Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower and
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends and
welcome to the Kyle Serfin Show. Today is Monday, it is March the
2nd and I appreciate you guys coming along for the ride.
We're going to have kind of a different show today because I
want to do some long form quotations, want to show you
some video clips from the president of the United States
who essentially declared that we are going to depose the Iranian
regime. They were able to kill the
Ayatollah over the weekend since we last talked.
So I think it's worth hearing the man in his own words, make
the justification for what's going on.
The problem is, is that he spent literally years saying the
opposite of that and saying that this was not a great idea.
And so anybody who wants to disagree with Donald Trump is
going to have unlimited fodder of both Donald Trump's words and
members of his cabinet saying exactly the opposite of what
we're doing right now. So we'll listen to his his his
speeches, the statements he made, including sort of
declaring at what, 2:00 AM in a social media post while wearing
an American hat and no tie. He just popped up on the mic and
spoke to an empty room in a month, you know, and then and
then rolled out. Now here we go.
There's also some retrospective that's worth looking at, which
is that the last time a president in this sort of
scenario where you're likely to lose the House and maybe even
the Senate at midterms, the last time that a president was
actually able to pick up seats during this sort of experience
for midterms was in 2002. And as one of my buddies pointed
out, an awful lot of Toby Keith being played right now, like
2002, 2003, war in Iraq type sentiment.
So that's a strange place for us to be.
There was also a terror attack in in Austin, TX.
A little bit on that. I think that may be something
that people should be aware of. Not because you necessarily live
in Austin, TX, not because you're out at a bar at 2:00 AM
'cause I'm not, and many of you will not be either.
But it does mean that the threat picture in this country is going
to pick up. And if you believe that our
federal security apparatus is going to keep you safe, the only
way they can do that is with utter and complete tyranny.
So I don't think they're going to do that either.
So we're going to get into all those things.
I got a handful of news stories. Like I said, I've got a bunch of
sort of evidence why people are going to be attacking Donald
Trump's decision. I'll let you guys make up your
own mind. There are plenty of reasons to
get excited about the capabilities of American force
and the ability to project force.
And yet there's plenty of reasons to hold people
accountable to their own words. And I think that's reasonable,
too. So we'll do all that in one
second here talked about the idea that you might be seeing
some danger in your hometown. We just had a a guy step into a
a bar with a rifle and a handgun and A and a hoodie that said
property of a la. One of the things you might want
to do is make sure you insulate yourself.
Carry yourself a firearm. I will show you this one right
here for my friends over at silent.
This is a bag that you can use. It's a concealed carry sling.
It actually blends in pretty well with his black shirt and
you can not only get yourself off grid, which I will show you
right here, it sits into this little pouch, disappears in
there. It's tight and firm disappears
away. You've got room for wallet.
You've got room for extra little things.
Oh, what do I have in here? I have a magazine, a sister, an
easy loader because right behind where you keep the Faraday pouch
is this little big loop and you can keep a handgun in there,
which is something you might want to do.
This one actually is my wife's. This is her, her Sig P365.
Guys, if you are interested in being able to carry and get off
grid on your choice, this is a really nice piece of equipment.
We own 1 now and I probably will end up with another one in
Multicam black because that's my jam.
We've been using it for hiking. You can put a little Boo Boo bag
in there. You can put all kinds of little
stuff you might need Licky's and Chewy's, the snacks and things
like that. And you can jump off grid and
you just hang out. You might want to have your
pockets free. Sometimes I like to go hike in
some really lightweight shorts and I don't want to necessarily
put on a heavy belt. I don't want to put something in
my waistband. I just kind of want to be
unrestricted so I can bend over and climb and get on rocks and
stuff like that with my kiddos. And, and this is an an excellent
option. I can actually also carry like a
GoPro on there, some batteries, things like that.
If you're not carrying on a regular basis, you should
consider it. And if you're looking for a way
to do kind of more than one thing, little cross body body
sling like this, which can double as a purse for women, it
works pretty well for men for all the things you're doing.
Yeah, it can also use, you can use it as kind of a bigger Fanny
pack or a waste pack. Check out silent.
It's SLN, t.com/K, YLE again, SLNT or silent.com.
There's no vowels in it. Slash Kyle.
Use my name at checkout. Kyle, save yourself 15% think
these things are in like the $130.00 ish range.
It's got a lot of functionality, it's got a lot of capabilities.
You can actually even take the the Faraday case out and put it
on a plate carrier. You can slap it on there.
You can peel it off the hook and loop here.
So look at them, look at that website and then go kind of
digging around. Find out the things that make
sense for your life, whether it be a backpack, wrestling bag,
but maybe give yourself an opportunity to unplug from the
world. There's a lot of bad news out
there, but having your phone with you is probably still a
good choice, especially if you're going into a place where
there's people you might need to make a call.
But you maybe want to just be able to enjoy a church service
like I did this Sunday. So check out our Silent Faraday
Partners link in the show description.
Let's get into today's program. There's a lot to cover and we're
going to start it right now. Hopefully I don't get myself in
trouble showing a weapon system in a bag without being touched.
I know they have some special rules on YouTube, so there you
go. It was just a quick little
glimpse, just a little peek behind the curtain on that
thing. Guys lot to go and talk about.
I guess the the first thing I wanted to do is I want to
retouch what we talked about last week and I don't want to
leave it without sort of another another little quick revisit.
So last week I told you something that I think actually
is continuing to bother me. I did a program with Alex
Jones's son and a podcast last night called Gray Area.
We talked about this sort of terrifying nature of this
revelation of this thing called prohibited files.
It's my fault. I didn't actually keep track of
this. I didn't recognize that there
was a thing previously brought up and and I missed it somehow.
This was actually brought up in June of last year, and I don't
know what I don't know outside of Margo Cleveland at The
Federalist, who talked about this concept of prohibited
access coding or prohibited access files.
But it's maybe the scariest thing that I've found out since
I started doing what we're doing here on this podcast and talking
about sort of the behind the scenes of what things mean.
And you know what, why our federal law enforcement agencies
are not really serving our purposes.
This article that she wrote called says the the FBI's
ability to disappear evidence calls for transparency.
And underneath it she has this thing that says if the FB is use
of prohibited access coding was happening on a widespread basis.
The ramification, the ramifications are enormous.
I don't think it was happening on like a hugely widespread
basis. But I do want to read you and
answer some of the questions that are involved in this
article, which is now, you know, it's nine months old.
She talks about the prohibited access capability, A coding that
that essentially makes things invisible to the average person,
to the average FBI agent and user.
It allows for sort of an unaccountable, unauditable, non
FOIA compliant 4th Amendment violating because if there were
exculpatory information, it wouldn't pop up in Sentinel.
Sentinel is the record keeping system that you're seeing the
Hoover building where apparently the FBI is moved out of and is
now in the Reagan building. But we'll always kind of
remember that building as kind of representative of what the
the FBI's headquarters looks like, at least for now.
It says if Sentinel number of users do not even know that
relevant evidence exists, the DOJ cannot possibly provide
exculpatory or impeach of an evidence in criminal defendants
cases or fulfill their discovery obligations in simple cases.
This stuff that we found out last week has such broad
reaching ramifications and it's everything from a criminal
defendant might have some exculpatory evidence.
The FBI is not is not providing them all the way up into
deniable operations on US soil to include include things that
look like, you know, Jeffrey Epstein and other access agents
doing things that are otherwise illicit, immoral,
unconstitutional, and yet they're without oversight.
She mentions here again, this is going back to June of last year.
From the scant evidence available today, we know that
these concerns are not hypothetical.
The documents related to the Trump and Russia collusion
investigations were coded prohibited access.
That coding prevented agents in the Washington field office from
identifying potentially relevant evidence concerning whether
Fusion GPS contractor Nellie Orr lied to Congress about her role
of Crossfire Hurricane. We know that there was some
other additional issues about Biden corruption, Ukraine, what
was or was not relevant or or visible to members of the FBI
who actually use this this program, Sentinel.
And then she goes on and she asks a couple of questions here
and some of them we actually know the answers to, which she
would not have known. You guys are asking in the chat,
am I surprised? I'm not surprised that this
exists so much as I'm surprised that I didn't know it.
And I'm surprised that I didn't know it in June when it was
being reported over at The Federalist.
So it means I need to open my scope a little bit more broadly.
Here's what Margo Cleveland asks.
When was the prohibited access function added to Sentinel?
Who added that functionality? Who approved that decision and
who was told of that decision? We know some of those answers.
In fact, some people have reached out to me and told me
that it was built in as functionality from the
beginning. So as long as that record
keeping system existed, which is that that that digital option,
that's how long it's been around.
It was baked in and it was probably required as part of the
the coding in the contract. Well, that tells you that
there's an FBI that wants to be unaccountable.
And we historically learned that this kind of thing could exist.
If you go back into the archives, you recognize that the
the original founder of the FBI and the real sort of like the
impetus for the current FBI could very well be J Edgar
Hoover. I mean, the guy who launched it
and used it as his own sort of blackmail operation.
If you listen to Mike Waller, who's been on this program, in
fact, I highly recommend you go back and listen to our interview
with Mike Waller and I may have him on again to reflect on this.
Mike Waller said that the capabilities of the FBI under
Hoover was that he used blackmail type information.
He knew derogatory information on politicians of both sides of
the aisle, and he used that to essentially keep the FBI out of
the fray. That doesn't mean the FBI didn't
weigh in on politics. It just weighed in on what
Hoover thought was this sort of American position.
And so that was against communism and against leftism,
progressive leftism and some other things.
So that was kind of the that was kind of his defense, if you
will. The apology for Hoover was he
was doing things that most Americans didn't have a problem
with. And yet Hoover did operate
something that was relatively unaccountable.
And so the the discussion and Steve Friend brought this up
over on Friday's show, was that people would rather J Edgar
Hoover be sort of in the tent pissing out than standing
outside the tent and dismantling all of their sexual
proclivities, their their marital infidelities, their
financial improprieties and so on.
And so they were really cautious about getting on the wrong side
of that man. What's interesting is the person
who took over the FBI after Hoover left was a guy named Mark
Felt. He was the first deputy director
after Hoover's death. Now, some of you guys know that
name, and it's going to be really interesting to you when
you hear it. You go, oh, that's right.
And some of you don't know that name, but you may know him by
the moniker that appeared in the common press, which is that Mark
Felt was Deep Throat, the source that gave up all the information
on Watergate, which resulted in the removal of President Nixon.
And so you could probably make an argument, and I'm guessing
that there probably is evidence if somebody was so intrepid as
to go find it, that the FB is political operations continued
long beyond J Edgar Hoover and these prohibited access files,
which now appear in a system called Sentinel, which is
digitized. That used to be the paper files
and likely were the same. It's sort of like a an outgrowth
of where Hoover kept paper files in an, in a like a hallway
headed to his office where it was his personal little
information to check out and wage his own little information
wars against anybody that he chose.
Most people think that the Hoover FBI left with Hoover, and
I think that there's probably some evidence that indicates
that the deputy director just continued it on.
You wouldn't get it from a new J Edgar Hoover because that person
didn't come up in the Bureau. But there's a reason why every
single deputy director has about two decades or more of
experience being formed and chosen within that organization.
And a lot of them of of late have come out of the the
counterintelligence program, the national security apparatus, and
have more importantly come out of the New York field office.
So we're dealing with something really scary and this is the
failure of the Cash Battelle FBI, the Cash Battelle attempt
to reform it and having someone like Dan Vongino step in there
that didn't know the organization, didn't even know
that these things existed. And I didn't know they existed.
And I got friends that spent 1518 years in the Bureau and
didn't know they existed. In fact, I'd say it was a pretty
small cadre of people, most people who even thought they did
exist, these prohibited access files, they didn't know that
they were real, they just heard of them.
They were like a legendary thing.
I think a lot of folks have pointed at Chris Ray over the
last couple years and acted like he was a bad guy.
And I, I think that I've tried to, I think I've tried to put a
nuanced point on that on this podcast because we've been
calling out FBI directors for as long as I've been doing this
program. And I don't think Chris Ray was
a bad guy. I think he was exactly what the
FBI likes. It was a go along to get along,
a person who didn't have to know all the details.
He was happy to live like a billionaire.
He defended the Bureau when he needed to.
He asked for budget. He was, he was not emotional.
He was professional. He wore a suit and he showed up
to Congress without information that he didn't need to know
about because why would he need to know?
Don't read him in. He has plausible deniability.
And he always looked like a yes man from those of us that were
watching. He looked like a Lifetime movie
coach. You know, the kind of guy that
that gives you these, like, mediocre speeches about football
when the kid is trying to figure out what's going on in his home
life because mom and dad are breaking up.
It doesn't make him a good guy, doesn't make him a good person,
doesn't make him a hero or a villain.
Just means that he's like a classic government bureaucrat
and that the real villains were working behind the scenes and
they've always had access. And so Patel unwittingly has
given us the best, the best evidence that we should actually
destroy this organization and reform it under something else
that has none of the intelligence capabilities and
cannot have hidden files, can't have unaccountable, unauditable,
non oversight, responsive operations that run on the
American taxpayers time. And I think this thing may be
the scariest piece because for me, the domestic is always more
important. There are things that are
threats overseas, but the same domestic organization that has
these other things. There's a couple of other little
questions I'm going to run through here.
Who could mark material prohibited access.
From what we understand, it was a program that was run by the
deputy director. So that tells you who the number
2 with the FBI and below, a couple of people that are in
that orbit. What standards determine whether
the materials classified as prohibited access versus
restricted? Again, a deputy director, a
senior, senior executive position who must approve these
things, who can see the existence of the files that are
designated. We found out it's an access
roster, so very, very small. In other words, a circle of of
small group of people that don't want to share this information.
How long are the materials maintained?
Well, if you can't even find out where they are and if they did
them properly, you could actually make them disappear
when these people retire. So they would actually disappear
to the ether and never be accessible.
And that's pretty terrifying. What happens if the individuals
with prohibited access leave the Bureau?
Likely if they didn't actually open it up under the role as
their job code and did it under their name, then they're gone
and they're no longer accessible.
And can anyone else see the existence?
The answer we know is no. Our prohibited access materials
ever deleted. It turns out it may be a
functionality issue where they may not be deleted, but if you
can never access them again, it's like having a Bitcoin in a
in a a wallet and then no longer having your access code to
unlock it. They're gone forever, can't be
hacked. And it's and it's functionally
no longer available to anybody. Even if it still exists, consent
will be audited. And the answer we seem like is
yes, but only through like brute force.
You have to lay out every single case file in order and find the
ones that don't show up and then find out who the hell is on
those numbers that you don't know.
And so all of those are really dangerous.
And then, you know, document recovery.
So a lot of these questions, and there's dozens of questions that
Margo Cleveland asked in this piece, which goes back to again
to June of last year. And I think that it is a really,
really good example of what happens when you have
unaccountable government doing secret programs, which I think
is the reason why we had a church Commission.
And people just assume that since it was no longer the CIA
doing this, we now would have a, a, a better group that would
take care of it. And that we could trust the FBI
because they had told everybody that they were trustworthy.
And there's really no evidence that's the case.
To be able to apply AI to these classified systems and try to
bring this out. It's, it's, it's very difficult.
And I'm not even sure that there's a legal way to do it, to
introduce this thing in without a lot of risk.
So now we have evidence that there's an unaccountable group
doing operations that nobody can stop, nobody can audit, nobody
can find out what they are. And we put people in that said
they were going to fix the problem.
And all they've shown us is that maybe the problem is actually
unfixable. Think that's really scary.
I think it's worth us considering whether or not in
light of that evidence, which again, it was available last
year, I just didn't see it. And, and the way that they're
talking about it, whether we should really have that honest
conversation on whether or not we can do these, do this, do
this thing as we've been doing it.
And that's going to actually segue nicely into the discussion
about what happened in Austin. Cash Patel over the weekend put
out a post in the wake of us going to drop bombs on Iran and
said OK guys here's the deal. Our JTTF is going to be
operating 24/7 to keep the American people safe.
And there are now several people in the United States in Austin,
TX who have family members and they are missing those family
members forever because the FBI cannot keep you safe.
It's the reason why I recommended the concealed carry
option. No government is going to be
able to keep you safe without utter and abject tyranny.
This goes back to the comments that we made about COVID.
It goes out to the discussion of dangerous freedom and that
liberty is something that requires a lot of like personal
responsibility. If you want to cede your
personal safety and the responsibility for that safety
to a government, then you are actually accepting a, a blank
check of, of tyranny. In the same way that the the
Chinese government was trying to do what they called 0 COVID,
right? There was going to be no
transmission in order to do 0 COVID.
Their solution was what? We just have to eliminate the
people. Who have COVID and anybody who
could also get it from those people.
So why don't we Weld people into their homes?
Why don't we lock people down and drag off anybody who shows
symptoms? It's kind of the Skynet
solution, guys. This is the way that AI might
see the problem. It's like, well, human beings
seem like there are, you know, there, there's a lot of threats
to people and to our systems and to our government.
How could we save everybody? Oh, we could just kill all the
people that are threats. That would be all the people.
So if you're not a big fan of the way that the Terminator
movies turned out and the fact that we had sort of this
tyrannical idea that if you were to take it to its logical
conclusion, the threat is freedom, the threat is liberty,
the threat, the threat is free will.
And, and the concepts that America is sort of based on,
you'd have to lock everybody down.
Our JTTFS, by the way, were not operating on on 24/7 basis.
They were not operating through the night and through the day.
I know that because I have friends who are on the JTTFS and
nobody told them that they were operating 24/7.
This is just bullshit messaging. So that's where we're going to
get. And let's go ahead and cover
that story real quick. This is the the photo of the
alleged shooter that took that that came into a bar in Austin,
TX and it's really disquieting. First of all, he's wearing a
hoodie. If you can't see it, he's a
black man, apparently 53 years old, born in Senegal,
naturalized citizen. And I went and I pulled a couple
of different articles that were that were talking about who this
guy is and what's going on. Let's see if we can pull up this
one from first CBS. Let's go CBS first.
I'll show you some footage too of of how people responded to
it. It turns out if you're out at
2:00 AM and you're drinking, the odds that you're going to make a
really good sort of enemy contact situation work better
for you. Not very high.
You're probably going to act illogically.
You're going to act like a lazy drunk person.
And I don't think anybody actually took this as seriously
as it was. Meanwhile, there were literally
shots going off in the bar right next door.
So I've got some footage that there's also also footage that
was leaked from inside the bar where people were doing CPR and
people bleeding to death. I don't want to show you that
because I don't think there's any value other than it's it's
disquieting to watch. All right, so here you go.
This is CBS News. A gunman who wore property of a
LA hoodie during attack had photos of the Iranian leaders at
home, sources say. New photo emerge of this gunman
who police say killed two people, wounded fourteen.
We got all kinds of different reports by the way, numbers,
they went from as low as 2, which we're seeing right now as
of this last night to as many as four people.
So I don't know how many people were killed, but it, you know,
more than one, less than 5 is what they're claiming. 14 people
injured or seriously wounded. So we kept that a number of
times. The gunman who was shot and
killed by police was wearing a sweatshirt, said property of
Allah during the attack. Two sources familiar with the
investigation say description matches a photo that they that
Fox News got with this individual carrying a long gun.
I'll show you. You can't see it here.
There's actually a better photo. It shows there's a rifle in his
right hand in this photograph. A little bit further down, there
were indicators on the suspect and in his vehicle that
suggested there was a potential Nexus to terrorism, said the
special agent in charge, acting special agent in charge.
I guess that's probably the huge that's San Antonio's field
office if they're talking about Austin.
The officials from the FBI executed a search warrant at the
gunman's home, found an Iranian flag pictures of Iranian leaders
said a source with direct knowledge.
They said there was a Quran found in his vehicle.
The vehicle also matches the the same vehicle found on Google
Earth in front of the residents that he lives in.
He said he's a 53 year old. Here's a problem for you that
are bacon cheeseburger nationalists.
How many of you grew up with Nadiga Nadiaga?
You know how many Nadiagas I knew growing up?
Let's take a coffee break to think of all the Nadiagas that
we knew when we were children. Oh, there were none.
Nobody knew a single Nadiagia. What about a diagne?
That was his last name? Nadiaga Diagne.
Perfect naturalized citizen, born in Senegal.
They think he acted alone. Again, you can't stop these sort
of things. This is the whole point that I'd
like to make when we start talking about the FBI protecting
you. They're busy doing deniable
operations. And at the same time, they can't
do the thing that they claim they could do.
So we got to ask the question, like, what are we paying $11
billion for? Are we going to be able to stop
this stuff? No.
Can you investigate and find him after the fact?
Yes. Do you guys want to know?
The most disquieting thing about this whole story for me is that
this happened on 6th St. in Austin and this guy started
shooting and there was a law enforcement response.
Not a federal law enforcement, not of FBI agents, but of police
officers, because there are always lots of police officers
on any given Friday, Saturday night in the Austin, TX area.
They're up and down. Kind of like imagine New Orleans
during Mardi Gras with a little bit less people but every single
weekend. Police officer responded with 57
seconds warning. There were shots fired and 57
seconds later Austin PD engaged this guy and killed him and he
still put 18 people down injured or killed and maybe more.
The totals will come out later. The response was under one
minute. Now, if there was an armed
person in the bar that was coherent and, you know, carrying
illegally in that bar illegally under state law in Texas, maybe
that's half the time. Maybe you cut the the number of
people that are that are hurt or killed in half.
But there's no protection against something like this.
You can't stop it. What you could do is you could
not have people that are from Senegal in our country.
You think this guy's a bacon cheeseburger?
Nationalist typed with pictures of the Iranian leader at his
home. So we're going to probably see
more stuff like this. For those of you that that do go
out to bars and you decide to make a choice that you'd rather
stay sober because that's the smart thing to do, I applaud
that. For those of you that don't
think that concealed carry signs hold weight, you'd rather deal
with being able to put someone like this down and protect your
family instead of compliance with some paper state law, I
applaud that as well. It's your own choice.
You guys have to make your own best decisions.
But it reminds me of the meme that says that these are the
number of states that you can carry concealed in in the United
States if you're not a little B. And little B, of course, is a
not particularly nice word for people.
I don't seed like I generally either don't go places where I
can't carry a weapon system or I don't know what that sign means
because I'd much rather have to deal with the consequences of
dealing with a cop later. Talk to a cop after the fact and
explain, hey, I know you shot this guy that was trying to kill
people with this rifle system, but but you're not allowed to
have a gun there. And I'd be like, well, thank God
I did. Here's my hands, here's my
wrists. Deal with what you got to do for
all you guys that think this is a Patsy or all you people that
think that this was someone that was like put up to it.
We can't rule that stuff out. Will he be on the FB is radar at
some point? Who knows.
But we're already seeing some spin from some mainstream
outlets. So I do want to cover NB CS
version of the story. And then again, we're going to
get into the sort of the the Iran war.
And this I think is just sort of the domestic end of it.
I don't think this will be the end of it.
I don't think this will be the last that we see of someone
being inspired by this sort of thing.
So just be aware that we're in a time when the world could be,
could be more dangerous than it was a few minutes ago.
I may or may not be carrying a long gun with my minivan, with
my, with my truck when I go out. And it's not because I'm
paranoid. I just don't want to find myself
in a situation where I'm outgunned and my family is in
the crossfire. And is that a little bit
extreme? Maybe, but I'm kind of an
extreme guy and I've seen bad things happen and it happened
just down the street from me. So it's a little close, as my
buddy said, a little close for comfort.
There's plenty of illegal aliens or naturalized citizens who have
come to this country and do not share our values and are willing
to do things because they're motivated by something that
happens overseas. It happens all the time.
So the question was this person, was he motivated by some sort of
ideology of what was going on? This is my favorite because
immediately the left-leaning news is going to try to spin
this a bit. The suspect identified in
Austin, TX bar that left two dead, 14 injured.
The suspect who was fatally shot by officers, Well, guys, he had
a history of mental illness, sources familiar with the
investigation told NBC News. So I think that begs the
question is why are we allowing, bringing, importing,
naturalizing, Americanizing people who have a history of
mental illness into our country? I mean, we have plenty of
Americans that have mental illness.
We have plenty of Americans that are dealing with rough times.
Most of them are unlikely to have property of a LA and do a
mass shooting in a bar at random.
Like they may hurt someone that they know, they may hurt a place
that they're familiar with or they feel like has aggrieved
them. It's really, really, really hard
to stop someone who is engaged in completely illogical mentally
illness, like, like no connection, detached violence.
We can find predictors of domestic violence.
We can find predictors of inciting incidents where people
have decided to come after someone that they know.
It's really hard for someone to just choose a target at random
and then think that you're going to stop that.
And by the way, that reminds me that we started off Donald
Trump's presidency. The first thing that happened at
the beginning of the year in 2025 was a similar sort of lone
wolf attack, which the FBI also didn't stop in New Orleans.
I don't think they can stop it, but I think that we should stop
expecting that they will stop it.
So here you go. The man suspected of killing two
and injuring 14 opened fires on patrons at a bar in Austin, TX
early Sunday morning. This would have been into the
night of Saturday with a history of mental illness again giving
it a reason. Yes.
Nadi Nadiaga Dagani, 53, was a Senegalese national and then
naturalized U.S. citizen living in Pflugerville.
Pflugerville. I used to live there in the
early 2000s. According to four law, law
enforcement officials, of course he lived in Pflugerville.
That's just a suburb of Austin, guys.
It's a suburb where a lot of people are tech workers.
They work for, you know, AMG or AMD, whatever the chip maker is.
They work for Dell. It's just a regular suburban
American Texas neighborhood with a funny name.
At the time of the shooting, he was wearing a sweatshirt.
They're going to call that out. Under the underneath the shirt
was an Iranian flag themed shirt.
So he had property of all law and an Iranian shirt.
He was shot and killed by officers shortly after the ranch
management. Again, again, 57 seconds is the
reported response time. That's very, very fast.
They were indicated that this person had a potential Nexus to
terrorism is the same report here.
Again, I love that they've just sort of like pushed it off on
mental illness though. Here's what we would need.
A Homeland Security official told NBC News that Diogenae
first entered the United States in March of 2000.
He's been here 26 years on AB2 tourist visa, so why was he
allowed to be a permanent resident?
He stayed here apparently and became a lawful permanent
resident that's a green card holder in 2006 based on a
marriage to AUS citizen and became a naturalized citizen in
2003. So there's your process, 13
years for him to come here. He was arrested in 2022 in Texas
for a collision with vehicle damage.
And that's it. 26 years in the United States.
And then suddenly he's decided he's angry about Iran, which
apparently we've been at war with forever.
The violence took place as revellers outside of a place
called Beaufort. It's a popular beer garden in
downtown Austin. It took him by surprise.
A video recorded by a bystander catches bursts of gunfire.
And people saying, oh, my God, other people trying to Crouch
and hide. I actually have that video.
I didn't pull it up beforehand, so bear with me.
It may be a little bit loud. And let me go ahead and get that
going. So we can kind of get like a
little sense of how is it that people respond when something
like this happens. I just want you guys to see it
and then you guys will have a kind of a sense of people don't
respond well because they never thought about it.
All right, right. You're seeing someone videoing
death and destruction and there's some CPR.
This is actually kind of, this is actually not the one I was
going to show you initially. So let me switch this out real
quick, but pretty good indication of the chaos that
happens in the in the area. Where's my Austin video
shooting? Here?
It's Austin shooting #1 stand by.
Here we go. OK.
This is taken from a bar nearby. Look at that woman just
wandering. There's ongoing shooting.
There's active shooting happening.
And this chick is walking around with a beard in her hand and
these people are giggling and ducking behind something that
doesn't provide cover. People laying on the ground,
just hanging out. This is like a balcony bar.
It's like looking down on the street.
You're about to see a dude just like sprawl out.
He's like, OK. It's been a long day of social
media posts, some people running that are exposed.
We got law enforcement vehicles. We also found out that one of
those, you guys hear the guns still shooting.
I'm gonna turn down the audio here.
You're gonna see a dude just laid out.
He just chills out on the floor. The crazy part here is that also
we had all the things that could possibly go wrong.
First of all, you had law enforcement respond as fast as
humanly possible in under a minute.
That's crazy fast. So that's super impressive.
You have idiots like this closing glass doors.
You guys know anything about glass doors?
You know, they're gonna have to stop rounds.
And then on top of that, they had one of those automatic robot
style cabs, the Waymos or whatever they are.
It just got lost in the middle of the street and it was
blocking emergency responses. So you had Austin, you know,
the, the Travis County medical EMS teams, the paramedics and
EMTs couldn't actually get through the street because this
damn robot car was doing back and forth.
Anyway, I just wanted to show you like when things go wrong,
if you've never thought about, hey, what are my exits and
what's it look like? What's my situational awareness
level? Or are you just completely tuned
out? Are you living in the white
where the world is safe and if something happens bad, then
you're just going to be a victim of whatever circumstances.
And I think a lot of people are in that.
And you're going to get people answering.
Well, the best thing we can do is take guns.
And I'm already seeing some of those calls, including current
candidates in the state of Texas who are running for office, like
Senate. James Talarico, I think is one
of the most dangerous. So I'm going to show you a video
from him and then we'll get into the Iran thing.
Before we do all of that stuff, let's talk about my buddies over
at Patriot Protect. Guys, the website
ispatriot-protect.com/K YLE. There's always the external
threat and the possibility of somebody trying to you know,
kill you at a bar, I suppose. But the internal threat that we
all deal with is that all of our data is out there.
So our names, our phone numbers, our e-mail addresses, the the
place you work, your family members.
If somebody wanted to target you and try to take the money that
you had, if they wanted to go out there and steal your title
or anything else, the best way to do it is for them to have
access to who the heck you are. And every company is using AI
right now. So from TurboTax to Google and
Amazon and Microsoft and Meta, Apple, banks, insurance
companies, hospitals, credit bureaus, you name it, if you're
doing business with somebody, the odds are they're exploding
your data with AI. And if you guys think that that
is not hackable, you are very wrong.
That means the people that are not bacon cheeseburger
nationalist living abroad and even some scumbags that live
here, They could be involved in trying to look you up, steal
your identity, impersonate you, scam you.
They can use AI to spoof your voice to family members.
They can take all your public information and use it against
you. So the best thing you can do is
have it scrubbed off the web. Recommend using the service
Patriot Protect. That's the ones that we've been
using. My wife and I just renewed in
the last 30 days. I think mine and then hers a
little bit afterwards. It's patriot-protect.com/K YLE.
You'll save 15% on annual subscriptions to their programs.
They're as cheap as under $100 a year, which is not a ton of
money to be able to keep yourself out of the pile.
The average American suffers about $600.00 of loss from fraud
and scam per year on average. But it's usually not one time
each year. It's generally speaking one big
bulk amount, and it might be every 10 or 15 years.
So if you guys want to eliminate your risk, try to take yourself
out of the pile there where these people are targeting.
Do so by checking out the folks over at Patriot Protect.
And there's a link in today's show description.
All right, let's do, let's do the response from politicians
because it's always this kind of piece.
And then we'll get into the war effort.
And again, I'm going to play you long form.
You may not listen anywhere else and many of you may not have the
instinct to go out and seek out what Donald Trump actually said,
but I think we should listen to it.
So let's see if I can find this little clip here of that Goob
Tallerico. I downloaded it, so I may have
to just pull it up real quick here.
Stand by y'all. James Talarico, I think, is one
of the most dangerous types of politicians working at this
point. And he's dangerous because the
things he says sound utterly reasonable.
And they're very appealing to people who are Christians and
they are appealing to people who are good human beings.
But this is that classic version of using faith or your
principles against you and doing so with, with almost no, almost
no, no instinct to be really honest about it.
You can tell that this is really disingenuous.
I can tell. I want you to kind of listen to
this. And you can see the kind of the,
the wolf in sheep's clothing sort of attitude that this guy
has. And here he is talking about
thoughts and prayers. This is always the talking
point. And then they always want to go
to gun violence or, you know, gun, gun confiscations.
I frankly am tired of the thoughts and prayers rhetoric
from our leaders here in Texas and in our nation's capital.
I believe in the power of prayer.
I believe prayer changes lives. I believe prayer changes the
world. But there is something
profoundly cynical about asking God to solve a problem that
we're not willing to solve ourselves.
God moves and works through us. God has no other hands but our
hands. We prayed and God sent moms from
both political parties to advocate in the halls of power
for gun safety. We prayed and God sent lawmakers
with common sense gun safety proposals like universal
background checks, red flag laws, closing the gun show
loophole. As you know, Rev Scripture
reminds us that faith without works is dead.
And so the time for thoughts and prayers is over.
It's time for us to act. Well, there's nothing faster
than the action of somebody picking up a weapon system as a
law enforcement officer and responding in under a minute.
I suppose if somebody was standing there and packing at
the time, they could have had a few second response time.
But this is what happens if you want to have evil human beings
in the world and there are plenty of them.
And this is what happens if you leave people without some way to
defend themselves and some a hole figures out, oh, where will
I find people who are not armed. This is a gun free zone.
Every single time that you go into a bar in Texas, they have
what what is called the 51% rule.
And the 51% rule is a posted sign.
It's done in white with black lettering and a big 51% written
in red in the background. And that means that the that
this establishment gets more than 51% of its revenue from
alcohol sales. And if that's the case, it is
explicitly forbidden that you carry a firearm.
I may or may not have ignored those things in my youth when I
got out of the military because I've put my hands in bullet
holes. I've watched people get shot and
or you know when that happens, when you see somebody who's
coming in with a gunshot wound, it's not really going to help.
Turns out you saw those medics on the ground doing the best
they can. When someone gets smoked in a
place that you can't respond, especially if they take a rifle
round in the chest. All your work.
I've done 40 minutes worth of work on a guy shot in the chest
and it doesn't matter. You can even have signs of life
and when you get to the hospital, you find out that
their heart was split in two. So put your signs up.
But that was a gun free zone, as is so often the case for these
sort of mass shooting type things.
Where would you go if you wanted to find people who are unarmed
and not aware? I would go to a bar, I guess, if
that's what I was going to look for.
And those signs tell you exactly where they are.
It's the same thing as going to a school or a university or some
sort of academic place where they're not going to have, you
know, people armed. What a bummer.
What a bummer to know that you voluntarily made yourself an
easier victim and then these guys go after it.
And for your, some of them got guy to go out there and talk
about the moms demanding action. They're living in a fantasy
world where you somehow are going to stop human evil.
And I think that that's a very disingenuous move.
But again, he's using the words of Christianity.
He's using the values that people might have.
It sounds really good and emotional right up until the
point where it doesn't actually meet mustard.
It's the same as our FBI director telling us that our our
FBI is out there working 24/7 to stop terrorism.
Every single time we see them arrest somebody under the
playbook where they had to set them up in order to get the
arrest. And then on the side, you also
find that somebody slips through the safety net, which happens
every couple months and it always will because human nature
is undefeated. There you go.
Laws don't stop bad guys. Thoughts and prayers don't
either. Turns out in this case, being
prepared, probably not being there in the 1st place and being
able to do something about is a big deal.
All right, so let's let's get to the wildest story.
The wildest story is that Donald Trump announced that we were
going to war after saying that we wasn't going to go to war.
And he's essentially said that we can expect this war to last
for a little while, maybe 4 weeks to flatten Tehran.
And a lot of us are seeing that certain statements have a real
eerie parallel when people start giving us estimations on how
long they might take. And we remember a time when
Donald Trump said other things that were really a bad idea,
like we should shut down this country for a little bit just to
get this this stuff under, under wraps again.
I always will see the tyrannical implications of what our
government did in 2020 and 2021 on everything else that you make
a promise of. Because I know for a fact that
we were lied to. Everyone who lived through it
knows if you experience the COVID tyranny then you know that
our our government and the people that are even feeding the
top politicians are giving them bad information.
Sounds something like this. When that happened this.
Is the first time this has ever happened and we're working out a
tremendous financial package for them so they don't work.
Whoever heard of this? Usually you work out a financial
package to get people working. We're asking people not to work
social distancing. That new term that's become
probably the hottest term there is.
So no, I'm very honored by the way the American people are are
taking this. I mean, it's so serious.
All right, so we're taking it so serious and we're going to deal
with this, this new war that has been kicked off.
I'll play you the the Donald Trump stuff in just a moment.
Here's the deal. Apparently the authorization
falls underneath the 50 USC Chapter 33, which is the War
Powers Resolution of 1973. This is the AI grab on it.
I wanted to go to the actual document so we can understand
under what circumstances the president has the ability to do
these things. And I think there's a real
argument that is not appropriate policy.
This is going to be the purpose and the policy.
So congressional, congressional declaration, they lay out like
why they're doing it. They say that this is the the
necessary and proper clause. And then they say, what are the
president's executive powers as commander in chief?
Here's the limitations underneath the statute.
And I'm always saying this because the argument is, well,
the president has always been able to use the War Powers
Resolution Act, War Powers Act, the 1973.
Yeah, but not really. And so the argument gets water,
water and, you know, more and more watered down and wider and
wider and more and more loose. And I think that's problematic.
Here's what it says in Section C.
This is again, this is 50 USC 1541 Purpose and policy.
Section C Presidential executive power as commander in chief
limitations the the constitutional powers of the
President as commander in chief to introduce the United States
armed forces into hostilities or into situations where imminent
involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the
circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to 1A declaration
of war. That is not the case in this
case. There's no declaration of war. 2
Specific statutory authorizations.
I guess there's more to that. Or three, a national emergency
created by attack on the United States and its territories or
possessions or its armed forces. This was the wiggle room they
used in the Iraq War. This was the wiggle room they
used in Afghanistan is that we were imminently involved in a
national emergency. But if you guys listen to our
story and the, the interview I did 2 weeks ago or week and a
half ago with George Hill and gunboat diplomacy, there is no
real, like, there's no argument that Iran represented an
imminent threat other than the fact that we'd already
introduced troops into a place where they could strike.
And so the smartest mind, you know, the smartest money is that
this is about China and the Chinese, the Chinese economic
situation, which is that they, we've eliminated the peace in
our hemisphere and we're working on, you know, cutting down their
oil capabilities. By the way, oil already spiking.
So that's kind of interesting. I think I've actually got a
story on that here. Let me pull this up here just so
you guys understand what the implications are going to be on
the home front. A lot of what Donald Trump
campaigned on was affordability. Also, no new wars, which I'll
play in a second, but NBC reporting a higher gas prices
likely coming at the pump after the oil prices jumped.
They've gone from like $65 a a gallon or sorry, $65 a barrel.
Let me see if I got the graph here.
There it is. This is from Axios.
This is a graph right here showing it was about 7860 in the
overseas trading and I watched about a 10% hike in our gas
prices and our diesel prices here over the weekend.
Many of you guys know, you know, you go out there and you look at
your prices, you know what it should be In Texas, we were
dealing with our best prices. We're below $3 a gallon for
diesel, which is what I'm filling my truck up with.
And when I went and filled up, it was 330.
So straight up 10% hike right there and essentially over the
weekend and there are places that were as high as 375.
I had to find the best deal in town because that's kind of my
neurotic thing. But at the best case scenario,
it was a 10% hike from the best case when I was buying over the
last couple months. That's a lot.
That's a lot for most people. We could easily see this go a
lot higher, especially if we start seeing disruption.
And that's what war does in the areas that are producing oil.
Wanted to go to Axios real quick too and show you guys what
Donald Trump likely saw this morning because we're told that
he reads Axios first thing in the morning.
So here's the Axios front page. And the first piece is about
Donald Trump. There's actually kind of a cool
graphic shows him with the shadow of a of a rifle round.
So here's here's Donald Trump and then a rifle round is what's
projected in the shadow on the wall behind him and it says
Trump's lethal presidency. Your multiple headlines here.
These are all like the one minute reads is the Iranian
conflict escalates. 4 service members now have been confirmed
killed. I've got the the press release
coming from CENTCOM as well. I'm kind of monitoring that.
But we've lost four Americans in some capacity.
We've also lost to several fighter jets because apparently
we had a friendly fire incident in Kuwait where our missile
systems targeted our F fifteens and knocked down 3 for them.
The pilots had to evacuate or had to eject out.
So that's terrible. Your story #3 is Iran attack on
Saudi refinery pushes up oil prices.
So they're going to go after proxies.
It's not going to just be going after American war targets.
The Iranians will strike out at everything.
GOP is worried about a Senate primary.
John Cornyn is dealing with a primary challenge and Ken
Paxton. And then you have two Democrats
that are playing out. Jasmine Crockett wants to be a
senator in Texas. And that James Talarico, I
played you earlier. So you can see that ends up
being kind of a national story. And then lastly, Iran strikes.
They have injected chaos into various Democrat primaries
because they're going to have to talk about war and their
positions on it and so on and so forth.
There's another really interesting little piece in here
that I thought was worth covering.
It's right here. I had to go find this this
morning the the 19 sorry, the the 2002 mentality.
I told you that I've been hearing Toby Keith.
You guys remember if we saw the Cash Patel story where he was
hanging out with the US guys, the hockey team in Italy and
they're playing a they're playing a Toby Keith song.
And then the country music sensation girlfriend, also a
Toby Keith song that she did same exact Toby Keith song
talking about brought to you courtesy of the red, white and
blue. That was a early G Watt kind of
mentality where Americans were really excited about going to
war. They were excited about getting
revenge on people that took down buildings in New York City.
They were, you know, kind of bought into the entirety of
let's go out there and get the evil people that did bad things
to this nation. You can't show up and do
something to us. We're going to break a boot off
in your ass kind of thing. A lot of young men my age at the
time, you know, I was 19 when the towers went down.
A lot of us looked around and were like, how do I get into
this? I had friends that quit college
and went to war. Some of you did as well.
There's an interesting little phenomenon, and this is done by
presidencypresidency.ucsb.edu. I'll put this in the the YouTube
and the Rumble comments you guys will be able to find.
This as a reference goes back to 1934 and it talks about what
sort of seats were gained or lost in the House and Senate at
the midterms and in recent memory, basically nobody has
been able to hold on to both houses if they had them when
they were elected president, with one exception.
And that one exception is right here.
The only person that actually gained ground in that in that
time frame put on the screen is George W Bush in 2002.
This was directly after. So September 11th, 2001, you got
about a year and that campaign season stepped up and in in
2002, George W Bush, Republican, managed to pick up 8 seats in
the House and two more in the Senate despite already having
control. The GOP already had the House
and the Senate at that time and that's the last time it's
happened. And every president since then.
Bush when he was a lame duck, didn't have that experience.
He lost 30 in the House and lost six.
You can see here Barack Obama in 2010.
That was a turnover of 63 and 6 in Barack Obama's second term,
13 and 9 again lost, lost ground.
Donald Trump lost ground, picked up some in the Senate, but lost
40 in the House. And then Biden, same thing, nine
and one. So nobody ends up really
benefiting in both the House and the Senate except in the
instances of a new war. And that might be the most
cynical talking point that can come up.
But if this is what that was about, it's really, it's really,
really dark stuff. And here's why people are saying
that. So Donald Trump, two weeks to
flatten the spread, two weeks to flatten the curve, all this kind
of thing. Here's JD Vance's vice
president. This is the problem.
There's unlimited amounts of clips of these guys saying
exactly the opposite. And I'm going to play some of
those. So you at least know what the
argument, people who are saying that this is a bad idea, they're
they're quoting the words of the people that are currently in
office. So here you have it.
JD Vance is giving you the argument why we're going to be
here, why we're going to be doing this and that it's only
going to take a couple weeks. This is kind of like 4 weeks to
flatten Tehran. If that turns out to be the
case, I think many of us will actually be pretty shocked.
But here's the argument. I certainly empathize with
Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign
entanglements in the Middle East.
I understand the concern. But the difference is that back
then we had dumb presidents, and now we have a president who
actually knows how to accomplish America's national security
objectives. So this is not going to be some
long drawn out thing we've got in.
We've done the job of setting their nuclear program back.
We're going to now work to permanently dismantle that
nuclear program over the coming years.
And that is what the president has set out to do.
Simple principle. Iran can't have a nuclear weapon
that has animated American policy over the past 130 days.
It's going to continue to be a driving force of our policy in
the Middle East for the next 3 1/2 years.
So that was actually argument being made when not, not
yesterday, not this weekend, but after we quote, UN quote,
obliterated the Iranian nuclear program.
Obliterated was their words. And then you have people making
discussions. Well, how do you, how do you fix
something that's been obliterated?
Well, how do you fix your legs if they've been shattered?
Well, it turns out they're not actually shattered if you're
going to fix them. Because if you shatter
somebody's leg, and some of us have seen it, if you see what a
shattered leg looks like where there's nothing there to put
back together, they have to give you artificial legs.
And it takes a while. Anyway.
The problem is, is that all the members of the cabinet have said
the opposite. And then also Donald Trump said
something which is going to be thrown back in his face.
And it was probably just a little joke.
But The funny thing about jokes are sometimes they tell a little
bit of truth, and they tell a little bit about way people
think about problems. And this is not a good joke.
This is back when Zielinski was visiting the White House.
And this is one of those moments where you watch it.
And today you can't help but cringe when you hear Donald
Trump joking about wouldn't it be nice to not have elections?
And I didn't say it, he did. So this is going to be thrown in
his face. These are his words.
This is the danger of being in a time where we have access to the
Internet. You can run the AI and ask for
clips of things that people have said, even if they were done in
a sarcastic or joking manner. When you're sitting next to this
kind of tin pot looking dictator guy, it actually kind of hits a
little bit differently for folks.
And I think this is going to be thrown back in Donald Trump's
face for a while now, unfortunately, upon peace, God
willing, we get peace. Are you open to holding an
election in your country? Yes, of course we are open.
For election, yes, we have to do safety circumstances and a
little bit we need to work in the parliament because during
the war you can't have elections.
But we can, we can do security. We need maybe how to say we need
a truth. Yes, everywhere in the
battlefield, in the sky and the sea.
Yeah. To make possible for people to,
to, to do democratic, open, legal, legal elections.
So you say during during the war, you can't have elections.
So let me just say 3 1/2 years from now.
So you mean if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more
elections. Oh, understood.
I wonder. What the I wonder what the fake
you like this idea? Speaking of news.
I got a question. Yeah.
It's not a great joke to be making, right?
Especially when here you are saying that a year ago and now
here we are sitting and I've kept it.
There's the 20 core promises in the top ten, prevent World War
three, restore peace in in Europe and in the Middle East.
Do the thing you said. It's problematic.
And I'm going to show you how many times Donald Trump
mentioned these kind of things, not just on the campaign trail,
but before, even as a guy who would prior to being a
candidate. Here's the New York Times
coverage says, Donald Trump says that the war could last weeks
could offer contradictory visions of the new regime.
In a brief interview, he said that the country's hardened
military should simply surrender their weapons to the Iranian
people. Pretty much guarantee that's not
going to happen. Also, again, we're going to
increase some of the some of the threats to the nation here.
I think Austin is probably the kickoff of what that looks like.
I do I think it's going to be widespread, probably not.
But the possibility of sort of rolling sketchy interactions,
lone wolf actors, sleeper cells, whatever may want to activate.
And then of course, the Iranian cyber capabilities are decent.
So if they plus the Chinese want to go and play havoc with a lot
of the stuff we have the the crazy thing about cyber, which
George Hill brought up on our, our our interview a couple weeks
ago, two weeks ago, was that they're deniable.
So you don't even know who would necessarily do it.
Could be China doing it. And then the footprints or
fingerprints look like Iran. And they've got plausible cover
for doing so. In any case, Donald Trump said
on Sunday, that was yesterday, that the United States military
intends to sustain its assault on Iran for four to five weeks,
if necessary, insisting that it won't be difficult for Israel
and the United States to maintain the intensity of the
battle even as he warned the possibility of more American
casualties. It was a brief phone interview
that they did. None of that is particularly
great because this is the stuff that Donald Trump said before.
Want to squander all of America's strength, blood and
treasure chasing monsters and phantoms overseas?
In addition, there must also be a complete commitment to
dismantling the entire globalist neo con establishment that is
perpetually dragging us into endless wars pretending to fight
for freedom and democracy abroad.
We should have never got into the Middle East.
Under my leadership, we will turn the page forever.
One of those foolish, stupid days of never ending wars.
We're rebuilding our military stronger than ever before
endless wars. World War 3 has never been
closer than it is right now. We need to clean House of all of
the war mongers and America last globalist in the deep state.
I am the president who delivers peace.
I was the 1st president in decades who didn't start a war.
And the worst, most incompetent, most corrupt president in
history is going to drag us into World War Three.
And this horrible, horrible president is dragging us toward
World War three. We're going to be in World War
Three soon. Because I think we would have
been good with Iran. I don't want to do anything bad
to Iran. Large sections of the Middle
East. I mean, look at the death and
destruction that's taking place. And none of this would have
happened to our president. Our opponents join with war
mongers and neocons to wage endless wars, these wars that
never end. Together we're fighting to
secure our borders and the endless foreign wars and defend
the working people of America. But the Muslim and Arab voters
in Michigan and across the country want a stop to the
endless wars that are returned to peace in the Middle East.
That's all they want. Speaking of World War three,
I'll keep you out of World War Three.
What would happen if we had a war?
We won't with me, but you will have World War Three, I believe,
without me, but we won't have. I will be sure that World War 3
will not happen. I'm the only one can say it
won't happen. But I stand here today and I'm
the only candidate who can make this promise.
I will prevent and very easily World War Three, very easily.
So there you have it. It's not just going to be
threats to people who are directly in that theater.
We already had a consulate in Pakistan.
There was an attempted overrun. Sounds like 2322 people were
shot and killed trying to take over the Marine Guard did what
they're supposed to do. So good on them.
Way to go, Marines. But also it just lets you know
that every US, you know, embassy, every U.S. consulate is
a potential attack point overseas.
So all of them have to beef up and deal with now being under
threat. And of course, the American
people, who knows who the hell we let in.
So that is not Donald Trump's fault.
But the problem is, is that you may trigger a lot of these
people. We've had this conversation.
We had Sarah Adams on here before.
We did an entire discussion about law enforcement response
to terrorism events and that most law enforcement agencies
are woefully underprepared because they just don't have the
budget. They don't have the time or the
training. They haven't ever like, war
games it out. When you bring in 152030 million
people over a border without knowing who they are, the odds
of them attacking you while they're still having an open
ingress route into the United States is very, very low.
So Donald Trump's sort of priority #1 shut down the
border. All that does is close the door
behind the people that comes in. And that's great.
That's why we needed the biggest deportation effort.
And in theory, we would need really aggressive investigations
of who these these people are that came in here.
So let's lay it at Biden's feet for the people that came in.
Let's be aware of it, but the problem is if you're going to go
out and kick off a war, which could be an inciting event for
all these people that are like, OK, that's the, you know, that's
the dead man trigger. Now we go to work.
Some of them are going to be radicalized by American freedom
and they won't do anything. There's no question in my mind
that people come here with one idea.
They experience American liberty.
They get to see pretty women that are not wearing veils.
They get to go to a mall and buy a corn dog or whatever the hell
people go do that makes them look around and go like, man,
this place is pretty good. It's way better than what I
thought it was going to be. I'm not mad at these people.
In fact, that kind of want to be one of them.
That definitely happens, which is why we deal with a far less
like number. But there are some people that
come here and they turn exactly the opposite way and they get
more and more incensed and grossed out and angered and they
see whatever they think is discriminatory and they're sort
of in their little confirmation bias.
And those people are going to be dangerous and you're not going
to be able to root them all out. Again, there are many, many
examples. If you go out there and find out
was on the radar of the Bureau, was on the radar of local law
enforcement, had mental illness, came here, came here illegally,
but then was able to somehow like Juke the system and stick
around. And now they have legally owned
weapons going doing dumb things because suddenly they're
activated because we have a problem that that was not
necessary. I do think it's a problem that's
not necessary. In fact, when Trump was in the
the original debates with Jeb Bush and others, he said the
same thing. This is a consistent Donald
Trump message. And so he's going to have this
thrown in his face over and over and over again.
I just want you to see what it is.
And then I'll show you what he said.
And it's long. Like his first address was
something like 6 or 8 minutes. The other one's about the same.
We're going to play all of it because I think it's relevant.
But first, I'm giving you kind of the setup.
And you're also going to see lefties that are going to be
taking stuff from the members of today's cabinet.
Remember, Donald Trump grabbed a bunch of Democrats, recruited
them in the Tulsi Gabbard, the RF KS, and they all spoke about
this in a big way, but so did Trump himself.
The. War in Iraq, we spent $2
trillion, thousands of lives. We don't even have it.
Iran is taking over Iraq with the second largest oil reserves
in the world. Obviously it was a mistake.
So George Bush made a mistake. We can make mistakes, but that
one was a beauty. We should have never been in
Iraq. We have destabilized the middle.
East but so you so I mean so you still think he should be in
peace. I think it's my turn and.
You do whatever you want. You call it whatever you want.
I want to tell you they lied. They said there were weapons of
mass destruction. There were none, and they knew
there were none. There were no weapons of mass.
OK. All right, also just look at the
energy. And it's not by any fault of his
own. That's just what time and and
age does to anybody. But look at the energy.
Look at the clarity of thought. Look at the the preciseness of
his speech when he's doing those debates back then.
I mean, he was fired up and he's a different man today, whether
you guys like it or not. That's pretty obvious to those
watching on the outside. If you're being honest about it.
Donald Trump is not as sharp, as aggressive, as principled as he
sounded like when he was running for office the first time
around. And that's not being mean about
it. And again, I think he was still
a 90s Democrat then. So, you know, one way or
another, like, kudos for that. But ten years is a long time and
10 years is a long time when you're in your 70s.
And for those of you who have watched people age, and I used
to work in a in a field where I saw people in memory care,
they'd go from being, you know, looking at you and telling you
about their family and the life that they lived.
And I'd watch them go in six months and they would fall off
the Cliff where they were no longer even verbal.
And they were just sitting there with, like, tears running down
their eyes because they could no longer run their eyelids.
And it's atrocious to watch when, you know, it's just the
hardest thing in the world to watch somebody age in a way
that's really fast. But just saying that was a big
change. All right, if you guys are
watching this program, you haven't hit the like over on
Rumble. Please do that.
Like us on YouTube, we had a really good performance on the
the YouTube video over the weekend.
So I appreciate you guys doing that.
Subscribe to the channel if you haven't.
If you're on Rumble and you're watching and you're like, hey,
how come your audio is screwy? How come things keep stalling?
How come I have all these problems?
And then how come you keep watching over on Rumble?
I don't know why you guys keep doing it.
I like, I appreciate that Rumble gave us an opportunity when
YouTube didn't. But when it comes to
infrastructure and the capabilities, YouTube's letting
us run a channel and we're able to say whatever we want and
nobody has stopped us. So if you guys want at least
have a backup channel, you should do so over on YouTube.
And I just realized the best feature that YouTube has of all
of them because the reason people come to our Rumble
channel is the chat chat. You guys know that I'm right
about this. You guys are the reason why we
love Rumble. And if you watch the Rumble
chat, it is full of names and faces that I recognize, some of
whom I met in real life. And some of you guys are just
out there and you're just a voice to me that calls in on a
call in program. But I, I very much appreciate
all of you doing that. The neatest thing for me about
the YouTube replay is after we're done on YouTube, it saves
the chat. And so if you want to go back
and watch the show and see what the conversation was like, I
think that's really, really neat for me.
Like watching the, the, the sub discussion that goes on on the
replay on YouTube. As I go back and look into your
comments, 'cause somebody will time stamp something.
I'll look and I'll see what were people talking about and what
hit and what their thoughts were.
It's really neat. So the chat is preserved over on
on on YouTube. If you guys are interested, if
you want to be able to have your chat log kept in one place, it's
a cool feature to be able to see that after the fact.
I think it's really neat to be able to see what was the
concurrent discussion. Now you guys don't like YouTube,
that's fine. YouTube still has a better
platform when it comes to the infrastructure.
So I'm just letting you guys know that's that's the
difficulty. Otherwise, you know, just keep
complaining about how rumble does dumb things and it does.
It's really frustrating and they lose signal and they certainly
censor us. I went and found, for whatever
it's worth, I went and found a channel that's bigger than my
channel and gets 1/4 of the views that our channel gets.
We have a significantly more aggressive channel for the size
of our channel on on Rumble. And it's all because Rumble
suppresses what we're doing. And they can act like they
don't, but I know they they don't actually ever let us
compete fairly. So if you guys are worried
about, well, like, you know, rumbles about free speech and
YouTube's a bunch of jerks, it's like everybody's a bunch of
jerks. Guys, let's be realistic.
All right, a couple more interesting videos as we get in
here. This one I think is also
probably pretty damning. Guys, how many of you are a big
fan of John Bolton and or John Bolton's mustache?
The same guy that was arrested by Donald Trump's administration
right by Kash Patel's FBI for classified documents.
You remember that, But he doesn't seem all that humbled.
He doesn't seem all that worried.
Here's CNN interviewing him. John Bolton is psyched about
this, this war, so is Lindsey Graham.
So when we talk about the war boners that are throbbing in
this administration and people that are, you know, advisers and
close to Donald Trump, look at the people that are happy and
look at the people that are frustrated.
For those of you that are like, this is what I voted for.
I voted for war in Iran. Did you though?
Did you vote for what this guy likes?
Here's John Bolton saying, I wish I could have convinced him
of this sooner. We know, man, that's the whole
point. I know you support these
strikes, but obviously there's going to be a lot of the
president's supporters and, and people in the United States who
listen to what he said on the campaign trail and certainly
what he said in his first term and say, you know, this is the
president who said he was against regime change in the
Middle East, that he was against starting new wars.
What do you make of of what would you say to them tonight?
Well, I think they made the mistake of believing that Donald
Trump had a consistent philosophy, national security
strategy and policy, which he doesn't.
My only regret is that I wasn't persuasive enough in the first
term to get to this point. In terms of the regime change
that the president is calling for.
I mean, we have no idea right now what is the status of Iran's
supreme leader. But I think a key question is
what would happen next if he is ultimately killed in this
attack? Well, I think at this point,
really, the Revolutionary Guard is the governing force in Iran.
And, and that's the that's the element of state power that
needs to be destroyed. Yeah, I think that the division
of Labor between Israel and the United States makes a lot of
sense. But I think the real unknown
question at this point is how much we and the Israelis have
coordinated with the opposition. What we need for the Iranians
themselves to be doing is looking for weak links in the
leadership, looking for the tensions and the fractures and
the divisions that can pull the regime apart at the top and
bring significant elements over to the side of the opposition.
So that terrific. Great.
And now, obviously, that was taped and that interview
happened before we found out that the Ayatollah had been
killed. So here's Fox News breaking that
story over the weekend for us at this hour.
Trey. Yes, Sandra, we just got this in
literally 2 minutes ago. But Fox News can confirm that
Iran's supreme leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, is dead.
Also just to note, Trey, the chief foreign correspondent is
broadcasting from Tel Aviv, Israel for this following
Israeli strikes against his compound and location earlier
today. A senior Israeli official
confirming this news earlier tonight.
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu describing the strikes
not only against the supreme leader but against much of the
Iranian leadership. Cool.
So lots of Fox News audience, people super excited about this.
They're cheering on their team. They really love it.
And maybe you could get the cheerleader in chief.
What's Dan Bongino think about this?
You think he's psyched? You think that he's got any sort
of consistency and thinks that it's OK that people point out
that the cabinet used to not be behind this?
No, you're just a doomer and you suck.
Well, it's incredible how the Dumors Laura hasn't even been 24
hours. It's happened at 3:00 AM.
It's not 3:00 AM Eastern Time. Can you give, can you give the
man a chance to cook a little bit?
I mean, he's, he just deposed and decapitated the entire upper
level infrastructure of the Iranian death to America regime.
Maybe give the guy 5 minutes before you're ready crapping on
everything he did. I mean, who else has been able
to do this? If it doesn't work out over
time, there'll be a bunch papers and a bunch of talking heads I'm
sure who will RIP it apart. It's been 24 hours.
Give the guy a chance. Where has he been proven wrong
in the past? I thought World War 3 was going
to break out after the Abraham of hammer cards and after he
moved the embassy and after he got Maduro.
What? None of that happened.
Give the guy a chance. He knows what he's doing.
He's surrounded himself with more than competent people.
Give it a chance. It's only it's not even been 20.
4 hours yet. Great points, Great points,
great energy. Nothing, nothing like seeing Dan
Bongino back in his most comfortable role, cheerleading
Republicans, acting like he wasn't out there in the FBI
theoretically trying to go after, I don't know, pedophiles,
right? Sort of nice to see that he
cares about something. And that's something that turns
out is the defense of Israel. So this is Operation Epic Fury
and it is amazing simply because 'cause that is dearest to Dan
Bongino's heart is being fulfilled.
That's good to know. And again, I never saw that
energy the entire time he was at the FBII never saw it when he
was doing the things that he was supposed to be doing
domestically. Apparently Dan's just really big
on foreign policy. I didn't realize that.
Here's the thing, the Cabinet didn't agree with you.
The the cabinet thought this was a bad plan right up until now.
Everybody has to reverse course. And so watching people do 100%,
you know, 180 turn that U-turn and act like they didn't say the
thing that they said just a couple of months ago, it's
problematic. Here's JD Vance in in December.
I'm sorry, this is October of 2024.
So this was just before the election.
You know, like those campaign promises, they're so pesky.
But America's interest is sometimes going to be distinct.
Like sometimes we're going to have overlapping interests and
sometimes we're going to have distinct interests.
And our interest I think very much is in not going to war with
Iran, right? It would be huge distraction of
resources. It would be massively expensive
to our country. Oh, good.
All right. So but you know, whose position
has never changed other than John Bolton's is Lindsey Graham
here is a throbbing war boner on what is this NBC News letting
you know? He also said that we should not
just be satisfied with this, but we should also probably depose
the the regime in Cuba their next and anybody else that that
also might be interesting because war is war and he just
wants to bathe in the blood of young men.
We've got 4 that are dead so far.
So Lindsey Graham is probably absolutely pulsing right now.
No Viagra needed. Here we go moving forward.
In a social media post Sunday, President Trump wrote this
quote. Hopefully the IRGC and police
will peacefully merge with the Iranian patriots and work
together as a unit to bring back the country to the greatness it
deserves. Is hope the plan for the future
of Iran? No, the future of Iran is going
to be determined by the Iranian people, the new Iran, whatever
it is for this, a cleric or or a representative democracy, our
goal is to make sure it cannot become again the largest state
sponsor of terrorism. That's a win for us.
But is, is there a, is there a plan to make sure that happens,
Senator, is there a plan? Does the president have a plan
to guarantee that that happens? No, it's not his job or my job
to do this. How many times do I have to tell
you? Our job is to make sure Iran is
no longer the largest state sponsor of terrorism, to help
the people reconstruct a new government.
No boots on the ground. We don't own.
You know this idea. You break it, you own it.
I don't buy that one dip. It's in America's interest to
make sure the Ayatollah is dead. He's dead.
All right. Roger that.
So just so we're clear, Lindsey Graham has been read in maybe
and at least has something to say about this.
We have no plan for him. I I hope that's not true.
And we have no role in trying to create power vacuums and then be
responsible for what comes out of them.
I don't know. I think ISIS is calling maybe
something to that effect. So that's kind of unsettling.
Here's kind of a more sober look.
This was on Bannon's war room talking about what it's going to
actually involve. I think that the cynical thought
is that this leads to a midterm victory.
There's a really good chance this actually involves a massive
hemorrhaging of support for people that actually did show up
and cross the aisle and did want the anti war types.
And we're excited about RFK and we're excited about Tulsi
Gabbard being there and having these people that were all
saying the same thing, including JD Vance and Donald Trump, about
not getting involved in this stuff.
Anyhow, here is, I think, maybe one of the more sobering
analysis that it's going to be a slog and that it probably is not
going to be quick and that four weeks to to level Tehran is not
going to be enough. But again, this isn't going to
be over tomorrow. I pray it will be, but I don't
think we should expect that. Will we take more casualties?
I'm mourn the loss of three American servicemen as much as
anybody, but this is essentially cost free to us at this point.
Will there be more losses? You saw Rabbi Awlaki talking
about them in Israel. Of course there will.
Should we be operating on any basis other than this is likely
to be a slog, a hard slog. But the fight is, is
incalculably important because if we do in fact render A
decisive defeat of Sharia supremacism in Iran, it will
help us with all of the other places.
If we do in fact have control, effective control of China's
lifeline, its energy import lifeline between Venezuela and
and Iran, we have a leverage on them about Taiwan and everything
else they have in mind. I I haven't had until now and
I'm glad we're doing this in the war room.
It's one of the reasons we're doing it seven days a week and
we're get all the different voices in here to make sure the
war in posse can think this through.
But I'm just going to be brutally frank if it's going to
be a hard slog. I mean, that was not pitched in
the 2024 campaign. It just wasn't.
We are going to bleed support. We just, we're going to bleed.
Here are the steps that Donald Trump has taken to create a war
with Iran. First, he tore up the Iran
nuclear agreement. I am announcing today that the
United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal.
Second, he has escalated crippling sanctions against
Iran. Sanctions kicking in at midnight
Sunday target Iran's oil exports, banking and chip, even
though UN inspectors say Iran is still complying with the nuclear
deal. United States will pursue
additional sanctions tougher than ever before.
Third, he designated Iran's military as a terrorist
organization. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
has announced that the US is designating the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard as a terror group today. the United States,
all right. And there's been all kinds of
different videos put out, statements made.
There's captured, there's there's captured evidence of
people inside Trump's own cabinet and and some of his
senior advisors. That was Tulsi Gabbard when she
was running for president, going back to 2019-2020.
All these people have evidence of being on the other side of
this. So it's going to be difficult
for them to go out there and say the, oh, well, I just meant the
opposite at this point. And so you got it.
You got a, you got an uphill battle at least convincing the
American people. And I don't think it gets any
better when you're doing little hits like this.
This is the the exiled Crown Prince.
So the former monarchy in in Iran is going out and making
basically claims like you're going to lose American lives.
Now we're up to four, and we've got many others that have been
injured. And we're going to do so.
But it's going to result in a trillion dollars in open market
capabilities if Iran is now friendly to the United States.
So in other words, pick me, let me be installed in is what he's
making the argument. And put my family back in as a
monarchy because that's where we used to be.
And then, yeah, then it'll be really good for Americans and
businesses. I'm, I'm not 100% sure that
that's a really strong hitting message for regular bacon
cheeseburger Americans who are looking at their, their price of
oil going up that are wondering like how many freaking
terrorists are running around in the US?
We don't have the mass deportations and we're going to
just try to what confuse us and and distract us with a foreign
war, which I'm pretty sure is what he said he opted of.
Economic growth and what have you, just by a change that we
hope to bring to the table that will be probably over a trillion
dollars worth of impact and revenue to the American economy
just by Iran's market being open to to America and how much we
stand to benefit from billions of dollars willing to be
invested into Iran. Great.
So it's a business opportunity that sounds really good.
I guess we're all really into that.
All right, so let's do it this, Let's just open up and give you
the opportunity here with Donald Trump said in his own words.
If you guys did not listen to these, then now is the time that
you'll hear them. And if you did listen to them
and you want to tune out, by all means, I appreciate you guys
listening up to the point. So make sure you guys are giving
us a like over on Rumble. Give us a like on YouTube.
I'm going to give the man his fair shake and it's a big long
chunk of it. But the upside of getting it in
the audio format after the fact, if you guys want to go Fast
forward and listen to 2X whatever, you certainly can make
sure you're supporting the program on Spotify.
Easiest way to do it is kyleseraphinshow.com.
You'll get chapters, you'll be able to line this stuff and send
it to a friend if you like. And you can find the new program
we're doing called the I'm Your Tackleberry, the Tackleberry
project. And I'm getting some of the the
videos cut for that as well. It took me a while to figure out
how to actually export stuff from my cameras, as dumb as that
sounds, but that's what was holding me up.
So those are working right now. All right, let's do Donald Trump
in his own words. This is the the 2:00 AM address
that was mentioned previously. And again, if you wanted to, if
you're listening in the audio after the fact or if you're
watching on Spotify video and you want to like Fast forward
this thing, this mean you can make it fast.
But this is a long form address of him telling you what happened
and why it happened. And then I've got another one.
That's the update, which I'll give you that, which he just
released as well. So here is a lot of Donald Trump
coming up in the next like 15 minutes.
A. Short time ago, the United
States military began major combat operations in Iran.
Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating
imminent threats from the Iranian regime, a vicious group
of very hard, terrible people. It's menacing activities,
directly in danger the United States, our troops, our bases
overseas, and our allies throughout the world.
For 47 years, the Iranian regime has chanted death to America and
waged. An unending campaign of
bloodshed and mass murder targeting the United states, our
troops, and the innocent people in many, many countries.
Among the regime's very first acts was to back a violent
takeover of the US Embassy in Tehran, holding dozens of
American hostages for 444 days. In 1983, Iran's proxies carried
out the Marine barracks bombing in Beirut that killed 241
American military personnel in 2000.
They knew and were probably involved with the attack on the
USS Cole. Many died.
Iranian forces killed and maimed hundreds of American
servicemembers in Iraq. The regime's proxies have
continued to launch countless attacks against American forces
stationed in the Middle East in recent years, as well as US
naval and commercial vessels in international shipping lanes.
It's been mass terror, and we're not going to put up with it any
longer. From Lebanon to Yemen and Syria
to Iraq, the regime has armed, trained and funded terrorist
militias that have soaked the earth with blood and guts.
And it was Iran's proxy Hamas that launched the monstrous
October 7th attacks on Israel, slaughtering more than 1000
innocent people, including 46 Americans, while taking twelve
of our citizens hostage. It was brutal, something like
the world has never seen before. Iran is the world's number one
state sponsor of terror and just recently killed 10s of thousands
of its own citizens on the street as they protested.
It has always been the policy of the United States, in particular
my administration, that this terrorist regime can never have
a nuclear weapon. I'll say it again.
They can never have a nuclear weapon.
That is why, in Operation Midnight Hammer last June, we
obliterated the regime's nuclear program at Fordo, Natanz and
Isfahan. After that attack, we warned
them never to resume their malicious pursuit of nuclear
weapons, and we sought repeatedly to make a deal.
We tried. They wanted to do it.
They didn't want to do it again. They wanted to do it.
They didn't want to do it. They didn't know what was
happening. They just wanted to practice
evil. But Iran refused, just as it has
for decades and decades. They've rejected every
opportunity to renounce their nuclear ambitions.
And we can't take it anymore. Instead, they attempted to
rebuild their nuclear program and to continue developing long
rage missiles that can now threaten our very good friends
and allies in Europe, our troops stationed overseas and could
soon reach the American homeland.
Just imagine how emboldened this regime would be if they ever had
and actually were armed with nuclear weapons as a means to
deliver their message. For these reasons, the United
States military is undertaking a massive and ongoing operation to
prevent this very wicked radical dictatorship from threatening
America and our core national security interests.
We are going to destroy their missiles and raise their missile
industry to the ground. It will be totally again
obliterated. We're going to annihilate their
Navy. We're going to ensure that the
region's terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region
or the world and attack our forces and no longer use their
IE, DS or roadside bombs, as they are sometimes called, to so
gravely wound and kill thousands and thousands of people,
including many Americans. And we will ensure that Iran
does not obtain a nuclear weapon.
It's a very simple message. They will never have a nuclear
weapon. This regime will soon learn that
no one should challenge the strength and might of the United
States Armed Forces. I built and rebuilt our military
in my first administration, and there is no military on earth
even close to its power, strength or sophistication.
My administration has taken every possible step to minimize
the risk to US personnel in the region.
Even so, and I do not make this statement lightly, the Iranian
regime seeks to kill. The lives of courageous American
heroes may be lost and we may have casualties.
That often happens in war, but we're doing this not for now.
We're doing this for the future, and it is a noble mission.
We pray for every service member as they selflessly risk their
lives to ensure that Americans and our children will never be
threatened by a nuclear armed Iran.
We ask God to protect all of our heroes in harm's way, and we
trust that with His help, the men and women of the armed
forces will prevail. We have the greatest in the
world, and they will prevail. To the members of the Islamic
Revolutionary Guard, the armed forces, and all of the police, I
say tonight that you must lay down your weapons and have
complete immunity or in the alternative, face certain death.
So lay down your arms. You will be treated fairly, with
total immunity, or you will face certain death.
Finally, to the great proud people of Iran, I say tonight
that the hour of your freedom is at hand.
Stay sheltered. Don't leave your home.
It's very dangerous outside. Bombs will be dropping
everywhere. When we are finished, take over
your government. It will be yours to take.
This will be probably your only chance for generations.
For many years you have asked for America's help, but you
never got it. No president was willing to do
what I am willing to do tonight. Now you have a president who is
giving you what you want. So let's see how you respond.
America is backing you with overwhelming strength and
devastating force. Now is the time to seize control
of your destiny and to unleash the prosperous and glorious
future that is close within your reach.
This is the moment for action. Do not let it pass.
May God bless the brave men and women of America's armed forces,
May God bless the United States of America, May God bless you
all. Thank you all.
Right. The reason I wanted to play that
in its entirety and why I'm going to give his update in its
entirety is because this was kicked off at 2:00 AM to what is
obviously an empty room with the president of the United States
wearing a baseball cap pulled low over his eyes, standing
there in a suit with no tie on. And he just gave you a canned
statement about why we're doing what we're doing.
And none of that sounds like the Donald Trump that we heard
during the campaign trail or some of the other things I'm
seeing people revisionist history all over the place on on
the social media places where you see these pundits and
talking heads and all of the people that previously were 100%
like he's the president of no war.
I'm the president, you know, I'm backing the president for no new
wars. That's what I'm about.
Isn't that what you love? Now they're all flipped on their
head, including guys like Sean Davis at the Federalist.
I went and found like he was saying that there until you
finish the, the domestic agenda in the United States, deported
the people that needed deported, fix the criminal problems, you
know, sort of worked on the domestic agenda of economy and
so on. And so you've solved the
problems that you've you've bitten off.
Like why in the hell do we need to go get ourselves entangled
overseas? This is not an imminent threat
to the United States and it's not.
And we covered that with George Hill the other day.
The only real strong argument is that you're making a strong
statement against China, in which case it'd be interesting
if they said it, but they're never going to do that.
So there's also even people including the new Charlie Kirk
show, which is bizarre. I was never a Charlie Kirk show
listener. I think real America's Voice and
OANN and all these sort of like sub sub Fox News wannabes,
they're, they're all pretty bad and they're all like lapping
propagandists that are just willing to say whatever.
Like, as long as you're saying what the regime wants, then
you're going to get access to people from the administration
to come in and do interviews. But the new Charlie Kirk show
said, even though Charlie Kirk didn't favor a war in Iran, if
Donald Trump went to war in Iran, he would back it.
That's a hell of a claim. And I wanted to just put that in
his own words. And I'm going to give you the
update that that Trump gave, I guess, yesterday as well.
So let's do this. This short little clip from
Charlie Kirk when he was talking about this kind of stuff, you
know, like the problem with the power vacuum that Lindsey Graham
was mentioning going to take out the Ayatollah.
Oh, really? What comes next?
What comes after regime change might be, Oh well, we need a
small number of U.S. troops that support the new regime.
We have seen this play before regime change.
You have no idea how this is going to work out.
You have no idea. And that's pretty much the way
that it's done every single time.
When I was talking to George, not last Friday, but the one
before, the question was, is there a golden shining example?
I went back and rewatched the interview because I wanted to
make sure I didn't miss something.
Is there a golden shining example of the regime change
that we are trying to model on? Yeah, We have a lot of failures.
Yeah. Whenever we try to go do this,
it doesn't usually work out very well.
There's a lot of examples that people can think of where you
depose or do a decapitation strike on a foreign government.
What is the goal of like, hey, this is what we want to achieve.
Yeah. We don't always get that.
But this is like, this is the premium sort of performance
mechanism. How do we.
How do we yardstick it? And George couldn't come up with
1 and I couldn't either. But if you have one, if the
United States has ever done a perfect textbook, this is what
we are hoping to achieve, regime change operation.
Will you please put in the comments so that I can kind of
get a look at what that looks like?
And is it in the last 100 years? Is it in the last, like, I don't
know life? Is there anybody alive that was
involved in that that could point to it or not?
So that's my question. I'm going to finish with Donald
Trump's update, which I'm going to give you.
Also, you guys are seeing on the screen live update won't rule
out ground troops at this point. That's the new thing that's been
pushed out. Confirms that there have been 4
troops killed so far. We don't know who the service
members are, but I'm sure their family members do.
And we've lost a couple of aircraft that said com confirmed
as of this morning from a quote UN quote friendly fire incident
over Kuwait. So there are casualties.
There will be more casualties. This is obviously going to
happen. Americans are going to have to
decide whether or not that's the distraction they were hoping for
in the midterms. I really hope that that's not
what this was about. This is Donald Trump's update
and then we'll we'll wrap up the program.
Again, I'm putting it out there for you guys to be able to hear
it because you may not listen to it in another format.
It's not conducive in some other ways, but it's available to you
in this podcast. And more importantly, if you're
listening after the fact, you can do it faster so you can
control the speed. And, and I hope some of you
probably will because he's he's definitely methodical and a
little bit slow in the delivery. So here's Donald Trump's update
on the situation in Iran. Over the past 36 hours, the
United States and its partners have launched Operation Epic
Fury, one of the largest, most complex, most overwhelming
military offensives the world has ever seen.
Nobody's seen anything like it. We have hit hundreds of targets
in Iran, including Revolutionary Guard facilities, Iranian air
defense systems. Just now was announced that we
knocked out nine ships plus their naval building, all in a
matter of literally minutes. Iran's formerly Supreme Leader,
Ayatollah Khamenei is dead. This wretched and vile man had
the blood of hundreds and even thousands of Americans on his
hands and was responsible for the slaughter of countless
thousands of innocent people all across many countries last
night, all over Iran, the voices of the Iranian people could be
heard cheering and celebrating in the streets when his death
was announced. The entire military command is
gone as well, and many of them want to surrender into saving
their lives. They want immunity.
They're calling by the thousands.
Combat operations continue at this time in full force, and
they will continue until all of our objectives are achieved.
We have very strong objectives. They could have done something
two weeks ago, but they just couldn't get there.
Earlier today, CENTCOM shared the news that three U.S.
military service members have been killed in action.
As one nation, we grieve for the true American patriots who have
made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation, even as we continue
the righteous mission for which they gave their lives.
We pray for the full recovery of the wounded and send our immense
love and eternal gratitude to the families of the fallen.
And sadly, there will likely be more before it ends.
That's the way it is. Likely be more, but we'll do
everything possible where that won't be the case.
But America will avenge their deaths and deliver the most
punishing blow to the terrorists who have waged war against,
basically, civilization. They have waged war against
civilization itself. Our resolve, and likewise that
of Israel, has never been stronger.
America is now again the richest, most powerful nation in
the world by far. But the only reason we enjoy the
quality of life that we do and the freedom and security is we
have done things that others are unable to do.
But it's because of warriors who are willing to lay down their
lives to do battle with our enemies, and they do battle
better than anybody. An Iranian regime armed with
long range missiles and nuclear weapons would be a dire threat
to every American. We cannot allow a nation that
raises terrorist armies to possess such weapons would allow
them to extort the world to their evil.
Will that kind of let it happen? We're not happening to us, and
we're not going to let it happen to others. the United States has
the strongest military the world has ever seen.
I rebuilt our military in my first term.
There's never been a military like we possess, and frankly,
there's nobody even close. But we are now using that
military for good. We want to have it for good
purpose. We're undertaking this massive
operation not merely to ensure security for our own time and
place, but for our children and their children, just as our
ancestors have done for us many, many years ago.
This is the duty and the burden of a free people.
These actions are right and they are necessary to ensure that
Americans will never have to face a radical, bloodthirsty
terrorist regime armed with nuclear weapons and lots of
threats. For almost 50 years, these
wicked extremists have been attacking the United States
while chanting the slogan Death to America or death to Israel or
both. They are the world's number one
state sponsor of terror. We are the world's greatest and
most powerful nation, so we can do something about what they do.
These intolerable threats will not continue any longer.
I once again urge the Revolutionary Guard, the Iranian
military police, to lay down your arms and receive full
immunity or face certain death. It will be certain.
Death won't be pretty. I call upon all Iranian patriots
who yearn for freedom to seize this moment, to be brave, Be
bold, be heroic, and take back your country.
America is with you. I made a promise to you, and I
fulfilled that promise. The rest will be up to you, but
we'll be there to help. Thank you.
God bless you to our incredible warriors, and God bless the
United States of America. Thank you all.
Right. So that's it.
That's what he has to say. He's doing it for the kids, not
his kid going to be there. Right.
You guys are pointing that out. When's Baron going to enlist?
Obviously not as is the same for a lot of these other people that
are been getting really ramped up about it.
So I guess we'll just see what happens.
I I don't have, I don't have to be punching in a whole bunch
and, and say what my my thoughts are.
I just know that there's going to be a lot of domestic backlash
on this, and I don't think they're going to get the midterm
victory that they're hoping. We are going to do midterms one
way or another. We're going to have the primary
here in the state of Texas for the GOP.
So if you guys have a primary race coming up and there's
someone that's truly atrocious that I should know about, let me
know. But let me just show you who's
someone who's truly atrocious in my little backyard that's going
to be running for office and I get a chance to vote against
tomorrow. This is Valentina Gomez.
I think Noriega is her last name.
She was born in Medellin, Colombia.
And she touts herself as a conservative, as a fighter, as
an anti Muslim, as sort of like almost all the things we talk
about when it comes to bacon cheeseburger nationalism, but
actually lives up to none of them.
This is, as far as I can tell, someone who's unemployed.
I don't know if she has an actual job, but I can't figure
out what the heck it is. She's a carpetbagger that ran
for office in Missouri and failed, and now she's running
for Texas. She wants to be the
representative for my Congressional District, even
though she's blocked me on the on the social media platforms.
So there's a lot of people out there that are going to say
things that are pretty gross, and this is one of them.
She's under 30. She's unmarried, as far as I can
tell, She has no children. She represents none of the
conservative values that anybody would expect.
And yet, just like a lot of these people, she's got a
somewhat pretty face. She's a foreign accent.
And then steps in and acts like they're going to bring you the
solution. I wanted to just show you what a
what a fake looks like in the time when we're dealing with so
many fakes and here she is. She found a way to make all of
this that's going on about her. And when I say all of this, I
mean Mr. Property of Allah, Senegalese dude, she's decided
that with no evidence, he was actually out to try to kill her
and that's why he ended up killing people that were not
her. My major issue.
Look, if you're a grown up and you've done something in the
world and you want to go ahead and show us what it is and you
want to make the argument why we should why we should elect you
to be our Rep. But this woman has actually said
if you don't elect me. Fathers, husbands, men, American
military veterans, people who have industry started businesses
and have done something other than just being a wealthy girl
who moved in here to New Jersey. By the way, I should show you
this. Hold on real quick.
If you guys are watching, this is pretty funny.
So this is her story. She basically is just sort of
she's offensive for the purpose of social media gathering and
does these sort of fake wrap myself literally if you wrap
yourself in the flag, a cheap Chinese flag at that.
Pretty pathetic. There's pictures of her going
back to to high school. Her basic, her claim to fame was
that she was a Division One athlete and she was a good
swimmer and that's it. No claim of job, work, anything
else functional. She runs around with guns and
does weird things. She's not from Texas.
She registered at APO box to vote here and may not even be
able to vote in her own election.
And anyway, there's a lot of these types of griffs that
happen. We're surrounded by them,
whether they be Anna Paulina Luna, who changed her name to
run for office and pretended to be Jewish during her campaign,
or a lady that takes a flamethrower and lights a Quran
on fire or burns, you know, LGBTQ books or whatever the heck
is going on this sort of thing. This is the unserious nature of
our country. And then in the meantime, we
have, like, really desperately serious things that are
happening when we've got, you know, war starting, even though
we were promised otherwise. Just wanted to give you guys a
little taste of who I'm not going to be voting for in my
district. And if you guys have things like
this, let me know. I wanted to play this video that
was blocked. I wasn't able to respond to it,
but I was able to download it and share it with you.
And we're going to wrap up today.
A Muslim just killed multiple Americans right here in Austin,
TX just two days before my election.
And he also wanted to kill me. I was very clear when I told you
that for me, this is just an election, but for you and your
family, this is your life. So you either vote me to
Congress on Tuesday, March 3rd, or get ready to be raped or
murdered by a Muslim that will fulfill the jihad.
The choice is yours. Don't say that nobody fought for
you. Yeah.
All right. So if you are from not this
country and you want to make a pitch to people who are actually
in this country, who actually have skiing in the game and have
actually done something like put more babies into the world to be
able to protect them themselves. We don't need some girl who's
under the age of 30 to try to come up and tell us that she
fought for us anyway. This is the status of the GOP at
this point. This is what the GOP looks like.
And This is why we have an unserious answer to a lot of
really, really serious questions for me.
That's why you won't find me registered as a Republican.
But I will be going out in that primary to try to get Doc to get
Doc Pete Chambers as the candidate Texas governor.
And I'll vote for anybody against this woman.
And in fact, if she actually wins the Texas primary, which I
think are very low odds, I would actually vote for a Democrat
over her 100% because I'd rather have a Democrat than someone
who's just like utterly dip shitted like that.
All right, folks, that's the program.
Thanks so much for joining us. I hope you guys had some fun.
Again, if you if you didn't like the Donald Trump long form, I
think it's fair and it's appropriate sometimes to tell,
you know, let the president say it his own things, especially if
we're going to be going to war with somebody overseas.
Rumble, give us the like YouTube, do the same thing.
If you guys haven't subscribed in those places, do so now.
If you're on X, join us on one of the platforms where you get a
little better experience and more importantly, you get the
chat, which is the best you guys in the chat.
We really appreciate you. If you're watching on Spotify,
we appreciate you guys doing over there.
Make sure you guys have signed up and leave a comment on
whatever you agree with or disagree with because I, I do
care. Just make a real point.
Don't just say dumb things. Sometimes people do and I have
to, I have to discount you have a great rest of your Monday.
I look forward to whatever the heck we're going to be doing
this week and I expect that it's going to be a little bit nuts.
So that's your sort of heavy-handed start for the week
and the beginning of March. God bless you guys.
See you on the other end. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Serafin Bobble Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at
Kyle Serafin.