Take a look behind the curtain with the real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serafin. Well, hello, my friends, and
welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show.
Today is Tuesday. It's January the 16th.
It is cold outside. Iowa is now in the rear view,
which means we have to talk about it and all kinds of other
things are happening around the world, including a trans slaying
wave that's crossing Mexico. Did you know this?
We're going to talk about it. Texas is standing up to the
federal government. That's not nothing and it's
Davos time. You guys remember Davos?
Let's talk about that too in just a little bit here.
Before we do that, I want to say thanks to my buddies over at for
Patriots. They are supporting our show
this month. I got a little little bundle of
things for you guys to take a look at here.
This is the landing claims. These are the new arrivals at
fourpatriots.com/kyle, fourpatriots.com/kyle.
You guys can jump in and get yourself squared away with an
emergency tote. It's got the emergency radio
that you saw a winding for multiple days here, what I'm
calling the zombie radio. It's got first aid, it's got
water, it's got food, it's got the lemon bars.
I'm into that. It's got a cool tote that may be
a one stop solution for you. It's cold and things are stupid.
So you should prepare yourself. You don't want to get caught
unawares. You don't want to get caught
unprepared. They've also got some of the
higher ticket items out there, like that 2000 Expatriate power
generator running at 3K right now.
But 71 five star reviews? That's a pretty hefty thing.
You guys might want to check into keeping your power supply
going. Whether it's small power, like a
little mini portable power cell that you can keep your comms
going, or whether it's something larger so you can run one or two
major appliances that you want to make sure that you can keep
running in your house. Check out for patriots.com/kyle
again for patriots.com/kyle. Are we ready?
Today's got a lot of stuff going on and let's start with the
obvious. Trump won.
But that's not the whole story, is it?
I feel like half the time what I'm doing here, they always say
like news is reporting what happened and then this is like
politics, which is what what it means.
And what it means is the Never Nikki crowd better step up their
game because Nikki is in play. If you ask the mainstream media,
doesn't matter what side of the aisle you go to, that is true.
But forget aisles, let's talk about borders first, because the
Texas Governor, Greg Abbott, is in a neat and interesting and
God willing prolonged standoff with the federal government
right now. We're going to talk about this.
We're going to dig in just a bit.
The Texas Tribune, who is quite upset about this.
Texas Tribune is a pretty left-leaning organization has
reported for the last week or so that the federal government is
complaining that the Texas National Guard is blocking
Border Patrol from an entire section of the border.
Now, this entire section of the hundreds miles long Texas border
is 2.5 miles, and it's basically is just a single boat ramp and a
little park called Shelby Park in Eagle Pass, TX, which if
you've never been to the Texas border, it's like a little
outpost on the way. And the Justice Department is
very upset that they cannot access this.
They're so upset, in fact, that they are complaining.
They're getting their media buddies to talk about it.
It's a total of 47 acres, and you've got the Texas National
Guard taking, quote UN quote, full control.
According to the Texas Tribune says National Guard and state
troopers have been blocking this thing off.
It's only a 2 1/2 mile stretch. It's across the Rio Grande.
It's right in the heart of Eagle Pass, which is, you know, not
big, but there's a there's a fairly decent city on the other
side that is the issue. And what we're dealing with is
the Texas government trying to exercise a little bit of
breaking action on the unbelievable flow.
If you guys remember when we were, well when I was younger,
we used to say that there was possibly as many as 10 million
illegal aliens in this country. 10 million illegal aliens was
like the 80s Talking point Now we're in the 20s.
Maybe what's wild is, is that almost 4 million came over last
year in 2022. It's like 3.7 million.
That's what they know about. That's not even the estimates of
the God aways and the people who just like slipped in in ways
that we weren't looking at. That to me looks like full scale
invasion. Now, the real problem that we
should have when we're looking at the situation is that Article
Four of the United States Constitution the Founders saw
the need for the federal government was to be the largest
and most powerful only in a very limited number of circumstances.
And Section 4, Section 4 of Article Four of the United
States Constitution states, I'm just going to read it in its
entirety. The United States shall
guarantee to every state in this Union #1 a republican form of
government. Oh, that's weird.
A republican form of government. That's not a democracy.
No, it's not. It actually says it right here
in the Constitution. We will not have democracies at
the state level and shall protect each of them against
invasion. Now, there's a reason why the
right wing media continues to use the word invasion over and
over again. And it's right here in Article
4, Section 4 of the US Constitution, signed all the way
back in the 1790s. The entire purpose was that the
federal government's job was to handle federal problems like a
national border, like protection against invasion, OK, And that's
the mandate. That's the charge.
It's also really interesting that it says shall guarantee.
The words shall in a legal sense are very useful.
It's not may guarantee, which means that they have the
possibility and they have the the authority to exercise a
little bit of discussion. Hey, do we do we want to do
this? Do we not want to do this?
There was a big decision for gun rights recently and you guys may
remember the brewing decision and what it basically put to
rest was the difference between shell issue for gun permits and
may issue. The may issue.
State said that they had discretion over it, that they
could decide whether or not you had a Second Amendment right to
carry a firearm to bear arms. As the US Constitution
guarantees you OK, Shell is a mandate.
Shell means you must, you can say the United States must
guarantee and who is the person that is the chief executive of
the United States That's the US president, in this case, Joe
Biden, sitting in that office must guarantee, must guarantee
protection against invasion and is currently failing to do so.
So what we are seeing at this moment, we're seeing the
governor of Texas, the largest state in the continuous 48.
He is doing something that has not been done before.
He's using state authorities and saying fine, the federal
government doesn't really want to do this.
We're going to do it. This is almost the reverse of
what you've seen in the sanctuary city movement, what
you've seen in the legalized marijuana movement where the
federal government is saying this thing and and then the
states are saying, but we will not do this.
The state is now saying we are going to enforce federal law
under state law and they've passed a state law.
And this stand down is very important because if the federal
government is derelict in its duties and the states step in,
it tends to make the argument for the anti federalists, does
it not the original anti federalists who said a strong
national government is not necessary, the states need to be
basically autonomous. It's very interesting just watch
this happen in real time and of course it's upsetting.
It's truly upsetting to the Biden administration and and as
such in in perfectly mirror momenting, we have the Biden
administration writing a very strong letter.
They are telling the Texas government to cease and desist
on all the border access because a woman and two children died
trying to get over two people who were breaking our laws
trying to enter our country illegally died in the process.
If we were really serious people, we would go after
whoever was that was enabling those folks.
And maybe the the government of Mexico ought to do that.
But two people, a woman and two children, died attempting to
cross the Rio Grande illegally into Eagle Pass, TX, which is
now prompted A sternly written letter.
It's kind of nice to see a sternly written letter on the
other side, that impotent action of putting words on paper that
has no legal force. You must cease and desist.
It's kind of refreshing to see that the general counsel for the
Department of Homeland Security who's representing the federal
government, this guy named Jonathan Meyer, and he wrote
Texas actions also improperly seek to regulate the federal
government. I'm writing to demand that Texas
immediately cease and desist any actions taken by the state that
block Border Patrol full access to the US Mexico border in and
around the Shelby Park area. Again, this is a this is a
symbolic place. It obviously doesn't represent
the entirety of the Texas border.
It's a very small location, but it was a location that the
federal government had set up in.
It's a city or a State Park. I can't tell which the which
organization funds it, the money.
But my guess is that it's a City Park, which means it's on state
land and it was being taken over by Border Patrol as a processing
Center for people who have illegally come to this country.
Because the Biden administration seems very, very confident that
they are going to just release people with impunity and claim
that they are in fact defending our borders, that they are
keeping and protecting the state of Texas from invasion.
And Greg Rabbit is basically making the opposite argument and
he's putting his money where his mouth is.
Finally, after so many years, we now have people from our
National Guard being called up by the governor and they are
going up and they are reinforcing one section.
It's not the only section. This has been going on for
months, by the way, folks, I've just kind of been watching it to
see what the, the, the swing back is going to be on the
federal government side. And right now it's a sternly
worded letter that was written two days ago.
So that's sort of refreshing like I say is there, is there
anything that's really that's of note in this letter?
Maybe it says that they quote the Constitution.
So that might be the first time that they've actually been
forced to read it, except what they actually do is they go to
constitutional law as divided by the the US Supreme Court.
They said that the government of the United States has broad and
undoubted powers over the subject of immigration and the
status of non citizens and securing the nation's borders.
But what if they objectively have abdicated that
responsibility? Then what do we do?
What do we do? When the United States
government is not meeting its mandate, it shall guarantee, and
it is failing to do so. Does that make its authorities
null and void in that case? If it's if it's walked away from
its responsibilities and duties to the people, see the people in
in our federal government right now, What they'd love to think
is that the government has authority and you must listen to
it. But what they forget is the
other people, the the people that sort of fund the
government, you know, us, we the people part of it, the part
where the people have established the government in
order to serve them. The government is not waiting
for us to serve what they're about.
It is designed to serve us and our interests.
And it's not doing that. So how do you deal with that?
And I think the state has to do it.
I think what's most interesting, and I threw it on the on the
screen, I think earlier, right up at the top here, the powers
not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited to it by the states, are reserved to the states
respectively, or to the people. So I've advocated for quite a
while now that we have what what I would call a 10th Amendment
revolution in this country, where the states start looking
at the explicit powers of the federal government, which are
enumerated in a fairly short document.
You can carry the entire Constitution.
Obviously, you can carry it on your phone, but you can carry it
all in your pocket in paper. It's fairly easy to read and you
can decide whether or not pretty objectively based on the writing
and the words that were written at the time, whether or not the
federal government has any business getting involved in
things. And I would say overwhelmingly
that the US code continues to grow and metastasize like cancer
and it's time to do a little bit of cutting.
The states need to claim back their authorities.
And if Texas is the first one to do it, and it's going to go head
to head and say, hey, not only do we not necessarily have this
authority, but you've abdicated it, We're going to take it.
We're going to fill in that power vacuum.
And by the way, we're going to start taking back some of our
other rights, that would be fantastic.
I don't know if Greg Abbott has it in him, but it'd be really,
really nice to start seeing the states do the job of stopping
the federal government. The state is supposed to
actually be the blockade. We're going to actually talk
about why state governments are so important.
I'm going to tell you about that towards the end.
That'll be the last thing we cover down on.
It's just a little thing that's sneaking around right now that's
happening in Wisconsin, and you guys will appreciate that.
Before we do that, let's let's take a quick break.
Let's talk about people who actually do love this country.
They're a good company. They've been with us since the
beginning. You know, we don't get funding.
Like nobody has to pay to watch our show.
You guys, maybe I had this like funny little conversation on on
social media the other day and this guy was, I love the
grifter, the word grifter. It's really coming to the
lexicon we used to call people, con men or frauds.
If you'll notice you guys can watch the show for nothing and
if you want to support our sponsors then you have that
opportunity and we give you a way to track that sort of thing.
People supported our sponsors and used not our promo code and
that's OK too. Like you know, they don't they
can't track all of the of the business we generate.
But the fun thing is, is that when somebody comes out there
and says we want to put money behind your show so that you can
do this and we do this full time.
This is what I do full time. I sit here and I read and I go
through all this information and I try to suss it out to be
something of value and if it is valuable to you then you can
also choose like a you know these people support him.
Here's my friends over at Patriot Coolers and I've got the
the 19th oz on my desk. I'm going to give away the the
the Yeti that we have. My wife will be not thrilled
because she likes the way it looks.
It's pretty and it's for a screen.
You can buy a four screen version of this as well.
But our tumblers for Patriot coolers vastly superior and
outperform the Yeti in head to So that was the first time I've
accidentally done that and I want to highly recommend that
you guys check out stuff like they're they're tumblers.
Not only do they have an air gap the way that our our election
should have, but they actually do a job that they're supposed
to do which is keep your things hot or keep them cold.
Check out Patriot coolers.com. You can follow them on social
media at Patriot coolers. And the promo code across all
the platforms is always Kyle. Kyle.
In this case, it's going to give you 10% off if you spend 50
bucks, which is easy enough to do.
If you start getting in there and you're like me, you're like,
oh, do I want to spend 6 bucks on shipping or do I want to
spend another like 10 bucks to get another you know, item?
I'm that guy. You may find yourself getting a
little some of their accessories because they've got some hats
and they've got some other kind of fun stuff.
They all say Patriot. They're all branded with things
in the right colors and the right scheme and the right
verbiage. They say something right up
front that probably resonates with you, especially if you're
pissed off about this border situation.
You like this country as it is and you want it to do its job.
Check out Patriot Coolers Houston Company, good people.
They reached out to us, for what it's worth.
They reached out and said, hey, we'd like to sponsor you and
that's pretty cool. That's a nice thing to have
people that want to get in and support what you're up to.
Go to patriotcoolers.com again or follow them on social media.
They're on true social. They're on Twitter now.
X at Patriot coolers with an S in the end promo code is Kyle.
Kyle. All right.
Let's get to the news of the day.
I guess the big news of the day or whatever if you will.
This is it's not just what's going on in in Iowa, which is
wrapped up last night. It's also what the mainstream
media is covering on both sides of the aisle.
You know, I always go over and see what the with the CBS folks
and the ABC and the and the supposedly nonpartisan AP and so
on and so forth. I want to know what everybody is
saying about it. They all have the same message,
which is the message we reported to you yesterday.
I think that's the proxy analysis that needs to be done.
But if you haven't been paying attention, if you're just waking
up now, Donald Trump dominated the Iowa caucuses all day
yesterday going late into the night.
We have the results popping in. The Fox News said that that he
he dominated and that Ron DeSantis was taking second
place. I've got a little list of the
polls up there. Right there.
You can see Donald Trump got 51% and 21 delegates or sorry, 20
delegates of the 40. And then you see what else is
out there. You see that DeSantis and Nikki
Haley combined still less than Donald Trump.
That didn't have to be so, but it was.
So even if you were to combine the two, the 2nd and the 3rd
place finishers, in that particular poll, what you see is
less support than Donald Trump. Also of note, Vivek Ramaswami
dropping out, throwing his support behind Donald Trump.
I don't know if he picks up those delegates or how that
works out at the moment. Sort of irrelevant, but he's out
of the race. So you're not going to hear any
more of the Vivek things. People think it was a death
blow. This may have been the game all
along. It's a lot of money to run
around. It's a lot of work.
And I've dealt with Vivek's campaign.
They were really nice people. They were really sharp.
We got to see them in in New Hampshire.
I went up and sat on a stage with him.
He's a sharp guy. I hope that he pushed the needle
when it came to the policy positions he was talking about
specifically defunding specific federal agencies.
I hope that is the case. But what we saw in the coverage
of this that you know, the performance is one thing and the
performance was overwhelmingly Donald Trump, which is exactly
what we've said basically going back to the moment that they
first indicted him in New York and then indicted him federally.
It was very simple and it was very obvious that this is Donald
Trump's race. The question was how much is it
Donald Trump's race And the answer is overwhelming.
Now the stuff that you're seeing on screen here is kind of
interesting. If you look on the bottom right
hand side, what we have here is that non MAGA supporter.
So they they did some polls and they did exit polls and entrance
polls trying to figure out what is the Iowa base who are
interested in showing up for this primary, for this caucus,
what what are these people made of?
And basically 6 out of 10 of them describe themselves as MAGA
and overwhelmingly the so-called MAGA people support Donald
Trump. I don't know who the MAGA people
are that don't support Donald Trump.
That's a bizarre number. The fact that it was only 60%,
maybe the polling and that that should tell us a little bit
about the questions they were answering.
They may have been confusing and because if the Donald Trump
supporters are not overwhelmingly like 100%
supporting Donald Trump that's really bizarre.
However, of the non MAGA supporters, so of the 40% that
was leftover that don't identify as MAGA, 42% of them support
Haley supposedly if you believe this poll, which I'm not sure I
do and then they were in an entire little section.
This is even on Fox talking about Haley's strength and her
strengths are is that she was strongest among college
graduates. Oh, people who might otherwise
lean left and suburban caucus goers So that and then people
who think that abortion should be legal despite her pro-life
stance, which is what she claims she supposedly has a pro-life
stance. Right.
They're they're still pumping this Nikki Haley thing.
What's really interesting too there's a an entire piece I
think over it might have been CBS, but it could have been Fox
as well. I've been reading a bunch of the
stuff and what I took away from it was is that here it is.
This is it's CBS actually saying this.
I want you to just think about the cognitive dissonance that
has to happen for you to write this piece.
The pieces, entitled DeSantis, take second place over Haley and
Iowa caucuses, vowing to remain in the 2024 race.
OK, that's fair enough. Here's what it says.
Florida Governor Rod DeSantis finished second in Monday's Iowa
caucuses in the Republican caucuses, trailing former Donald
Trump, former President Donald Trump, but coming out ahead of
Nikki Haley. OK, fine.
That's just like a flat That's what happened.
The second paragraph. A third place finish could have
delivered a fatal blow. To the Florida governor's
campaign, he largely staked his fortunes on the Hawkeye State,
where he devoted most of his time and resources in the run up
to the primary season. So if he finished third, that
would have been a fatal blow to his campaign.
Now they want to talk about Nikki Haley and how great she is
even though she finished third, which they just said could have
been a fatal blow. Haley, meanwhile, claimed that
the results in the primary made it a two person race.
She got third place, but now it's a two person race.
Is she in the two person race? She's not hanging up her spikes
right now. She's going to stay in.
She's going to go into the New Hampshire primary, which is on
the 23rd. How much sense does this make?
Nikki Haley supposedly just, you know, should have her death blow
according to the people that just wrote this article.
But what it tells us overwhelmingly is that they are
so interested in trying to prop up a Nikki Haley.
And it doesn't matter whether you go to Fox where you see what
her strengths are. And her strengths are people who
have college degrees and moderates and people who love
abortion. You know, people that probably
otherwise lean closer to the political left.
She's trying to, they're trying to act like she's the the middle
ground candidate. But as I said yesterday, she's
the great candidate for like 20, you know, 2002.
In 2002, Nikki Haley would have been great.
She could have run against Bush and she would have been an
interesting candidate, I suppose, because she was a
woman. End of the day, if you don't
think that, these people will immediately pivot and say, oh,
notice Nikki Haley, she was in the Trump administration, so
she's no good. What's also kind of interesting
is there some additional polling.
And and we should always take these polls with a grain of salt
because they say one thing, but then they could be construed any
way that you like. In this particular polling says
that Nikki Haley would be the best candidate to run against
Republican contenders. Interesting.
That's the way that the the CBS crowd played it.
OK, Daily Wire says that Trump, DeSantis or Haley would all beat
Biden. And that's the real answer.
Because when you look in and you get down and you pull them up on
the screen and you and you read through what these results were.
If people had to choose between Nikki Haley and Joe Biden,
supposedly it's a 53 Haley, 45 Biden.
But if you pulled him up against Donald Trump, Donald Trump is
still ahead with a three-point margin of error, which is
basically a toss up. And it's a narrow, narrow,
narrow victory when you talk about it in Nikki Haley.
And this is just a small number of people, like how many people
were polled? Not very many.
CBS, you Gov. These things do like 1015
hundred. So how representative are they
in real life? I don't know.
Let's wonder what do the polls mean?
Like, are these polls of value? Are they actually giving us some
real information? How about we look at performance
first? Should we look at performance?
Somebody in the chat earlier was asking, you know, how how
important is this 51%? Let's do it on the screen.
You guys want to see it visually.
This is what it looks like visually.
Trump wins big in Iowa. This is CNN reluctantly
reporting Trump wins big in Iowa.
DeSantis edges out Haley for second.
The bottom map that you see there that is checkered all of
those yellow counties. There's 99 counties in Iowa and
all of those yellow counties are Ted Cruz victories.
All of the red counties are Donald Trump.
That's the bottom. That's in 2016 when he when he
won and went on to beat Hillary Clinton.
And then who else was in there? Rubio, I think.
So Rubio's in the dark, the the like the blood red instead of
the the maroon red. So it's a mixed bag.
And Ted Cruz took the state. I want you to look at the top
right hand side on the screen right now.
And if you're missing it, what you're seeing is all of the
counties, 98 of them. One county did not go for Donald
Trump this time. That's how much more
conclusively his margin for victory was versus 2016.
All right, so you've got Nikki Haley took the only one which
was in looks like Iowa City. Is that right?
Yeah, that's the only, that's the only county that went for
Nikki Haley. And DeSantis got a mixed bag all
the way across the state didn't win a single county outright.
That is a big, big difference. And that is a major, like more
than 2X performance from 2016 to 2024.
And what does it say? One, it's a very definitive
victory, as Rose Lopez and our chat just said, It's definitive
100%. But it also tells you that these
poles and this push for this Nikki Haley thing, they're
pretty iffy. They don't make a lot of sense
to me. Let's throw it one more time.
There's another little thing on the screen to look at.
Again. Here's the numbers. 56,000
people voting Donald Trump. It's not that many people.
This is why you guys have to get out and do your voting.
Your primaries are actually fairly small if you want to move
the needle and you have a strong feeling one way or another.
I'm not voting in Texas. I've already said that I don't
vote in the primary here because I'm not registered as a party
and I'm not particularly interested because I probably
won't even be in Texas when they when they end up doing the final
vote. But let's put it this way, and
Trump's going to win here. Let's be real.
Donald Trump, 56,000, DeSantis 23, Nikki Haley 21.
So A2 point margin of error. And then if you were to add
those two up, you get to 40 and Trump beat both of them combined
by 1111 percentage points. It's a massive victory.
So they're trying to downplay it pretty much everywhere you look.
Fox News, CBSNBCAPCNN, everybody wants to prop up this Nikki
Haley thing. I don't know why.
Does it make any sense? Well, if you remember, we played
this for you yesterday, and I did want to play it again just
because it made me laugh. You don't have to watch the
guy's body language this time. Let's just listen.
What are the polls say? Because the polls say a lot of
things. Looks like Nikki's really got a
good shot. Here's what people in Nikki's
camp are saying as covered by Fox.
And like I said, it's always interesting to see who they're
trying to prop up. I actually think she's going to
do very well tomorrow. I think people might be
surprised. You know, her polls have been
going up, and I know a lot of people think that Trump has it
in a bag already. But if she does well and then
goes on to a couple of the next States and does well, I think
she could be our nominee. It it's hard to tell until the
caucus is over. It's hard to tell except she
lost. I don't know why I find that
disease so amusing, but that guy is great and what is he kind of
looking at? He's looking at, I don't know,
you. It's kind of like a Bongino rule
is it not where you just kind of wait and see what happens?
Maybe that would be the right answer.
Look at this. I pulled this because I was
really curious. This came from USA TODAY,
another left-leaning source. This came just a couple of days
before the caucus before our the elections that went on on Monday
or the the caucusing that goes goes on yesterday, nearly half
of Republican caucus goers say Donald Trump is their first
choice. That's not surprising.
He over performed right. He went 51% even though he was
pulling at 48. Nikki Haley was supposedly at
20% and she only performed at 19.
She underperformed according to these polls and DeSantis
overperformed as well. So that just tells you I agree
with her. She is it is a two-part, a two
person race. It's between DeSantis and Donald
Trump and the margin of victory is now 2X.
It looks like at least in this first little area, but that
seems to be the case and I I'd be shocked to find it.
Doesn't mean that DeSantis isn't a decent candidate, doesn't mean
that there should be a lot of, like, animosity towards him.
Like all of that is totally negative.
That's people pissing in their own tent.
It's very weird to see like just let the best person win, who's
going to represent the platform and the the purpose.
That has always happened. And I guess people like forget
this every four years. But the reason that we have
these primary seasons, particularly when we have a
really, really strong candidate up front, is that people want to
move the platform forward. People like Vivek Ramaswami are
incredibly important. He outperformed, I think what
people would have expected for a guy, as he said, a little guy
with a funny name. And he is a little guy.
He's way smaller than me. He's very bright and he speaks
really well. And he moved the platform
forward. He moved it forward because he
was showing this is what's important.
Like we need to be talking about these things.
The stuff. The reason that Vivek was so
popular, it was specifically because he was speaking to the
populist agenda of our federal government is is overreaching.
It's not, it's not solving things at the border.
And he was coming forward with some plans.
So one would hope that Donald Trump's camp looks at it and
goes, OK, these were pretty valuable.
Look, he got way more than he should have.
He massively over performed in most in like for what he is and
for his name recognition prior to getting started.
I mean he was on Tucker Carlson a couple times.
You guys remember, go back, rewind the clocks.
That's basically who he was. He was doing financial analysis,
talking about DEI on Tucker Carlson show and that's how he
basically launched out. He moved the needle, move the
needle in a in a good way, positively in ways that we
should all listen to. So that's a value.
And if he's in the Trump administration or not, he still
did something pretty valuable for me.
That's what's really relevant. I think like again these these
polls, we take them with a grain of salt, but what they're
actually showing is that Donald Trump is over performing based
on what they said. I think that's probably true.
That's worth keeping in mind when you hear the, you know,
Nikki Haley would do better in a head to
And then you got sort of like the chaos.
The chaos of how much are these things slanted?
How much of it is because of bad questioning.
Like we just said, how is it that you found that the MAGA
people, 6 out of 10 people in Iowa who identify as MAGA, that
only 77% of those people said they were going to vote for
Donald Trump? Like that doesn't make any
sense. You could just kind of punch
holes in this stuff on its foolishness.
I want to, I want to say thanks to my buddies at Catholic Vote
because they're covering down on a lot of this and today's loop
is quite good. So I think you guys should
definitely check that if you're not getting it.
I checked it just before the show went live and they hit on a
bunch of these topics, including stuff about the EPA talk about
government overreach and failure.
That's in there. They're talking about how a how
even now Illinois governor is starting to feel the heat on the
border. Good story on that one.
And then lastly, Nikki Haley again trying to tack down the
middle. She won't give a straight answer
about trans stuff. She's so pro-life that she's
actually going to be not conservative whatsoever.
You guys can get all that stuff by going to the loop.
Just go to catholicvote.org, it's catholicvote.org, putting
your e-mail address in there. And you will be having access to
their emails every morning, which I get usually.
I'm already awake. You can also make a donation if
you want to do it. They are in the fight for faith,
family and freedom. They are a nonprofit.
They are A5O1C4. They have a 5O1C3.
They got a couple of different advocacy groups, but what are
they doing? They are pushing the needle on
conservative values, faith, family, freedom.
These things are not unique to Catholic Americans.
They are actually pretty much broadly Christian values.
And more importantly, they're pretty just conservative values
straight up. So check out Catholic Vote.
I'm a big fan of them. I'm actually going to be
spending a couple days. It's kind of an imposition
because I'm going to be offline here.
I will be playing you guys some wonderful interviews that we've
logged in and you guys are going to get more perspective.
I didn't plan it this way, but both of the guys that I
interviewed ended up being Catholic, which is kind of
strange. It was totally accidental.
It was one person, J Michael Waller, who we're going to hear
from tomorrow. He just released a book which is
available today. You guys can check that out and
it'll be on tomorrow's show that it'll go scheduled live very
soon right after we finish up today.
And and Mike Waller, super neat guy.
Really, really good perspective. And it's like got this very
crazy cool personal story and amusingly, you know, it kind of
reveals that he was Catholic. I didn't know that before we
started talking. It's not relevant to any of the
story other than there's some fun stuff that happened in the
Catholic Church with the director of the CIA.
You guys are going to want to tune in tomorrow for that.
If you have not made it part of your normal day, definitely
check into that one And then all right.
So let's push on, let's push on a little bit.
There's some weird things that are going on.
I I went to the AP because I wanted to see if they're
covering Nikki Haley and they're pushing.
And we're all focused on local politics of of of what's
happening in one state, which is nationally significant, but it's
still one state. What else is going on out there?
What other agendas do you guys ever listen to?
NPR. You ever just like, turn on NPR
just to see what the, like, the loony left thinks about my wife.
And had this funny this conversation the other day,
apparently her. Her family members used to make
her mix tapes of, like, songs and stuff that came off the
radio. Because when I asked her, I was
like, do you remember that song from the 80s?
And she was like, yeah, but I don't know how I knew it because
I never listened to radio with music.
My dad only listened to NPR, which used to be somewhat
sensible, even if it was on the left.
And now my buddy who who drives around and and works for the FBI
and spends a bunch of time behind the wheel and the
windshield, he's always telling me he's like, all right, so
here's the update on what NPR is interested in.
It's all trans all the time. There are trans Nigerians that
are getting, you know, this and this thing is bad and so on and
so forth. So he's constantly keeping me
updated on what's going on with the trans situation.
And Yep, the AP is not not an exception.
It's kind of an NPR like thing. Here's a great story you didn't
know about. But there is a a wave.
A wave. Let's see how big that wave is
in one second. But a wave of transgender slangs
going on in Mexico, spurring anger and protest by the LGBTQ
plus community picture of a guy wearing a hat looks like kind of
like a artist. He looks like a real dude.
And there's a lady, She's very upset and they're protesting the
murder of a transgender activist.
Now, should we be dismissive of people dying in other places?
No, But I think that when you get right down to it, there's an
awful lot of bad things that are happening in the United States.
The fact that they're covering down on this with such with such
outrage, the killing spurred outrage.
They use the word itself right there among members of the LGBT
community. It spawned A protest.
You guys have any idea that Mexico City is bigger than any
city in the United States and 100 people got together.
Like, you can get more than that to protest in favor of Hamas.
In New York City, it's just, you know, is this really outrage?
No, it's just trying to blow up something. 3 transgender people
have been killed in the first two weeks of 2024.
They're saying that they're targeted slangs.
That's actually not a very good thing at all for human rights.
Nobody wants that. But the problem is, is that
these what they want to do is they want to go after the
politicians and they're trying to blame the entirety of Mexican
culture, which is exactly what the AP, this nonpartisan
organization, is going out and saying, says the gay and
transgender populations. By the way, mixing gay and
transgender populations, it may actually make more sense.
It used to really bother me when they would say that because I
know gay people and they're not confused about what to do with
their genitals. I don't necessarily agree with
what they do with them, but that's their business.
And as long as it's two consenting adults, we sort of
I'm, I'm almost like a Nikki Haley in that one.
I kind of just don't want to get into it.
I have a religious issue with it, but politically it's like
it's none of my damn business. I thought we got there in the
90s and maybe that's just my formative years.
They're they're trying to make the claim that there was a
brutality. A brutality is what, like being
shot. Like that happens in every major
urban area right now and it happens really aggressively in
Ecuador. They've actually had something
like a 200% increase in their homicides and shootings, which I
I just all covered down on later.
But anyway, transgender and gay populations hard to make that
sort of movement other than what it seems like is most of the
activist level. Transgender people are what the
Mexican president has referred to as men dressed as women.
He's calling it exactly as it seems and as it is.
It's a dude in a dress and we used to like that.
That used to be like a bizarre sexual fetish in the 80s.
It was not a mainstream idea that you'd be talking about that
and then trying to attribute them to like the way that women
work. I mean the AP is is so radical.
55 year old Zamalia that's with an HI mean with an X rather.
Or maybe it's Kamalia Ramirez said the violence was partly the
consequence. The the violence was was the
president's fault because he referred to a transgender
congresswoman, which is really a man as a man in a dress.
So the Mexican president calling things as they actually are, our
our president can't do that, at least not the one that's sitting
there right now. And then apparently somebody was
killed. And so that's the fault of the
president. That's what they're going to lay
it on. They're trying to basically
bully all of their political agendas and all the sort of
wacky, just non normal takes. I had a a conversation the other
day and I think I I think I had it with it might have been with
Mike Waller. We said this very simple.
It's like we used to just call these people weirdos.
You can be a weirdo and in the United States it's actually a
really safe place to be a weirdo compared to the rest of the
world. Think about that.
If you were going to be a weirdo anywhere in the world, would you
want to go to like Tanzania or would you want to go to China or
would you want to take your take a risk in Poland or Russia?
Would you rather be in the United States Like we are very
incredibly weirdo tolerant in this country, which I think is
good in some ways because it allows people to try to find the
right path. If we are truly a Christian
nation and and the United States is undoubtedly that at least by
founding, then you know we'll work on the the plank in our own
eye and we'll let other people deal with respect.
We don't have to stone everybody to death.
We have this pretty Christian attitude that's like, well, if
you're without without any sins maybe, maybe you throw the first
stone and then nobody does it. It's OK.
It's OK to be like that. Our justice system doesn't need
to go after people for being social weirdos right up until
you start touching kids. We've got a the the the doctor,
the whistleblower Doctor Who is in the state of Texas that was
exposing Texas Children's Hospital.
I've just made contact with him through a kind of back channel
he and I've been talking. He's a really, really cool guy
young. He's like in his early 30s and
super sharp and everybody who's who's decided to blow the
whistle has basically done it. Everyone that I'm seeing that is
calling out major government abuse, they do it because they
come from a position of faith. They come from a position of
knowing that there is a an an absolute moral right and wrong
which this country just forgot in the last year, like five
years. I think basically about the time
I joined the FBI in 20/15/2016 was when they decided that
nobody here could tell you what I like what an an absolute right
or wrong was. And Speaking of right and wrong,
Oh, man, this one's weird. OK, so like I said, I started
digging around. I was like, if we're talking
about Iowa, what are we not talking about?
And what we're not talking about?
It's Davos, all right? It's Davos.
This is the coverage of Davos. I'm going to do a couple little
pieces up here that I want to talk about.
The first one. This is coming from Reuters.
They're fantastic as well as you guys probably know them.
That's sarcasm. The E us von der Leyen warns
that the West is slackening its support for Ukraine.
You guys, remember them? Holy moly, we're not giving
enough money to Ukraine. We have to ensure all of the
money goes to Ukraine. Please continue to open your
hearts and your bank accounts to Ukraine.
Here's what And it's always fun the way they write these
stories. So they literally took a direct
quote and they and they made that the opening line, except
they didn't put it in quotation marks.
The West must not let up on supplying Ukraine with weapons
and money if it wants Kiev to succeed in its war against
Russia. Has anyone been told, have we
been told at all what success looks like?
Like Ukraine gets to hold on to territory.
Is that is that it? That it's just a rubble pile.
I I happen to know some people that are in sort of this bizarre
International Space of business and stuff and they meet with
some like real shady characters. Interesting people reach out and
talk to me And some of the people that I knew were always
kind of interesting. And.
And the story is, if there's like a bunch of Ukrainian
oligarchs that have already carved up this country and
they're going to turn it into whatever they want it to be,
they just need the war to stop. And the question is, is how much
devastation will it be? But it doesn't really matter as
long as the US is going to back it.
Like they have unlimited money to rebuild whatever they want.
And it's going to be tyrannical in the same way that it did
here. Here's another little quote.
She says that Ukraine can prevail in this war.
What does it look like? What is Ukrainian prevailing?
Like Russia's not going anywhere.
It's enormous and it's just a meat grinder that has no problem
throwing millions of people into conflict.
If we look at any of the past wars that Russia's been able to
do and and and and Putin, as you guys may hear, we'll have a
little bit of a discussion about it tomorrow on on the podcast.
But you know, Putin is a nationalist and he's looking at
you Ukrainian. And he's like, he's like, yeah,
I'm gonna grab pieces of mine, of my old country back, OK, I
don't know what, I don't know what it looks like, but we must
continue to empower their resistance.
You hear these vague words. None of those are a concrete
plan of what success looks like, that that is very troubling to
me in a lot of ways. Mostly because it looks like an
unlimited check. Mostly by the United States and
some of the Western powers Just throwing money unaccountable
into places that are clearly without the ability to do any
real auditing and cannot track the cash.
Ukrainians need predictable financing.
That's what Ukrainians need. You guys probably knew that they
don't need peace and and a negotiated Armistice and a
cessation of hostilities. No, they need predictable
financing. It sounds like they're they're
talking about their own bank accounts.
They need a sufficient and sustained supply of weapons to
defend and regain rightful territory.
If anybody believes that that's happening, that the offensive is
going to come back, it just the narrative there has completely
fallen. But of course, Reuters is happy
to pick it up. And as you're seeing, Zelinsky
is going to go to Davos. He's a wartime president that is
besieged on all sides. Do you remember those absolute
bullshit claims that they were like Russian hit squads that
were running after him and he was running around.
That's why he was wearing that, that that cheap green sweater
or, you know, sweatshirt. Like his sweatshirt is not even
as nice as the suspendables merch.
It's bizarre. And in the meantime, he's
running to Davos, flying off on private jets to go to a Swiss
ski resort where he can talk to people who have a bunch of money
basically keeping. You want to talk about the grift
of the con? Keeping the long term con of
money? Dropping into Ukraine?
Insane. Absolutely insane.
Which is, of course, the title of Dan's book or Dan's chapter
that's about this stuff. Insane in Ukraine.
But it's he's going to to members of Qatar like are are
they sitting down? They're supposed to hopefully
see like this sort of like sit down with members of the the
Chinese delegation is going to sit down with members of the US
delegation members of Ukraine and maybe the workout that
China's going to pressure Russia.
Not happening. It's all so stupid and ugly.
Since I brought him up let me let me do a quick call out to my
buddy here at o'boyle's merch store.
You guys can go over there if you want to check out.
I'm wearing the hoodie today. This is the light duty hoodie.
They still have those in stock looks like.
So you can check out the dash suspendables.
It's the dash suspendables.com. The merch store supporting the
O'boyle family sweatshop. Lots of neat stuff in there.
Let me reach off and off camera. Here we go.
We got this. Got these.
These are really neat looking. If you if you do, if you want to
put them on the plate carrier. Remember the eagle goes downward
just like you're seeing on the chest.
These are really good size too. It's like when I when I saw him,
I was like, I don't know about all that, but this is like the
size of a of your of your palm or my palm.
We've also still got the pins. You guys can check out the pins
if you want to support the suspendables.
Easiest things you can do patches and pins, easy, no
effort, fire and forget. They're easy to hand out.
You can carry them with you. They're really nice little
little nice trinket that shows your overwhelming support for
what the O'boyle family has gone through.
Which is to say that they're still waiting.
By the way, he's still an official FBI employee, which is
why that's his wife's company. He's an FBI employee with no
paycheck going on into the year and a half.
Mark. Marcus Allen, we're still
keeping an eye on these guys. Like we're not going to let him
fall, but you guys can show support and you can actually
wear your support@thedashsuspendables.com.
And if you use the promo code, Kyle, just like everywhere else,
Kyle will save you some percentage on all this stuff.
Thanks to Jen Chang for throwing that into the chat.
The Dash suspendables.com Yeah, what else we got guys like, it's
just it's foolishness left and right.
We can't help it. And so let's see some of the
other things that were going on. This is another fun piece of
Davos. Why is Doug Emhoff, the husband
of Kamala Harris, going to go speak anything, Anybody.
And they're going to talk about anti-Semitism and gender
equality. Oh, weird.
Didn't we just kind of cover a little bit of that?
We talked about how gender equality is such a big deal.
Rich people flying off in private jets are going to go
talk about gender equality plus anti-Semitism.
In the meantime Daily Wire has a lead piece today that shows that
there are pro Hamas, anti Israel, you know anti Zionist
protesters going on in London. Same time Zoner.
Damn near it. Just across the just across the
channel there and what are they doing?
They're they're they're saying we must normalize massacres.
We have to be able to normalize making people feel very
uncomfortable. So there's your anti-Semitism
right there. I don't understand how these
people go out and represent us. Last year we saw Chris Ray I
think he probably got his lesson he's not going to be doing that.
We'll be talking a little bit later probably on Friday with
Steve friend about some of the the self owns the FBI has been
involved in. But yeah second the second man,
second gentleman of the United States will be taking his
advocacy campaign. Isn't that sad that we've that
we've made this guy like in the position of I don't know other
unelected people and now he's going to advocate against two
things. Oh man, anti-Semitism and
Islamophobia. Right, right.
Because we play both sides of the aisle.
We don't want to upset all those pro Hamas people.
If you guys heard there might be a government shutdown where
they're going to actually walk off the job because of Biden's
Israel policy because he's too pro Israel and he's not
supporting terrorists and and and Hamas that are picked a
fight and has been going on for eons.
Interestingly, federal employees think they can walk off the job.
Should be a Hatch Act violation. We'll see you tomorrow.
I guess today is the day they're actually supposed to be walked
off. In any case, good to know this
is what the elites are focusing on. anti-Semitism and gender
equality. Just the big important stuff.
They don't really care about what's going on in our country
and they don't really care about the border.
Just want to make sure they talk about their their pet peeves as
they all hang out together with a bunch of money.
The last little thing that I wanted to cover doubt on because
man, this is what they should be talking about.
How about this? The global economy, third
straight year. What has been going on for three
years? Oh, we had a like a what do they
call him? The rotting bag of oatmeal.
The Dan Bongino rotting bag of oatmeal sitting in the White
House. And the United States is a
pretty big driver of what goes on in the global economy that in
China and the Chinese are dealing with sluggish growth.
They're saying that we came out gangbusters in 2021, still under
power from what was going on with the Trump recovery and
worldwide 6.2% growth. And it slowed down to three the
year before last. And then we just saw 2.6.
And the projection is it's going to continue to grow at a slower
and slower rate. 2.4 in 2024. They're hobbled by high
interest, percent of inflation, slumping trade.
China's having a sluggish and difficult year.
Global tensions. Oh yeah, because there's like a
war. Oh no, there's like multiple
wars, right? There's a war in Israel with
Hamas. There's a conflict.
I like how it's now it's just it's been downgraded from war to
conflict. According to the AP, there's a
conflict in Ukraine between Russia and Ukraine, which the
United States continues to fuel with money and weapons and so
on. And we must not slacken.
Very interesting. They keep trying to tell you
that you guys remember cuz we had Janet Yellen story the other
day and she said, she said very clearly people are feeling very
good about their financial positions and they're spending,
you know, they're spending indicates that.
Have have you ever wondered that when they look at these
indicators, when they say that the spending indicates that
people are very good with their their financial situations and
that people are starting new businesses, is it because the
things that they were doing got them laid off and they have no
other choice but to go out on their own?
People who would otherwise be W2 employees like me, I was more
than happy making a paycheck. I didn't want to start my own
media business. That's what I had to do.
That's what the option was. That's what looked most
favorable for me in that moment because all my skill sets
basically were geared towards government service.
And that was a no go. How many other people are in the
same boat as me because I don't think I'm alone.
And how many other people are spending money not because they
feel really good about it, but like, you know, my wife will
throw something in the cart when we're going through Costco.
And the answer is always like, you know, are we thrilled about
something? You know, bacon now cost 12
bucks more than it used to. We buy a big pack of bacon, and
it used to be, you know, I don't know, it used to be 14 bucks and
and now it's $26. And you're like, I don't know
what? We haven't changed our life
dramatically yet. People are spending money like
they're feeling good about it. No, Janet Yellen, they're
spending money because that's the only way that they're going
to maintain the same thing they're doing.
They're used to spending it. And now it's just everything
costs a lot more, a lot more. That's not good.
We may even cover down on the the economy a little bit with
Steve on Friday because I've got some graphs.
My cousin is a money guy and he sent me some really, really
interesting things. The deviation that happened in
the last couple years from the baseline growth of the US
economy and the the GDP per capita going back to the 1950s,
it's basically always grown at a 2.1% rate.
I'll show you guys the graphs on Friday, but it's always grown at
about a 2.1 rate for the last like several decades.
It goes back, you know, well before my, my life.
And we had a dramatic deviation and that was in 2008 and under
Barack Obama, it basically separated from that line and it
never, never went back. It's never gone back even the
better. And like even the recovery
growth rate, not including COVID was like 1.7.
So that's a pretty dramatic drop off.
And you know, I don't know if we recover that sort of standard of
living, which which is to say those millennials and the Gen.
Z types that are all crying about it, you know, things are
harder, but they basically have been harder my whole adult life.
You can still be successful if you don't act like a moron.
If you're financially responsible, it's certainly a
lot harder. We're hearing right now that
federal employees are also very scared that the federal
government might shut down. We'll probably talk about this
with Steve as well, but it they're, they're worried it's
going to shut down and they've done nothing to insulate
themselves against it. This is the reason why we don't
have more whistleblowers, folks. If you're curious, like, hey,
how come people are coming out and saying there's all these
abuses? We know that there's failures on
the border. We know that Border Patrol
people must be furious. They signed up to do something.
How come they're not coming out in droves?
And the answer is because financially, they have
absolutely no cushion. None of these people are looking
around and going, oh, my life is contingent on the success of a
federal government. And if it doesn't do its job,
like I might be screwed. They don't put money away for a
rainy day. One of the things that the
suspendables were talking about, I'll just give you one last
little piece on here. The one little thing we were
talking about is in 2018, end of 2018, I believe going into 2019,
there was a question. I think we ended up having a
sequester and essentially federal employees like, like my
agency lost a paycheck one paycheck for like a week.
I think we were supposed to get paid on a Friday, and we didn't
get paid until like the next Thursday.
So it was like four or five days where we didn't get paid, but
there was this looming specter like they'd shut down and then
we went through the whole pay period.
And then, of course, they chewed it up and they passed this bill
and everybody got back pay. But for those 4-5 days that we
were looking at it, and even before we didn't get paid, they
set up a a food cantina in the basis of the government
building, the Washington field office where they were handing
out canned goods for people who couldn't make ends meet even
though they hadn't even missed a paycheck yet because of the fear
of missing a paycheck made people start getting all this
kind of stuff. It's absolutely insane.
It's just they're these people are not responsible.
And if you don't think that's the biggest threat to national
security is a bunch of people who have security clearances
that can't even afford to miss one paycheck.
I mean, I'm not saying that everybody out there can do it.
I'm just saying that if you have a national security clearance
and you're paid by the federal government, should you not,
should you not very simply be thinking, you know what, I'm
going to be able to do this. I'm going to be able to do it
because it's the right thing to do.
And I should be able to at least look into my own pockets and
know that I'm not going to be compromised over something so
simple. We throw something on the screen
here because you guys we just had a little little rumble rat
that is of value. Give me one SEC here.
There it is. Watch this.
Throw this up here. The the fact is is there's the
federal government is massively bloated and there you have seek
you find you. I haven't seen you on here
before but thanks for for the $10 rumble rant saying the
federal government needs to be 20% of its current size.
That's probably a stretch that's the upside like I said of a
Vivek Ramaswamy that's the upside that he had.
He was pushing the envelope, saying we need to basically
lessen, lessen, lessen and continue to lessen the size of
our federal government. And he was giving concrete plans
within the authority set that existed, so to be able to do
that. So I do these things all matter.
That's why you don't attack everybody in the primary.
It's worth looking at. All right.
So there's an awful lot of garbage out there in the world.
We've got something a little fun.
How about the extreme rhetoric, which continues to go on?
I've got a fun video for you guys to take a little.
Just a breather as we go off into Tuesday.
It's cold. This breather is called People
Will Die. If you're not familiar with
Reason TV and this guy's name is Remy.
He's on YouTube. He's got about a million
followers on there. Definitely worth your time.
Definitely. If you need a little break in
the action where you can listen to a catchy tune.
He's got a lot of musical talents and also has a pretty
compelling message. Almost every one of these these
things he does are quite fun. So enjoy this.
People will die. Let's let's tune it down just a
little bit. Y'all these cuts are blood
money. People will die.
Let's be very clear. Senate Republicans are.
Paying for. Tax cuts for the wealthy
American lives. People need kidneys.
It's sad but decreed. Yet the senator's hoarding one
more than she needs. Ioffer this bill and I hope
you'll vote. Aye.
Unless, of course, you just want people to die.
Traffic deaths have many crying with fear.
Over 30,000 people are dying each year.
This modest change, I propose, must be applied.
Unless, of course, you just want people to die.
Alcohol deaths are exceeding comparisons.
Black people, White people, Native American.
We need to ban alcohol. It can't be denied.
Unless of course you just want people to die.
Murders are bad. They have no defenders, yet many
are committed by repeat offenders.
I say lifetime in prison, whatever the crime.
Unless of course you just want people to die.
I don't have a bill or a grown to detail.
I just need a short clip for my donor e-mail.
Tim, there's blood on your hands.
You want people to die that good?
Cool. Tim.
Dinner at five? Yeah.
The car deaths I mentioned are terrible stuff.
Doesn't seem one seat belt is ever enough.
You must vote for my ACT so that fewer will cry.
Unless, of course, you just want people to die.
Carbs the container. We cannot ignore whipped creams
killing more people than ever before.
This bill would be passed and be ratified of those people that
didn't want people to die. Not weigh all the costs, the
effects, the results. Empathize with each other as if
we were adults. Use our brains to craft
arguments, not vilify. See that?
Freedom's a traitor. You want people to die?
I tried. Crossing the street is
incredibly tough. People look left and right but
rarely look up. My bill would mandate the.
Deal crossing the street. Yeah, if you guys missed that,
it's reason. TV on YouTube.
Guy's name is Remy. Remy.
You should be able to search it. You can find a lot of stuff.
He has some really, really good stuff.
That's copies of country songs. I think he even did a cover of
the Richmond with a Richmond, which is quite funny.
All of this stuff's really good. We'll we'll probably play some
more. I enjoyed it.
Yeah. Put Pocahontas in her place.
I like that. He says Native Americans and it
cuts back. Very clever guy and hitting it
out there. All right folks, that's where
we're at for the day. I hope you guys walk out and you
know a little more about what they're looking at, what you're
looking at. And Nikki Haley, are we in the
Never Nikki Camp yet? I think everybody in the chat
was so I appreciate that. Let me do a quick five star
review. Here we go.
This is from UTM, KT3913 and UTAM.
I saw you in the chat earlier today, so we're reading your
five Star view. It's called the most interesting
podcast in the world. Five Stars.
I don't always consume podcasts, but when I do, I prefer The Kyle
Serafin Show. I don't know why I felt like
that was the way that it had to be read, but that's the way I
felt it needed to be read. Folks, we appreciate you guys.
Make sure you are leaving us a five star review If you are
listening to us in any of the audio platforms, whether it's
Spotify, iHeartRadio, whether it's on your Lexus spyware
device or Apple. If you are watching on
rumble.com/kyle Serif and go ahead and give us a thumbs up.
Make sure you are following the channel.
We appreciate you guys doing that.
And for all of you who are watching on Twitter X, yes it is
still Twitter. If you guys type in x.com, it
redirects to Twitter. We appreciate you.
I see all of you out there and join us for the live chat.
You guys come for the content but you stay for the live chat.
At least that's what I'm told. It looks insane and I can't keep
track of it. So we'll see you guys again
tomorrow with a good interview of Doctor J.
Michael Waller and I will be out of town, but you guys will have
live Kyle Seraphin show streaming same time 0930 Eastern
Time or 8:30 here in Central in Texas, America.
God bless you all. Be safe.
We'll see you soon. Thanks for listening to The Kyle
Serafin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True
Social, and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.