Prepare to hear the truth from a real whistleblower, an American
Patriot, here's civil liberties, enthusiasts, Second Amendment,
Defender and indefinitely suspended FBI agent.
Kyle seraphin. Hello, my friends and welcome to
the Kyle serif and show. Today's Wednesday.
Show on February 15th. I've got a whole bunch of things
to tell you today. I don't like it.
When people say we've got a great show for you, I have no
idea if it's going to great show, we haven't done it yet,
and you don't know if it's going to be great either.
So, you're going to stick around to find out.
I got a couple updates on some of the whistleblowers that I'm
friends with and let you know what they've been doing on
Capitol Hill, we're going to talk about a piece that says
gotten an awful lot of tension on my end for the FBI's
targeting of radical traditionalist.
Flicks, probably a step too far. I got a whole list of things.
I'm going to talk about it. We want to go over the Michigan
State shooting. I think that is a troubling
situation, but I think that we should have an honest
conversation about what that means.
And what it doesn't mean, let's talk about a little bit about
what happened in to some individual students.
That were visiting, the Smithsonian wearing pro-life
gear yet another targeting of the federal government going.
After an agenda that they are not authorized to infringe on
and it looks like the ACLU is going to step in so that's
fantastic. Want to talk about a piece that
Julie Kelly did about the proud boys.
Trial and maybe something we can all kind of take away from that,
including is the government doing entrapment.
Might do some live grabs here because I'm I'm doing this solo
with no dr. Phil, no producer, Phil rather
dr. Phil someone else altogether.
Although funny story just came to my mind when I was a kid.
I grew up in Dallas, and my younger brother played on a
basketball team. And dr.
Phil was his coach, so that's weird before he was dr.
Phil with Oprah. He was dr.
Phil, the basketball coach For my younger brothers, small,
Middle School, basketball team. We're going to talk about a
weaponization of the IRS again. Lois Lerner 2.0, got just the
news article that I want to run through and kind of make sure
that you are aware of it yet. Another example of the federal
government trying to pick winners and losers.
Once again, it is not an opportunity that the FBI that
the, the IRS that the Commerce department at the Small Business
Association, should be taking on themselves to censor speech or
thought. But it It mean they're not doing
it and we're getting all the way down to the front line guards at
the sodium, so we'll get into that.
Let's, let's go ahead and start first right here at me.
See if I can open up this web page for you.
There it is. Fantastic, let's do a quick
move. So we're going to talk about the
Michigan, Michigan State shooting, first and foremost, I
think that was on some, a lot of people's minds.
I'm seeing a lot of pro gun control posts.
I'm seeing people talk about why this keep happening.
I saw a really good piece the other day and I was actually so
on. A show with on a television show
where they were before at the segment before, talked about, if
this had happened in South East Detroit or in South Side,
Chicago, there would be no conversation whatsoever.
I think there are, of course. Correct.
This is a big problem that we are willing to talk about only
gun control and, you know, all the other kind of nonsense that
people get really excited about regarding firearms, safety, when
it affects a certain group of people, People and it has
nothing to do with what it's others.
The discussion was, is it class-based?
Is it race-based? I think that it's none of those
things. I think it's just whenever
there's a political opportunity for politicians to move forward,
an agenda that some of their base thinks is really important
and this case gun control then that's when we're going to see
it. So let's talk about the Michigan
State University. Shooting at a really weird
window into this particular thing.
I got a DM on Twitter, asking me to join in co-host a space.
If you're not familiar with the spaces program, it's essentially
Car panel or like a chat call. It reminds me of the old AOL
chat rooms but we ended up having over 17,000.
People come into the room at some point in time and
listeners, you know, between 2000 and 3000 listeners
listening in on what we were doing.
Just kind of live tracking what we knew and when we knew it in
the middle of the event, in the middle of this active shooter
until he was actually mitigated. And I had the strangest
experience because I was asked to co-host that I didn't have a
plan or agenda and I'm not a new Castor by trade, I'm criminal
investigator. But what I do have a lot of
experience on is sitting in a car and listening to a police
scanner and that's something I used to do and I've done
thousands of hours of it. It's not an FBI skill per se but
it was a safety skills that I developed when I was running my
team because I wanted to be able to see what was happening in the
area. I was in and what was going on
in in the general community at large and more importantly, what
was the public safety aspect? Was there a fire department
coming out to where we were? Was there going to be a police
officer dispatch? For us, it's a huge especially
when you're in a low visibility or a plainclothes surveillance
role. What you're trying to do is
avoid any kind of attention from anybody and law enforcement
attentions, probably the worst kind because everybody sees when
the cops come onto a on a street, and having the cops come
and stop by your vehicle, when you're doing surveillance, is as
kind of a no-go. It burns you.
And you have to explain to them who you are and then of course
they're going to run away. So we're looking at this, you
know this case this active shooter situation, here's the
things I'll pull up CNN because I think That's a good source.
Any, in this case, talking about the gunman, so I'll access that.
But one of the things that we were doing is I just pulled up a
scanner and it brought me to the understanding that a lot of
people have no idea what to do in a real critical emergency.
Where information is light, and they are dealing with a lot of
unknowns, particularly, you know, they don't have a
connection into law enforcement. So, what do you do when you find
out? Hey, I just got a text message,
I'm a student. And I got a text message saying,
there's an active shooter on Mike.
Piss or in the neighborhood of your children's school or in the
vicinity of where you work and you're getting the
shelter-in-place notice like, what is the action?
What is the plan? And if you don't have a plan, by
the way, you're not going to have one in the moment, you're
going to panic, that's what people do.
So we started getting students actually coming into the Twitter
space and they were interested in, you know what people knew
that's, you know, they couldn't turn on the news.
So Twitter was their Lifeline for a number of these people.
And what I did is I just started broadcasting a scanner for
Ingham County. In in Michigan State.
And we were able to access the scanner for the East Lansing the
greater East Lansing Public Safety Division, which include
both fire department, and we got the Battalion Chiefs coming in
and saying, what are we to do? And different medic engines that
were moving and and fire department engines, that were
moving around the city. And then also a number of police
departments including those who came in on the mutual Aid.
And then we're accessiblestl to the dispatcher there.
A couple comments on that number one.
Absolutely. Fantastic job by the Actors who
were working that crisis, that that active shooter scenario.
It is an overwhelming amount of information to keep track of and
they seem to be doing an outstanding job just like you
would expect your Public Safety professionals to do.
They really earn their paycheck that night.
So just a great shout out that you know, unsung heroes is is
dispatch and the people that are maintaining calm and Order and
moving units around and they were clearing buildings and you
know, working with the incident command structure in order to to
Eight this threat which eventually ended up being this
gentleman right here that we see in the photo.
This is a 43 year-old Anthony, Dwayne McRae.
A couple things about him. It sounded like he was, he pled
guilty to a firearm charge in 2019, he was sort of let off the
hook. He was carrying a concealed
weapon without a permit. Which is a felony in Michigan.
I'm not real crazy about that, felony.
I'm be curious to know more about this guy and whether he
was on any sort of mental health situation, whether he was being
medicated, whatever. But he plead guilty to a
misdemeanor year and a half on probation, still had his Firearm
rights and then unfortunately turned around and ended up
killing a number of people two nights ago, which is really
awful. That is not the fault of the
gun. That is a person.
There's a person that made some bad decisions and obviously made
other bad decisions and that resulted in the loss of life.
So there's some things we can do to mitigate those sort of
situations, one of them is, if you are of age and you are
legally able, you should train own and carry a firearm, I will
vehement Lee advocate. On that, I do it everywhere I
go. I'm obviously trained as both a
former law enforcement and and former military professional but
when it comes to training you can get training.
A lot of places. A lot of it, you can do on your
own. There's wonderful access to a
resources on YouTube teaching you drills teaching you grip,
you can dry fire. And then I would say once you
feel comfortable enough that you can load handle and move around
with your weapon, safely, go and attend a class, spend some
money. This is your personal safety, it
doesn't matter if you're 21. Old.
It doesn't matter if you're 45 years old, doesn't matter if
you're 80 years old, if you have the hand strength to carry a
firearm, you should do. So, and that puts you, in a
infinitely better position, then someone who is hiding in a dorm
room hiding in a cafeteria hiding in a locker room as we
found out, was we listen to the scanner and just barricading a
door and praying that nobody comes in that door.
That tried to kill you. It's, it's a hopeless feeling.
I have to imagine, it's very helpless one way or another and
there's no reason why you shouldn't mitigate that threat.
If you can now obviously within the law, I'm not advocating for
carrying places that you're not allowed to.
I don't know what Michigan flaws are and carrying, but this is a
thing you could do in a lot of places.
And a lot of states are figuring out that, you know, having a
firearm in the hands of capable individuals.
The good guy with a gun thing is many hundreds of thousands of
times a year. It plays out in the favor of the
American public which is to say that it's disrupts.
A firearm related crime on the other end when somebody is
trying to be an aggressor and is illegally using a weapon to do
something. We're already dealing with.
Does that say that you can't kill you can't you can't go up
and use a weapon in a robbery. In fact, you can't Rob, so all
these sort of things, they're already against the law and gun
laws are not going to change the game.
So what you do is you look at the world as it lays and you try
to fix it and and try to get back to something.
That makes sense, which is that you're responsible for your own
personal safety, it is your job to be your own first responder
first and foremost with no caveats to that.
I No, that might Glover does a really good job talking about
it. He has a company called
fieldcraft survival. You can go there and you can buy
tourniquets and things like that.
I highly recommend you carry a tourniquet.
I highly recommend, you learn how to take care of your own
emergencies and we'll talk about why that came up.
So during this this Twitter spaces, we found out that one of
the students had a roommate or a friend or something that had
become overwhelmed by the circumstances and had gone into
shock. Commonly just, you know, just
overwhelmed catatonic fainted or passed out and the question is,
what do you do? You're not in a situation where
you can get an ambulance to you, although that may be the best
situation in the long run. Make sure there's no underlying
medical problems. But you want to make sure that
you have an ability to mitigate the potential risk that person
has, which is mostly just a collapsed, are way.
You want to make sure you can save, you know, people.
And then if there was actually a kinetic threat of some sort of a
gunshot wound or blunt force, trauma, somebody attacking you
want to know how to do these things.
To it's very easy to learn this stuff.
A lot of the stuff is available on YouTube.
It's available on Rumble. I'm not necessarily Go to put
out that content but I am going to talk about it today because
it's totally relevant. And if it's the only thing you
walk away with the show from, you'll be a better person for
the rest of your life. So number one, learn CPR.
That's that's number one, you must learn CPR.
It's very easy when in doubt pump on the chest if there is a
very, very slow pulse. 30 beats a minute or slower.
That's one every two seconds. You don't have to be a scientist
to do it. You don't even need a watch, if
it sounds like this bum. Boom.
Bump start doing compressions. There's a reason why you need to
do compressions even when the heart is still beating because
what you're seeing is a slowing and we're not moving any, we're
not moving any blood around the way, it should be.
So people are circling the drain usually at that point obviously
this is in the like if you feel your buddy, who's a, you know,
feel their pulse in there, they run marathons or something or
they're an Ironman, this is not the person you're doing this on.
I'm talking about somebody who's symptomatic and has no pulse.
That is that is moving down the the We want to do something
about that and you can do that when there is a pulse till you
don't have to wait for it to stop.
That's number one. Number two, you are generally
speaking at, almost all states. You are not criminally liable.
Even if you fail, if you attempt to in good faith, provide Aid to
an individual, who is having a medical crisis or has a trauma?
You can go and do the best you can.
And you are generally safe from that prosecution.
If you don't, if you're not successful.
So don't be afraid go out there. I used to tell people when I
taught What we call care Under Fire which is just sort of
emergency action medicine. I used to tell students FBI
agents who were training that the number one goal should be do
something most. People do nothing, most people
do, nothing in all situations and their life.
They do. They always talk about the fight
or flight syndrome, but there's really three possibilities.
It's fight flight or freeze, so many people freeze, most people
freeze these days they don't take action and you'll know
whether you're an action taking individual or not.
On your preparation for it the way that you're actually
inoculated against the stress of that moment.
So like I said, touch the patient touch the person.
This is a human being that's having an emergency do something
about it. If you can, there's no reason
not to and if you're not successful and somebody gets
there and they know more things, let them do it to.
That's fine. It's great, CPR, learn it, it's
very easy. You can pick it up by watching
videos. You don't need a CPR card to do
CPR. You just need to push on the
chest and know how to do rescue breaths.
So, that's number one. Number two, I recommend people
carry like a roll of gauze. It's very easy to do.
You in your car carrying a backpack.
If you're moving around, it doesn't weigh anything.
And the other thing is the tourniquet, I will show you
right now. I have a plate carrier sitting
behind me. This is my plate carrier.
That is my personal one. I have gauze right here, sitting
right there up front. And on the side is a tourniquet,
it's actually sitting in a radio pouch, but this is my
tourniquet. I carry a tourniquet whenever
I'm doing firearms training, I carry a tourniquet in my car
like three or four of them. Actually, this is an inexpensive
tool that could save somebody's life.
If they were having a massive bleed from one of their
appendages, the arms or the legs.
We used to have a joke. I'd always see if I could get
somebody to say that they were going to put a tourniquet on the
neck when I was doing training and they would always somebody
inevitably would always say that you apply a tourniquet for a
head bleed. And I would say only a gs-15 or
above for all the who work in the government, you know, gs-15
above no mental acuity at all. No thinking happening at all.
Just yes, men. If you are a gs-15, you can call
me up or you can leave it in the comments below.
By all means, comment about your gs-15 experience and why you're
a good person and that's Okay, I will, I will accept it.
There's plenty of good gs-15 so I'm sure but it's a good joke.
Tourniquet. This is made by North American
Rescue. It is the the cat tourniquet.
The cat. This is the one that is the
standard for the military. It is the standard for most law
enforcement agencies, it is the standard for the FBI.
It is the standard for people who want people not to die from
a bleed. That is a preventable death.
Okay, these are very inexpensive. $30 is not a lot of
money to carry around. They don't really go bad but
break them out of the packaging stage them in a way.
You can watch videos on it. Maybe I'll do one but Days of
tourniquet so that you can break it open and use it right away.
Because any time that you're wasting is blood, that is being
spilled blood that cannot carry oxygen anymore blood that you do
not have to put back in somebody's body.
You don't have it it's not carrying around with you very
very few. Ambulances are carrying blood or
blood extender products like hex and or whatever.
So it's just not common. The only people that generally
have it are, you know, units that have a refrigeration.
It's difficult to do. It's got to be thought out.
It's got to be used right away. So if they don't know, there's
trauma, it's generally something that they just keep it in.
Emergency room, it goes into the trauma base.
It's hard to put blood back in the body once it's gone and
people suffer when they don't have blood.
So put blood back in by keeping it in the first place.
That's the best move carry a tourniquet.
Kari goes, the gauze is going to be for any kind of wounds that
are junctional, that's going to be like your shoulders.
It's going to be down in your hips where you can apply it.
Your abdomen areas where you may need to stop a bleeding.
That is not something you can apply a tourniquet to, you can
tie it around things. You can put pressure on heads,
things like that and absorbent cause great stuff to have.
So do that for yourself. Highly recommended.
I did this whole podcast yesterday and it recorded with
no audio, which is atrocious is the worst thing.
So I'm doing it again and I'm going to run through an acronym
that I think is really important.
Now when we talk about somebody who passed out on the floor in
an active shooter situation, that's a very real possibility
and in fact I did an after-action with some trauma
surgeons and some paramedics who were being refreshed on their
paramedic certification back in probably 20 18 and they were
doing an after action of the Pulse Nightclub.
Shooting 49, people lost their lives during that shooting seven
of those people is it is my understanding from the the
debrief. I got seven of those people so
about 14% of those people died needlessly because they
collapsed into a position where they were not, fatally wounded,
but they did die of what's called positional asphyxia.
That's a hard thing to say. But essentially they collapse
their own are way. They found himself in a corner
of a room. They got a small as possible
which is a totally reasonable thing to do when there's someone
shooting at you and you have no cover.
You know, you're better. Move is probably to fight, but a
lot of people are not prepared. Fight flight freeze.
The freeze, the instinct is real.
Seven people died from freeze. They got very, very small, they
were wounded. They Crush their own.
There are way they had a diminishing returns on the
amount of oxygen, that they could recirculate, and, and
minimal respirations, and that circled, and they ended up
perishing from that. And they could have been saved
literally by pulling them off the wall and having them lay in
what we call the recovery position.
So, but a cover, what that is, you can I'll describe it as I
For the students that were on the listening to the space.
If you are just an audio listener, you can imagine this.
I want you to imagine that you're going to put the victim
or this person that has passed out on their left side.
That means their left hip, and their left shoulder or going to
be on the ground there, right? Hip, and their right shoulder
are pointing upwards. They are knife faced on the
ground, okay? In order to keep them like that.
The first thing you do is you pull the right knee and put that
in kind of a Captain Morgan position.
You just pull the knee. You can hold their body with
your body or your knees. You literally just pull them up
against You, you're going to put their whole body facing you
against your your thighs. And you're going to put a knee
on the ground in sort of a triangular position, or a
Captain Morgan, kind of like one leg extended, and that's going
to keep them pinned up. Words, they don't roll over,
then you need to work on the airway, the Airways easily
accessible, you put their head in a neutral position and you
use their left arm like a triangle putting their hand
under their ear. Once you do that you're going to
have a stable base and then you can put the the right arm in the
same way you're going to basically put it so that it's
laying over it. It keeps their body from
Clapping all those things, you can use the right arm and put it
under on top of the left hand as well.
So now you have two hands just like they're sleeping keeping
their head open. If they were to vomit or have
any kind of obstruction, it's going to be able to be mitigated
because they're an easy way where their body can clear it
themselves. And even if they are struggling
to breathe, it's going to help them, okay?
It's a very easy thing to do. There's no medical knowledge
required. There's no technology involved.
It's literally grab somebody by the belt, pull them up onto that
side. So they're left side is facing
the ground, put them against your body, pull their knee up,
and now they are basically pinned in a good position.
And this could save a life and would have saved Seven Lives.
There's an acronym during trauma, there's an acronym that
people who don't know what to do, can remember, it's very easy
when you have somebody has a traumatic injury.
Your thing to do is to march on, you need to March, okay?
And that is the the acronym that the military uses for self Aid
and Buddy care. It's what the teacher will see
the Tactical, casualty combat care, teaches law, enforcement
and Military, how to handle active shooter, you know, blunt
force, trauma, things like this. March there's one M.
Usually, I like to say to the first m is movement move the
patient to where you want to deal with them, but moreover
that you can move them into the recovery position.
It's a perfectly good place to do a something.
If you have to get back to them later you have them in a place
where you could walk away deal with another patient, come back
and deal with them while they're laying there in that recovery
position. So, number one, M4 movement, but
the real M. And the one that people always
remember, is massive Hemorrhage, massive Hemorrhage means, big
bleeds, like you took A liter of Coke and pour it on the floor.
That's how much blood we're talking about big blood.
When there is a big pool of blood, you need to find out
where it's coming from. And the only way that we're
going to find a massive Hemorrhage is by exposing the
patient's skin. So you got to look on the back.
You got to look on the front. You got to look on both the
legs. We do what's called a blood
sweep. I would encourage you to go look
it up, how to do a blood sweep. I'm not going to go over it, but
you're essentially just touching every part of the body front and
back with your hands and checking your hands regularly,
to see if there's blood and then if there is blood, you're going
to try to find out where it's coming from, that's the goal of
a blood sweep. And when you do that, that's
your massive trauma. I'm sorry, your massive
Hemorrhage intervention. And the reason why is, as I
mentioned earlier, once blood is out of your body, it's gone.
It is gone. There's no way to put it back in
in the field. So that is what carries oxygen
and what I'm telling you march actually tells you the order in
which a traumatic injury will kill you.
The first is losing all your blood.
Okay, so blood is number 1. Number 2 a.m.
A, A is for Airway think of Airway as the container.
It needs to be solid container so it doesn't leak air out of it
and that includes your mouth is not torn, open and doesn't have
you no obstructions in it. Your throat, your your, your
windpipe running all the way down into your lungs.
And just being very simple about this, we're talking about your
chest. Cavity is not compromised, it's
not crushed and it doesn't have, it doesn't have holes in it,
which is a big deal. We are trying to make sure that
the Integrity of the vessel all the way from your, your oral
pharynx, and your nasal pharynx, your Open your nose all the way
down to the bottom of your lungs are intact, okay.
And if they're not we need to do things to stop that.
That means maybe putting a piece of duct tape on it maybe putting
a sliced open Capri-Sun, a gloved hand, there are things
that you can use a credit card. There's a lot of different
techniques that you can use for field medicine that don't have
to be special a plastic bag anything that will stop air from
moving and you can either seal it down with tape or you can
hold it with pressure. You want to stop and make sure
that there is a there is a closed and Peyton are way so
that we can get are from your mouth or a Actually the world in
general down into your lungs, where you can actually move it
into your bloodstream. Okay.
So that's massive. Massive Hemorrhage Airway are is
respiration. That's the mechanical movement.
That's your diaphragm flexing and relaxing and pulling air
into your body. It has to pull it through your
mouth and your nose down into your lungs.
If you can't do those things then you need to have someone do
it for you. And so that's where we move it.
The intervention to the the Hemorrhage is going to be either
packing a wound or doing a tourniquet.
The intervention to the airway is Making sure that the vessel
is intact and then the intervention for respirations.
If somebody's not breathing is to make sure that they breathe
you breathe for them. That's what rescue breaths are.
That's the CPR piece of it. Okay, after they are comes the
C. C is for circulation.
That's your heart. So once again, we need to have
blood in there in your body. We need to have are accessible
to that blood and then we need to move that that blood around
so that your body has perfusion to your brain and to your end
organ. So those are the two most
important things, essentially your kidneys and your brain with
the too big. Has parts that have to because
otherwise you get toxic and you can't filter out toxins.
So you'll die from that. And if you don't have oxygen
going to your brain, then you will die as well because all the
autonomic functions will cease and you won't do anything on
your own. Okay.
So we're doing those think. So sir, the CPR get that
circulation that means you're checking the pulse.
We're seeing. If somebody has a heartbeat, if
they do great, if they don't we're beating for them with
chest pumps. If you feel what your pulse is,
it's probably 60 to 100 beats a minute.
That's how fast you should be doing CPR if you don't know
anything about CPR and you've never heard this before, this
will Change your life. If you ever have to do
compressions, you can do one or two things.
You can do the beat of Staying Alive by the Bee, Gees now.okay
that in your head, that's what you're paying and it's beat.
Beat beat beat beat, beat staying alive, staying alive.
That's how you do your compressions.
Now, if you're a little bit darker and you've been doing
this for a while, and it's something that you're familiar
with. You can also do another one
bites, the dust doo-doo-doo-doo-doo-doo-doo,
dundun, dundun, dundun. Doom, doom.
That's the speed, boom. Boom, boom.
You're doing. You know, another one bites, the
dust. When you're a paramedic, that's
something you tend to hear a lot too, because you just hear in
your head, but that's how fast your compressions need to be.
They need to be quick. None of this TV, like push, come
on, push, that's nonsense. You push fast.
You push hard and you do it and make sure there's someone there
to relieve you. So CPR is your correction for.
See, the last thing is H and that's either hypothermia or
head trauma. There can be, that's usually
like h, / H. So two M's, two h's, the
acronym. March, remember that if you ever
in a scenario where you have to treat people who are wounded, if
you come across a car accident, if you find someone who's fallen
off a ladder, these are all the same types of traumatic scans.
This is what we would do for a head to toe and you would start
with these, okay? These are the biggest life
threats that will kill people, and when it comes to head
trauma, there's not a whole lot. You can do you have to make sure
you keep their heads, you know, supported and when it comes to
hypothermia, that's that's cold. The people who have the worst
outcomes when it comes to traumatic injuries.
This includes Ed's penetrating trauma, if you're out, you know,
hunting and you get shot in the leg, or you take that Arrow from
somebody, because they are carelessly doing some
bowhunting, you fall out of a tree stand and break your leg.
I don't really care what it is. You get attacked by an animal,
whatever you roll your truck or your ATV.
All these things are all trauma. The fastest way for you to have
a bad outcome, is to be cold. You will die from the cold,
plus, the trauma, okay? So exposure is a real real
threat. You want to First, make sure
that there's blood, make sure that those are make sure that
there's a heartbeat and that Are stable and then you get them
warm. It is critical if you have ever
been in an ambulance that is like, 95 degrees.
It's because we're trying to get it closer to body heat.
It's really awful to sweat your face off while you're doing CPR.
But if it's cold outside, that's what you have to do, you have to
keep it hot. You have to keep that thing.
So if you're running somebody on a an Emergency like this, if you
happen to grab somebody and dragged him to an emergency
room, keep the car hot. Turn on the heater be
uncomfortable as the driver be uncomfortable as the person in
the back seat, helping your friend, but It maybe keep it hot
and I would say do not wait for an ambulance, if you have the
ability to get somebody to an emergency room, if it really is
serious. So, that's something that the
studies have borne out. You don't need to wait for an
ambulance. There's no special vehicle
power. It's just getting people to a
surgical facility where they can do the real solution, which is
generally referred to as bright lights, Cold Steel.
That's what saves lives and Trauma.
There are wonderful surgeons. They have incredible
capabilities, but you got to get people to them.
So, I spent a lot of time on this because I think it's super
important. The second thing about that is
There is a technology once again, like this this streaming
this scanner technology, that I was using, was really a
potential Lifesaver for people. And it's not because I was
using, it's just something that people should know of.
You're never going to know how to use it.
If you've already, if you've never downloaded it and you've
never used the app. So, I recommend that people
download an app, the one that I personally use is called 5-0, 50
Radio Pro. It has a nice little rhyme to it
50 Radio Pro. It's about $3 in the App Store
from Apple. I know what it costs on Android.
I don't use that but if you were to do that, you can get a free
version of it just has ads and it uses more data.
And I didn't have time for that because I literally have done
thousands of hours of streaming on that 50 Radio Pro.com.
I'm sorry. If I've already a pro, the app,
download that and then listen to it, like go somewhere and listen
to it or find out an area that you might be traveling.
And listen in on it and spend some time listening to radio
code. The way that people speak on
radios is not very easy to understand if you've never
listened to it, if your ear is not trained, they have certain
things that you will get familiar.
With when you hear them, usually a police officer or a medic unit
will start with calling out their call sign or their unit
number. So they'll say 171 and then
you'll hear the dispatcher respond, 171.
That's a go ahead, 171, but they don't say all that.
They just say 171, you heard another voice 171, then the
person who said 171 the first time will speak and they'll say
their message. I'm being dispatched to this.
I'm going to go this. I had a report of this, you
know, I'm whatever. Sometimes they use 10 codes.
The nice thing about the 50 Radio Pro, is that it actually
has the 10 codes or at least a common set of 10 codes in the
The app that you can literally tap it on and it'll say info,
and it'll give you all the 10 codes.
So when they say, you know, we're ten, seven or ten eight,
well, we're tend to. What does that usually mean?
A lot of departments are moving away from that, but it doesn't
mean that they're not still out there.
So it's worth knowing that and when you're traveling and you're
in a place that you're not familiar with, you might want to
know how do the police communicate.
Their, I often times they won't say Ten-Four and they won't say,
yes, they'll say direct direct is a police code that.
I don't know why they do it, but they do it.
They say, you know, you know, Say the, the dispatcher will
give some information and then what you'll hear is the officer,
the responding unit will say I'm direct or direct.
And that means they're going. And yes, it's an affirmative
that they are doing the things that they said they were going
to do. It's bizarre, if you're not used
to hearing it, you don't want the first time to hear that is
when somebody is moving around on your business campus or
stalking you, you know, you're in the parking.
Lot of a Walmart, trying to see if your spouse is okay, or
whatever. There's a shooting, whatever.
The horrible scenario is that comes to your mind.
You'd want to know what that is. And then the other thing is
this, Carrie earbuds, you should carry earbuds.
It's silly, like all the stuff, but like, if you want to be able
to quietly, listen to 50 Radio Pro, because something crazy is
going on. Put it in your little go back,
set at your buds, weighs almost nothing, they're good.
For a lot of things including like ear protection, if there's
actually shooting because then you can keep your awareness of
what's happening. So simple, tools, situational
awareness, increase cost $3. There's no reason not to have
something like that. There's many other tools.
That's just the one that I like, that's the one that I know, and
I highly recommend having access to that.
I got a little sidetracked here on the the active shooter But I
think it's super important that we remember that.
The answer is not gun control or we don't have more guns.
There's 400 million guns in public circulation in the United
States alone. We are not getting rid of guns
in this country in any meaningful way.
It's not happening. So, regardless of what they say,
regardless with the ATF comes out and tries to do, it does not
matter. Guns will be a part of our lives
for as long as I'm on this planet.
And probably as long as my kids are on this planet, they're
durable goods. They don't go bad and they are
around forever so we might as well learn to be safe around
them and have some contingencies worked out.
So carry your own and be smart, get training.
Be somebody who is a part of the solution and not part of the
problem who's complaining, who's going to come save me.
You? You come save you.
Nobody else is coming. It's just you, if you think
about it, that way, it's much easier.
All right, whistleblower, updates my buddy, Garrett, Steve
friend is on the hill today. Right now, Garrett has already
testified on my buddy, George Hill, who you heard on our
podcast, doing a long-form interview and prior intelligence
analyst with the FBI has already spoken.
They've been deposed, they are Contrary back and forth, you
know, discussions and kind of the rumor that we've heard.
And I've got some contacts outside of these guys who's
basically shared that the Democrat side of this committee.
The weaponization committee has no interest in looking into the
FBI at all and that should horrify everybody.
The FBI is weaponized. There's no doubt about this.
I will go on record saying it. Explicitly and I have examples
and so do you. They've gone after people like,
Mark out, they've gone after people who they've written.
And saying that they're going to go after radical traditionalist
Catholics which is insane. They've gone after people that
they claim are white supremacists, who have no
instance of it, they are using Scare Tactics and they are doing
some really crap work, despite the fact that there's also
decent work going on inside the FBI, but there's an ideological
Focus that is going on and permitted and it is bad news.
So the whistleblowers are telling me kind of that they're
getting called in that the Republicans are trying to get to
the bottom of it but it's a long time table and it's not going to
be fast enough if they don't pass some bilateral support.
Port for whistleblowers in general.
It will not be successful. So the Republicans on the hill
need to get together and figure out who on the other side wants
to do the right thing. They don't need a lot of votes
but they better figure it out so that we have protections for
whistleblowers or this is not going to get done because
waiting until 2025 to event, examine what's going on in our
FBI. Like we could have a much
different uglier situation, develop in this country.
And I think so many people are not concerned about the siop
nearly as much or what we would call fifth generation Warfare.
Its fourth generation Warfare that It could Decay into that's
a real possibility and if people aren't talking about it they're
foolish everybody that I talk. So I talk to you.
That has a serious understanding of how screwed up this country
is right now is concerned that it will get what we call
Kinetic, which is to say physical.
I don't want that, I don't want to be part of it, but it is a
real possibility and if we're not honest about it and taking
steps to try to mitigate that in a meaningful way.
And that means a curtailed FBI and Intelligence on the domestic
side. We're going to be in a bad space
and it could happen, very, very quickly.
So many people are talking about these You know balloons the Spy
balloons and so on, it's all distractions.
A lot of these things are distraction it doesn't mean that
doesn't need to be handled. It's just showing that we have a
week Administration on many levels and this Biden
Administration has gone fully into the pale by pushing on, you
know, the the covid shot mandates and trying to root out
the number of people that that are dissenting opinions and I'm
going to get into that. Just a little further now.
So let's get into the next article here.
I've got a I think this is totally nuts.
I'm going to throw this up on the screen here.
So this is an article from Life news.com or life site news.
I believe is what they they go by that, right?
Like news.com the article is entitled students ooh,
Smithsonian after it kicked them out for wearing pro-life hats,
they're literally wearing that. There's a picture here.
If you're not looking on our Rumble stream which you should
definitely come check out, this is from February 7.
So this is a week-old. I'm not trying to give you the,
you know, the updates in the world that are happening in real
time. That's not what I'm doing.
I'm not a new site, I'm an analyst when it comes to this
stuff and what I'm seeing is that you've got not the ACLU,
which is What? I originally saw its the aclj
filed, a lawsuit against the Smithsonian, National Air, and
Space Museum, that used to be on my drive to work.
It's, it's out there in Virginia and they had some students that
traveled from Greenville, South Carolina went to the DC area
attended. The national March for Life,
which if you've never done, it is an absolutely shocking event.
And I mean that in a way that someone who hates crowds, I
would go to the March for Life, every year, I'd be more than
happy to the last time we were there.
It was, it was closed down. Because it was 2020.
They didn't have it. But I went to the 2019 and Trump
spoke and it was one of the more moving experiences that I can
remember and certainly the most comfortable I've ever been in a
large crowd. So I highly recommend the March
for Life, the national March for Life that happens in DC.
And so here we are. We're talking about these folks
that they went in and they were a couple of hats.
One of them had one that said Rosary pro-life.
There were other people who were wearing other political type
hats and they were not kicked out.
But you had the Smithsonian guards, kick them out.
I'm just kind of scanning through here.
See if there's any fantastic quotes to put out there, the
lawsuit says that the, the defendants which is going to be
the museum and the staff there, unlawfully deprived, the
plaintiffs, these are going to be the students who were those
hats of their first amendment rights to engage in protected,
speech and expression in violation of the Free Speech
Clause of the First Amendment. So the issue here is not that
they wore hats. It's the fact that they made a
political statement was being censored and it was being
censored by the federal government.
The Smithsonian is our institution, we own it, we run
it. We pay for it.
I saw this from Julie Kelly's website, it's going to segue
nicely into what she has going on on Twitter right now.
But Julie Kelly is a writer for American greatness.
She does a great job. She wrote this thing that I
thought was very interesting. So I pulled up here usajobs.gov.
If you've never tried for a federal employment, this is
where you do it. You go to USA jobs and you find
all the list of jobs and all the different categories.
Now, this is a pretty decent paying job.
I would say for a security guard Front Royal VA, if you're seeing
over here on the screen, I'm highlighting it.
But it is where The Smithsonian Institute has the air and space
museum. It's out in Front Royal I think
that's right. Yeah, sounds right to me, I'm
open to the comments, telling me that I'm wrong it.
I drove that all the time and now I'm remember seeing front
row and all the signs, but in any case, the Smithsonian is the
Institute out there, they have their own police force, which is
a federal position and it pays at the NZ November Zulu, 07 paid
grade, which they say starts at 65,000 and it tops out at
85,000, for a baseline, police officer doing police, for Sony
and Institute. Here's what I thought was really
interesting and this is why I'm mentioning Julie Kelly.
When you go and you search for Education, there's going to tell
you the education requirements of this position.
Okay. And here it is right here.
I'm going to highlight it for the for you that are looking on
Rumble education. Quote, this job does not have an
education qualification requirement none, not a high
school diploma, not anything for 65 Grand a year.
This is part of what I've always called the federal jobs program.
These are the people that are willing to do whatever they're
told without understanding this early, even what they're getting
involved in. They tell you how you're gonna
be evaluated that you have to follow, like, noodles rules and
laws and regulations, efficient practice law enforcement, but
there's no education, requirement, that's pretty
shocking for a job. That pays that decently 65
Grand. Without even have to get a high
school, diploma is a lot and then this is put into a
suitability position of trust and fitness.
No security clearance required. There is a drug test.
I don't know, I just think it's interesting that you're able to
go and be a cop and Have Federal arrest authorities like these
people throughout these students without having any understanding
of what the hell's going on in the law.
I think it's a problem. I'm going to bring up another
little article here. This is one that's in Julie,
Kelly's feed. I've actually retweeted it.
So if you're following me should have seen this.
And if not, then go look for it. In my feet or hers makes no
difference. It's an American greatness
piece, which is a pretty good little graphic.
This is an article that's entitled did government until
assets plant key evidence in the proud boys case and it says we
should be suspicious of weird. Incidences in the world of law
enforcement, we don't really believe in coincidences, we
should actually believe that there is a reason we just have
to figure out what that reason is.
Okay? So synopsis of this this
article, I do think that it's worth a read on its own, I
think, because of the, the particular allegations that are
being made here are pretty credible and they think they're
a problem. But what it says is that there's
a five, high-stakes criminal cases that are happening in the
January 6 trials. Five members of The Proud boys.
They're being charged with the quote-unquote suspicious
conspiracy charge, and Julie's impression is that these are at
To get Donald Trump as an unindicted co-conspirator
basically saying that he was in control of a militia, which I
don't agree that. The power boys are saying that
the proud way militia was being controlled by Trump and then
being asked to execute a coup against the US government.
This is the suspicious conspiracy or the, the so-called
Insurrection that went on and they're using this, this
extemporaneous comment that Trump made while he was in the,
the presidential debates. If you recall several months
before the January sixth event happened in 2021, they Ask him
to condemn the proud boys for violence or some nonsense like
that. And this is Chris Wallace.
Basically, spoon-feeding trumpet answer and Trump said, stand
back and stand by. That's the quote, stand back and
stand by which they use to mean that he was in control of them,
and obviously had ordered them to do something evil and elicit.
This is patently absurd. This is an absurd Claim by
absurd people. They are not serious and yet
they are going to court and they are taking the time and they are
actually, you know, Facing down like the proud boys are facing
down real jail time because of this thing.
Even though it's a totally insane contention.
Including as I understand it, Andre Kate REO.
Who is the not the founder of, but he's the current leader.
It was founded by Gavin McInnes. So here's the thing.
The FBI has very little understanding of what these
groups are about. I sat in briefings in 2017 from
counterterrorism, one. This is the number one squad for
counterterrorism at Washington field office.
So, that's going to be the people that are dealing with
this and then there's counterterrorism for, which is
now the domestic extremists quad.
People and it was this lecture was given by table O'Connor, who
is now retired. So I'll say who he is and he's
the former FBI agents Association president.
He was there for a long time him and his wife, both agents, they
both retired and they were given this talk about the proud boys,
about Gavin, McGinnis, and about about keka Stan.
He's they were talking about Jordan Pederson and Miley
innopolis in a bunch of this other nonsense.
Richard Spencer, these were all in the same lecture by the way.
This was all for like new agents, to learn about domestic
terrorism and they had no idea what they were talking about in
my Estimation and I'm a pretty aggressive follower of this kind
of information because I want to know.
Who are we talking about? What's going on in this
movement? Are they conservatives that I
agree with? Are they people that do things
that are dumb and in some cases? Yes, some cases.
No. But very weak understanding of
these things. They didn't understand what the
whole Keck movement in the Pepe the Frog and all that.
So if you're listening to me and you're familiar with those
things by all means, you know, you can also put some comments
down there, how about your take on it but I can tell you the FBI
doesn't have a good understanding of it and the
analysts are very very left-leaning when they come to
it. So the Crazy thing about this,
this particular articles that is talking about how Matthew Graves
he's the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia,
he's actually attending these trials on at least three
separate occasions. That's not common.
If you're not familiar with the way that Federal prosecution
happens. Generally speaking what you get
isn't it? An assistant United States
Attorney that's a front line prosecutor known as a USA's.
That's the the acronym and the ausa is the federal prosecutor
that does the cases. You never really see a United
States Attorney. That's a political appointee
they always show up when they think it's really important.
To be there. And it doesn't mean that they're
not good prosecutor. Some of them are probably
wonderful. I've actually met one or two
United States attorneys, who were wonderful people.
They were under Bush and they are living in Texas.
Now, in private practice, but incredibly bright and very,
giving and capable and had a background as serious
prosecutors. That's not always the case, it
is a political appointment. So it runs the whole gamut of
people that are totally incompetent but never have to do
anything, like people who, you know, might run for district
attorney, but have never prosecuted a single case, but
they're an attorney and they run. - elected and some leftist
nonsense City and then they just like try to do policy.
They don't actually do Frontline prosecution, so worth noting.
Anyway, they're talking about this being a militia group
that's really bizarre this entire document.
I'm sorry. This whole this whole article
hinges around a discussion of a document entitled 1776 returns.
So that's the name of the document.
The allegation was is that this document was the blueprint that
the proud boys were using in order to go and take over the
federal government and overthrow the United States, a totally
absurd. Surd contention, there are
thousands of law enforcement officers in Washington.
D.c. there are hundreds. If not thousands of national
Guardsmen that arse like hanging out there.
You are not going to overthrow Washington.
D.c. even with every single person who Associates with the
probably in the entire United States.
I will confidently. Say that that's a crazy.
Contention not happening and yet they're on trial for it.
So, and here's the real quote, that's so wild in two separate
criminal indictments prosecutors explained how the document.
This is the 1776. Ended up in the hands of Enrique
torrio the leader of the proud boys, quote on December 30th
2020, an unnamed individual Centauri.
Oh a document that set forth a plan to occupy a few quote
unquote, crucial buildings in Washington DC on January, 6th
including the house and the Senate buildings around the
capitol with as many as possible.
People are many people as possible rather to show our
politicians that we the people are in charge.
Okay. The document is listed as being
a high level summary. Prosecutors are like banging
their case on this egg. This is a big deal, it's a plan.
It shows the individual buildings how to get in how to
cause a distraction pulling fire alarms.
Distracting law enforcement, making a crowd so they can get
in there and and occupy and demand.
A new election, wasn't that weird.
They're doing a, an Insurrection.
In order to demand a new election.
I just feel like that's absurd on its face.
The FBI agent that's testifying is a guy named Peter, Peter
dabrowski sounds like he's out of New York, I don't know him
personally, he was a Jag attorney from my quick research
on him and work for the Army. And it's more than happy
apparently to testify in these things and just find it really
disgusting that FBI Personnel are engaged in this stuff.
It bothers me at no end but we'll continue on so long and
short of it is this document goes on and talks about how it
was kind of a thing. But here's the real crazy part.
Here's a quotation from one of the most recent motions filed by
the defense, it appears that the government itself is the author
of the most incriminating and damaging document.
In this case which was mysteriously sent at government
requests to proud. Boys leader, Enrique, torrio
immediately prior to January 6, in order to frame or implicate,
torrio in a government, created scheme to storm, the buildings
around the capitol. This is Roger Roots.
He's an attorney working for the for the defense and they are
seeking a mistrial with this motion.
This is a request for a mistrial.
So the real question is, does the government frame people?
Do they, do they implicate people, and create this.
These sort of situations, I'm going to do a quick search here
for a book that I think is relevant to our discussion.
So I'm going to pull it up on Amazon.
Let's go ahead and flip this back over.
If you want to take a look, should be coming up here on
Amazon, there, it is slowly loading.
As I'm using up all the bandwidth for this.
The book is called the terror factory inside the FBI's
manufactured war on terrorism. Now, this is not a new book,
this is coming from October of 2014, it's written by a guy
named Trevor Aaronson. I've spoken to Trevor Aaronson.
We agree on how things work in the FBI.
His book was listed as required Reading required a requirement
to understand the way the FBI Works.
Counter terrorism cases by my friends when I joined the
surveillance team in Washington, d.c., I think that's really
interesting. Why is that?
Because what do you centrally says?
And his whole purpose is and Trevor is a very left-leaning
type guy. He is got a new podcast out
called the alphabet boys, talking about how the FBI
infiltrated, the BLM in antifa in Denver, I think it's an
interesting. Listen, I am not a partisan guy
and when the FBI is wrong, it's wrong.
And this case, it's always wrong when it comes to CT.
F, c TB, and counterterrorism, the way that this particular
book is written and the way that it helps, you understand it.
And this is the high level overview is that essentially,
the FBI finds people online or in person at mosques in the
world, on Reddit, whatever it may be social media.
And so on that have terrible ideas and say them out loud,
often times, these people are very low IQ or they're very low
awareness of what's going on in the world and they have these
awful ideas. They are they FBI pay sources to
get close to them. Introduces, Undercover
operations. And then, basically
manufacturers the case. So that, that person can take
care of it. And if you want an example,
Gretchen, Whitmer, when you had, you know, six people in a car
and for them or FBI informants, and, or agents, that's how you
do a manufacturing of Terror, that's how you do this thing.
Now, Aaron's case is all about the fact that the FBI goes ever
black and brown. People his thing is, you know,
foreign terrorism which is known as like Islamic terrorism, that
kind of thing, that's his purpose but you could literally
swap out the word Islamic terrorism and black and brown
people for white. And domestic terrorism and it's
the same thing. It's the same Playbook.
Why does the FBI do this? Because they're incentivized to
have these cases open and to conduct X number of
dismantlement and disruptions. These are the statistical
accomplishments that they claim inside the file that earns them,
the Kudos and it gets the bonuses for the senior
Executives that are run in the field office.
That's the guy like Steve the Antoine, oh, who was the one
running the, the Detroit field office and then was eventually
promoted to the Washington field office?
He hit his metrics, no doubt about it.
Big metrics to and then he was in charge of the Washington
field office on January 6th and obviously did that and he's
since retired, Julie Kelly was very excited about reporting
that but I want people to know that this is a very important
book to read. He has a TED Talk.
That's 15 minutes long Youkilis is that it's got over a million
views and I've watched it myself.
This book has been passed around the FBI because it's legit it
legitimately shows you and the the cover if you're not looking
at it is a bear trap and inside the bear trap is the local of
the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
So Tara Factory highly recommend that.
I think it's worth your time but moreover is it possible that the
FBI set up the guys in the problems?
Of course they have already admitted that they had sources
there and that's 100%. Now they do things who wrote
that document 1776 returns. I think it's relevant and if
there it was in fact written by some governments or written on
behalf of the government based on, you know, an FBI agent,
who's running a source and said, hey put something out there and
get it to this guy. Big problem, big problem, not
something we should easily handle, and we shouldn't be
comfortable with it, but it's out there.
Okay. A couple of the things I wanted
to. Note, because they're having
problems with media, obviously in this country.
Also, scan back over here. So, this is from just the news.
This is John Solomon site, half of Americans believe mainstream
media, tend to mislead and misinform the public.
That's the actual purpose of it. This is a nice foundation and a
Gallup survey fully fifty percent of the respondents said
that they do not intend. They do not believe that
national news organizations are interested in giving the public
good information, that's not good.
Only 25% of the people in this country said that they felt very
confident about that. So, Yuck, not a good situation
that we're living in. We're living in a time when you
have to be very discriminating against media, discriminating in
your choice of media, even more over and, you know, their
stories are not being covered. I don't know if you've noticed,
but the the burning wreckage that was happening in Ohio and
I'm no expert on hazmat, but that was happening and very
little coverage. I actually just saw it last
night. I turned on CNN.
I was watching a very disgusting panel of people, including some
like cartoon characters ladies with like these weird, you know
like cats eyeglasses And weird hair colors and silly make-up.
And, you know, this very effeminate black guy in a suit
and there's other lady who's the anchor, whatever it was.
They were all talking about something very important.
Nikki Haley, just announced he's running for president, like, I
don't care, but it's amazing that what they will cover.
And the meantime, they were not covering the the burning fires
that were happening from polyvinyl chloride.
In, you know, tanker trucks that went off the rails in Ohio and
what's going on in Texas with a derailment outside of Houston.
So you just got to be careful with your news sources.
You should be looking A lot of different places you should be
looking at left and right. That's what I try to do is what
I did when I was in the FBI. It's what I recommend people do.
Now, the reason is nobody's telling you the truth, you got
to figure it out yourself. Once again, like being a first
responder go out there and find it yourself.
You're responsible for what you think you're responsible with
for what you know. And if you listen to me and
you're in the FBI like go out and find some information that
disagrees with what you think, figure it out, learn what a
pureblood is, I found out that guys in my office that pureblood
people who are talking about pure Bloods, which is obviously
a Harry Potter reference in a joke.
Joke about people who didn't get the covid shots, they thought
that was a white supremacy reference.
It's absurd, it's totally crazy. But it's because you're
uninformed. So don't be uninformed the
world's too. Volatile right now.
For you, not to have information gonna bring up another article
here, this is from John Solomon as well.
This is just the news. Lois, Lerner 2.0, we talked
about it on the opening here, I wanted to discuss the IRS once
again. This is the government getting
involved in your free speech. It has no business being there,
Federal prosecutor by the name of retired Federal prosecutor by
the name of Bill Shipley. Many of you.
Him as Shipwrecked crew. Online used to write for Red
State, he wrote for uncovered DC.com, but big deal, like big
deal that he said the right thing on the one of these spaces
that I was sitting in panel discussion and he said that the
government has absolutely no interest in the outcome of prep
criminal prosecution and I would argue that it doesn't have any
out like outcome interest at all.
It's job is to just execute process.
That is not what we're seeing right here.
So if people don't remember Lois Lerner and 2010 was found to
have been the personal One who was running the IRS exempt,
organizations unit, that's going to be the unit that assigns the
nonprofit status. 501 c, 3, 501, C 4 and so on two individuals
who are seeking that tax-exempt status because of their Church
affiliation or nonprofit or whatever, you know, the crow the
qualifications that they have to meet Lois Lerner's organization
you know she was the one that was kind of the one at the face
of it. It was exposed a couple years
later they were going after the Tea Party and some other
additional like right wing type things.
Under the Obama Administration and She and the invoking, the
fifth saying that she wouldn't talk about it and she wouldn't
talk about it because she didn't want a self-incriminate, that's
bad news. This is another lawsuit that's
coming in here right now. The sort of reminiscent of that
situation and it's a by a non-profit Educational
Foundation that known as Adams Baldwin and Covey Adams Baldwin
and cubby Foundation Incorporated, also known as ABC
in this case and what they did is they went out there and they
said that the B Administration. Now, this is the Biden's policy
that is being implemented by the IRS obviously, Jill Biden
probably doesn't do it directly, but it is empowering these
organizations to go do things that are infringing on First
Amendment protected activities, that's not okay.
That is not an acceptable thing so the IRS questions they claim
are quote further Evidence at the by demonstration believes it
has the authority to license thought and speech and it does
not and that's obviously true. It does not have that Authority.
And so you know what sort of evidence are they talking about?
They have one of these questions.
I'm going to find it out here there, you know, a couple of
really fun questions or quotations from the law firms
that are representing. This ABC Foundation saying the
thought police have found Home in the by Administration and
that's obviously very troubling. So IRS questions that were being
posed. Include things are, have you
held a particular position or view on certain topics or
issues? If you do please detail the
position or views of your organization.
Hello federal government you have no business asking those
questions. It's none of your damn business.
You stay out first amendment protected activities, which is
what your views and your positions are.
That's the whole thing. We can assemble, and we can
petition for Grievances and we can have our own religion and
worship the way. We want and we can speak freely
in this country, that's the whole.
Freaking point is the whole point.
That's what the first amendment is it says that you don't get a
say in that, the government does not have a vested interest in
that and it has no interest in picking winners and losers in
the Free Speech game or in the policy games.
So here's another one IRS do you have any policies or policy or
policies or guidance in place to avoid unsupported opinions or
conclusions and inflammatory language in these activities.
Look there's a lot of unsupported policies or
positions or guidance that has Ben's in the Church of any
church, whether it be Scientology, whether it be the
Roman Catholic Church, whether it be, you know, an Evangelical
Church, whether it be a Jewish synagogue or a Muslim Mosque.
You, there's a lot of it that's unsupported by factual things,
it's based on faith. That's the whole point.
You're allowed to have these things.
So even if it's an unsupported position or it might be
inflammatory, nobody cares. You're the IRS.
That's not your job either you. They get tax exempt status
because they meet the The minimum requirement so they
don't. So this is really gross stuff
and it gets me hot and bothered like Angry.
Sorry. Not hot and bothered.
I guess like more flustered because it's just such a
disgusting thing. I've got another our question
here. Explain how you ensure the
content presented in your educational activities are fair
and unbiased facts. It doesn't need to be you can
take a policy position that's that's allowed and that would
permit an individual to form an independent opinion or
conclusions based on these represented facts.
Again the Catholic church is a Catholic non-profit You know,
it's a religious nonprofit. They have schools.
They are educational. And they do not provide unbiased
Fairfax per se. Because they believe that the
worship of Jesus in the way that that the Catholic church has
always said, is the best way, that's what they're advocating
for. It's an advocacy group and it's
still nonprofit because it's religious.
So these are, these are foolish types of things.
It makes me really concerned, but it does lead me to my final
thing which has been getting a lot of media traction to put me
on Tucker Carlson this week this week last week on last Thursday
I guess almost a million views on his On the little piece of it
that was up on YouTube. And if you haven't seen it, you
can find it on my profile. I might actually pin it now that
I think about it. And yeah, just a, an obvious
problem with the FBI. This obvious problem is that the
Richmond field office put out a document that has since been
rescinded. Thank God.
But, but it was still an attempt to open a door.
I found out a little bit more about it since then apparently a
just out of college Intel analyst.
Got it approved by a supervisor. It was, it was allowed to be
published by the chief division Council, which is the top
attorney in the Richmond field office.
That supposed to be calling balls and Strikes and whether
something is constitutional, and it was a document that allowed
for the or advocated the source recruitment inside the Catholic
Church of all places to try to keep an eye on once again white
supremacy. This this Boogeyman that the FBI
has because they believe that it is something that is going to be
familiar to people in the traditional lat.
En masse and what? They're calling radical
traditionalist Catholics. Now I've been a Catholic for 5th
41 years rather. I was baptized when I was a
child was confirmed in high school.
I went to Catholic schools going through a number of different
Catholic schools including different denominations.
Sorry rather different liturgical Traditions.
I was in a cistercian school. I was a Jesuit school.
I've been to just parochial schools.
So on I've had Navy chaplains as my as my religious education,
you know, teachers and things like that.
I've had people that came out with Seminary degree from Notre
Dame you name it. I've been through a lot of it
and I've never heard of any white supremacy as part of the
Catholic teachings or any alignment.
But what they did is they essentially try to draw line
saying that if you are someone who likes the Latin mass and you
have a very traditional view on Catholicism.
Then you also then you also are sharing common cause on the
issues of abortion rights which is not, you know, that's in the
ideological Avail drop, that's the writer.
Telling us, I say abortion rights and Air quotes because it
tells us that the the writer believes that there is a
position in the federal government has and I'm pretty
confident, that's what the Dobbs decision says it doesn't have a
stake in moreover. It says that you know things
like lgbtq rights or that agenda immigrant issues and things like
that are going to share a common cause between these traditional
Latin Mass goers who are radicalized and, you know, white
supremacist, even though it admits in the peace, that white
supremacist generally speaking. Don't like Catholics, I don't
know if people know this, but the KKK used to go and try to do
the same. Thing to Catholics that it did
to the Jews and blacks, it's not a friendly organization, white
supremacist, where they do exist are not people that are going to
be able to find a home in any church, I would imagine, but
certainly not people that are here.
Instead, the traditional Catholic mass and the
pre-vatican do traditions of the Roman Catholic Church Bazaar
Bizarro world. But as I discussed with somebody
who was a, who was a an FBI whistleblower, brought it to me.
This is an attempt to open the door up to going after
Christians in general, I firmly believe that.
So if you haven't read the piece, you can go see my piece
that I wrote uncovered e si.com, our friend, Tracy beans, who is
wonderful. It's been real helpful.
It has gotten me some some news play on people like Tucker
Carlson. I've been back on my friend, Dan
Brown, Gino's radio show, some of you have probably listeners,
they're probably most of you are Glenn Beck had me on the other
morning to talk about it. It's a real problem when the FBI
is once again. I'm trying to pick these winners
and losers and what speech is and isn't protected by doing so,
under the guise of this counterterrorism peace where
there is no burden of criminal proof.
There's no burden when you work criminal case, I'm sorry when
you work a counterterrorism case.
The burden is like, does terrorism exists.
Yes. Can we articulate this person?
Maybe should we be able to do things to mitigate it and
getting sources into the Catholic Church?
To keep white supremacist out his full crazy.
If you haven't listened to our long-form podcast for this week,
Do it came out on Monday, you can download.
It's about 90 minutes long or close to it.
I talked to Mark, how talking about, you know, radical
traditional. Catholics, I would say Mark is
pretty darn close to that sort of thing and a wonderful man and
a great person who was talking about being a leader, a
projector and a provider, as a man, unapologetically masculine
Catholic, a man, who defended his son and was attacked for it
by the doj in a way that is totally illogical.
So go listen to our interview with him.
I learned some things on it. I feel like there are people in
this world that are fighting the spiritual battle and there's no
doubt. I like to think that I'm part of
it, but Mark is definitely on the front lines and has gone to
the mat when he knew when he was right.
And he had his wife, supporting him all the way.
So that's really wonderful stuff.
So, check out our long-form interview there.
If you haven't heard it already. I'm gonna pull up real quick on
the fly but I could do it. Here we go.
If you do like what you're hearing here, we appreciate it.
If you share it with your friends, if you will subscribe
to the podcast at anywhere you do.
You're obviously listening to it.
So you could hear what that is. But subscribe if you haven't
already and the five-star. Views are things that we really
do appreciate if you can throw one on nothing better than a
five star review to let us know what we're doing.
And if there's things that you don't like you know let us know
that too I'll take a I'll take any other reviews as well.
Go give us a review give us a like give us a share.
Here's a review that comes from Mimi number five with the
American flag after it way to go Mimi here it goes.
It says valuable insight into the inner workings of the bureau
five stars before this episode. I had not a clue as to how the
FBI's inner workings could make this entity as disk.
Jointed and cumbersome as it is now I can see how what seems to
be common sense that the public about Miss opportunities is
legitimately plausible by the sheer disconnect from upper
management to the good men and women in the field.
Yep. That's all true in my career,
working in management with a large corporation, the success
of the business could not function.
The way. The FBI is run, all our right by
saying, it needs to be dismantled and rebuilt with Kyle
and Chris. I assume Chris Gonzalez in the
lead. Thank you.
I will become an A follower of the podcast and I would like to
hear more about the changes needed for reform so much
changes needed. Thanks so much.
Mimi for your five star review. Folks, we still have a gift then
go up if you want to do that. I'm working on some sponsors.
So if you are a business owner and you'd like to get in on the
ground floor here, it'd be amazing if we had some sponsors.
I've got some products that I've already been using for years
that reached out to me. And I'm going to be kind of
negotiating with them to see if that makes some sense end of the
day. Thanks so much for listening.
It really does mean a lot that people care what we have to say,
not just for me, but I'm speaking on behalf of all the
suspended oils, Steve Garrett, George.
And any of you that are also suspended, although you who have
drawn A Line in the Sand and decided that you will not back
paddle on your principles and that you will not give up the
fight in for this country because it needs to be done and
I do think it's worth it again. You've been listening to the
Kyle Serafin show, we'll see you next time.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin.
Show be sure to follow him on Twitter and Truth at Kyle
seraphin. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin. Show be sure to follow him on
Twitter and Truth at Kyle seraphin.