Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Hey folks, welcome to the Kyle
Serafin Show. Today is Tuesday, March the 26th
and we're rolling live on rumble.com/kyle Serafin.
We are rolling live on Twitter X.
We are rolling live on Facebook and on YouTube.
If you're on YouTube and you are sick of all the ads which happen
every 60 seconds, all you got to do is click on the link that
I've added in the description. You can click on the link and
you can roll straight on over to our Rumble channel and you can
see what we're doing. I'm watching this chat go nuts
right now for all of you. Apparently Bongino had some
issues yesterday. Rumble continues to be an
interesting experience. That's the exact right way to do
it. Experience is exactly the way we
would call it. If you have not already given us
a like, make sure you do. If you have not subscribed, make
sure you do that as well and we appreciate you guys being there.
I want to go ahead and say thanks to the sponsors that we
have that keep this program running and then we are going to
get deep into some strange, some strangeness that's going on.
Here we go #1 My friends over at Catholic Vote.
If you are not getting The loop, please do go to
catholicvote.org. Again catholicvote.org and you
can sign up for The Loop right there.
The Loop is an outstanding news aggregator service.
It is going to bring you all the top stories of the day, better
than the AP, better than Reuters, better than any of
these other wire services. They're going to give you a mix
of conservative and sort of not conservative news.
They're going to give it from a good take and they're just going
to present you with some facts from Daily Caller, from Daily
Wire, from CBS, from CNN, from the New York Times and so on and
so forth. You can go to catholicvote.org
and get that e-mail again. It's called The Loop.
And if you don't want to sign up for it, if you're that kind of
person you just want to visit, go to catholicvote.org/loop and
you can get a kind of a preview. You'll get a look of what it
looks like. You can follow them on social
media at Catholic Vote. That's their handle everywhere
you look. Let's also do our little ad for
our friends over at 4 Patriots, folks.
We're just seeing now some chaos, absolute chaos happening
in the port of Baltimore. If you're worried about food
shortages, if you're worried about things not going well in
this country and you want to give yourself a hedge against
that uncertainty, I recommend you prepare with emergency food.
You can do so at 4. The number four
patriots.com/kyle. Again, fourpatriots.com/kyle.
That will take you to our landing page.
The the targeted idea. They they talk about the Rule of
threes when you go to survival school, and the Rule of Threes
essentially tells you what you can and cannot survive with.
You can actually survive for about 3 weeks without without
food, three days without water, so on and so forth.
There's all these different threes, but three months is kind
of a sweet spot. 90 days worth of being able to see what's
going on around you. You can get 90 days worth of
emergency food. It has something like 700 plus
individual servings of calories for you and your family, and you
guys can get that from a four patriots.com/kyle.
If you go in there, Scroll down a little ways and you will get
to an opportunity to add that to a cart and give yourself just a
little bit of breathing room if crazy things happen.
Like, I don't know, a boat goes drifting into a bridge that you
would normally commute on the 695 and takes out a major a
major US port. Stops it cold.
Everything that's there is going to be stuck until they can pull
all these trestles out. We're going to talk about that.
We're going to talk about a, a pop star.
What is he, a pop star? R&B.
What do you want to call him? Hip hop in, Sean Puffy Combs
known as Diddy. He's got some issues going on
today that's kind of strange. Let's let's jump right into it
and we'll start with this weird search warrant story.
Do we know anything about this? I keep getting these tags on
social media. Hey Kyle, can you tell us what
happened with P Diddy? Why did the HSI go and raid his
house? I don't know.
I don't have access to the case. While we're going to exercise a
little bit of the Bongino rule here.
But let's read what is being reported locally because it's
been all crazy last 24 hours. The story is coming from ABC 7.
Local news says Homeland Security ranges the home be
home. Associated with Diddy's film
company Homeland Security agents on Monday raided A Holmby
mansion associated with rap mogul.
Guess rap mogul. Hip hop mogul, whatever.
Sean Diddy Combs, Is he not going by Puff Daddy anymore?
I got to tell you folks, I I never, I never liked any of his
music. I don't care about it.
Here's what I think is important.
They believe that this raid was somehow associated with a
federal sex trafficking investigation based out of New
York. OK, there was also apparently a
similar raid that happened in Miami.
Now this one was in the Los Angeles area, down the street
from the Playboy Mansion. All right, you're seeing on the
screen a kind of a an overhead shot of a bunch of agents coming
in in Bearcats. This is where we're at today.
This is the state of affairs in America.
We are now taking people who are very, very well known.
His net worth is, is close to a billion or maybe even north of a
billion dollars. And then they're going to say,
OK, well we've got to bring in a BearCat.
Why? Because billionaires are going
to try to shoot it out with the cops.
Is there any instance or any evidence that this is necessary?
Or are we doing the shock and awe treatment right now where we
are specifically doing punishment through process?
And I think that's what we're seeing evidence of.
There was some initial reports as well that he had fled the
country. It sounds like his plane flew
down out of the United States, down into the Caribbean and that
he was not on it. So that's strange.
All of this stuff is weird. If you follow Mike Benz, you saw
him say probably my favorite quote of the day, which was tell
me that in 2024 we are not about to get a a white Bronco in the
sky. And for a second I was like a
Bronco in the sky. What in the world, Which of
course is reference to the OJ that's slow fleeing down the
highway where there was that that V shaped the flying V of
patrol cars that followed OJ Simpson until he eventually
turned himself in which was a harrying moment.
Very strange times indeed. Here's where I land on this kind
of stuff. It may be the case that there is
a solid backing and a a real significant threat posed by Sean
Diddycombs to the American public, or we have an entirely
weaponized DOJ. And the scariest thing about
seeing Homeland Security and not even DOJ go after them is that
you don't have any of the normal shackles.
Even DOJ. For as crazy as it is and as
weaponized as it is, as as much as it's gone off the rails, it
does still have some rules that it operates under.
It tends to violate them in some ways.
But it at least has a rule book that it has to play by, and
that's known as the dialogue and the AGG Dom.
That's the Attorney General's guideline for domestic
operations. OK, that's one of them.
AGG. Dom.
The other is the dialogue which is domestic Investigations
Operations guide. Those two are sort of slowing
down the complete insanity of what FBI and ATF and and the
Marshall service can get involved with.
It actually is a playbook and tells them what they can and
cannot do. HSI Homeland Security
Investigations under DHS doesn't have those.
They can still bring cases for prosecution to DOJ, but they
don't answer to DOJ. And that's where I get really
shaky about it. People ask me why this Look, if
there's an international trafficking situation and HSI is
the investigation agency. OK, fine.
But I don't understand why we're seeing on the screen here that
there's at least two Bearcats full of tactical guys.
I know there's a lot of places to clear, but this is as dumb to
me as clearing President Trump's mansion at Mira Lago.
Sending a bunch of FBI SWAT guys and probably the HRT is what we
heard. The Hostage Rescue Team, which
is the FBI Tier One Counter Terrorism Division.
So why are we sending these people to go after very public
figures who are very publicly available, who have everything
they have invested in this country.
All of their money is going here.
Could he run off and disappear in another country?
I suppose so. Is that going to be a big
miscarriage of justice? Probably not.
I mean, all of his resources are here. the US government has the
ability to tie those up. So what flight risk does this
person actually represent? And even if he got away, I mean,
the other interesting thing is, is that Brianna Morello, whose
show was on yesterday, and if you guys want to check on
Rumble, you can check her out. We were discussing things that
were happening at Parkland and some of the propaganda mission
that was going on. The crazy thing to me was that
she said she had friends that actually worked for him, that
interned him as a like young, pretty females back when she was
in high school and college. And they never reported anything
untoward. And generally speaking, when you
talk about somebody involved in this kind of action, it's not
like it's it would be, it would not be.
It's difficult to hide that type of behavior.
If you have a predatory attitude, it's unlikely that
somebody is so compartmented in their life that they're only
predatory at some point in time and they're also not at other
times. And this hasn't come out.
He's been a public figure for quite a while.
Doesn't mean it's, it's ruled out.
But again, we're going to kind of sit back and watch it.
I have a innate distrust of what our federal government is doing
right now. It made my tax season, which I
just had to go do my taxes as a as a self-employed or a business
owner. A small business owner for the
first time made me nauseated because I'm going to write out a
check and I'm funding this garbage, which I've always been.
All of you have W2 jobs as well. It's a little bit less, it's a
little bit less on the nose when it comes out of your paycheck,
before you ever touch it. When you're actually writing out
and stroking out a check and putting thousands of dollars
towards our government and you know that you're funding these
dudes walking around that are doing things that are not, that
are not along with the American values that we sort of believe
should be there, it's real scary to me.
Now what are they spending our money on?
Because that's what's been kind of in my mind.
That's what's been sort of floating around here.
I got a video. I got a little story here.
This is a an attempt to debunk the the the right wing narrative
about climate change and the the the Senator Kennedy attack.
We get this attack on this poor kid.
You see this guy on the screen right now?
He's an Alaskan based cross country skier.
He did his first ever congressional hearing.
His name is Gus Schumacher and we're getting a reporting here
from the Alaska Beacon. Now.
I thought Alaska was a pretty conservative area.
The title of this article you're seeing on the screen is Alaska
Olympian went to DC to testify on climate change and then a
senator dredged up old tweets. Well, this kids like 2324 years
old. So how old are those tweets
really? That's Part 1, #2.
He's got a pretty face. He seems like a stud athlete.
And there they brought him there to testify about climate change.
So in true form, as we played the other day, Senator Kennedy
just kind of asks people the basic questions, like, you have
these thoughts. What are they all about?
Is there any basis for your thoughts or are you just AOC
with emotion? We have a we have an AOC clip as
well. So when we look at this kind of
nonsense, the question is, hey bro, Because that's what I
assume he prefers to be called. Hey, bro, you represent the
skiing community. The snow isn't as snowy as it
used to be. Can you tell me what you think
is going on here? This little exchange is fun, and
apparently it was unfair, per the Alaska Beacon, which, I
don't know. The kids own words.
Just listen to him. He only went to high school.
I'm not mad at anybody who has a high school education alone.
That's fine. You're just probably not a
scientist. Most likely not a scientist.
Here's this kid talking. What is What is carbon dioxide?
I'm, I went to high school, but that's carbon dioxide is a a
gas. OK, I'm not a I'm not a I'm not
a professional to talk about carbon dioxide so much, but,
well, you want us to abolish it, right?
No, I there's always going to be carbon dioxide, right.
So, So what is it you want us to do?
I let me back up because I I want to.
I mean you're here as an expert. Tell me more about what carbon
dioxide is. I'm here as an expert cross
country skier who sees the changes in my winters and the
landscape that I live in in Alaska.
And so carbon dioxide is what I see it as is.
You know, it's a gas that exists in our atmosphere.
And is it the major part of our atmosphere or it's a huge part
of our atmosphere? Yeah, it's actually very small
part of our atmosphere. Well, OK.
But yeah, I don't know. What are you asking
specifically? Well, you said we need to reduce
carbon dioxide emissions. I'd like to know first, if you
know what it is you want us to abolish fossil fuels.
I never said that. You never have said that.
No. OK, what?
What do you think we ought to do with fossil fuels?
What will we do with fossil fuels?
Yeah. Should we make any changes?
I would like to see a decrease in the use of fossil fuels.
I think there's a possibility to use more electric generation.
OK, over over what period of time?
10 years, 50 years? 100 years?
That's not. I would like to see it come as
fast as possible while continuing.
How fast? Sorry, how fat.
It's so awkward. It's so awkward.
Listen to this poor guy. So here you have one of the best
when it comes to putting people's feet to the fire and
you got this poor kid who's out there going like look bro, like
all the things that I have that came here because of because of
petroleum products. Like I wear jackets and they
have like puppy and they're made by like The North Face or
whatever. But those were also petroleum.
They don't know like every plastic thing in his entire
life, which is what the basis of his, his profession is.
The sad thing is, is that Democrats trotted him out like
this was somehow going to be a win.
They also brought in a fly fishing outfitter because these
climate pagans and I'm going to straight steal this from from
George Hill climate Pagans, these people are worshipping
something that they don't understand.
It's a God that is that is imperfect.
It's the God of the climate. It's a Gaia type character.
These dudes are bringing out their their experience in the
fishing industry and the fact that the snow is not as snowy as
it used to be. None of that is real information
And so that's kind of distracting that was that's
that's over here waving like look at this meanwhile what do
we have going on. We've got real problems in
infrastructure. We now have a bridge collapse,
which we're going to talk about. And I think you guys are going
to take George Hill's experience.
Yeah. I think you're going to find
that his his analysis of this is actually very disquieting
because this could be the just the beginning of it based on
what he was just telling me. I've got a little video that
will show while he's on and that will let him talk about it, but
some kind of wild moments. And so anyway, so you've got
this poor kid doing the best that he can.
And then like I said, you're if you're going to bring on fly
fitting Outfitters to talk about it to me, that's like asking
somebody from REI bring on the REI employee that sells hiking
boots to talk about how forest fires are really bad.
OK, It's like what? What is your experience?
Well, I sell boots and people use those boots to walk in the
woods. And then when they come back and
they buy new boots, they tell me that there are now more forest
fires than there were. Uh huh.
And well, based on my experience in selling boots, people are now
buying more fire retardant boots than they used to.
And so we've got to get rid of the climate emergency.
No further information. In the intelligence world, we
call that no further information.
It's sad. I mean, it is sad because simply
this poor kid. Anyway, that was the the moment
here it was covered. This is a hit job, by the way.
This is Republicans pounce because the Democrats brought in
this perfectly nice kid. He's Olympian.
He's a stud athlete. He's a the kind of thing that we
expect in this country, like, hey, you're really good at this
one thing. Go be really good at that.
By the way. Now we're going to abuse you and
trot you out like a dancing monkey.
And we're going to try to have you give your opinions to real,
serious people, like actual thinkers, and you're going to be
promptly exposed to foolishness. And then when you've been
exposed as being foolish and not knowing anything about the thing
that you're supposedly an expert on the winter recreation
business, then then everybody's really mean for being mean to
you because he did his best. You guys remember that.
Remember that whole thing about how you did your best?
It's like the results actually matter, too.
This whole everybody gets a trophy thing.
Just because you get a trophy skiing across Alaska doesn't
mean you get to come testify about the snow in Alaska like
you've been in the snow. That doesn't mean you know about
the snow. Like, I eat dinner all the time.
That doesn't make me an expert on evaluating, you know, some
sort of nutritional basis. That'd be foolish.
But it's a Democrat talking point now that this was mean.
That's how we do it. And and it led me to this sort
of thing about the 60 Minutes piece.
Some of you guys may have seen this.
There's a 60 Minutes piece that was out there that has been
talking about misinformation. I saw you guys in the chat
already kind of talking about it.
A woman named Kate Birdstar, I believe that's her name.
And Kate Birdstar, who I actually have listed here, this
is the name of the video. I called it Lesbians want to
stop free speech. I don't know why I called it
that, but that seemed like the only way I could remember who
this lady was. This is 60 Minutes covering how
really bad it is that people are not listening to experts.
There are experts on fake information, which seems really
wild. You remember like that Lady that
sang the Mary Poppins song. There are experts out there that
are going to tell you how to think.
And if you're going to think on your own without the experts,
it's basically like driving without a seat belt.
It's really dangerous for you to go out there and think on your
own. That's why we have experts,
folks. Starboard Birdstar.
I don't know what I said here. She has Let's listen to a little
bit of this interview. I'm going to give you kind of a
take of it. Then I want to go show you what
CNN did because they tried to cover down on this, which is
quite funny. Kate Starboard says the social
media platforms also often ignored the researchers
suggestions. The statistics I've seen are
just for the Twitter platform, but I my understanding is, is
that they responded to about 30% of the things that we sent them
and I think the on the majority of those they put labels.
But just a third. But just a third.
And do you suspect that Facebook was the same?
And Kate Starbird says the social media platform OK, that's
the repeat They only they only censored like a third of the
speech that we recommended that they censor How weird.
And then you go and and so people are like, hey, by the
way, you have no right to censor anybody's speech.
And I don't know why, but there's like sort of this trend
in the last couple days that I've seen of women who are
attempting to look like men. She has a male haircut.
She's wearing masculine clothes. She's not masculine, obviously.
Obviously a woman, but not an attractive one and not one
that's trying to be feminine in any way, has kind of embraced
this androgyny or this attempt to sort of blur the lines, not
winning. This is the best part for me.
And I'm going to show you why. This is a CNCBS who who doubled
down on this. This is from 60 Minutes Overtime
on their website. Look at this, it's an entire
article on how pre bunking misinformation works.
Now if you're watching on the video version of this, you're
immediately going to see what a picture normally that would be
the picture that was associated with the article.
They actually had a video pre roll on there and it was a piece
of this particular interview that I just showed you.
But here's what's really fun. The pre roll advertisement for
that video, which I normally have to sit through and then I
screenshot for you and then I put it on the screen.
The pre roll was brought to you by Pfizer where you can learn
more about vaccine options and you can book a shot at schedule.
Covidvax.com Yeah yeah Pfizer is sponsoring this pre bunking
situation. There's a lady out there and
she's jogging and she's got a Band-Aid on her left arm and
she's got myocarditis and she can no longer do things that she
used to be. Is that is that just
misinformation? I don't know what it is.
Anyway, it's very fun this this 60 Minutes interview reports
about the ongoing debate over social media companies including
Meta X, Google, Moderate harmful content, False medical
information and hate speech. Again, remember this article was
brought to you by Pfizer. It's so good.
It's so it's so on the nose. It's so straight in your face,
you can't even hide it. So, you know, 60 Minutes spoke
to a couple of different people. They talked to someone called
Sander Vander Linden, a professor of social psychology
and the director of the Social Decision Making Laboratory at
Cambridge University. I think you have to call, call
it a laboratory when it's actually outside the US.
If it's in Cambridge, you have to call a laboratory.
And Vander Linden did research on how people interact with
misleading or false information on social media and why they end
up believing things that are either half true or completely
false. Yeah.
So we have confirmation biases. Someone gives us information,
says, you know, P Diddy left the country, and then they show a
picture of the jet on, you know, on a thing.
And you go, oh, my God, he left the country.
He's fleeing. He's guilty, you know, or you
go, oh, my God, he's thinks everything's corrupted.
He won't get a fair trial. He's fleeing.
And then it turns out the fact is that he's not fleeing at all.
He's hanging out in Miami. That's OK.
OK, You can have false information.
The thing is, is that the government has no role in this.
And that's where these people are really upset.
The censors are trying so desperately.
They so much want you to believe only the approved truth, and so
they'll give you their take and they're very incensed, she said.
They only censored 1/3 of the things that we recommended.
I don't know why they didn't just listen to everything we
said. We're experts on what's true and
what's not true, and we can't let these people, these normies
out there that have, you know, jobs and thoughts and everything
else going on in there. We can't let these people be
involved in their own decision making.
Information is not for everyone. It is for us to tell them what
to think. That's what the news media is
all about and they're very incensed by this.
She gave an example of a misleading information that went
viral during COVID-19 during the pandemic stuff, a misleading
headline that said a healthy doctor died two weeks after
getting the COVID-19 vaccine The CDC is investigating.
Why that's misleading. I don't know why it's
misleading. I'm sure the guy was probably
healthy beforehand. It was seen by 10s of millions
of viewers. It was used by skeptics and
conspiracy theorists online to suggest that the COVID-19
vaccines didn't work and could even kill people.
Weird. Why would you think that,
people? Why would you consider that the
COVID-19 vaccines didn't work? Maybe your lying eyes told you
that everybody who got those shots still got COVID.
Maybe there was that maybe that the word vaccine changed in
definition. We had to just sort of just take
that on the nose and say, well, obviously words, the meanings of
words change, especially when it's inconvenient for the
pharmaceutical companies that are making the thing that we're
talking about. And they said it's highly
misleading because it's suggesting the doctor died
because of the COVID vaccine. But of course, to this day,
there's no evidence that the vaccine actually causes or
actually was a cause for the death of this doctor.
Well, thanks so much. That's so helpful to us.
Now we know, and so we're just ignorant and it's our own fault.
Here's the fun part. That entire interview was based
on, you know, I would say, misinformation or a little bit
of missing context. Isn't it worthwhile knowing, as
the Daily Caller is showing right here, the 60 Minutes
interview failed to disclose that the misinformation
researcher, the person who wants to be the arbiter of truth, that
mannish looking woman there. Yeah, she got millions of
dollars in government grants and also donated to Joe Biden who
was 100% behind. Getting rid of people like me
and Garrett O'boyle and Steve Friend and George Hill.
Getting rid of people that didn't want to do compliance
with a mandatory vaccine That we ended up winning in court, but
they pulled back. This question came to me the
other day. What did you do to try to stop
these vaccine mandates? That the answer is, is I funded
out of my own pocket not just my plaintiff nature, but also which
by the way, we have ongoing cases in Florida against the
Biden administration and I'm still a named plaintiff in that.
But additionally, I paid for other people to be plaintiffs in
the eventually victorious lawsuit out of the 5th Circuit,
which went down to the Southern District of Texas and Galveston.
We got the original injunction against that federal mandate.
It shut it down. Then it went to the the the
Appellate division. It went up to the appeals court
in Louisiana, in New Orleans, and we had three different
rulings there. We had an initial judge that was
favorable. Then we had a three panel judge
that said no and they removed the injunction.
Then we had an end bank panel that was basically just shy of
the Supreme Court that said, yeah, we think that you have a
lot of merit in your case. And what happened next?
The Biden administration withdrew their mandate because
we won and they didn't want us to have case law on our side
saying they could never do this again.
Interestingly enough, this lady who got money and donated to
that guy, the guy that got rid of my jobs, University of
Washington professor and researcher Kate Starbird, I'm
going to properly say her name. She was featured on 60 Minutes
and was talking about misinformation proliferating on
social media. This is her big thing.
And then she spearheaded a project that the National
Science Foundation gave a $2.25 million grant to, and she
cooperated with the Department of Homeland Security.
You know, the same kind of people that are investigating
Diddy Combs and they just got to put out the narrative that they
want. And she was also on the advisory
committee for SISA. The people that want to police
your thoughts, that think that your mind is part of the
cognitive infrastructure and that the government has some
role in regulating what goes into your eyes and into your
ears, what you read and what you hear.
They think that that's part of their infrastructure that they
have to protect. That's that Gray matter between
your ears, actually is government infrastructure.
If you listen to SISA, which Tracy Beans did a great job
reporting on. So that's what we're talking
about right here. The misinformation researchers
failed to say that they might have had a conflict of interest,
that they were somehow involved in government censorship simply
because the government funds what they do.
Isn't that something? It's kind of wild.
I don't understand how we can sit here and take these people
seriously. They want to be taken seriously
All they continue to do. I saw Chuck Todd on on Twitter
last night saying these people and they're talking about people
that are, you know, pro Trump. These people are are looking for
us to voice information when they've been you know, trying to
attack our credibility for years.
Homie, Chuck Todd, Leslie Stahl, all these types, let's let's be
real serious right now for one second.
Nobody needed to undermine your credibility.
You did it to yourself. This is a self-inflicted wound,
and it is fatal, I think, to the mainstream media.
There's no chance that they come back from this sort of thing.
Doesn't mean that people will not be listening to them for
ages. They kept saying that radio was
going to die. The the reason that radio
doesn't die is because, one, there's a massive diversity of
opinions that are out there on radio.
Two, it is highly localized and it touches people where they
are. And three, it's instantaneous,
and it happens right now for all of the multimedia feeds that we
have. Right now you're dealing with
this maybe in a podcast format. Maybe you downloaded it, maybe
you're streaming it live with me right now, like the audience is
on Rumble or over on X. Maybe you're seeing it in a
recording that comes on with all the video elements.
You can see this, you know the this, this sort of PowerPoint
presentation, this glorified PowerPoint that we do as we show
up articles and and there's video and there's little
graphics and things like that. And I can show you some some
video clips, but all of that stuff still has not been able to
terminate simple spoken word of people saying things that are
eminently true to them right near them.
That's just how it works. The truth will always cut.
That's that signal of accuracy, will always slice through the
noise of confusion. All right, I'm going to kind of
pivot from this nonsense because even though it's very fun and I
enjoyed it, we're going to talk about a couple things.
Let me start with this, actually, let me just start by
saying something about my buddies over at Patriot Coolers.
Then we're going to bring on George Hill and I want to
introduce a topic before he gets on.
Lest anyone think that he is breaking a confidentiality
agreement that he has with the US government.
I want to make sure that we show that this is open source
information that is available right now that has been reported
on going at least at least for the last couple weeks in the in
the public sphere. And I think it's relevant to the
story that we're going to deal with talking about this bridge
collapse, which by the way was a boat hitting a bridge.
I'm saying that irreverently. Obviously it was a big container
ship, but first let's say well thank you to my buddies over at
Patriot Coolers. If you guys do not have a
Patriot cooler, if you were in the market for Patriot Cooler,
that just means you looking for a Tumblr that says something Pro
America on it and you want to support the Kyle Seraphin Show.
And we're 100% behind it. We got Rose in the chat already
dropping in there. It's Patriot coolers.com again.
Patriot coolers.com. You must use the promo code.
Kyle. Kyle.
The promo code is my name as I am always attempting to get them
to use and everybody so far has not had anyone else using the
promo code Kyle. I think we're the first Kyle
that pops up if you search Kyle on on Apple right now on the the
Podcast app. In any case, promo code Kyle
will get you 10% off at Patriot coolers.
Whether you're looking for a hard sided cooler, whether
you're looking for a new backpack to carry your lunch to
work and you want to carry a water bottle in there.
They've got cantinas or canteens, little water carrier.
They've got the hot and cold tumblers which can be used for
coffee and so on and so forth. They've got big jugs that we're
coming into the summer right now.
You might want one of their 32 ounce or their 64 ounces or the
one gallon kind of moving around.
I've got one sitting over here. It's actually holding my door
open at the moment, but check out Patriot coolers.com.
Again, promo code Kyle save 10% off and it's free shipping over
50 bucks. So any of the big items or two
of the smaller ones and you'll get that option.
All right, let's put this article on the screen, let's
talk about the Chinese and then we're going to get George Hill
on the phone. So what you're seeing on the
screen right now from the Wall Street Journal this is coming
from Lisa Lynn March 7th of this year article entitled China
intensifies push to quote UN quote delete America from its
technology a directive known as Document 79 ramps up Beijing's
effort to replace US technology with home grown initiatives.
George and I talked about this earlier today.
I wanted to make sure that we could source it openly so we can
talk about it. The for American tech companies
in China the writing is on the wall.
It's also in paper on a on a document called 79 in 2022
Chinese government directed expands a drive that is muscling
US technology out of the country.
Some refer to it as Delete A Standing for Delete America
Document 79 was so sensitive that high-ranking officials and
executives were only shown the order.
And we're not allowed to make copies, said people who are
familiar with the matter. So there you go.
IT requires state owned companies in finance, energy and
other sectors to replace foreign software in all of their IT
systems by 2027. American tech giants have long
thrived in China, where they have hard wired the country's
meteoric rise with computers and operating systems and software
and so on. And Chinese leaders want to
sever that relationship and are driven by a push for
self-sufficiency. We're going to talk about what
that application and why you would need self-sufficiency is.
I'm going to get George on the line right now.
So George, if you're listening, I will be calling you shortly.
And let's just do a little video of what we can expect or what we
just saw. Here's some aerial footage of
the results of this crash in Baltimore.
And Mr. George Hill, do we have you on the line?
Hey, what happened? Well, we had you come in, but it
sounded like somebody had given you some benzos and that you
were so depressed that you were about to fall asleep on
yourself. So now we can hear you.
No man, I had a great workout this morning.
I turned a anaerobic workout into a combination anaerobic
anaerobic so I could make this call.
You just did double time pretty much.
All right, let's let's talk about some of the stuff while
we're I want to put this on the screen.
This is a time lapsed footage of this boat drifting into the
bridge. And so I know you've seen a lot
of this. What people are seeing on the
screen right now is going to show that there was a loss of
power. It looks like the entire ship
lost power and all of the lights went out and that happened
twice. Give me a take on what what you
think is going on there in Baltimore.
So just to give your audience a little bit of a background,
that's where I did my visit board search and seizure
training with the Coast Guard right after 911.
So I'm pretty familiar with the Coast Guard station there, the
Patapsco River. And I I mean this sincerely, you
know, the Coast Guard there is is just superb.
I mean they're the best ship handlers in the business.
It pains me to say that, but it is what it is.
So I'm familiar with that harbor and it it's like an airport if
it runs. It's just that the vehicles are
moving slower than on an airport.
So everything's highly synchronized and choreographed,
and nothing happens there without the Harbor master and
all the other parties involved, from the shipping companies to
the Coast Guard not not knowing what's going on.
So I'm going to, I'm going to show people this.
So people just saw the the bridge collapse.
It was happening at about four to 5X speed, which obviously is
way faster than it happens in reality.
I'm going to throw it on the screen now that people can
actually see in real time because we now have a regular
clock. It started at 1:23 this morning
and we're showing 31 seconds. People on the on the on the
screen can actually see it. But George, this as you said in
slow motion. The speed at which this thing
drifted towards that, that stanchion support was incredibly
slow. I mean it it's it's like
watching a disaster in slow motion divided by two.
Right. So the speed for that Channel
should be no more than 7 knots. So those diesel engines, there's
only one on the ship that size, they never turn off.
They're they're running all the time.
So that diesel engine and all the ships systems were
functioning while it was being loaded.
So I heard some people say, well it must have been a fire.
Well, that must have been a very quickly spreading fire if from
the time it left the pier to the time it hit the bridge to to
generate that much smoke. I'm not saying it's not, I'm
just saying that that would be unusual.
But those are diesel electric. It runs on one diesel engine
powering the generators which drive the propulsion system.
So seven knot speed, the black boxes, you know well you know
verify that whether that's accurate or not and they had two
pilots on board. That's a very busy port and like
I said, you know the level of professionalism there.
At least when I was there after 911 going through training, they
were pretty tight. Here's what I wanted to to touch
on, 'cause you brought this up to me and I hadn't even thought
about it. There's a lot of a lot of noise
going on in the world right now. The signal is much more more
interesting and I think the signal that you brought up about
what goes on when these ports, when when these ships which all
of them touch Chinese ports. Now because of the way we talked
about Document 79 just a second ago and kind of brief, do you
want to give a a kind of overarching look at what 79
actually means and then what it might mean in the context of
this particular situation, the? 79 is is a response to the US
looking to onshore its manufacturing capability and the
US technology companies pulling out of China.
So they were kind of forced into document 79 to onshore the
technology. But unlike the United States
they cannot onshore everything necessary to be self-sufficient.
They're the world's largest importer of food and petroleum
products. Now they have taken steps to
correct that to gain control of the slot, the strategic lines of
of communication, namely the shipping lines around the
Straits of Morocca. They're looking to build
overland routes through what used to be known as, oh God,
William Blanking right now. The the, the crazy country
there, Kazakhstan. And some stuff around it.
No, no, off the it's just East of India there in between Laos
and India not Thailand but it's in that neighborhood so.
So they're looking to work their way around that they're they're
getting belligerent with all the the other nation states around
there all of most of whom are in ascendancy from an economic
standpoint. So there's a lot of strategic
and geopolitical competition going on there.
But back to your earlier point, the Chinese, when they and we
know this both in industry and in the intelligence community.
So none of this is is super secret, classified.
But the Chinese control these ports and there's always some
sort of Port Authority officer, nudge, nudge, wink, wink who
will come in on board ship, you know routine, routine.
And they'll plug a thumb drive into the ship's network and do
who knows what. But you know, the captain, the
engineer, the first mate, really the the skilled portion of the
work ship, of the of the ship, it's really not going to be
sitting there. They don't have a chief
information officer that is riding herd over the, the
Chinese officer that's, you know, plugging a thumb drive
into the ship's network. So we know we, meaning the
industry, the intelligence community, we know that there's
malware on, you know, maybe not on every single ship, but on
just about every ship sailing the high seas that has touched a
Chinese port, which is just about all of them, you know, And
apparently this ship Nadali was involved in some sort of
accident in Antwerp in 2016. So, you know, we're just going
to have to wait and see. You know, we're just exploring
possibilities and vulnerabilities that exist out
there. You know, we're not going to
leave the world behind, which I'm sure some people have
already went to. Yeah.
So that's obviously the big thing is that this is not like
necessarily protective programming.
What we're showing on the screen right now, George that you're
not seeing is that I've actually done a real time stream.
It came from the from the cameras out there in the you
know underneath the bridge. So people are seeing this slow
motion, not that speed up version we showed earlier which
showed everything collapsing and it takes forever.
It's got I think it's a 7 minute long video.
So that's slowly been unfolding. We're seeing the we're seeing
the ship about to make impact with the the stanchion of the
bridge what and now it's falling.
So people are kind of seeing that here and you can see it
doesn't fall nearly as fast as it showed and it completely fell
apart. Maybe talk about some of the the
thoughts that we had that we were discussing about you know
what on earth does it mean for this thing to have had multiple
different sections fall apart as you guys did analysis for you
know security vulnerabilities and and and in your prior line
of work and we can talk about like what that looks like to you
when you see it. Yeah, I'm not a structural
engineer and I'm not a demolitions expert, but we saw
when the bridge over into Crimea was taken out, that just dropped
one span of it. It didn't drop the whole entire
bridge. And while a merchant vessel that
size and tonnage crashing into a pylon, you know, we take out
that, that one. Like I said, I'm not an
engineer, but it just seems odd that the entire bridge would
collapse from shore to shore. That it would not have been
built into the math that it would just separate and leave
the other spans intact, like what we saw on the bridge
growing it going into Crimea that was recently taken out.
Sure. So as people just saw on the
screen here, what we saw was multiple different sections
fell, including places that were unrelated to the space where
where the actual boat made impact.
So that's always strange. Can you kind of break out maybe
what the the implications of having Chinese malware on
commercial vessels all around the globe might mean?
You know what your analysis on it?
I, I, I don't need to, you know, we don't need to get real
specific on you know what that malware is.
But can you kind of talk about what, what implications it has
for the shipping industries? So I I talked to some people
early, early this morning that are actually involved in the
industry both and on the cyber front.
And there has been almost no interest both industry wide and
from the US intelligence community as to what kind of
malware is being placed on these ships in that as long as they
keep on functioning that there's doesn't seem to be any interest
at all. And I just talked to this
morning the Navy O 6 reservist as well as a gentleman in the
industry. I've talked to others in the
industry as well. And there just seems to be a
general overall lack of interest as to what kind of malware is
going on to these shipboard networks.
Like I said, they don't have a Chief Information Officer, they
don't have ACSO on ship. Primarily all is what we have
been concerned about as a nation is the physical security within
the ports that these ships visit and right after 911 that was my
focus as part of the Office of Naval Intelligence, what they
call the cluster harness program.
So there's been no attention paid to the the cyber component
of these ships and I'll give you a good example where it actually
worked to our advantage. We, the FBI, in conjunction with
some other entities, did a vulnerability analysis on the
liquid natural gas coming into the Port of Boston, and we found
no vulnerabilities because it was all analog.
They were all Windows DOS systems, people communicating
via walkie-talkie and cell phone.
And so while cyber is convenient and helpful, it also has a
tremendous vulnerability. As if, yeah, a lot of this stuff
is is so antiquated. A lot of our infrastructure, not
just the shipping industry, I think it, but also, you know,
our our power grids and our water.
These things are run on old systems.
I know I've made reference to it, but things like Cobalt are
the programming languages like freely ancient stuff, stuff that
has been used since the 50s and 60s because nobody's, you know,
updated them or they're they're running on some hobble together,
you know, Windows 98 computer, that kind of stuff, which is
kind of wild. Can you zoom out a little bit
and take some maybe some of your military experience and give us
kind of a perspective on what it might mean to this port?
You guys had ports in Boston, you had the the harbor there.
What does it mean to block a port like strategically, you
know, maybe in a not not specifically in a counter
terrorism type Spence, but maybe in a in a strategic movement by
by another country if there was any goal for that?
Yeah. So before I start that, let's be
clear, we're not talking about that.
You know that nobody's saying on the show that this is an attack
by a nation state or some terrorist organization or the
Houthis. So let's let's just be, you
know, clear on that, which is to sit out of the way in the
tinfoil hat crowd. But I actually do this in my war
gaming class for the graduate level course I teach, which is
take down a couple of ports and as soon as you do that you
institute tonic buying which clears the shelves because we
have no we don't. We went away from warehouses
beginning in the 70s when computers became ubiquitous and
we went to just in time inventory management.
So basically the whole entire supply global supply chain is
demand initiated and there are sophisticated algorithms out
there so that when you do your point of sale purchase at the
Wawa or the Cumberland Farms or wherever you go, it triggers
things on down the line, you know, all the way to Shanghai,
China, you know, but it's all done electronically within
seconds. So once you shut down a couple
of key ports, you know, that's all interrupted.
And then if if you shut down, you know more than just one or
two, you know, and then people start losing their collective
minds and you can't buy toilet paper anymore at Costco.
We're talking about essentially that that you're going to put
strain and pressure because right now not just the port or
the the port of Baltimore is shut down.
But we've also basically seen that they're going to have 695
is is down which is a major route for heavy trucks going in
and out crossing that that area. They're going to have to go
around, they're going to have to route through Baltimore or
around Baltimore and I have to assume that's going to, that's
going to affect all these things.
When you do these sort of supply chain interruptions, what do
your students and and for folks awareness, George Hill also is
an adjunct professor and teaches this sort of stuff at a college
level. What do your students generally
think you know? What do they leap to as far as
solutions to these problems? They don't jump to solutions.
They're mostly taken aback by the level of vulnerability and
how sensitive these supply chains are.
Like, like that's not the purpose of the class per SE.
It's up to them to like make a recommendation to the governor,
you know, this part of the war game.
But they are just amazed. They don't understand how our
supply chains work and the level of connectivity that exists
throughout the globe and how sensitive they are and how
easily disrupted they are. So as much as anything else,
it's just sort of an illustrating point that that
we're kind of civilization kind of hangs by this very, very thin
thread or that there's a very thin veil between everything
works and nothing works. And it can literally be as easy
as losing a couple of major roads in a couple of ports to
disrupt sort of the way of life, at least in one part of the the
country that that region looks like it's going to probably have
a pretty rough go of it for the next little.
Bit sure. So I take down the Port of New
York, which includes Newark, NJ and Long Beach, CA.
You take down those two ports and America stops within a
couple of days. Did we see that happen?
Not by blocking harbors and losing bridges, but that was
essentially what people experienced during 2020 when
when we had this sort of global supply chain interruption from
COVID. Actually, it's just a war game.
I do that using the same malware that was done to take down the
mayor's shipping line. Got it.
And and what do we think the vulnerability is?
You think it's complete or if you had to estimate a percentage
of the number of these ships that are traveling around the
globe and and basically make the world turn What what what do you
think it looks like that are touching Chinese ports at some
point in time and getting this malware?
I would say north of 90% of them have some sort of Chinese
malware on them. Is there a solution to that that
can be can be easily doled out or is there any there any sort
of guard against this or are we just waiting?
Are we just like that ship? Like slowly drifting towards the
stanchion and and waiting to hit and make impact on the bridge
and then see what happens? That's a great analogy.
I think that since the Chinese control the ports, you know,
they have the leverage. So how do you tell the the the
Port Authority, the port officer coming on board your ship, you
know, which they have to do and there are inspections that take
place and, you know, before they can, you know, clear the ship to
leave the port. You know, not just customs but
you know safety issues and things of that nature.
You know, unless you disable every, just remove every thumb
drive on every computer on your ship, which I would recommend,
you can't stop them. So we're so you could, you
could, you could rebuild your network on a ship pretty
inexpensively. That way you're sure that it's
clean and then every terminal you put in there.
No thumb drive, no thumb drives, no DVDs, you know, no disk
drive, nothing compared to closed loop system.
Yeah. Essentially air gap it from
anything on the outside, which is what we do for all the kind
of classified systems that we're supposed to be, however.
It's not a lot of money. It's it's it's not a lot of
money. I realize these shipping lines,
believe it or not, operate on a pretty thin profitability
margin. We're not talking about breaking
the bank here. You know, I mean, we're already
driving up the cost of shipping because of what's going on in
the Red Sea, right? So and now everybody has to go
around Africa. So we're adding hundreds of
hours, thousands of hours to every merchant vessel that that
normally used to transit the Suez Canal in the Red Sea.
When it's an Iranian ship that's sitting there giving the Houthis
telemetry and targeting information, the Navy could drop
that to the bottom of the ocean within 30 minutes if we wanted
to, and we could open that back up again.
But there doesn't seem to be the stomach for anything other than,
you know, going after white supremacist.
Right, speculation on your part, but what do you think that's?
What do you think that is? I I I'm just going to keep that
for myself because. That's.
Fair. I I'd like to.
I'll, I'll leave that for private conversations.
It's but I think I can make a convincing argument that it's
happening. It doesn't seem to be.
Doesn't seem to be a lot of focus on the like the the really
big things. I mean, we're $34 trillion in
debt. I should be driving on black
ribbons of asphalt with not a single pothole.
And we shouldn't be looking at a crumbling infrastructure when
we're that much in debt. Yet we have the money to take on
10 million illegals in this country.
Feed, house and clothing, providing with life coaches,
diapers, cribs, You know, just stop it.
I mean. I promise I promise people that
they would get some salty chief takes some salty senior chief
takes and and you have not disappointed on that one I want
to play probably your favorite politician in America.
I've got a little clip of AOC here you should be able to hear
the video is is irrelevant other than you can see AOC speaking.
But I I I'm kind of I want to play a couple of back-to-back
clips and then I want to get your your read on them because
the language is important. You just brought up the the the
nature of going after white supremacists and the opportunity
cost that we have because we obviously only have a limited
amount of resources. Let's kind of see what this
focus looks like coming out of the the left and then I want to,
I want to re hit you about the the election and whether you
think it's happening or not because we've had some fun
conversations about that. Here we go.
What do you say to an independent voter, an average
voter, who looks at what's going on with Donald Trump?
You have his assets might be seized tomorrow.
You also have the hush money case from the attorney general,
I'm sorry, the District Attorney, Alvin Bragg of New
York. You also have the Georgia case
about election interference. You also have the special
counsel investigation on election interference.
You also have the classified documents case down in Florida.
That's five cases. And to a voter, what do you say
to a voter who says, well, that doesn't look like he's being
treated equally before the law. That looks like somebody that
the government is going after. Has there ever been a president,
Republican or Democrat, that has been subject to this level of
criminal charges, indictments and investigations?
This is not about party. This is not about politics.
This is about. Corruption and criminality.
We're talking about an individual.
Who? Ordered essentially a terrorist
attack on the capital of the United States in order to retain
power. That that is not about being a
Republican. It is not about being a
Democrat. It's about being an unethical
and individual who is subject and prone to criminality.
And unfortunately I this is the state that we're in and.
George, you want to you're you're a counterterrorism
expert. Can you put January 6th into the
the stratosphere of of terrorism events that you've seen in your
life are? You on?
Where does that rate cut a scale of one to 10?
Is that down near the one? It's, yes, barely pushing A1.
I mean, this is just silly and they won't let it go.
They've started with this narrative the very next day with
Steven D'antono and I can't remember some of the other
clowns names off the top of my head, but they started pushing
this and they won't let go 'cause that's all they've got.
Well we heard this too. I thought this was an
interesting little piece and for some reason I I I put these
together in my mind. These are not clips that were
coordinated. As far as I can tell, however,
this is Joe Biden standing next to Nancy Pelosi who looks like a
wax cut out of Nancy Pelosi, but it's actually the real thing.
And Barack Obama who apparently is Co signing on this message,
this is the virile president that is not taking action
against Iranian targeting ships that are ruining our shipping
canals. And the guy who's been touting
his infrastructure bills and his his great success, this is, this
is kind of an interesting kind of take to add on top of that.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump is about the past and serving himself.
This is the guy who doesn't care about science and reason.
Remember, during the pandemic, Donald Trump told us to inject
them ourselves with bleach, he said.
There's nothing to worry about if you do that now.
Trump keeps telling us he's going to terminate the ACA.
Think about what that means. It would mean 100 million
Americans with pre-existing condition would lose their
health care coverage. It would mean young people would
be kicked off their parents coverage. 10s of millions of
Americans will lose health care coverage as a consequence of all
that. He wants to get rid of the power
of Medicare to negotiate low prescription drug prices,
driving up cost of insulin back to $400.00 instead of $35 for
seniors. And Trump recently said Social
Security and Medicare quote, there's a lot you can do in
terms of cutting. End of quote.
Right on cue, 180 House Republicans just proposed a
budget that would raise Social Security age, retirement age.
All right. That's all I could listen to.
Sorry about that. That's, that's got to cut off.
You ever hear anybody say that this guy is only focused on the
past and then just sit and focus on the past?
Is that what are we doing here, George?
Barack Obama did it for eight years.
He blamed everything during his administration on George Bush.
Just go back and listen to the the, the audio tapes.
Go back and watch the videos. Everything was George Bush's
fault. They're like, it's like dealing
with a bunch of five year olds like nothing's their fault.
Nothing. It's interesting my my 6 year
old does that right now. Anything that even when she's
caught in a complete lie, that we know she's the only person
who could have done it, she will stick to it.
But if it's anything good, obviously it was.
It was all her. It is.
It's it's like a it's it's grade school mentality to only claim
victories and never and never take responsibility.
Accountability is the hallmark of an adult.
Accountability and responsibility.
Accepting responsibility for your actions and then making
adjustments you know going forward, but if you never accept
responsibility, you can't make adjustments going forward.
Sage words, not wrong. You got any predictions on
whether or not we're having an election in November?
Does that seem like it's on track right now based on what
your your your sober analysis looks like?
I'm leaning towards either no election in November or an
election that no one would recognize as your standard US
election. In other words, some sort of
coast to coast crisis where we have to have mail in balloting
because it's the only way to protect the US population and
protect our democracy. So there's nothing in history to
indicate that any group in power, you know, has ever just
willfully given back power until George Washington did it.
And that has been the hallmark of our country for almost 250
years. And apparently we've crossed no
pun intended that bridge. And we're not going to do that
anymore. And we're not going to give up
power, because the only party that can protect your abortion
rights are the Democrats. And they're not.
Just they're not going to willing fully, willfully give it
up. It's so interesting.
That's the that's the last story that I will cover and I'll do it
while while I say goodbye to you.
But I did have a story about abortion and I don't know why we
keep fixating on the same things, but it does seem like
the weirdest, the weirdest focus for this party.
It has nothing to do with the so-called working class that
they seem to be interested in getting their votes but not in
actually taking care of, you know, basic stuff.
And you're right. This George Washington was a
singular event in history. And I feel like FDR was the one
who decided that they were, they were done with that and maybe
that's when the the country kind of started dramatically turning.
There's an awful lot of evidence that shows that was kind of one
of those major watershed moments for for the changeover in the
executive where we started electing kings, I guess just.
A a quick closing remark, Don't leave the world behind.
It's the only one we have. It's the only country we have.
Fight like you're the third monkey on getting on the Ark and
it's raining like hell. I love it.
Thanks George, you're a good man.
Thanks for jumping on with me last last minute and short
notice. Take care.
All right, buddy. All right.
So George Hill, you guys can follow him at Senior Chief.
Exw. That's Echo X-ray Whiskey Exw.
Senior Chief Exw. On X Twitter.
And if you want to follow him on True Social, it's a little
harder. But it's Jar Head George all
spelled out. Always a sober voice in there.
People kind of give George sort of short shrift on the
suspendables thing. And I I don't like it because
George is one of my the members of my brain trust.
When I have serious questions that require real analysis by
people who have a lot of deep, deep, incapable, worldly
experience, I go to George. He's got hundreds and hundreds
of DoD interrogations, and that's something that's of value
to me. He's got, he's got several
decades in the intelligence world, both in the kind of
kinetic operation end and also in the strategic and analytical
end, which is a little further removed from the battle space or
further removed from the operational end where he was
looking over it. And he has a really interesting
take on all the son of stuff I I love that.
I think George would share this with me.
I love America, but that's only because I love Americans.
I don't love the American government.
I never did and that's the reason why I went to go work for
the government. I think those of us that have
been in the suspendables category, we all looked around
and said if not us, we're like the opportunity cost of us not
taking this job is letting somebody who doesn't love the
people of this country take it. The joke was when I had my badge
and my gun taken in in April of 2022, one of my buddies called
me up and he said they took your badge and they gave it to a
tranny. And isn't that the truth?
And then we actually found out that they were actually
transgender type FBI agents that were getting through the Academy
and some of them had showed up at my old office.
All of this kind of nonsense is out there.
Let me let me cover this last little story here which I found
to be telling CNN has Atds the Trump Derangement Syndrome.
It's 100% out there and it is always the case.
That they will cover Trump whenever possible.
Today they decided to forgo Trump.
And what you're seeing on the top left hand side of the screen
here is actually the the little click through article, their
analysis piece that says the Supreme Court will now have to
deal with the consequences of its Roe V Wade ruling.
They're actually trying to delegitimize the court.
This is the thing that they want to do because it didn't rule
their way. Again, that grade school
mentality, that sort of toddler type attitude, and this
particular one is written by some lady who's their senior
Supreme Court analyst, whoever that is.
Joan Biskupic I suppose is her name.
It says when the Supreme Court overturned Roe V Wade, the
floodgates open for abortion related lawsuits.
And yes, of course there are a number of people, a number of
states that have voted based on the fact that the states were
giving back the power to do it, to ban abortion more or less
outright, which is the right of the states per the Supreme
Court. But they don't like that they
wanted a federalized solution. So now they got cases in Alabama
talking about in vitro and a bunch of other things.
There's an interesting story that popped up in conservative
news that showed a man who was paying a surrogate to adopt A
baby without any other partners and was also advertising that he
was going to be creating child pornography with this yet unborn
child, showing outfits saying that he preferred sex with with
children that were in single digit ages.
Like, there's some really awful people in the world and I don't
think the federal solution is going to solve this because
they're not in every state and they're not every level.
Some of these people need to be fed into a wood chipper.
I'm sure many of you would agree with me, but the the fact of the
matter is that A1 size fits all solution is not the right
answer. It is the answer that every
state should figured out. And if some people want to live
in demonic states that support the the sacrificing of the
unborn, knock themselves out, I guess that's what we'll have to
deal with. This country is full of a lot of
sickos. And if you don't want to live in
that, if you want to live in a state that has freedom and has
gun rights that are not going to be infringed upon according to
where the Constitution is written, then maybe you live in
those. It's unfortunate that we see
people that are victims of this as they try to find out what
that middle ground is. And the story that we talked
about yesterday of Dexter Taylor in New York, like, look, being a
gun owner in New York is like being an endangered species.
And there's a pot in the constant pressure for something
to kill you. Like you have massive amounts of
predatory instincts coming in from the state government and
the local government. It's very difficult to sort of
navigate that narrow space. But for whatever reason, you've
got this leftist media that is out there celebrating the same
groups that were, that were 100% behind Bill Clinton that we're
talking about how the safe, legal and rare was the right
answer. And then now we got this, I got
a couple of things with that. We'll we'll talk 7O2 tomorrow.
There's a really good clip that was running around of Lisa
Monaco that I want to touch and I don't think I can actually
connect it. Today I will show you, since
this just dropped at this this Tucker interview with Tulsi
Gabbard, I'm going to show you a quick little thing of Tulsi
Gabbard saying something that sounds really good to you all.
I bet you all feel this way. And then I want you to think, is
someone just confirming your biases or is there some actual
information here or some inside baseball?
Because I don't think it is. Here's here's Tucker on X.
Or Tucker. I think the Tucker encounter
with Tulsi Gabbard. Just a little short clip.
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are not in office right now, but
they still continue to wield immense power in influencing the
decisions that are being made. So can I.
Just sort of sidebar, but I think relevant.
Interesting. Are you answering the question
that everyone watching has which is who is running the government
at this point? It's obviously not Joe Biden you
you think Hillary I I there It's not a a leap of of imagination
to know that that's true. When you look at the people who
are in Joe Biden's administration, they are the the
the people who were the right hands for the Obama
administration, for President Obama and for for Hillary
Clinton. When Hillary Clinton said
herself the other day, she said, Oh yeah, I talked to the White
House every day. So it's not, it is no shock or
surprise who the influences are behind the policies that are
coming out of this White House that many people say is the most
radical and woke White House that our country has ever seen.
There's. There's no question about it.
Yeah, there is no question about it.
But she didn't say anything new, and she didn't say that she had
any inside baseball. And she didn't say that she knew
anything specifically other than she feels the same way you do.
Which is to say that when people talk to her and and I've kind of
gone behind the the scenes and spoken to some folks that have
done interviews with her, she says all the right things.
But she never takes personal accountability for her
previously bad ideas. She never says I got it
completely wrong. I blew it.
I went out there and pushed gun control and I'm pro abortion on,
you know. And now I've decided that I was
completely wrong. Everything I did is, you know,
that when I was, when I was a Democrat was was inaccurate.
And now what I'm going to do is I'm going to spend my time
trying to help convert people who misunderstood.
I'm going to take them and bring them back into the fold of
reality. She doesn't do that.
She's out there doing this half assed campaign where she's
appearing in, you know, makeup in a plate carrier and carrying
a gun. Or she's out there saying the
things that we all know, Like the people that are running this
government are the people that have been in this government
since before Trump, since before Obama that started getting Neo
con and and sort of leftist ideas underneath maybe George
Bush. They've been around forever.
These people have been around since the 90s, and those folks
have worked their way up. That's what the deep state is.
That's what the administrate is, the administrative straight.
The administrative state, rather, is a bunch of people
that have outlasted all the presidential administrations,
and they think their ideas count more than the person who's
elected. And in some ways, that actually
makes a lot of sense, doesn't it?
Because we're not supposed to elect a king.
We're supposed to elect a president who's supposed to just
set policy and then execute what Congress says.
But since they've all shirked their responsibilities, this
group of people have taken upon themselves saying, hey, I've
been in government for 20 or 30 years, I know what's right.
And so the Lisa Monaco types, the the Lee Loftus, the the
folks that are permanent Washington that bounce back and
forth between white shoe firms and then into the the, the
levers of power, the James Bakers who went to Twitter but
was at DOJ for 30 years. Those types think that they
should be making the policy because they know the most about
it and they may not be wrong, but that's not how our system is
supposed to work. So for hearing, Tulsi Gabbard
basically say, well, Hillary Clinton and and Barack Obama
have outsized influence. They're the two largest names
that are still standing, that are still mentally cogent in the
in in the Democrat Party. So of course they're the ones
that are out there doing the doing the work mentally.
I mean, we know that Joe Biden isn't because he can't handle
it. In any case, I will go this far.
Allow me to say this because I'm going to commit to this right
now. I've been thinking about this
for a couple weeks. Tucker Carlson obviously likes
Tulsi as a person. They get along.
I don't care. I'm not, I'm not interested in
that. What I want to look at is Tulsi
Gabbard hasn't said I'm going to sit back and I'm not going to be
in politics. What I want to do is comment on
it and help move, you know, the the needle and bring voices into
the movement. There are plenty of women, which
I'm not even crazy about having women politicians, which you
guys probably know about. But there are plenty of women
who have had the right ideas all along and they are equal or
better messengers, Mostly better messengers than a Tulsi Gabbard.
If Tulsi Gabbard ends up on the ticket in any way, shape or form
for any election, I won't vote for whoever she's part of.
If she gets on as as Donald Trump's vice President, I won't
vote. I won't even vote at all.
In that case, I'll just think that we've we've lost.
That's how strongly I feel about Tulsi Gabbard.
I think she's trash in this state.
I think she is. She is.
Doesn't have to be an op. She just needs to know that her
role is to just learn. You're a long ways behind.
I don't care if you had 11 year journey.
You very recently said that you thought it was it was obvious
that Donald Trump was guilty of things just the same way we just
heard AOC and and Biden say so that doesn't do it for me
anyway. That's a long piece.
I don't care if you're a surfer either.
None of that matters to me. All right that's a that's a lot
to digest. I hope you guys are are feeling
OK. I think that we will do more
interesting things This week is only going to get stranger
especially when we've got bridges collapsing.
We've got chaos and we've got the yeah, like I said, the HSI
folks running after billionaire hip hop stars.
What a strange time to be alive while you guys are out there.
If you want to support our show, you can always support my friend
Garrett o'boyle, too. Speaking of which, he would be
my pick for vice president. He's also got pretty long dark
hair. He's just like an actual
conservative. He's actually a Christian.
He actually is a father. He actually has kids in this
world that he cares about how this country ends up.
thedashdispendables.com is the website you guys can go to if
you want to support the O'boyle family.
There are new Kyle Seraphin show shirts.
We had a conversation last night about it and the answer was
what's the best looking shirt? And he said, I don't know, I put
it in the olive and it man, I'm like, man, that's a really good
looking shirt. Then he puts it on the royal
blue and he's like, oh that might be better.
Then he looks in the Gray. Anyhow, it's a charcoal print.
It looks really good. I will be getting one very soon.
Some of you guys have already ordered.
You can go to thedashdispendables.com the
promo code. Kyle will save you 10%.
I make nothing out of this. This is 100% because I support
my friend and this is thing he's able to do.
So if you want to support him and you want to support us, the
don't forget the dash suspendables allspelledout.com
promo code Kyle for our merch store.
Let's go to the five star review here of the day.
This one's a really nice one and I do appreciate it.
From beeswax I know I recognize that handle from our Twitter
interactions. 5 stars almost like he was born to do this from
the opening to the God bless at closing.
Kyle has a knack for effective communication.
His honesty combined with knowledge and ease of bringing
forth topics that matter. The Kyle Seraphin Show is
something everyone can and should be checking out.
Thanks, Kyle. And Steve and GOB.
That's our buddy Garrett for bringing us the truth.
We appreciate you suspendable as we appreciate you, bees wax.
Thanks for being with us this morning.
Thanks for working through our weird George audio.
Like I said, it's always something here in there.
It's always something. And I know that this initially
froze. Maybe Rumble will work out the
kinks or not. It's part of the charm of the
show. We appreciate all of you.
We will see you again tomorrow morning at 0930 Eastern Time on
Rumble On X. And I'm probably going to have
to stop streaming to YouTube, but we'll discuss that tomorrow.
How about that? All right.
God bless you. See you soon.
Thanks for listening to The Kyle Serafin Show, streamed live
weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth, Social and Instagram at Kyle
Serafin.