Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Hello my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Serif Show. Today is Wednesday.
It is March the 27th and we are rolling live on rumble.com/kyle
Serif. And make sure you have liked
this video at some point. Make sure you subscribe to the
channel. Make sure if you're watching us
somewhere else, especially if you're watching it in a replay
and you don't want all the commercials come to rumble,
There's less, there's less and we actually get paid.
We're monetized there. We don't get paid on the other
places. If you're watching us on X, we
appreciate you guys joining us. We're going to be talking some X
stuff today, including I just, I just had this little funny
interaction and I want to share it with you all just because
this is the kind of stuff that goes on just before the show
gets started. I'm having this conversation
with a buddy of mine. I'm looking over on my my little
chat group here and he's a he's a former Green Beret or retired
Green Beret and he goes, you're an influencer in real life.
Because one of you in your comments said I'd really love to
be able to pay whatever money it takes to get Kyle Serif and up
here to teach me about firearms, that I can be competent and
defend my family. And he said you're a real life
influencer. And I was like, yeah, well, in
the same way that Steve Friend's book is true blue, his journey
from beat cop to FBI whistleblower, Mine would be
something like from FBI agent to like real life Internet asshole,
'cause I just want to pick fights with these people that
are evil. I want to fight the the the
abortion harpies that are out there screaming.
I just want to get engaged with all of them.
I want to find the people on all the major networks and I want to
engage them in the most unpleasant way possible because
they are dishonest and many of them are operating from a place
of evil in their hearts anyway. That's where I'm at.
I just can't get over how funny. My other buddy just sent me a
thing that said that the the US Marshall Service has doubled
down on the 30 by 30, so they're going to get 30% of their
workforce to be women by 20-30. And if you don't know what the
United States Marshall Service does, they protect federal
judges and they run down fugitives around the country.
So what are we supposed to think?
That women are going to be the best at kicking down the doors
of seedy hotel rooms and dragging suspected felons out at
the early morning hours or whatever hour they decide to go
and intervene? I just, I don't get it.
Women, you shouldn't want this for women and men, you shouldn't
be allowing it. That's what we're going to talk
about today. There's going to be a bunch more
of it. We're going to get hot into the
culture piece of it. We're going to talk about the
last man standing. We got three dudes in the race
for president. Yeah, I said dudes.
All these dudes are over the age of 70, aren't they?
What is going on here? Geriacracy.
Full insanity. All right, before we do that,
let's get started with a couple of thanks.
And the first one I want to thank out is my friends over at
the Catholic Vote Guys. catholicvote.org is the host of
The Loop. They are a Catholic advocacy
group. They're in the fight for faith,
family, and freedom. They are doing it not with their
fists. They're doing it with their
words and with their money and backing candidates and putting
out information. You can follow them at Catholic
Vote, at Catholic Vote on all the major social media
platforms. At Catholic Vote.
You don't have to be Catholic per SE.
In fact, this is not specifically affiliated with the
Church. They are Catholics in good
standing with the Church, but they are not endorsed or paid
for or otherwise by the Church. These are just people who go to
the Church, in other words, a lay organization.
They are not ordained members of the Church and today's loop has
things about the deadly abortion pill being decided in the
Supreme Court. We're going to cover that talks
about RF KS controversial pick running for president.
We're going to talk about that. They have a story about the New
York City council trying to push to let migrants vote.
I'm not going to be talking about that And some stuff about
the Santos in Florida veterans warning about DEIA really solid
thing. They got their own podcast
called the Loot Cast. My friends are on there.
Go check out Tom and Mercer and Allison and see what they have
to say. You guys may really enjoy that.
All right, catholicvote.org, our friends and our big sponsors
here. And one more.
I'm going to do this right up front just because it's at the
top of my mind and my awareness right now.
Patriot coolers.com I am sitting here next to my Patriot cooler.
This is the Seraphin 19 oz. Black Tumblr that has traveled
to multiple states with me. Patriot coolers.com promo code
Kyle gets you 10% off if you're in the market for a Tumblr.
Let me tell you what this thing has done for me today, because
it is full of coffee and I need it.
My youngest daughter woke me up at 1:15.
At 2:22, I still saw that I was awake.
I looked up at the clock, which I have one of those projection
clocks above my my bed, and I went.
I just got an hour of sleep, stolen by my oldest.
It's going to be a coffee morning.
So it is a coffee morning. And what's gets it's what gets
me out of the bed and keeps this coffee hot enough that I can
keep drinking it. I start here at about 5:45 and
we roll all the way through until 8:30 to get this show
together. Patriot Coolers is not just a
sponsor, but they are also supporting My Chemical Health
and My Mental Health. Patriot coolers.com.
You guys can get your own Tumblr there.
Use promo code. Kyle STILL hot.
Yep. And and save that 10%.
So let's do some stories. We're into the last man standing
now. We've gotten rid of all the
fluff. We've gotten rid of all the
noise. Oh, I'm seeing this in the chat.
Chris Roush asked if it's blackout coffee.
It is blackout coffee. And Chris sent it to me.
I'm still burning through that 5 LB Bag.
Appreciate that, man. That was very nice of you.
All right, here we go. 3 three men standing.
Only one can be the president. One is a doddering crazy old
fool. The other looks like he might be
on steroids. He seems to be quite fit for a
dude in his his 70s or coming right up on 70.
He just picked AVP pick. We have two of these
individuals, both Democrats have both picked women to be their
running mate. And then you got The Donald.
The Donald looks funny there. This is a CNN piece.
So they're never trying to make him look good this hair.
I mean, he just looks very Donald Trump on this picture.
Anyway, this is the contention. This is the story that we should
see. They picked a running mate, they
being whoever the RFK, the RFK campaign is.
And we start off with CNN, who had a really funny, actually,
I've got it on my phone here. They had a really funny take on
their opening page. I want to actually, I screenshot
of it because it was worth looking at.
What do they say? Can Biden put a Trump state back
on the electoral map? That's the question.
That's the question that CNN wants you to click through.
That's their click baity title. Can Biden put a Trump's date
back on the map? OK And the actual article is
written by Stephen Collinson, who is my favorite bad analyzer
of information analyst. Bad analyst analyzer.
Why the 2024 election is about far more than Trump's legal
nightmare. Is that what it was about for
you guys? Was it about his legal
nightmares? That's what you thought you were
going to be electing? Well, if you're on the political
left, that's what you're focusing on.
Donald Trump, 91 indictments, blah, blah, blah.
They're very upset about this. They're upset about
insurrection. They are upset about classified
documents, even though they don't know what the hell they're
talking about. These people who have never held
a classified document, who have never moved with classified
documents, who doesn't understand anything about the
originating authority of classifications, how they are
declassified, what the authorities, the presidents are
the case law around it. They don't know any of that.
They just know he had classified documents in his bathroom and
there was a chandelier in his bathroom and people who have
chandeliers in their bathrooms are bad.
That's the take. So we're going to break this
thing down. It says this year is not only
going to be about Donald Trump's courtroom dramas, as the ex
president tries to This is my favorite sentence in the whole
thing. I read this out loud to my wife
this morning before she was awake.
As the ex president tries to ride a narrative of personal
political persecution through his criminal trial quagmire back
to the White House, other substantial political forces are
gathering that could be equally critical to November's election.
Listen to that long sentence, holy moly.
That's right. So Trump is writing a narrative,
not the real story that they are actually doing political
persecutions against him in a multiple jurisdictions.
That's not what's going on. No, this is a a narrative of
that and his criminal trial quagmire is what they want to
call it. All right, well, let's accept
that the political left is never going to see eye to eye on
what's going on there. They also mentioned political
drama coming in from Washington to North Carolina and Colorado.
I keep saying they because it's they as CNN and CNN is
represented by Steven in this case.
This Tuesday, they had a already intense campaign.
It has been highlighting that there's going to be a rematch
between the presumptive nominee. Yes, it's going to be Donald
Trump and President Joe Biden. There's a trio of events that
have showed that there's a lot more at stake here.
And So what are these events going to be?
What are we going to hear? All right, #1.
Washington, DC The Supreme Court has heard a case about
restricting A widely used abortion drug that is also used
to manage miscarriages. That's what's going to be on the
ballot, apparently, because Democrats are 100% all in, with
no reservations that baby should be able to be killed at any time
by anyone in anywhere. 100% baby killing Now here's my thoughts.
This is a really, really bizarre departure from 20 years ago
Democrats, which we know we listened to, how far away the
the Democrat Party of 2024 is from the 1995 Bill Clinton State
of the Union on immigration, the fact that we should actually
have American borders and the whole concept of safe, legal and
rare, they always accepted that it was bad.
Now what we've moved into is this full embrace of evil.
And that's what this is. This is evil.
If we were having a disagreement with people who said abortion is
terrible, we think it's a necessary evil, and it's
necessary for the following reasons, then we could have a
debate about whether those reasons actually justify the
evil. You know, I don't think they do,
but we could have that debate. Those are those are people who
at least accept the facts on the ground.
What they've gone to do is they've turned it into this,
this hideous sacrament of leftism, Leftism.
What do they do? They worship the government.
The government is interested in having women in the workforce
full time, that their babies not relevant, raising a family, not
a value. Your value is only if you
compete with men head to head, just like I talked about with my
friend over here in the US Marshall Service.
If you are not kicking down doors next to men trying to drag
bad guys out, which is the work of men, it's the work of men
because it's dangerous and men do not represent the future the
way that children and women do. Had a long conversation with
Dexter Taylor. He's the gentleman we talked
about goes by Carbon Mike online.
Dexter is facing down the prosecution in the city of New
York in in Brooklyn specifically the the DA of Brooklyn is going
after him over gun stuff. And we were talking about men
used to know one of our one of our sacred tenants of Western
civilization is that civilizations in in the West
looked to the future. They always considered the
future. Other civilizations have looked
at the past, they've looked at history, they've looked at their
legacy and the ancestors and so on.
People in the West have always looked forward specifically in a
post Christian. And you know as the as
Christianity took over, we looked to the future.
There's a couple of things that are hallmarks of Western
civilization. Number one is the innate value
of every single person. And the political left actually
knows this. Leftist know this.
They know that every person is sacred and valuable.
They know that the poor, even though they have no money, are
people. They're people that matter to
them. They champion the poor, do they
not? That's what Marxism is all
about. That's who the proletariat are.
They're the unwashed masses of people that need to have
freedom, that need to have rights and so on.
That is a Christian concept. We're already on the same page.
They just don't know it. They can't they can't digest
that because it it goes against the thing that they're being
indoctrinated to believe that religion is coming after them,
but religion actually formed and Christian religion specifically
is the fundamental jump off point.
I will, I will challenge all of you to talk to your leftist
friends, your your, your Democrat neighbors, the people
that are independents that are in the middle, that are
wondering that don't let's say that they're spiritual or not
religious or that they don't think religion is good at all.
Where did your values come from? What are the things that you
live by and why? What is the originating source
of those beliefs? Do you believe that every person
has a right to their labor, that the thing that they do is
theirs, that they can own property, and that they should
be able to have possessions? Do you believe that even the
poor have value as human beings, That you can't just arbitrarily
terminate them, throw them off, kick them off a Cliff because
they don't matter? They're not favored by God?
That is a uniquely Christian idea.
I challenge you. Go into any civilization and
find a time when people said that those without matter.
And I will also suggest to you that that didn't exist prior to
Jesus Christ coming to earth and bringing this revolutionary
concept that those who were sick, who were poor, who were
unwell, those previously were thought to be people who were in
the possession of demons or that were serving out the sins of
their of their parents. Generationally, we're going to
get into a biblical perspective on what and not and not the way
that Garrett does per SE. I just want a reflection on
words because they're really interesting that we've lost this
word. But I want to talk about the the
the complete 180 flip that has happened about abortion.
And it's not just since 1995 with the Clintons, it's actually
way deeper than that. In any case, abortion is the
fight that they want to have. You're seeing this year a new
front in the abortion fight. This is what's this is what CNN
are, I'll call them center left because there's close to center
left, even though they're far left compared to 20 years ago,
their center left compared to today.
And one of the things that they are arguing is that Donald Trump
killed Roe V Wade. That's what Biden's saying.
That's what they are highlighting here.
When you highlight quotations from someone that you believe
because they think Biden's the best choice, if you're going to
do that, then you're telling us that you also believe that
that's what CNN's position is on Roe V Wade, that Donald Trump
killed it. And I say good riddance, but
what he really did was he actually remanded it to the
States because we have all kinds of people that are more than
happy to get behind it. Here's what's fun.
There are two Democrats in the race.
As I said earlier, there's RFK Junior and there's Joe Biden.
One of them is younger and smarter and more capable.
One of them has a better record, at least on advocacy when it
comes to the environment, which is another big sort of piece for
the political left. The climate paganism, right,
That's a George Hill term. Climate pagans, the people that
worship a Gaia or a Mother Earth, because they can't figure
out that that they're actually talking about God, which our
founders called the God of nature, the God of man.
So you've got two of them. I think the record for RFK is
better. He will draw people from the Joe
Biden camp that look at him and think that he's terrible.
RFK is probably better on an anti war sentiment.
That's also good for RFK. It's good for Trump, It's bad
for Biden, right? And then lastly, you wonder, OK,
the political lefty, the the the old anti vaxxer thing from my
childhood, the 80s and 90s moms that were living in Berkeley or
that we're living in Washington state and they didn't want to
vaccinate their kids and they were talking about autism.
Those people all love RFK. They're all left.
That was a leftist position until just recently when we all
kind of went like, oh, all the institutions are corrupt.
We don't even like my, my youngest daughter has never even
seen a doctor, not even when she was in the womb.
She hadn't seen a doctor ever. Seven months old and nine months
of development. Never seen a doctor.
Why? Because we don't trust this
institution. It doesn't mean that I think
medicine is bad. If I broke an arm, I would go to
a hospital. But I have an innate distrust
now that is built up. And there are people that have
had this distrust long before we have, long before I have, and
long before many of you have. So The thing is, is RFK is still
on the political left. Do you remember how many people
were saying, oh, there's some folks out there that were like
in the DeSantis camp and then they went, oh, now we're going
to go after RFK because RFK is the only real conservative.
There is nothing conservative about this man.
And I want to show you his VP pick.
Her name is Nicole Shanahan. She's a left wing lawyer.
She gave a six figure amount of money to the awful DA in Los
Angeles. She spent money on behalf of,
like, all kinds of left wing causes, big money.
And here's what she has to say. Listen to the cognitive
dissonance that she is going to spell out right now.
She's about to tell you, and I want to prep you with this
before you hear it. What you're about to hear her
say is that women's fertility is a big issue to her.
It's a big issue to me. I think fertility is really
important. It's the reason why I refused
the vaccine. When I worked for the FBI, I
specifically noted fertility issues as one of the reasons.
The other one I issued was the fact that I was not interested
in the way it was developed. But what's crazy is this, this
woman, because she's a leftist and they don't have to make
sense, not in their own heads, not when they speak out loud.
What she says is women's fertility is down for three
reasons. She's going to lay them out.
They are all going to appeal to people in the political left.
They're going to appeal to the climate change people, to the to
stop using pesticides people. It's going to appeal to folks
who are interested in safer foods.
That's all great, but she also says that women's reproductive
health is at stake. And we know that reproductive
health is a euphemism for abortion.
Explain to me, anybody, in the chat in the comments.
I'll show you later on at the end of the show, on how you guys
can contact us if you're not familiar.
I want to know if anybody can explain to me how you could be
very worried about women's fertility issues and at the same
time advocating for women's unlimited access to abortion.
Why do you care about being able to make babies if you also
really, really want to defend the right to kill babies?
It makes no sense, but that's a Joe Biden position.
It's an RFK position. Those guys are going to Duke it
out for people that are on the left in the middle.
That's what they're going to do. So let them have it.
Here's a little taste of this woman in her speech accepting
the, the, the, I don't even know what you call this.
It's not a nomination, but accepting the sort of the
request to join the ticket with RFK Junior and listen to those
things. In contrast, you just hear them
right there. I discovered that women's
fertility is in precipitous decline around the world.
We are facing a crisis in reproductive health that is
embedded in the larger epidemic of chronic disease.
Because it has been so personal for me and my daughter, I got
deep into the research and consulted some of the best
scientists and doctors. Let me tell you what I found.
There are three main causes. One is a toxic substances in our
environment like endocrine disrupting chemicals in our
food, water and soil, like the pesticide residues, the
industrial pollutants, the microplastics, the PF as the
food additives, and the forever chemicals that have contaminated
nearly every human cell. Yes, and it makes you angry to
hear this. It makes me angry to say it
because we shouldn't be here right now. 2nd is
electromagnetic pollution. You don't hear politicians
talking much about that either, but it is something we need to
look at. As Bobby says, we need to
investigate every possible 'cause of chronic disease
epidemic that is devouring our nation from the inside. 3rd, I'm
sorry to say is our medications. Pharmaceutical pharmaceutical
medicine has its place, but no single safety study can assess
the cumulative impact of one prescription on top of another
prescription, and one shot on top of another shot on top of
another shot throughout the course of childhood.
We just don't do that study right now.
And we ought to. We can and we will.
Conditions like autism used to be one in 10,000.
Now here in the state of California, it is one in 22, one
in 22 children affected, allergies, obesity, anxiety,
depression. Our children are not well, our
people are not well, and our country will not be well for
very much longer if we don't heed this desperate call for
attention. I think that's enough for all of
you. And yet despite the shrill voice
and the fact that she's not a great public speaker, it's
important to note that that take an environmental take, an anti
vax take or an anti pharmaceutical without limits
take, that will resonate with people in the middle.
It will resonate with people who would otherwise lean to the
political left, because they do. They're she's a, she's a
Democrat. So is RFK.
She may not be a good messenger, but the words she's saying and
the emotion that she has in that way, that is a decidedly
feminine way to look at this problem.
It also was completely illogical.
Did you hear her say we should not be here right now?
It goes along with the things that I hear Joe Biden say.
Joe Biden will say things like what?
What? What was my favorite one,
though? You know, that's not our values.
It's like, who the hell are you to decide what our values are?
You claim to be a Catholic, and then you're pro abortion.
Not pro-choice, pro abortion. You're advocating on behalf of
abortion. You are funding abortion.
You're putting your money where your mouth is.
That's crazy to me. It's a crazy take.
It's a good thing that this woman's in the race.
It's a good thing that she is representing a second female
vice president choice. That's why Trump can't choose a
female vice president choice. We cannot have three elderly men
and three younger horrible women involved in this in this
political cycle. Just if you're going to be
pretending to be a conservative. And Full disclosure, I don't
believe that Donald Trump is a conservative and I don't think
any of you can show me evidence otherwise.
But he is a populist that is answering to a conservative
audience, and that's not terrible.
It's not terrible. That's the fair choice to look
at. He's a populist who needs to
listen to people that are conservative.
That's what many of you are, lowercase C, non, TM, not, not
trademarked. And if that's the case, then he
needs to actually think about what we're talking about
conserving and how about we conserve things like values.
And those values would be, let's find a strong male that's going
to be able to replace him in four years and put that person
up there. I'm sick of hearing the Tulsi
Gabbard argument just because someone looks good in a bikini
and somebody is able to carry a gun and wear a plate carrier and
join the military and by the way, joined the military while
she was a politician. Do you guys realize the Tulsi
Gabbard sort of disingenuous arc?
It's so bizarre. She joined the State House and
then she joined the military. That looks so brazenly
political. There's no other way to explain
it. I don't care if Tucker Carlson
likes her, I'm fine with people liking her as a person.
She's probably lovely. She's probably a lovely person
that I would disagree with vehemently on things like
abortion. But there's nothing conservative
about that. And the second thing that's so
strange to me is conservative movements are all about personal
responsibility. I want anybody to clip out and
send to me. I will play it and I will eat my
words. If you find where she says
everything that I used to believe is wrong because I
didn't understand what was going on, not well, I came to
understand that the Democrat Party is now the one that is
against freedom and they've moved.
And I've just sort of stayed here.
Yeah, you stayed here as a Lib. She would have been a good pick
for RFK. She would have been a better
pick for RFK. That's it.
She's not a good choice for a Donald Trump.
That's not a tack back towards the middle.
That's a that's a surrender. It bothers me.
It bothers me that so many people think that's reasonable.
It bothers me that people like Roger Stone are out there
advocating on it. When you hear people talking
about this woman like they're selling you something and it's a
weird something at that, there's a second thing.
That's a play in the CNN article that I wanted to bring back up.
The second one is, can we can we put Biden on the map in North
Carolina? And that's what they're talking
about. So that's the, that's the the
the state that they believe is in play.
Like North Carolina, like vacillates between being red and
purple on any given day. And the urban areas are
certainly held hostage by Democrat voters.
That's what they brought up. And so there's a couple of
states that they think are in play, this sort of Silicon
Valley choice of this Nicole Shanahan who is, you know, going
to speak to those crunchy, crunchy mom types that are also
libs. So California, they think is in
play. Washington is in play because of
what's going on with the Supreme Court.
And then specifically it said North Carolina.
Very weird. It's a weird time to be alive.
It's a weird time to see all this stuff.
We're going to get deeper into a whole bunch more.
What I wanted you to know is that despite all the lies that
are out there, this this is an easy Donald Trump run.
All he's got to do is not say much about abortion at all.
He already did it. The answer is I put in
conservative justices. They've made decisions based on
the constitutionality of it and they've remanded it to the
states. This is a state's issue.
The end. That's the winning pick.
What I love him to say. I think we should have banned
abortion. Yes, it does.
That win. I don't know why.
Why even make it about that? The left is perfectly crazy on
being radicalized against babies.
Just let him be that that's not a popular position.
Here's the thing that I've been finding out when I sit and talk
to folks, we we oftentimes assume that there's this black
firewall, this black voting base of black people that live in
urban areas. Overwhelmingly, if you look at
people who vote and are black, they they they go to churches,
they have otherwise conservative liens.
They just think the government is willing to help them.
The evidence is pretty obvious that it's not.
You could simply run on this. It's like, hey, the government
has been intervening since the 1930s.
Do you think that black people are better off now than they
were when they had more dads in the home, when they had babies,
when they didn't have a bunch of Planned Parenthood's being built
up in poor black neighborhoods? Do you really want to see more
black baby death? Is that what you guys are about?
Or are you actually Christians who go to church?
Oh, you are. We think the same way.
You should consider doing a change.
Give it a shot. See how it feels.
See how it feels to actually embrace something that's
pro-life because you're pro-life.
What's more important, babies. Or like government programs that
fund garbage? Like somebody who just said
Malcolm X was pointing these things out?
Yeah, of course. Anybody who looks at it knows
there's not good outcomes. Forget about the the, the, the
color of the politician. Forget about the words they're
saying that are pandering. Forget about that.
If you ain't black, then you ain't for me, kind of nonsense.
It's real simple. You just have to ask simple
questions. Are your outcomes decidedly
better? Did Barack Obama the great, the
great hope that he brought of change?
Did it make it better? Or do you feel more divided
against your white neighbors? And is that a thing that you
want to teach your children? Do you want to go out and have
your children believe that all black people are your friend and
that all white people are dangerous to you?
Is that a, A, a, a value system that you're willing to stand
behind? I don't think it is.
When I was talking to Dexter yesterday, again, this is Dexter
Taylor out in Brooklyn. We're talking about it, He said,
as a young man with dreadlocks swinging, I thought one thing,
which was that, yeah, the man's keeping me down, all this other
stuff. But then I had a lot of black
people not step up when they said they should have.
And I realized people are individuals, which is what we
all come to when we're old enough to look at it.
When you're old enough to look at it, you realize that
individually, a lot of people suck.
That's like a sociology area right there.
Some people are worse than other people.
Now you all have a sociology degree.
That's fantastic. Steal that from Tom Segura.
That was one of his great comedy little bits.
It's true. Some people suck.
A lot of them suck. And if they suck, then you
realize that we should take people as individuals.
And that's a conservative position.
We were going to analyze people by their fruits.
That's a biblical position. And their fruits are pretty
straightforward. If the outcomes are decidedly
better than you can say, yeah, this person has done better for
me. If the government, if you want
your children raised by the DMV and you think that government
schools are resulting in better reading rates and better, you
know, opportunities of success, how about it?
I just don't think the evidence is there, and neither do most
people. Most people know, hey, our
schools are not wrong. It's not that we need to give
our schools more money. If the answer is more money and
more government programs, maybe you should consider that they
have a ton of it and it's not working.
Maybe we try something else. It's very simple.
It's Socratic. Hey, do you think they're doing
a great job? They've had a bunch of money.
They have more money than they've ever had before.
Does that seem like it's working?
Would you be interested in trying something new?
These are basic sales techniques, by the way.
It's asking questions that are leading to a solution.
And the solution is always like, have you tried this thing that I
am offering you? I don't have to tell you
explicitly, I just have to undermine the things that are
garbage. From your own personal.
Experience, which we all have that experience.
It is there. All right.
I want to show you how, how all in these people are on the
abortion game. By the way, this is a proxy.
This is, this is New York State, so it's as safe as it gets.
And this is a truly radical take.
This is the governor of New York giving her little hot takes on
why abortion pills are so important to the point where
she's going to spend your money on it whether you like it or
not. If you're a conservative, lives
in New York, it doesn't matter. She's spending your money
because she's you and I already decided she's going to give out
152,000 doses of baby death. Here we go.
New York State is a safe harbor. This is what I announced right
after the Dobbs decision. I announced $35,000,000 to beef
up the services here in New York knowing that we'd be the place
for for freedom refugees. I mean, these are women seeking
freedom, freedom over their own body.
And so we're going to continue supporting them.
But as I mentioned, it's one thing to provide abortion
services, but if they outlaw the distribution of mifepristone as
a result of the Supreme Court decision which we'll hear about
in June, if they go that far, then what options do I have?
I have 150,000 doses stockpile, but it should not come to this.
And we are becoming now a state of of haves and have nots.
Some states have freedom, sums do not, based on your governor.
But if this Supreme Court listens to these judge, this
judge in Amarillo, TX of all places, to dictate to all of us
that our freedoms that we fought for for decades and decades are
gone. I'm going to tell you this,
don't underestimate the rage of women in this country.
They will March, they will take to the streets, they will
protest, and there will be electoral consequences because
Donald Trump appointed 243 federal judges, of which one of
them, this judge in Texas, was, and the Supreme Court, there
will be a rebellion. Well, there's going to be a
rebellion. Sounds like a call for
insurrection. Sounds like a call for violence.
We don't care about that kind of stuff because it's political
rhetoric and we're people on the political, right?
So we listen to people and we take them at what they mean and
not what they just said. Just like I'm going to play a
little bit maybe on about how this guy James Cargill was
talking about wet work, jobs and people getting all incensed.
It's like now let him speak. Who cares?
We're not talking about actual assassinations.
So she just disparaged Texas. She said that New York is going
to be a state of freedom. Meanwhile, they are restricting
gun laws and they're trying to put a black man who's never been
in jail, who's never had a criminal record, who has no run
insurance with the cops, who's 51 years old, who's been a
productive member of society working in that tech industry,
that they worship so much for 30 plus years they're going to
throw that guy in jail. Are you kidding me?
It's absurd. It's on his face.
Absurd. So let him run it.
Let them run on. Babies must be killed at all
times. They're they're scared of this
stuff. Why?
Because you're seeing it a little bit everywhere.
This is a little gal on TikTok. What they've done is they've
managed to have people internalize women, specifically
internalize this terrible idea. This idea comes from women who
have bought into feminism, which is a lie.
Unfortunately, the idea that you can have it all, you can't.
You can have a career. No one's saying you cannot, but
you can't do that and have the best outcome for children.
Any women who says otherwise, you have no idea.
It's an unfalsifiable premise that you were saying.
You're saying, well, my kids came out great, Maybe they came
out great. Would they have come out
greater? Can you prove that they wouldn't
know? We can't.
We can't know. But it's pretty clear if you
believe in any conservative principles whatsoever and if you
follow any world view that's aligned with what we're talking
about here, a mother and a father have unique and distinct
roles. When you try to make a mom go to
work specifically for a primary income, 50% of the primary
income or something to that effect, you're now trying to
make women rival men. And women can do something men
can never do. And men are generally going to
be better at the thing that women can do.
OK, Kicking down doors with the United States Marshall Service.
Great example. Are you telling me that if you
have 30% of the United States Marshals are women, that they
are not going to be 10s of thousands if not hundreds of
thousands of men who could do that job better?
I'm not saying women can't kick down the door and pull a guy
out. I'm just saying what are we
risking and what's the upside for society for that woman,
etcetera. We've made it worse and they've
internalized it to the point where this little girl is
running around saying I should have baby killing options on
every aisle of the grocery store.
If you showed this in 1995 to people that were sitting and
watching the Bill Clinton State of the Union, that were on the
political left, that voted for the Clintons and thought that
abortion should be safe, legal and rare, and they were
pro-choice, literally in that move, pro-choice, if you showed
them this, they'd be like, we can't avow this.
This is a radical. This is a person that has lost
their damn mind. Listen to this poor young girl
who's internalized it. Abortion pills should be here.
They should be here, and they should also be here if you
haven't gotten it by now. They should really be
everywhere. They should be everywhere.
If you haven't gotten it right now, little girl, what should
happen is 2 things. Number one, there are a million
options for contraceptive. That's obviously a preferable
choice. It's called personal
responsibility. Embrace it #2 If you don't want
to have babies, there are things you can avoid so you don't have
babies. And that includes, you know, the
physical act of love, having sex.
You could just not do it. That's how you avoid having
babies. If you choose to do that.
There are, there are techniques and there are tools.
There is technology that exists that is inexpensive.
And as Rose just said in the chat, you can always just close
your legs. You can resist that.
The other piece of it comes from the men's side because it takes
two to tango, as we all know. Maybe that's what happens when
you stop teaching science, when you start teaching gender
ideology in schools, like people think they wake up one day and
because a man thought dirty thoughts about them, they
they're pregnant. Maybe that's what's going on
because they are no longer the party of science.
They don't even know what men and women are.
But I think, I think most people have figured out what that, what
that looks like, because they even figured it out before they
had science, how it all works when men lay with women.
So men, it's on. You have babies, take
responsibility, take care of the the woman that is raising your
children. That's it.
It's very easy. It's been going on for thousands
of years. It's the basis for Western
civilization. It's the basis for the reason
why this important concept of fertility matters.
She left out one of those major failures in women's fertility.
It may be a little bit about how we have chemicals and it might
be because there's radiation in the air.
It's also because women and men are not mutually agreeing that
till death day we part means forever, and that we are going
to do this in order to range children.
And I'm going to do a read for my sponsors who are, who are
fantastic. And then we're going to get a
little bit deeper into this piece about the biblical
language that is escaped and why I'm bringing back the word Baron
because I think it's very important.
All right. If you have not prepared for the
chaos that we are dealing with, we've got two Democrats in the
race. We've got one populist
Republican. You guys, it's going to get
spicy. It doesn't matter who wins.
It'll be ugly. There's no question about it.
The political left's not happy either way.
No one's going to be happy for patriots.com/kyle.
The number 4 Patriots with an s.com/kyle is our emergency food
prep place that you can go and get yourself squared away.
And when I say squared away, I mean prepared for disaster for
emergencies. You can hedge yourself against
coming chaos. It doesn't have to be this year.
That's the best part. All of their foods are packed
for up to 25 years of storage. You can put them in a dry
storage space and just hold on to them in case something's
coming down. It may not be this year in your
area. It will be this year in
somebody's area. You can prepare against that
kind of chaos. Make sure that you're able to
make good decisions that are coming from a full belly and not
from desperation and panic. You have the prepare option now,
not the repair. Go to fourpatriots.com/kyle.
If you have not made a plan for your food security for you and
your family, then you are falling down on the job and
honestly, that sort of thing. It's the same sort of situation.
It says when we're talking about taking care of your children,
it's taking personal responsibility for yourself.
There's a reason why our sponsors work really well with
us. They have a lot in common.
All right. The interesting piece of all
this stuff is this concept of barrenness.
Now I want to show you these are just little clips from social
media, from these pro abortion handles.
I find them very off putting, but I think it's worth looking.
Here's an Amy Klobuchar, Amy Klobuchar quote quote We cannot
allow a world where our daughters have fewer rights than
their mothers and grandmother. Yeah, guess what happens If you
kill your babies, Then you won't have daughters you clown show
Amy. Amy Klobuchar is one of the
worst, one of the worst and like least inspiring politicians I've
ever seen. It's this crop of women that
Does she have children? I don't know.
Somebody in the chat let me know if if Amy Klobuchar has
children. I actually should have looked
into that. So many of these women have
conned the generation. This is what I think the cycle
of. I think the cycle of abuse looks
like. Abusive cycles usually look like
somebody does something and then they basically convince somebody
that what they did was good for them, right?
A bunch of women. The Gloria Steinem generation
went forward and and said women can do all the things that men
can do. Women are fantastic and they are
just like men and they are able to do all the man stuff.
And so in such, we are not going to have children and around 50
something years old, right. Probably about the time they hit
menopause, right. Probably just before that they
had that panic where they went, oh shoot, I didn't fulfill my
biological imperative, which is to pass my genes down.
That's literally why our biological machines exist and we
know that there's a biblical concept for it.
But even just on the straight possibility of of populations
continuing, we are all built to be able to move our genetic
material into the future. That's why Western society works
so. Here we are listening to these
women that said, I've chosen not to have offspring.
I've chosen to pursue a career. I've decided to do something
that anybody else could do. The thing that I can only I can
do, only men can do or only women can do.
Rather, the thing that only women have the ability to move
forward, that that carrying of a child and procreation.
I'm going to ignore it. And then suddenly they realized,
oh crap, I may have ignored something really important.
And I have bitterness and I have anger and I have resentment.
And I don't want to be alone in that.
And so they've been preaching that same garbage gospel down to
women who are younger. Hey, you two can have it all.
You could be just like me, 58 years old, with a couple of cats
and no children. You could be the person who also
is barren. And some women are like, oh,
those those ladies look really happy.
Look, they have really nice purses and other things.
They know what's up. There's no way that somebody
would be malicious and evil and try to talk me out of my own
happiness. By the way this was the the
coverage that we had here from what what articles.
This is from Wapo. I just wanted to show you guys
that a couple of these things are out there that what they
what they did is they tried to undermine all the things and
we're going to get into like the fact checker piece of it too
they tried to undermine all these parts.
And before we jump into the biblical piece I want to play
you this little clip that I found Where is this lady at
talking about abortion pills should be everywhere.
Katie Hope Maybe I didn't even add it on here.
There's a there's a woman who she says essentially I'm not
even sure that the people that were making the argument that
are the the in the case in Texas are doctors.
She said people who call themselves doctors like that's
how dishonest this has to be. It has to be dishonest because
there's no way that you can have this argument on its face.
You must go ahead and attack the messenger.
It's the same thing that I saw by the way this little piece
here from Politico. This was super funny.
It popped up. I typed in fact checking, I
think, or maybe I typed in misinformation and I got this
little garbage gem. This is from Politica
PolitiFact, which is a fact checking garbage institution
coming out of Instagram. We fact checked Donald Trump
1000 times. And here's what we learned the
best of this. It's not unusual for politicians
of both parties to mislead, exaggerate and sometimes still
falsehoods. But as fact checkers, we've
never encountered A politician who compares with Donald Trump.
Yeah, really. It's because you've never
actually looked into the claims of anybody else.
You're just so obsessed with the Donald Trump that you can't
handle it. Let's move into this little this
little concept here. This is an article that is
written on a personal blog. The woman's name is Tracy
McComb. I found her.
She's a military spouse and she writes about things that are
very difficult to talk about. Specifically, miscarriage, which
is a concept that is near and dear to my heart.
I have a number of friends whose spouses, whose whose wives have
experienced a miscarriage in the last couple years.
It's it's really, really really hard and often times is not
talked about. This woman has like a pretty
good article talking about some of that but we she also talks
about is infertility and barrenness in the Bible and they
give examples here, which some of you have been calling out in
the chat. Sarah and Rebecca and Leah and
Rachel and Hannah, Elizabeth and others.
There are many women that are listed as being barren and being
infertile, and that was seen not as something that you should
aspire to, certainly not that you should try to get rid of the
blessing of child. If women were able to carry
children, it was looked at as a burden that God would put on
women to test them. Sometimes it was thought of as a
curse. The word barrenness meaning that
it wouldn't, that women who could not bear children was was
something that that people prayed what they would be
relieved from. They literally asked God to
bless them with children because children have always been
thought of as a blessing in Western society.
That's how upside down we are right now.
We have a Society of people who are telling you we have to
protect women's facility. This is why our case choice.
That's why this Shanahan chick is so amusing to me.
She actually knows it all. All liberals do, all leftist,
actually know what those values are.
We share those values with them. We really do.
They've just managed to convince themself that the thing that
they know is true, that the center from which they are
trying to operate, that their values come from, is actually
the opposite. And they're in contract there.
It's it's the same problem of saying I don't trust the police.
The police are all racist. They're all out there to get me.
It's like, OK, so you must be in favor of of universal gun
ownership, right? You must be thinking that
everybody should be able to own all the same weapon systems that
the federal government has and that the local government has.
And then they say no, no, no, no guns kill people.
How is it that you believe that the only group that has a
monopoly on force is the group that is supposed to be the one
that that you can't trust? How how can you trust a group
that has a monopoly on force when you actually have already
said that your your premise is that they are untrustworthy.
They don't. They don't make sense.
It's cognitive dissonance. In the same story, we have women
out there that are talking about women's fertility and safety and
the environment and all the stuff.
Why do we care? Why do these people care about
the climate for themselves? Every single climate estimate
I've ever heard is always like going out, like into 100 years.
It's never going to be like in 10 years we're going to die.
Unless you're AOC and she's a dimwit.
No real people think that, like in 10 years that the sea levels
are going to swallow up Miami. No serious politicians do
either. That's how you know that all
these politicians have Oceanside villas.
That's why they live on Martha's Vineyard.
That's why. That's one of the most expensive
places in the world. That's why Barack Obama's little
enclave is there. So people who don't think that
you should have children, who think that you should have a
universal right to kill your children are also telling you
that they want to protect the planet.
It doesn't make sense. It's upside down and it comes to
the fact that we have no longer valued.
At least people on the left have been unable to value this
concept. They can't rectify.
In their mind, infertility was considered a curse.
Baroness was an insult. It was mean.
I say it online. Baron spinsters, old women who
who did not bear children, they have no skin in the game.
That's the way it was looked at for all of time.
I'm very sympathetic to individual cases.
I'm not trying to call anybody out.
I understand that there are circumstances.
God doesn't call everyone to have children.
And yet as a society, the values of society only make sense if we
actually have a society to continue on.
If not, who cares? Then you do the Dave Matthews
Band thing, eat, drink and be married for tomorrow.
We die. If everybody's going to die
tomorrow, it doesn't matter what you do.
It doesn't matter what you do for the earth.
It doesn't matter what laws you pass because it's all over in a
heartbeat. Just have a good time and it's
over. We don't believe that.
We actually believe. Even people who are, who are not
religious kind of think they're going to be held accountable
because they all kind of feel uncomfortable.
They have that sense. It's impossible to shake.
It's because they were raised in a in a society that has
Christian values, whether they like it or not, they can't help
it. In any case, if you want to read
this article about infertility and Baroness in the Bible and
the reflections on it and what it means for women who have
miscarriages, it's a very, very soft take.
I think it's a very nice. It's a very nice look at a
difficult thing to discuss from a feminine perspective, from a
from a military veteran's wife who's traveled all over the
world and chased her husband to do all the things that need to
be done for the service of this country.
Check out Tracy McCombs. I read this this morning and I
thought this was A1 full of biblical quotations, 2 full of
modern reflections and her own personal experience.
It's worth your time to look into those things.
I'm not going to read all of it. There's no reason to it.
But that is the sense that we used to know the difference
between blessing and and challenge.
Let's call it a challenge, the challenge of not having
children. There's a reason why they're
also think about the left right now.
They're also fighting so much for in vitro fertilization,
which seems overwhelmingly to to feed into people that are doing
things that are against God's plan.
You know, like 2 dudes who are married to each other.
I'm going to put air quotes around marriage because I don't
believe that. But two dudes who are together,
they're going to rent out somebody's uterus and make a
baby that way. Are there solutions that like
bring other people? I don't know.
I I have a hard, I have a hard time rectifying the sort of
dissonance that these people are struggling with every single
day. And they are struggling with it
because if they try to adjust their positions and say, yeah,
these these are my perfectly aligned, reasonable social
agendas, you go, they seem in conflict, nonstop, nonstop
conflict. There's another conflict that I
think that we should all look at here.
This is Steve Friend, my buddy reporting by by Wendy Mahoney
over at at Uncovered DC. There's there's this will to do
something and then there's still no actual political will to do
that thing. Steve Wren went to Tennessee.
I I made reference to it in our show notes.
Steve Friend, FBI whistleblower. Author.
Center for Newing America fellow all around good dude, My buddy,
our contributor for Friendly Fridays, he went and he was
talking in favor of a thing known as House Bill 2912, which
was trying to amend the Tennessee code, specifically
38-8, Section 1. Trying to get them to reduce the
types of cooperation that local law enforcement could be
involved in with the federal government and specifically the
FBI. You know why we think the FBI is
dangerous? I'm going to show you why in
just a second here as well, for those of you who don't get it.
And he was speaking alongside of a Tennessee and a guy named Paul
Vaughn who has been arrested for the FBI.
He's got 11 children. He's a guy that gets it.
He understands what the value of kids are, 11 kids.
That guy got after it early. I'm really jealous of those
people. I had four kids starting at 36,
and I'm 42 now and that's a lot, man.
If I'd if I'd met my wife many years earlier, I wouldn't be the
person I am. But we, we talk about this all
the time. Like, wouldn't it have been
better to have kids when we were in our 20s?
We would have been Dumber, no question about it.
I was definitely Dumber in my 20s.
But for those of you that can figure it out, like jump up
being married and and parenthood changes you in a way that you
cannot predict. And if you're doing it right, if
you come in it with the right values, you're going to be
better off anyway. This man who is who's a a
pro-life guy that was arrested by the Bureau.
They he has the same sort of skin in the game that Steve
Friend does. We both looked at it one looking
at it from the position of an FBI agent being asked to do
things that are illegal immoral or unethical.
Specifically Steve problem with them going after J Sixers using
extreme you know extra force that was totally unnecessary
making the the, the process the punishment.
We hate that we hate. That is the suspendables.
And then a guy who was on the receiving end of it, just the
way that mark out was who's been on the show and I think made a
very compelling argument against weaponized aggressive SWAT
tactics coming in, you know, for nonviolent garbage offenses that
are 1 sidedly enforced. And here's the thing.
That's the bat behind the scenes of the story.
The behind the scenes of this story is that Steve testified in
front of a subcommittee. The subcommittee voted to bring
it to the committee. The committee voted to bring it
to the floor. And when they got to the floor,
Steve was absolutely furious. They brought in four uniformed
troopers from the state police that were representing the
Democrat position and probably the status quo Republican
position. And those people said, I think
this bill would be bad for us. I think this bill would be bad
for us. Yeah, it's bad for us.
It's it would defund some of our, some of our extra money for
overtime. It's bad for us.
And then they decided not to vote on it.
So Steve went up to Tennessee to try to help a state that claims
to care about getting this federal garbage out of the way.
And they tabled it. And they said, hey, will you
come back and testify another time?
We're going to change the bill. We're going to make it weaker.
We're going to make it stupider. We're going to not do the thing
that you said. We're not going to specifically
mention the FBI. We're going to make sure that
the federal government can fund all the overtime.
We're going to try to rework the bill where it just says the
sheriff has to have some oversight of what his guys do.
Are you folks really OK with the fact that you have publicly
funded, at the local level, sheriff's deputies and police
officers that are on JTTF, joint terrorism task forces with the
FBI that have security clearances that exceed the
security clearance of the police chief, of the captains of the
leadership in your Police Department or in your Sheriff's
Office. And certainly more than your
elected sheriff. And then you're going to have
officers who theoretically answer to a chief or to a
sheriff that can't even tell the chief or sheriff what it is that
they do with their time. And some of that stuff is going
to be tyrannical. That's the danger we're talking
about. Look at this clown show.
This is this useless woman, Gloria Johnson, who Steve said
was sitting just five feet away for 10 feet away from him in the
subcommittee. And she's tweeting while she
should be listening to what someone who is honest says.
And she says, I'm sitting in a committee listening to a former
FBI agent talking about being a whistleblower, then finding out
he was suspended for refusing to do his job.
He refused to participate in J6 cases.
That isn't a whistleblower. That's a guy refusing to do his
job. Then the guy who was convicted
of blocking Women's Health clinic is made big mad that the
FBI came to his door. I can't believe these are
considered expert witnesses. You know what, fat middle-aged,
midwit woman. You should never hold office in
this country. You are a walking argument
against participation in politics.
You're stupid and emotional, Gloria Johnson.
You're a fool. And you're pictured right there
with the what do they call them? The Tennessee 3 or whatever
these morons. I guess you need a token fat
white chick in her 50s to step up.
By the way she's running against Marsha Blackburn.
So if you're in Tennessee and you are not voting make sure you
are voting against this clown show who is trying to get the
trying to flip the the the the Senate seat Gross.
Just gross you. I watched her some of her
campaign video. She sat with Mark Hamill like
Luke from Star Wars. Really.
And she seems to be wearing somebody's floral pattern that
came off a 70s couch. Everything about this woman is
detestable. She's exactly the representation
of ugly, nasty, gross stuff. She's got pronouns in her bio.
She has BLM in there. She's a token clown show, and
she's going to go after people like Steve Friend without
knowing anything because she couldn't be bothered to listen
and ask an intelligent question. She simply asked Steve one
question, apparently, And that question was what city were you
in the FBI with? And And he answered, and that
was it. So there's there's your rigorous
debate and thought process. This is what leftists do.
They have no ability to actually process information or take
things on. So you're thinking, OK, fine,
well, at least that weaponization committee is out
there solving problems. We should be good.
You know, GOP's got it. Guys, don't worry about this.
Luckily, we've elected fantastic representatives all over this
country. We have a majority in the House.
So here it comes. And this is what they did.
This came out on Saturday, by the way, when no one was
looking. This is an article from Fox
News. House Republicans moved to
strengthen protections for DOJ whistleblowers.
Quote, the FBI and DOJ have a long history of quieting
whistleblowers, says Representative Nick Langworthy.
You remember how he told you that these people will say stuff
and then they'll do things. And the entire goal is that they
get themselves on Fox News to talk about it.
That's considered the victory. It doesn't really matter what
the outcome is. The question is, is can they get
a political hit that they can play on their website and get
reelected? There it is, he said.
Unfortunately, I think we actually have that quote.
Let me see if I've got it on here.
Yeah, he said. Unfortunately, the DOJ had this
long history of of quieting whistleblowers by pulling
security clearances, delaying investigations, ending their
careers. The Protect Whistleblowers Act
From Retaliation or I'm sorry, the Protect Whistleblowers From
Retaliation Act will ensure that those who come forward to do the
right thing will do so without having to fear for their future.
Really. Will it?
Here's the pieces of the ACT. This is what they cite.
Specifically, it's going to clarify the investigative
authority by letting the DOJ Inspector General be the sole
independent investigative body for the whistleblowers.
Hello. The The IG works for the DOJ.
They're gutless. Absolutely gutless.
Establish reasonable investigation timelines, require
the DOJIG to communicate consistent and timely manners
with impacted whistleblowers and complete the investigation with
240 days. Do you think any of you can go
240 days without a paycheck the way that I did?
I went something like, shoot, what did I go like maybe 500
days without a paycheck. Garrett's right about there now.
Marcus Allen north of 700. Can you guys go for two years
without a paycheck while the DOJ invested investigative group
that answers to the DOJ that answers to Merrick Garland that
is funded by the Attorney General which is a political
hack. While they go out there and do
whatever it is they do, grant equal appeal rights that secures
the FBI whistleblowers right to appeal to the Merit Service
Protections Board, MSPB and ensure that this right is
afforded to the same way it is for every other federal
employee. I had rights to the MSPB, I'm a
veteran. I went to the MSPB and they said
we don't know, we don't have standing.
We're gutless. Then they went to Navy versus
Eagan. Navy versus Eagan is a court
case that already says that you have no right to a security
clearance, so they can pull it anyway, even though they said
they're going to stop this. And then the last one is
enhanced transparency, which require reports on the IG to go
at length to the whistleblower retaliation.
What it should say is, is that we will assume that any action
taken against someone who comes forward as a whistleblower is by
default a reprisal until proven otherwise.
That would be real language that mattered.
Instead, what you have is this bullshit comment to get yourself
on Fox News. And he said, quote, these
whistleblowers risk their careers and their livelihoods to
speak out, to shine a light on the problem and restore the
public trust in the FBI. Regrettably, loopholes exist in
whistleblower protection laws that have allowed senior FBI
leadership to retaliate against many of these whistleblowers.
That's Jim Jordan. Yeah, you know what, Jim?
You can stuff it. You can absolutely stuff it.
Because this happened too. Yesterday, my buddy Garrett
O'boyle put this out on Twitter. It's been seen 77,000 times.
That's not that many. Considering what it is.
I'm going to read it for you. The FBI claims that I'm an
employee. They claimed I was an employee
until April. I was doing this podcast.
I started off and they claimed I was an employee even though they
hadn't paid me. In a year.
They've severed every single connection that an employer
would have, including pay and healthcare.
Garrett O'boyle just paid them $3397.43 for a transfer that
they canceled and didn't happen where they stole his stuff,
knowing that he didn't do the thing that they said, as
whistleblowers have said and shared with The Washington
Times, he just paid them $3400 as not an employee because they
consider him an employee and they are holding him hostage.
That's the bill that you're seeing on the screen right now.
That's the requirement. The payment confrontation from
the FBI debt management service. I got one of those bills, by the
way, just before. Just before I was suspended
forever. And it was thousands of dollars.
And I've gotten one cents for my healthcare cost that we didn't
have because we didn't know we had healthcare.
Why would we have healthcare? We didn't have a paycheck.
There was no deduction. They carried it on and sent me a
bill for like 10 grand, which I haven't paid and I have no
intention of paying. The FBI goes after people and
then tries to financially ruin them instead of saying, you know
what, we suck. We're sorry that we've destroyed
your careers. A couple of people there could
actually be halfway decent. We appealed this, by the way,
through the appeals process and all of those are kicked back.
So thanks very much, Jim Jordan and weaponization and all you
clown shows. Langworthy out of New York
trying to make your whistleblower protection act to
get on Fox. You had a victory.
We all lose and the American people lose.
And that's why the Seven O 2 stuff is going to be so
important here because this is what the FBI is getting away
with when they fund it, which they did.
And then $1.2 trillion, they fund the FBI all the way.
Why not? And what does it look like?
It looks like Chris Ray talking about this is the FB is Twitter
account by the way which got community noted, which is a Fact
Check by the community says the FBI violated American citizens
4th Amendment rights 278,000 times with illegal unauthorized
FISA 7O2 searches. I'm going to play the video.
I know it hurts to watch but we're going to play this little
video of Chris Ray telling you just how important it is that
they've they've done a great job.
I mean like less than 1% of the time.
In the millions of searches have violated the Constitution.
This is the stuff that our GOP is still funding.
Just be aware of it. This is what's at stake, folks.
Those reforms are working. The FISA court itself most
recently found 98% compliance and commented on the reforms
working. The most recent Justice
Department report found the reforms working 99% compliance
and so I think legislation that ensures those reforms stay in
place but also preserves the agility and the utility of the
tools, what we need to be able to protect the American people.
All right, he needs to protect the American people.
So let's go to Lisa Monaco, who I absolutely adore.
She's my absolute favorite piece of garbage.
Lisa Monaco is going to tell you what the Seven O 2 is most
important for. And just like you already heard,
our Speaker of the House get up and say our number one priority
is America First. That's why we have to fund
Israel and Ukraine, right? That's why no one for speaker
was the right answer. Lisa Monaco is going to let you
know that those tools that they need to protect the American
people, you're never going to believe who their priority is.
You just heard me give you a little tip.
Here's Lisa Monaco. First, let me agree
wholeheartedly with General Nakasone. 7O2 is an absolutely
indispensable national security tool.
I have seen the value of it in every job that I have had, and
you mentioned my prior roles in national security.
I see it when I review the President's Daily Brief.
A significant portion of that vital intelligence that we get
is derived from 7:02. It gives us insights into cyber
threats, help helps us prevent ransomware attacks from foreign
actors. But when it comes to this
conflict and what Russia is doing in Ukraine, it has proved
vitally important. Indeed, Seven O2 has helped us
uncover gruesome atrocities committed by Russia in Ukraine,
including the murder of non combatants, the forced
relocation of children from Russian occupied Ukraine to
Russia, and the detention of refugees fleeing violence by
Russian personnel. All of that we were able to see
thanks to Seven O 2. And that information and other
information helped has helped us as a country and as a national
security community, galvanized accountability efforts regarding
Ukraine by allowing us to confidently and accurately speak
with the international community about Russian atrocities.
So, Senator, I think one of the most important things that this
committee and this Congress can do to help us push back against
Russian aggression is reauthorize 7O2.
OK, we need to push back against Russian, Russian aggression, and
we need to have accountability and we need to be capable on the
world stage of talking about Ukraine.
What on earth does that have to do with the DOJ?
Can anybody fathom how stupid this stuff is?
Why are senators listening going?
Like, oh wow. Yeah, of.
Course because seven O 2. Because what we're finding war
atrocities that were committed by some country that wasn't us,
by another to another country that wasn't us.
Like what? What role does the Department of
Justice, which runs our federal prosecutions and our law
enforcement apparatus in this country, have to do with any of
that? Are they talking about going
after Americans in other places? No.
They're talking about insanity. It's Russia.
It's Ukraine. It's not America.
None of these people care about America.
Lisa Monaco has been there forever.
She's on Cash Patel's personal hate list.
She sucks awful. And her and guys like Lee
Loftus, who I mentioned the other day, Both of those people
were the ones that ran that mandate and shoved it down the
throat of those who worked at the FBI, who were more than
happy to just follow orders and get rid of guys like me and
Garrett and Steve. And they would have gotten rid
of George if he'd stuck around. That's why he retired.
They're justifying 7O2 coverage, which is primarily used to spy
on Americans. Whether you like it or not, the
only interest you have with Seven O 2 is finding out is
there someone you can actually go after in any meaningful way.
And those people don't live in Russia and don't live in
Ukraine, and they aren't involved in the Russian
Ukrainian war. They're in America.
And when you search for their names because they're in America
and you want to find out the contacts in DWS, the data
warehouse system, when you search for those names, you are
breaking federal law. And the FBI bragged that they
did such a good job, they only did that almost 300,000, *,
278,000 times. That they violated the 4th
Amendment was pretty good because it was down from
millions of times of violation, millions of misuse of this tool.
I have used it. None of those senators have.
I bet Lisa Monaco has not ever actually gone into DWS
personally and used it. And if she has, she's probably
broken the law. So how about they get tried for
that? How about the Justice Department
actually try to do justice instead of reminding us that
it's just us out here that care about it?
Nauseating. This is why all the stuff about
free speech matters. This is why we have to be able
to speak our mind. This is why censorship is such a
big deal, why it's at the top of our list when we start thinking
about this kind of garbage. I've got a a video here from
Brookings Institute. I want to play you this.
This is from that 60 minute nonsensical piece I'm going to
talk about fact checking. They're so mad that they can't
control the information. That's why places like rumble.
It's why places like X formerly Twitter.
What a what a weird choice. By the way.
I still like Twitter. I hate the name Twitter right up
until I started using Twitter and then I'm like, oh, I get it.
Anyway, the reason why these these places are so important is
because they are the only stuff that is doing something contrary
to the garbage narrative that is basically directly coming from
the A of the government right to the mouth of the media.
And they turn around and spit it back into our mouth like we're
baby birds. But we know better.
Here they are trying to throw shade on Elon Musk's, you know,
investment and the capabilities that we get out of there.
Here we go. After Elon Musk took over in
2022, most of its fact checkers were fired.
Now the site is rife with trash talk and lies.
Little would you know that this, said to be footage from Gaza, is
really from a video game. Eventually, ex users added a
warning label in this post. Pictures of real babies killed
in Israeli strikes are falsely dismissed as dolls.
The toothpaste is out of the tube and we have to figure out
how to deal with the resulting mess.
Darrell, WA, senior fellow of technology innovation at the
Brookings Institution, says the clash over what is true is
fraying our institutions and threatening democracies around
the world. Half of the world is voting this
year and the world could stick with democracy or move towards
authoritarianism. The danger is disinformation
could decide the elections in a number of different countries.
In the US, he says, the right wing has been flooding the
Internet with reams of misleading information.
I'm breaking away from that, OK. I'm breaking away from it
specifically because of this. Did you just hear him?
He just said half the world is voting and we have to decide
whether or not they're going to go for authoritarianism.
A journalist would ask the question, what sort of
authoritarianism are you worried about?
How do you define authoritarianism?
What are examples of this authoritarianism that you think
is coming in? Did you hear any of that?
Did you hear anybody ask a critical question at all, or are
they presenting you with not journalism?
What they're presenting you with is a narrative.
Remember, the same kind of thing that they're concerned about
Donald Trump putting out there when it comes to his court
cases, a narrative of persecution.
Except the narrative of persecution aligns with the
facts. You can critically ask questions
about what happened to Donald Trump, and you will see
political persecution. There's no other excuse.
There's a victimless crime where nobody lost money.
In fact, everybody made money. And it was levied by a judge
who's a political activist in the state of New York.
And what happened? A 500, almost $500 million
penalty was well levied. And then when the appeals court
looked at it, they were like, oh, dude, that's way too much.
We're going to probably overturn this.
So they knocked it down to 1/3 of that 175 million.
And Donald Trump came out like AG and said, yeah, I'm going to
pay it in cash because F you, you don't have to like Donald
Trump to know that that's AG move.
And you don't have to like anything about our court system
to know that even the lefties that are in the New York court
looked at it and went, this is garbage, we're probably going to
have to overturn this. There's no reason to put this
man out for $500 million. We're all going to be on the
hook after that. Nuts.
Absolutely nuts. And they hate it.
They hate the free speech. They want to attack it.
It's always these lesbian looking women, these women that
hate babies. You could just tell by the way
they but why? Because they don't embrace being
feminine. They don't embrace anything
about it. You could be a tomboy woman and
still be very feminine. You can dress in jeans and
overalls. I don't care.
There's a difference between that and trying to approximate
the dress of a man, which we saw with that starboard.
Starboard gal the other day said her name.
Yeah, Kate Starboard. The one that had $2.25 million
in grants to her little organization by the Biden
administration. That was very upset.
I'd play the clip, but I don't want you guys to puke.
So instead I'm going to play something from Bill Maher.
This lady hates free speech and even Bill Maher's like, come on
man, give me a break. Bill Maher just likes to be in a
contrarian. He's actually correct in this
case too. Elon Musk might be a complicated
guy. He's not conservative, by the
way. He's not conservative.
But he knows that babies are important because he's not
insane. You know, in the back of the
book instead of, you know, you do blurbs on the back of the
book. I put all the insults they had
like, Elon, you're an asshole. My, my my voice is so shrilled
only dogs can hear me and that my heart is seething with hate.
So that's what Elon thinks of me, which I'm like look in a
mirror. Sir, but that's.
He's a complicated guy. Oh, OK, sure, why not?
Well, I mean. How about he's just not a
complicated guy, He's just a jerk.
But go ahead. OK, well, you know.
What? Complicated.
But so are you. So am I.
OK, well now you just debated with yourself and agreed with.
Me. Yes.
And I can easily prove he's a complicated guy, because
yesterday I saw on the news somebody who was paralyzed, who
was giddy with happiness because he was being able to play video
games with his mind. Yep, that came from Neuralink.
That's he. That's Elon's company.
And so did my car. And so you.
Know I get No, I I I like those. Elon.
I I like. I like Tesla.
Elon. I like Neuralink.
Elon. I even like Hyperloop.
Elon. It's it's Twitter slash xe.
I agree. But in in the big scheme of
things, where do you think his legacy will be in history?
Because I've never seen anybody who has more articles written
about him every day in the paper because he's got his finger in
so many pies and then he does crazy stuff.
He is. Come on, Spectre.
Me so. She debated with herself and she
lost because Elon's worldview, even though I think he's flawed
because he misses the complete version of it, which is to say
why those values are important. His worldview is not wrong, it's
it's slanted off. I think he missed the mark and
the further you get down, you miss it more.
His his perspective is that babies are important, human
beings are the end result, that technology is supposed to serve
them. I think that he just misses the
the gap by seeing that when you start putting men and machines
together, particularly things like AI, some of those end up
being misguided. He's also trying to put out
electric electric cars, which probably makes sense in a very
small way as we continue to experiment.
But as it stands, it's also resulting in like slavery in
Africa with kids digging out cobalt with their freaking
fingertips. So he's not completely unified
in his world belief, but he makes a lot more sense than that
woman does. I guarantee it.
That woman just debated with herself and said I like what he
does, except what he does. These people can't figure it
out. A lot of these women, they're
they're emotional and they're allowed to be emotional.
That's what women are supposed to do.
And that's when rationality, the other side of the coin, it's
supposed to be a yin and a Yang. They're supposed to be balance.
Political left and political right are supposed to argue
about it from compassion that that's misguided and from
rationality that's detached from emotion.
And then you end up in this thing where we help people, but
we do it in a way that makes sense.
It's not that hard. Men have to be men, Women have
to be women. This is like literally this is
who would have thought that in 2024 that our discussion is
whether or not men are men and women are women and if we can
actually just align those things together And they also want to
distract you with this garbage. I had to play this because I saw
this and I'm Dumber for having watched it.
Now you all have to be Dumber because you're going to watch
it. This is the kind of stuff that
the so-called news agency, the people that covered the opening
shots of the Gulf War when I was a kid.
I remember them watching. They had scud Busters and they
were shooting through night vision.
You remember this, the 1st 24 hour coverage of a conflict that
lasted for three days in Iraq when they opened shot under
under Bush One. This organization now has this
silliness. Here's ACNN clip of just like I
know they're not serious. They're telling me they're not
serious by the kind of idiots they bring on here.
All right, have a taste. How popular you are, How
talented an artist you are. How many accolades and
nominations and everything you've got going on.
At least what you have planned for the summer, coming ahead
with a concert and a tour, The idea of them inviting you there
in particular. Did they talk to you about what
they wanted politically? Did they want your endorsement?
They want you to help people get out the vote.
Hey, you know, that ain't got nothing to do with me.
You know what I'm saying? Like, I'm just living my life
like a gold and living my life like a gold.
But you know, I'm not going. You know what I'm saying?
It's like politics and get out of the president, you know what
I'm saying? I love everybody.
And at the end of the day that they got to end.
Yo, at the end of the day, the day got to end.
That's the Idiocracy. That is what happens when
Camacho President Camacho shoots the the, the 240 into the air at
the State of the Union. Like, that's where we're headed
with that Lady. I don't know who that is.
I think it's called Megan the Stallion.
But I don't understand who that person is or why.
Talentless, retarded, speaking like a fool.
And imagine that was your job. Like you're you're like a news
anchor for a news station and you've got to ask this lady, I'm
like, did the Biden administration ask you to do
something? She's like, I don't even know
how questions work. What is that?
Is that an interrogative? Terrible, Absolutely terrible
stuff. Anyway, if that's who the Biden
administration is inviting to the White House, that's what
that story was about. By the way.
They invited that woman to the White House.
Pro abortion retards trying to influence people.
Can we do better? Can't we?
Can't we say it's not about the the the mug shot for Trump and
sneakers to get people in the black community like black
communities? Because I don't think there's
one. I think there are many.
Can we just go out there and be like, hey, your outcomes suck.
People are trying to kill your babies.
We like babies. We want you to have better
outcomes. We want to have less government.
We think the government should get out of your business.
It's a hopeful position to be in the conservative thing.
Do you think that you one day could have more money?
Wouldn't you want people to have more money?
Don't you want the less government pulling money when
you make more money? That's the hopeful position.
Or do you say, hey, are you too dumb to ever make money?
You should vote for the people that think that you're too dumb
to make money because that's what Democrats do.
It's really simple stuff, man. It's like it's the easiest pitch
in the world. What's working?
Has it been like this for a long time?
Does it seem good? Do you think that voting for
these people is going to help? There's a lot of people in in
black communities across this country that don't vote because
they just feel like they're disaffected.
There's a lot of people in white communities that feel the same
way. It's not a race issue.
At the end of the day, it's the people that say we have no skin
in the game. A lot of these local races are
decided by a few thousand votes or less, some of them by dozens
of votes, most of them by a few 100 votes.
In the local elections where that really, really makes a
difference, you could at least get some people with guts that
would go after a bill like Steve Friend had.
I'm just saying, All right, I've got this last little piece here.
I wanted you guys to kind of revisit the bridge collapse
thing from yesterday. If you didn't listen to our show
with George Hill, I encourage you to listen to it.
George Hill is a counterterrorism expert.
He didn't think that it had a counterterrorism Nexus.
The FBI has said, no, we don't take the FBI at their word, but
we do look at real sources of information and we try to
evaluate them. And by the way, Laura Logan, I
think she's way off. I don't know who her sources
are, but doesn't really matter. People that I've talked to that
spent decades working in cyber security, including guys like
Aaron Gogley, who was a former IRS agent that worked this way
in a big way. He worked on cybersecurity task
forces for the federal government.
We don't think, as you heard George say the other day, even
though many of these ships are going to be corrupted with
malware, it's going to be exploiting information and
status and position the odds of it being something that they can
remotely control. We're not talking about an RC
car here. We're talking about a hundreds
of thousands of ton cargo ship that appears based on the
information that I've seen from this guy.
So I recommend this article. This is coming out of Bloomberg
and this guy's, his name is Sal, and I'm going to mess up his
last name here, Mercagliano. I think it's his last name,
Mercagliano. He is a shipping expert.
He has an entire podcast that literally is about what's going
on with shipping in the world. That's what it's called, what's
going on with shipping. And his take was essentially
that they lost power, which could happen and that could be
the result of some kind of a, a a major actual problem.
It could be a result of bad fuel, is what they're saying,
and this is the investigation that's going on currently.
But essentially, either way, the ship lost power.
There's no way they could predict that it would hit that
particular pylon the way that it did.
And they dropped an anchor. That sharp turn that you saw was
the drop of an anchor, which is part of the.
SO PS when they've lost power to try to slow and retard the speed
of that vessel and then they drop the other angle trying to
like last minute correct. And it ended up going directly
into a darkened pylon. Not a good situation.
It doesn't always have to be a conspiracy.
I'm going to show you one last thing here.
I talked about this the other day with Dexter when we were on
the phone. Do you see this?
This poster some of you guys have seen?
It says I want to believe it's from The X-Files.
It's from the opening pilot episode of The X-Files where
Scully comes down and meets Mulder.
I've probably said this year before, but I'm going to say it
again. We all want to believe in all of
our weirdest theories. We all want to believe in the
conspiracy, that our worldview is united, that the things that
we suspect are actually true, that everybody's coming to get
us whatever. The thing is that we are
personally invested in when it comes to looking at, hey, was it
terrorism? Are they lying to it?
Yeah, they're lying to us all the time, they being the
institutions for their own reasons.
But that doesn't mean that everything is going to align.
You remember the number of times that they were actually aliens
and fault in The X-Files. It was almost always like, weird
stuff going on, but there was almost always some sort of
explanation for it. And that's why we also have to
be not just our own Fox Mulder, we also have to be our own Dana
Scully. We have to have that voice of
reason of balance. We have to have that emotional
instinct to say, yeah, it's crazy and the Russians or the
Chinese crashed a ship into our port or bad fuel, basic failures
of software, engine failure, you know, the the, the SOP's for
safety resulted in a terrible outcome.
And those bridges are supposed to fall the way that they did.
There's a bridge expert I was reading about who said it's a
complex bridge and it was always going to have that.
If you had a structural support, you're going to lose multiple
tresses. OK, I believe you.
Here's how I know you're not going to be able to coordinate a
ton of these people, including some random dude who's been
shipping, doing shipping information for for a decade and
talking about it on a podcast. He didn't randomly just get,
like, a bunch of government talking points.
That's not how it works. There's no way to reach out to
that guy. There's no way that anybody
would know that that dude would be interviewed about this
particular situation. And he's picked up by a number
of, like, very small but articulate voices across social
media, including places like X. Which is why the free speech
matters. It's why all of this unified
thing, even though we want to believe one thing, we got to be
cautious about it. And we have to.
We should start from the position of skepticism.
That's how we do it. All right, that's a lot.
Let me give you a dad joke. I just thought this was funny,
OK, so if you're listening, I'm going to read it for you, Man
sits down. He tells his wife.
Listen, I've got to tell you something that's really been
bothering me for the last 28 years.
All you've done is find mistakes in anything that I say and she
interrupts him and says 29 years, that's that's OK We're OK
with that. Folks, If you want to send
comments to the show, I wanted to put this on here.
Some of you don't know this. If you go to kyleserafin.com,
it's just my name, Kyle. serafin.com.
You can actually go to the open DMS, which are on Twitter.
There's a link to it right there.
There's also an arrow down there that you'll see the chat
function that sends emails to us.
You can click on. I have a question.
Or you could just click the chat and you can send us just a
little bit of your thoughts if it's a question.
If you're going to suggest a guest, I'm fine with that.
You better have contact information for the guest,
because I don't have contact information for everybody.
OK? But if you want to reach out to
us with your thoughts, your questions, your comments, your
sarcastic remarks, I'll take those.
There's a lot of weird mental illness that comes through
there. You guys can start doing that
from the people that listen to the show that want to add some
context. Or if you have some information
or whatever it is, you can reach out to me there.
That goes directly to me. I may or may not be able to get
back to you in a reasonable amount of time.
A lot of stuff comes in there, but I just want to let you guys
know that is a way you can do it.
Kyle. serafin.com. Go in there and then let's also
say support o'boyle, the O'boyle family.
You guys can go to thedashsuspendables.com.
The dash suspendables.com. The Don't forget the dash
suspendables.com. The promo code.
Kyle will save you 10% on there. That's just just kind of a way
to track it. But essentially, if you guys
want to support the family that just paid the FBI for not
working for the FBI, it's like writing your taxes when you know
that you're directly funding tyranny.
That's what we're involved in right now.
You guys can support them. And my buddy who's going
through, you know, it's a mentally rough thing to do to
write a check to the government when you know the government has
been screwing you. I know a lot of us are doing
that in tax season right now. And the new Kyle Seraphin show
shirts are coming and they are en route.
I saw a stack. There are dozens and dozens and
dozens of T-shirts on their their prep table to ship out.
They just got a bunch of the pins in.
So if you guys were waiting on a pin, they are now on en route.
They've got the stack of pins in there, a big, a big sort of
order. I think we had over 1000 that we
ordered so that they came in from the manufacturer and we're
going to ship those out to you guys as well.
So if you were waiting on that or if you did have those in your
order and you haven't received your order in the last couple
weeks, that's what's going on there was just waiting on a
manufacturing thing, the Dash suspendables.com promo code,
Kyle and that is it. Let's do a five star review and
let's shut the sucker down. All right, Five star review
coming in from Reba Will in a sea of podcast.
Five stars out of all the choices a person can make in a
sea of podcasts. I listen to Kyle because of his
keen intellect and razor sharp wit.
He dissects the issues of the day and breaks it down so that
even Tards can understand. I don't know why that makes me
happy. Tards even has like a little
apostrophe. I wonder if this review will get
censored. The review did not get censored.
It made it through. Remo.
Well, thanks so much for joining
us. All right, ladies and gentlemen,
we will see you again tomorrow on Thursday.
I've got a an interview that I'm going to be recording today for
you with a surgeon who blew the whistle on some garbage going on
in the Texas, the Texas hospitals.
So look forward to that pretty soon.
God bless you. I mean it.
We'll see you again tomorrow morning.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin Show streamed live
weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth, Social and Instagram at Kyle
Serafin.