Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, and
welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Thursday. It is February the 5th.
I'm going to make a argument to you today, and I'm going to use
the words of the current president.
The argument is somehow this administration has fallen off
from the promises and there is nothing that is more indicative
of this failure than what's happening right now in
Minnesota. Lot of big promises.
Agenda 47. This was Donald Trump's
platform. You can still find it at
donaldjtrump.com/platform if you'd like to read it yourself,
and I will link that in today's show notes.
He made a bunch of claims, and it seems like more and more of
these things are getting rolled back or getting gutted entirely,
and they're happening from people inside of his own
administration, and they're actually happening by the man
himself. If people make you a promise and
they don't keep it, I think you should evaluate them based on
those promises. There's no such thing as, oh,
well, there's some different situations on the ground.
It's like you made a promise, you didn't deliver it.
Just own it. Just say I can't do what I said
I would do. And the biggest single one that
I continue to see is this, this movement from mass deportation
to targeted operations. We went from everybody must go
to targeted drawdown. We're going to try to find a few
people. We went from millions of people
need to leave this country because they're here illegally
to maybe 10s of thousands of people.
And if we're lucky, we'll get it into the six figures.
That's an utter failure. It's a priority one failure.
It's a priority two failure. It's not.
It's not winning the way that people thought they were going
to win. And that really, that really
chaps my ass. I'm just going to tell you
because I actually did want that and I actually do think it's
feasible. It won't be nice.
It won't be something that anybody will give you a high 5
at the end. They may think that you're the
worst person ever. That's kind of what happens when
you walk in and you take the reins.
You have to turn your back on the audience, you have to face
the orchestra, and then you have to make sure that the music
plays. And if there are people in the
back that are heckling and booing, so be it.
Unfortunately, we have an administration that's more
interested in PR and positive spin and headlines that are
favorable and make them feel good.
And I'll show you some evidence of that.
All those things do not make you a strong or great leader.
And that's disappointing, more disappointing to those of us
that were looking for a realistic.
You're not going to get all 20 of the things you promised, but
I would like a couple of them. I'd like you to get the ones
that are in the most important the the top few ranks.
And so I'll show you what I think the the failure there is.
And that happens on the Second Amendment.
It's happening on deportations and immigration, C minus at
best. And I know you're not in a good
spot when you take people that are meant to be doing reform and
they're supposed to come out and make generational changes to the
danger that is our federal government.
And you move them back into a propaganda spot instead, which
is being covered by Ms. now. So we've got a whole survey of
things. I want to talk about some stuff
over at CNN, some stuff. What is this?
What is this article this N hold on one second here.
Oh, that's the Constitution. We're going to go over the Bill
of Rights and why I think this, the 9th and the 10th Amendment
continue to be the least thought about, and they're very
important. Interestingly enough, Democrats
are starting to highlight them. We've got a couple stories from
CBS, one from NPRMS now, some funny little procedural pieces
talking about ICE and what kind of propaganda goes on on the
left side of it. So we'll get all of that stuff
as well. And we're going to get all that
right after we talk about our friends over at Patriot Protect
who sponsored this episode, patriot-protect.com/K YLE,
patriot-protect.com/kyle. You'll get yourself 15% off an
annual subscription. Scammers and criminals have
raised the stakes. They did it in 2025.
They're continuing to do it now. Actually, a really weird story
about AI. We're going to be covered in a
minute, but AI is sort of the nuclear weapon system when it
comes to scams when it involves things like cloning voices or
faking text messages that emulate friends or families
style they can impersonate with an e-mail.
I actually just got a notification yesterday of all
things, and we may have a conversation with skip hold
about this in the in the near future.
I got a an e-mail letting me know that my data had been
breached and shared with third parties that were unauthorized.
And this is my official stuff over on sub Stacked where we
actually published things. All of these things can be out
there and available to the public.
It's going to be your name, your address, your phone number, your
family members, your age, your online behavior.
Sometimes it's actually your credit card and all that kind of
stuff. They, they always tell you that
they didn't get access to the credit cards, but you never know
until something like may or may not pop up on the credit card.
If you want to make yourself a less favorable target to these
scumbags that are out there trying to steal from you.
And that's what they are. They're scumbags.
This is how they operate. They're trying to take things
that they didn't earn. The easiest way is to not just
be someone that they can keep track of.
It's kind of like hiding your your jewelry or putting your
your valuables underneath the seat or making sure that your
purse is in the trunk and not somewhere that people can see
through an open window. If you guys want to do that, you
can do things like join up with Patriot Protect.
Again, it's patriot-protect.com/K YLE.
You'll get less junk calls almost always.
That's the first thing that people notice.
You'll have a smaller profile on the Internet for scammers and
cyber criminals and maybe even federal agents who are just
sitting out there that don't have all the databases
available. Check them out.
There's a link in the show description.
The annual subscription is 15% less with my name and it's
relatively inexpensive. It's like less than 10 bucks a
month to be able to kind of protect yourself from
potentially thousands, 10s of thousands or hundreds of
thousands of dollars in scams. So that's what I will recommend.
We use it here at the house. Me and my wife both do, and
we'll recommend it to you. All right, let's dive into
today's program starting now. We're going to talk about it in
the man's own words. I want to discuss the agenda and
I also want to discuss that the solution is not meant to be the
executive. So we're living in a strange
time. I had a conversation just a few
minutes ago. Somebody that you guys probably
would not be excited about me talking to, but doesn't matter.
Somebody who disagrees with us on a lot of things but can
honestly say there is nobody that is alive today that is
absolutely responsible for the problems, but the continuation
of not addressing where the actual issues lay.
And this is where they lay. This is the institution that
seated its authorities and have acted like the president is
supposed to be a king and he is not.
President's job is not to go out and set policy and then execute
policy. It is meant to be followed up
from the people in the House. It is meant to be approved by
the majority in the states, which would be the Senate, so
that you actually have some sort of consensus and some sort of
filter. There's supposed to be a check
and a balance on the populist movement.
Can we just get people to do the jobs that they were elected to
do? And the answer is basically no.
There's a very interesting situation that is developing
regarding the Second Amendment. And we've had this conversation.
There's people in the gun rights movement now that are worried
about it. There's a new ATF director
that's being proposed for a, for a, for being confirmed.
And here's what's really wacky. And This is why I know that we
have no principles on either side.
There are things that the federal government absolutely is
not allowed to talk about, to touch, to get involved in things
like the establishment of religion, right?
We can go to the Bill of Rights, which we will actually right
now. That's what I'm going to do
right now. Let's go to the Bill of Rights.
Here we have it, OK, US Bill of Rights, it's on the screen #1
Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of
religion, prohibiting the free exercise thereof, abridging the
freedom of speech. And that means all speech, all
of it. It doesn't matter if it's
incitement or anything else. Those things can be handled at
the locality level. And that's what was meant to be
done. They're not supposed to restrict
the the freedom of the press, the right of the people to
peacefully assemble, petition the government for a redress of
grievances it says shall make no law.
And then or or or or or. That's any of those things fits
into that category. These are plain spoken simple
language that anybody should be able, if I said, hey, you can do
not this, you'd be like, what about if I want to do this?
I just said, no, you can't do this, so don't.
That doesn't mean that no one can make those laws.
It just means that it cannot be done at the federal level.
For some reason, we've just decided to waffle on all of
these things. The Second Amendment is the same
deal. The right of the people to keep
and bear arms shall not be infringed.
It's really, really simple language preparatory.
Here's the reason why we believe this is necessary.
And then boom, here's what must happen.
So why do we have an ATF at all? Why are firearms included in the
in the mandate of this organization?
Because the explosives are in there as well.
And theoretically explosives are also arms.
They're also tools. People use things like dynamite
and various different types of explosives for all kinds of
commercial processes and they used to use them.
The famous story that I get is that my wife's, she was, she had
great aunt. I'm trying to think, yeah, great
aunt. My mother in
So no big pieces went rocketing through everybody's home and
then they blew it up because they needed to get down into
bedrock. And explosives have have value
when you're trying to do these kind of things.
Why on earth are they able to infringe?
Now, that doesn't mean that you're not supposed to be able
to make local rules, right? You can't bring your guns to
town. So this city says you cannot
bring guns in and they're going to enforce it at their level.
Same situation. It can be done at the state
level. You can have ridiculous
California laws. You can have the silly woman who
is the governor of New York say things that are completely
illogical. And if you are dumb enough to
elect this person and you want that person to announce, by the
way, she's in the executive. So this should actually be
coming from their legislative branch as well.
But if you want to have this person represent you and have
the stupidest gun laws I can think of by someone who doesn't
even understand what the technology that she's
discussing, that's your right as a state, not at the federal
level. Here's Kathy Hochul just because
this is funny and let's just start off with a smile.
She's really worried about semi automatic machines, unclear what
this is or what this rate of fire indicates or who is
shooting this rate of fire. But she wants to outlaw them.
You can't just have them. She says you can do that at the
state level. You'll no longer sell handguns
that can be converted into semi automatic machines able to able
to fire 1200 rounds a minute not here, not in New York.
PayPal. You just blowing from stupid
down. Oh, that was a little SpongeBob
piece at the end. How nice is that?
There are hold on, I'll just open up the screen here real
quick. There are semi automatic options
behind me. These are semi automatic
machines. One of them is a revolver.
I don't know if it's actually technically a semi automatic,
but every time I pull the trigger, it does what it's
supposed to do. And then on the other side,
well, Glock handgun over here, Glock 43X with my Shield arm
stuff on it. You guys can check them out too
if you've never bought any of their accessories.
I stand behind them. I use them all everyday.
That one's part of my display. The other one is on my everyday
carry. It's a little bit lower
visibility. Semi automatic machines.
Semi automatic means you pull the trigger and then the gun
goes boom and then you pull the trigger and the gun goes boom
and it doesn't go because you're not carrying a suppressor.
Because they don't want you to have a suppressor, and carrying
it on a handgun is kind of impractical, right?
At least for your concealed carry. 1200 rounds a minute,
That's a really fast finger movement.
That's faster than Jerry Mitchell.
Like, yeah, that's not a thing. But she can make up whatever
crazy rules she wants at the state level.
If they want to pass them and they want to elect idiots to go
do it, then fine. Why can we not just look and
understand that there is a federal system that is meant to
say, hold on, let's go down to these amendments that actually
matter here. It is amendment #9 the one that
nobody can ever cite. The enumeration in the
Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny
or disparage others retained by the people.
No, I, I didn't get it all the way on the screen there.
It's on, It's nice on my screen. There you go.
OK, there's the 9th. And how about the 10th, which is
so powerful? The powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by
it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or
to the people. The things that are not
addressed inside that document are not meant to be the purview
of the federal government. They are meant to remain with
the states. There are things that are meant
to be the purview of the federal government.
It turns out there are things that are supposed to be done by
the federal government, and we are actually meant to see those
things. So it would be nice if these
people understood what it was that they swore an oath to.
And it frustrates the everliving hell out of it.
Like, I don't understand. There's ACNN article right now
talking about Carolyn Levitt trying to downplay some of the
things that Donald Trump said. Yeah, the headline says Trump
obliterates his aides efforts to downplay his comments.
Again, I don't know if you guys have seen this happen, but this
is like a Trump thing. He says something that's just
not artful and might not be what he meant.
And then you've got people inside of his administration
like, well, that's not really what he meant by the way they
used to do this. Joe Biden all the time.
Joe Biden didn't come back and go, yeah, no, no, that's, that's
exactly what I meant because I don't think Joe Biden even knew
what he said the first time. But in this case, you've got
analysis here. It says at this point, whenever
an aide or advisor to Donald Trump offers to translate
something to the president has said, you should probably assume
that they had no idea what they're talking about.
That's that's kind of harsh, but probably true.
Trump on Tuesday laid waste to the White House press secretary
Carolyn Levitt's effort to pretend he didn't say something
as controversial as he did. And what is he talking about?
He's floating the idea of nationalizing federal elections,
which are meant to be run by the states.
And they are not a power that is granted under the federal
government like they're not granted the federal government.
These are the states options. So what did he say?
He did this on Bongino's show. He said Republicans say we want
to take over, Trump told former deputy director Dan Bongino of
the FBI in a podcast. We should take over the voting,
the voting in at least as many as 15 places.
Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.
It's highly impractical given the Constitution gives the power
to run elections to the states. You guys get why that is a
problem. It should be a problem to people
who swore the oath, including the president.
It's also provocative in that this is how the president who
tried to overturn the election based on a volume of face vote,
roll, roll, roll, roll. And then they go into their sort
of like crazy nonsense. And this is all talking about
whether or not the SAVE Act can do what it can do, which is
supposed to be make sure, as we talked about yesterday, that you
have either a valid passport or a birth certificate and that you
can't just use Real ID. And that illegal aliens and
people that are not meant to vote in our system are not
allowed to vote because that's kind of kind of important.
That assumes that it matters whether or not you have like
people legally or illegally voting.
And I'm not 100% sure that it matters.
To be fair, I'm actually living in the space where I kind of
believe that these things are just flipped over by the by the
algorithm in the machine. So the only reason they want
more registered voters is so they have more potentially and
feasible excuse for how they're going to steal it.
I don't even think that we live. I, I think we live in such a
thinly veiled version of a constitutional Republic that I
think it's almost offensive for us to talk about there being a
constitution. It's this vague notion that we
give tribute to, but nobody really knows what's in it.
Apparently nobody seems to know what's in it.
They just, they just ignore it flat out.
So let's go to the things that were promised and they were
promised. And I'm going to show you why
we're in a bad spot because of the promises made.
Not by me, not by podcasters, not by news host, not by
anonymous accounts on X or Twitter or on Facebook or people
that you like or even your friends that say things that are
that are agreeable. Donald Trump, JD Vance, Agenda
47, it's on the screen. And I'll key in on a few pieces
of it in just a second. All right, let's start with this
#1 seal the border and stop the migrant invasion.
Migrant might even be too soft of a term, but sure.
OK, that sounds good #2 carry out the largest deportation
operation in American history. They didn't just put it on their
platform. They spoke about it.
And they've immediately, as of the last three days, walked away
from that piece. Number one, check.
Good job. That's temporary, it turns out,
because all it took was changing the executive, which means that
people are not going to carry out the duties of their office.
We saw that in the last administration.
So credit where it's due. Check mark on one.
Number two, walking away, redefining and acting like it's
happening when it's not #3 and inflation to make America
affordable again. You guys tell me we talked about
the K shaped economy this week already, but there's plenty of
studies that show that maybe if you have a ton of money, then
everything is fine because this stuff doesn't, you know, hit you
as as much. But if you are not in a very
high income learning or if you're on a fixed income, you're
probably in a bad spot right now.
And if you're looking to move and buy another home somewhere,
Yikes, double Yikes for you. Make America the dominant energy
producer. Stop outsourcing, turn the world
into a manufacturing superpower. I don't even know why the
executive has that. There's nowhere in the
Constitution that should say anything about what they have to
do. Large tax cuts.
This is, again, this is the purview of Congress.
Who has the power of the purse? Who's supposed to be able to
side taxes in the 1st place? No taxes on tips.
This is like the president pushes the agenda forward.
Did they get it done sort of capped?
That sounds absolute. Like these are simple words like
I'm not, I'm not making them up. No tax on tips.
That means that there would be what?
No taxes on tips? That's not the case.
And then here's where I get really upset.
Defend our Constitution, our Bill of Rights, and our
fundamental freedoms, including the freedom of speech, the
freedom of religion, and the right to keep and bear arms.
I'll just stop at 7. Those are the big ones for me.
Why are we not carrying out the largest deportation operation in
American history? Why is that not the case?
That's Part 1. And the second one is why on
earth are we not defending this thing the way that we were told?
Defend the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Did they not
read it? Did they not know what that
involved? Like even explicitly called out
the 1st Amendment, another part of the 1st Amendment and the
Second Amendment in this particular promise on the
campaign trail. Let's do #2 first, let's do the
what I think is a betrayal of what Americans thought they were
getting. And by the way, they're still
the, the, the largest number of people still believe that people
who are here illegally should be deported.
The crazy thing is it was carried out in such a way that
they let the media narrative get you.
Before we even play this little speech here, let me show you
this. This is an NPR poll. 2/3 of
Americans say ISIS, quote, UN quote, gone too far in
immigration enforcement. That doesn't have anything to do
with what the promise was and what needed to be done.
Just because people don't feel good about something when you're
doing something that is austere doesn't mean you stop.
If you were to go and start a punishment for your child, you
might not feel good about watching their tears, but at the
end of the day, when they turn out to be a decent human being
that understands there are consequences, it's worth it.
Watching your child cry because of something you've done.
It's awful. It's nobody wants that.
Nobody's like, well, I'm really enjoying myself right now as I
have to discipline my child. That sounds.
I feel great about this. You go this, you know, what are
the thing you always heard? Oh, the the thing you hear is
this hurts me more than it hurts you.
And yet it must be done, isn't that it?
I know it must be done because he talked about it in June of
2024 when he was running for office.
But this thing allows millions of people.
This allows millions of people into our country.
Joe Biden's order is pro invasion, pro child trafficking,
pro women trafficking, pro human trafficking, pro drug dealers.
And in all it's really they bring death and they bring
destruction into our country. It's really pro illegal
immigration. It's it's great for illegal
immigration. On day one, I will seal the
border. I will stop the invasion and we
will begin the largest domestic deportation operation in the
history of our country. Have no choice.
We have no choice. Biden has given us no choice.
We've never had massive amounts of drugs pouring into our
country. We fought it like hell.
We were fighting. And by the way, you'll never
solve the problem without the death penalty.
When I was when I was when I was in China, I was with President
Xi, 1.4 billion people strong guy and we get along well until
COVID. Then I said, I said hell with
it, man. It wasn't what they what they
unleashed on the world was incredible, but.
Rambling, rambling, rambling. Fine.
What was that, June 2024 running for office?
What did he say? We are going to do the we're
going to seal the border and we're going to carry out the
largest deportation operation in American history.
Those are his words, not mine. It's on the campaign promise.
He didn't run away from that. In fact, in April of last year,
in his first 100 days in office, he made the same claim, said it
was getting done. Lot of hype.
I've got 2 pieces from that camp.
It was like a post campaign room rally, the ongoing PR campaign
to see how great we're doing. And people were excited about
it. Everybody wanted to see it.
Here's what it looked like, Democrats.
Have vowed mass invasion and mass migration.
We are delivering mass deportation and it's happening
very far. Is it happening very fast?
Then he decided to show, I'm gonna turn this video down
'cause it's a little bit loud and there's not really anything
on it. They showed a, this is in, in
Michigan. They showed an ice hype video.
So you've got flashing lights and some drones flying around
the edge of a plane, people being deported.
You've got press, you know, folks that are taking pictures
of, of folks. This is when they were running
everybody down to El Salvador. OK, They got some cool hip hop
type music. Listen, you got the sound of
chains. These are these are really,
really bad guys. OK, good.
So you're getting rid of some Ms. 13 guys.
This is the first 100 days rally.
And he went on and he hyped it and he showed it.
He was like, look how good we're doing.
We're doing awesome. Everything that you voted for,
it's coming down and and nobody was like, oh, I hate that you're
doing this. You had people on the left that
were crying about it, but people that voted for it, which by the
way, wasn't just people on the MAGA right.
And that's why that that poll is relevant from NPR.
It wasn't just MAGA right? People that were saying, hey,
let's go. It was people that were
independents. Now, you might lose the
independence on the messaging campaign, but that doesn't mean
you like you. You, you don't stay the course
for you that wanted to know what this NPR article had to say, let
me move it to where it needs to be here on the heels of two
fatal shootings. Those fatal shootings, I blame
100% on the law enforcement officers, more importantly, the,
the, the, the management, the administration in Minneapolis.
I think it is their fault because they weren't doing crowd
control as they should do. And I think it was also the
fault of a bunch of people getting whipped up since they
decided that they could do things that they are not
lawfully allowed to do and they've been allowed to do it
for five years. This is the mistaken kindness
for weakness situation. Federal officers, federal agents
are not the same as your local PD.
They don't have the same charter.
They don't have the same sort of rules for use of force.
At the end of the day, they also don't have that continuation of
force that's meant to either escalate up a spectrum or down.
Oh well, sucks. 65% of Americans said that ICE and Immigrations
Customs Enforcement has gone down too far.
And this poll was done by NPR and PBS.
So yeah, I get it. It probably slants left.
The percentage of those saying that ICE has gone too far has
increased 11 points since the last summer when people were
cheering it on. And that's kind of rally.
And it's driven by independents and Democrats.
Both groups went up by double digits.
You need independents to win these things if you want to go
ahead and hold on to any of the any of the political power you
have. You don't just get it with a
fractured coalition because America's too fractured to be
able to handle anything, you know, by Fiat.
You need a coalition, and the coalition of people are in the
middle. And a lot of them I think are
bacon cheeseburger nationalist types.
I think they're like me. I'm not part of a political
team. If you promise things like I'm
going to go back to the Constitution, I'm going to make
America, quote UN quote, great again, AKA make America
constitutional again, because that is pretty great.
When the federal government stays out of my business,
awesome. I'm for it.
This is not it. This was Tom Holman.
Either yesterday or the day before talking about what
they're going to do in Minneapolis.
Given this increase and unprecedented collaboration, and
as a result of the need for less law enforcement officers to do
this work in a safer environment, I have announced,
effective immediately, we'll draw down 700 people, effective
today, 700 law enforcement personnel.
Oh, we're going to take 700 people out of there.
Well, whose idea was this? OK, let's drill down into to the
news today. That big change on immigration,
700 officers leaving Minneapolis.
Did that come from you? Yes, it did, but it didn't come
from me because I just wanted to do it.
We have. We are waiting for them to
release prisoners, give us the murderers that they're holding.
And all of the bad people, drug dealers, all of the bad people
we allowed in our country. I'd say 25 million people with
an open border policy for four years under Biden.
And that group, the auto pen group, I call them we allowed to
come into our country, people the likes of which no country
would accept. And we're getting them out.
But we've gotten a lot of them out.
So crime now in Minnesota, crime now in Minneapolis is down.
Crime in all cities is down. Speaking of why it's sound
because of us. It's down in Chicago by 25%,
despite the fact that we are always dealing with these people
and they happen to be Democrats. Speaking of that, we don't know
anything about crime prevention, Mr. President.
Speaking of Minneapolis, what did you learn?
I learned that maybe we can use a little bit of a softer touch,
but you still have to be tough. These are criminal.
We're dealing with really hard criminals.
But look, I've called the people, I've called the
governor, I've called the mayor, spoke to him, had great
conversations with him. And then I see them ranting and
raving out there, literally as though a call wasn't made.
Got it. OK.
So I heard that we need a softer touch.
We got all the bad people out. The cities are way better.
We fixed Chicago, we fixed Washington, DC, Minneapolis.
We're getting all the murders. We're going to wait until the
state government does what the state government is meant to do,
which is release them to us. But they have laws that say they
can't do that because they're sanctuary cities and sanctuary
states. So they said that they're not
going to cooperate. So we're just going to, we're
just going to draw down 700 officers.
By the way, here's Chicago the other day.
It looks fine. Yeah.
That's that's that's that's that's semi automatic machine
fire. Apparently a bunch of black
teenagers running up and shooting at a car that looks
fine. They're not very.
Their tactics are questionable. Running back into fire doesn't
seem smart, but there you go. So that seems good.
They're not going to drive a car then and then go shoot at the
car again, will they? They wouldn't do that.
It doesn't seem like something. Oh, they're going to drive up
and shoot. Yeah, cool.
And there's someone just filming it from their dash Cam, by the
way, that's a trucker. He's like, yeah, I just don't
want to get in the crossfire here.
I'm just, that's just what's required of me.
Seems like Chicago's fine. I think everything's probably
OK. There's no crime in any cities
anymore, so that's good. I'm not trying to be sarcastic,
but it's like, are we going to do mass deportations?
That was the priority #2 should I show it to you?
I'll show it to you. It was priority #2 on not Kyle
Seraphin's agenda. This is Agenda 47.
So are we going to do that or mass the largest deportation
operation or are we just we just done with that?
I have a question about immigration still looking
forward now, your goal during the election was to deport
everyone who came here illegally under President Biden.
Is your mission now to deport everyone who came in illegally
or just people who have come in illegally who have also
committed additional crimes? We are totally.
Focused on criminals, really bad criminals.
Now, you could say people that came in illegally are criminals,
but I'm talking about murderers from different countries.
We have 11,888 murderers that Biden and his group LED into our
country. We've captured a lot of them.
We've brought some of them back. A lot of them we don't want to
bring back because we don't trust the country that they're
not sent back again, despite how strong the borders are.
They'll figure a way to try and get in and we don't want to.
And we'll, we'll incarcerate them, but 11,888 murders, we are
after those people. We're after the drug dealers.
We're after the, we are, by the way, a big problem.
They, they allowed to come into our country, people from their
mental institutions, people from insane asylums that are mentally
ill and very dangerous. We're getting them out.
All right, so we're going to get the murderers the 11th.
You got to get 11,000 people out and we're going to get some of
the other people that are maybe mentally ill somehow.
We'll adjudicate that. And so we're going to go
targeted. That's a targeted operation.
That's a softer touch. Not my words, his words, Tom
Holman. We're going to take away 700
people because we've had unprecedented cooperation that
we haven't actually gotten yet. But we will get cooperation.
And the reason we know that is because they said nice things to
Donald Trump on the phone. And that's the, that's the coin
of the realm. The coin of the realm is Knob
Slobberry, from what I can tell. I'm just looking at it from the
outside. I don't have any more inside
information than you guys on this thing.
I just noticed that people who talk nice to Trump, they get
what they need, which is cooperation.
Whether or not they follow through on the nice thing is
irrelevant. You say nice things, you get to
be the FBI director, you can stick around.
You say nice things. You get to be the DHS director.
You can stick around. You say nice things even though
you're basically useless as far as all the people that that
voted for the guy. You say nice things.
Then you could just stick around and be the the attorney general,
even though people have been clamoring for her to leave
immediately. In fact, when she was named, who
did we want? I wanted Matt Gaetz.
I just thought that would be just like throwing a grenade
into the room and see what happens.
It's a it's a room full of propane canisters and you're
going to toss in some sort of incendiary device.
That sounds fun to me. I just want to see what happens
when someone goes in and wants to break stuff because that
place needed to be broken. What did we talk about the early
this week? Exile or execution?
Those are the only ways put someone in that makes people run
for the freaking hills and grab their balls on the way or not
and leave them behind. I don't care.
That would have been the right answer.
Instead we got we got Bondi. She seems awesome.
She hasn't lied to everybody at every turn, has she?
But she speaks nice to Donald Trump.
And that is in fact the coin of the realm.
That is what keeps you in your spot.
That does shield you from Donald Trump's wrath as long as you say
nice things. You know what I never, I never
hear, I never hear Tom Massey or Rand Paul just like go out of
their way to do knob slobbery. So that's probably their big
problem. That's probably why we can't get
anything done right. That's their fault, guys.
If you're watching, give me a like on Rumble.
Give us a like on YouTube. Subscribe to the channels.
We'd really appreciate that. Follow us over on Spotify.
It's Kyle seraphinshow.com. I won't even put it on there.
It's easy enough to remember. You may hear a Spotify ad right
now. That's a easy way to do that.
Let's let's do that. Let's do.
What does it look like if you don't do it right?
Sorry, let's do it. What happens if you say it
nicely? And then we'll do the
alternative. If you want to say things that
are like true but inconvenient, like, hey, we really agreed with
your agenda 47, we like to get that done.
That's not acceptable. You can't bring up old promises.
That's some old stuff. Let's talk about what happens if
you just are friendly on the phone.
How many times have I said that I think Donald Trump is a 90s
Democrat? If this doesn't solidify it for
you, there's no hope. ABC News broke the story today.
I don't know if you saw it, that the Democrats are already saying
if you bring President Bill Clinton and he has to testify,
we're bringing President Trump. What do you say to that?
I. Think they might say that, you
know, but they've already brought me.
See, I've been brought. They had me indicted many, many
times. Many, many.
Times and the president had some surprising thoughts about former
President Bill Clinton. It bothers me that.
Somebody's going after Bill Clinton.
See, I like Bill Clinton. I still like Bill Clinton.
What do you like about him? I like.
Well, I liked his behavior toward me.
I thought he got me. He understood me.
You know, he was the one that said very famously that you
don't want to run against Trump when there were 18 people.
There was 18 people including me total.
And he kept telling them, you don't want to run against Trump,
run against anyone, don't run against Trump.
And Hillary sort of laughed at him.
Yeah. I mean, if you think that Trump
is formidable and you say Trump is formidable and you can't run
against Donald Trump, kind of like that.
I like that he says nice things about me.
I mean, we all like it when people say nice things about us.
Don't you have like a little bit of curiosity about what that
might be about or that's it. If they're nice to you, then
then you're good to go. I don't like that they're going
after Bill Clinton, a guy that I'm pretty confident he was out
there talking about, if not him than his surrogates were.
I know his son and the vice president and other people were
talking about the so-called Epstein list and the fact that
Bill Clinton was going to the island didn't didn't.
I'm pretty confident I could probably go find some Donald
Trump clips talking about how I didn't go to the island.
Bill Clinton went to the island. They just think you have the
memory of a goldfish. I keep posting this, but it's
it's so obvious to me that everybody that is trying to sell
you a narrative acts like you didn't, you didn't have a life
before they said something out loud.
They want to act like you just booted up.
You have a fresh hard drive. You are recently online and now
we are going to give you this slop and will you consume it?
Bill Clinton was nice to me. OK, here's what we need to know
from ABC about the fight, the congressional fight over ICE
restrictions, which is what this is about, and whether or not
we're actually going to get the thing that we're supposed to
get. And the thing we're supposed to
get. I thought, I thought we were
going to get secured elections, a border, mass deportations, all
the things that would sort of like that would galvanized this
country against movement aggressively one way or another
in ways that are not appropriate.
Nah, that's not what we're doing.
Partial government shutdown came to an end On the other end.
There may be another horizon where we can't hammer out a deal
on the potential restrictions on immigration enforcement tactics.
There's already been a an issuing of some some findings by
some federal judges saying that they can't use things like
chemical munitions. I guess they want everyone to
get beaten with batons. I don't know which one of those
is better. Honestly, I don't actually know
which one is better. Baton chemical munitions.
One of them is a lot better for denying areas.
The other one is like kinetic. It'll really make you think
about your life choices. So maybe that's what they want.
A day after House Majority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and the
overwhelming majority in his caucus voted against the funding
deal. And again, Tom Massey did as
well. Why?
Oh, because there's things in the funding deal that are
atrocious. We talked about them yesterday.
It was like $3.8 billion for Israel and $5 billion for
funding daycares at the state level that the state can give
out, but the federal government collects the taxes and then
gives them to. We started with the
Constitution, didn't we? We started that.
There's something in the 10th Amendment that says that they're
like, what power requires that the federal government look
after daycare centers and give money to it and by the way, take
your money to do it because that's the only way they
operate. I have no idea.
It's almost like there's a power that exists over in Congress
that they don't use that they say it's complete bullshit.
How many times will you hear them say it?
Tell me there's a difference between any of these people
saying the same thing over and over again.
Let me know when you hear them wield it.
Check this out. The power of the purse and we
will use it, use the power of the purse to stop funding it
because you know what if you fund it, you own it.
That's why we have to look at the power of the purse.
We have to look at the appropriations process.
One is oversight and then that's a a job that we have and also,
of course, the use of the power of the purse.
Let me. Be very clear.
We will use the power of the purse and the.
Power of the subpoena to get the job done.
Everybody cheers. We're going.
To use. All of our of our congressional.
Leverage as a majority party by controlling the, which referred
to commonly as the power of the purse.
That body, which stands for election every two years, to be
the body closest to the people deciding how we spend the money.
So we have to exercise our authority, the power of the
purse to limit what the federal government, what the FBI, the
Justice Department are doing to the American people and that we
use the power of the purse that was given to us to do our job.
Congress has a responsibility. We have the power of the purse.
This is not using the power of the purse.
This is abdicating the power of the purse.
That's true. Why do you think that is where
everyone is on Mike Johnson is it's all about his actions,
because he's really good at talking.
He's great at talking. He's not good at acting.
The power of the purse, and we will use it and we will use it.
We should recognize the power of the purse.
They, in a word, hold the purse. This power of the purse may in
fact be regarded as, and this is the most important part, we
control the power of the purse. The fact that the Congress
controlled by Republicans, that controls the purse strings
continues to fully fund the FBI. There's a plan to build them a
new headquarters and they again, you talk about a two way St.
there. There's one set of rules for
Republicans. There's a different set of rules
for Democrats and Republicans continue to fund them.
I think a lot of Americans sit back and scratch their head to
go, why did I elect you Republicans?
What are you guys going to do to contain the FBI?
That's Sean Duffy. He used to be in Congress.
Now he's a member of the Cabinet and he's 100% right.
What's the difference? You have the power of the purse.
You have a different speaker. It used to be Kevin McCarthy,
and now it's Smithers, Mike Johnson.
And what's the difference? Did they fund all these agencies
all the way? Yeah.
Do you know who doesn't fund them?
And looks like they're going to actually get their budget fight
and may even win on it because they don't want to fund DHS
Democrats and they're supposedly in the minority.
Why is that? Oh, because Republicans pack a
bunch of crap in there. So principled Republicans can't
go along with it. They go, hey, this is this, $5
billion for daycares is not what we are meant to do.
Why are we funding agencies that don't need to be funded?
Why are we putting money out to Nigeria or to Jordan or to
Israel or to Egypt? Why are we spending this when we
we're running on America first? We literally have it in the name
that we're going to take care of this country 1st and it's not
done yet. It's really simple.
I just look at these people at their own words.
I don't even have to do complex analysis.
I just say, what have you said? Have you done what you said?
You have not. So you're a freaking liar.
If you dealt with anybody else in your life at any other level,
how many of you would go to a, a, a, a big box store?
You go to Lowe's and they advertise a sale and you go
there and you try to buy it and they're like, well, that sales
just, that's just what we talk about.
We don't actually do that. You'd be like, that's false
advertising, Number one. I expect you to honor your
promise. And they say we're not going to
do it. And you're like, well, I'm never
going to shop here again. And then the next time you drive
somewhere, you'll drive to a Home Depot or you'll drive to a
Mccoy's or you'll drive to any other an ace.
You will go out of your way to not go to that place that lied
to you. And yet people keep voting in
the incumbents because they sound good.
And they went on Fox News. And the narrative victory is a
win. In the same way that left his
message that ICE is too hard and it's too mean and it's doing all
the bad things and people bought it, including independence.
Not this guy. I'm like, do more of it.
You're not doing enough. I can tell you're not doing
enough. The reason I know is because the
people that are working in the federal government that are
doing this work are getting like dozens and not 10s of thousands.
That's it. I'm not even trying to be a jerk
about it. I'm just saying I evaluated on
your own words and you were found to be lacking.
Maybe we are lacking because the people that represent us are
also lactating. I'm going to say that one more
time because I saw this video yesterday and it was like how
freaking unserious of a nation and how tacky is Florida right
now? You have a woman who worked as a
as a cocktail waitress in a strip club that totally wasn't a
stripper. We covered her dimwitted stuff
yesterday, talking like the the Miss South Carolina in the
1990s. And then you got this character
who's got a machine pump in the background that is, that is
pumping milk for her baby because she's a lactating
nursing mother and she doesn't have the sense to not be in
office while she's taking care of a nursing baby.
I got a, a text message yesterday.
I should pull out of my phones in the Faraday bag.
I should pull it out because it was some woman running for
office that said I'm a true conservative running to be your
mayor of, of Leander, TX. And I responded, what is
conservative about women in politics?
I'm just asking what is what are you conserving?
Because it's a relatively new thing.
So if you want to tell me that you're conservative, can you can
you define the word conservative for me?
Just tell you this ain't it. And today the House will end the
government shutdown by passing the Senate Appropriations
package without the SAVE Act attached.
Instead, we're getting a pinky promise from the Senate that
they are going to reform the filibuster from a zombie
filibuster to a talking filibuster.
First that sounds you're hearing.
Yes, I am pumping because I am a multitasking Mama with a 5 month
old and I got to feed the baby. But I wanted to jump on here.
I can't listen to anything else you have to say.
I, I honestly can't. There's more.
There's, there's two more minutes of that video and that
was it. You're a multitasking Mama.
I had people that respond in comments, 'cause we posted this
over on social media as well. I mean, she posted this on
social media. I just responded to it.
And yeah, this is Kat Kamak, whatever her name is, CAMMACK.
I'm blown away. You're a multitasking Mama.
Do you know how many people responded and said, hey, by the
way, mom brain is a real thing that when you're nursing and
you're lactating and you're dealing with a, a crying baby
and that's the most important thing in your life, which it
should be. And it's far more important than
whatever you could do. There's somebody else that could
represent the people in Florida in the third district.
There's like literally anybody else would be a better choice
than that. You want to know why we're not
doing the things that are that are tough?
Because you have people that are that are honoring leftist
bullshit. Like you can be a mom and you
can have it all and you could be a nursing mom and also be a
freaking representative in Congress.
What an unserious, stupid country we are to have that.
They're not taking care of the power of the purse because
they're actually taking they're they're nursing moms.
She also brought her baby out on the floor as like some kind of a
kind of a publicity stunt. It that grosses me out on every
level. It's so gross.
We're talking about whether or not we're going to fund an
agency that is required to enforce the laws that are passed
by the people that are debating whether or not they're going to
fund the agency. And I've put on the screen my
meme, which I cannot, I can't delete this thing.
ICE enforces laws passed by Congress.
If you want to change the law, knock yourself out.
We know they can't do that. They can't use the power of the
purse. They can't actually change any
laws. They're so damn busy doing what
campaigns and, and, and, and milking, milking themselves.
It's so goofy. What a seriously unserious time
we live in right now. This is a great example of the
propaganda that's going from the other side, 'cause I do like to
do media analysis on both sides. And I don't just hate one side,
I hate all of them. This one made me crack up and,
and I think you guys will laugh too.
This is an opinion piece that was prominent on Ms. Now,
formerly MSNBC. And the the title of this
article is I'm a Doctor. ICE agents at hospitals make our
jobs a lot harder. Now, that may be true, but I
immediately was like, well, you're a doctor.
What kind of a doctor are you? In the same way I asked what
kind of a gun owner are you yesterday?
I want to know because I've known some doctors in my time.
You probably have some friends who are doctors, right?
OK. This is Doctor Uche Blackstock.
And it doesn't matter what she says.
I'm just going to be very candid with you.
It doesn't matter what she says. There's the doctor.
She's kind of pretty. I wanted to know what other
things Doctor Uche Blacktalk was known for.
Blackstock. Sorry, she's an MD and she's the
founder and CEO of Advancing HealthEquity.
Oh, she's the best selling author of a book called Legacy.
A Black Physician reckons with racism in medicine.
She's a former MSNBC contributor and an NBC News medical
contributor. This is the bio that they give
her and she's written such articles as I'm a doctor.
The consequences of ice presence in hospitals could be Deadly.
I'm an ER doctor. I know what the end of the ACA
subsidies will mean. She's also, eleven months ago
wrote when COVID hit black Americans too hard, too many
white Americans shrugged. So she's a serious doctor that's
interested in doctoring. That was my experience from it.
And here's some lovely pictures of her I don't like.
I'm just so interested in who writes what.
Does anybody go out there and check out like, hey, who's this
person? Is she credible?
Does she come from, like, a really aggressive perspective
that has nothing to do with reality and all about pushing
some narrative? Yeah.
Nice pictures. This is interesting.
I don't know what's going on. Oh, you guys can't see this?
I don't know what's going on down here, but she's standing
with a woman with a shaved head, like way closer than is
comfortable. Anyway, she's a doctor with a
perspective, and that's where the narrative goes.
You have hard leftism and you got 90s Democrats, AKA
Republicans. So everybody seems like they're
on the same team. So who's looking out for what I
wanted? Who's looking out for what I
expected because I foolishly read Agenda 47, and I thought,
yeah, that's pretty good. We should do those things.
We should defend the Constitution, the Bill of
Rights, the fundamental freedoms.
We should keep the freedom of speech and not have Pam Bondi go
out there and say that hate speech is not protected by the
1st Amendment. I'm pretty confident I can read
that First Amendment, as can you.
And we can find it right there where it says Congress shall
make no law. And then right then everything
after it that they make a law about shouldn't exist.
At least we're not going to get like a new ATF guy that's going
to do some things that are problematic, right?
Like we're not going to, we're not going to bring in an ATF
director under this president that's going to make the ATF
like way bigger. I don't think we would do that.
That seems like something we wouldn't do.
Here's Adam Schiff talking to the proposed the Trump nominee
for ATF director. And he's definitely not saying
they're going to grow an agency. That is totally
unconstitutional, right, Mrs. Skater?
Thank you for taking the time to sit down with me yesterday.
I just want to follow up on Senator Booker's question.
You mentioned that at any one time, 100 agents could be
essentially reassigned to work on immigration cases.
That's 100 agents out of how many overall?
Good morning, Senator. That's 100 agents out of the
total agent cadre, which is about 2400 agents.
And I think when we got together you mentioned that you still
have to do some considerable hiring to get up to the capacity
you need. Yes, Sir.
The administration has directed us to increase our special agent
numbers up the actual special agents up to 3000 agents, which
would bring us additional 800 or so agents to get to that number.
And what do you what is the need for the additional 800 agents
Completely stay focused on violent crime in the United
throughout the United States and our cities most impacted by
violent crime. The ATF is a tax organization.
They used to work under Treasury.
They got kicked out of Treasury because they didn't have a
mission set and they didn't understand why they were a law
enforcement agency that did some sort of like half assed version
of a tax administration. So they were getting kicked out.
They got picked up by DOJ and they almost disappeared.
They were almost gone. There was going to be no ATF
under Janet Reno. That was the proposal.
And what do they do? They decided to do the smartest
thing possible, which was go in and run Ruby Ridge and the
Branch Davidian compound and a bunch of other high profile
operations, which we all sort of like reference now as government
overreach. And the result of that was it
saved their flippin agency and it still exists right now so
that it can infringe on your constitutional liberties.
The Trump administration said that they were going to protect
the Second Amendment explicitly in their Agenda 47.
It was item number 7 of 20. And they've nominated this guy
who can't give a straight answer to the former AG of Missouri.
Here's Eric Schmidt talking about.
Will you roll back the stupidity that the Biden administration
did? They came after gun owners as
possible firearms dealers by redefining what the words meant,
which is the problem that Congress created.
This is the Administrative Procedures Act in inaction.
What happened is in 1946, the Congress decided that being in
the Congress is too hard to do Congress work.
They'd much rather do hearings. They'd much rather do all kinds
of televised stuff. They'd much rather do
fundraising. They'd much rather talk instead
of do. They don't want to actually do
the work of this is what the money is for.
This is the explicit priorities of this particular agencies that
gave broad mandates. And they said, you figure it
out. And the executive said, yeah,
gladly, we'll take up that burden.
We will now also write our own rules which have force of law
under the APA. 1946 is how far back we have to go to see that
again. Other than Chuck Grassley who
saw them plant the plant the grass on the National Mall, like
very few people saw this ever happening.
Eric Schmidt asking questions, can you fix the problems that
happened in the last administration?
And what did he say? I'm going to leave this clip
because it's long. It's almost 3 minutes.
The end of it is the word potentially.
You guys tell me if this makes you feel good about who they
picked. Thank you.
Mr. Chairman. Mr. Cicada, I want to ask you,
well, during the Biden administration, first, that ATF
issued several administrative rules that violated statutory
authorities that were enacted by Congress.
In a previous life when I was Attorney general, Missouri
helped lead one of the lawsuits against one of those rules, the
frame of receiver rule. Eventually a different lawsuit
came up against the rule and the Supreme Court sort of
sidestepped the ultimate issue on that.
But there are similar rules such as the stabilizing brace rule
and the engaged in business rule that threaten to make
responsible law abiding Americans into criminals and
left gun owners with vague, difficult to follow mandates.
Americans who want to exercise their second and rights and
follow the law in good faith lacked any real guidance and
felt like the ATF was trying to trap and punish them.
The second, the Second Amendment is a fundamental, fundamental,
and inalienable right. So it's especially concerning
when administrative state agencies like ATF infringe not
only on the Second Amendment, but also the Constitution's
structural separation of powers by issuing rules that are equal
parts illegal and impossible to comply with.
I understand you want the ATF to return to a true law enforcement
mission rather than harassing law abiding gun owners.
So I want to ask you if today if you'll commit to repealing or
otherwise fixing this nightmare scenario for gun owners by
revisiting the frame and receiver rule, the stabilizing
blaze brace rule and the engaged in business rule and any other
overreaching administrative rules in a timely manner.
Good morning, Senator. Thank you again for your
question. I can assure you that ATF, under
my direction, is following President Trump's Second
Amendment executive order. We are currently undergoing A
thorough review of all regulations.
I can't speak to the specific regulations because of the
guidance under APA in In the future, when the President and
the Department of Justice team that our work is ready to be put
out for a notice of proposed rulemaking, there'll be a draft
of all those rules for everyone to review and we fully encourage
everyone to please review those. Ask your constituents to do the
same to make sure that ATF thoroughly took those concerns
into So if I. Hear you right.
If you're reviewing all of the rules, the three that I
mentioned would be included in that, correct?
Potentially. What's that?
Potentially, Sir, I I can't. Let's let's.
Lock that in. Let's lock that in.
Well, I can't do that, Sir, but I I I would be glad to tell you.
OK? I think that.
Follow up on potentially we could do the thing that you're
asking. Can you lock that in for me?
Can you go ahead and answer that and just say that that we're
going to do it? No, I can't do that, not at all.
But this agency totally serves us.
I'm sure of it. Some of you guys are asking
like, what's what's the purpose? When I tell you this, this is
the quick AI version of it. Obviously there's an entire
timeline that the ATF gives. It was created to enforce
federal tax laws. The IRS goes after revenue,
revenue being like your revenue, your incoming income.
So they handle taxes and revenue that comes in via that route.
Under Treasury, the ATF was meant to go after tax laws on
alcohol and tobacco. It is a remnant and is a legacy
of prohibition. In many ways, that's what it was
supposed to do. And then they just created a law
enforcement mission because that's way easier.
It's the same way the FBI is meant to do things called
healthcare fraud. My former agency, they're meant
to do healthcare fraud, which means they're supposed to find
people that are defrauding the government on paper with white
collar stuff. What do they do instead?
They just run pill mill cases. They find out people that are
doing drugs and then, you know, physicians that are prescribing
opiates because that's way more, that's more, way more
interesting. I mean, it's boring to do white
care healthcare fraud. Like nobody wants to do
healthcare fraud. Nobody wants to be the people
that just, like, check in and make sure that taxes are paid.
It'd be way more fun to kick down doors and shoot up a
religious community which may have had pedophiles in it.
By the way, as far as we can tell, David Koresh wasn't a good
dude. They'd rather go after former
Green Berets out in the mountains, bothering nobody
because a shotgun is slightly too short, so they heard, and
then go kill a dog and a son and a wife.
That'd be better, right? Wouldn't that be better?
Like I can't commit to fixing things.
And what did he cite? I just told you it the APA, He
said because of the APAI can't tell you the answer that we're
going to do these things. The Administrative Procedures
Act. Is Congress serious about fixing
any things? I thought they had the power of
the purse. Why are we funding this?
Why are we trying to add another 800 agents under the Trump
administration? Their words, not mine.
And then lastly, at least they're not going to infringe on
the Second Amendment, right? It's a big deal to me.
It's priority #7 for Trump's agenda.
We're not going to do that, I think in turn.
We will make sure that during the next several years, we
follow President Trump's Second Amendment executive order to
review all ATF policies, procedures, and regulations to
ensure that none of those infringe upon the Second
Amendment unnecessarily. We're not going to infringe on a
thing that we're not allowed to infringe on unnecessarily.
But if we necessarily need to infringe on it, that's the,
that's the converse of what that said.
If we necessarily have to do it, then we're going to do it kind
of thing. Same thing we heard from Jeanine
Pirro, kind of the same thing we heard from Cash Patel, kind of
the same thing that we've heard from Pam Bondi.
It's almost like the entire administration has like a real
really weird 90s Democrat, progressive liberal type
sensibility about guns. They put something on the agenda
that sounded good. They got a former Marine to be
the VP. Where is JD, the guy that I saw
sitting holding an AR15 outside of his his cabin or something
pointing it at the sky? Where's that guy who
theoretically understands guns, but America's back?
There's a great picture of it from from Trump right here.
Again, it doesn't mean the other side understands anything.
But the people that we put in there that said certain words,
they can't even be held to their own words.
And to me, that's really troubling because that's a
fundamental freedom. Let's jump into this one.
This is about Epstein. It continues on the this is the
ongoing, the ongoing saga of things that will not go away.
The Justice Department under scrutiny for revealing victim
info and concealing possible enablers in the Epstein files.
They just cannot, they cannot get away from this bad PR
nightmare. And it's a lot of it's because
there was a lot of talk beforehand, a lot of talk
beforehand about this place yesterday or the day before.
We mentioned a guy named Brad Karp.
So I want to show you guys, this is an NBC story.
He was in charge. He was the chairman of a very
powerful law firm known as Paul Weiss.
And apparently he quit, walked away.
There's no, there's no clients, guys.
There's no clients of Epstein. But like, there were some things
that were pretty kind of unsavory that people said.
And so there's a little bit of fallout publicly, but.
There's no prosecutions. These people are safe.
It's just going to be they're going to be embarrassed a little
bit. Brad Karp was the chairman of
the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton and Garrison,
and he resigned yesterday after the most recent batch of Epstein
files, which we're told were they going to be the end?
That's the end of it. That's what Patel said were
released by the Justice Department, including
correspondence between him and Jeffrey Epstein.
Recent reporting has created a distraction.
That's what it did and it placed focus on me.
That is not in the best interest of the firm.
He said in a statement released his resignation is effective
immediately. The firm is commonly known in
corporate circles as Paul, Weiss.
It's one of the most prestigious and high-powered law firms in
the country. Weird.
Weren't we told that Jeffrey Epstein was involved with super
powerful people all around the globe?
And so then that's when he had blackmail stuff on them and
that's how he got what he needed.
OK, Anyway, yeah. So Carpet shared the firm since
2008. He's been there for a very long
time. He spent his entire 40 year
career working for them. They said that he will continue
to focus full time on client services at the firm, but he
will not be leaving the firm entirely.
He's just not going to be the chairman.
He won't be in charge anymore. So what was it that was going
on? Documents released Friday posted
to the Justice Department's website show dozens of e-mail
exchanges between Karp and Epstein or Epstein, Karp's
assistant, spanning multiple years, including 2015 to 2019.
The emails were about a variety of topics.
Or again, the the the arrest in 2019 was why it would be the
2015 to 19 thing. Some of the emails show that
Karp planned to take meetings with Epstein at his infamous New
York City townhouse. The documents showed him helping
Epstein with his plea deal on sex trafficking charges.
Said the draft motion is in great shape when they shared
emails back and forth in March of 2019.
Another exchange in 2015 said he put in writing.
You're amazing and describes an evening I'll never forget.
It was truly once in a lifetime in every way, Karp wrote.
You're an extraordinary host. We don't know what that means or
what that was about. But again, when you start
dealing with the type of unsavory people that were talked
about, we only have our imaginations.
But those are not facts, as we are reminded by some people who
make sure that you get it right. Like you can't just say whatever
you want about Jeffrey Epstein. You can't just have your own
thoughts. There's an approved version of
it. So I hope you guys will please
have it. Here's what the approved
narrative sound like. A lot of people are looking for
the connection between the Jeffrey Epstein story, the saga,
the details that are now coming out and what that means about,
quote, UN quote, who runs our world now.
There are a lot of very powerful people whose names have been
mentioned in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, people who are hanging
out hobnobbing with Jeffrey Epstein, people who are asking
dating advice, like Lauren Summers, former president of
Harvard, or people who are apparently soliciting visits to
Epstein parties or whom Epstein was soliciting to go to his
parties, including people like Elon Musk.
Obviously, Jeffrey Epstein was friendly with Bill Clinton.
There's a time early on in his life earlier when he was
friendly with Donald Trump. All of that is true.
Now, the leap that some people are making is that this means
that Epstein was manipulating all of these powerful people
through blackmail with regard to sex.
That is not in evidence. If that turns out to be in
evidence, then we will happily report on it.
That is not what so far has come out.
And the reason I'm making this distinction is because it is in
fact a deeply important thing that some of the most powerful
people in our society, in fact, in morally depraved ways,
godless, virtue free ways, hanging out with some of the
worst people in our society, people they know to be
trafficking in women who are very, very young, if not in
minors. When it comes to Epstein and
Glenn Maxwell, what was criminally indicted was the
trafficking of underage girls for Epstein's own use.
There have yet to be legally verifiable allegations that
girls who were underage were trafficked to people who are not
Jeffrey Epstein or by Glen Maxwell, two people not Jeffrey
Epstein. Right.
OK, I got all that. And then there was like this
entire thing that we had. There was an organization and I
feel like I used to work there and they had cases and part of
the job and part of the the transparency that we were told
was going to come out on the campaign trail.
When Donald Trump was out there campaigning and had his son and
others out there talking about it.
What did they say? They said that they were going
to find out who the list of elite pedophiles were because
even though we didn't have legally verifiable allegations,
there was all this smoke. So everyone wanted to know what
the fire was underneath it, right?
You're not allowed to talk about that anymore.
How do I know? Because everyone told you.
You can't talk about it. Here's Owen Shroyer's montage.
It's really good. Evidence suggested there really
was not an Epstein list. If you were watching this case
with any sort of eagle eye, you can't waste our time on Epstein
and other stuff that are going on here that some people want us
to focus on. I'm about had it with all that
stuff killed. Himself again.
You want me to get I've. I've seen the whole file.
He killed himself. You were convinced that Epstein
killed himself in jail today, eight months, eight months after
that, are you still convinced? Yes, 100% yes, Sir.
There has been no evidence of that.
I'm looking through all of the documents and so far there is
still no. Evidence.
I'm open. To this, to me, I just feel like
it's like the obsession. I mean, bringing the Clintons
in, it's ridiculous. It is ridiculous.
And no, he made a statement about me, and Jeffrey Epstein
said I have nothing to do with that.
No, the apparently Jeffrey wrote an e-mail to himself.
Yeah, no, he wrote an e-mail to himself.
That's he wrote an e-mail to himself, but he didn't actually
send it. And so that e-mail that he wrote
to himself is that that's what said all these things that were
not real. I like Owen's face on the screen
here right now. Interesting.
Most of those commentators in news are either Jewish people or
people that have sworn allegiance to Israel in the
like, really bizarre in public ways to include Cash Patel.
I don't get it. I'm not a Israel did everything
kind of thing. But it does seem like real
specific. And I just read or listened to
Matt Walsh's statement about it, talking about how frequently and
how specific Jeffrey Epstein's worldview was crafted around his
identity as being a Jewish person.
Maybe that means something. Maybe it doesn't mean something.
Maybe it means that like we were promised something and we just
didn't get it. And like, for those of you that
didn't ever see this, there's 11 minutes of this and it only goes
back for the first six months of the Trump administration.
But all of it is freaking damning because all I'm saying
is just like the members of Congress who are going to use
the power of the purse, and just like Donald Trump who told us we
were going to get mass deportations, there were
promises that were made. They were statements that were
shared and then I can look at your own words and say you are a
liar. So why would I trust you again?
Why would we listen to you? Why would we care what happens
during the midterms? It's like, what's the
difference? Sean Duffy said that.
What's the difference when you put people in that are
supposedly going to do your agenda?
I don't get it. Before we do that little clip,
we just remind you guys you can support the program free.
You just give us a thumbs up. We'd appreciate that.
Subscribe wherever you're listening, Rumble, YouTube X
locals. Thanks for all the people that
do that stuff everyday. You guys are a blessing.
Making sure this will get a little AD from Spotify if you're
listening on the audio right now and you can follow on Spotify.
If you can't see this and these videos, maybe they're not worth
seeing. Some of them actually are
definitely worth seeing because facial expressions can be
priceless. You can find them Kyle
seraphinshow.com over on Spotify.
Let's dive right into this little super clip montage that
we put out not too long ago. DOJ may be releasing the list of
Jeffrey Epstein's clients. Will that really happen?
It's sitting on my desk right now to review.
That's been a directive by President Trump.
I'm reviewing that. I'm flashback who has Jeffrey
Epstein's black book, black book FBI.
That's under direct control of the director of the FBI.
The Senate has confirmed Kash Patel is the new director of the
FBI. He was another controversial
choice. That's why you don't have a
black book that Jeffrey. Epstein story is a big deal.
Please do not let that story go. Keep your eye on this.
I'm just going. To throw this out there,
Armacost, you think that would be valuable to an intelligence
apparatus to have blackmail material on people on video
doing things with young women they shouldn't be doing in case
you need a, let's say, favor later?
Hey, be a real shame if this got out.
Yeah. Damn.
I think that may be very helpful.
Yeah, I think yeah, maybe we need to.
Keep the heat on this case folks.
There are a. Lot of people who are knee deep
in the Washington swamp who are not telling you the truth about
serious allegations out there that Epstein may have had.
Video and audio of people out there doing things they
shouldn't have been doing. And you should be asking
yourself the question how? Is it that all these people, the
CIA director, the Obama fixer, Bill Clinton, all intersected
past with Jeffrey Epstein? Jeffrey Epstein isn't with us
anymore and nobody seems to want to talk about it.
Newly sworn in FBI Director Cash Patel named popular podcaster
Dan Bongino as the deputy director of the agency.
The black book, it's not just sitting.
I mean, that's, that's, that's Hoover power times 10.
And, and to me, that's the thing I think President Trump should
run on on day one roll out the black book.
And not just that, on day one roll out all of the text
messaging communications we were told were deleted.
They over classify 50% of the stuff there to protect the deep
state. Oh no, you can't see that.
Nothing to see here, you know. Epstein's an intelligence asset
for people in the Middle East, right?
I'm like, no, I didn't know that.
I'm like, you sure that's the person?
Let's say is like. I'm absolutely sure that that
he's either a witting or unwitting asset intelligence
asset. So I want.
To talk to you about the Epstein case, I have worked on this for
years trying to get those records of who flew on Epstein's
plane and who helped him build this international human
trafficking, sex trafficking ring.
Now, earlier, I urged then Chairman Durbin to subpoena
those records and I ended up being blocked by Senator Durbin
and Christopher Wray. They stonewalled on this.
And I know that breaking up these trafficking rings is
important to President Trump. So will you work with me on this
issue? So we know who worked with
Jeffrey Epstein in building these sex trafficking rings?
Absolutely, Senators. Child sex trafficking has no
place in the. United.
States of America and I will do everything if confirmed as FBI
Director to make sure the American public knows the full
weight of what happened in the past evidence.
From Jeffrey Epstein Safe. When?
Missing after an FBI raid, court hears and Elaine Maxwell trial.
How? The hell do you lose evidence in
a case this big? Is it lost?
Was it lost, if you get what I mean?
I don't know. You know, it's the same thing
with Epstein's list. It's like, what the hell are
these Republicans doing? Regardless of who may be
embarrassed in the release of that list, why is the FBI
protecting the greatest pederist, the the largest scale
pederist in human history? Simple, because of who's on that
list. And the FBI handed over a couple
100 pages of documents. But you know, Sean, I gave them
a deadline of Friday at 8:00 AM to get us everything.
And a source had told me where the documents were being kept,
Southern District of New York shock.
So we got them all by hopefully all of them Friday at 8:00 AM,
thousands of pages of documents. I have the FBI going through
them. And cash is also now that we
have cash here, it's a game changer.
Of course, it's a freaking game changer.
Now that we have cash, right, it's on.
That was just like the beginning of last year.
That's that wasn't even a year ago.
Those and there's more of that that goes on for.
I could watch that forever because it's crazy when you
start stringing the statements these people made together.
How about how about Dan Bongino, who's gone back to podcasting?
There's a an Ms. now piece right now.
I'll just show you real quickly where this is coming from
because it's a I don't know. It's it's worth pop popping on
the screen. So the headline is Dan Bongino's
happy to be back where you can serve Trump best podcasting.
I think that's probably true. We'll keep him on the screen
here for a second. Didn't you hear some things that
were said like 1. He was an intelligence asset
that he knew. Apparently he had sourcing on
that, right? He was just talking out of turn.
He was a guy that used to be a federal agent.
He used to work at the Secret Service.
He had access to sourcing. The longer you spend in this
game, you lose some sources in your old agency.
You meet some sources and some other agencies.
So I imagine that he knew some people that were talking to
about it. Who are these people apparently
in a Fox green room? Did they run those charges down?
Did they demonstrate any of this stuff?
We were told we couldn't talk about it because of national
security. That's Mike Johnson saying that,
Smithers. So what happened?
He also was complaining about evidence lost by the FBI.
Was it lost? Right.
I heard that. You heard that, not my words.
Somebody used to be in charge of the FBI.
The guy that's currently still there, he's out running around
looking for some 84 year old woman who may or may not have
been kidnapped in Arizona, pretending that he's part of an
investigation when he's really the FBI director and he just
wants to put on a cool jacket and a SWAT patch.
That's Kash Patel. He's still there.
What about the guy that's out there now?
Did he find out anything about what happened to that evidence?
Where did it go? Why is he out talking about
tentacle porn and fighting invisible enemies on his podcast
right now instead of coming clean with people and saying,
look, here's what we know, here's the story.
It's all apparently been released.
Pam Bondi, she said there were thousands of pages.
They've literally released millions of pages, many of which
are redacted. How far off in scope was Pam
Bondi? How little did she know about
what the hell she was talking about and why?
It's almost like they don't know what the hell they're talking
about when they're out there. And that would go to my
supposition that none of these people run the agencies they're
at, and they never have. The agencies are not run from
the top down or the bottom up. They're run from the middle out
the middle, runs the top and the bottom, and they screw both
sides. So that's what I've been trying
to explain to people, exile or execution.
There's really not any other way to go about it.
And the way you would do that is you would simply look at the
oath. Are you defending the
Constitution? Do you understand the Bill of
Rights? Are you going ahead and
enforcing the rules and policies that you have in order to secure
fundamental freedoms that you are not allowed to infringe on,
including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the
right to keep and bear arms? That would be an easy start.
And it turns out Donald Trump actually made that promise.
I can keep returning to these people's words because it's so
easy. They said them, not me.
I hold them to account because I just, I give people agency.
I suggest that if you are a human being and you have free
will and a God-given intellect of whatever capability it is and
you commit to something, then I will just hold you to what you
committed to. I don't have to make it up.
I don't have to put all my expectations on you.
I don't have to have hopes and fears and dreams about what
those things may be. I simply look and say I will
evaluate you based on your own criteria.
You gave me the rubric by which to assess whether or not what
you did was necessary. And apparently currently you are
not fighting when you had the job, You're only fighting when
you're talking shit online. And for some reason, this
Bongino new podcast spends an inordinate amount of time
talking about something that he keeps calling tentacle porn.
And I only know that because I don't watch the show, I don't
care, but it keeps popping up in my feed that he's, he's fighting
a mythical enemy who has a fat ass, whoever this person is.
And he's, he owns them, and he does so.
And that person spends their time watching tentacle porn.
I don't even know what tentacle porn is.
It's very interesting to Bongino, apparently.
I think I have a clip from it. So stand by.
It's weird enough that it's worth like, it's worth playing.
Yeah. I think we've got that kind of
like an ugly statement saying that he owns you.
Who, who is the audience for that type of messaging?
He had an opportunity. You talked a bunch of shit.
We all heard it. And now your talk is, is you're
going to go after your detractors in the media who are
writing pieces on Ms. Now and they're fat asses and you own
them. Buck stops on that Resolute
desk. They are tough decisions and
that's what happened. To be fair, I think he just said
that we can say that Donald Trump is responsible for what
happens under his administration at the Resolute Desk.
And all I'm trying to do is do that.
I know a. Lot of you.
And by the way, there are people in the chat.
I just want you to know a little message to you, some of them,
what is it? The supporters, we love you
guys. The detractors welcome here too.
But I just want you to know something.
I own. You guys, you can't stay away.
I tweet, you instantly respond. I do a show.
You can't stay away. I wish.
If no one's going to be there, really, it's 194,000.
No one's biggest live stream in the world right now.
No one's going to be there. No one really.
Then when people show up, that's just us there to RIP you the
great. I own you guys, the greatest
superpower in the world. It's the power to command
attention and I own yours. You can't stay away.
But to my supporters and people love the show, thank you.
It's an honor, I say with humility.
It's really an honor to call you all friends.
That is not what humility looks like, buddy.
That's what looks that's. That's a cocky asshole moment
that you are having right now. Weird.
What a weird, what a weird lack of humility to fail so
dramatically after all the things that were said.
Our Chad is saying that it looks like WWE.
Yeah, right up with the face makeup and the and the Botox or
whatever the hell is going on. Do you know who used to whisper
creepy weird shit to us? Joe Biden.
That's who did that. That's the only person I
remember in recent, in recent memory who had a strange
disconnect with reality. And the disconnect was I whisper
things because it makes me sound like I am more serious.
I don't know if it's age or alcoholism or if it's simply
that something has gone to your head and you no longer recognize
the reality because you have too much money and, and, and you
can't, you can't see things as they are.
But whispering to your audience is freaking weird.
So yeah. So anyway, but that's the good
news, is that apparently that apparently per MSN, NBC/MSN, now
that's where Dan Bongino is best, serving Donald Trump, not
solving the problems, not making America constitutional again,
and not defending the Second Amendment and making sure we
didn't have any of the garbage go on.
They didn't get rid of any of the people.
They kept promoting the same people.
And a guy who was involved in who who had to be the final
approver on surveillance of a Catholic school teacher who was
married to a federal agent. That woman got terrorist watch
listed and he's now the number two in the FBI.
That's it. That's all I have to say about
that little quick little thing which I I failed to give you
guys earlier, but I meant to I meant to I feel bad that I did
not the the question of a doctor here.
Let me put it back on the screen.
If a Doctor Who is pretty and and a black woman who wrote
books about being a black doctor and being a black doctor is the
relevant part of her experience in life and her blackness is
100% important and she also knows things about racism.
If that woman is the potential doctor you have.
It reminded me immediately of this Family Guy episode that I
can't get away from. And every time I see this stuff
and I see what I would say is a diversity type hire anywhere,
I'm remembered of this little exchange.
And so I'm sharing it with you because.
Our sense of humor is not that far off.
OK, guys, check out one. Would you rather get a massage
from a man or surgery from a female doctor?
Wow. Like minor surgery?
No serious surgery like a blown kidney or something.
Jeez. Good question, Peter.
Is the man gay? Nope.
Is the female doctor at least Jewish or Asian?
No. But actually, you know what?
I'm going to take it up a notch. Hispanic.
Female doctor or gay male masseuse?
Hispanic from Spain? No.
So it's basically would you rather get a massage from a gay
man or die? All right, I got another one.
Let Amy Winehouse spit in your mouth or eat a raw slice of
Anderson Cooper's ass. Sign me up for Cooper.
What? Is wrong with this show.
That show is so good. You know, I I'm getting a
massage. I don't care.
It could be worse. It's so funny, so silly.
What a strange time we live in right now, guys.
Just so we're all on the same page.
That's what I think of America. We, this is the serious
conversations we should be having.
We we're basically having grown up versions of Would you rather?
Would you rather a president come in and lie to your face and
spit in your mouth and tell you that you're useless?
Or would you like him to say really nice things and then when
you're not looking, kick you down the stairs so that your
family is, you know, destitute and your kids have no future and
they spent all the money. That's where we're at.
We're playing horrible games of Would you rather.
It reminds me when I was in college, I had some friends that
were more, they were like pot smoking goofballs that would sit
around and either drink and smoke and then they would have
really strange thoughts. And I remember a guy I'll refer
to him as by Doctor Landers because that's how we called
him. And he was sitting there and he
said, would you rather have God? I have to remember this exactly.
Would you rather have your your male genital parts smashed by a
dropping anvil? Or would you have your nose
surgically removed and your eyebrows surgically removed and
then and put placed in circles around where your nostrils would
have been? We're, we're living in the
America where like pot smoking weirdo ideas are essentially
what our political options are. If only there was a cheat code
to it. And I'm going to put it on the
screen just for the hell of it. There's the cheat code.
The cheat code is the US Bill of Rights.
There were 10 amendments. You can go back to 9 to 1791.
It turned out these guys actually had it figured out.
They were like, what if there was a solution to keep the
federal government, which is terrible, from doing all the
awful things that it could do? We'll just make a list of rules
and restrictions that it cannot do, you know, like it can't take
guns and it can't put troops in your house and so on.
They can't just search your property because they want to
know what's going on. They, we'll, we'll give you a,
a, we'll acknowledge your fundamental right to being
secure in your home, in your, in your house and your papers and
your effects and your stuff. And we just won't do all that
stuff. And then we have people in 2026
Underoath who have already sworn some sort of allegiance to the
Constitution and that want a more prestigious position saying
we won't do things that are illegal unnecessarily.
But if we're necessarily required to do it, like
obviously we'll do that. Way to make me sign with people
who think that you guys are going down the route of tyranny.
At least we've got protectors of the Republic that are calling it
out. So that's a lot of today's show.
We'll have something really funny in a moment.
Just because the voices that you choose to listen to say a lot
about who you are. And if you guys tolerate
stupidity, then what does that say?
Join this program anytime you like.
Share it with a friend. If you think it's interesting,
sensible. If you disagree with it, put it
in the comments. I don't mind hearing what you
don't like or what you don't agree with.
I do think it's funny when you guys want to make excuses for
Donald Trump when he can't even make excuses for himself and the
evidence is pretty overwhelming, but combat it with evidence.
I'd love to give me a like on Rumble.
Give us a like on YouTube. Subscribe to the channel over
there. Follow us on Spotify.
If you're not, if you don't have a backup program for finding us.
That's the easiest way to do it. And you get video and you get
audio and I'm appreciative of all that.
Stick around afterwards. You'll get to my buddy Steve
Friend's take. He just got out of a minor
Fender Bender, which destroyed the back end of his car.
Female driver, no big deal, but I'm just saying I called it when
I saw the wreck. I was like, what sort of lady
ran into the back of your car there, Steve friend and was
following you too closely. It was a lady in a Jeep classic.
Maybe she was busy nursing or milking or whatever it is.
She was pumping instead of just doing a drive.
So let's do something funny. These are the voices of sanity.
These are the top. This is the top podcast that Dan
Bongino is competing against. So this the competition is very
stiff. America is an interesting
country right now. There is something so
reminiscent and it's it's striking to me.
Obviously that's pretty remniscient of one of the themes
of the Matrix. Think that they can be a better
Christian is so remniscient to me of a discussion I had.
Yeah, it's eerily reminiscient of event 2:01, so visually
reminiscient of and a man. And this is reminiscient to me
of when I looked through the Romanian case regarding Andrew
Tate. Everything that they have done
to Donald Trump actually is reminiscent of a government that
has taken too much power for itself, is reminiscent of a
government in which they are going after their enemies.
This is reminiscent of Albert Einstein's famed quote.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and
expecting different results. It's reminiscent of of insanity.
Yeah. It's so good there.
There are non-stop clips of this woman not pronuncing.
Pronunciating. I want to make up my own version
of it. Pronunciating.
I'm trying to find a funny way to do it.
It's reminiscent of her pronunciating.
OK, I'm done, That's too funny for me.
Why do? Why do people listen to dumb
people? Ask yourself that question and
then maybe you have an answer or maybe you don't.
We look forward to seeing you guys again tomorrow.
It'll be friendly Friday. We'll bring someone who doesn't
mispronounce words and is hyper articulate in a way that makes
me uncomfortable sometimes. Have a great rest of your
Thursday. Look forward to seeing you guys
again tomorrow. God bless.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle
Seraphin.