Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast. 2nd Amendment defender and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome
to the Kyle Seraphin show. Today is Wednesday, it is June
the 4th. Appreciate you guys being here.
Appreciate it if you are a new listener.
Thanks so much. Hopefully we are going to have
an uneventful show. It looks like we've got all of
the the required bandwidth to make things happen.
I don't know if my complaining on X the other day and tagging
Spectrum on it made a difference, but we're going to
get a second line rolling in here.
Anyway. It's not Tuesday, but I do want
to talk about Taco Tuesday because leftists decided that
they were going to dunk on Donald Trump.
There's stories about tariffs which are not particularly
interesting. Essentially, Donald Trump is
doing exactly what he said he was going to do.
He's going to adjust tariffs as necessary to try to get his
desired outcomes. And the goofballs like Eric
Swalwell and Jamie Raskin and a couple of others decided to eat
some really gross looking tacos in order to dunk on Donald Trump
using an acronym that nobody would associate with tacos.
Trump always chickens out. That spells out Taco.
So they ate some like really disgusting looking Cisco tacos.
It's just another reminder that they're not very good at this.
They are kind of lost and America is not that interested
in sort of a communist push. I've got a fun story that goes
from last year that talks about communism.
So all of today's show and the name of today's show comes from
a little quip that my wife made. She constantly makes little
brilliant insights that I walk away with and I roommate on for
hours, sometimes days. And she said you never really
see a happy communist, do you? I want you to think about that.
Do any of you know somebody that espouses communistic ideas or
very hard left ideas which border up on communism?
I'm going to kind of draw a line on why I think they are similar.
They don't like it, by the way. But then when you start asking
the differences and you go, hey, what's what's the difference
between a communist and what you believe as a progressive
leftist, there's a hard, there's a hard difficulty trying to
delineate that line. It's just not that easy to find.
So we're going to talk about it. Why do they love communism?
Communism proposes, and this is something I had to write down
because communism proposes to provide a salvific heaven on
earth experience. And that's antithetical to
people in western ideologies who believe in Christianity, who
even believe in Judaism. If you think that there is a
better possibility after you die, if that the there is an
afterlife and that exceeds that of the the current life, then
you're not going to get it. Communists promised to bring it
on earth through man made goods and that will always, always
under deliver. And then they end up in violence
and anger and disappointment and it all comes out in sort of this
gross frustration of dealing with really nasty and unpleasant
people. So there you go.
That's where we're going to go. Since we are not communists
here. We are in fact, capitalists.
We will recommend somebody who can keep you away from communist
countries who are trying to look into your stuff.
If you want to protect yourself from our government or any other
government, from big tech, which is sort of communistic in the
way that they go after things, corporate America, blah, blah,
blah, blah, blah. Criminals who don't care.
Maybe you might want to invest in buy something with your
capital. You could buy something like
this. And I waited to throw it in
today. This is my silent sleeve.
This is my phone so nobody interrupts the podcast.
You guys can check yourself out. Protect yourself with silent.
It's SLNT. That's the word silent with no
vowels. Silence.
Faraday blocking products or Faraday products which block all
incoming and outgoing signals are a way to make your devices
invisible, save from the outside world, unhackable because they
cannot be accessed. You can put it in the backpack,
which we have one of. You can put them in the phone
sleeves like I have here on the desk.
They make pants, they make dry bags.
They make non dry bags. If you're a swimmer, maybe you
want the dry bag. It's kind of nice to be able to
throw your phone in there, know that it disappears and nobody
knows you're in the water without your gun.
Lets you swim with a gun, but also keeps it dry after the fact
when you put your towels in there.
Yeah, I'm speaking from experience here.
Their signal blocking technology gives you Peace of Mind.
It stops all the Wi-Fi signals. It stops the RF signals from
Bluetooth, from your actual phone, etcetera, etcetera.
Makes them unhackable. It makes you kind of disappear
off the GPS grid. You place the device inside, you
close it up, you're safeguarded. That's it.
No unauthorized access. Go silent today at
slnt.com/kyle. You'll save 15% on any order you
make. If it's, you're also going to
get free shipping, stay ahead of what's coming at you.
Secure your privacy. The only way you do that is by
making sure that you control your signal in the world.
Again, slnt.com slash Kyle 15% off and free shipping on all
your qualified orders. Let's get into today's show.
Here we go. So some of you guys are still
having issues over on the rumble stream.
I don't know if that's a rumble issue, but we had plenty of
bandwidth to get things going. So maybe it's just you or maybe
it's just Rumble, but if you are having one of those issues, I
would invite you to join us over on YouTube.
You could do that too. That's why we put it in
different places. You can go to locals, which is
Kyle seraphin.com. It's a free stream over there.
You can find us at rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Give us a thumbs up if you're watching over there.
If it's working for you, great, and if not, you can go to
youtube.com slash at Kyle Seraphin.
Back to streaming in 4K today. Hopefully it's all going
through. Like I said, this is kind of an
interesting thing. We're going to get another line
in here, but you guys are. I see, I see your chat.
Here's what it looks like, folks.
That's the chat, intermittent people discussing whether or not
we have rumble issues. So that's kind of fun.
All right, we're going to lead off today with this Taco thing
because I think it's fun. I think it's dumb.
That's almost like 1/2 assed Nazi salute.
There was actually an educational video that we showed
at one point in time of what is and what is not the Nazi salute.
If you guys have to go to the full screen here, whether your,
your hand breaks the the 90° plane, if it goes on a slightly
upward angle, it becomes the Nazi salute.
If it's below that, you're safe, I guess.
Eric Swalwell marked safe from Nazi salute.
I had to go into a garbage British reprint of a Huffington
Post story in order to get this headline.
Representative Eric Swalwell inspires MAGA tizzy fit by
eating a Taco. No, it's just kind of like the
left can't mean. They just don't have the ability
to be both clever, funny, and make the point at the same time
and it doesn't impact. They also have to be really
profane and kind of gross. I'm actually not going to play
you the video. We got plenty of communist
swearing for later on in the show, but the story goes is that
he had a TikTok video, which is obviously staged.
It's staged with microphones already on him, 'cause that's
how it works. That's how you normally sit down
and just have your lunch, isn't it?
That's how you guys eat your lunch.
You just mic up and then hope someone might walk in while
filming and having the same mics that you understand what I'm
saying? All these things are are
contrived. But Yahoo News reported that he
trolled the hell out of Donald Trump and supporters by eating a
Taco on TikTok. The the video features somebody
walking into the office saying, quote, hey, congressman, what
the F is up with Donald Trump always chickening out on tacos
and he eats a Taco Bell Taco. That's the that's the the gist
of the video. And that was it.
And that prompted his buddy Jamie Raskin to post this
yesterday to remind us that one, he used to be a gang member or
maybe someone who was getting cancer treatment.
It's not real clear to say that. And he thought that posting this
sort of like Cisco compilation of mediocre meats, kind of sad
looking lettuce and the whitest tacos.
These are like the most gringo Cisco tacos from the most
generic food truck in the DC area that you could ever find.
Or I'm sure it came out of the cafeteria there.
This was his troll. And I guess they're trying to
say like, hey, guys are just like us.
They eat tacos and they make fun of people.
Is that, is that effective for a group of people that are having
such a struggle right now connecting with men who do
nothing but like lampoon each other and make fun of each other
left and right? It's really interesting that
they thought this was going to be a successful move.
It's it's comical in so much as it's sad.
It's kind of like people getting really upset about Harvey Milk's
name being taken off a Navy ship.
And that's the next story I wanted to do, too.
Look, there's not much to it. Tacos equals just so you guys
know, when you hear it, you go like, why are people talking
about tacos with the the Democrats?
Trump is always chickening out. That's what it means.
Believe that if you want. Here we go.
In the same way, kind of like picking losers, siding on the 20
side of the 8020. Are there any people that are
really supporting Harvey Milk's name on a naval ship?
Pete Hexas ordered the Navy to strip the name of the gay rights
icon. I got into kind of like a weird
little rabbit hole today and I was quite interesting.
I was like, hey, people have called Harvey Milk a pedophile.
Does that? Is that an accurate statement?
And when you go look it up on left-leaning sources, they just
go, it's a conspiracy theory that gay men are pedophiles.
And I went like, well, that yeah, that checks out.
Like I'm sure that not all gay people are pedophiles.
That's that's a ridiculous position to hold.
But some gay people are pedophiles, just like some
straight people are pedophiles, because some pedophiles just
exist, period. I wasn't curious whether or not
Harvey Milk was alleged to be a pedophile because he was gay.
I was curious if he was alleged to be a pedophile because it was
evidence of him doing things that were pedophilic.
And so there's, I guess, this conflicting reports on whether
or not he was targeting young men in their teens.
And of course, we're far enough away that we don't have
digitized copies of the stories of the time, but they did in
fact, name a couple of like 15 year old men, young men at the
time, who had alleged relationships with him.
And so there's at least enough there that I just don't think
that the Navy, which already struggles with sort of like the
stigma of being the gayest military service.
Yeah, I said it out there, Navy folks, you guys know what I'm
talking about. What do they say about
submariners? 100 men go underway and 50
couples come back up. I've heard that.
Yes, I have. I've heard all kinds of funny
things. I heard people that it's it's
not gay if you're underway. I've heard that too.
Navy guys. I heard that from you.
And as somebody who used to be part of the, the Navy of the
Sky, AKA the Air Force, you know, I feel like the Army and
the and the Marine Corps get a little bit out of this.
They can always claim the men's department.
So they're not part of this. But there's a, there's an inner
service rivalry. You just not going to get more
recruiting by naming ships after quote, UN quote, gay rights
icons who may or may not have been pedophiles.
He said Daddy is still out there.
It just you don't need that. So Pete Hegseth catching flak
from that in the military. Military news from military.com.
Look, the fact that this is like contentious in any way.
It's a rare step of renaming a ship.
Yeah. No, the, the the rare step was
naming a Navy ship which already struggles with stigma, the USS
Harvey Milk. Probably, probably not the way
you want to go about it. So they themilitary.com says
they reviewed A memorandum from the office of the Secretary of
the Navy, the official who holds the power to name Navy ships
that showed that the sea service, I guess that's what
they're calling the Navy, the sea service.
That's also not very good. Guys.
Seamen, All right, Comes up with a with a roll out plan for
renaming the oiler ship the USNS Harvey Milk.
Yeah, the defense officials confirmed that the Navy was
making preparations to strip the the ship of its name.
They were ordered to do so by PTXF.
I mean, I think that's what we voted for, right?
I think of most of America. It was like, yeah, that's not
the way that you go and recruit men.
You want to restore the luster to some institutions.
Maybe you start doing things like encourage masculinity
because in theory, when you go and you raise your hand and
swear in, when you go and do that enlisted oath, which I did,
you're supposed to be pledging your life.
That's a masculine thing to do. And I don't care if you have
daughters that are in the service.
It's a masculine thing to do to say that you're going to go die
for something like that. And the vast majority of the
military, especially all the combat jobs, tend to be men.
And I think that's where it should be.
That's the right people to do it.
You don't get them to sign up with the Harvey Milk.
You also are probably going to get them to sign up to fight on
behalf of Ukraine. But that doesn't seem to stop
some of our people who may or may not be fans of Harvey Milk,
like Lindsey Graham, from going over to Ukraine and offering all
this help. And then suddenly we find
ourselves maybe not even anymore in a proxy war with Russia, but
potentially in a legitimately sort of semi undeclared war.
I heard this from Rebecca Koffler the other day.
She showed up on War Room with Bannon.
And she's talking about the actions that just had happened.
There was a demolition that happened at the the bridge that
goes to Crimea. And, and all of this is sort of
like not interesting to me right up until the point where we find
out that we have US senators spending hundreds of thousands
of dollars on short trips to go over.
And then immediately thereafter, we have what seems to be more
sophisticated military operations than the Ukrainian
military forces are able to actually pull off without the
help of, let's say, I don't know, our friends at the CIA.
So this is Rebecca Koffler making the declaration or making
the claim that by the United States sending people over and
by the actions that were recently taken, the US is
basically they've lifted the veil and said, we know and you
know, 'cause the Russians know what what the, what the
Ukrainian military can and can't do that we're basically
declaring war on Russia. That's not a good thing.
I guess it's good that we have better recruiting right now, but
I don't want to see any of our sons and daughters in there,
whether they're serving on the Harvey Milk or anything else.
So here's Rebecca Koffler kind of making the the analysis,
let's say on the current status after that demolition of the
bridge. Yes, Sir, we are no longer in a
proxy war with Russia. the United States is now officially
in the direct kinetic war with Moscow because of how Russia
looks that thing. Ukraine has no indigenous
capability to execute this tactically brilliant operation
that doesn't have satellites. It cannot geolocate these
strategic nuclear bombers, right?
That those bombers are reserved to wage nuclear war and and
Ukraine just attack them. And that came right after
Ukraine tried to assassinate President Putin, Russian
President Putin's helicopter when he was missing, Ukraine
came under a drone attack. And so right now, because the
nuclear doctrine of the Russian Federation that Putin actually
updated late last year, because he has noticed that we are
consistently climbing this escalation ladder, It has a
clause of a joint attack. And so they are looking at this
attack that it is enabled by the United States and that is the
danger. We are climbing very steadily
the escalation ladder and we're, we're probably the, the actual
full ladder is classified. So I can't talk about it, but I
might. It's my official intelligence
assessment that we have climbed up more than 50% at this point.
And, and, and the danger is here.
At first it goes pretty gradually, but then after you
cross a certain threshold, it goes very, very fast into cyber
warfare, space warfare, and then all the way into the nuclear and
every single war game that we conducted back in the
intelligence community. And we conducted dozens of them.
And I LED some of the red teams. It ended up in a nuclear war.
And guess what? Blue lost and red won.
Why? Because Putin has a playbook.
He has been planning for it. It's it's all, you know, very
well thought through. And we don't, we don't have the
response because instead of actually targeting Russia and
neutralizing the threat, the deep state of the US
intelligence community was chasing the non existent Russia
Trump collusion. So they weren't doing that.
OK, so I wanted to break away from that, but first of all, she
did write a book called Putin's Playbook, so she obviously has
kind of a vested interest in there.
She did mention a couple things in there that I thought were
truly telling. One, that the United States
intelligence community in the apparatus that exists in there,
the sort of like deep state that we hear about, people that think
that they know what's best and should execute US foreign policy
even though they weren't elected because they outlast presidents.
That attitude that I've been here longer and I will be here
longer and I'm going to be able to make the continuity of
government work. It's a, it's a very entitled
position and it turns out kind of dangerously so.
I listen to Jesse Kelly's piece the other day saying that the
92% of government employees vote Democrat and it doesn't make
every one of them a communist, but a lot of them lean far more
on the progressive side. And if nothing else, they're
voting for people who are mouthing platitudes towards the
communists and the the the sort of progressive left.
Progressive just means it's always going forward.
There's no real principle. There's just they just have to
make movements, right? And they're always looking to
make the world better through government.
I don't know when that's ever been the case.
There's no great examples of the world made better through
government. The more government you have,
eventually you get less good. You might apex where you have
like an okay mixture of not very much government and as much
freedom as you can get. And then the minute you cross
over that that it begins to get worse and worse.
And then they just pursue worse by going downhill, getting worse
and worse outcomes. Kind of amazing her statement
is, is that the red, the red cell, if you guys are not
familiar with the way they do this, they whatever, whenever
you want to sort of make your plans stronger and ironclad, you
set up whatever your plans are and you war game them by playing
against the red cell. The red cell is people that know
what your capabilities are, know what the other's enemies are and
play from the enemy's side. It's essentially playing a game
of chess against yourself. And it's not good because the
Russians do, for all their weaknesses, and I don't think
they're anywhere near the capabilities of the American
military, the Russians have continuity.
They've had the same guy in office for years.
They don't have to worry about internal push backs or
disagreements or whether or not their commanders are going to
kind of buck the system because they just kill those guys.
I heard George Hill and I had this little conversation.
He called me up specifically to tell him yesterday he wanted to
go on the record. He tweeted out yesterday so I
can talk about it. He said that if I was in the
position of Vladimir Putin, I being George Hill, if he were in
that position, what he would do is what he called a decapitation
strike. So you heard it here, probably
not first, but you heard it here.
A decapitation strike is far superior to going into a nuclear
war where the United States and Russia are trading nukes.
But the idea that we were able to help and, and probably most
likely without a whole lot of discussion, there's a real
probability that you've got people in the Intel community
that are feeding intelligence to their Ukrainian counterparts,
allowing them to make those strategic strikes overseas.
Helping them take out bridges and things like this, like
enabling attacks that are outside of their capabilities.
When you do that, you, you guys have heard this before that the,
that the FBI, that the CIA, they don't want to reveal what they
call sources and methods. Often times you don't get
information about what people have said.
Like the actual information itself is not the message, It's
that the information could only be derived in a certain way.
And so by giving up some information, like we know that
you said the following things well, like there were three
people in the room and one of those people would have had to
either been wearing a wire or the OR the room was what miked
up. So if I said something and there
were two other human beings that I could identify with my eyes,
either one or two of them lied and was was leaking information
or the room was compromised. Those are the only kind of
options out there. So by you telling me that you
knew what I said in that room with two other people, you've
now revealed the possibility of me uncovering sources or
methods. Sources would be the two people
methods would be like a wiretap in the room.
Does that make sense? We're talking about when you
lift the veil and you use certain intelligence or you show
a capability that you previously didn't have.
You've revealed that source and method.
And if you know, because you've compromised Ukraine for so long
and they've done it for a long, long time as a neighbor, it
means that somebody came in and offered outside assistance.
So that's not a great situation. A decapitation strike actually
was something that was talked about very, very early on in the
Ukraine conflict. Am I the only one that remembers
right when it kicked off, which by the way, was right when Joe
Biden came into office? So of course it's it's not his
fault. It couldn't be his fault that we
had a feeble world leader out there allowing weakness to to
kind of show on the world stage and strength to prevail.
But there were all these talks about how how Vladimir Zelinsky
was a hero and he was leading his people and that's why he had
to dress in a military uniform because he was a wartime leader.
The Russian death squads were chasing him down in Kiev.
Do you remember that? And he was on the run.
At any moment he might be killed.
But he was also doing media broadcast.
But he was on the run kind of James O'Keefe style.
I'm going dark. Pray for me.
But also I'm going to be DJ ING a party in Miami.
And I have like, you know, retards wearing balaclavas on
their face and dressing up like their Cobra Commanders.
That seems sort of theatrical vibe was early on.
We may have actually reached the point where that goes down, I
think. I think George is probably
correct. So what made me start thinking
about sort of the remnants of communism and what it used to be
like and all of these things, It also made me think about what
was the United States focusing on?
What were we focusing on on the foreign side?
Were they paying attention to like threats to the United
States or they interested in meddling like they always do?
The sort of our Intel community trying to go out there and make
things happen that they wanted. Were they focusing on the threat
of China, which continues to come in here and do things like
flying drones and having students and collecting on us
and turning down prosecutions? Like whistleblowers told me that
we had prosecutions. We could go on The the the DOJ
just filed some charges and it sounds like the FBI was able to
intercept a couple of Chinese nationals coming in with some
sort of fungus, which could be considered like an agro
biological threat to our our AG industry.
We don't really know the details on it yet.
I just call it kind of like the cursory glance on it.
How much of that was being deprioritized in order to
prioritize like January Sixers? I got AI got a a a text message
today from Steve friend with a picture of one of the cases out
of Texas AJ6 case and it categorized it as tier one,
which was not a thing by the way, in the FBI Tier 1 sounds
like internal. It sounds like internal, what
would you even call that? Like striations, I guess of who
needed to be prioritized in the January 6th investigations
themselves. It was added to the title of the
of the investigation. And that's not common
nomenclature, certainly not up until like 2022.
So at some point in time, since I never got AJ6 case, I can't
say what the guidance looked like like that.
But my guess is, is that they started tearing out whether tier
one meant the highest priority threat or the lowest priority
threat. It sounds like the people that
were running those cases started tearing those people, thousands
of Americans were the priority. And so the opportunity cost
inevitably had to be something else.
The media was doing the same thing.
The media was prioritizing their own versions of the threats.
And when in doubt, just like Taco Tuesday, just like Trump
always chickens out, that's where they want to turn the
focus. They'll do the same thing about
what happened in Boulder. So I've gone from this, this
foreign threat, and I'm looking domestically.
It's like, well, we have a bunch of people in here.
Can we just admit now that our security apparatus this, this
deep state that, you know, somebody in the government made
a movie about, seems like Deputy Dan made this movie that I was
participating and I actually got paid to be part of it called
police state where they were talking about weaponized
government, where government predetermined what the outcomes
were. And they were not focusing on
real threats. They were focusing on the
threats that they wanted. It's kind of the same thing our
media's been doing here. This is ACNN discussion.
They want to go from the terror attack, which by the way, the
FBI didn't interrupt. And I've got a story coming up
in a second talking about how they did know that this guy
existed. He got turned down for a handgun
purchase while he was an illegal alien, a visa overstay.
So he should have been on somebody's radar.
If you have an illegal alien turned down for being a non
citizen trying to buy a gun in this country, it's a it's the
first time that you realize like, OK, let's say you, you
blew every other indicator. When someone pops up on the
radar at NCI or what is it NCIC and they try to run a next
background check and they get denied.
It could be denied for a felony. So now we know a felon is trying
to purchase a gun. So we might want to look into
that person. That does seem like a triggering
event. It would be a felony for them to
hold on to it. What about the illegal alien
that's not allowed to be in this country to begin with and then
also chooses to go out and accomplish or purchase firearms?
Do you want to go like, why is that guy need a firearm?
Is he doing dangerous things? Does he just want to exercise
the 1st Amendment or the Second Amendment liberty that he
doesn't have access to? What makes this guy want to go
get a gun? And why is he so dumb as to buy
it in a in a gun store of all places, where they're going to
run a background check? In any case, that was
overlooked. I made the argument the other
day that the only terrorists that we catch in the United
States are the ones that the federal government is involved
in prodding into terrorism. The reason why is because you
can't know what's in a man's heart.
You can't know what they're going to do before they do it.
So we should just accept that that's true.
What you can know, though, in advance is that if you're on the
political left and you have to pick a scapegoat, which by the
way is a very communistic idea. If we could just blame one group
of people, if we could just grain, blame one individual.
This is the root of all your problems.
It's a real leftist thing to do. I don't know why people always
assume that's the the hard, the hard right.
But you noticed that Hitler did that with the Jews.
Scapegoated said these are the problems in the in the
Fatherland, right? Stalin did the same thing.
Lenin did it. They identified people, farmers
and people who had some kind of wealth or land or whatever.
They were actually keeping people fed and they said, oh,
these are my problems. If we just got rid of those
people. They are the root of the issue.
And if you're in the leftist media, that person is Donald
Trump. So if you could just get rid of
Donald Trump, who obviously is stirring up all this
anti-Semitism, you'll notice that the guy came into this
country before Donald Trump came in under policies that were not
Donald Trump's is being deported, his family being
deported under policies that were set up by Donald Trump.
Donald Trump who moved the embassy of the United States to
get into Jerusalem. He's obviously anti-Semitic even
though he has like, you know, I don't know Jewish people in his
family and has been, I think by the admission of many people
like one of the more pro Israel, pro Jewish presidents.
Whether you like it or not is irrelevant.
It's very upsetting to people that are on CNN.
They want to let you know that it's probably Donald Trump's
fault that there's anti-Semitism in the United States.
It's not Ilhan Omar, it's not Jasmine Crockett, it's not the
the squad, it's not AOC fomenting this nonsense, right?
It's Donald Trump, obviously, because Taco Tuesday.
The rise of anti-Semitism in the last decade can be correlated
with the rise of Donald Trump. And the kind of language that he
uses, has used, gives a permission slip for all of this
anti-Semitic language to be used, you know, in a way that we
really hadn't seen before. Is that even like, does anyone,
anyone Fact Check these people? Do they ever like listen to
themselves before they gather? I think not.
I'm going to show you some other clips that are kind of fun.
Like I said, communists are always kind of a a good trip.
I got one more clip and then we're going to go to a sponsor
real, real quick. Actually, let me do that first.
Let me go to let me go to a read from one of our sponsors.
In this case, we're going to do a Patriot Protect.
If you guys want to kind of keep your, your data away from other
communists, particularly the Chinese Communists, then you
might want to check out my friends over at Patriot Protect.
It's patriot-protect.com/kyle. Again, that promo code Kyle will
save you on an annual subscription.
The Chinese, another great communist country who doesn't
have to worry about dissent, who's able to do unilateral law
and, and rule. They've been using AI
technologies to to scrape up all of your data.
They can use it to impersonate you.
They can sell it off to cyber scammers.
They can cause havoc. They might be able to compromise
people that are in the intelligence sphere because the
many of them have poor financial acumen.
They've dumped over a million highly sensitive American
records onto the dark web coming from their their data program
DeepSeek. This can include names and
e-mail addresses and relatives and work histories and other
personal details that can be used to either impersonate you
or to go and represent themselves as a legitimate
company if somebody were to call and try to scam you.
We're not talking about password leaks.
We're talking about the kind of information that criminals use
to hijack your accounts, destroy your finances.
I've seen things like fake kidnappings.
They call them virtual kidnappings because they have
enough information on you to be able to present themselves as
legitimate. If you want to use Patriot
Protect, you can get their Blackout service, which searches
the dark web, finds your information that's been leaked
and removes it from the people search sites scammers use to
find their victims. Their search and destroy
protocol works 24/7. It is the system that Emily and
I have my wife. There's going to be basically
the attempt to get 100 plus data brokers.
There's all these websites, by the way.
Those are super useful websites if you're an FBI agent working
out of your car. They're all open source.
They're all free to access. They all want to drive it based
on clicks. We did a nice little sit down
with one of their Co founders. It's not really an if, it is a
when you will get scammed. The question is for how much and
what they'll be able to get into.
If you guys want to take your name out of that pile and make
it harder, check out Patriot Protect.
It's really relatively inexpensive.
It's cheaper than keeping your porch light on at night.
So patriot-protect.com slash Kyle, let's do this, let's do
this. I've got a little clip here.
This is coming. I guess Andrew Cuomo has tried
to rebrand himself as not being a communist from CNN.
This guy is like one of the great rebranding acts.
He's now like a meathead bro trying to be sane, but he still
has that sensitivity towards the previous.
He still wants to blame Donald Trump by default because he
spent so much time in that ecosystem where people did just
affirm what they said. Again, it's Donald Trump's fault
that there's anti-Semitism. It's Donald Trump's fault that
he's very, very mean. Even though you could write
volumes about what happened to Donald Trump the scapegoat and
the Russia collusion and all the other kind of nonsense, it's
really his fault what happened to Hunter Biden and this
country. This is a really wild argument.
And then he's got Tim Dillon, who's a comedian, who crushes
him by bringing up the fact that no, no, Biden's were just
corrupt. Being corrupt is corrupt.
We could just call that out. You don't have to go and play
this middle line. Maybe he's just been
desensitized and he hangs out with the wrong people too long.
I think he overestimates how bright he is and comedians are
if nothing else, especially ones that know how to do crowd work.
They know how to roast you on the spot, and that's exactly
what Dylan does here. Look at what happened with
Trump. OK, I you can write three books
on how what happened to him with Russia Gate or whatever you want
to call it was wrong. What was the first thing he did
when he got in power? He went after Biden for being a
Ukrainian Russian plant. The first thing he did was go
after Biden and his son, weaponizing a guy's addiction.
I don't know how much you know about that world, but
unfortunately, I was an addict for many years from when I was.
I started doing cocaine at 12 and I stopped at 25.
And I never ended up in the Ukraine and I never took a photo
of everything I did and put it on a laptop.
But you know very well in Circuit City, but you know very
well that Hunter Biden is a typical drug addled person.
I know. I'm not saying that he didn't do
business people. Very few of them ended up in the
Ukraine. And I mean, their dads are the
vice president. It's not about why he wasn't a
Ukraine life. Let's say that it's a unique
life. You would have to look at none
of drug addict friends ended up in Malibu selling art for
$80,000. Boom.
And yeah, and $80,000. We heard hundreds of thousands
of dollars for some of Hunter's art, which wasn't the worst art
I've ever seen. It just is.
The only reason you would buy it is if you were trying to, I
don't know, launder money from some foreign government and buy
influence. That seems like the most
probable answer on why you would go out there and buy on an
otherwise not noteworthy, not collectible, not resellable,
quote UN quote artist slash cocaine addict.
Nothing funnier than someone saying, I don't know what your
background is with addiction. He's like, well, my background
is like a decade and a half of being a cocaine addict.
Just zoom. And he was like, well, he's just
doing typical addict behavior. It's like except nobody else has
the experience of doing that. And by the way, for some reason,
the little Circuit City jab in there, it made me quite happy
again. I want to, I want to double back
on this again. We're talking commies, we're
talking Taco Tuesday, we're talking about that lie that
continues to the to, to try to scapegoat Donald Trump as being
the 'cause. It took me back to a time when
Swalwell, who not only eats tacos in profane TikTok videos,
he also does leading questions. The sense of irony that most of
us have knowing the story of Fang Fang and knowing the fact
that that the Chinese used an influence operation and probably
like what we would call a honeypot tactic on Swalwell.
That was before he was in Congress.
Many people don't really know much of they just know they're
like Fang Fang, you slept with a Chinese spy.
They were actually trying to put the Chinese spy into his life
before he became as big as he is today.
And to his credit, he actually did the right thing, which was
like pushed, pushed this person out.
Hold on. Before we get there, sometimes I
see stuff in my chat that completely derails me.
We have a we have a, a regular in the chat, Jigsaw Massacre.
Who said, don't tell me that you worked at Circuit City, Kyle?
I absolutely worked at Circuit City when I was in college.
And that would have been probably my sophomore or junior
year. I 100% worked at Circuit City
and I was one of the last employees there before they shut
it down. OK, you derailed me, but I'm
going to get right back on track.
Eric Swalwell and you know, most people don't really understand
that the the Fang Fang thing was the FBI came to him, gave him
what they call a defensive briefing.
They could have investigated him, by the way, like they did
with Trump in the Crossfire Hurricane.
That would have been an option. That's not what you'd normally
do to a politician if you're operating in good faith as an
FBI that cares about what America is about, if you care
about like, I don't know, our rule of law and staying out of
politics. But then we had this guy that
kind of didn't do that. So historically, Eric Swalwell
got the benefit of the doubt, was given a defensive briefing.
You have a Chinese infiltrator in your in your midst.
Would you like to help us? The answer, he said, was yes, to
his credit. But that's probably because Jim
Comedy wasn't the boss back then or because he was a Democrat, or
both. Because given the opportunity to
do the same thing to Donald Trump, we found out it was a
night and day distinction. That's part of what the Durham
report revealed. Hillary Clinton got defensive
briefings. Donald Trump got
counterintelligence investigations opened into him.
This is classic, this is a classic communistic move where
the state finds the enemies to whatever it is that the state
wants to accomplish and investigates them.
And it does so under any pretense it chooses.
And that pretense, it turned out, was something that a guy
who's currently at the FBI should know a lot about since he
did a lot of shows about it. Here's Jim Comedy talking about
you know, the quote UN quote playbook AKA the the the peepee
tape as one guy likes to call. It I want to talk about the
Kremlin playbook and there are a number of ways that a foreign
adversary could seek to influence a person.
Do you agree with that? Yes, financial.
Yes, that can be 1. Romance, you said, is another
yes. Compromise.
Correct. Setting up a compromise.
Sure. To execute on a compromise, yes.
How about inadvertently capturing a compromise, meaning
they have vast surveillance and you stumble into that
surveillance and are caught in a compromise, and then they take
that information, try and use it to coerce you?
Yeah, that's part of the playbook.
Like the irony in that statement right there, because one, the
Chinese absolutely do that. I've actually worked cases, some
of them are public now, where the Chinese would monitor U.S.
citizens coming in that had a family member in U.S. government
and they would monitor that person do something that was
compromising overseas because they have ubiquitous
surveillance. And then they would leverage
that information. In the case that I'm thinking
of, there was a State Department employee, she was a secretary
with a top secret clearance and she had a gay son who went and
engaged in gay sex in China while he was infected with HIV,
which was a criminal act in China.
And then he had a couple of things in front of him.
His mom was presented with an opportunity.
Give us some information when we ask for it, or we're going to
imprison your son forever and come and, and, and take him out.
He's going to find himself in a Chinese prison and have a very,
very bad outcome. And so she gave up US
information. She also got money for it too.
So she's classic, classic. She was a classic government
employee, single mom. She was in her 50s, black,
female, high school educated, making a really good salary as a
government employee. You know, like the 92% that vote
Democrat. Just saying, Jim, Comedy is
actually talking about that thing.
And then they did exactly that thing with Donald Trump, did
they not? They did ubiquitous surveillance
to the point where they investigated him.
They didn't give him the courtesy of the Eric Swalwell
thing where they said, hey, here's a defensive briefing.
They didn't do the courtesy like they did to Hillary Clinton's
campaign defensive briefing. These are very, very common
folks. A defensive briefing.
You give them to companies, you give them to business
executives. You give them to complete
strangers who might find themselves in the wrong space.
You give them to military officers.
You give them to people that are academics that happened to cross
paths with and you're like, I think this person, because I'm
going to default to good faith on Americans, This person likely
will side with the United States government's interests.
So let's go get them on our side and let them know what's coming
in and see if they want to do what we call a double agent
operation. Most people don't understand how
double agent operations work. It's really straightforward.
Let me just lay this out for you guys.
You've probably heard the term double agent.
How do you get a double agent operation to start?
What it means is you're playing for both sides.
Everyone kind of has that instinct, but what does it
really mean? It means that you are in a
position of trust or authority within your government.
It might mean that you have access to someone who's in that
position. The foreign power approaches you
and asks you to turn against your nation and you report it to
your nation. This chief security officer, you
bring it to the Intel agencies. You might bring it to the FBI,
what we would call a walk in. Hey, I was approached and I need
to self report that I had this problem.
I have a clearance and I'm required to tell you that this
happened. And so then the FBI has a couple
things. They could just investigate that
person that's going after you that's targeted.
You deport them, PNG, shut them down.
Maybe they've got them on enough information from what's already
happened that they can shut them down or they can play the double
agent game when the double agent game is.
We would like you, Donald Trump, Eric Swalwell, take your pick.
We would like you to pretend to be agreeable.
And whenever they ask you for something, you come to us and
we'll give you what it is. We'll give you something that
will appease this so we can see what it is that they're
targeting. We can find out more about how
they work. We can insinuate you into that
system. And so you will be reporting on
the United States government with the blessing of the United
States government. There's an entire system of
allowing classified or otherwise classified material to change
hands. So that we can set that person
up again. Rarely do you find penetrations,
rarely do you find terrorists if the United States federal
government is not actually involved in actively feeding
that person or allowing them to continue.
Because when you do, you'd think they'd shut him down.
If there was a real terroristic threat, you wouldn't let them
just hang out. But if you need to build your
case, you might let him do it for longer.
And if they're not going to do it and you're really invested in
getting that case, maybe you feed them a bunch of stuff.
Double agent operations are constantly this this give and
take where you are trying to passively receive information
from the foreign nation, but you're also trying to go them
into asking for more stuff and show them that you're really
capable because you want to reveal more over there.
So it's a delicate operation. You don't want your person to
become not useful to the foreign asset because it takes a lot of
time and money to set these up. And in theory, the money goes
into what are called white funds.
The white funds get in and then they're used by the agency to
run the op back against the other country.
It's really messy. And if you're involved in this
stuff, like you understand, you have to think kind of
multilaterally, which is why when you see these kind of evil,
I almost said a swear word. When you see these evil people
working, you can't like, they work in an area of distrust.
These are the people that are surrounding Cash Patel and Dan
Bongina right now, by the way, people from the
counterintelligence world that think like that, that think it's
not 4D chess, it's just regular chess, folks.
Regular 2D chess on a board means you are trying to move
several moves ahead of your opponent.
So when they move into a space, you trap them.
Kind of like there's a woman now whose name is Shannon Perry, who
was apparently attached at the hip to Donald to, to Dan Bongino
was the deputy director. There's a woman there who's been
in since 2002. She was last promoted into a a
non agent. So she's not a sworn federal
agent. She was promoted into what's
called an assistant director role in 2024 by none of them.
Chris Wray, who many of us see are it was problematic.
And like so many others, she's one of the of Paula Bates crew,
the former deputy director that's been surrounding and
bubble wrapping and keeping track of these guys.
So how do you figure out who you can trust in an in a complete
agency that does a a ton of intelligence and
counterintelligence work, that is constantly lying to their own
people, that is lying to people out in the public that doesn't
feel like they need to show their faces?
Plenty of examples of that. Tom Fitton's had enough.
It makes me kind of happy. You're worried about it.
You're worried about can we deal with people that have basically
purged descent from the ranks and all the people that are
there went along to get along with things that were probably
illegal? Based on all the court rulings
we've had so far, we haven't had a definitive, but it's pretty
clear that the COVID, COVID vaccine mandates were not
constitutional. The 5th Circuit agreed with my
lawsuit, my friend's lawsuits. We have ongoing litigation
that's going to be able to suss some of the stuff out.
The things they did were violations of law.
They were willing to do that to protect the agency, not the
country, but the institution over the Constitution.
And Tom Fenton at Judicial Watch is kind of saying his piece.
It's like, how do you trust them?
You can't. Are they going to investigate
themselves? No.
How do you? Like, it's not like Bongino and
Cash Patel can walk in there and figure out who's who without
having to trust some people. And who the hell are they going
to trust because they didn't work there.
They don't know the background. They don't know that Shannon
Perry is who she is. She probably seems like a really
nice lady. That's why you have to get rid
of some parts of it. That's why you have to get deep,
deep cuts. Or maybe you just get rid of the
whole thing, which is what Fitton has kind of arrived at.
I kind of love this, like radicalized, angry Tom Fitton
because he's seeing that the old FBI and the new FBI treat his
FOIA request basically the same way.
Is the FBI going to investigate the FBI?
Is the FBI going to investigate the DOJ?
This is why it won't work. They need to shut down the FBI.
As far as I'm concerned, it can't be trusted to investigate
anything. I trust Dan to, you know, to
personally investigate something, but he's just one
man. Cash, he's just one person.
He's going to be relying, they'll be relying on a flawed
institution. A.
Flawed institution, one that I don't think it's fixable.
Yeah, I tend to agree with that, it turns out.
And what? Where's all this coming from?
What does this have to do with communists, you think?
Well, first of all, the concept of scapegoating.
Second, of all, the types of people that were allowed to
operate with complete impunity in this country that did get the
benefit of First Amendment protections.
You know, like radical crazy leftists that were breaking
laws. I have this really fun way to
wrap up for us. We're going to talk about the
1983 Senate building bombing, which involved none other than
Susan Rosenstein. Many of you will know her name.
So sorry, Susan Rosenberg, not Rosenstein.
That's not that's not a good catch.
Susan Rosenberg and I compared it to January 6th in my head
because I couldn't help get past the idea that commies tend to
make a lot out of a little and they make a little out of a lot.
1 of the things that they did was create this false story
about Russia and collusion and peepee, hey peepee tape hoaxes
and so on and so forth. The whole story they self
rewarded. They gave out Pulitzer prizes.
Greg Gutfeld actually nails this, talking about why the
scandal of the quote UN quote, Big Lie and the steal of the
election and everything that everybody was really excited
about. And some of that, some of that
data comes back and you're like, oh, it's real.
On top of all that, they're having this moment of crisis
where there's a a tell all book that Jake Tapper did, basically
saying that all of you were idiots for believing us.
And they actually they outed themselves to their own audience
and the audience finally realized we don't like being
called dummies. Listen to him the way he sums
this up. And of course the FBI was
integral in in perpetrating this scheme and this sort of this
narrative on the American people along with the media, which they
were leaking to. All right, so here's the
problem. This is different.
The damage is done. The Democrats always thrived on
hoaxes, assuming that by the time the big lie would be
exposed, whether it would be Russian collusion or the fine
people hoax, they already got what they needed.
The emotional impact of the lie resonated.
The truth didn't matter. It's based on that understanding
that you know, and, and working in the in the press office, the
big story always lands on the front page. 2 weeks later, the
corrections on page B7. That's how it worked.
The The New York Times and the Washington Post still have their
Pulitzers for the alleged Russian interference story, even
though we know it's BS. But then something happened and
This is why it's so different. Tapper's book came out and he
deflates this hoax. But it was a hoax that we
already knew, but his audience didn't.
It was the first time that the correction didn't get buried in
the back pages. Biden's infirmity is now more
well known than Biden himself. His name will never be separated
from what? Happened.
So the interesting thing, even more interesting than that, if
you can imagine, the book didn't sell.
That tells you everything. His audience, Jake's audience
was just informed that they were stupid, that they were gullible,
that they just got taken. Who wants to buy that book?
But seriously, who wants to buy the book that tells you that you
were dumb, we lied to you, We're claiming we didn't know, But if
we were a reputable voice, then why would you listen to us now?
So we probably knew, and you got taken in.
Everybody else that was on the political right already knew
these stories. Now they've basically exposed
the magician's trick and said, you dummies, you got taken too.
And it became very obvious, I think that the, that the lies
are just they're, they're self-serving that the, that the
narrative that they're being fed is false constantly.
I'll give you a fun example. I just saw this yesterday.
This was just a leaked out or just sorry, tweeted out by the
FBI. This is Biden FBI, if you want
to believe that sort of thing exists.
The FBI releases their 2024 active shooter incidents in the
United States report active shooter incidents decreased by
50% compared to 2023. So in the third year of the
Biden presidency, they had 50% more or they had twice as many.
And then in the the last year the Biden presidency, we saw
less active shooter incidents. How many incidents were those?
You want to talk about the way that communists like to do
things? They hide it in statistics.
They hide the lie in numbers. They use word games nonstop.
They constantly reframe and rephrase.
In 2024, the FBI designated 24 shootings as active shooter
incidents. Well, what the hell is an active
shooter incident? It turns out that seems really
problematic because I need to know what the definition is.
These are incidents. I think they actually have a
direct name here. An active shooter is one or more
individuals actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill
people in a populated area. But like, when does it stop?
When does it stop being an active shooter?
Do you see how that's the dumbest way?
It's not like it's it's ongoing in perpetuity.
These are not like people who shot and then got away with it.
Almost all these people are either killed or arrested.
We don't have like a lot of unsolved active shooter
incidents in the United States. So I don't know what an active
shooter incident is. So I started asking some of the
the AI out there and that's how I got the headline at the top.
How many mass shootings have there been?
I asked how many active shootings were there in 2024 in
the USAI gave me back the answer from this BBC story.
How many mass shootings are there?
Again, play with the words, play with the answer, play with the
narrative. Confuse your audience and it
turns out the mass shootings, which I assume include all the
active shooter events and then some others, which I don't know
what it means. And it also includes all the
gangland violence. Because when you talk about
active shooters, I'm almost positive they're talking about
like angry white people. Like I'm almost positive of
that. It's the, it's the people that
are acceptable to call shooters. It can't be the people that do
shootings every single day. All you got to do is go to
heyjackass.com and see what happens in Chicago, which they
they, they sort of lampoon as Chicago family values.
Mass shootings were on the rise. It turns out whatever the
difference is between those things, mass shootings, there
were more than 488 mass shootings in the United States
not even at the end of 2024. This was in December.
And then it gives you this like chart, which is all in the
hundreds, but we were talking about things that were in the
dozens because they just make it up as they go.
How does the US get death gun? How does the US gun death
breakdown work? 48,830 people died from gun
related injuries in the US in 2021.
That was an 8% increase. Of course what they forget to
tell you is that the bulk of those are still suicides.
So we just make it up as we go. It just, it just kind of pushed
things along. But it turned out in 2021 you
had a fair number of homicides as well. 20 thousand. 2021 was a
Biden era. I believe he didn't get that
pushed out, that there was a huge number of homicides and a
big spike from what we've seen historically.
The homicide number historically in the United States, as it was
like sitting in its natural place was like 12,000, thirteen,
14,000. That was like Trump's legacy.
That was kind of where it was, and it was also Obama's.
It was like a thing that happened in most of my early
adult life. It was always in the teens, and
now we've punched over 20. You wonder why that was.
Maybe it's because you're encouraging crazy people to act
crazy and do crazy things like say that communistic type things
like you, the land you're standing on is is stolen.
This is kind of a fun thing. This is from Nick Shirley.
He's like a young guy that goes out, does these kind of like
auspicious interviews where he stands in contentious places and
puts a microphone in people's faces.
He also catches some great, great stuff of crazies.
And some of that was what I saw yesterday, which inspired my
wife's quip. You never find a happy
communist. These people are always effing
miserable. So check this guy out.
He's got a mask on, he's got glasses, his hair looks like
he's a rat that got sprayed down with like a some kind of a weed
sprayer and and he's got like poison on his head.
And and then they got this black kid with a shirt open who's
going to steal his iPhone because the kid asked to have
his stuff stolen. Very funny.
Enjoy. Hey, hey, who is this guy?
Come with me. Come with me.
Here we go. Look, now he's running.
There he is. He's.
Running away, what's going on? You got a problem with us live
streaming or what? Might as well, I don't
understand where you're coming from, because you got to take
accountability for it. Accountability for what?
Systemic problems. Because this right here, you're
occupying indigenous land here. You're occupying space that
isn't here. Wait.
But I can say the exact same thing to you.
You can. And you and you're occupying
this space. We should we should be calling
on people, honestly. He he was supposed to be robbed.
Was we human? We deserve to be robbed.
Yeah. OK.
Take his iPhone. Take it.
I use it for mutual aid. You want to help my mutual
agents? Give it.
You want to give it iPhone? How are you helping your friend
Corey so far if she doesn't have those resources?
Because I give them to her as well as giving it to her and
actually allowing her to you. It, it immediately breaks down
the minute when it's like, yeah, these people should be robbed.
These people should have their stuff taken.
And you go like, Oh dear, well, can we take your stuff?
And it's like, well, no, because I'm a good person.
I'm one of the good ones. All that stuff ends up in a
place like this. It ends up with people against
scapegoating, blaming folks without even knowing anything
about the story because they predetermined what the answer
is. I found this little video.
This was a, this was a ice raid taking a guy into custody.
And so you've got this angry black guy out there who feels
very empowered to say whatever he wants to say.
He's screaming at people that he doesn't know.
He doesn't know the case. He hasn't read the affidavit for
this warrant. He has 0 information and he's
encouraging federal agents to put a bolt in their head.
Now, we don't have to like what federal agents do.
We don't have to like federal agencies.
But wishing people to kill themselves when you don't know
anything about why they're there or what happened and saying that
it's because Donald Trump is an A hole.
It's a pretty bold move. So again, the little spicy
language in this, but you watch this, this is where the brain
rot goes. This is where people, This is
why people aren't, they're not happy.
This is not a happy guy that started saying this stuff.
You don't just walk up on the street, see federal agents, and
then do this. If you're generally a happy
person, there's no happy communists.
Like, come on, man, that's the damn shame.
What y'all doing? Yeah, that's cool.
That's cool. But it's a.
Damn shame. Yo my man.
I'm sorry. I'm sorry Trump's an asshole.
I'm sorry they voted for this fucking asshole.
It's just cops wandering around. It's all ice, guys.
What are we talking about here? I.
Said it. What?
I'm a United States citizen. I said it.
Oh, y'all put a bullet in your head?
You're fucking losers. Oh, y'all fucking losers.
Touch me again. Touch me again.
Come on, touch me again. Just touch me again.
I'm walking to my car. Touch me again.
Yeah, you have a car. Touch me in America.
Touch me, I swear to God. Touch me one more.
Touch me one more time. Touch me one more time.
Touch me one more fucking time, pussy.
Touch me one more time, pussy. He's asking for violence.
Why is it that they want to go with violence?
Because it's really effective on people that can be bullied.
You just don't know what that's going to be.
And you find out that a lot of people actually will.
They will. They will cave to violence.
Here's Jesse Kelly talking about this on his radio show.
I don't think he's wrong about this.
It's a tool that works because many people shy away from
violence. The communist loves violence
because violence is effective, especially on weak people.
People like Amy Coney Barrett get eaten alive by violence.
They get eaten alive by communists.
The left is inherently violent. Here's a couple charts for you.
This one is courtesy of a network contagion.
What percentage say that it is at least partially justified to
murder Donald Trump? All respondents, Only about 38%
of them said it was partially justified.
That's a little scary. What percentage of the left?
55%. The majority.
Oh, that's interesting. What percentage of the left say
it's at least partially acceptable to destroy a Tesla
dealership? 57%.
What percentage of the left say it's at least partially
justified to murder Elon Musk? 48.6%.
Do I need to pull up the old COVID charts?
What percentage of American Democrats thought you should
have your children taken from you if you weren't vaccinated?
Thought that you should be hauled away to a quarantine
camp? Communists are violent human
beings. They have no morality against it
and unless you realize it, you will succumb to it.
That's a real simple, real stable statement and they're not
happy people because of it. It doesn't make them any better
off. This happened in Minneapolis.
This was a drug raid that involved DEAATF and it sounds
like there was also FBI there. They put the wrong tools out
there. They keep putting these tactical
teams out that have no business doing it.
There were all these comments online like how come these guys
don't have OCOC? Is your your pepper spray?
I've never seen an FBI SWAT team train with pepper spray ever.
They don't have pepper balls. They're not a crowd control
unit. But here they are trying to do
crowd control on a bunch of communists, I'm going to call
them, that have decided violence is acceptable, including against
federal agents. And I've got a couple of videos
of it. So I'm going to show both of you
because I want you guys to see it.
It starts off kind of small. It got to the point where
they're throwing trash cans on the ground.
They're trashing their own place.
Is that how you get to heaven on earth?
Is that how you create this salvific experience on Earth?
It's the reason why they just don't have anything to look
forward to. All they have is this.
And so they're pissed because guess what?
Man will always let you down, even the ones you like.
Anyway, here it is. They're about to tank, I guess
They brought tankers people because they're bringing someone
from custody out right now. It's going to probably get
crazy. So they're trying to make a line
to get someone out. They're bringing somebody out,
so it might get. Crazy.
Kind of catchy though, isn't it? That chant, shut the F up, OK?
You're seeing them pushing back. These people are going to go
stand in front of vehicles, lean against them.
All right? And that video, it doesn't show
it nearly as well as this next one, which is kind of fun
because you're going to shoot some throws.
Oh, now it's going to go down because they're moving people
away from a moving car that's moving out.
So here's another angle. This is from Nick Shirley.
I believe these guys are getting fed up because people are
getting in their face and I'm going to mute some of the
background. They're swearing and you're
like, you're not missing anything on the background here
with the noise. But let me just ask you this.
How insane? Look at that.
That's a man dressed up like a lady.
There's a couple of those that's kind of fun.
How insane do you have to be to push into these people that are
armed and act like you're going to get away with it and
everything's going to be fine? Like you can go and pick a fight
with an armed federal agent who's in the middle of doing
their job and think it's going to be OK.
The only reason why is because we allowed this stuff for years
and we acted like it was not something that was unusual.
And I I kind of realized it goes back to even my childhood.
I just didn't know it at the time.
I actually always thought Beavis and Butthead was kind of dumb.
But I think Mike Judge more and more, he was a prophet.
This is coming from times when I was probably in high school and
white privilege was being talked about then pretty well too.
So this is one of those great clips.
It's a mixture of people who just were out there on the
streets screaming about white privilege, just like that guy
talking about land back and you should rob us and that we're all
wrong again, commies. And then like where it goes if
you were to actually live it out and you were kind of like, you
know. Beavis or butt head kind of
retarded. God be racist to white people
because white people are the dominant race in this country,
full stop. You are calling me privilege
when you don't know anything about me.
I could have grown up in Section 8 housing.
This. This is privilege.
All right, Tell me this. Tell me this.
Tell me this.
Privilege.
A classic example of white privilege.
And you both have it. What's that?
Anyone want to fill them in? Yeah, I'll do it.
OK, so white privilege is when white people, particularly men,
automatically assume they can take whatever they want, and
they never have to worry about getting stopped by the police.
And they have the inside track for any job.
I got this. One Aisha, they have the inside
track for any job they want. Exactly, Gage, Thank you for
that. That's white privilege.
Whoa. And we have that.
You sure do. I see.
Whoa. I never realized this stuff.
Yeah, You've really opened up my eyes.
Well, I'm glad we've been able to enlighten you.
The real question is, do you think you'll be acting
differently from now on? Oh, yeah.
I guarantee it. Yeah.
Yeah, me too.
Yeah. Set the side, please.
We have white privilege. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Check it out. Don't worry.
It's OK. We automatically assume we can
take what we want. We don't have to worry about the
police. It's OK.
You didn't know. They didn't either.
Let's. Stop it now.
Watch this. This is what we were taught,
Sir. We're subverting existing
paradigm. This is what we were taught,
Sir. We didn't know any better.
But now that you learned it, imagine if people actually live
the way that you hear these leftists kind of talk like it
actually happened. So I'm going to go all the way
back to what I said at the beginning, which is that we're
going to talk slightly a little bit about this whole, this whole
communism slash the, you know, renaming, changing up the words
and focusing, kind of minimizing things that are a big deal,
which is what we saw in 2020. It was a big deal for the entire
year. We saw insanity in this country
that was not being diagnosed and then we saw something that was
at least a little bit of a swing back that happened on January
6th of 2021. And of course that became the
biggest deal ever. I found this article here.
This is coming from this is coming from the Guardian.
So again, we have to go overseas.
It's an 8 month old article coming from September of 2024.
the US right keeps accusing Democrats of being communists or
accusing Democrats of communism. What does that even mean?
Says this academic looking white guy with swooshed over hair.
He seems to have white privilege.
Conservatives think that giving children free lunch at school is
socialism, but vast, powerful private monopolies are in fact
freedom. No, that's not what we believe.
That's called a straw man. That's when you set up an
argument that's false. You artificially set it up so
that we don't have to to actually deal with the real
points being made. And this is like, again, you get
right into the meat of it and you find out just how ridiculous
these people are. They don't.
They can't make an honest argument about this.
You can't honestly argue for a lot of leftist policies.
So you set up these straw men to state the obvious.
Free lunches ensuring that poor kids won't go hungry is not
communism. It's the government providing
for you, making from others and providing to you.
That's kind of communism. It's hard to say otherwise.
At one time in recent history, the United States clearly
resembled the Soviet Union. So now we're going to go, and
we're going to make this, like sort of false analogy, Empty
shelves, long lines outside of shops.
Those happened under Trump, to be sure, because of the supply
chain problems that happened during COVID-19, which was
pushed by and was absolutely capitalized on by communists,
right? The same people that went out
and destroyed stuff, they use it as an opportunity and they
pushed. Instead of doing about class,
they did it about race, right? Instead of being about money,
they did it about gender and about access to things.
It's all struggle, It's all garbage.
To me, that's pretty incredible to see people making such a
disingenuous and dishonest argument.
So the answer should always be less government and it should
always be more faith in not man and not from this world.
I'm going to give you my last little example.
I don't actually have it on the screen.
I didn't make slides of it, but let me just read something.
In 1983, the United States Senate building was bombed in
what is called a terrorist attack.
Accurately, it happened on November 7th of 1983.
I was a very small child right then.
It was a quote UN quote protest against military involvement in
Lebanon and Grenada. So like, not the United States.
The attack led to heightened security in the DC metropolitan
area in accessibility of certain parts of the Senate building. 6
members of the Maoist Armed Resistance Unit, also known as
Resistance Conspiracy, a communist organization, were
charged and they were not arrested for almost five years.
They were picked up in May of 1988.
They were charged with the bombing and related bombings
that happened at Fort McNair and the Washington Navy Yard, also
in Washington, DC, which occurred on April 25th of 1983
and April 20th of 1984 respectively.
In other words, they did this from April of 1983 till April of
1984. They had a full year with three
successful bombings of federal properties and they represented
A communist movement and several of them were in fact captured.
This is what the Senate building looked like.
So you're aware after the bombing?
That looks far worse than anything I saw on January 6th.
They did millions of dollars worth of damage, which would
equate probably close to half a billion dollars from what we can
estimate in today's money, 1983 to 2025.
That also shows you how far things have gone.
What's crazy is one of the people that was involved in that
bombing was a woman named Susan Rosenberg.
And the reason why I found it so interesting because my mind
immediately left to the most dangerous thing that ever
happened in the US Capitol, which obviously was not January
6th, even if those people acted like it was.
So I just wanted to see how did Wikipedia cover that 1983 Maoist
uprising, also known as the communist.
They were called M19 Co was the other group of it quote UN
quote, far left terrorists. So she's not part of us.
She's not obviously representing our ideology, even though she
fits right into the to the ideology of today.
Susan Lila Rosenberg, listen to what how she's described by
people on the left who run sites like Wikipedia where a lot of
leftists get their history. Susan Lisa Rosenberg is an
American activist, writer, advocate for social justice and
prisoners rights. And also incidentally, during
the late 1970s and in the mid 1980s, she was active in a far
left terrorist cell called May 19th Communist Organization,
also known as M19 Co, which according to contemporaneous FBI
reports, which we're going to have to obviously discount
because it was 70s FBI before we took it over, quote, openly
advocated for the overthrow of the US government through armed
struggle and use of violence. Again, not nice, not happy
people, violent communists. They provided material support
to an offshoot of the Black Liberation Army that it also
included armored truck robberies engaged in bombings of
government buildings, including the 1983 capital bombing.
She lived as a fugitive for three years.
She was eventually captured with a large cache of explosives,
firearms, including automatic weapons, you know, just like the
J Sixers. I just cannot help but see the
the parallel there. She was then pardoned later on
and found herself back in the good graces of the Democrat
Party. I want you to just do a little
contrast with people that have been on this program to include
Joe Biggs and Enrique Tario. If you're watching this program,
whether you're on, whether you're on YouTube, whether
you're watching it over on Spotify, and you have that
ability, if you're watching on Rumble, if you're watching on X,
you can see the big difference in these two people's posts and
the way that they're listed photographs.
When you are someone on the right, they post your mug shot.
They post something to make you look at so you can see that face
and know that that is what a terrorist really looks like.
That person is a criminal. Susan Rogenberg has been excused
from having to have a photograph on her Wikipedia site.
I found that to be very interesting.
You guys are asking the chat who pardoned her?
Of course, it was Bill Clinton on the last day of his
presidency. Joseph Biggs, also known as
Joseph Randall Biggs, he's an American veteran, media
personality, organizer of the Proud Boys, and convicted felon
who participated in the January 6th US Capitol attack.
I find that the things that he did in his life are probably far
less interesting than the one day when he decided to go walk
around with what he described AS2 hot Italian girls through
the US Capitol, resulting in no violence on his behalf.
Compared to the lady who participated in a bombing and
was caught with weapons and explosives, including machine
guns in her hands. Doesn't that seem crazy?
Thank you. Enrique Tario is the other one
also on the screen, also shown with a picture wearing a plate
carrier because that's probably how he always dresses, right?
Enrique slash Henry Tario, born in 1983 or 1984, is an American
convicted seditionist and far right activists.
He was the chairman of the Proud Boys, a neo fascist organization
that promotes and engages in political violence in the United
States. He was convicted of seditious
conspiracy for his role in the United States capital attack.
But he was pardoned by Donald Trump.
By the way, they bury the pardon of Susan Rosenberg all the way
down after her, her imprisonment.
They have a whole thing about her activism and her
imprisonment because of course she went to, she went to jail
for the struggle. Her sentence was commuted by
Bill Clinton on January 20th, 2001, his last day in office
after she served more than 16 years.
Her commutation produced a wave of criticism by police officers
and New York elected officials. And like anybody else that cares
about justice, because these people don't.
And again, that leads us to the fact that our judiciary is such
a problem. They actually look at this as a
moral struggle. They love it.
It's all about that. And that's why you're communists
are really unhappy. And here's the other thing that
I just noticed because I'm going to play you a little clip from
from Senator Kennedy out of Louisiana.
I wasn't sure if we had any room for this, but we're going to put
it in here. It's quite interesting to me
that if you were to ask me if someone is evil and I were to
answer yes, or if I would refer to somebody on this podcast as
evil, and then you ask me over Underoath if I believe that
person is evil, the answer would still be yes, whether I said it
here or whether I said it in front of a Senate confirmation
hearing or anywhere else. It's very interesting that this
woman who is, she's the host of the Strictly Scrutiny podcast,
it sounds like, or maybe she was just a guest on this one.
She's a law professor and she referred to some of the Supreme
Court justices that she disagrees with as evil.
And then she wouldn't own that statement, even though I know
she feels that way because that's how you say things when
you casually drop it in conversation.
It's just one more idea that that we don't have people that
are working from the same good faith position.
There are people in this government, there are people
that are training people in this government that refuse to
operate under the good faith principles that even if I don't
agree with someone, it probably comes from a place where they
don't think they're the bad guy. They're the bad guys.
I'll say it. And what this lady is doing,
this disingenuous, this lie, this obvious lie, it actually is
evil. That's evil.
That's what it looks like. It looks like unhappy, very
despondent communists. On April 22nd, 2024, you said
there are some members of the Supreme Court that are evil.
Will she be able to control its potential future distortion by
her evil colleagues? Probably not.
Which justices were you talking about?
I'll take it your word, Senator. I don't recall using that word,
but I guess what you said, you were talking about the majority
opinion in Muldrovi, city of Saint Louis.
You said quote Justice Kagan, I mean, will she be able to
control the opinions future distortion by her evil
colleagues? Probably not End Quote.
Who were you talking about, Sir? I'm I'm I'm I'm very skeptical.
There's a if there's a transcription, it was probably a
transcription error. I do not think I said no.
You said it are your evil colleagues.
Once you own up to it, which you call some of the members of the
Supreme Court evil. Now, which ones do you think are
evil? I would have to refresh my
recollection. I've I've been very critical
members of the Supreme Court statement aren't you you're an
officer doesn't sound like something that you know what I'm
saying embarrassed at that you're teaching our kids.
I don't refer to Supreme Court justices as evil or evil
colleagues. Right here in the classroom on
broadcast April 22nd, 2024, big as Dallas and you're an officer
of the court and you're here advising us to be respectful of
federal judges and you say they're evil members of the
United States Supreme Court. Gag me with a spoon.
Why do people still say gag me with a spoon?
You can't, you can't agree to the thing that makes you look
bad because then everybody realizes that you're out there
and you have this opinion. If you actually respect and and
you have that opinion and you believe that people are
operating in evil, you can very clearly talk about it.
Go watch any of the people on the political right.
They would say the same thing. I think this is a spiritual war.
I think people that are engaging on the other side are evil.
And I'm willing to say it out loud.
It's caused some heat in our family, not between my wife and
I, but because our extended family is concerned.
There are things that are evil, but if you're going to just play
mealy mouthed games with what is and what is not evil, bad
outcomes resulting in a the not the, not the, the paradise on
earth that you aspire to, then you're going to then you're
going to dance around it because you can't, you can't own those
statements because you know how it looks.
And then those people in the Supreme Court, they disagree
with you. They're probably not evil, some
of them where they are and you just own it.
And you say that. I want to end today with
something that we don't always do.
But my friend Joe Ullman is going to be in court today.
You guys have seen him on this program before, and I want to
just have you guys put him in your prayers for the day he's
going to go and do something that's difficult.
He's going to be asked for information that he is not going
to provide to a federal court. He's going to protect a source
as like a journalist, as a reporter, as somebody who was
out doing something that he's allowed to do.
And journalist for a long time have protected sources and
methods, not like the United States intelligence community.
They don't have that that ability and that shield.
So sometimes they have to go to jail for contempt.
And he told me last night that he's going to be going to jail
for contempt if he is asked. And he refuses to give up the
names to a judge in a in a hearing today in Denver.
So put your prayers out there for Joe.
Think about him today and his family, his wife and And I asked
him last night, and this is the difference between communist and
not communist. It's real.
He's not angry. He wasn't angry.
I said, you sound like you're at peace with this decision.
And he said, yeah. And I said, it's funny.
If you know that we're not supposed to win here on earth,
then you don't get mad when you lose as much.
You just don't because that's the difference.
Communists are not happy people because they're not going to
win, but they kind of expect to win.
They're looking for some sort of like, just world that doesn't
exist and people that are Christian, that have faith in
more than just what men do and what men live on.
They look around and they say, yeah, the world's full of
injustice. It's always been full of
injustice. The most perfect man that ever
walked this earth was killed by people who knew him and his best
friends denied him because they were scared to save their own
skin. And it was still OK.
And he won. He won by losing.
So how much are we going to be mad about losing when we're not
even near that? So it Joe seemed to have a lot
of peace in his life when I talked to him last night.
So anyway, pray for him that he continues to have that strength
and discernment. And pray that the judge doesn't
send him. Because wouldn't it be nice if
we lived in a just world where a judge saw someone doing
something honorable and saw that, yeah, we do have freedom
of the press and we do not give up sources for people.
We do actually allow our journalists to to report on
malfeasance within our government because we can't
trust that our law enforcement agencies or that our government
just by itself will do the right thing.
It hasn't done the right thing. It is scapegoated and gone after
people the way the communist regimes did.
So we don't have a a monopoly on just actions within our federal
government or our state government or our local
governments. They don't all operate well, and
it'd be nice if a judge actually acted like a judge and had some
discernment. And we'll see.
I hope that she does. I pray that she does.
And if not, my friend will still be OK.
So pray for his strength and for his his fortitude as he goes
through this kind of ordeal. And that is my ask of you guys.
I'm also going to ask you to go ahead and like the video.
If you're watching here, I would like you to ask or I'd ask you
to put a five star review if you're watching over on Spotify,
if you're listening on Apple, give us one of those as well.
I haven't been punching those nearly as much, but it'd be
awesome if you guys did. Again, you can find us at
rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. It's youtube.com at Kyle
Seraphin where we keep growing. And I'm very appreciative for
you guys doing that thing over there.
Just another way that we have an outlet in case things get screwy
on one end. Locals, you can find us in the
community over there where we put all the articles up.
It's a Kyle seraphin.com. And Lassie, if you want to share
the show with a friend, just send him a link.
Just send him the text and say, hey, check
thisoutkyleseraphinshow.com. It's not spam.
It will take you right to Spotify.
You don't even need to download the app, but it is a free app.
If you guys want to go do that, make sure you've liked,
subscribed, shared with the friends where you're at.
That is my ask of you in addition to praying for my
buddy. Thanks for letting us go along
today. Go out there and don't be a
communist today, you know, go out there and be someone who's
happy because you're not going to get heaven on earth.
But if you don't expect it, you won't be one of those miserable
turds that throws trash cans at federal agents.
All right? God bless you.
Look forward to seeing you again tomorrow, where it won't be Taco
Tuesday, Wednesday, it will be Thursday.
And I'm sure more nonsense will be happening in this country.
Have a great day. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin Bobble Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at
Kyle Seraphin.