Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serafin. Well, hello, my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Yeah, we're kind of off to a little bit of a technical
weirdness. A little bit.
Buttons didn't want to work. We're getting started.
We're rocking and rolling here on rumble.com/kyle Serif and you
guys can come here and join the live chat, which has already
bumping. Apparently people are very upset
about the Central Florida Weathers, the Tundra of Central
Florida. What do you got?
A bunch of Steve friends hanging out here.
What's going on with you folks? Why are you guys crying about
being in Florida? I was in a T-shirt yesterday in
Texas. We had a fire last night.
I want to say a quick thanks to my friends over at Crystal
Welding and C Roush, who is in our chat often times and made a
really cool fire pit. My kids and I roasted some
marshmallows. It wasn't cold enough for it,
but we did. And let's see.
Today is Thursday. It's January the 11th, wrapping
up this week. What a weird week on so many
levels. I think we're just going to be
dealing with that for a while. I think that's what this year is
going to be. So I'm just trying to settle
into it. Let's see, We got we got more
stuff than should normally fit into a one hour show.
So I may go over and I don't think anybody will complain
about it, but I'm giving you fair warning right up front.
That's probably what we're looking at.
It's probably how it's coming at you and so be it.
Yeah, Let's talk about my friends over at Catholic Vote
real quick. First, let's get that started
off. And in fact some of our stories
came from today's loop. Recommend you guys go and check
it out. Make sure that you get yourself
signed up for it. They are signing up 1,000,000
members. They're getting they're getting
themselves on the way. And one of the things that's
really good about being a member of Catholic Vote by being one of
the e-mail type folks who's looped in and get the the daily
emails that you get updates on some important political
candidates that are in your area, people that are interested
in fight, fighting for faith, family and freedom.
Really important that we move the needle in this year lest we
have to move the the selector switch on your AR, which I'd
rather not do. Let's keep it talking.
Let's keep it voting. Go to catholicvote.org.
You guys can make a donation on the top where it says give.
If you see that, you'll probably see one of their stories.
We're going to cover directly from their own news feed.
catholicvote.org. Put in the e-mail put in the zip
code and make it so. All right.
I think I've shaken shake shook some of those things out.
Actually the end of today's show.
Our little palate cleanser that I grabbed for you, which made me
laugh as I was just about to get rolling, is exactly how I feel
right now. You guys will see that in about
an hour, 45 minutes or so. So let's get to that.
Let's start off with story #1, because it's not good out there
necessarily and it's still coming our way.
The question is this, For those of you talking about whether you
guys didn't know this, but this is what I've got here.
Can shoveling snow give you a heart attack?
Can it kill you? Could it be the end of it for
you? The question I love that they
frave it this way. This is coming from the
Washington Post. Nothing more fun than hearing
the Washington Post try to talk about really dangerous things
that many of you have to do every single day during the
winter. The question is, is it true that
snow shoveling can give you a heart attack?
Is it true that snow can kill you?
Yeah, I think Joe Dirt in the in the chat just nailed it.
If you had the jab. It turns out they have the
science. The first sentence of the
science is snow shoveling can be dangerous.
It places stress on the heart and it's been associated with
increased cardiovascular events, particularly after heavy
snowfalls. So saith the research, one study
showing from before COVID that between 1990 and 20 O six,
that's a 16 year period there were 195,000 people who were
treated for emergencies and medical emergencies and injuries
after snow shoveling. And the smallest percentage of
them, 6% were cardiac related. So in 16 years they were 1600
cardiac related events, 100 people, which is less than the
number of people who die from falling down stairs every year.
So snow shoveling is absolutely critical.
Is this fear mongering? Are they setting the narrative?
Yes, they are. We talked about the narrative
very early on in this week. That's what's going on here,
folks. This is, it's not even
predictive programming. They're just trying to explain
away something that is absurd. And the absurdity would be that
you would die from snow shoveling.
There's some really, really, really fun quotes in here.
The head of emergency medicine, they got somebody from the
Cleveland Clinic's Akron General.
And he said people often think that snow is very light and
fluffy until they go out and they start shoveling it.
Is that what they think, these people that live in the snow?
I talked to Garrett O'boyle who shovels snow and cleans off his
driveway. You know, I don't think anybody
who's been around it thinks it's fun per SE, but this is the fun
stuff. And as you guys can probably see
on here, we got the math. The math behind it is middle and
older age people who shovel heavy snow.
Maybe you move moving approximately 2000 lbs in 10
minutes. That's the weight of a mid size
car. Well, it's 2000 lbs on an
average of 10 to 15 lbs at a time.
Nobody's saying that snow shoveling doesn't suck.
What I'm saying is the idea that you think it's going to kill you
is very funny to me. And the idea that they said that
it's not only hard work, but it's one of the most dangerous
activities that you ever do. Wow.
Not more dangerous. It's it's it's obviously not as
dangerous as getting into a car and driving to work.
It's not as dangerous as pretty much anything else you do.
Drinking alcohol. Dating might be more dangerous.
But but yeah, also when you have the possibility, because of the
shots that we've got out there in the world and some of the
weird cardiac events that seem to have no answer and science is
not particularly interested in exploring, that might be the
most dangerous thing you do because at least we should be
able to explain it away. Thank you very much.
Washington Post. Washington Post is going to be
featured prominently today. It's going to be featured
prominently because they are behind a lot of today's
narrative. Not all of it, but a lot of it,
and particularly the insurrection of January 6th.
They are all in on that and they're also all in on COVID
still. So basically the Washington
Post, which is a mouthpiece for the Democratic Party, is
essentially trying to re adjudicate 2020 and they are
trying to re adjudicate 2021 just as Biden got into office.
They are going to keep that same sort of narrative push and they
are going to share things with you that probably don't make any
sense to you if you are on the political right.
But you need to know what people who are your neighbors that
don't vote the way that you do, who don't think the way that you
do think you need to know where they're getting their
information. It's worth us knowing it.
That's why I dwell on these pages as long and often as I do.
Let's do another one. Did you guys know that this is
still happening? Did you know COVID kills?
Y'all COVID kills nearly 10,000 a month, says The Who.
Wait a minute, Are we talking about in the United States or
are we talking about worldwide? The picture that you're seeing
on the screen, should you be watching on our Rumble channel?
That's rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. And go ahead and give us a
thumbs up while you're there. If you're watching on the Rumble
channel, what you're seeing is a picture of somebody laying in a
hospital bed and being treated by a guy who looks like an
orderly or a nurse or some kind of technician or in green
scrubs. That person seems to be on a
vent based on what I can see from here, and they may or may
not be almost dead. That's an Indian healthcare
worker and Bangalore, not the United States.
Because when the Washington Post needs to scare you about
coronavirus deaths, almost 10,000 reported in December, per
the article headline. And per the first paragraph,
it's coming from The Who, who has a global focus and as we
talked about the other day, also has a bizarre focus on people
who are not doctors, people who are not medical professionals.
They're happy to hire people who are like weird trans activists
that don't know what to do with their genitals.
That seems medically bizarre. But they're telling you that the
10,000 people died across the world in December, which lets
you know that these holiday gatherings, they fueled an
increase in transmission of the virus.
It reminds me of the guy in what was he called Agent Smith that
was in the Matrix. He was worried about the virus
of humanity. It almost is like The Who
doesn't like people. And although COVID-19, this is
the director of The Who. Although COVID-19 is no longer a
global health emergency. Thank you Biden.
You saved us. The virus is still circulating
and changing and killing. OK, there was a 42% increase in
hospitalizations to a basically a number that is completely
irrelevant. 10,000 deaths around the world, around the globe is
almost nothing. It means nearly nothing.
So there you are, Washington Post giving us front and center
information. This was on their main page
folks and they also have another in their most read health
section. Another coronavirus wave hits
the US as JN One becomes the dominant variant.
If you don't know the dominant variant of coronavirus then
you're UN American. That's what they would have you
believe. How bizarre.
What a weird time to be alive that they are literally trying
to push this fear and death narrative again, despite the
fact that basically nobody buys it.
Although what you'll see is because people on the political
left are reading and sharing and looking at this place for
information, they're looking at a Washington Post where
democracy, a thing that is the the narrative of the Democrat
Party, where democracy dies in darkness.
What we find out is I have to believe this is where those
masks are coming from. And if you've travelled
recently, you know there's plenty of retards that are out
there on the plains that are wearing the masks.
Almost everybody in the travel industry that doesn't seem to be
a very high information individual.
Maybe they're on their feet all day, maybe they have no time to
consume anything except the CNN that's on the up on the, what do
you call it, the TV in the airport lobby.
Maybe that's where they're getting this stuff.
But people are masking up. I also wanted to show you this
because this was I I forgot to comment on it, but let me, let
me do so. If you look on the side of your
screen, you see all the way to the side there's a a vertical
little piece of text. That vertical text, it says that
this is provided for free. The Washington, The Washington
Post is providing this propaganda, news propaganda
slash news free to all readers because it's a public service
that, you know, that 10,000 people died in the world in
December from coronavirus. And I don't think that means
they died because they were actually in a car accident, but
they knew somebody who had the flu or they knew somebody who
had the cold. I think they're trying to say
that these people actually died from COVID.
But the problem with E legitimizing all of our industry
and all of our institutions that we used to be able to believe
and trust and and have some sort of faith in when you do that, we
don't know and we don't know why you're giving us a free news
article when your job is to make money.
Especially when it's narrative driven, fear driven amygdala
porn as you might call it. So very strange, but thank God
they're out there. It it got me down this little
rabbit hole folks. It got me down to rabbit hole of
thinking about COVID and I want to do one more little thing.
One of the things that I remember is that we talked about
how hospitals were incentivized to kill patients.
Do you remember that? That was sort of like that that
the highline version of it that was like that the fear mongering
version that hospitals were killing people off for money.
And so I went down this little rabbit hole to try to figure
out, number one, is there still money for each coronavirus
patient? It appears there is.
I'm not 100% sure because that's the way that government sort of
writes things. They don't come out and tell you
anything, obviously. But what I did find was this.
What I found is that a Fact Check from this year, from March
of 2023, this is coming from the AP, which I absolutely love
because the AP is happy to knock down straw man, which we talked
about the other day hobid hospital COVID payments tied to
patient treatment, not death. So they are going to debunk that
narrative that every time someone came in with the
coronavirus, what they saw were green signs if they could kill
them. The green, the green dollar
signs. And so the claim was is that
U.S. hospitals are earning $48,000 for a government subsidy
every time a patient that dies from the coronavirus care, the
COVID-19 care in their units. And the AP says no, that's
false. Of course that's false.
They would never do that. Hospital industry officials and
public health officials can confirm that the federal
government only provides hospitals with enhanced payments
for treating, said COVID-19 patients.
But the payments are currently only applicable to those who are
on Medicare. OK, though, that's an important
distinction. So it's not everybody.
It's the Medicare patients. It's not just if people showed
up, then they let them die and they had a financial obligation
or they had a financial incentive to allow them to fail.
But here's what's weird about that.
Number one, who's on Medicaid? Sorry, who's on Medicare?
Medicaid is for people who are indigent.
Medicare is for people who are old enough to qualify for it.
So the old, the elderly are the ones who are on Medicare.
And what did the coronavirus kill people who are of a certain
age? That was pretty obvious to us.
We've talked to some other folks.
I've got an interview coming up about some of the military
professionals who were looking down the line at what was coming
in. The information and people who
are in the military, generally speaking, are not going to be in
danger from coronavirus death. They're not going to be one of
the 10,000 that died because they went to a Christmas
celebration somewhere in the world.
No. Now if you listen to people that
are on the political left, you would believe that 50% of the
people who got the virus dead, which is wild.
And there are still some people out there that think that it is
fatal. We talked about Howard Stern.
Howard Stern basically operates as though the contracting of the
virus equals a fatality, like a A Mortal Kombat style Sega
Genesis fatality where your spine is ripped out and that's
the end of you. No, no, no, no, no, no, no,
That's silly, but it didn't stop people who were fearful.
And interestingly enough, if we only had old people on aggregate
that were dying of this disease, which is mostly the case, and
the government was paying them, the interesting thing is they're
not incentivized for treatments that involve their death.
Obviously that seems pretty morbid, and I don't think they
could ever put that into a government policy.
But what is not discussed here is the fact that there's another
argument to be made that the actual treatment itself resulted
in death, that the treatment protocols were bad, they were
written up by people who were not interested in saving the
patients. That's pretty much the real
argument. So once again, this straw man is
pushing something aside that would say, hey, is there any
validity to this? If you were a serious
journalist, what you would say is OK, Well, the context piece,
which they would love to normally put in, lacks context.
The context is, is that there's some real problems with
REMDESIVIR and some of the other drug protocols.
And putting people on a vent where you literally take their
ability to control their airway away and you put it into the
hands of a respiratory therapist or a pulmonologist or an
anesthesiologist. And those people now are going
to be responsible for their airway.
And these people end up having negative outcomes because they
are no longer fighting for their own airway, for their own
ability to breathe. That seems like that's where the
real discussion should be. But we're not going to have
honest discussions because we're talking about the AP.
Last little piece on this, let's throw it on the screen here.
This is the little bit that comes from the office, the
Inspector General for Health and Human Services.
I shared it with you only because like I said, I tried to
go out there and find out if Coronavirus payments were still
getting done. And it does appear that that's
actually expected to go through 2024.
Right now, this little article is undated, but it talks about
the CARES Act. It talks about the Payroll
Protection Act and cumulatively they were known as the provider
relief funds that were being given to hospitals in order to
treat people who were getting treated for Coronavirus and
being tested for it. And so under those terms, it
appears that they actually extend through.
The idea was that they were supposed to stop surprise
billing and things that were considered out of network for
people so that people were not hit with this and then suddenly
devastated once again. Yet another reason why our
federal government has found to hand out money to its preferred
industries and to improperly use your money.
That's what federal governments do.
Let's talk about your money for just one second.
Things you could do with your money, should you be so
inclined. You could spend it on some
disaster preparedness. You could spend it on getting
ready for whatever's coming and God knows what's coming.
Honestly, no. God only knows.
That's the only people who know. Check out some of the things
that are over at fourpatriots.com/kyle.
You can go to fourpatriots.com/kyle.
You can get some emergency food. You can hide yourself against
disasters. You can check out these schools.
I don't know what else to call them.
They call them like a liberty radio, a liberty self charging
with four different options. The hand crank and the batteries
and the solar and all the stuff. I'm more into the calling it the
zombie protection radio because I see them in every zombie
thing. There's also, if you guys look
at the bottom here where we've got a guy that's continually
throwing his power cell, it's a solar chargeable power cell.
I used to have one of these when I was working for The Bureau.
Nothing better than putting that up in your windshield and
letting it charge up. And then when you're on foot,
you just toss it into your bag and you never know when you
might need it because if your phone starts dying, you lose
your comms. Continuity of comms is a safety
thing, both for law enforcement and in in disasters or
emergencies. If you can't reach out to
people, you're going to be in trouble.
So check out four Patriots, the number 4 Patriots with an
s.com/kyle. Or just use my promo code Kyle.
We have the same promo code everywhere you go.
fourpatriots.com/kyle and check them out.
Get yourself set up. You never know.
It's coming. Whatever it is, something's
coming. We can't figure out exactly what
it is, but we are getting a little instinct of it.
I'm not done with COVID yet. You guys might have discovered
I'm not done. We're going to keep going
regardless of whether you like it or not.
Here is a little piece from Catholic Vote.
And what we know is, is that Anthony Fauci is really not
convinced that what he did and what he recommended and closing
all these schools for COVID, that it negatively affected
kids. Well, that seems like a problem
because I'm pretty sure that all parents can pretty much
recognize this. Anthony Fauci told members of
Congress on Tuesday that he's not, quote UN quote convinced.
This is the same guy that said he doesn't need religion.
Do you remember that? He doesn't normally need
religion because his ethics are superior to a church.
That's that's called pride. My buddy Garrett O'boyle would
refer to that as hubris, both accurate and When you have such
a thing, you cannot see fault in yourself.
And that's where Anthony Fauci always seems to land the
arrogance of this man. Pride, the original sin.
It's pretty incredible. And the fact that he's out there
and testifying to this, amazingly enough, he also could
not remember he went to the gym. Jim Comedy and the Chris Ray
School of testification. Should we make that a word?
Testification. The idea is that this guy has
testified saying he's not convinced about what he did was
wrong and more importantly, he's really not sure what actually
went on. I mean, it's so long ago, It was
years ago. How could he ever remember
exactly what it is he did now? Ask him about anything that he
is asked about, Anything he's ever done.
Man, I bet you that guy's got his ACL legs.
All like people who who praised him, top of mind awareness, but
things that he might be held accountable for, Definitely not.
The New York Post noted that he made the stunning admission on
the 2nd and final day of his 14 hour closed door interview.
These are all obviously leaked with the House Select Committee
on the Coronavirus pandemic. Just remember, the Republicans
have handled all this stuff OK? They've handled it perfectly.
They're solving all your problems.
They had a closed door hearing with Anthony Fauci.
End of discussion. I don't want to hear any more
things saying the Republicans didn't solve the problem just so
you guys know that's what their solution looks like.
A hearing. It doesn't look like doing
anything about it. It doesn't look like holding
anybody accountable. If that's what you were
thinking, you were mistaken. You didn't understand where
government goes. But they did hold a a flippant
hearing. And then they showed some
government statistics saying that reading scores among nine
year olds had plummeted over the course of the pandemic to their
lowest point in 30 years. That's not Fauci's fault.
How could that be Fauci's fault? He just recommended the schools
were closed. The fact that kids stop reading
when they were at home with their parents, that's on them,
right? In some ways I actually agree
with that. In some ways I had.
You have to say, you know he's not totally wrong.
It is your responsibility to educate your own children.
I think that between Randi Weingartner, who is basically a
screaming Yeti and a disgusting, disgusting, masculine looking
female, it's like I said, the trans movement was hard on the
ugly women, harder than harder than anybody.
I call them homely women on on the Internet last night.
But that and and Anthony Fauci, the two biggest advocates for
homeschooling and the coronavirus actually put
millions of kids on the on the track to being educated by their
own parents. We went, you know what, The
Internet exists. The world is not the same thing
that it was. Thank you for reminding us a lot
of times, incremental technology and games.
The the games that we would get from disruptive technologies.
It should have disrupted the education industry.
What should have happened was we should have had probably by the
time that I got out of high school.
That's probably about where it started.
Somewhere between let's say 1995 and 2005 when I finished college
and I'm and yes I did take an extra year in college.
But as I as I got out of school completely, was about the time
that the the normal method of educating your kids was it was
obsolete. It no longer made any sense to
anybody that was paying attention.
I don't think it made any sense and the reason is, is because
the disruptive technology of the Internet and being able to
digitize all the books. Do you guys know why people used
to go to university? Do you know why it was such a
big deal? Because that's where the books
were. Universities used to rank
themselves by the number of volumes in the library.
That's the differential between colleges and universities.
As I understand it. It was literally how do we
figure out, you know, where all the knowledge is, who's got the
best access to it. Then they started the
interlibrary loan program. Some of you have used those for
research. If you went to a school and had
to do something like that. And what happened was is we
actually moved onward right about then from whether it
mattered. You could get a good education
almost anywhere. And then the Internet basically
blew that out of the water and we didn't notice it.
We sort of just didn't pay attention.
And then when they realized that, Oh well, we can have
teachers just sit in a safe classroom and educate people
remotely, they decentralized it on accident.
And I actually think they disrupted their own industry,
They are now shrieking to try to bring it back.
And Anthony Fauci failing to realize that he was responsible
with some of his recommendations for this, this bad program.
It was. It was partially the Fauci plan
of shutting things down, but it was also partially the fact that
teachers didn't want to come to the office and they were scared,
even though most of them are young.
And both of those things combined LED us to a kind of an
interesting point in American history, I think a tipping point
for homeschooling, which will take us back maybe 200 years,
but with resources that we couldn't have imagined even 10
years ago. There's curriculums left and
right, and my wife has got my my daughter reading.
There's nothing more exciting than seeing your kid read and
open up the entire world. I remember like Reading Rainbow
as a kid. Maybe you guys do, too.
Honestly, the minute that I could open up a book and and
take information from somebody else that I didn't have to
consume from my folks or from any other approved source, I
could grab a book off the shelf and open it.
It was game on. And a lot of kids, once they get
that point, that's the single most important thing.
Teaching kids how to critically evaluate information, Teaching
them how to take it in on their own.
You know, math most of you will never use, not in a meaningful
way, but man, reading and being able to discern what is and what
is not accurate in truth. Last night I caught my 6 year
old reading her children's Bible.
She was looking at pictures and kind of scanning through and
kind of, you know, assessing what the other stories were that
were in it. That is a proud moment for for a
parent and I I actually do credit these clowns because
right when this was happening, it was three years ago, my kids
were pretty young and it literally put us on a path that
changed the trajectory. I think a lot of you may see
that those of you who are able to and pull your kids out think
you'll be much happier in that in that homeschooling
experience. And it's not nearly the
weirdness that it was before. When I was a kid, it was always
kind of frowned upon. Also, I don't think parents took
it seriously because they didn't have the resources they have
today. Kind of amazing, pretty amazing
stuff. We got a whole bunch more junk
to keep covering. Let let's do Let's do something
that I don't normally do. I'm wearing red.
I don't even know if you can buy this, but I think GOB is in the
chat so I will plug the sweatshop right here.
This is the dash suspendables.com.
The dash suspendables.com. Again, the easiest thing that
you can do if you want to support the suspendables and you
want to show your support in public is this little pin here,
which is fantastic. Let me go full screen with this
Kaboom. Look at that.
It looks great. You can get three of them, 30
bucks. Just go in and add them in the
bundle. Put my name in there is the
promo code. Kyle, save 10% on everything.
You get free shipping. So three of those for 30 bucks.
They ship out. They're fast.
They're super easy to get. You can give them as gifts in
the last minute pinch and worth your time 100% doing that.
We've got the the patches too if you're like a CrossFit type.
If you if you walk around or if you're George Hill you walk
around with a plate carrier on. Go to thedashsuspendables.com.
I will tell you without any shame if you look on that page
right there the green rifle shirt the last line strength I I
wore the last line sub stack shirt yesterday and a pair of
Ranger panties that actually had the last line emblem in green.
I think they're one offs. I'm not sure if they're they're
selling them on the on the site but I wore those yesterday and
jogged around and nothing like skies out thighs out to get
people looking at you. It's only like in the 50s right
here so it's plenty of T-shirt and and Ranger panty weather.
If you guys live in Florida where it's freezing and it's 51°
consider maybe you just need to move more.
Don't snow don't don't don't need show snow.
Snow shoveling. I can't even say it.
Don't do that. That might kill you, but go for
a jog. You'll be happy you did.
All right, so let's press on. How about some news about what's
going on in the world? This is going to be very
exciting to you guys. Kaboom.
There he is, Chris Christie. He's dropped out of the race.
And when I say dropped out of the race, I don't mean that he
hit the ground and fell because you would have known.
No, he just said I'm no longer going to be running for
president, which we all knew. The minute he started running
for president, interestingly enough, he was caught on a hot
mic kind of noting that none of the other candidates are serious
or have any chance. And I think that he's saying the
quiet part out loud on accident. It's actually really helpful.
Like I said, I I told you guys and you all probably know that
this was never going to be a successful run against a Donald
Trump. It's not going to happen.
But let's listen to some audio of Chris Christie right after.
And he's just kind of telling people like this is how it is.
He's actually not a dumb guy at all.
He never has been. But his, his political facade is
awful and it's really unlikable. I think he's probably very
bright in in in like, back channels.
And if you dealt with him one-on-one, you wouldn't hate
it. And I and I don't hate listening
to this. This is a very sober assessment
from a very heavy guy that, you know, doesn't look like he could
ever be president in this country, not in the era of TV,
but here he is. Let's hear him in his own words,
you know, forget she. Spent. 68 Movie.
Yeah, well, when you get land to China and places like that,
yeah, that's what you get. Yeah.
I mean, look, she's spent 68,000,000 so far just on TV,
spent 68,000,000 so far, 59,000,000 by DeSantis and we
spent 12. I mean, who's punching above
their weight and who's getting a return on their investment, you
know, And she's going to get smoked.
And you and I both know it. She's not up to this.
He's still 20 points behind Trump in New Hampshire, right.
Oh yeah. And he's going to.
He's still going to carry out, right.
Yes, always. I, you know, I talked to
DeSantis, called me Petrified that I would he's probably
getting out of half of Iowa well.
He is DeSantis getting out after Iowa.
I don't know why the audio cut out there, why they didn't
decide to leak that piece too, or whoever had it has chopped
it. But that's the piece that's all
over the web. A lot of people, Laura Loomer
and DC Drano and some others were sharing this all over
social media. But yeah, like, why are these
people even sticking around the race, the amount of money
they're spending to $60 million on each of their campaigns to
lose, They're not even close. I mean in the polling that the
likability of it, the fact the matter is, is that whether you
like it or not, I don't care who you want to vote for in the
primary. This is Donald Trump's race.
It always was, Like I said, the deep state, the administrative
state, the powers that be, the media have ordained him the
problem. And that's how you're going to
get what's going to happen. That's how you're going to get
the person who is going to come after you full bore.
He's got no other choice. And and honestly, people in the
political right, if you are lowercase C conservative,
lowercase L libertarian. If you're looking who it is that
they're scared of and who it is, that has to be, you know the
nominee who's got to go head to head.
We got to have a 2020 rematch. They've already named it.
They told you they want to talk about COVID.
They want to talk about January 6th.
January 6th is directly related to what happened in November of
2020. All these things have to happen.
So we're doing it again folks. I mean that's the reason I I
actually said that like based on what happened in 2020 and then
2022's election might be the last one.
It was such an eked out like non victory for people in the
Republican Party that it just kicked the can down the road.
And now we're going to re adjudicate the last two
elections in November of this year.
I think it's pretty apparent to me, and I appreciate that Chris
Christie knows it. Nikki Haley's going to get
smoked. I don't know about this whole
thing about land for China. I don't think she gave land for
China. But they're tolerating certain
things in the Republican Party. That tells you they are not
conservative with a lower case C They don't want to conserve
anything. They're more than happy to give
our country away. They really are.
And I guess that kind of is an interesting sort of attempt to
segue. The people that are helping them
do that are the folks that are working for my ex-girlfriend,
the FBI, and here we go. Are you ready?
Here's the story of the day. I called this episode Entrapped
on purpose because we're going to talk about something that's
truly, truly upsetting and also incredibly normal.
There's nothing weird or unusual about this, and this story
actually broke a little while ago, but this is another good
cover down on it was done yesterday at the Intercept.
Who they have a they have an ideological bend.
There's no doubt about it that The Intercept, when they cover
these stories, they believe that the reason the FBI is unfair is
because they unfairly target black and brown people.
I've been told as much by the people that right there at least
Trevor Aronson, who covered this.
This one is done by Murzada Muraza.
I don't know. Hussein.
You can tell by the name this guy is looking at this
particular ideology and saying, Oh well, it's the FBI targeting
black and brown people. Don't get me wrong, the FBI has
been very unfair to a lot of people and Muslim people in the
Post 911 ERA were 100% targeted in a meaningful way.
OK, that happened. They definitely did not have a
perfect record on this. But to say that it was only that
we can look forward and say no, no, no.
What they did is they basically created a playbook, which Trevor
Aronson wrote about in his book called The Terror Factory.
And I highly recommend the Ted Talk once again if you're going
to spend 15 minutes and understand the way the FBI
operates, not as conclusions about why, but the way the
methodology, the Terror Factory is the way it's done.
And what do they do? They find low information people
that have either mental problems or financial problems or they
are down on their luck and then they go and they target them and
they offer them an opportunity. Again, I have said, I've said
this a couple times in other people's podcast and I and I do
it on mine occasionally and I'll do it today.
Here's a good little snippet for you.
If you're online, which mount. Most of us are.
And you engage in a back and forth, whether it be in DMS,
whether it be on channels, whether you be on a 4 Chan or a
Reddit or any of these kind of things.
If you're on Facebook groups and there is somebody who is
encouraging your worst ideas specifically and especially the
ones that involve violence, it's like we're going to overthrow
the capital, right? If you hear Ray Epps coming out
of somebody's mouth online and they're typing it up to you and
that person not only is going to back up your your worst ideas,
but they want to help you carry them out and they're really
driving you to help do it. Hey, let's meet up.
Let's do this. Let's make this happen.
Worst ideas want to help you carry them out.
And the last piece is they know somebody, they know a guy throw
away. They know a guy and that guy can
help you accomplish whatever it is that you need for the exact
amount of money that you have. That's a Fed.
That's an undercover employee for the FBI or the DHS.
That is someone who is basically paid, whether as ACHS or as an
actual W2 federal employee and undercover.
They are trying to move you along so that you can also be
someone who commits A terrorism. Just do a terrorism and that
person is going to get paid out or they're going to be able to
meet their legal quotas. They're going to be able to push
the stats up so that somebody hit the metric to get a green or
a gold little stars, as they do in a field office evaluation.
That person gets a bonus. I'm not making this up.
This is not like, this is not speculation.
This is how it works. You have to drive the case
along. Simple example.
We're going to talk about this kid who is an autistic teen at
16 years old. They love people that are young
and stupid. That's fantastic for them.
OK, we had a guy who was a so-called white supremacist who
was saying white supremacist stuff, whatever that means.
I'll just put that in air. Quotes, scare quotes.
He was saying those things online.
He was a active duty Marine in a East Coast military base.
You guys can guess where it might be known as the what do
they call it? The the wayward School for Boys
or the school for wayward boys. And long and short of it is here
he was saying stupid things. So what did they do?
They invested security resources because they put a surveillance
team on him that literally moved into a hotel for three months.
My team went down for two separate two week deployments.
We followed this guy even though he was sitting on a military
base, even though he was following orders.
He didn't even bring his gun on base in violation of the
standing orders against having a firearm that wasn't in the
Armory. He kept it at a gun store where
he rented space. And then what did he do?
He decided to meet up with an undercover because that's what
happens. And the undercovers, like, hey
man, let's do a terrorism. Are you in?
Let's kill cops. Let's kill black cops.
You want some? And he's like, Nah, man, I think
I'm trying to get a discharge. I'm trying to get out of the
military. And then I want to meet a girl
and I want to hold hands with her.
And maybe that would be good for me, like, emotionally and
sexually. And then also maybe I could get
a job. And then maybe she would stick
around. And then maybe I'd have a girl
in my life. And then maybe I wouldn't hate
black people as much. Maybe I can get myself out of
this. I just need to get out of the
military. That's really where I'm at.
And they're like, oh, yeah, yeah.
And then a terrorism, right? A terrorism.
Are you into it? Shoot up a police station.
And he's like, I don't want to let you guys down.
Like, maybe later, but no, That's the FBI driving a
terrorism narrative, driving somebody in a white supremacy
setting. And what do we do?
They kept that going for months. Multiple meetups, long term
commitments, Pull cameras outside of his barracks in the
dormitories or barracks on a Marine base.
Yeah, yeah, you guys know what I'm talking about.
Is that normal? Is that OK?
Should we be OK with that? I I like, is that how you want
your money being used? Again?
And the question about the FBI is very simple.
It may not be legally known as entrapment, but morally all of
us have a sense that what that that little interaction that I
described to you, which was by the way, very, very gentle, it
was actually probably a lot more aggressive than that.
In real life, all of that stuff is what we are spending $11
billion on. And would you spend your $11
billion on that if you had a chance?
I don't know. Let's do the Intercept story.
This guy who was arrested, his name was Humza Hod and he had
cleared security in the Denver International Airport.
When the FBI showed up to arrest him, he was an 18 year old who
was diagnosed with a developmental disability on the
autism spectrum. At the time of the arrest, he
was reading Diary of a Wimpy Kid, which is written for
elementary school kids. He was developmentally delayed.
He'd gone to the airport on December 18th to fly to Dubai,
right, because he was going to join ISIS because that's what
they're looking for, is an 18 year old that the FBI has helped
recruit to go to ISIS. Was ISIS ever involved?
Probably not. That's not how it works.
In the criminal complaint, there were actually 4 FBI undercover
agents who all kind of rotated on talking to this guy for
years, starting when he was about 16 years old.
After the initial hearing, family members found out that he
had been basically recruited online by FBI agents and
undercovers people who are acting in a covert capacity for
years. And rather than try to fix him
or rather than try to reach out to parents, which is what you
might think that your federal government would do when your 16
year old is out there having terroristic ideas and has no
ability to accomplish them. They just waited till he turned
18 and he could go get himself a passport and he could have a
little bit of money which they helped him out with.
And then he goes and he decides to fly to join ISIS.
But the ISIS is actually the FBI.
How else do we deal with This is the same story that happened in
Whitmer's case in Gretchen Whitmer's case with the Michigan
Wolverines, when everybody in the car is a Fed except the guy
they're trying to arrest. Does that seem like the way that
you want your dollar spent for the federal government?
There's a big reason why this narrative has to continue.
There has to be lots of terrorisms and there have to be
lots of very, very bad people. And it doesn't matter if they're
black or brown or any other flavor of color that the the
human skin can take. Doesn't matter if they're white
supremacist, they're all equally good.
And so for the political left to push the narrative at the FBI is
really, really good because they're going after the MAGA
people. They are missing out on the
historical pattern that has existed for a very long time,
and it's just a matter of time before they decide to come after
them. It just depends on where the
funding is. That's what's going on here.
This kid is 16 years old. Otherwise would have been like
in his relative's basement posting offensive content
similar to a white supremacist or a Proud Boy.
And the FBI doesn't spend enormous resources trying to
entrap them. Yeah, actually they do, as you
guys have found out. So the Intercept is slightly
wrong about this. And unfortunately, we have
people in our national security space that are professors at
various things. You can get a quote about it.
But the reality is, is that all the cases that I've seen, all of
them are the same white supremacist, you know, Islamic
terrorism. They use the same exact
playbook. They're all counterterrorism.
They all come out of the same group, which is called CTD, the
FBI Counterterrorism division. And those are the same people
that sent out the letter saying that they were going to watch
parents at school board meetings with the Edu officials.
Threat tag. Are you starting to put it all
together here? Because that's what it looks
like when your budget is tied to terrorism.
Your goal is to find terrorism, not disrupt terrorism that is
actually there organically. And when it goes away, we just
send those people to other places.
Wouldn't that be the case? Wouldn't they go, well, you know
what we've noticed that we've lost a bunch of kids at the
border and maybe we should go after child sex trafficking.
That would be good. Let's surge to where it makes
sense. No.
You are a counterterrorism agent, and you work for someone
who's made their bones in the counterterrorism division.
That person needs there to be lots of counterterrorism work.
And so in order to continue doing that, they will create
fantasy events like this one. He was, quote UN quote known to
police for social media posts about the time of his 16th
birthday. How many idiots are out there at
16? How many of you were retards at
16 years old doing things that were overly aggressive and if
you had the ability to transmit it out into the world where the
FBI might be waiting to catch whatever crazy small little
thing you said? A tweet that nobody else saw?
A Reddit post that nobody else was looking for Because there's
keyword searching. They have tools that will scroll
social media like social spider. And there's a couple of other
ones out there that are of varying capabilities, but they
can hone in on keywords in areas to target the so-called threats.
And if they pick up an underage juvenile, it doesn't matter,
they'll just cultivate him like this until that person is of the
age of majority where they can arrest him.
Does that worry you? It worries the hell out of me.
And I was saw it. I saw this stuff when we went
out there and and did the the surveillance on these types of
cases. More often than not, and this is
one of the reasons why I don't feel bad about what we did.
The stuff that we were writing down was exculpatory.
You familiar with that term? Exculpatory means that what we
witnessed actually went to the defense of the person.
If they were discovered, they would go and they would look at
what we were watching. They would look at our daily
reports and they'd be like this person is not a threat.
We didn't comment with anything other than on this time this
happened, on this time this person was met, so on and so
forth. We would just describe what
their daily patterns were. And those daily patterns were
not a threat. And I would say as much if asked
under testimony, which of course they would never want to do.
Most of these people plea out because they're indigent and
they have a crappy public defender and the public defender
is basically incentivized to take on more cases and settle
them. So just be aware this is what
the the MO of our federal government is.
This is what the Entraven looks like, and it's really strange.
Now, here's a fun thing. That kid is going to face 20
years for material support of terrorism.
Many of them plea out for about that much.
I've seen very similar cases for people who maybe don't belong in
public, who need some help. This kid had autism.
He was, you know, sort of developmentally delayed.
But then you've got this stuff going on.
Meanwhile, we're sending Proud Boys to jail for 20 and 30
years. How about this nonsense?
You guys see the story already as well.
Navy sailor accepted bribes from China.
I don't know how. You're a sailor.
You work for the Navy and you get a bribe.
It's not really a bribe, is it? It's a payment for espionage,
transmitting sensitive information to a Chinese
military agent, which is a collector.
This person, this, this, this Chinese national who goes and
joins the United States Navy and starts giving things away,
Received 27 months. That's the sentence. 27 months
and a five $5500 fine. This is published by Sarah
Carter's website. 26 year old Petty Officer Wen Heng Zhao pled
guilty at the end of last year for accepting bribes from the
Chinese in exchange for non public U.S. intelligence that he
collected while performing his duties.
You notice it doesn't say classified.
That's kind of interesting too. The question is this, whether or
not it's classified as irrelevant.
When it's national security information, it's national
security information. That's the way the statute is
written. That's the way the way they're
going after Trump by the way too.
It's not about whether it's classified.
Sentenced to 27 months in prison, he'll see probably 50%
of that, most likely based on the First Step Act, because this
is his first problem. He received $14,866 in over a
dozen separate payments. Those are small payments.
Do you guys want to know when I say that things like Charles
Mcgonagall is not dealing with money, That is transactional
espionage. There's a real number when you
look at it. When you work these types of
cases, there are numbers that look like transactional amounts
of espionage. 10s of thousands of dollars, that's really more
reasonable. 10s of thousands of dollars are more reasonable, not
hundreds of thousands of dollars.
This is not a way to get rich. You know how desperate you have
to be for this kind of thing? 14,866 dollars is going to be
the amount of money that you take in to betray the federal
government that you work for under the threat of going to
jail for. You'd think for life, wouldn't
you? No, it's just going to be a
year. And he didn't even have to pay
back all the money. He only has to pay back 5500
bucks in fines. He actually took in more money
and based on what a naval the Navy sailor makes, that's
actually not the worst deal. I think I was making like 17 or
$18,000 a year when I was a when I was in E3 and E4.
So low level people like this, He's a Petty Officer.
I guess he made a little bit more money than that.
But in that wild, the numbers that we think, the numbers that
we would think for betraying this country are not what they
are in reality. That's not what they're actually
being sentenced with. All this stuff is kind of crazy.
And the other funny thing is to think that the PRC, the People's
Republic of China, is not out there trying this on.
A lot of people like that's false.
Of course they are. This is a standard thing.
And they are happy to get people to take what they call first.
It's it's public information. Go get me some public stuff.
That's how they start. OK.
So if you guys are looking at what looks to be groomed by an
intelligence service, it's getting people to say, yes, just
like a salesperson. If I could do this thing and you
could do that, would that, would that be interesting to you?
Well, yeah. OK.
If I could do this, would you do this?
It's the train of yeses. And the train of yeses is get
some stuff that I can get, like off Google.
Well, like, oh, they just want some Google stuff.
They're going to give you 800 bucks for it.
Awesome. No big deal.
You're saying yes. You're saying yes.
Hey, what? Wasn't there something in a
briefing you guys had the other day?
It's not classified. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Oh, it's not classified. So then they give it to you and
you get those people saying yes until either they're caught or
they're not. And they give away something
really serious, like, I don't know, like the plans to one of
our super carriers. All this stuff is dangerous, But
the thing that blows my mind is 27 months for legitimately
treacherous activity. I don't want to use the word
treason, but treacherous activity and giving away secrets
from a trusted position inside our military.
It's compromise. It's compromise.
And then meanwhile you've got people like Steve Baker,
journalists that are going to jail.
We've got 60 days in prison, which ended up being a little
bit shorter by by Owen Schroyer, right?
We went after journalists who were literally exercising their
rights as Americans to say things that were not dangerous.
Problematic. Is it not a little bit of good
news? Ray Epps got off light, as you
guys saw, 12 months of probation.
We actually have a sort of a nice little analogue to that
Stephen Horne, whose case I've been watching for a little
while. He's actually squared away.
And and and, you know, he seems like a really nice kid.
He's very young. Baker's been following this too.
Got a very unusual light sentence as well.
Yesterday he read a statement to the judge.
I'm going to play the statement for you.
It's worth hearing these things. The most important piece is that
we continue to ride these and hold the judges accountable so
that if giving away classified or or intelligence information
to a Chinese spy results in 27 months, all things should be
treated accordingly. And and Congress actually has a
big rule in this. They're the ones who actually
set the statute and the minimums and the maximums for these types
of jails or for these types of offenses against US code.
So wouldn't it be nice if we saw just a little bit of parity
here, If there was some even handedness, it would go a long
ways to establishing credibility within the judicial system,
which we don't necessarily have and we don't necessarily feel at
this exact moment. Let's play Stephen Horn's video
real quick, give you I'm not going to play the whole thing.
It's about 3 minutes. You guys can find this on
social. But if you guys want to listen
to a little piece, here's a test, a little taste.
This is my statement that I read to the judge today before my
sentencing. Now I'm reading it for the
public. Your Honor, I appreciate this
opportunity to address you directly.
Whenever a journalist or other member of the media is covering
an unstable or tumultuous situation like a riot, they must
grapple with balancing the public interest in whatever
events are occurring against the potential impact of their
presence. I attempted to keep this
principle in mind while I was on Capitol grounds, observing the
human dynamics in each room I entered, whether my presence and
behavior was raising or lowering the average temperature, and
trying to avoid being in the way of police carrying out their
duties to the extent of my presence emboldened violent
rioters or hindered police officers from doing their duty.
I am genuinely sorry to the extent of my joining in a chant
of USA and the crypt under the Rotunda emboldened violent
rioters or hindered police officers from doing their duty.
I'm sorry for that as well. I cannot stand before you today
and tell you that my judgment was without air, but what I can
speak to with 100% certainty is my intent.
I won't belabor the point by rehashing testimony you have
already heard. I have attempted to be
forthright from day one about my behavior and motives and
reaching out to the FBI and conducting an interview with
them and numerous media interviews and public statements
I have made and then sworn testimony at trial.
However, I will admit that I allowed the prosecution to get
under my skin during cross examination, and for that
failure and my demeanor, I apologize to the court.
That's probably good enough right there.
So he apologizes to the court. He reached out to the FBI.
Let's just do another quick lesson.
I've already told you how to spot a Fed either in the chat or
in in your own life or in your DMS or whatever else.
Let's do the second piece of that, which is do not talk to
the FBI. There's another story we're
going to have here in just a second.
We're going to talk about that. Stop talking to the FBI people.
That's generally the case for law enforcement.
It's very much the case for the FBI.
They're not first responders. They are not trying to solve an
imminent problem. They are trying to do what their
job is, which is to go out and interview people that they're
told to interview. And if that name that comes
across their desk, which I've made fun of many times, that the
the, the conveyor belt of names or the ticker tape of names,
that they're just going to go talk to you.
Sometimes it is that stupid. It's a lead from somewhere else.
They don't even know what it's about.
They don't need to entrap you. They don't need to say anything,
but they're going to listen to what you say and they're going
to just hone in on things. I've been out on interviews that
were really dumb, a guy who was like using an eBay account and
pretending to be a government agent, which is stupid, by the
way, and who cares? But we had to check it out.
And when I got there to talk to the guy, the first thing he did
is said, come on in, sit down in my house, mistake #1.
But I'm pretty good at talking to people, as you guys can tell.
And I'm sitting down. And the first thing he does is
he reaches over, he unplugs his router.
And I was like, what in the actual hell?
And so I go, why did you do that?
Like, why did you just, why did you just reach over and unplug
your router in front of two FBI agents and he goes, oh, I
thought you might be here about my search history.
That's a big red flag. Nobody made him say that.
And it was really weird and stupid.
Here's the thing. I don't actually really care.
And I don't think anything came out of this.
But what I will tell you is he goes, I thought you were here
about my search history. And I go, oh, well, what about
your search history would I be interested in?
And he was like, well, I do a lot of research into like
terrorist groups and stuff. And like, I'm a student.
And I go, oh, OK Where are you a student?
Well, I'm, I'm. I'm at this university and this
and this and that. So he explains it to me and I
go, oh, OK, fair enough. How long you been studying
there? Well, I started studying in this
thing and then I started going there.
And then, you know, then I took like a couple semesters off and
I go, oh, OK, fair enough. Yeah.
So you're back studying there now?
No, no, I still, I'm still on a break from that.
So what you're telling me, and I rephrased this for him, what
you're telling me is that you were a student and you were
studying counterterrorism, and now you're not a student and
you're still studying counterterrorism, and you're
afraid of your search history and you unplugged your router.
Am I getting that correctly? That's not why I was there,
folks. I was there because he had
pretended to be a federal agent online.
And then he's like, yeah, I go, what kind of stuff did you
research? A lot of ISIS.
And like, some of the things I watched, some of their videos,
It's like, man, what's wrong with you?
Why are you talking to the FBI, you clown.
Now you just made more work for me, #1 and #2, what are you
doing? Well, like, how foolish.
Are you also not a cyber security expert?
As someone just mentioned, the chat you only just hit unplugged
router is not going to help you. No, it's not like that.
History is already at your, you know, your ISP or Internet
service provider and so on. You need a Hillary Clinton
bleach bit, I think, and you need to wipe it with a cloth if
you really want. It's gone.
But I'm just sitting here listening to this person.
I'm going like, I'm like unbelievable.
Stop talking to the FBI people and stop doing weird stuff,
especially if they come talk to you.
Just politely say no thank you. No, thank you.
We're not taking me. If they're going to arrest you,
they're going to arrest you. They're going to search you.
You don't have to say anything
about it. Just say I invoke my right to
counsel. I'd like to speak to an
attorney. That's definitive.
And it's over. That's the end of it.
They can't talk to you after that.
I've had people try to talk to me after that.
And it's like, no, no, no, no. I can't talk to you.
You just told me you want an attorney.
I have to wait. This drive is going to be in
silence. I don't mind.
Let's put on a podcast. We cannot talk about the thing
that is related to your case. Once you tell me that that's the
that's the way that it's supposed to be done and you will
find that, no, generally speaking, be honest.
So that's not terrible. Now here's the thing about
Stephen Horn's video that bothers me, OK?
The thing is, is that there's some other stuff that's out
there and there's some people that have not been charged at
all. Now he got probation and he had
a light sentence, and that's actually pretty good.
He's got some fines and they're not cheap, but he didn't have a
public defender. He fought it correctly.
And Stephen Horne basically got probation too.
So even though he had four misdemeanor charges, he's not
going to face jail time, thank God.
Honestly, you saw that kid. He would get torn up.
But this is also not facing any jail time, nor is it facing any
prosecution. And you probably haven't heard
this before. You probably haven't heard this.
You ready? This is a radio call from
Lieutenant Michael Byrd inside the United States Capitol on
January 6th. Somebody that I would argue
should have been investigated at least for whether or not the
homicide was justified against Ashley Babbitt, and I don't
think so. And this, apparently, was what
he thought was going on. Just listen to the tone of voice
and some of the information that's being shared.
Oh. 5B We got shots fired in the lobby.
We got shots fired in the lobby of the House chamber.
You have to be fired enough and then we have to fire back at
them. You have guns.
Wrong. Don't leave that in.
I'm casting shots fired on the
House floor again. I got an injured person.
I believe that person was shot. Civilians, we need em fees.
We need come through on the West side of the building up to the
house lobby. I'll be house 2. 53 Get your
copy the. Copy house, lobby, Westside
individual, have you heard that before?
He said. There were shots fired at them
and they are prepared to return fire.
He's the only one that shot that day.
At the very least, he was mistaken and overcome by
circumstances. We'd call that vapor lock.
Sometimes in a training environment, they just had too
much going on. But instead, this is a guy who
was bad with his weapon, who failed to maintain control of
it. That's not a fireable offense
for most federal agencies. You'll be shocked to learn
losing your weapon in a public bathroom inside the Capitol is
actually not a fireable offense. If you did that in the FBI, you
probably get like 5 days suspension without pay.
So that's kind of wild. And that happens.
People lose rifles or like, you know, whatever.
But a pattern of poor handling of weapons, a pattern of, you
know, not being very capable and that's why the whole diversity
hire narrative about what the Capitol Police hires, which is
not very capable people. Anybody who's really
particularly serious, I don't know anybody that stayed in the
Capitol Police, they use it as a springboard.
There's people that were decent, They were there for a couple
years and they went and found another federal job.
Because if you're serious about being in law enforcement, you
don't want to be a security guard that just hangs out in the
US Capitol and is subservient to a non executive branch where you
can't go out and do law enforcement that they don't.
They're not investigative. They're security guards,
International mall cops. I've said that enough times
here. We've talked about it with
Gerard O'boyle. That's my take on it.
I'm not particularly impressed with the United States Capitol
Police. I would say they are slightly
below the barrel of the people at DC Metro PD, which is one of
the lowest barrels there is. It's at the bottom of the
barrel. These DC Metro PD might be the
bottom and US Capitol Police might be under the barrel.
It's not even in the barrel of law enforcement.
At least DC Metro does some law enforcement activities.
And even though they hire people with felonies, you know, people
with felonies tend to know a little bit about crime.
Just saying, take it for whatever it is worth.
And yes, the city of DC will hire people with felonies in
their backgrounds, including murder it turns out, because
I've arrested a actual convicted murderer who was working for the
city of DC. So that's where your tax dollars
go. In the meantime, we have this,
and this is kind of an interesting story in in and of
itself, but talking about things like talking about being able to
coerce people into testimonies, being able to go after sort of
like entrapment type cases. Let's look at the story that
broke the other day. 5000 rounds of ammo found it in Arizona.
Man's house, accused of threatening to kill FBI agents.
Guy's name is Michael Lee Tomasi and they found three they
uncovered. That's my favorite.
I love NBC by the way. This is not in their law
enforcement section and this is not in their you know, I don't
know what what other section you would have like, you know
national news. This is in their Guns in America
section, The Guns in America, NBC News And what are they
talking about 5000 rounds of ammo like No exaggeration.
I have more than hold on. I'm going to do, I'm just going
to do that. I don't normally show this, but
look at this. I've got about eight of these.
These are bricks of 22. I have more than 5000 rounds
under my desk right now. I got more than 5000 rounds of
ammunition in this room within arm's reach of where I'm at.
5000 rounds of ammunition. Get the hell out of here.
They found an AR15 style bazooka.
I I made that up. But my buddy and I agreed at one
point in time that we will call all AR Fifteens Bazookas because
it's funny and and six loaded magazines.
You remember that whether the magazine is loaded or not
loaded. How loaded does it have to be?
Is it fully loaded? Is it only 28 rounds Because he
wants to preserve the springs? And he has some idea that that
might help. I mean, what are we talking
about? This is Smith and Wesson style.
AR15. That's a budget.
AR15. I spent more money on optics
than that rifle. And the way he's got it set up,
he had a loaded handgun. Oh, my God.
A loaded handgun In Arizona. In his vehicle, no less.
Holy moly, A constitutional carry state.
Give me a break. And what was he?
He was arrested for guns, right? I mean, that's obviously what's
going on. There's gun charges.
No, he was arrested for three counts of threats against a
federal official. That's what you're seeing on the
screen here. 3 threats for threatening posts on social
media. The so-called Interstate
threats. That's what they came after him
for And his trial set to begin February 6th.
He was arrested last month 5000 rounds and three guns and some
loaded magazines in unsealed court documents.
NBC is basically creaming them self over this stuff and well,
he did post extremist things, including saying that he wanted
to target FBI agents, including a threat to shoot FBI agents on
site. He posted quote, shoot the FBI
first, ask questions later. They are terrorists.
They deserve nothing but to be shot on site.
That's interesting. Is that considered a true threat
under the true threat doctrine? Do you guys know about how this
is supposed to work? There was actually a Supreme
Court case in 1969 known as Watts versus United States.
This is where you all should be reading.
If you're not familiar with Watts versus US, this is worth
your time. It goes back to the Vietnam era.
It is a Vietnam War era case. Watts versus US essentially
established what we now know is the true threat doctrine which
is to say that every threat has to be evaluated.
The reason why Watts was brought, he was arrested.
Was he was arrested under the same thing that they actually
killed that guy in Utah over threats to the president.
There's AUS statute that said you cannot threaten the United
States president and this guy was in a black anti 18 year old
war protester. His name was Robert Watts.
He was at an anti war rally on the Washington Monument and he
was observed or overheard by the Army counterintelligence corps.
Yeah, they had people in the crowd that day too, it turns
out. And there were 10s of thousands
of people out there protesting against the Vietnam War in 1969,
sorry, 1966, in the early stages of the war.
And So what was it that he said? He said I'm going to quote the
entirety of it because it's often only quoted like the
little statement that was the problem.
But he said they always holler at us to get an education.
And now I've received my draft classification as 1A, which I
assume meant that he was at the top of the list.
And I've got a report for my physical this coming Monday.
I'm not going. If they ever make me carry a
rifle, the first man I want to get in my sights is LBJ.
They're not going to make me kill my black brothers.
That's the statement he made. It's considered a hypothetical
and it's considered not a true threat, even though he was
arrested for it because they were trying to quash free
speech, right? And so there you have it.
It's always happened, as I said, entrapment cases, these things.
This was not entrapment. This was just an over here he
said something publicly that is part of the political debate,
it's part of the free speech clauses you would have.
And what's interesting is, is that the court said yes, of
course that the, the, the statement, the, the entirety of
that law that protects the president from legitimate
threats. It's good, it's constitutional
and we can have it. But what they also said was that
political hyperbole is actually protected, that what a threat
must be distinguished from is constitutionally protected
speech, and that the language of the political arena is often
vituperative, abusive and inexact.
When you say what this guy said on NBC, when you say shoot the
FBI first, ask questions later, would you say that that is
inexact, vituperative, and abusive, that it is political
hyperbole? He said.
They're terrorists that deserve nothing less to be shot on
sight. Is that a true threat?
Is that a man who's going to threaten the FBI?
Do you know how I know it's not a true threat?
Because the FBI came and arrested him with that incident.
They were able to take him into custody without incident.
And he said, yeah, I was drinking, which doesn't excuse
your behavior, but it would be hard for you to argue that
somebody is making a true threat by saying that he also
supposedly made a post saying he wanted to torture federal
officials to death, one of the federal congresswoman to have
the horror of a violent rape. These are awful things.
But being an awful Sayer of things in the United States is
constitutionally protected on purpose.
It always has been. Because, as the Supreme Court
rightly says in Watts, the US 1969, this is not new.
This predates my lifetime. The language of the political
arena is often vituperative, abusive and inexact without a
plan, without a method to carry it out, without some ability
that actually goes closer to conspiracy.
We don't have the ability to carry out Interstate threat
cases, which is why the mass, the vast majority of these
things are gone. Whenever they are, they are
uttered, they basically show up, they are investigated by the the
agent who is assigned the lead and they go away because we're
like person had no ability to carry this thing out.
Person has no willingness to carry this thing out, you know,
spoke hot while high on crack. As somebody just said in the
chat, you can get away with an awful lot of things because it
doesn't have the ability to actually counter carry them out.
And that should be the number one thing that reasonable people
do unless you're not being reasonable.
Unless you are only interested in getting counterterrorism
stats. And right now that's against 266
Oscar Agave's anti government anti authority violent
extremists including this guy who supposedly threatens FBI
agents per NBCI. Highly recommend that you guys
go and get yourself versed up on Watts versus US.
That should be his defense. In this case, it's allowed to be
vituperative, vituperative, abusive, and inexact the crude
language of an offensive method of stating a political
opposition. That's exactly the words that
comes out. The court agreed that saying
that he wanted to get his rifle sights on AUS president was the
very crude, offensive method of stating political opposition to
the president. And you can have the same thing
to an executive agency. It would be my argument.
I think it's foolish to think otherwise.
It's really important that we do not discount how dangerous it is
to try to just move these needles.
Words are not violence, regardless of what.
Yeah, I saw what you saw there, Dee.
They're not violence and they can't be considered violence,
certainly not under U.S. law and certainly not under the way that
we actually have adjudicated threats for so long.
All right. Does that bug you?
It bothers me in a big way. I don't like to see people
arrested by the FBI, especially when they were going to go out
there and claim that there are 5000 rounds like that somehow.
A big deal, but this, by the way, it was one of the
interactions I had with the counterterrorism agent in my
office. He literally said the number of
guns and ammos that you have in your garage and in your house
would be enough for me to open ACT case on it.
And my buddy, who thank God, actually appreciates the
Constitution push back because you don't want to be the guy
pushing back on your on your own, you know, colleagues.
And he said, I'll take that case and I just closed it.
It's called the Second Amendment, dude.
That guy also is a Green Beret unconventional warfare.
It's kind of nice to see that kind of stuff.
Still a good person. There are decent people in the
FBI. They are outnumbered and
outgunned, and even the ones that are decent have told me
they don't like being there. And even though that they do
good work doesn't mean that the agencies to survive.
That's the argument I've made with the blessing of people who
work for the FBI. Anyone who argues against
otherwise and says the FBI is necessary doesn't understand
what the FBI does. All right, let's talk about
something that is not the FBI for one second.
Let's talk about my friends over at Patriot Coolers.
Something that I use while I work for the FBI and they never
let me down. They're great.
Great company. Patriot coolers.com.
Use the promo code Kyle. You guys are touching the trend.
Kyle saves you 10% if you want to buy any of their stuff.
This is the one that I've got on the desk right now, including
suspendables, merch stickers. This is the 19 oz cooler or the
19 oz Tumblr. It is a coffee mug with a
handle. It's nice if you're driving.
You can reach over and grab it. It fits into a cup holder,
double walled and insulated. Keeps things hot including my
coffee and keeps things cold. How do it know it's that vacuum
insulated technology which can only be made in China because
our government is ineffective? Go to patriotcoolers.com, a
Houston company that does good things.
They've reached out to us from the beginning and all their
stuff is branded with the name Patriot Patriot coolers.com.
Find them on social media at Patriot Coolers.
I told you guys I was going to make you sick.
I told folks in the chat before we got started that it's less
comedy and more dry heaves. But that's what we're at right
now. And then let's talk about
something that's even nastier. And I didn't realize this.
There's some fantastic reporting going on over at Public.
This is Mike and Michael Shellenberger's a recovering
liberal. And now I would say a
politically homeless person. A lot like Matt Taibbi, a man
who broke the Twitter files. This stuff is quite good.
This stuff is very good. And so let's read from public.
I have their other paid subscription.
If you guys want a good subscription, this is one of
them that is quite good. And they have something that
comes out every single day. This is Al.
Alex Gutentag wrote this one with Zayed Jeleni.
I don't know who Zayed is, but I've talked to Alex before the
the article is false. Claims of quote, UN quote
insurrection began minutes after the January 6th capital riot
suggests A disinformation plot. Key figures promoted the coup
attempt narrative before January 6th.
You know, when things are a set up, sometimes they just don't
count on the the amount of scrutiny that it's going to be
subjected to. I've got a number of individual
quotes on here. I'm going to try to read most of
them. I think they're worth seeing.
All right, so this article starts off saying that former
President Trump, who leads the polls right now, has been denied
his place in the ballot in two different states, Colorado and
Maine. They are the consequences of
court decisions and state officials and officers claiming
that he's ineligible to the president.
He, thanks to a provision of the 14th Amendment that bars
individuals who are, quote, UN quote, engaged in insurrection
from serving as president. OK, that's where it all starts.
It's the 14th Amendment prohibition on insurrection.
That's why that word is important.
The word insurrection is in and of itself important because of
the 14th Amendment and what they believe they might be able to
pull over again. A novel interpretation of 1512
when it comes to the Sarbanes-Oxley law saying that
they disrupted an official proceeding.
And the novel interpretation that a riot that happened
outside of AUS capitol building and inside of it could somehow
be construed as an insurrection. When the previous use of the
word insurrection, which they rightly named in this public
article was about the United States Civil War where 600,000
people died. Five people died on January 6th,
600,000 people died in the Civil War that the word insurrection
was previously used to describe. Think about the term
insurrection. Have you ever heard it before
January 6th of 2021? And the answer is likely no.
What about sedition? Have you ever heard that before?
It's not something that is commonly used in American
politics. It's not something that is
commonly used in any of the polite discussions that I've
been around. And I lived in DC for five
years, surrounded by people who cared about this kind of thing.
I'd never heard anybody talk about it.
To many Americans, this is a simply a given recording the
article here. Trump engaged in insurrection,
people on the political left. The the entirety.
In fact, let me throw this up here before anything else, lest
you think that these guys are speaking out of school, and I
don't think you do. But look at this.
This is the Washington Post, a leftist news mouthpiece.
What's on there? Right there at the top of the
screen. If you guys are not watching,
what we are seeing is the January 6th Insurrection page.
It is a landing page, is an entire section of Wapo's website
that simply has January 6th stuff on it.
And it's not even particularly interesting.
Man who who's the subject of J6 conspiracies.
Sentenced to probation. There's a Ray EPS piece on
there. Trump trades Iowa rallies for a
day in court Trump tries re appropriating insurrection on
January 6th. Ashley Babbitt story.
Trump passively encourages violence and then he rationalize
it. There's a whole section none of
these things have to do with like case.
If they were only covering cases that'd be one thing.
It's still absurd they have a insurrection sub page because
the narrative is critical for them preserving it.
And Schellenberger rightly lands on this.
They talk about the most seditious or the most serious
charge was sedition. Handful of defendants like
Enrique Tario, who wasn't even physically present in Washington
DC at the day of the riot but was convicted for his alleged
role. Why?
Because we need fall guys. When the rice stock fire
happens, we need to send the commies to jail.
That's what the Nazis did in this case when the riot
happened. It has to be insurrection.
It has to be an attempt to overthrow the government.
And most importantly, we got to have MAGA to get them going,
Schellenberger points out, because he's fair.
Even though some of the messages in the Proud Way group chats
were overtly violent and hinted at action at the Capitol, none
set forth an explicit plan to storm the building or to
forcibly disrupt the election certification taking place
inside. More importantly, what in the
hell was the plan to take over the United States government?
Because everything that I've ever seen, even the one that
was, you know, like Fed planted the 1776 return story, all of
that had to involve legal processes that you theoretically
could actually use. And they were not based on
violence, even if they were like, disruptive by using a
riot. It's all really wild and it
doesn't make any sense. But here's the things that I
found very, very interesting on here.
You'll notice the first, the first paragraph that I've
quoted, which is about halfway down in this particular page
under a section that they entitled The Birth of a
Conspiracy Theory. The earliest reference We're
quoting the piece, again the earliest reference to the term
by a high profile figure, may have come from one of Trump's
political foes. Oh, you're going to love this,
Mitton's fellow Republican Senator Mitt Romney journalist
Jonathan Martin, tweeted at 2:53 PM on January the 6th that
Romney told him, Quote, this is what the president has caused
today, this insurrection. According to the January 6th
report, protesters entered the Capitol at 2:06 PM Eastern Time.
So what is that, 4047? Minutes later, Mitt Romney is
calling it an insurrection. Wow.
It's almost like he knew that word was important.
A few minutes later, at 3:00 PM on the nose, MSNBC quoted
Martin's live tweet on air. So we started getting it going
out there into the news media on the leftist sources.
An hour and 40 minutes after the breach, Democratic Congresswoman
Ted Deutsch joined in, describing the riot as a violent
insurrection, and the narrative was crafted at 4 O 9:00 PM.
Florida Democratic Congresswoman, my favorite desi,
Debbie Wasserman Schultz ramen noodle hair accused Trump of
quote, UN quote, encouraging armed insurrection.
There we go. And then pride.
President Biden now endorse the term by saying at 4:00 PM, it's
not a protest, it's an insurrection.
Everybody got the memo 253 less than an hour after the thing had
been breached and they were still clearing people out of the
Capitol at 253. Mitt Romney calls it an
insurrection. Then a Florida Democrat.
And then Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
And then the president-elect. At the time, the first time
Biden used the term much of the press reported as something that
president-elect said. president-elect Joe Biden calls
the capital riot insurrection says USA TODAY.
Wall Street Journal picked it up.
Biden calls the attack on the capitol and insurrection that
was a headline as well. And by 7:00 PM that day, news
anchor we are learning today that today's insurrection.
It's already assumed that CNN picked it up by 7:00 PM, like 5
hours later, Rachel Maddow said the same thing.
Shocker. And then of course, Washington
Post started their Insurrection page and it began after that.
The narrative was being crafted pretty aggressively, folks.
That's some heavy-handed stuff. There's no other way to call it
That is heavy-handed nastiness, is it not?
I don't know how you deal with that.
I don't know how you square that with reality, if that's what you
believe when it was crafted that way.
And thank God for guys like Michael Shellenberger who are
out there trying to be fair minded, who are out there
looking at the stuff that are going back and analyzing it.
Very interestingly enough to you saw another little piece on the
screen here, two things #1 moon shot CVE.
It was a key player in the censorship industrial complex.
That sort of his bugaboo, that's what he focuses on.
They formed a crisis team the day before the riot.
Why? These are people that were
funded by Obama Foundation stuff.
They had people that had participated in Obama's, Obama's
Leaders for Europe program and so on, and they spent their
time. This is an organization that
apparently has been working on domestic violent extremism for
years, causing it and trapping it, creating it.
I don't know. They've been working on it,
whatever that means. And in the run up to the
election of the month of falls, it wasn't a surprise that this
attack happened. Yeah, we know what's surprising
is the government wasn't ready for it.
Why is that? That seems problematic to most
of us. All right.
I got a couple things that are going to make you sick.
Speaking of narratives, we got to craft it.
We got to put it out there. We we'd be foolish if we didn't
share with you this this very impressive song that is now in
my head, and I don't want to be the only one who has to deal
with it. And it is apparently composed,
written by these two lovely individuals, these lovely
ladies. You guys know who they are.
This is not I to be Wells. This is Nicole Hannah Jones, who
wrote the 1619 project So a fiction writer and another
fiction writer who wrote romance novels, including one called Roe
Justice Stacey Abrams, two of my least favorite people.
They created a song that I will play for you that was played and
a song by a Unitarian church. OK, this is not your palate
cleanser, so just stand by the Unitarian Church Choir sang
this. This was saying in a Church, of
all places, and we have to listen to it.
If you can't figure out what they're saying, watch the
captions on screen. If you need to go to about where
are we at. We're about 75 minutes in the
podcast. If you want to come in and watch
on the Rumble channel, it's rumble.com/kyle Serif and you
guys can follow there. Make sure you've given us a
thumbs up If you're watching, here we go.
Don't turn up the volume, you'll be sick.
Here. Let's play it Wrong button.
Video 5 coming at you. None.
The. The.
Nothing in there rhymed.
That's like some of the worst lyricism I've ever seen in my
life. But the music is kind of catchy
and we'll stay with you. And now you're going to wonder,
do your rights depend on the state that you reside in?
And do they do they depend on whether or not you can afford
valid ID? Imagine putting all that
together and being like, Yep, we got it, we're killing it.
That was Stacey Abrams. Doesn't make me want to read her
prose. Her poetry is crap and fake.
Ida B. Wells, also known as Nicole
Hannah Jones, composing the dumbest piece of choral music
that I've ever seen. And as you all accurately
pointed out, everyone in there is wearing a mask.
Pretty gross, except the one person who's not singing, which
is also really funny. And yeah, that that little Star
Wars trick they did like, they put that together.
They they published that. They're proud of what they did.
It's amazing. And I guess that led me to
thinking about white privilege and, you know, the fact that all
white people are singing about this, by the way, that right
they're talking about, for the most part, it's the right to
vote. But more importantly, they're
talking about the right to abortion, which is also really
disgusting to me. How about this lady whose name
is Jasmine? She's either named for a
stripper or for a tea that I'm a big fan of?
It's good tea, Jasmine Tea. And Crockett, who was a hero of
the Alamo in here in Texas. So she has some either Asian
cultural appropriation and Tennessean white frontiersman
cultural appropriation. She's going to do a little
lecture. I need you guys to have one more
little taste of nasty and then then we'll do something that's a
little bit cleaning. We'll get there.
We're we're working on it. But let's, let's hear what one
of my favorite congresswoman had to say.
She represents Dallas. She previously was on the show
talking about how much she hated people in Texas and how we're
deplorable. Let's hear what?
Real Housewives of South Oak Cliff, Jasmine Crockett has to
say about white privilege. And maybe just take it to heart.
Don't you lecture her about things coming from the GOP side
of the aisle. She's a Democrat in the party of
the clan. You can't make these people up.
And that I just can't get over. I can't get over the gentle lady
from South Carolina talking about white privilege.
It was a spit in the face, at least of mine as a black woman,
for you to talk about what white privilege looks like, especially
from that side of the aisle. And let me quote your now ousted
speaker and what he had to say about the Republican Party and
y'all's lack of diversity. When you look at the Democrats,
they actually look like America. When I look at my party, we look
like the most restrictive Country Club in America.
So let me tell you something. Y'all don't know what white
privilege looks like, but I'm a I'm a show you a little bit of
something. You see you want to talk about
A2 tier justice system and this is the only time that y'all have
ever referenced it. When this country has a history
when it comes to black and brown folk of having two separate sets
of rules and right now what you want to do is have two separate
sets of rules. Because Mr. Moskowitz offered
Y'all a fair situation. He said he would vote for Hunter
to be held in contempt if Y'all voted to hold all.
Even if you remove all of the members of Congress, there's
still other people that Y'all haven't decided that Y'all have
excuses for, but Y'all don't want to hold them in contempt.
But for some reason it makes sense to hold Hunter Biden in
contempt who has tried to comply.
And let me tell you why nobody wants to talk to Y'all behind
closed doors. Because y'all lie.
OK, I want to do a point of order.
The the the gentlewoman from Texas has used the word y'all
too many times in the same sentence, and that is a point of
order. We'd like to correct that.
This is against our parliamentary rules.
Can I get a ruling on that? It's amazing when you're
defending A crackhead, is what that that, that a little piece
was written on my show notes here.
When you defend A crackhead who's a really rich white guy,
it's a really weird thing to do. That's why the the, the, the,
the whole point of of white privilege is brought up.
Lest anyone think that there's a racial tinge to what we're
saying, when white people are screaming about, they're singing
a song written by dumb black women and and and talking about
racism and then we've got that poor nonsense.
You know, there are people who are intelligent in Congress, it
turns out it's irrelevant, like what color their skin is.
It's absolutely irrelevant. And here's a sober take by
someone. Let's hear a little bit from
Byron Donald spelling out like, hey, if you get served as a
subpoena, you're supposed to show up, even if you're the
president's son. Let's just hold people to the
basic standards. Let's try to have a rule of law
that is based on fairness and not based on, like, rich
crackheads sliding out on things.
Here we go. Well, wrong one.
Sorry about that one. What number am I on?
This is, oh, Byron Donaldson, number six.
There we go. Ladies and gentlemen, America,
this is ridiculous. The Biden family has no
business. They've never had a business
except for politics. And the one thing that the
Oversight Committee in conjunction with the Ways and
Means Committee and in conjunction with the Judiciary
Committee has always been able to demonstrate is that they took
down foreign nations for 1,000,000 millions, 26,000,000
at the latest count and growing millions.
And there was never any business entity involved except public
corruption and a pay for play scheme.
The House Oversight Committee would like to get to the bottom
of this. Under the impeachment inquiry of
the House, we have questions for Hunter Biden.
We issued A subpoena for him to answer said questions.
He ignored A congressional subpoena as a private citizen.
There are many attorneys on the other side of the aisle.
If you had one of your clients in your private practice ignore
a congressional subpoena as a private citizen, you would
advise them not to because they will be held in contempt and
they would actually be punished by the Department of Justice.
So I find it interesting. I'm not going to yell, Mr.
Gomen, because I had a question for you earlier.
You didn't want to take my question, so I'm not going to
take yours. Thank you.
So in closing, I will say private citizens, yes, they have
a responsibility to answer congressional subpoenas.
They do. Hunter Biden had it, and he was
flagrant. He decided to give a press
conference. So we're going to do this
business and he should be held in contempt by the full House of
Representatives. I yield back Mr. Chairman.
Love it. I also love it when Dan Goldman
is shut down. Very simple, the man said.
Things that are true. He said words and orders that
are an English sentence. He didn't have to rely on flashy
nails and crazy fake hair, which is also cultural appropriation.
Just just common sense, common decency, saying things that are
true. That's what I wanted to wrap up
on. I do have a palate cleanser for
you, though. It's a weird world out there.
I had a couple people, including some folks that you may know
that are like political influencers or whatever, and
they hit me up females. And they were like, do we know
who these people are? And I'm like, I don't know, like
ask them if they're single. I'm not into this world that you
guys deal with people stalking you online.
That's like your business. You've made your looks part of
the game. But I do think it was kind of
fun out there. Women, some of you do some
really weird stuff. We don't hate it.
My wife is one of the goofiest people that nobody will ever
find out because the stuff she does is goofy behind closed
doors. This little this woman filmed
this video and it made me laugh. So I'm sharing with you as we go
off into the day. You guys can watch this, our
little palate cleansing taste before we do our five star view.
Enjoy. And if you are this lady or your
lady who is like this, you know you can let that kind of stuff
be seen. Men are not scared by your by
your weird stuff, particularly when it's particularly charming.
And I think this definitely is that.
So enjoy. So I'm about to go on a dirt and
I have to get all my weirdness out before I see him because I
want to. I want to impress him.
He's so awesome. I don't even know what that is,
those noises coming out of that Lady that's so strange.
But I do. I do like it.
I especially if you're going to sing like random things, that's
100% of serif and household deal.
Yeah, just get your weirdness out before your date.
But, you know, don't hide that stuff forever because that's
that's gold anyway. And if you're if you're decent
looking and then nobody cares, that turns out to be men.
We we are not easily dissuaded by your weird ideas.
As long as you keep your crazy away, your weird is fine.
That's what I'm going to say. All right, let's do a five star
review here and let's shut this thing down South.
One of you really liked the Stoop Ball episode, which had my
friend Sal Greco on there. This is from Sally. 42 Stoop
ball, five stars. I grew up in Brooklyn in the
1950s. For all of you who were upset
about it, how about this? OK, Stickball was played by with
a Spalding ball because the brand had a lot of bounce.
Everybody in Brooklyn called it a small Dean as the stoop ball.
That word is from the Dutch and it means steps or sidewalk.
You can throw a small Dean at the edge of the steps.
The other kids would stand in the street to catch it 1 bounce
before catching it as a single, two bounces, a double, so on.
We had a great games back then because we played outside
everyday. We went home When the street
lights came on in the 1950s, it was a wonderful time to be a
kid. It's a crying shame that today
Brooklyn is so crime ridden and filled with Marxist money.
That's from Nancy and Jim Sullivan, expats from Brooklyn.
You know, you guys wonder why we show certain things, why we
don't show certain things. That's why we show it, because
everybody's got a little bit of different taste.
And if we brought back a little bit of that 1950s Brooklyn feel
for you, I can definitely appreciate it.
I'm glad that people enjoyed it. It was a mixed bag.
But yeah, you know what? Things were better when you got
to play outside. You got to know your neighbors
were. That's kind of what it was.
Even my wife told me that growing up in the 80s, she knew
everybody on her block. Go out there and meet your
neighbors. Folks.
It continues to be the thing that we tell you is the right
answer. And it is the right answer,
because if you know your neighbors, then you will have
less crazy and you will not be worrying about whether your
rights depend on some nonsense that is sung in a crazy, crazy
Unitarian church written by Stacey Abrams.
All people, for God's sake. All right, we'll see you again
tomorrow for a friendly Friday. I hope you guys have a wonderful
day. God bless you.
Be safe and we'll see you soon. Thanks for listening to The Kyle
Seraphin Show streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle
Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True
Social, and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.