Take a look behind the curtain with the real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Well, hello my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Tuesday, it is April the 9th, and we are rolling live
on rumble.com/kyle Serafin. I hope you all are joining us
there. If you survived the apocalypse,
if you survived the Eclipse Ellipse, you can come on over
right here to rumble.com/kyle Serafin and be part of the live
show and the live chat which has been going.
Good morning to all of you. Glad to see you there.
Today's show is one of those things where I got up this
morning and looked around and I thought, man, it must be a slow
Newsday because all I see on every page of all the places is
Donald Trump. How much does our media love to
hate Donald Trump? They had this momentary break
for just one second where they were able to think maybe, just
maybe, they'll be the rapture and the apocalypse and all the
other silliness that was coming out regarding this, this
regularly scheduled event that happens in our celestial view
like this normal thing that happens all the time the the
eclipse goes by and now we're back to the fools.
So I have more pictures of Donald Trump on my computer
right now than I am comfortable with.
There are far more than any normal man should have, but so
be it. We're going to talk a little bit
about Donald Trump. Let's see today we're going to
talk about a pro-life ruling from a federal judge.
That's kind of cool. And in fact, it kind of gives a
little bit more. When we read in depth.
We're going to talk about Trump's statement about abortion
specifically, which I think is relevant.
My my my contention is, generally speaking, that Trump
is not conservative. He's a populist.
That doesn't mean that he's the wrong choice, but we should know
what it is, what we're talking about when we do that.
Some of you guys get really heated because I don't love
Donald Trump. I don't love any politicians.
I love outcomes. His outcomes are decidedly
better. But let's be realistic about
what they are. We're going to talk about his
trial, the the fact that this is about to go down in New York
City. He is fighting the city of New
York. He's fighting the federal
government. The man is besieged on all
sides, and obviously the media is there for it in greater or
worse things. And then I want to talk about a
concept that everybody might be familiar with.
If you follow anything on social media, it's the word grift.
We had Ron Coleman on the program not too long ago, and
one of the things that he said that I found very, very amusing
towards the end, everybody is a grifter.
And then he did the grifter thing, that grift, grift, grift,
grift where if you promote yourself in any way, shape or
form, or you decide to make money because your life has
changed dramatically and you're unable to do so in a previous
format, then the most common thing to say is that you are a
grifter. And the word grifter is being
misused. I want to discuss that versus
what a con artist is. I think we'll talk a little bit
about all that. But first, say thanks to a
sponsor. Grift, grift, grift, grift,
grift. Every time I hear that now I
just think of Ron Coleman. Love Ron Coleman.
How about how about Patriot coolers?
Our friends over at patriotcoolers.com?
The promo code is Kyle. It's Kyle.
That saves you 10% on buying their lovely products like this
one. If you guys don't have one.
Look at this. I got my suspendables merch
stickers. This is a 19 oz coffee mug.
If it's great in All in all of the cup holders, in all of the
vehicles that I have been able to drive and it keeps my coffee
warm. That's all it's it's only job.
Keep things hot, hot, keep things cold, cold.
Have a handle on it. It's got 50 stars on the bottom.
It says Patriot on the side and ghost letters right here.
It's a fantastic little piece of equipment.
They're not particularly expensive.
You buy it one time, you fire away and that is it.
They have been supporting our program.
Speaking of the grift, they've been supporting our program
since February of last year because they believe in the
message we have. They believe in our audience and
as that audience grows, they continue to stay with us.
Never had a single statement about what it is that we say.
What we can't say, we love Patriot coolers because of their
support. If you guys are interested in
having something that says Patriot on the side of it when
you are at work or in the office or en route to the office and so
on, check out Patriot. coolers.com are good friends
here. Really, they are.
They're good people. Marcus is my contact over there
and he's a good guy and we're going to get this thing set up
so you guys can actually go out and buy should you choose
Suspendables Cups because that's actually going to be really,
really fun and we don't want to keep the inventory.
I don't want to put more more on Garrett.
This just came in and this is where I'm going to start today.
You know that we'll always give you the inside baseball when we
can. This just came out of CNN's
reporting and I want to cover it full form because this is not a
slow news story. The FBI just arrested a man who
allegedly pledged allegiance to ISIS and planned attacks on
Idaho churches. The DOJ says this was in Coeur
d'Alene, Idaho, where I just was a couple of days ago.
Holy moly, were we in in in possible vulnerability of an
ISIS attack in Idaho, of all places, by a white kid who has a
knife and a dumb haircut and the silly hat and an ISIS flag, Huh.
Is that real? You know, we'll always tell you
guys how it works before I even read the story.
And I hate to bring my biases to this, but my guess was, 'cause
this is my guess all the time for the FBI.
When they do a terrorism case like this, it will involve A
confidential human formant, an online contact, encouragement of
the worst ideas, and the amount of money that that person has in
order to fund said ideas. You guys know it.
It's a free lesson from the Kyle Sarovic Show.
This is this is the number one rule of feds.
If you ever meet somebody online who agrees with all of your
dumbest ideas, especially the violent ones, wants to be your
buddy during business hours, mostly is able and willing to
help you carry out said ideas for the exact amount of money
that you have. That is a federal informant or
an undercover fed. And they are not your real
friend. You need to go to church.
You need to go meet a real friend.
Go find an 8 year old lady who praised the rosary and she will
listen to you. And then you can make a friend
that will tell you something better than that.
This guy didn't follow that basic advice and this is what it
comes down to. He's an 18 year old guy.
Oh, interesting, 18. What do we know about that?
They probably waited until he turned 18 because that's how
these things work. Investigators believe that his
alleged efforts to carry out an attack intensified following the
March attack that killed 144 people in Moscow.
Oh, interesting. So this nonsensical thing that
what happened in Moscow somehow inspired this guy to carry out
an attack. The complaint alleges that he
swore allegiance to ISIS. This happens all the time.
By the way, this is a classic FBI ploy.
And then decided to plan an attack waged against certain
churches in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.
I brought up the FBI statement on this and their news release.
And whenever you go to the news release in the store, you can
also find what is called the the criminal complaint.
OK, And the criminal complaint will always have this date, this
thing called the summary of probable cause or the statement
of facts. And I'm going to read it to you
right here. This is on page three of the
complaint from the DOJ. This is critical stuff to learn.
Paragraph #5. This case began when Alexander
Mercurio reached out to a confidential human source online
and indicated his support for ISIS and terrorist organizations
more generally. I don't even have to read these
things to know what they're going to say.
It doesn't take any work to know that they are running a standard
playbook. This particular complaint was
sworn out by a task force officer on the JTTF, and that
task force officer was AUS. Marshall, a Deputy Marshall.
The FBI was able to work with a confidential human source, ACHS,
who met with Mercurio in person. OK, now we've established that
Mercurio proceeded to express support for terrorist
organizations, specifically ISIS online in person, spread ISIS
propaganda online, solicit ISIS involvement in and approval of
his propaganda efforts, and then discussed traveling from the
United States to join ISIS. Considered and planned ways to
support ISIS financially and most recently set forth a plan
to assault his father with a metal pipe.
Are you ready? This is the terroristic act this
guy came up with. Do you understand how much this
is a reach for a federal crime? He was going to beat up his dad
with a metal pipe and then steal his dad's guns because he had
none, and then attack a local church, which the FBI said,
yeah, you should do all those things.
Are you sure you want to do those things?
You do want to do those things. Good.
OK, got it. Now we're going to arrest you.
At the beginning of 2024, his conduct escalated, blah blah,
blah. He planned a suicide attack on
church or churches in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.
His plan involved flame covered weapons.
That's a new one on me. Flame covered weapons,
explosives, knives, machetes, a pipe, and ultimately firearms.
This is a moron. This is someone that the FBI
targets. A dumb young kid who has sense
of violence, a sense of violence because of hormones and wants to
use flame covered weapons, whatever the hell that means.
They wrote this thing down in a serious way.
Go figure, you can't make this kind of stuff up.
His plan was to incapacitate his father with a steel pipe,
restrain him using handcuffs, and then steal those firearms to
cause maximum casualties. They wrote this with a straight
face. Folks.
This is the this is what we're paying for.
The FBI does this all the time, all over the country.
And then the special agent in charge of the of the Salt Lake
City field office, which runs the Coeur d'Alene office, which
is a little satellite office there in in Idaho, that person
claimed a victory and said we've protected the American people.
You need to hear this kind of stupidity.
This case should be an eye opener to the dangers of self
radicalization, which is a real threat to our community.
Is it when you radicalize people?
Said Special Agent in Charge Sinihi Sinha.
Sorry, Shohini, sorry, Let me just get that right.
Shohini Sinha of the of the Salt Lake City, UT Field Office.
That's a new SAC there, By the way.
Protecting the American people from terrorism remains the FB is
#1 priority and we continue to encourage the public to report
anything suspicious to the FBI or your local law enforcement.
Let me just end that statement with so that we can continue to
do this nonsense. That's how we have to do it.
We need you guys to report them. Please report your neighbors
that we may be able to radicalize foolishness, abject
foolishness, but this is the kind of people that we're
dealing with. If you think that we are not
dealing with a weaponized federal government, then you are
not paying attention. And this is one of those
examples. You can tell the story every FBI
agent that's ever worked this sort of knows before they even
read from the headline on. I could have told you what the
story was about. Yet another reason, by the way,
for you guys to prepare yourselves.
Let's let's handle this one too. For patriots.com/kyle.
If you are not prepared for any kind of stupidity, including
flame covered weapons in your community coming after your
churches, you guys can do that by going to
forpatriots.com/kyle. Prepare yourself so you don't
have to repair yourself. Make sure that you have calories
in a stash of some kind, whether it's 72 hours, whether it's
three weeks, whether it's three months, six months, or even up
to a full year. You guys can go and purchase
calories that will remain in a sealed bag and be edible for up
to 25 years. That's how they pack them at
Fort patriots.com. Go to fortpatriots.com/kyle.
Make sure that you have your mind right, that you have
prepared yourself for apocalypses and earthquakes and
the Rapture and all the other nonsensical things that didn't
happen yesterday. You never know when it might be
worth doing it, and you never know when some ISIS kid is going
to get arrested down the street from your house and just block
you into your home. Yeah, you should have some
calories put away and this is the way you can do it.
You can support our sponsors that support us for
patriots.com/kyle. We appreciate them and their
support. I appreciate you guys knowing
that there is not going to be just an easy day coming.
It's not what we're dealing with, but we do have some
victories in this fight, this fight for, I don't know, First
Amendment liberties. Like, by the way, that kid.
Here's the other thing that's really weird.
OK, let me go back to this. What is really weird is that you
can give money to ISIS and that is considered, that's considered
material support of terrorism. But you can give money to a
politician and that's considered free speech.
So how do we deal with that? At some point, we're going to
have to come and reckon with the idea that giving money is either
speech or it's not speech. And we have two conflicting laws
in this world. Depending on who you give money
to, It tells us whether or not there is, in fact, speech
happening. Big problem, not normal.
All right. First Amendment liberties are
going to include your freedom to practice your religion.
That means the government not coming in and putting its boot
on your neck and telling you that you must do something that
you choose not to do or that you would rather not do or that you
believe is morally wrong. In this story, this is the state
of Texas and the Mayo Pharmacy versus the United States
Department of Health and Human Services.
How weird is it that we have to keep suing our federal
government to get out of our damn business?
That's. That's the actual purpose of the
1st Amendment. That's that's actually why it
was written. Stay out of the out of our our
beliefs, out of our practice of religion.
The court affirmed that the pharmacies free to operate
according to their own religious beliefs.
We're actually getting some incremental steps forward, and
this is only happening in places like the 5th Circuit.
This is happening in one of the district of Texas.
The Biden administration issued A mandate requiring pharmacies
serve patients with Medicare, Medicaid or other federally
funded coverage. Do you see how, when government
money gets into it, that's how they weasel their way in and try
to make things happen? It's the same way they tried to
make rules for OSHA. They're like, oh, do you have
any federal money that's involved in your situation?
Then we're going to come and leverage our access.
That's not how our government is supposed to work.
It's not supposed to be that we vote for a king who then looks
for loopholes in the legalities of it to come after every single
person to try to enforce their garbage policies.
I get it that when you work for the federal government the way
that I did, that they may come down with some awful policies,
some of which are illegal, all of which are stupid.
Why would you try to get rid of your federal workforce unless
you're trying to get compliance, which they did.
But in this case, we're talking about private businesses, which
we've often believed we're able to operate with impunity.
Like, remember the signs that just said we reserve the right
to to refuse service to anyone? How come we can't do that
anymore? Why can't we refuse service to
people? And this goes to the the master
cake situation and all the others.
But look, let's just throw this this this is the lawsuit.
And I just find it very difficult when the defendant is
the federal government that we are suing our government to do
its job properly. Isn't that bizarre?
It makes no sense at all to me. I want to read something that's
really critical that came out of this decision.
Mostly what I wanted to read was this thing that Section B does
the revised guidance require the plaintiff to dispense drugs for
abortion purposes. And this is what happened in
this court, this court filing, in this decision, they addressed
a whole bunch of malfeasance by our federal government.
In other words, that they're they're doing this sort of
gnarly little game where they they advance an agenda, then
they pull back from it and they try to act like they didn't
advance an agenda. And that's what happened in this
one. And the courts actually called
them out for it. Very specifically.
It said the defendants, OK, this is the defense is the federal
government, Xavier Becerra and the Health and Human Services
Department asserted in their motion to dismiss.
Because they always say dismiss, they don't want the court to
hear it. They also always claim that it's
moot because they changed the rules since then, Even though
they did something, they knew it was illegal.
All right, in the motion to dismiss, the original pharmacy
guidance did not require pharmacies like Mayo or those in
Texas to dispense drugs for abortion purposes.
But due to the flurry of abortion related executive
orders, press releases, and guidance documents released by
this administration, that's the Biden administration.
Mere weeks after the Supreme Court's decision in the Dobbs
case, this court doubted that claim.
This is I I dug through this entire decision, which is about
15 pages long. No, it's not.
It's 18 pages long. And And that line stood out to
me in such a strong contrast to what is supposed to happen.
The count the, the court doubted the claims of the defendant and
the and the is the federal government.
They don't believe them. Thus, this court denied the
defendant's motion, which was the motion to dismiss the case
altogether and detailing its suspicion that the defendants
were smurfing the administration's abortion
policies through the pharmacy, the pharmacy guidance.
And that had a strong impact on everything.
It actually caused the defendant, the federal
government, to go back and rewrite all the words on the
thing that they had put out that was guidance for pharmacies.
They advanced this thing three steps forward.
They say, oh, I'm sorry, but that's not what we really meant.
And they walk back 2 steps, there's still one step ahead and
then they try to make one more step forward.
All of this is is deliberate. This is what law fair looks
like. It is moving the ball in ways
that are that are very disingenuous and they are not
the stated purpose of what's supposed to happen.
This is the conclusion that comes directly out of this
particular document. This is the court's decision and
their final conclusion says as follows.
The defendants again the federal government have given the
plaintiffs, This is the pharmacy and the individual who said he
had a moral belief against abortion pills, the relief
requested and then some. The courts holding therefore, is
simple. One, the revised guidance does
not require the plaintiffs to dispense drugs for abortion
purposes. That's a massive victory.
It turns out the revised guidance does not require
plaintiffs to dispense abortion drugs for non abortion purposes
when doing so would violate Texas abortion laws or Mayo
sincerely held religious beliefs.
That's a two prong piece there #1 the abortion laws in Texas to
the actual sincerely held belief of the people that run this
pharmacy. That's good.
Based on the defendant's repeated affirmations in person,
before the court, and in writing.
Any investigation by OCR are based on the complainants.
Rising from either of the above scenarios would involve the
plaintiffs quickly resolved without need for judicial
interference. In other words, they are saying
very definitively that this is settled so we don't need to mess
around with any more long form, despite who's right or wrong.
If the defendants are in the wrong, they've said that they
won't do the the the wrong thing and come after them.
And if they do that, they are automatically going to be judged
incorrect based on this ruling. The defendants are right that
when one side sorry, when one side gives the other everything
it asked for, then that renders the case moot.
So that's what they try to do. They try to change the rules
enough to make it moot. What they always want to do with
the Biden administration has been really, really big on this.
They did this in the 5th Circuit with our case against the the
vaccine mandates. What they'll do is they advance
their agenda right up to the point when they know that they
have lost in the courts and then they withdraw it in order to not
have a decision entered like this one.
They want to not have a decision that is on paper and then they
say, look, it's moot. I know we infringed on a bunch
of people's civil liberties. I know we took Seraphin's job
and and friend's job and O'boyle's job and Marcus Allen's
job and about, you know, a couple hundred others.
We screwed over these guys in the FBI and we screwed over a
bunch of other people, Guys like, don't get me wrong, we
screwed over a bunch of people in the military and also another
civil service. But we withdraw the mandate, so
don't give us a court decision on it.
We want to be able to do that again in the future.
Which is exactly why these cases are important, for them to go
all the way to the end. And in the case that I helped
fund in the 5th Circuit, they pulled it before the N Bank
review, before we would have had a chance to have standing case
law saying, aha, you were wrong. It has been properly
adjudicated. They know it.
It's bad faith. Exactly correct.
Whatever in the chat we are seeing this, it's bad faith to
operate in this way, to know that what you're doing is wrong
and they're going to do it anyway.
They do not care, not even a little bit, and they carry on
with it. This is not the reason our
government exists. It's not supposed to do this.
It's supposed to serve the people, not its own interests.
But what is happening is, is that a small minority?
As you all know, a very small minority of people have elected
the executive. The executive is supposed to be
subservient to the legislative branch.
The Article One, Article 2 powers are out of they are out
of a balance. And that out of balance is the
reason why there is so much anxiety right now in this
country. It's one of many reasons, but it
is a strong reason because the legislature is not legislating
and the executive is trying to do so by Fiat, which is to say
they make an argument and then they carry it out because of
their belief that it's correct. Wiping out student debt and all
this other nonsense. All of these come from assuming
powers that do not belong in the executive and the legislation
being weak. We're actually going to talk
about another example of the executive usurping the
legislative power for oversight a little bit later on 1st I want
to talk about this piece that that Catholic vote wrote.
So you guys know how to find Catholic vote.
You can always follow them. catholicvote.org.
Go to the the main website there and you can follow the loop.
And the loop is what I got this particular article.
This is a good article. This is a response by pro-life
leaders to Trump's statement on abortion, which I will play for
you in just one second, but make sure you guys are following
Catholic vote on social media and so on.
And if you're not getting the loop, you're missing out.
So that's your choice. But I recommend it.
catholicvote.org/loop is a way you could just read it if you
don't want to give them your e-mail, and I understand that
instinct as well. Let's play this statement on
abortion that Trump made because this is going to be.
This was a dunk, by the way, for the left.
Meanwhile, they completely ignore the fact that we have a
guy sitting in the White House who actually does not even come
close to this. People are almost always in
politics choosing the lesser of two evils.
And for those of you that are diehard Trumpers, I get that
that bothers you. But he is a lesser of two evils.
He's not perfect, and if you claim otherwise, we can have
that debate, I will win it. He's not perfect.
There's a lot of imperfections for many years.
That doesn't make him not the best presidential candidate.
We're not even close. It's not even.
It's like what did the what did the Dexter Taylor, when I was
talking, he said Trump is about a 5050 and Biden's a -15.
That's nowhere near a discussion.
It's like I can do that with my eyes close.
OK Now his position is politically correct.
You will hear this. It's politically correct.
It's morally weak, but I'll take it where I can get it.
I'll take a victory because he actually did the thing that
needed to be done. Federalism is actually a
principle that we should back. It makes it hard for people that
are pro-life. People like Lila Rose came out
from Live Action. She was another one of the
contestants for for Catholic Hero of the Year, and Lila said
the same thing. She's very disappointed in this
statement, which is fine, but this is a political statement.
He's not making a religious statement.
He's not making even a moral statement.
And this is the reason why many people will always say that
great men are often not good men.
If he was really great and fully suspendable the way we want, he
would just go like, you know, guns blazing.
That's not the world we live in. And I'm OK with that because we
live in a fallen world. We've got an imperfect leader
who's doing something that is far better and the outcome is
far better than the alternative. So anyway, the the left is going
to play this up like Trump, you know, he's he's basically
sticking it to the evangelical left.
Well, first of all, I'm not on the evangelical, right.
Sorry, I said the evangelical right.
I'm not on that side. I'm on the pro-life side in
general. And yet, he's not sticking it to
me. He's just being politically
expedient. I get it.
I actually do get it. I can see both sides here.
He's still the better choice, hands down.
It's not even. It's not even a contestant.
Anyway, let's hear his statement on abortion and his little self
praise here. It's not bad.
Many people have asked me what my position is on abortion and
abortion rights, especially since I was proudly the person
responsible for the ending of something that all legal
scholars, both sides wanted and in fact demanded be ended.
Roe V Wade, they wanted it ended.
It must be remembered that the Democrats are the radical ones
on this position because they support abortion up to and even
beyond the 9th month, the concept of having an abortion in
the later months, and even execution after birth.
And that's exactly what it is. The baby is born.
The baby is executed after birth is unacceptable, and almost
everyone agrees with that. My view is now that we have
abortion, where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint to,
states will determine by vote or legislation, or perhaps both,
and whatever they decide must be the law of the land, in this
case the law of the state. Many states will be different.
Many will have a different number of weeks, or some will
have more conservative than others, and that's what they
will be at the end of the day. This is all about the will of
the people. You must follow your heart, or
in many cases, your religion or your faith.
Do what's right for your family and do what's right for
yourself. Do what's right for your
children. Do what's right for our country
and vote so important to vote. At the end of the day, it's all
about will of the people. That's where we are right now
and that's what we want, the will of the people.
Many people have asked me what? That was on a loop.
Listen, one of the things that Dan Bongino very, very astutely
pointed out the other day sometime last week, was that
political campaigns are about contrast.
And there you have a contrast. And Trump actually points out
the contrast. The contrast is as follows.
Are you interested in baby death to the point of birth?
And even after, Are you down with that or do you think that
we should have 50 independent laboratories for freedom?
He said that the will of the people is served.
That's a populist argument, by the way.
It's populist. It's not conservative.
Conservatives want to conserve things that already are good and
have existed. Conservatives want to make sure
that babies have a right to life.
But he's making a prudent political argument.
I don't need Trump raising my kids.
He's not telling us that. He's trying to tell us what our
values are. He already said, you know what
your values are, so live them. That's fine.
It really is. I don't need politicians to also
be my religious figures. And at the end of the day, if we
are going to be people who say that the Constitution is where
it's supposed to be, the federal government, it's not listed
anywhere in the Constitution, right?
That's the whole point. That Roe V Rade was, was was
screwed up. They created a right out of
nowhere. And since it doesn't exist in
the Constitution according to the 10th Amendment, it should be
left to the States and the people.
And you have that choice. You can choose to live in a
state. You can choose to vote in that
state. You can choose to move the
policy in that state. That is correct.
Is it great? I don't know.
If he gets into office, it's not terrible.
He's obviously better than the guy who claims to be Catholic.
And isn't that an interesting shot?
I would be pointing that out as well.
If I were Trump, I'd be pointing out the fact that we are talking
about a man that he is running against, who claims to be a
Catholic and then lives in diametric opposition to the
Catholic position on abortion. That's not good.
OK, what he said the states will determine by vote, by
legislation, perhaps both, because there are people that
are making constitutional amendments.
They're happening right now in Florida, which is that that case
is moving forward and they'll decide what's going to be the
law of the land, the law of the state.
Isn't that interesting. That actually is not necessarily
a conservative argument per SE, but what it is, is a
constitutional argument that the law of the state is supposed to
be there unless the Constitution gives the federal government the
right to get involved. It's not wrong.
Like I said, it's an imperfect but not that far off, and it's
also very pragmatic because he said I'm not going to get
involved in it, he said. I like what happened.
We put in a good Supreme Court and they did the job that needed
to be done. All right.
So he also made a stance that said that the the Republican
Party should be on the side of IVF.
Big problems with that as well. He's trying to be consistent
here talking about the miracle of life.
Well, it's hard for you to make a moral argument about life.
Look, the guy wins some, he loses some.
That one is a loss for me. So be it.
OK, So what are people saying? The fact the matter is, is the
federal government should not be abandoning women to be
exploited. This is the this is the Catholic
response, this is the pro-life responses, that we shouldn't be
abandoning women to be exploited by abortion.
It's bad for women, which means it's bad for people who are
Americans. That's not good, but there's a
stark contrast. This is from my friends over at
Catholic Vote. The contrast between Joe Biden
and the Democrats and President Trump is unmistakable.
That pro-life voters have only one option in November.
I'll go further than that. If you believe in the First
Amendment and you don't want to weaponize government, you only
have one choice in November. When it comes to between those
two, if you believe in the Second Amendment and you think
that people should be able to own firearms, one has said that
they want to confiscate and get rid of things.
Trump is highly imperfect on guns, guys.
He he was involved in the bump stack ban.
He was OK with that. I hope he's learned.
I hope that we can even nudge him on that.
But he's light years better. He's not calling for assault
weapons ban. So that's a big deal if you are
interested in any, like, even even even if we're interested in
the rest of it, he's talking about federalism all the way
through the 10th Amendment. I would say that your argument
basically is not even a pro-life situation.
It's an argument between whether or not we believe that somebody
cares about the Bill of Rights and somebody believes that they
are elected to be the king, the Fiat, the ruler.
What's funny is, is that we hear what Joe Biden is doing.
We know what he's doing. He's garbage at what he does
too. And yet apparently we're not
listening to him enough. This is a complaint that was
made by Donna Brazell. She's not very bright.
I don't know. I listen to her.
I'm like, yeah, maybe people don't want to listen to Joe
Biden, even in his own party, because he's absolutely
terrible, because he makes absurd claims and he barely can
stand upright. But here she is making the
argument that people should be listening to him and giving him
more credit for all of his terrible and stupid ideas.
You ready for this one? Take a deep breath.
Here we go. Let's get into the stupid.
Alex made the point that President Biden doesn't talk
about the wars very often. Should he?
Absolutely not just in Israel, Ukraine, we have superpower.
He is the commander in chief. Absolutely.
He should speak out more and also we should cover what he's
saying because often when he speaks nobody.
Listens. OK.
And Alex? Yeah, that's a former DNC chair
Donna Brazell. From her mouth to God's ears.
Let it be that the Democrats now also run and add that to their
platform. Wouldn't that be good?
What do we got on a platform for the Dems Right now?
They're running on abortion up to point of birth or after.
So kill babies. That's good.
Everybody is racist, racist, racist, trans, everybody.
And affirm that men are women, women are men and they should
get into that space. And let's add, oh, everything is
white supremacy. That's the racist theme, right?
And let's add a fourth pillar, a fourth leg to the stool, which
is that Joe Biden got us into some really good wars, Ukraine,
Israel and maybe Russia. Let's add that we should be
listening to Joe Biden when he he should talk about it more.
I agree 100%. Talk about that more and then
let us know. And maybe he should also kick
off Kamala Harris and get Nikki Haley as his running mate.
That would be a great unifying ticket.
The pro war, We're doing a great job creating turmoil and death
in the world. We're killing babies, we're
sterilizing kids, and we would love to see some American youth
go to die in other places 'cause that's what we're all about.
Maybe he could also run on his record a day.
The excellent work he did in Afghanistan when he shut that
sucker down and 13 service members were killed that didn't
need to die. How about that?
The fact that there's a combat memorial in front of my parents
front, front yard to remind people as they walk by out in
Arizona, when they walk by on that little loop they go, Oh
yeah, the Biden administration killed people for no reason.
They should definitely run on that.
I would very much like to see it.
The other fun thing is this. You'd think this is the Babylon
Bee, but this is actually a so-called serious news
organization. This is MSNBC telling us that
they actually just missed the Republicans of yore that used to
hate Russia the way that they hate Russia.
Is it? That's really what we're doing
right now. Just so you guys know, we're
we're actually going to go and say that they loved John McCain
and Mitt Romney and they're going to play clips and and and
that they loved Reagan. Do you remember how much Reagan
was loved by the political left? So much show that he was
actually shot in the chest. Yeah.
OK, here we go. This is the take.
This is revisionist history. If you don't know your history,
you're going to just do this, I guess.
And people go like, yeah, we were really nice to Mitt Romney,
the guy that we accused that Joe Biden actually accused of
wanting to put black people in chains.
Like what? Here we go.
Gorbachev, tear down this wall. Russian imperialism, which of
course has been a characteristic of Russian foreign policy for
centuries. I'm not going to wear rose
colored glasses when it comes to Russia or Mr. Putin, and I'm
certainly not going to say to him I'll give you more
flexibility after the election. First of all, we've got to
realize what Vladimir Putin is. He's an old KGB Colonel that
wants to restore the Russian Empire.
According to our intelligence services, the Russian government
has made a project of turning Americans against each other.
Ancient history. Relics of a bygone era, what
Republicans used to say and sound like when they talked
about Russia. Now, though, Donald Trump's
allies in Congress seemed damn right eager to do Vladimir
Putin's bidding to say what? What Putin would want them to
say. And it turns out, as of today,
even some Republican lawmakers agree with that.
After House Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul told
Puck News that Russian propaganda had, quote, infected
a good chunk of his party's base yesterday, House Intelligence
Chair Michael Turner agreed with that watch.
We see directly coming from Russia attempts to mask
communications that are anti Ukraine and pro Russia messages,
some of which we even hear being uttered on the House floor.
I mean there are members of Congress today who still
incorrectly say that this conflict between Russia and
Ukraine is over NATO, which of course it is not.
Of course it's not about NATO. Of course it might be about NATO
because NATO keeps threatening to expand right next to Russia.
Who doesn't really want that? I don't know.
Is that really Russian propaganda to look at it and go,
you know what? NATO sucks.
We don't need to be in NATO. There's no reason for NATO.
The reason for NATO died in the 90s.
Makes sense to me. I don't get it.
And are you being influenced by Russian propaganda because you
think with your head instead of just saying blindly that you
need to put our Ukrainian flag on everything?
We're not wearing a Ukrainian T-shirt on this on this, on the
show. Is that what we need to have?
We have to just 100% be like listen to these guys talk the
so-called America first people are also 100% Israel and Ukraine
first. It's it's bizarre.
Mike Johnson did it. He stepped into the speaker's
chair, stepped up right in front of the chair and said our first
priority is America first and that's why we must give money to
Israel and Ukraine. Huh.
What maybe he need, Maybe he's auditioning for a spot on The
View. Is that what's going on?
Is it possible that he's trying to get on The View anyway?
But of course, it always goes back to Trump is bad evil Trump.
Bad man Trump. So here's some fun stuff.
Are you guys ready? Like I said, way too much Trump
on my desktop. But it is what it is.
Here you go. So from the left, this is from I
think ABC sets up yes. No.
Is it from ABC? It's from the Hill.
There we go. It says a memo bets that anti
Trump or anti abortion evangelicals have no choice but
to back Trump. And that's what Trump is playing
on with that statement you heard a moment ago.
Yeah, I mean he's they're right. That's true.
You have no other choice because you're alternative.
It's like do you want some abortion as determined by the
state or do you want all the abortion as determined by the
federal government? I'll take, I'll take the first
one, please. That sounds way better.
And then we'll incrementally try to lower that at the state
level. For whatever reason, they think
this is a win. But this was all over the place
to the point where, as I started looking this morning, this is
what was all over the place on this is 4 different news sites
that you're seeing that the main pages of the previous one and
this The Hills lead story. Then you've also got this
nonsense coming out of CNN and CBS and MSNBC, and they're
talking about the special counsel, and they're talking
about bids to reject immunity. And in contrast is also
interestingly, if you're looking on the screen right now in the
bottom right, that tiny little picture of Biden, we're going to
cover that in a minute. But all this is about
historically, he's just about to face the real consequences of do
you know what the trial that's going on in New York even is?
Do you guys even realize that he's being tried for hush money
payments to Stormy Daniels prior to 2016?
We're talking about a guy that Trump is running against, a dude
who basically said that Donald Trump lives in the past.
Meanwhile, his operatives in the state of New York, which is 100%
working on behalf of what Biden wants to do, and then the actual
operatives coming out of DOJ who are making cover stories for
Biden and also who are directly coming after his, his political
rival, they are 100% focused on things that happened a long time
ago and don't matter. I'm telling you, it doesn't
matter. Do you know why it doesn't
matter that Donald Trump had classified documents at his
house? Because nothing happened from
it. We're no worse off.
Our guy is still getting us into wars.
Did Trump get us into wars? No, Like I said, you don't have
to love the man to look at it and go, good God, they also both
had the same problems. One of them was a former
commander in chief. One of them was a senator that
also wanted to protect his legacy.
That's not covered, it turns out, by the Presidential Records
Act to keep stuff like that. You can't just take things home
because you want to protect your legacy.
And then he's apparently too old to be prosecuted.
We're just living in this twilight zone.
All of this stuff is wild. The first day of his criminal
trial. So this is the thing.
The the, the, the walls caving in moment.
At any moment, it can. It can happen.
They could finally get that piece.
This is Stephen Collinson's piece up here.
Trump is just days from his first criminal trial after the
last legal gambit fails. It was always going to fail.
It's in front of an unfriendly judge.
It's in front of a partisan judiciary in the state of New
York where they elect judges. They want to do gag orders on
people because they can't talk about what's going on.
And it's so funny, this case, which stems from payment to an
adult film actress ahead of the 2016 election, now in excess of
eight years ago. It's one of just 4 criminal
cases against him, and he's pleaded not guilty in all the
cases, God forbid. But he's treated like he's
guilty because the political left cannot handle the idea that
people are innocent until proven guilty.
So they've already convicted him.
They've convicted him left and right.
He's guilty of hush money payments, which may or may not
even be a problem. The statute ran out, but they
did it anyway. Do you recall all the, like, the
ridiculousness? This is the Alvin Bragg case
that we've all sort of mentally moved on from because it was
crazy and stupid. It's ongoing.
It's about to come to fruition, and they are wetting their chops
about it. So this is what is invading the
news cycle in all of the different news sites that are
out there pushing the stuff. This is another fun one.
The judge releases the questionnaire for jury selection
in the Trump hush money trial. And you notice they're talking
about it's not a hush money trial.
That's not what's being discussed.
In theory, they're talking about violations of campaign finance
laws. But why talk about it honestly
when you can actually throw a smear in there about hush money?
What kind of hush money was out there in the Biden world?
They don't need hush money. It turns out what they do is
they go arrest people that have Ashley Biden's diary.
Yeah, that's right. They went after and sent
federal, federal agents to arrest people who were holding
on to a worthless piece of paper, a book of papers that a
girl wrote in when she was like, rehabbing from drugs.
That's that's what they do. You don't need hush money
payments when you have the DOJ working on your behalf.
When the entirety of the FBI is willing to go out there and do
this nonsense and run right through the 1st Amendment
protections of the of the press, you can see why this stuff is so
it like it's it's a constitutional argument when it
comes to who's who's running in November right now.
Donald Trump lawyers on Monday afternoon attempted to convince
an appellate judge that a fairy jurors, a fair jury selection
couldn't happen in Manhattan. Oh no shit like I, I you almost
want to hit yourself in the face when you read this.
The judge released a questionnaire that he plans to
use to oversee jury selection, which is scheduled to begin on
April 15th. We're one week away from them
seating a jury perspective. Juries will be asked you ready
for how safe and fair and reasonable this is going to be
in Manhattan. They want to know if prospective
jurors have ever attended one of Donald Trump's rallies
eliminated. You can't go.
Wouldn't that be a jury of his peers?
Wouldn't his peers be people that actually went to his rally?
Listen to him. I don't know if they ever belong
to a group like the Proud Boys or Antifa.
Oh, got it. So at least they're being fair,
right? Or if they've ever volunteered
with a political entity associated with the former
president. How about if they've ever
volunteered with a political entity or ever given money to
the opposite of that political entity?
What if you were a Democrat donor?
Are you eliminated? Because that seems like how
about non political people are the only ones that could be on
the jury? Wouldn't that make sense?
No. Anybody that's given money or
helped out with MAGA 'cause if they've ever had any association
with the Republican Party, they're going to get kicked out.
Here's a question directly Do you have any strong opinions or
firmly held beliefs about whether the former president may
be criminally charged in a state court?
You see, we need to establish our legitimacy by getting rid of
the people that might think that we're not legitimate right up
front in the jury selections. Another question, do you have
any feelings about how Mr. Trump is treated in this case?
Because if you think he's being treated unfairly, you're out.
By the way that's most of America thinks this.
Even people on the left can look at it and go like this is pretty
uncomfortable. This is a pretty uncomfortable
thing to do. So we're going to get staunch
leftist on the jury. This is, This is why they're
fighting it tooth and nail. This is why the Trump, you know,
the Trump legal team has to fight it.
It still comes out. This is actually I think very
good for the fairness. Do you have any strong opinions
or firmly held beliefs about the former president or the fact
that he's currently a candidate for president that would
interfere with your ability to be fair or an impartial juror?
This is the same stuff that happened for the January 6th
defendants by the way. What they said was, I know you
were in Washington DC and by the fact like the fact that you live
there 95% Democrat that you're also kind of a victim, you're
kind of a victim of January 6th cause like it shut down the
entire city. You guys have no idea if you've
never been to DC when they did this, but when they shut down,
when they shut down Washington DC in January of 2021, post
January 6th it looked like something that you would see in
a movie about West Germany and East Germany and like behind the
Berlin Wall, the Iron Curtain countries, it was insane.
There were, you know, 8 foot anti scale fencing everywhere.
Where the hell was that on January 6th, right?
There were National Guards troops.
You remember they were sleeping on the ground, which is not the
worst thing for a troop to be doing, but they were sleeping on
the ground and like parking garages, they were sleeping on
the marble floor of the Rotunda inside the Capitol.
Do you guys remember how insane that was at the time as they
were doing the transition over? I still got my badge.
It's it's actually, it's on the wall right over there.
My badge from the inauguration, Not only that, but they also had
COVID guidance that they gave out to everybody that was a
federal law enforcement officer or everybody that had access to
move freely about DC. And if you didn't have a badge
like I did that said that you worked for a law enforcement
agency with a picture in your credentials, you could not just
drive anywhere you wanted without a good reason.
They shut down free movement in the District of Columbia.
And those people who lived through that garbage are on the
trials for the January Sixers. And all they're asked is, can
you put your feelings about January 6th aside and give a
fair verge? And they're like, Oh my God,
yes, I can't wait. In the same way that people in
Manhattan are going to be like, absolutely lock this sucker up,
Let's get in there, Let's do this.
By the way, if you happen to be a Trump donor, you're gone.
How about if you gave money to the RN, to the DNC?
How about that? How about if you support Chuck
Schumer, who's a scumbag? How about that?
Nope, You're still good. You can still be in.
It's it's so obviously unfair. Like I said, I don't have a ton
of love for the guy per SE. Outcomes are better.
And what we're talking about is objectively wrong.
It is weaponization of our federal government in such a bad
way. And then, of course, also at the
state level, and we are setting it there like a really, really,
really dangerous a dangerous precedent in this country.
Because if the states are going to start going after the highest
authority in the land at the time that they were there over
bullshit, there's no other way to say it.
That's what this is. I guess we better play the same
game. That's the only like, this is a
mutually assured destruction situation my buddy Steve friend
talks about all the time. Make it unbearable for
everybody. Apparently they don't believe
that it could happen. They don't think that our our
governments have the spine that the red states will do the same.
Just pick a left wing target and hit them.
If they've ever come to your state, I guarantee you they've
broken the state law. I guarantee it.
It's very easy to find that. And then you know just Impanela
jury of not their peers get a bunch of you know MAGA redneck
types, my, you know my people that own guns out in the country
and just say you know what screw Y'all we're done with it.
We can get that's that's called getting western in this country.
If we want to do that, if we're going to have rule of posse, if
we're going to just have the, the vigilante style use of the
state, OK, they open the, they open the door.
We can walk through it, I suppose.
I don't think that the union works out really well, at least
not in the short term. It will not be very unified, but
that's what we're talking about. We're talking about regression
but going backwards in time and talk about a a group of people
that want to focus on the past. How about that nonsense?
All right. And here's something I wanted to
bring up too, because this is also fairly shocking.
It was on the exact same page from CBS.
It was in a tiny little piece, big picture of Donald Trump.
Donald Trump is a bad guy. Little tiny picture of Joe
Biden. The Justice Department rejects
the House GO PS bid to obtain audio of the Biden interview
with the special counsel. Why would they reject that?
Are they not involved in in any an inquiry over impeachment?
Shouldn't they have access to it?
Isn't that an investigative purpose for me That would fine
be fine. I think the DOJ rejected request
from two House LED Republican committees, two of them that are
supposed to have oversight. Do you know who gives the money
to the the Department of Justice?
The House, they're the ones who write the appropriations bills.
They're the ones that are supposed to have the fear and
the and the power of the purse. They don't care because we're
upside down, because the 1st Amendment doesn't matter and
because the first article of our Constitution is not being
treated like the primary. The department's said this is
the Department of Justice said the committee's didn't have an
identified investigative purpose.
They were able to just they they positively identify that they
don't care. That's what they said for the
request of the audio and they accused the the the House GOP of
escalation and of seeking conflict for conflict's sake.
Because they're very high minded in this, aren't they?
This DOJ that entrapped a young kid, went after a kid and and
turned him into an ISIS supporter.
And that's something that same DOJ is now telling people that
that are theoretically controlling this is like a
teenager, like a teenager coming out.
And and like, your parents are like, hey, give me the car keys.
And they're like, no, you didn't ask for it correctly.
And you know the rules in this house, the rules are that you
have to say please and thank you and you didn't.
And so therefore, I will keep the car.
How about shut off all of it, Turn off the credit card, stop
funding these idiots. How about acting like you
actually have oversight instead of complaining about it?
But instead, we get Acbs, Article House Judiciary and the
oversight committees, the two committees that are responsible
for looking over the DOJ, they issued subpoenas.
They said give us our thing. And you know what?
They said no. And they thumbed their nose at
them. This should bother everybody.
The political left should be also upset about this.
We don't have an independent judiciary.
We know that they're actually picking a side.
And the side is we don't want to give you the tapes because it
would be very incriminating for your your impeachment inquiry.
And also we think that you're just doing it to start conflict.
I mean, special counsel her had a year long investigation that
began after the discovery of documents with classified
markings in Biden's home. Oh, remember the same thing that
they're going after Trump Fort. Yeah.
They don't want to give up the goods on Biden.
Why not? And then we know that they
actually, he's already testified to it.
He's testified to the fact that there were classified documents,
that they were in violation of law and that they chose not to
go forward with prosecution because he's old and nice.
Well, you get 2 choices in this world.
Either you're old, nice and forgetful and you can't be
president, or you're the president and you should be held
accountable for high crimes and misdemeanors, whether or not it
means now, how about that? Wouldn't that be something a
little bit of fundamental fairness?
Can we just see that it doesn't make any bit of sense?
All right, I'm appropriately heated up about that.
So I'm going to move to this topic right here.
I want to talk about the grift before we do, let's talk about
something that's not grifty. This is a You trade money and
then you get things guys, you can support Our affiliates, Mad
hat jerky is one of them. I keep seeing the orders kind of
pop in. They're intermittent.
You guys are making some good decisions on there.
I actually don't see all the things you're ordering, but I
they're sharing with me some of the the positive feedback.
When you taste it, you'll know the difference.
It's actually really good stuff. This is not like, you know, the
stuff you find at a gas station. This is not a Slim Jim.
This is actual real food with a high amount of protein.
It's a great option if you're sitting there and you're like,
OK, I got two options. Nuts or meat.
You can have meat with some flavor.
It's got some spice to, it's got a little bit of cake.
It's a little bit salty water and that and you're good to go.
And then you can buy a bag. You can basically go through a
bag every day or two. Matt hat jerky.
It's Matt with two, TS hat with 1tjerky.com/kyle.
Or just use the promo code. When you go to the website Kyle
that tags us, it gets us credit for sending you over that way
and you're going to get a good product.
So this is a fair exchange. Same story with our friends over
at my pillow, Michael and Dell and the crew over there often
offering. They're constantly like mixing
up their discounts and whatnot. So I never know exactly what
they are, but you can use the promo code Kyle, the same as any
of the other people social media grifty influencers.
You could use promo code Kyle Kyle and you'll save as much as
50%, which I have seen done. They're currently running a
special from what I saw last week on the towels, which is
something that we're going to change.
I'm not there yet. I'm going to change when we
actually move. I may tell tell Dawn over at my
pillow and maybe she'll send it to me at my new address when we
move mypillow.com/kyle or use the promo code Kyle at checkout
Kyle, we see that orders are coming in from that because
we're talking to you guys too. So if you guys are planning on
making those purchases, if you're looking for snacks, mad
hat jerky, if you're looking for bedding or some of the stuff
like around the houseware or a robe or whatever, then you can
check out my pillow and you guys can always play with this.
You guys are laughing about the grifter piece in the in the chat
and that's OK. I don't mind it.
It is funny. All right, Can we talk about the
grift? Let me pull this thing up here.
This hit me this morning in in a in kind of a raw way.
This is a woman named Aaron Wexler.
I've never heard of her before. I don't know anything about her.
Previously, she's calling out Benny Johnson.
Benny Johnson got his start in multiple places and he was a he
was someone that was plagiarizing other people's
work. He was he was directly copying
their written material, and he was publishing it as his own at
BuzzFeed and some of the other places he was at.
I think the IJR Independent Journal review, or something to
that effect, did the same thing. He's got a massive history of
doing this, and now his game is, you've probably seen him on
social media. He does this thing where he
takes somebody else's clip and sometimes it's fair use and
sometimes it's not. But in the case of something
like this, I will tell you this is really not very fair use.
What he does is he goes, hey, have you guys seen this thing?
And then they play the whole thing.
They take somebody's content in its entirety.
We get demonetized on YouTube on a regular basis, which I don't
care about. I I'm not interested in that.
I'm just there for the audience. And we've got all 15 of you that
are watching over on YouTube. That's fine.
I can actually see in real time the numbers.
Very few people are are watching us on YouTube and we get
demonetized there all the time. Why?
Because like a 14 or a 92nd clip, somewhere under 2 minutes
we'll have a little clip of a song and they'll demonetize a 75
minute podcast over the whole thing.
That's not what we're talking about here.
That should be fair use by the way.
That should be the default position is that a fraction of
the content is used. People are not coming just to
hear a 14 or a 90 or a two-minute clip of some audio
that's in the background that somebody did on TikTok because
I'm laughing at some idiot, which we'll do in a second.
We'll get demonetized because I'm going to show you a piece
from Family Guy, and Family Guy will have 14 seconds and they'll
demonetize us for that. And that's fine.
I don't give a shit I really don't like.
It's so sad and stupid. Meanwhile, Betty Johnson is
doing this nonsense all the time.
He's taking somebody's work, and it actually takes a lot of work
to put the stuff together. I would love to make fun of
content creators because I hate the term.
I think it's boring and dumb, but people that do this for a
living, and it is a living, are out there thinking of clever
ideas, seeing their vision, going out and filming it and
acting it. Going through the software,
editing the videos, putting in the captions, putting all the
the the AI clips in the B roll. There's a lot of work that's
involved in that. It takes time, it's frustrating
and it's not very fun. It's not the kind of thing that
I consider to be work. My hands don't get callous from
doing it, but it's work nonetheless.
And this gal created something and she's out there.
She's like, hey, you use my videos, you pull my, your, my
watermark off and slapped your watermark on my video like, how
dare you, It's garbage. It's really, really bad
technique and this guy's been doing it for quite a long time.
I want to play you the video that he made of her stuff.
You'll see 96% of the of the content comes directly from this
girl Wexler and she's pissed, rightly so.
We need to kind of stay away from this kind of thing.
We need to stay away from these because we should be doing
things better. And I would say that people that
do this kind of stuff are not conservative.
All they're thieves. Kyle's take.
Here we go. Have you heard of liberal math?
It's destroying the country. Though you've heard about girl
math, but what about liberal math?
Liberal math is if you get something that's paid for with
your taxes but not with your credit card, then it is free.
What does that even mean? Like, why don't you?
I mean. If you just keep printing money,
then everything is free. If there is a war we do not
like, then it is very expensive. But if there is a war we do
like, then it is free. If gas is the same and not
higher than it was last week, then you've actually made money.
If you go to college and study communist dance theory, then the
government will just force someone else to pay off your
loan, so it will be free. What?
The hell are you talking about? If you're a hard working,
taxpaying homeowner contributing to society, don't be silly.
Obviously then nothing is free. But if you're an undocumented,
unvaccinated, unknown, unverified UN American illegal
immigrants, well, then everything is free.
That's so gross. This girl's like, hey, that's
not fair use. And people are like, yeah, maybe
it is. Ron Coleman weighed in on it.
Ron Coleman has argued First Amendment stuff in front of the
Supreme Court and he said, no, it's not just one word.
No, Ron Coleman is one of the guys.
I go look at this. Look, a lot of people have the
same problem with this same guy. I've told his producer that
because he's he's in the circle of people I chat with, I find it
to be they find it to be lazy and it's stupid.
He put 1 1/2 seconds on hey, have you heard about this thing?
And then somebody else's content and then at the end of it he put
his logo nasty and gets more views.
That girl has a very small following on places like
Twitter. She's out there.
She's had a half million people view that it's not good.
When you start from a position of not being a good person and
you continue to be a not good person, it kind of works out
that way. That's the grift that's actually
known as. That's an actual grift.
The other thing people always use the word grift for is when
they mean a con artist. A con artist is someone like
what Jake Lang is doing, where they are deliberately presenting
themselves to be something, getting your confidence.
Hence the con artist, a confidence artist.
You believe in what they are selling even though it's false
because they're really good at it and then they use that to
take money. Last night Bill Shipley was
talking about it on a Twitter space with us.
And Bill Shipley is a defendant who or he's a defense attorney
that's had like 50 or more J Sixers that he has defended.
And he he laid out the case that that Jake Lang, the guy that I
called out yesterday who went on Viva Ferrer's podcast yesterday,
is that his name Viva. He went on Viva's podcast and he
and Viva and I have no beef. We went and talked about it on
the offline and it's fine. Like I I we just disagree, which
is fine. We can totally do that.
He asked some questions. I didn't think they were hard,
but that's his prerogative. At the end of the day, you'll
always know the the con artist. Because the first thing they do
when someone starts questioning their credibility.
You don't ever hear me when someone's like, you're not an
FBI whistleblower. I'm like, yes, I am.
Let me show you all the whistleblower things I do.
I'm just like, whatever, dude, I hope you live a good life.
You suck. That's the right answer.
The right answer is is like, who are you?
I'm sorry, who are you? What?
Do you have any standing to challenge me?
No, you don't. You don't know what you're
talking about. Bye.
So when someone immediately goes to nuclear and they have to run
a big media blitz, and by the way, can we just consider the
fact that Jake Lang is sitting in jail in Brooklyn right now in
federal custody? And apparently, yeah, Viva's
name is David. That's correct.
Apparently a guy who's sitting in federal custody in a jail in
Brooklyn is able to, in real time keep trabs on what Kyle
Serafin is saying on Twitter and on his podcast.
Does that not bother you a little bit?
Does that seem like a normal thing for an inmate to be able
to be aware of? And is that really what his,
his, his time should be locked up and be involved in?
That's called a grift, right? The grift, the the con artist.
He's got confidence of people and they've given a lot of
money. Anyway, what Bill Shipley said
last night, which is just like it's it's it's called
circumstantial evidence, but it's evidence nonetheless.
Bill Shipley came up with trademarked art, created a
website that was not a give, send go website.
It was a a click through link that was a direct linked to his
legal defense fund. And when he did that Jake Lang
took that artwork and posted the same artwork on gifts and go
promoted his gifts and go and walked away with like $600,000.
The guy is probably raised close to $2,000,000.
Now when you talk to when you talk to somebody about like Oh
well how much money is it really being raised $2,000,000 is
enough that people make bad decisions.
Not me by the way. I've got $600,000 waiting for
two FBI whistleblowers just sitting in a bank account.
I'm waiting to hand it to him from whatever their their
attorneys, so they can get it. And the reason they trust me is
because I'm me and I'm not going to take anybody else's money.
I would never do that like $600,000.
My credibility is worth more. But $2,000,000 is worth more
than some people who are sitting in jail that swung bats at cops
heads. So that's Jake Lang for you.
And that's the problem with this sort of whole, this, this grifty
slash confidence game that keeps getting played.
The political right is guilty of it quite a bit.
It's quite a bit. We see a lot of these people out
there in the space and a lot of them have big voices.
There's others too. We don't have to talk about them
today. But I just want you to know that
stuff is it should be offensive to you because you're the actual
target. It's your confidence, it's your
sensibilities, it's your compassion for people that are
being treated unfairly. To say that all January 6th
defendants are the same is to say that you are simple minded
and you don't understand what's going on.
Some people belong in jail because they hit cops.
Are there people that belong in jail from 2020?
Yes, of course. Did they get treated the way
that they're supposed to? No.
That doesn't mean we throw out the rule of law and say it's OK
that you hit cops because other people also hit cops.
What about the cops who were just showing up?
OK, that's all I'm saying. Look, from both sides, we're in
a complex world. The answer should never be
simple answers. And I will at some point give
you guys a little taste of my favorite Bad Religion song,
which is called The Answer. You can go look it up.
Bad Religion is probably one of the most politically savvy bands
from the punk rock era. It was like sort of how I cut
some of my teeth on just being a contrarian and a skeptic, and
that is a skeptic song. The song The Answer, tells you
that if you believe you have the answer, then then it's perfect
for you, but nobody else. Simple solutions to complex
problems equals morons, and we got a lot of them out there.
So we got to educate ourselves and we need to continually be
skeptical. All right.
Speaking of people that are not skeptical, I got a little bit of
taste of two things that'll make you laugh.
One is the view and then a response by Family Guy so we can
get demonetized. And then the last one will just
be the inconsistencies that the political left has is kind of a
palate cleanser as we go into this Tuesday, let's play I just
called this the view is retarded.
I don't know what else to call this.
Like this is the dumbest people talking about things that they
don't even understand. They don't even know how to
pronounce the word Sagada. Cicada are those little bugs
that make that make the tree scream if you live in Texas
during the summer. I don't know.
There was a comedian. He was like, do you ever imagine
like the first settlers getting out there and looking over and
being like, Oh my God, are the are the trees screaming and then
some Indian coming up and being like, yes, they just do that.
That's what they do here. It'd be scary to move to Texas
and not know what the hell the the cicadas were doing.
And they're like this big. They're this tiny little fat
weird bug that makes an incredibly big, big noise.
All right. Anyway, here's the people, the
ladies from The View just tarting out with each other and
being confused about reality. Leaving we've got a solar
eclipse we've got the earthquake ran down the hallway the.
Rapture is here. Rapture.
'S here and then also I learned that the cicadas are coming.
Cicadas cicadas for the first time in like no, no, no, 100
meters, no, no, no, no, no. Two different, no, no.
Well, this is what I've read. Two different times, two
different kinds of circadians, two different times.
Times. Times are coming the good but
then the bad. So for the first time in in
many, many years, no, every 17 years this happens.
Well, that's not what I read. But maybe, you know, maybe you
know better. In a way, all those all those
things together would maybe lead one to believe that, you know,
either climate change exists or something is.
Returning. Earthquakes are not at the mercy
of climate change. It's on the ground.
It happens. And the eclipse.
They've known about the eclipse coming because the eclipse has
happened. Yep, that was a translation of
what was actually being said right there.
You just had Joy Behar, one of the dumbest people in one of the
worst political takes on television.
Try to straighten out a woman who believes that earthquakes
are coming from climate change. And she's like, no, no, no, no.
Climate change is above the ground and earthquakes come from
below the ground, so that can't be right.
And Whoopi's like, yeah, I know more about bugs than you know
about bugs. She's like, oh, well, maybe you
saw something differently than I did.
She was like, in a way, in a way, yes.
My favorite joke is when there's a table full of women just
walking up and saying, what are you hands clucking about?
Because for some reason, women get really, really offended by
that. And for whatever reason, like
that really just hits home for me.
It's just so good. I wonder if they'll be able to
tie that clucking to the Family Guy and demonetize us.
I I can never guarantee. All right, let's do, let's do a
five star review and then we'll do a palate cleanser and we'll
shut it down because we need to have a little.
We need to spit this kind of stuff out because it's kind of
gross. This show obviously is for you
guys. This is from living in the
country from April first, from April Fool's Day says enjoyable
and informative 5 stars every episode.
I learned something new and I frequently laugh at something
said. I hope you did.
You and your family have been through so much.
Thank you for presenting the truth.
I appreciate it. From living the good life in the
country. That's a really nice review.
That's a nice, solid one. And living the good life in the
country is something we can all aspire to.
For those of you that are city dwellers, you guys always look
at the country in a nice way. We look at the city in a nice
way. We want to visit, but we don't
want to stay. All right, let's take a deep
breath and watch this. Oh, I didn't play this earlier.
I blew it. Listen, this is the sound that
the FBI Counterterrorism Division does, and this is
something you guys can laugh about.
This is the sound. This is what it looks like in
real time when the FBI Counterterrorism division gets
word that a 17 year old is online talking favorably about
any kind of terrorism. OK, this will definitely get us
demonetized. This is what goes on all across
the United States and every FBI field office, All the CT teams
do this. So you probably have seen this
clip before, but you didn't know what it was actually showing.
Here's what it is. Hello, Ghostbusters.
Yes, of course they're serious. You do?
You have no kidding. Well, just just give me the
address. Yes, of course.
Oh, they'll be totally discreet. Thank you.
We got one and then the swat team rolls and they throw the
flash bangs and they grab the 18 year old that was going to hit
his dad with a pipe and steal the flame covered weapons.
Anyway, I stayed that earlier and I forgot I threw that on and
then I I was like why do I have that at the end there?
OK ladies and gentlemen, you've been listening to the Kyle
Saravan Show. Go out there and share it.
Let people know that you enjoyed your time here.
Make sure you hit the like button before you go and we will
see you again tomorrow. God bless you.
Stay safe. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth,
Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.