Are you familiar with FBI special agents Kyle Serpen?
I'm familiar with the name. Is that?
Yes, I'm familiar with the name. Familiar with the name, familiar
with the name. Let's bring in Kyle Serafin.
He's the FBI whistleblower who helped expose government
censorship of our First Amendment rights.
Now, we only have this memo because a recently suspended FBI
agent called Kyle Serafin brought it to the public, and
we're grateful that he did. Kyle, thank you so much for
joining us tonight. He's the host of something that,
strangely, is called the Kyle Sarah Fish.
Kyle, Sarah, I can't thank you enough for speaking out.
I knew you guys were out there and I knew it was just a matter
of time. But you got a lot of guts
putting your face and your name to this.
You're doing a service on behalf of the American people.
And from the bottom of my cracked and broken heart
sometimes, thank you very much. Take a look behind the curtain
with a real whistle blower, an American patriot.
Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this
program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties enthusiasts, Second Amendment
defender and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin.
Well, hello, my friends. Today on the Kyle Seraphin Show,
we're going to be talking about something a little different.
Today's Wednesday. It's November the 20th.
Welcome to the program. I hope you guys are tucked in.
I've got a ton of material I want to try to cover down on.
We're going to be talking about tariffs, we're going to be
talking about Christianity, and we're going to be talking about
making America great again. And I want to focus on the again
part because there was a time when this country was a proper
country. I think that's what we just
adjudicated. The political left continues to
double down on the hubris that says it wasn't our bad values
that caused an election failure. It wasn't an issue with the way
that we message it, the fact that we paid 10s of millions of
dollars to celebrities and all this woke kind of nonsense.
What the left wants us to believe is that they just
misread the economy. That's it.
It's just the economy. They just had a little blind
sight. I saw this really interesting
article over on MSNBC and it made me realize that there is
something quite interesting about the way that our money is
set up. If you'll notice, and I'll throw
the thumbnail back up on here for a second, there's a little
thing on there. It says in God we trust.
Americans used to know this. The word God is actually over
government. But the left has a priority
problem, and it's something that we make the argument about here
all the time. The argument is, is that the
left has tried to substitute government for God, which
explains why all the fanatics are crying about the
dismantlement of some of the apparatus of government.
You can't trust in government because it is an institution of
men. We sort of know that as
Christians. We used to know that as a nation
and we seem to have lost it. And I think that's how you make
America great again. The again part, we're going to
get deep into the weeds on that and a bunch of different stories
that sort of illustrate this, from transgenderism to tariffs
to trying to make America healthy.
All of these things are related to focus and the fact that we've
become a nation full of, at least at the the outset, godless
heathens, as you said in the chat.
Well said, Renzo, that are keeping track of us.
Before we get too deep into that, let's say thanks to our
friends who do support us Patriots like you, Patriot
Coolers. Patriot coolers.com is where you
go. This the show is always kind of
like a stumble start sometimes in the morning when we get going
and it would not go anywhere without a Patriot cooler tumble.
This is a lot like the way that when I was working for the FB I
I always had a cup of coffee sitting with me, particularly
when I was doing surveillance. You need to have hot beverage
with caffeine in it to get your brain working right.
If you guys want to get your own Tumblr that'll keep things hot
or cold, go to patriotcoolers.com.
Use the promo code Kyle. It's Kyle.
It's 4 letters and it saves you 10%.
The math on it all checks out, 50 bucks or more, you're going
to get free shipping, get one for you, get one for a friend.
They make a fantastic gift. As we are starting to come into
the space, there will be a Black Friday deal that if you guys are
on the fence and you're thinking, oh, maybe I'll hold on
to it. Go ahead and do your shopping
now. Figure out what it is you want.
And then when that big discount drops in a couple days, then you
guys will be able to also get your own Patriot cooler.
And I guarantee you if you buy one for somebody, you're going
to want one for yourself too. So don't, don't neglect yourself
in the gift giving. It's a gift that lasts for a
very long time. All right, let's dive into this
nonsense here. Let's make America great again.
All right, I'm going to go with a weird start.
We're going to go back to 1900. Is that the time that America
was great? This is a guy named Harold
Lutnick. He seems to know a little bit
about things that are going on. I want you to consider the
argument he's making. We'll talk about why he's making
that argument and why he's relevant in one second.
First of all, asking the sample question, when was America
great? When was America great?
At the turn of the century our economy was rocking.
This is 99125 years ago. We had no income tax, and all we
had was tariffs. All we had was tariffs.
And we had so much money that we had the greatest businessmen of
America get together to try to figure out how to spend it.
That's who we were then. But then we had World War One,
and we had World War 2, and we felt we had a duty to rebuild
the rest of the world. So here's what we did.
We took down our protection. We took down our tariffs, and we
turned instead. And we taxed Americans so that
we could export the power of our economy and save the rest of the
world, which we did. Now let me now let me ask you a
question. What decade should that have
ended? It's a relevant question.
What decade should we have stopped saving the world?
There is a Christian value in charity.
There's a Christian value in pushing things out and taking
care of those around you that are less fortunate.
This is an argument that I would make to all of you.
I want you to consider the amount of charity that you give
out of your own pocket, and would it be more if you had more
in your pocket? That's been my experience.
This year has been one of those better years for US financially
than most. I know a lot of people, at least
on the number that I'm sure the inflation actually cut into it
some, but it felt like we were doing better and that allowed me
to do things that I've never been able to do for people
before. Part of it is because people
like you are listening to this program, you're contributing to
us, you're joining us over on locals at kyleserafin.com.
That was something that I didn't really expect to have an income
from. And so a lot of that we've been
able to give away. I actually forgot some of the
stuff we gave away. We supported AJ6 journalist and
paid for a month of his living expenses in order to let him
continue as he's on federal probation.
We gave a truck away to a suspendable who didn't have, who
never owned a pickup truck, but worked with his hands for most
of his life, and it seemed like a thing that would benefit him.
We were able to help folks in our in our sphere that needed
things that we wanted to help them out and we could.
We wrote the check, we handed out the cash.
And part of it is because we had more in our pocket.
That's a very Christian value. I would give more to our church.
I just don't like institutions. I'd rather see people benefit
individually. And the worst institution to
support is the federal government, which is what we've
kind of done. We've mandated charity.
I think so much of our taxes are this feeling that we owe others
and we don't want to go out there and find those people.
We don't want to vet what that charity should look like.
We're not doing a 10% tithe. Many people are not because
we're so busy paying our tithe to the God of people, which is
called the government. The worst.
The absolute worst way to solve every problem, including when
it's the only way to solve the problem, is that federal
government. The state government being being
slightly less, and our local government being maybe the best
way that government exists, but still not great.
Local government is terrible all the time.
How many of you have complained about the way things go down?
Your school boards are the ones that are indoctrinating your
kids and they fallen victim to things that don't make sense to
you. The political left, the godless
folk, a lot of them are godless, for whatever it's worth.
They continue to think that because they give money to their
God, they give money to their church, their religion, that
that's the solution. But why don't they just give it
direct? Some of them do.
Why do they think everybody needs to be mandated to do the
things that they think are the most important?
I think it has something to do with the loss of Christianity in
this nation. Lutnick just made the argument.
By the way, Harold Lutnick was just named to be the nominee for
the Secretary of Commerce. So he's going to be the one
who's handling those tariffs that he was talking about.
We go back on this program a lot and we talk about the year of
1913. It was the year the Federal
Reserve was created. It was the year that we
instituted a federal income tax, and it was the year that we
started directly electing the Senate.
So we broke the Senate and what it's supposed to be, we broke
the American people by giving the federal government the
ability to tax them directly on all incomes.
And then we also saw a massive decline from that point in time
onward. The Federal Reserve is a big
problem as well in 1900. This is an AI answer and it came
mostly from this top article here, which is called
Christianity in North America. It was published in September of
2020 by a woman named Gina. I'm assuming a woman, a woman
named Gina Zerlo, who is the Co director for the Center for
Studies on Global Christianity. Religion in North America has
substantially changed and it's changed substantially in the
20th century. At the turn of the century, the
continent was 97.1% Christian all right, with fewer than a
million non Christians on the North American continent at that
time. The population is obviously
grown on this continent dramatically.
And what we see now is that in the the end of the 20th century,
going into what we are in now the 21st century, by 2020, only
72.6% of the population are Christian.
That's a dramatic and staggering drop, 25%.
So the values of this country have shifted.
Some of it happened because of secularization, because of
education, because people believe often times that we see
in the Old Testament that they got too good for God.
That's an ongoing theme that we talked about on this podcast.
People thought that they are, they basically they've
transcended the need for religion.
And then isn't it interesting that we've seen people start
finding their way back? Because when you have all the
money and all the education and you have all the capabilities,
you still have this big hole. It doesn't matter.
All the drugs and all the pleasures and all the the the
luxuries in the world will not fill these holes as many human
beings have found over the last 2000 years.
It's a pride. It says that I'm so good that I
no longer need God. I actually am as God.
And that's the pride that government continues to have.
It's the pride that the political left continues to
have. I just found it interesting that
all of the things that we are talking about can be taken back
to an Old Testament experience of having good things because
you followed a godly way. You participated in the world as
God sort of dictated to man, who were far more simple and lived
in far more simple times and had much more simple and smaller
forms of government. And then we got bigger and we
got smarter and we thought we were too good for it.
And we've made our idols. And then we experience humility
as we get crushed down like every people have before.
You can go read the Old Testament.
The stories are ubiquitous. There's a little interesting
piece in Newsweek that I want to share with you.
Kamala Harris lost the Catholic vote because she didn't try to
win them. This is from a founder of a
group called Catholics for Harris, which seems oxymoronic
because Kamala Harris was running the campaign based on
abortion, which is antithetical to not just Catholicism, but
more broadly to Christianity. Found some of these things very
interesting. The writer of this is someone
named Christopher Hale. He's the Co founder of Catholics
for Harris. Again, I think oxymoronic and
said that he was shocked when he found out that Kamala Harris
didn't go to the Al Smith dinner.
Maybe you wouldn't want to cozy up with conservative New Yorkers
and their wealthy friends, but based on 15 years of doing this
is the weirdest part for me. faith-based political organizing
for Democrats, huh? It turns out because in the last
15 years, the Democrats have made a radical pivot away from
godliness. That's been quite clear to
anybody who's been paying attention.
All of the transgender madness, all of the, the, the inability
to take care of your fellow man by trying to mandate it through
government means. Those have all happened in the
last 15 years. Like they've been much more
aggressive. This is the the, the standout
line, though, in the first or second paragraph here.
The thing that he saw that was the problem was that there would
be headlines that persuadable Hispanic Catholics in Pittsburgh
and Philadelphia would read in the final days of the election.
Persuadable Hispanics. It's that breaking people down
along ethnic lines. It seems kind of racist to think
that it was going to be dumb Latino people that couldn't tell
the difference between what was good for them or not and they
were going to be the ones that were going to turn the tide in
Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. That's what this guy wrote in
Newsweek. And then it goes on and talks
about, you know, some the Democrats were actually overtly
anti Catholic. There's number of pieces that
have covered this sort of in proxy, in meta coverage that
they didn't just run without talking about religion.
They actually ran against religion dramatically turning
from a place where it was common to talk about it in the 90s.
And then we've had all of these educated people tell us that
they were too good for it, and regular people rejected that.
So they got humbled, but they didn't listen to it, and they
still are not listening to it. And they're still writing
stories saying, listen, we didn't have bad values because
their values are those of government.
Their values are those of secularism.
And you can't turn away from your religion if you're a
zealot. And that's what we're talking
about, zealotry towards a religious thing, the government
being sort of the end goal. This is why you're hearing
people meltdown at choices like Matt Gaetz, who said he wants to
go in and potentially throw out entire government divisions, why
they are upset with Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, because
they want to get rid of and delete and downsize the
government, their God. You're also seeing it in this,
this new attempt to sort of thwart it.
How are they going to try to thwart Donald Trump?
Is it through values? Is it through getting grassroots
people? Is it through getting folks to
change their opinion that made them vote for Donald Trump?
No, it's through government. It's through the last means
possible, a captured judiciary. There's a story over here coming
in from CBS. I'm going to 1st read the CBS
version and then you're seeing I think the ABC or the NBC1 on on
the screen here. As Biden nears Trump's number of
judicial confirmations, Republicans are looking to slow
the process. Remember, it's always the
Republicans reacting to in a bad way, but Biden is attempting to
get as many people in the judiciary as Donald Trump did,
and he's darn close. The the legacy of Donald Trump's
Article 3 nominations were 234 federal judges, including the
Supreme Court and the federal appeals courts and the various
district courts of the US. That's what Donald Trump's
legacy was from term #1 probably the biggest one and the only
reason to actually have any sort of friendliness towards a Mitch
McConnell. Joe Biden's getting pretty
close. He's getting very close in so
much as he's got, what, 217 I think is where he's at right
now. And they're trying to push a
couple more. The story is, is that Kamala
Harris could be the tie breaking vote because they still do have
the majority in the Senate. She could be the tie breaking
vote. One last attempt to use
governmental office to defy the will of the people.
Well, we were told these are the people that believe in democracy
and that Donald Trump was the end of it.
And I don't know if there's anything less democratic than
trying to shove this thing in. But I'm not going to hold them
accountable for it because this is the way that politics works.
We live in a pragmatic society. And if they have the ability to
do so, they should do so. But I also found it somewhat
interesting that they continue to raise money on this.
And maybe people don't know that, but Kamala Harris raised
more than a billion dollars for her campaign, and she's still
standing donor information out trying to overturn races for the
House. They're still sending requests
for money out in order to get her to do the thing that is part
of her job anyway, which is to be president of the Senate.
They're sending these things out every single time that Donald
Trump names a new appointment nominee.
They're trying to raise money because that's their tithe.
How do you contribute to your God?
You give money to the people that are serving it, and they
keep doing it. They can't let it go.
Some of the stuff that has been pushed out is that, well, you
had a real crisis of values. American people want to see
their dollar go farther. They don't want to see their
friends or neighbors murdered by illegal aliens that have no
business being in this country. They want to see American jobs
stay here. That's obviously a more of an
economic reason, but there's a sociological reason to it as
well. When your neighbor has a job,
then you don't have to worry about giving them charity, which
means everybody raises their own level.
It's good for your neighborhood to be safe and it's safer when
people have jobs that can support their families and
they're not reliant on you. In my own little community of
suspendables, which is kind of a digital community cause Steve
Friend doesn't live near me and neither does Garrett and neither
does Marcus. You know, we've been trying to
keep our boats afloat and I'm watching my buddy Steve struggle
right now. Some of you don't realize this,
but he lost his job because he was my friend and his job fired
him because he refused to disavow me.
That's not a good situation. If people had more money in
their pockets that wasn't going out to the federal government, I
do believe that it would be a lot easier for them to say, hey,
we do have another spot here and we'd like to hire a Steve
friend. They would look out there and
say, look, we do have the ability to support a Marcus
Allen who hasn't been paid in two years.
By the way, neither has Garrett. We'd like to continue doing
that. And there is a mechanism on the
political left where they do that because they believe that
they're actually supporting a moral good.
They don't have a church to support and they don't have
other charities necessarily. So they give their taxes and
then they go out there and they support the people that work for
their God. They are supporting the priest
like Andy McCabe, who raised $1,000,000 and then still got a
$700,000 settlement from the clowns that worked at the
Justice Department. I'm a little bit hopeful that
when we come in, we right some of those wrongs.
And I think Americans on the conservative side who, generally
speaking, don't want to see government waste and don't want
to see big settlements from the federal government.
They've overwhelmingly been telling me on social media that
they want to see us made whole and that they want to send a
message out there to this government that when you screw
over people that do the right thing, then you're going to be
held accountable and it's going to come out of all of our
pockets. That's the craziest part about
it. And yet people are still sort of
OK with that. The one thing that I think did
draw the line there is this bizarre notion that women should
have to contend with men, as Nancy May said, penises in their
locker rooms and their bathrooms, and that children
should face that. Or that we would mutilate
children because there's a pretty big biblical prohibition
against sacrificing your children, cutting them up and
and malforming them. And most Americans actually do
still agree with that. Even if we have a Christian
population that's only in the low 70s.
They don't want this. And the trends show that as
well. Americans across the political
spectrum strongly oppose transgender surgery for minors.
This is why Donald Trump was able to run successful ads on
this. And this is what they baited the
Democrat Party into supporting something that is truly insane.
This is coming from John Solomon's organization.
Just the News says the Neapolitan.
Is it? Yeah.
Neapolitan News Service found 72% of Americans think it should
be illegal for doctors to perform, quote UN quote gender
affirming surgeries. Of course they should.
It's absurd. If you want a man to dress as a
man. I pushed this out yesterday.
If a man wants to dress like a woman and come into the men's
restroom, I don't care. I saw Misses Doubtfire.
It's a little bit jarring to see a dude in a dress come and pee
next to you at a urinal, but it doesn't scare me.
It certainly doesn't put me in a position of danger.
But if that same man wants to go pee in the women's restroom and
my daughter, let's say, is not 7 and goes into the restroom with
me now. But let's say she's 9 or 10 and
you know, needs privacy and insists on going in on her own.
If I find that guy wearing a dress in the ladies bathroom
when I go to the park or something like that, I'm going
to treat him like I would treat any other pervert that was
trying to touch kids. And it won't be good.
And he's going to have to re evaluate his life decisions,
assuming that he survives it. And that's that's not a threat.
That's a promise to you. That's my job as a father.
That's something we used to actually know as Christians.
Your job is to your your children and your wife.
My life is forfeit compared to what my kids need to have.
And Americans actually know this.
It turns out 72% of Americans don't support doing bad things
like cutting off the genitals of children or chemically
castrating them. 86% are Republicans, 58% of Democrats.
Still, the majority of Democrats are not insane.
I do feel bad for these people though, I really do, because
there's nothing normal about living like this poor man.
I'm going to show you a video of a guy that initially I saw it
and I was repulsed and I thought, OK, this is, this is
horrific and stupid and it's worth ridiculing.
And then I watched it a few more times from a Christian lens,
which is hard sometimes to do when you see people that are
potentially a threat to your family, to your, to your little
ones. And I have so much pity for
someone that does this to themselves.
I don't know what sort of trauma this man endured.
I don't know what sort of insanity people have gone out
there and and stimulated in his brain and then have reaffirmed
that, allowed him to dress like this, to present himself in
public like this, to be upset and scared.
This man does not face a lot of danger except for his own
making. He put on a dress crazy
lipstick, drew on eyeliner like he's Johnny Depp and Pirates of
the Caribbean, except he's overweight.
He's very unhealthy and there's this, this moment where you you
read things from the the Bible where Jesus talks about his
heart was moved with pity. And I actually had that moment.
Like I said, it started off as being repulsed and then I was
moved with pity. I want you to see this person
because these are the people that are not being well served
by any of this transgender insanity.
We're going to go down the rabbit hole on this a little bit
only because Nancy Mace is pushing forward something for
her own safety. She said she survived rape and
sexual assault. She doesn't want this type of
person in the bathroom with her. She's not actually scared of
this guy. I'm going to show you the kind
of people that she is scared of and why really, really
vindictive, nasty homosexual men who dress up like women.
But this guy I have a lot of pity for.
And the Democrat Party has done a disservice to these human
beings. They are still human beings.
And I think if you didn't have this God of government pushing
down garbage, these people could actually get help, which is why
you might want to see asylums and inpatient, which is what
we're really talking about, inpatient mental health.
All right, take a deep breath. This is strange.
And do you know how hard that is to know that to go out there
being myself, I don't even think I could be myself anymore.
And what do you think that does? To be in my community that we
can't even go out and be free anymore because all of you
people, the, the ones who voted for that, man, you are so
emboldened now, aren't you? So emboldened to do and say what
you want, Make people feel like it, feel any way that you, you
think that they should feel. This is a sad time.
This is a very sad time. And you're not?
I'm not going back. I won't.
That man needs to go back to whatever was there.
What's crazy about the mental illness you just saw there is
that he lives in a clean place. He's not living in squalor.
He has like an underwear, underwear and a socks drawer
behind him. That's all sort of it's put
together. It's neatly organized, right?
And then he's painted things on his face like a clown and he's
wearing a floral dress and he doesn't want to go back.
And yet what is going on for him is probably the worst thing that
could happen. There's nothing Christian,
there's nothing charitable, there's nothing loving about
allowing someone to live like that.
So you are actually hurting yourself in that way.
And people wonder, why is it that Trump won married women,
right? Here was the here was the clip
we played yesterday. A little quick, little taste in
it, right? In Texas, we won with married
women. What about unmarried women?
What happened to unmarried women?
They're affirming this craziness and married women tend to have
children and they have a man in their life.
So they know the difference between men and women.
It turns out for the most part, particularly in Texas,
particularly in a border area where they are worried about
what happens to their kids. And the fact that we could see,
I went to the park the other day with my kids, it was, it was
three of them. So the the older 3, three-year
old, 5 year old, 7 year old. And they're running around and
everybody is a potential threat when you're out at a park.
But mostly they should be parents.
And yet most of the people that were at that park were
non-english speakers as natives, most of them in Central Texas,
America. One of the weirdest moments to
look like you were the you were one of the few people that was
born in this country, both by visual appearance.
And I can tell people that were born in other cultures 'cause
you can see the way they dress and you can listen to them
speaking to their kids and to their, to their family members.
And you go, you're not even from here.
And it's fine. We can have immigrants, but were
they trying to be from here necessarily?
Probably not. They didn't have a very good,
they're not assimilating very well.
We have this ethnic enclave of people that are from Pakistan
and India and Afghanistan. They were they were like almost
a dozen women wearing full eye cover burqas.
What a bizarre moment in some place called Leander, Leander,
TX or Cedar Park, TX. Look, these are very American
type areas and until very recently they were like suburban
areas that were the outgrowth of people who wanted to live in a
slightly more conservative part of Texas outside of Austin.
They still want to be Austin. These stuff.
How weird to be a stranger in your own home, in your own
place. And how weird to see people that
you, you know, that a bunch of the people that were there that
did look like me, that were from this country had bizarre values,
bizarre values about things, watching their kids wear clothes
that made no sense. I could see that they were on
the edge of just going like, you know what?
My son should wear a dress. And yet they're the minority.
They're still the minority. The vast majority of Americans
do not agree with This is another piece from the Daily
Signal, OK, out of Heritage Foundation, 3/4 of voters said
it should be illegal to subject kids to this.
And I know that if you said that out loud, if you said it in
private, those people would agree with you.
But if he said it in public, they would think that they were
being compelled to say so they would be compelled to agree with
the sort of social order, which is why my buddy Steve friend
talks about liberal educated well to do.
White women are the worst people in America because they will
castrate their children simply simply to to impress their
friends and they will push everything that they can in
favor of a God of government. I guess it's because they listen
to crazy. Let's do a little Nancy Mace
piece here. Let's let's go to the this
transgender bathroom thing that's going on.
ABC reporter thought he was about to get a scoop and so he
went and he pushed on the the steps of the Capitol the other
day and this is what he came up with.
I think he kind of came up empty.
You tell me who won this one? He's obviously pushing for a,
he's pushing for a specific position.
He's not just asking simple questions because they're
guided. But here we go.
Nancy Mace outside in Washington, DC, yesterday.
Using Here she goes. Here's Congresswoman Mace.
Congresswoman Mace, can I ask you a question as you walk here?
So the question is with your piece of legislation about
banning women from using, Yes. My question to you is.
It doesn't go far enough. You filing more bills?
You have said that it was created in response to
Congresswoman Elect McBride. Percent and it.
Should legislation be created targeted at one specific person?
It doesn't mention anyone in the legislation, but.
You've said it. It was aimed at her.
No, I have said it's a result of this.
I'm not going to allow biological men into women's
private spaces. I will stand in the brink and
stand in the way of anyone on the radical left who thinks that
it's OK for a penis to be in a women's locker room or a
bathroom or a changing room. Hell no.
I'm not going to stand for it. And the speaker said it would be
in the House rules package. If it's not, I'll be ready with
a motion, a privileged motion, to force a vote on this.
This is not OK. I'm a survivor of rape.
I'm a survivor of sexual abuse and I'm not going to allow any
man in any female private spaces.
Speaker, end of story. And by the way, I'm getting
death threats from men pretending to be women.
Why is it that these crazy people, the insanity, the
radical left, are willing to kill women over over a man's
right to be in a women's restroom?
Speaker Johnson has said. Speaker Johnson has said he
wants to treat every new member with the words dignity and
respect. Forcing this Congressperson to
go into a male restroom, Is that dignity and respect?
We're going to respect every woman up here.
She mentioned death threats. I'm going to play you that death
threat, at least one of them that I found on social media,
which is probably going to go viral in a short minute.
Before we do that, how about some folks that agree with us on
values and what we're talking about here?
Allow us to do the podcast. It's Catholic Vote.
You guys can go and support them at catholicvote.org by getting
the loop. It doesn't cost you anything.
Literally, they're able to do something because they have a
reach and you can be part of that reach.
You don't have to be a Catholic by name if you are not Roman
Catholic, you can still sign up for Catholic Vote.
And if you are listening to this program and you haven't already,
you got to trust me. You're going to be getting the
best news in the morning. That's fantastic stuff.
And you can also follow them on social media for all the content
that they put out there, including stuff with RFK Junior.
I got a special message from RFK Junior to end the show, so make
sure you guys stick around for that as well.
It's at Catholic Vote if you want to follow them on the
social media platforms and I encourage that you do.
Really appreciative of their support.
It's been ongoing and they are the number one reason why we are
able to continue you doing the program the way that we do.
Allow me to play you a threat because some people say, oh,
I've been, I've had death threats.
This is pretty close to, although this is still free
speech because there's a hypothetical statement in there.
But this is as pretty close to an actual death threat as you
could claim, especially from a politician.
And I think it indicates the problem with men taking hormones
and pretending to be women is that they're still men.
And men, I tend to think of solving problems with violence.
I know I do. I already just told you what I
would do to someone like this that wanted to go after and be
around my kids. I'm not apologetic about it.
But if your thing is that you're going to go after a woman
because you want to be in their space and they better
acknowledge you, it's not the guy in the dress that we saw
earlier with the clown makeup on.
These are the really dangerous people because they have never
left behind the thing. Women might try to do things,
but you'll notice that women don't bludgeon men to death very
often. Other than our ice pick story
they had the other day, they generally speaking, historically
poison has been the weapon of women words, right?
Sabotage and so on. This guy wants to bludgeon Nancy
Mace head into the tile. So have a taste.
This video goes out to Congresswoman Nancy Mace.
Congresswoman Nancy Mace, I hope that one day I do frighten you
in that women's bathroom and I grab your ratty looking fucking
hair and drag your face down to the floor while I repeatedly
bash it in until the blood's everywhere and you're dead.
Thank you. I hope that Nancy Mace receives
this message. Well, kisses.
That's not how women talk. That's not what a woman looks
like. That's not how women sound.
That's not how women try to solve their problems.
These are sick boys that are being treated like they are
women by some group of people. And that's why you ended up with
a big loss. And it's something that was
really obvious to people like Dave Portnoy on the night of,
OK, it was arrogance. It was moral superiority.
That's because they don't actually have a moral center,
because they lack the ability to look to God for guidance.
They look to government. And government tells them,
including all the people in government, particularly on
their side, this sort of tribal world we live in, that they do
have the superiority that they are the smarter ones, that they
do know what's right and wrong, that they are the more tolerant.
That's not very tolerant with that person, a person named
Venus Andromeda, because that's what women are called Venus
Andromeda. It's a drag name.
It's performative. Those nails are ridiculous too.
Everything about it. So even Dave Portnoy, who grew
up in the what? He's like a Boston guy, if my
memory serves. He gets it because he's talking
about where the problem is, and the problem is really clear.
It's that you are acting like a freak and nobody wants to be
around freaks like that. Let's go ahead and listen to him
in his own words. I'm probably going to skip ahead
to the point where he he gets the message directly to
Democrats. This is not a new message.
He figured this out on election night.
All right, I'm about to go to bed.
Call it, it's late. So this may be a little
rambling. Donald Trump, next president of
the United States. Barring a huge miracle, he just
didn't win. He won for fun.
How did Trump get more votes than he got last time?
Well, here's the answer. Because people like myself,
independents or moderates, the Democrats gave us no choice.
The Democrats gave us no choice. That was the worst campaign.
And their pure arrogance and their moral superiority have
driven people away. If you say you're voting for
Trump, suddenly you're a Nazi, you're Hitler, you're garbage
enough, enough. Like, yeah, I'm sure there's
racist in the party, just like those fucking crazy people and
assholes and racist in the Democratic Party, all right.
But millions and millions and millions and millions of people
vote for Trump. He won clear.
He won decisive. So when you call us that, and
when you say that you're calling the majority of country racists,
Hitlers, Nazis, I don't think you get the words of what that
means. You are alienating all this
middle ground people by acting like you're better than us,
smarter than us, and frankly insulting our intelligence.
That's exactly it. They're trying to feed a
narrative that doesn't actually fit the place.
There's a story that I remember a little while ago.
We're going to get to a person called Abigail Spanberger, who
is a congresswoman and a former CIA officer, claims to have been
in 1811. It's not real clear what she was
in. Maybe she was in like 1 of the
smaller federal agencies as an investigator.
But she has this like very governmental background, someone
who's been a a good servant of the government, for whatever
it's worth. You need more people like me.
It's kind of funny, Dave Port and I probably don't agree on a
ton of stuff, but I bet you we actually have more in common
than not, including the fact that we're both men with beards
and we know what men look like. And we know that that person we
saw previously was still a man. And if that person was hanging
out and trying to be around kids or be weird, then we would deal
with them like a man, which is with our hands as needed.
Interestingly enough, the the sort of transgender question is
not new and it's not something that we ever get real clarity on
from the left. Michael Knowles took it on when
he went to CPAC. Do you guys remember there's a
big controversy about this? I'm going to show you the tweets
about this in a second, but first I want to play his actual
words. Michael Knowles, Daily Wire
host, Catholic talking about listen very closely.
He says transgenderism, the ISM, part of it is the belief system
that allow these people to operate the way that they do.
And it's being encouraged by the government, which loves isms,
racisms and sexisms, because they divide.
And when you divide then you can conquer.
And they are a human group that tries to conquer people in a
human way, not try to inspire them and show mastery in a godly
way. So there's sort of a poor
substitute. Anyway, Knowles is talking about
something that I think is objectively obvious to those of
us that know about human beings. And then I'm going to play the
disingenuous nature of it. And then I'm going to show you
why it doesn't matter what this woman says when she starts going
after other people she doesn't like because she has a history
of being, you know, a misinforming government
operative. There can be no middle way in
dealing with transgenderism. It is all or nothing.
If transgenderism is true, If men really can become women,
then it's true for everybody of all ages.
If transgenderism is false as it is, if men really can't become
women, as they cannot, then it's false for everybody too.
And if it's false, then we should not indulge it,
especially since that indulgence requires taking away the rights
and customs of so many people. If it is false, then for the
good of society, and especially for the good of the poor people
who have fallen prey to this confusion, transgenderism must
be eradicated from public life entirely.
The whole preposterous ideology at every level.
Did you hear that fundamentally Christian statement he just
made? Especially for those who have
fallen victim to it? Because it's wrong, it's false,
it's inaccurate. This is Abigail Spanberger in
her account as she's campaigning.
This is not current, by the way. This goes back to like March of
2023, Spanberger said, quote, he's calling for the eradication
of people. This is evil and dangerous.
We're using words of moral superiority, that arrogance that
they have again, when in fact he's actually talking about
something very loving, which is to say, do not let people fall
victim to lies and live in falsehood.
She said. Again, quote, this was in front
of thousands of people at a Republican conference.
Every person who believes that calling for the eradication of
others is wrong must denounce it.
There can be no what he meant excuses.
And that came from a previous tweet of this other woman saying
in a direct quote from Michael Knowles, if transgenderism is
false, then for the good of society, transgenderism must be
eradicated from public life entirely.
The fact checked on that is true, these facts.
This is about protecting children.
It's also about protecting people from themselves.
And why do I bring that up? Because this woman is trotting
out herself as being an arbiter of truth and what is good, A
good servant of the government. Former CIA case officer.
Saying that Tulsi Gabbard is really bad.
They're saying the same thing about Matt Gaetz.
I'm sure things will come out about Harold Lutnick that they
don't like. They're going to say things
about every single pick that they can.
Because Donald Trump in the way that he is trying to make
America great again, he's trying to do the thing that rolls back
the clock a lot of ways. We'll play you a couple other
ideas of this. The the deleting of government,
the attack on their God and their church is the thing that
they are fighting. And just imagine if the left
were people on the right. The way that they fight for
their government, for their church, is the way that we
should have fought for hours. When they shut them down during
COVID. I was so upset.
It was so upsetting. I actually didn't go to Mass for
quite a while. When the diocese outside of
Northern Virginia did not keep the churches open and thumb
their noses at the government regulations saying shut down for
COVID, they told us we could only have one family in the cry
room. That would have caused a
meltdown on the left the way that we're seeing right now,
because we are actually seeing the equivalent of that shutdown,
except this is righteous and it's on the right side of
things. Abigail Spanberger talking about
why you can't trust a Tulsi Gabbard.
I'm going to give you some evidence of like, again, first
of all, I think she's discredited, but they never have
any facts of it. Then you need to trust me
because I'm from the government. Pretty sure Ronald Reagan wrote
us about that too. So I'm a former CIA officer.
I worked undercover for my time with the agency as a case
officer, and case officers throughout the world currently
are out there recruiting foreign individuals to provide
information to the United States government, to provide
information that helps inform our policy makers, our military
leaders, our diplomats, and ultimately the president.
And that's when we talk about sources and methods, right?
The sources and methods are the means by which we know certain
things, whether that's the person who's reporting that
information in some far off country, whether it's
technologies that might be at play.
And so not only is it vitally important that we have a clear
understanding that every person with access to classified
information, and especially the DNI, protects the classified
information that is collected, but also that they protect and
understand how sensitive sometimes our means of gathering
that information is the sources and methods.
And the DNI is the person who sees everything they know, every
capability, they know the information that we do or do not
have, the information that is or isn't informing our decisions.
And, and frankly, the reason that this nomination, I think is
so dangerous is because any damage that she would do, any
information she would provide the president, right?
She tweets Russian propaganda. Why not include it in the
Presidential Daily Brief? Oh, well, it turns out that
Donald Trump is a thinking, sentient person, and he's done
this before, and he can have anybody he wants advising him on
this kind of stuff. And it also turns out that Tulsi
Gabbard, who is not my favorite, but I've just read her stuff
recently, and it's not actually new.
Apparently she put this out in like 2022, her take on the
Second Amendment, which has always been one of my big
issues. She said she got it 100% wrong.
That's what I've been waiting to see.
I, I've been waiting like it needs to be more publicized.
I'll throw it out on my social media.
We'll put a link over on the the local channel.
If you guys want to follow us over at kyleserafin.com, you can
go do that and we'll put it out in the public way.
It's actually a pretty good piece.
She doesn't go all the way and say she was wrong about abortion
and some of her values on life. And I don't get the impression
that she's Christian, but she does say that she was wrong
about individual liberties and the fact that the government is
dangerous and will overstep its boundaries.
And then you have this lady, apologist, sycophant acolyte for
her church, the Church of the government, the thing that she's
done and served her entire life. She's gone from quote UN quote
public service to now elected official.
She lies so, so easily. Tulsi Gabbard has had a
clearance for something like 21 years.
Tulsi Gabbard has at least had a top secret clearance since she
started working in an army psyops unit, which is what that
requires of you. Which means she's had multiple
background checks. They do background checks every
five years on general. That's when the reinvestigations
for your top secret clearances. She's allowed to have an opinion
that is more aligned with what Russia says.
That doesn't mean that she is being influenced by Russia.
It's the same argument they made with Tenant Media and this this
Tim Poole thing. I'm sure I have plenty of
disagreements with what Tim Poole thinks, but I don't think
he's a Russian puppet. I think that the things he said
we're probably in line with what Russia wanted pushed out there,
but I don't think that they pushed talking points on him and
made him say those things. That's the same thing for Tulsi
Gabbard. She's allowed to agree with
certain things that don't agree with the public sentiment.
That's the whole democracy thing, isn't it?
We're allowed to have dissent. The majority is supposed to be
protected, and if they're able to convince people otherwise,
then they do. You can't have that kind of
narrative parading around. All of this stuff stems from
this very simple thing here, which is a very amusing article
from MSNBC. This is over at the which.
What was this under? This is an MSNBCA pin opinion
writer. We've played this stuff before,
shared it before. His name is Zeeshan Alim.
The Democratic Party is in crisis.
There are now three contests against Donald Trump.
One that it lost, one that they narrowly squeaked by.
That's 2020. We don't believe that.
And then one more they lost decisively.
I'm fairly confident that that actually doesn't make a lot of
sense, does it? I think he won all three because
that's how trends work. Donald Trump's latest victory
over 90% of the counties shifted in his direction.
People across the left are scrambling to diagnose what ails
the party. This is the thing.
This is that pride. This is that hubris.
This is putting government over God because their values are
aligned with something that's that's secular.
A group of center left commentators and party
operatives have converged on a diagnosis that could be
summarized as quote. The wokes lost it, which is
factually accurate. Of course they lost it.
They went and campaigned on the wrong things, but they're
doubling down on it and there's no reason to get in their way
while they do so let them continue to make this argument.
I will promote it. This set argues that the social
justice activists who focused on oppression tied to identity are
too much of an influence in the Democratic Party and they
torpedoed Harris's campaign. Working class people were
alienated, they contend, by such issues as to fund the police,
trans rights, reparations for black people, abolishing
Immigration and Customs, campus cancel culture, diversity,
equity and inclusion, and the ever evolving academic sounding
jargon that surrounds these issues.
Go find a regular person that thinks that those issues win.
You will have a hard time because regular people don't
think they win, but it's not stopping them.
They continue to double down on it and thank God for that.
Let him keep doing it. Let him keep losing.
I'm for it. Sometimes they have to eat crow.
It's kind of fun to watch. Sometimes we get to watch The
View do a hostage video. We've seen a lot of people on
the political right sort of kowtow.
He had to see Tucker Carlson go and be nice to Dominion because
they sued them. This is how you face them down.
You hit them where they're actually most scared.
Apparently it's in in litigation and they're realizing that
they're going to lose their audiences as well.
This is Sonny Hostin who's on the view and she's fairly
terrible. And she was berating Matt Gaetz
the other day on allegations that are unproven in our system
under due process. They didn't happen.
So she's eating this crow in front of everybody.
Look at her face. If you are missing this on the
if you're just listening, you can kind of hear it in her
voice. It's really worth watching and
come in about 45 minutes into the program, 50 minutes in and
you'll enjoy watching this little clip.
Otherwise, we'll share it over on on locals@kyleseraphin.com.
Here we go. On screen, Sonny, you have a
legal note. I do have a legal note.
Thank you, Whoopi. Matt Gaetz has long denied all
allegations, calling the claims quote invented and saying in a
statement to ABC News that this false smear following a
three-year criminal investigation should be viewed
with great skepticism. That DOJ investigation was
closed with no charges being brought.
We'll be right back. Pow right in the face.
She looks like she's stunned. She's doing her best to do a a
hostage impression. And yet that's what's going on
there. They're forcing you to say
things that are true and it hurts.
It hurts to say things are true when you are serving lies.
It doesn't feel well, it doesn't it doesn't, it doesn't vibe with
your jam, does it? And so that's kind of delicious
for for us to enjoy. How much was that hard for they
needed to cut to a break right afterwards.
Also funny that Whoopi had to set it up.
I don't know why I think that's funny.
I don't think why, but this is the sort of overwhelming
movement when we're talking about the woke lost it.
They did. And I've been telling you guys
for quite a while that Twitter is not real life.
And I do think that's not real life.
So if you are upset with me saying mean things on Twitter or
if I say something mean to you, it's not real life.
I wouldn't say that to your face.
I don't consider it real, but it is more and more representative.
This is a very telling piece from CNN.
It's more representative of the way that real people at least
vote the people that are actively participating in the
social square and Elon Musk can be credited directly with
allowing this to exist. This is a truly interesting Pew
Research Center graph and, and, and survey.
I want you to digest what it says about where you can
actually suss out truth, because you can't suss it out from the
mainstream media. The woke lost it.
Don't do that. But you can find it when you get
enough people that are actively participating and they don't
feel like they're going to be censored, when you can say
things like retard and gay. You know, I had someone talk to
me the other day from an advertising agency.
We were just chatting and he said he said, yeah, I
understand, that's kind of gay. And I was like, oh, Donald Trump
won, we can say gay again. And he was like, I hadn't
thought about it, but yes, we can in the same way I said it to
the guy about the wheels, which had nothing to do with sexuality
at all. But it's like when I grew up, if
you had weird looking wheels, they were either douchey or it
was like, those, those are some gay wheels on that truck.
Why do they look like that? And the guy knew exactly what I
was talking about. Because if we're just
communicating honestly like human beings, it's not because
we're trying to hurt somebody. And you can do that on Twitter
now. And maybe that's why the numbers
have swung this way. So the reason, one of the big
reasons he bought Twitter slash X is because he wanted to make
it his own platform, remake it in his own image.
And I think this really gets at it.
Look at this, the party ID among those who regularly use X slash
Twitter for news. Back in 2020, two, 65% of those
who regularly use Twitter slash X for news were Democrats.
Just 31% were Republicans. Look at where we are today, just
a completely different picture. Now it's basically split between
Democrats 48%, Republicans at 47%.
And what I should note, Mr. Berman, is this now this new
overall makeup matches the overall electorate far better.
And more than that, more than that, John, look at where Mr.
Musk's net worth is today versus where it was just two months
ago. He.
It's 252 billion to 314 billion. The number has gone up
dramatically. His actual worth has gone up
because he's doing things. Did you notice that language
though? Did you notice that language
that he said he wanted to remake Twitter X in his own image?
They constantly are stealing the language from religion.
How funny. That was on John Berman show.
He went on CNN the other night because kind of lambast all
these people because everything they do is trying to discredit,
listen to these just like slanderous statements that he
makes out there. He just sort of alleges them
without any sort of facts. This is why they've lost
credibility. And that's why Twitter as a
public square is far more interesting and far more
accurate than you're going to find on, let's say, ACNN.
This was John Berman show. Here he is guest hosting while
he just kind of casually lobs all these allegations that have
made them discredited in their own right because people just go
like, no, good evening. Abby is out.
I'm John Berman. You might know me from a cable
morning show, though not the one that might soon have a Defense
Secretary who paid a woman that accused him of sexual assault,
nor the one that just sent 2 anchors to Mar A Lago then
talked about it like it was the Yalta Summit.
No, I Co host the morning show here on CNN that starts in like
10 minutes. So let's get right to what
America is talking about. Let's get right to what America
is talking about. Me trying to make slanderous
allegations and this real weird acting voice that I don't
normally talk to my friends like right?
Like nobody knows. Nobody talks like that and
that's why all these things have been garbage.
You know, you can make the argument that the economy was
better in the year 1900, that we had strong things.
Those are policy based arguments.
Nobody has any sort of refuting of this.
Actually wanted to play this earlier on but I forgot.
I want to give you this little taste about tariffs because this
is the thing, everything you can do to discredit these people.
The problem is when the facts are on your side and you
actually have things in proper order and you know that human
autonomy, the reason why free will is given to people so that
they can choose to the right things.
With it, the government actually subverts your ability to freely
do things as maybe you would choose.
Now that stops some bad people, but it also stops good people
too. Anyway, tariffs as a bargaining
chip is a kind of an interesting idea being pushed forward by
Harold Lutnick. Yes, this is a bit out of order,
I think, but I do think it falls into sort of like people pushing
back and not even being able to have honest arguments on these
these television programs, which is why Twitter ends up being far
more successful and more accurately representing the
American population the way that we disagree.
It's actually far more fun to be there than it is to be around
people you agree with all the time, for whatever it's worth.
All right, here's an argument about tariffs, which we're not
going to hear as many things because this guy's too smart to
be argued with and he continues to say the right thing and of.
Course it's a bargaining chip. We key and sell a Ford or GM in
Europe. You go to Europe, you can't sell
a Ford GMY, there's 100% tariffs.
How about in Japan? 100% tariffs?
So do you think if we said we're going to tariff you the way you
tariff us, do you think they're going to allow Mercedes and all
these Japanese companies and Porsches and BMWs to all of a
sudden have 100% tariffs in America?
Of course that they're going to come and negotiate and their
tariffs are going to come down. And finally Ford and General
Motors are going to be able to sell in these places.
How? Does that sound of?
Course, they're going to come down.
Of course, this is just. Negotiatingly, it absolutely
makes sense if you do it strategically.
If it's across the board, it creates a real problem.
And the question is whether you believe the president is going
to do it strategically or across the board.
He keeps saying it across the board.
Well, when you're running for office, you make broad
statements so people understand you.
OK, Tariffs are an amazing tool by the president to use.
They're an amazing tool. But he understands don't tariff
stuff we don't make right. If we don't make it and you want
to buy it, I don't want to put the price up there.
It's pointless. But use tariffs to build in
America. If we want to make it in
America, tariff it. Or if we're competing with a
tariff it. But you got to remember, we need
to protect the American worker. Why would you need to protect
the American worker? Because that's the regular
person and giving them better autonomy to be able to do the
right things, to be able to serve God as way they want to
see it, which is what most Americans still think,
especially working class people get out of their way.
Also, there's this funny little moment in the press where you
keep seeing it, where they continue to learn the wrong
lessons. This was something they should
have picked up in 2016 when he beat Hillary.
They took him literally when they should have taken him
seriously. And they can't handle it.
It's like, no, he's serious about certain things, but he
says things broadly. It's so simple.
It's very important. I'm going to give you 2 more
little evidence pieces of the sort of the, the, the scare
tactics that are going on right now in the government.
One of the biggest ones is this argument against Cash Patel, who
you guys know. I'm 100% behind Cash Patel being
the FBI director. I hope, it is my hope that
Donald Trump is holding on to that so that Chris Ray can
continue to act like he's going to operate with impunity and not
let his enemy know and, and Chris Ray is an enemy, not let
Chris Ray know what's coming his way.
I hope that's the case. We've heard that Chris Wray has
hired a new chief of staff. That's an interesting thing to
do if you think you're going to be gone in 50 or 60 days.
He's been setting up his appointment calendar and setting
out all of his meetings and pushing all the stuff forward.
I just saw you guys in the chat mentioned Russ Vaught.
If you guys love Russ Vaught, he's the guy that fired Steve
Friend. I think Russ Vaught is a
complete Pansy. Think he's a cock.
He also left his wife with a special needs child.
He he talked about being Christian.
I don't know why I got to derail by that, but there are people on
our side that are garbage too. For whatever it's worth, I think
Ross is one of them. It's neither here nor there.
All right, let me give you this example of people that are truly
garbage. This is an FBI agent who exists
now in his post FBI life. His name is Daniel Bruner on a
government contract. Again, another subservient
acolyte of the government making the argument that my buddy Cash
Patel, he's not a good director, that he doesn't have the
experience for it. I'm going to go debunk that as
well. Let's go ahead and play this
again. CNN kind of trying to go out
there. They're telling you who they're
scared of. These are the people you put in.
If they're scared of the people, Matt Gaetz, Tulsi Gabbard, RFK
Junior, then that's the people that need to be in because
that's the people that roll it back.
That's how you make it great again.
You do the opposite of what you've been doing for the last,
let's say, 120 years like we just heard about.
This is retired FBI Special agent Daniel Brunner.
Daniel, thanks so much for being here with us.
We appreciate it. Thanks, Jessica.
And we just walked through this again, at this point, it is a
hypothetical, but we do have reporting that this is a
decision Trump is mulling over and and seriously considering.
If he were to fire Christopher Wray when he takes office in
January, in terms of the implications for the FBI, for
the agency to carry out its ability to carry out its
mission, how impactful might that be?
Well, thanks for having me. And it's really important to
understand that the person who's leading the FBI, who is the
director and then the deputy director, those are two very
important positions. You're in charge of 10s of
thousands of employees, both special agents, analysts,
everyone that is enforcing the law, federal law that is on the
books and they supporting the Constitution of the United
States. Putting someone like Cash Patel
in the position of director of the FBI is, I believe,
extremely, extremely dangerous because you just alluded to
that. His resume isn't his
traditional. There is nothing on his resume
other than three years as a lying US attorney at the DOJ.
He has no experience leading an organization, no less a Cub
Scout pack, to put him in front of the lead law enforcement
agency in the United States. And some consider the world to
have him in charge of so many employees.
And he has clearly stated that he wants to exact revenge upon
those that have investigated President Trump and those
investigated those that are around him.
He will conduct a massive amount of damage to the interior of the
FBI. Good.
That's the whole point, dummy. Did you notice that he said he
doesn't have the leadership experience or any executive
authority, the like time that he spent time doing this stuff,
He's never let a Cub Scout pack. Let me just read you the
excerpts from a little piece that was covering down on this.
Mr. Patel. These are these are just line
items on Cash Patel's resume. Mr. Patel serves as the former
chief of staff to the acting Secretary of Defense, Chris
Miller. He served as the deputy
assistant to the president and a senior director for the
Counterterrorism Center, which is the National Security
Council, OK. He also served as the principal
deputy to the acting Director of National Intelligence, The DNI.
He was over in the place where we're putting Tulsi Gabbard.
He served as the national security advisor and the senior
counsel for the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence, which is what they referred to as being a Devin
Nunez aide. And he was also a line
prosecutor working in the terrorism department of the DOJ.
Yeah. He's never LED anything at all,
I'm sure of it. That makes perfect sense.
Why are they so scared of these people?
They're so scared because of the thing that Vivek said, which is
that most of these folks don't need to be there.
They can be gone and nobody will notice.
And there should be a massive rollback because 120 years ago.
We had a much better country in some ways.
We were able to financially stand on our own.
I think Christianity is part of it.
And I think having that God of government grow so big, it's
time to prune it back down aggressively.
Here's my little take from the vague scaring people in the
government going after their God.
Are you expecting to close down entire agencies like President
Trump has talked about the Department of Education, for
example? Are you going to be closing down
departments? We expect mass reductions, we
expect certain agencies to be deleted outright.
We expect mass reductions in force in areas of the federal
government that are bloated. We expect massive cuts of on
federal contractors and others who are over billing the federal
government. So yes, we expect all of the
above, and I think people will be surprised by, I think, how
quickly we're able to move with some of those changes given the
legal backdrop the Supreme Court has given us.
Yeah. From your mouth to God's ear.
The question there is, can he do it?
Can he break the federal government is the question,
because he has the right people in the judgeships.
And hopefully they're able to thwart some of the Biden
nominations. You know, even if Kamala wants
to go out there and vote in their favor, hopefully that he
gets a chance to go out and do the right thing, which is to
reduce this animal, which is a terrible God for people and it
is a false God. All right, we're going to wrap
it up with that. I think that's a useful thought.
I think it is probably the last place to go if you guys want to
support the program. I'll give you one last little
plug here. You can support by going over to
my friends at madhatjerky.com/kyle.
It's Matt with two T's hat with 1tjerky.com/kyle.
I saw some of you guys made some weird orders at like weird
hours. I always get the emails whenever
the orders go through. Maybe it's just the processing
system, but sometimes they're in the middle of the night.
I don't know who's buying jerky at midnight, but keep doing it.
That's fine. It's a great snack.
It's I've actually got to do my order as well.
So thanks for supporting them and supporting our program and
getting yourself something healthy.
I have been on a nothing but of meat diet.
We're now in the 5th week and it continues to make us healthy.
So that leads us in to the Palate Cleanse of the day.
This is a special message from Robert F Kennedy Junior who has
decided to come and he's going to be the HHS Secretary we
believe and he's going to make America healthy again, including
you. He's got a message today.
It's time. Well make some better choices as
you open up your fridge. Don't even think about touching
that aspartame. I made a promise to protect you
all. Even if it meant from
yourselves. By the way, we're hitting biceps
and triceps today. It's time to make America swole
again. It's time to make America swole
again. Go out there and have a
fantastic day. I appreciate it.
Go out there and love your neighbors, even the ones that
don't know what to do, and set that example that says that God
is in charge. It will actually lead people
away from the false gods. That's always the way it's been.
It's been the profits by living examples.
And then people look and go, hey, they're living better.
Maybe I can too. Appreciate it.
I'll see you guys again for tomorrow.
God bless the listeners of the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Please expand the show by sharing it, make sure you've
liked it wherever you're hearing it, and make sure you're
subscribed if you are not on both the audio and the video.
I will take them both. Appreciate y'all, see you again
tomorrow. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth
Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.