Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, and
welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Friday and it is March the 14th and we are streaming
live. It's a friendly Friday.
We're going to have author and host of the American Radicals
podcast and my friend and your friend Steve friend joining us
momentarily. Got a lot to talk about today
because apparently we're all going to get swatted.
Or maybe just me and people that are like me.
Or maybe just people like me and not me.
Hopefully not me. I'm not real crazy about getting
swatted. I wanted to talk about
weaponized government, which is something we do all the time.
But I had a revelation this morning and as I was driving
over to my old house, 'cause we've had to switch from one
place to another, but I left the studio in place.
As I drove to the to the old house where the studio is and
sat here to talk to you, it occurred to me that swatting is
the perfect example. It's the pinnacle of weaponized
government. It is the exact thing that we
talk about in the most sort of pure and crystallized form.
And we're going to get Steve Friend to talk about it.
So we're going to get into swatting.
We're going to talk about how governments have basically
forgotten the mission of government, and swatting is the
example of that that we can see. But there are plenty others,
including things like education. And that's what we talk about
all the time. But I'm going to give you some
ammunition in your discussions so you can say nice things in
nice ways that are obviously true, not antagonistic.
So you can have these conversations.
And we'll do a little bit of culture war stuff too, because a
guy named Sarah, AKA Tim McBride, thinks that you need to
stop letting him live in your head.
We'll talk about that in a little bit too.
Before we get any deeper into the weeds and before we get
started with my friend, let's go ahead and get started with the
folks over at Yeah, Patriot Protect.
Sorry, I was not trying to do a pregnant pause like that, but I
think it was fun. So the problem is, is that if
you're living in the world, you are likely to be exposed to a
data breach. Your data is being stored by all
kinds of different companies. You never know when they're
going to do it, and they can go undetected for months.
They can basically leak all your information, private information
that you don't want out there in the world, your full name,
Social Security number, your home address.
This is how you get swatting. It turns out phone numbers,
things like that, drug test results.
Anybody that's keeping information on you has the
potential of losing that information.
And if they do, then it can circulate around on the dark
web. It's worse than a password leak
because people can actually start up new bank accounts.
They can take out loans in your name and so on and so forth.
You wouldn't leave your front door unlocked.
Why would you leave your identity wide open?
The solution is to have a service that will help protect
you and scrub the Internet for all of your stuff and get rid of
it. Patriot Protect uses a search
and destroy protocol. They have a new blackout service
that actually goes into the deep web, the dark web, scanning for
all these sites, these data brokers and places where people
are keeping all of your information and scrubbing it
off. If you use our promo code Kyle,
Kyle, you're going to save 15% on an annual subscription.
I've got it now. My wife has it as well.
Do something to protect yourself.
That is the smart thing to do. You're seeing the landing screen
right there. It's not.
They're not spending money on making some fancy graphics.
What they're doing is they're giving you an opportunity to try
to scrub your stuff off. The one thing I can tell, and
Steve and I were talking about this before we went live.
I see much, much fewer on the robocall list.
So you guys get there by going to patriot-protect.com/kyle.
Again, Patriot, the dash, protect.com/kyle.
Sign up for that search and destroy protocol.
Get yourself kind of protected from all these data brokers that
are trying to sell your stuff. Don't let someone profit off
your information. Nothing good about all that.
Let's let's dive into what we got going on today.
Here we go. And there he is.
There's my friend. How you doing, Mr. Steve Friend?
I'm feeling a little pressure today.
You've been teasing me for the last two days, so I better bring
double the impact right on this friendly Friday.
Yeah, yeah, I know obviously that that was the expectation.
I need you to bring it all the way.
Steve. Your podcast is called the
American Radicals Podcast. What makes you a radical?
I engage in extreme activities. It's kind of up for what the the
government deems to be problematic extreme activities.
But I think probably radical in that I like to be left alone and
do my own thing and have guns and say what I want and not have
to worry about the government coming to my door to blast me in
the face. And when did that become a
radical position, do you think? September 12th, 2001.
That's very specific. Yeah.
All right, That's fair. Do you have any particular
instance when that you can identify in your own life where
you're like, I'm now a radical, I don't believe in the things,
institutions or or whatever because you were a police
officer, you worked for the government.
In theory, you're what, what did you call it?
A system idealist? Yep.
I've always contended that if you work in law enforcement,
you're not a system disruptor. Those are the criminals.
Those are the people that are deviating from the civil society
that want to break the rules, break the laws, and hurt their
fellow man. And then the system idealists
are upholding not just the law, but the processes that are
guaranteed by our constitutional Republic.
Let's talk about swatting. Can we start with that?
This is the the new epidemic, apparently on the political
right. What?
Is swatting. Will you define it for people
who are not familiar with this term and they think that it's
just what you do to kids that are misbehaved and or flies that
are buzzing around in your kitchen?
Both of which are great ideas, by the way.
Go ahead. I mean, you need to just use the
assault. The the bug assault.
I yeah, I have a Gen. 3 bug assault folks.
We don't advertise for them, but I totally would.
I have gone on killing spree. This is totally in the side, but
we might as well. I have gone on killing sprees.
The funny thing is OK, so there's a there's a pneumatic
like shotgun style weapon that sprays out salt at high velocity
and it injuries, stuns and or kills flies, right.
You've seen the advertisement for it.
I will load it up with cheap ionized salt and then I will
roll around my house and I will massacre all the flies.
You know what the downside is? You.
Have lots of dead flies all over the place.
That's true, I do leave the dead flies that is not.
I'm in the in the fly killing business but not in the fly body
disposing business it. Just attracts more of them.
So that just gives me a target rich environment.
Maybe, maybe I just feel like my wife is good at cleaning up the
flies and so she does and she hates it.
So she doesn't like it when I go around there.
The other thing is, is I leave significant amounts of salt
because I'm shooting like I'll shoot dozens of times.
I'll go after these suckers and and I'm I'm pumping and I'm
following down. So I will shoot a lot of salt
and it ends up looking like an episode of Supernatural, like
where Sam and Dean have like tried to expel the zombies or
the other the demons and there's salt everywhere.
Yeah, that was a Supernatural reference that somebody got
excited. I have some like weird nerdy
knowledge in my head. I've made a Firefly reference
the other the other day and somebody in the comments was
like best episode ever. Reference Terrarinity and
Firefly. Serenity, man, that's one of my
wife's favorite. Isn't it?
It's great. Somebody, it's like this episode
was shiny and I was like, oh, this space is.
Awesome. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
No, I agree anyway. So the bug of salt is good for
that. But if you're leaving salt
everywhere, you know, you have to have a teammate.
And I have a teammate that has nothing to do with what we were
talking. About No, we were talking.
About squatting. Squatting would.
Be essentially the next level up of doxing right?
Like you are able to somehow find out an individual's
location and then you summon the police to their location under
the guise that there's some sort of emergency happening.
They're giving them exigent circumstances that there could
be a violent action coming in that's going to require them to
go in without like the following the normal due process protocols
where they have to get like a search warrant to go in if
there's a threat to life. And this is being used and
weaponized against people. And now the police are coming in
in an aggressive fashion. They're more inclined to be the
hammer in search of a nail because their expectation is
that they're they're trying to interrupt a negative consequence
from happening to somebody being murdered or something to that
effect. All right, use the word
weaponize. We use it all the time.
Can you define what you believe the word weaponize is about?
I'm getting to an argument here that I want people to be able to
walk away with. And we're going to kind of
define terms and then we're going to make the the position
push. So go ahead.
It would be basically mutating, I guess, the the function of of
the government to achieve a particular outcome, rather than
letting the process play out naturally and organically.
OK. And what, as a former police
officer and a former FBI agent, what is the purpose of law
enforcement, let's say, at any given level, what what would it?
What is What are you supposed to see?
Law enforcement? Do protect citizens against
fraud and force. OK.
And you said weaponized is seeing a perversion of this.
Is that an accurate word? I think that's that's probably a
more appropriate than mutable. You're watching the Ninja
Turtles. That's probably where where my
my mind was at the moment. But yeah, so perversion is of
that. And actually it can in essence
use the police and use the the government as a unwitting
participant in your perversion as well.
I mean, because you have police officers responding to the scene
in good faith, they actually have qualified immunity that
they're going to go there to interrupt something negative
from happening, and they could actually have been a useful
idiot. All right, the argument that I
want to make is that swatting is the apex of weaponized
government because you are literally using the thing that
is designed to stop for some fraud, as you mentioned, that is
supposed to protect people from those who are the antisocial
actors, from those who would would do harm to them.
And you're using that that institution to actually be the
implement of harm. You're actually using it as a
weapon. It is the perfect perversion of
what happens when you when government basically is no
longer serving the mission, but actually the opposite of the
mission and doing so on behalf of someone that that is willing
it. It's anything turns it into the
photo negative of what it's intended to be.
The only question is what's the driving factor behind it?
Is it an independent party who is manipulating the system, or
is it the government itself? Right.
So if the government's driving it, you'd call that weaponized
government. And if the, if it's an
independent party, what do we call that?
Because that's what we're seeing right now.
We're seeing basically that the political left, although we
might say that that is very similar to alignment with the
government, at least the a lot of agencies within the
government actually align that way.
We're seeing it being, does that mean that the, the, the, the,
the agencies that are being used as swatting, what like
responding forces, are they, are they complicit?
Do they have the potential of being complicit?
They absolutely do. If they're not doing the due
diligence and particularly we're seeing these reports that
they're going to these houses multiple times.
I mean, you would think that there would be some sort of
notation put in there which you do in law enforcement.
I mean, there was these frequent Flyers, you could call them that
as a patrolman, you would always go it to that location and look,
if you ruined your beat every day, you kind of knew them
because you just were always going.
But you would always put a note in there because what if you're
sick one day or you're off on a vacation and somebody else is
filling in and they're less familiar with that area.
You would put a notation, hey, this is a house.
This is an emotionally disturbed person.
This is a person who is saying that there is a ray that's
shooting into their nose. And this is something you should
be aware of so that when the call comes in, you're less
inclined to be like peeked up and taking it at face value that
the person is maybe reporting something that's not necessarily
accurate. What is CAD?
CAD is the way you do it. CAD is is a system where you as
a police officer have the ability to like input data,
input information and tie it specifically to a person or to a
location so that there is a track record in history.
CAT has saved my butt from emotionally disturbed people on
multiple times where people were calling in and saying that
officer friend is harassing me. And then we go back into the cat
and realize, oh, this is a person who is a crazy person.
And that has been saying these things about every single
officer on the force. And I mean, you're able to have
that permanent record. It is permanent.
I mean, it's basically like recording of the the radio
transmissions so that that information is out there forever
to know and have it as a reference point.
I see our our chat is trying to define the term or the, the
acronym CAD. It's computer aided dispatch
when we talk about law enforcement, which means that
there's a dispatch that usually comes out over the radio that's
going to be imminent sort of information that's coming out.
Hey, you know, need a responding officer at the following
address. Please go and, and do this and
you need to go under various, you know, respond code or not
exigent circumstances or otherwise.
They give you kind of the quick and dirty.
We used to get the same thing on the ambulance where you get in
there and they'd say, you know, unconscious person, this address
and then somebody would Roger up.
Yep, so and so ambulance 9 respond and then you start
getting the call notes because they're staying on the phone.
The 911 operator is on the phone still and getting information as
necessary. OK, There's an unconscious
person, they're not breathing. It's a 38 year old female, no
medical history, you know, recent instance of being out of
the club, partying, whatever. So you start working through the
problem there. Same thing for a cop.
I imagine you're getting the same stuff where it's like, you
know, neighbors have been called to this address before.
Three other people were called last night.
There was a loud party, Parties are intoxicated, no presence of
a weapon, blah, blah, blah, right.
I mean, you're getting information in a in a dispatch
format that's kind of updating on the screen as you're doing
the thing like navigating the roads real fast.
Yes, and is real time information.
I mean, it might be even something like caller is stating
that their spouse was beating them but now has left the
residence. So that would change the way
that you're going to respond. You might have been running code
and now there's not a threat to life that's imminent.
You have to slow it down and it's going to change that.
And it's it's a way to, you know, not have to clog up the
actual airwaves, particularly if you ride with a partner, because
they're able to like read through it while you're driving.
I mean, theoretically you don't want to be reading and driving,
but. Whatever, I always.
Read I always have to make the adjustment.
So did you. Don't act like you didn't.
Well, that's why they changed the law for us.
There's no texting and driving statute against police officers
in state of Georgia. Yeah, so when I used to work for
the for the surveillance team and a lot of times we would do
these real wild moves where you'd be driving behind
somebody, then you'd you'd duck off, you'd make a turn that they
didn't, so they would continue on.
So you want to basically give the appearance that you're not
following them and then somebody else follows in and then you
have to go and catch up with this, what we call the conga
line. So you'd have like 8 cars that
are kind of trailing at various distances to jump in so that
whenever someone drops off, a new person can follow.
If somebody makes a a turn, you continue straight and the you
follow the subject. The second in line or the third
in line will actually follow the subject.
But then you got to catch up to the to the conga line.
Otherwise you're out and you're useless.
You can't participate anymore. And I have done so many straight
through from a right hand turn lane just as the light is
turning green where you blast and God, it makes people so mad.
You've never seen anyone drive as wild as a really decently
trained surveillance agent. And while we're doing it, I'm
looking on the screen watching the blue forest tracker of
where's my team at? Because I got to get behind the
last dot. I'm seeing a dot on the screen
running through the city streets.
So we used to do do it all the time.
And I mean, I've done 90 and 100 miles an hour on surface streets
and all kinds of cities all over America that probably look like
the craziest things you've ever seen.
I was doing it in like minivans, though.
That was the best part. Like you weren't doing it in
performance cars or a squad car where people could recognize
you're blasting through these lights like in a Gray minivan
with like little side wig wag lights that are turning on.
And, and you go past a cop who's sitting at A at a light and they
would just look at you just like, I don't even know what I
just saw. Like they don't even I I never
had cops respond to me when we did wild stuff and I did it in
front of them all the time. Probably they're.
Looking and they're like, dude, I see you in this wood panelled
van like from the midnight with soccer mom just killing it.
Yeah, the, the Minivan of Justice was a real thing and it
was always my preferred. It's, there's tons of room in
it. It's a great mobile shooting
platform. It's an urban hide.
There's all these other kind of things in any case, wild stuff
like that. So when we're talking about
this, this idea of, of weaponized government, what I,
what I see is when government leaves the mission that it was
created to do and it starts doing something else, what
that's the biggest time, that's the opportunity for using it as
a weapon is when it's basically divorced.
Here's my argument for you. I got a couple different videos.
One of them is this this lady who, who was in front of a, a
like a congressional hearing and she's talking about private
schools. We played a clip yesterday.
I'm going to play it again for you.
She's a product of private schools and she's arguing
against school choice. And I want to, I want to hone in
on the same argument that we did with the swatting piece, which
is to say that she actually doesn't know what public schools
are. All right.
So I want to see if you come to the same conclusions I do.
Here's the first clip. We played this yesterday.
We're going to play it again. If you listen yesterday, Just
bear with me. We're making a slightly
different point. I think you guys will appreciate
it. So did you go to a public school
system? No, I went to a private school.
OK, you went to Head Royce School.
Why? I, I, I, I spent time in
Oakland. You had a choice in Oakland to
go to public schools. Also, why didn't your parents do
that for you? Well.
I I would remind you that children generally don't choose
the school that they go. Your parents did.
Your parents had a choice. Your parents paid 30 to $50,000
a year for your choice. What, what gets me is how people
like yourself, when I say, I would say this across the board,
parents who have an option, they put their kids in the best
schools. They know that's, that's an
investment for their kids future.
And you have to you, you come here and say how well it doesn't
work. I, I just want to repeat, I want
to read this real quick. In reality, students who use
violentry experience experience worse educational outcomes than
their public school peers. Do you have any belief that
that's even remotely possible, that students using vouchers are
getting worse outcomes than the public school?
Peers, No, no, that's not true at all.
I mean just there's actually legitimate studies that show
just the exact opposite of that from her.
And this is just another example of an elitist and probably a
member of the worst tribe in the world, the worst people in the
world, liberal white women kicking the door closed behind
them and saying rules for thee but not for me.
I actually think there's a slightly worse person than the
liberal white lady. I've I've come to that like this
conclusion today. I think I know this person, you
think? You know where I'm going to go?
Yeah. The worst, The worst person is
actually worse than liberal white ladies.
Are men pretending to be liberal white ladies.
That actually is slightly worse to me.
Counterpoint, could it be liberal white ladies who stand
in solidarity with men pretending to be liberal like
white women? I see them as very similar,
yeah. So they're obviously like
fighting to get on the same podium, but I think the men win
because men are stronger. And so, so, so like, quote, UN
quote, women. Yeah, women with Adam's apples
and penises that climb on top of the lady podium, They actually
end up being the best at being liberal white women, just like
they're the best at like the Randy Savage, like strong woman
competition. Because at our core, despite
whatever makeup you put on your face and whatever procedures or
hormones you inject, it comes down to the fact that all men
are basically super competitive. We just need to know what the
game is and what the rules are and how do I win.
And when we get that information, the ladies really
don't have much of a chance. What you're saying is that every
single cell in a man's body is a Dick.
I just wanted to throw that at you for no reason.
XXXY That's the science, yeah. Happy, happy Friday in Science.
OK, So enjoyable. So this is the other little
piece. There's another guy asking this
question. This is Mr. Kelly.
He's the chairperson of this particular committee.
I think it's the chair. It's the Committee on Education.
And he asked this woman something and she nails all of
the of the the wrong answers in one piece, which I absolutely
love. I want you to listen
specifically for one phrase. Public schools are the
cornerstone of our democracy. I'm priming you for it because
it's so special. Let's do the next clip.
Here we go. So just to understand position,
Miss Levin, do you think the private school should be
abolished? No, I do not.
OK. Because you referred to my
colleagues line of questioning as an ad hominem attack.
But I think that totally misses the point.
You think that your parents are well within their rights to send
you to a a private school that cost 10s of thousands of dollars
in tuition at their own expense? Yes.
And you support the right of Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, Joe
Biden to send their child to private school.
I'm an attorney and the law supports their right and I
support it as well. OK, so you support the right of
families to choose private schools if they can afford it,
Is that right? That's correct.
I do believe that public education, though, is the
cornerstone of our democracy. And I, as an individual, firmly
support it. OK, but do you see how that
might rub some people the wrong way when you support school
choice for wealthy families but oppose efforts to extend that
same opportunity to lower income families?
What do you think there, Steve? Is that a fun little gotcha
moment? Oh, it's very much like follow
the bread crumbs into this gingerbread house so I can eat
you alive as you did there. I was actually thinking more
along the lines of how analogous that is to the healthcare
argument. Like Healthcare is a right.
We have public education as a cornerstone of democracy, which
is just coded language for things we like.
And Healthcare is a right, again, coded language for things
we like. And look, they, they actually go
further on healthcare because they'll say that if you have the
ability and the finances to afford something that you are
not entitled to that that everyone should actually have
the right to go to the doctor and demand of their time
services that you might not necessarily be able to afford.
Yeah, the cornerstone of our democracy thing makes me that
made me kind of perk up just a little bit because earlier this
week we played a couple different clips where we've
heard things that, you know, if I were to say taxation is, what
would you say? Theft.
OK, so good.
We agree on this. I, I, I didn't have any question
about that. Taxation is theft.
That's when the government takes your money and they don't, they
don't ask you. Like at the time, theoretically
an elected representative is supposed to do it, but it's sort
of like you have a, you have a say in the theft in theory, but
maybe not in reality. Theoretically, you get to vote
for a representative who could then pass legislation to make
them take and steal less of your money.
Right. But more on that in a minute,
because we've decided that that's pretty theatrical.
Would you? Yes, it's it's one big party and
we ain't in it. It's almost like it's set up for
us to be like Hollywood for ugly people.
So we've got more for that in a second here as well.
My, my point is, is that taxation is theft.
And if we were to say that that tax cuts cost money, then you
live in a fundamentally different reality.
You actually are divorced from the things that we agree.
Like, that's why I wanted to define terms.
That's usually what you do when you have an argument or a
disagreement. You say, OK, let's define the
terms. What do these things mean?
Which is why the what is a woman argument is always so
problematic for people. If you can't define the term
that we're going to be talking about, how can you tell me
something is this thing if you can't tell me what that thing
is? And in the case of this public
school, it's the cornerstone of our democracy.
What I've determined is every single agency that I despise has
forgotten what its purpose is or why it was created.
And let me give you a really interesting example that came
from the headlines. And I didn't know.
This is why I like the story. Look at this one.
Democrats introduce a bill forcing Donald Trump
administration to rehire fired veterans.
So you read that, and that's from ABC.
And you think this is from from the 10th.
So this is from Monday. And you go, oh, OK, well, they
fired veterans and therefore we want the veterans to be rehired.
There's a problem in that are they are they good workers?
Were they providing a value or is simply the purpose of the
government to hire these veterans?
No further questions. And that's when you start
getting completely divorced from the actual mission of what it is
that government supposed to do. It's doing an end, but it's
forgot that there's like actually a purpose and and and
supposed to achieve a goal. And there's no evaluation of
what each individual circumstances were here.
But it's again, more theater, right?
Because they're going to say, well, you're doing this to the
veterans. It's an appeal to authority.
It's a pulling on the the heartstrings of most Americans
because most people, they got to support the troops no matter
what. And now you're saying, well, you
have to. You exist.
The government exists as a jobs program for particular groups of
people that we have a case of the fields for.
And that's not why the government exists.
The government exists because there's a social compact
involved. We agreed to give up some or
limit some of our freedoms in return for duties and services
that the government provides. Now, I think the government's
doing way too much going way beyond that.
We've actually written down what the relationship was supposed to
be, and we have not followed it for a very long time.
But it is certainly not a jobs program for people who at one
point served in a military capacity.
And for them to set this up is basically just a messaging thing
to say like, oh look, they fired the vets who we 15 seconds ago
were saying we're, you know, war mongers and we hated but.
And we hate the fact that they won't get COVID shots.
We're going to get rid of them for that.
You can be fired for not doing what we tell you, but you can't
be fired because because you want to make things more
efficient. No, no, you could.
Well, efficiency is the enemy of bureaucracy, right?
I mean, bureaucracy is set up to just grow.
Success is in growth. It's not in actually achieving
the mission, unless you view again back to terms.
What is the mission of your bureaucracy?
Oh, to grow that's. That's how you measure success
in a in a government agency. Folks, if you don't know that,
the only way that you can always tell you're successful is that
your program continues to grow. Not that it's done the mission
or that it's being successful. You've added more people, you've
added more responsibilities, and you've asked for more budget.
Now you're winning. Theoretically, the mission of
any government service should be to work itself out of existence.
Theoretically, solve the problem, just do away with
crime, and then they wouldn't exist, right?
Right. And then of course, we have the
human condition, so we know it's not, but it should be striving
to the least number. Instead, it's perversely
incentivized to the opposite. I'm going to do a quick sponsor
read. This is something I actually
have VA healthcare. This is that.
That thing you saw on the screen was folks that were complaining
about guys who are veterans being fired from the VA.
I found the VA to be fairly inefficient.
So we're going to talk a little bit quick about how you can take
control of your own healthcare. This is one of the ways you can
do it. You can go to the Wellness
company. It's TWC dot health slash Kyle,
KYLETWC dot health slash Kyle. And here's the statement.
This is my claim about this. I don't like being sick.
I actually don't like going to the VA.
I don't like going to any doctor's office offices because
making decisions and doing errands when I'm sick is my
least favorite thing as an adult.
I've been sick a bunch of times just like you in my lifetime, so
I kind of know what I need to do and my time is more valuable.
I'd much rather do route downtime and resting and chicken
soup and fluids and hanging out in bed if I'm going to be sick
so I can get better sooner so I can get back to do a podcast and
so on. I don't want to hang out in
pharmacy lines. If you want to take control of
your own healthcare, one of the ways you can do it is by having
an emergency medical kit from TWC dot health slash Kyle.
It's a prepare so you don't have to repair sort of thing.
It's already at your house. It's like having a pharmacy in
your medicine cabinet. You can always do this thing.
You can also check out their contagion emergency kit.
If you are more prone to like airway issues.
They have a nebulizer in there. They've got a Tamiflu.
The other ones are containing things like ivermectin,
hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, which is just
generic Z pack, a very broad spectrum antibiotic.
They all come with a guidebook so you can kind of look at the
indications, what we call them or the symptoms and see how to
use them. It takes about two minutes after
you do the the the original buy. That's where the intake form is.
It's very easy to do 1 kit per person.
It has to be prescribed to you, but they actually have refills
on it. It's a really great product and
it's something that we use in the Seraphin house.
The last time I got sick, I actually ended up doing exactly
that, going to my medicine cabinet, not going out to find a
physician. Again, it's TWC for the Wellness
company, TWC dot health slash Kyle.
There is a link in the show description if you guys are
interested. Again, take care and troll your
own health. Don't wait for someone else.
That's sort of self reliant thing.
Here's what we talk about here a lot and for whatever reason, all
of our sponsors kind of like fit into that vein, which makes me
happy. Maybe that's why I took them on
as sponsors. What do you think about that,
Steve? I think you're pretty nothing if
not consistent with the. Messages.
Repair or repair on everything. On everything.
It's almost like you don't want to have to wait on the
government because when seconds count, the police are minutes
away. They are indeed all right.
So we did the private school lady.
I got some Democrat theater because what they were crying
about was that the government was going to be defunded.
And so I've got kind of a good compilation with some background
music of people that were crying about the possible defunding of
said government, which is in fact, like sort of their little
demigod that they worship out at.
That's where all the good things come from.
That's where the education comes from, Steve.
It comes from the government. Here's Democrats talking about
how it'd be really bad if Republicans didn't fund it.
Republicans are marching America to a painful.
Government shutdown, but we need traditional Republicans to break
with MAGA extremists so we can keep the government open.
Republicans shutdown will cost 6306 of her constituents their
paychecks. Put the bill on the floor for
another down vote so we can end this MAGA Republican nightmare.
And if you don't, you own this government shutdown and we.
OK. And then they agreed that they
were going to do a shutdown, right?
Because they didn't want to vote for the continuing resolution
and they voted against it in the House, yes.
Oh yeah, they were, I mean, it's this, this script is being
followed to a tee. And, and can I for a moment just
say the most libertarian thing ever was the the Democrats
saying that they were going to shut down the government.
I was like, am I being radicalized?
Do I like Chuck Schumer right now?
Because like that was the most optimal solution.
All the non essential people go home, All the essential people
go to work. And now the doge doesn't have to
like cull through that. And they're like, Oh well,
everybody who's home right now just loses their job.
Well, let me give you another opinion by someone who is
considered to be a thought leader of her generation.
This is Jasmine Crockett, AKA dollar store Cardi B.
She's got thoughts. Here's her opinion about
government shutdowns. I'll share them with you right
now. In my opinion, if we're shut
down, you can't be fired. And what does that mean?
It does mean that people will not be paid, but it does mean
that they will get their back pay.
So hopefully we can stop some of the bleeding.
We just saw that the Department of Education laid off 50% of
their workforce. So I don't really understand why
anybody would say, oh, we got to take the High Road.
We got to. Listen, he is decimating the
federal government and you're talking about whether or not
we're going to keep the doors open.
He literally is shutting down departments anyway.
What does decimating mean, Steve?
Removing 110th. I wish he would do more than
decimate. Yes, that seems like like rookie
numbers from what we're expecting.
Yeah, 50%, there's not a word that I know for that, but that's
what I want. Having them sounds really good.
And so anyway, she's crying about that.
The fun thing was, did she know? Do you notice?
She said, I think it's good because one, they can't get
fired if they're if they're if the government shutdown.
So that's Part 1. That's her, her argument.
And people will get their back pay, which is to say they will
be paid for time that they are not working.
Does that not give away the game?
That it's not about the work they do or the mission, That
it's actually just about getting the paycheck.
That's all it's all about. I mean, they by and large, the
majority of government workers, their number one priority is
keeping their job. It's not, again, the mission is
not doing it. They, they might do, they
weren't really work hard at their job.
I mean, that's the minority of people, but they might actually
do good work, but their job is just not worth doing.
And the fact that now that we have a more of a a microscope
into what people doing, we're actually assessing, we're
setting the bobs in office space style and asking like, is your
contribution here? Actually, there's a juice worth
the squeeze. And they just reject and they
have such umbrage with being asked that because they're just
a, a civil servant, right? They're a career civil servant
and they can't even, they can't, they can never even for a moment
think like, hey, maybe I, I'm not essential to the outcome
here because. When there's a shutdown, what
happens when there's a shutdown? Who doesn't come to work?
And you get paid, you get paid, you get a essentially a deferred
paid vacation, that's how. Right.
That's exactly what it is. And unless you work in law
enforcement or one of the essential functions, government,
then you're still required to show up if you want to still be
paid when you get when they when they start paying you.
Again, it might be a 13th Amendment violation, but maybe
Thomas Massey could speak to that better than me.
Well, Speaking of Thomas Massey, is there anybody that you've
seen that seems to have like, I don't know if it's like the
Hubble Space Telescope, but can see into the future and see
what's going to happen with all this stuff?
How is it that some people seem to be able to predict the
future? I have two different slides here
that say the future is being predicted by Tom Massey.
The because the history repeats itself, or it rhymes at least
continually as it comes to funding the government over and
over again. Tom Massey stands up there every
single time and basically does the M and M8 mile and says, I
know what you're going to say about me.
I know how this is exactly going to play out.
You know, you guys are already scheduled to to go home for the
weekend. So clearly this is all feeder
and he makes people very uncomfortable when he does it.
But the guy's principled and he's not at risk of losing his
seat anytime soon because he does what he says he's going to
do, which is the one way that if you tell your constituents like,
I'm going to do X and then you go do X, even if it makes
everybody else in the country mad, you're pretty secure.
I had this interesting back and forth with Bill Mitchell, who
used to be a He was a representative for the
Republican Party in Illinois. They've also elected such August
leaders and is Adam Kinzinger so like really strong principled
Republicans that only stand on the the right and moral stance.
But anyway, and he was saying that Tom Massey needs to be
primaried as as so many people were.
Obviously Donald Trump said the same thing.
You can say it all you want. They already tried this game.
They did it in 2020. It was utterly ineffective.
Like he still won by hundreds of thousands of votes.
And yeah, for whatever reason, like you said, he's the guy
that's running this. So like here he is.
I think this is October of last year.
This is the second to last time that we had ACR fight, which
happened happens every couple months it turns out.
So he's able to predict the future because he's seen the
future so many times. He's like one of those engineers
that like recognizes patterns or something.
Here's Tom Massey coming out saying why he was a no on the
last time they had a spending bill can.
You. Just talk to us.
Are you still? A No.
Is there anything they they convinced?
Me in there I'm a no. Is there anything?
Look what? Let me, let me.
Their own numbers if the Republican plan passes.
Under the rosiest assumptions, which aren't even true, we're
going to add $328 billion to the deficit this year.
We're going to add $295 billion to the deficit the year after
that and $242 billion to the deficit after that under the
rosiest. Assumptions.
Why would I vote for that? I.
So are you solidly a no? Yeah, They convinced me I was at
Lean No until this meeting. Not at Lean no, but now this is
a yeah. Why?
What? Why?
They're talking points. Look, this is these are not
something I'm made of this. Is the same thing all over
again. This is the leadership side.
That girl looks like she's about 14 years old.
It adds $328 billion to the deficit.
It adds $295 billion to the deficit the year after that.
It the only way they get to this magic thing where it's not going
to kill our country is five years from now they imagine that
2.5% growth. Accumulates and that even right
here they say they're going to cap discretionary spending you
think we're going to cap discretionary spending and.
Right. So he's basically just making
the argument like, look, everything I know because I've
seen this before. This is a game we've played
before. I'm not buying into it.
I'm going to say my thing. We're going to come back to this
in a second because I'm going to show you in predicting the
Future from just earlier this week.
And he predicted what happened yesterday, which is always my
favorite thing to do. Let's do this real quick.
Let's talk about blackout coffee.
Let's talk about my friends over there.
It's blackout coffee.com slash Kyle.
It is what I started my morning with today.
It took me a little while to get it in.
I'm running on pitch black right now, folks.
It's their espresso bean. And the other day I said I
cranked it up from a from an 8 out of 16.
It's actually 8 out of 10. That makes way more sense to you
too, probably. But I brew up to liters of it.
Listen up. We're putting you on to
something that will change the way that you start your morning
blackout coffee. It's not just coffee, it's a
wake up call. It's a call to rise and grind,
to push hard, to never compromise, to do what you just
saw Tom Massey come and say, whether you like him or not, and
she's still saying the right things.
It's not your average cup of Joe.
It's a bag of blackout coffee that's roasted with purpose,
packed with bold flavor, fueled by the kind of values that built
this country. Great determination, not being
taxed if you can help it. Refusal to back down.
They don't just make coffee. They're making a statement.
And they're stepping up and putting more people to work in
America. You know an American business
hiring American people so that when you hit the order button,
your coffee is coming in fresh and is ready to fuel your next
move. Whether you're powering through
your daily grind or chasing down big goals or crushing government
stupidity, which we do every day here, or refusing to settle for
just mediocre performance, Blackout Coffee got your back.
Don't just drink coffee. Drink Blackout Blackout
coffee.com slash Kyle coupon code Kyle will save you 20% off
your first order. Taste the coffee that doesn't
just wake you up, it fires you up.
A lot of you guys like this. This is the reason why we
actually got them as a sponsor because you turned me on to
them. blackoutcoffee.com slash Kyle.
Let's do that. Go ahead and check underneath
there. And while I'm talking about
things that are firing me up, can I just say I appreciate all
of you that are watching over here.
I'm seeing all as many as 2000 people have tuned in over on X.
We're seeing our probably our our highest numbers, almost 100
people watching on YouTube. We never get YouTube people.
So it's really cool. We're starting to do that.
I've got a YouTube Rep coming in.
You can follow us on Spotify, which I'd really appreciate if
you guys are doing the download after the fact only because you
don't get a pop up ad and wherever you're listening,
whatever you're watching, do me a big favor.
Hit the like button. There's a thumbs up somewhere.
Hit that. If there's a heart, if you're
watching on X, hit that too. Promote the the by by showing
that you're liking it and what it does.
It gives the algorithm like a little thing like somebody like
what they saw, and that does promote it to the next person
who's similar to you. There's probably a couple people
out there that think like you do.
Also, if you tell a friend, we very much appreciate that
because we could literally double overnight if you just
told one person who actually tuned in.
And and that's huge for us. It's huge because I don't think
we're being unreasonable here. If we're going to get America
back to the middle and stop taxation as theft, we're going
to have to do it by, like having people open their eyes up and
go, ah, yes, of course, these are bad ideas.
I am now armed with better arguments.
Here's Tom Massey. Are you ready?
You said it. He called it theater in
production, right? What did he say that that you
heard him say earlier this week? That the CR was going to be
passed with just the Republicans through the House and that then
it would go to the Senate. And then they were going to need
a certain number of Democrats to go along with it.
And it was a fait accompli because the Democrats have some
sort of retreat scheduled. So they're going to wail a gnash
teeth, get on TV and then ultimately at the last minute,
then they're going to go through it and pass it.
All right, here he is making that prediction real quickly,
and we'll do a short version of this clip and then I will come
back and show you exactly what he said happened, as per usual.
Hi, Congressman Massey here. I thought you'd like to know
about the fake fight that's going on in the House of
Representatives right now over the CR.
They're trying to pitch it as a conservative CR versus Liberal
Democrats, and even the Democrats are going along in the
House. But let me tell you why that's a
fake fight. They plan to pass it with all
Republicans here in the House, but after we leave town, the
Democrats are going to vote for it in the Senate.
That's right. They're going to need about 8
Democrat senators to vote for this thing over in the Senate.
That means that this deal has already been cut, that Mike
Johnson has cut a deal with the Senate, Senate Democrats, Senate
leadership, and even Hakeem Jeffries.
He's in on this so that they can pitch their fake fight here in
the House. Now, how do I why am I so
certain this is going to pass in the Senate when it gets over
there with eight Democrats or however many Democrats they
need? Well, Mike Johnson is sending
his home a day early. We're going to vote on this.
Thing at skip town if. You thought there was really a
threat of them not passing it in the Senate.
Why would you leave town? The other thing that's going on
is the Democrats have a retreat, an off site retreat where
they're going to get together and party and have, you know,
guest speakers and stuff. And that starts tomorrow and
runs through Thursday and Friday.
Republican rejection leads us to a decision.
And it's not really a decision. It's a Hobson's choice.
Either proceed with the bill before us, or risk Donald Trump
throwing America into the chaos of a shutdown.
This, in my view, is no choice at all.
While the CR bill is very bad, the potential for a shutdown has
consequences for America that are much, much worse.
And so we're going to do the thing that is so bad.
We're going to fund the government the way that we
already agreed to fund the government because Tom Massey
already knew what was going to be happening.
This was a waste of time and stupid.
We agreed to fund the government to funding levels that are
exceeding what they were before. According to Tom Massey,
according to the talking points, which he was asked for twice.
They were doing the whole like, hey, Donald Trump, but will you
disavow the the racists out there, the white supremacists
and says yes. And they go, well, what about
now? Do you disavow them now?
Like in this exact moment? Yes.
Well, how about now They just keep asking for the same
document. Why don't you start every speech
with a disavowal of the racists? So it's spending that was
approved when they had a Democrat president.
Democrat controlled the Senate and essentially Democrat
controlled the House because Mike Johnson is a eunuch who
basically negotiated with Hakeem Jeffries to give him everything
he wanted. And now we're going to do more
than that. But that's catastrophic because
reasons. Well, because we're supposed to
oppose it because that gets us on TV and gets people to donate
when they get their emails, because they're not subscribing
to sponsors of the Kyle Seraphin Show.
And they are going to get just lambasted and beat over the head
that they need to contribute to campaigns of people like Chuck
Schumer. When government is completely
detached from the purpose that it is stated to be, it's out
there going and supposed to stop for some fraud from coming after
people. When in reality the only thing
that matters is that they're considering your money, their
money. Remember, tax cuts cost money.
That means that them not taking as much of your money is somehow
a cost. So they do creative accounting.
I, I put you to the spot last time as my, my resident
accounting guest. It doesn't make any sense to me,
but we have that moment where you just have turned it on his
head. So I, I was going to evaluate a
spectrum, see what you think of this.
On one side, you have government doing the thing that it's
supposed to do and it has the most light touch.
Isn't that what they always teach you in law enforcement?
The lightest touch necessary to bring people into custody to
affect the good that you're doing is that.
Is that fair? You don't need to have an
elephant gun to kill a mouse. And is that not sort of the
whistleblower disclosure that you actually brought forward
when you were coming into Congress as a, as a policy
violation? That's how you end up losing
your job. That's Steve Friend's position.
That was my position from the very beginning, that I'd had no
objection to arresting someone under a lawful and I would even
at this point quibble with the the way that they got that
arrest warrant. But the means in which they were
bringing a cooperative person who had pledged to do whatever
we was asked with the SWAT team was an unnecessary risk to the
public safety. OK, then you got in the middle.
I'm going to say that's the right hand side.
That's the that's the conservative argument.
Not Republican, mind you, conservative.
That is the side that says minimal government, lightest
touch possible assigned a mission and attempting to carry
out that mission. In the middle is that there is a
mission and the mission is just fund us.
We're going to take your money and we're going to build up
these groups that are nominally supposed to do something, but
they're not going to actually do it.
But we don't really care because the real end goal is that money
is being distributed to our preferred parties and the status
quo is being maintained. That's the sort of like squishy
center, left, center right position.
This is George W Bush. This is, this was Bill Clinton.
This was a lot of people in the middle who said, you know, don't
get too far outside the margins, but we're not going to do
anything. And then the hard left position,
in my opinion, is that we're going to use this tool, which
should have the lightest touch. We're going to use the heaviest
touch. And whatever the mission is,
we're going to do the opposite of it.
If it's supposed to protect people from forcing fraud, we
are actually going to fraudulently engage in force to
come after them. That's the swatting piece.
Is that a, is that a reasonable argument to you?
Does that hit properly at all? Yes, I mean, I, I, I would think
that the Borg, that is the communist, who probably
encompasses the center and the far left of it at this point,
because if you're not actually pushing back on this expansion
of government power, then you're complicit in that.
But I agree with you, especially in that far left, because their
movement never ends. It will never be complete.
They're always waging war until they destroy everything, and
they won't. Even if they do achieve some
sort of like destruction of institutions, then it's on to
the next thing. It is an ongoing forever mission
set. Which is why they're, they're
more accurately referred to as progressives, right?
Because they're always making progress.
Even if it ends up hurting the original goal they had, they're
still moving forward. By the way, this is a
screenshot. I went looking for swatted
conservatives because I wanted to see if it was being picked up
by the mainstream media. This is a simple Google search
and these are two sets of results.
One of them talks about the the swatting that happened at a
hospital somewhere in California, and the other one
says something similar. They're all basically stories
that have to do with hospitals and our institutions that are
loved and favored by the left. Zero of them talking about how
Sean Farish, how Chase Geyser, how how Joe Pags, friend of ours
has recently been swatted. I've got a little bit of Joe
Pags's story and I've got a little bit of Chases.
This is what it sounded like at 2:00 in the morning.
They've all happened in Texas, by the way, San Antonio and
Austin. We've had a couple of those.
We had Jamie White, who was an Infowars reporter who was
actually killed unrelated to the swatting.
But we don't know that. This is not like a broader push
to see people on the right punished for their wrong thing,
which was what we continue to think until proven otherwise.
I'm sort of living in that default position.
Doesn't mean that I have the evidence for it.
I just feel strongly that this is not unrelated, especially
when the media refused to cover it.
I'm going to throw this on the screen here.
We'll listen to what it sounded like outside of Chase's house.
I want people to put themselves in the mindset.
You're sleeping and at 2:30 in the morning you have this.
And then to law enforcement, we're going to respond to it.
I want to hear from the local cop position if you would.
Chase, are you inside? You acknowledge or Chase, can
you step out with your hands up? This is Travis County Sheriff's
Department. Yeah, as they announce now with
your hands up, is that a lot to order?
Yeah, Do it now. Do it.
So he's stepping out. If you're looking on the screen
here, it's really, really bad, grainy photographs from across
the way, but he's stepping out of his house from across the.
And then you get the flashlights on.
Weapon lights or flashlights, you think?
Those are flashlights. So he comes out from the right
hand side of the video and steps in.
It's not too much relevance. I'm going to actually drop the
video sound and we're going to talk about this for a second.
Lawful order to step out of your house, even though you've broken
no law, you've done nothing wrong.
You've been asleep and somebody else called and claimed that
there was a murder homicide situation and a homicide suicide
that was going to happen in your home.
And now you've got to take lawful orders allegedly to go
out and do this. What's your best protocol for
someone is, is calling you out for a law enforcement action
outside your home. You've done absolutely nothing
wrong. What what is your advice for?
For them you, you have to take it in good faith that they're
they're doing a lawful or giving you lawful orders and there's
some sort of exigent circumstances or maybe there's
probable cause for it. And you are going to have to
comply with those requests and do so peacefully.
You're not going to barricade yourself.
You're going to be safe. You're going to make sure that
your hands are on full display, that you are in open dialogue
with people that you're not and that you're moving very slowly.
There's no sorts of movements to, you know, put your hands in
your waistband. Anything that's going to get
guys that are hyped up to a get a little bit trigger happy with
you. You'd be overly complying with
every single request. What's the what's the danger in
that situation for someone who's trying to do that and is not
used to that kind of stress? Well, I mean just the stress
itself, I mean, you're going to have natural body reactions to
that, right? I mean, you can have somebody
wet themselves because they're never in that sort of a like an
emergency situation. They're going to and that time
of day, I mean, you're going to be out of a dead sleep.
You might have somebody who's intoxicated, You might have
somebody who is just misunderstands what the requests
are because they're unfamiliar with the way that it's being
articulated to them. Maybe they hear that something
that's a little bit conflicting where you have one officer who
says, you know, turn around, the other one says you go down to a
knee and then all of a sudden you are failing to comply with
one where you're complying with another.
And they might interpret that as all right, well, this guy's
going to not be a willfully participating with us.
And you could if you find yourself in the wrong end of
some force. So Joe Pags had the same
situation happen also in Texas, just a little bit down the road,
down in a place called Bernie, or is that right?
I don't know if he's in Bernie yet.
Sorry. I saw another place.
He's over north of San Antonio at some point.
I'll sit down with him in person out there.
Here is his radio show and kind of a quick coverage.
I cropped the video just to make it in the square, but we'll talk
about that in just a second too. I think his tactic is actually
very, very good. And one of the most important
things they teach you when you're moving with a gun is it's
what do they say the three pieces are shoot, move and
communicate? Yeah, it's a military thing.
Shoot, move and communicate. And if you can, communication is
one of those, like, really critical things, especially when
you're linking up the blue on blue being the threat.
The way you avoid that is good comms.
The FBI is actually really bad at COM, so that's not surprising
actually. Steve well.
They don't communicate with like local law enforcement because
they can require using another radio.
Yeah, well, they don't even. I've never even seen FBI agents
use radios properly, so there's that.
OK, so here's Joe Pags talking about this.
His idea of calling 911 and getting a positive phone link up
with the people that are on scene, I think is actually very
good. It's the same thing I would
recommend for people. And if you're a conservative and
you're in the world and someone decides to try this stuff on
you, this is my ongoing advice. Get a positive link up via phone
through the dispatch. Again, we talked talk about
computer aided dispatch and radio dispatch.
They can chirp this into an ear. They can.
They can splice in a phone call into the radio so you can
actually talk to the officers. What Alpha did, when the
Sheriff's Office came for him, he was in communication saying
like I have, I have young children coming out and to make
sure that they are completely in the no, there's no surprises.
Exactly that. All right, so here's Joe talking
about and this is what he did and you'll see the video of
them, which they're stalking his backyard, which is actually a
lot creepier looking for. So I waited a couple of days
because they didn't want to put this out there yesterday and put
fuel in the fire, maybe give somebody some oxygen who's
trying to get some publicity out of this.
But we were swatted 2 nights ago at my house.
Now the good thing is I'm up until about 5:00 in the morning.
This happened at 2:35 AM. And we have cameras around the
house. Some you can see, some you
can't. So if you're a bad guy out
there, you're not going to see where they all are.
But we have cameras outside the house.
And at 2:00, at 2:35 in the morning, I got a an indication
of my phone that there was some camera or there was some
movement. It's a motion sensor at the
front door. And I went, OK, that's weird.
Maybe a bug, Who knows, Maybe the dogs had to go up.
My wife took the dogs out. Nope.
It was a guy holding an AR15 with a cap on looking in my
window. Now that point you say to
yourself, well, I've got a rifle too, can go grab that and go see
what's what. He's got five other guns nearby.
Grab some of them, go see what's what.
And then, you know, end up in a shootout at 2:35 in the morning
in the middle of rural Texas. This is the danger.
That's something that I don't think that I wanted to do
immediately. So what happened was I had this
level of calculation in my brain going about 1,000,000 miles a
second. And I said, OK, first thing I
need to do, because when it's at night, the cameras are very
good. They're color cameras, they're
audio cameras. But at night it goes to sort of
a night vision view. So I can't tell if it's a police
officer or not. I don't know who it is, but he
looks, he looks a little bit nervous.
But believe me, I've got a video of this guy with a with a rifle
at my front door. Like chicken wing arm.
Holding it, ready to use it. And I called 911.
That was the right answer. And I said I need to.
This is my address. This is who I am.
Radio, television talk show host.
So some would say public figure. I think I'm being swatted.
Are you guys at my house? But 2 seconds later she said,
yes, we are. We got a reporter.
This, this, this, this and this. Dogs were shot, people were
bleeding, people were hiding people.
And none of that was true. And, and the key to that, that I
wanted to share was him kind of explaining what the 911
dispatcher was hearing. That's why we started with the
the idea of the CAD. The information that's being
updated for these officers on scene is more and more intense.
Someone has been killed, animals are being killed.
I'm going to kill anybody that comes nearby.
All of the wild statements that get people ratcheted up so that
those cops have the same sympathetic nervous reaction
they're going in looking for, like expecting conflict and
wanting to survive. Meanwhile, you're you're asleep.
And it creates a mechanism through exigency to bypass
normal protections against the police is inability to just
enter your home at will, right? I had, I had a report that there
was a threat to life going on, that people were bleeding, that
animals were bleeding. And they're saying that I can't
be taken alive. And then all of a sudden I hear
a loud bang. I'm going to the door, going to
the door. And the law is going to protect
that officer in that situation. And you're going to find
yourself in in a good shoot, it will be cleared and in a
negative consequence that it was a tragic consequence.
That's right. When you choose the way that you
respond to a threat, that's also often times choosing the outcome
that is going to come out. And so we see this in the time
when this is the reason why you don't want the FBI sending a
SWAT team for J Sixers. You want to stop this kind of
stuff. This is a federal crime, by the
way, folks. There's ways that you can charge
us federally because it's using Interstate communications.
So anytime over the Internet, anytime over the phone, there's
an Interstate Nexus, which means the FBI can get involved.
The question is, is it one person who's doing all of these?
Apparently all of these people from our friend Brianna Marella
was talking about were sent pizza, at least a lot of them
were. They were sent a pizza order
that was like cash on delivery so that they were able to notify
that somebody was actually physically at the house and they
were trying to 1st affirm that there were people resident and
then send police there in an evil way.
It's really, really ugly stuff. Again, it is the exact
weaponization of government. It takes the thing that is
supposed to be protective and it turns it into an oppressive and
adversarial force and against necessarily the will of the
people that are involved in it. The agency is being targeted and
pointed at people even though that's not what they intended to
do most of the time. I imagine those cops in rural
Texas are not a problem like by themselves.
And who's to say that you can't have downstream consequences
when they're actually is a legitimate reason to swat a
house, right. And now they're going to be
having the boy who cried wolf situation.
That's right. You know, I'm going to maybe
going to be a little bit hesitant when I don't need to be
hesitant when I need to go into that house to protect life.
Yeah, my recommendation is that that positive link up that Joe
talked about calling 911, getting it through, making sure
that you let them know who you are so you can try to de
escalate at least in the comms. They may have heard one thing.
It's hard to shake that, especially when you're in the
moment, you're all amped up ready to handle business.
You're standing out in somebody's backyard in the
darkness with a rifle. And at the same time, if they're
like, hey, this is potentially a swatting situation.
That is not. The more we talk about it, the
more people are going to understand what that is and why
it is a real threat. And it's actually a threat to
law enforcement. And they're, you know, there,
there's sanity. Nobody wants to be the guy that
goes in thinking that they're doing the right thing and
putting down some innocent person who was in fact targeted
by some political bullshit, which is what we're talking
about here. I got a couple of things.
I got a video of AI told you we would get to the worst people,
the kind of people that I imagine do this.
These are aggressive people but don't have natural masculine
outputs for it. So they are men who act like
what they think women look like. And it turns out like most women
don't actually engage in physical violence.
I think it's actually the the weapon of a coward to do the
swatting type thing. And the most cowardly people I
can think of are men that dress like women and then try to tell
people, try to lecture them. So I've been following this
story about this guy named Sarah McBride, who's used to be called
Tim. And I got a couple things about
Tim. Let's start with who Tim is.
Can we do that? Let's get the background.
Let's get the background, this is Tim.
He was at American University, which was a hotbed for anti
Trump activity in 2016 and 2017 was part of the Disrupt J20
protest that happened at the inauguration of Donald Trump.
We're basically all briefed at American University.
Things I know because I worked in the FBI there.
So a lot of Antifa. He was the student body
president. I don't have a year on this, but
I imagine it's about that same time.
Here's Tim McBride prior to him deciding to put on woman face
the President at American University.
I'm proud to join over 100 other student body presidents to sign
this letter and send the message to the President and
Congressional leaders that bold action is required and required
now. Our economic recovery and our
long term fiscal stability are far too important to be subject
to partisan political point scoring.
I'm signing this letter because it's time for this generation of
leaders to show the next that Washington can still work
together for the common good and that elected officials still
have our best interests at heart.
OK, So he doesn't totally plan on being a Congress person at
that age, but obviously like. Student body president, your
leadership has nothing to do with the goings on in Congress.
OK, but what he's been doing is going out and lecturing people
of late saying that Republicans are obsessed with the culture
war and they're only interested in doing culture war stuff.
Let's do some culture war stuff. Here's Tim McBride, who is
singing Did I Ever tell You about Shanya versus Shania
Twain? Yes, you did, but it's worth
going back into. OK, so just real quickly folks,
if you're new to the audience, I had a friend who was Polish when
I lived in London for a little bit.
And we had this really funny interaction because in Poland
and the way that people pronounce things in Polish, they
pronounce the the language a little bit differently.
And when they see English letters, they do a little bit
differently the Roman alphabet. So I had a friend whose name was
Mihao, and at one point in time I played a song from him, which
was Shania Twain. And I said, do you know this
song? And he said, yes, that's Shania
Twain. Everybody knows Shania Twain in
Poland, which made me very much laugh.
So I always think of her as Shania Twain.
Here's Shania Twain performed by Tim.
Don't call me Sarah yet, McBride.
Be like a woman. I kind of want to do the what's,
What's the Asian guy that goes like?
That's a professionally produced video, right?
They set up a camera to see the vehicle driving away.
Somebody sitting shotgun filming this entire thing.
This is all for show. OK, you do something on your
program called the oh boil over meter, is that correct?
Yes. Can you describe the OH boil
meter for people that have not heard the American Radicals
podcast? Well, the American Radicals
podcast is available Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday on
rubble.com. Drop the quarter in there.
My Co host Garrett O'boyle, I like to, you know, set him to
zero and then geek him up to see if I can get his head to
explode, which normally ends with lots of Bible verses so he
can get himself back to a standard.
OK, so I'm going to o'boyle over you.
We're slowly building up the pressure on this pot.
So we've now seen him do his political aspirations, his feel
like a woman. Shanya Twain professionally shot
weird, cringy video. And he's remember he's lecturing
Republicans about how they're obsessing about the culture war.
Tell me what you call this thing.
I have a girl brain, but a boy body.
This is called transgender. I was Born This Way when I was
very little. And my mom would say, you're
such a good boy, I would say. No Mama.
Good girl. At first, my family was
confused. They'd always thought of.
Me. As a boy, you.
Can see jazz. There with her family that is a
welcoming schools presentation being done in a library for
children who look like they are under the age of seven.
I have a 7 year old daughter and she looks slightly older than
them. So this is like 4-5 six year
olds tops and being presented by the National Education or
Educators Association. Another thing that has
completely been this is the reason why public schools are
the cornerstone of our democracy.
Their purpose is not to educate anymore, they are to
indoctrinate, which is why we don't like sending our kids to
public schools per SE. Then, yeah, Yeah, Again, to find
your term, what is educate? I would think that they they
view education is essentially a Child Exploitation and grooming,
because that's what that clearly is.
And at any other time in our country's history, no one would
object when the posse rounded that evil satanic being up and
skinned him alive and left him in the desert.
My, one of my favorite people in the conservative quote UN quote
influencer space, somebody who probably doesn't have to worry
about being swatted because he's so well prepared.
This guy named John Lovell Lowell.
Sorry, do you know John Lowell? Sounds familiar.
So he he. Owns and operates a thing called
the Warrior Poet Society. If I can get him on as a guest,
the podcast, I would like to do that at some point in the future
because he's just one of my favorites.
I love the way that he talks. I love the way that he has a
positivity despite some of the negative things he's seen.
He's a former Ranger battalion guy, total stud, does great
pistol training, does some of the best instructional videos
for people that are new to firearms.
So if you haven't checked out Warriors Poet Society to do so,
here he is talking very simply and a thing that we've probably
heard before, to Sean Ryan, another guy I like a lot, who's
been very, very amusing. Sean Ryan, by the way, is
exactly the way that he sounds like on the podcast.
He's exactly that way. Whenever I've had phone calls
with him, he's like, no shit. You know, he's just like, he's
like, just incredulous about the, like, really simple humble
brag. Yeah.
Super, super normal guy, though. Yeah, humble brag that he called
me up and asked me things, which was very funny.
We had a moment at the beginning of this year that was very
unusual here. Here's John discussing the exact
thing we're talking about when indoctrination is the policy.
That's why they're fighting for public schools right now.
And again, I think this is this is weaponization.
Why would you trust your kids to be educated by the government?
Vody Bachman said. Don't be surprised when you send
your kids off to Caesar and they come back as Romans.
That's it. That's it, man.
You're wondering why everyone's gone woke and is has no idea
what bathroom to use anymore. Just if like what happened to
our kids? I'm like, well, you gave them
the government for for their entire childhood.
You saw them at dinner and you attended their sporting events.
But the government raised your kids and social media helped and
video games or what whatever. But you saw them every day, but
you didn't raise them. You didn't log enough hours each
day to counteract all the poison and time wasting and ideological
propagandistic crap that they were getting fed.
Really straightforward again, John Lovell.
Awesome stuff. We're Poets Society and you want
to see where that all leads. Send it, Sir.
OK, if you're missing the visual on this, you are in fact missing
something and I encourage you to check it out.
I did put it out on Twitter, something I made for you.
I am the world's okayest sort of snarky video maker.
So you're missing the visuals here, but I'll just give you a
tip. This man dressed up like a woman
now called Tim Slash, Sarah McBride, is now going to lecture
us on culture war after participating in it, quite
obviously, but also does it in a mansplaining way, which is my
favorite thing again there. This is my argument for why
they're the worst. Here we go.
We will not take a lecture on decorum from a party that
incited an insurrection. I appear to live rent free in
the minds of some of my Republican colleagues.
I wish that they would spend even a fraction of the time that
they spend thinking about me, thinking about how to lower the
costs for American families. I wish they would spend a
fraction of the time that they spend thinking about me figuring
out how to make government actually work better, rather
than making it work worse in order to prove that government
can't work. They are obsessed with culture
war issues. The Republican Party is obsessed
with culture war issues. It is weird and it is bizarre,
and the American people deserve serious legislators, serious
elected officials. Who are focused on bringing
people together to deliver real results for the American people,
not to play games and not to engage in schoolyard taunts.
I just see Adam's apple, Adam's apple, Adam's apple bouncing up
and down, being lectured by a man.
Couple things on on Timmy. It's weird and bizarre.
Bro you want to pee next to women?
So slow your roll on that one. And I always love to.
If you want to see the inner man come out of any of these
trannies, you just tell them no. And then and then the the fact
that all men are Dicks does come to the surface because boy, is
Timmy really upset. And again, I the counterpoint
got those girls in the background.
They're just nodding along. I mean I think it is one and one
a for who is the worst. It's, it's interesting too, when
I see people, you can't call people liberal if they're voting
against actual liberty. And and I see that in the gun
right community too. I have a thing that's been that
kind of like jumped up. I don't know.
I actually have have softened my stance on what it used to be
when I was in the when I was in the military, law enforcement, I
used to kind of believe that, yeah, if you're a dangerous
person, if you make bad decisions with a firearm,
probably you shouldn't have a firearm.
And then I got to the point where I started having more
empathy, which is a weird place to be when you start going, who
needs a gun more than someone who actually is a convicted
felon and has actually, you know, come out of a dangerous
position. I'm seriously like.
Playing with some rough people. He probably needs a firearm.
Yeah. So if you have come out of
prison and you've served your time and you are now acceptable
for society to have you in it, then you are acceptable to have
a firearm. And I think you should be able
to vote. That is my strong stance.
That is where I'm there and the the.
Otherwise, we shouldn't let you out.
If you if that makes you uncomfortable to let a convicted
felon who has now done their time come out.
If you say, hey, he's dangerous, I don't want him having a gun,
why did you let him out of jail to begin with?
Exactly the case. It should not be that it's for
prison labor and it should not be that you're trying to get a
quota or anything else. Like you don't let somebody out
on conditional release and then say that's forever.
You're conditionally not a person anymore.
They actually did that before it used to be called slavery, where
you didn't have all the rights of the other people.
And I don't like the idea of a second class citizen, not in
America. That's my take on it.
It's a very illiberal position, so I'm fine with the idea of
reforming prisons, but at the same time, if they're too
dangerous to be out there in the public, then they shouldn't be
out in the public. The end, full stop.
Either you're out and you're part of us.
There's maybe some very, very narrow exceptions to that.
I actually can't think of how that would work if you actually
applied that universally. If you were too dangerous to be
around people, then you are the end.
You don't get to hold a gun. There's this this controversy
about Mel Gibson and his gun rights and this went on.
This is on CNN. They brought this lady on who
said she got fired for it. By the way, the, the Justice
Department said, no, we actually fired her for some other
reasons. How about insubordination?
Like you were given a pretty straight order.
Do you think anybody could have pushed back against Joe Biden
and say, hey, we're not going to write up the documentation for
the, the, the pardon of, of Hunter or your family members
who have not even been accused of a crime?
Would those people have been removed?
Did anyone like, cry? You didn't see crying about it
then, but you're crying about Mel Gibson getting a handgun
like one of the richest people in the world.
Let's just be real honest. Mel Gibson is one of the richest
people ever. That's just how it works.
Anyway, this is the and and notice this woman looks an awful
lot like what what I expect Tim Slash Sarah will grow into write
a memo to the attorney General recommending that these 9
individuals get this relief that she was interested in granting
to some deserving Americans. And when the memo came back to
me, the comment was. Please add Mel Gibson to this
recommendation. Who asked you to add Mel Gibson?
An official in the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, who is
running this project on the day-to-day instructed me that
Mel Gibson should be added to the memo.
Do you know the name of that person?
Could you share it with us? It's a.
It's one of the associate. Deputy attorney generals, there
are several in the in the office and I don't want to call anyone
out by by by name. But there are, you know, is
e-mail traffic between me and a number of individuals in the
Deputy attorney General's office about this issue.
And the request was made and I responded that I was unable to
fulfill the request because I did not have enough information
about Mr. Gibson to. And then rather than like,
getting more of the information, what I decided to do was
continue to talk just like this. And then NBC News reached out
for comment and says, quote. A Justice Department official
familiar with the matter, AKA anonymous source, told NBC News
that the owner firing was not related to the Gibson case.
The Mel Gibson decision did not play a role in the termination
decision. The paperwork was actually done
before the Mel Gibson e-mail went out, said the person, on a
condition of anonymity. So an anonymous source was not
even making a like a legal comment and allowed to talk
about it. How long can we do that?
I could do that indefinitely, by the way.
I would eventually end up swatting myself.
But as. A as a call back to some of our
previous stories, I mean, I went I went into that watching the
video firmly in the camp of if you do your time, you should get
your firearm and then we should probably allow all people to
have firearms. And then very much like Thomas
Massie, they talked me into the fact that if you up talk like
she does, then you probably shouldn't be able to defend
yourself. Because at some point, you
probably might end up being like this person, your favorite.
This is my argument again, the worst people in America, people
who do wild things. I want you to close your eyes,
audience, all of you that are listening.
Picture the person that you're about to see.
This is a person that would be engaged in reckless and
dangerous behavior, bombing a Tesla dealership and shooting it
up and throwing firebombs in. What does that person look like?
They're from Portland. Does that help you picture them?
Now we're going to show them on the screen.
Enjoy. I love it when people say stuff
set me up for success and then they don't disappoint me.
So to protest Elon Musk, someone shot up and firebombed a Tesla
dealership in Salem, OR last month.
And that suspect has finally been caught by authorities and
is facing federal charges, including domestic terrorism.
Now when you think of someone that would do something like
this, you would think they would be from Portland and you can
kind of imagine what they would look like.
Well, it's. Exactly that.
His name is Adam Matthew Lansky, a far left trans activist who
used to train LGBTQIA plus activists on using weapons.
He loves guns. He also has a horn channel and
he goes under the name Allison. Tesla, thank you to my friend
Andy Noah for the reporting on this.
If convicted, Lansky is facing up to 40 years in prison.
I say good. Just want to shout out real
quick the FBI, Portland for doing their job.
The same one. Yeah, that's the first time
they've ever done that. So that's weird.
I heard that. That actually might be the
argument that they're. Protesters.
I was specifically told that they love their political
activist. That might be the first time FBI
Portland has actually been allowed to do their job.
And I don't know if that's FBI Portland's fault or if it's the
AUS as there and the the SA CS they put in charge.
But maybe cash is actually having an effect 'cause that
actually is kind of unexpected in Portland.
I mean, any sort of progress on arresting anyone in Portland is
probably progress. And you saw the picture there at
the end of the agent walking away with the the Blu-ray
jacket, which no one ever wears unless.
That's from a photo shoot. Nobody wears this.
And had someone tell me yesterday that you'll see all
the the postings online now, especially for the ICE raids,
they are being specifically told that they must pose in photos
with their backs to the camera. And this is the way that they're
actually accounting for all of the illegals within the FBI.
I don't know why. Why are they turning their back?
That's just the new messaging. That's, that's sort of the new
pose, I guess, so that their identities aren't revealed
because they're really secret agents, but they're, they're
having agents who are saying, I don't want to be photographed
because I just did my job. Say no, you have to pose for a
picture with your back to the camera so we can get a picture
of you arresting an illegal alien.
We're doing, we're doing messaging, we're doing serious,
serious. I'm going to take a deep breath
on that. Of all the things that I could
be outraged on, that is not very far into the Kyle spectrum of
weaponization. That is like somewhere to the
right of the middle and I just, I'm going to, I'm going to
contain my own irritation on that old boil meter.
I sent it right back at you. Yeah, yeah.
That doesn't really bother me as much as it could, I guess.
All right, that's what we're going to do for today.
Let me go ahead and say again, folks, if you want to support
the channel, you can go to rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
You can go to youtube.com slash at Kyle Seraphin.
It's at Kyle Seraphin over on X, all the places you can follow us
and the locals channel. This is Kyle seraphin.com.
If you want to get our Sunday sit down a day early, Spotify is
the place. You can follow us.
If you want to get it ad free, I've got a little taste of
what's coming up on Sunday, Steve.
I'll play that. Then we'll give you a little
pitch on the run out for what you're doing for AMRAD, and then
I'll give the palate cleanse. We went long because I don't
care. I'm the boss of me.
Here we go. As a soldier, one of the things
you don't worry about being downrange is Americans are
Americans. We're all fighting the same
'cause we're fighting on the same team.
So I have two CIA assets in the room with me.
I didn't know that at the time. 1 was with the Colombian
intelligence service, this one right up to the top.
And this was essentially a great way to really hurt Donald Trump
back then. I don't want to say the Trump
administration because you can't, the Trump administration
back then was so fragmented between the people who are
working against Donald Trump like, you know, the Gina
Haskell's and the bill bars and Mike Pompeo's and Elliot Abrams
and all of these individuals. And Elliot Abrams, he's I mean,
if you, if you read my discovery, it is a who's who of
the State Department at the highest levels.
It is mind blind. We'll Fast forward, you know, a
year and a half when everything happens and the operation
sabotage, Elliot Abrams goes in front of the Senate subcommittee
hearing and basically says, no, we just learned about this.
We had no idea. All right, that is the Sunday
sit down that I'm doing. That'll come out on Sunday at
1:00 PM. You'll see it streaming live on
all the places to live premiere. That's Jordan Goudreau.
He is the Green Beret that staged a coup to take over
Venezuela. And the story is freaking wild,
dude. And I don't know how much of it.
I don't know. No caveat.
It's, it's a wild story one way or another.
Steve, what do you got coming up on Saturday for folks all?
Right. So we're returning back to the
new tradition that we have on the American Radicals podcast
for Saturday. It's a Saturday grab bag because
there's just way too much news to get to.
We got like 1516 stories. We're going to churn and burn
through them. Includes like AOC under some
sort of ethics complaint. Lots more stuff coming out about
coronavirus, all of it, all across the board.
We're just going to pull it out. I'm going to try to get Garrett
to freak out, get his head to explode.
It'll be a good time. Join us 10:30 Eastern Time on
rumble.com/amradpod. Buddy, thanks for joining me
folks in the chat who are over there.
If you are over on YouTube, we see you there.
Now we've crossed 100. So we're we're making ground up
on the YouTube channel, which is kind of fun to see the Rumble
folks, all of you out there, hundreds and hundreds.
I think sometimes we're maybe I'll look over here.
Hold on. Let me just look.
I want to know now we're at we're over 2000.
So we we stream a pretty good game over around Rumble.
So for all of you that watch it live, really appreciate that I
do have a palate cleanser for you.
Just something about office things for those of you that are
listening, this is the perfect the perfect palate cleanser for
my listeners only if you're an audio only, this is meant for
you. If you're watching, you're going
to be able to see it. The word dongle and being on a
conference call is something that we all are familiar with
now after the COVID stuff. So enjoy this little weird send
off on a Friday. Try to get not sexual in your
workplaces people, it's just too much.
And don't leave poor Steve on the conference call without a
little visual here because he doesn't know what you guys are
doing. A huge dongle.
Thanks. Gets the job done I guess.
I've seen bigger. I have a really small 10.
Mine's normal size but it doesn't work like it used to.
Hey. Guys what?
Is going on in there presentation Paul?
I'm trying to get his trip. I think yours is too wide.
I've got 2. Can you use them at the same
time? Never tried it.
Has anyone seen mine? It's resting on top of a sack.
Trip, is yours wider? Than it is long never seen that
before. Wait, Terry, do you have one?
Yeah. But it's at home in my drawer.
You know mine was like this once my bends to the left.
Oh, I think you're stepping on mine.
Is yours purple? Just the top part, actually.
Clint, let me hold yours for a second.
Sure. Why is this so hard?
Did you try taking it out? And putting it back in I.
Think it's stuck? Sometimes if you jiggle it
around a little bit, that helps push it harder.
That's all we got for today, folks.
God bless all of you. Thanks to Steve for joining me.
Guys. Go check out the AMRAD podcast.
It's at Amradpod over on Rumble. You can find him over on on X as
well. And I hope you have a wonderful
weekend. We'll see you either on Saturday
for the sit down, Sunday for the sit down, or Monday at 0930
Eastern Time here on the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Let's shut this one down.