Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Hello, my friends.
Good morning and welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show.
Today is Monday. It is September the 15th,
halfway through this month, which has already been a year
long. Just a crazy last week or two,
and we're going to have to talk about a bunch of sort of nasty
topics. But I think that I had some
clarity over the weekend. I put the phone down, I put it
in the bag. I went to church.
Actually, my whole family has been kind of sick.
So I went to church by myself and I was able to do 2 things.
Number 1, I had my head on a swivel like many of you probably
do. I saw a couple things that made
me just hone in. It took me out of the moment.
There was a guy there dressed in all black who's wearing a
backpack. Maybe he had a Med kit or
something and he thought he was being helpful.
But when you wear a COVID mask in 2025, that's all black and
the black clothing in a black sling bag and all that stuff,
you're certainly going to get my attention.
So I ended up kind of focused on this guy.
But while I was sitting there listening to the sermon, which
actually was decidedly on topic, and that's not always the case.
If you guys go to Catholic Mass, a lot of times it feels like
you're getting canned garbage. And that was not the case.
This today, Chinese born priest. Just laying it out there that we
have a real difficult task of accepting the things in front of
us that children can be shot. How many people have already
forgotten that that happened in Minneapolis only two weeks ago,
that you can have political figures shot for having
discourse. And it occurred to me as I'm
sitting there listening that the answer you keep hearing the word
war and civil war, but I don't think that's really the concept
that Americans are getting towards.
And when I went home, I got a text message from a good friend
of mine who said for the first time in 20 years, he went to
church. And it occurred to me that we
are facing a moment of crusade, not of war to gain territory or
property, but a cultural crusade, which if we recall that
what the Crusades were about, at least nominally, right, They
were about political power and influence and the, and the, the
ability of the church to send men off to battle and all this
kind of thing that happened in Europe.
But it was an attempt to quote UN quote, reconquer the holy
lands and that there was a, a purpose that was believed, they
believed was ordained by God. And so it doesn't matter if you
use the word revival like I see folks in the chat using, or
whether you use the word holy war or whether you talk about
recapturing. The West needs to recapture its
moral high ground. And we've seeded it.
One of the things that my buddy and I were discussing over the
weekend came down to this huge shift in this country that in
the 60s and 70s, you could abandoned your children to
public schooling. Maybe they went to parochial
schools, maybe they went to a private school.
But odds are you could leave them in school for 8 hours a
day. And I don't think this was the
the norm, but you could have a mom that was self interested and
was interested in doing whatever her own things were.
And dad could spend 90% of his time on the road traveling for
work and the kids would still mostly come out OK.
Because we had an expectation that there was a common system
of values, that there was a common morality in the United
States, that Western values were pervasive.
And if you go back and look at the numbers by household, about
90% or more than 90% of households in 1970 USA were at
least nominally Christian. So they shared these values.
And if you look at the numbers today, it's about 60.
So when a third of the population has turned away from
you don't even have to say God, you simply have to say when a
third of the population has turned away from accepting a
common system of values and morality, then anything is fair
game. And it doesn't take a lot of the
population to be radicalized for us to really find ourselves in a
in a bad situation because most people tend to just listen and
and see what goes around and stay out of the fray.
Most of us are interested in trying to raise our own kids and
try to make a living and make sure that your household
functions. And we don't have the ability to
go out there and look at the broader culture and say, hey,
how do we recapture this damn thing that has gotten away from
us? So this concept of crusade and
maybe even today's thumbnail, I think it's required not just for
the, for the American experiment, which is, is
obviously on the rocks at this exact moment.
We, we feel it. There's a, there's a tide
turning and you can call it Charlie's crusade if you like,
but there's a Western crusade that has to happen where Western
civilization has ceded so much territory passively that there
is no other choice, that the action has to be revolutionary.
And so we're going to talk today about what happened in Utah a
little bit more. Also what it is unveiled about
the weakness of our federal law enforcement system.
It actually has brought out the worst in some some people that
we would otherwise like. It's also showed the weakness of
people that we don't necessarily like.
And then lastly, I think what it says about Europe because there
was a massive rally and the numbers are contested right now.
Another friend of mine, we're talking about whether or not it
was 100,000 people or a million plus people that gathered in
London, but there was a huge gathering in the UK to indicate
that there is a problem. And the fact that news media
even wants to contest the numbers and say that it was not
enough people or that the the numbers are falsified.
All of that leads me to believe that they are probably closer to
the million number or more than the 100,000 number that the left
wants to maintain. And they demonized Elon Musk for
speaking, even doing so remotely.
And so there's calls to censor him and to sanction him and to
bring financial free, you know, financial penalties against his
companies and so on. This is a, this is a really
global topic. If not global, it's at least a
like a hemisphere topic where those of us in the West really
need to take a moment and figure out what we're talking about.
So we're going to get into all that first.
This is just as good a time as any to remind you that this is
the National Preparedness Month. Our folks over at My Patriot
Supply have a deal going on right now.
If you want to see the deal, just simply go to
mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle. Again, mypatriotsupply.com/kyle.
You'll see all of the stuff on there.
There's a video on how to use the stuff, but it's a great time
to ask yourself what your preparedness level looks like.
Look, you cannot push back against things unless you know
that you're going to be safe and that your family has what they
need to move forward. Do you have enough food?
How long will it last you? If an emergency would happen
around you, Let's say there was civil unrest, what would you do
about it? What if the taps went went dry
and you no longer had clean water coming out of the faucet?
What do you do about that? What do you do about a storm
knocking out power or someone attacking the power grid, which
we keep being told white supremacists are going to do?
I think it's likely to be someone else.
If there's any room for improvement on your end, it's
worth looking at. I have most of these items right
now. We can all do better, but I'm
telling you that if you're not thinking about this, you are
well behind the curve. We already learned this in 2020.
So check out the folks over at My Patriot Supply.
Go look at mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle.
Right now they're offering a deal that includes $1500 in free
emergency food and preparedness free on top of this mega kit
that they've got going on. It's called the Preparedness
Month Mega kit. It's huge.
It's a ton of stuff. It's a it's a year of food.
It's got water filtration to purify, it's got solar backup
power, all kinds of things. Most of the stuff that we've out
picked up piece meal year you can do in one fell swoop.
So check them out again, mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle.
Get the full details. There is a link below in the
show description if you are watching or listening anywhere.
And let's get into today's program and try to get a little
bit. I think it might be a little bit
heavy, but I think it's worth talking about.
So we're going to, we're going to cover something first that
may not be the most obvious piece of this, but if you're
going to conquer and we're going to talk about crusades, if we're
going to talk about retaking territory and property, we're
going to talk about retaking the moral ground and the culture.
Let's talk about some of the people that have taken some of
that space up. And a lot of it comes down to
money and convenience. And it's always been this way.
Look at this. This is a story from CBS News
this Morning. Major US comedians are set to
perform in Saudi Arabia, and they're urged not to help cover
up for the, quote, UN quote, abuses of a repressive regime.
And yet there will be something called the Riyadh Comedy
Festival that is going to go between September 26th and
October 9th, just a few weeks away.
Some of the biggest names in American comedy have signed up
to perform at this festival in Saudi Arabia.
They're being urged by people on the left to speak out about the
country's human rights abuses. It's pretty interesting because
these same people will fall all over themselves to explain why
Muslims need to be in this country, why they need to come
from Muslim majority countries and bring their own values, and
why they don't need to assimilate into a predominantly
Christian country like America. Isn't it funny?
You should speak out about it over there if you go and visit
them on their territory, but not when you come here.
When you come here, you can just keep your culture, even if we
don't generally agree with it. Here in the West, Saudi Arabia
is going to host the Riyadh Comedy Festival.
Some of the biggest names in North American comic look like
they're going to be people like Dave Chappelle, Kevin Hart, Bill
Burr. I've got the lineup sitting
right here. Whitney Cummings.
Some of these folks I don't recognize.
Aziz Ansari is going to be there.
Gabrielle Iglesias on October the 1st Chris Tucker.
See who else we recognize. Jimmy Carr, Tom Segura,
Sebastian Maniscalco, Bill Burr, Andrew Schultz, Who else?
Animal Burress. They don't have them listed on
here. Oh, there you go.
Jim Jeffries, Jim Gaffigan, Louis CK, big names.
Pete Davidson, Tim Dillon supposed to be there as well.
There was a some pushback by folks about Tim Dillon going and
I got a, a message a couple of you sent me over or something
and said Tim Dillon's dropping the ultimate truth on what's
going on in Utah right now in this investigation, Huh.
Is that so he's dropping the ultimate truth.
How many of you guys know anything about these comedians
or the people that you watch in a podcast?
How many of you actually even look into their background?
And it's not taken away from some of the stuff because I've
played some of his clips here and some of the things he has to
say are very salient observations.
But it's quite interesting that moving to a comedian and
comedians tend to be very astute observers of the world.
Nobody, you know, nobody could say that I don't love stand up
comedy. And it's not a reference point
in most of my life. My wife and I used to sit and
watch stand up almost every night.
We'd go watch a different special.
But if your version of conservative news comes from a a
man who came out as gay at 25 years old, who's from New York,
who basically doesn't understand what conservatism is, 'cause
he's not conservative and he lived in New York and he lives
in Los Angeles and he also partly lived in Austin for a
little bit. It's pretty interesting that
that's the thing that that is slanted your views.
I think we're often willing to give credit to people who say
things that we like that we want to believe.
And I see a ton of that over the weekend.
It's the reason why I had to get off social media for the
weekend. I couldn't handle it anymore
because this, the confirmation bias of somebody said something
and I like what it is. Don't confuse me with the facts.
Simply let me reaffirm my own opinion.
And so you have folks out there that are making arguments that
are completely absurd, completely insane that members
of the security detail from Charlie Kirk's team, people who
are Christian apologists that have been his friend for
decades, people that have spent, you know, thousands of hours
around him, were the people responsible because they touched
their hats or they rub their nose from 1 angle and you think
that they were given signals to steal third base.
And these include people that I like saying just the most absurd
and dumb things. If you guys don't know who it is
you're listening to and if you don't know what position they're
in, this is really simple. I'm going to give it to you one
more time. When law enforcement looks at a
source of information, there's a couple things that they want to
evaluate. Is this person in the position?
Do they have placement enough to know what they're talking about
and do they have access to that information?
Access and placement are the things that we analyze.
Without those things, it's like, how do you know this?
Well, somebody told me who's the somebody?
Well, I can't really tell you. Done.
Not interested. We're in a place where people
are so quick to assume that because it agrees with my
underlying sentiment that I believe that there needs to be a
conspiracy, that I'm willing to connect dots that are so outside
of a linear path from this is what happened and This is why it
happened. There's very simple explanations
and then we cheer on when our preferred answer is announced.
Some people were cheering on the fact that it was unveiled over
the weekend that the shooters or the alleged shooters boyfriend
is transitioning to be a female, whatever the hell that's
supposed to mean. Again, insane.
The guy looks like a guy and he has like furry costumes and
stuff like that. There's such a quick rush to say
because all of these institutions have fundamentally
cut out their own credibility to me.
And that is the news media, that is our political structure, that
is our law enforcement agencies. They've all worked against their
owned their own credibility so now people just go meh, whatever
I want to believe is true and I'll justify it no matter how
many Froot Loops I have to go and swirl around to get there.
It's pretty wild. This is not a a troll, totally
unique time in American history, so it's worth knowing that there
is history behind this. It's a story on CBS as well from
a guy named Jon Meacham. He won a Pulitzer Prize talking
about the soul of America, the battle for our better angels.
Went on some of the weekend programs and was talking about
this, saying that this is his, his, his statement.
He said, I think we're in a dangerous place.
There's never been a Once Upon a time in American history and
you're never going to be happily ever after.
There are moments that you and I could agree that we'd like to
see replicated, and this obviously is not one of them.
Political violence erupts in America when there is an
existential question. Who is an American?
That's the existential question. This is the question that was
being asked and partially answered during the lead up to
the November election in 2024. Who deserves to be included in
we the people or all men are created equal, He said.
And when that's intention and we don't have common ground or
agreement, then we look at what happens historically and
violence erupts. And that's what we saw on
Wednesday. But that's what we saw a week
prior to that in Minneapolis as well.
Utah, Minneapolis. We've been seeing this happen
intermittently. It's what we saw in July of 2024
in Butler, PA. Who deserves to be an American?
What does an American mean? What does it mean to be there?
And historically, what it meant is that you actually assimilated
to this country. Remember, I grew up in the same
place that you guys did hearing about the words melting pot.
What we didn't hear is that it was the American Stew, right?
It was supposed to be. It was supposed to be more like
fondue, a bunch of chunks, different flavors of cheese,
different styles, different cultures that come together.
They meltdown. We keep whatever sort of stays
around. It adds a little bit of flavor
to the dish, but the dish fundamentally just takes you in
and is absorbing you. Not we chop up a bunch of
carrots and we throw a bunch of chunky things.
So now we have this, like, weird Muslim community in the middle
of Texas that wants to go after and use Sharia law, even though
it's antithetical to American liberty.
We don't do that. And less and less are we seeing
that homogeneity where we've just added you to the existing
flavor. What we're seeing now is we're
adding a new chunk to the pot. And if you do not assimilate,
and there's been many people that have made the same point
without assimilation, immigration is actually
invasion. And once something comes in and
sweeps in, and this happened, this happened historically
throughout different places in Europe.
And the pushback was in fact, things like crusades.
There were attempts to to regain footing, to recapture.
I think that's where we're at right now, where we have to
recapture. I'm going to give you an example
of what has been pushed in because the predominant culture
of America for most of American history, it has been less or
more Christian, but the values have been consistent.
Buddy and I are talking about whether or not America was a
truly religious nation at its founding.
And I think the answer is probably not, which is why many
of the people that are that are founders and and signed on to
the Constitution, signed on to the Declaration of Independence,
breaking away from England, they were deists.
They had the same basic values as you and I do today.
But what they didn't have was necessarily religious fervor,
which is what you're seeing spark up today when a friend of
mine who is exactly the kind of person you all, you all have a
friend like this. And maybe you are that friend in
your group. You're raised with a certain
faith tradition, get a little bit older, it's less important
to you. It's less interesting to you.
You've got other things to do. And so you go out there and
pursue that and you forget that there was a Sunday tradition,
that there was something that you did with your family.
And maybe you forget because it's not all that relevant.
I'll tell you a a good thing. When anybody goes to basic
training, and all of you military veterans know that what
I'm talking about, you go to basic training, the first thing
that you do is you decide which Sunday service you're going to
go to because it is a moment of peace in otherwise storm that is
disruptive to your life. It's the one continuity that you
can kind of hold onto and go like, OK, my whole life is
upside down. There are people screaming at me
all the time. They're telling me when to eat,
they're telling me when to sleep.
They're telling me when I can stand up or sit down or turn
around or which way to walk or which pivot I'm supposed to do,
what I'm supposed to carry, how I'm supposed to dress.
I get screamed at for having a button out of out of line or
that I've got a string on my on my uniform.
And the one moment of peace you would have would be to go back
to church. And most people can remember
that also touching back to a time when they were younger.
And they go, like, got it. OK, continuity.
We need that thread to hold onto.
If you're in the dark, if you're in a Blizzard.
How many of you have seen a movie where they show a Blizzard
from 200 years ago? And what did people do?
They ran a rope to the outhouse. They ran a rope to where the
cattle were. They put their hand on the rope.
That ends up being the thing we reach for when we realize that
we're completely in a place where we can't see what's going
on. And so you do it in the military
when you experience that chaos. Right now our nation is
experiencing chaos and upheaval. And I think more people are
going to reach down and find, I'm going to find that rope that
I had when I was a child, that continuity, that thread through
for the last, let's call it six weeks at the church that I've
been going to. And a big chunk of it is because
they have a, a school. So children have something to do
with this. And having children has
something to do with it. But we've had standing room only
in a church that people told me not ten years ago was dying and
dead, that the Catholic Church was over.
And many of you were finding that, yeah, you might have a
small gathering. How many of you have standing
room only in a room that holds 500 people?
And they've packed in another 100 up on the the choir loft,
and another 50 to 60 sitting in just the vestibule or in the the
narthex or the atrium, and another 40 or 50 sprung out
along the wings. If any of you are Catholic and
listen to this, you'll know exactly how weird this is.
Our priest on Sunday said that they are introducing a second
Mass that's going to run concurrent to the first Mass.
Mass starts at 9:30, the one that we've been going to at 940.
They're going to open up another Mass that will hold as many as
200 people in another room, and they had to get special
dispensation for that. They have so much overflow that
they're going to run a secondary Mass to be able to try to handle
the crowd. That's revival.
That is unprecedented. This is a pilot program they're
running to figure out what in the world they're going to need
to do. They need to add more to the
schedule. If you're going to a Church of
any kind, Christian denomination of whatever flavor, and it is
not saying things that are hard to understand and that will
result in people deliberately pushing back, then you might not
be hearing the right message. And I think that's what I keep
seeing when I go to churches that look like they're dead.
They are not preaching the actual gospel.
They are not preaching the difficulty of the path.
And when you hear people say, listen, no, no, no, no, it's
hard, but this is what we're going to do.
We're going to grab a hold of this lifeline and we're going to
walk into the unknown and the dangerous.
We're going to walk into the Blizzard.
We're going to get there because we have this guiding rope and
it's a straight line, but it's going to be awful all along the
way. When I hear those messages that
it was a hard path, that's when people start listening.
And I think people are realizing right now the soft and the
squishy, the the the same sort of thing that people were
rejecting in the late 90s and began to grab again in the early
2000s after 911 and lost their way again after 15 or 20 years.
This is the the, the constant story of God's church on earth,
but it's also the story of humanity.
It doesn't matter whether you're a faith person or not.
You could read the Bible as history and see that when, when
mankind and when civilization loses its way, it always gets
difficult and then they always have to turn back.
And this might be part of that course correction.
Again, a reconquering would be the way to look at it.
And what are we reconquering from?
We're reconquering from institutions that seem like they
do not care about facts or reality.
They are simply pushing forward ideology that has no basis
underneath it. I saw a debate with Ben Shapiro
or a little exchange between Ben Shapiro and Bill Maher.
Bill Maher being sort of your classic old school liberal, if
you will. We start seeing them as pretty
reasonable, even though we would have viciously pushed back
previously. And he's talking with Ben
Shapiro about morality and how the Bible is full of things that
are nonsensical and why I don't believe it.
And Ben Shapiro says we agree probably on 80% of what morality
looks like. Why is that you did not hit a
triple. You were born on third base if
you grew up in a Western culture.
And we've ceded that territory to people that say things like
this. And this is what is not
acceptable. And this is what I think that
the the Crusade will be against. We have to start calling his
supporters supporters racist as well.
That MAGA had that MAGA symbol has come to represent something.
It is the new Nazi symbol. It is the new could because it's
not a party, right? They're Sinn Fein to the IRA,
They're they're the PLO to Hamas.
They're a dime storefront for a terrorist movement.
The. Republican Party is basically a
domestic terrorist cell at this. Point and they should be treated
as. Such There are elements of the
GOP that are starting to look like the jihadists.
Not a political party. They're white national.
Movement. They're a fascist threat to our
nation. That's not hyperbolic.
That's academic. Would have one seemed
hyperbolic. But it increasingly does feel
like the Republican Party has become a death cult and it's all
about Donald Trump. There is no alternative right
now because the Republican Party project today is a fascist
authoritarian project. Fact as Republicans in Congress
are still in the grip of the ultra MAGA agenda, party of
dupes, party of knuckleheads, party of weirdos, party of
freaks. So that that that is a simple,
simple message. And underneath that it's the
party of nothing. It has become an authoritarian
embracing cult. It is fascist.
We take an oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all
enemies, foreign and domestic, and sadly, the domestic enemies
to our voting system and are honoring our Constitution are
right at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. with their allies in the
Congress of the United States. Trump's modern day escapos is
scooping folks up off the street.
They're in unmarked vans, wearing masks, being shipped off
to foreign torture dungeons. No chance to mount a defense,
not even a chance to kiss a loved one goodbye.
Just grabbed up by masked agents shoved into those vans and the
old films of the Gestapo grabbing, grabbing people off
the streets of Poland. And you've compare them to those
nondescript thugs who grabbed that, that student, that
graduate student. It does look like a Gestapo
operation. You know, my dad served in
Second World War. He fought the Nazis in northern
Africa. He fought the Nazis on the
Italian peninsula. And I think he's looking down
right now and he's happy that I'm fighting today's Nazis.
You really think that? I think your dad probably is
disappointed in what a ridiculous person you are.
It it's wild. There's this concept that I see
when people want to grab valor that is not theirs.
My father was a this, My grandfather fought in this.
I'm a daughter of the American Civil War.
This concept of family valor also like family valor.
I, I have valor. I have moral authority because
someone I know did something one time that wasn't me and I'm
going to Co opt all that crap to me.
They are talking about weapons, they are talking about war.
They are othering in a way that we've been talking about on this
podcast for a couple years now. To make somebody less than human
means that they are an appropriate enemy, and this has
been done as a psychological operation in all wars.
You always want to make sure that people do not see the
common humanity in the adversary.
You want to make sure that they look at them and see them as
subhuman, other than human, less than human, Take your pick.
They think that they have a moral high ground and they've
also, if nothing else, they've had progress on their side
because they have taken things back.
America loves an underdog and for a very long time, the left,
the sort of communist left, the socialist, the Marxist, put any
sort of ideology that you want to like overlay on the top of
it. All of it is just the anti
American version, the anti western, the anti Christian
version of it. All of those things where I say
that your work is mine because what?
Because I want it, Because I'm going to push.
I'm going to come after your empathy, I'm going to come after
your compassion, and I'm going to weaponize it against you.
America's job, the experiment that we created here is really,
really unusual in all of human history because we believe in a
majority rules, but the minority is protected to be a dissident
group and not quashed. And that's an incredibly
delicate balance. It has to be done with a culture
of people that basically agree that both sides are in good
faith, that both sides have the same values.
And then we can disagree with how we spend our money or how we
implement governmental rule. What rules what, what laws need
to be in place, which things can be culturally enforced.
All of this kind of stuff. They are talking about actual
weapons. They are all whether it's
hyperbole or whether it's rhetoric or otherwise, it
continues to exist. I'm going to show you one thing.
This is the same one of the same women from the other political
commentary piece and also Jasmine Crockett talking.
And then I'm going to give you very sane reason from someone
who's fought in actual wars with actual weapons that actually can
see this change happening. One of the one of my kind of
favorite observers, Nick Frieda. So first, Jasmine Crockett, I'll
subject you to that. And then second, we'll give you
analysis on it. But this is a, a war.
This isn't a battle and we absolutely will win this war.
It is a war. It is indeed a war.
And I have to say they have won some battles, Jasmine.
But we we have to keep our eye on the war and, and everybody
needs to pick up a weapon and and get involved because this is
for the the, the safety and and lasting of the country.
It has to be for the safety and the lasting of the country.
We all need to pick up a weapon. What if we could break down what
that actually has meant? Because there's been an
evolution of language, and language eventually evolved into
action. This is what I think is going
on. I think this, I think this hits
the nail on the head. Many of you will already have
this, but you won't have it in such a coherent and succinct
manner. So I noticed something a couple
of years back, and that was that the terminology the left was
using in debates had shifted a little bit.
We were all used to them calling us racist or sexist whenever we
disagreed. And we all knew that was a way
of shutting down debate, right? Because after all, if you're a
racist or a sexist, why should I listen to anything that you say?
But then it shifted. They started claiming that any
sort of disagreement with them was a form of violence.
If you disagreed with trans ideology, then you are engaging
in trans genocide. And that that was different.
And I started to posit this theory a couple years back where
I said, you know what? I don't think they're trying to
shut down debate the way they used to.
I think they're trying to come up with a moral framework
whereby they can engage in aggressive violence toward you
and claim that it's merely self-defense.
So what do you think now? Isn't that interesting, the
language change we saw, but the reason to be to build your own
moral framework up. Every organization that's ever
decided to levy war or that has decided to fight against another
has to frame themselves as the good guy in their own, in their
own mind. And, and we've had discussions
about that on this podcast previously that the people who
do the most evil, they don't think that what they're doing is
evil. What they think is, is that
they're actually doing something that's morally good.
In fact, it is demanded of them. And so they have to frame the
argument in such a way. Silence is violence, Speech is
violence. The answer to violence is
violence. I've now made them one to one
comparators, even though that we don't believe that's the case.
So if someone says something I don't like, violence against
them is justifiable if you believe in that sort of
nonsense. And the only way you can do that
is if you take two things that are not equal and you asset you,
you start pushing out and, and repeating it over and over again
that in fact, it is equal. Rockstar commentary.
You guys are seeing this too. It's, it's the thought that many
of us felt, but maybe didn't articulate.
I think that is the advantage of some of the media that we have,
that we can have something that allows someone else to
crystallize the thoughts that we feel are accurate, but we may
not arrive at the exact same word.
And we have this, this, this constant ability to parallel
construct, to steal one of the FBI things where we all are
constructing information and, and, and argument at the same
time. That's the only value that I see
in the the social media context. I don't see it in you.
I don't see a lot of value there.
Fast dissemination of information, yes.
Fast dissemination of misinformation and
disinformation and bad information, yes.
Crystallizing arguments so that people can realize that they're
not alone. That's the value.
That's the entirety of it. The governor of Utah in this, in
this moment is saying something that is true.
And yet I don't know how you put this genie back in the the
bottle. Unless you can start
reconquering culture, you're not going to stop the technology
that's already out. People have have made the
argument for several years now that the Internet and social
media in the way that it is and the way that we disseminate
information is a digital dark age.
But it's backwards from the regular dark ages.
When we look back at the dark ages, what you saw was that
there was a high point in society where technologies were
created, where certain types of methods of, let's say,
delivering water aqueducts or buildings were constructed, or
philosophical ideas and logic and reason and education were
created. And then those things went out
of vogue and the people who knew how to do them stopped.
And so we looked around and we said, well, we have this stuff
and we like this stuff, but we don't know how to maintain or
how to create it independently. We have to just sort of hope
it's keeps working. We're backwards right now with,
with technology. We have sort of the Ian, the Ian
Malcolm from, from Jurassic Park moment where we spent so much
time trying to figure out, you know, if we could, we failed to
determine whether or not we should do a lot of the things
that we do. So the information dark ages
backwards from the from the dark ages that we saw in Europe.
We've created things and we don't know how they actually
apply to human existence and condition and make things work.
We have the technology, but we don't know how to integrate it
into human happiness and its existence.
It turns out when you've corrupted the underlying sort of
culture behind it, that's where you have real problems.
I don't think Governor Cox is wrong about this.
I also don't think Governor Cox is like a hero of the Republic,
per SE. I've seen the pronouns like you
guys have. I've seen him fight some things
that are not good battles for a conservative person to fight.
So he's a politician. That's fine, but occasionally
having someone say the right things in the right way at the
right time, it actually is pretty helpful.
You need momentary, proper leadership in very acute
circumstances. That doesn't mean this person
should run America. This doesn't mean this guy
should run for president. It just means at this moment he
was tapped and he stepped up and he said the things that needed
to be said properly. And he's making observations.
And then I will probably also forget about who he is in a
couple of weeks, just like many of you will, because he won't be
relevant to the national news story.
He'll go back to being just the governor of Utah that nobody
listens to. But he's not wrong about this
concept that our our interactions are cancerous.
This is not good for us. It is not good to consume.
Social media is a cancer on our society right now.
It's a cancer. So what about all the rest of
this nonsense too? Because I've seen people in our
chat this morning already. Oh, how did the how did the
rifle get to the roof? We covered that last week.
Go watch it. Go watch one of the interviews I
did. I did a really good one with
redacted. I did one with with Chase Geyser
over on Infowars as well. I think it cleanly and clearly
states what is the straightest line.
And by the way, the official story is not ridiculous.
It's not, it's not crazy. It's not wild or insane.
This is wild and insane. This is irresponsible.
Let me play a couple of FBI people.
Actually, before we do that, let me just plug my friends over at
Patriot Coolers while we're sitting here.
You guys are probably not seeing me drinking off camera, but I'm
drinking from my 19 oz coffee mug.
This is the one that has the handle.
You don't actually know you need a handle on your coffee mug
until you have one on and you realize how convenient it is.
If you guys are looking to upgrade your current, whatever
it is, thermos cup or so on, you want one that fits in a cup
holder. Check out my friends at Patriot
Coolers. You can get it engraved.
You can get it looking like this one behind me over there.
Lean back, There it is. You can get the suspendables
flag on it. You can get the suspendables
badge on it. You can get your own company
logo. You can get something from, you
know, thin blue line or red line or whatever it is you're
interested. You could have a nursing symbol.
Check them out. patriotcoolers.com promo code
Kyle. Kyle saves you 10% if you guys
type that in at checkout. They've been with us for a very
long time. They make a great product.
I use them every day, everywhere I go.
When I'm out mowing the lawn, my daughters bring me out my 40 oz
cup and I drain the darn thing because I'm dehydrated.
When I'm going on a road trip, I take one or more of them with
me. They're always with us.
They have water bottles and they have coffee mugs and they have
big smoothie cups or whatever else you're into.
patriotcoolers.com promo code Kyle.
They won't cancel you if you happen to have a different idea
and you want to get that engraved on there.
You guys are looking for a big order or something like that.
You need a discount, Just shoot me an e-mail,
info@kyleseraphin.com. I will put you in touch with
their folks over there, and they will get you taken care of.
Good folks. They do small or large orders.
Take your pick. All right, let's do.
Let's do this video, which I think I think this is some of
the most irresponsible nonsense. We've moved into a space where
traditional media is now chasing social media.
I watched my buddy Ryan Maddow. Yeah, we love Ryan.
Ryan doesn't know what he's talking about.
About certain things. God love him.
He he for a long time tried to convince me to buy a crypto coin
that's worth nothing right now. I would have lost all my money.
He also has tried to convince me that the earth is flat.
And he also tried to convince me during the weekend that somebody
on the side had a cell phone shaped pistol and that's where
the shot came from. There's just, there's so much
bad information. And since social media, the
cancer is pushing that out, you're also seeing the feedback
loop, which is that mainstream media is now trying to do the
same thing. I played you guys this last
week. Let's see how this aged.
This is Stewart Kaplan. He's billed as a former FBI
agent. In a world where Steve Friend
exists, why would you ever interview this guy or Nicole
Parker who went on and cried? She just got on and just sobbed.
Is that what? Is that what the Fox News
audience wants? The boomer audience that listens
to Fox News? Do they just want to just TuneIn
and see a 40 something year old woman just sob about someone she
didn't even know because she's just an emotional wreck?
Remember the reason that Nikki Parker AKAFBI Barbie, we got
another Barbie, we got border Barbie on a little bit later.
The reason why Nikki Parker even has a job at Fox is because she
quit her job at the FBI because her friend got killed.
Well, now somebody in media has been killed.
Is she going to quit her job there too?
Because it's just I don't get it.
I don't get it. While you bring people like this
on that say nonsense. And by the way, if you guys
don't know how this works on the back end, when Fox News reaches
out, when a producer for Jesse Watters reaches out to you and
says, would you care to, to join our program tonight?
And you'd say, OK, sure, yeah, I'd be happy to.
They go, can you give us some talking points?
That's they don't say we're going to talk about this.
They say, will you give us some talking points?
And you go, yes. Or they'll say, we'd like you to
talk about this thing with this angle.
They've come to me and said, would you go on and talk about
how the FBI should be investigating Harvard professors
for their speech and backing Palestine?
And I go, no, I'm not. I don't think the FBI should
investigate anybody for speech. And they go, oh, OK, we'll go
find somebody else to do that. That's how that's how people
like Stuart Kaplan end up on this thing.
I don't know specifically what they asked him to be.
But I can tell you the process, which I've gone through a dozen
plus times with just Fox News alone, they always want to know
what angle are you going to take and does it work with the angle
that we're selling? Because we're selling a specific
angle because we're Fox News, We're not interested in fair and
balanced or truth or anything else.
What we're interested in selling an interesting narrative.
And I'm going to tell you why that gets interesting because
all of the news sources left and right have decided to hone in on
Cash Patel as a very interesting and singular fail point in this
whole experience. For those of you who've been
listening to this program for a while, especially you, that
comment, oh, stop talking about Cash Patel.
Listen, I read your comments and I don't care because I'm ahead
of the curve on this. And I'm going to show you today
how that's the case. There are at least a dozen
stories on the Main Street outlets from both sides of the
coin talking about it. The FBI is still full of people
like this that are willing to say whatever it takes to
maintain a job or relevancy. I think this assassination,
different than the assassinated attempt back in Butler, PA, was
a very well planned, very well orchestrated plot that was put
in motion days before. And this individual had a plan
of escape to elude detection of being out up on a rooftop and
also being able to evade and elude law enforcement after that
shot was taken. When you take a look at what
happened in Butler, PA, Crooks came on to the venue.
He left the venue, he came back, he was questioned.
I mean, it was really an amateur scenario.
This assassination of Charlie Kurt, to me is indicative of a
professional hit. And I'm not so sure that we are
going to quickly be able to apprehend this individual
without some luck, Hopefully. What?
What do we mean by the word
professional hit, by the way? Jesse Watters asked them to, and
then he doesn't have a great answer.
Professional, hit word. Professional indicates something
someone does for wages and does so to sustain themselves.
You're telling me that this person, based on what they saw,
does this for a living? Here's how I know that's not
true, and here's how you know it's not true.
I want you to think back in your mind, how many public figures
have you seen, let's call it, in the last 25 years?
It's something that you're going to be a professional at, so
you're going to have to be able to make a living in the last 25
years. How many public figures have
been shot to death from a distance greater than 100 yards?
Feel free to put them in the comments.
The number of people that you know that were killed
professionally with a rifle at distance.
I don't have one in my mind so I'm looking for a couple.
I don't know how many you have to do to kill to make you a
professional where that sustains you as a as a for a living, even
for a year. That was an absurd and moronic
statement by this guy. Sounds good as long as you don't
have any evidence. I see the chat starting to
answer with none. Nobody can think of any because
that's not how people get killed.
Intelligence agencies don't kill you like that.
They lure you into an embassy. They chop you up and put you
into a barrel of acid. Somebody comes up and spit some
powder in your face. Somebody comes up and has some
stuff on their hands while they're wearing a glove.
They shake your hand and you die because of a poisoning.
Somebody gives you bad food and you just, you fall, I'll
somebody injects you with ricin and you have a heart attack
instantaneously. There's a lot of reasons why
this was not a professional hit, not the least of which was he
didn't actually get away without being seen.
He was seen. We have the security camera
footage of the guy. So for everybody that wants the
conspiracy and wants to get deep into the weeds on this nonsense,
that's the distraction. The reality is, is that there
was a interaction. There was someone who was killed
for speech in the same way that Nick Fridas was talking about.
He was saying things that were that were not palatable to the
other side. And they have been able to set
this up to the point where they can justify violence behind it.
We saw dozens of people fired over the weekend from their jobs
because of their awful take on this.
We talked about it on Friday, But a concept of assassination
culture actually exists mostly on the hard political left where
where surveys from April out of Rutgers University showed 55% of
people who lean left of center. That's not all hard leftist, but
left of center in general. Those people, about 55% of them
polled, said that they would be OK with an assassination of Elon
Musk and Donald Trump, that that was palatable to them because
words are violence. Things I don't like result in
violence, and then we decide to move on and we're going to take
action against it to protect yourself from violence.
They did this to Elon already. I'm going to make this argument
right now. Someone threw a Molotov cocktail
at a Tesla service center. At least 5 Teslas blew up when
you pull out a chainsaw to celebrate firing thousands of
people. They get mad.
It's just that, you know, let's send these techno fascist
broligarchs and old fashioned Nazis a message loud and clear.
Vandalism really shows the the outright anger and rage that
people are feeling about what Elon Musk is doing.
We should all be protesting in the streets about this and be
incredibly angry. It has taken the American people
to go protest at Tesla to get the president's attention, try
to dismantle the reputation of Tesla in hopes of.
Hitting. Elon Musk where it hurts.
He's incompetent. He's a thief.
He's a Nazi. Musk is a pathological liar.
He's a criminal, he's a sociopath and a ghoul.
He's literally killing people. But he should really enjoy
taking this. And all I want to see happen on
my birthday is for Elon to be taken down.
Yes. Elon Musk kind of turned out to
be I don't want to be driving the car built and designed.
If you drive a Tesla, please sell it.
And if you own stock in Tesla, please dump it.
I've never wanted to buy a Tesla because I prefer to buy cars
made by car companies, not computer companies.
I added Tesla to to give me a little boost during the day 225
and dropping. Tesla's tanking right now and
I'm OK with that. Tesla is a mean stock.
It is one of the most wildly over inflated stock.
Tesla stock is way down. Please don't vandalize, don't
ever vandalize Tesla vehicles. And so they're taking to the
streets or the the parking lots. Can I see FBI and ATF now
investigating multiple cases of possible arson?
How you guys like petty acts of domestic terrorism pair Bondi?
Piece is very disturbing to me to hear her throwing around
words like terrorists. Is it appropriate to increase
penalties? No, it's it's not same thing
with Pam Bondi. She's you know, just stop that
it's a masquerade. It's this is just a ridiculous
do you? Believe that there's there's
dozens and dozens and dozens of examples of that sort of
character assassination type move and the right's not immune
to this by the way, because there was a backlash and a
reaction right. They were going to go after all
the Tesla terrorists and so on. We got no pipe bomber from
January 6th. The cocaine in the White House
for whatever reason, that was a big deal for Dan Bongino.
That also hasn't been solved Dobbs leak.
That was the other thing Bongino talked about that cutesy time is
not over, is it? It's not, it's just not.
But the original speculation which came out from the ATF that
there was some sort of transgender ideology behind the
shooting, that there was going to be a furry connection.
It came out over the weekend. Charlie Kirk's assassination
suspect had a furry fixation and his trans boyfriend proclaimed
support for the Biden administration on social media.
So we're just perfectly divided on that.
They got it. They got it all set up.
You read the story here real quickly and then I'm going to
play you. Fox News breaking it.
I think it's relevant. Alleged Charlie Kirk assassin
Tyler Robinson appears to have a fixation on furries and he had a
live in transgender boyfriend, espoused support for Joe Biden
and joked about being mentally ill, according to social media
post linked to the pair. Guy's name is Lance Twig, an
aspiring pro gamer. I didn't if that, If that's not
the other cancer. Pro gamers appeared to have made
comments in a 2022 Reddit post stating we're riding with Biden
on this glorious subreddit and that's not that big of a deal.
Plenty of people have said that family appears to be
conservative Christians, based in Utah and is supposedly
transitioning from male to female in a relationship with 22
year old Robinson. So I would say that that
indicates that the man was gay. A man who's attracted to another
man. That's a homosexual impulse.
This transgender thought that you could switch from one to
another is pretty wild. It continues to be one of the
dumbest things that we're living in.
I will show you that NBC News reported on it and they referred
to God. Did I even not I didn't grab
that article. There was an article that I read
from NBC that indicated that the governor misgendered this
person. And so they were very incensed
that because he's decided to identify himself as a woman, the
boyfriend who's going through some sort of thing and is always
pictured wearing like the only things we see are like wearing
some sort of a costume. That person was misgendered.
So that was the real prime here. Here's Fox News breaking it.
Exciting. This is why we think this is
probably credible only because they would risk too much by not
by not double checking and and getting this on good
information. A Fox News alert.
FBI sources tell Fox News Digital that the man charged
with assassinating Charlie Kirk was living with a transgender
partner. Bureau officials confirmed that
Tyler Robinson was in a romantic relationship with someone
transitioning from male to female.
They say that individual is fully cooperating with their
investigation, claims to have had no idea of Robinson's plans,
and is not currently accused of any criminal activity.
OK, so let's go down the list here because this is what
happened last week, and I think that this is going to prove some
things that I've been trying to talk about for a little while
here. In no particular order.
Let's start with this story. This is from Ryan Riley.
I know Ryan Riley, so Full disclosure, I've talked with
him. He and I were discussing Cash
Patel's dinner reservation, which came out on Friday
afternoon. I believe FBI Director Cash
Patel is criticized for his actions and posts during the
Charlie Kirk shooting investigation.
FBI leaders decisions to dine at an exclusive restaurant hours
after the assassination and to criticize Utah officials raises
questions about his leadership, current and former officials
say. Now Fox News was just citing
somebody at Fox Digital that was Brooke Singman.
Brooke Singman is a preferred outlet in many in many leaks of
Dan Bongino's preferred talking points.
So I can't say definitively that that's where she got her
information, but her sources say is most likely Dan Bongino.
In my estimation. That's what I believe happened
there. And so Dan was getting out what
he wanted to get out. Now, it's been more or less
substantiated by other people as well that this is the case, that
this person, Lance Twigs wasn't. Is that a real name even?
Is that an alias? Lance Twigs is supposedly a
male, dresses up like a female and also apparently wears fur
costumes. This story goes on FBI Director
Cash Patel's activities during the investigation of
conservative activist Charlie Kirk's assassination.
Read questions about his decision making during the
crisis. Four former FBI officials and
two administration officials have told NBC News.
This is where it's going to get interesting because it's always
fine for the left to go after one.
We expect Ryan Reilly to attack the FBI when Trump's in charge.
We expect him to go after Bongino and Patel.
It's not surprising to me. From the shooting Wednesday to
the suspect's arrest on Friday, Patel took steps that gave pause
to some federal and local law enforcement officials and raised
questions about his judgement, the sources say.
Several spoke on condition of anonymity because they're not
authorized to speak it publicly and they have fear of
retaliation from the Trump administration.
This fear of retaliation is a real thing.
Hold on to that for a second. That is actually kind of
problematic. I think the actions range from
when he was on the evening of the assassination.
He was grandstanding about his own role in the arrest after the
after they arrested the subject. You have other people that are
former administrators, like Chris O'Leary, former
counterterrorism officials said that he's got zero leadership
experience and capabilities. OK, fine, fine, fine.
The White House supposedly defended it.
One of the interesting things was he was at this place called
Rao Rao. Now, I knew about this on
Friday, but I, I couldn't, I knew about it on Thursday night,
actually, but we couldn't talk about it 'cause we hadn't
substantiated it. And then by Friday afternoon, it
sounds like it was substantiated that that's where he was.
This place, Rao is a exclusive restaurant in New York City.
They have 10 tables. Apparently, it's 100 plus
dollars a plate. But it's not that it's 100 plus
dollars a plate. And I'm sure that it costs way
more than that to eat there. It's that you can't get in
unless you know somebody that invites you to be there.
So God forbid he missed his dinner reservation there.
Now, here's the real answer of what should have happened
because this is super simple. People said a man's got to eat.
Yeah, he does. Man's got to meet with people.
Man's got to hold up to his obligations.
That's fine. If you're friends with someone
who is killed, contrary to what you see on television, you're
not allowed to investigate that. And for those of you who are
confused or troubled or have beliefs that are not reality,
the FBI director and the FBI deputy director have 0
investigative role. They are not investigators.
That's not what they do. They are administrators.
They are managers. Their job is to handle the
business and the execution of strategy, not to do the
operational work of an agency. Period.
The CEO does not go and get involved in individual sales to
a customer. They don't even manage an
individual store. The CEO of a large company looks
down and says here's the strategy, here's the vision,
here's the way that we're going to implement it, go out and do
forth. And then the people that are
that, that are his subordinates go out and handle regions.
And then those regional managers go and handle individual store
managers and the individual store managers go and handle the
individual employees. Usually they're actually
handling shift managers and the shift managers handle the
employees on that shift, right? You don't get to step out as an
FBI director and act like you are somehow going to walk the
scene and add value to the people who actually do the work
of investigation. And some of them have decades of
experience in it. And I know that because I
actually know some people that were in there in Utah.
It's really silly to act like they are doing something that
they are not. The right answer by FBI policy
and by all standard law enforcement policy is if you
have any vested interest or connection to a victim, to the
subject of the investigation, to anything that is emotionally
connected to you, your first answer is recuse yourself.
You recuse yourself from the investigation and you delegate
the authority and the power to someone that's appropriate at a
lower level. Now, normally that would go to
the deputy director who could make, let's say, calls for
resources and things. But the deputy director also
knew Charlie Kirk. So the right answer would be
Cash Patel would say Charlie Kirk is a friend, was a friend.
I'm emotionally invested in this.
And so I will be delegating it to our number three.
We're going to give it to William Rivers, who is our
associate deputy director. And he has all my, both my, my
faith and my, all the competencies to handle this.
And he's been authorized to give whatever resources local law
enforcement needs. This is not about us.
That would be the right answer. That's what a serious person
would have done. Recuse yourself and step away,
but do not make it about yourself.
That's not what we saw. We saw the Valhalla thing.
For a avowed Christian coming from a Hindu, very illogical.
We saw over and over again Fox News talking about the bold
strategy. The bold strategy of releasing a
photograph of someone that law enforcement was working for,
also known as the default standard operating position in a
manhunt. If you want to find someone and
you want the public's help, you put out a picture.
Cash Patel spent all of the weekend arguing that what he did
was brilliant and nobody was was on board with it and he had to
beat them into it. When the FBI didn't own the
surveillance pictures, didn't gather the surveillance
pictures, and didn't really have a real strong Nexus to that
investigation, I don't know how you would make that the case.
You have to have a federal crime.
Shooting somebody is not a federal crime.
There's a small possibility you start getting because there's a
gun, you have Interstate commerce.
So they come in with that or you start talking about ideology,
But that wasn't always obvious. The investigation should have
been handled by DPS in in Utah or by the state police or even
by the campus police for all I know, depending on how
jurisdictions work out, which is probably a state entity.
It's just desperate. And so because of that, we get
this kind of nonsense. Is that Fox and friends?
Let me see if I've got I've got a couple of different little
pieces here. I went and grabbed something.
That's why I started late. I had to go grab some clips for
you guys. Let's start with, let's start
with the overreach end of it. I'm actually not going to start
with Patel. I'm going to start with Stephen
Miller, who generally speaking, I really like.
I like the way that he's aggressive.
This is the wrong answer. And I'm going to show you why
it's the wrong answer because everything about what Stephen
Miller is saying is not what law enforcement is supposed to do.
It's supposed to be apolitical. It's supposed to be
disinterested. And it doesn't go looking at
people and then find a crime. He's just describing what we
called weaponized government for the last four years under the
Biden administration. Tell me that I'm wrong here.
And we are going to do that under President Trump's
leadership. I don't care how it could be a
Rico charge, a conspiracy charge, conspiracy against the
United States, insurrection. But we are going to do what it
takes to dismantle the organizations and the entities
that are fomenting riots, that are doxing, that are trying to
inspire terrorism, and they're committing acts of wanton
violence. It has to stop.
And my message is to all of the domestic terrorists in this
country spreading this evil hate.
You want us to live in fear. We will not live in fear.
But you will live in exile because the power of law
enforcement under President Trump's leadership will be used
to find you. We use to take away your money,
take away your power. And if you've.
Broken the law to take away your freedom, Sean.
That's not OK. That's just not an OK thing to
say. That's not what we do in
America. We don't say that.
We're going to identify who you are and then go figure out what
crime you've committed. That's the whole reason why I
have a public platform in the 1st place.
Folks, just so you know, that was a really, really bad take by
Stephen Miller. We don't all hit it right.
And especially when we're we're more emotional.
That's why you recuse yourself and you step away.
I'm going to do a Spotify ad right here.
So if you guys are listening online, we'll actually do some
visual cues so you guys can see it.
But there Spotify play some canned ads.
Here's one potentially if you're listening somewhere else.
Let's do a quick little piece on Patel's coming out and talking
about it. He went out and made all these
claims and I've got, OK, well, let me just do this too.
How about this defending Cash Patel from himself?
I don't usually go to the conservative tree house, mostly
because I don't like people who write anonymously and I don't
take them nearly a series because I don't know who they
are. I don't know what their what
their agenda is. This is someone writes under the
name Sundance. I know a lot of you guys like
this. I know Dinesh D'souza has
promoted it. I've seen other people on true
social promote it. It just feels click baity to me.
But this is an example of somebody that I would say is on
the go with the flow, right? The MAGA agenda, right?
Defending Cash Patel from himself is the headline that
came out yesterday. On Sunday, many people were
thrilled with the nomination, eventual confirmation of Cash
Patel to be FBI director. However, after decades of
research and political weaponization of the FBI and
it's known capabilities and the known capabilities of this
nominee, we were not part of the thrilled group.
I don't know who we is. That's the royal we, I guess, of
whatever this collective is or Sundance.
The non pretenders looked at the challenge, the contrast, the
scope of work, the skill set of the person elected and warned
that there were reasons to be apprehensive instead of
optimistic. Goes on to basically say that
Kaspatul may have never been up to the job and all he's doing is
sort of living this life of swanky reservations and trying
to be a bro and go to cool places.
And that resulted in the inevitable embarrassment.
I think we can actually pull this over here.
Let's see here. I'm going to show you the tweet.
That we've we had on yesterday or we had on Friday.
This is the tweet. The subject for the horrific
shooting today that took place, it took the life of Charlie Kirk
is now in custody. Thank you to state and local law
enforcement in Utah for your partnership.
That's the day of about an hour and a half later, you have the
following. The subject in custody has been
released after interrogation by law enforcement.
Our investigation continues. We'll continue to release
information in the interest of transparency.
This is not about transparency. This is about jumping to claim
credit desperately in a thirsty manner.
Anything to be able to say that we're the ones who did the great
job. Now, I know people that were
doing the interviews on the ground in Utah, several of them,
and they've reached out to me and said things like, we were
getting so much pressure after this first tweet because the
people that we had in custody needed to be the answer, needed
to be the subject and not just a person of interest.
And Patel and Bongino jumped the gun on this and then immediately
went and stomped on the investigation.
They actually hindered it and said, find something, otherwise
you're going to be the problem. Now, senior agents say no, screw
off. But junior agents, which is what
we saw on January 6th, junior agents say, yes, Sir, how high
when they are asked to jump like that?
And that's really dangerous for our law enforcement agencies to
get involved in. Let me show you another couple
things here. This is from CNN.
Not surprising CNN is going to take a shot at Patel.
Let's acknowledge where the biases exist.
They said it's unacceptable. Inside growing concerns about
Cash Patel's leadership of the FBI.
He stepped up to a microphone at a news conference and wasted no
time explaining what led to the capture of the suspect in
Charlie Kirk's murder. This is what happens when you
let good cops be cops, said Cash Patel.
Which is the dumbest statement because the FBI are not cops.
Again, the operational unit of the FBI, 1811 criminal
investigator, not police investigator.
Long term investigations, not cops.
Cops are something else. Cops are people who do patrols
that go out there and respond to reactionary things.
Long term investigations are not it.
The joke about the FBI is that if we need to get somebody into
custody, we'll get them. And if they get away, we'll just
get them another day because that's what we do.
Because we plan arrest operations.
We don't need to do it today. It can be done whenever we want
because that's what a long term investigation means.
You rarely have to scoop somebody up with exigent
circumstances. And he made it all about himself
for 6 minutes. He talked about the FBI leading
the investigation, no clear why, that it coordinated with state
and locals as though it were the primary agency when in fact it
shouldn't have been twice saying the decision to release the
photos and the videos were his decision.
Well, who gives a shit? That's a normal thing you do.
You normally release photos when you want to find somebody.
You want the public's health without the father doing the
right thing. What do you have?
It doesn't stop this guy from going out and trying to claim
and everything. You see, even the weekend, over
the weekend, what we heard was a report that Donald Trump said
he's really proud of the FBI and Cash Patel, but not Donald
Trump's own words. We didn't see that.
So Truth Social post, please let me know if I'm wrong on this,
but I didn't see it. So all you're hearing is a guy
who's desperate to hold on to his grip on a job that he's not
doing a good work. And I'm going to show you how I
know that because Fox News is even reporting it.
If CNN and NBC and CBS and the conservative Tree House and Fox
News all agree on the same thing.
Oh. That's deadly.
We flex all resources the FBI had and surged multiple air
assets as soon as this shooting occurred.
We were cycling in agents, evidence response technicians,
human hostage rescue technicians and special operators in and out
of Utah, cycling evidence back and forth on these FBI planes as
soon as we could so that there was number delay.
And what we did once I got there along with the deputy on the
ground on the around 5:00 PM local on September 11th was walk
the entire crime scene, including the foots the suspect
himself took. And what we learned was there
was evidence, DNA evidence that could be collected and had been
collected, including a screwdriver that was found on
the rooftop. Also.
We went over to the scene in the wooded area where the firearm
was discarded and the firearm had a towel wrapped around it.
It's important. I'll get back to that later.
I even walked into the wooded area in the ravine, so I knew.
So from my investigative experience, what I could bring
to the table and what decisions I needed to make.
And having the support of President Trump and the full
support of the White House was what we needed for these
resources to happen. And I can report today that the
DNA hits from the towel that was wrapped around the firearm and
the DNA on the screwdriver are positively processed for the
suspect in custody. Holy moly, if Cash Patel wasn't
there to look at the things that other people discovered, then
how would they have ever found this guy?
Oh, you released a a freaking picture from a security camera
and said this person looks like a person of interest and then
the dad turned him in because he confessed to the dad and then he
wanted to kill himself. Are are we serious with that?
Like I'm going to upload that clip again.
I'll put it over on on fox. He's the hero of the story.
He just made himself the hero. And by the way, with the with
the support and the faithfulness of Donald Trump, Why do you all
have to sick a phantomly say that?
How about I got involved because I needed APR win.
Why did he fly out there? I'm told he flew out there with
his entire PR team, including people that are not actually FBI
employees. Do you guys even know that
you're not allowed to have the FBI director and the deputy
director on the same plane for obvious reasons, because you
have the, if you have to have people be safe, then you'd want
to spread them out. You wouldn't have the deputy and
the and the and the the number one and the number 2 on the same
plane. They don't do that.
It's against FBI policy. Do you know that every single
time that you put on not FBI director on the plane, you need
permission from DOJ to do that? Do they give me that permission
for an SES or to go out and fly on the plane?
How about the private individuals that are special
governmental employees, we're told that went with them.
What are they doing? Why does the FBI director have
an outside PR team? I'm asking questions that people
should be asking about this clown and he's acting like a
clown, like a desperate, thirsty clown.
Here's another sad thing, This is Fox News.
They're kind of not sure what they're going to run with this.
Miranda Devine, who I'm very fond of as far as the work she's
done, she's kept an eye on my guys and she's been very, very
helpful for maintaining the stories of Zach Stoffsall.
She's done great profiles on Steve Friend and so on.
So Miranda, fantastic for the suspendables, but also this is
propaganda what she's saying. Cash Patel cleaned house at the
FBI with key firings. What do you mean which ones?
The FBI has a basically a complete fog of war over the
middle management that we don't know.
You don't know who they are and I don't know who they are.
And they didn't fire them. And the people that they're
firing are basically being fired illegally as a lawsuit now is
alleging. Here's how I know that they're
in deep trouble over there because Fox News ran this Fox
News Digital, the same one that went out there and said Kash
Patel had a bold new strategy for releasing a photograph when
everyone wanted to push against it.
OK, sure, whatever. They also ran this story.
And this is a prominent story on Fox right now.
Guys. Knives are out for the embattled
FBI director despite Trump's support.
Patel sought a meeting with Trump following the blunders.
As the new Co deputy goes on. Do you know what's crazy about
the story? Because a lot of it has to do
with who wrote it. There's Jackie Heinrich, She's
married to or she's engaged to be married to Brian Fitzpatrick.
There's a whole other story there, but he's a Republican
congressman. She's 36, he's 51.
She represents to me what I believe is an official statement
from the machine, from the from the GOP machine.
If the knives are out and we are talking about it publicly, it
will not be surprising when we have to get rid of this guy,
which is something I've been saying for a while, but I said
it too early, obviously. On Monday, former Attorney
General Andrew Bailey, once President Trump's top pick to
lead the FBI. Oh, you remember when I told you
that? Here's Fox News collaborating
what I said once Trump's top pick for the FBI director
position will be sworn into a new power sharing role.
That means he starts, I guess, today.
Is that what this says? Yeah, today, the 15th will be
his. Swearing in Bailey's installment
comes at a perilous time for the FBI director, Cash Patel, whose
leadership atop the nation's premier law enforcement is under
fire, according to ten sources in multiple federal offices
granted anonymity so they could speak freely.
The White House reasoning to create an unprecedented office
for Bailey has not yet been explained and it has left the
FBI leadership confused, said two people with the FBI, the
White House, Bondi, Todd Blanche, they have no confidence
in Cash, said one one source with ongoing knowledge.
This is coming from Fox. This is not NBC, this is not
Ryan Riley, this is not Dan Kladman at CBS.
Pam Bondi in particular can't stand him.
Todd Blanch can't either. Bondi and Blanch both denied the
characterization. Just like Donald Trump went on
and praised him. No reason to beat somebody up
when you're about to fire them. The White House officials denied
any plans to remove Cash Patel from his job.
Just like people who regularly run for president say that they
have no interest in running for president and then they do.
The allies of President Trump and Kash Patel's harshest
critics have begun circulating the word about contingency plans
for an ouster that are forming. They're also hopeful that's his
successor. Andrew Bailey made clear that he
would not leave his post at Missouri AG or abandoned his
aspirations to run for state governor.
He's previously said things that he wasn't going to leave those
jobs and sure he did. Why did he leave again?
Name the last five FBI deputy directors.
Name the last Co deputy director.
There is none quite interesting. Multiple sources close to Trump
acknowledged the president was not thrilled with the past
performance of Cash Patel, including the public feud with
AG Bondi over the Epstein cases. One official involved in
personnel decisions framed Cash Patel's botched communications
during the manhunt for Charlie Kirk's assassin is something
Cash Patel would likely wish he could do differently if he could
do it all over again. Donald Trump did not call for
any action to be taken, said the person.
But people are looking at a purported off ramp.
The knives are out. We haven't heard a lot from Dan
Bongino either. He flew out there and just kept
his mouth shut. Kind of interesting.
Also interesting. Cash Patel went on Fox and
Friends this morning touting shocking information.
This is shocking new information.
Are you guys ready? Hold your horses.
Here it comes. But we've learned some shocking
things when we spoke to his family and friends as well.
You want to share them those shocking things?
Sure. And my, my, my job as FBI
director is not to speak to motive, it's to speak to the
facts. And that's what I'm going to do.
His family has collectively told investigators that he subscribed
to left wing ideology and even more so in these last couple of
years. And he had a text message
exchange he, the suspect with another individual in which he
claimed that he had an opportunity to take out Charlie
Kirk and he was going to do it because of his hatred for what
Charlie stood for. That are those are factually
accurate investigatory findings by the FBI that we've handed
over to the local authorities and the federal authorities to
make their prosecutorial decisions.
But I believe in this instance of such public importance, the
public has a right to know. And I've told you I'm committed
to transparency. And that's what I'm doing here.
What are you talking about? The FBI discovered that, Did
they? Again?
The guy was turned in by his dad.
What did you have to do with that?
Nothing. Who was resisting you and saying
that you couldn't release a photograph, which people do all
the time? Boston Marathon bombing, 3 days
after the bombing, they released the pictures when they had
positively identified who they believe was involved.
Ask the public for help. Why do you do that?
Was there danger to the public when they said the person was
was in custody and they weren't? Probably.
People do all kinds of crazy things when they think they're
being hunted and the public stops looking when they're told
that somebody's in custody, don't they?
What are we talking about here? Alleged.
This is from a day ago. So this is shocking information.
Again, this is shocking information, but this is the the
governor of Utah talking about it.
He went on Meet the Press, talked about the romantic
relationship, who's cooperating with authorities.
What we've learned specifically is that this person did not have
any knowledge, was shocked when they found out.
Really they were shocked. You live with somebody and you
didn't know they were going to go kill someone.
You have text messages back and forth about a rifle and some
other things that we heard about.
None of this stuff actually lines up on that story.
Now, you could be a cooperating witness and you can get some,
you can get some, some leniency because you're helping law
enforcement piece together what the hell happened.
But I don't believe that for a second.
It's weak and it's bad and it's desperate is what it looks like
to me. Hence you've got Fox News
talking about it again, if CNN it's unacceptable if the
conservative tree house defending Kash Patel from
himself and his own bad decisions.
If Fox News the knives are out. If this is where we're going and
this is what everyone's talking about.
Cash Patel criticized for his investigation work and the
things that happened on. If this is not the nail in the
coffin, then what should have happened on or what did happen
on September the 10th should be and it looks like this FBI
director Cash Patel had to fire agents to keep his job.
This is CNN reporting lawsuit accuses.
That's Brian Driscoll. He was the acting director of
the FBI. He was the number one.
He was the FBI director's predecessor and chosen by the
Trump administration. And he was fired last month.
He was fired because he wouldn't fire somebody else that the FBI
could not legally fire. And he stated it as much.
I would probably disagree with things that Brian Driscoll has
to say, but I don't disagree with the type of character of a
leader who says you can't fire that guy.
We have rules. That's the whole point of what
we do here. I don't know that he's
political. I don't know that he has any
political ideology that is against me.
What I found is he was a former HRT guy.
A lot of the HRT guys are pretty conservative Christian dudes.
Doesn't mean they won't do bad things.
Doesn't mean that they won't get sent in to do missions where
they cover for each other or maybe they act in ways that are
unlawful, which can't fire people without actual authority
to do so. And this is what the claim is in
that lawsuit. So this is an allegation the
lawsuit makes is that the authority to fire a federal
employee under Article 2 cannot be delegated to the FBI director
that exists in the office of the president.
And by Cash Patel claiming it and some of his own statements
because he was dumb enough to talk to these men trying to make
them friends. He basically said if we don't
fire these people that I want to fire or that we have to fire,
then I will be fired. Cash Patel had to fire the
agents that I brought up on August the 4th in a large,
widely read tweet, which is also coded in the lawsuit.
If they didn't do what they were told, then he says he was going
to be fired. Do you know how many people are
at risk of being fired if they're doing a good job because
they just don't agree with one decision?
Cash Patel also testified Underoath that he would be
independent and that nobody would be fired in political
retaliation. Did we believe him?
Probably not. Is that problematic if you go
out and lie, Underoath? Oh yeah, it is in America and
he's going to be facing a a pre scheduled hearing in front of in
front of Congress. And I guarantee you he's going
to have to eat a ton of questions and allegations that
are made in this lawsuit. How is that guy not cooked at
this point? It is a bigger problem because
what we should have had was a steady hand on the helm steering
America away. If you want to recapture the
culture, if you want to go and do the right thing in this
country, it's de weaponized law enforcement.
It's de weaponized government. It's de escalate the crisis that
we saw where these people look like they had some sort of
political agenda. You take that away, you take
away resources from the FBI. And we heard the same FBI
director talking about we needed more resources.
This is one of the other guys that he got rid of, a guy named
Michael Feinberg who was allegedly friends with Peter
Strzok. Again, you don't make people go
away in the FBI. The answer is you exile them.
This is what Hoover did. This goes all the way back to
Hoover's time. You give them a post that nobody
wants and wait for them to retire where they cannot bother
anybody. Then you're good.
Then there's no lawsuits. Then it's like, thanks for
playing. You can quit on your own time.
You're needed in Fairbanks, AK. You're needed in Juneau.
You're needed in Guam. You're needed in Puerto Rico in
the interior of the island. Go investigate federal crimes in
your neighborhood. Piss off.
That's what you do in the FBI if you want to get rid of somebody.
They broke the book when they went after me and the other
suspendables and Patel's using the same book and it's dumb.
He's actually using it Dumber than they did.
At least they just suspended us forever and made us, you know,
not have a paycheck. He's actually actually
terminating them in Word and it's going to come back and bite
him. I think they'll win their
lawsuits and I think they'll win big.
Feinberg saying you need to give the FBI more resources.
How is this any different than what Patel says?
They all want to add more resources to this animal that is
running itself. There's a black hole of middle
management that he has no visibility into, and they'll do
whatever they want. They're going to make him look
like a fool, and they've already done it.
When you are moving that amount of people and you are not
getting an increase in your budget or in your personnel
numbers, by definition, things are going to fall through the
cracks. And when that's combined with a
Department of Justice wide de prioritization of the domestic
terrorism mission, this is what happens.
Agents aren't out there recruiting sources.
They're not maintaining trip wires.
They're not able to keep their ear to the ground about what's
happening among extremist movements.
And as a result, the extremists have more latitude to do things
that harm our society. Absolutely nonsense.
If they had more budget, they would have hired more people to
look into parents of school board meetings.
They would have gone after more Catholic churches.
They would have done more of what the FBI does.
The FBI is terrible at pre crime.
What they're really good at doing is setting people up for
crimes, which we've seen over and over again, AKA the
playbook, AKA the police state movie.
You guys can go look. There's examples on the left and
the right. By the way, wherever the money
is, that's where the FBI will go and investigate.
So we know that's true. If you gave the FBI more
resources, it would be more people doing the FBI thing.
How do you know? I know because only a few people
have ever spoken out. And when they do, they get
unilaterally crushed. By the way, we had FBI
whistleblowers that came forward that were supposedly made whole
by Cash Patel and his organization.
They have not been paid. They have not been reinstated.
They have not been given their health benefits, they didn't get
the back pay money, and they haven't been introduced back in.
They have no badge, no gun, no cat card.
They are not back on duty. They have no sax badge.
Rather they bought their their silence for $0.00 and continue
to use the weaponization against them and drag their feet and
delay. They've only got a couple more
days to make good on their deal. More FBI means more FBI stuff,
not the new thing. And Feinberg is saying exactly
what you'd expect the FBI to do. They've proven that they're
shitty at pre crime. They do a terrible job.
The FBI cannot prevent anything and doesn't prevent anything
unless they're actually involved in the planning of that thing.
I will definitively say that based on like 3 years of every
single high profile counterterrorism investigation I
saw, they were all essentially put up set up jobs by the FBI.
That's it. There's there's almost no
argument against it. And the reason that you know
that is because when the FBI celebrates their wins, you go
and look and there's always an undercover, there's always a
confidential human source. There's always somebody that's
prodding along the plot, waiting for long enough that they can
get enough of a Big Bang out of it.
And then they go and they tell everybody, look how we saved the
day. Yeah.
Forget the fact that we set up the bad thing in the 1st place.
Forget the fact that we encourage the guy to do the
thing. I would not be surprised to find
that people in Discord channels or trans Tifa or Transantifa
types. Are out there being radicalized,
including by people who are involved in federal law
enforcement reporting. That is a very high probability.
But generally speaking, they tend to focus these days on
right wing ideology. And that's because Mueller and
Comedy and Ray all had a very specific group of people that
they went after to to recruit personnel's policy.
Holy crap, I feel like I've heard that before personnel's
policy if you go after this is the ongoing supposition of the
Kyle Seraphin show. If you recruit people from high
academic backgrounds, then you're going to get people from
high academic backgrounds filling the ranks of your
employees. And academia is almost
exclusively populated by people on the hard left right now, with
very, very few exceptions if you minimalize the recruiting of law
enforcement and military experienced people.
It used to be like 50, sixty, 70%, and it's gone down where
it's less than 30%. I would say now if the majority
of people are coming out of law schools and graduate programs
and national security things and their former government workers
or their former FBI employees who got really good grades, got
hired on a diversity program, and then now they have a
clearance. So it's super easy to onboard
them as FBI agents, you're going to get leftist running the FBI.
And for the last two decades, they've done that.
They've brought in more and more of those people, and they
populate the entire ranks of middle management from GS15 up
to whatever the SES levels are, the assistant directors level,
that's who runs the FBI, not the director.
And the director is making a fool of himself.
Why is that relevant to the culture war?
It's relevant because if we're going to have a cultural
crusade, we cannot be distracted by nonsense where the FBI
director makes himself part of the story.
And it's trending on every single major news outlet.
CBSABCNBCCNN. Fox News, every conservative
outlet too, they're all talking about the blunders, the mix up
and the thirsty desperation of the FBI director.
All of them are. There are a dozen articles that
I saved over the weekend before I I logged off for all of
yesterday. There's probably even more than
that. And reputable people who,
whether you like him or not, Adam Goldman has good sourcing
in the FBI. Why?
Because a bunch of leftists work in the FBI and so they talk to
the New York Times. It turns out that if you even
try to spin it and you get Brooke Singman to take on the
position that the the senior FBI executives want to do the Dan
Von genotypes, they're like whispering in her ear.
This is good info. And she runs a story on it.
Cash Patel, how to pull strategy.
The next thing you have is Jackie Heinrich putting out
knives out for FBI Director Cash Patel because the establishment
pushed back and said, Nope, he's junk.
He's going to have a really difficult hearing.
I'll probably live stream it because it'll be interesting to
see what they what they ask. Blew it.
It was such a golden opportunity to grab.
It would have been so easy to have the right people fix this
FBI and they blew it. And I am not celebrating that.
It scares the crap out of me. I'm far more worried about this
FBI because this FBI director and girlfriend have decided to
come after me in law fair. And by the way, that's mentioned
in the lawsuit by these three guys that that Cash Patel was
essentially on duty requesting FBI senior personnel to
personally sue me, yours truly, a lawsuit.
And so they've loaded up a gun to ask that question.
How many people did he ask to sue me and why?
And what did he think the case was?
Because if you remember, my coverage of Steve Jensen was
what his job was, what those responsibilities were and what
he said in sworn statements. There's nothing defamatory about
the actual truth of what you did.
And that's something. And then we also covered the
medical coverage of how Julie Kelly was falling all over
herself to do it. I think a couple of people have
had really good takes. Then we're going to get into the
Elon thing. And briefly, like the Elon thing
is almost the smallest piece of it.
All of this is about the cultural crusade to me, and also
the distraction from the actual purpose.
If we're going to have Charlie's crusade, if we're going to have
a cultural crusade to to bring back the West, then we need to
have people get the hell out of the way that are not part of it.
And they can go to Valhalla or wherever the hell it is that
they go when they think that that's what it's about.
Stephen A Smith is speaking pretty rationally as well.
We're finding that the kind of classical liberals are going
like, wait a minute. I also am not represented by
this hatred. I'm, I, I think that an American
party that is post partisan needs to be developed.
And maybe that's what Elon Musk's America Party looks like.
It's like, how about just America from 50 years ago, Basic
values, Christian ideology. You don't have to be Christian
to be protected. You can still be a dissenting
minority voice, but we don't get like, you don't get to go and
tell us what we're going to do or not do.
And assimilation. There needs to be homogeneity of
what it is to be American, which means come here and speak
English. Come here and pick up the
dominant culture. If you want to do like your own
spice because you like Curry and that's where you come from.
Or if you want to come here and you want to have different types
of music, you want to bring Afro Caribbean music to the to the
thing. Awesome.
Love the music. Thanks for bringing it in.
But this is America and there are certain things that are non
negotiable and you don't get to stop us from doing those.
That's the right answer. Steve Naismith making a lot of
sense to me. I've seen a lot of things
growing up in the streets of Hollis Squeeze, New York City.
I've seen people dead and what have you.
What I've never seen is somebody talking to an audience of people
with their kids right in front of them and their wife right in
front of them, and all of a sudden their body jolts before
completely collapsing in a lifeless fashion and blood come
gushing out the left side of their neck.
I've never seen anything like that.
But for people to speak about it in a way that's dismissive or to
point to some of the things that he may have said that
antagonized and agitated somebody else, it's inexcusable
for us to even have those kind of thoughts at that particular
moment in time. There are people in our industry
who would disagree with me. I don't give a damn about what
they have to say in that. That's right, we don't give a
damn what they have to say. We're being distracted because
of stuff like this. Listen, only the British press
was asking this from what I can tell.
This is Sky News. I guess maybe that's Australian
press. This is the only people that are
willing to go out and ask this question of of cash fatal as
he's walking off like, hey, man, did you did you cause problems?
We're not even seeing that as like from the left or the right,
like until there's a a groundswell again, there's
things that are distracting and then there's what Stephen,
Stephen A Curry's talking about, which is which is correct.
Is that wait, is it Curry or Smith?
Yeah, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm off track on that one.
I'll bring, I'll bring it back up in a second.
Listen, this is this is a a foreign news reporter who has to
hold our FBI director accountable as he walks away
from a press conference. Mr. Patel, did you endanger
public safety when you said the killer was in custody?
Mr. Patel, did you misrepresent the investigation?
Just nothing ghosting, by the way.
OK, Yeah. Not Stephen Curry.
What are you guys in the chat? But the word Curry, Stephen A
Smith, I was on it the first time around.
That's the stuff we should be talking about.
And he said there are people in our industry, what's the
industry, entertainment, news, etcetera.
There are people that are trying to make that push, that are
trying to send forward a bunch of hatred and normalize it and
make it sound like it was, it was a justifiable thing that
happened. Here's Don Lemon.
Now he's relegated to being an on the street guy who does Tik
Toks. I'm sure there's plenty of money
in it asking someone who represents the, the, the
assassination culture. And then I'm going to show you
the right answer because there are more and more people that
are actually getting to the right answer.
Again, that cultural, that cultural crusade, it's going to
have a lot more people that are left of center that are going to
be more likely to to be sympathetic to it than most
people probably think it is. I think still the majority of
America, even if it's only the 60% and that needs to grow back
up. All right, here's something
horrible from an on the street interview do.
You know Charlie Kirk? Yeah, I do.
And what do you think of what happened to him?
You know, sometimes revenge the dishfest are cold.
I hate to to celebrate someone's death, but when you talk about
guns rights and you talk about how much to take a minute manage
to you and then it impacts you. Like, what do you expect?
You know, activities to his family.
But This is why we need gun control.
One of my friends said on social media he died in a world that he
wanted. Yeah, he said it himself, Right.
This is like this old court that's been floating around
about, like, sacrifices for me. If I take an amendment to still
exist, there's something along those lines, right?
It's an ad Lib. But yeah, this is what happens.
You reap what you sow and got it.
No. It's sad that someone died.
But also, hey, you know. Hey, you know, you were wearing
a shirt that said freedom. You were having a public
discourse with people who disagreed with you.
So that's what you reap and that's what you sow Disgusting.
It comes from people like this. Again, what's Stephen A Smith
saying? He's saying there's a lot of
people in our industry that say this kind of stuff.
This is the push. This is where the fight should
be. It should not be focused on an
an FBI director who injected himself into it that didn't mean
to. I saw the same thing from
Christy Noem. I'm not going to play her clip,
but I haven't. She was like CC texted me about
border security because that's what I do.
Maybe he did, maybe he didn't. You didn't show the the text.
How about get yourself out of it and just say we lost somebody
who's a father and a husband and who who was peacefully doing
what Americans are supposed to do and stop making it about
yourself. I saw James O'Keefe release
multiple videos too. This is what I was doing.
I was teaching a class. Here's my fake reaction to it
that I went and staged. It's my belief that he staged
that because he stages a bunch of other stuff too.
Everybody took an immediate moment to say, how do I promote
myself on somebody's death that I knew?
Absolutely disgusting. When we talk about drifting
culture, that's what it looks like.
It's nauseating. It could be uglier.
I don't know what's uglier. I don't know what's uglier.
Profiting or attempting to profit or push your message
because your friend died, or someone that was an acquaintance
if you died, or just being an outright awful human being.
Like this is Jameel Hill. The reason he was labeled a
white supremacist is because he believed in the superiority of
white people, which is why he said that A, he would be
concerned if he saw a black pilot, which is why he said that
he questioned the brain processing of brilliant minds
such as Joy Ann Reid and Kentangey Brown Jackson because
he ultimately believed in the superiority of of white people.
So I don't think I'm being insensitive by bringing that up.
And the only reason I feel like I even need to bring that up is
because of the counter narrative that is establishing itself.
And that's the problem with history and the problem with
receipts is that you can't erase the receipts.
You can't. You know, I learned this a long
time ago, and I'm sure you guys have heard this before, is that
people don't remember what you do, although a lot of times they
do, but more importantly, they remember how you made them feel.
That is a great, great point. They remember how you made them
feel when they took a little snippet and a little sound bite
and you say things that he did not say because the statement
about a black pilot was. Isn't it awful that in 2025,
because of DEI hiring, because of this, this insane instinct to
promote people based on race and not on competency, that we now
look at people who might be hyper competent and super
capable, but because they also fit the paradigm of people that
were promoted who didn't have that, we are now concerned
whether or not they actually have that competency.
There was a time when you could look at a pilot and you would
go, that's the best person for the job.
That's why he was hired or she was hired.
She must be superior at this skill set.
And then you've seen stupid corporate, you know, montages of
saying we're putting women in the air and we don't even need a
man. And you're going, oh, my God,
what airline is that? I want to fly on anything.
I'm going to drive. I'm not going to fly.
Thank you. We look at competency and say,
well, if you have made race a competency, then I will now be
concerned about it. You have actually cheapened the
people that do awesome work. I've said this, I have hyper,
hyper competent friends. You might imagine that I've got
stud buddies who are special forces dudes just because they
happen to have darker skin or lighter skin.
I'll tell you this, if you find a guy in 2006 who's a Navy SEAL
or a or a special forces operator who went through combat
dive, it is historically not full of black guys.
That's a fact. There are very few dark skinned
men that make it through there. You know who makes it through?
Guys who spent their life around pools, water polo players,
surfers, rugby players that also did water stuff, some swimmers.
It is not common to find dark skin like African American black
men in America becoming special forces divers, becoming special
operations divers, whether it be Seals or PJS or combat
controllers or Marine Corps. You know, MARSOC guys, it
doesn't happen that often. It's rare.
If you see them today, you're going to wonder, did they get an
extra hand? And that is stealing from those
men's accomplishments, right? That's it's theft.
You've cheapened what they've done because of crap policies.
So Charlie Kirk's point was you've stolen from those pilots
who earned the position, and you've made regular people like
me question whether or not they had competency.
And she turned around and said it made her feel like it was
racist because she had a preconceived notion.
That's where the culture fight should be.
It should not be that we're asking questions of like, what
is our law enforcement doing? And are they just as weaponized
as they were under Biden? And the answer might be yes.
That's not where we need to be. That is a that is a theft from
this moment. I'm going to show you why I
think though it's not a lost cause.
And most importantly, I'm going to show you why I actually think
there are far more people you'll look at someone, look at this
lady, walk up, make your make your, your, your stereotypical
prejudice decision, whatever that is.
If you eyeballed this lady, she's got big googly sunglasses.
She's got dark hair and she's a black lady wearing a midriff and
she's kind of a little bit overweight and she's showing off
her belly. And it doesn't like she looks
like she could be someone that would not agree with anything I
have to say. And she answers this question
from Don Lemon with grace and dignity and a commonality with
probably everybody who's listening here.
This may surprise you that I still think it is a majority of
this country that are decent, even if we're outnumbered by
loud asshole voices. That's the only way I can say
it. Watch this.
This. I think this is actually
something that gives you hope. What do you think would happen
to Charlie Kirk? It's just messed up.
Totally messed up. You know, that was messed up.
Like nobody deserved that. He definitely didn't deserve
that. He was a good guy.
You think he was a good guy? I think he was only Kirk, good
moral. The only Kirk you recognize is
Captain Kirk. I don't know Charlie Kirk.
I don't know who they don't know who it is.
I don't know what that is. I know who it was like you know,
all of us, all of us have flaws. You can't, I can't really tell
you what to believe in or how to feel like everybody's having a
human experience. Like why knock him for having
this human experience or what he believed in?
Even though this belief, what he even though he says things that
are anti women, black, all that that's I can't judge him for
that. I can't, I can't judge him for
that. But I can use judgment.
He didn't deserve that. As a human being.
You are very spiritual, you know.
Yeah. I can't go left.
I can't go left with that. No, you sound like you mean
left. Go on that.
Left because I'm humanity. Humanity and love first, you
know, I love that. So the first person I spoke to,
you didn't want to be on camera. And he said I can't judge him
because I'm not God. So let him, you know, let the
whatever the reaction is, if the government wants to give him a
state like funeral, if they let him do it because God is the
only judge. And yeah, like nobody really can
judge him. And like, I kind of like seen
him before all of this happened, but I, I, I don't see whatever
everybody else was saying. So, you know, Yeah, yeah.
Hey, that's how you feel. It's nice to see you.
Hey, I'm trying to slander people here.
That's what I'm trying to do. I'm Don Lemon.
Here I am. She's a better person and I
think she's more common. I think that the sick people
that you see on social media, the cancer that Spencer Cox
talked about, I don't think they're common, not as common.
They're out there, no doubt. They might be even 55% of the
left. That may be the case, but
they're not the majority of people in this country, even
though they are a pretty big minority.
So find those people because we can make common ground with that
Lady. Only God can judge him.
Yeah. Isn't that the right sentiment?
Who would say otherwise? 10 years ago, could you imagine
people going out and celebrating a political assassination?
Horrible wouldn't happen. Nobody would be foolish enough
to do it. And they all changed because
Donald Trump was evil. So anyway, that's why that's why
Elon Musk needs to be cancelled as well.
So here's the final thought. This is coming from CNN, it's on
ABC. There's a couple of other
different articles talking about it.
Billionaire Elon Musk on Saturday said that the United
Kingdom needs to face quote, revolutionary government change,
speaking virtually at a quote UN quote far right anti immigration
protest. Let me read you the headline.
Elon Musk says the UK needs revolutionary change of
government in a speech to anti migrant rally.
Nobody's anti migrant. We are anti illegal immigration.
We are anti people coming in and settling and doing a
colonization, reverse colonization, whatever you want
to call it, great, great replacement.
People are against having the prominent culture of their
country replaced, hence the need for a cultural crusade.
But we're not taking back the Holy lands.
We don't need to retake the holy lands to protect the the, the,
the the sites of historical importance and religious
importance to Jews and Christians.
We need to retake our cultural institutions that are still
important to Jews and Christians, primarily Christians
in this case. Western society has basically
been overrun by whatever the Horde is.
The Horde is not just Muslim people or migrants.
It is people that are espousing radical leftism and things that
are not the way that the society was developed.
Elon Musk says this. There needs to be massive
government reform in Britain, and the people need to be in
charge, not some bureaucracy that doesn't care.
We must have revolutionary government change.
This really requires everyone to sort of Marshall the people to
take charge, to reform the government, to make sure that
you actually have a government that is for the people and by
the people. Yeah, those are great words.
He said civil war is inevitable. The question is, is it a hot war
or is it a cultural crusade that we just take back those
institutions and how that gets done.
One of the ways you do it is by capturing your children's minds.
That's why homeschooling is so big right now.
That's my take on that too. Here's another great picture.
Again, the arguments were whether or not there were enough
people there. They called it 110,100 thousand
or more strong. I looked at the thing, it was
miles of human beings that were wall to wall.
It looked closer to 1,000,000, maybe more.
Neon must said things like violence is coming to you and
either you fight back or you die.
That's not wrong. We've already seen that in the
last two weeks. Could happen on either side.
But what fight back means and why you should censor him over
that. They claimed it was to sow
discord and incite violence in the streets.
That's not what he said. He said fight back or you die.
And if this is a cultural battle, the fight back has to be
seizing minds, seizing education.
It can be as radical and revolutionary as somebody who's
not been to church in 20 years going back to church for the
first time. If you guys ever want to go back
and see what it looks like, if you actually want to just step
back in time because you can do it right now.
You can actually step. You can time travel.
Every one of you can find a Latin Mass.
If you are a Christian of any denomination, find a Latin Mass.
Go sit in the back Pew and listen to the Mass that all of
Europe listen to during the time of the Crusades, before D-Day,
before almost every great event that you've seen in Western
civilization where like freedom was the was the reason why and
where all of your history comes from.
Even if you're a Protestant, go sit in a Catholic Mass that does
TLM, Traditional Latin Mass. Go spend 90 minutes in the back
Pew and just listen. You will walk out and you will
realize that you have walked back in time hundreds of years.
It's still there. It's still something you can
touch. It doesn't mean you have to
convert to Catholicism, although many of my friends continue to
do that. I think that showing up a Church
of any kind will be your your gateway.
If you guys want to see what the real powerful mission, if you
want to see what the big howitzers look like, it's
stepping back in time and doing the Latin Mass.
It's one guy's take. I can't take my kids all the
time. It's too much for them.
It's pretty intense. It feels like a foreign thing
for me. And I grew up Catholic.
So you will not be alone and walking in there and looking
around going like, I don't even know what's going on in this.
You'll recognize the form of the mass if you were raised in the
Catholic household, but it'll still be a little bit foreign to
you because basically most of the people that are my age,
certainly everybody younger than me.
This is not standard pretty wild give it a shot that's a thought
for you. I have something as a palate
cleanse. I don't want to leave you
without that. I'm also going to encourage you
if you want to support our program, subscribe.
We crossed 13,000. We're adding about you know,
close to 1000 every single month watching over on YouTube.
So God bless all of you over on YouTube.
Thanks so much for joining us make sure you hit the like
before you leave. If you're watching on rumble,
same story if you're watching on X watch us on one of the other
platforms. We actually get monetized if you
want to help us out. It's the same stream, just helps
out and there's is a pretty cool chat.
We've got the best chat in the business on both sides, YouTube
and Rumble, awesome people. You can support us on locals by
going to kyleseraphin.com. Super easy to do and if you want
to share with a friend, I would encourage you.
It's actually turns out to be one of our best monetized
things. Cost you nothing.
By the way, it's a free service over on Spotify.
You don't even have to download the damn app.
Go to Kyle Seraphin, show the word Kyle seraphinshow.com.
That's how you send the Spotify app.
You can do video or audio super easy.
You can go fast. After we upload it, it's usually
uploaded by about 11:30 on the Eastern seaboard, 10:30 here
locally. So go and check them out for
sure. Let me give you a palate cleanse
of some kind. This is a Canadian talking about
what he sees in this country and what his fear was and what it
wasn't. Again, this doesn't mean a hot
war when we talk about a crusade.
So here's one of our snow Mexican neighbors from the
north. He's got a great mustache.
Well, I'm a Canadian in the US right now.
And when Charlie's assassination happened, I genuinely thought,
like, am I going to have to go home?
Because this is the type of major event that you'd think
could destabilize society, You know, people hitting the streets
and maybe if it got real bad, maybe even a civil war.
I think we all thought about it. But I genuinely remember it
hitting me that day. Like, no, we don't have to worry
because it's the people that you have to worry about that are
celebrating right now. And the people that are pissed
off are supporters of Charlie, which means they have deeply
strong morals and they have a God.
So when you piss off the left, they get violent in the streets.
And we've seen it and don't act like we haven't.
And when you piss off the right, evidently they hold prayer
vigils. Seriously, name one business
that's had to board up their windows.
Name one act of violence. There's been no looting, no
maniacs in the streets. And it's not because we're not
pissed off, it's because we're not the same.
And this whole situation perfectly shows the true
concern. And the media has convinced so
many people that it's the radical right wing extremists
that you have to worry about. OK, where are these people?
What are they doing that's so dangerous?
If I can be really honest, they're in some Deep South small
town, honestly minding their own business.
OK, these radicals on the left are out in society, among us,
everywhere. And not even secretly
celebrating the death of Charlie like being so open about it.
These people have no honor, no integrity, no shame, no morals.
And honestly, can you really be that surprised?
These are the same people who have no problems casually
castrating children and unaliving their babies.
These are the issues they care the most about.
But if you want to keep believing CNN when they tell you
that it's the right wing lunatics that are the problem, I
guess that's your choice. And I guess not everyone was
meant to wake up and see the truth.
The. Truth, it's not yours, not mine.
It exists. It's outside of us.
We're all dressed trying to get to it.
So anyway, thanks so much for joining the program here.
God bless all of you that are listening.
Please share the show and I look forward to seeing you guys
again. I hope this week is a little bit
more, a little bit more tame than last week.
Time will tell. This is the tumultuous moment.
All right, see you again tomorrow.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle
Serafin.