Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Well, hello my friends and
welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show.
Today is Tuesday, it is June the 18th, and who says you can't
rush greatness? Just getting ready today and
what do we see, man? Everything failed.
The monitors failed, the soundboard failed, the computer
was flickering, all kinds of weird stuff coming in right
under the wire. But we're still here on time
rolling live on rumble.com/kyle Serif.
And I don't think it's anything nefarious.
I don't think it was anything shady going on.
Sometimes your computer just needs to take a break for 90
seconds so I can turn it all around.
If you are not on rumble.com/kyle Serif and you
were missing out on the live chat, which is going out there.
And you know what folks? I forgot.
Well, let's say just I ran out of time to load and share this
episode. So if you'll do me a favor, if
you're watching us live right now, if you're watching this
tape delay, go out there and share this episode with the
folks that you are watching. We crammed a lot of material
into a very short amount of time.
We're going to try to get it into an hour here for you.
And I want to get started right away.
In fact, we were so tight on time this morning that I was
unable to even look at the loop, which I'm going to do right now
with you. Go to catholicvote.org.
If you want to get the loop, sign it up.
Let's see what's going on with today's loop.
Tuesday the 18th says judge blocks Biden, LGBTQ rule in six
more states. We are now expanding that that
temporary injunction on this garbage Title 9 change.
That's all good news. The Biden administration has had
to unseal an indictment against the whistleblower.
Dr. That's our friend a Tam Heim, who's up in Dallas or the
Dallas area. He is facing 4 counts and I read
this earlier, so I know this not this particular story, but he's
facing 4 counts of violations of HIPAA, which will be an
interesting thing for them to prove.
Many of you guys saw our interview with him.
We'll have him back very soon. If you guys are not following
catholicvote.org on social media, you're missing out.
And we are going to be doing another Between the Lines this
week. Make sure you are following my
friends over there and giving them, giving them the attention
they deserve. They're putting out a really
good product and they are supporting us, which is a big
deal to me. They have made it so that even
if everybody else leaves us, we will be able to continue doing
the show, which is fantastic news, I think for those of you
who listen here. All right, I'm going to dive
right into this, folks. We got a lot going on.
We got a lot of threats that are happening in this country that
are not being paid attention. Yeah, we've got a president that
doesn't have a mind that works very well.
Yes, we do have a guy that's sitting in the Oval Office that
occasionally freezes. We have a left wing media that
is running cover for him and they're trying to act like this
is not. So we're going to debunk some of
that stuff. So the things we're talking
about today are going to include things that did happen that the
media says did not happen. This is almost like a like one
of those Jeopardy boards, right? We've got the Streisand effect,
which I want to break down not only because of what it is and
what it historically is, but because Barbra Streisand
actually had a play and actually did a Streisand effect on us.
Now that's actually really, really funny.
We're going to talk about FBI crime statistics, the fake
investigation that the FBI is doing and how they are, how they
play together, which I think is a a worthy topic.
And then lastly, something that blew my blew my mind apart this
morning and is why we have the thumbnail we have today.
Apparently that I in DEI is a push for inclusion and it's not
based on whether it benefits society.
It's this bizarre narcissistic push to benefit the individual
at the expense of society. I think we all have sort of seen
that. But this example of what's going
on with blood banks and a story that I just saw on ABC, this is
not a new ruling per SE, but it is a is a bigger push to
normalize the giving of blood by gay men who have the highest
potential of being infected by HIV, AIDS.
I'm going to tell you why that actually matters and how insane
it is for a society to push these things.
So anyway, we're going to get into a DEI, hence the name of
today's episode. Why the I in DEI?
It actually is all about I, me, the individual at the cost of
society. And I think that's a really big
problem. First, we're going to get into
stories of the news, and specifically this news man.
This is written by Joseph McKinnon over at The Blaze.
Good story written yesterday, talking about the dangers that
we kind of touched on a little bit, which is this judge in
Nashville attempting to engage in what's called prior
restraint, which is stop the media from reporting on
information that they have. Now, interestingly enough, most
of the Free Press, we're not talking about this, and that's
problematic. The people on the political
right, particularly the sort of independent conservative
organizations, Blaze, Daily Wire and so on, had a good sort of
thumb on this pulse. But why was the larger media
not? And I think it only plays into
our understanding that our media is captured by trying to get
access and trying to allow the government narrative to be
pervasive because it benefits them in the long run.
They get less, you know, government oversight, they have
less regulation as long as they don't piss off the hand that
feeds them. And the hand that feeds them is
our federal government. It feeds them crime statistics.
It feeds them members of Congress to be able to come and
do interviews. It feeds that 24 hour news
cycle. And so they are largely quiet on
something that is actually pretty terrifying when it comes
to what the implications are for the 1st Amendment.
This story, as we talked about a little bit yesterday involves
the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, the MNPD and
their concern about anybody having access to the so-called
legacy tokens, those things we defined yesterday.
So I just encourage you to go back and listen to yesterday's
show if you want to know about legacy tokens.
And the FBI is weighing in heavily on the scale and trying
to be the arbiter of what is appropriate for the public to
consume. They have no right to that.
I, I, I did a tweet yesterday that just said how dare they?
And somebody was like, Oh yeah, how dare they?
No, no, seriously. How dare our federal government
try to decide what goes into your mind?
This is part of a broader pattern where the federal law
enforcement apparatus and the federal security apparatus
thinks that they have a right to legislate and to regulate what
goes into your eyeballs and what you hear with your ears.
I don't know if any of you guys ever saw the, the cartoon show
Archer, but they talk about ear balls.
I don't know why I always hear that.
Eyeballs and ear balls. And if you haven't seen Archer,
you should watch it. It's very sarcastic and fun.
They're trying to regulate what goes into the Gray matter.
And the only way they can do that is what you consume in
media, So what you hear and what you view.
We know this is the case because documents have proven that SISA,
the Cyber Security Infrastructure Security Agency,
so good they named it twice, right, with the word security.
They want to regulate cognitive infrastructure.
They said, well, if a structures in our mandate, how do we handle
what's in people's brains? We'll call it cognitive
infrastructure. That's the stuff between your
ears, folks, the Gray matter. They want to do the nanny state
so strongly that they're going to tell you what you can think
by what you are able to actually view in order to make your
decisions. And that's what this is all
about here. And the FBI is getting it on
that game as well and apparently has been weighing in on this for
a while. But specifically, they didn't
like that it might infringe on their favored people, the
LGBTQIA people. They're worried that they may
not be included in certain communities again, that I in
DEI, the FBI is trying to protect the feelings of someone
who is dead, that killed children, murdered them.
And then you are not supposed to have your own feelings that you
would otherwise have. What you're seeing in the
graphic above on the actual screen right now are the faces
of the adults and the children, three and three, who were
murdered by Audrey Hale because of this LGBTQBS agenda being
pushed down, this nonsensical theory that a female can become
a male. There are real consequences to
encouraging mental illness, and this is one of them.
There are children that will never see adulthood.
There are adults that will never be able to live the natural
course of their life because they were taken too soon.
And, and a judge coming in and trying to tell us as Americans
what we can and can't think about.
This is antithetical to American Civil Liberties.
And by the way, as we talked about yesterday, has already
been ruled upon. I'm going to touch a little bit
more about New York versus USA, the 1971 court case.
I just grabbed a couple of snippets as an overview.
I want you to understand that prior restraint, which is to say
that the government should have a say on what the media can put
out in the world. It is roundly rejected and has
been case law for over 50 years. It actually goes back into the
1930s, the original cases. But this is a big problem if we
are regressing in freedoms. Here's Daily Wires coverage of
what happened yesterday in the show cause hearing in Nashville.
Steve Baker was there to cover it.
This is, I think a pretty good article.
It was dated yesterday afternoon and it's by someone called Leaf.
Oh my God, I'm going to mess this one up.
The Mayhew. Why, why why must you have a
French name Leaf? It's like a a Viking name and A
and a French name. Anyway, the the articles
entitled veered off a very dangerous Rd.
Judge backs off from threat to punished journalist over the
Covenant School reporting, specifically that trans
manifesto. So the judge backed off.
That's the good news right up front.
I'm going to give it to you. The judge decided this was not a
good thing. Now, this is not the picture
that you're seeing on the screen.
That's not the picture that Daily Wire chose.
They chose a picture from the school, the Covenant School in
Nashville. What I'm showing you is the
judge. And why does that matter?
Well, she's very pretty, is she not?
She's got beautiful, bouncy hair, except when she has
straight hair. She's fit.
She's got an Instagram account full of glamour photos of
herself. That is a wild dress.
By the way, if you are looking on our Rumble channel, if you
missed it, go out there and look this woman up.
And like I said, she's a real looker.
But is she a good judge? Is she a good jurist, sitting on
a bench doing things that make sense?
Or was she hired because she looks this way?
She's a Democrat. She was elected as they do
there. So this is a partisan office.
And the judge was trying to figure out whether or not the
people that did a publication of information that they got from a
source, as journalists have always done.
She was trying to decide whether or not she could go after this
journalist, this newspaper reporter, this newspaper editor
and throw him in jail because she didn't like that he
circumvented what she was trying to decide, which is whether or
not they should release this information, which the answer is
always yes, they should release the information.
Why would the government have a right to hide this from you, the
people? The government has no vested
interest in this. The the person who was involved
in the shooting is dead and no longer has any rights to privacy
at all. The only people that are at play
here is potentially the victims. But the problem is, is that the
victims don't get a say in what's the public good.
Didn't we do an entire insane year in 2020, locking down
everybody for the public good, Things that were antithetical to
all of our civil liberties? This is the opposite.
Our civil liberty is that we should understand.
You know, imagine if they didn't put out the the manifesto of Ted
Kaczynski. So you didn't understand why
this guy was living in a a cabin and sending those bombs.
The crazy thing about learning from what Uncle Ted, which who I
always call him that because Ted Kaczynski is one of those wild
creatures in American history. Uncle Ted had a lot of really
good ideas specifically about technology.
I agree with the guy almost 100%.
I disagree with the way he thought to solve the problem
because he was nuts. He sent bombs to people that
doesn't make any sense. He didn't even send it to people
that would be able to stop the technology.
He was just sending bombs that he built in a cabin because he
lost his mind. But the reason behind it is
actually worth hearing. And it's like how many people
have we alienated geniuses like Ted Kaczynski?
Now do we think Audrey Hale was a genius?
No, but we have to know what was going on here.
Why did she act like this? How do we see those warning
signs that exist out there in the world now?
Luckily, the judge backed off. And Daniel Horowitz, who was the
lawyer representing this gentleman, whose name was
Michael Patrick Leahy, he's the executive who is in charge of or
the chief editor over at the Tennessee Star, which we quoted
yesterday, said, I don't know how this evolved or why, but I'm
glad the press isn't being threatened with jail time today.
That's a welcome development. I don't want reporters going to
jail for lawful reporting. He's keying in on lawful
reporting because it's already settled case law and that's why
we're here today, he said. We seem to have veered off a
very dangerous path, threatening reporters for lawful reporting,
and that is 100% the case. But the idea that this is even
being tolerated and not being attacked by the political left
because they're OK with censorship as long as it goes
along with their narrative, that is horrifying.
That is not American. We're allowed to engage in both
disinformation, misinformation and malinformation, I guess not
both. All of the above, and I want to
again, highlight what those things are, lest you, lest you
not be using those terms correctly because a lot of
people do not use them properly. Again, misinformation, things
that are wrong, but you do so on accident.
You don't believe they're wrong when you share them.
Then there's disinformation. Those are things that are
inaccurate and you know they are inaccurate, so you're spreading
the light for your purposes or maybe somebody else's purposes,
it turns out. And then the last is
malinformation. Things that are true but are
inconvenient for somebody's narrative.
In the case of what was going on, sharing the diary posts of
this Audrey Hale, those, those are things called
malinformation. I would say they would fall into
that category. So we might as well know what it
is that people are saying. It doesn't mean that people on
our side know those words or that even people on the other
side know what those words are. They use them interchangeably,
but they are not interchangeable.
So let's be very specific. Malinformation is the goal of
this program. And it turns out it's also the
goal of what that reporting was for the Tennessee Star.
They were trying to show that yes, there was an anti Christian
bias. Yes, there was this a logical
fit focus on children. And one of the things that I
found very interesting, and I can't remember, but I think it
might have been Steve Friend who kind of pointed me into this
idea, the idea that children are a problem for the trans people,
the mentally ill, because children don't have that social
filter where they think, oh, I'm supposed to agree.
I'm supposed to go along with this garbage.
Children don't do that. They just go, dad, why is that?
Why is that man wearing a dress and makeup?
He looks silly. That man is wearing a woman's
bathing suit. That woman is has a man's
haircut. That's weird.
How do kids know? Because they know, because all
adults know. There's this concept that Gavin
de Becker, he runs a very successful security operation,
was actually protecting RFK Junior for a while.
And Gavin de Becker talks about this thing called the gift of
fear. The gift of fear is actually
your intuition. It's this sort of micro
processing, billions of calculations going on every
minute that your brain is doing to be able to keep you upright
and to evaluate all the threats and how to make you get through
a door. The intuition is, is that you
don't have to calculate. How am I going to get through
that door and not hit my shoulders on the wall?
We fail as we get older, sure, but when you're, when you're
dialed in, you have all these calculations that are going on
without your knowledge. And some of those are evaluating
threat, no threat situations in public.
And when you meet strangers and even when you meet people that
you know and love, when you say something feels off about that
person, someone you know or someone you don't, your brain is
processing all kinds of tiny little things.
Little changes in their smell, pheromones, little changes in
the way that their posture is set up, the way that they are
analyzing you, the way that their eyes are looking at you.
And and you are doing these these calculations, whether or
not you can articulate what they are.
Children do that too. They just don't have the filter.
The old story was is that dogs are supposed to be able to, you
know, sense evil and bad in people.
But that's actually not accurate.
From what they can tell. Dogs have no, you know, innate
sense to know what people are or what they aren't.
But what the dog can do is pick up on what the owner is seeing
in that individual, that human being, because people are way
better at evaluating human beings than dogs are.
But the dog knows you and knows when you are out of sync with
your normal behavior. In The Gift of Fear, Gavin de
Becker talks about this, that we like to attribute some sort of
superpower to the dogs, when in fact the superpower is our own.
And just like we instinctively know when we're being lied to,
and then we have two choices. We can either go along and say,
well, I must be incorrect. I must not be inclusive.
I must not be properly civilized and socialized.
So I'm going to adjust what I know to be true and what I've
evaluated without asking myself. I've just come up with this
idea. I'm going to go ahead and
correct myself. Sometimes we're right and
sometimes we're wrong. But your intuition tends to be,
if it's properly tuned, very accurate about what's going on.
And that's when you know these mainstream media stories are
lying to us. Want to hit the facts of the
case real quick of New York Times versus USA?
This is that Seminole case regarding whether or not you can
print information you have. If you get it lawfully or
unlawfully, it turns out as long as you didn't break the law to
get it, you can publish it is what the New York Times case
says. Before we do that, how about a
little bit of plug for my friends over at Patriot Coolers.
My Patriot Cooler is downstairs right now.
That's how much of A scramble we were in getting the show going.
Patriot coolers.com is the website promo code Kyle is how
you get the discount. The discount is 10%.
You get 10% off and you can also customize your Tumblr to your
liking. Whatever it is that you want to
show out there in the world. Maybe you want to get one of
their stock images that shows an American flag.
Maybe you want something with an axe and a shield that shows like
a fire department public safety type thing.
Or maybe you want one of the suspendables upside down flags,
the last line sub stack rifle. You want to get the Betsy Ross
badge and stars, You can do all those things at
patriotcoolers.com. Hit customize, hit stock images
and Scroll down to the tab that says suspendables.
Many of you guys did that last month and many more doing it
this month as well. Patriot coolers.com.
If you're looking for a custom Tumblr, 50 bucks or more, you're
going to get free shipping. So don't, don't cheat yourself
and pay for something when you can basically get half the next
cooler or a Tumblr off. You might as well.
Yeah. And then use our promo code Kyle
at checkout. Save yourself that money.
I like that. I see this in the chat right
now. See Parker.
One, thanks for being a monthly subscriber here.
And #2 I like that this is the first time that you're hearing
that you can customize it. I'm not saying it well enough
then. So we're going to do that.
All right, let's do, let's do New York Times.
This is the case. It comes from Oyez.
If you guys are looking for a good way to get summaries of
SCOTUS cases and even some of the other appeals court.
OYEZ oyez.org is a place where you can find a lot of these
summaries. They do a decent job of it.
I think they do it accurately. All right, so this happened in
1971. That's when it was finally
argued in front of the Supreme Court Obviously predates that
time and facts of the case. This is as they described them.
So I'm just going to read it specifically from the website
says it became known as the Pentagon Papers case.
So lots of you were actually tagging me in social media
saying you remember the Pentagon Papers case.
It's more accurately known as New York Times, the USA, and it
was the Nixon administration attempting to prevent New York
Times, Washington Post from public material that they had
that was coming from the Department of Defense study
regarding US activities in Vietnam.
The president argued that prior restraint was necessary to
protect national security interests.
The court did not agree. The court said, you know, unless
there was a inevitable direct and immediate event imperiling
American safety of forces, in other words, if they were
publishing real time information of troops in contact or units
that would be able to be used by enemy forces, prior restraint
was not justified. Our First Amendment, the siding
we should generally go towards, is absolutism.
Anything can be printed at any time for any reason, regardless
of the veracity. It does get to some very
irresponsible reporting, but that's the nature of a dangerous
freedom. I will always side on behalf of
people who are. Using their First Amendment
rights even when they say things that I despise.
Many of you who served in the military know this.
Those of you who served in law enforcement as well.
The whole point of service to this country is that you were
supposed to be able to go out there and say, I vehemently
disagree with the things that you are saying, but I will
defend your right to say it up to and including my life.
That's what a soldier says. That's what an airman says.
That's what a sailor says. I don't know what you call Coast
guards. What do you call coasties?
Somebody tell me in the chat, what do you call a Coast Guard
service member? Are they coasties?
That's not what they call themselves.
All right. But the fact of the matter is,
is we should remain default position freedom no matter what.
And this is where the sort of gas lighting and why we need to
be able to have independent printing leakers,
whistleblowers, take your pick of what you want to call it.
They need to be able to be printed without fear of jailing
some sort of Mal information distributor because the
government can't be trusted withholding on to the narrative.
The government serves itself at this point.
It no longer serves people. There's plenty of evidence of
it. Good story, which we covered the
other day. I think we actually covered at
the end of last week, but coming out in red state right now.
This is Neil McCabe, who Full disclosure, I know Neil at least
from doing Twitter Spaces and he's friendly with our guy Mark
Naughton. And they have an ongoing, you
know, personal relationship, you know, buddies.
He's a good guy from what I can tell.
He's fair minded and we generally agree on most things.
Exclusive FBI whistleblower Steve friend blast DOJ's race
war Bad Bunny concert shooting charges.
So what's going on here? What's going on is the exact
same thing that we continue to talk about here.
I've referred to it as the playbook.
It's the thing that Garrett and Steve and George and I have all
agreed on. And actually even our our
producer emeritus, Phil, we talk about the playbook because it's
a real thing and it actually goes back far before our
awareness of it. Guys like Trevor Aronson, who
writes on the left. And it's pretty reasonable as
far as I can tell. We don't agree on everything,
but we agree on what the facts show.
And the facts show that the FBI creates more terrorism than it
can actually find. Why does it do that?
Because it's really bad at doing its job and it's actually way
easier to create terrorism than it is to go find real terrorism.
The plan looks as follows. And I've given this on dozens of
podcasts and I've done done it here myself on my own.
I will do it again. What you do is you find someone
who is a low information, low IQ, potentially emotionally
disturbed person. Steve Friends defines the same
thing, by the way, in this article.
You find that person who is vulnerable for whatever reason,
financially, emotionally, physically.
Sometimes you take that person and you befriend them by an FBI
source or an FBI online undercover or an FBI undercover
agent. There are three ways we do it.
What we call the CHS, the UCE, or the OCE.
Those 3 categories of people will then exploit this
vulnerable person and help them do the one thing that the FBI is
able to make a profit on. What is the profit, you say?
Well, first of all, they are going to get a terrorism stat,
they're going to get a disruption stat, they're going
to get arrest stats. They're going to get all these
sensitive techniques stats, and they're going to push those into
gold stars, gold ratings in various different categories so
that the senior executive in that field office is able to get
a 5 figure bonus. These are usually between 30 and
$50,000. From what we understand, they
are paid incentivized to generate these cases.
Now, if they could find them organically, fantastic.
They just can't because they don't exist that frequently and
the ones that do exist are under the radar to the point where the
FBI doesn't find them or it's too hard.
So they go and they find people like this guy.
This guy is the the picture you're seeing is Mark a Pareido
is what it looks like. His name is spelled or
pronounced. He's carrying a rifle.
This is one of the surveillance photos they took.
This is very exciting stuff when you get to find a subject who is
armed in a terrorism case. I've done this myself.
It is very exciting. The problem is, is this is an
invented case. This is completely invented.
They went out there and found this guy.
They pitched him a race riot scheme.
They went out there and said that, you know, we need to get
gun charges. Did they charge him with
terrorism? No, they did not charge him with
terrorism. They charged him with 922 cases,
which is what Steve Fred accurately points out in this
piece and is reported accurately by Neil McCabe.
The two of them are talking about something very specific.
We can't really actually generate a domestic terrorism
case, although we had one open. So we're able to claim certain
statistical accomplishments under that case and those are a
bonus. But the actual case itself is a
is a ho hum garden variety 922 gun case saying that someone had
a short barreled rifle in their house and they sold guns to
people that were that were probably and most likely should
be known to the subject as an unauthorized purchaser of the
weapon. But it does feel that narrative
of the race war. And This is why you have to have
whistleblowers come forward. This is why you have to have a
Free Press to be able to report this stuff and say, listen, I
know you're inclined to believe that these things are happening,
but they are not. And here are people from the
inside that are willing to give us and risk it all career
safety, potentially obstruction of justice charges.
They are going to go out there and tell you that these things
are garbage. They're made-up, they're they're
fanciful. And if you can't do that, then
we live in a much more dangerous tyranny than we currently
understand it to be. All right, I want to get into
the Streisand effect, which is very funny to me.
I'm trying to figure out how we want to breach this broach,
this, let's say, let's start with, yeah, let's start with the
Streisand effect. Here it is the Streisand effect.
You can find it on Wikipedia. You can look it up in Google and
get a sort of decision on it. It it all relates to the
photograph that you're seeing on the screen right now.
That photograph is a picture of a sprawling mansion photograph
taken in 2003 by some sort of drone or helicopter footage
talking about coastal erosion in California near Malibu.
And that picture right there shows a sprawling, beautiful
mansion with a large pool and a big roof and multiple chimneys.
And that is Barbra Streisand's personal residence in Malibu.
Now, when this picture was taken, no one knew about it.
It didn't matter. It was totally irrelevant.
And nobody knew that that photograph, that specific house
was in fact Barbra Streisand's house, even though it's probably
on maps of the stars and things like that kind of didn't matter.
But Barbra Streisand didn't want that photograph published with
this climate study showing or this coastal erosion study.
And so she took umbrage at it and she went out there and tried
to get it removed. The problem is that you have no
right to privacy. Just like a satellite can fly
over and take a picture of your home.
So the Streisand effect is when you say, hey, I see this totally
non, non issue and I'm going to call attention to it because I
don't want it. I know that I have this
knowledge that that is my home and I don't want people to see
my home. So she said, hey, take that
picture down. That shows my home.
And then everybody picked up on the story that's Barbra
Streisand's house. And it became very, very famous
to the point where they've actually coined a term.
The Streisand effects is unintentionally, It's the
unintended consequences of attempting to hide, remove or
censor information that actually makes the public more aware in
the long run. Now some censorship is very
successful. Hunter Biden laptop type stuff.
It's only when they have the pervasive means to actually go
out there, reach out and grab and squash the story at the
source where it should be reported.
But if the news media is doing their job, then everybody knows
about it and everybody on the political right actually did in
fact know about the Hunter Biden laptop.
Everybody except FBI agents and Democrat voters.
Sometimes that is a overlapping circle.
Sometimes it's not just means that they're dumb.
But if you're not paying attention, if you're not
curating your own news feed, then you're not going to know
about these things. So the Streisand effect is a
real thing. And amusingly, Barbra Streisand
actually got in on the act of the most recent evidence of the
Streisand effect, which I think is really fun.
Let's start with the story. I'm going to let CNN tell you
the story. I'm going to show you the New
York Post version of the story, and then we're actually going to
cover the Barbra Streisand part of it, which is actually very
funny. OK, so CNN, they're going to run
cover for Biden. That's what they do.
We don't expect anything less. But let's get into who they
quote as their sources and why this thing ended up going the
wrong way Tonight, Barack Obamas camp firing back after
widespread claims on the right that he needed to lead President
Biden off stage after Biden appeared to freeze up at the end
of a weekend fundraiser in LA. So Eric Schultz is a senior
Obama advisor and he has put out a statement saying, quote, this
did not happen. Now the this is in response to a
tweet by the New York Post, which is pushing the claim of
Biden freezing up. So here is the video that the
Post linked to in its article that many have seized on.
All right, now, there are still questions about what exactly
happened there, but that clip comes just days after the far
right. You selectively edited video to
claim that Biden was wandering off like some dimension.
All right, the far right is making these deceptive claims.
Those evil people. By the way, I just read an
article about how using the term far right, this comes from
Shellenberger's public. It's not part of today's show
per SE, but in Shellenberger's public sub stack, he he mentions
that the term far right is often being used now by the left wing
media in order to sort of conjure images of anti-Semitism
and fascism and so on on people who are basically just right of
center. So that actually is slur and
it's done on purpose. They are actually slanting their
coverage in this case. Now they go on to debunk the
story of Joe Biden staring off into the the confusing area.
Look, it was a photo shoot, people, while he was staying
there, the British press were making fun of it.
We actually had a clip of a Brit that was teasing about how he's
daughtering about what does he do?
He turns around, he's looking at one thing in front of him where
they're doing this rigging and they got parachuters.
And this is a photo shoot with it's like all the people that
are that are national leaders got the Italian Prime Minister.
I think Mccrone was there as well.
And they're watching these parachutists.
And then he just sort of just gets distracted by, like, a
shiny object, and he turns around and faces away from the
camera, and he looks ridiculous. That's not deceptively editing.
That's a man who's just, like, on his own program.
He's off in the sauce, as we would say.
So we've got all kinds of evidence of this guy freezing.
This is not the only one of it. And I actually have a really fun
kind of mash up the the pushback that came from paid activist
like Harry Sisson and this woman who comes from some like quote
UN quote independent media thing.
They're all showing the same video all over social media that
claims that he wasn't that he wasn't freezing on stage like
you just saw. And I'll actually have a side by
side of the freezing video and the video that they are using to
quote UN quote debunk it. It's very good.
But before we do that, let's just look once again, I know
this. This is really hard to see
because there's a weird guy, a man in a gold dress, but he
freezes all the time. This is not news.
These are not deceptively edited.
The push back on it is obviously ridiculous, but it is doing kind
of a Streisand effect. I think it's highlighting how
many of these instances there are, and I found a couple of
them without very much work at all.
I won't subject you to much more of that.
That goes on for like 30 seconds, people.
There's 30 seconds of this nonsense.
So the White House gets asked this question.
Listen to the way that the question is phrased in the White
House Correspondents room where they are doing the press
secretary briefings. And they are doing it in order
to set her up to do cover because the media is not
interested in actually holding people accountable and it's not
interested in asking hard questions.
Their job is covering in the same way the judge's job is
apparently covering in the same way the FB is job and Cease's
job is covering for an administration that continues to
fail. I appreciate that you guys know
that I have your best interests in heart and I will not show you
super long cuts of Biden and a dancing black man in a dress.
I won't do that to you. But this is the KJP basically
Sideshow Bob making her argument that these are all fakes.
Don't believe you're lying eyes, folks.
Believe. Believe what they tell you.
That's the job. Here's the press covering there.
There seems to be a a sort of rash of videos that have been
exited to make the president appear especially frail or
mentally confused. I'm wondering if the the White
House is especially worried about the fact that this this
appears to be a a pattern that we're seeing more fun.
Yeah, we, and I think you all have called this the cheap fakes
video. And that's exactly what they
are. They are cheap fakes video.
They are done in bad faith and and some of your news
organization have have been very clear, have stressed that these
right wing, the white wing critics of the president have a
credibility problem because of the fact checkers have
repeatedly caught them pushing misinformation, disinformation.
And so we see this and this is something coming from from your
your part of the world calling them cheap fakes and
misinformation. That's really interesting
sourcing. I've never heard anyone call
them cheap fakes. I don't see anything.
I read leftist news sources basically for a living at this
point. I look through all of the left
wing media and I have never seen the term cheap fake.
I'm going to go do a search on it after this show and we'll see
if we can find some example of it.
I think she made that up and then she did like an argument to
authority saying that well those are your words and I'm using
your words that I just made-up. I think it's what's happening
there. Pretty wild.
But as promised, I told you I would show you how the Streisand
effect works in real time with none other than Babb Streisand.
So that pushback that you heard on CNN was Eric Schultz.
He's an Obama propagandist. He's 34,000 followers, not very
big on Twitter, you know, bigger than many, but not that big in
the in the sphere of things, not compared to a Barbra Streisand
who has real reach and clout. Now, a lot of people did the
same thing that I did, which was recognize Chris Ruffo being one
of the best. They recognize the Streisand
effect by Barbra Streisand in real time because what Barbra
Streisand says, not that this didn't happen, she wrote the New
York Post is printing lies about President Biden.
No other media outlets should amplify its disinformation.
That makes us all as contrarians and Americans who don't like to
be told what to do want to amplify it.
When I saw this post yesterday, it had 173,000 views.
It's now up to 2.3 million views.
Barbra Streisand actually executing yet another Streisand
effect. Very, very funny.
And another little piece coming out from RedState.
Kind of highlights on some of the things.
Don't forget your lying eyes, Right?
Like, don't believe what you think or what you see.
You're supposed to actually take the narrative.
And then you notice how she conflates miss and
disinformation 'cause she probably doesn't have a real
good grasp on what those things are.
God forbid you just listen to the man in his own words.
This is one of those cheap fakes, I guess.
This is a cheap fake video of the man saying the thing that
the man would say. Because he's a confused old guy
sitting up on a stage with Barack Obama who looks horrified
as usual. He's very, very concerned that
somehow his legacy is going to be tainted by this babbling old
fool. And that's what this fool says.
End of the day, we got a three-year difference between
Biden and Trump when it comes to two guys who I think are too old
to be in office. But the activity level and the
cerebral capabilities is not even in comparison.
And even though who's been around people that are in their
90s that are sharp and they are witty and they are clever, maybe
their body is starting to go the way of the age, but their mind
is sharp as a tack. We always describe those things,
right? They're still not as sharp as
they were when they're 40 or 50. Let's be totally realistic.
They slow things down. But with age can come wisdom,
and that's always good. And if you're still sharp at
that age, it's very obvious when you are sit side by side with
your peers, where your skin and your hair and all the body parts
sort of look like you should be in the same category.
But the mind is infinitely sharper.
You can see it in the eyes. It is that like gift of fear
moment, that intuition where you can literally look into people
and go, there's nobody there behind those eyes.
And Biden does this all the time where he just just tards out, I
don't know anything else to call it.
He just has this reboot. And you guys called it the robot
Biden failure when the program stops running.
And here's one of those moment where he's just babbling to try
to get words out, he's going to say numbers.
The bane of Biden's existence is actually saying statistical
numbers. He's 100 trillion billion
millions trillion strongly soon. So this is him saying 50
million, but apparently he means 15,000,000.
But that number is also false. But it's going to give you don't
believe your lying eyes. But here's what Biden did on
stage at that fundraiser. And guess what?
It's growing. The economy's growing.
People are doing better. We have the highest
unemployment, the highest, the lowest unemployment rate in 50
years. We have more people.
We've had over 15,000,000 people brand new, higher than the
workforce. You know, my, my, my son says
they all have a you know, we all have various short term
descriptions for your jobs, for what, what, what you
accomplished. You should say Joe Jobs.
Joe jobs, Joe jobs. I don't think that's what he was
talking about with the Joe jobs. I think he was talking about
something else and the wires got crossed.
The confusion is there the entire time.
If you guys watch, I only, I don't even watch Joe anymore.
I just watch Barack Obama because that's actually really
fun. And Brock is going like, oh,
shit, you could just see that look on his face, like, is he
going to be able to pull out of his tailspin?
Or am I going to have to tap on the shoulder and take him off?
Are we going to have to do a diaper change?
And you can tell that it's there.
It's dark and it's obvious. And he looks very, very confused
about it. But I don't know what a Joe job
is, but apparently a Joe job is something that Hunter Biden has
come up with. A Joe job might be a job that
you get when you have no qualifications for it and they
just pay you a ton of money because your last name is not
Joe, but it's Biden. Maybe that's a Joe job.
In any case, how about this? He's talking about how awesome
the economy is. In contrast, we immediately have
this fun story over on CNN's Travel, by the way.
They always like, they're always contradicting themselves on
their own page. It's my favorite amazing
economy. Biden is doing a great job.
Everybody's getting all these things. 15,000,000 new workers.
We covered this the other week. I think last week alone we went
out there and covered that. A lot of those jobs, it's like a
four to one ratio are being gained by people who don't have
a legal right to be in this country.
Oops. And the one part of it, so
1,000,000 versus like three and a half million, that 1,000,000
or sub 1,000,000 number are American workers who are
basically regaining their COVID positions, their pre COVID
positions. Total total disingenuous push.
But you want to know if things are good?
How about this one, that European vacation that you've
been fantasizing about? I just thought this article was
too funny not to include, so I'm going to share it.
A weaker dollar. Wait a minute.
I heard we're we're doing great. Skyrocketing prices.
What I thought the economy was doing really good and a record
quote UN quote, record visitor numbers.
Are those the illegals there too?
Good luck in Europe this summer. There's an entire story about
how travelers are running around in Europe making a mess and
things are looking chaotic because things are getting too
expensive. Hotel rooms are like gold dust.
The dollar has slipped against the pound and the euro.
But. But.
But what about our really strong economy?
Didn't. What about the Joe jobs, y'all?
Yeah. How many of you are actually
contemplating going on a European vacation at this point?
How many people are are able to afford such a thing?
It's so funny to me. But anyway, this is the best
when the media actually checks itself in its own publication
because some things are worth covering on.
And apparently the travel people didn't understand that there are
implications in their travel section about the politics
section, which is lying to people so they can't help it but
push the stuff out. It's very fun for me to watch
because you can see it in real time as you scroll through a lot
of this stuff. And that's what I do.
I just go looking for inconsistencies on a daily basis
so that you're armed with them when you walk out there.
So that cognitive dissonance that they should have is
something that you can point out when you want.
Do it in a polite way, but by the way, just do it in a, a
totally questionable Socratic method.
You're just going to ask questions.
If you want to debunk people's lies, it's way easier for them
to do it to themselves. And you do that by asking
questions about, hey, can you afford a European vacation this
year? What do you heard?
Oh, oh, have you looked into flights?
Man, it's really expensive to travel.
How does that jive with that high yield economy that's doing
such a great job and putting everybody back to work?
If everybody's back to work, why are the prices so high?
Why is the dollar so weak against other currencies?
Why are fuel costs up and so on? Why are you having a problem
affording basic things? My buddy Alpha, who who does the
Alpha Warrior show, told me that he pays almost $1000 a month for
his electric bill. In California, that may be
common for you guys out there. My electric bills are in the
$250 range and that's really high for me in Texas.
And I live in a 2500 square foot little rental house here.
You know, it's not a huge house, but it's not as tiny.
It's no apartment. If you're paying more than that
for an apartment in California, you're the one getting screwed.
So we just ask these questions with basic facts like, hey,
doesn't it seem like a lot of money, $1000 a month for your
electric bill? Is the economy really doing that
well? Is your system really
functioning that well when you're paying 4-5 X what regular
people used to pay a long, long time ago?
For whatever it's worth, many of you know the answers to these.
The question is, is can you phrase them in a way that
doesn't get immediately hit with the, oh, that's a cheap fake.
You want to slide under the radar of that by asking
questions in an honest way, which is to say, I care about
your well-being and it seems like you're being lied to.
I don't like being lied to. Maybe you don't either.
Here's some information for you. All right, let's do the merch
store. By the way, I haven't talked
about the merch store in quite a while.
I'm wearing the suspendables PT shirt.
If you guys do not have one of these, it's stenciled on the
back. It says suspendables.
You'll get looks wherever you go, especially in the OD green
and the Gray, which looks very much like the military PT or the
law enforcement PT shirts I used to wear.
If you're retired, if you're former, or if you're just
looking for a good looking shirt to wear to the gym, you can
check those out at the Dash suspendables.com.
We can put my buddy Garrett back to work so he's not on Twitter
getting angry at people like Julie Kelly.
Just let's keep him in the sweatshop.
The Dash suspendables.com Use the promo code Kyle and you'll
save yourself 10%. It's just something we do out of
the goodness of our heart to keep our man working and making
money for his wife who owns the company, I think is the way it's
structured. In any case, it supports the
o'boyle family and FBI whistleblower who is now coming
on 22 months without paycheck from his agency as he fights for
that same vindication. Marcus Allen did the
dashsuspendables.com. By the way, links to all of the
things we talked about in the program are always in the show
notes. If you're like, hey, what the
hell was it? And like, where's the promo
code? It's in the show notes.
Just check that out. Very, very easy.
Let's keep pushing on because some of these things are really
wild. And this is another great, great
example of lies that happen right when they happen.
So I had to go actually into the NRA's website, which I don't
really like the NRA very much. And I think of them as a sketchy
news source at best. But this information seems
pretty accurate. The state of crime, is there a
steep decline or yet another Biden esque wild story that's
coming from May of this year? So not immediately this last
couple weeks, but within about the last five or six weeks,
we've seen the story. And this is a push that's been
going on. Why?
Because the FBI released crime stats.
They're down across the board. You've got people that are
crowing this is great success. Joe Biden, look at him, he's
fighting crime. What's the real story here?
And this was brought up to my attention again by my father,
who sent me a thing from ABC. It doesn't matter what news
organization you go to, ABCCBSCNN.
All of them are Hawking two things that are in stark
contrast. Here's another mass shooting.
Guns are really bad, MK. They're always Juneteenth.
Right now. They're the summer shootings of
summer gatherings between groups of people that don't agree, that
might or may not be gangs, that may or may not be all black
people that are fighting each other for some damn reason.
I don't know why that's the case, but it turns out to be all
the time. But in the meantime, they're
trying to talk about how everything is better.
It's actually better. We got to tell you the lie.
Let's give it to you. Let's go.
Kareem, Jean Pierre on this. So here's the couple little
quotes that are coming directly out of this article.
Again, it's coming from the NRA. So grain of salt here.
But these these are pretty, pretty specific.
It's a quote from Joe Biden saying Americans deserve freedom
to be safe and America's safer today than when I took office.
That's one claim. Last year, the murder rate we
saw was the sharpest decrease in history, and violent crime fell
to the lowest levels in more than 50 years.
Then of course, they go highlight the thing.
That's the problem. The problem is that 37 percent,
37%, more than 1/3 of police departments stop reporting crime
data to the FBI, which is where we get these numbers, including
departments like the Chicago Police Department, the Los
Angeles Police Department and the NYPD in New York.
Also, other jurisdictions are under reporting because they
don't give full information or they don't give full breakdowns.
And that includes places like Nashville where that judge was,
and Baltimore. What does that all mean, folks?
Here it is. And right when they're, by the
way, this is a picture of like evidence tents and a bunch of
brass casings all over the ground, which is pretty funny.
FBI stats show historic decline in violent crime rates with
murder being the sharpest drop. Now they quote the Philadelphia
police chief who says he's excited about what he's seeing
in these numbers, but he's also very cautious because we don't
want to overstate and overestimate the direction that
we're going. It's a very funny story for
those of us who are paying attention specifically because
Merrick Garland made similar statements.
Press release coming directly from DOJ, which I'm going to
read from you right here. Merrick Garland states the FB is
quarterly uniform crime report. That's the thing they do.
The UCR, it says this data makes it clear that last year's
historic decline in violent crime is continuing.
In the first three months of this year, violent crime
decreased by 15% overall and murder decreased by over 26%.
This historic decrease and decline in homicides does not
represent abstract statistics. These are people's whose people
whose lives were saved. All right, Are we ready?
Because we're going to debunk it.
Right now, 37% of these departments are not reporting.
This has been an increasing trend.
The question is why. Why is this now propaganda and
where does it come from? And if you can understand why,
then you can understand exactly what is happening.
The why is almost always what you're doing in an
investigation. What is happening is sometimes
very easy, but the why is what we're going to hone in on here.
Imagine for a moment and you'll know this is true, that you're
the mayor of, let's say, a big city like Los Angeles or New
York or Chicago or Philadelphia, and you go out and make claims
in your campaign speech. And your campaign speech is
crime is down, murder is down, violent robberies and assaults
are down. Rapes are down.
I'm doing an awesome job because my job as mayor is to make a
safer and more profitable, prosperous city.
Business is up. Spending is up, profits are up,
tax revenues are up, crime is down.
You make that claim factually, you're doing a decent job and
you can get people from either side of the aisle to be like,
you know what, things are pretty good.
I'm into it, I'm for it. Now, here's the problem.
When you make those claims and you're not being honest,
somebody's going to Fact Check you because the Universal
Uniform Crime Reports coming from the FBI were reported by
your Police Department. And that information was sent
off to a federal government agency, which compiled it all
into a big thing, broke it down by city, broke it down by state.
And then as you're making these false claims about how great
things are, somebody is able to quote a federal government
agency like the FBI, which used at least have credibility in a
lot of people's eyes. And they go, hey, Mr. Mayor,
sorry, the FB is report from data coming out of your
department shows that you're full of it.
You're lying to us. You've been fact checked in real
time. Now you're a lying politician
saying things that are not true. And there's at least at the very
minimum conflicting evidence showing that you are not
reporting things accurately compared to what is being
reported to this federal government agency.
Now, why would your Police Department want to report
accurate things? Because they want money the same
way the FBI is looking to increase terrorism stats.
They want money to be able to do all the projects they have, all
people in the government. They're very interested in one
thing. They're interested in growing
their department. Growth equals success.
Cutting down on the number of things you have and say, hey, we
did such a good job, we don't even need all your money
anymore. That's not how government works.
So your police departments are reverse incentivized.
They should be trying to get it down.
That's what the that's what the leadership wants.
That's what your police chief and your and your marijuana.
But the people that are actually growing the programs at the
Lieutenant and the captain level, they need to show that
there's a real need for their programs.
And so look, there's a lot of crime out there and we're
finding it and we're digging for it and we're going to go out
there and get it. So give us more money.
So now you have this perverse sort of problem.
So how do you fix that? What you do is you as a mayor or
you as a police chief who wants to keep your job, you just don't
tell the mayor and you don't tell the the FBI what's going on
anymore. You just say, hey, look, we're
not reporting to you. And the picture that is shown
nationally is that crime is going down because you've now
got 37% less reporting that when you got man, if we're only down
25% on murder and 37% of the cities are not reporting, that
looks like an increase to me. I don't know how that math
works. It's like, well, well, more than
10%, but you've got a big increase in homicides most
likely. And the biggest cities out
there, like how much of the population are covered by the
remaining, what is it 63% that actually are reporting?
How many people are being covered by that?
Because those are departments that's not based on population.
And huge swaths of the population live in Los Angeles
and Chicago and New York. These are some of the biggest
cities in America, Baltimore and Nashville, very high crime
areas. So you're incentivized not to
report it. And it also looks really good.
So now you are doing the self looking ice cream cone game.
I want you to understand that why?
Because that why makes perfect sense to anybody that sees
politics. It looks bad.
It's bad for business. And then right after you report
that crime is on the way down, then you get stories like this.
This is coming from CNN, but everybody reported on it.
Secret Service member robbed at gunpoint during Biden's LA trip
for that fundraiser that we just showed you stuff from.
So in this year alone, I have seen evidence that FBI agents
have had their car stolen in Washington, DC and now a member
of the Secret Service. And you think, well, is it just
some Secret Service employee? No, this was apparently an armed
agent because the Secret Service agent fired at the person that
was stealing their stuff and the person still got away with a
bag. No idea whether they hit them or
not. That means no, by the way,
because otherwise the story would be Secret Service agent
shoot somebody in the middle of a robbery.
They raised $30 million talking about fake crime stats and fake
job statistics and fake security stats.
Meanwhile, one of Biden's own security protective detailed
members from the United States Secret Service was robbed at
gunpoint and got into a gunfight with somebody.
Even if it was A1 sided gun fight, this was a gun versus a
gun. That's a gunfight as far as I'm
concerned. You draw a gun on me and I shoot
you. That was a gunfight.
Even if the Secret Service agent won, what on earth is going on
here? You can't make these statements
that crime is down when the evidence, even if it's
anecdotal, is popping up right in, yes, Los Angeles, one of
those people that does not report crime statistics.
Washington, DC is the other great example.
A female FBI agent had her car stolen while she was just like
looking at her phone. Somebody came up and took it.
They got that one back. By the way, they don't get most
cars back. That happened in in Washington,
DC when they get stolen. But they do if you work for the
FBI, 'cause that looks really, really bad.
And meanwhile, how does this stuff keep happening?
Well, as President Trump pointed out on True Social the other
day, yet another person has been killed by an illegal immigrant
that has no right to be in this country.
Again, we talked about the job growth are happening for people
that have no right to be in this country.
So what do you do? Well, if you're a Democrat and
you're Joe Biden and you're that administration, you double down
on stupid and you say that you're going to grant what they
call amnesty, a plan for citizenship for people, a half
million of them to be specific. What about the other 10 +
1,000,000 that crept in here? That's all part of the long term
plan in order to get this one. These are like Dreamer types and
spouses of people that can't otherwise get citizenship.
So they're going to offer what they call expansive relief to
hundreds of thousands of illegals.
You know what those also mean? That relief, it equals voting
population. If you're trying to move the
vote by a small percentage. We're not talking about illegal
immigrants here. We're talking about illegal
aliens, people that are in criminal violation of law, but
and now they're going to be able to get green cards and work
permits and shielded from deportation for now until they
hit that 10 year mark and then they're going to be able to get
that citizenship. That's what this article is
talking about over in the AP. They're telling you what they're
going to do right up front. They have all these reasons that
they should bring them in and basically the reasons have
nothing to do with what's good for our country.
They have nothing about what's good for society.
They have everything to do with what's good for the voting bloc
that they are trying to do. And it goes down and they make
it about the individual. Shouldn't we be more inclusive?
Shouldn't we be more fair? Shouldn't we take care of this
thing? These people that are here
because they're human beings, Is that really what this is all
about? So This is why I found this
article so interesting and why today's thumbnail is what it is.
Let me, just before I pivot to that, throw a quick promo up for
the Mat Hat Jerky folks. An 11 year old boy came up with
a recipe At 18, he now employs over 20 employees at Mat Hat
Jerky. You can go to
mathatjerky.com/kyle. That's Matt Matt Hat HAT jerky.
That's dried beef.com slash Kyle promo code Kyle will save you
20% on your first order. If you find what you like, set
yourself up for a subscription. Many of you've already done
this. Make it a regular thing.
Make it for whatever time frame it is that you want to be able
to have this. It's a high quality, high
protein snack. It is not the same kind of chewy
boot leather as I was talking to my daughters about the other
day. She was like, what is an
overcooked steak? And I was like, it's like eating
a Doc Martin and they don't know what a Doc Martin is.
You don't want to eat Doc Martin's.
You want a tender piece of meat that actually is moist and it is
very chewy, but also flavorful and easy to chew through.
It's really good stuff. I'm telling you, they make the
best product when it comes to the jerky market and everybody
who's tried it so far has nobody has told me.
Hey, Kyle, you're, you're way off on this jerky thing.
I make better jerky. I've had better jerky.
I can buy better jerky. I don't think you can, but let
me know if you do. By all means, check them out.
Promo code Kyle Mad hat jerky.com/kyle look at this
ready. The FDA changed the rule in
2015. They've been slowly pushing it
further and making it more and more inclusive.
The I in DEI in order to allow gay and bisexual men to donate
blood. Here is ABC carrying water for
this story, and it says that they've been able to get more
blood donations because of it incrementally.
Early data says maybe 10% of those people who were previously
deferred are now coming back and donating blood.
So what happens is if you show up and you do not qualify based
on your medical history or your sexual activity, then you get
into a list that is either restricted, which means you
cannot donate blood forever, or it might be that you were put
into a deferred category. And if you're in that deferred
category, 10% of those people that have been deferred for six
months or a year or whatever that the wait period is will
actually come back and donate blood.
My question is who cares? Do you have any idea what we are
risking by putting this sort of blood into the blood supply?
It's really like a cost benefit analysis.
The problem with inclusion is is there has to be a benefit both
to the individual and also society.
And I don't know what the benefits to society is for
having gay men being able who are sexually active and are they
highest risk of HIV, what it looks like for them to be in the
donating pool for blood. Can anyone tell me what that is?
Please articulate it in a comment if you want, send it to
us either at kyleseraphin.com or you can do it on a comment to
this video wherever you're at. What on earth are we talking
about here? I went and did some digging
because I was very curious. Like one of the things that you
learn when you're a paramedic is the possibility of communicable
diseases and what they call a PPE, the protective equipment
that you wear in order to sort of isolate yourself.
They also call it the BSI, bodily substance isolation, and
you want to be able to keep that stuff from getting into your
body. So there's all these protocols
that happen if you get bit by a homeless person who might have
hepatitis, you get stuck with a needle on accident by somebody
who may be HIV positive. There's all these different
things that we do and there's all these prophylactics, but the
numbers do not actually favor transmission in general, when it
comes to sexual activity. It's incredibly low to be able
to transmit things like HIV. It's crazy low.
Like percentage, like, like like small fractions of a percent.
You'd be shocked. It's one in 2500 instances
according to study. So we're talking about like .04%
transmission for somebody who you know has an actual viral
load, .08% transmission, less than 1/10 of a percent.
These things are very, very low. Needle sticks equally low, like
they're under 2% chance. Most of them are under 1% chance
of actually transferring. If you were an intravenous
needle user using drugs and you share a dirty needle with
somebody who is HIV positive, you have less than like a one in
500 percent or one one in 500 chance of actually contracting
AIDS, contracting that virus. It's very, very low.
Do you know what the odds are of contracting AIDS if you get a
blood transfusion with dirty blood that has HIV in it?
It's 92.5% according to the study that I just read here.
And this is like aggregate studies.
You go from like less than 1/10 of a percent for sexual
transmitted activities. That's considered very
dangerous, which can be mitigated by 70% less if you use
protection to 92% with a blood transfusion.
Now they've claimed like only 3500 people have ever gotten
AIDS from blood transfusion, and we're way better at filtering
it. Really.
What's the upside for society? Why do I need to make this guy
who's on the screen a guy named Jose Dominguez, I think is his
name. Yeah, Jose Dominguez, a 50 year
old gay man who's married to another dude and is sitting
there and him and his husband now go and give blood.
Why do I care as a person who goes in to the hospital and I'm
looking like, oh, I might die, I need blood.
Oh, by the way, thanks for killing me by adding a 92%
likelihood of, you know, dangerous blood getting put in.
You're, you're going to have AIDS, then can you keep it in
check? Why should you have to?
And then you're gonna have to sue the hospital and then your
life will change forever. This only benefits people
feeling and has nothing to do with what's beneficial for
society. You know, the Frotigina is too
high. This is garbage.
It's shocking too. And then what is it all about?
This entire article that I read was about how he feels good
about himself. Who gives a shit?
I'm serious, I don't understand. I was grinning from ear to ear
because we were able to do this. I've never done it before and I
was just getting to do with my husband and we got to go give
blood at a hospital. What is the upside?
Like go give blood and pour it in the on the ground?
This is nonsensical. The danger that you're bringing,
which is very low, is still a danger and the risk of it is
massively high should it actually get transmitted
through. If you screw it up, the person's
life will be forever screwed. Now here's the problem with the
EI agendas like this. There are a lot of things that
are non inclusive. I actually typed in inclusivity
and social exclusion. There are tons of things that
you're supposed to be excluded from.
That's what we do. If you commit a crime around
children, you may not ever want to do that again.
But we don't trust you, so we keep you away from kids and you
can no longer be a teacher. You were excluded because you
were a dirt bag at one point in time in your life.
And maybe it's a chronic problem and maybe it was a one time
accident. Too bad the payoff for society
is too low for your personal feelings.
If you have a seizure disorder, you can't be a pilot.
Do you know how exclusive we are about pilots?
At least previously? You have to be flight fit.
You have to go through a Class 3 physical.
I've done that four times. I did it when I was in the
military. To be a flight crew member is an
incredibly rigorous PT test. They do all kinds of stress
analysis. They do blood markers.
They are trying to make sure that you don't put a bunch of
other people at risk. Exclusion is what we do when we
want to do things for the greater good.
DEI is the opposite of that. They are basically saying screw
the greater good. How about this stupid minority
that wants to feel like they're part of it?
By the way, the story of this guy Dominguez, because they just
talk about it. It's the only evidence they have
of anybody that was being excluded.
Like who? How many gay dudes are?
Like hey, I want to have unlimited butt sex, but also if
I have AIDS, I also want to be able to go and feel good about
myself giving blood. None.
That guy. One guy.
And his story was is that his mom used to wake him up in the
middle of the night because she had a rare blood type, but he
doesn't know what it was. And she used to get called to
come in and donate to the hospital.
And so she would wake up him and his brother and take him to the
hospital and they would give blood.
And he was part of a community. And that community, you know, of
people that gave blood, he was excluded from in 1997 when he
came out as gay and then no longer could go give blood.
One, I don't care #2 I'll take things that didn't happen for
500. Alex, who's ever heard of this
happening? You get called up by the blood
bank 'cause you have the rare blood type.
Uncle Bosey's BBQ ribs said I'm B positive.
I'm also B positive. So is my wife.
You want to do something smart, marry somebody, build your own
blood bank with people around you.
And as far as I can tell, there's a 75% chance, although I
haven't tested them, that my kids are also B positive.
So, well, the Serafin family is going to be handling our own
blood donations. If you are somebody who has a
rare blood type and you're the only person who can give, then
great, go do it. It's a choice, but I don't need
gay people randomly like some souls.
Fraction of the percentage. What is it, like 2 to 5% of the
population? They have to be included,
including the fact that they're sexually transmitting possibly,
you know, these diseases. Like, dude, what are we doing?
We've given up on the greater good.
We've gone into full retarded. And that is retarded.
DEI. There's a reason why it also
spells die. Yeah, because it's it's a
killer. It's a killer to the societal
values that we should have. Very, very, very simple.
You want to be a person who donates blood, knock yourself
out. You want to be a gay person,
knock yourself out. You can't be both.
The end, The end. None of the frochagini is
appropriate. How about that?
Can we handle this? I've got one more thing just
because you guys don't know that what you don't know this is the
side by side. I did promise this earlier, so I
just wanted to show you. I actually put this together so
you guys can see it. This is Joe Biden's thing.
If you guys go out in the world and you need a copy of this
video, it's actually in my timeline so you can find it.
This is a hand Cam footage and it's I'll actually maybe even
put this you can just clip the show if you want.
This is side by side footage of what was using to debunk the the
Biden freeze. Watch the zoom out here.
It's really awesome. Anyway, I wanted to at least
show this because it's funny and it shows the media is willing to
be deceptive when they need to be and they will.
They'll do it in a viral way. They're willing to lie to you.
This is actually called this information.
Did you see that cut? So on the left side what you saw
was the freeze, and then on the right side what they did, as
soon as he froze, they zoomed out to this crowd shot to show
how many people were there. I would like to sync it up.
I'll probably sync it up for you guys.
I just didn't have time and I didn't actually really care that
much. But now I do because the
Streisand effect has made this much bigger than it looked like
originally. They were, like I said, 173,000
people. Who cares?
5 million people are seeing it. So let's go out there and sync
these things up and I'll do that for you guys because why not?
It was a 7:00 to 8:00 second freeze.
I've seen it multiple times in the chat, but yeah, that's how
long it takes. Wild stuff.
Don't believe your lying eyes or come here.
Join us at the Kyle Sarah Show for the uncomfortable truths
'cause that's what we are all about.
Do it over here on Rumble. Make sure you've hit the like
button. Make sure, like I said, we
didn't share this earlier before we went live.
So share it live or share it taped.
We appreciate you guys doing that.
We're trying to overcome some serious, serious algorithmic
censorship, which is pretty obvious to anybody who's
watching it. We've stalled out when it comes
to follower growth, even though we grew month after month after
month. It all kind of like went to went
to the, the free status. You guys can overcome that with
us. rumble.com/kyle Serafin is where the the live chat lives
and you guys can push it out for us.
We really appreciate you doing that and all of you who are
there this morning. Thanks for being here.
Let me give you a five star review.
This one's short and sweet. GPS 240 says the best podcast
out there. Five stars.
I very much love and appreciate your podcast, Kyle.
Keep telling the truth. 100% guaranteed we're going to keep
doing it. houseairfin.com for any questions, comments,
sarcastic remarks. Yes, they do flow in.
Yes, they are amusing. I don't always respond to them,
but I do read them. And so if you guys want to make
me chuckle or say something crazy, please do it.
We'll see you again tomorrow. I hope you have a wonderful day.
We'll be back with a weird Wednesday.
I'm confident it's 2024 in the summer there will be some weird
stuff going on, so we'll see you then.
God bless you. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True
Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.