Prepare to hear the truth from a real whistleblower, an American
Patriot, here's civil liberties, enthusiasts, Second Amendment,
Defender and indefinitely suspended FBI agent.
Kyle seraphin. Hello, my friends and welcome to
the Kyle's tariff and show for Wednesday March 15th 2023.
The United States of America, we have a constitutional republic
The Republic is organized under the Constitution of the United
States of America. Many of you listening will have
sworn allegiance to this country, probably growing up and
you've sworn allegiance to its flag.
In fact, that Pledge of Allegiance and the Republic This
this whole process has been trending.
Number one on iTunes, this week, our former president got
together and recorded himself saying something.
So simple that gray school students used to say, but why is
that Pledge of Allegiance? Why is that the thing that is
trending on iTunes? What is it?
What does it mean to people? I think it means that Americans
are a bunch of people who believe in Law and Order.
We're a bunch that decided Generations ago that we want a
structure and an order to our country and to our government.
And that government would be limited in a dramatic fashion
that was not common to Nations at that time.
It's limited in what it can do. But also it explains what you
can do, which is all the things that it can't.
The purpose of the American Constitution is to organize and
lay out the limited powers of government.
And the first deal that was struck in order to make this
government become a reality. Was a limit, a Bill of Rights,
which expressly forbade, the US government from infringing on
the rights, that our founding generation cared about so much
themselves. These Patriots were the Original
civil liberties, enthusiasts fact, my father made fun of the
fact that that was in my Twitter bio, who isn't a civil
liberties? Enthusiast was his question?
Well, apparently, a lot of people and the reason that this
is also important is when we put someone into the office of the
presidency, we do not elect a king.
We're going to talk about that pretty extensively.
We're going to get into a bunch of other things as well.
Today we're going to be talking about.
Why would that that person that we put in office?
Doesn't get to make. Decisions.
Unilaterally about our gun rights about what our children
can do the, the dangers of going on.
And having that person engage in foreign policy, that is outside.
The range of the Constitutional Powers.
Your talk about, what happened with the Russian fighter jet, a
couple of other little stories here.
And then maybe what we're looking at with the, the Chinese
situation like apparently, this president has decided to put us
into the crosshairs of at least three Wars, right now that we
are looking down the One is a proxy war.
The other would be to direct. I want to talk about those what
they mean, but we're speaking about the original Patriots in
this country, the people that helped found our nation and what
it meant? I'm going to bring up our first
sponsor. This is the sponsor of today's
show is brought to you by Patriot coolers which you can
find at Patriot coolers plural.com so every single
police officer every single Investigator will tell you that
one of the most important tools that you can have on
surveillance is a radio hands down, communication is key.
The second most important thing you can have is your cup for
coffee. I've got mine for the show right
now. There it is.
This is one of the new Patriot tumblers.
They sent me. It actually has a really nice
feel to it, it's not one that I used previously, but what I did
have when I joined the Washington field office, Special
Operations Group, which was the FBI surveillance team in DC, I
had my first Patriot It coolers Tumblr.
It looks like this. Here it is.
You may have even seen me using this on the show.
Previously, this is the 1.0 version.
They've, they've redefined it. They've given me a different one
here, so I can kind of see what this one looks like.
These ones have the color going all the way to the top, but same
basic idea. They've got this 13 stripes down
here to represent the 13 stripes, on our flag.
They've got 50 stars on the bottom, which you probably can't
even see on this one. Now, I can turn it up.
There it is a little bit of scuff no worse for the wear.
I bought this in October of 17. So this thing has been running
with me for over 5 years at this point, and still going strong,
the 1.0 version which you can still order.
These tops has a big hole in the middle.
You can actually pull out the spill resistant which I did and
it allows you to put a big silicon straw in there, which
you can buy for cheap on Amazon. I would put smoothies on there
and roll them all day long. Sometimes if you're not going to
eat for for you know, eight hours or so nine hours sitting
in a car, this was the move that I would have and I'd have a
different mode for coffee or I'd have a big thermos but Nothing
better than having your meal stay cold for eight plus hours
while you were sitting in there. First thing in the morning,
bring it along with you, check out patreon coolers as you can
see over here on our little web page display.
They've got hard sided coolers, they've got soft sided coolers
the soft sided one the 34 can is like 125 bucks, something like
that. You can check those suckers out
and get 10% off plus free shipping with promo code.
Kyle k yl e will get you 10% off these things.
These guys are equivalent. I would To anybody else in the
market. That's making these roto-molded
style coolers. They keep ice for days and days
you've seen them with other you know big Brands.
This one Patriot coolers not only is sponsoring the Kyle
serif and show but they also give back to Veterans.
They help with a charity that helps refinish post 9/11
veterans that have had significant injuries to refit
their homes so they can live in the more comfortably.
So that's a great cause you're supporting our show.
This is a brand that believes in this Three straight out of
Houston Texas. So give them a look.
And if you're in the market for either a Tumblr or a hard sided
or a soft sided cooler, they've got some hats and Birch and
things like that to check them out.
Good brand. Good people.
And they support the Kyle Serafin.
Show, we appreciate you supporting them.
All right, so let's dig into what we believe.
What we know is the rule in this country, the United States
Constitution, I want to read pieces because we don't often
talk about What are the nuts and bolts of this people.
So I believe in the Constitution.
Maybe you do how many of you have read the Constitution
recently. Now, there's going to be a small
percentage of my listeners that obviously have done this because
you're that person and I appreciate that you're out.
There you are the minority most people believe in the
Constitution but the things that they remember are the Bill of
Rights, that's good. Those the amendment, let's talk
about the order in which things were put together in the US
Constitution because if you don't understand what the order
of operations looks like, How can you, how can you rightly get
involved and and try to fight for what it actually means.
So I'm going to read the Preamble and then we're going to
discuss the two first articles. Okay.
The Preamble says we the people of the United States in order to
form a more perfect union, establish justice insure
domestic tranquility provide for the common defense, promote the
general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to
ourselves. And our posterity do ordain and
establish this constitution. Lucien for the United States of
America. This was a revolutionary
statement at that time, the things that the the the founders
of our constitution laid out as the most important parts.
The most important parts of what the government's job is to do
are as follows. A more perfect union.
That's part one. A more perfect union of the
states that were out there which were operating on their own and
they were they were not aligned in a meaningful way under the
under the previous Articles of Confederation we want to
establish justice. Okay, so there's a Justice
component. This is going to be your Law and
Order. This is going to be your federal
abilities to do adjudicate crimes and punishments.
Events and things along this link nature, they want to insure
domestic tranquility. That might be something that we
have to dig into it. Another time I feel like there's
probably an entire podcast on domestic tranquility and what
that means, provide for the common defense has always been
established as the militias the ability to have a commander in
chief. The ability to have a
centralized and unified response to foreign Invasion and so on.
So common defense, promote the general welfare.
That one might be the one of the things that has really come
after us and has led To the administrative state that we
see. And then secure the blessings of
liberty on ourselves. And our posterity, the, the
blessings of liberty I think are really the most important thing
that are at the end of this. And so, we'll have to, we'll
have to get some some deeper Dives.
Maybe we'll get a constitutional expert to say, what these things
meant and why they were in that order.
But when we move down to the first article, it's really
important that the first thing that was addressed the first
topic addressed Article, 1 Section 1.
And I quote all legislative powers herein granted shall be
vested in a Congress of the United States which shall
consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
All right, Article 1 Section, 1 establishes the Congress.
This is the first Branch. There's a reason why it's the
first Branch. I believe that our Founders
thought this was the most important thing to establish the
group that wrote the laws. And yet, we have fallen into a
tendency that people His do, which is to try to get one
person. One man, one woman.
Whoever this thing is, whatever, whatever entity, occupies an
executive space to take over. This has been the commonality,
the strongman Theory, the warlord Theory, the the king,
the ruler, the Caesar, it doesn't matter whenever the
Republic begins to fail, when Democratic process and the
ability to debate and do the difficult work of legislation
fails. We end up with totalitarians.
That's what the king does. That's what a king does.
So the number one thing that the the founders wanted was a
legislative branch Article, 2 Section, 1 defines the powers of
the presidency. And I want to discuss those very
specifically Article. 2 Section 1, the executive power shall be
vested in a president of the United States of America.
He shall hold his office during the term of four years and
together with the vice president, chosen for the same
term be elected as follows, okay?
There's a whole list of the things that need to be done for
that. That's actually not really
important for our purposes. At this particular moment, it
follows up that it says, before he enter on the execution of his
office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation.
And I quote, I do solemnly swear or affirm that I will Faithfully
execute the Office of the President of the United States.
And will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and
defend the Constitution of the United States.
So, people who have not listened to the oath of office, if you've
never been to an inauguration, if you've never watched one,
it's really important. What they say they will do to
the best of my ability, preserve protect and defend the
Constitution. I think that we are now in a
place where that is not happening.
The president may be saying those words but like, my buddy,
Steve friend likes to add, these are a check mark, this is the I
accept. On the iOS terms of service
agreement and not something that someone is really considering
that they will preserve. Preserve means to to leave
unchanged. And yet what we have right now
is an executive that has for a number of years.
This this goes before even President Trump.
Obviously we've had a probably 50 to 70 year increase in the
power of the executive to a point where they are doing
things that was never intended because Americans like all
people. Tend towards wanting someone to
take responsibility and do the thing for them, do something
make it better and an our presidents have obliged by
taking on more and more power and usurping.
The Article 1 Section 1 powers that should be left to the
legislature Article 2 Section 2. This one is easy to remember to
to sew down in the section. Second article, we learn what
the, the actual power. Ours shall be and I'm going to
read them because they think they're relevant and then we're
going to discuss in long form including some of the decisions
made very recently on gun control on transiting the kids
and so on the president shall be the commander-in-chief of the
Army and the Navy of the United States and of the militia of
several States. When called into the actual
service of the United States, he may require the opinion in
writing of the principal officer of each of the executive
departments. Upon any subject relating to the
duties of their respective offices.
And he shall have the power to Grant reprieves and pardons for
offenses against the United States, except in cases of
impeachment. All right, he shall have the
power by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, this is
the confirmation hearings that we have, okay?
This is where it comes from, and to make treaties.
Provided two-thirds of the Senate present occurs.
Okay. So he has to have a quorum and
he can make these these treaties with other foreign Nations.
This is going to come into play when we talk about the one China
policy, as long as that the Senate approves it in the 2/3.
So they have to confirm what the President says.
This is the vote and then with the by and with the advice and
consent of the Senate shall appoint ambassadors.
So, once again, this is our foreign policy setups other
public ministers, councils judges of the Supreme Court and
other officers, the United States whose appointments are
not here in otherwise provided for, because there are some that
are provided for in the Constitution and which shall be
established by law. But the Congress May by law
vest, the appointment of such inferior officers As they think
proper in the president alone in the courts of law or in the
heads of department. So this is where I think the
administrative State sort of has its nascent form.
The president shall have the power to fill up vacancies which
may happen during the recess of the Senate by granting
commission's which shall expire at the end of the next session.
Okay. Article 2 Section 2 lays out the
powers of the executive. Nothing in there says anything
about granting or making laws Nothing in their states.
They should be able to rule by Fiat.
This is the old, Barack Obama time, the the pen and a phone
thing. This is not, this is not written
to the Constitution and this is the danger.
So why am I talking about all this stuff today, why?
Today of all days today, it's a concern of mine because
yesterday Our President, Joe Biden has decided to release his
do something attitude. This is a fact sheet.
It says President, Biden announces new actions to reduce
gun violence and make our communities safer.
Now, I don't know if you were listening to Article, 2 Section
2, but nothing in there says that he can reduce gun violence
or call out dramatic actions. There's nothing in there that
says that he may execute actions to make our community safer,
whatever he believes. That means this is not a
presidential power. I'm going to go through what
this guy said he's going to do. I'm going to just skim through
some of these things, but the essential attempt of this
announcement is that they are going to release an executive
order, which I guess we'll see shortly that will have an
increased in federal background checks, that's weird.
Because that seems like a legislative power And they've
actually stated that they are going to move the United States
as close to Universal background checks as possible, without
adding additional legislation. This should be massive Paws, and
should cause a significant amount of concern for citizens
of this country citizens, not subjects.
This is not a king, the king does not get to go out and tell
people that they will now be more background checks.
It says the executive order will keep more guns out of dangerous.
Hands by increasing the effective use of red flag laws.
Well, if you listen to our Monday show and if you haven't
get to it, put it on your list. Listen to it sometime this week.
Red flag laws were what they used to pull the guns and to
take the freedom from Alfredo Luna.
Also known as Alpha lawyer who has a wonderful show and is a
really, really nice man. And is not a threat to this
Republic, nor to himself. They took his guns, a police
officer who has done significant work in his small town to reduce
actually dangerous people from being able to come after the
regular citizens who simply want to enjoy the, the blessings of
liberty that this country promises them.
That's a big problem for me. I don't want to know that our
federal government is going to take unilateral action under the
executive branch, which does not have the authority to do.
So, to go after the guns of cops or anyone else.
For that matter, they can't come after mine.
They shouldn't be coming after yours.
Red flag laws are an infringement on our freedoms.
Because they are not in a judicial process.
They immediately usurp the due process clause that we had in
the Bill of Rights letting us know that we have the due
process before they remove us of our property and guns or
property. They are tools.
They are not in adamant objects that also have a personality and
decide to go out and commit mass shootings.
That's a, that's a people thing. And whenever I get into a gun
control debate with people who are progressives or liberals, or
whatever you want to call them, are true leftists,
authoritarians It stops usually immediately because what I tell
them is they don't know enough to have an argument with someone
like me about Firearms, period? They don't understand the
machine, they don't understand the mechanics.
They don't understand what they do, what they don't do, how they
operate, how they are named. Many of you can see the if
you're watching on a rumble Channel, I have a an AR-15
behind me. It's a guys, we automatics, at
least that's how it started. It's got some additional Parts
on the that I've put. I know the name and manufacturer
of almost every part and manufacturer of each of the
individual small parts on. They're going down to the Roll
pins. Because I care because this is
my tool and I built it the way that I wanted it.
I chose almost all the things on there on purpose and I chose the
manufacturer because I like the way they Source their materials,
this is a thing I care about deeply and when the president's
going to go out there and come after it, trying to say that
they're going to help identify and apprehend shooters.
That Menace, our society, this is a direct quote.
Let's go to Excel or very law, enforcement efforts to identify
and apprehend Shooters, why? What is it additional
background? Check, do to anybody.
Our background check system is fine.
In fact, historically for most of this country, you could buy
firearms through the mail system, you could have them
shipped directly to your house and the system of going to a gun
store and going to a federally licensed firearm dealer, that's
new. It's new in this country
compared to what it's been historically.
So very strange and of course, they're using a tragedy because
that's the nature of how things work here.
The by demonstration is going to be using this tragedy.
Is the Monterey Park shootings, going to go and grieve with the
eleven lives that lost and family members that happened in
January. So, we're now already two months
out, but we're still going to play off a tragedy there, and
he's going to announce that they're going to limit gun
violence. They're going to stop human
nature to cause violence to each other because the president said
so. And once again, he's going to go
after the things that do not cause violence.
In fact, they are not even responsible.
For the actions nor they actually, they're not even
complicit in the actions that kill most people in this
country. If we're being honest, handguns,
are the things that are used to kill people?
And I'm talking about homicides here, I'm not talking about
suicides, which constitute two-thirds of the so-called gun
deaths in this country. This is one of those topics
where they will give you a number 30,000 35,000.
Whatever the number may be, and two-thirds of those numbers are
bloated because they are a choice that someone made to take
their own life, which is Course, atrocious, but that's a mental
health issue. It's a desperation issue,
sometimes a financial issue and it is not about guns.
People have been taking their own life for a very long time.
Whether it be hanging or throwing themselves from
something, whether it be jumping into cold Waters.
When I was at the Academy at Quantico, my recruiter from the
Air Force, actually drank a bottle, walked into the waves,
and he was a person that was capable of extreme violence,
especially operator, who went into theater?
Multiple times, had a brother that died.
Overseas. And he didn't take it well and
eventually, you know, lost his own life to Mental Health.
Battle didn't need a gun spent all of this time around
explosives and guns worth noting.
This this president wants to stop things by.
These are some of the things that drive me insane.
They've created a whole host of made-up problems and then they
batter them down. This is the straw man argument.
So here you guys again and again, he called for Congress to
act Banning assault weapons, I don't need to get into it on
this show. There's no such thing as an
assault weapon I guess a weapon that assault somebody maybe but
the the legal definition just thing is just a bunch of
arbitrary features that has nothing to do with the
capability of a weapon. This is something we've known
going back to the original assault weapons.
Banned that happened in the 90s when you could own a Ruger
Mini-14 but you couldn't own an AR-15 and functionally the
engines and the and the ammunition of these two Weapons
Systems. The same, they stripped out of a
magazine they re chambered it at the same speed and the Mini-14
was used very effectively in the Miami shootout that the FBI
engaged in a 1986 worth noting. They also have this big thing
with a high-capacity magazines. So here's an interesting
anecdote, when I was working on surveillance we had a case
assigned to us which was a number of armored car robbers
and and they were actually kind of funny.
So they Opt-in. We saw video from the back of
one of these armored trucks, like a lowest armored truck or
something, picked up a bunch of cash.
I think it was a 7-Eleven drop or something like that.
And so the guy basically waited for the guys, there were
multiple. I think they were maybe three or
four, crappy part of town Southeast d.c. on the line with
Maryland and Fort Washington area if you know the DC the
southern side of DC. So we've got this this dude he
comes out of his car he would jump out he would stick an AR-15
in this guy's face. The guy being the person that's
handling the bag, get the bag of cash and then rolled out and it
was very, very fast 15 18 seconds and gone.
The thing that was really notable to me, which is why I
thought they would be easier to catch.
First of all, they were dumb. The first time they grabbed like
a hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars in cash which
is shocking and so much more effective than robbing a bank
where you get a few thousand dollars.
Same kind of crime, same kind of risk.
When it comes to prosecution, but significant pay off and then
the second time they did it, they got an empty bag because
they got greedy and they weren't watching as well.
And then the, you know, the guy hadn't, even filled up the truck
yet with cash. So rolled off with an empty bag,
threw it off. In the thing they did this three
or four times, it was always the same mechanism.
This person used an old school. What's called the the Delta
grips are the, what do you call it?
The plastic grips on the foregrip.
It wasn't like one of these newer modern rifles that had a a
frame up in the front, the triangle pose.
Front sight, fixed front sight and like a 20-inch Barrel which
if you're used to seeing some of the newer more modern 16 inches
and 14 and a half since. So on this AR-15 had a very long
barrel comparatively and was carrying something that I
thought was really amusing. It had a 100 round beta
magazine. Be ETA beta magazine and those
have these like spirals on the outside of it, so it comes down
out of the magazine. Well, goes off to the left into
a big circle, goes off to the right into a big circle and I've
never owned one, but I have I shot them and they jam up
regularly. It's not a good mechanism.
So this is the the so-called dangerous high capacity
magazine. This is why it's so funny to me
and I made a comment to my team at the time I would much rather
so much rather have ten 10-round magazines for my AR-15.
If I was serious about getting into a shooting that have 100
round beta magazine. Number one, it is heavy as hell.
You are carrying around a hundred rounds stuffed into your
gun that's absurd. 30 is plenty for Is a lot these 60 round
drums. You've seen in some movies are
60 Mound, Surefire mags where they're double sided.
Very heavy, okay? They just add a lot of weight
and then they reduce the maneuverability of that, that
weapon system. And the second thing is, if they
jam and the reliability of feeding, 100 rounds is not very
good. 30 rounds is not high capacity.
It's a standard capacity. It's the capacity that comes
with the weapon system. It's used by every single law
enforcement agency and all of the United States military.
That's what you put in an AR-15. This is what you put in a
central I mean, automatic rifle. That's just been the standard.
I don't know why people think that's the thing.
They can say with impunity, but there's no high-capacity about
it. 60s, high-capacity hundred is High Capacity and honestly if
you ban those that would change nothing and if you ban the other
magazines, there are hundreds of millions of magazines in
circulation in this country and they don't have a manufacture
date and they don't have a serial number.
There's no way to tell when they were made this is a ridiculous
idea that they're going to go out there.
The only way they can get rid of them is claiming that all of
them are illegal. And that actually might spark
something really nasty. They don't want to deal with.
They're going to require background checks for all gun
sales. You can't do that.
Here's why there's no enforcement mechanism.
You are giving the federal government and you're probably
giving state and local law enforcement a mandate they
cannot keep. If I were to go and give a gun
to a neighbor who's going to stop me and who's going to say
when that changed hands? It's a piece of property, it
doesn't have a tracking device on it, it doesn't have a homing
device. There's no way that we could
fingerprinted over, it doesn't matter.
It's just a single in adamant piece of metal, that, I'm going
to hand you someone else, who's going to do, whatever, they're
going to do with it. And the fact that I was the
original buyer of it or maybe I wasn't.
Maybe I bought it from somebody else, already.
These things have changed hands. These are durable goods.
I've got rifles in my safe right now that were made in 1917 for
World War one. I've got a shotgun that was made
in 1868 that we inherited. It's still functional.
It's a 12-gauge shotgun made by the cult.
The cult firearms company, these things can be around for a very
long time. In excess of 100 years,
certainly longer than a human life and you can get handguns,
rifles, shotguns, all kinds of things that have been around
that long. This is ridiculous stuff.
But the other thing is that, you know, they're just making things
up when they say they're going to require safe storage of
firearms. That means they're just going to
punish you if they choose to punish you if they've targeted
you, this is the real problem. It's giving the government.
Or access to come after you and the King doesn't get to say that
because we don't have gang, they're going to close.
This is my up by read this to my wife and I was just shocked that
anybody. So stupid would write this.
They're going to close the dating violence, restraining
order loophole. I don't even know where they
come up with a stuff at this point.
The they're just literally making things up out of whole
cloth and then they're going to repeal gun manufacturers
immunity from liability. Well, start there and then go
after cars for drunk drivers and then go after any device that
somebody buys and Misuses, this is absurd.
If the weapon is misused, it's the fault of the user.
If the weapon fails then then the manufacturer has liability.
If, the weapon system has a faulty, you know, upper receiver
or a slide or a barrel that is outside of spec because the
Metallurgy is improperly done and they the quality control is
not checked and the weapon explodes in your hands.
Like you can sue the manufacturer, but you can't sue
the manufacturer for the weapon working, the way that it was
designed because somebody is in a hole and decides to do.
Something stupid. So anyway, they're going to do
these things. These are the priorities of
this, this President King that we have that believes that he
has all these things. They're going to keep dangerous
guns out of dangerous hands which is going to be the
universal background check. No effect.
Totally absurd doesn't work in places where it exists.
People get guns because there are a bunch of guns.
There's 400 million in this country from what they say.
I don't know who owns the other three hundred ninety nine
million of them, but they're out there, you all have them good
for you and I've got the ones I've got.
They're going to improve public awareness, and the appropriate
use of extreme risk protection extreme risk is this the same as
extreme Maga? My friends were called Extreme
Maga operatives. If you're an extreme Mega
operative, are you also an extreme risk?
And how far can we classify these things?
They're talking about how 19 different states have red flag
laws. I think they should all go away.
Red flag laws, do not save lives.
This is absurd stuff. What they do is infringed on
Americans rights. You want to stop somebody from
doing something, go live in communist, China.
They have the authority to do that, where they do elect a king
and that can do whatever he wants, they're going to address
the the loss and theft of firearms during shipment.
Really like is that a problem that's happening right now?
There's a 250% increase in lost or stolen Firearms as reported
between the shipments, okay. Why is that the federal
government's problem? What does it have to do with the
federal government? Are they losing tax revenue
because they're talking about the batf going in and dealing
with it. The ATF was a tax organization
until the 90s when they decided to go and attack.
Waco and get themselves involved in Ruby Ridge and then somehow
they managed to get themselves out of the justice department
during that time. And they almost went away almost
disappeared because they are an agency without a real Mission
set. Their mission set is owned by
everybody else except taxes except the tax collection which
is their thing that they do the least.
Well they're happy to take your money but they don't give out
the stamp that you're if you're paying for.
So if you've never had to buy an ATF tax stamp for a suppressor,
a machine gun or a short-barrel rifle, you don't know I'm
talking about but it's awful, they are an For an awful
organization that promises 90 days and everybody is happy that
deliver it in nine months. Like they're literally three
hundred percent slower than they should be.
And that's, that's good because it used to be that it would be
two years and maybe a year like this is just a terrible
organization. I've waited for them to do their
jobs multiple times. They said they're going to got
hold the gun, industry menu, the gun manufacturers accountable.
This is that statement about hold them liable, so bizarre.
And then this is something that's really really should
trouble you because the president does have the ability
to control the Department of Defense.
It says they're going to use the Department of Defense
acquisition of firearms to further.
Firearms and Public Safety practices because the dod buys,
a large number of guns and other weapons.
They're going to use that to try to serve our country by buying
all the guns. The this is something we're
gonna have to get a little bit more information on.
Here's what I'm going to promise you our friend, my friend,
Stephen stamp Alia. The machine gun lawyer, we did a
long-form interview with. This is his wheelhouse.
I actually texted him yesterday and of the day and asked him if
he'd be willing to come on the show and consider discussing.
This he said he hadn't read the letter, or the CEO yet, and it
looks like it hasn't been codified.
This is their announcement of what's going to be in it.
When it comes out, if it's this week we'll get him on if it's
next week or the week after we'll get him on, will read it
and we'll do maybe 10 minutes where I just Q&A, what are the
things to take away? One of the things we can do for
ourselves. And and here's that Patriot
cooler, So we'll get Stephen on to discuss it and break it down.
I think it's important stuff, but this is a massive amount of
over each. It's a thing that we should be
really concerned about and all of us should be concerned
because this is not the, this is not how it's supposed to work.
This is not a power that is given to the president.
Okay, I'm going to move onto this thing about.
He's starting he's talking about transiting the kids and we
can't, we can't talk about that without hearing his own words.
So let's hear the man. Say this is again, like I said,
this The issue of a man believing that he is, in fact, a
king. And now he's going to give you
what the King used to do, which is the morals.
This is the values of our country.
This guy's going to say this. So, stand by for, for President
Biden's, take on cringe transgender kids.
And these things always stole out on me, stand by here we go.
I'm transgender. Kids is a really harder day
thing. What's going on in Florida?
Is as my mother would say close to sinful.
I mean, it's just terrible what they're doing.
It's not like, you know, a kid wakes up one morning and says,
you know, I decided I want to become a man or I want to become
a woman or I want to change. I mean, what, what are they
thinking about here? Human beings.
They love. They have feelings.
They have inclinations that are. I mean, it just to me is I don't
know, it's cruel. And the way we do it, is we make
sure we pass legislation, like, we passed on same-sex marriage.
If you mess with that, you're breaking the law and you're
going to be held accountable and transgender kids is really
harder than the harder ding one. We can all kind of agree that
the Biden is falling apart. When it comes to his ability to
communicate his age is, obviously a problem.
He is not nearly as slick as he thinks that.
He is. And now, he's this old feeling
man, talking about things. He doesn't understand at all nor
does he have any business in getting involved in the
transgender issue? Is one of those deals where it's
probably outside of my wheelhouse as a former FBI
agent, but it is right inside my wheelhouse as a parent and as a
husband, as someone who is Catholic, as someone who cares
about children deeply, I really do.
I think the only reason that we have our country, the securing
the blessings of liberty. It's literally in that Preamble
for our Austerity, that's our children.
That's the people that follow us.
It is the reason why we have established government and it is
to stay the heck out of this business.
Why the old doddering barely functional president of the
United States wants to get out there and tell us what our
morals are. This is not his job, it has
nowhere in there. It's not an Article 2 Section 2
power under the Constitution. It's one old guy's opinion.
Thanks so much Joe. Why don't you stuff it?
This is the same guy that I watched some other piece.
He was talking about how you know many years ago when he was
a child, he's driving with his dad.
So that's got to be what like 70 years ago maybe. 68 years ago,
he's driving with his dad and watch two men kissing.
I don't think so. Not in this country.
That was the thing that got done, they were well-dressed men
in suits and all this other nonsense and many.
You've probably heard these stories.
The guy cannot help but lie and moreover this is one of those
dangers where he just he's going to get out there and share with
you things that are not true. They are not accurate.
They don't make any damn sense. And in this case, there's
nothing, you know what, what's going on in Florida, is the
process where the state is allowed to make its own
decisions. They have elected
Representatives. They have their own executive
who's gonna be able to do what they want and Joe Biden's, you
know, almost sinful situation. It's a moral judgment.
That is outside the parameters of his office because we do not
elect this person as a king. But what we did do was passed
the administrative Services. Sorry.
I always say the administrative Services, it's actually called
the administrative procedures act.
I want to pull this up. It's worth a read on Wikipedia
if you ever want to get into their this is this is the the 5
USC. This is Title 5, United States
code and what it did was Under Truman, it allowed executive
agencies to propose and establish regulations and Grant
the federal courts oversight over these executive agencies,
the executive agencies exist, under they call them under
independent agencies and federal executive agencies.
But they answer to the president, these are the pieces
under the cabinet that they have basically subjugated the or they
have delegated. The powers of those legislature
in many, many Broad and wide. Reaching facets over to the
president. And this is how we ended up with
someone who thinks that they're a king.
This has been a slow creep since 1946 when this was passed and
instituted in law, and it was an attempt at probably streamlining
and otherwise, out of control government at that time.
And now we have something that you probably couldn't ever
dismantle. It's so big apparently, it was
instituted after a 10-year, painstaking detailed study
showing that all these problems existed and how do we streamline
government and make it functional.
And the answer is you just cut it.
You get rid of it, you can't actually do that.
But unfortunately, the basics of this proposed legislation don't
necessarily do what they're supposed to do.
They're supposed to maintain a very important separation of
powers Article 1 Section 1. There is a congress.
The Congress is the is supposed to be the primary of three equal
co-equal branches. And instead what we got is a
president that is now very very Top-heavy on the power
structure. So the basic purposes of the
administrative procedures Act of 1946, which has been updated, a
number of times is as follows. Number one, it's to require
agencies to keep public the public informed of their
organization procedures and rules.
Look at that, that being the first and most primary rule that
the or purpose of the APA gets to keep the public informed of
what the agency does and what their procedures and the rules
are not to create rules that go out there and legislate without
having the authority. But that is what goes on right
now. So that's number one.
Number two to provide for public participation in the rulemaking
process through public commenting, the ability of the
public to weigh in on whether a proposed rule is appropriate.
Or not is the number two, priority second only to keeping
the public informed as to what these are.
Now, that is not the way it works.
If you've been watching the way things like the ATF and those
the ones that I'm most familiar with because I despise the ATF
the most. But the ATF does this thing
where they are basically constantly trying to sneak one
by the goalie, I guess, as the only way you could explain it,
they are constantly trying to pass rules that get interpreted
as law that would otherwise never go anywhere.
And they can't get through Congress.
So they try to expand through the rulemaking procedures, the
ability of the agency, to enforce things that that suit,
the political whim, basically of the left, only in the case of
the ATF but the EPA is another one.
These rules about, you know, stoves and whether or not you
should be having coffee and like, other ridiculous things
that have no business being inside the executive, these are
where they come from, they come from the APA under 5, USC.
So they Define all kinds of different stuff in here.
I'm going to do number three because there's exactly for
there's exactly for purposes listed.
This Wikipedia page is a one-page read.
You can do it in 15 minutes and have a much better understanding
of the origins of the administrative State.
I think it's worth your time. So number three is established
uniform standards for the conduct of formal rulemaking
processes. And adjudication, every single
executive agency does something to make rules, they all kind of
follow the same template, they proposed a rule, they put it out
for public. Comment you can go online now
and you can say this sucks or Is wonderful or thank God.
You're going to trans the kids or you know, please take all the
guns away because they're dangerous and I'm scared of them
and I don't understand my rights and I want to get rid of them,
these kind of things. So a public comment happens and
then at the end of it, they're supposed to adjudicate.
And then do this uniform standard for formal rulemaking
and they adjudicate whether or not they're going to actually go
through it. Sometimes there's review and
then there's a scope of judicial review.
That's the fourth premise of this particular bill.
It's Scopes out how the the Judiciary is going to review.
view the rules and the procedures that have been to,
you know, enacted by said administrative agency That's
what it supposed to do. What it does in reality, is it
subjugates everybody else to the executive by allowing the
executive to take Broad and massive overreach in defining
what is, and what is not in their own wheelhouse.
They literally get to write what they're interested in and they
run it the way. They like very scary stuff and
it leads to stupidity it leads to stupidity because we don't
have Congress writing the laws that govern us.
What we have are these Unelected bureaucrats who move into the
SES, the senior executive service who are the most tenured
people in the federal government.
These are your people like fauci.
These are people like the deputy director of the FBI, people who
have been there. The longest have the most
administrative Rod don't necessarily have the highest
qualifications for example, and this is my personal beef, but
the the FBI's Human Resources, executive assistant director is
a woman named Jennifer Moore. I've published her emails if you
ever wanted to read those and see how dumb it is that somebody
that's out there. Well, What's her background in
Human Resources? It's none she has no special
training and Human Resources. She's not a good manager, she's
actually kind of a moron. So you've got this person who is
not smart when it comes to the, the core features of what her
job are. So she makes all these really
dangerous moves but unfortunately because the
executive is able to basically administrate itself because of
the APA, the get away with all kinds of stuff, including
violations of law. People are like walking me.
Not permit protected under whistleblower protection act.
It's like It exists. It's also under Title 5, 5 USC
2302 and 2303 cover the entire federal government for
whistleblower protections, including the FBI.
And yet, there's no teeth in it. There's no one to administrate
it because it's administrated by the executive, the executive is
down with what they're doing right now, very dangerous stuff,
very frustrating and it leads to incompetence in different
places. One of those things I'm going to
tie in real quick, this from the daily wire wanted to send this
over. I read a bunch of different
sources but sometimes One strikes me better than others.
So I've got a couple will run through here.
Just just incompetence in general and some general
thoughts about what's going on in this week.
The, some of them are tied to this and some are not.
We're going to cover this. The Russian fighter jet collides
with the Reaper drone. They've got a picture of the
Reaper drone. If you're watching on our
Rumble, you can see that. Obviously if you're listening,
it says to Russian Fighters were poorly.
Harassing US military drone, over international waters on
Tuesday when one of the fighters collided with the Drone forcing
it to stop. So the way the Drone is set up
it has This big phallic sort of just you know, bulbous head and
then it's got a rear-mounted wings that kick out about
two-thirds of the way back on the body with this x shape, Tail
Fins, and then behind the tail. Fins is this big propeller?
And that's how this thing flies around.
It has a rear-mounted propeller, because it's not a man to drone,
there's no human being in there. You don't have a cockpit.
So they load the front end heavy with sensors.
It's got, you know, three wheels to land it and take off and so
on and they can arm it with different packages on the
wingspan. But the The rear mounted
propeller is what keeps this thing up in the air Aloft.
And it's, you know, this ultralight kind of cool frame
looking thing. Apparently, what these Fighters
did is they were flying around and they were dumping fuel on
them, which somebody online was laughing about, you know, they
essentially got pissed on and then get hit, which is
ridiculous. But funny, the, the, the tail
was, what got got tapped. It was the propeller.
Apparently got clipped by this, this aircraft.
But this is what's really telling.
This is a, they claim 32 million dollars.
Dean estimates of 55 million dollar, depending on the
electronics package. So a fairly expensive piece of
equipment for military standards.
Certainly not something we want to just ditch and drop to the
ground. The Russian Fighters were
su-27s, apparently there were two of them.
Flying, I learned something kinda interesting from folks
that used to fly with the Russians when they would go
around to air shows and apparently, the only way that
the Russians were able to actually stay in the air during
the non-war arrows. After the Cold War was by
flying, these are shows, and they were so humiliated.
By having to put on these kind of things because the only way
that they were able to get time in the air to pay for the fuel
and training and stuff. Apparently, they were drunk on a
regular basis and I've heard a lot of stories from guys, both
in the Navy and the Air Force flying and knowing Russian
Pilots that were drinking heavily while flying so this
could have been a drunken joke. I think it's worth noting that
some of the really dangerous things that have happened and
some of the close calls that happened during the Cold War
were because of intoxicated Pilots.
Interesting to note, it's a culture thing.
When you're already kind of like a high-risk Daredevil, type guy,
flying fighter jets and this kind of deal, maybe we'll get
Kreider to come on and talk about this, our former guest
Sheriff. Mark, Kreider was a Rio back
Cedar for F-14. Tomcats at the, you know, sort
of the end of the Cold War that might be fun.
He literally was at Top Gun when Top Gun came out.
Is what he explained it so well maybe we'll have come on talk
about Russian fighter jet culture.
I don't know if it just might just be a fun conversation to
have. But in any case, that's what
happened here, we get a steak on and maybe if that makes sense.
But essentially knock this 55 million dollar, maybe a 30
million dollar depending on what your estimates are.
I love how we don't actually know what these things cost but
that's another part of the administrative issue that they
want to. You know, they're responsible
for releasing this transparency and the default is not
transparency. Here's what I thought was really
wild. It's been commented on online
but the thing, the response by this is by Air Force General.
James, be Hecker. He's the commander of US Air
Force Europe, and an Air Force Africa.
This is this is response about what happened.
Our MQ-9 aircraft was conducting routine operations, in
international airspace, I've also been told that the
transporter may have been turned off, which could have made it
harder to identify where it was and if they were harassing it
and dumping fuel on it than they knew where it was, When it was
intercepted and hit by a Russian aircraft resulting, in a crash
in the complete loss of the MQ-9.
In fact, this unsafe and unprofessional act by the
Russians nearly caused both aircrafts crash.
Where's the little funny thing in here?
They mentioned the fact that it was it was environmentally
unsound practices. This may be something in a
different longer form of the statement they mentioned because
they dumped fuel that it was environmentally unsound and
there Or unprofessional. It's just it's a clown show.
When you have these kind of people saying, these kind of
things about something. That's so serious.
Is losing losing a. 55 million dollar aircraft or 30 million
dollar cut doesn't really matter how much it cost like, what do
you mean was environmentally unsound?
Like what does that come into? It was an act of aggression
against one of our items either. We were allowed to be there.
We weren't. That's the only thing that
matters and then what are we going to do about it?
That's not the seriousness of this nation regarding the the
problem of this escalation. So we taught it said earlier
that we are basically looking down at three Wars, obviously,
the Ukrainian war that is going on that we are trying to find
ourselves in not we but the king this elected representative and
a number of people that are following it sued because they
all want to do the thing. The man says, that's that's our
proxy war and that would lead to potentially to other Wars that
we have that are kind of brewing and I don't want anything.
I don't want anything to happen at all.
I don't want our country to go to war right now.
We just pull ourselves out of the longest, one in a very
disastrous fashion. And we're not good at getting
out of Wars, it turns out in my lifetime, most of my, most of my
adult life was spent while we are a country at War.
Whether we felt like that at home or not is irrelevant
because a lot of people pay the price and some of you did so
with a too hot Wars would be one Russia who were meddling with
when it comes to what's going on in Ukraine.
And the second one, and the one that I know bungee.
No has Been concerned about with some of the conversations he and
I have had, is the one in China. Now, that was the Chinese, were
the, the sort of the threat that I dealt with when I was working
in, Washington field. I'm by no means an expert on it,
but I'm familiar with it. Potentially.
More than many people were. Here's the problem with the
Chinese that most people don't realize, and this is a
totalitarian system. This is a top-down organization.
This is a group that quote unquote elects, you know,
someone who acts as though. They were a king.
Many people don't realize what the real root of this problem is
When it comes to the the ongoing and the increasing threat, and
I'm going to switch over here, and I'm going to tie this to
something that you have to be aware of, to be able to
accurately discuss this, the one child policy.
Which apparently began in the 1970s ended in 1921.
This was under Mal, the one-child policy allowed, a
limited family planned situation where they were only going to
have one child per family and it led to mass sterilization.
It led to a bunch of atrocities. Let's just be honest about all
those things and they're too big and too, you could have tomes
written about what they did. But the the effect was, is that
there was a value put on each child being male and the
families that generated female children sometimes would kill
off the girls which is atrocious, they claim that it
prevented 400 million births. This is still like a an economy
that got still bigger and bigger.
But the one child policy, is probably one of the nastiest
things that could happen because it put an incentive on having
that single child be a male. Ow.
Well, what's the problem with that?
The problem is that you have a bunch of unmarried men who
started being born in the in the 70s and only recently stopped.
And so you have a top-heavy population.
Let's say that that starts at 50, a 50 years old and then
there are many in my age bracket.
And then there are many that are younger than me.
This is a group of military aged men.
Fifth, let's call it. 20 to 50 years old who are not able to
marry and they're not going to be able to build families that
will support them. So the state is going to be
burdened with their care. As they moved into the geriatric
range over 60 over 65 70. So they have a window of
probably maybe 10 to 20 years and different people have
different arguments about it. But that window is how do you
deal with excess population? When that excess population are
men and those men have no families to support themselves.
That's a real serious. Logistical question the Chinese
government is currently trying to figure out how to answer.
How do you deal with this excess of grown men with no families?
They refer to it as a generation of missing women because they
literally either aborted killed or didn't have females.
And the state has to provide, that's what they're
theoretically, do is a communist Nation.
That's an incredibly dangerous thing.
What do you do with excess male populations?
Historically, like what's the, what is the the mechanism that
governments? See that that population, how do
we deal with these these these surpluses?
And the answer is war, historically.
Always and the war that would be the, or the predicate, for this
particular War. The thing that would be the
inciting incident is Is the fact that Joe Biden has not been
sticking to the one China policy, which is to say that
China and Taiwan and China are the same thing.
He has said that we would defend Taiwan and that's been kind of a
break. This is the advise and consent
role that we have not heard from the Senate.
We have not created that treaty where we're going to go do that.
This is just a man saying policy that we would defend it and
that's incredibly dangerous when we don't have a formalized
treaty because in theory they are the same country after the
Brits pulled out. So what do you do?
What do you do when you have a executive who is not a king who
continues to act like a king, who's going to act unilaterally?
Because that's what's being cheered on by the party?
And the real danger in my opinion, is that when the right
the conservative movement, whether they be a Libertarian or
a republican takes that same exact power, they don't exercise
at the way that the left us, we have a very measured approach
people that want to stay closer to the Constitution.
Although obviously there's still plenty of overreach and there's
plenty of executive orders that are all as strictly speaking.
Not the way, the system was set up.
But there's this desire on the right to play fair and to do
things the way that they were designed or closer to that way
and that weakens and cheapens what would maybe otherwise be
the the ability to exercise that power and the left has no
compunction with was going after it.
They simply simply do that thing all the way everybody else is
hurt feelings. Be damned.
I think it's incredibly dangerous.
It's a it's a scenario that we don't have a great mechanism to
handle. As far as I can tell.
It doesn't seem like we have a way to to do anything to stop
such a thing and We're gonna have to figure something out
shortly because we're in a very close timeline.
We're at some point, one of these things is going to have to
give. It's got to give it has to
happen and if it doesn't, we're going to find ourselves in one
or two hot Wars. Both of which seem like the
opposite of what we would otherwise want.
I think, all right, ladies and gentlemen, it's Wednesday.
It's the middle of the week, that's kind of a lot of
heaviness for a middle week. I hope this does not bum you out
to a level that you're unable to accomplish your task.
If you haven't listened to our to our long-form interview,
check that out. That will bum you out for sure,
but I think it'll give you some hope.
Alfredo Alpha Luna, very good man.
That we talked to this week is already got one of the most
downloaded episodes that we've done a great guy with his own.
Show is a great microphone presence, got a good booming
voice, I'm more and more listening to voices in my head.
Headphones. And and I, there's certain
voices that I like to hear more and Alpha has one of those guys,
I just like listening to his voice.
I like what he has to say, we're going to, we're going to ask you
to put your comments in there about whether you knew about the
one China policy, whether you knew about the fact that we are
looking at a war with them because their Surplus
population, if you have a chance please feel free to comment on
these things. The discussion that can be had
in on Rumble. You can leave us a five star
review on on That's where you feel like putting it in but we
can have some interaction there. I do actually read all the
comments that are on all the rumble chat.
So if you're watching this or rather, if you're listening to
this and you decide you want to come in way and I think we could
probably have a robust discussion there and you can
always engage with me on Truth or Twitter or Twitter I'm
constantly responding to people that are listening to these
things. This is a this is a real serious
question that we're going to have to answer and that should
be one of the things that we discuss when we collect an
executive. All right, ladies and Gentlemen,
please consider hitting the Subscribe button if you like
What you had to hear? We're on Rumble.
Apple Spotify, iHeartRadio wherever you are listening to
this podcast. You can share it with a friend.
If you enjoyed it. You can share it with 50.
If you have so many friends and help us grow this audience,
we're really appreciative had our highest download on audio on
Monday and hoping this week continues to grow the more that
you guys share it, the more it does help us out, it allows us
to reach more people and make this thing a more stable
Enterprise. We always appreciate your
feedback once. When comments are great.
Five star reviews on Apple podcast, does help us move into
the, the algorithmic recommendations and where more
people can find us. So, please consider doing that,
I've got one pulled up right here, will go ahead and read
this one. This one says, well the alpha
Luna interview, there you go from a Jarhead Hooser, says a
fascinating and compelling interview between two great
Americans. Please keep sharing the truth
Semper Fi. Thanks Jarhead.
We do appreciate those and folks.
We look forward to seeing you on the next one here.
Hopefully, if they actually do put out this terrible, executive
order will bring a couple people on.
I'm thinking, we'll probably have Steve friend on and and
possibly, Stephen stanbow for the for the Friday show.
I got a couple things I want to run by them but there's some
movement that's happening in the weaponization committee that I
think all of you are going to want to know about.
And once again you have been listening to the Kyle Serafin
show, I will see you next time. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin. Show be sure to follow him on
Twitter and Truth at Kyle's seraphin.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin.
Show be sure to follow him on Twitter and Truth at Kyle's
seraphin.