Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot prepared to embrace the uncomfortable truth
because this program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties enthusiasts, Second Amendment
defender and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin.
Well, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show.
Today is Thursday. It's October the 3rd, 2024 and
we are in the middle of what CNN referred to as a three headed
monster for the Biden Harris regime.
We're going to talk about all the aspects of it except the one
that's going on overseas because I am an America only kind of
guy. You guys can find out more about
what's going on with Israel, Iran, Lebanon, etcetera
somewhere else today. Today we're going to dig into
something that occurred to me. It's it was inspired by the
striking signs of the longshoremen.
There's currently a dockworker strike going on on the East
Coast specifically, which I'm sure is going to be problematic.
I just received a a message that there might be some shortages of
some medical supplies starting already.
That seems quick, but some of the things that they use in
medicine are used every single day, like IV supplies and some
types of things that don't last forever.
There's not really a stockpile of of normal saline necessarily.
If people burn through it pretty quickly on ambulances, they use
it in almost every medical procedure.
So it's possible that people will start feeling that effect
immediately. Hard to say.
The other problem is, is that we have a natural disaster that has
happened, a hurricane that is punched over into the Southeast.
Some states recovered quickly. Others got hit harder in places
they were not expecting it. FEMA, predictably, is doing a
terrible job. And that goes along with the
thesis of this program, which is that the government,
particularly the federal government, is the worst
solution to every single problem, including what it is,
the only solution to the problem.
And that's not been something that should be new.
It should not be a revelation to you.
So today's going to be a good reminder for you to stock up on
the things that you need, that you should be prepared to take
care of yourself, and then be aware that you might be asked to
take care of your neighbor to the extent that you can.
It's an ongoing theme of this program that self-reliance
equals independence. And that is a conservative
position. There's some basic American
positions that have always existed.
I think it's my belief that the values America espouses are
rugged accountability and self-reliance and the ability to
take personal responsibility for your own safety, for your own
progress, for the success of you and your family.
And if you're a conservative, you fall on the side of
improving processes and making sure that people understand that
no one owes them anything. I stole this from Ben Shapiro
quite a while ago, and I continue to believe it.
Nobody in America is guaranteed success.
I think most of you who are listening can feel that to be
true. You're guaranteed a shot of the
journey, but your results may vary.
And so just like the immigrants that came here, and I call them
immigrants accurately, the people that landed at Ellis
Island, or maybe they walked across the southern border, or
maybe there was no southern border at the time, who came to
the United States at various times in history.
They came here hoping for the adventure.
And some of them died trying. And some of them were able to
make fabulous wealth and they lost it.
And some of the fabulously wealthy families from the 19th
century are not that today. Some still are.
You're not guaranteed success. There's no safety net in a real
America. But we've been building it up
over and over again. And what we're seeing is it's
very ineffective at doing an equitable or a reasonable
distribution. So I dug into something today
that I was most interested in by the signage.
The signage said something to the effect of robots don't pay
taxes, automation doesn't feed families, and we've done this
before as human beings. It turns out many things are not
new under the sun. This fight has been has been a
an age-old recurrence that as industries advance, I'm going to
give you some some analogies and some analogs for you to be able
to have in your head. But the term Luddite is
something we should be familiar with.
And I'm not a Luddite, but I understand where they came from.
And I also understand that it's not really an American position.
It's probably why it happened in England.
So we're going to go into the Luddites today.
And I took a long time setting that up because I want you to
understand that this is a an age-old fight, that people who
are stuck in the belief that someone owes them a living, that
someone owes them a paycheck, that someone owes them success
because that's how they've done it before.
And I don't say that as someone who has not had to reinvent
himself. My friends know that my work
history is pretty ridiculous. If you were to go look at my my
resume, when I used to shop it around, I spent a little bit of
time in a lot of industries. And one of the interesting
things, the first job that I did out of college was in sales.
And one of my first clients was the International Longshoreman
and Warehousers Warehouse Workers Union.
It was the ILWU in San Francisco, CA.
And what I found when I went to go sell to them is that they had
more money than they know what to do with.
They were not very worried about spending it or negotiating down
rates when it came to to buying equipment, which was quite
expensive. And the reason that I was able
to walk away with, and by the way, I talked to other people
that sold to that business as well, is that they sort of
operate like a mini federal government, which is to say they
use OPM, other people's money. And so they are not that
accountable for it. And we're starting to see that
because most Americans are not aware of the unions is
particularly if you live in a right to work state like I do,
that's to say that you can have a job and you don't need to be
part of a union. The union can form, but the
union can't force you to be part of it.
There are states where if you want to work in an industry, you
must be part of the union. And I think that's not American,
particularly when the federal government has stepped in and
done the job of it. So now we have the government
doing the thing that it does, safety regulation of, of the
industry and so on, requirements of minimum wages and, and, and,
and minimum safety protocols. And then you have another little
mini government type apparatus, this sort of shakedown mafioso
rig. And I say that very
specifically. We're going to talk about La
Cosa Nostra, at least what it is.
You guys have the terminology to deal with this.
This is mobster tactics, this is protection racket, this is
shakedown. And it's pretty common on the
East Coast. Most people who are on the West
Coast haven't seen it in the same way.
So we're going to kind of touch on that before we get too deep
into the weeds here. I want to do say thank you to my
buddies at Catholic Vote and they are my friends.
Most of folks over there, they've nominated Marcus Allen,
one of our suspendables as Catholic Hero of the Month, or
one of the Catholic heroes at least.
And I expect him to be nominated for Catholic Hero of the Year, a
man who stood up for his faith. If you guys want to follow
Catholic Vote, people that are backing my friends backing this
program, catholicvote.org is where you can go do that.
You can sign up for the loop. You can sign up and put your
e-mail in there. You'll get outstanding
information. You can follow them on social
media. They're talking about surrogacy
today, which I think is useful, but Catholic Vote, it's at
Catholic Vote if you want to find it there.
And interestingly enough, we set up a little e-mail and it
resulted in an interview with Marcus, the top story of the day
here on your phone if you were to get it, FBI whistleblower and
the Holy Spirit. We are in a spiritual battle
right now for this country and you guys should check in to my
friends over there who are helping me fight it, who are
helping you fight it, who are helping America fight it.
And they're all in for Donald Trump, even though I don't have
to be. I think Donald Trump is a lesser
of two evils. They've endorsed the man and you
guys can probably get behind that as well.
So thanks to them. All right, let's see.
I wanted to start with something completely different, one of the
ongoing lies that's been predicated because I think it
actually had a lot to do with the vice presidential debate
that happened this week. One of the lies is is that there
was an insurrection on January 6th, 2021, that people tried to
overthrow the American government.
And those people were endorsed and backed and supporting Donald
Trump. All right, that's an interesting
take for those of us who have been paying attention.
And so here we have it. Officer Harry Dunn was one of
the heroes of the so-called interaction.
He was a person that was marched out as a victorious example of
how you are supposed to behave the way that you are supposed to
do things. A great federal employee.
The problem is, is that his story is completely BS.
And my friend, another suspendable Steve Baker who
works for The Blaze has covered this.
And so in kind of a rare moment, what I did is I stole their
trailer. And the only reason I did is
because I've tagged Harry Dunn in this.
Harry Dunn is a £350 six foot 7 fat, lazy, classic government
employee. Again, the worst way of doing
anything, except when it's the only way, and even then, not
great. Harry Dunn is a classic federal
employee in Washington DC, takes credit for things that he didn't
do and is unable to lock into the truth.
He's not a a particularly literate man from what you can
tell. He from some information that we
got needed help writing a single letter that he took credit for
and and signed on behalf of all Capitol Police officers, which
is inaccurate as he couldn't do that.
So here we go. There's a little taste.
I want you guys to do it. What I'm going to do is give you
a little bit of homework today. And one of those pieces of
homework is go see the Blaze Channel and check out the story
of Harry Dunn. A day in the life of Harry Dunn,
the leisurely walk. Because this man, for all of his
testimony about how hard he was working and what he was doing
and that he was running around trying to save lives on January
6th, it appears that almost all of it is manufactured.
It goes along the lines with what Nancy Pelosi said about how
they need to preserve the narrative of January 6th.
So this is a teaser and there's a 15 minute video.
You guys can watch it in 2X and you won't lose anything.
If you really have a fast ear. So you can go watch it in about
7 or 8 minutes. You should see this because
people on the left that are going to argue one thing are not
going to watch it and therefore you should arm yourself with the
facts. Harry Dunn taking it easy on a
day that he claimed that he was basically fighting for his life
over and over again. Private First Class Harry Dunn
Officer Dunn has been among the First Capital Police officers to
describe what happened to law enforcement on January 6th.
Dunn is launching a new political action committee
called Dunn's Democracy Defenders.
Fighting on January 6th, that was hard.
We've watched hours of footage. Dunn is either a pathological
liar or he has been conscripted to support their narrative.
Officer Harry Dunn is an American hero.
Private First Class Harry Dunn Saturate Congress, The truth
tellers, he says. That day we met in a large
auditorium. We went over logistics, who the
overall commander would be, who the field lieutenants would be.
Harry never attended a morning roll call briefing.
Nothing Harry described about that meeting ever took place
that morning. Why is telling the truth hard?
I assumed my post on the east side of the Capitol at about
9:30 AM. The truth is on my side.
We can see Harry did not take his post until more than two and
a half. Hours after he claimed.
It's always important to tell the truth and be honest about
what happened. I rushed into the Capitol with
another officer going first to the basement.
He never went to the basement. I'm not one to speculate, so I
like to stick the facts. Dunn basically spent the entire
day doing everything he could to avoid being in the presence of
protest. This is a day in the life of
Harry Dunn. All right, and it says watch
Part 1 tomorrow, that tomorrow is today and it started this
morning at 0700 Central Time, so you guys can check it out.
He's going to be exposed for a liar.
It's pretty obvious what Steve Baker does.
Friend of mine. So Full disclosure, I like
Steve. I don't care what you think
about the Blaze. I actually don't.
I don't care what you think about the people who founded the
Blaze. I don't.
I care about the fact that I've spent a lot of time eyeball to
eyeball with Steve Baker. And although Steve and I don't
agree on every fact like all friends don't, we agree on the
process and the methodology. And his methodology is solid.
So look at it. He's comparing the the words in
Harry Dunn's book, which is part of this marched out nonsensical
lie about what happened in 2021. And he compares it against the
video footage, which is pretty conclusive, especially the time
stands on it. Just as an example, the man
supposedly got to his post at 9:30 but didn't show up until
12/19. These are lies.
It's not OK for people to go out in front of Congress and do
this. There's no accountability on it.
And of course, those groups have been funded.
So when you think the government's working against
you, the answer is pretty obvious that it is because we
can actually see it on tape. All right.
As we move forward, I want to cover some of the things that
happened. Again, like I said that that
vice presidential debate has been kind of sticking with me a
little bit and there were two things that were brought up in
there that are that I thought were very interesting.
People on the left think the question about 2020 and the
election and who won the election was definitive.
A knockout blow was the claim over on Morning Joe, which is
the hard left egotistical sort of emotional center of of
leftism. And then there was what I
thought was the knockout blow, which is that JD Van stepped up
and said, if you're going to Fact Check me, allow me to talk
about the CBP 1 app. So there are these two
contrasts. One of them is them the the
campaign that's talking about moving forward, about how we're
going to look forward to a better America.
They're simply focused on the rearview mirror mostly January
6th, the election of 2020, how much they hate Donald Trump
despite the fact that his outcomes were actually better
than where we're sitting right now as a nation.
And then the alternative, which is to say, OK, we should be
focusing on the border. That's actually a forward look.
How do we fix this? How do we deport these people?
How do we try to grab back our country from the millions of
people that have been brought in here that have no authorization
to be so? So those were the two contrasts,
I think, from that debate. As I'm sitting and reflecting on
it over the last couple days, let me tell you, or let me play
you this sort of clip of Mika Brzezinski and their their guest
talking about, I think this is Michael Steele.
He's talking about what they believe was the knockout blow.
And then I went back and pulled a couple of little fact checks
'cause I was so curious. You'll be shocked to learn that
the lefty fact checkers didn't actually give it a fair shake.
So we'll read through that in just a second here.
Here's this little take again. This is what the left is
hearing. It's worth knowing and it's
debunk able in real time. This.
Is a practice a couple of ways real quick.
So the the first part of this you're right.
This I I looked at that debate between Vance and and walls as
two fighters in a ring going at each other.
One fighter, Vance, for you know, out of a 10 round bout for
9 rounds, was winning on points, right?
He was. The judges were impressed by the
style, the movements. He landed some punches.
It was winning on points. In the 10th round, the guy who's
losing on points landed a knockout blow with one question,
which utterly disqualified his opponent for the office that
he's seeking. And that's that's a profound
moment. And I think that moment will
register and has registered with the 40 + 1,000,000 Americans who
watched that debate. That part of that, what happened
of that story is what the campaign has to get out in front
and which they've begun to do almost immediately after that
debate with a very important ad. I think this sort of clarifies
that that's 1-2, all right. So no to everything there except
the fact that JD Vance was winning all nine rounds and then
he won the 10th round because the claim was is that he got
knocked out because the question came up who won the election in
2020? What JD Vance did over and over
again, he said you guys are worried about this guy becoming
a dictator, but he turned over power on January 20th of 2021.
That happened. Donald Trump left.
He got in Air Force 2 or Air Force One rather and well, what
whatever, Marine One rather the helicopter and he flew off and
then he got on his plane and he flew down and moved to Florida.
So that already happened. What's fun is you can actually
read the Fact Check because one of the things that I always
remember from that time, I'm old enough to remember it, as some
people have said, Fact Check. Biden won the most number of
total votes in history of any president ever, and the fewest
total number of counties of any president-elect.
This is coming from USA TODAY and it's dated December 9th of
2020. Look, before the Stop the Steel
rally and before the January 6th debacle.
And then you read the claim is that he won the most number of
votes in history, but he run won a a record low number of
counties. And how could that be?
And then you read and you read and you read and you read down
and they talk about the votes and they talk about the counties
and counties are not the same thing as population and that
they vary. And so it doesn't necessarily
have a correlation. And it goes down and we're
reading and we're reading. And they finally get to the
rating at the bottom here. And it says our reading is that
it's missing context, which is to say, yes, he supposedly got
the most number of votes in American history, but it doesn't
have the context, which is to say that we really can't.
We can't really assess it because he did also get the
least number of counties to vote for him.
America doesn't have a popular vote system, as you well know.
My friend Sal Greco likes to say that a lot.
As you well know, people listen, America doesn't have a popular
vote system. That's what the Electoral
College is. There's a reason why they hate
the Electoral College, because the Electoral College puts the
power in the States and specifically the state
legislatures, and this was defined in 2020, that the state
legislatures have the plenary power to appoint electors that
you actually have no right to vote for in a president, period,
because the president wasn't supposed to be that big of a
deal. Just because we've made the
executive office in the executive branch into sort of a
monarchical power doesn't mean it was supposed to be that way.
And this is a reaffirmation. The other thing is, is that
apparently amongst registered voters, there was like 91% turn
out. And I looked and the previous
high of voter turn out before that interesting election that
happened was far lower. You guys can see it on the
screen here. I didn't have time to pull these
graphics for you, but there's a strange little bump in 2020,
which is higher than any bump in American history.
So the most number of people turned out to vote, the most
number of people voted of the registered voters, and they
elected a man in the least number of places.
So the problems of 2020 persist. It's yet another reason why
people like George Hill and I don't believe that we're about
to have a free, fair and reputable election.
And it actually has a lot to do with the Luddites.
You guys are going to be shocked to find out that I found a
parallel because we're talking about using voting technology
and automating a process. And I don't think that every
process deserves to be automated, but some of them
certainly do, and logistics are a big one of them.
So we're going to get to that in just a moment, I promise you.
I also wanted to touch on the winning moment for JD Vance, and
I actually want to play you what I think was the winning moment
for him because he dominated not just the person that he was
debating, but he also dominated those clowns that were
moderators. I actually saw a couple of women
say this is the reason why two women should never moderate the
debate. They had feelings.
They couldn't help themselves. They had to correct the problem.
They couldn't just sit there and listen.
If anyone's ever done an interview with someone who is
lying to them, and I have done this, you don't interrupt them
when they're lying. You just take note of what
they're saying. You can go and do commentary
later. You can do the investigation and
prove that they were lying as a later thing.
But these women couldn't do that.
And so they tried to Fact Check JD Vance.
And when he was doing his job, which was pushing back, they got
upset. We played this for you
yesterday. I want to play it for you again.
This was the winning blow. And then I want to play you
something with the CBP One app because he mentions it.
And I found a pretty, pretty interesting little video of a
guy who decided to use it in America.
And I've never seen it. I've only heard about it.
And you probably haven't seen it either.
Here we go, this is the debate footage from yesterday as well.
After watching that. That is not the debate footage
from yesterday. So where did I put that?
Oh, there it is. Debate footage from the debate
Mara. But but thank you, Senator.
We have so much to get to. Margaret I I think it's
important because Margaret. The the the rules were that you
guys weren't going. To Fact Check.
And since you're fact checking me, I think it's important to
say what's actually going on. So there's an application called
the CBP One app where you can go on as an illegal migrant, apply
for asylum or apply for parole and be granted legal status at
the wave of a Kamala Harris open border wand.
That is not a person coming in, applying for a green card and
waiting for 10 years. Thank.
You, Senator Rotation of illegal immigration.
Margaret by. Thank you, Senator, for
describing the legal process. We have so much to get to,
Senator. We have so.
We have so much to get to, Senator.
We cannot sit here and belabor the fact that what you said is
accurate and it's devastating to the people that we're
supporting. Again, as I promised, this is a
guy who actually went up there and use the CBP One app.
There's some visuals in the background.
He's explaining his commentary on.
I don't think it's bad commentary.
So we're going to play the whole thing.
This is like a TikTok video, but look in the background for those
you are watching, for those you are listening.
He's describing it accurately. I'll just go ahead and give you
the heads up. After watching that vice
presidential debate last night, I was curious just how easy that
CBP One app was to use, so I downloaded it.
So once you create an account from the main page, you just
have to choose if you're the smuggler or the smuggly.
Then you just got to fill in basic info, first name, last
name, you know. All the basics.
I don't know my gender yet. I'm still figuring that out.
Now it's time to take a selfie. And passport or any
identification is also optional. Then it asks you which state
you're headed to. I said I didn't know the
address, I didn't know the city. I just chose California.
And then I added the first zip code that Google gave me for
California, and that's it. I'm good to go.
It does let you choose. Between like 8 different bridges
to meet under. I chose the Eagle pass bridge to
meet under. I just have to wait until noon,
so a couple more hours to actually make my appointment.
Now I know what you're saying. That's not you, that's Carlos
Mencia. Correct.
I was just trying to show you how easy it was to register.
I'm just a white dude from Michigan.
This took me 5 minutes. Someone who really wants to get
into this country get temporary asylum with open-ended
expiration dates. They'll just use their own
picture. I said I have no documentation.
I have no ID, no passport, no license.
There is no way to cross check who I say I am with who I really
AM. All they go off of.
Is the picture that you submit all right?
So you guys see that? That's what it looks like.
And then this is how it looks in real life.
There's a guy named Anthony Aguero.
He's running down on the southern border.
He's really, really good reporting in so much as he just
presents information. I'm going to skip around in this
video because it's about 6 minutes long and I want to get
to some. There's some really unsettling
people that speak English really well.
They're Russian. What the hell they doing here?
And they look young and scared. But this is Anthony going down
along the southern border. You can see the the border fence
in the background. These people just snuck into the
country. They all have a location in mind
where they want to go. I'm sure that's the way they did
it in the CBP One app. Hence, they are all primed to
answer this question and they do.
So you're going to hear a lot of Spanish, but you'll understand
what's going on. He's asking them essentially,
where are you coming from and where do you intend to go in the
United States? And then they answer them and
you'll hear country like Peru or Venezuela, and then you'll hear
they're going to Florida, California, Michigan, Detroit,
take it back, whatever. They're some are specific by
state, some are specific by city.
You hear Tampa in there a few times.
So just kind of a mixed bag. A lot of people going to
Florida, whatever that's worth. Some of them are Cuban, so that
makes more sense. But listen to this for just a
moment. Venezuela, Venezuela.
Miami. Venezuela.
Miami. Venezuela, Miami.
Colombia. Tampa.
Colomba. Tampa.
You stay Venezuela, Chicago. You stay Venezuela.
Chicago. You said Cerrita.
CUA. Las Vegas, You said CUA.
I'll never. Tampa, you said.
CUA. I'll never.
You said. Cool.
I'll never. Miami, you said.
What? I'm sorry.
Where are you going? Going.
I don't know. Where are you coming from?
I'm from Russia. Oh, you're from Russia?
OK, cool. All right.
You don't know where you're going yet.
I don't know. You don't know.
I don't know. All right.
You Russia.
You don't know where you're going.
They don't know here. USA.
We're in USA. OK.
Yeah.
Detroit. OK.
You stay. You're going to Houston.
You stay there with that. What?
What state are you going to? You don't know where you're
going. OK.
You're still in the NA Colombia
de Colombia a Maryland, Cesarita de Cuba, Yandeva para Tampa, FL.
You said Florida, the Nicaragua, you stay Cuba Andeva, Maryland,
you stay Miami, FL Miami, FL you stay Colombia.
OK, so and it goes on, like I said, there's there's several
minutes of this. He does this quite a bit.
If you guys want to follow his channel, you should definitely
do that. It's Anthony Aguera live.
The thing that's most interesting in that visually,
first of all, there's people from all over the place and
they're all coming into the US. The other thing is that you'll
notice there's a border fence in the background, the sort of
Trump border wall, those big slats of vertical steel.
And then as they get to the end of the video, you see something
very different. And those things are called
Jersey barriers or Normandy barriers rather.
Jersey barriers are on a highway.
Normandy barriers are basically a, it's an X with these little
lines that go in between them and they stop cars and cattle,
but not people from climbing under, over or around them.
And that's what they do. And so these are things that are
all over the place once you run out of border wall and they're
not affected barriers except for vehicular travel.
That's why those people are all on foot.
So anyway, just AII know that to be what the border looks like.
Any of you who spent any time down there do, if you've ever
worked with people from CBP, Customs and Border Protection,
or if you've worked with the US Border Patrol, and I've worked
with both and I've spent time at the checkpoints and also just
out in the middle of nowhere, that's what it looks like.
And it's very easy to walk across that border.
People move those, those, what do you call them, Normandy
barriers out of the way. They do look like the sort of
barbed wire stuff that you'd see down on like the World War 2
footage. That's why they're called that
way. But they can move those out of
the way and drive a vehicle and then move them back.
It's actually relatively easy. A couple of men can do it.
So just so you guys are knowing what we're seeing, this stuff
all checks out. And this is what's happening at
the southern border. So that CBP One app gives them
the two things that are most important.
Where are you coming from in very, very broad strokes and
where are you going to? And the Biden's administration
is is accommodating. We also saw people from Russia.
There's people that seem like they're fleeing from conflict.
I don't know what that means. Neither do you, and neither does
the Biden administration, as far as we could tell, because
they're throwing an awful lot of money at bringing these folks
in. What they're not doing is taking
care of people in our own country.
So here's a little taste of kind of a side by side.
We're giving money to Ukraine to the tune of 2.4 billion more.
That's what the president's doing.
And then the person who seems to be auditioning for the role in
the next round, who wants to be the next president, is doing
what she's going to talk about how much money American
governments are going to give back to the American people that
actually pay those taxes. And you're going to find a kind
of a stark contrast there. 2.4 billion, says Joe Biden.
Here we go. I see two key pieces.
First, right now we have to strengthen Ukraine's position on
the battlefield. And that's why today I'm proud
to announce a new $2.4 billion package of Security Assistance.
I've also directed the Pentagon to allocate to allocate all the
remaining security systems funding that has been
appropriated from Ukraine period, by the end of this my
term, which is January 20. I see.
So give all the money that we can, anything that the Pentagon
has, don't worry about the Blackhawks that should be flying
out there to North Carolina or Georgia or whatever and getting
people out of areas where the the roads are down.
Don't worry about that. Don't worry about tread vehicles
or water filtration or purification.
Make sure we're sending things over to the Middle East where
they screwed up and allowed something happened.
And make sure that we're giving as much money as possible to
Ukraine, where they also screwed up and allowed something to
happen, which is to say, weak people allow strong people to
make strong moves. That's been the legacy of the
Biden administration, and Kamala is going to get front and
center. She's going to take the glory.
Imagine thinking that this was a good look because someone in her
campaign advised her to step up and get in front of this
microphone and announce the amount of money that they're
going to give to Americans. The people who actually pay
those taxes, the ones who are funding that $2.4 billion
additional money to Ukraine. Yep, She's going to go out there
and let them know. You're going to hear an eerie
similarity. I don't know where this number
comes from. It must be built into the way
that FEMA operates, because I heard this in Hawaii too, and it
wasn't good enough. Then we're just stacking failure
on failure. FEMA, like all other government
agencies at this point, it doesn't serve the people it's
meant to. They exhausted their budget on
those people you saw on the southern border.
So they've got this kind of money for people who just lost
everything and have been paying taxes their whole lives.
And the federal relief and assistance that we have been
providing has included on FEMA providing $750 for folks who
need immediate needs being met, such as food, baby formula and
the like. And you can apply now for anyone
who's watching this, who has been affected.
You can apply if you have service, if you have the ability
to see what's going on, if you have Internet connectivity,
which you probably don't, if you're sitting in the middle of
the woods, if you need $750, not even $1000.
In this economy where we've seen inflation just continue to
weaken, that $750 is worth less than it was in Hawaii, isn't it?
So that's what they do. You don't hate your government
enough. Your government is meant to
serve you. And it acts like it's going to
it's, it's throwing out crumbs. We're in the let them eat cake
situation at this point. When, when are we going to start
seeing heads roll, literally or figuratively?
Actually don't care because these people are horrific.
And there are bureaucrats that work within these agencies that
are totally fine with what they're doing and they think
that they are serving and they're going to get a nice
pension when they're done with it, $750, huh?
It bothers me. Meanwhile, there are some people
that have been doing pretty well, it turns out.
Let me just throw this last thing up here and then we'll
we'll break away to the story and talk about Luddites because
I just, it's fascinating to me that this has been done before.
There you go. This is FEMA.
Why is it available, unavailable to those who need it most?
And it's coming in 2021 when they were problems in Puerto
Rico. They are problems that have
existed. They happened in Hawaii when
they had the disastrous fires. I don't need to get
conspiratorial about what happened.
I watched Steve Baker yesterday talk to Alex Stein.
Alex Stein is happy to get into the conspiracy theories and what
not. At the end of the day,
regardless of what happened, there was a failure on the
federal government side. So I am less interested in the
action that took place than the reaction by the government and
the government's inefficiencies and inability.
What they have shown us is that they always suck and they've
sucked for a long time. This is a left-leaning source
that loves the government. This is NPR heard on ALL Things
Considered, why FEMA aid is not available to those who need it.
They talk about a people that are got hit with a hurricane in
De Quincy, Louisiana, living on the end of an unpaved Rd.
They live in a mobile home. People that probably have a lot
of needs and don't have the financial cushion to solve their
own problems. And in theory, if we did have a
safety net in this country, the safety net should benefit, you
know, American citizens, not Ukrainian citizens, not people
from Paraguay or Peru or Venezuela.
But instead, the federal government has decided to take
all the money for FEMA. And it's used to set up migrant
welcoming centers because that's obviously an emergency, an
emergency that is predictable. And instead of using the CVP
officers and using the the Border Patrol to stop these
folks from coming in and repelling them at the border and
actually having that boundary, they don't do it.
The funny thing about leftism is it's this false compassion and
they continue in false compassion to bring people in to
the detriment of those who would otherwise be willing to help
them. We can't help them if you
overrun our systems. If the people that are living in
FEMA, FEMA a failure areas when category 4 hurricanes come in,
they did this little analysis. It said 4.8 million people
registered for aid. This is in 2021.
That's when the the story is between 2014 and 2018, almost 5
million Americans registered for disaster relief.
And they found that the poorest renters were 23% less likely to
receive any help compared to people who had more money.
So it's for the all the crying of the political left.
They should be upset that there's this disparity that the
poor are most likely to be impacted by this stuff, which
makes sense because people who have more money one, maybe they
have better access to government and 2:00 they have better access
to kind of fighting this. All right, before we go forward
on, let me just say thanks to my friends over on the locals.
If you guys are a a subscriber or a supporter over on locals,
we really do appreciate you. Kyle seraphin.com is how you get
there. Kyle seraphin.com makes it
really easy. Link in the show description if
you want to join the locals community discussions happen
after the fact. We're doing our call in show
tonight. Tonight it might be me solo.
We do that at 8:00 Eastern Time. That's 7:00 central.
If you guys want to support us on locals, if you want the phone
number to be able to call in, it is available only to subscribers
on locals and you can also do it on X, by the way, we'll give you
the phone number there. Let's get into this thing.
Let's talk about Luddites. This just came out yesterday.
New York Post, a union bossed who threatened to quote UN
quote, cripple the economy, lives in a luxurious 7000 square
foot mansion. By the way, it's on 10 acres.
Good reporting done by the New York Post.
It's being covered other places. Let's listen to this guy.
Let's see you guys feel sympathetic to this man.
He made, as we talked about yesterday, about $900,000 a
year. I looked back going back to
1999, he's been making in excess of $400,000 a year.
Back when 400 K was actually like even more than it is today.
Since the time that I was in high school, this dude's been
making nigh on half $1,000,000 and now closer to $1,000,000 a
year. Drives a Bentley, has a 7000
square foot house, and he's out there talking like he's a tough
guy that actually works on the docks when he hasn't been doing
it in 25 years. Very interesting, very mafioso
like. So let's just listen to him in
his own words, his threats, and then we're going to cover down
on more stuff about. Him do you worry that this the
capital to settle this thing? Are you worried that this strike
is going to hurt the everyday American, the farmers that need
to reach the export market? They're telling me that they're
going to hurt you start to realize who the longshoremen
are, right? People never gave a about us
until now when they finally realized that the chain is being
broke. Now, cars won't come in, food
won't come in, clothing won't come in.
You know how many people depend on our jobs?
Half the world. And it's time for them and time
for Washington to put so much pressure on them to take care of
us because we took care of them and we're here 135 years and
brought to where they are today. And they don't want to share.
They don't want to share, they don't want to share 135 years of
us doing this thing. Da da da 20.
Five years of you living in a mansion.
Pretty nice look at that. Look at the mansion here on the
screen. That's a big ass pool people.
I don't know a house to describe it.
That thing looks like a castle and it's on 10 acres so it's not
messing around either. Here's another shot.
It's got A5 car garage to keep his Bentley in, in a guest
house, and probably an outdoor sauna that sits right next to
the pool. It's a nice place to live if you
can get it. Nothing against it except you
work for a union, you freaking clown.
Are you kidding me? He's 78 years old.
And so it brought us to this thing He's mobbed up.
We know this. Connections that are listed in
indictments going back to 2004, the Genovese crime family.
I brought it up online because someone said, oh, now we got to
listen to a former FBI agent talked about the global
logistics chain. News flash for you, Bod.
I didn't always live and work as an FBI agent.
I also used to work for some of the biggest manufacturers in the
world. I work for Dell Computers, which
is probably one of the most successful and capable
logistical companies I've ever seen.
And I've seen some. I've done a tour of Dell's
facility, which happens in, it's in Round Rock, TX.
And not only do they bring in and not pay for the stuff until
they actually use it, they empty an entire truck.
They make the trucks back in, They get shipped in from Korea
and the different parts and all the different transistors and
circuit boards and so on. They come in on one side, let's
call it the east side of the of the facility.
And then from left to right, from east to West within this
building, they build every single thing that they're going
to build. They assemble them from the
parts and from the finished chips and so on.
They put together an entire PC and it goes out the West side.
It is 100% streamlined and efficient.
I've seen what efficiency looks like and I've seen what global
commerce can look like. I also had longshoremen who were
in fact my clients and as I found out later, they make a ton
of money and they sub out. They hire these casuals to be
able to do their work. So they can actually work
multiple jobs for seven days a week and make money off it.
So these guys, often times the reason they look doughy and weak
is they've never actually done the work.
Once you get high enough up, you're actually hiring people to
do the work on your behalf, like a subcontractor and they're just
collecting the money because of the union.
That is a Mafiosa protection type operation.
And I, I mentioned La Cosa Nostra a couple times and people
said, what is that? So I wanted to tell you, if you
just type in La Cosa Nostra and pull it up, even Wikipedia will
tell you that it's referred to as the Sicilian Mafia or Cosa
Nostra or La Cosa Nostra. LCN is the way that organized
crime organizations fight against it.
We call it, we call it transnational organized crime or
talk. OK.
And La Cosa Nostra is fairly well known and it dates back to
the 19th century in Sicily. How interesting, because we're
going to be talking about some 18th century and 19th century
movements about Luddites. And so this is what spiked it.
Automation hurts families. What you're seeing on the screen
is that guy, Harold Daggett. And Harold is standing with a
bullhorn and he's wearing like an everyman jacket because he
got out of his Bentley and he took off his like, driving hat
and his little British leather gloves or whatever it is that he
did. He's worn a, he used to have a
clean shaven face, but he decided to do a goatee because
he looks too fat and weak. So now he's got the goatee, so
he looks more like a biker and he wears his trucker hat and
he's carrying a bullhorn. And behind him are the
following, the following things that I'm reading.
Automation hurts families. The ILA stands for job
protection. OK, Machines don't feed
families, support ILA workers. And the last one is profit over
people is unacceptable. So these are all pro union
things. Why?
Why should we think that that families have a right to do
anything? Like, look, I'm compassionate
and I'm a Christian, and so I believe that I want people to
succeed. But not at the cost of
efficiency. That's not very American.
And if you're a free market type of person, you start realizing
that everything about unions works against the free market.
Now they can band together and they can actually organize for
collective bargaining. That's not a problem.
This was brought up in the debate as well.
So a lot of these things keep touching the same thing.
But what they've done is they've tried to do a shakedown, a
protection racket. So I wanted to talk about
Luddites because most people actually, if you ask them what a
Luddite is, they would tell you it's someone who fears
technology, but it's not 100% correct.
The Luddite was a protest movement that happened in 19th
century Britain. Interestingly enough, 19th
century Sicily was exporting organized crime and the Luddites
were trying to basically fight for their survival.
Who were they? They were textile workers.
They were people that were skilled machinist that ran very
sophisticated looms. But it still required a lot of
manual and human interaction with them.
And so when they started getting replaced essentially by machines
that could automate the processes that they did, they
came in with hammers and they broke them.
And they had this fictional leader named Lud, which is the
the person you see pictured. I'm going to read a little bit
from some of these articles. Despite their reputation.
This is coming from Smithsonian Magazine.
Despite their reputation, the original Luddites were neither
opposed to technology nor were they inept at using it.
Many were highly skilled machine operators in the textile
industry, and nor was technology that they attacked particularly
new. Moreover, the idea of smashing
machines as a form of industrial protest did not begin or end
with them, them being the Luddites.
In truth, the secret of their enduring reputation depends less
on what they did under the name and more on what name they used.
In fact, you could say that they were very good at branding
because many of us still use this term, although most of us
have forgotten what it means. The disturbances, I'm sorry, the
disturbances started in circumstances that are
superficially similar to our own.
Now this is not a very modern this was like I think a 10 year
old article at this point, but it's but it's still we're going
through these in multiple different industries.
British working families at the start of the 19th century were
enduring economic upheaval and widespread unemployment
seemingly endless wars against Napoleon's France Interesting
the United States has been in endless wars for the last 20
years as well has brought the hard pinch of poverty wrote a
Yorkshire historian, a guy named Frank Peel, where it had hit her
been a stranger. Food was scarce, becoming more
costly, and then on March 11th of 1811 in Nottingham, a textile
manufacturing set of British troops had to break up a crowd
of protesters demanding more work and better wages.
This is where we are at right now in America.
When we keep talking about these things have all been done
before. I believe they have.
We've seen these things, they've happened before, and now people
are asking the question about whether they're a Luddite for
resisting certain types of technologies.
There's articles written about it because people are interested
in the tech industry. They're worried about AI
replacing writers. Most of the AI actually does a
better job than writers because of the writers that I see need
editors pretty badly, and we decided to scrimp on editors and
just mass produce garbage content.
So here's a little article asking the same thing and do we
need to take a hammer to these things?
I'm not a Luddite, and I don't think you should be.
This is a position paper arguing that you ought to be a Luddite,
and the reason you should do so is simply because there are all
kinds of value and the innate value of the human being doing
the thing. I don't necessarily believe
that, but I am an anti technologist in some ways
because I watched the Terminator growing up and I understand that
AI leads to certain things like sentience and it undermines the
value of human life, but not human labor.
There's still going to be people that make the equipment that
does the automation. It's just going to be a more
sophisticated person. You're not going to be able to
come out of high school with no particular skill set, make
friends in a nepotistic way with a guy like Harold Daggett, who's
a gangster who takes you onto his wing, and he's going to show
you how to do it. And by the way, here's your
chain and now you're one of us. This kind of nonsense, you're
not going to be able to do that. And you can't turn around and
make your 100, your $81,000 a year base salary, which is
$200,000 a year with overtime, because you slowly work around
and you work at the speed of Harry Dunn.
The interesting thing about unions today is that they are so
in bed and they are so mobbed up in their mindset, they actually
operate far more like government than they do like private
industry. And so they're actually making
things inefficient when they shouldn't be.
It doesn't make a lot of sense for us to be doing that as a
nation, as particularly one that is a group of people that that
resist communism, that resist a lot of the sort of ugly sides of
the labor movement. Now, labor movement has a
massive history in socialism. So I went back and found an
article jaded July of 1913 by someone named Anton Penekohic,
Socialism and the Labor Union. And you can even find him today.
Or even when Donald Trump was running under the Democratic
left banner, which comes from the democratic socialism
America, the Socialist Party's legacy in the US labor movement.
They don't hide this stuff, folks.
It's not like they're trying to say that that's not a thing that
they do. Of course they do it.
Little piece here. The labor union movement and
from from this article written in 1913 took a little little
segment out here. I'm going to read to you.
Naturally that only holds true where labor union is actually
fighting against the capitalist, and not where, as in the old
conservative trade utism, peaceable agreements are the
goal and harmony between capital and labor is the guiding rule of
a narrow trade egotism. But where they regard their
activity as a struggle, as part of the great class struggle of
Labor against capital, they constantly increase the most
important elements of the proletariat's power.
They are building the foundation of our future victory by making
new men out of the workers who, through their rigid discipline
and their strong organized spirit, are capable of
overthrowing the power of the bourgeoisie.
It's like 112 years old. Interesting, right?
We're talking about the ideas of struggle.
These are not American ideas. And the idea that you still have
people like the Democratic Socialists of America who are
more than happy. This is the opening paragraph.
This is coming from September 27th of 2016, more than 100
years after that article was written. the US labor movement
has been fueled by the passions and the fires of socialists and
anarchists and communists and the leftists of many types.
Socialists have been active since the very beginning of the
nationally organized movements. The best known amongst them is
Eugene Debs, a moving orator and a staunch union activist.
He began his career as the leader of the Brotherhood of
Locomotive Firemen. Do you know how many locomotive
firemen are in existence today? Probably none.
It's not a union anymore. The reason is because technology
left that behind. They have automated systems to
do that for fire suppression. And after the founder and the
guiding light, he also helped find, found the American Railway
Union during the Great Pullman Strike of 1894.
We all remember that one, of course, powerful corporate U.S.
government alliance was smashed through the strike.
They imprisoned Deb and other union leaders, and they
destroyed the early industrial union.
But he went on to be a member of the Socialist Party as a a
candidate for president in the 1st 2 decades of the 20th
century. Thankfully didn't actually
triumph. How interesting the hardcore
leftist were able to get this movement only because they talk
about unfairness and they think that we should all have it.
This is something that I actually do get behind because I
am sort of an anti technologist in certain phases.
And many of you who called into our show actually realized that
because we would all hit the red button that would make social
media go away and Internet connectivity would be the cost
of that. I'm going to read you something
that I found very interesting. I'm going to put on the screen
and then I'm going to show you who wrote it because it might
surprise you. Introduction The industrial
revolution and its consequences have been disastrous for the
human race. Many people could probably make
this argument comfortably. They've greatly increased the
life expectancy of those of us who live in, quote, so-called
advanced countries. But they have destabilized
society, have made life unfulfilling, and have subjected
human beings to indignities, have led to widespread
psychological suffering and in the third world to physical
suffering as well, and have inflicted severe damage on the
natural world. The continued development of
technology will worsen the situation.
It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities
and inflict greater damages on the national world, natural
world. Rather, it will probably lead to
greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it
may lead to the increased physical suffering even in
advanced countries. The same same article that I
just quoted has an entire section called the Psychology of
Modern Leftism, saying that everyone will agree we live in a
deeply troubled society, a spiritual war, if you will.
Most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is
leftism, and so the discussion of psychology of lesson can only
serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of
the modern society in general. But what is it?
In the first half of the 20th century, leftism could have
practically been identified with socialism, and today that
movement is fragmented and it's not clear who can properly be
called a leftist. As we speak of leftist in his
article, we have to keep in mind that mainly socialist,
collectivist, politically correct types, feminist, gays
and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like,
that's the people that fit into that category, but not everyone
who is associated with these movement and a leftist obviously
not. So we're trying to discuss
leftism not so much as a movement or an ideology, but as
a psychological type. Do you know who wrote all those
words? Because it's going to be fun.
Are you ready? I'm going to just unveil it here
on the screen for you. How many of you know on the
chat? There you go.
Somebody knows. I saw that.
Watch this. That's being quoted from
Industrial Society and Its Future by Theodore Kaczynski at
1995. First appeared in The New York
Times in The Washington Post, September 19th of 1995.
I was in high school. I was actually probably about to
start my what? No, I was probably.
Yeah, I was just going into high school.
How interesting Ted Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber, he
saw these problems. And as one of these articles I
just was reading quoted, they said that he saw a problem with
technology and he decided to go after the people that were in
charge of technology with greater and greater
sophistication of explosive devices using automated systems
like sending through the post. The Unabomber used technology to
try to disrupt technology as same as the Luddites who decided
to use hammers to smash machines that they had been working on.
Do you know who lost in the end of all the stuff the Luddites
didn't win? We have very, very sophisticated
and automated textile machines. We can buy cheaper clothes and
clothe the world in a way that we couldn't do before.
So there are some things out there that seem pretty obvious
that when you actually add technology, you're not entitled
to do an older style of work. Nobody owes you a living at
that. Your job is to adapt.
Most of the American accomplishments came from
technological adaptations. We did it better, we did it
faster, we did it more efficiently, and therefore
America maintained its space in the world.
It's pretty interesting to think that we have people that are
arguing about the the non automation of docs because they
want to keep making a living and their argument is people need
jobs and we pay taxes. The taxes can also be paid on
profits, on the efficiencies that they're able to do, on
sales taxes, on taxes on fuel as it moves.
And it's also interesting to note that the shortest amount of
movement in the logistical supply chain happens from ship
to shore. And those people tend to be the
best paid in the entire world. The US has a very inefficient
port system compared to many, and the US also faces a billion
plus dollar problem in shrinkage, in theft of cargo,
loss of cargo, and it happens because you have not automated
these ports and the accountability is low.
Hence the mafia thing. I told you the story of one of
the companies I work for that was a manufacturer lost entire
truckloads because mafioso guys would get in, take over the
truck, disappear, they'd move off with $1,000,000 for the
merchandise. That happens over and over and
over again to the tune of 1 billion plus dollars a year.
It's interesting to me they're fighting to maintain something
that is proven to be inefficient in the same way that places like
Oregon and New Jersey insist on somebody coming to pump your gas
because this somebody needs a job.
It's the argument that was made to me while some guy in a yellow
vest unhappily did a job that nobody wanted.
The problem for human happiness is when you're doing a job that
you know is unnecessary and you're only in a job simply
because it feeds your family and not providing value to the
company or your service that people want.
There's not a lot of pride in it.
Notice how pissed off those people are.
Wouldn't it be better if they were involved in the anime, like
in the the automation process? They could become consultants in
that space. They would actually probably
have a lot of like hands on knowledge.
This is why you can't do it this way.
This is why you need the machine to do this.
This is where you're going to find the the weak points.
These are some of the unusual circumstances you need to
program the bots to do blah blah blah.
Like there are jobs, just not as many.
And some people are going to have to find new jobs, just like
the Luddites had to find new jobs when some of their textile
jobs were replaced. This has always happened, by the
way. Imagine the amount of anger that
happened between the people that started running the, let's say,
the Telegraph services. They probably were really hated
by those who are doing the telegram services because we
don't do telegrams anymore because we have the Telegraph.
And then the Telegraph operators must have been furious at the
telephone operators. As technology moves forward, the
product end ends up better for the consumer.
And yeah, some people get lost in the in the shuffle.
There are not people that are out there making a living as
Coopers and farriers in the same way they did 150 years ago.
These technologies have passed by.
But as I said, each one of these technologies gives birth to
something else. There will be people that need
to maintain the machines. They will have to be mechanics
that go other. Even if you have machines
retaining maintain maintaining the machines, they're not all
going to be sentient and able to see and diagnose the problems.
And someone has to program them and someone has to stock all
that. So even if you have automated
factories, that will still be a human component to it, except
when humans are going to find other things to do, less and
less of us work with our hands, more and more of us work with
our minds. It's not terrible.
I actually like the connection with the with the physical
world. I think Ted Kaczynski was
correct about that. It does have a problem with
human psychology. But it's all about finding worth
in what you do. And so if your job exists simply
because your job needs to exist, then you don't have worth and
you know it. And that's a weight, that's a
psychological burden. And women, you may not
understand it the same way, but it hits men in a very specific
way when you know your job is unnecessary, when you have a job
for the sake of having a job. It's the reason why most people
in the government are miserable and do a shit job at it.
Excuse my language. They do a crap job because their
their work is not necessary. They are the self licking ice
cream cone. They have a job specifically
because there's a job that needs to be done for them to get paid.
Most of the federal government works on a federal jobs program.
And when you do that, what do you do?
You lose a lot of joy in what you do.
So for all of the nonsense that the political left talks about,
about bringing joy back into it, the reason they need to bring
joy is because they've sucked the joy out of doing things that
involve creation, involve destruction, involve progress.
The actual progress, not some garbage about equity, but like
really doing things that change the game for people.
When you introduce those kind of things, you actually can feel
it. There's a psychic value to your
work. Here's the last little thing.
CNN covered it too, and I thought it was fun.
CNN wanted you to go out there and know that there's basically
a triple headed monster. And they are talking about how
doc workers are fighting the battle against automation.
We should all take note. This is their senior business
correspondent, this woman named Allison Mora.
She might be my second favorite now to Stephen Collinson.
And she's talking about how they're doing something really,
really important and they're fighting against this evil
called automation. It's because they're leftist.
It's because her job also provides no value because her
commentary is foolish. She doesn't know anything, and
it's a shame. They're talking about modest
wage increases of $5 per hour for each of the next six years
until the point where they actually have a 77% increase on
their base. That's wild, folks.
It's completely wild. Find me another job that's going
to increase your pay at like 12 1/2% per year.
We'll all take that, I'm pretty sure of it.
That's a huge amount of interest to go there.
In any case, this is her bottom line.
The bots are coming for all of us, which is why the outcome of
the port strike is particularly important to watch.
It's the early battle of well paid workers against advanced
automation. There will be many more to come.
Yes, but only if you don't understand the dynamics and the
fact that this historically has played out over and over again.
If anybody wants to go back and live in 1811 and wants only the
clothes available in 1811, let me know.
There's no way to transport you back, but you can actually go
fake that somewhere, so that would be good.
All right, I got something a little bit fun for you.
It's a little bit silly. A lot a lot of news has been
covering down on stuff that's been going on with P Daddy.
Before we do that, let me just throw a little thanks to my
buddies of Rich Shield Arms, an American manufacturer that is
not outsourcing. They are using sophisticated
techniques and they make a really good product, which I was
just using the other day. shieldarms.com, that's the
website. You also can find out they have
an entire group of like slings and soft goods.
They call them under the the banner Mountain Partisan.
My promo code should work at all those.
The promo code is Kyle. It's Kyle saves you 5% site
wide, including on their firearms, which are
extraordinary. They are really well made.
They feel really good. I've held a lot of high end
firearms and these would qualify in there and they're at a pretty
reasonable price for a hiring thing.
The owners of the company are shooters and that makes a big
difference because shooters making guns for shooters is a
good deal. They're not just going on
marketing trends, they're actually out there at making
something they use themselves. shieldarms.com promo code Kyle,
How about a little bit of light hearted stuff?
A lot of been going on about Diddy Sean Combs in New York.
I got kind of an interesting interview that you guys might
enjoy. This actually happened with
Caitlin Collins, who was interviewed Donald Trump and
some others. She also interviewed Bill
Clinton and an expert on Sean Combs.
So that we'll just play a little bit of that real.
Quick as Sean Diddy Combs sits in a prison cell in New York
waiting to stand trial. Few people have come out in
support of the man. Many people are branding a
dangerous and violent sex offender.
But today, I'm joined by Diddy's personal friend and former
President Bill Clinton, as well as legal expert Dave Berg.
Thank you both for being here today.
Thanks for having me Caitlin, it is great to be here.
Hi, Caitlin. Looking wonderful as always
today. Thank you, Mr. President.
You can call me Bill. Bill, you have shocked a lot of
people by coming out in defense of Diddy.
How long have you known one another?
Diddy is a good man. We've known each other since the
Vote or Die campaign in 2004. Since then, he's been a great
friend, even inviting Hillary and I to some of his mansion
parties. But Hillary's invitation kept
getting lost in the mail, if you know what I mean.
Dave, what are your thoughts on the likelihood of a conviction
in the case based on everything you've seen and read?
You know, I think he's fighting an uphill battle.
The things that he's been accused of are serious and will
be difficult to defend. I mean 1000 bottles of baby oil.
Hey, a lot of people use baby oil, even me.
At any point I have a few 100 bottles on hand as I have dry
skin and it really helps. Bill, what about the 784 dildos?
Does hearing that concern you? No, there's actually a really
good explanation. You see, whatever, you go over
to someone's house. Normally you bring a bottle of
wine, but Diddy was having so many parties he was having a
problem storing all the wine and was complaining about it.
So one day, as a joke, I decide I'm going to bring him a giant
pink dildo in a box. I think it was called the
Destroyer or the Gate Master, one of those two.
Either way, when he opened the box, he couldn't stop laughing
and put the big pink dildo next to all his awards.
And that caught on and other people started bringing him
dildos to his house parties, or so you can see how he would have
so many. It's important to remember in
America it is not a crime to have 1000 bottles of baby oil
and 784 dildos. And I think that's important
context. That is important context,
folks. It's not a crime to own a lot of
baby oil or to have nearly 800 dildos in your house, especially
if your friends just bring them to you as a gift instead of a
bottle of wine. It's way easier to store because
they're not breakable in the same way that might not have
actually been Bill Clinton. We are living in an age when
automation and AI is coming out there, and it makes it pretty
hard to tell the difference except when comedians use it for
great comic purpose. And I appreciate them doing so.
I hope you guys get a kick out of that, too.
I think I actually added another pallet cleanse in here, and I
don't remember what I added, so it's probably about the biopic.
This might be Danny Polchuk's buddy and partner.
We're shutting this thing down, so let's enjoy like a little bit
of comedy on this. He's dropped another biopic
about me, so I'm just going to watch the trailer.
He is considered a sacred figure by both Republicans and
Democrats. He led the nation through its
greatest crisis. He's on our currency.
We build monuments to him. He's the greatest president the
United States has ever had. Today, the big question that
people are asking is, was Abraham Lincoln gay in the 19th
century For many men, their closest relationships were other
men and the. Same guy and jovial.
Greater. Live with another man when
they're single and often did in shared beds.
Lincoln slept in the same bed with men more than he did with
women. Honest to God never did that.
If you want. A smoking.
Gland. Here it is.
But again, you see. Problems to the end of the 19th
century. Because this guy, if you can
accept a queer Lincoln, you. Can accept dear people.
Overall, lover of men, there's there's some technical glitch.
Yeah, that's a real movie. By the way, Lover of men, Abe
Lincoln story. If you can take on a queer Abe
Lincoln, again, this is the problem.
It's revisionist history. It's people who don't know
history. And if you don't know anything,
then of course you could be programmed with new stuff.
A lot of empty headed folks out there.
So in any case, here what I have to say, question it all you
want, go out there and do some reading.
Go read about the Luddite movement, see if you are more
sympathetic to the mob types that run our longshore workers.
It's an interesting time to do it.
They did it for political leverage and they're going to
get leverage. I just don't think it's going to
work out the way they think because history is a pretty long
tradition of saying, oh, you don't agree with this
technology, we are going to cast you aside and you will now be
made fun of. I think longshoremen are
probably a job that is short for this world, but in the short
term they're going to piss everybody off.
So there's that that's the that's the show for the day.
Hope you guys enjoy it. Like I said, if you guys want to
join us over on locals, go sign up, become a subscriber.
You'll have access to the phone number.
We'll do a call in show and I want to hear what you guys have
to say about technology, about advancing, about Luddites.
We'll talk about that tonight. It's at 8:00 Eastern Time 7
Central. Kyle seraphin.com is how you get
to our locals program. Kyle seraphin.com.
Thanks for all of you who are already subscribers and we'll
have a good little chat about that this evening.
Until then, hope you guys are having a great day.
Hope you do OK out there and for all of those people that are
from America that are in a hard spot, we really do pray for
them. I hope you guys take a moment,
just silently pray for the survival and the help of those
that are going to get their neighbors to step in and help
fix some of the problems that are happening in their own
backyard. See you again tonight.
God bless. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True
Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.