Take a look behind the curtain because the real whistleblower,
an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truths because this program has no time time
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiasts, Second Amendment defend defender and recovering
FBI agent Kyle Sarah Seraphin. and welcome to the Kyle Seraphin
show. We're doing a little bit
different thing here, sitting in a hotel room in Las Vegas, NV.
Really going to have complete failures.
That's fun. Cool.
All right, hopefully the audio holds and hopefully the
everything works the way it's supposed to do.
We're going to be doing a show on the road for the next couple
days as I kind of explore the SHOT Show space.
And hopefully we can give you guys a little bit of a look
behind the scenes with that is, if you've never been to the SHOT
Show convention, you're not missing out on a ton other than
sore feet and probably dehydration.
It's a massive convention of all the different gun dealers, all
the different gun gear and parts and all the sort of accessories
that go along with the firearms industry.
And it's held in Las Vegas, NV once a year, everybody goes out
there, makes a lot of big purchases.
So you get to see what's coming up in the world and what's going
to be out there and sort of the guns and gear fasted.
I'm fascinated by it, but also our friends at Silence, some
others are going to be here. I'm going to be able to see our
advertisers. So I want to check in with them.
We're going to kind of just see it.
And again, my passion is really about firearms and freedoms that
kind of go along that are protected by those firearms.
So we'll hopefully be able to kind of give you guys a kind of
a clue into what this place looks like.
And instead, I'm sitting in this sort of weird room.
And that's the way that it works on this day, this Tuesday,
January the 20th. Now I'm going to do a quick
survey of some of the stuff that I see that's going on out there.
There's clearly an information war that's going and being waged
against ICE. I think that broadly speaking,
that the, the online version of it is not as real as as what
they would like you to believe. But unfortunately, it's also
motivating some sort of online soldiers to actually step into
the the ring and throw, see if they can get actually violent
against these guys to see if they can actually bring some of
that online anger and energy into the space where they're
going to come after it. And I do think that we're
hearing messaging over and over again about civil war and it's
broader and getting more and more, I don't know, aggressive.
It's also always by people who are never going to actually
physically get into the war that they are asking for.
So let's talk about that. We're going to talk a little bit
about a piece of foreign policy, not so much that I think that
this is something I talk about, but it's normalizing discussion.
And we're seeing this sort of massive contrast about whether
or not Donald Trump is completely a buffoon, which is
kind of like one side says, or whether or not the things he's
doing are generally reasonable. Even if he did or, you know,
didn't exactly say it. You'll see that I've got a clip
from Ben Shapiro that's going to say that he thinks that the
things are going really well and Donald Trump is not as
aggressive as he wants. Like this is kind of the
separation between sort of the conservative incorporated and
the, the MAGA type or the, the America first folks who are
expecting something a little bit different, a little bit more
America focused, just want to be kind of aware of those things
being discussed. And we're also going to be aware
of the fact that there's a really high probability that you
can get scammed in 2026. I'm aware of this.
As I'm flying, I see people leaving their their equipment or
their, what do you call them? They're leaving their, their
ticket stubs, places. You're leaving your name, your
phone number, you're leaving your address.
Maybe the little tag pops off your luggage.
Yeah, that's all small potatoes compared to some of the really
bad stuff that people are doing, which is they're using things
like voice fakes and AIS and they're stealing your data and
posting it all over the place on the web to be able to to take
money from you or to extort the companies that had the stuff.
In 2025, we saw a turning point to threats to privacy and
security became more powerful, more precise.
They became harder to stop because the advent of AI and
voice cloning and being able to spoof text and phone numbers.
If you guys are interested in protecting your net worth, if
you're interested in protecting the whatever it is that you had,
whatever you've clawed together over your lifetime, you don't
want your bank accounts emptied. You don't want someone to come
and steal your title, your house or all the other kind of things.
A lot of ways they do it is by finding out who you are are in
the 1st place. They search like everybody else
does. Anytime they're looking for
something, they look online. The folks over at
patriotprotectitspatriot-protect.com/K YLE will give you 15% off using
my name as a promo code and they want to help you keep your name,
your address, your phone number, your family members, the age of
all the folks that live with you, even your online behavior
and some of the things that you're doing, where you're going
and what kind of stuff you're interested in.
They want to keep that away from the scammers and they do that by
removing your name and your information from these 200 Plus
people. Search data broker websites
whenever I want to go find somebody.
And whenever I used to do it as a federal agent, it was almost
amazing to me how much of it is available in these weird no name
kind of Chinese looking sites. And they would have all kinds of
incredible stuff. You don't even have to pay for
it if you know what you're doing.
If you do pay for it, you can get more of it.
There are hundreds of millions of Americans.
Almost everybody is exposed at some level.
So if you want to have yourself taken out of the pile so that
people are not looking to take your stuff, check out my friends
at Patriot Protect. It's very inexpensive.
It's like dollars per month and the the hope is that it keeps
you from hundreds of dollars or thousands of dollars in fraud on
any given year. So check them out and we're
going to get into today's program starting right now.
As usual, there's a link in the show description.
Here we go. It's kind of interesting because
I had to get up quite early. I actually got up about 3:45
local time here, which is kind of awful to do.
And I went down wandering into the casino floor where I can get
some Internet connection, pull today's clips and be able to put
this stuff together. And I saw the exact opposite of
the sort of America that I want to live in.
But it is an indicator that things are still going
swimmingly for some people. I saw a handful of men walking
in with even more women than they are were men with their in
various states of disarray. It looked drunk.
And it's like, man, there are some people that are living a
very, very different life than me.
I'm not necessarily worried about what those people are
about. They're always going to make
decisions that are not mine. What I am worried about is the
majority and the dominant culture.
And right now there are two pushes and they are not just
pushes against the people that are doing ICE.
By the way, the folks that are doing the ICE enforcement, a lot
of Border Patrol and customs and agents that are working for
these agencies, they're Hispanic because they speak Spanish and
that's required or there it's, it's really helpful.
But the people that we have volunteering from the other
federal agencies to step up, they're overwhelmingly police
officers and and white males, which by the way, is still
probably one of the biggest dominant sections of the
workforce. So I do want people to be aware
that even though you hear a lot of things online, you're going
to, we're going to play some and try to debunk some of them as
well. Just because there's a, a
rattling online presence discussing something, it doesn't
mean that it's actually the case.
It doesn't mean that if you're not seeing something happen
about, let's say what ICE is doing, that doesn't mean that
they're actually advertising all of that information.
They've apparently, as we talked about yesterday, got 3000 people
in Minneapolis. That's not very many, but how
many of those have you seen arrested versus how much
coverage have you seen of a lesbian woman sitting in a car
who may or may not have tried to run one of the ICE agents over
getting shot? The imbalance is very, very
high. So it's worthwhile looking at
these things and seeing just how the shaping of what you consume
changes what you believe is actually going on.
That's particularly true. We start talking about our
friends on the political left, and this is about as far left it
is. I got friends that regularly
update me with what's going on on terrestrial radio from NPR.
I don't spend time in a car anymore the way I used to.
So looking at something like this is always kind of shocking
to me that that you're selling this.
Donald Trump is apparently dismantling the existing world
order. If you believe the article
coming from NPR, it's kind of a strong claim.
They've got a picture of Nicolas Maduro, who I think the left and
the right has historically sort of said was a problematic guy,
and then they immediately go into a celebration of Harry
Truman and the creation of NATO. It's a pretty bizarre take
because at this point, I don't know how you even defend the
fact that there is a NATO. There are people in the
conservative movement that would do it, and there are obviously
people on the left that are now stepping up for it because of
Ukraine. But it's a system that seems to
have outlived its purpose. In fact, when Truman instituted
it and was speaking at the at the founding in 1949, this is
what they quote him saying. In this treaty, we seek to
establish freedom from aggression and from the use of
force in the North Atlantic community.
This was about the Russians. This was specifically about the
Soviets at that time. If the threat no longer exists,
why did the alliance continue? I think that kind of question is
what the America First people are asking.
I think people that are that are looking and saying when do we
get to focus on the things that happen in America?
When do we get to worry about the dominant culture in America
and whether or not we have the freedoms that we expect to have?
Do we even have the freedom to speak?
Do we have the freedom to have controversial ideas?
What the hell do we care about what's going on in NATO?
It's an interesting little kind of conversation back and forth
with Ben Shapiro and Gavin Newsom.
And one of the info OPS that I see is normalizing these radical
liars like the guy who's the governor of California.
I, I played you really great evidence of it.
He doesn't just lie. He lies with a straight face.
He lies with a convincing tone and he can immediately abandoned
any position that he held previously.
And he never once thinks twice. He never feels any shame about
it. For what we could tell kind of
that Gavin, Gavin Newsom always has the, the, the, the Pat
Bateman kind of thing. And people look at him as like
American Psycho kind of clean face, empty eyes.
There's an idea of a Gavin Newsom, but there's no real
Gavin Newsom. This is this little conversation
back and forth between them. And then again, the contrasting
piece of it is dismantling. Hold on.
Let me get the headline again from from the folks over at NPR.
Dismantling the existing world order.
I don't know. I don't know how you sell these
two. How did two people that have
such contrasting ideas, whoever wrote this and Ben Shapiro, how
can you even exist in the same information sphere?
The on foreign policy, which you put it to the side.
I, I, I think Trump has been the greatest foreign policy
president in my lifetime. I don't think it's close.
I think he's been spectacular on foreign policy.
And that's with, and that's with many of my critiques with regard
to, for example, Ukraine, where I'm significantly more hawkish
than the administration has been.
And where did you feel that way in his first term?
Yes. I thought the same way too.
Yes, I was very much an advocate of his foreign policy.
I thought that that in terms of his foreign policy, I, he, he
is, as he said before, he's not got us into any major wars,
which is a, a good thing. You've used the military 6-7
significant times. Yeah, he, he is, he has used the
military and I think targeted and pinpointed ways that that do
not reinforce the Iraq war syndrome that we, you know, we
need to put hundreds of thousands of troops on on the
ground. I think the president.
Has a very good feel for the. The the thing about foreign
policy is it kind of. Works like the New York.
Real estate market, it actually is a sort of 0 sum win or lose
game. And President Trump actually is
quite good at those. And I think that that on
domestic economics, the president tends to bring a 0 sum
approach sometimes to his economic issues that I don't
agree with because I think that you can expand the pie for, for
everybody. But I don't think the same thing
holds true generally in foreign policy where when it comes to
geopolitics, there's a winner and there's a loser.
And, and it's all about relative power and, and power dynamics.
And the president seems to get that on a, on a very gut level,
which is which is why in the Middle East, I think he did the
right thing with Gaza. I think he's done the right,
right thing with the, with the Iran strike on photo nuclear
facility. I think he did the right thing
in extraditing Nicolas Maduro. I think those are all good
things. I think that that he has found
ways to continue the funding of Ukraine via this sort of Jerry
rigged NATO, NATO buying weapons and and funding.
I think that he has gotten a bunch of countries in Europe to
increase their defense spending, which is something that even
Mark Rudy over at NATO has said is, is generally a good thing.
OK, fair enough. So we can take that at face
value. I like listening to people that
I don't necessarily agree with on everything and see is there
value there? My, my issue has never been
whether or not we have that going on, whether or not Donald
Trump is doing a great job, but whether it is a 0 sum game in
foreign politics. Maybe it is.
It's not my Forte. What I know is, is that I wasn't
being messaged that this was what was going on.
We were being messaged, especially even early on, that
there were certain things that were going to be massive
priorities of this administration and then we're
not seeing those. So for me, the America First
agenda, it's like, fine, great, solve the problems overseas, go
get the guy. You know, you want to go grab
Maduro. I think it's problematic.
I think that it's a constitutional issue.
Doesn't mean he's the first one to have done it.
But how does that fit into the America First agenda that I was
told that we were going to solve problems here first.
Have we corrected the real problems of, of, of whether or
not our DOJ is going to go after people who are rigging
elections? Whether we're going to go after
people who are, you know, mandating illegal things on, on
the, on a, on a population. Did we ever get any justice for
what happened during COVID? The bacon cheeseburger
nationalist position is just like, it's great that you want
to pick up a, a fight with folks over it in in Greenland and you
want to tell Denmark that they've got to solve certain
problems for us. My concern is, is what does that
have to do with justice in America when we have people that
are on the streets telling you that they are at war with your
government? I mean, forget the foreign wars.
If you want to be the president of peace, we need to have some
things solved here, and some of those means a hard hand.
The government doesn't have a monopoly on violence at this
point. We don't have that monopoly
living in the state. We now have people stepping in
and doing all kinds of wild stuff.
Whether or not whether or not, you know, there's going to be
any reaction to it is, is really the question.
There's a massive concern on whether we're going to actually
see our government claim the territory that it's supposed to
be doing. And you've got you've got crazy
former GOP members messaging that they're at war with our
government and and asking people to step into the war with them.
This is Joe Walsh. I've no instinct that Joe Walsh
is going to join any war, but he's motivating certain people
to move that way. And it's all based on the same
stuff that we saw in 2020 because we never actually solved
those problems, whether it be election fraud, whether it be
COVID injustices, they never got addressed.
And I would think that before we start worrying about whether
we're going to dismantle NATO, which sounds great to me, by the
way, it doesn't sound like it's happening, but it'd be good if
it did. We're not getting that promise
delivered first, which is what I took America first to mean, that
we are going to solve our problems at home.
Here's Joe Wallace telling you let's go to war.
Democrats, please wake the fuck up and meet this fucking moment.
Congressional Democrats, shut the government down until those
masked federal thugs are off of our streets.
How about that? How about Democrats?
Just that you've got to keep you.
You've got to vote to keep the government funded by the end of
January. How about you don't keep the
government funded until these masked federal thugs that are
brutalizing citizens and immigrants alike are off of our
streets? How about Democrats?
You just do that. I mean, he's sort of pointing
out the fact that the issue is in Congress.
I sort of like that. But what you're also seeing is
this heated rhetoric where people are getting more and more
amped up about something that I don't think is realistic.
It's not even happening. Look at this.
This is a great example of how the information narrative is
being waged right now. This is a story about an ICE
detainee. Look how they use the words
presumed suicide. And they do so in sort of little
air quotes, discrediting quotations.
A man being held in a tent complex at the US Army's Fort
Bliss base. This is where we had all those
folks that were that were being held from Afghanistan when I was
out there. You guys have seen video of it
here. I think if you've watched this
program long enough, you have ICE detainee dies of presumed
suicide. This is the second one that I've
seen message this way. And what they'll do on these
stories is not tell you anything about the actual suicide or why
that is or why they're putting the terms presumed suicide in
quotes. Victor Manuel Diaz, 36,
Nicaragua, died of presumed suicide on January 14th at the
Camp E Montana sprawling tent complex, the US Army's Fort
Bliss base in El Paso, TX. The cause of death remains under
investigation, although they're presuming suicide.
Apparently I said that he entered illegally into the
country. 2024 Immigration judge ordered him removed in August of
2025. He's been in federal custody
custody since January 6th when they encountered him in
Minnesota. So now we're going back to
Minneapolis and he was part of the ICE immigration crackdown.
He was arrested for an immigration violation and then
processed the final order of removal January 12th. 2 days
later, they found him unconscious and unresponsive in
his room. He was pronounced dead following
life saving measures and on site medical staff.
OK, they're acting like there was no reason to understand what
was happening, but this is the second story that I've read like
this, where the previous story there was a guy who was
experiencing a medical distress. They left him in his room and
they found him hanging from his own sheet.
They didn't say why these presumed suicide, but the odds
are is that there was something that actually indicated suicide.
So they're crafting this narrative to be able to tell you
something that looks troubling on the onset.
It looks as though it's not actually a suicide.
There's actually people doing really ugly stuff and that's
what we're getting. We're getting this messaging,
which is getting people inflamed and starting to take action
again. I think it's interesting that
we're we're normalizing a Gavin Newsom conversation with with
Ben Shapiro, but we can't even have a conversation with people
that are in our own neighborhood that may have a different
opinion. You can easily imagine people
losing their minds. I was very careful about it when
I was flying on the airport the other day.
It's like, I don't know who believes what and what that's
going to cause these people to lose their mind.
I've watched all the unhinged videos that you guys have.
Some of them look like they're taking actions.
This is what happened in Portland the other day.
It looks like there's these ambush style attacks.
This is the same stuff we saw in 2020 where somebody would get
lured in with a certain kind of, you know, call for distress or,
or a call for, for police service and then they'd be
ambushed. And we've seen this happen to
ice officers as well. This is the This is a troubling
thing when the the state no longer has a monopoly on
violence shortly after 8. O'clock this evening, officers
got a threats with a knife ball. After officers arrived on scene,
two officers were struck by gunfire.
The officers were brought to a local hospital where they're in
stable condition. Recovery.
The suspect is outstanding right now.
So we had the area closed off. It's going to be closed off for
a while. While our cert teams here, we
continue to do our investigation.
We asked the residents stay in place.
Stay in place. That's a bad cut, isn't it?
I keep seeing over and over again things that that indicate
that it's not just the left that's concerned about the
whether or not the police are the good guys.
And by the way, this is also unresolved from 2020.
This story is something that keeps popping up.
It seems like CBS News has run this more than once.
New video contradicting Border Patrol account of a shooting in
Chicago. This is a woman who was This is.
Miramar Martinez. We actually played clips of her
back when this happened. She was driving and she decided
to follow a vehicle on the road that had no plates, had lights
under the window that looked like it was a Lyft driver.
And then of course, the the driver was wearing green because
this was an ICE operation. And she decided it was her job
to notify people in the area that this was la migra.
She was going to let them know that immigration enforcement is
right there. She's a first generation Mexican
American, so her responsibility is not to her own safety.
It's certainly not to you just minding her own business.
She thought she was going to go out there and highlight these
people and who knows what sort of sensitive operation they were
involved in. And you're getting a bunch of
sympathy because she got shot after I'm, you know, some sort
of conflicting conflict that happened there.
They claimed that she ran the vehicle.
There's some video that says she didn't.
It's hard to say. Again, I told you guys
previously, federal use of force is not the same as local use of
force. And people have this conflated
idea that somehow that there's going to be de escalation.
There's going to be sort of the spectrum.
These ICE officers are doing planned operations.
They're doing things that are very specific and they know
generally who they're going to encounter.
And when someone shows up and gets themself involved with,
they may get sort of the the wires crossed.
The difference is, is the public doesn't know this.
This video from this man talking about who is and who is not
getting rounded up is probably the biggest messaging victory
for the political left to get people riled up.
It's also really dangerous because I've talked to guys that
are out being on these ice operations.
They're out doing the job that they're meant to do.
They're they're targeting the folks that they can.
Doesn't mean they don't get targets of opportunity or what
they call collaterals, but they're going after specific
gang members, they're going after drug dealers, they're
going after, you know, prioritize targets.
That's not just completely random, but if you happen to be
in the area, you're going to get grabbed.
That's not what people like this woman, Marina Martinez think is
happening because it's not like you go out there and advertise
all the people that you've arrested today and you don't see
at least any sort of news coverage I'm saying is not
showing, oh, well, we've got 5 different these types of drug
dealers or we brought in this number of convicted child sex
traffickers. We brought in this.
They're not giving those numbers out and nor should they
necessarily. It's just they're doing the
business of what ICE has always done, working in the background.
Suddenly people are aware of it. And just like they became
experts on COVID and virology and just like people became
election, you know, machine experts in 2020.
I just see that we're having pop up expertise from people who
know nothing. And people get a lot of their
news from TikTok like this guy. And so this sounds like it might
be reasonable. You go, oh, I also haven't heard
that. It doesn't mean that that's
what's happening. Listen up close 'cause this is
controversial. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I
have not seen one video of ICE arresting any gang members.
I have not seen money video of them arresting any drug dealers,
any sex traffickers. I haven't even seen them seize
any large drug shipments or breaking up any drug labs.
I haven't seen any of that. All I have seen is them
arresting Walmart workers, Target workers, random passers
by on the street who fit the description, breaking up
landscaping, jobs and labor situations, separating women
from their children, killing people.
I've yet to see them one time affect the mission in which we
were told they're going to be coming to these streets for.
They just rousting homeless people and folks that look like
they fit the description. I mean, that would be true, but
how many, how many times do you see the FBI taking down these
things? How many times do you see the
DEA doing the job of the DEA? He does every single day.
It's weird to watch somebody think that they have a monopoly
on knowledge and he's just said, correct me if I'm wrong.
Well, you're wrong. Of course you're wrong.
What you're seeing, though, is specific news coverage.
This is where the information battles happening.
AUS citizen shares fear that he felt when ICE took him from his
Minnesota home nearly naked. Yeah, that's traumatic, by the
way. I've taken a lot of people.
Almost everybody that gets taken out in the first thing in the
morning, they're almost all naked.
I don't know why that's a thing. But being a federal law
enforcement officer, you basically experience that
regularly. You're going to take people out
into custody, and they're almost always wearing almost nothing
because we go there at 6:00 AM when people are still in bed
with whatever they wear to bed. This guy was a Mung man, born in
Laos, naturalized AUS citizen. He was returned home without
explanation or apology. I don't really know.
I mean, I first of all, we don't know what the apology is.
Are they looking for like a written apology?
This is how these operations work.
If you're in a place where they think somebody is, they're going
to go in there. This happens all the time.
Unfortunately, the nature of the government having the monopoly
on violence is that we're going to go out there and we're going
to grab places. We're going to go into homes.
Sometimes you don't know why that you're even involved in the
sweep. We would go into homes of
grandparents who had grandchildren that were involved
in, let's say distribution of PCP or child pornography or take
your pick, and your address is somehow associated with the
search warrant. In this case, maybe they went
into the wrong house. Maybe they blew it.
Maybe they do owe them an apologies or maybe there's
someone that lives there. And what you're when I read
this, it's like they broke the door.
They were trying to figure out how to fix it.
They're going into all the sort of emotional piece of it that
gets this guy on TikTok riled up.
But ICE is not supposed to break up drug labs.
It's just supposed to go find people that don't belong in this
country and deport them. Criminal aliens.
The the other stuff is being done by the other agencies, but
they're not being covered in the same way.
All I see is this, this this non-stop attempt to to demonize
specific specific federal law enforcement because they found a
purchase where they can actually get people really riled up.
And it always ends up at the same spot.
It always ends up in this like aggressive, sort of like a
racist push. Local cops are paying the price,
people getting shot, and it doesn't necessarily have
anything to do with the reality of what the situation looks like
on the ground. Having talked to people that are
actually out there doing it. It doesn't help that these guys
are not in prison for the stuff that they've done that are
actual federal felonies and you don't need that much time.
I'm going to give you guys another comparison.
Did we not go through January 6th and all the things that
happened on January 6th? Didn't we see that there was a
an easy way to get completely riled up, have the entire
federal government turn and bring people into custody?
I feel like we did. I feel like that was a thing.
So they're not done with it over on the political left either.
Check this out is Acbs news story.
This is from Scott McFarlane and he focuses on January 6th as one
of his beats. But isn't it interesting that
every single time one of these folks of the 1600 or whatever it
was, pardon J Sixers finds themselves in legal trouble?
And that doesn't matter whether it's a Jake Lang or this guy
Andrew Johnson, He was pardoned. Like everyone, Donald Trump
didn't go line by line and pardon these people.
But this guy is going to be charged on child molestation
charges in following arrest that he had in July.
So this is an old story. It's being rehashed.
He was accused of of molesting A victim for months in Hernando
County, Florida and he's held in custody.
He's got a trial coming up in February the 9th.
We want to point out all the wrongdoings of the people there.
No one ever said that all the J Sixers were were good people or
even the people that that got convicted shouldn't have gotten
what they got. Some people certainly could.
I think Jake Lang is a great example of that.
Swinging a bat at cops is a really good reason to go to
prison. The J6 prosecutions represented
an overreach of federal authority.
It represented the federal government doing the exact
opposite thing of what it should have been doing.
Instead of caring about fair process, what they cared about
was outcomes. And so the entirety of it got
reviewed. Here's the crazy thing, they all
still work there. So what are we seeing?
Are they solving the problems? Are they going after these guys
who are doing things that are, I think, probably as bad or worse?
No, you've got this, the same guy that interrupted the church
the other day, and he's proud of it.
He's pleased with himself. I'm going to show you some
really bizarre videos of these folks and they're getting
massively amplified. And guess what?
When you don't go to prison for doing things that are obviously
bad and you turn, you turn into a folk hero for some of the
actual, you know, radicals that will continue to join them to
the local Somali mosque. And as you can see how beautiful
it is. This is where they do their
prayer. This is where normally 500
people will, you know, come and make prayer, but things are
quiet because the local community is scared to come out.
They're terrified. It was an honor to be invited to
this mosque. But it was surreal to be there.
And it made me feel good about my actions in that white
supremacist church earlier. How can these people be not
afraid to go out of their homes, afraid to go practice their
prayer, while these rich white people can live like nothing's
happening and ignore it completely?
It's unjust, it's UN American. What is?
What is freedom if it only applies to white people?
This is the first neighborhood that I started to see the
Riverside. Gotcha, gotcha. 8 of 10,000
Somalis live here. And you said this is one of the
first Somali mosques, This is the.
The first mosque Imam Shafi. OK, got you.
Got you. Intersection See the Riverside
West Bank right next to the University of Minnesota.
Gotcha. And we and we just thank you for
having us here today. We're very grateful and we won't
forget about your community. Traveling and fighting for the
right 'cause we really appreciate you guys coming to
the Twin Cities. Thank you, Jolly, thank you.
You walk, farmer. Thank you.
So we've been invited by some
Somali elders to come eat some of their beautiful food.
Look at that. Oh, God, dude, this is look at
that. Please go check out this
restaurant we ate at tonight. It was freaking delicious.
What on earth are we even doing in this country?
Like, who are these crazy people that are getting the voice we
need to know that they're out there.
We need to understand that they're they're doing it and
they're actually marketing it to people who think that they're on
the side of right. They're not the majority of this
country. They're not even close.
There's a fractional minority. All Muslims, not not even
Somalis. All Muslims make up about 1.5%
of the United States population. Similar to Hindus who are a
little bit less, somewhere between like 1 and 1 1/2 Jewish
people who have been here forever.
Jewish people represent religiously 2.5% of this nation.
And so we still have a majority of people in this country that
either are Christian, 60% where they have Christian values and
they live that way, which I would say is the remainder of
people. There's a very small number of
fringe lunatics like this guy who are going to go out and talk
about making prayer in a Somali mosque.
But look what we highlight about it.
And it's being sold as virtue. And that's what's really crazy
to me. This is the scariest part of it.
So the, the, your, your government, which is meant to
protect the majority, which is meant to protect the dominant
culture. They're, they're majoring in the
minors. I'm going to show you that
there's this like new outrage about whether or not they're
going to go out there. There's a with the face Act is
going to be, you know, whether it's going to be enforced.
As we talked about yesterday. And I think it's clear.
I've got a couple of Don Lemon Klip's we'll play in a second
here to do that too. It's it looks really obvious to
me that that's what what we're dealing with.
You've got the state attorney general in in Minnesota saying
the exact opposite, saying the craziest thing possible, that
this is a First Amendment right to go in and disrupt a church.
How many people Can you imagine going into that mosque that you
just saw? De woke farmer, by the way, DA
woke farmer, That's his, that's his handle.
How many people would walk in there and think that they would
not immediately be scooped up by local authorities and then also
probably charged federally? And the reason is because the
same people who were standing by when George Floyd riots were
happening, the same people who went after Christians that were
sitting outside of abortion clinics, they all still work for
DOJ. It doesn't matter if you change
the top. Bondy doesn't seem to be all
that action oriented. We've got Harmony Dillon coming
out and saying that we're going to go after them for potential
conspiracy against rights. And so you end up in a federal
felony place, your first action against the face tag.
But who are you going to get to do it?
The people you're going to get to do it are the people that
you've been making war against for quite a while now.
This is that crazy woman, Jennifer Wells.
And I do say she's a little bit crazy because she continues to
say things more and more aggressive.
She kind of gives me this like Candace Owen vibes where she's
going to say whatever is the most outrageous thing to get
audience going because it's getting an emotional reaction
from people, even though it represents A minority opinion.
Apparently, if you go to an evangelical church, you're a
white supremacist or a white nationalist.
So that is one of those white evangelical churches that turn
out to vote for Donald Trump. 80 plus percent of that sect of
Christianity. These are the Don't tread on me
folks. These are the people who feel
like America is for Americans and American only.
These are white nationalists and the DOJ got their panties in a
wad because these protesters went straight to them and
addressed their hypocrisy. You, a gay black journalist,
are, I mean, prime bait for them to drum up these charges.
But so that's one issue. You went right into the most
entitled white nationalists there are and they feel that ICE
is 100% justified. But second, I mean, ICE is 100%
justified because ICE is doing what ICE is supposed to do.
They're going after people that are here in this country
illegally. The stories from NBC News, the
DOJ civil rights chief. This is Harmony Dillon blasting
Don Lemon for covering an anti ice protest from inside the
church and vows charged against the protesters.
Nobody should think in the United States that they're going
to be able to get away with this after anti ice protesters halted
a Sunday service in St. in a Saint Paul's church.
Well, here's the reason why they think they should and why they
think they can. It's because they did and it's
because they're being mentioned that message this way.
And you haven't changed the personnel who allowed this
stuff. FACE Act violations, broadly
speaking, 9095% of the time are only prosecuted against people
who are Christians sitting outside of abortion clinics,
usually with an overreach of what that law actually entails.
We've put people in prison over this regularly.
But churches were stomped. I had AI, had an article up.
Catholic Vote was keeping track of them until they stopped.
My friends over at Catholic Vote were giving a 500.
Churches in crisis pregnancy centers were vandalized or
destroyed in some way, shape or form from 2020 onward.
Did DOJ aggressively go back and start announcing that they were
going after these things? Granted, if they don't always
tell you when they've gone after something historically, but I
went and looked and I couldn't see that any of these things
were closed. And we were told they got away
with it because it was dark. It's hard to find people outside
Harmeet Dhillon is saying the right things about maybe
stepping up and doing this. The problem is, is that the guy
is getting cheered on by the Jennifer Welch, the media types,
the new media, and also from people inside state law
enforcement like he's Ellison. So Democrat operatives are
telling you that what they did was fine.
This was totally acceptable. Here is a Harmeet laying out the
case against what you think can happen.
My worry is, is that this is always going to be the same sort
of we're talking and therefore that is the action.
The Trump administration is really good about going out and
messaging. They're not always great with
follow through. And this is the big concern
because this can't happen. It broke my heart.
These are scenes out of another era and another place.
They are not American scenes. They have no place in America.
This conduct is illegal under federal law.
A predicate act of a violation of the FACE Act can actually
become a federal felony conspiracy under Section 241 is
what we call it, of the Klan Act.
And so that is definitely something we're looking at as
well. And there may be other
collateral offenses too. Great.
So there's some potential for felony charges.
What are they saying on the other side?
What's the other side saying? Do they agree that that exists?
No, they do not. In fact, they're defending it.
They're claiming there's A1A, right to go in and stop a
church. But do these people think the
same thing about a mosque? Do they think the same thing
about a synagogue? And.
The and the And the FACE Act, by the way, is designed to protect
the rights of people seeking their reproductive rights to be
protected and so that people for a religious reason, you know,
cannot just use religion to break into women's reproductive
health centers, right. So how they are stretching
either of these laws to apply to people who protested in a church
over the behavior or the conceived behavior of a of a of
a religious leader is is beyond me.
Tracking. Got it.
Yeah. So there's no protection if
you're in a church because it's really meant to do something
else. That was that's the attorney
general for Minnesota. He did the same thing on CNN.
Do with whether they're going to focus or investigate you.
So I wish in a normal time I would say no.
I say this is First Amendment activity in time like this.
It's it's just really difficult to say because the one that one
thing's the only one thing is clear.
If Trump likes you, you can do no wrong.
If he doesn't, he's going to use every weapon he can against you,
including our criminal justice system.
Well, that's probably true, but the, the issue that I think
people that are struggling with is, is whether or not, whether
or not it has anything to do with whether or not it's
actually a violation of law, because there's plenty of things
that are violations of law and we don't see any actions.
We've been seeing this for a long time.
This is the, this is the, this is the, the overwhelming drum
beat of the so-called malcontents or the black pillars
that that we got, you know, criticized about being do
something. I look on social media every
day. The, the, the expectation that
nothing will happen is very high.
If you guys see my social media over the next couple days, I'm
going to again say I think nothing is going to happen.
Part of it is because I'm actually hoping to shame these
people into doing something. Wouldn't it be nice if they
actually stepped up and did the thing that they said they would
do? It's kind of my hope that we can
actually shame them into moving forward because there still is a
contingent that says these people are not victims.
They're actually the aggressor and there's enough soft, squishy
people in the middle. They haven't really picked up a
side, but they've internalized the the mainstream position that
because you all there goes my soundboard for a second.
The mainstream position holds that because you are white,
you're the issue. And it doesn't help that the
lovely ladies on the View are pushing that forward.
I'm going to show you this real quickly and then we're going to
go into kind of our final little thoughts and why I think this
still matters broadly speaking, why we don't have a ton of faith
that our law enforcement's going to do the thing they're supposed
to do. I see them, you know, you know,
equality feels much like a pression when you have always
had privilege of being ahead, even if you were mediocre.
And I think I think we're talking about here, white men
and the 2023 were 7070% of the workforce and in all sort of
positions where people of color and we're not, we're not.
And so, So what we're learning from this from this interview is
that this administration kept on talking about a meritocracy.
They should they should be merit based based.
And they and they they felt, they felt that it never was
never was. Now we now we know know this
attack attacked diversity, equity, inclusion based on white
male reasons. And the fact that Donald Trump
seems to really become the concept of.
Of reverse discrimination and the N double ACP very clear
after hearing your comments that in fact there is absolutely no
evidence no no faced evidence that white men have suffered
because of because of the. Oh yeah right.
Right through the. So that is one of those white
evangelical churches. White evangelical churches, the
things that we're going to say that it's OK to victimize
certain people because they're not in the favorite group.
I did the math on it. White people still represent 3/4
of the workforce in the United States.
So the idea that they would be in charge of more things that
they would have more senior positions in companies.
I have no idea why that's even remotely controversial unless
your whole thing is to Stew up outrage.
And again this is that Jennifer Welch doing the same exact
thing. What is her point?
Her point is, is that we're going to stir up outrage because
these people with no evidence, By the way, does she give any
examples of like, well, look, these are some of the speeches
that have been given in that church.
These are some of the sermons that have been going on.
This is how they advocate for separatism and so on.
No, she just says, broadly speaking, if you're an
evangelical American and you happen to vote for Donald Trump,
by the way, that's where she ties it together.
Your vote for Donald Trump makes you an acceptable target.
And so you should experience no social civil rights.
You should not have them defended.
So that is one of those white evangelical churches that turn
out to vote for Donald Trump, 80 plus percent of that sect of
Christianity. These are the don't tread on me
folks. These are the people who feel
like America is for Americans and American only.
These are white nationalists and the DOJ.
Zero evidence. Zero evidence, nothing that she
said there was based on anything factual.
It's just her feelings. Sounds great.
What about those of us that actually had some facts on our
side? We asked some serious questions
and we never had accountability. The interesting thing about
being on the left is as long as you're going down the middle of
like whatever it is that they're interested in selling you and,
and this Jennifer Welch sells like whatever the mainstream
emotional feelings are with 0 fact base.
What about those of us that actually had some facts and we
had all of like, I don't know, scientific history on our side?
What happened? What happened when we started
asking questions, we said, Hey, I think that we'd like to
continue to have our jobs and we don't want to have to do things
that are, that are against our religious principles or maybe
our medical decisions. We don't want to make them based
on what you guys say. You need to have facts then.
And even if you did wasn't good enough, there's Brett Weinstein
asking a question that I, I've encouraged you guys to ask.
It's funny to see people do this sort of stuff.
When did you stop getting the COVID boosters was the question.
I'm going to send this to my mother-in-law.
Maybe she'll see it this way too.
Some of you need to be sharing this clip to to some folks.
It's been obvious to us that natural immunity was an option.
Just like it's obvious to us that when you have the majority
of the culture, then you should have probably the majority of
the senior leadership jobs. And that when you have the
majority of the religious bloc in this country that you should
experience the majority of the protections of the of the state.
Just turns out that's not what happens.
Are you still getting COVID boosters?
No, you're not. Why not?
Well, I've already had COVID a couple times, so I have natural
immunity. So you believe in natural
immunity? Well, after the entire public
health apparatus assured us that natural immunity was not good
enough and that you still got a benefit from the.
They got it. Look, look, Brett, they got many
things. Do you remember that moment in
time? I do.
I do remember people like me shouting about this.
Yes, I do. OK, So now we find out from Paul
Offit that all of the major players gathered together and
privately understood the very same thing that they were
gaslighting us over. They understood that natural
immunity was the best immunity that you were going to come by
and that a vaccine wasn't going to augment it.
And they decided to keep that to themselves, in spite of the fact
that these vaccines are built on a novel technology they didn't
know the hazards of, at best. So how is it that these people
can privately meet and decide? There's a whole swath, millions
of people, hundreds of millions of people who had already had
Covic, who didn't need to take any risk whatsoever from a novel
vaccine. How is it that they get to
privately decide to keep that information to themselves?
And why, given that they did that, given that you remember
the moment in history at which they were, not only were they
disagreeing with us, which was a lie, they were gaslighting us.
They were telling people like you that people like me were
crazy. I don't understand how you don't
learn that lesson. Or maybe you did and that's why
you're not getting any more COVID boosters.
No, I just think it again, it's more of a changing information
landscape. We think this is what you know,
we think mass work. Mass don't work.
Yeah, we should have mass distancing.
My close the schools like the Why do you think the
international landscape changed? Well, because the information
was low at to to begin with and then we got more information.
I'm less conspiratorial that that Paul Offit and his buddies
all met and said, we know according to Paul Offit, I don't
I don't remember him saying he's talked about it twice on video.
He's described the meeting where he and Fauci and Collins and
Wollensky got together and they talked about the fact that
natural immunity was superior and they decided not to tell the
public. That's from Paul Offit.
You can go look at I don't remember that, but but they
they're going to, they're going to lie to the public.
They can't. I always come back to this
stuff. I always come back to COVID.
At the end of the day, it's been the single most dominant thing
that happened in the last five years.
It's the reason why I think at least it's the it's the
predicate reason why I don't have a job doing what I used to
do, why I'm not out there helping round up illegal aliens.
And you can't ever ask questions about it and you can't ever
assume that somebody was doing something intentionally with
malice. And yet they told us they ran
the information game on low information people who are
willing to just accept new programming.
And when they did, it was like, fine, this is what's happening
now we're going to go after all the bad.
Do you remember being demonized for that?
In the same way you're being, you're going to find yourself
demonized for showing up at church.
If you have white children and you are a white person by other
white people. That's the most shocking part of
it. And so any grievance or any
actions taken against you is acceptable.
And if you're out there trying to make this country follow the
actual laws written by our Congress, if we are actually
going to have Congress say there are certain things that allow
you to come here. There are certain things that
don't, you are within your parameters to stay.
If you overstay, this is what happens.
If you are committing crimes and you are, you are, you know, a
criminal alien, then you must be deported.
We've actually normalized so many different marginalizations
of regular people who just did regular stuff that the fringes
are being celebrated. The wacko that decides to go in
and tell you that he's going to celebrate a Somali mosque.
And that's the most beautiful thing that has that happens in
America. But tie it all up to the place
where we started, which was the Joe Walsh, let's go start this
war, which is what he said he wants to bring the war.
Are people really ready for it? There's some people that are
getting that message loud and clear, and they watch the
inaction of government in in things that are righteous and
just. And they watched the government
actually protect those doing things that were unjust,
including being a participant itself, getting rid of folks
from their positions in the military and law enforcement.
And we watched a bunch of law enforcement comply with it.
It's a complicated issue because clearly it's not monolithic, but
some people got that message loud and clear that now is an
opportunity for them to take action.
And I don't think necessarily that they represent a majority,
but if we don't actually see Harmi, Dillon and company go
after and use the force of the federal government to maintain a
monopoly on force, barging in to a church service and stopping
it. Again, the the FACE Act is
pretty clear. It's through physical
obstruction. It's through interference, it's
through threat of force or violence.
It doesn't have to actually involve force, but it's clearly
on the table for people that are willing to come into a place
where they're not welcome and they're not allowed, and they're
justifying it under freedom, civil liberties.
I don't think so. This guy is going to justify
what he's saying under free speech, too.
I'm OK with the free speech part of it.
It's the action. If you start showing up at
people's homes when you physically present yourself as a
target or you physically present yourself as a threat, there
needs to be governmental action about it.
Otherwise, we're going to get real ugly real quick here in
this country if we dox these ICE agents, If we can dox these ICE
agents, we need to go to their fucking houses.
You understand me? I know that shit sounds crazy or
cruel. They're like, Jesus, you're
going to. Yes, I am.
I am. This is war.
Do you understand? We're at war with the
government, and the branch of the government are state, local
police, troopers, guard aren't doing anything.
Fry Walls, Peggy, Amy, Tina. None of them are doing anything.
Angie Craig, Ilon Omar, much as I like her, none of them are
doing anything. None of them are doing anything.
You want to come after our families?
OK, game on. Who is his family in this story,
by the way? He just said that Ilan Omar was
one of his favorite. As much as he likes her.
That may be the craziest thing that I've heard.
And people are getting in there and thinking, hey, my video is
getting likes. It's it's it's real.
It's valuable. Like, people are, people want to
go do this thing. And you're seeing in small
doses, people are. The question is, will they be
held accountable? Will they be found?
Will they be punished the way that the state's meant to?
Will the state actually maintain its monopoly on violence?
Or is it going to seed it to some random elements like that
and further debase its legitimacy?
And time will tell. That's what I got for today's
show. That's what I'm seeing out there
and it's, you know, obviously tainted by a little bit of
travel and do my best to try to clean these up over the next
couple days as we work. Working remote is not the same
as working from my own space. I'll just tell you that much.
While you guys are listening, if you guys are listening anywhere
without the visuals, check out Kyle seraphinshow.com on
Spotify. Give us a like if you're
listening on Rumble, if you're listening over on YouTube, we'd
appreciate that if you're on locals.
Thanks so much for being part of the community at
kyleseraphin.com and wherever you're at.
If you have not shared this with a friend, if you have not
subscribed to the channel, the we'd appreciate if you guys
would do that. And we're going to have a little
bit shorter shows what we hear a little bit a little bit weirder
set up. As you guys can tell, I've got
some moving parts. I actually funniest thing I'll
just tell you this is not a pal cleanse, but it is sort of the
way that Murphy's Law works. I have a microphone stand that
will fit on any table anywhere except the tables in the hotel
that I've stayed in. Where they where they.
Where we have 4 inch thick tables for some reason, so I
don't have a clamp big enough to put it.
So in any case, making do with what we got, we're going to make
these roadshows work as best they can.
And I'm probably going to do some sit down interviews with
some of the folks that are here because there's some neat people
I want to talk to. Anyway, hope you have a great
day. God bless you.
Look forward to seeing you guys again on the other side of this
Tuesday. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth
Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.