.
Imagine if you had to go out and buy a jacket and you were cold.
And you, any jacket would do. In fact, Ryan, you gotta, you
gotta, you have a sweatshirt on right now that I might, man, I
might show you. Yeah, show.
Show me. Show me what you got going on.
So there it is. You got it.
You. Express right here, so.
Ryan has a Sherpa hoodie on because it's cold.
He sits. He's working in the studio,
which is insulated less than it ought to be, and so he's got
this suspendable Sherpa that would you would any other
sweatshirt work if you recalled though Ryan?
Now, I didn't cut it, man. This was it.
I had to have this one. Ryan's only in designer babies.
The fact of the matter is if you're if you're going over
function, function is something that keeps you warm is good
enough. A baby is a baby.
Unless you want a designer baby. And this is a fame hungry couple
as described by the Daily Mirror, the now fame hungry
wannabe couple who appeared on Britain Britain's Got Talent.
They did a Britney Spears drag act.
Oh, it always comes back to this ohm.
Interesting. Why are the drag drag people
interested in babies? They had a civil ceremony in
July and then immediately recruited A surrogate mother.
The mother is a stunning female model pal who who's giving them
eggs in return only for a 2000 LB pair of shoes, some designer
shoes. The story of this is actually
like one of the most nauseating things you'll ever read and many
of you probably have not heard this.
And of course this is now 13 years old.
It says they went in through this selection process.
They also realised that sex selection wasn't illegal in
Britain, so they had to fly to a third world country and go to
Los Angeles in order to create this first child.
And like all designer trendies, they're very choosy.
They said they would also very choosy about whose egg they
would use. Obviously.
One woman said she would donate her eggs, but she wasn't
suitable. She had hardly any nice clothes
at all and that's just not what we want.
Another woman was so money grabbing.
She said she wanted a credit card from us with no limit, so
she could buy whatever she wanted every single month.
But we found our perfect model donor.
She's a friend, she's tall, she has dark hair, blue eyes.
She's intelligent and very beautiful and we were talking
about the baby one night and she just turned around and said go
on then you can have my eggs. And we were so happy and she
said she would donate again if we wanted to have more children.
And all she wants in return is a 2000 LB.
Chair pair of Christian Louboutin.
I have no idea what this brand is.
Shoes. Now the kid, the guy adds that
it'll cost them £100,000 from their savings and earnings, but
it means they can have our perfect baby and we want a boy
with dark hair and blue eyes, as you just heard.
And we've been assured that that's what we can create.
The way they do that is they create enough embryos and then
they throw out the ones they don't want.
That's how that works. That's the hidden cost.
They met us podium dancers. I don't know what the hell
podium dancer is, but I can imagine in Birmingham three
years ago and they've longed for a child really, really
nauseating. Also, I don't know if you want
to Scroll down, if you want to show the woman they allowed to
have the the surrogate. Also, kind of funny, there's a
surrogate named Jackie. You see that?
If you go about 3/4 the way down the article, you may be able to
find that on there. Long and short of it is these
people are interested in a custom accessory.
They're not interested in a baby for the sake of the baby because
they're trying to provide this thing.
They found this woman who's on board with it.
This woman looks exactly the opposite of what she would
expect. Keep going down.
There she is. That's their surrogate.
She's the opposite of what the mom is going to look like.
So that's even weirder. All of this stuff is truly
pretty just bizarre on every level, but it continues to go
because it's all about it's all about the person involved.
It's not about the babies. And so we have another example
of that coming from Huffington Post.
I felt this, this moves forward a couple years.
We're going through the timeline here, folks.
This is 2016. This article is from their blog
with tags under gay, lesbian and IVF in vitro fertilisation and
the blog post is entitled Lesbian Designer Babies.
No one has ever thought to control or limit the
heterosexual production of babies.
But suddenly when the LGBT couples by the way they didn't
have more acronyms back in 20/16/2017, our force are
attempting to build up a family then using medical methods.
Suddenly the procedures are strictly regulated due to
ethical concerns. Caitlin McGarry is the
contributor of This and economic Students at Wesleyan College and
a lesbian. Interestingly enough, what
Caitlin seems to not be paying attention to is that it has
nothing to do with whether or not it's the LGBT part of it,
the part that is the concern for most people.
The ethical concerns I would imagine is having babies raised
in a household with a biologically are impossible.
So here she is. She opens her article with an
inflammatory statement. I hope he'll be tall, blue eyes,
WAVY brown hair, and smart. He has to be smart.
You thought I was talking about my future husband?
I'm actually describing my ideal sperm donor vomit in my mouth.
As a gay woman who will likely use artificial insemination and
or in vitro fertilisation to start a family, this is the
thing that's so insane. Why?
What is the purpose of the family?
She says. I've watched the debates
regarding the ethics of designer babies over the last few years
with confusion and frustration. Everybody has an opinion on
whether it's morally permissible for parents to influence the
genes of their offspring. But very few of these voices
come from the LGBTQ parents, who are overwhelmingly the concern
of the consumers of artificial insemination and IVF
technologies. The media is especially harsh
when parents private decisions appear to enforce races or
ablist attitudes. That's even funnier to me when
the left eats their own on this kind of stuff.
They claim that white couples who only want white sperm donors
are racist, and that the parents who choose to fertilise embryos
with a lower chance of developing autism are ablist and
eugenics and prejudice and all this other kind of stuff.
Yes, of course all these things are kind of fun to watch them
eat their own on this. But the real reason comes down,
I think, to the fact that there actually were laws historically,
and they were they were cultural norms that were meant to protect
children. They were designed to protect
children. That the outcome was not about
whether or not the lesbian couple gets to live their best
life and have a designer baby or this gay couple can choose a
little boy or a little girl with blue eyes and dark hair.
You know you don't get to choose those sort of things in real
life, not when you just have a child.
We always laugh like one of my we have a a streak of of red
haired jeans in our family. I have an uncle with red hair
and and my children have come out with like kind of Auburn
looking hair and then they've changed.
They've gotten darker. But it's always really
interesting. We always laugh like it could
happen. You never know you just it would
look funny. Also my best friend is red
haired so that's also funny. He he kind of roots that on.
Very weird to think that you think that you should be able to
select your babies and that you would be able to basically
terminate an embryo based on the way that they are biologically
going to look. But it comes down to this
fundamentally evil premise that has nothing to do with the child
or their best existence or upbringing.
I want to bring up this NPR article from about the same year
2016 as well. Says a gay couple wins a case,
gains custody of baby born to tie surrogate again leaving,
leaving first world nations like Spain and going to 3rd world
places like Thailand or Los Angeles.
Is the way that this is done. You have to actually leave
places where they have a little shred of sanity and have a
little bit more of that western Christian idea that they're
supposed to be not terminating babies simply because of their
gender or their sex as they're born.
Says the next story is one that goes about the length that one
same sex couple has gone to have a family.
They hired a surrogate mother in Thailand who carried A donor egg
that was fertilised by one of the partners in that same sex
marriage. The child was born.
The mother claimed custody even though she said the baby should
not be raised with a gay couple. Oh, when the hold on when the
when the when the child was born, the woman who donated the
egg said that the baby should not be raised by a gay couple,
but she's not the biological mother.
Do you see the kind of ugly nastiness Discuss goes on.
So what they did is they just left the the man.
One of the men from the couple stayed in Thailand with the
surrogate because that's what's best, and hung out there with
this baby, baby Carmen and refused to come back to the UK
because the egg donor was filing a a custody claim on the child
saying that this is inappropriate, donated the egg,
maybe not knowing what couple was going to go to.
And then it got litigated in the Bangkok Family Court, which made
it somehow legal. And then they can bring the baby
back to the UK. Like, all this stuff is truly
crazy to most of us. We're going to get into IVF in
just a second, but I want to play this video because this
makes me want to puke The same sort of vibes that you saw, the
same sort of vibes that you saw from that British TV in 2010.
Here's one from this year, the same exact sort of mockery of
God as what Ryan just threw in the chat.
And that's exactly it. Look at this.
I want you to look at the eyes. If any of you have ever held
your your new baby, my, my, my daughter is just over like 12
weeks old. Now.
If my wife and I are talking about our baby, we're not
talking to each other. We're looking at the baby.
Why? Because that's what you do.
You look at babies, you you focus in.
That is the purpose. That is the focus of what you're
trying to do. You're trying to do things that
are for the child, and even if you're talking to someone else
in their presence, I often find myself simply looking directly
into my daughter's eyes. So watch what they are doing
when they talk about this. This is video #5.
This will probably make you guys want to puke in your mouth, but
let's roll this thing out there. Let's just see it.
You tell me what you think in the chat.
So this is how we chose our beautiful egg donut.
So we wanted her to have a lovely big eyes.
I wanted her to have really thick hair cause I've had two
hair transplants. I wanted her to have a really
wide, nice smile and just look like a kind person.
Yeah. And we wanted her to be creative
because we love the arts. Yeah.
So how it works is you join up with the egg donor agency and
you literally go through thousands.
That's what Stuart That's what I did.
I went through thousand, thousand, thousand.
I shortlisted them. Senator Francis.
Yeah, him decide. And then we had three or four in
front of me and then we have a diffusing calls with the ones
that we liked and then the first I'm gonna let us down few
minutes, so let us down yeah, humid.
And then by the 3rd we literally found her and I was like, oh
she's incredible. And when we got on the zoom call
we were like, we can't play it now, don't be too keen and
luckily she said yes and this is the result.
Look at our little accessory that we are choking out because
we don't care about. We don't know how to handle
babies because they have no idea, because it's just, it's
completely, it's completely foreign.
That's totally upside down. This is not about children.
It's not about children at all. Nothing about those two men
holding that baby led you to believe that it was about kids.
Look at the baby's eyes. The baby's just drifting off.
Like, what am I doing? How did I end up in this, this
hellish existence going to be pampered with a bunch of
designer things, have a bunch of looks based standards that are
not. They're not natural.
It's totally outside of the norms.
That's really gross to me and it makes me sad.
And so like I said, we talked about let's talk about IVF a
little bit. Let's first let's do a quick
thanks over to our friends over at 4 Patriots.
You want to prepare for the coming disaster, maybe the
biblical plague that is coming our way for all these sort of
rings with God. If you if you keep track of the
story of the Tower of Babel, it doesn't end real well for those
who are building it, and we are clearly building it right now.
You may need some survival stuff.
Go to fourpatriots.com/kyle, fourpatriots.com/kyle.
Find yourself some some water purification, some of your stuff
that you may be able to use dual purpose for both camping and RV
but also for survival. Should things go sideways, check
out the Survival food run. You want to click on the
Survival food pack. There it is.
Lots of different options there. You guys can go from 72 hour
survival packs. That's just for one person, or
you can go all the way up to the three month or the one year.
These things are designed to last 25 years.
As long as you keep them in the shade and don't put them in
direct heat, it tastes better than MRE.
Despite some of you weirdos who like them.
Yeah, there's a couple of you out there.
I know. I keep getting messages of
people like I don't know why people want to tell me that they
really love MRE's. I feel like that's a that's like
a character indictment. That's just something bad about
you. Or maybe it says that you've
been institutionalised. Check out some of these really
interesting products they've got on here.
They've got these flashlights that are solar powered stuff.
I'll tell you what, if you been in the dark and you've ever been
in power outage, if you live in a place where you might lose
power, having a backup option to be able to just see there's
nothing weirder than being in your house and then suddenly
realising that you have no ability, you're just going to
bump into your own stuff. You actually don't know your own
house as well as you think you do.
So anyway, go do 4 patriots com slash Kyle or just use the promo
code Kyle. If you go to the website, check
that out and get yourself prepared for forewarned.
Is forearmed and be prepared. You never know.
Somebody asked me if I know Dave Rubin.
No, I don't know Dave Rubin, but I do not support Dave Rubin
having babies. My wife and I have talked about
that quite a few times and it's pretty disgusting to me.
He may be a really nice man, but it's narcissism.
That's what that looks like to me.
It looks like narcissism. If you are getting a baby, it
has nothing to do with the baby. It has to do with you.
That's what you want. You've made a lifestyle choice.
The choice is that you have another partner and your partner
is a man. Two men cannot make a baby.
Mr Roger, can you play the Mr. Rogers one more time?
It's real quick. I just like that that video too.
Let's do one more. Mine boys are boys.
From the beginning. If you were born a boy, you stay
a boy. Girls are girls right from the
start. If you were born a girl, you
stay a girl and grow up to be a lady.
Everybody's fancy, Everybody's fine.
Your body's fancy and so is mine.
Only girls can be. Only girls can be a mommy.
I mean, look, you choose your partner.
You choose your outcome. It seems like it's It used to be
known for all of human history. You didn't get an error if you
were a man who was married to a man or had a man as a partner.
That's just the way it works. It's not that hard.
It's not that hard, folks. And yet we are now in an era
where let's pull up topic #7 here real quick.
If we'll get into the the IVF, this is the the Scientific
American. And so they they're sort of
trying to debunk some of the stuff, but at the same time,
they're also also talking about sort of the cost of what it
looks like says a new era of designer babies may be based on
overhyped science. Yeah, it's actually old science.
The science is trial and error. It's the equivalent of if you go
and have it, it's like the Henry the Eighth style.
Instead of instead of getting rid of each wife that provides
them with not a son, he gets rid of the baby too.
That's kind of the way it works. Genetic testing with IVF is
being marketed as a means to choose healthy embryos despite
questions about the soundness of the technology.
For better or worse, genetic testing of embryos offer a
potential gateway into the new era of human control over
reproduction. Couples at risk of having a
child with a severe or life limiting disease such as cystic
fibrosis or Deshane's muscular dystrophy have used pre
implantation genetic testing for decades to select embryos
created through IVF. There is an argument here that
is actually you look. The argument here is actually in
favour of the child's life and that there is at least a
discussion here that is reasonable.
The reasonable discussion is if you had a choice between
implanting an embryo that was going to to have a negative
outcome and a very difficult experience on the planet, then
you've got that. You've at least got a moral
foundation saying that you are looking to be what would be the
best for the child, not the parent per se.
The designer baby movement is like, how do we make this, this
child look nicest? OK, now they always try to couch
it, the likelihood of confronting common illnesses
like heart disease or diabetes or schizophrenia and so on.
And would you pass these things on Parents to be can use IVF
along with orchard this is a company that they're talking
about here. This this company called Orchard
Biosciences upcoming embryo screening packages to identify
the healthiest of their embryos and then only implant those for
pregnancy. Man.
You know, if you're trying to screen out for certain genetic
diseases, that's going to have a child that doesn't, that doesn't
live long. There's something there.
Ryan and I were talking about that offline and we can, but
there's also, if you want to, to screen based on whether or not
you are going to be having these problems, you can actually
screen a lot of these things before you marry somebody.
And people you see that that used to be the entire reason why
they did blood test. You guys know that they used to
do blood tests. They would say you go out there,
you go to the courthouse and you have to get a blood test.
And I think, I think my wife and I did a blood test.
They try to make sure that you are not immediate immediately
biologically related because once you are, we've determined
that you have basically narrowed the amount of the gene pool and
you increase the likelihood of certain rare recessive diseases.
If you have one, you're more likely to pass it along because
recessive recessive genes can only go that route.
So if you are more biologically related to your spouse, if you
are much closer related to them, then you you have that higher
instances of rare genetic disorders.
They've actually found this in the Brits.
The British population is this weird study because they brought
in all these different people, the Muslim majority countries,
and there tends to be a high incidence of inbreeding that
goes on in those populations and they account for like a third.
There's something like under 5% of the total population of
Britain. I remember reading the study I
think we've covered on the show before.
They're under 5% of the overall population of Great Britain, but
they account for like 33% or more of the rare genetic
disorder. So that was the goal.
The goal was, is you actually decide whether or not your
partner is biologically compatible.
And one of them was, is like, you can't be that closely
related. That's why you can't marry your
sister, your cousin. You're not supposed to.
I guess some people do. If you're like Angelina Jolie or
whatever her name is, but you're not supposed to, that's the
whole goal. And the and the reason is for
the children it's focused on. Those were laws that were put in
place specifically for children to make children have better
outcomes as the opposite of what we're talking about here.
In any case, what this article goes on to say is essentially
that this foundation is that they really can't do all these
things. So what they do is they just do
it the old fashioned way, which is you make a bunch of things,
you sort out the things you like and you just keep the ones that
are good. And that is essentially what
designer babies looks like. It means you are calling a soul
out of the void. If you're a Catholic or you're
even a most pro life Christians, you're going to believe that
life starts at conception, that the the soul is cold from the
void into existence put into this body and then you are going
to cast them aside or keep them in suspended animation forever.
You notice that one of these, this, this, the the couple will
talk about how the the female was going to give them multiple
eggs. They were going to have a boy
first, but then after that they would have a girl.
After that they would have a girl.
So they would have multiple, you know, babies.
And that baby would be able to be just sort of sitting in
suspended animation, conceived at the same time but waiting for
later. I've seen this with my own eyes.
I don't want to get into the personal experience because it's
not my story to tell, but there is a story in our family that is
actually really tragic about the same sort of thing.
And one of the two had a good outcome, and one of them has a
very bad outcome so far and is living a very difficult life
because the parent chose an accessory child and not a child
for the sake of the child. Which is why there's this weird
line we walk when you're a parent because having children
is one of the most selfish things you can do, but at the
same time, it's the most selfless thing you can do.
You've basically said, I think the world needs more me, right?
Right. You know, I'm talking about you
say the world needs more than me, and so you have children.
My wife and I made the decision about four, so the world needed
more of us. We thought that's kind of what
you do. But then you basically
sacrificed your life for the next 18 years, making sure that
those people are successful. It's a mix.
It's a real interesting dynamic that is very different than when
you choose a designer baby. And I think it's really
nauseating. Let's go bring up our our
fearless Mayor Pete Gay. Pete Buttigieg, Z and his family
says that his family deserves to be supported.
In response to the House Speaker's previous comment, this
was his claim that Mike Johnson, the new Speaker of the House,
here, is a real problem, and it's because he doesn't support
Pete Buttigieg's family. I I join Mike Johnson in this
particular situation. Here's what people just says on
CNN. I think we've actually even
played this clip here, but I'll just read it, he said.
I will admit it's a bit difficult driving the family
minivan to drop our kids off at daycare, passing the Dome of the
Capitol, knowing that the speaker of the House sitting
under that Dome doesn't even think our family ought to exist.
That is not, historically a strange position to hold
biologically and and historically, their family
shouldn't exist. Period.
No caveat. None at all.
Alright, but because we are living in a world where they are
going to celebrate 2 gay men having a child that they spend
$100,000 on, not only do they have to break the laws of their
country and leave their country in order to do so, it's like
baby tourism. You know, we we look really sort
of not very fondly on people that engage in what's called sex
tourism. They'll they'll leave the United
States and they'll go engage where prostitution is allowed
and they'll go and do that and they'll come back here.
It's not illegal. They've broken the law in some
other place and since they're not in the United States, not
breaking U.S. law. But it's not exactly like if
your friend tells you that he likes to go whoring in in
Thailand for one month out of every year, I don't know.
That's probably not someone that I'm going to be wanting to
associate with. I'm certainly not to let people
like that around my kids. It's the same kind of idea to me
that it it takes that sort of mentality for people in Britain
to be able to have a baby. They have to actually come to
the United States, where our standards are lower and do not
protect children in the same way.
Johnson, who secured the Speaker's gavel last month, this
is going back from the beginning of last month now.
This is a one month old article. So now, two months ago, has a
history of harsh anti-gay language from his time as an
attorney for a socially conservative legal group in the
mid 2000s, the mid 2000s. That would have been 5/06/07.
You know, right before they started pushing this agenda like
we saw in that 2010 little article.
It's just, it's very interesting to me how quickly that slippery
slope has slid. It really has gone very quickly,
hasn't it, From that point where people were talking about, hey,
are you really removing a baby from from his or her mother.
And you are now making that child an orphan in that way to
you're a bigot if you don't accept our family, which
biologically can't exist and require science and the casting
off of embryos left and right. I know this is sort of a heavy
topic to start on Monday on, so there's that.
But it's interesting, he said there's another editorial that
says your race, creed, sex are what you are and while
homosexuality are cross dressing are things that you do.
This is something that Mike Johnson said, I totally agree
with that. Look, you've made a certain
choices. You could choose to ignore that
particular impulse. I'm not saying you should if
you're gay. I think you should be gay if
that's what you are. Do what you do.
I don't need to judge you. I got enough sins of my own.
But I do know that you shouldn't be bringing babies in.
I know that's true, he said. This is a free country, but we
don't give special protections for every person's bizarre
choices, and they are statistically very, very rare,
all things considered, Overwhelmingly, this is not how
babies are made. In fact, even that 2016 article
from HuffPost acknowledges that the biggest consumers right now
of this particular technology are not are not heterosexual
couples. They're actually homosexual
couples that are stepping outside the bounds of what
happens in nature and they're doing it through science.
And I'm not confident it's very good.
Like I said, a modern day Tower of Babel in so many ways, let's
bring up the the inevitable consequence of where this goes,
because the inevitable consequence about this is that
it actually ends 2 bigotry in the opposite direction.
We've done a full swing from 1999 to 2023.
We bring up that topic from Catholic News Agency.
This story, which we we touched on briefly, was carried in the
loop. So if you're not getting the
loop, this is one of the things you're missing out on A story
that I think is of relevance. This is the story of Michael and
Catherine Burke. They live in Southampton, MA.
That's their mistake. They chose to live in a place
that is so overwhelmingly left wing that they were actually
denied approval to become foster parents.
They're not trying to create babies.
Their foster parents, they wanna be foster parents.
They wanna take kids who have no parents, or whose parents are
now in some sort of dire straits where they are no longer able to
provide to them, whether they be drug addicts or abuse or
whatever else. And the foster care authorities
denied this Catholic couple approval to become foster
parents simply because they hold true to the Catholic teaching on
marriage, on sex, on gender. And so now they filed a lawsuit.
He's an Iraq war veteran. He owns a small business.
He's an organist for the diocese, plays organ at church.
Catherine is a special education caregiver, a small business
owner, and she also sings for their diocese in in the
churches. She's a cancer at Masses and the
lawsuit which was filed basically said that they're
loving couple, they just want to welcome children to their home.
They've experienced infertility, They've applied to become foster
parents. They've gone through all the
lengthy interviews, 30 hours worth of training, home
assessment, health assessment, family life assessment.
However, they're troubled because many of their home
interview questions focus on their Catholic views about
sexual orientation and gender dysphoria, which is in fact
pretty rare. Statistically, whether you like
it or not, it's not the overwhelming average and is not
the most common thing. And after months of interviewing
and training and after years of heartbreak because they couldn't
become parents on their own, are on the verge of finally becoming
parents. They were absolutely devastated
to learn that the state of Massachusetts would rather let
children sleep in the hallways of a hospital than let them
welcome them into their home when they needed it.
And that was simply because the authorities stated that,
according to their interviews and based on what they learned,
that they would not be affirming to a child who identifies as
LGBTQ LGBTQIA man. We covered this about how the
government agencies are doing the same thing, but this is
where it ends. It ends with people who would
otherwise offer a good home who are only interested in this
case, or I would say, would our majority interested in offering.
They've gone through all these hoops.
Is it simply because Is it about money?
No, they're not. They don't seem to be
particularly wealthy. They're small business owners,
but the fact that they have traditional views about things
that have been basically held for all 10,000 years that human
beings been walking around on this planet, they're the problem
now. They're the outlier.
And that's the radical shift that we've seen.
It used to be about us protecting children.
And if you were interested in protecting children, what you
would do is you would actually only have children in homes that
affirm children's safety and their nutrition and that they
get hugs and they're cared for and they're looked after and
their education is continued. And not whether or not that we
affirm some sort of like fringe sexual identity that doesn't
even have any play that is still in NC 17 for them to be able to
carry out in real life. Because the kids that we're
talking about being adopted are gonna be all under the age of 18
cause they age out of the system at that point And that's
something, it's pretty crazy and it also leads to awful and
immoral positions like this one from video 4.
We're going to play this. If you guys don't know the
story, this is the kind of stuff that my wife and I are always
talking about in the background. These are the things that
outrage my wife and women like her, the women that kind of hang
out. We just did a birthday party for
our five year old. She's about to turn 5.
My middle, my middle daughter. And when women get together,
they talk about things like labour, pains and pregnancies
and how many children they have and raising children and the
functions of things that go along with that.
Men don't talk about that. That's not what men get around
and do not, in my experience at least.
And I've been around a lot of men for a long time and I was in
the military with a bunch of men.
That's not what we get around and talk about.
Women talk about things that are uniquely situated towards child
rearing when they are mothers and they talk about things like
this. That's why this is so
horrifying. This is the kind of stuff that
they share. They do #4 let's go and just run
it. It's a woman giving commentary.
You guys are not going to believe this.
Two men hired surrogate Brittany Pearson to have a baby for them.
And when she. Was 22 weeks pregnant.
They found out that she had breast cancer, so she wanted to
have chemotherapy immediately and offered to deliver the baby
at 25 weeks so that the baby would have a chance at survival
and she could also survive and have her chemotherapy treatment.
The couple did not want her to have the baby at 25 weeks, but
she needed her treatment so they told her to abort the baby.
She refused to abort a perfectly healthy maybe.
She offered to adopt the baby. They said no.
They threatened her with legal action, and so she had the baby
at 25 weeks. The couple then allowed the baby
to die without having any kind of medical services because they
didn't want a baby with any kind of health issues that was born
before 38 weeks. This is medical murder, and it's
legal in California. It's medical murder, California.
Like I said, Third World nation. That's where people go to do
their most absurd and disgusting things.
I don't need to add any commentary on what she said.
That's it. That's the story, is the story.
You guys probably already heard this thing.
If you're paying attention, if you have not, this is the kind
of stuff, like I said, my wife and I discussed on a regular
basis. These are the kind of things
that are out there and we're just bringing it in this show
because I think it makes sense. Should we leave with something a
little bit light hearted? I I get it.
That's heavy and and and appropriately so.
I just want to throw something kind of like some levity into it
over the Over the weekend, FBI jobs continue to put out their
absurdities, and our friend FBI Panty Raid made some fun
commentary on this. This video is also presented
with no commentary. Let's just play it because it's
fun. Video #3.
A little bit of lighter way to start off your week.
Just think, if you are physically or mentally disabled,
you could also be part of the elite workforce of the FBI.
Go ahead and fire it up, Video #3.
The FBI is looking for the best and brightest people, and with
more than 30,000 employees, not everyone is a special agent.
About 2/3 of those people are what are what are considered
professional support staff. So those are people that don't
carry guns, that don't carry badges.
That's my girl specialist who has a vision impairment and says
even if you have a disability, you can apply to work at the
FBI. Matter of fact, you know they
are encouraged to do so. And the fact that just because
you do have a disability doesn't mean that you can't do the job.
Garlic has worked at FBI headquarters and several field
offices and says reasonable accommodations are provided for
persons with disabilities. If you apply and you get the job
within the FBI, then the FBI will supply you with the tools
to do your job. Our jobs at the FBI for you go
to www.fbijobs.gov I'm Neil, chief of the Bureau, and that's
what's happening at the FBI this week.
That's what happened at the FBI this week.
All they're saying is that they comply with federal employment
law, which is a requirement. But what they will also not tell
you is that if you're a conservative, or if you happen
to vote for Trump or you think that he's the guy that is
actually incompatible with FBI service, many of you guys
already know that instinctively, that's just the way it works.
That's it for today, folks. We're going to wrap this thing
up with a couple of thank yous #1.
If you have not hit the like button on Rumble, this may be a
somewhat controversial topic. So go ahead and let them know
that you appreciated us sharing it.
Give us comments, grow if you agree, If you disagree, I went
through a sales training once. They said questions, comments,
sarcastic marks. Go ahead and leave those down in
the comments, not in the chat. We'll take them and maybe take a
look at them for tomorrow. Let's do some thank yous.
How about our five star reviews? If you guys are listening on
Apple, on Spotify, on iHeartRadio, you can leave us a
five star review for the audio podcast.
We appreciate when you do JB 7778, said good dude with
quality contact entertaining. Check.
Valuable content? Check.
Decent, honest person at the helm?
Check. Shaka sign.
Keep rolling. Serafin.
I will do it. Thanks JB.
Appreciate you guys. We're clearing.
We're coming up on 855 Star Review, so keep keep them.
Women, as we go towards the new year, we really appreciate.
You guys do. We may not hit 1000, but we do
appreciate all of that. And let's do some, some rumble
rants here from Jack Penis, says you.
Who else doesn't like MRE's? Gay dudes who designed babies?
Probably true. That's definitely true.
Justice is Blonde says. No Pete.
You don't deserve anything. You either earn it or it's given
to you by grace. You are owed nothing.
And peace, Sturgis, with the last minute comment saying I'm
grateful for all the work you do to keep us informed.
From now on, my rants will be in memory of my mom and dad.
Rest in peace, Bonnie and Paul. The facts that killed them.
Man, that's tough news. Yeah, well, rest in peace to
both of your parents. I'm sorry that they that your
family is going through that, especially at this time of year.
I feel like it's one of the time of year when when death is
particularly hard for us to to deal with.
So that being said, we're celebrating life in the life and
the birth of Christ and maybe the birth of babies.
So maybe this Advent, maybe as we are in the Christmas season,
we can remember that it was about the coming of God to man.
And most importantly, he came in the form of a child, a
defenceless child, because our society was literally built up
in, in the Christian tradition, in the Western tradition, to
defend and protect children. That's the message that I took
away from this sort of thing. That's what I thought about when
I was putting this together. I hope that means something to
you. We do appreciate all of you guys
and we really will look forward to seeing you again tomorrow.
Go out there in the world, Have a great day.
Be safe. God bless you all.
Talk to you in the morning. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter through
social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.