Are you familiar with FBI Special Agents Kyle Serpent?
I'm familiar with the name. Is that yes?
I'm familiar with the name, familiar with the name, familiar
with the name. Let's bring in Kyle Serafin.
He's the FBI whistleblower who helped expose government
censorship of our First Amendment rights.
Now, we only have this memo because a recently suspended FBI
agent called Kyle Serafin brought it to the public.
And we're grateful that he did. Kyle, thank you so much for
joining us tonight. He's the host of something that
strangely is called with Kyle Serafish.
Kyle Serafi, I can't thank you enough for speaking out.
I knew you guys were out there and I knew it was just a matter
of time. But you got a lot of guts
putting your face and your name to this.
You're doing a service on behalf of the American people.
And from the bottom of my cracked and broken heart
sometimes, thank you very much. Take a look behind the curtain
with a real whistleblower and American patriot.
Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth, because
this program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment
defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin.
Well, hello my friends, Welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Today is Tuesday, it is February the 4th and I'm very happy to
have you along for this little, little journey we're going to go
on today. We're going to be talking about
US aid because everybody is talking about US aid throughout
all of the news media coverage I'm looking at, except the these
people at CNN, they're really worried about gay Canadians,
which by the way, it was always there.
It was right out in front of you Canadians.
They're not snow Mexicans. There's something else.
We're going to get there in just a second.
Kind of an interesting situation.
You're seeing a squawk and a squeal from the folks that are
supporting the deep state, the the people who are kind of
starting to say the the quiet part out loud.
It's really coming out in response to foreign aid being
shut down. We're going to talk a little bit
about the history of it, where it came from, why I think this
is really problematic. There are some arguments in
favor of keeping things like USAID going, but it certainly
needs some accountability and there's plenty of the wrong
people that are defending it. So I think that's the most
interesting piece. We got a couple other things
coming up this week. In theory, we'll have an RFK
confirmation, maybe a Tulsi Gabbard confirmation hearing,
maybe a Cash Patel, like all the hearings have gone on.
So the votes may be coming on. And we just had Pam Bondi get
out of cloture the other day or cloture, whatever the hell they
call that. So this long process of putting
people through committees and then putting up for a vote still
ongoing. So we still don't have any of
the people that we really want to see to change the face of the
way this government is working. And honestly, they should be
arguing in favor. But I'm going to tell you why,
because the chaos that's happening at the FBI is actually
government wide. There's a sort of like a
widespread, oh God, dare, dare we say the word insurrection.
There's certainly an uprising within government employees and
USAID is just a piece of it. Before we get into the news
cycle and some of the commentary that's going to be there, I want
to start with a a new sponsor. And so I will give them a little
bit extra time right now. It's a really neat sponsor.
If you guys know anything about me, yes, there are some things
you got to pay for. You got to have cell phone
service, you got to have Internet service, you got to
have various things in your life that you have to do.
Those are kind of the adult things you do.
But gear, that's where I'm most excited.
I'm going to show you. This is a Faraday bag from a
company called Silent. I put my phone in there.
You guys don't know this, but I've been doing this for a
little while now. When we start the show, so the
damn thing doesn't ring while we're working, I'm going to show
you a little bit of background footage and we're going to talk
about a company called Silent and the the danger of a thing
called ubiquitous technical surveillance, which is something
that I will do an entire program on.
I promise you. If you're not following me over
on locals, it's Kyle seraphin.com.
Check that out because I'm going to actually give you guys a
behind the scenes where we went through a SHOT Show and we
walked through the booth. You're going to see some B roll
footage of that right now. You can go to their website,
itisslnt.com/kyle SLNT. It's silent without any of the
vowels. OK.
Between government, big tech, corporate America, and
criminals, your privacy is constantly on the verge of
compromise 24/7. There is no other option.
You have to protect yourself and you can do that with a product
from silent again. SLNT they make a Faraday product
that blocks all incoming and outgoing RF signals.
It's going to make your devices invisible and say from the
outside world. It also makes you digitally
invisible, right from their backpacks to their phone
sleeves, even pants that they can make right now that have
patented pockets that are signal blocking technology for your
cell phone, for your mobile device.
They will give you Peace of Mind that your data is not going to
end up in the wrong hands. You simply place your device
inside of it, close it and that's it.
You're safeguarded from unauthorized accent.
Go silent today by going to slnt.com/K YLE.
You'll save 15%. These are not the least
expensive things in the market, but they are very effective.
I've used the least expensive and they all suck and they all
they all fail. We used to test them.
OK, you're going to stay ahead. What's coming your way?
You're going to secure your privacy and you're also going to
secure your devices by going to SLN t.com/kyle.
Again, 15% off free shipping with qualified orders.
SLN t.com/kyle. I will give you guys a full look
at why I'm excited about this. But I did a leak test on their
product, which meant that I actually drove it from Dallas to
Austin and exposed it to various different angles and various
different positions across a couple 100 miles worth of
driving or 100 and 5200 miles of driving.
And they passed our league test, which almost all commercial
Faraday bags used to fail when I was in the FBI.
So check them out. We're going to get right into
the news right now, but excited to welcome aboard.
OK, as promised, we're going to get into Canadians first.
Why? Because other people are
starting to use my terminology of snow.
Mexicans. I've seen it.
Some of you are sharing with me. They've they've made memes about
it. That's good.
Let it catch on. There are different types of
people that live up in America's attic, also known as Canadia.
Some of them are snow Mexicans, some of them are Canadians.
And this was the opening story. This is why I'm going to have to
find a new source. I'm actually getting more and
more turned on to go to ABC to start off my day.
They're actually fair and reasonable ish comparatively.
This was one of the lead stories on CN NS website which makes me
laugh. Am I now a walking target?
The Canadians who are boycotting travel to the United States
because off Donald Trump. Now, I don't know why they have
these pictures. There's actually three pictures.
I had to cut one of them out. It's two women and a man.
But the story is about a gay couple.
The guy on the left, the guy who's closest to me wearing the
sunglasses, his name is Jason Dale.
He started planning a family vacation to Tennessee.
He started planning it a year ago.
Do you know who plans family vacations a year out?
Apparently women and gay men, real men do not have time to
plan vacations a year out. I've had people invite me like,
hey, will you come speak at our conference?
It's next year and I'm like, I don't even know what state I'm
going to live in next year. I cannot figure out how on earth
that would work. In any case, this Canadian said
that it was going to be his family's last hurrah and a send
off before his oldest son, who turned 18, leaves the family
nest. They were going to go with two
other families and this guy, Jason Dale and his husband.
I'm going to put that in air quotes because right now I don't
believe that anymore. I haven't believed it from the
beginning. I just don't like it.
I don't like calling men who are married to men because I don't
believe that they're actually married just because I have this
weird idea. We're doing rollbacks right now
under the new Donald Trump era. The golden age also involves
rolling back 16 years of craziness.
Oberfeld should go as well. It's not that I don't think that
gay people should be happy. I think they should.
And if they want to spend their life with another man or another
woman, like knock themselves out.
But you're not married. It's not the same thing.
I also don't think the government should be involved in
any tax incentives for people that are married.
So like, you know, I'm, I am consistent, like in a sort of a
libertarian sort of way. Just get the hell out.
Stay out of this. Anyway, they were going to go to
Tennessee, apparently and go check out the Great Smoky
Mountains. They mapped out their route and
they had the rest stop. This is very gay stuff.
They booked their resort and it was all set up.
They've been wanting to make this trip since the kids were
little. They've done it before and now
they were going to do a recreation of this trip and the
Canadians decided that their dollar is garbage and Donald
Trump is scary and so they're not going to go there.
This is considered news. And the and the most interesting
thing for me, I don't know why this was interesting, but it was
behind a paywall, people. That story was a for subscribers
only. That means there's, like, in
theory, I don't think it's much of A market, but there's some
kind of a market that CNN has tapped into where people want to
read the story of Canadians who want to come to the United
States but now feel very, very bad.
This is like a shame story. Like, shame on you Americans.
The gay Canadians can't come here.
It's a weird way to waste your time.
But I think it's indicative of a lot of the information that the
left has consumed that they think that is relevant.
They also think that the purpose of the American federal
government is to throw money at people that are not American.
You know, maybe that's why you would care about gay Canadians.
There you are again. There's another picture of them.
By the way, if you submit a photo like this to a national
news service. Let me describe this for my
listeners that are just not seeing this.
If you have the phone in your pocket and or you are not
watching the video, you're actually missing out on
something fairly substantial. There's a chubby man dressed in
a woman's tank top in the middle.
There are about 8 kids on either side and then like one or two
grown males that are standing in the background that look like
regular dudes, but they have like Floppy Gilligan's hats on
and kind of silly. They're standing in front of the
ball at Epcot Center in Florida and they are wearing various
rainbow colored things. Maybe there's just one rainbow
thing, but it's very prominent. It's like a rainbow heart and it
looks crazy gay to me. And it looks obnoxious.
It looks like the worst people that are going to go visit
Florida. It's the people that Floridians
are like we have to tolerate these people because they bring
tourist dollars, but nobody wants them there.
And there's one kid on the far left hand side who's absolutely
miserable. He looks like a regular kid.
He's wearing a regular like skateboarding T-shirt.
He's wearing like some, you know, some jeans or what do you
call those things like gym shorts.
He's got skinny little legs. He's just a poor kid who's just
going left my life. I cannot believe that I have to
hang out with these people that I got brought here by a bunch of
Canadians in any case OK, so that that's the story all right
poor things anyway, it was always right out there.
I got a message from from a producer of a very large like
one of the largest podcasts in America reaching out and letting
me know that he spit his coffee out learning that it was always
there Canadians. Now you guys have it as well.
Go forth and conquer, share it on all the places that you need
to. Let's move into reel some news.
So this is ABC. As I said, ABC is starting to
sound actually useful. They're the they are the most
fair and reasonable. But this is a pretty funny
little interview. This man that you're seeing on
the screen is a former USAID, also known as USAID official who
calls its closure a quote extinction level event for the
global aid sector. End Quote.
Sounds really, really troubling if you support things like
global aid and the global aid sector.
I mean, I've been reflecting on this just a little bit.
And all of these people who are coming out of the woodwork to
talk about how bad it would be if the American government
suddenly stopped funding everything around the globe.
You know, like the global priorities were always the most
important piece. All it's made me do is think
Alex Jones is not that crazy for screaming about the globalist
nonstop. He might be a little bit wild
for screaming about transcendent, you know,
dimensional vampires coming after your children in a in
another dimension. But the globalist thing, it is a
it's a terminal position. It's the reason why a Trump
doctrine, sort of a resurrection of the Monroe Doctrine, is not
wrong. We've been spending money all
over the globe. We've been basically subjugating
ourselves to the people that we have basically conquered. the
United States has an empire, but it's an empire of feeling
ashamed of having an empire. And it's a strange place to
exist. In any case, ABC News
interviewed this guy's name was Jeremy.
Who knows what this name is going to be?
There's three, there's two YS and AK in it that don't make any
sense and four consonants in a row.
But it's like Condyke. We'll call him Condyke.
Condyke, he's the president of the Refugees International.
That doesn't sound like a thing that I want to support at all
unless you're going to keep them overseas.
It turns out that a lot of these people keep coming over here.
So hard pass. Thank you so much.
He's the former lead of US AID. And yeah, that stands for the
United States Agency for International Development.
It's funny, I've got a little clip explaining this maybe for
like the the the primer for those of you who have never
heard of this organization, but you're now seeing it everywhere
and you're wondering like, oh, who could talk about this?
Let's go to Mike Benz. Mike Benz was working at the
State Department for a little while.
He's become an expert on sort of global tyranny in the Internet
space, and he's absolutely brilliant.
There's no question about that. He's clearly slanted toward the
sides that we're going to more or less agree on.
He went on Joe Rogan and laid out this primer.
This is him explaining that even using the name and the acronym
US AID is sort of a trick to your brain because it has the
word AID. But in reality, what it stands
for is Agency for International Development.
And that is not the same thing as AID.
It turns out it's a proxy to get US State Department interests
projected around the globe, which turns out to be sort of
this deep state thing. If you've listened to this
program before, you know that everybody at the State
Department that focuses on a specific country tends to come
from that country. In other words, the Ukraine desk
at the State Department will have a bunch of native born
Ukrainians. They speak the language, they
understand the culture, and in theory they're American citizens
that are loyal to the US. But we've got to have some
questions about it because they also have family ties and kind
of a conflict of interest that pulls them in the direction of
the place that they are representing.
They should be representing only US interests.
They only people. I really want to see at the
State Department, and I know this is kind of like it's going
to be really hard to do. It may be even impossible, but
I'd like to see US born people that have no connection to a
foreign area that have maybe traveled there and picked up
native fluency. And there are people that did
that. Like for example, my wife speaks
fluent Italian and at least she did much better when she lived
there. But she's an American.
She has American sympathies. She has American family.
She doesn't have any direct lineage that we can go out there
and, and hang up and call and, and go and go visit in Italy.
And so people like that would be better to represent US interests
to Italy than people who are like, let's say first generation
Italians where their grandparents are still living in
Italy. It's kind of a danger that we
deal with. So here's Mike Ben's kind of
breaking down what it is, what is USAID?
This is a biased opinion because there are plenty of people that
actually see some value in this. We're going to give them an
opportunity to talk about it as well.
And for those of you who are worried it will be the worst
people. So it does kind of slant my
opinion as on the same page, the department, USAID and the
national down for Democracy Now. Now, USAID is, you know, a, a
very notorious, it's, it's sort of a switch player.
There's no aid in, in USAID, by the way, that's your brain is
being tricked when you see the phrase USAID.
It's not an aid organization. The aid in USAID stands for
Agent, US Agency for International Development.
It is developing internationally around the world, all of the
institutions that the State Department needs to use.
So when they are capacity building activist groups in a
foreign country, that's because the State Department wants those
activists there. Now.
USAID for the first time in its history, it was created in the
early 1960s by JFK 1961. It was, it was created because
you had all of this intelligence, statecraft and
military support and logistical aid that was tripping over it
itself. Basically the military would be
funding, you know, would be running aid to certain groups in
the region. The State Department would be
running aid to certain groups in the region, the intelligence
committee. And there was no way there was
no sort of central coordinator of those of those capacity
building operations. USA, by the way, is a $50
billion budget the entire. So we'll get more into it a
little bit more and I'm going to let people say it in their own
words. We're going to talk about some
of the ridiculous spending that is out there.
And I don't know if these are cover stories or if this is
actually what they spend their money on, but it's the line
items that they've gotten approved and what goes into
Congress. And that's what the US, what the
White House is actually out there projecting.
So, you know, if you don't want any oversight with what you're
doing with the money, then probably you shouldn't get the
money because you still are taxpayer funded.
This guy, what's his name, Coney Dyke.
Coney Dick, he said the following this if he had a
chance to talk to Elon Musk, he's the guy that's on the
screen, then this is what he would tell him.
I'm just reading from the transcript right here.
I would tell Elon Musk who is running DOGE, which is basically
running a demo operation and has paused all funding for USAID.
He said, look, we tell him this, look past the stereotypes and
the characters that you've seemingly created about what
USAID is and actually talk to the people working there.
You know, hard pass. I don't actually want to talk to
the people working there. I want to look at your books,
which is what's actually been going on.
He said, I served in the agency twice and some of the images
that you're seeing on the screen of disaster relief and those
sorts of things I actually led and oversaw and that is all
offline right now. The people there are
professionals and they deeply care about the mission, the
Fairfax County Search and Rescue.
These are the people that go out after the earthquakes and save
lives. What the hell does Fairfax
County search? And that was county funded.
I used to pay for Fairfax County Search and Rescue, He said.
That's why the staff of USA does what they do.
Look, all of this stuff ends up being very, very goofy because
they can't give you a straight answer about what it does.
They won't give you a straight answer about what they spend the
money on. And when you ask them directly,
they answer a different question.
This is Samantha Powers answering questions of Rand Paul
Underoath, by the way. And she tries to answer other
questions. This is why we're so sketchy
about it. Here is an example of a
testimony before the Senate Foreman Foreign Relations
Committee where the a former USAID administrator is giving
this like Dodge. Maybe that's why there needs to
be doge. Miss Powers, Did USAID fund
coronavirus research in Wuhan, China?
We did not fund gain of function, as you know.
The question is, did you fund coronavirus research in Wuhan,
China? Before my time, there was the
predict program with which you're familiar, which ended in
China in 2019. This is a $200 million program,
and the GAO has also identified that some of these grants went
directly to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where there is a
suspicion that the lab leak began that began the pandemic.
Has USAID awarded funds to the Academy of Military Medical
Sciences in China? I not to my knowledge, but I'd
have. To I think the answer is once
again, yes, GAO has found that there have been sub awards of
NIH money is probably as well as USAID money that went to the
Academy of not just medical research, military medical
research in China. Now, part of the unknowns here
is we can't get the records to look at this.
So I've been asking for months and months for records.
In September of last year, I wrote Miss Powers USAID a
request asking for records from the PREDICT program.
These are not classified. These are simply records of
scientific research and we want to read the grants to find out
what they were doing and whether the research was dangerous or
not. So that was April of 2023.
This is a sworn testimony. And again, nothing but dodging,
not trying to answer the question.
He mentioned that it was going to military medical research,
which is always sort of problematic.
And so you wonder like, what's going on there?
You heard Mike Benz talk about it just a little bit.
It is a clearing house for funding for foreign aid and then
also for sort of intelligence operations, State Department
programs and what they call civil affairs.
Now, Civil Affairs has a cousin that's known as PSI Operations,
right, Psychological operations and the money.
Part of it goes along with the operations part of it where they
are trying to craft messaging. So you're in the space where
you've got people who don't want to answer questions.
They want to spend our money, but they don't want
accountability. They're not classified programs.
Except it kind of leans like they might be because we're
talking about things that a lot of people think we're bio
weapons. A lot of people have this
concern. When she immediately jumps to an
answer, it's this sort of the the the lady doth protest too
much. Have you been funding this type
of, you know, a specific research on a particular type of
virus? And the answer was we have not
been doing gain of function. Excuse me, ma'am, Nobody asked
about gain of function. Are you dumping dollars that
actually have a headline that says coronavirus in China?
Because a lot of people supposedly died for that.
And if nothing else, a lot of people had their lives
completely disrupted. And it seemed like it was a
technique to take down a sitting U.S.
President. So these questions can't be
answered. It doesn't matter who asked
them, by the way. It doesn't matter if it's
underoath. It doesn't matter if it happens
at a press conference or under a congressional hearing.
These things go unanswered. Here's a reporter asking the
same question. And frankly, I'm not going to
dignify your your insinuation. How about you do your job as a
spokesperson and you give transparency to the American
people who is funding this stuff?
You are, I am the taxpayers of the United States and all the
borrowing that they do when they print off our money.
So we're either funding it through actual taxation or we're
funding it through inflation when they print money to go give
it away. But either way, we're talking
about $50 billion for everybody that's upset about the FBI,
myself included, What's going on over at DOJ?
The FBI is an $11 billion budget for his fiscal year.
OK, multiply that by 4 1/2 to five.
That's what you're dealing with. Sent overseas to do God knows
what in 100 countries. Here's a little taste of what
happens if you're a if you're a reporter and you're doing the
job of a reporter asking questions.
How much money went from USAID to this, to the work at Wuhan
and to their collaborator, Ralph Barrick at the University of
North Carolina to create, to collect and make coronaviruses
that are weaponized more deadly? So I first of all, reject the
implicit accusation in that question.
And I do not have at my finger. I, I, I do not, I do not have at
my fingertips the particular details of USAID.
You say for certain, Are you saying for certain that no USAID
money went to the question? Go ahead.
No, please tell me, do you know, are you stating that?
No, USAIDI would say. I am happy to take questions
from those in this audience. I'm happy to answer them.
I appreciate that they treat every person in this room,
including myself, respectfully. I've called on you.
I'm now calling on someone else. Go ahead.
Do you hear how terrified that guy is?
And then we hide behind this fake virtue of respect that we
must do something like this. Like, I'm going to get into what
some of the weird dollar amounts are.
I've got both the White House spokesperson and we also have a
senator talking about it. You know, on the Republican
side, they're they're calling out to what these funds are
spent on. And they're fairly, they're
fairly incredible. And I think they're, it's an
audacious way to take our dollars and to use them.
And it's hard to believe that they're real.
These are all of the things that we've always thought were absurd
about like foreign aid, you know, the, the the lesbian
basket weaving dance competition that's going on in Kenya or
whatever other made-up weird. Like you're like, these can't be
real. How can there actually be
dollars assigned to this line item?
We're going to get into a couple of those because they're being
read out loud. And the, and the fact that
matter is either they are using them on things that are so
absurd, they might as well be funding Canadians doing trips to
the Smoky Mountains because they just want gay Canadians to be
able to experience Tennessee. That would be a thing that
actually wouldn't sound that crazy comparatively.
Or they're doing the money. They're using the money for
something more nefarious, which is also a possibility.
Speaking of spending, Speaking of things that you need, there
are obviously things that you need to spend money on.
One of them is going to be a cell phone service.
So if you guys are interested, we can talk about the folks over
at Patreon Mobile. Right now, it's
patriotmobile.com/KSS if you want to get there, right?
While we've won this election, the fight to restore the great
nation is only beginning. You're seeing that right now
with US aid. It's time to take a stand.
Patriot Mobile is leading the charge.
As America's only Christian conservative wireless provider,
Patriot Mobile offers a way to vote with your wallet.
What a novel idea. Spending money on things you
want without compromising on quality or convenience.
Patriot Mobile isn't just providing exceptional cell phone
service. It's a call to action to defend
our rights and our freedom. Putting money where you want it
instead of the things that you don't.
With Patriot Mobile, you're going to get outstanding
nationwide coverage because they operate on all three of the
major networks. That makes it easy.
If you have cell phone service right now, you can get cell
phone service from Patriot Mobile.
Period. And they have a coverage
guarantee. There's a difference though.
Every dollar you spend supports the First Amendment and the
Second Amendment. The sanctity of life veterans
and 1st responders. It's really easy.
All you got to do is keep your number, keep your phone, or you
can upgrade both or either. It's 100% US based customer
service team. We'll give you the perfect
solution. If you guys want to call them
up, you could do that. Talk to them.
It's 972 Patriot. Use the promo code KSS.
Get yourself a free months of service right now.
Go to patriotmobile.com/KSS. Get that free month of service
with promo code KSS. It's the only time that we use a
different promo code because there's another Kyle out there.
Apparently we need to do a death match, switch to Patriot Mobile,
defend Freedom, and use your dollars every single time you
make a phone call or a text with the people that care about what
we care about. Let's do a little bit more of
this, this breakdown. Let me give you kind of a gaggle
outside of the White House lawn. All right?
This is where this money is. And I'm telling you, this is
audacious stuff. Imagine if you were told when
you write your check or you see that deduction from your from
your paycheck on AW2, this is what it's funding.
Through USA ID over the past several years, these are some of
the insane priorities that that organization has been spending
money on. $1.5 million to advance DI in Serbians
workplaces. 70,000 for a production of a DI musical in
Ireland. 47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia.
32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru.
I don't know about you, but as an American taxpayer, I don't
want my dollars going towards this crap.
And I know the American people don't either.
And that's exactly what Elon Musk has been tasked by
President Trump to do to get. It's real simple.
It's like, hey, what the hell are we spending our money on and
what do we get for it? I'm looking at this thing here.
Technical assistance is the training and the scholarships
and construction and Commodities USA contracts, procurements.
They almost always use US suppliers.
So that's kind of the workaround to say, well, this is in the
United States best interest. We're going to take government
money, we're going to go back and spend it with U.S.
government contractors, and then we're going to export the thing
that we spent it on to places to get what we want.
Or maybe we're doing something really nefarious with it, like
lesbian basket weaving in Kenya, or maybe we're doing a
transgender opera in Latin America.
Is that a thing that we really need?
It's a 27 year old gal who's standing out there just giving
you the straight facts. It's not that crazy.
How about an old white guy doing it?
Apparently we like diversity, so let's do a little bit of
diversity. Let's go to the other end of the
spectrum. We're going to talk about the
competent white men at the end of the show, which is apparently
a real problem for the political left.
This is John Kennedy, who generally speaking, even though
he speaks quite slowly, as they often do down in the South,
particularly around around the bayous, he's not making any sort
of nonsensical statements. I can track this logic.
It makes sense to me. If you run on doing
accountability for money spent, then maybe you should do
accountability for the tax dollars.
That and how they're spent. Donald Trump's doing that.
Here we go. Now President Trump ran for
office saying I'm going to review every single penny in the
federal budget. Now, how are you going to review
spending in the federal budget without reviewing the spending?
And that's what Mr. Musk is doing now.
My many of my Democratic colleagues and some of the, the
tofu eating wo karate at the USAID are screaming like they're
part of a prison riot because they don't want us reviewing the
spending. But that's all Mr. Musk is doing
and he's finding some pretty interesting stuff.
To my to my friends who are upset, I would say with respect,
you know, call somebody who cares.
They better get used to this. It's USAID today.
It's going to be Department of Education tomorrow.
And really here's what's going on.
For four years under President Biden, the people in charge ask
one simple question. Who needs to pay more in taxes?
Well, that's not the question
that the Republicans and President Trump are going to
ask. Our question is, what the hell
happened to the money? This seems really
straightforward. I mean, honestly, it's like
every audit you would ever do, you'd expect to be audited.
The fact the matter is the government is fine failing an
audit, not knowing where all the money went and there's no
accountability. Like nobody loses a job, nobody
goes to prison. If that happened in a private
corporation, you'd be shut down. Your investors would pull out.
This is not like that complicated.
It's very scary to Chuck Schumer.
I'm just going to say this from whatever Chuck Schumer is most
afraid of, please, dear God, let it happen.
You just heard the mention of the Department of Education.
Trump has signed an order saying that they're going to dismantle
it. Good.
It's a constitutional crisis, though.
If you're on the political left, let me give you Chuck Schumer,
who starts off the crying. And you know, I don't think he
understands how well this hits for people that are sitting on
our side of the aisle. I'm over here listening to it
going like, yeah, let's do that. Here we go.
We also know this is just the beginning.
If DOGE attacks USAID today, then you can be sure they'll
move on to another target tomorrow.
Who knows, maybe it'll be the Postal Service or the IRS or
even the Social Security Administration.
They could be next, or maybe our national security agencies.
What? Stop teasing me.
The old line is don't threaten me with a good time.
Chuck Schumer, did you say you might shut down the post office?
An agency that we spend a ton of money on that is pseudo
governmental that operates outside of the rules for regular
federal employees. And you know it doesn't, it
doesn't actually financially make sense.
Do you know that the federal government, when they send this
is funny. When the FBI wants to send
evidence, they don't use the post office because it's not
considered trustworthy. The FBI has a massive contract
with FedEx. In fact, I used to send enormous
boxes for like 10s of thousands of dollars.
We would insure $100,000 worth of equipment and send it across
the country in five 100 plus # Pelican cases and we'd spend
like $100 because the FBI move so much equipment around that
they use FedEx at such a high rate and the and FedEx wants the
government's business so badly that it basically charges almost
nothing. I'm not even kidding.
It was like $100 to send 500 plus pounds insured over
$100,000. That's real.
They don't even trust their own post office.
When I used to go into the nail room, which is what I called the
the mail room because it was a bunch of black ladies in there
that would just paint their nails and not do any work.
When I would go into the nail room at the Washington field
office, it was FedEx envelopes that we had.
There's no, there's no U.S. Postal option.
Even even the federal government doesn't trust the post office.
And how about the IRS? Didn't Trump say the IRS sucks
and we should get rid of it and we should try to get rid of the
the amendments that have moved that as a real possibility?
Like, like there's other ways to collect revenue.
That's why he's been talking about tariffs.
I think it's hilarious he's trolling Chuck Schumer.
And Chuck Schumer is basically saying God forbid we might go
after the most hated places on the political right.
But how many people are psyched about the IRS?
Like, what person is going like, I love the IRS.
They're my favorite. What I like to do is call and be
put on hold indefinitely, have an obscure manual that may or
may not land me in prison. There's all these like these
meme jokes about it where somebody goes in and starts
talking about it. They're like, how much money do
I owe? And they're like, you have to
figure it out. And they're like, well, do you
know how much it is? And they're like, yeah, we can,
we can. Well, can you tell me?
No, you have to guess. If you get it wrong, though,
it's going to it's going to cost you.
The, the, the system of the IRS is absurd.
And here's Chuck Sheehan. We're talking about it.
How about Marco Rubio? Marco Rubio just stepped into a
role at the State Department, which runs USAID.
It's an executive agency that falls underneath the US State
Department. The State Department is the
administrator of it. So the Secretary of State would
be losing like a real big power to be able to move money around
and to make declarations and so on.
Is Marco Rubio, the new Secretary of State, upset about
losing this power? Here he is in a Fox News
interview talking about it. It doesn't sound like he's upset
about it. Kind of sounds like he's on the
team. America here.
You're now the head of USAID, the head of doge.
Elon Musk called USAID a criminal organization and added
that it is time for it to die. Do you agree with that?
They have basically evolved into an agency that believes that
they're not even AUS government agency, that they are out there
global charity, that they take the taxpayer money and they
spend it as a global charity irrespective of whether it is in
the national interest or not. In the national interest.
One of the most common complaints you will get if you
go to embassies around the world from State Department officials
and ambassadors and the like, is USAID is not only not
cooperative, they undermine the work that we're doing in that
country. They are supporting programs
that upset the host government for whom we're trying to work
with on a broader scale and so forth.
So they're completely unresponsive.
They just don't consider that they work for the US.
They just think they're a global entity and that their master is
the globe and not the United States.
And that's not what the statute says, and that's not
sustainable. Can it be reformed or does it
need to die? Well, that was always the goal
was to reform it. But now we have rank
insubordination. Now we have basically an active
effort where their basic attitude is we don't work for
anyone, we work for ourselves. No agency of government can tell
us what to do. So the president made me the
acting administrator. I've delegated that power to
someone who's there full time. And we're going to go through
the same process at USAID as we're going through now at the
State Department. I think there are some.
This is not about getting rid of foreign aid.
There are things that we do through USUSAID that we should
continue to do. That makes sense.
And we'll have to decide, is that better through the State
Department or is that better through something, you know,
reformed USAID? That's.
Real simple, there is an open rebellion amongst government
employees who have this really strange idea that they actually
do not in fact, answer to the president of the United States.
They work under the executive branch.
But you've seen members of Congress push this forward as
well. And that's I think where our our
major issue is. Here's a story that came out of
NBC. Elon Musk and Doge are hacking
the government. Of course, they're taking
advantage of the fact that there's computers that are
involved and this they're saying he's moving with lightning speed
to try to remake the federal government.
Thank God for those of us that follow a news cycle that updates
every minute. Do you realize only a few months
ago, the guy who's sitting in the White House got shot in the
head and nobody talks about it every day?
I was on a podcast last night discussing it, the stuff that
happened in Butler that could be national news every single day
because it's so insane. And yet we've just moved the
hell on. So moving at the speed of
business and the news cycle is a welcome change compared to what
government normally does. They usually just wait it out
until nobody pays attention anymore, and then they just do
what they were doing beforehand. It's very refreshing for people
who actually want to see movement, who get bored of
watching policies languish in committee and never go anywhere.
Elon Musk is moving at a speed that these people don't don't
like, and they're saying it's unlawful.
And so you're seeing judges, lower judges, by the way, who
actually don't have the authority, as far as I can read
it. And I have no idea why a
president would cede authority to some appointed judge in some
tiny jurisdiction somewhere that is in a lower court than the
actual branch of government that is mentioned in the
Constitution. This is my novel interpretation
and I don't know where it stands, but I don't think
anybody could stop them because the old idea was is how are you
going to sanction the US president if you're the
judiciary and you have 0 mechanism of implementing it?
The president doesn't need to recognize these lower courts.
He can say that's fine. Thank you for your opinion.
I look forward to it getting up to the Supreme Court who
actually is a Co equal branch. You are not it.
You've been established by Congress, you've been
implemented by the judiciary, but you're not part of it.
In fact, you got appointed by another president.
So why don't you shut your mouth for a little bit until the the
adults get to it? It's like your teenagers
disagreeing with what kind of Canadian trip you want to go on.
They get a vote, but it doesn't matter.
It's not a vote that anyone has to listen to because they don't
have the power of an equal. My kids have a vote on what
they're going to eat for dinner and we may or may not oblige it.
I feel the same way about these lower federal courts.
They have no way to enforce it as you guys are thrown out in
the chat. Of course, Andrew Jackson
brought this up. This is not a new concept.
They're very upset that that Elon Musk has gone through and
then he's starting to fulfill the campaign promises.
Also, they're saying he doesn't have a clearance.
It's like the guy launches rockets into space.
You think he's not cleared? You think he hasn't been read in
on all kinds of stuff? He has unbelievable amounts of
government contracts. I'm confident this guy is quite,
quite well cleared. In any case, this is a
constitutional crisis. So say, if people who don't
understand the Constitution, this is Chris Murphy.
He's a former colleague of Marco Rubio, and he's talking about
whether or not Marco Rubio is acting in good faith.
It's always telling when they get on and they start crying
about things. He's saying a couple of the
quiet parts out loud. So I want you to listen
carefully to this clip. Again, this is Jake Tapper, CNN
and Chris Murphy. Do you have a point?
Do you think, Senator, that that money should be spent in a way
that's not contradictory to American interests?
Well, listen, Marco Rubio knows better.
He knows what he said isn't true.
USAAD doesn't spend money independently.
They spend money based upon specific allocations of money to
spend in advance of US National Security interests prescribed by
Congress. So Congress writes a law that
dictates how USAID spends money to make sure that we're counter
countering Chinese influence inside Africa, to make sure that
we don't lose access to critical mineral supplies, so that we're
fighting back against Hezbollah in Lebanon, so that we're
helping South American countries stop the flow of migrants to the
United States. It is just not true, as Elon
Musk and now unfortunately Marco Rubio are saying, that USAID has
some independent mandates separate from how money is
authorized to them from Congress.
OK, got it. So what you're saying is, is all
of those weird little pet projects that we just heard
about, and there are plenty more of them.
There's an endless, well over the last couple decades going
back to the Bush era at least, of all the nonsense that you
guys have been spending money on transgender comic books and, and
operas and places and, and, and putting, like I said, lesbian
basket weaving theater on. If that is something that you
have specifically mandated, I want you to run on that.
Chris Murphy, I want you to go to your constituents and tell
them that this is very vital to American interests because I
think we need to take money from your pocket and fund these
ridiculously weird ideas that we have all over the globe and
spread our religion of crazy. We need to make sure that we
spread it because we are proselytizing the gospel of
leftism. We don't believe in God.
We only believe in man made government and the United States
government above all else. We want to go ahead and shove
that down the throats of the entire world.
Make sure you run on that and see how it plays.
Here's somebody that's not from America.
She is a naturalized citizen. She's been a beneficiary of
being in this great country. And she thinks that we owe the
world a debt of something because, you know, she operates
under this leftist principle that you should all feel guilty
for who you are, where you were born and what your money can do
for your country. You owe it to the rest of the
globe. This is Ilhan Omar, who is
pretty detestable. And every time I hear her, I
think, why does she speak that way?
And then I go, oh, yeah, because she's not from my country and
she doesn't care about my country.
She represents people from Somalia that actually still want
to be Somalia. Somalia.
And even though they live in a place like America, because
Somalia is not even really a country, it's just a territory
that hasn't had a functional government in decades.
And that's because they can't handle it, not because it's our
fault. It is really, really a sad day
in America. We are witnessing a
constitutional crisis. We talked about Trump wanting to
be a dictator on day one, and here we are.
This is what the beginning of dictatorship looks like when you
got the Constitution and you install yourself as the sole
power. That is how dictators are made.
What Trump and Elon and all of their cruelies are trying to do
is take away the constitutional power of Congress.
We get to decide. We have the power of the purse.
We get to decide where money is allocated, and it's the
executive's power to make sure that that money gets to where it
needs to get. In the way that he chooses to do
so, and he's going to just go ahead and put a little pause on
the people that are administering because he doesn't
think it's being done correctly. Welcome to the Constitution.
Do not lecture Americans on a document that is so capable that
your country could never generate it, in fact, never has.
They now have some sort of weird federal government out there for
the last couple years, I think like 2 1/2 years, and I've never
heard anything about it because it doesn't matter.
Somalia is irrelevant. So are all the people that came
from it. They are irrelevant.
She's irrelevant. The fact that she has a voice in
Congress is actually a testimony to the great will of the
American people and not to some sort of functionality of her
intellect lecturing Americans on the Constitution, a document I'm
fairly confident she actually hasn't read yet, or if she has,
she hasn't digested in any meaningful way.
Isn't it funny though, when they go in this press conference and
they start saying the quiet part out loud?
Which is to say that US aid funds, quote UN quote, freedom
fighters, you know, those people that are also known as
revolutionaries, sometimes known as terrorists, depending on what
side they're on. And almost always we get it
wrong. The American intelligence
apparatus has basically gotten every single color revolution
wrong. It's temporarily helpful, or we
think it will be, but we end up pushing in and something else
pops out that's much worse. I don't know very many instances
of foreign meddling that the United States has been involved
in where it's worked out great for America.
It continues to have these like negative dividends that continue
to pay out. And I don't know why that is.
Maybe it's because the people have conflicted interests.
Maybe it's because they're just not that good at longitudinal
studies of how their interventions are going to work.
By the way, I'm fine with us doing nothing.
That actually is a strategy when it comes to watching people that
are not us in problems that are not ours handle themselves.
If that means that there's a problem in Africa, so be it.
That's what America First was supposed to be about.
At least that's why I took it. Maybe you did as well.
This is, again, Chris Murphy seems very invested in this.
Is this what people who are from Connecticut really want?
Do they go to Hartford where there's like, gang violence
every single night and they think, you know what I need?
We need to send money overseas to make sure whatever Ilhan
Omar's priorities are. A woman who lives in Minnesota
and Washington, DC, that came from Somalia and a failed state
and is only interested in a Muslim constituency.
We need that Lady to be able to hand out all the money that we
make and that we spend in taxes, just stuff that has nothing to
do with us. The senator from Connecticut,
Senator Chris Murphy. So Elon Musk has been floating
all sorts of awful, terrible conspiracy theories about what
happens at USAID. Let's make it very clear that
every single day America is safer because of what happens at
USAID. USAID fights terrorist groups
all across this world, making sure that we address the
underlying causes for a retreat to terrorism.
USAID chases China all around the world, making sure that
China doesn't monopolize contracts for critical minerals
and port infrastructure all around the world.
It supports freedom fighters everywhere in this world, up
until yesterday delivering firewood, for instance, to the
brave Ukrainian defenders on the Eastern Front.
It supports freedom fighters and and gives firewood to people who
are fighting. What about the hundreds of
billions of dollars in military aid that we sent over there?
Where did that go? Did that go into buying super
yachts and mansions around Miami?
Is that maybe in like Los Angeles that just got burned in
the fires that we're going to now insure?
Is that where the money went 'cause I got some real
questions. If you're in the world of buying
firewood for troops that are in conflict in Ukraine, didn't you
let the cat out of the bag? Isn't that like the lowest
technology solution? And didn't we send an awful lot
more money than what firewood? Is that what we got for her for?
I mean, that's probably right. Are they sending pallets of cash
to light on fire and calling it wood?
Scary stuff. A constitutional crisis.
I found this article to be quite telling.
I just find it fun when people want to go out there and say
things like this. A constitutional crisis is
something that comes from. What article is this?
I think this is from ABC again. US aid freeze puts the Ukrainian
wartime help for frontline evacuees in danger.
Yeah, it's just nonstop. There it is.
There's more of it. It's like if you're not giving
all of your money away to foreign nations that have done
0. Do you remember how many people
have stepped up to help Americans when there's a
disaster in the United States? It's basically none.
There's one that's coming forward.
They're willing to do it for pay.
We're going to cover that in just a second.
The folks in El Salvador have been offering to take all of the
illegal aliens that we want to deport the worst of the worst
and put them in their supermax prison, which is very
interesting. It just tells me that they
probably don't have the money to run their supermax and they need
to get on the the US government teat.
Well, so that's a possibility, but everybody wants you to send
the money. Nobody is out there saying, hey,
what do we get for this? What is the actual pay off to
the average working Joe who's writing a check?
I'm getting ready to write a check to the federal government.
I'm not thrilled about it. It's a huge chunk of money.
It's probably, it's probably two months pay that I have to write
in a bulk sum because I work everything on a 1099.
I would say they're working for tips.
You guys say otherwise. So we're in a world where when
you're writing that check out and you look down, you're
thinking like, oh, am I getting like really good roads?
Am I getting an FBI that serves my purposes?
Am I getting, you know, federal law enforcement and a military?
Now you're getting like woke retard stuff going on and we're
going to be able to put a bunch of beds in a church and firewood
in Ukraine. Seems like we're spending an
awful lot more money than that. In any case, at least you guys
should take the most important argument, which is that if you
don't agree with this, you're a racist.
Having what they called competent white men.
Let me see if I've got that slide up.
Here it is. This is Darren Beatty.
He just got put into the state department of this kind of
interesting. He's going to be the Under
Secretary of State for public diplomacy.
He runs Revolver News. We've had some interactions,
mostly positive. I don't have a lot of feelings
one way or another with Darren Beatty.
But he got called out by, I think this is NBC very, very
upset because he said that it's time for competent white men to
be in jobs. God forbid you say anything like
that. That's very upsetting.
And apparently he got removed from Trump's original White
House in one point, O, because he attended some sort of a white
nationalist rally. Again, when NBC News calls it a
white nationalist rally, they are pretty much on the fringe of
the sensible people. They are just on the edge of
going on to the hard left, if not crossing over it.
So they're really upset about it.
He's also been pushing things about January 6th that are
probably not true. Unfortunately for him.
You know, he he's called it the feds erection.
He's in the Julie Kelly camp. It's an unsophisticated take.
I think it monetizes on an audience that doesn't care about
the actual truth. They're mostly like interested
in close enough. But he's not a dumb guy.
He's upset the right people. And here's someone called
Jasmine Crockett who's saying things about white men, mediocre
white men. Meanwhile, does this woman have
a place in America out? Like, does she have a place
anywhere else? She's actually not as dumb as
she sounds. For whatever it's worth.
We played video of her not sounding like a complete ghetto
hood rat dollar star Cardi B. But she actually acts like that
and she's playing to an audience.
It tells me that there is in fact, an audience, that there is
a way to monetize this thing or to become a congressperson,
which is what she's done. Here's Dollar Store Cardi B
Jasmine Crockett, representative from.
Dallas, listen, if you are competent, you are not
concerned. When I walk into Congress every
single day, you know why I don't feel away and why you can't make
me doubt who I am is because I know that I had to work 10 times
as hard as they did just to get into the seat.
When you look and you compare me to Marjorie Taylor Green or me
to Lauren Bobert, there is no comparison.
And that is the life that we have always lived.
So the only people that are crying are the mediocre white
boys that have been beaten out by people that historically have
had to work so, so much harder. This is why they don't want us
to have education. This is why they are trying to
literally say we won't fund the HBC us because they know that if
they've already gone after affirmative action and they're
saying, you know what, don't allow them to come in to say
these, these PWS, as we call them, don't allow them to come
into these institutions. We know why they created the HBC
US in the 1st place. It was because they wouldn't
allow us into to the white institutions.
And so now they're not allowing us in.
And now they're saying, you know where we're also going to defund
the HBCUS. You know why?
Because they don't want any more Kamala Harris's.
They don't. No, no, we want all the Kamala
Harris's please. We want all the Jasmine
Crockett's. You, you racist turds are the
best. Continue please.
Run on racism. Run on lecturing white people
that they are mediocre when in fact the entire country doesn't
care about race anymore except you.
It's the only way that you got into office.
You had to work harder. Trump funded HBC US at a higher
level than any president before that.
I'm not a big Trump defender. I don't think we should be
funding any schools with our federal dollars.
I'm not interested. If you can afford college,
great. If you can't piss off, go get a
trade job. They actually pay better, and
they're actually a lot more satisfying.
Anybody who's ever worked with their hands and had to sit at a
computer desk, working at a computer desk is pretty awful.
Working with a shovel, even though it's much harder, is
infinitely more satisfying. And it turns out most of the
time now it actually pays better because people need to do those
jobs. We don't have robots out there
building houses. This woman claimed that she just
got that her job was harder to get because of who she is.
The evidence is stacked up in the contrary.
That goes back to like my early high school days.
That's a 30 year old issue at least.
And maybe before that. Affirmative action was always
racist. And the fact that she was hired
on because of the way she looks and the fact that she's adopted
this ghetto bullshit way of talking because it is not real.
That is not how Jasmine Crockett sounds.
I mean, she probably does now. She's probably adopted that role
and doesn't know how to get out of it.
And that's a thing. But when you listen to her speak
prior to being elected to Congress, before she got a
national stage, she sounded like every other intelligent,
articulate, educated person that you've ever listened to.
She speaks in complete sentences.
She actually doesn't even have that obnoxious like millennial
slash Gen. Z up talk thing, which is common
in her age. But if you look at what MTG or
Lauren, Lauren Bobert or her have in common, they're all just
fake Mean Girls that are pretending to be something so
that they have a national audience of people that cheer
them on and say slay queen. It's gross.
I don't like any of that. I think it's all nasty, like
mature adult, grown-ups to be in charge of things.
Go figure. But that's kind of what we're
working towards here. This guy's kind of a mature
adult. He seems to say things that are
sensible. We don't even have to agree.
I disagree with almost everything that RFK says about
government spending, about where we should put our money, about
the fact that government is the solution to problems when in
fact it is probably the creator of the problem and also getting
rid of it would be the solution. But he's reasonable.
He's articulate and he cares about things that are the same
values, at least he says he does.
He cares about things like people being healthy and our
kids having a future. That seems totally reasonable.
I can have a reasonable discussion with people who are
Democrats that are now working in the Trump administration
because they're Democrats from 30-40, fifty years ago.
But the the Today Democrats that are trying to bring up the the
specter of racism, they're trying to relive the 1950s and
the early 1960s. Time has passed.
I think Americans are done with it.
It's very weird. And those same people are, are
applauding that the government is the solution the same way
that it's always been in a very racially, you know, in this like
a logical way. They think that the solution to
the problem is that the government is not even
accountable to the people that it's supposed to be accountable
to. There's a reason we have 3
branches of government. You're hearing them talk about
constitutional crises. This is another one right here.
This is the last one we'll touch on today.
The names of FBI agents who investigated the capital riots
are to be handed over to the Trump DOJ officials in a very
lawful order. You're hearing crying and
wailing about this because they think they are not accountable
to the people that they are actually accountable to.
The American people have a representative.
It's called the President of the United States.
It wasn't supposed to be that big of an office, but leftist
made it such. Now they have to reap the
whirlwind of creating a very strong executive.
It's the opposite of what you want if you are in a Republic.
It's supposed to be that Article 1 defined Congress to be the
primary branch among the equals. But people who wanted to
implement policy and wanted things to go, go, go when they
wanted to move progressively to the left, they got it.
Now you got Donald Trump controlling that desk.
So if he wants the names of FBI agents who did something, it is
a lawful order to say, hey, give records to the agency that you
answer to, who answers to the president of the United States
of America. Meanwhile, you've got guys like
Andy McCabe who actually got removed from that agency for
lying and were reinstated under technicalities.
It's the only reason why I would argue Donald Trump needs to be
cautious about this and the DOJ needs to be careful about what
they do with it because they'll be wasting a lot of our money
and time if they go to the Supreme Court.
But I don't think they should pay out.
I think they should make every single person go the entire
distance the same way that me and my lawsuits are too, as me
and the suspendables are currently involved in suing the
FBI for the things that Andy McCabe is about to be crying
about. None of these people showed up
when it was about a coronavirus vaccine that we said no thank
you to because we have religious principles that, by the way,
predate not just the FBI, but they actually predate this
country. And in theory, the 1st Amendment
protects them. Where was the constitutional
crying over people who had their lives destroyed over illogical
and unjust executive orders? 14043 is the one we're talking
about here. Suddenly, suddenly, we want to
resist. It's because these people serve
their own master, and that master is government as its own
end. Here's Andy McCabe.
I just have to put it's totally. Unprecedented FBI rank and file
agents and analysts who make up the vast majority of the field
offices who do the work in of investigating these cases of
executing search warrants, of executing arrest warrants, doing
surveillance, electronic surveillance, whatever might be.
Those people are never touched by the political winds that blow
through every four years, nor should they be.
They, as you said, they don't pick their work.
They're assigned to the work that they do.
The work they do is lawful. It's it's within FBI policies
and not doing the work is not really an option for them.
That's false. Yes, it is.
You can also object and people do, and you could lose your job
like Steve Friend did, and that was the right thing to do.
So here's the deal. We know that this is nonsensical
because with some of the lawful work that you're supposed to do
as an FBI agent is when they tell you to go work with ICE and
go round up people, you should be doing that.
And you're seeing that FBI agents within that agency are
rejecting it. They're refusing to be part of
it and they don't want to take part in lawful orders to go do
things that are part of federal law enforcement.
And that brings us to this thing in El Salvador, which is kind of
interesting, the projection of power.
This is some of the stuff that America can use its money for.
And one of them is getting El Salvador, who seems like they're
probably running out of money, running the Super prison.
El Salvador's offered to house US violent criminals and
deportees of any nationality in this unprecedented deal.
Again, this is coming from, I think ABC who continued, No, no,
this one's actually coming from CNN.
So good job to CNN. Marco Rubio unveiled that they
had a meeting with the Salvadorian president and it
resulted in a tour of several Central American countries and
also an expanded regional support for Donald Trump's
administrations and their immigration policies in an
extraordinary act of friendship to our country.
Like I said, I'm sure there's money involved.
El Salvador has agreed in a most unprecedented and extraordinary
migratory agreement anywhere in the world.
They will begin accepting Salvadorian deportees who
illegally enter the US and also accept deportation of any
illegal alien in the United States who has a criminal record
from any nationality, whether they be MS13, Trans de Agua or
House of them in their jails. Referring to two notorious
transnational gangs that have members in both El Salvador and
Venezuela. Like I say, I'm sure there's
money. This is where your your federal
dollar should be going is funding supermax prisons so they
don't run out. I'm going to show you an inside
look that CNN did. This is actually a fascinating
video. I'm not new to the idea that
they have the supermax. I am a little bit perplexed.
I want you to look at the faces of the MS13 guys that are
standing in these jail cells. They have them in these blocks
that are basically several dozen.
There's up to 80 members in each one of these cells.
There's no mattresses. They're simply like hard mesh
steel toilet bucket for water. It's very primitive conditions.
They get basically 23 1/2 hours a day where they're locked in.
You're creating sociopaths right here.
You're creating people that are not going to ever be able to be
released. So I don't know what you do with
these people. It does ask like it, it begs a
question for me. I'm like, but what happens?
Why do we want a bunch of military age males consolidated
and radicalized in a place 80 at a time?
I don't know the answer to it either.
I don't think it's like justifiable necessarily to go
execute all these people. But what life are they going to
have after this? Watch this little CNN video.
All right, we're going to go in here.
Even as I'm stepping through these doors, I don't fully grasp
what we're about to walk into. Suddenly, you're hit with the
intense gaze of dozens locking on To you, these men described
as the worst of the worst, tattooed with reminders of El
Salvador's dark past. It's.
Tense and uncomfortable. But here, officials say comfort
isn't meant to exist. There's no mattresses, there's
no sheets. You've got a toilet over here
for them to go to the bathroom. You've got this base in here
that they used to bathe themselves.
And then you can see there, there's a barrel of water that
they can drink from. Do you see those guys line up?
I mean, that's military type formations, whether or not
they're actually in a military. Obviously they're not, but that
that doesn't look like you're building anything good there.
How do you let those guys out ever again?
There's no rehabilitation happening right there.
They're basically holding on to them.
And of course, the most effeminate man in the world
working for CNN going to look at these dudes who are looking at
him like he's a piece of raw meat.
So that's not very great either. In any case, kind of crazy.
The other thing is, is that we're hearing a lot about this,
this this opening of the Donald Trump just did about a sovereign
wealth fund. I actually want to play that
real quickly for you as well because they mentioned that the
purpose of USAID was to go around and combat China and
their economic interests. It sounds like Donald Trump has
a different plan for doing that. I'm not well up on the sovereign
wealth fund idea yet. I've been reading on it.
I'm going to try to get an expert on to come talk about a
little bit further. But my instinct is it's a way to
combat the Chinese sort of nationalized dollars or yen or
whatever they're they're putting out.
Of the world, the Chinese currencies that are going out
there and they're and I may have just got the currency wrong for
China, but they're pushing to snap up interest that are that
are economically viable for China and do investments that
yield profits back for the home country.
And so the United States has never had this.
But this is not a concept that's brand new.
It's a 20 plus year old idea. So I'd like to get somebody that
has a little bit more experience in sort of like money moving
around the globe and whether they think this is a good idea.
My general instinct is that having more money wrapped up in
the federal government is worse. So I'm not crazy about this.
But you do have a couple of very smart guys, both people that are
billionaires in their own right, standing next to Donald Trump
talking about the sovereign wealth fund.
And that they're going to use it to try to basically leverage the
buying power of the United States federal government and
get equities that are actually going to return a profit, which
in theory would be decent, except it just means more
government. Again, Donald Trump, not a
conservative, everybody who wants to say otherwise, You guys
are missing out on the thing. They want to use more
government. So that's kind of where we
should all be a little bit like a little squeamish.
Here he is talking about signing this executive order.
Next, this is an executive order discharges your Secretary of the
Treasury, Scott Besson, and your Secretary of Commerce, Howard
Lutnick to begin a process that will hopefully result in the
creation of an American sovereign wealth fund.
It's a very exciting event. We're going to have a sovereign
wealth fund, which we've never had.
We have a lot of things that create wealth and you've seen
that over the last two weeks. I think we've created more
wealth. Other people have created de
wealth. The people, my predecessors,
we're creating a lot of wealth. Scott, maybe you'd like to say
something about it And I'd ask also Howard to say something
about it. Yes, Sir.
There's a very exciting, we're going to stand this thing up
within the next 12 months. We are going to monetize the
asset side of the US balance sheet for the American people.
We are going to put the assets to work and I think it's going
to be very exciting. We're going to study best
practices that's done around the world.
It'll be a combination of liquid assets, assets that we have in
this country as we work work to bring them out for the American
people. The extraordinary size and scale
of the US government and the business it does with companies
should create value for American citizens.
If we are going to buy 2 billion COVID vaccines, maybe we should
have some warrants and some equity in these companies and
have that grow for the help of the American people side.
All right, So you're hearing them just kind of talk about
they're going to basically leverage the buying power of the
American government. From everything I can read about
sovereign wealth funds, they want to generally be for
countries that have limited debt.
I guess it could be a way to leverage your actual money that
you're spending and try to alleviate that that way.
It's kind of it's kind of iffy. Like I said, getting more
government money involved doesn't always make me happy.
So we'll get people who have a little bit more balanced
perspective who look at global finance and, and something that
is, you know, I look at personal finance.
That's the best I'm willing to do.
So most you guys, but you heard that example, he's like, if
we're going to buy 2 billion vaccines for COVID and everybody
in the room went like, who wants to be doing that?
Doesn't make me feel very good. In any case, So be it.
That's that's the world. I actually just had a moment
over the the evening as I was kind of reflecting on things.
We've been going back in time, we've been kind of doing a
reflection on the time and and where we stand today versus
where we did a couple years ago. This is something I want to
throw up on the screen just to make you guys laugh a little
bit. If you guys are listening to the
podcast, this is a picture of Donald Trump riding on a tank
carrying a 50 Cal on. The tank is gilded with gold and
explosions behind him in an American flag.
This is one of the reasons why I got in trouble with Andy
McCabe's FBI, because I had that hanging out on my desk when
Donald Trump was not a political candidate.
It was not a Hatch Act violation.
He was just hanging out on my desk in a printed format.
But it upset the libs that worked in my office.
And here's another one. That's Ronald Reagan riding on
top of a velociraptor, obviously some artist rendering while he's
got an RPG on his back, which I've like to call a bazooka
because it's funnier carrying an American flag and shooting an
Uzi. Both of those things were
problematic to the current FBI and the folks that are running
there that are now losing their minds.
God forbid that they're not allowed to do the good work and
they don't want to expose the thing they been doing on January
6th. Kind of funny.
And then lastly, Phil Kennedy reminded me of this because I've
kind of forgotten at one point in time, Donald Trump Junior,
I'm sorry, Donald Trump actually, Donald Trump Junior
did as well, but Donald Trump actually said thank you to Kyle
Seraphin. There are many whistleblowers
coming out and exposing what's taking place in the FBI and DOJ.
Soon there'll be a flood. They are American heroes.
The funny thing is that flood was pretty small, it turned out.
And that's flood is called the suspendables.
Most of you guys know who we are, but if you're not familiar
with the story of Garrett O'boyle, please check it out.
It's in our channel. Go back into the old episodes if
you're new here and find out about my friend Garrett Steve
friend who you will find every Friday on friendly Fridays.
Check again to his story, Marcus Allen, who has been less covered
because he wants to be, he wants to be a quieter guy, George
Hill. Also, someone who's been
prominent on this channel, a newly sort of public, is my
friend Phil Kennedy, who was the Yeah, he was the OG and let's
say producer emeritus of this program.
He got me to launch the Kyle Seraphin show and named it as
such, even though I didn't much like it.
Anyway, this is kind of a funny little moment in time to go back
and reflect on. I've got things to walk out the
door with. And that thing is the most
unhappy people on earth. You guys, as we consider who's
screaming the loudest, I think you'll know who it is.
It used to be liberal men were the saddest.
As we showed on that, that stage for the DNC yesterday, It's
changed. It's the other people that were
on the stage. Enjoy our little palate cleanse.
It's not good news, but at least we know it's.
True. And years ago you wrote
conservative women are particularly seem to be
particularly blissful. About 40% say they're very
happy. That makes them slightly happier
than conservative men and significantly happier than
liberal women. The unhappiest of all our
liberal men. Only about a fifth consider
themselves very happy. That was true 10 years ago.
Liberal women have overtaken liberal men as the unhappiest
group. You find that particularly young
women. Very interesting new data show
that white liberal women under 30 have almost a six and ten
chance of having been diagnosed with a mental illness in America
today. It's a really big problem and
there's lots of speculation about what that.
Has to do with politics, what has to do with race, what has to
do with age, etcetera, etcetera. But what you find is that this
is a group that's really, really struggling and it's a pity
because it's not good for them, it's not good for society, and
that's what we see. So I don't think that being a
political conservative is a panacea for being a happy
person, but we see disproportionately these
happiness and unhappiness. This effects in different parts
of the population for sure. Yeah, 10 years ago you wrote
Conservative Women. Hey, hey, hey, hey.
The saddest ones are those people that Steve Friend refers
to as the most miserable people on earth or the worst people in
America. The ones that would cut off
their kids genitals to impress their girlfriends.
Anyhow, don't be that person. Go out there and share the Kyle
Seraphin show. Thanks for listening today.
We really appreciate all of you. You can find us on
rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. If you want to see the video and
watch us live 0930 Eastern Time, you can find us on X where I've
got that video from CNN today. If you want to go out there and
catch all the articles, I always post them on kyleseraphin.com,
which is our locals community. And if you want to watch the
video replay with no advertisements, if you're
watching somewhere else, you're thinking, man, I'm sick of these
ads. Yeah, you can find it on Spotify
and you can go a cheat code to get there.
You simply go to kyleseraphinshow.com.
I'll add that in later. Thanks so much for watching the
program. I look forward to seeing you
guys again tomorrow. Have a wonderful day.
God Bless America, God bless you.
See you then. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin show, streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle
Serafin Bobble Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at
Kyle Serafin.