Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower.
An American Patriot prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth
because this program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties, enthusiasts Second Amendment,
Defender and recovering FBI agent.
Kyle seraphin. Hello, my friends and welcome to
the Kyle Surf and show it is Friday.
It is June, the 9th. It is 9:30 Eastern and 8:30 in
Texas America and we are rolling live on Rumble.com.
Kyle seraphin, / live. You can find us there every
Monday, Wednesday and Friday. When we start getting down,
we've got some wacky stuff going on in this country right now.
I went to bed, I woke up with a headache because it is such a
ridiculous time and it's happening on all fronts.
We're going to be talking about the indictment Moment of Donald
Trump there's no question about that.
That is on everybody's mind a lot of Fury and rage going on
and maybe not all of the information.
So let's see what that goes on with.
We're going to talk another piece about some attacks on the
suspended ones that happened yesterday.
Many of you probably didn't hear it because it was covered by the
left-wing media. So we're going to give you those
things including the letter that was written by.
Stacey Plaskett and Jordan. What's his name?
Jerry Nadler aka the Penguin and we are also going to get into a
older case. It went in front of the Supreme
Court was kicked back down to the ninth circuit and is known
as operation. Flex by the FBI, we're going to
talk about the state secrets to fence and we're going to do so
with my buddy and our friend, the real Steve friend.
And of course Steve, I put you on here and I spent all this
time trying to get all of our our camera angles, right?
And then, of course, it just disappeared on me.
So give me a second. I want to re crop it here.
Put you where I belong. All right, folks, welcome.
Steve friend to the program as well.
Steve X for joining me, buddy. Thanks and you are clearly an
apparatus to the Deep State you buried.
The lead There Are UFOs that were discovered in Las Vegas.
Thanks a lot. Kyle serve were there.
Indeed, some UFOs. There you are.
I lost you for a second. So there were some UFOs that
were discovered in Las Vegas and they scrub the body cam footage,
but we're not going to talk about those things because God
knows what they are. God knows why they're there.
And, of course, the typical live show.
I got to put this thing back up where I can actually see where
you are. So buddy, folks, bear with me.
Just a second, we have the I'll challenge of technical failures
while doing their. Yes.
Okay, my friend. There you are buddy.
So you think the the the Vegas thing has any watered you talk
to anybody out there in Vegas? No, I tried to reach out and
then everybody's going to send me the YouTube videos of the
some kid talking about it and I don't know, it just seems like
every time there's some sort of major scandal going on that,
they just drip out the UFO. Shiny object and I don't know if
maybe that they're actually trying to leak it out because
it's legitimate and they figure that nobody's gonna pay
attention to it because it's other things going on.
Or if it's just to distract people but I couldn't couldn't
get anything beyond just like the headlines.
So yeah, they keep throwing this out there.
They drop the you know here's a bunch of Navy Pilots.
Here's a bunch of guys that are involved in something and now
we've got like there was also a like a deep State whistleblower.
Supposedly 36 year old dude coming out of the Air Force,
right? Yeah.
Yeah I saw his interview a little bit of it and he he
looked way too pleased with himself like he was.
He was enjoying it a little too much.
I just didn't get the vibe now. I don't know.
The man, maybe that's just his regular demeanor but he didn't
seem to have like firsthand it information.
Like, hey, I've seen Little Green Men.
I put my hands on the UFO. He was like, well, I've got
access to other people who have told me things, and I'm like,
now, that's not going to fly, right?
So he's talking about how he has seen things.
He's talked to people who know And then they have confirmed to
him. That's kind of not how this game
works. At least not the way that you
and I have been playing it. No no, I mean like I will have
to wait on the facts. He could do the bajeena rule,
you got to give it some time, right?
Don't don't be the first just be correct.
The bungee no rule. Okay.
So let's talk about our first of three things.
This is going to we're going to get to the Trump indictment.
Maybe maybe we'll get that up front since I think, I think the
Trump indictment was actually a pretty ridiculous.
I'm going to pull up a Web browser here real quick, folks.
Here we go. So the Trump indictment, this is
a as reported by Politico. This is the Trump indictment
cheat sheet, they need a cheat sheet and what to know about the
classified documents cases, what are the likely charges house?
Trump going to turn himself in blah, blah.
We know that he was given a summons which is what we do sort
of expect to see with this sort of a deal.
And here it says, last year the federal government recovered
more than 300 documents with classified markings from your
Lago. We knew all those things, some
of them are labeled top secret, the FBI sent in Hostage rescue
team and an armed. SWAT team to go do a perimeter,
clear of a place that is being secured by the Secret Service.
Which is amazing and they grabbed 15 boxes of documents.
The indictment comes two months after Trump was charged in New
York for the hush money thing to a porn star blah blah blah that
was the Alvin Bragg situation. But now we're dealing with a
Federal indictment which is coming out of Florida and it's
the southern district of Florida and supposedly the laws that are
being cited are things like the Espionage Act obstruction of a
official proceeding, falsifying or destroying permanent record.
AIDS and some additional statutes like false statements
and conspiracy Steve. Is there any there there I
immediately struck by the obstruction of official
proceeding charge that was thrown out that the Enron law
that's been thrown at all the January Sixers.
So, apparently walking in the capital is the same as having
classified documents in a compound.
Same law that you broken that we need to charge.
I think it has all the indications of a point.
You made you made back to me like months ago and it was very
spot on. It was the 1980s America would
infiltrate and provoke a A coup in 2023 America this point
because we're essentially a Banana Republic America from
like the Red Dawn era. When we had real Action Hero was
going on, would take over current America and do a culvert
color. Revolution would send a CIA
black team down, they would infiltrate there would be a
regime turnover. I mean, just like every Chuck
Norris movie ever. That's exactly what happened.
I think you're right. I think that's what we're
dealing with. Okay.
So, we're going to talk a little bit about what the Ah, Jack
said, first of all the the Glee that is going on right now.
When we talk about the mainstream media's, look at it.
This is a CNN. For those of you who are
watching the live chat, you can see that this is the latest on
the Federal indictment of Donald Trump in the documents probe
Steve. How many probes.
How many probes did you initiate when you work for the FBI?
You said probes and you're just talking about UFOs and aliens,
ha ha ha. How many, how many probes have
you ever opened, as is there such a thing as a probe that the
FBI does? And why does the media always
cover it that way? They love their terms, man.
It's like these stories were written months ago and they just
got dropped. They're going to see that term
probe thrown out. It'll be just like dossier what
everybody used it and quid pro quo, you will see in lockstep
media because that's not an actual law enforcement term
which means Means that they are just making things up as they go
to sort of set the stage and make a good feeder.
It's going to it's going to be a good story to tell that they can
win their Pulitzer off of, but it's not going to be certainly
fact-based. No, why would it be?
All right, I'm gonna run some questions that they have on the
CNN politics live news feed and they have these questions and
answers. Let's see if you can answer the
same way that their panel of experts came up with.
So question number one, has this ever happened before has a
sitting president ever been indicted by a Federal grand No,
absolutely not. Yeah that's their answer here
too. Wasn't he already indicted?
Yes. In State Court.
Okay, excellent. Strong.
You're two for two right now. Can he still run for president
under indictment? He can there was a socialist at
did run for president. From prison was in it.
Eugene, Debs the X and the 30s. That sounds correct.
More. Importantly, he could actually
hold office while in jail, there is actually nothing precluding
him from holding that office in the Constitution.
In which is what governs this. So you might not be able to
vote. You may not be able to view his
himself. Okay?
What if he wins before the end of the trial?
What happens, what's the implications, what are the
Democrats going to be worried? About a constitutional crisis at
that point, because he's going to Pardon himself.
It seems Seems correct. This is what it says.
They say gentle words. They don't like the words like
pardon. They said he could make it all
go away. That was the CNS.
Think on it and then let more could be in fact, dr.
You yeah. It's a little more that's kind
of like a hmm. And then yes, he could make it
all go away. And then of course, we just
mention that he could actually do this from jail.
This could all happen in that way.
I think that would be the most actual the best outcome for
America to have the president in a small cell where he would be
completely cut off from all the just noise and focus on doing
the job of the president, like being the plumber and fixing the
leak. That might be the person that we
had to have that. That's an interesting thing.
I think a lot of Americans have less faith in politics now than
they ever have. What would that look like?
He's just, he's been trapped away and that's yeah, he would
just be there and they would have to slide them, the
documents through the glass and have him sign stuff, right?
Like he wouldn't be he wouldn't have Aids in his ear.
That wouldn't be all the books exposed out because all of his
record, all is a conversation is being recorded, right?
They would be, they don't be jail calls.
Yeah. What would the Secret Service
fully transparent? How would the Secret Service had
about? Oh well, I mean now you got a
bigger problem because they can actually, it's federal prison,
right? So they can actually fire
warning shots in the prison context.
People don't know. Okay, tell people with a deadly
force, policy is so they understand that that's that's
that's one of the caveats. That's the one of the caveats
that no warning shots shall be fired outside of the prison
context. They are entitled to shoot
warning shots at the prisoners, right?
Yeah. Alright, so I've just pulled up
here. This is another piece from CNN
politics. I just wanted to show you just
the, there's actually a pretty amazing little interview that
was being done by some woman who I don't know her name.
Oh her name is katalin Collins. I guess that's a person that is
on CNN and she's barely able to contain her Glee.
You can see that like the corners of her mouth are tipped
upwards. She's so excited about talking
about this. She's talking in this case, to
Jeff. I think was his name, Jeff
trustee. He who is the the attorney
that's representing Trump, who basically just says, you know,
we got this almonds and that's what we're going to do.
We're going to show up and this is all going to go down on
Tuesday for the, the initial appearance that sounds like I
don't know, like, I don't even know how this goes have.
You had to work in the, the southern district of Florida at
all? Did you actually have enough
time there to get any cases, move forward?
Well, all my cases in Daytona were the the Middle District,
okay. But I had to help Miami and they
had a guy come in our area. So we were you working through
both districts, but I mean, I really was involved with that.
I was just kind of on the operational side and you just
got off doing something with news max.
You had a legal analyst there to anything that he shined on, I'll
tell you kind of what I learned from.
Shipley last night in a second here.
You know, they were they the one thing that struck me, that was
mentioned that it was actually out of the context of Donald
Trump but was more in with that, with the Joe Biden allege
allegations of corruption and he was talking about impeachment
proceedings and he said that the precedent was set for Donald
Trump, where they essentially tried to impeach.
A president who is no longer in office, that they would try to
impeach Joe Biden as vice president.
Because that's when it happened, what during his vice presidency?
Because basically the whole thing was, well this is old
news, this is old news, it's not didn't happen while he was
president. He's like, yeah, but we can
instill impeach him as vice-president, you set the
precedent with Donald Trump. Okay, well, that's a take on it.
One of the things that was brought up is that there's a
possibility that the Espionage Act is is involved.
We saw that just a second ago, we saw that, you know, being
discussed last night and it's being discussed today on CNN.
So I wanted to read some pieces from the Espionage Act and get
kind of your thoughts on him. There's two sections.
It's 18. USC 793 and 794 that's going to
be the Gathering transmitting or losing of Defense information.
And the second piece of it is sort of like either selling or
handing it off to a foreign power.
Those institutions Which basically mirror each other with
just like slightly different language.
Here's the part that I think is going to be the most
interesting. Look at your reflection on it.
What it says is. Whoever for the purpose of
obtaining information respecting.
The National Defense, which is what we call National Defense
information. Not necessarily classified with
intent or Reason to Believe that the information is going to be
used to injure or to the injury of the United States.
So again, that's going to be with intent or reason to believe
that the information is to be used to the injury of the United
States. Any thoughts on the intent piece
of this, by the way that goes all the way across, unless you
get to some really bizarre piece of gross negligence, which we
already found out under Hillary Clinton.
There's, there's just no reasonable prosecutor.
You beat me to the punch, man. All I could think of was a gross
negligence versus care. This carelessness and these just
these sort of loose terms and clearly the, the doj is going to
take a very hard line interpreting them depending on
the person that they want to go after here.
So this is very, they're going to assign some sort of Nefarious
intent on Donald Trump's part. So so the question that I have
to have, you know what, I look at something like this is I go,
you got a man who is the former president, who supposedly took
information, that he knew would be injury?
Is the United States either had intent?
Or he had the reason to believe that that him holding on to this
information was going to be dangerous.
It was moved by the GSA. The GSA is a government agency
that just packed up stuff. That's what they do.
You know, you've probably seen government moves but they just
grab things. And then they bring it back to
you and all of these suckers were supposed to have caused
possible injury and then he's going to run for president a
second time because he's interested in the injury or has
the intent to injure the country.
Does that, does that sit with any jury in Florida?
Yeah, no, not Florida. Certainly not even in Southern
Florida, which, like, overwhelmingly flip to
conservative and 2022 elections as you want the.
I going back to what you asked me.
Did I learn anything? I think might be relevant here
is apparently when the president's leave office, they
the government will essentially lease space for these documents
near them. So there's there's a hole
location in Arkansas for Bill Clinton.
There's a spot in Texas. As for Bush, as one in Chicago
for Obama where they can actually house their papers.
But when it came to Donald Trump, they didn't lease any
space. They basically took part of
moral law, go over and said well this is the spot we're going to
use. So they made of actually might
have actually been setting him up for this by putting the
papers there on behalf of the government and then claiming
that he had them improperly. So that's pretty weird.
I hadn't actually thought that are heard that, but I was always
kind of interested in why it was the mirror log of space.
Why did he just put it in the in his garage next to his
Rolls-Royce or his Corvette? I don't know.
But I was blown away by the spot that they showed for.
And I mean maybe it was a stock footage like a Getty image, but
it was like a strip mall in Arkansas for the Clinton won.
And I was, I mean, it looked like it could just be any sort
of storage location that they could take didn't look secure or
anything like that, but You would think, actually, if
they're going to put into a compound that secret service had
full control command and control over that that's probably
preferable to alternate location, which they would then
have to staff up and and keep oversight do.
But yeah, just back to do. They set him up for this sort of
weird obscure Espionage Act because he had documents that he
was actually able to declassify sort of charge, I don't know.
Yeah. And once again that statute does
not require to be classified per se, it just it has to be
National Defense material. So there's a whole list of what
those things can be and it's you would be shocked.
I mean it's like boat designed its its fuel Depots.
It's anything that could Aid a war effort.
So there's a lot of things that are built into that sort of that
statute as far as descriptive of what defensive information is
even stuff, that was Declassified.
And that's sort of the allegations being made is that
because they had, he may have Declassified it.
They wanted to do an end around and kind of short circuit that
that defense tactic. And so You know, they could they
could say well this is doesn't have to be classified.
It just has to be defense material.
Do you think this whole thing, regardless, about shakes out and
because of the politics of it, I guess I'm all answer my own
question. It won't generate the necessary
attention, but it should highlight the fact that there's
over classification. Classification going on and what
are the motivations behind that and how P everybody wants to say
that their job is super uber important and so they have to
have this great security clearance in order to know the
menu. The lunch menu for what served
at the White House. So we're going to have a
classification for that. And then, you know, I could put
that on my resume for when I move on to my private sector
career after government service. But what are the most motivated
and how motivations for that, and how we need to reform that
because there's just these layers of classification that
are completely unnecessary. I think you're right.
I think that's true. And moreover, I think we're
going to discuss that at the end here with operation Flex, which
is in fact, the name of this particular podcast episode
You're going to enjoy that. Some of the stuff that you may
know, some of its stuff will be new to you, but I'll still get
your Reflections on it. Let's pivot real quickly to our
friend Garrett. And this is a picture of Garrett
up here, throwing up on the screen.
It says, this is an article that we all read yesterday, we all
being the suspended balls read. This is an NBC news article
written by Ryan Nobles, who seems to be fast and loose with
the facts. And it says FBI agent who
testified for Republicans was suspended over leaked sensitive
information. The house Democrats are asking
attorney general Merrick Garland to investigate, whether Garrett
oil, boom, Republicans presented as an FBI whistleblower lied to
Congress. You think there's any chance
that our buddy Garrett lied to Congress?
No, I know he didn't. I was there and I witness his
entire testimony. And he's talked about how they
had the really loose allegation, was about his legal
representation, where they asked him, who they try to basically
make it look like Donald Trump and cash.
Patel were He's bought and paid for and paying for his legal
representation and he expressed in his deposition that he
believed. That cash is charitable
organization, was paying for his legal representation,
unbeknownst to him, but was revealed at the end of his
hearing, was that in fact, his lawyer is working pro bono.
So good on that guy for doing that.
But then also clarifying, that and then that information was
new to Garrett. He he'd answered honestly and
wasn't trying to mislead the committee.
And then still the Democrats said that he Hurt himself
because he misrepresented who was paying for his legal
representation, which was free. Yeah, so they realized that that
was pretty weak and so that Uriel today they've moved on to
a new charge which was that he was actually suspended by The
Bureau for an internal investigation which had
concluded. He leaks sensitive investigative
information to the right-wing group project.
Veritas this is according to Ryan Nobles again on nbcnews.com
this says they now accused him of lying.
I'm gonna get the specifics of it for Right here.
The lawmakers learned about the reason for a barrel of oil
suspension which was previously unreported in testimony.
That our dear friend, Jennifer more AKA drunk, Jenny the FBI
executive director, executive assistant director for human
resources, Who provided testimony in front of the
weaponization committee. Parts of her testimony are
included in a letter that were sent the letter is linked.
I'm going to show folks the letter here because we always
bring the receipts for what's going on.
It says, in the letter, Jerry Nadler and Stacey Plaskett to
Democrats of Minimal value to the American people detailed
several instances when O'Boyle in his interviews denied that he
had leaked information to the media.
So let's just be clear. The Democrats are alleging that
the FBI has come has completed a fantastic investigation that has
positively concluded that Garrett, O'Boyle did a thing
that he claims he didn't do. And curious if you think that
the FBI is is capable of such an internal investigation, I know
they're not competent to that level.
I know they're completely able to just lie and make things up.
Garrett, didn't do what they said he did and I think we have
some sworn affidavits to show that he didn't.
All he did was take the information as he is entitled to
do, and sworn to do to Congress. He didn't leak any classified
information to the media. I'm back.
He's bent over backwards and held back from talking to the
media until after he Testified. So that's a guy who sat on his
hands for nine months and churned out every single offer
from media and still, even to this day when he's on media,
he's boober careful and saying I can't talk about certain
elements of that. So he's very buttoned up with it
and Jennifer more. She needs to be a verb, we need
to come up with a verb for her because she's just a despicable
human being, who's gone? After people that were just
doing things the right way, for the right reasons, but she told
the party line and was rewarded for it.
So, interestingly enough Garrett was suspended last year in
September, which is noted in this thing.
And it also says that in February, he went in front of
the weaponization Committees attorneys.
Same thing you did gave this, this compelled deposition or is
sworn testimony which was done behind closed doors and then
leaked as part of a sort of a smear campaign their first
attempt was to say that he had perjured himself there about his
legal coverage which I think you just covered accurately and then
they have some of these other Out of quotes that they pulled
out saying. Can you tell me the contents of
the security, or the suspension notice?
And his attorney said, we're not going to be discussing anything
specifically. There's a couple pieces on here,
folks, if you want to see this, it's, it's available.
It's a doj letter or letter written to the doj rather.
But the thing that I think is very interesting, is they cut
away from Garrett, stuff to go and discuss the the Jennifer
more piece. Here's what's very interesting.
The allegation is, the allegation is that Garrett
O'Boyle Went to project veritas. This is James who keeps outfit
that he founded. No longer is with at this point
after some drama that happened this year.
But last year the project Veritas folks had access to a
number of documents that I disclose the Congress.
And I'm going to tell you guys, exactly what happened, which the
Democrats wanted to, you won't hear this pretty much anywhere
else because nobody else knows the story Garrett and I were
working on whistleblower activities.
While we were suspended, I was suspended.
He was not and, and Steve, I think, you know, this as well.
Well, and during that time, I decided to go public with my
story. I started giving some
information in the background to members of Congress in different
offices. You can imagine that members of
Congress, have lots of different contacts.
They are able to share things with the media at will
especially things that are unclassified things that I would
give, was giving them things that I was making allegations
about. And sometimes project, Veritas
is a vehicle for sort of those things.
Fox News is also a vehicle. We've seen numbers of documents.
That we've put forward pop up in the media.
The first one, which made me a public figure in a way that I
didn't care to be was what I went forward with that edu
threats. Edu officials threat tag email
and that wasn't for public consumption.
That was me sharing it with Congress saying this is the
problem. It looks like the the Attorney
General Pershing himself and sure enough, two weeks later, we
see it in the national news. I know things that you've
brought to public have also ended up in the national news.
So this is not like a this is not a new game but the and that
they're making is that Garrett went to the went to project
Veritas while he was working actively before he was
suspended. And that's absurd because I
actually introduced him to project Veritas after he was
suspended, they had asked me specifically and I had an
ongoing working relationship with them about certain things.
Once I had already been made public, it's like, well, screw
it. I might as well talk to these
guys and after that conversation a number of months later, I was
able to bring Garrett to them and to this point He hasn't
given any interviews to them other than they reached out and
asked him if he would do an interview and so far he's
declined which you have never seen gerd O'Boyle do an
interview with project. Veritas is that more or less
line up with the way that we've been seeing things here?
Yeah, with the I guess that's the accurate story, that's not
what's going to be reported though and that's where you have
the mouthpiece at NBC. Run a story to scare off
potential future whistleblowers. Because clearly, the levers of
power will turn and spin to a drum up, criminal charges
against you any way they can. If you come forward as Garrett
did, which is again, we're back to.
This is the kind of Country that the 1980s America would
infiltrate and provoke coup to overturn because it is a South
American style Banana Republic. Right, that makes sense.
So your contention is that they're doing this to chill
whistleblowers? Yeah, yeah.
I mean what they they tried a bunch of different things.
I mean they obviously the FBI itself was used all of the all
of its full arsenal to deprive Garrett and Marcus myself, you
of a paycheck and in any way they could and we'll get into
your letter that you received from them.
So the FBI itself as weaponized, all of its processes to chill.
Any sort of whistleblowing action has introduced more
training to make Whistleblowers look like their Insider threats
and now they've partnered with the Democrats and mainstream
media to make it very public. And they're not, they're not
hiding behind any sort of mask. They're just saying pretty
openly, like if you come out you will charge you with a crime and
the only response to that is going to be just refuse to
produce a painted. It, I mean, we're just the
entire process is a farce. Wherever Garrett is he can Count
Me In a side. I'm not going to, he's not going
to surrender himself, I'm not going to let him.
I mean, all 150 pounds of meat will just hold him down because
I'm not going to let him surrender to this sort of
tyranny, from our government. So, there's a page 14, they
actually bring up me. I'm pretty confident that you
are also addressed in here, but they mentioned the checks that
we had written to these guys, which we are having them hold
onto and not cash, until we figure out whether or not.
There's some tax implications since in America.
If you raise money for someone in good faith, the IRS still may
want a piece of it. Even though it wasn't your money
and it otherwise complies with legal donations, it seems like
we're going to be okay on their. We're going to you've got just
one more person we're going to check with before they catch
this. Yeah.
What they what they wrote was specifically on May 30th.
Kyle seraphin, an FBI agent who resigned after being suspended
for weapons violations. You know me, very unsafe with
weapons. That's my problems posted on
Twitter images of checks that he was providing to Mr. Boyle and
mr. Allen and the amount of 255,000,
194 dollars each the memo line checks, describes them as a gift
for quote, unquote, Holding the line.
How out of touch? Do you have to be as a
congressperson? You got to talk to Stacy
Plaskett and I don't know if Nadler was there or not how out
of touch with reality? Do you have to be to not know
what quote-unquote holding the line means just willful
ignorance. At this point the same rationale
people who went up there and said that.
Well this Twitter account is Marcus Allen on it, so we're
going to sign anything that that random Twitter account says to
you. Because you have the same name
or And Goldman, who's one of the richest members of Congress
implying that I and and Garrett were bought and paid for and
just clearly financially beholden to Trump lieutenants
when in fact we had sacrificed six-figure careers and received
5,000 dollar charitable donation at Christmas time from man.
Who neither one of us has ever actually met his charitable arm
Not even from him personally. So it's a completely just
divorced from reality, and you never met cash.
I forget that you guys have never met cash.
He did something. That was I think very nice.
I think that's just his nature, he's a, he's kind of a pretty
regular dude. When I met him and hung out with
him, the he offered me a Coors Light which I thought was kind
of a funny. Like this is, this is a regular
Haas, you know, Hotel beer, beer bar that had all kinds of you
know, Imports or whatever. Like no, he's a chorus guy.
Okay, I was actually just thinking with it with regard to
the checks once we get the final, you know, sign off on
that, which is ridiculous because people donated their
money that they've already paid taxes on to these guys and the
government's going to want a piece of it.
That's no, that's absurd. Maybe cash can hook us up with
one of those sweepstakes giant checks and we can do an event
where we hand over, like the 4x6 giant Jack.
Yeah, we need a Our check for Garrett because he's so big.
It won't it won't look as big if he's not no it'll just look like
a little button. So their citation, this is in
this is in the Congressional Record record.
These are letters that are being sent by members of Congress to
the doj and they have pictures of my Twitter feed saying that.
If you are uncomfortable, making an online donation, you can go
ahead and give the money through our physical address and just
address it to catch Patel. I literally sent a text message
over to cash. And said, would you be willing
to receive money on these guys? Laughs, honestly, like there's
enough money in the online version of it.
Just put it towards the next whistleblower and he was like,
yeah, that's fine. So there's no coordination.
There's no Financial coordination with the capital
Foundation, anything else, much to the surprise that the Society
of former agents who we got, we got a blow that one up.
Go for it. I know that's not on the adjust,
I'm just said it, just go for it.
So, you had a contact from a member of the Society of former
agents, which is essentially has it It slips surgically attached
to the anus of the director's office and the FBI.
These are guys who are never was, or has been that best who
just continued to mouth what the FBI wants to do.
And they talk about the good old days of the bureau.
They have not recognized that the organization that they once
worked for is a completely gone. At this point, it's it needs to
be dissolved in broken down. It's a weapon of the political
left, this country, but all those homeless characterizations
aside this I reached out to you and wanted a full audit of
membership or of contributions to this, and in imply that this
sort of torpor type of effort, because it was so successful was
right for corruption, or graft, or something like that.
It was written in a way it was almost like he was trying to get
an information, which I'm sure he would just personally accept
and just for his own edification, not necessarily
going to provide that to anybody who is his lips or surgically
attached to. The anus of and wanted to make
sure that his money was just, you know, not going to be
misused or her pocketed by you because you are clearly a person
of questionable honor, right? And unfortunately for him
there's a counting record of your contribution.
So even if he just was really worried about his money being
spent, his five dollar contribution to this charitable
effort. I'm sorry, doesn't entitle him
to the And that he was seeking and let me just say, if you are
so beholdin to the organization because you want to accept a
pension from them, you're going to kiss their ass.
Well into retirement, how sad are you that the pension that
they gave you that you sold your soul for only allows you to
contribute five dollars to a charity.
Yeah yeah. So the quick and dirty is a guy
gave $5 and then asked us to have a forensic audit and a
Board of Governors that would hand out the money that he
contributed all five dollars to look.
We appreciate every single donation that went to these
guys. I really do.
It's you know Americans opened their hearts in their wallets
and they took care of my friends are friends and showed you know
that they were willing to stand with these guys who have now
faced something pretty withering.
And I'm going to just push this up on the screen real quick as
well. It says, mr.
O'Boyle and mr. Allens acceptance of two hundred
fifty five thousand dollars 194 from mr.
Serafin the Raises additional concerns regarding whether they
complied with all FBI and justice department, regulations
concerning the receipt of gifts. And for these reasons, we asked
you to move expeditiously to examine whether mr.
O'Boyle has lied to Congress in violation of 18, USC 1001, when
converted and committed perjury under 18, USC, 1621 or violated
applicable, FBI regulations regarding the acceptance of GIF,
we ask that you move expeditiously to investigate
what whether mr. Allen has violated applicable
regulations regarding the acceptance.
Lots of gifts. So there you go.
We have a congress. This is what weaponization looks
like of a federal government. This is what happens when your
federal government decides to come after people in a
disgusting way I think. And in a way that is totally
unwarranted other than they are trying to serve the doj and
serve the FBI. These are, this is the self
licking ice cream cone. It continues to lick itself.
It seems like. And right now, it's benefiting
Democrats, but I'm about to show you a story where we can realize
everybody is in danger. Yes, you agree.
Yeah, I mean Goldman, why aren't you giving $5?
You should just give him $5 and then demanded the forensic audit
representative Goldman. Levi, Strauss are right worth
worth, what half a billion dollars, something like that.
So so let's talk about weaponize government for a second here.
This is something that you and I are focused on.
This is what you are doing with your work as a senior fellow at
the center for renewing America. I'm gonna bring up a document on
the on the on the screen here, many of you are familiar with
this. If you're not watching our
Rumble Channel, you can tune in, and check this out at the
timestamp. What you'll see is the domain
perspective, which I shared, which I was able to expose to
the American people showing that the FBI was willing to
investigate Catholics at their Church in Richmond.
And that it would show that people who are interested in the
Latin. Mass people who wanted a
traditional Catholic experience. Obviously we're ripe for being
recruited by white supremacists that they had the Of being white
supremacist for their standings on border security for their
standing on lgbtqia, whatever you want to call them rights
that are being pushed into the public space and their
anti-abortion stance. And the reason we know that is
because appendix D, which is right here, front and center,
the Southern Poverty Law Center, a hate group in and of itself,
defining, radical traditional. Catholics as a hate group, this
is the entire document folks. This is the original one that
you may or may not have seen on uncovered DC.com, I wrote an
article about it, the entire thing was available to all of
you. You still is up there under FBI
doubles down going after Christians.
That's what this is about. Let's talk about operation Flex.
Do you know anything about operation flexi?
If you ever heard of them because I may just be sharing it
with you. Yeah I mean I think you spoke
about this operation some podcasts to go a couple months
back I think. And that was really my first rev
that's the first time I've ever learned anything about it.
But I think that this the latest Revelation from this, this
article that we were reviewing earlier today, just shows how
we're back to our concerns about the government hiding behind the
veil of National Security and ongoing investigation.
We had to preserve sources and methods and how that itself is
just weaponized against anybody, not just those evil dastardly
Republicans in the oversight committee evil indeed.
So the this story goes a long way.
As back, this goes back to 20 2006 beginning of the war on
terror or at least the beginning part of the war on terror.
The first 25% of it or so. This is a an article that I'm
going to bring up here from the ACLU.
So by no means a right-wing source, and they are covering
FBI vs. Blue Gaza Faz AGA.
How do you, how do you think pronounce that vizago?
That's better. So FBI versus vizago who was an
eye mom in Orange County, California.
We're going to read through the quick basics of this thing here.
This was a landmark case that went up in front of Supreme
Court it was kicked back down to the ninth circuit on a 920
ruling stating that they in fact needed to go back and have it
read adjudicated. And essentially the summary of
this case which we're scrolling through right in front of you.
On the rumble Channel says that the case stemmed from an FBI
operation in 2006. And 7, it was known as operation
Flex due to the fact that the informant was using his time and
his skill at the gym, to try to recruit other Muslim.
Men to potential plots, that would involve terrorism.
It says the FBI informant in discriminately gathered names,
telephone numbers, email addresses as well as information
on the religious and political beliefs of hundreds of Muslim
Americans again in Orange County California so by no means a
right-wing Place. Although Orange County is
actually pretty right-wing for California.
This was in, this is sitting in the ninth circuit and there they
are still considering giving the government this credibility even
though I would say that Muslims in general have been a protected
group. He's FBI, handlers were
conducting electronic surveillance in at least eight
area. Mosques.
This should not Shock anybody that this was going on.
But this is far before we ever had the outrage about the
Catholic church, this is the all they came for fill in the blank
and it wasn't me. And so I said nothing, here's a
quote from the from one of the plaintiffs here.
He says, as the I'm on of the, I'm Orange County Islamic
Federation. I worked diligently to establish
trust between my community and United States Government.
After the horrifying attacks on September 11th, more than 20
years ago. Go.
I invited the FBI to come speak to members of my mosque.
They looked us all in the eyes. And a shirt is unequivocally
that they were not spying on us. We trusted them, but they lied.
And our sacred Community was shaken to the core.
This is again, the the I mom that was out of Orange County.
This is vizago, who is the named plaintiff?
There are two other plaintiffs to members of the congregation
showing that that the FBI was going in.
And one of the things that the bureau did Steve and you can
kind of speak to this as well. The the bureau gave this guy Key
fobs and other recording devices, which would be familiar
with, for making up a confidential human informant.
And he left the room and just left these on tables and
gathered, hundreds of hours of recordings.
Where does that fit in the the dialogues policy on how you can
use recording devices? I think it's a departure.
I think is a very the legalese on that.
I think it violates two-party consent or one-party consent.
Is essentially a wiretap at that point.
Point, which you would need an enhanced ability to do, you need
a judge to sign off on, right? So without a fisa which would be
the warrant that would allow this kind of wiretapping.
Then you you can't just leave something.
You said, one could party consent.
Can you explain to people the difference between one and
two-party consent? I think that's probably.
It gets bandied abound a lot. I think journalists generally
have a pretty good grasp it, but people in the world don't
necessarily need to know. It's not part of their life so
maybe expound upon that for a sec.
Yeah, it's just a, it's normally, it's a state-by-state
basis about recording conversations and if the state
happens to be a two-party consent law, that means that
both members of the of conversation you and I having a
conversation, we both have to agree that we're all okay, with
that conversation being recorded, other states is
one-party consent. So I could surreptitiously put a
recording device on myself, record my conversation with you.
And that would be Perfectly kosher.
There are exceptions obviously so in my case in the State of
Florida, it's a two-party State. However, if you were doing
something for law enforcement purposes as an officer of the
law, you can do one party. And that's how you would record
a phone call with, say a suspect and have him on the phone.
Say, yeah, you know, I did the crime and then you'd have a
taped confession of it definitely.
So this article came out in Time magazine or Time online.
Time.com yesterday. I'm going to bring it back up
here. This is a an article that is
related to this operation flex and and the reason why I think
it's so absurd is that essentially the FBI is arguing.
This is the title of the article.
This is written by Sonia Mansoor.
It says the FBI claimed secret evidence, Trump's religious
discrimination charges in domestic spying cases for me.
This is a sort of the way that the shark is jumped.
You know, everyone seeing it, we're going to know that that's
the case when we're going after a former president and claiming
that he somehow was, is being injury has to to this country
that he is now running to be in charge of again.
But in this place, this is the same case here.
I'm going to read you kind of the piece that made the most
sort of troubling allegations, which is that it's a decade into
the system. This has been going on for
almost 15 years, right now. But, they've been in court for
over a decade, they had a Supreme Court decision, kick it
back down, and it was heard back in front of the ninth circuit
again, and the argument is the FBI says, That the plaintiffs
claims alleging religious discrimination, I'm going to
quote directly here. Need to be dismissed because it
has secret evidence. That would exonerate the FBI if
they made it public, but they're not going to do that.
And since the court cannot hear evidence as to who the FBI
investigated or why, it cannot adjudicate whether the
government targeted, the plaintiffs based on their
religion, it said in their legal filings, the plaintiffs have
argued. They don't need secret evidence
to win their argument and that the case should proceed without
the information, religious discrimination claims.
They should not be dismissed, they stated.
That makes sense to me the government.
So far has not invoked the state-secrets privilege for
allegations of unlawful surveillance but essentially the
FBI is arguing. Just trust me bro.
We had reasons to be there. We're not going to tell you what
they were and we're not even going to tell you that there was
any prosecution out of it. This goes back to our long
discussion about intelligence versus criminal cases, they
could have had a predicated intelligence investigation,
which is very Broad and easy. Z and they would have never need
to bring criminal charges and yet they could be involved in
spying and then also please just trust me bro we did it for a
good reason. Yeah, yeah.
I mean there's Congress shall make no law.
Right? I mean it's the first one guy.
It's this is free religion, and you're going to say, well, we've
passed a law that allows us to infringe on your religion.
We can't tell you about it because we're doing really
important things here. So there's always the caveat.
You can have free religion, but if we want to do something that
infringes on that, then you're just going to have to sit and
take it and just take our word for it.
I was thinking about actually we it was laughable back in the
60s, when Richard Nixon was running for president and he
said, he had a secret plan to end the u.s. involvement in
Vietnam. Just have to trust me and elect
me. Yes.
And could and people at that point gave him the benefit out
and essentially handed the presidency over to him.
You can debate whether or not that was a good decision or not.
Richard Nixon and then Richard Nixon up with the most
indictments in a presidential cabinet.
In a presidential staff which was 75 until we got to Donald
Trump which has now eclipsed it by orders of magnitude 215.
So we've gone from a man who commissioned a break-in of his
political opponents and used government apparatus for
physical spying to a man who is now being targeted by that same
apparatus in a way and obviously he's far more guilty and far
more dangerous with 215 and I To all of his close Circle and
friends and advisers, so there's that.
Yeah, but but the point is that government secrecy is never led
to a good outcome and it just leads to infringement on civil
liberties religious freedom, free expression and the
government, then has this get-out-of-jail-free card that
we've seen the FBI continuously deploy or we can't reveal that
because it's an ongoing investigation.
We can't reveal that because we Have to protect our sources and
methods. I think for a time, it's those,
the sort of you give them the benefit of the doubt.
I think we've got exit, put the last exit off that Highway was
passed miles ago at this point. So I got, I got to thinking
about the first amendment when you were talking about it.
There's two real pieces that discuss the, the religious
Liberties that we have in this country.
One is that Congress shall make no law?
That establishes a particular religion and then it shall not
make any laws that infringe on the, the free.
Exercise. Their upright.
So we have two real important pieces and right now in this
case, they're saying, look, I know it's in the Constitution.
But what we're doing is so much more important because we're
defending the Constitution. I think this is sort of the
fundamental argument that we've been making that the FBI has
reached the point where it is now, in the same way that Skynet
wanted to kill off all the people in The Terminator movie.
It's like, who's the real threat to democracy?
Oh, the Democratic people. We need to get rid of those.
People. And then we can have perfect
democracy with no people by the way.
So Skynet, got rid of all the people that were a threat to
humanity, which was humanity and and it seems like the FBI is on
the same. Sort of AI logic course at this
point. And, and even to take it out of
the fictional science, the science fiction film theater.
Let's just put it to real world. I have to suspend principles of
the free market to save the free market.
By stalwart of constitutional conservatism George w--.
Bush 2008. Right.
This is the Patriot Act arguments is essentially that
the only way that we're going to save, this country is by turning
it into the autocratic and tear tyrannical, sort of government
that we were fighting against in other places because because,
because trust me, bro is what it keeps coming down to is that we
have your best and I mean part, we know about the head with a
Patriot Act, they did and they did it with tarp with Financial
sector. It's always, it's always just
trust us this time because we have to do it for your, for your
own good. It's back to the, the 10 most
terrifying words in the English language.
I'm from the government and I'm here to help.
And on top of that, and I've made some arguments recently
that this, this government-sponsored religion,
which is the religion of leftism is, it's complete with all of
its own things, including a promise of eternal life that
eternal life just turns out, to be for government entities,
things like the ATF. That should have been disbanded.
Years ago, we're actually on the chopping block and so rather
than lose the ATF, we now have a bigger ATF than ever and the
reason they got that way is because they got involved in a
botched rate in Waco and they went after a US military veteran
for having it illegal shotgun potentially by like one or two
inches on the barrel, which I don't know if anyone's ever
tried to conceal, like a 30 inch long gun under anything, it's
just not an issue. So these, you know these things
musket. It's it's yeah, it's like a
blunderbuss and There's just there's no justification for
coming after people in that way. And yet we see This Promise of
eternal life. And then we have all these other
sort of illogical, tenants of sort of cultish type religion,
which is going to be things like climate change and, you know,
the lgbtq agenda which is shutting down families.
And, you know, separating kids from their parents and letting
people know that you don't have a right to raise your own
children, the state knows better which is why we're getting
government, indoctrinations and all this kind of thing.
So we're in this like spiritual battle but we're actually in a
physical battle when the FBI is Being listening devices going
back. 15 years in churches, going after and targeting these
religious minorities which historically that was the whole
point of this country that you were allowed to practice, your
religion, and being a religious minority.
In this country was sort of sacrosanct, you didn't go and
screw with them. You didn't mess with people who
wanted the Latin Mass when everybody else wants Mass, you
know, in an English in the vernacular.
It's just a departure. And again, the idea that we are
going to suspend the Constitution so that we can
protect the Tushin. If people are not waking up to
see this and for some reason, we're seeing people on the left
that are just cheering this on and defending it, is there any
way that you can get into the heads of those people and
understand what they're saying, because they don't sound like
they're foaming at the mouth crazy.
Even though the things they're saying, are terrifying to me.
No, it's invulnerable. Ignorance.
At this point it, I remember hearing the story about the.
I think it was during the Clinton when they when Bill
Clinton was first elected. And there was some sort of
during his inauguration or some of the festivities in the
immediate aftermath of that, there was a military event where
the planes did the giant fly over and one of his, you know,
code pink style supporters was like, well, I thought, you know
what We were going to shut down the military-industrial complex
because we're going to you know it's there the the hippies right
there against the the military and the response back was well
known. Now we have those tools at our
disposal their hours and I think that the folks on the left see
the FBI is their plaything now and they've been able to
institutionalize so much now that they don't foresee a Time
the future where the tables will be turned and then they can be
those forces. Can be used against them.
I think that they now feel like they've reached the end of the
race. They run the race they won, and
we are in charge in into perpetuity.
So you think that they are not in the, the category of the
crocodiles going to eat us last. So we're just sort of staying at
the end. They think they actually won
this thing and that this will not come back, even though we're
seeing evidence. Like I said, people in the
Muslim Community are basically considered to be protected and
yet they're not, it's the same story that we talked about with
April Rogers and the infiltration of the Lem
protesters that were going on in Colorado.
This only happened two years ago.
So this is not this is not something that the FBI has given
up on even in the last two years.
Even as we've seen like a dramatic push to the left,
they're still willing to go after anybody civil liberties.
It's just takes a, you know, it's taken a back seat to their
involvement in January 6, because there's obviously money
to be made in the DT space. Yeah, I think that they view
those those people as necessary sacrifices their the pawns on
the chessboard but at the end king and queen are going to
going to win and Reigns Supreme. And they don't really care if
they have to sacrifice a few ponds for the cause.
How do people that work in the FBI right now?
Justify working for that agency. I just sent a copy of the letter
that I got from the, the office of the Inspector General.
Was it the Inspector General? No, it was the office of
professional responsibility. Yeah.
So I got an opr letter from O.j. stating that they've really
investigated themself and determined that they were not at
fault that the government has done a government investigation
and concludes that the government was in fact.
Correct. This is the same government that
is falsely. Decided that girdle Boyle was
involved with project Veritas prior to him meeting project.
Veritas with, you know, I'll just say it like this.
There's no evidence that that's the case, there cannot be
evidence of something that didn't happen and yet they have
argued. Now, both in front of Congress
and they've let drunk Jenny go out there.
Who's since retired and she's been able to make this kind of
Same with impunity. Like what's the consequences for
her? Stating a investigation that has
come up with false proceedings? It makes me wonder about Hansen
right now. To be honest, I don't know if
you have that same feeling. Yeah, I mean I'm questioning
everything at this point, I'd with a letter, you got from opr,
I thought was was great because the Lion's Share of the response
you got from them is them say doing our investigation
determined that we shouldn't really be having to investigate
this because it doesn't meet with our criteria to investigate
it. Our parenthetically at the end
if we did investigate it were right, that's exactly it.
That's exactly at the because they're not actually making an
argument whether or not there was anything there.
They just basically say, well we don't have the jurisdiction
after all this investigation that we've done.
It reminds me of a lot of the stuff that bungee no likes to
talk about how he says, you know, it's not happening but
it's really great that it is and it in the same way they're like
you know, they didn't discriminate against you, but
it's really great that they did. And also if they did
discriminate against you, they didn't because we're not at
fault because we're the government and we've Estimated
herself and hold herself blameless, seriously, scary,
seriously weird times, my friend and very unfortunate, I think
for the American people because on a Friday, I don't like going
out on a bad note, but this is like a rage note.
I feel like we're getting closer and closer to low-intensity
skirmishes and like small and violence.
As you mentioned, you're going to put 155 pounds of your frame
in front of the government. Coming for a guy.
Like are it'll boil, I would do the same thing I mentioned that
last night. That's my line.
That's a red line for me if this government decides to come after
people. People that didn't do anything
wrong. And I know for a fact that was
not the case. I will be, I will be gorilla
Warrior status, like, I just don't see, like, they've left
all of the. The ability of them to have any
claim, they've left any possibility of legitimacy.
And I think a lot of Americans are already there.
Anyway. They're all just waiting for
their own red line, but that's mine.
That sounds like that's yours too.
Yeah, I mean I think that I view that as their decision, not
ours. At that point.
We're we're just going to I mean it's the thing that I caution
about originally when I objected to the January 6 stuff, I said
guys were really lucky. You know, that we haven't
encountered a community that has the back of somebody whether or
not they did something wrong right or wrong.
We need to do it the right way and I know that Garrett will be
surrounded by Community. You will be and I will be if
they come there. I'm going to make him.
Come get me. I don't know, make him come get
Garrett because we're not going to.
Fly with unlawful out-of-control government.
There is some examples of this in Texas, where they had some
sort of state warrant, where a guy basically stood on his
property for the rest of his life and he didn't come off and
he had 400 acres and he just hung out there and he never
left. And so it was like I think it
was referred to as the longest armed standoff in the history of
America which went on 15 or 18 years before the government drop
charges, statute of limitation stuff.
I can't actually imagine them going after him in real life,
but I do think that is a line that cannot be uncrossed.
You know, he's being represented by the same attorneys that
represent cash. Represent the president and
Michael Flynn. So luckily they have that
background. Not everybody is in that same
that spot but they may have picked the wrong guy to be
tangling with. Especially because like I said,
there is a, they've just undermine The credibility of the
agency we work for, and it makes me question, everything.
Same with same as you like, I literally am looking at Robert
Hansen and prison and going. Yeah, he probably did all that
stuff and yet it came from the same agency that just made a
credible allegation to Congress that is factually lacking all
evidence. They can't have any evidence
because it didn't happen. That's really scary.
Stuff when you're on the receiving end of that, I'm sure
there's some people who have been framed in the world that
are looking around and going. Yeah, we've been telling you
that for a long time, but that wasn't our experience until
until right now until the last couple days we've been seeing it
building and building and this is sort of the culmination of
that foolishness. Oh yeah, that's my monologue.
To end it out folks. That can't think about it in any
other way. I do want to thank Steve friend
for joining me, buddy. I let people know where they can
follow you and will put your book Link in the description.
I know that is being sold as about to release.
Is it not? Yep. 13th next week is were
cleared for launch. True blue, my journey from Beat
cop to suspended, FBI whistleblower, it's on sale on
Amazon also Barnes & Noble. If you don't want to give Jeff
Bezos any money, you can follow me at at real Steve friend on
Twitter at real underscore, Steve friend on true social and
I appreciate all the support from everybody's house far.
What are you all dressed up? Where, where you at?
Right now, you're in another place.
I actually about to go to the Georgia GOP state A convention.
I'm in Columbus Georgia, I'm going to be doing address there.
I believe. President Trump is going to be
speaking tomorrow, but I don't know if his plans may be changed
after last night. Yeah, that checks out, fair
enough. All right, well, thanks so much
for joining me, buddy. I'm going to go ahead and close
this thing out. We're going to do a thank you to
our sponsors. We're going to start by thanking
Patriot coolers. Folks, if you have not visited
Patriot coolers.com, check them out.
Put it on your bookmark. You may not need one today, but
you might be in the market soon. You've got a picture right now,
on the screen of their hard coolers.
These are comparable to a Yeti. They've got 13.
Drives on the bottom. They say Patriot on them in a
nice very patriotic logo, they've got cool colors.
They've got larger sizes for better prices than you'll find
on like a Yeti or an Arctic and they're an outstanding piece of
equipment. The stuff they can make in
America, they do the stuff that they cannot that's provision by
a silly laws. By our our government are made
overseas just like everybody else's stuff and they are a
houston-based company. That does a great job, they
support veterans and they support the Kyle seraphin show.
Now for several months, they were our first sponsor and we're
truly grateful for that and then secondarily, I want to say thank
you to Catholic. Vote.org you can go to their
website at Catholic. Vote.org you can sign up for the
loop, which is there news and their email.
I get it every morning, it's full of excellent updates on
current events. They will cover all things from
the perspective of Defending faith, family and freedom.
These are things that many of us in our audience can all
appreciate and are looking for. You're looking for defending the
things that are most important to Americans faith family and
freedom check. Gout Catholic vote.org and you
can sign up for that newsletter there.
Like I said, the loop outstanding stuff, we're really
grateful for them coming in here.
Ladies and gentlemen, you have been listening to the Kyle
seraphin show We do this every Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
We have some, just a significant tumbling in of five star
reviews. I will read one again on Monday,
I am over my time limit, I think at the moment, but I want to
thank all of you for being in the live chat for joining us
for, for praying, for the suspended walls, were praying
for our nation praying for our former president.
Right now, we are at such a dangerous Crossroads.
I don't want anyone to be black pilled because there is no
reason for you to give up hope, but it is time for you.
If you have not set the Line in the Sand and set your feet, Feet
set your face like Flint. Then you better get that done
right now. You better do a quick
examination before this weekend ends and know exactly what
you're willing to tolerate from this government, which is
supposed to serve us, and obviously has left the mark a
truly dangerous time but all dangerous things will end and
all good things can come from them.
Might be Rocky in the meantime. Imagine what George Hill said
the other day. This is the the incoming storm
this, the cold front. That's going to push out some of
the stagnant growth in this. It will be She was during that
time and on the other end of it, I see sort of great times
hopefully in time for my children to be teenagers and
they don't remember any of this stuff, anyhow, we will see you
again. On Monday, I will be working on
getting an interview for us there, I have a couple of ideas
and if not, then you'll just see me and my smiling mug with more
of the ridiculous. New cycle that is going on.
Thanks so much for joining us and have a great weekend.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle seraphin show streamed live
Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays on Rumble.com.
Kyle seraphin, follow Chi Lon On Twitter and true social at Kyle
seraphin.