Take a look. Behind the curtain with a real
whistle blower, an American patriot prepared to embrace the
uncomfortable truth. Because this program has no time
for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphim. Well, hello my friends, welcome
to the Kyle Serfin show. Today's Wednesday.
It's September the 18th. I'm going to see if I could do
like a black voice. I'm going to do like a Kamala
Harris show. Like with the whole show is just
me pretending to do an accent that I don't have.
What do you guys think about that?
This is a program where we have no room for comforting lies,
which means we bring on people who had the similar sense of
skepticism that we do, but also know how to connect dots and see
patterns. So today my guest is going to be
Steve Baker, and I will bring him on momentarily.
Before we do that, let me give you a rundown where I think
we're going to end up going because I've got these articles
up on and I want you to know what we're going to cover down
on. We're going to talk about Ryan
Ralph #1 The main reason is I do not want to let this story drop
at this point. I watched them drop the first
assassination attempt and I don't like it.
I don't like that they did that. I don't like that 65 days
afterwards, another person decided to go try it again
because the story wasn't talking about how nuts it is and how
crazy this country is. So we're going to talk about
that. We're going to talk a little bit
about some new information about the would be assassin.
We're going to talk about what I see here on my list, dogs and
cats and eating. There's some videos that have
been coming out from the City Council out there in
Springfield. OH, so we're going to keep
talking about that. We're going to talk about Donald
Trump being labeled a threat, which is I think how we got here
and we want to do that. The Libertarian Party again from
yesterday with Jeremy Kaufman. I want to get Steve's take on
that and, and paging the 1980s. Hopefully all of you had marked
this day safe from exploding pagers.
If you don't know what happened, we'll get into it.
Let me unmute my friend Steve Baker and bring him on.
I got to look up and there he is.
Mr. Baker, how you doing today? Hey, I'm good, Kyle.
Thanks for having me this morning.
Are you at the Blaze Studios? I am, I'm actually in one of the
conference rooms here at Blaze and I'm I'm actually double
fisting it this morning for the coffee.
I I thought I'd go and load up with two cops.
We got started here. That is definitely the right
move if you are dealing with our program.
All right, so let me do a quick intro and then you fill in any
dots in here. Steve Baker is a former
musician, folks, and a part time investigator who became a full
time investigative journalist and now has the musicianship on
the sidelines, although I imagine the capabilities haven't
gone anywhere. He worked behind the Iron
Curtain exposing propaganda, which is kind of why I'm excited
about this, because we're talking about possibly a
propaganda op and an intelligence op.
And you have some experience in that part of the world, or at
least in that part of the the human cultures, the Slavic
cultures doing this kind of thing.
And now you work for The Blaze and you are also a misdemeanor
terrorist. Do you want to tell people what
a misdemeanor terrorist is? Well, I am actually one of those
people that I performed the act of accidental journalism or some
people would say accidental tourism in the capital on
January 6th. And I followed a story where the
story went. And unlike 100 other journalists
that also went through open doors and busted open windows
that day to record and document for their stories that they
submitted to the likes of The New York Times or The New Yorker
or whatever other publication they're working for.
I didn't submit my stories apparently to the right
organization. So as a result of that, I've
been charged and something that I don't think you and I have
even talked about yet, I actually received a plea deal
offer last week. I I don't think I've told you
that so. How's it?
How's it look? Surprise, surprise, it looks
like a typical plea deal offer. There's no promises, as you
know, in those plea deals that there's always the, you know,
the the backroom insinuation that if you take the plea deal
that it's going to be, you're going to be better off than if
you go to trial or you otherwise plead guilty.
But you have to waive your constitutional rights to appeal.
That's stated several times. And more importantly, and it's
very odd, is that in these plea deal offers, they say it several
times in the exact quote, is that Mister Baker will, if he
accepts, will waive his constitutional rights.
That's what a plea deal is from the federal government.
That's the federal government telling you that if you accept
our deal, you waive your constitutional rights.
I think that actually has a a lot to do with what we're going
to be talking about in New Hampshire, that this concept of
not understanding the Constitution and that these
these constitutional liberties, the way they were written up,
they predate the government. They predate the existence of
the government. They are your rights because
they're God-given. Right, right, right.
Yeah, you would think so, but in this particular plea deal, So
what? They're here just to to get this
misdemeanor terrorist thing over and done with.
I was only charged with the four basic misdemeanors that most of
the January 6th offenders have been charged with.
Let's let's go ahead and right off the bat here once again, for
the millionth time, dispel the notion that the capital was
overrun by thousands of violent offenders by Matthew Graves, US
Attorney over the District of Columbia's own words out of his
own mouth. He actually stated about a year
and a half ago that only about 225 people actually did violence
against law enforcement that day, 225 out of somewhere
between a quarter of a million and 400,000 people.
All right, so that with that baseline drawn, then there was
probably somewhere between 350 to 400 people who have been
charged with various acts of violence, aiding and abetting.
They were in the wrong place at the wrong time.
They got, they got caught up in a pushing or, or shoving scrum
or something like that. And so they were charged with
violence, but they actually didn't overtly attack law
enforcement. So there's a very, very small
number of actual felonious violent offenders as it relates
to January 6th. Then you get into the other
charges of seditious conspiracy, which was about, oh, gosh,
there's been a couple of dozen people that have been charged
with that and a dozen or so that have been convicted of that,
including the founder of the Oath Keepers, Stewart Rhodes,
who did not go inside the Capitol that day.
Who in fact, the FBI over and over and over again in his trial
said we have no evidence that he ever ordered the Oath Keepers to
invade the capital, to go inside the Capitol, to attack Congress,
to stop the certification of the election or otherwise commit a
conspiracy. This was actually the testimony
under cross examination of every single FBI officer in that
trial. I was there.
I saw it with my own eyes, heard it with my own ears, recorded it
myself and reported on it at the time back in September, October,
November of 2022, during that. Trial.
Did you get clearance from the editor?
Well, if we're talking about the food blogging editor, no, I
didn't get permission at that time.
OK, good. I wasn't on those terms yet with
the Monsanto industrial complex. That's how it.
Works all right but the bottom, but the bottom?
Line is is that you know, 3 1/2 years later of them wreck trying
to wreck my life and trying to put me through the wringer.
You know the as as they say the punishment is the process and
going through their process for the last 3 1/2 years.
My the first time that I was contacted by the FBI was in July
of 2021. And so all of these months and
years later, after charging me, after arresting me, after
putting me in leg chains and marching me before a magistrate
here in Dallas at the federal courthouse here, they finally
have sent me over a plea deal offer these many months later,
because that was March 1st when they actually went Well, I say
they arrested me, I self presented, and then they chained
me there. They didn't.
Yeah. And you actually, if people
remember, you got the only accidental pairing of two black
FBI agents out of the Dallas field office.
I'm sure that was completely coincidental that they just
happened to get two big black guys out of a field office, out
of a career field. That I would say is 10, maybe
15% black tops. Is that what it is?
It's just not that high. Yeah.
I mean, there were like 2 black guys in my in my Academy class
of 50. So for whatever that's worth.
It's just really, really hard to randomly choose two agents to
escort Steve Baker, the federal courthouse in.
In what, Like they did a belly chain and leg irons in the whole
deal? He just happened to pick two
guys at random that just happened to be looking that way.
I don't know. Yeah, and then, and then, and
then the US Marshall that actually processed me, who was
actually doing the electronic fingerprints and the, you know,
the, the, the mug shot and all that kind of stuff.
As he's looking at my paperwork now.
He was Hispanic, actually, he's from South American country.
I'm, I'm going to try and not out him as much as I can because
he was actually a, he was actually a really good guy.
And I know you've talked favorably of US Marshals in the
past. These these, these guys are, I
mean, of all the federal quote, UN quote law enforcement guys,
they seem to be more in tune with doing the actual work of
protecting us from force and fraud and rounding up bad.
Guys, you know why that is. Steve, though, it's so simple
because their mission is very simple.
Their mission is 2 things they handle well, three things, I
guess because one of them is a piece of it.
They are involved in the protection of the federal
judiciary. So in a physical way, they do
physical protection, they do securing of those that are in
custody, federal custody, and they go hunt down people that
are evading federal custody. But they don't do investigative
work necessarily like the Marshall Service, even though
you'd get some guys that want to like be on your investigation,
they're not investigators, they're manhunters.
So they rundown. Sometimes their tactics are
sketchy, sometimes they're a little bit dangerous and scary,
but they do really good work. They'll kick down a hotel room
door and go get a pedophile like they're into that.
That's what they're all about. They'll go through the door,
they'll go get the person. If they are evading, you know,
if they are a fugitive, that is doing unlawful flight to avoid
prosecution, which is what AU FAP warrant is.
They're big on manhunting. So I think because they have
such a clear mission set, the US Marshall Service is not our
problem. Well, that's some other.
Ones oh am I getting an echo again?
You're right. You're right.
So the, the US Marshall that did process, I mean, he's looking at
my paperwork as he's, you know, typing things in and he goes,
oh, man, this is bullshit just like that.
Just a reasonable guy reading something that seems like
completely unreasonable. And he, I mean, he saw me
standing there in the belly chain and leg chains for four
misdemeanor offenses and went, this is bullshit.
Right, because he knows what the what it takes to be in that
situation. And in those circumstances.
Let me let me do a quick sort of promotion to our our folks over
on locals. Saw a couple of you guys out
there that are hearing this. Somebody said they're not
getting any sound. It might be on your end.
Anybody if you guys are having issues in the chat, make sure
you let me know, but it doesn't sound like it is.
Folks. If you guys want to join our
Locals program, it's Seraphin Kyle, seraphin.com,
kyleseraphin.com that will direct you over to the Locals
community and you can sign up there and you might as well sign
up for Steve Baker's as well. You can sign up as a free
member, You can sign up as a paid member.
It's up to you If you want to get involved in the
conversation. I recommend you do it just
because it's a really good group of people, they're solid, and
you guys are one of the supporters that allows us to do
these programs long form without a lot of interruption.
Do you want to get into the weird stuff You.
Know that's the only reason I got up early this morning, not
just to hang with you, but to totally get into the tats and
tatas. Tats and Tatas, hold on, let me
throw the the OK again. If you guys don't know what he's
talking about, you're missing out on the thumbnail.
Today's thumbnail. I promised Steve yesterday
afternoon and and delivered this morning.
Here's what it looks like, Tats and tatas.
She has a Ukrainian tattoo on the forearm that's kind of
interesting and the most cleavage filled photograph that
I've ever seen in the Wall Street Journal.
I don't know if that's your experience as well.
Yeah, I, I mean, I, I, I did go back through my memory banks,
although I did not do any actual searching.
I didn't Google up Wall Street Journal and cleavage, but that
is a highly unusual representation for the Wall
Street Journal. It's kind of suggestive and kind
of strange. So let's get into who we're
talking about. We're talking about this guy,
Ryan Ralph. Again, I don't want this story
to drop because I watched it drop the last time.
And we're not talking about Thomas Crooks nearly as much.
And they're not talking about an assassination attempt where a
bullet hit the man that's running for president's ear.
That's unfathomable to me like that.
We've gotten to this place. So here's the criminal
complaint. I put it on the screen for those
of you who are watching the rubble program.
If you're listening, I will share you again, United States
of America versus Ryan Wesley Ralph.
And there are only two charges against this guy at this point.
And they are both 922 charges, which is the federal gun
statute, 18 USC 922, Section G and Section K Kilo.
And that is an obliterated firearm.
So that's actually, there's been a West Virginia court that said
that that's unconstitutional because it's an entire class of
firearms. I don't know if you knew this,
Steve. And then the other one is felon
in possession that, Gee, that was overturned, at least at the
district level. There have been some attacks on
that as well. So these are like iffy.
I mean, they've been solid charges for a very long time,
but I've got issues with it. Tell me what you know about this
guy. Well, unfortunately, I know way
too much and I, I know a hell of a lot more than I ever wanted to
know. In fact, I, to be honest with
you, I was on my way to Dallas. I was driving from North
Carolina, where where my home is, knowing that I was going to
be working on some really what I think are infinitely more
important stories. But people keep trying to kill
former President Trump. And that keeps knocking me off
of my game because each time that happens, I get a, you know,
I get a e-mail or a text from my blaze, you know, editor in chief
and says, OK, you and Joe Hanneman are on the beat.
It's like, oh, here we go again. And so when it, I'm, I'm
driving, I'm, I'm about an hour and a half out of Dallas on
Sunday when this thing starts hitting the you know, the, the
news and, and I'm, I'm getting my phone is blowing up and I'm
like, ah, crap. You know, so I know that when I
got to Dallas, I got here to the blaze mothership and, and the
studios that I was not going to be able to work on the things
that I really am looking forward to knocking out here soon.
But it is an important story. And you're right, it doesn't
need to go away. It doesn't need to appear into
the media ether. They're already downplaying it.
They were downplaying it within a couple of hours this time.
Yeah, minutes almost. I, I feel like, like within I, I
think I had somebody from the, from the FBI reach out to me and
said the evidence response team in Miami is spinning up for a
possible assassination attempt on Trump outside the golf
course. And I go, OK.
And then not 10 minutes later, there are people out there
reaching out to discredit it and they're saying, well, it was
just a gunfight between two dudes who were outside of the
the area. You remember that because that
was the first story that came down New York Post.
Actually, I think you were the first one to actually ping me on
my drive and let me know that this was happening.
No, you were, you were, you were the bearer of bad news.
But but it was, it was immediately downplayed by so
many elements within the MSM and within, you know, leftist
influencers on social media, not only downplaying the severity of
the alleged attempt on another attempt on Trump's life, but
they were also immediately starting to once again defend
their own actions, their own words as it relates to the
inflammatory speech of accusing Trump of being the most sinister
danger of all time to all democracies ever in the history
of the world on planet Earth. I mean, they've, they've gone
beyond him being literal Hitler to being the most dangerous man
who's ever lived. And they're actually out there
now defending like, look, just because he was shot at doesn't
mean he's not a real threat. And you're just going, guys,
Scott Jennings seems to be the only person.
Do you watch any of his stuff on CNN?
Have you seen? No.
Well, I I have not. To be perfectly honest, since I
checked into my hotel room here in Dallas on at 3:00 on Sunday
afternoon, I have had I've purposely locked the television
on MSNBC on purpose. Well, you want to see what the
what the craziest side is saying it Scott Jennings has been.
I think that I think CNN is actually in a play for ratings
right now where they're like, I don't think we can only have
whatever it is that that 25% of people that are on the hard
left. And it's probably smaller than
that, but there's people that kind of lean that way.
So rather than competing for the audience that MSNBC has locked
up tight, they're actually competing for people that want
to hear a little bit more balance.
And Scott Jennings has been doing balance.
Let me bring up this story here. This is coming from CBS, so I'm
going to read this is kind of bullet point.
So I think it's useful for us to get kind of the facts as they
are described by sort of a leftist, but not in crazy, not a
crazy leftist. Source.
So this is from reporting 2 days ago and this is what they
basically said. They said that we know that
there was an apparent assassination attempt.
They're using the word apparent. The FBI has used the word
alleged. People are kind of like trying
to shade around the edges. Dude with a gun sitting outside
in a sniper nest for 12 hours equals an assassination attempt
to me. I get why they're being cautious
but still. Essentially they they saw the
barrel of an AK47 is what was reported, but we know now it was
an SKS because it was actually charged as such.
SKS is a just a cheaper garbage version.
Similar kind of gas piston system.
Still shoots a 762 by 39 caliber round.
And for those who do not know rifles, and this is worth
noting, that gun is probably an inside of 300 yard gun.
But for real accuracy, it's got to be probably 200 to 150 yards.
It's not an inherently stable or accurate round, which means
people have said at 300 yards your groups open up to bigger
than 12 inches, which means you're missing most man sized
targets if your aim is not very good.
And he had a scope on there and all this other kind of stuff.
All right, so he was he was engaged by Secret Service.
Handgun was drawn, fired by a protective agent who was in the
bubble. They did their job.
That's good to hear. And essentially we start finding
out about this guy who got in his car after he got shot at and
he drove away and he was picked up by local law enforcement.
I believe it was by the county sheriff's in in Martin County.
Does that register with what you know?
Yeah, yes, it does. That's exactly.
And then when they. Asked him and this is the thing
that I think is the weirdest part because he we've seen
pictures of him being arrested, we've seen the body Cam footage
and they said do you know what this is about?
And he said yes to me. That's very, very telling.
All right. I'll let you kind of opine on
what you think about sort of the original details from that.
Yeah, so you asked the first question was, what do I know
about this guy? I know entirely too much.
I and I, we've been going all the way back and digging.
Joe Hanneman and myself also investigative reporter for The
Blaze now formerly with the Epic Times.
He's now with me. He's my partner in crime on a
lot of these investigations. What a lot of people don't know
is Joe and I were partner in crimes long before we were
working for the same company because we were sharing every,
everything together to make sure that we got stuff right.
He was one of my, you know, guys that I trusted.
He knew I wasn't going to steal his stories.
I wasn't going to steal his stories.
We always hoped that one day we we would be able to combine our
efforts. And, you know, kind of the way I
always put it is Woodward and Bernstein the shit out of one of
these big, you know, blockbuster stories.
And so I'm, I'm very, very happy to have him here now.
And, and we are working together on this.
And one of the things that we have been doing is digging into
this guy's background we've found.
Positive news stories on him going back to when he was 25
years old. We've got a new article coming
out today, an analysis piece basically on his life and his
history and where he was written up, where he, you know, he he
had a heroic action where he saved the, you know, a damsel in
distress back when he was 25. And the local Greensboro paper
did a, you know, feature story on him.
And he was he was a good looking young man had that long horse
face that he still has. But you know, nevertheless it
was it was a positive story, but then things.
This is 30 years old is what you're saying though.
This is a 30 year old news story.
This guy is in the news all over the place.
That that's correct. And then suddenly in the late
90s, he basically becomes a career criminal.
I mean, he breaks into criminality with, with Ferber
and gusto. We're talking about a guy who
has over 100 identifiable criminal charges against him,
not only, but basically beginning about 1998 up through
just a couple of years ago. He has over Kyle.
He has over 70 arrests. How many?
How many years behind bars? Well, let's hold that thought.
So over 100 criminal charges, over 70 arrests, multiple felony
convictions, 0 years behind bars.
Now we're talking about a we're talking about a guy who
notorious, most notoriously in 2002, held off the Greensboro,
North Carolina Police Department and the Guilford County
Sheriff's Department with an AK or an SKAS fully automatic rifle
at the time. That should get you 10 years
just for holding it. As I and I spoke to the sheriff
yesterday, the sheriff of Guilford County, who was the
sheriff at the time, 24 years elected sheriff of the county
there, and he was of course there when this incident took
place. He said that he never personally
interacted with Ralph, but he said his guys had interacted
with him dozens and dozens of times over the years.
They said he was notorious among his guys.
He said at the very least in that incident, there should have
been a federal referral at that time because of the gun crime
itself, but rather the locals pled it down to a concealed
carry violation and it went away.
OK, when was the assault weapons ban?
The Assault Weapons ban was what, 9495?
But it was a 10 year thing, What it I think it encompassed that
time. Oh yeah, absolutely.
Absolutely. I'm gonna I'm looking it up just
'cause I want the the years on it specifically, but we.
Already. But we already had a ban on
fully automatic, you know. Sure, we did, but what I'm
getting at is like this was all during the time when this
actually was a thing that people cared about.
And so this was 1994 was when Congress passed the ACT and it
expired in September of 2004. He has a machine gun under
federal law in 2002. No federal referral.
Violation of the assault weapons ban, probably, definitely a
violation of the National Firearms Act 1934.
Failure to register a machine gun.
So, and then it was listed as a weapon of mass destruction,
which must have been a state charge at that time, which is to
say that if you had a Full Auto machine.
OK, So this guy, this is where we start getting shady.
And I talked about it yesterday. I'm not ready to call him a
federal asset. But what I will say is, is when
you start crossing the line and you have interactions with the
United States prosecutor's office.
I asked. I asked the the sheriff
yesterday. I said, can you give me an
explanation for why this guy with multiple felony
convictions, firearm conviction, stolen goods, I mean, this guy,
this guy was in possession of stolen goods, multiple charges
convicted, his suspended sentence expired and six months
later he does it again and still doesn't go to jail.
I, I went through this in great detail with the, with the former
sheriff of Guilford County. And what he told me was he said,
well, Guilford County is notoriously liberal and, and he
said, you know, I was an exception to the rule being a
conservative, you know, sheriff at the time re elected over and
over and over again. And he said, he said they in
that camp in that county, they notoriously don't want to go
through the process of trial with anybody.
They love pleading everything out and pleading everything down
and allowing people to walk. And I said, OK, I said, I
understand that about liberal courts, all right.
But this is a middle-aged white guy with a machine gun.
Right. Like this is not the people that
we expect to see the white privilege card applied to.
Right. And to which?
To which the sheriff said, well, that's a good question.
And I said so. So I said, all right, So I said,
engage me for a moment. I said, was somebody protecting
this guy? And he says, I have no evidence
of that, He said. But I can tell you he's this is
this is a quote, he is the type of person that the CIA loves to
bring in. All right, let's get
conspiratorial because I've got a Mike Benz tweet up here and he
refers to a story by John Solomon.
But we're going to go to the to the actual story where it
started. So this was a breaking thing
from John Solomon, the suspected Trump assassin flagged by the
United States during his return from Ukraine.
But or I guess it's pronounced Ukraine.
I don't know. I don't know why I emphasize one
part. But Homeland Security refused to
probe. And here's Mike Benz's take on
it. We all know Mike Benz loves
getting into the thing called the BLOB, which is the, the, the
Intel community. He says can't think of a reason
why they do that. A CIA targeter flagged him.
CBP flagged him. He has 74 arrests but never
spent a day in prison. Recruited Islamic fundamentalist
to fight for the CI as war in Ukraine.
But all government agencies kept their hands off.
This is a big mystery. What kind of mystery are we
looking at here, Mr. Baker? All right.
So you know this enough about me, and you and I have had these
types of discussions enough times to know that before I put
on my tinfoil hat, I always first go to just the facts
ma'am, and then convince me of why I need to go down a
conspiracy rabbit hole. Convince me I'm I'm having to do
this one in reverse order. And the reason why I'm doing
this one in reverse order is because what we know about how
secrets and how they apply to for the protection of one of
their protectees. And the fact that they would
have had to have notified local law enforcement two or three
days in advance of where Trump was playing golf so that they
could do allegedly, as we know, they're supposed to do, site
survey inspections, things of that nature bomb sweeps, all the
things that they're supposed to do for a protectee.
Now, knowing Trump, like we know Trump, Trump could have very
well LED them on and said, I'm playing at such and such golf
course. And then at the last minute said
no, just for his own, you know, because, because world leaders
have done that for throughout, you know, history for thousands
of years. They, they've fooled their own
Praetorian guards or their protective details or whatever,
and, and change at the last minute.
So he could have done that. But even if he had changed at
the last minute, how did Ralph know when and where to set up a
sniper's nest 12 hours in advance?
I there's, there's. I find it highly unlikely that
he made a guess of where he needed to be now.
Let's let's say why that is, though.
Let's get really, really granular about this because I
think it's necessary. People will incidentally do spot
checks on a regular basis to see if somebody is where they want
to be. I used to do surveillance.
You used to do surveillance as an investigator.
You know how this works. If there's a place where someone
is most likely to be, you might camp out there all day or all
night, right? That's correct, but if it's.
A point where someone might show up like they sometimes go to
this grocery store or they have coffee on some Thursdays at this
coffee shop. You might go hang out during
coffee hours for like a couple hours, but then you're going to
leave we or you'll just drive by and see if their car is in the
parking lot. That's called a spot check.
So there's spot checks, there's the limited surveillance, and
then there's the bunker down and watch.
And you've basically tucked in to see when this person comes
in, you're going to see them come into your field of view.
Yeah, he did the last one, you know, as we put these things out
there and we were asking questions, we we were challenged
as we should be. Somebody said, well, they, you
know, it's it's not hard to spot, you know, Trump Force One
and his airplane when it lands and he could have ran out there
that that night after he saw the plane land.
So. OK, reasonable question.
So I immediately got on with our sources here from the Blaze and
found out when Trump left Salt Lake City the night before.
Just so happens that Glenn Beck was on the same billing with him
in Salt Lake City that night. So we had Beck security team
telling me exactly when Trump left the building.
We knew then that he was wheels up in his plane at 7:15 PM
mountain time. So that's 915 W Palm, Florida
time, right? And it's a four and a half hour
flight. So he's not landing till
basically about 2:00 in the morning, about the time that
Ralph posted up. Right.
So we eliminate that kind. And so you have to go through
these layers of, of trying to figure these things out and, and
see if there was another reason or another motivation or like
you said, maybe he just knew that that Trump, if he's home on
a Sunday morning, that this is the golf course that he likes to
play. We'll see what we don't know
yet. And the reason why I can't make,
I can't answer these questions yet is because we have not been
given the information about how long Ralph was in Florida.
We don't know how long he was there.
We don't know when he arrived from either Hawaii or North
Carolina. And by the way, interestingly as
a as an aside, we know from voting records in both Hawaii
and North Carolina that he was vote, he was voting in both
jurisdictions at. The same.
Time, at the very least, we ought to investigate him for,
you know, a voter fraud. Yeah.
So, so we know that we know that he voted on a Democratic primary
ballot in this year in North Carolina at his old resident
address, but he's been living in Hawaii for the last 6 1/2 years
and his most recent vote there that we could find was 2021.
Interesting. One of the weird things about
election records too is that left-leaning and very blue
states tend not to wash their records and conservative states
tend to wash them when you re register somewhere new.
So I've lived in multiple states.
The only one that I still am registered in, by the way, that
I haven't lived in in for more than a decade.
In fact, it's the only one that I've been registered as a voter
since I registered. And they won't cancel it no
matter what I do. I send them emails, I'll send
them stuff. I'm like, hey, I'm not going to
go out there and get a notary public.
It's California and I've been registered there since 2008 and
I get I get information as a voter like in Glendale and
they're like, Hey, we're running for Glendale City Council and
I'm like, dude, I haven't lived there since O 9 when I enlisted.
Give me a break. Let let's kind of.
They they hold, they hold your, they hold your registration in
reserve in case. That's right.
Well, hope springs eternal that I might come back and pay
whatever their crazy taxes are. So the Wall Street Journal ran
this piece. I've actually got the video clip
of her talking to Jesse Watters, which we can play in a little
bit here. But let's introduce the the tats
and Tatas, if you will. Is that, is that a reasonable
thing to do? Because this is where you hit me
yesterday. You hit me up yesterday and you
said, what's up with this article?
And you had me and Steve friend and Gerardo Boyle all review it.
We all kind of came up with the same thoughts.
And your thoughts, by the way, are not incongruous with the
thoughts of many others that I sent.
I sent this article out to a long list of my former
intelligence community sources, special OPS sources, guys that
have worked overseas, guys who have been in Ukraine in some
pretty hairy stuff for a very long time, long before the
recent conflict with Russia, and that have been involved very,
very much in both the political scene.
I'm trying to be careful here. The electoral process in Ukraine
since 2014 and as well as covert operations there.
And so as a result of this, I sent this over to them.
This includes, by the way, Kyle, not just former USIC guys, but
also European. Yeah, and.
And for folks awareness, like the techniques are the same,
recruiting people, spotting people, assessing people and
having them do things that you want them to do.
They kind of are all the same. And it's usually finding
leverage and squeezing. It's usually identifying them,
you know, what their assets and their liabilities are.
You know, will they be a net positive to what I'm trying to
accomplish? Can I actually suggest things to
them that they'll do? Are they motivated and, you
know, are they going to burn my OP to the ground or how how much
do I have to kind of insulate and shield them?
But these are standard things. I mean, these have been going on
for thousands of years, it turns out in in a human history.
So what happened is universally, without exception, every single
one of our sources that read this article after I sent it out
to them last night wrote me back straight ahead.
Bullshit. This is disinformation.
This is a disinformation campaign, and there the Wall
Street Journal is not immune to that.
They are well known to be a voice of the IC community and
have covered for the IC and DoD for decades, just as the New
York Times has, just as Newsweek does, and so forth and so on.
And, and this is a quid pro quo situation, so folks understand
how this works. It's like we're going to give
you scoops and we're going to give you stories.
And occasionally we're going to come and tell you that we need
you to run a story that we need you to run.
So sometimes you're going to get exclusive information that
nobody else has and you're going to lead and you're going to
break it. And that's going to build your
reputation. And sometimes you're going to be
a shield for what we need because propaganda is also part
of the deal. Are you in?
And there are people that we've all identified and the names are
well known within the mainstream media.
And if you guys follow this program, you've seen some of
them, That's how it plays. This is a quid pro quo game.
You are. You are essentially whoring
yourself out to the Intel community for great scoops and
sometimes propaganda. And that's exactly what somebody
asked me last night. They said, why would so and so
pick one of the writers either with WSJ or yeah, WSJ or
Newsweek or New York Times? Why would they?
Why would they do this? Why would they be a basically a
useful idiot for the IC community?
And, and it is exactly what you said, they're getting access
that they would not get otherwise.
They're getting scoops that they would not get otherwise.
And in exchange for that, they have sold their soul.
That's exactly what it is. There are people that have
written stories about the cartels and they got that
information from deep inside of either DOJ entities like ATF or
or FBI or DEA. And then the trade off is
sometimes you run a story that's favorable that we need you to,
or you're putting out some sort of misinformation,
disinformation operation that's going to be backstop and we're
going to be giving you the unnamed sources to go and tell
you, but we need you to do it. Let me read some from this Wall
Street Journal article, which I pulled off and I put into the
archive. So folks, I can actually link
this. I'll put it on social media a
little bit later for your readings.
Does the government suspected of attempting to assassinate former
President Donald Trump acted so erratically during his his years
as a pro Ukraine activist that other Americans who encountered
him flagged him and his behavior to US authorities?
He was taken into custody, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
But during his time in Ukraine, he traveled shortly after the
Russian invasion in 2002, hoping to join the fight where his
tumultuous life full of failures and brushes with the law seemed
to spiral further downward and to alarm those who came in
contact with him. We're going to assess those who
who who were alarmed because I think what you're seeing on the
screen right now, if you guys are looking is supposedly a
picture from the journal of the woman with the tats and Tatas
that is there sitting there in that sort of seductive photo.
And by the way, she doesn't look like that on Fox News.
I don't know why she chose to pose that way.
And it definitely made me read and stop right there.
I I went to Steve and I said, Steve, I'm going down a rabbit
hole right now. I have no idea what you wanted
me to read, but I just found a woman who's got an open shirt.
What's going on here? This is the story.
Her name is Chelsea Walsh and nothing against Chelsea was.
I mean, I think it's an attractive picture.
I think it's actually probably more alluring that she she
presented herself on Fox. But it's just so weird for the
Wall Street Journal to like throw a honeypot picture like
this. Says she's a nurse who
encountered several people, including several times with
Rouse in Kiev in 2022. Said his threats of violence
worried her so much that she conveyed her concerns to Customs
and Border Protection officers during an hour long interview at
Washington's Dulles in June of 2022.
That's flag number one. She told the officer during the
interview, which took place after she returned to the US,
that he was among the most dangerous American she met
during her month and a half long stint in Ukraine.
That's a big, weird red flag. Why was she doing this interview
and all of this? She showed the officer a
notebook listing more than a dozen names of Americans and
others who took actions who alarmed her.
She had a heading referred to as, quote, overall predatory
behavior or antisocial traits, End Quote.
And there were four names. Ralph's was on the top.
And then she had another one which was entitled people who
have been arrested in Ukraine, of which apparently Ryan was the
only one. Talk to me about that, Steve.
Well, the one thing that I have not figured out yet is what the
the circumstances behind the arrest in Ukraine, because I
don't have the access to police. So we have that now.
Yeah, we, well, we have it's alleged, but go ahead.
Yeah. So the story, and I want to say
this comes from John Solomon here.
Apparently he, Ryan was one of the people and and told people
at the time that he was organizing A protest outside of
Zelinsky's home. Did you get this background that
he basically got a bunch of rabble rousers together,
including foreign nationals, but also people who were
domestically there and got them really riled up to go and do a
protest that was considered unlawful at the time in front of
the the House of the president of Ukraine.
And therefore he was rounded up like everybody else because he
was considered an unlawful protest.
They did not disperse and they ended up being arrested over it.
That's the claim that was being made.
That's what I'm seeing published.
I'll find you where that is. I'll give you a.
Second, yeah, we, we actually, we actually quote the Solomon
story in our, our a piece that's going to come out later today.
And, and the, and that's why I say we, we, I, I think I'm, I'm
hesitating here because I'm trying to be as accurate as I
can when we look at every one of these things, even if it's the
domestic police reports. When I saw, and I went through
it the first time with a fine tooth comb and realized that
everything on every single arrest and every single charge
and every single conviction ended in either suspended
sentence, parole, probation. And we could find not a single
incident where he was actually incarcerated for one of his
crimes. I didn't believe it as we're
missing something. Right.
We have to wait. We have to go further.
So we did. And we, even though we were on
it from day one, we couldn't. We were waiting for.
And sure enough, all of a sudden, NBC and Washington Post,
the New York Times start corroborating.
Yeah, we can't find incarceration either.
We can't find prison time either.
So we knew we were missing, Yeah.
I well, I found the story. So this is the this is the
headline for the story. This is actually coming from
wflx.com. So this is a local news station
and this is the paragraph where I read what you just it wasn't
in John Solomon story. I just did a search for it.
Again, it says, quote, this is apparently according to Walsh,
quote, Ryan told me the story because he was very proud and
explained when he was arrested, which has not been confirmed.
Again, as you just said, quote, shortly before I met him, he
said that he enlisted a bunch of local Ukrainian citizens to
start a protest in front of Zelinsky's house and the protest
was about freeing the Azov defenders of Maripol.
I think it's what it's pronounced.
Ryan said that they allowed nobody to do that protest.
So everybody in got put in jail at that time, including Ryan.
So that's the claim. That's apparently when he was
arrested. You tell me when you want to
play video of this lady, by the way, and we'll play the a little
bit of the Jesse Watters bit. Oh, now see, I haven't seen the
I heard that she was, she was on Jesse Watters last night.
So I haven't seen it. So let's play it.
Yeah, OK, let's do this. OK, so here's here's Chelsea
Walsh, the the gal from the photos discussing with Jesse
Watters. I don't know how much we'll
play. There's about 3 1/2 minutes of
this clip. I'll put it out on social media
again, but we'll play at least some of it here.
Chelsea Walsh is the nurse who flagged Ruth to the feds after
meeting him in Ukraine, and she joins us now.
Chelsea, what about Ruth struck you?
He had very bizarre and volatile tendencies as a nurse.
I'm a mandated reporter and we are also trained to determine
when someone is a threat to themselves or others.
I determined after knowing Ryan for a while that he was a threat
to others, so I felt that it was necessary that he be reported to
the proper authorities. And you reported?
This to the federal government and what happened next?
I haven't heard anything. I have had no correspondence.
Nobody had tried to connect with me until today.
OK. Has someone from which agency
specifically connected with you now A.
A agency has connected with me. I would.
I don't want to say which one, but someone has connected with
me. OK.
In your conversations and observations of Ruth, what were
the things that he was saying he was operating in?
Ryan got involved with the humanitarian side as well as the
military side. He got involved with things that
he shouldn't have been involved with.
He was able to con members in the Ukrainian military.
He was able to con charities. He he was a good con artist.
He was calculated, but he was also very volatile and sporadic.
He got into just about everything.
Drones, weapons, humanitarian aid.
He got involved in things he shouldn't have been involved
with because he didn't have a background in any of this.
How was he able to con the Ukrainian military that?
You'll have to ask him. All right, there's more to it,
but let's just leave it at that for now.
What you thought? This is this is what my, and I,
again, I'm being very careful. One of our European Intelligence
Community sources has been very active with me since this began.
He personally spent a lot of time in Eastern Europe,
including Ukraine. His background by and large is
he spent most of his his time over there infiltrating
Islamicist extreme extremist groups.
That's what his that's what his background is.
And, and he said, and I'm I'm just going to quote what a
message I received from him this morning.
He said there's only two reasons why.
He said apart from ideology, there's only two reasons why
Ralph was in Ukraine. He said it's either money or
pussy, OK. And he said, and he said, he
said. That's pretty straightforward
stuff. No, and that's that's what
that's what is used to induce and attract and bring these
types of people into these dangerous situations.
They're being offered something they're not getting at home and
that's all it is. It's no more complicated than
that. It's base hedonistic desires for
either you're, you know, he's he, they talk, she talked about
and they talked about his failed business ventures, you know, as
a roofer and all the other things that he was involved in.
And then he learned that he could make some money by other
means, some other way. He also, as we talked about
before and as the sheriff of Guilford County told me
yesterday on the phone, he's the type of guy who's easily
recruitable into these types of. Situations less people
misunderstand what we're saying. There are basically three major
reasons, because you mentioned the first one, but I don't want
to leave that behind because that's always a possibility.
Ideology. People come over because they
believe in a 'cause people come and work on behalf of the
federal government because they believe that they're doing the
right thing. Patriotism, however naive things
like that, they believe in a religious cause, etcetera.
So people do that. They do it for women or for men.
They do it for some sort of religious, I mean some romantic
entanglement or physiological connection and then they do it
for money. Those are the major motivators.
This is universal, by the way. This is not like unique to this
guy. And the simpler minded you are,
the more easy it is to get you to hone in on one thing because
all you're ever trying to do in one of these pitches, these a
pitch for a source. It's a sales job.
It's like, what do you want? Do I have it?
Can I give it to you for you to do what I want?
The edge. And, and this is could just be
purely coincidental, but our Tats and Tatas girl just also
happens to be from West Palm Beach.
Right, also very strange and you notice that the the CIA case
officer that is cited in this thing.
So I'm going to I'm going to read another little piece here
because sometimes it's the CIA and we're just trying to make
connections and sometimes someone from the CIA is telling
you that they are involved in this story out of nowhere.
It says here in this little piece article from the Wall
Street Journal, like I, I feel like this is just a little like
like a screw you homage from the IC.
It says Ralph was well known among the volunteer aid groups
in Ukraine as a, quote, UN, quote, fraud and quote, UN
quote, kind of a whack job, said Sarah Adams, a former CIA
officer who helped run a network that linked fifty aid groups to
share information and coordinate humanitarian and volunteer
efforts. He claimed to be working with
the Ukrainian government to recruit foreign fighters, but he
wasn't, she said. Why does she know that?
Probably because she was connected to the Ukraine
government. In reality, that's how these
things work. The thing that I found really
interesting is this woman, Chelsea, who was just
interviewed by Jesse Watters. She's got a notebook.
Tell me the kind of people that you know of that note names and
their affiliations and put them into categories just based on
your life as a man for 65 years on the planet.
All right. The only person that I would
know that would do that would be my father, who was a private
investigator and he journaled for decades.
He wrote everything down. What if I asked you to do it?
What if I said Steve? It'd be really great if you kept
a list of names of people that were involved, especially
American names. Could you do that for me as you
travel abroad and you're working?
But as she said, as she said, Oh, and by the way, when I was
in Soviet Union, I journaled every day.
I imagine you did. I kept records.
It was all in code I used. I invented my own, you know,
alternate phrases and words to identify, you know, various
people and organizations while I was over there.
Why did you do? That why did I do that?
I mean, first of all for my own history, my own, my own
historical account of what I was doing and what I was involved
in. But also there was a high degree
of probability that after upon exit from these countries that
would they would confiscate my own documentation of my trip.
And so everything was changed on purpose so as not to incriminate
the people that I was meeting with did.
That come from working around your dad?
Did that come from somebody suggesting it to you?
Was it something you read in a spy novel?
Like, where'd you come up with that?
No, I mean, I had gone through what they very and look, I
don't, I don't mean to overplay my own history at all or
oversell it, but I did go through what we call the Slavic
training camp for how to interact and how to deal not
only with the citizens behind the Iron Curtain and their
unique psychology. As you know, for instance, I
mean, look the in in 1981, my first time to go into the Soviet
Union, the the Russian people had been in bondage for 1000
years. This effects them to their core,
to their genetic core of how they interact with people and
how they interact with foreigners.
It it's it's not, it's not a customer is always right.
You know society. It's a pessimistic, it's a
pessimistic world out view in the same way the Chinese have a
collectivist look, you know, the people, cultures have different
ways of addressing and looking at the world, different values
of human life, different standards for human interaction
and so on. So yeah, getting was that
something put on by the US government, this this
acclamation thing and and any you.
Know State Department or something, this was a this was a
private organization and and of course one of the most important
aspects of the the training that I was put through was also how
to deal with the police with the KGB.
We would most definitely have interactions.
Our rooms would most definitely they, you know, they put you in
what they call in tourist hotels.
This was, these were the hotels where only foreigners could
stay, not only for the benefit of controlling you and
monitoring foreigners, but also because they could scoop up the
Western currency there. Western currency was incredibly
valuable at the time because at the time the ruble was not
exchanged, you know, on the world currency exchange.
And so hard currencies, as they said, the American dollar or the
US pound, I mean the UK pound or the Swedish kroner was very
valuable to them. So they could scoop it all up in
a concentrated zone. So that's why they put you in
those specific hotels. But we also, we also knew that
every one of our rooms were, were bugged.
So, I mean, as soon as we would walk into the room, we'd walk up
to the light fixtures and the, the planters and the, the, you
know, the, the plastic flowers and we testing, testing 1-2 and
we would talk to them and, you know, give.
Give me a levels check. Yeah, yeah.
And, and, and of course after the great thing, the incredible
part about this, Kyle, was after the the wall came down and after
the fall of the Soviet Union, then historically, you know,
they actually had a, the equivalent of a Freedom of
Information initiative that was enacted in Russia.
And they actually started showing.
I've seen it, I've watched the videos of the actual listening
rooms in all of these hotels, hotels where I stayed, they're
now museums. So with with all the old gear
and all the old listening devices and everything, they're
actually museums and these old in tourist hotels now.
I think Mike Waller was saying that he was actually there
trying to collect some transcripts and things like that
as the the wall was coming down. So he was on that end of it,
seeing the fruits of what you guys have been out there,
talking to the the plants, knowing that they were there.
And then he was there running around through the Kremlin like
as the thing was coming down and they were going like here, you
could take some of this stuff, like stuff in your briefcase.
So, you know, the stories of people interacting with the
stuff is normal. It is a totally abnormal way to
live, to be under surveillance and to be in a foreign area
where you are a complete foreigner and interacting with
Intel assets and not know, you know, And then you've got this
lady, this Sarah Adams, former CIA case officer who's talking
about who Ryan is. You want to hone in on this for
a little bit? What?
Your thoughts are so yeah, but but listen to what she said and
what she told Waters, she said. As a nurse, I'm also a reporter.
A mandated reporter, now that's a real thing.
So folks understand mandated reporters.
I was one as an FBI agent. I was 1 as a paramedic.
My wife was 1 as a mental health counselor.
There are certain jobs in the United States where you have to
report things like child abuse or people who are mentally
unwell. The funny thing is it doesn't
extend internationally. That's not a real thing.
That sounds like plausible deniability on why I was keeping
a journal on these people's names to me.
Yeah. And and when when you're a woman
that looks like she does, let's, let's call her, you know,
moderately attractive and certainly could be used for
other operations overseas. Particularly lowering
operations. Yes, alluring operations and to
be a quote UN quote reporter in that circumstance that means
that she is reporting to who and then she denied Jesse Waters
questioned in that interview about who she was currently
interacting with, which agency she was interacting with do.
You know what I find weird about that too?
Can we add to that? Yeah.
When you talk about the FBI, what do we call it?
When we what, what do you and I call?
It well, we might call them shitheads, but what what?
They're the Bureau right there. We call them the FBI.
They're an overt law enforcement agency in this country.
When we talk about the DEA, we talk about the DEA, we talk
about the ATF. We might have some choice words
for them as well. But again, these are all,
they're law enforcement, you know, agencies.
They have the names and they're pretty straightforward.
The only people that I know of that are referred to as an
agency, real specifically, it's usually a capital A.
The agency is the CIA. That's government speak.
That's the euphemism. In the 80s they used to call
them the company. They're all these little
euphemisms. But as it stands right now, now
they have things for NSA and they talk about those.
And there's different little monikers where someone says oga,
you know, sometimes that's the CIA, sometimes it's NSA, but
it's always like a very specific Intel when you start saying I'm
not going to talk about the agency that I'm talking to.
Are you talking about capital T, Capital A?
Because that's what it's sounded like.
That sounds like a slip to me. Just saying.
Yeah, and, and, and again, going back to this story from Wall
Street Journal that I sent out to literally every single source
I have in in the Intel community and, and otherwise for and I
didn't, and by the way, I didn't prep them.
I sent it out just like I sent it out to the suspendables last
night. I read, I read something is
fishy about this. What do you give me?
Your thoughts? This is exactly the the text.
I imagine you probably just forward this to everybody.
It says read the story and tell me what you think.
Something is fishy. And the link that was it.
That was the prompt that that was.
All I sent out to everybody and then I just got an avalanche of
responses, particularly from the IC guys.
And, and of course then they go into the detailed explanation of
what's the things that you and I already know about, about how
the, how the NGOs are layered and how the, the former CIA
operatives are our agents are now contractors and, and they
can build 2 and 3 levels of the contractors.
So a guy like Ryan Ralph would be contracted by the contractor
of a contractor, all of that funding.
Yeah, all totally plausible deniability.
You've got this from Steve friend here, which I'm just
going to out Steve because he said this.
I said the nurse sounds like achs.
That was less than two minutes after you sent the story.
I sent you a picture. I sent you a picture of cleavage
because that's what I did, because I I like to give you a
hard time and that's that's the joy that in my life.
But Steve immediately honed in on that and he said, how did
this all happen within a day or two?
Because this happened on Sunday, folks, and we are now Wednesday
and we still don't know much about Thomas crooks.
I I get it. He's dead.
So maybe less important, or at least less imminent, but we have
an awful lot of info on this guy right away.
And we suddenly and we suddenly have a media celebrity nurse who
was in Ukraine who was interacting with Ryan Ralph on a
regular basis, 3 down notes about him and then who also just
happens to be from West Palm Beach, FL.
This is amazing. This is an amazing series of
coincidences and circumstances. And you know, so if I can, if I
can take this a step further, so and I, and I don't mind talking
about this because I'm not going to out any of these guys, but I
have AI have a contact and a source particular in particular
from that community. He's only been retired for just
a handful of years. He's so he's very recently
retired from the IC and he is still very active as a, as a
contractor. He does go off grid frequently
because he's still involved in operations as a contractor.
And he, he came, he reemerged last night after I sent him the
Wall Street Journal article. Now I've been trying to reach
him for days and he reemerged and I said, are you available to
chat? He said yes.
Called him on a one of the encrypted apps and we chatted
for a while specifically about this circumstance and about Ryan
Ralph. It just so happens he has just
now recently received a call from Florida engaging him in the
investigation. He's headed that way and he's
headed down there. And he said, and this is exactly
what he said, he said, I am, I have 0 interest in Ralph's
domestic activities. He said, now this is a guy who
speaks 5 languages, including Russian and Ukraine, Ukrainian.
And he said I have my interest is who his contacts were over
there. We find out who his contacts are
there. We'll find out if in fact and
then who activated him here. That makes sense to me.
Interestingly enough, the first thing I got a clip here from
Tucker Carlson that I wanted to play.
And so we'll take a little coffee break.
Tell me what you think about this.
This is, I guess, smashing down on Lindsey Graham, which I'm
always down for. Here's Tucker Carlson and I'm
I'm watching this. They're literally telling me
that this guy whom they've arrested is a Trump supporter.
Huh. So you flip channels, and then
you learn that I've flipped over to a channel I used to work on,
and there's Lindsey Graham. And I know, I know, I know.
He's a Republican senator from one of the most conservative
states. How does that happen, by the
way, if democracy is real, how is Lindsey Graham a senator?
But whatever. So I'm watching Lindsey Graham,
and Lindsey Graham's looking right into the camera, and he's
like, you know who did this? Iran.
So I looked into this.
Yeah, that's for sure. Well, it turns out someone to
see a war monger. Well, the guy who shot Trump was
also a war monger. And in fact, the closer you look
at it, the more you realize his politics are exactly the same as
Lindsey Graham's. He's a neo con.
He literally volunteered in Ukraine.
And Lindsey Graham's like, no, Iran did.
It's like, no, you have no opinions that are different from
this guy's and you're lying to me.
In the audience I used to speak to five nights a week.
You were lying to them. I'm shouting this in my hotel
room. Nobody heard me.
My wife was brushing her teeth. She's like, what is that?
They're lying. I don't know why he always does
that weird laugh. Right, right.
That's a strange thing, but he entertains.
Himself, he entertains himself as much he.
Clearly does, and he has this thing.
I don't know anyone else who laughs like that, but what I do
know is that somebody's running information and they're pushing
it out to wherever that what wherever Lindsey Graham was on
right, that's Iran. That doesn't that doesn't sound
like a checks, although they had an interesting little downfall,
which we'll cover in just a second here.
Some of the some of the the assets there.
What do you what do you make of pushing these counter narratives
based on what you were just talking about in the in the
background of the sources you've been dealing with?
Look, I I am becoming singularly focused throughout this entire
process, all right? I have been wide open to all
possibilities and technically, you know, intellectually I still
have to be, I have to be open to any suggestion, any possibility,
any pulling on any thread and what that thread will unravel.
But the more and more I get into this, the more and more I see
and reveal and it's revealed to me and, and it becomes more
ingrained in my, I don't, I don't want it to be part of my
knee jerk inherent expectation. But I see that it's all
connected, Kyle. I see that this is all coming
from a singular source. And it doesn't matter whether
we're talking about Thomas Crooks, if we're talking about
Ryan Ralph, or we're talking about the 2014 Ukrainian
election for president, or we're talking about the 2020 election,
or we're talking about January 6th, or we're talking about
COVID-19. And the sudden release of that
bio weapon upon the planet Earth and then the subsequent, you
know, government reaction to that and the imposition of the
mandates, the lockdowns, the vaccines and all these things.
Every single time I pull on a thread from each one of those
keeps going back to the same source.
And the agency. And you have a hat for it.
Yeah, I do. I I wear the hat frequently on
purpose. I just do illicit response and
reactions. I've worn it on your program.
Yeah, it's really good. You've worn it into hotels where
I was sitting at and came and sat down with me and then
everyone gave me weird looks. That's right.
And, and, and, and of course,
you know, part, part of the, part of the, the things that you
and I go through. I mean, you're, you're, you are
a former Fed, but you're a current Fed according to, you
know, the Internet, the Internet, right?
And and of course I I am now a fed because when I don't take
the absolute 100% conspiratorial line on any story, I am
obliterate. You know what?
I, I want to show you, I want to show you, and I'm sure you get
this as well, but I want to, I want to read something to you
that I get. This is not quite daily, but
it's almost every day. So on a regular basis I get
leads, right? So I'm an investigative
reporter. I work for the Blaze.
Somebody has a story. If I don't take their story, and
we've documented this, if I don't take their story and I
don't, you know, and, and run with it or, or I don't have the
exact same version of events that they have in my reporting,
they'll get on a frickin airplane and fly halfway across
the country to confront me. It's how nobody does that to me,
Steve. What?
How come nobody wants to fly and confront me?
I don't know, maybe it's part of the maybe it's part of the blaze
magnetism. I don't know what it is, but
they they have come out. I mean, you can't see it here,
but outside this very window right here, our security in this
building has confronted a stalker that flew halfway across
the country to track me down. I get these stories too.
We get, I mean, so folks have to understand, like they'll send
you the story, they'll tell you something that immediately, you
know, there's something off with it because the first line of it
is unhinged. It starts off with Kyle, I'm the
whistleblower from and then they cite some evidence of like
something that no one ever heard of.
Like I'm the whistleblower from the the, the 1997 scandal that
involved Crisco Foods. And you're like, I don't even, I
mean, maybe there was one, but I don't know what the
whistleblower is. So now that that's called me
same you same. That's how they do it in
recruiting. We're look at we're the same,
we're simpatico. And then the next thing they say
is, is I've been chased by government, you know, energy
weapons by drones for the last three decades.
And I have an implant in my foot that tracks my place.
And then you're like, all right, I'm done with you.
And so you just go, thanks so much for your story.
Or I don't answer it. And then they get pissed and
then you're a fed because you didn't cover their story, which
is nuts, by the way. It's always.
Been and, and, and I had one of the implant persons, OK, one of
the, you know, the implant persons, a lady who lives in
Chicago, she read in my, you know, ex announcements that I
was going to be covering a particular trial at the District
courthouse in DC. I walked out of the courtroom
one day and she confronts me. She flew from Chicago to DC
specifically because I would not take her story and.
Run the other so that this actually gets us back to Routh a
little bit. The man's been flying all over
the world that cost money. It cost money to fly to Chicago
to confront Steve Baker. So there's two possibilities in
my mind because I would love to know how these things were paid
for because that's really where it comes down to for me.
Possibility one is they live like many Americans.
They make a terrible financial decisions and they live in
constant debt and threat of basically having complete
financial meltdown. So they have 0 money and they're
spending the money they don't have and running up credit card
debts and someone offered them something.
That's one possibility because that would be the most logical
for a crazy person or someone's financing them and they're
paying in cash because someone's giving them cash to be able to
do it. And then they're a fed, they're
being they're being sourced by federal funds or international,
federal, you know, international operations, whether it be I see
here or somewhere else, because that's the only way that you go
all around the world and you are able to break laws with
impunity, still return without losing your passport, without
getting flagged. Like, how is it that if somebody
gets arrested in Ukraine, which we're giving billions and
billions of dollars to, and theoretically we have some
relationship, State Department, intelligence community, why are
they not sharing information on Americans 'cause I have to
imagine they would. If you get a vest arrested
overseas, if you went somewhere and got arrested in Europe,
Steve, the State Department would know about it and the FBI
would hear about it very shortly, no doubt.
No doubt about it. So let me, let me read you this
new one. This is the latest.
So at the end of last week, I get this guy he's and he's got a
story, right? He's got it's it's, it's massive
and it's and it's how he leads it off.
Dear Mr. Baker, I would like to discuss some high level
corruption at DHS. Interested.
Message me back. Oh, corruption at DHS?
Hell yeah, I'm interested. But I said to him, I said just
please give me a hint about what you have.
Right. So he goes into this little, you
know, little description about these people running fake
immigration rackets and, and, and printing up a fake green
cards, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
Please kindly investigate this. And then he says, and then he
says something to the effect of if you have a strong moral
sense, you'll do this. Well, right now I know I got a
wacko right. I knew you had a wacko from the
opening just for whatever, right So.
So he says, well, usually 99% of the time it is, it is.
So, all right, So Monday morning, this Monday, this is
we're not even 24 hours after the second assassination attempt
of, of, of the president. And after, by the way, my editor
in chief has said, OK, Steve, you and Joe, you're on, you're
on the assassination beat again. So he so he sends me another
note and he says at 7:13 AM, hello Sir, what's your feedback?
Will you report this crime? Please let me know.
To which I responded and said I'm working on the new
assassination attempt of the president right now.
And he said would would you please delegate it to some other
staff or associate, anyone who can work on this.
Now this he sends me that at 9 O 5:00 AM Monday morning, 4
minutes later. Hello Sir, because I'm not
responded yet, 20 minutes later, may I get a response Sir?
5 minutes later. OK, you work on your fake
assassination story you moron. No one would believe right wing
liars like you. Just fuck off and tell Trump to
die peacefully. That's what mental illness looks
like, folks. This is a this is an everyday
experience if you have enough high enough profile where people
think that you might take their story and you become their only
hope. I've been getting hammer emails
from a guy in in Arkansas, which I I rarely ever worry about
these things. But when you start talking about
putting bullets into people's heads and other wild stuff, then
I end up calling the police and telling them who I am.
It turns out I speak the same language as local police.
I speak the same language because I used to run on an
ambulance. And I said, look that your EMS
probably has them on a frequent flyer list.
If you guys are not familiar with them, you should know, and
most of you should know in case you interact with them, you
should probably just put a little tag out there that if
your officer just happened to run this guy's tags, plates show
up at his house for some disturbance, he's unhinged.
And I'm going to send you over the emails and here are the list
of them. So I do that stuff very, very
infrequently because I just don't necessarily care to.
Sometimes people need to be, they need to be told like that
they're really dangerous. And yeah, we get that.
So yeah, these kind of people also are perfect opera because
anybody who's going to show them attention is going to get all of
their attention, and you can ask them to do things on your behalf
because they're asking you to do favors.
It's totally reasonable. These are easily recruitable,
not for my purposes certainly, but for other people who have
nefarious purposes, I think. And, and in fact, if you need
somebody to run a recruitment operation in Ukraine that these
types of people would be easy to bring over for either money or
pussy and to get them involved and then you start feeding them.
Now. You know, the one of the amazing
aspects of this overall overarching story is that
apparently Ryan Ralph had the ability to offer these radical
Islamic militant terrorist fundamentalist to come over and
fight in Ukraine for $1200 a month.
Now, I don't think that's enough to induce an American to come
over and get his ass blown off in Ukraine.
But they were fighting for free in Syria.
Right, right. But $1200 a month to, you know,
ISIS, Al Qaeda, you know, Islamists, that might be a
year's salary. I don't know the metrics but.
And where is that money coming from and how do you have it to
pass on? And once again, this guy's
flying around the world and doesn't seem to have any
credible business. No obvious source of income is
the way that it would be annotated in the file.
No obvious source of income when you look at him.
So how is he clean dressed? Where did he get a gun in
Florida? He's not from Florida.
He's a felon. He bought an obliterate.
He bought something off the street, obviously.
How do you like if you or I went down like we probably could, if
we went to go buy a gun in Dallas or in Austin and try to
buy it in some crappy neighborhood, like they would
pay us as cops right away. They're not selling to us.
Why are you selling it to a 58 year old white guy who who just
got back from Ukraine and he's relatively clean cut And he's, I
mean, he looks like dudes. I was on surveillance teams.
But I mean, he looks exactly like a couple guys that I worked
with. You know, they were, they were
less crazy eyed. But that build that, you know,
the height, the general physical fitness, the whiteness, the
clean shaveness, you look like a cop bro.
Like, I don't know, I'm not selling you a gun in a way.
I just don't know how he comes up with that.
Right. So right.
And you know, another one of my guys, also a guy that speaks
native Ukrainian, another guy from the the IC community here
retired, he's been retired for quite some time, but he spent a
tremendous amount of his career in Ukraine.
And this is a guy who immediately jumped on this
story, began investigating through his resources overseas.
And one of the things that he told me yesterday, and I'm not,
I'm not, I probably won't put this in writing.
I'm saying it here to you because we're having a
discussion. I don't, I have not personally
vetted this allegation or this sourcing from him yet.
Although the individual is highly credible is that he told
me he's already he's already attached Ralph to at least 2,
most likely three different NGOs that he's been able to source
already feeding him those source those resources in Ukraine to
perform the operations and the recruiting services that he was
doing. And it's not just that I mean,
he's doing basically running websites, printing.
I mean, the guy's, you know, he's, he's got recruitment, he's
wearing recruitment T-shirts, for God's sake.
I. Mean it's definitely all of
these things again, they all take money.
They all and if he's doing it with NGOs, that's the perfect
version of a government cut out because that's how it works.
And anybody who pays attention to this stuff, you guys can
follow Mike Benz and reading about all the things that
happened domestically and internationally.
You can read any number of reportings, but Mike's kind of a
he's kind of fixated on that kind of like autistic way and I
don't he wouldn't he wouldn't mind me saying that.
I think he he embraces the autism sort of end of it this
sort of this need to understand what's happening.
Do you mind if we zoom out a little bit?
Can we zoom out? Yeah.
OK, let's zoom out to the rest of Trump.
I do this. Before we do, I'm going to just
say if you guys are not getting enough news today, go check out
my buddies over at Catholic Votes, catholicvote.org, Faith,
Family and Freedom. They're putting out a new ad
that's pro Trump, that's going against some of these lies that
have been said by the Harris administration or the the Harris
Waltz campaign where they're talking about how they did
nothing and they had nothing to do with transgender surgeries.
Of course, they can prove that that is demonstrably false and
fake. So if you guys want to support
them, it's catholicvote.org. Get signed up for the loop.
Follow them on social media at Catholic Vote, follow them on
YouTube specifically and on Rumble at Catholic Vote, where
we'll put some stuff out and we're going to get a little bit
broader here. We're going to talk maybe about
the bigger threat. Yesterday I talked about it and
I want to continue. I promised you guys more than
just one topic, even though Steve and I can get very, very
aggressive on a single thing. We're going to talk about the
threat that Donald Trump represents to the left.
And one of the things that I saw that was pretty nutty was
Jonathan Gillum, who's a former FBI agent and he's a former SEAL
and he's someone that I've got a little bit of a connection to.
And I know some people that know him.
I think I've been on a program once or twice with him and Seb
Gorka, he, he was cut off, He had his microphone cut off
specifically for saying one single thing.
He said. It's very obvious that people on
the political left, particularly Democrats, but also I guess more
specifically people that people that are in the news media
apparatus, the sort of propaganda sphere, they keep
saying the word threat, eliminate, put a bullet in.
They're talking about killing Donald Trump.
And nothing would make them happier if there's this
resistance to agreeing on that. So I'm going to play you guys
again. These little clips, these little
clips of Jasmine Crockett, Dan Goldman, some defense that's
being run by a former prosecutor saying that Donald Trump is the
threat because he won't accept election results.
All of these things right in the wake of, seriously, it was
Sunday. It was Sunday afternoon that we
got this story. I remember because, you know, my
wife and I were like, prepping for dinner and we're finding out
that there's a dude hanging out in the bushes.
It's like 2:00 PM on a Sunday that wanted to kill the man.
So here again, I'm going to I'm going to belabor this.
You guys heard this yesterday if you listen to the program.
But if you're with us right now, listen to Jasmine Crockett, Dan
Goldman, using this terminology about domestic threats.
And I know that we hate listening to him, but it's
important to be able to kind of put this evidence forward as we
continue to move forward about the election threat that Donald
Trump represents to them right now.
I feel like MAGA in general, they are threats to us
domestically. And we see it time and time
again. And I think that's why you see
so many national leaders, whether they're Republicans or
Democrats, coming together to say there is only one person
qualified to be the commander in chief, and that is Kamala
Harris. Now, Oh, there's no question.
There's no question, says Jen Pasaki, ginger Gobbles.
So a propagandist on a propaganda network, MSNBC, quite
obviously, we're going to have another one.
Same story, same program, same host.
You heard Steve Baker say earlier that he is absolutely
pinned. Steve's probably seen all these
clips. If he's pinned to MSNBC, then
these are the things that he's seeing.
This is Dan Goldman saying the exact same thing Dan is talking
about, how there must be an elimination of Donald Trump
because he's this existential threat.
We've got a couple of more examples.
So here we go again. If you're watching MSNBC, this
is what you're getting. Just unquestionable at this
point that that man cannot see public office again.
He is not only unfit, he is destructive to our democracy and
he has to be. He has to be eliminated, OK, He
has to be eliminated. And lastly, they're worrying
about, oh, there's this both sides situation.
Like people are hitting the left because of the rhetoric, because
of the the concern about calling Donald Trump a threat.
Well, he is a threat, they say as they double down again.
I would argue very, very comfortably that the political
left wants, needs, hopes that Donald Trump dies.
They won't say it out loud. The only thing that you're not
allowed to do is say that out loud.
It got microphones cut off on Fox Business the other day.
Just saying here's the last little clip.
I'm going to play this and we'll go back and Steve and I'll talk
about it. This is a former United States
Attorney prosecutor, like an assistant US attorney making the
same argument. He sounds very credible.
He also looks very feminine and might prefer the company of men.
I'm struck by on the defense of this or I guess on the attack on
Democrats on this threat to democracy stuff, is that, for
instance, Trump has not committed to accepting the
results of the election, right? That sounds to me like a threat
to democracy. And I don't think it's that
unfair to to question someone's commitment to democracy if
they're saying that they can't commit to the results of the
election. Another one is a lot of
defenders of the former president have latched on this
dictator concept. Except that Kamala Harris said
that Trump might be addictive. He said those words himself.
He's now, he might have been joking, but he said I will be a
dictator on day one. And I guess I'm struggling with
this idea that echoing those points is somehow putting chum
in the water to drive up violence against.
I mean, I would say, though, that, you know, that rhetoric
has changed and Vice President Harris isn't really talking
about democracy as much. And it's not, you know, the
reason may not be be related to political violence.
It's related to the ballot box and the fact that this democracy
message wasn't actually working very well for Joe Biden.
And she's we, it's, it's Donald Trump's fault for being Donald
Trump. That's why people need to kill
him and need to try. That's the take, Steve.
Yeah, did you see the op-ed that JD Bance wrote yesterday?
I did not. It was published both on his his
ex page, but it also was an op-ed here at the Blaze and
absolutely incredible. I mean, he he makes one of the
most powerful statements. And I want to, I want to pull it
up if you'll give me, excuse me, the scrolling time that I'm
doing right here for just a moment to pull this up.
Because he makes an absolutely astoundingly profound statement
related to this idea of these threats, the idea of democracy
being suspended, especially the suspension of, of, of First
Amendment and free speech rights.
And I'm not going to I'm I'm not going to continue to dig for it.
But listen, you dig for it. I've got a clip of Peter Doocy.
So he'll give you about a 92nd clip.
Peter Doocy asked the right question.
And of course, we had a completely an unhinged response
from Korean Jean Pierre, who is the new Ginger Gurbles.
She's now Sideshow Bob. That's that's her phrase over on
our program because she looks just like Sideshow Bob, but
she's the one who's doing the propaganda mouthpiece.
He asked, should you tone down the rhetoric?
And her answer is double down. So listen to this and Steve's
going to find the output. Two days since somebody
allegedly tried to kill Donald Trump again, and you're here at
the podium in the White House briefing room calling him a
threat. How many more assassination
attempts on Donald Trump until the president and the vice
president and you pick a different word to describe Trump
other than threat? Peter, if anything from this
administration, I actually completely disagree with the
premise of your question. The question that you're asking,
it is also incredibly dangerous in the way that you're asking it
because American people are watching.
And to say that, to say that from the administration who has
consistently condemned political violence, from an administration
where the president called the former president and was
thankful, grateful that he was OK, from an administration who
has called out January 6th, called out the attack of Paul
Pelosi, called out and said we need to lower the temperature
after the Butler incident. And now for you to make that
kind of comment in your question, because it your
question involved a comment and a statement and you know, it is
that is also incredibly dangerous.
She's just exasperated. She is just she, she talks like
a very frustrated kindergarten teacher, Peter.
I mean, how dare you say the thing.
And then let me double down on the fact that we have just
decided to do false equivalence. We're going to talk about Paul
Pelosi. Did Paul Pelosi had some weird
thing happening with a dude and underwear and God knows what and
I don't even care. It's not the same as a dude put
in a bullet or someone hanging outside your house with a gun
waiting, lying in wait for 12 hours who has all these strange
agency connections overseas. It's not the same.
They keep they keep doubling down on this and we're going to
keep saying threat until someone does what we want.
I, I said it earlier and I, I mentioned it.
If you saw this, what's his name?
Gillum got pulled off Fox News the other day.
He was talking. He said Democrats want to see
Donald Trump dead. They keep saying it.
The only crime is you saying it out loud.
And Fox said we're not going to engage in that conspiracy.
And they dropped him off the air.
Right. Even though it's being said,
it's clearly and it's not A and it's not being.
It's not a conspiracy. It's not a conspiracy because
two people have actually tried and, and, and what we've seen is
doubling down on the on on the rhetoric.
Not hey man, maybe we really ought to stop this because
someone is going to end up trying to kill him for real and
actually have some skills. Here, here are the concluding 2
paragraphs to JD Vance's op-ed that came out yesterday.
As I said, you can find it on his ex feed or you can find it
on Blaze Media. And he said, and this was very
profound and I'm going to read a couple of these sentences twice
because it really needs to sink in.
He says when you reject censorship, you reject political
violence. Embrace censorship and you will
inevitably embrace violence on its behalf.
Let me read that last sentence again.
Embrace censorship and you will inevitably embrace violence on
its behalf. The reason is simple.
The logic of censorship leads directly to one place, for there
is only one sure way to silence a human being permanently put a
bullet in his brain. Can I throw something on the
screen here that's going to go to the perfect segue to this?
Yeah. Yeah.
Steve, this was the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire.
Did you see this tweet? Yes, I did OK.
It it's in poor taste, there's no question about it.
And I I reject the idea of thinking this is a good idea to
put out. It's certainly not the position
of a political party and it's definitely not the position of
all libertarians, certainly not even all libertarians in New
Hampshire. But American speech is
dangerous. That's the nature of the speech.
It is meant to be inflammatory and occasionally get out of
control. And this is well, well defended
by Watts versus US. If people are curious.
This has been decided already. When you talk about
hypotheticals, there's a 2 pronged thing.
It has to imminently incite violence and have a probability
of doing so for it to actually be a real problem against and
not be protected according to our case law.
I think even that stuff is probably I'm a First Amendment
absolutist and a Second Amendment absolutist.
I just believe the bill right says what it says.
You don't need a lot of like Gray interpretation, but this is
what the the the the tweet says, folks.
We talked about it yesterday, quote, anyone who murders Kamala
Harris would be an American hero.
End Quote. That's the entirety of it.
And then people got upset and they ended up getting a visit by
the FBI. You just pointed out that
censorship, which is that you must take this thing down.
It's it's a call to violence because the federal government
or the state government, whoever's doing the censorship
shows up and they look like men with guns.
Can we play that clip? Is that reasonable too?
This is what this is what actual censorship is.
It's people showing up under threat of force that work from
my former agency, which we call the Bureau or shitheads or
whatever. It's.
It is a government agency with men with guns on their hip and a
badge who will not tell you their name because they are
ashamed of what they're doing because they apparently haven't
read the Bill of Whites rights or they have read it and they
know that it's wrong. This is Jeremy Kaufman again.
We played it yesterday. I'm going to play it again.
How can I help you? Hey there.
Jeremy Yeah. How?
Are. You here we are, I made.
You O'Donnell with the. FBI, Can you give your full name
please? I made.
You O'Donnell with the FBI? Is that sufficient?
To identify as the only one O'Donnell affiliated with the
FBI in new. Hampshire, yes.
Could you please state your full name, Sir?
Could. You please stop recording.
No, it's Scott O'Donnell, those who want to know.
What's your name, Sir? Absolutely not.
You can show me your name and identification or I'm going to
go back inside my house, OK? I don't really want to.
Broadcast. Oh, this is going out right
after you guys walk away so you can show me your name, ID you
can walk away. I'm not going to talk to people
who claim to be federal agents unless they can show me
identification. You see our badges?
I I need to see but use your full.
Name on that badge? No.
I'd like to see something with your full name or I'm not going
to talk. To you, I refer you not to
broadcast. This will be going online as
soon as you walk away. All I want to do is talk to you
about a post that was made and if you happen to be the one that
made. The I want to talk to you.
And then he goes on and gives them both barrels of his
disrespect, which I'm totally fine with him doing.
Not the most advised route, folks.
You should just close the door and not engage.
That's smarter for you. And yet you're allowed to do
that in America. He literally just said we're
here to talk to you about a post.
That's what censorship looks like.
And it and it comes along with that, that threat of violence
because he tapped his badge. And what I happen to notice
behind it is a Glock 19 sitting in a holster issued by that
agency without a without a flashlight, by the way, which is
ill advised. It's not how you should carry
your weapon. If you're an operator that wants
to be a serious law enforcement individual.
If you want to go out there and protect the public, it's
probably going to happen in hours of darkness.
That's Kyle's here aside. Put a flashlight on your guns,
folks. Steve, you saw this.
What were your reactions when you first saw these videos and
this sort of running around the Internet?
Well, I obviously I saw this shortly after it was posted it
it was making the rounds, as they say, you know, among the
suspendables. And so I get tagged in these
things as well nowadays and, and, and happy to be an honorary
suspendable full member. But the thank you.
But the you know, it reminded me of a story I just published a
couple of months ago myself about the, you know, the knock
and talk raids that the FBI are now notorious for.
And they seem to be making more and more of these on a regular
basis. And these are these guys showing
up at your door. And more often than not now they
don't have the force of law yet like they have in the UK when
they show up at your door. And they would just want to talk
about your post on social media in the UK.
They're basically there to arrest you already.
Yes. Yes.
And, and, and they don't approach you that way.
It seems like they want to talk, but by the time you're 5 minutes
into the conversation, they're informing you that we.
Oh, yes. Oh, by the way, yeah, we are
arresting you and taking you in. We just wanted to see if you had
to incriminate yourself any further.
By the way, the FBI already has an investigation of some kind,
even if it's just a lead that they're following down from the
E guardian system. They're there for a reason.
I used to have this joke and I don't know if I've told you
this, Steve, but I would get these new agents coming out of
Quantico and that we, I would say, look, if you're going to go
out on an interview with me, I need you to role play with me.
I, I came out of the paramedic world where we constantly talk
to like plastic heads and and mannequins and you do treatments
because you don't want to sound like a fool when you're talking
to a real person. So you get used to it.
So I can walk up to an inanimate object and treat it like a
person. That's just my skill set.
It's kind of like an acting thing.
And if you're going to be an FBI agent and go interview people,
you better not sound weird if you're going to be with Kyle
Seraphin. Because I don't want to be
hanging out with weirdos. That's just I know how to talk
to people. And so I would ask them, hey,
knock, knock. Who's there?
I'm Kyle. How can I help you?
You know, and let's do this. And so you would get these new
agents and they'd say, well, hi, I'm, you know, I'm Mark, I'm
from the FBI. And congratulations, Mark, you
know, and I would just put them off like with a little bit of
just this kind of antisocial thing.
And they would go, right, what can I do for you, Mark?
Why are you here? Well, your name came across my
desk. And I heard this from from like
a dozen new agents. Your name came across my desk.
To which I would always say, well, do you have like a
conveyor belt? Like, it's like the sushi
restaurant where you just pick off the 1:00 you want?
Is it is it like a Wall Street ticker where the name just
scrolls across on a thing? Why did my name come across your
desk? What does that mean?
And they they go, hey, time out. Can we pause?
I say, sure, yeah. You want to start over?
And they say, yeah, I said, what is your name came across my desk
mean? That's a that's a phrase with no
meaning. And they would go, yeah, I
don't, I don't know. They must be teaching at the
Academy. That's the same attitude.
But that guy's a senior agent. He was the SSRA for like 7
years. He ran two different resident
agencies, which are the satellite offices.
So he's a senior, experienced guy, and he had that same vibe.
Your name came across my desk. How about someone made a social
media post? We believe it was you.
We're here to make sure that you're not a threat to anybody
else. You don't have any obligation to
talk to us. So we we have straight for
decades seen, you know, of course, this this is from
television and the movies. And we've seen all of the
examples of the two a pair of FBI agents coming to the door,
whether it's for a knock and talk or for an interview or
whatever the case may be. Back in the days when they wore,
you know, the black suits and the ties and all of that.
And they were buttoned up G men. And they were, you know, exactly
what Hoover would have expected from his his agency or his
Bureau rather. And so the point being is, is
that we always saw them first thing.
I'm so and so I'm special agent so and so with the FBI.
Here's the badge first thing. You didn't have to ask for it.
What you tell me what's going on here?
Is this new coming from the Academy?
Don't show. I don't think it's coming from
the Academy. There's a there's a conflict
between policy. This is a really good, that's a
good journalist question coming back my way so you can share
this with people. There's a, there's a conflict
between policy and normal human interaction.
That's what's going on. You can see the agent struggling
to balance two things. You're filming me and therefore
this is going to be public. And I don't know how public,
maybe very public, maybe millions and millions of views.
But there's a DOJ policy or specifically an FBI policy that
your credentials are not to be photographed or surrendered to
be photographed. So now you're at odds because
the order, the only way that someone's going to talk to you
is you going to give them your name and show them your
credentials, which by the way, have no identifying information
on them. I posted mine on Twitter the
other day. If you guys want to know what
FBI credentials look like, I've done it on this program before,
but you can see a scanned copy of mine.
The only thing you can't see are the like the holographic
watermarks and that's on purpose.
I think that's good. You can't see that.
So there are some some safety mechanisms.
You should see a holographic watermark when you look at them.
But having somebody examine your credentials in order to get
credibility is why they gave you the credentials.
That's literally what it is. It says your name, that you are
a regularly appointed special agent of the FBI under the
authorities of the attorney General general, signed off on
by the office of the Director of the FBI, and it has credential
numbers in the top right hand corner.
FBI agents don't go by badge numbers, they go by credit
numbers. And mine were 26662.
That was my credit number. So if you ask me for a badge
number, I don't have it, but I'd give you my credit number
because I don't care. They could look it up.
Nobody has any access to it, and they retire the credit number.
Then it goes back out into the field again.
So now somebody else has 26662 because I gave mine back in and
I'm no longer there. So somebody else has my number.
You literally had the mark of the beast in.
Your I literally did, yeah, but the twos were very important to
me. For whatever it's worth, I just
two by two, but yeah, I had this.
I had. Those were my numbers.
And so they're they're in conflict.
They're like, I'm not supposed to let this be photographed.
At the same time, you have a bigger obligation to do your job
and and identify yourself to the member of the public.
And it gives nothing away to show those credentials.
It's not a, it's not an 8K resolution photograph that can
be turned into fake credentials. It's going to show like a 1080P
maybe or maybe a 4K version, which is still not going to go
out on the Internet that way. So nobody is losing anything and
nobody has gone out from DOJ and said, look, body worn cameras
are a reality. They're an expectation of the
public. They are public.
You know, First Amendment auditors that are going to do
this. Show your damn creds to people.
Who cares if they videotape it. Your job is to get information
and do your job and be be credible to the public.
There's a credibility crisis and you're now furthering it with
videos like this. But instead.
He was right. Body cams, not just body cams,
but ring cams, of course it's. All I've retweeted, I've shared
video footage of a woman who is out of the Washington field
office who by the way, this caused a major stir at WFOI love
knowing that I'm causing anxiety in my old ex girlfriends
offices. And she showed her creds on a
ring Cam and you can see what it is, but it's like it's not that
you couldn't recreate it from that ring Cam video.
So show your creds, FBI agents, we used to call it, hitting them
with the roast beef. Have you heard that expression?
No, I haven't heard. That that's what it's called.
It's called, it's called hitting them with the roast beef.
It's like when you walk up and you're like, I'm Kyle Seraphim,
I'm with the FBI. Bam, you roast beef, I'm right
there. It's a long, it's a long story.
And it's just like one of those goofy things.
If you know, you know, but that's what that's what old
school FBI agents used to recall it.
If you walked up and immediately throw your credentials at
somebody that's roast beefing them, you're hitting them with
the roast beef. And and that's what you're
supposed to do because that's what people expect.
The reality is, is that's what TV showed.
The FBI was very complicit in creating all of them.
Those, you know, those videos and all that propaganda stuff,
Silence the Lambs and so on. The reason why they got access
to FBI personnel and people and you know, they were able to use
all the kind of trappings of the FBI is because the FBI wanted it
to look good, same as the Navy Seal's give a lot of access.
And so go out there and roast beef people, who cares?
Like let them see your creds, let them take a picture of it.
Who gives a shit? It doesn't matter.
It has your name and your middle initial and your cred numbers
and nothing else. It doesn't have your birthday,
it doesn't have your address. It is non identifying.
It's the equivalent of saying I'm Officer Kyle Seraphin and my
badge number is 26662. That's the same thing.
So man up weirdos. Like I don't know why they're
doing that, but they keep doing this and the threat of force is.
And it also comes from shame, I think.
As I said, as I said, this is not there.
We've not quite crossed that Rubicon here in the United
States yet. They're not showing up on these
knocking talks and then hauling you off for your social media
posts yet. But this is the precursor they
are now testing. This is R&D right now.
Yeah, this is a pressure test. It's a pressure test of what
America will tolerate the same way that COVID was, the same way
a lot of other things were. Exactly.
How, how much more will they, will they test this?
And in the process of doing this, they're also finding out
that they're not being shot at. OK.
That's right. The Bubba, the Bubba effect is
not kicked in yet. This is something that, you
know, Glenn Beck, he started talking about the bub Bubba
effect probably 10 or 12 years ago.
And he said, this is we're eventually going to be put into
that pressure cooker to the point where the good old boys
who can no longer take it and they maybe are a little bit off
in some way. They've had some troubles in
their life. Their wife has left them.
Their children have abandoned them.
They're in, you know, dire straits financially.
They're barely holding on to their home or whatever.
But they do have a collection of guns.
And the knock and talk happens and then they go off.
This happened, this is a real thing, by the way, we saw people
like Timothy McVeigh where that kind of a guy like the idea that
this is out like outlandish. It was in the 90s.
We just got away from it because of the Patriot Act, because of
911 United this country. And we sort of had this moment
where we were like, Oh yeah, LE is always the good guys.
There was an entire Patriot movement going on in the and,
and militia movement that was happening in the early 90s and
separatists and so on where people were just like, I'm sick
of this government, I'm sick of tyranny.
And we reset the clock on our tolerance for it and it's fed
up. Now.
I want to play a little clip here from the this is from the
March Springfield, OH City Council thing.
Because people are tired of being lied to and told that
they're completely out of their minds.
You got the entire left saying that the idea that Haitians
might eat animals and I don't know if they're eating dogs or
cats. I don't really care about that.
Like, I don't think that's necessarily the big threat in
the world, but snatching animals out of parks.
I've heard stories about this for over a decade about people
killing squirrels and eating animals that were like in public
parks and, you know, by people that don't understand our
customs because they come from a third world shit hole, as Donald
Trump accurately stated. And so here's a little evidence.
There's more and more of these videos that have been popping up
because people are going through the City Council meetings and
finding out that this allegation is not originated by the Trump
campaign. It was and it wasn't originated
by JD Vance. I'm sure it percolated up like
all things do from people who heard it and said, hey, this
seems like an issue. Maybe I'll call my congressman.
Here's a little video, just a little taste of that.
As laws and and you know. Culture.
Is 180° different than what they're used to And one of the
things that hurt that I heard that bothered me very much, I've
actually had quite a few people contact me here lately is some
pretty horrid things occurring to domesticated animal in the
neighborhood. We've had some stuff in the park
that again, they they're being taken advantage of for reasons
other than and if. Shake your head, Brian.
No, no. I asked the same.
I asked me if there was proof. I just.
Don't have proof of I haven't had.
Anything people that have confided in me have asked me for
anonymity. I'm not.
I can't give their names up. I mean, we haven't seen the
proof that you're that you're and I've heard, I've heard about
it. Yeah.
All right. So all that's sitting there and
they're just trying to defend. They want to defend the idea.
Oh, this. There's no proof yet.
It's like, OK. But that was going back in March
of this year, folks. So this has been going on where
people are saying there's some allegations.
We hear some troubling things from our neighbors.
Can you guys look into this? And they don't want to be
interrupting that, that that money pipeline or the, you know,
saying yes to the federal government or whatever it is
that keeps politicians. Politicians don't like scandal.
Like, that's pretty universal I think, right?
Well, I'm going to give some of your listeners some bad news.
Do it. Cat.
Cat meat by way of human consumption is a cultural thing
in virtually every continent on this planet.
It's Asia, Africa, South America, It is delicacy, it is
ritual, it is religious, it's worldwide.
And so if you don't think now we may not have the conclusive kill
shot video evidence of all time in Springfield, OH, yet.
But to think for a second that we're allowing millions of
people coming in from every continent.
I don't know that we're being invaded by Australia and
Antarctica, but we are being invaded from Asia, Eastern
Europe, South America. And to think that they're not
bringing their own cultural identity expectation mores as
well as their gastro. Gastronomic preferences look at
this. Your preferences it, it, it's.
It's absurd to the extreme to think that this is not taking
place. Here's here's a a call.
This is actually a call note from a 911 call that came in and
this is dated 828 of 2024. So that's like almost a month
ago, right? This is, I'm going to read the
comments for it. They blocked out the phone
number. That's good news.
The lat long of the caller there it is RP that's reporting party
AADV that's usually advising. So reporting party advises she
thinks her neighbors stole her cat and chopped it up and have
it in their backyard. She is advising the neighbors
are Haitian and she doesn't know who they are.
Then it goes on a little further.
Reporting party is requesting an officer come out and speak to
her to reference this. Then it goes on.
There's a officer that's assigned to the case, spoke with
Anna, that's the person, that's the reporting party and she
advised that on 8/24/24 her cat went missing and has not been
seen since. She found quote UN quote meat in
the backyard. That's obviously a direct quote
by the by the officer thinks it was from her cat.
No bones, no fur around the meat.
She suspects that it was the Haitian neighbors.
No evidence to support the claim.
Unknown if the meat she has is actually cat meat.
She has also collected the meat and put it in her freezer in
hopes to get it cremated, marked assisted.
So look, there are reports, there are 911.
Of course they are. Before that this quote UN quote,
scandal broke out. They happened.
People are upset about it because you've brought in people
from places like Haiti that have very different theories about
what domesticated animals are used for.
And like, this is something that people have done in desperate
situations for a long time. In fact, the movie Roger and Me,
which was the Michael Moore movie that brought him on the
map. I also used to think that that
movie was called Pets or Meet. Did you know?
I don't know why that was the case because there's a famous
sign and a famous scene where they are talking about raising
rabbits in Flint, MI and times are so desperate that the sign
said you can raise the rabbits, you can have them and they're
either used for pets or meat. Yeah.
And I actually thought that was the name of the movie and and.
You know, I'm, I'm a, I'm a couple years older than you are.
I'm a couple years older than probably most of your audience
is right now. And I grew up in an era, and
especially growing up in Louisiana, where back in those
days, our, our animals, our pets by and large were all outdoor
animals. And I'm talking about growing up
and over the years having dozens of dogs and cats.
Sometimes they just didn't come home.
Sometimes, you know, they roamed in packs and our dogs would join
up with the other dogs in the neighborhood and they would roam
in packs all day. And then they would come home
because their food was at, you know, in our driveway.
Or they killed something like somebody's cats and then they
had food somewhere else. They bring it home or we would
have the animals that would come back with our animals and they
would be manged up. They would have problem disease,
suspected rabies and we would take them out.
I mean, it was just, it was just a common thing to walk out the
back door and shoot a dog and that and it it because not
because we hated dogs because we loved them.
And I, I've, I've. Yes, there's no, there's no
needed defense in this. This is normal.
Like animals that are a threat to like human beings come first
in the value order and the and the hierarchy.
Some animals get put down because, you know, like if a
raccoon wants to hang out in your backyard in the daylight,
you put it down because that's a threat to your family, like.
But the culture, the culture and the laws have changed
significantly since I was a kid growing back up in the 60s and
70s. Now we have laws we don't have.
We don't see the roaming packs of dogs in every neighborhood
anymore. Unless you go to an Indian
Reservation. Yeah, yeah, exactly.
But but we don't, you know, people's animals are more more
domesticated than they've ever been.
They're parts of members of the family now.
They don't go outside unless they're on a leash.
There are leash laws and there are you know the the the
glorified dog catcher catchers now or you know, the animal
control are active in the neighborhoods they don't allow
stray. Animals and they're not rolling
out there with like a 22 rifle to smoke a dog and then throw it
in the back of the thing. They're actually trying to catch
it and and then rehabilitate it or take it to a a no kill
shelter or whatever The thing is.
Look, and I, I got nothing wrong with that, but your your point
being very, very important. Unless we lose it, yeah, the
values that exist here do not exist everywhere.
That's correct. And So what I'm, what I'm trying
to say is, is if these immigrants from these
populations who actually consider cats or other animals
that we cherish as members of the family and domesticate, they
consider his delicacies in their culture.
Had this been taking place 40 years ago, these people would
have been living large because those animals were outside all
the time. And that's right in the
neighborhoods now. They're not getting the access.
So we're cameras now, and we all have a camera in our pocket and
we all have a Ring camera on our front porch.
We're not going to probably see as much of this as we would have
seen back in the era before the cameras and before the massive
immigration that we're dealing with from these societies and
these cultures that are coming in who would consider, you know,
Fido or Fluffy to be, you know, their next meal.
Let's go to one more. I promised one more topic and
then we'll we'll be respectful of your time, which I appreciate
you giving me so much of this is the next topic.
My friend just sent me this in a meme.
I actually added this slide in while we were talking.
It says blowing up my pager and it's the the Arnold meme with a
Carl Weathers from predator and the two people blowing up your
pager are your mom and the Massad.
So let's it's so dark, it's so weird.
Let's see if I've got AI actually have a story that I
wanted to put on here. This is opinion piece and I
don't know why I didn't create a slide for it.
So let me throw you on the screen here while we talk and
I'm going to go find this slide. Essentially what we found out is
that yesterday at about 3:30 local time in Lebanon, a bunch
of members of Hezbollah got blown up.
What? What else do you know about
that, if anything? I, you know, I don't know
anything beyond the wonderful means that we're seeing now.
They're so good. Stories of, you know, and
obviously I've, I've heard the speculations on the technical
details of how the Israelis were able to pull this off, if in
fact it was the Israelis. But the the the reality is, is
God bless the IDFI mean this was this was this was, well, sheer
genius. That is not the take, by the
way, of the Wall Street Journal nor the Washington Post.
They're very upset about it. Yeah, we'll screw the Wall
Street Journal and the Washington Post and all the
above. This was this was brilliant.
In in fact, the only thing that I could think of yesterday when
we learned about this that I could compare it to there was a
oh gosh, what's what's the actor's name?
Pollard is his, is his last. Anyway, He he.
Come on, help me. Pollard, Pollard.
Pollard actor, Famous actor. Anyway.
We're not doing this one. Pollard.
No. But he was in.
I need a film reference. What's that?
I need a film reference. OK, well he anyway, he, he
played, he played the president in a movie and it was AI think
it was a late 90s, early 2000 movie.
He was the president. The president's motorcade was
caught in a snowstorm in mountains in Colorado.
And, and the entire movie, The entire set of the movie is
inside of a diner where the president and his Secret Service
detail and the the few local customers were all trapped in
this snowstorm in there. Is it Michael Pollan?
What's that? Michael J Pollard, is that No,
No, no, no, no. Not, not Mike.
You're going to know it. And I'm going to be mad at
myself that I've that I've forgotten.
We'll tweet it out later. But it, but it's but the, the,
the, the gist of the movie is that as the president and this
particular scene, he's, he's trapped in this situation where
he can't go anywhere. He can't do anything.
But if they've got radio comms and but they are now under the
United States is under a nuclear attack coming from an Islamic,
you know, warlord or whatever, ostensibly Iran or whatever.
So we're actually under nuclear attack.
Well, the whole time that he's in this diner and he's
interacting with people and they're hearing the reports of
launch. I mean, there's launching
nuclear weapons and he's just drinking his coffee and eating
his hamburger. Kevin Pollard, thank you so
much. Timothy Hutton's in there too,
apparently. Yeah, yeah.
So phenomenal and he's so and I'm going to.
It's called deterrence. I'm going to blow.
Yeah, yeah. Deterrence.
And I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm sorry, turn it off if you
want to watch this movie. But I'm going to.
I'm going to. I'm going.
To the spoiler. I'm going to deliver the spoiler
here. And the bottom line is, is that
the reason why he was not concerned about the nuclear
attack and was not organizing a response to it is they had
already reprogrammed all of those missiles to detonate
before the nuclear bombs were, you know, activated.
And so, and he knew that. He knew that our intelligence
and that our military had already done this and had
reprogrammed those missiles. Oh.
That's a good deal. Now you've ruined the movie for
me because I am going to go watch that.
I've never seen it. That sounds.
Fantastic. And so, and so that was the,
that was the first reference that came to mind with this is
to have this thousand 4000 pagers programmed our, our a
Trojan horse in, you know, built into them to be activated in a
moment to take out this many guys.
And then to see the videos of the hospitals and the chaos in
the hospitals. It's just, it's just brilliant.
I actually do have a video of at least one of these pagers going
off, which is pretty wild. If you guys are watching this
video, the first thing I think is a street scene.
The second one is like overhead Cam footage of somebody that's
at like a convenience store. You're going to want to look to
the far left. It's a guy who's wearing like a
yellow shirt or yellow shorts. I can't remember which one, but
you can actually see it's, it's it's barely on camera.
You hear like a phone ringing in the background.
That's actually people watching the security Cam footage.
It's not actually from the the video, but I'll show you this
because it's pretty wild. It's pretty, it's pretty crazy
to see. And then like you said, the
aftermath was like almost 3000 people.
They had like 9 deaths and 2800 people have been incapacitated.
Some of the I'm sure are incidental bystanders.
But this is Hezbollah. Hezbollah, which is in Lebanon.
This is in Beirut for the most part.
It apparently went off local time at about 3:30 their time.
And you know, Hezbollah is a terrorist organization and
they're aligned with Iran, and they got funded by Iran as they
got started. And they've been a problem for a
very long time. So stand by.
This is what the video looks like.
Seb Gorka tweeted out the other day.
Mess with the bull, get the horns.
I guess that's true. All right, there's just chaos
scenes and as you said, you if you guys want to go find videos
of it, apparently there's a couple of speculations that
people might have used like Petten PETN, which is a high
yield or a high capability explosives.
It's what they make grenades out of the, the fragmentation shell
of a grenade is made from. It's very, very high explosive,
which means we're talking about the the, the movement of of that
gas expanding. I don't know if you've ever done
explosive stuff, but like 2500 feet per second, but it's like
almost instantaneous. It's incredibly fast.
So you saw that guy get hit in the yellow shirt?
Yeah. I mean, like, apparently there
was a delay built in so that the page went off and then it gave
them enough time to either hold up to their face and look at it
or to page them, you know, so they were like checking it out.
Some people left at their pockets when it went off and
they got their ass blown off. They got their bellies blown off
right at the waistline. Horrific.
I mean, like, like human casualty, like when you see the
pictures of hands blown off, but you just disabled a bunch of
enemy fighters. And so like you say, that's kind
of why I want hands off with Israel.
I don't really want to be involved in any of it, but like,
I, I respect the game. The guys play it at a high
level. They don't ask, they don't ask
permission and they don't apologize.
So you can dislike the fact that they are sort of disregarding
human life, but I think it plays into what we talked about with
the cats. People in other cultures don't
consider human life the same way that we do in America.
And and the Israelis consider their lives to be more
important. And I don't kind of blame them
because so do we as Americans. That's why we don't mind carpet
bombing other nations that are that are, you know, threats and
enemies. Yeah, I mean, if only we would
get back to the good old days and carpet bomb, you know, like
we did in Dresden the way God intended us to.
You get really upset people about.
It I know I. Know, apparently, yeah, I know
it's super funny 'cause you're seeing people that are.
Recognize tongue in cheek. I know exactly.
Right. Let's let's, let's be honest,
let's just I'll, I'll, I'll close, I'll close it out here
with you. At least set you up for the
clothes by saying this, the I don't care how you feel about
Israel. I don't care how you feel about
Jews personally, whatever religiously, politically, I
don't care what your feelings or you think your knowledge is of
Zionism or anything else of the sort.
But let me, let me just say this because this is a soapbox issue
of mine and this is soapbox issue has been mine for decades.
This is not new and it's not new to the most recent conflict
since October 7th. This is good.
This goes back to many, many decades and my own travel, my
own research, my own studies in relation to this thing the the
Jewish people. Let's just start off as a
religion. Judaism as a religion is not a
proselytizing religion. Now, for those who don't know
what I mean, I'm going to give you the briefest description.
Christians have what is called the Great Commission to go into
all the world and share the gospel.
Now, centuries ago, before literature, literacy was
available to the Western cultures.
The church, the Roman church, was able to lie to the people in
mass and tell them that they had to spread the gospel at the
point of a sword or a spear. In other words, you know, a
point of a gun. If they had guns back then,
that's what they told the people.
And it was literacy. It was the invention of the
Gutenberg Bible. It was then the allowance.
And you see, there was a, there was an era where it was illegal
for anybody other than a priest to own a Bible, much less read
it read. But once literacy began to
overtake the Western world, we learned that Christianity was
not to be spread at the point of a sword.
Just go into all the world and preach the gospel, end of
sentence, not kill them if they don't.
Now the exact opposite is true in the Islamic world.
They went centuries without the same low, with the same low
level of literacy. But once literacy began to
proliferate within the Muslim world, then they became much,
much more radicalized because they saw inside their book that
even the stones would cry out and say, there's a Jew behind
the rock here, come kill him. All right.
So there there was. There was a cross differences in
what was happening as a result of literacy between the two
major religions. Now, Judaism has no such call to
proselytization, has no such call to recruitment.
They don't care. You can become a proselyte Jew.
I mean, I could marry a Jewish girl and then join the church or
the synagogue and the faith. And they were.
I would go through a ceremony and all the other things that I
would have to do in order to become a proselyte Jew.
But I can do that. But they don't require that, and
they don't care if you do or don't, because they don't have
that commandment. That's as a religion, as a
country. They are not an expansionist
country that neither do they have a mandate like the old
Soviet Union or like the Chinese satellites.
And let's just be perfectly honest, there are Chinese
satellites on this planet today. Doesn't look exactly like the
Soviet Union used to look. But this is this is not a
requirement of them. They just want to be left alone.
And I think and I, and please, if I get it wrong, as far as
which former Prime Minister, I want to say it was gold in my
ear. But she was the one that, you
know, famously said or one of the Prime Minister said that,
you know, if, if we, if, if, if the Palestinians would just lay
down their arms, there would be peace because we're not going to
attack, right? But if we give up our arms, it's
we're eliminated. We're we're eliminated from the
planet Earth. Yeah, and we used to know that
back in the we used to know that in the 90s and people were not
in conflict of it. And the Internet has been an
interesting thing for people 'cause it's allowed all the
worst ideas to proliferate and things that are not backed by
reality. But hey, again, I defend your
free speech. You can think any way you want.
You don't have to agree with me. I just think it's funny when
like people who are terrorist scumbags that have tried to kill
my friends in places where they have been.
Yeah, if they get their hands blown off or their Dick blown
off because they were using the pager, it's like, look, your
pager went off and the news was explosive.
Shalom, bro. That's that's, that's the memes
that are going. Out there, if you're carrying a
pager in Beirut or Gaza or somewhere else.
You're probably doing something shady.
You you are. You are on call to be activated
for your shady, illegal, immoral, let's call it
terroristic endeavors. I 100% agree with that, which is
why cell phone technology is ubiquitous in this on this
planet. There are people that are in
places that don't even have electricity that are running
around with a cell phone and can charge it.
So agreed. The people who got blown up
mostly were people that were involved in this.
I don't think they had a whole lot.
And, you know, it's just amazing.
It's like an amazing thing to be able to decide, hey, you know
what we're going to use? We're going to use 1980s
technology. We're going to send a page with
a delay and we're going to send an initiation.
And that means they probably had to capture it at the supply
chain. They either had to get the
batteries injected or they had to like surround the area.
I've heard some reports saying there were two ounces of
explosives basically injected into the battery compartment.
Whatever they did, pretty epic. The results are in and it was,
it was wild. So anyway, that's that that's a
full day of news. I got 2 little things that'll
make people laugh as we kind of wrap up our, our local channel
just dropped off because we can only go 2 hours and we've
exceeded the two hour maximum there.
But Steve, thanks for joining me.
Let me throw this on the screen so you can tell people where to
follow you. And you said you got a new story
coming out there it is. That's not the one I want.
How about this one? Boom, there you are.
There's your handle. Let's get let's get you to
100,000. We need 700 people that are
watching this to go and follow him on Twitter if you're not
already. Yeah, we're that, we're that
close. Yeah.
So, yeah, let's let's do that today.
Why not? Why not?
But obviously that there's my handle TPC for USA, that's all
of my social media, including locals.
And it's just TPC for usa.com, just like Kyle seraphim.com.
TPC for USAI may or may not change that soon because you
know that I'm with, I'm no longer rating under my own blog,
which used to be the pragmatic constitutionalist.
That's what the TPC is. It's a little unwieldy, but it's
there. It is it is unwieldy, but it's
just I haven't gone through the process of changing everything
over yet and and so that'll happen soon more than likely.
But having said that, Facebook true social me we obviously X
and locals. That's where you can find me is
at TPC for USA. And you can also find his
reporting over at theblaze.com/truth.
So guys, check that out. Make sure you have Steve.
Thanks for giving me a bunch of time.
Thanks for getting up a little bit early and hanging out and
drinking coffee with me. I'm going to send people off
with some funny things because it's been a heavy day.
We need some weird stuff, but thanks for being there.
Thank you Kyle for having me. I really appreciate it, always
enjoy it. All right, my friend, let me
break away here and let's do a palate cleanse.
I got two of them for you guys because we went extra long.
So let me play you some fun stuff thing #1 Actually, I got
to pull up my my list sheet, my CHEAT SHEET that tells me you
guys know that they were eating the dogs or the cats.
Maybe they were, maybe they weren't.
But what's more important is there was a song made about it
and it's a, it's a banger. Like I enjoyed it.
You'll enjoy it. Here's a little song about
eating the dogs and cats with Donald Trump as a cameo in
Springfield. They're eating the dogs, they're
eating the cats, they're eating the pets of the people that live
there. They're eating the dogs, they're
eating the cats, they're eating the pets of the people that live
there. People love Springfield.
Please don't eat my cats. Why would you do that?
Eat something else. People of Springfield, please
don't eat my dog. Here's a catalog of other things
to eat. They're eating the dogs.
They're eating the cats. They're.
Eating the pets of the people that live there.
They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, they're eating
the pets of the people that live there.
They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, they're eating
the dogs, they're eating the cats, they're eating the pets of
the people that live there. They're eating the dogs, they're
eating the cats, they're eating the.
Pets of the people that live there.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Whoa, I'm just saying it's
pretty good. It's catchy.
It'll stick with you, I promise you that much.
Let me give you a 5 star view and then I'll give you another
one. Someone we want to promote just
because we're all about free speech here and when people are
not screw them. So here is a five star review.
This is from driver 4A came in last week on Wednesday. 5 stars
for a fellow A hole. Kyle can come off as an A hole.
So why do I like his show so much?
That's right. I too am an A hole and a
shooter. Kyle, if you ever find yourself
in Western Arkansas America, you've got an open invitation to
bank some steel with us at the gun club.
That was a nice offer. I feel OK about being called a
fellow A hole. If you're an A hole, then I'm an
A hole. Maybe we're all a holes and
we're probably on the A hole list for the federal government.
Let me give you this last little taste.
There's a guy whose name is Tyler Fisher, and he created a
comedy special. He does a really good impression
of Donald Trump. What you're going to see in a
second and he was kicked off YouTube and demonetized.
So he's sharing it all over social media.
I encourage you guys to go find in my my timeline and retweet it
yourself if you can and allow it to be monetized.
Shame on YouTube for getting rid of good comedy.
And he is a good comic. And here he is talking about the
interview that just went down with Theo Vaughn, another comic
and Donald Trump. So I'm going to give you a
little taste of it and encourage you to go to my my timeline on
Twitter on X and retweet it to get this guy whatever
monetization he can for putting it out there.
He put it out for free. It's about 18 or 20 minutes
long. It's good stuff.
Here's a little taste. You can follow him.
It's at Tie the Fish. That's FISCH, Tyler Fisher.
Enjoy. Did you guys watch that?
Interview with Theo Von and Donald Trump.
So he didn't really get few fonts.
Wild sarcasm. He'll bomb me like.
Dude, I heard a fucking bite in the.
Fucking crazy dude. He went down to the border,
dude. He went to a Borders bookstore.
That's fucking crazy. Trump was like that sounds very
sad that he did that. Unfortunate because he's lost
his mind. He's confusing.
Bookstore with the border which I made so great and it feels
like, dude, I heard your brother was an alcoholic.
In my town we had a guy named Doseki's.
Damn brother. This guy would follow Doseki's
in his ass and squirted out like the Blasio pound Trump like that
sounds really unfortunate for your friend Dan.
How is Doseki Dan doing That's that's terrible and probably not
doing so good because of inflation.
And I've made the the price of Doseki's is through the roof.
So much spending, a lot of money to funnel.
The beer or the alcohol into his asshole.
It's really sad we're going to change that from Doseki Dan.
Let Toseki Dan though. Poor Doseki Stan.
All right, we've done a really long one.
I hope you guys enjoyed what we had to talk about.
I hope that takes you down the rabbit hole too.
There's a lot of indications out there.
We only try to go. Those are the dots.
The lines are not all in between yet we certainly had cannot
conclusively say anything. Anybody who's saying it is just
they're getting out over their skis.
The information is not available to them and it's not available
to us in the public. But there's a lot of really
strange. You know, where there's smoke,
there's fire. There's an awful lot of smoke
around this guy. Quite strange.
Anyway, I hope you guys enjoyed a little bit of levity and humor
at the end of all of this. The the Tats and Tatas, you guys
get a little kind of sense of how the brain works here.
And a big thank you to Steve Baker for joining us.
Make sure you're following him. Let's get him over 100,000
followers on X. If you guys are on X and you're
not following him at TPC, the number 4 USA, very easy, I'm
following him. You'll see that.
And we'll catch you guys again tomorrow on Thursday.
Remember, tomorrow is our local call in show and I've got the
technology set. I hope kyleseraphin.com for
locals check that out. Follow us.
You can leave us a voicemail if you want before the show even
starts and we'll play it and we'll see what you guys are all
up to. Otherwise, I'll give you some
prompts and some topics and we'll do that call in show
tomorrow evening. Until then, I'll see you
tomorrow morning here on the Kyle Seraphin show.
God bless you. See you soon.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin show, streamed live
weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, True Social and Instagram at Kyle
Seraphin.