Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Well, hello my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Wednesday. It is May the 22nd, and we are
rolling live right now on rumble.com/kyle Sarpin.
If you're listening to us anywhere else, if you're
listening on X, if you're listening on YouTube, come join
us on Rumble. I'm probably going to kill the
feed on YouTube midstream. There is an easy way to go do
it. You're going to see the link
right here. Go to rumble.com/kyle Sarpin.
Make the switch. Why is that?
Well, that is because we continue to tell you things that
are true and obvious and fair, balanced information that is
based on experience and based on evidence.
And that means that you've got to be destroyed when you're
sitting over on YouTube. We got our little strike
yesterday for talking to you about COVID.
If you guys saw yesterday's show, it got destroyed, it got
removed and they claimed that it was 54 minutes in.
Interesting. When I start telling you that
the the mainstream media is pushing fear porn, that they are
going to destroy that particular episode that we punched out
there. It's not the first time that
they've removed one of our episodes, but it might be the
last time because I just don't care.
And yes, obviously we're getting censored and throttle there in a
big, big way. It's not good.
It's not a good game. So today we're going to talk
about something that's very uncomfortable for most of you.
It's something that we are going to get into in a big way.
The question is this conservative folk I've asked you
what are you conserving, and I'm going to give you an option.
You can be involved in the business of truth, or you can
get into tribalism. You can't do both.
You can Only you can only serve one master, in this case, truth
or tribalism. That's where we're going today.
Before we do, I thank my sponsor real quickly.
Thank Patriot coolers. Guys, if you want to get your
own, a lot of you've been tagging me on social media.
I won't be seeing them on Twitter for a little bit because
I'm going to take the week off because it's awful there.
But this is one of mine. I got one in white that also
looks awesome. You guys are all getting the
suspendables merch, put on your tumblers.
Totally, totally good looking stuff.
I've seen you do it on the big water bottles.
I've seen on the tumblers, I've seen on the coffee cups.
They look awesome. You guys are doing a great job
and I appreciate you going to patriotcoolers.com with my promo
code. It's basically free to do the
engraving, etching. You can also get it printed on
there. Those are two options.
Go to customize, go to stock art and then go down to the
suspendables tab and you can add it.
There's some other things you can add on there as well.
If you want to add like a first responder flag or other things
you can do kind of a little mixed bag of the of the
suspendables and some of their other stock art, which is really
good looking stuff. It really is.
They make an outstanding product and as Garrett told me
yesterday, it is superior if only for the fact that you can
screw on the lid and then it is a like a leak proof seal.
Really good stuff from patriotcoolers.com promo code
Kyle. Kyle saves you 10% free shipping
for 50 bucks or more. Get yourself two and then you
will clear that threshold and you'll be like the suspendables
who I'll have at least two. I sent three to Garrett.
I sent two over to Steve. Yeah, they're my sponsor, but I
want my guys to have good stuff and and they do so today.
You guys ready for this? When you are a whistleblower
against the federal government. When you are a whistleblower
specifically against the law enforcement agency, it requires
a thing that I would call examination of conscience.
It makes you look inward. First, you have to evaluate, is
the thing that I'm saying true or did I miss the thread?
Is it possible that I'm wrong and everybody else is correct
because they're all doing this thing?
To become a whistleblower, you have to have a little bit of
faith. You have to have a faith in your
ability to discern what is true and what is false.
You have to believe that the thing you're doing is righteous
and you have to stand against the many.
You have to step out in front of a group, a group of people that
accepted you in this case, that pay you, a group of people that
have some scary authorities. Especially when you're dealing
with law enforcement, you have to step out in front of a lot of
people and they are all looking the same direction.
You have to look back in their faces and say you are all wrong.
Everyone of you is incorrect, and some of them know that
they're incorrect and some of them don't.
Some of them think that they are actually in the right.
Those people I don't have as much problem with.
They're just confused. But some of them know what
they're doing is incorrect, immoral, illegal, unethical, and
they have to go along with it anyway.
Those are the people that are really dangerous but all of
those people are called the ordinary men in the the trials
that happened in Germany. Nuremberg.
I'm sorry not in German. Yeah.
So the the post Nazi era trials what do they do?
They went out there and they tried to root out the so-called
good Germans. The good Germans were people who
went along to get along. This is exactly what the
suspendable stand against. Let me show you something.
This is our little removal for medical misinformation
yesterday. That's the claim.
But what was I talking about throughout that show yesterday
that would put that kind of thing on the radar for a
YouTube? And why are they worried about a
show that has a couple 1000 followers and gets a couple
dozen views on any given podcast that we do over there?
We're talking about beer porn. We're talking about using the
amygdala as a tool to short circuit rationality and reason.
We're talking about using tools that are otherwise successful.
And then we want to just cast a light on it.
Because once you understand what it is that is happening and why
it's happening, it's impossible for them to use that tool on you
again. Some of you guys may have seen a
movie. It's one of my favourites.
It's called Lucky number Seven. It's one of my favourites
because it's Bruce Willis. I've always felt like Bruce
Willis and my dad had a lot in common.
I don't know if any of you guys are in my age bracket and saw
that kind of thing, but they sort of look the same.
They sort of have the same kind of sense of humour from what I
can tell. And there's a little con game
that's played in Lucky number 7, and we're going to talk about
that at the end of the show today because it's what's
happening. But I'm going to tell you, you
got two choices. The choice is tribalism or
truth. Truth with a capital T means
that which is actually happening, a factual reality
that can be agreed upon that exists outside of your
emotionality. And any of the the lenses that
you have or any of the covers that you are seeing, tribal
Ness, tribalism is when you say it's my team.
And a lot of people right now in the political right are going
for tribalism, they're all in on it.
They're in on it to the point where it is a weapon that can be
used against them. And yesterday was a great
example of that. All right.
It's pretty dangerous. It's pretty dangerous when you
are so interested in one particular outcome.
There's another great movie that I like.
It's called 0 Effect. It's one of the greatest, one of
the best hands down Bill Pullman movies that was ever made and it
is one of the least seen. It's also one of the best
performances. I think of Ben Stiller who makes
my family very uncomfortable because he awkward and he does
like things that are really awkward.
Meet the Fockers type stuff. What they explain in this movie,
Daryl 0, which is based on the life of Sherlock Holmes, it's a
modern take on a Sherlock Holmes, someone who's sort of
socially dysfunctional and unable to kind of process
reality. But he has this objective
clearview because he's outside of it.
He's not really a person. He's just this weirdo.
Bill Pullman plays Daryl Zero, this, this great detective.
And he said these really bizarre statements that are great
monologues, and they bring some, like, underlying truth about the
human condition that I think is incredibly important to
consider. It's one of the reasons why I
always felt like I I was like, yeah, I get that.
He says when you go looking for something, if you're looking for
one particular thing, you are very unlikely to find it because
you're looking for only one thing and the world is full of
many things. But if you're looking for
anything, then you have a very high probability of finding it.
You can find a clue. If you're not looking for only
the solution, but you're looking for some broader piece of the
picture, then you can find it. Because there's a lot of things
in the world. And if you're looking for many
things, in a world of many things, you very well may find
one of the things. And that's something it's
something to consider right now. So yesterday, yesterday we had a
bombshell. I'm going to put that in air
quotes a bombshell put out by Julie Kelly picked up by Dan
Bongino covered down on by Jesse Watters, opined upon by former
CIA guys like Brian Wright. Said his name.
Brian Dean Wright shared by Judge Jeanine Steve Bannon.
Everybody's got an opinion and nobody knows what they're
talking about. And that's an awkward moment
when you live on the political, right?
This is why I'm not a Republican, folks.
I'm not, and I really never have been.
This is what's going on right now, All right?
It's right there. I'm going to break it down for
you so you guys understand exactly what I'm talking about.
I have no disrespect for Julie Kelly as a person.
Think she's a nice lady. She's very often correct.
But nobody has a monopoly on truth.
We all are just trying to to accomplish it.
And the same for Dan. Dan has done wonderful things
for my family. He's a wonderful person.
I would stand and fight for Dan Bongino anytime.
But Dan is inaccurate in this particular situation.
But he's not inaccurate because his information is generally
wrong. In this case, Dan is actually
missing the point of what the real story is.
I think, and I'm going to give you some real experience from it
now, People always like to mistake wisdom equals like age
equals wisdom, and that's not true.
It's age plus experience. It's time plus experience in
that particular category will give you wisdom in that area.
So in the case of the story of the FBI bombshell saying that
they authorized deadly force at Mira Lago, everybody that is
taking this, this one tinge on it is wrong.
They're absolutely wrong. The the outrage should come from
the following the FBI executed a search warrant at Mira Lago.
That's the end of the story. It's outrageous on its face.
It's the first thing that I sat with Dan Bongino and talked
about. I was appalled.
In fact, I considered it was the most important and and probably
that the my most proud moment was that the FBI considered me
unworthy of being in the FBI before they went and executed
that search warrant. Now, unlike people who claim
certain things and say they know certain people, I know people
that were on that raid and they don't speak to me anymore
because of the ways that I've spoken about what happened.
I know things apparently that most people don't know,
including people like Julie Kelly.
She was absolutely shocked to learn when Steve Friend reached
out to her yesterday and said listen she goes what was it?
Was it a SWAT raid? It's like it wasn't a swat raid
it was effing HRT. The FB is hostage rescue team,
the elite tier one operation that spends time training with
the seals and dev grew with the Delta force guys.
The people that are the FBI's best of the best, their
selection by the way one of my buddies went through, went
through the selection for Delta Force what he calls D fo he
finished it. He wasn't selected.
He's an absolute stud. He's an FBI agent.
He also went out for HR TS selection and nearly died doing
so. It is unreasonably difficult for
no particular reason because there is no mission set that
actually fits the bill for HRT to be the hardest, most elite
physical selection that there is.
But it's really, really difficult.
The problem is it still selects federal agents who basically are
beholden to a deadly force policy that falls under DOJ.
They're training these operators that basically could go and
exist and theoretically run side by side if they spent everyday
training with Delta Force guys. But they don't have the
discernment of working in foreign operational areas where
they are sending rounds down range and rounds are coming back
all the time. That's what that's what the CAD
guys do. That's what.
That's what Orange does. It's a counterterrorism unit,
that's what. That's what Devgru does.
SEAL Team Six HRT is not that, but they're outstanding at what
they do. And I've trained with HRT
because my surveillance team was theoretically the primary set up
team. We were the default set up team
because we were in Washington field.
We are in Washington field doing surveillance.
We would set up surveillance to what's called interdiction.
We would create a surveillance bubble around targets, whatever
it was, theore in the, you know, theoretical hostage situation,
possible, you know, dangerous guy would want to be terrorists.
We would follow said wannabe terrorists.
And when the order came in, then HRT would assume what we call
the surveillance bubble. They would take over our
positions, continue, and then they would be able to execute
whatever it was, the interdiction or the execution of
that person. And when I say execution, this
should blow your mind. The FBI has a thing that's
referred to as hurricane authority.
All of this crazy nonsense that you're hearing in the media
right now about authorizing deadly force.
Deadly force is always authorized.
It's always on the table when you're dealing with armed
federal agents. Period.
End of story. There's no negotiation about
this. This is not even close to a
debate. The minute that you get your
badge and your gun at Quantico, whether you're an FBI agent or
whether you're DEA agent, whether you get it at flexi when
you are a federal agent working for ATFDEAUS Marshals or the
FBI. Those the ones I can speak to.
That's the DOJ deadly force policy.
Deadly force is always authorized.
Period. End of story.
Full stop. That's it.
No more. It doesn't matter what's written
on a piece of paper, ever. The only thing that's usurps
that and and withdraws the deadly force policy and gives
you something much more dangerous, which is what Fox
News is talking about, which is what Dan and Julie are talking
about. They're they're an error,
they're mistaken. But the things they're talking
about is the thing that's called hurricane authority.
And almost nobody knows that that exists.
I've revealed it to Congress. We've seen no action on it.
Hurricane authority is this idea that there would be a finding by
a senior executive member person within the DOJ and this scares
the shit out of me. By the way, people, this is the
scariest single thing there is that they would pull back the
legal and constitutional protections of the deadly force
policy which exists for the DOJ for all agents.
They would withdraw that and they would usurp it with this
authority to proactively kill somebody based on a probable
cause, belief in advance. Like we believe that they're
carrying a weapon system that would be deployed.
We're going to shoot them in the head before they get a chance to
move their hands and detonate it.
That kind of deadly force is not something that is common.
It is not farmed out to anybody. It is actually in the SWAT
briefings. Steve Friend has sat in these
briefings. Garrett Boiler sat in these
briefings. I sat in these briefings where
they've talked about hurricane authority.
Nobody else has ever heard this kind of stuff as far as I'm
aware. And that is what they are
talking about when they talk about deadly force being
authorized outside of the deadly force policy.
Otherwise, deadly force is always at play.
When I'm at church and I'm an FBI agent, deadly force is at
play. The deadly force policy always
counts. I've got it up here for you
guys. OK And I want to show you this
Julie Kelly supposed bombshell was that we have the DOJ putting
it into what is actually known as a.
What do we call it? It's called an OPS plan.
Anybody who's ever done a military operation knows what
I'm talking about. I want to show you guys this.
OK, this is from an OPS plan. Now in the federal system it's
referred to as FD 888. That is an arrest plan and they
have more broadly used almost all the pieces of the arrest
plan as an OPS plan. The OPS plan is the federal
document 888. You guys can go look it up
yourself. This is an excerpt that is pre
filled in. All the other parts are filled
in by the agent. You have to fill them in.
Who's Who's the the person that's on the case?
Who is the person that is going to do the hands team?
That's the people that actually put their hands on the subject.
Who is going to be on the search team?
Who's the search team leader? What kind of equipment will you
bring? Who?
How many boxes are we going to bring?
Every single thing is nailed down because when you leave
things to chance, you leave things to failure.
That's the way our plans are written.
Anybody who's been in the military knows exactly what I'm
talking about. That doesn't mean that this plan
doesn't go to shit the minute you go and do something, but
these are all written down. The only thing that is pre
filled in on every single OPS plan that I've been able to find
going back to as you see they're effective November 2020,
November 21st of 2000. This is a 2425 year old
document. The newer one has the more
extended deadly force policy which I'll read you in a moment
but I don't need to read it to you because I know by memory.
The newer version of it will tell you the deadly force.
It is always pre populated because it is always on the
table as you guys are losing your minds on the on the chat a
little bit. Let me just say again, this
should never have been a search warrant.
That should have been a consensual search in the same
way it was done at the Biden residence.
And fact, for those of you that have been paying attention and
very few people have paid attention the way that I have or
Steve or Garrett has. Steve D'antuano, the Assistant
Director in charge of the FBI field office in Washington DC,
The FBI Washington field office, which is where I used to work,
Steve D'antuano was my boss. Steve Dantuano has said nasty
things about me in front of Congress incorrectly, by the
way. He doesn't know what he's
talking about. Steve Dantuano said it should be
a consent based search and he was supposedly overruled by
people below him, which was the special agent in charge of the
counterintelligence program that executed this raid.
By the way, that was my boss too.
For a period of time. I knew the people on that floor.
I worked there for two years on that specific floor, not just in
the building with these people. There's like 1000 plus agents
that work for Washington Field. I worked with the people that
specifically engaged in the Mirror Lago raid and I speak to
none of them anymore. You get it.
This is a real big problem for me that they executed a search
warrant on a former President's house that was protected by the
Secret Service. That's absolutely categorically
a stupid and dangerous and irresponsible decision.
And yet the paperwork that they did is completely normal and not
a bombshell. It is a joke because people
don't know what they're talking about.
They did not authorize deadly force.
Look, this is, and I'm going to tell you why this is so
dangerous. I'm going to tell you as we get
going here, Let's do Bret Baier first.
He's the one covering it. It gets, like, more and more
breathless as people go on and on and they get more and more
hyperbolic. The right is being whipped up
into a frenzy into this. And I'm going to caution you
right now. That is exactly what is at play.
That is intentional. OK, here we go.
Repair. Former President Trump's
attorneys argue the Biden administration Justice
Department authorized the use of deadly force if necessary during
that raid of the former president's home in Mar a Lago
down in Florida as they're searching for classified
materials. Again, this is an exhibit that
is just one of many documents released by the judge, Eileen
Cannon, in recent days. Correspondent Kevin Cork has
these breaking details as they're coming some 400 pages
released just in the past few minutes.
Good evening. Good evening, Brett.
I've been going over this. It is quite shocking what we
have been able to glean based on what Judge Cannon has released.
As you mentioned, the Biden administration authorizing the
use of deadly force during the FB Is raid on former President
Trump's Mar A Lago estate in August of 2022 as part of its
investigation into classified records.
That again, according to court documents now an operations
order Brett produced in discovery as part of Special
Counsel Jack Smith's investigation into the former
president's alleged improper retention of.
Classified records revealed that the FBI believed its objective
for the MAR a Lago raid was to seize classified information,
NDI, and government records as described in the search warrant.
Here's where things get very interesting.
The order, according to a court filing, contained a policy
statement regarding the use of deadly force, which stated, for
example, law enforcement officers of the DOJ may use
deadly force when necessary. That's not the.
Interesting part. There's nothing interesting
about it. Let me just show you what that
looks like. This is actually available to
you right now. You can go to DOJ website.
You can go search for one dash 16.200, the deadly force policy,
Law enforcement officers and correctional officers.
The Department of Justice may use deadly force only when
necessary. That is, when the officer has a
reasonable belief the subject of such force poses an imminent
danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer
or another person. I have said this upwards of 1000
times because I briefed this every single day when we did
surveillance, because every single surveillance operation
was an operation. And as you just heard the Fox
News guy say, it was an OP order.
An op order is not a search warrant affidavit.
It is not a sworn statement. It is simply a specific document
meant for a specific audience. I'm going to give you guys an
analogy. It's very important to
understand this analogy. If you're sitting at a
restaurant and you hear a couple next to you at a table telling a
joke, and it sounds really filthy and sounds really
diminutive to the woman, it sounds kind of like a really
abusive sort of statement and they're laughing about it.
Inside. Jokes are meant for an inside
audience. This document was not meant for
anybody. It's not that you can't read it,
It's just that you don't understand it.
You're like, I don't understand why that's funny.
That seemed really abusive. That guy's saying some crazy
stuff. No, it's probably from some joke
that they had from when they were dating or a movie that they
used to know. An inside.
Audience has to understand what's being done, and an FBI
agent who gets the deadly force policy on a search proposal on
an FD 888 or an OP order understands that the deadly
force policy is always on the table.
They simply use every single mass gathering of FBI agents as
an opportunity to rebrief it. The reason why is CYA cover your
ass. Cover your ass means if you were
to get involved in a shooting, it doesn't matter what operation
it is. If you get involved.
In a shooting, the first question is going to be when
were you last briefed on the deadly force policy and can you
articulate it and the answer should be it was briefed prior
to the operation as is FB is policy, it's always the policy.
It has to be done with about 24 hours of doing it.
They do a briefing and then they do the whatever the hit is,
whether it's a search warrant, whether it's a a surveillance
operation, you're going to get briefed and then you're going to
go do the thing if it's an arrest operation, etcetera.
It's very, very simple. The FBI does proactive
investigative steps like doing. Search warrants.
Arrest warrants, long term investigations, etcetera.
The Secret Service does a very, very small number of those, but
primarily involves itself in protection.
And protection is a different animal.
It's defensive, it's not offensive, It's not going after
people specifically. It's trying to keep people away.
So they do investigative work against people that are
threatening their targets. But the odds of them?
Doing something the way that we do it is very, very unusual.
It's not very high. Bill Shipley, who?
One of you just mentioned in the chat, talked about it.
He sent me a private message, he said.
In 21 years of being an assistant United States
Attorney, in 21 years, he signed one search warrant for the
United States Secret Service. That's not very many.
That's that's an AUSA whose job it is to to review search
warrants. It's not a bombshell.
Folks, I'm sorry. The bombshell is, is that the
FBI went into Mira Lago. That's flipping crazy.
It's absolutely insane. It's insane that the assistant
director of the field office that was like running the
investigation said we shouldn't do this.
And they did it anyway. They overruled him from above
and below in headquarters and also in his own field office.
That's freaking crazy. That's the bombshell.
But that already happened. So now we're stirring up outrage
and things that are wrong. It's mistaken.
So here's Julie Kelly talking about stuff.
Unfortunately, I reached out to Julie Kelly very privately and I
told her I said, look, I'm not mad at you.
I'm disappointed. You have access to people like
me and Steve Friend and Garrett O'boyle, 2 guys that are former
SWAT. One guy that was SWAT, like I
was on the all the SWAT operations for Washington field
for for years. I showed up at all of them
because I'm a medic. I was one of like 50 medics in
the FBI that was an agent. I got brought into all this
stuff. I went to trainings with HRT.
I went and taught at the SWAT Basic school.
I know how these things go down because I've been in dozens and
dozens and dozens of these briefings, like probably at
least 60 SWAT briefings, plus whatever search warrants I've
done with other squads. I'm not telling you this because
I want to defend the FBI. The FBI should be disbanded.
It is my general contention that it is a is a a threat to
American Civil Liberties in a big way.
It's the scariest. Thing to me it's way scarier
than any other government agency but.
That's what I've been talking. About for two years, folks.
Deadly force is. Always authorized.
When you have a group that uses national security tools and then
also has the ability to take your life at any time, should
you meet the threshold that I just read to you in the deadly
force policy where they can articulate that you're in
imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the
officer or someone else, then you are screwed.
And that's why we're screwed. With the FBI being the way it
is, we cannot have it be the way it is.
But that has nothing to do. With this, these are people
getting whipped up about the wrong thing.
And I'm going to tell you in just a moment why I think this
is George Hill and I compared notes after our discussion.
And we both came. Up with the same conclusion, the
answer is what you're seeing right now is called Rope a dope,
and it's a fifth generation warfare version of Rope a dope.
Here's Julie Kelly. On Bannon, and this is
embarrassing stuff. Bannon's wrong.
Kelly's wrong. They're all wrong, folks.
I can't help it. Just everything.
No picking the lots in the room and and.
No, no, no, no, They're all but no there.
There's one lead and this is it. They actually got authority for
use of dead force. And they had.
Plans for casualties. They brought a medic, they had
plans for casualties. They had a a trauma center set
up and they had a map to the trauma center.
That's all part of a component of one thing.
I take it Julie Kelly. Correct.
This is part of the plan to conduct the 9 hour raid armed
raid of Mar A Lago, and I know some other people are
extrapolating that this was a plan to harm the former
president or someone at Mar a Lago staff, God forbid his
family. I'm not so sure that that is
where this leads, but. It's not.
I'm just asking questions. I'm just saying suppositions of
things that I have no experience in and I have no knowledge of
this woman. Like she doesn't know she's
never sat in an FBI search warrant briefing.
Ever. Ever.
No chance. Sorry, Julie Kelly.
They're they're talking about how they were in plain clothes.
There's no uniform for the FBI folks.
There's no uniform. I was never given a uniform.
It doesn't exist. SWOT has a uniform, and they
regularly and on a frequent basis go in street clothes.
Why? Because then you can disguise a
SWOT hit to look like a regular agent search.
HRT does it. All the time too.
They have a uniform allowance for it to be able to buy street
clothes. They'll go out and buy flannels
or construction outfits. They've told me great stories,
really, really good stuff, like sort of tier, one level thinking
where you know that a subject comes down the same Rd. every
single day. So you put a construction unit
out there that's just digging a hole and filling it in all day
long. And so there's a flagger and
there's a guy wearing the vest. It just turns out every one of
those guys is actually carrying an AR underneath all that stuff.
HRT does this. And then what they'll do is
they'll block the guy and another freaking dump truck will
come in and drop a whole load of dirt on the back of the guy's
truck. And while he's trying to figure
out what the hell happened, rifle in your face, nobody
moves. OK?
It's a great technique. It's called tactical
surveillance to interdiction. TSI is the acronym my team used
to set this sort of thing up. For dangerous.
People, it's safer for the subject, It's safer for the
operators. Sorry, it's not.
It's not. Crazy to be in street clothes.
I could easily do a search warrant in this.
I could do it in anything that any of you are wearing, even a
dress. There's probably an articulation
for all that none of these things.
None of these. Things are exceptional or wild,
but what is wild is this reaction, and this reaction
tells us exactly what's been going on.
I didn't realize this until until I started thinking about
the whole insanity and the the uproar about saying something.
But it's obviously true about stuff that James O'Keefe is
doing in some of these other like really shitty undercovers
type journalists. Why are they?
Why? Are they so promoted?
Why are they super viral when the things that we're telling
people that is true are not viral and are not being
promoted? And I think once again, it looks
like the rope a dope. This is what it looks like,
folks. You're getting taken advantage
of. This is the Kansas City Shuffle.
It's being played out on a wide scale.
There's a con, you know there's a con, but you don't know how
the con is being done. And they are counting on you
misunderstanding what the con is.
They are misunderstanding it. Everybody here is getting
whipped into this frenzy about something that is not true and
it's dangerous. Now here's the worst thing.
I'm now put in a position you guys remember.
You've ever heard Trevor Aronson.
Trevor Aronson is the guy that wrote The Terror Factory.
I told you he's on the left. He would admit it as well.
He thinks the FBI, specifically Tarvik's black, black and brown
people and that he does. They do so unjustly, Trevor
Aronson told me. He's been giving speeches about
that book. He would go on this like little
run around. And the things that he said was
the most difficult was when crazy people or people that were
fully misinformed would come in talking about certain things
about 911 and make him defend the FBI.
Folks, you're making me defend the FBI.
They're actually correct in their statement about this.
They're wrong about what they did.
But the fact that this is boilerplate, standard paperwork
is not negotiable. It's not even close.
It's insane that they did this. It's insane that they didn't
have a liaison contact. Just reach out, ask Secret
Service. Hey, when can we come in and do
it? By the way, can you get, can you
get your boss to go ahead and give us a consent form for us to
come and get these documents? We're coming in.
We don't want to do the search warrant.
Very, very. Easy.
I'm now having to defend the freaking FBI, which I despise
with a passion, And the people that I despise who say the same
things, they're correct. In this case, balls and strikes.
Ladies and gentlemen, it's balls and strikes.
We're only going to call what's true.
Listen to this. Fox News.
Alert. The FBI just responded to the
bombshell allegations from the Trump team that the FBI was
authorized to use deadly force during the MAR A Lago raid.
Quote, The President has nothing to do with and had zero input on
the plan. The FBI followed standard
protocol, which includes a statement limiting the use of
deadly force. There was no departure from the
norm in this matter. Totally normal.
Probably going in arm to the teeth.
And do a former. Did you notice?
Both Jesse Watters and Julie Kelly probably doing this, maybe
doing this. They don't actually know
anything about what we're talking about and they have the
access to people that will tell them.
It's totally. Normal to do that on an OP
order. It's totally abnormal to go
after a former president. Do you understand that?
There's some nuance here. You can either choose truth or
you can choose the tribalism. If you want to be outraged, you
can be outraged. But when you are emotional that
that's when you're most vulnerable to have an advantage
taken of you and. That's what we're seeing.
Right now. People, there's a lot of.
Real threats that are happening out there.
This is fifth generation warfare being used as a rope, a dope.
They are burning you up with all the chaos.
The FBI, the CIA is coming after you look at this, get really
outraged and you're like, oh, I know I'm going to be conned.
What is the con? The con is, can we get enough
factionalization on the political right to divide and
conquer? Here's my supposition.
Look at the political left. How do they operate?
They operate in a world where they're unified.
They're behind Antifa, they're behind the BLM protest, even
though those things are antithetical to a lot of civil
liberties and it actually hurts their base people that they
claim are going to be really great.
They're like, oh, we we we really care about black and
ethnic minority businesses. We want to make sure that
they're taking care of, they're all burning down in their
neighborhoods. They back the Antifa play.
Why? Because they back all plays on
the left. The left is united in a very,
very small amount of time. We're seeing a small divide
between the Free Palestine idiots and the people that are
in the mainstream left. But generally speaking, they'll
even call cover for that. And you'll even see that the
people in the mainstream left will tack more towards the Free
Palestine people. Why?
Because they're united. So you can.
Buy them. You can buy them off and they
do. They will buy them off anytime
they get a chance. OK.
The buy off is like, how do we give them something that they
want? I just saw this on.
ABC Biden administration is cancelling student debt loans
for another 160,000 borrowers. Borrowers.
We need young people that are dumb and don't know anything.
We're going to tell them that they're getting free money from
the government. That's how we do it.
We buy them off on the left. What do you do to the right?
The right is unified behind a guy like Donald Trump.
Even people like me who are not like big pom pom cheering Donald
Trump Guys, what do we say? We say it's an obvious choice.
One guy is pro death, loves baby death, leaks, leaves an open
border, makes things markedly worse than the financial
situation. For my family, that's easy.
Trump's the choice. It's a default choice for me.
It's not my best choice. My best choice isn't running for
office. I put Steve friend.
In there. I put Garrett O'boyle in there.
They're all better options. They love America as much as
anybody, and I think that they're beyond reproach.
Those are my better choices. But I've got one choice and it's
very clear it's not Joe Biden. And that means we're 100% going
towards the Donald Trump. So how do you break that up?
Everybody on the right is on the same page, but the right can be
factionalized. Why?
Because we care about truth. And some of us are.
Very tribal. We see people like Laura Loomer
attacking people for their loyalty to Donald Trump.
That's not required. That's not required.
If you're a conservative, loyalty to any politician is not
required. That's absurd.
We don't elect kings. I don't like the king.
I don't like the role model for anybody.
I just want someone who's going to do a good job.
I don't care about the politician per SE.
I care about the outcome of the politician.
And if that's going to be better than, that's my choice.
It's very simple. It's rational, it's not
emotional. It's not based on cult of
personality. So how do you divide?
That up, Well, you got to find the people that are interested
in cult of personality and you got to pit them against the
people that are interested in rationality.
You have to do that. OK.
They're doing that right now. How many of you are mad at Jenna
Ellis, who agrees with like 80% of what you say as a political
ally and almost everything you want to do?
How many are? Mad at Ron DeSantis because he
decided to throw his hat in the ring in a primary, like everyone
has done forever. People always throw their hat in
the ring for a primary. That's what they do,
particularly when we don't have an actual incumbent.
Now, Trump is sort of like a de facto type in incumbent, but
he's not an actual incumbent. He's not sitting in the office.
You're not running against him. And we even had debates
historically in my childhood, in my lifetime, where you would run
against the incumbent. People did all the time.
They didn't go out there and try and demonize those people that
follow that person we're talking about.
We're talking about cult of personality and tribalism and
the interest in just what's true.
If you are only interested in what's true, then it doesn't
make you emotional to find out that the the thing that always
happened, here's the real outrageous thing that happened
at Mar a Lago. They treated it like every other
raid. That's actually the bombshell
story. They treated it like every other
raid. In fact, they actually upped the
ante and they brought in HRT. HRT.
Is brought in for like the most dangerous operations and then
sometimes when they need stuff. They bring in.
HRT to Puerto Rico to do this thing called Operation Guard
Shack every year because they think they're going to have to
shoot it out with the Puerto Rican State Police.
That's who they bring in. HRT for they bring in Puerto
like the the HRT guys when they think that there is a highly
high probability of having to engage in very sophisticated
tactics. And so you can almost argue
that, OK, it makes some sense because there's the possibility
of blue on blue. You want your best trained guys
there. HRT doesn't accidentally shoot
anybody that I'm aware of. Not very often of course.
There's always what happened at the Bunny Ranch.
I don't know exactly how that place but the outrage there
should be that they treated it like every other rage.
They treated it like a tactical search warrant when in fact it
was a property that was already secured by another another
government agency and it should have been a liaison contact.
It should have been done with consent.
And how do we know it should have?
Been done with consent because they did that for Biden.
That's how it should have been treated, not the way that it
was. That's the outrage.
Not that they wrote the deadly force policy like they do on
every other damn search warrant. From the first day that I
started in the Washington field office, My first day on the job
in December of 2016, I read the Deadly Force policy.
I read it from a little piece of paper that was in my wallet to
all the agents there. Not only do they read the deadly
force policy to everybody that's an agent, they also say for any
other law enforcement that's part of the task force, which is
commonly the case. You'll have people from State
Department. You'll have Secret Service.
If there's one of those people on a TFO for like a J TF, that's
a joint terrorism task Force. If you have any other local
police officers, State PD you will say all other officers were
are not covered by DOJ's deadly force policy.
You stay within the policy for your own department.
That's actually the add on when you have task force officers
there. It's standard.
It's read every time. People getting heated.
Up about the wrong stuff and in the meantime this is going on.
Cyber attacks on the. Water system are increasing EPA
warrants urging utilities to take immediate action.
OK. It's fear porn and device they
have to divide up the right. They're going to give you things
to be fearful of and they're trying to tell you look look
it's the next COVID outbreak right.
It's the bird flu that we talked about yesterday that that was
apparently medical information that was that was missed dis or
malinformation according to the according to the YouTube folks.
I strive. To be malinformation, things
that is inconvenient to the narrative and that can be on the
left or the right. I'm only going to tell you the
things that I know is true and I'm 100% correct on this.
If you have more. Experience than me as an FBI
agent. And you know for a fact that in
your experience, they never read the deadly force policy for
every single one of the search warrants.
Please come forward. I will give you a seat and you
can you can have the microphone for an hour.
Easy, there isn't one. I've even talked to people that
are in Trump's investigative team that are former FBI guys,
and they all know what I'm talking about.
This is an opportunity for the Trump team on the legal side to
make, hey, they're making an argument.
They're making an argument in a court filing.
What they are not doing is telling you something that is
factually true. They're trying.
To craft an argument, that is the purpose of the lawyers, and
they're allowed to do that. They don't have to say things
that are objectively factual. It can be played with, and when
they do that, they can push it any way they want.
But if you are part of the MAGA base and you are going to be
conned in by what lawyers are trying to slant an argument in
court, then you are the mark in this case.
You're getting outraged about something that's very dangerous.
And in the meantime, the left is uniting behind the things they
want to do. They're.
Going to tell you about. The big thing?
Look, cyber attacks, It's on water systems.
That's why we got to crack down on your speech.
That's why we need to do AI filtration.
We need to go out there and be able to have better control.
We need federal control of your local water in case we want to
turn that off and create real chaos in the streets.
It's a cyber attack. Folks, Sisa Sisa's out there.
It's really dangerous. The Cyber Security
Infrastructure Security Agency. Yeah.
So they need to go out there and make sure that they take over
all of your water supply, your electrical power grid, all this
other kind of things. You always, I always tell you
guys you got two options, prepare or repair, right?
Now you're in the. Middle of it.
So you can do a little. Bit of both.
You better start repairing what you're thinking about.
If you think that this is only about a bombshell reveal, this
is a federal judge who just released some basic paperwork.
If you're making a. Mountain out of this molehill.
What's the end game? What's the goal there?
How about this stuff that's happening in North Carolina?
North Carolina lawmaker fights, anti state masking law.
You got people on the political left.
She's a Democrat. She's trying to make sure that
they have the public health carve out.
We talked about fear porn yesterday.
One of the big pieces of it is this new avian flu, this H5 N 1.
That's the COVID. Variant of of November 2024, it
looks like. At least that's what they're
floating out there. Can we get people scared about
it? You've got the people on the
political left running with it, even though they admit it only
killed one person so far and it's not a big deal.
That's how it started with COVID.
That's just how it. Starts.
We get you whipped up. Into a frenzy.
You get the left really excited about wearing masks again and
lockdowns, and the government needs to take over all of the
infrastructure. You get the right divided on
who's the the most conservative and who's saying things that are
on Team Trump or on Team Republican.
Now you can fight. Now you can fight against them
and they're wearing you out. Y'all they're wearing you out.
They're giving you all this fear porn.
It's coming from all sides, including Fox.
They just keep you against. The ropes.
They'll just wear you out about all the things you're outraged
about. And there's two possibilities.
When you're that outraged, 2 possibilities exist.
Thing #1. You're too.
Tired to fight in November.
You've been outraged for the whole year.
You've been outraged for four years.
You got nothing left. You're empty.
It's all out of the tank. That's a real rope.
A dope, right? That's you let your opponent
punch themself out. But the other possibility is
this. They've been setting you up for
one thing. Outrage, outrage, outrage,
outrage. And then something really wild
happens, like what happened in Waco.
The government really steps over the line and when they do,
somebody reacts. And that's exactly what they
need to be able to come in and do the thing where there is no
election because we got martial law in this country, because we
got to be able to step beyond it.
I keep telling you that my friends who care about the stuff
always worry. Is there a like a better than
average chance? Is there at least an average of
50% chance or or around there that we won't even have an
election in November? Everyone keeps talking like it's
an assured thing. Not right now, all.
Bets are. Off and the reason why I don't
trust anything that comes from the left or the right is because
people like Fox News were also running the same death counters,
and they were also concerned about the same things.
With COVID, everybody's playing that same game.
You can't tell me there's a unit party and a BLOB like Mike Benz
likes to talk about and then not act like it's a flipping BLOB.
And anybody. Can be conned into this,
especially if you are emotional about it and you are tribal.
If you have a tribal attitude, you will not be willing to seek
the truth. It's hard to.
Deal with that, folks. I did a podcast with Catholic
Vote very recently, and it's going to be coming out, I think,
on Thursday. It'll be worth your time, but
consider this Inconvenient Truth is a very Christian phenomenon.
And it cost? You something.
It cost you friends. It cost you the ability to
navigate in public. It cost you social credit.
You think the things that Jesus was saying back in the day was,
like, really well received. They killed him for it.
You realize that, right? Like that's always been the
case. Martyrs come forward and say,
listen, you must know this. The prophets have done this for
a long time. I'm not claiming to be any of
those things. I'm just telling you the human
phenomenon of disregarding inconvenient truth is well
established and has been for centuries.
We don't like it. We don't like.
To have the thing that we want to believe dispelled and we
don't like. We want to be outraged.
It feels good. We're all on the same team.
We're all riled up. Have you ever been in a place
playing academics or sorry, been in a like a sporting event where
you get whipped up into a frenzy?
Coach is saying all the right things.
You're hearing everything you want to hear, get you like their
animals, their garbage. You're better than all this
stuff. I've been in these things and it
makes you feel superhuman. It feels awesome to be part of a
team that's ready to go in and nobody can touch us.
It's. One of the things that.
Really bothered me about Marcus Luttrell's book Lone Survivor.
I don't know if you guys have ever read it, but I couldn't get
through it. I couldn't get through the end
of it because when he's talking about the beginning, about how
they're getting whipped up into a frenzy, I understand that,
that mentality. But it's incredibly dangerous
for really rational operators to be talking about how we're the
best in the world and nobody can touch us.
And then all your friends get killed, right?
That thing really always sat with me.
It's a very sobering moment when you realize that getting whipped
up into a frenzy is only functional to a point.
We're talking about. Esprit de corps that the Marine
Corps talks about in the French sort of knew you didn't need
people to have incredible training.
What you had is to have people believe in themselves that they
were like the immortals and they could never be killed and they
would go out there and they would die for for this 'cause.
It's really hard to be able to take that and not kind of temper
it as a as a little bit more rational take.
There's. A place for.
It but not an election cycle, and certainly not in politics.
Politics is a game of strategy. Why do I keep telling you guys
that Republicans are playing maybe chess or checkers, right?
Depending on how good they are. Sometimes they're playing chess,
sometimes they're playing checkers.
Some of it is a little bit more strategic, no doubt.
Democrats aren't playing. That game they're playing,
demolition Derby. They're smashing the board
they're driving through with a monster truck.
You can't beat King me with somebody with a 34 inch tire
that drives right over the top of the board.
They win because they're not playing by the same rules of the
same game. We're not talking about the same
thing, folks. It's important to know.
This I want to thank my friends over at Catholic Vote
specifically because I mentioned them and there's something in
The loop today that I actually think is an antidote to a lot of
this. If you guys are not getting the
loop, go to catholicvote.org, sign up for The loop.
There's actually a link in the show description you guys can
click through and I think they have like a they're tagging the
people that are that are referring folks to The Loop.
You should get it. It's a good it's a great e-mail.
There's a bunch of stuff about news all kinds of different
perspectives today. There's one that's really
interesting in there. There there's an article that's
called Be like Jesus Have Parties.
That sounds pretty good, doesn't it says where did Jesus do the
most of his teachings? At house parties, at dinner,
around the table, with food and drinks and friends.
But modern people have such packed schedules that these
meals are becoming isolated and focused on efficiency.
That is not good for a life of faith.
Bring back dinner parties. There's an entire article making
the arguments that when we have neighbors come in and this is
something I want you to understand.
This is where I'm coming from with this.
Again, catholicvote.org. Go and sign up for the Lube.
Get that and read this thing. This is the really important
thing. Think of.
Every time that you've had a married couple over, friends of
yours, have them come over for dinner and.
What do you do when they? Leave when you and your spouse
are standing there. You do the same thing I do.
I know you do because I've seen everybody do this.
Everybody judges that person. Well, they do this.
They're kind of weird about that.
Like, do you remember when they said this?
Like, why do they say that everything we do as human beings
is judgmental? We are meant to do that.
We are programmed to do this. And you do it too.
I know you do because I do it and I've seen everybody else do
it. When somebody comes over to your
house and they have some quirky nuance, that's not 100% the way
that you do business, whenever those people leave, you guys cut
it up and you Twitter and you and you compare notes.
Why is that? Because you and your spouse are
supposed to be like a united front.
And the people that come. Into your house are not you.
They don't do things the way you do.
They do a lot of the things you do.
That's why you're friends, but not everything.
If you agree with. People 80% of the time, like,
you're really close. I always told my buddy I have a
friend who's in the FBI right now and he, he and I agree on
like probably 9394% of the things.
When we find that 6% that we don't agree on, it is a really,
really weird moment because we're so used to agreeing on
things and it gets really contentious.
But it's really important to remember, hey, you know what?
I don't have to agree with everything that my friends do or
say. One of my friends told me that
he thinks he's one of my best friends in the world.
I would do anything for him. He told me he thinks that there
should be unlimited money given to Ukraine at the cost of, like,
his children's future in this country.
I think that's a crazy impression.
We're not not friends anymore. We just don't agree, folks.
We don't have to agree on everything.
But when there is. An opportunity to look at truth.
We should. We should also question
ourselves when we are looking at and somebody's telling us, look,
I have more experience in this. I'm not emotional about this and
I'm telling you you're wrong. But I still love you.
I still care about you as a person.
I don't want you to be wrong. I'm not telling you because I
want to be right. I'm telling you because I need
you to be right as well. We should at least consider
that. Perspective.
Because it's not a crazy thing to do.
It's not crazy to disagree. It is crazy to lose your mind
and get angry and tell people that they're useless.
It's it's crazy to me to come out here.
This guy, Brian Dean Wright, I guess he was in the CII don't
know anything about this, he says.
I spoke to my friend still at the Bureau.
No one thought it was wise or proven to have an authorization
of deadly force in the Mira Lager raid.
I know for a fact you don't have any friends in the FBI that said
that. You know why?
Because nobody, nobody would say that.
That's an FBI agent. Even the people that I despise
that are in the FBI would would argue against this.
It's nonsensical. And in the meantime, we've got
Jim Comedy out there talking about how Trump is an
existential, existential threat to democracy.
And so he's going to do things that he didn't do before that he
set it up in the first term and now he's going to knock it down
in the second term. He's going to go after his
political opponents. They're literally doing the
thing. It's the Dan Bongino dipsy do
flip Peru that he always talks about.
They're literally setting up to do the thing that they've been
doing. If you get a second Biden term,
I would not be surprised. They're already trying to
financially assassinate the guy, but they didn't try to do that
at Mar a Lago. That's not what was being done
there. It doesn't mean we shouldn't be
worried about it, but it just means, come on people, let's not
play into this. And so there you have him
talking about there's Dan Bongino's quote being said, says
anybody who who says it's normal as a bonehead.
He says some really nasty things that are aimed at people like
Brianna Morello and Steve and Garrett and I, and they're
false. He's wrong.
I've done a lot more FBI search warrants than Dan Bongino has.
I'm not mad at him. We just have to disagree on this
one. And I would like people to step
back and see that this is the Kansas City Shuffle.
OK. It's a rope, a dope where
they're wearing you out and it's a Kansas City Shuffle.
The con man doesn't choose to play the shell game with you.
If there's any possibility of him actually losing.
The con man isn't getting you to pick the wrong shell.
The con man is getting you to accept the basic premise of the
game, that it's still being followed, that there are rules
to the game. That's what the con man is
doing. The con is getting you to pick a
shell at all. The con is getting you to
believe that there's a possibility that you could ever
win, even when you think that you might be conned.
They're trying to make you believe that there are, in fact
rules when the rules don't exist.
This is a Kansas City Shuffle, folks.
That's what this looks like. We're seeing it right now, yes.
Let me just ask if I've ever been on Bannon Show never once
been contacted by his people. Not once.
The ball isn't under the first shell or the second shell, or
even the third shell, because the ball isn't under the shells
at all. The ball is in the con man's
palm the whole time. It's called a shell.
Game but the But the premise of the con is a Kansas City shuffle
and I'm going to come play you a little bit of clip as we leave.
We don't get we we don't earn we didn't earn a pallet cleanser
for the day. What we earned is a warning and.
I'm going to. I'm going to.
Play for you in just a minute. The Kansas City.
Shuffle is an old, established name for a con game that depends
on the mark, believing, correctly, that the con artist
is trying to con them. We all know we're trying to be
conned right now, right? Do we not know that?
Guys, do you know that you're they're trying?
To con you. So we know that.
But the con is not that they are trying to con us.
The con is that they get us to believe that they're doing one
con and they're actually doing another.
You're looking left and they're doing something on the right.
It's a sleight of hand. There's a lot of names for this
stuff. It's the whole premise.
This one refers to it as being right for the wrong reasons.
You're right, they're trying to con you, but you're wrong about
how they're trying to do it. Here's the numbers that they
say. This is the one 2-3 of the
Kansas City Shuffle. Con artist needs to do the
following to suspect that the victim has to do this, you have
to suspect that you're involved in a con game.
Do all of you believe that you're being conned right now
that someone is trying to con you?
All right, step one Accomplished.
Then you have to think that you figured out how to beat the con
game. How about Q?
Remember that. Remember all the psyops that are
being played? You got to figure out that you
think that you've actually got the inside track on this.
You finally seen it. You got the bombshell, the
smoking gun. And the real con?
Is that they got you wrong about what the real con is.
Do you see it? So dangerous people.
We're in a dangerous time. If you guys want to support our
program, if you guys want to support what we're doing here,
you can do that financially and also get something really tasty
out of it. You can go to
madhatjerky.com/kyle. I didn't even want to read as
today, but I'm going to do it because these people are still
also trying to make a living and they're good Americans.
Mad hat jerky.com/kyle promo code.
Kyle will save 20%. The thing that I've just burned
through is called the black truffle, the USDA prime version
of that. It is the best.
That is my opinion. I will let you know.
That is my opinion. I can't substantiate it other
than that's my taste, but it is very tender and it's very good.
20% off promo code. Kyle, you'll get something for
spending money that supports the show and you'll be really
pleased that you did. It's a high protein snack, so
get out and check that out. Also, you can check out my
pillow guys over there. Mike Lindell.
I don't agree with everything Mike Lindell says, folks, I'll
just tell you right up front, but I think he's a decent person
and he's trying to do the best. We agree on many things.
So. So Mike Lindell is not my enemy.
And I think that's worth noting that we don't have to agree with
everybody all the time to still want to support what they're
about. mypillow.com/kyle. That'll auto procolate the promo
code. Kyle.
Kyle is the promo code save up
to 50% depending on what you're doing.
Sounds like they're doing a deal on slippers right now.
A lot of you like those. My buddy Alfa Luna likes them.
Check them out. I'm just seeing some feedback
that the the black truffle is very good.
I know you guys, it's very good. It's really good stuff.
Check out those our sponsors. And let me lastly say if you
guys want to support Garrett O'boyle, he's getting pummeled
on social media. He just told me he's like I'm
ready to delete the whole app. I don't blame him.
I I'm taking a week off from all this stuff.
It's terrible. You guys are wrong, and it's
it's tough to be the only person that's right.
I've already done with this with the FBI.
Now I've had to do this with Project Veritas people.
By the way, people from Project Veritas agree with me.
The only one who doesn't is James O'Keefe, who's a con
artist. It turns out
thedashdispendables.com is how you support Garrett.
If you guys want to go do that, the don't forget the dash
between it and suspendables.com promo code.
Kyle saves you 10%. You can get the shirts.
You want to get the red one like me.
A little bit of rage. You want to get something like
this one over here that's got the the last line sub stack.
Garrett is doing a 40 days and 40 nights reflection from his
fast. You guys can get that on a sub
stack and you can link through that.
The Dash dispendables.com Check all that stuff out.
Here's here's the thing. It's not a pallet cleanser.
OK. The Kansas City Shuffle.
You're the young guy. The game is being played.
By somebody who is much more sophisticated and been doing
this a very long time. The BLOB always looks out for
the BLOB, and the BLOB always leads you to believe something
that is not true. I love the way that Mike Benz
describes it, and many of you know why it's true.
The key is don't mistake the fact that you know that you're
being conned for understanding what that con is going to be.
You should be suspicious of all the things, especially when
everybody, everybody has landed on I know I'm right and they're
all wrong. They don't have the knowledge of
the experience or the time in this particular area to be able
to say it. It's tough.
It's tough to see it and it's tough to call out people for
being inaccurate. I don't like doing.
It it's not fun for me. It actually keeps me awake at
night. It's like one of those things
like calling out your friend is probably the hardest thing to
do. Calling out your enemies is
easy. Your enemies do evil things.
You just tell them they're evil. The people that you like and you
disagree with because they are doing something wrong and you
know it's not good, not just for them, but for everybody.
That's a real, real tough take. That's what being a
whistleblower has been about, folks.
For me. I did it.
I lost a bunch of friends at the FBIA, Lot of them.
And I'll lose followers over this.
I don't care because I'm never going to go to tribalism when
the truth is still available to me.
I encourage you guys do the same.
Here's the Kansas City Shuffle. Oh, that's not the Kansas.
City Shuffle. That's the book we just wrote
for Catholic Vote for God, Country, and Sanity.
How about that one? You guys can find it at
store.catholicvote.org, How Catholics Can Save America.
I wrote a chapter in there if you guys want to read it.
All right, here's the Kansas City Shuffle.
Sorry, without further ado, story, man.
Charlie Chaplin entered a Charlie story, man.
Charlie Chaplin entered a Charlie Chaplin Look Alike
contest in Monte Carlo and came in third.
Now that's a story. This this is something else.
So that's a Kansas City Shuffle. No, it's just the inciting
incident, the catalyst. This is a Kansas City Shuffle.
They look. Right.
And you get it. They need to push.
You one way and make you think you understand the game so they
can play the real game and Bruce Willis just set him up.
That's what it looks like. And it looks like you end up
getting. Crushed at the end of it.
In this particular case, I think that's what's being set up here.
Do not get pushed over the edge and get whipped into the fury
that is being being fomented on the political right just as much
as the political left wants to enrage you.
Those are our sponsors. You guys can see them.
Shows brought to you by all those folks.
We appreciate it. You guys can send me your nasty
comments and sarcastic remarks over at kalisariffin.com.
There's a contact me thing there.
Knock yourself out. Tomorrow's going to be an
interview with a former IRS agent.
Another person that knows by the way, he reached out to me in the
background and said, I have been saying this for years, that they
shouldn't put the deadly force policy on there because if those
documents are out, people don't understand what it is.
It's meant for a very specific audience and the audience is not
going to understand it. And that is true.
So look for Aaron Gogley. Tomorrow, I'm going to be going
and giving a talk to some folks from Vote tonight in College
Station. And if you're part of that, I
hope that you guys are watching the show.
And if not, hopefully they'll join the show soon.
Folks, the truth matters. You can always choose.
It doesn't take much. And yeah, this is exhausting.
You're right. Somebody just said get some
sleep. I'm working on it, folks.
I am. All right.
I will see you tomorrow for the interview and then we'll catch
you on the back end on Friday for friendly Friday.
Well, you're going to hear a lot of the same stuff because Steve
and I are in lock step on this stuff.
All right. God bless you.
See you tomorrow. Thanks for.
Listening to The Kyle Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on
rubble.com/kyle Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True
Social, and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.