Take a look. Behind the curtain with a real
whistle blower, an American patriot prepared to embrace the
uncomfortable truth. Because this program has no time
for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiasts, Second Amendment defender and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends and
welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show.
Today is Thursday, it is January the 25th, and we are going to
talk about bombs. Yeah, hopefully we drop a couple
of bombs on you as well. If you are joining us live on
rumble.com/kyle Seraphin, make sure you're giving us a like
giving us a thumbs up. There it is.
There's the icon. You guys know what to do.
Make sure that happens. All right, couple of exciting
things. Number one, we have finalized
the Easter egg hunt in the background.
If you guys want to start guessing, you can put them in
the comments below. If you are listening on our
audio right now, you're going. I don't even know what you're
talking about. Join us on Rumble.
That's where to do it. If you guys are joining us on X,
really appreciate it. We're also streaming to G OB
actuals. We're going to be bringing
Gerardo Boyle on in just one moment.
As as you guys can tell, I am fully ramped up today.
I got up and I've been thinking about this all night.
My neck actually hurts from the stress of like being just riled
up about all this nonsense that has been going on.
We had a really interesting drop yesterday.
We had Thomas Massey, the the congressman who was involved in
doing some of the weaponization discussions.
He was doing some of the interviews, including an
interview of a guy named Steve Dantuano.
Steve Dantuano was the assistant director in charge of the
Washington Field office on January 6th, also with the
special agent in charge of the Detroit field office when they
went after the Whitmer kidnappers.
So that's a lot. That's an interesting character
in the world that we should know a little bit more about.
And we're going to do all of that.
I'm pretty amped up. Yes, you guys are correct.
I see you guys in the chat. You guys see already.
Let's do a quick thank you to my friends over at Patriot Coolers.
They are the ones that are siphoning this coffee directly
into my veins. And I promised you guys that I
would take a picture and I kept thinking about it and just
before we went live, boom, I threw it on here.
Check this out. You guys can go to
patriotcoolers.com, use promo code Kyle.
You can go to their social media, which is at Patriot
Coolers. They're both on true social and
on X Twitter and right up in the top corner over there.
I think it's this way. If you guys look in the corner,
that is my minivan picture. That is the Patriot cooler that
we roll around with. It is the tan version of the 50
quart. I fill it with groceries all the
time. It keeps the milk cold, it keeps
the orange juice cold, it keeps the butter and all the other
things. Sometimes we put what, like
tortillas and stuff in there that we buy that are like the,
the ones that are in the refrigerator section.
Yeah. You throw them all in there, you
slap it down, you still got room on top.
Great for Costco trips, great for grocery store trips and a
really handsome looking thing. When people see you in there,
they're like, oh, that guy's figured it out.
Get more use out of your cooler and get one that says Patriot.
That's the way to do it. So folks, Patriot coolers.com
again, Patriot coolers.com promo code Kyle saves you 10%, four
letters, 10% off 50 bucks or more is free shipping.
That means you're going to get 50 bucks or are you going to get
free shipping on all the, the, the big hard sided stuff and
even the soft sided one that you see in their little tailgate
ready piece. We said it many times.
OK, so let's get riled up. GOB actual Do you want to unmute
and are you with me? I'm here.
I am here I think. You are here.
OK? Why are we both wearing red
shirts today? It's our own day of rage, as it
were. I mean, perhaps maybe we're a
little fired up. I'm drinking my coffee black
this morning for all the black pills that I hope to feed the
audience. No, no, no, we're not feeding
black pills. Actually, I'm going to actually
turn this on its head right now, GOB.
We're going to, we're going to flip it around.
So I want to start with some historical context.
You didn't know I was going to do this, so I'm dropping this on
you for the first time right now.
But we are wearing red. Let's call it La Pacion.
It's the red of passion about what we are doing right now.
I'm wearing the I don't even know what shirt this is.
I think this is the PT shirt. Does that make sense?
PT shirt probably. Oh yeah, that's a special
edition one off. That's a OK I've got a special
edition badge only red shirt from the merch store, the dash
dependables.com. We're letting Garrett out of the
sweatshop just for a little bit to do this interview.
Let's start with we're doing nothing but white pills today.
We're dropping. Hope you ready.
I like that. OK, good enough.
Let's start right here, ladies and gentlemen.
Right here is a picture that my friend Alpha Warrior put up on
Twitter. I'm going to be sharing a little
bit of this info with you. This one is a historical letter
written by a man named William Barrett Travis, and he was the
commander of the forces at the Alamo in Texas.
Before Texas was Texas America, it was just Texas, Texas in
1836, in February of 1836. And he wrote this letter that
you're seeing on this on the on the screen to the peoples of
Texas and all Americans in the world.
Now, this is particularly relevant on a day when we see
that Greg Abbott has finally kind of stepped into the role
and said, hey, someone's going to have to kick the ass of this
stupid federal government that continues to overreach.
And this is a reminder that Texas used to be made of some
really strong people, and I hope that we continue to do that.
Fellow citizens and compatriots. I am besieged by 1000 or more of
the Mexicans under Santa Ana, and I have sustained continual
bombardment and cannonade for 24 hours and have not lost a man.
The enemy has demanded A surrender at discretion,
otherwise the Garrison are to be put to the sword.
If the Fort is taken, and I have answered the demand with a
cannon shot, and our flag still waves proudly from the walls, I
shall never surrender or retreat.
And then I call on you, in the name of liberty, of patriotism,
and everything dear in the American character, to come to
our aid with dispatch. The enemy is receiving
reinforcements daily, and will no doubt increase to 3 or 4000
in four to five days if this call is neglected.
I am determined to sustain myself as long as possible and
die like a soldier who never forgets what is do his own honor
and that of his country, victory or death.
And then he says, PS the Lord is on our side.
When the enemy appeared insight we had not 3 bushels of corn,
and since we have found in deserted houses 80 or 90 more
bushels and gotten into the walls 20 or 30 heads of beeps.
So he's got cattle, He's got things that can sustain him.
We know they didn't live through that encounter, but the eventual
victory was theirs, right? I love it.
I love that type of history. And while you were reading that
it, it reminded me of a letter that I'm very fond of from World
War 2. It comes from General McAuliffe.
He was over the 101st Airborne, which as you see behind me,
there's 101st Airborne plaque and you know, whatever.
But the Germans asked them to surrender and so do so within
two hours. And the response he sent was
nuts, like not going to happen. And this, both of these examples
of when you read the one I just mentioned there, quintessential
examples of the American spirit. We are fighters.
We endure even in the face of extreme odds, perhaps even when
we know we aren't going to win. We're going to have the
mentality of God, country and my fellow man, even if that means
there's none of us left standing.
So that's awesome that you shared that from Alpha.
That's cool that he posted that up there.
It's AI think it's a great way to to start the day.
It is for me because it already is a glimmer of hope, like, Oh
yeah, we have, we have this fighting, enduring spirit and
let's let's get after it. I'm not done with these yet.
We're going to drop another one. You ready?
I'm ready. All right.
Good enough. How about this one Also,
historical context moving forward.
You just did. We've done the the the war in
Texas for Texas independence. We just talked about World War
2. Let's go on to Korea.
Here we go kaboom. Some of you may be Marines in
our audience and you know a little bit about Chesty Poehler.
In fact, you probably said good night to him every night while
in basic training. This is a little piece that I
found on a war archive website. It is known as, let's see what
it's called here. It's called, though, it's called
warhistoryonline.com. And on the screen you're seeing
a couple pictures of Chesty Polar one where he's standing
with a pipe and AK pot on his head or he's wearing one of
those steel, steel helmets and it's unbuckled.
He's got a, he's got a satchel and he looks like John Wayne.
And it says the enemy have us surrounded.
They won't get away this time. Chesty Polar American hero.
In many ways. He's a he's a Marine Corps hero,
but he's a American hero. There's another picture of him
you see on the screen where he is shirtless and he is shaking
hands with an Admiral. Apparently, some of those quotes
come from Korea. There's a lot of sort of
apocryphal language around what he may have said.
You know, the enemy have us surrounded.
They won't get away this time, but we've got them right where
we want them. Things like that.
He was awarded the Navy Cross for bravery just below the Medal
of Honor. Lots, lots of wonderful chesty
polar stories. But I think that those have a
lot of relevance to the way that we're looking at the world right
now because they have definitely got us surrounded.
GOB. They do.
And you know, I think, well, for one, I'm a veteran, You're a
veteran. So I think some of these these
stories from our the military history of our nation really,
really stand out. I know they do for me.
And I've heard it said before that war is life amplified and
intensified. And in my experience, that is
100% true. I think of some of the things
I've done and seen while I was in the military and how that
really is just an intense apple amplification of anybody's life.
We all go through trials and tribulations through our life.
We all go through times where we think we can't overcome the odds
or that we're not going to make it out alive.
And I think in in a lot of ways, we, without even sounding too
hyperbolic, I think we're at that type of point as a nation
right now. Like, yeah, sure, you know,
we're not getting, you know, RPG raining down on us from the
Taliban like I was in Afghanistan.
But in a lot of ways we're getting RP GS rain down on us
from our own government. I mean, look at the southern
border. Look at the things we talk about
all the time regarding the FBI. It's it's, it's really is a
Crucible, a war like Crucible that that we're in.
And I think one of the one of the white pill moments of this
is that more and more people are starting to see it and starting
to say, hey, wait a second, what what's going on in the land of
the free that that's it's not supposed to be this way.
It is not, and yet it is. And that the fact that they've
got us surrounded means every time we take a shot we're going
to hit something. Would you agree?
I would agree. And these days it's really not
that hard. I mean, you could just pick up a
handful of rocks and throw them behind your head and you're
going to hit all sorts of targets.
That's right. OK, so folks, we're about to
throw some rocks. Let's check this one out.
Ready. This just came in.
I got it sent to me. Yes.
By another FBI agent, a friend of mine.
Kaboom, Here you are. DEI hires pushing into the FBI
are putting the country's safety at risk for the sake of being,
quote UN quote, woke. Written by the wonderful and
lovely Miranda Devine, published yesterday in the almost 11:00
Eastern Time yesterday. So let's talk about what's going
on there. Garrett just said it.
If, if we toss these things out, we can throw rocks in all
directions, we're going to hit evil.
A lot of that evil is coming from our federal law
enforcement. An alarming deterioration and
recruitment standards for the FBI has been exposed in a report
delivered to the House Judiciary Committee by an alliance of
retired and active duty agents and analysts.
The DEI requirements pushed by Chris Ray have degraded
recruitment standards in all area including physical fitness,
illicit drug use, financial irregularities, mental health,
full time work experience and integrity and they pose a threat
to the FB is ability to protect Americans from harm, say the
authors. The report sites new agents are
so fat and unfit they cannot even pass the newly relaxed
physical fitness standards. Some are illiterate and are in
need of remedial English lessons.
They don't want to work weekdays or after hours or weekends or
after hours, or they have serious disabilities or mental
health issues. And quote, UN quote, create
drama for its own sake. The FBI is no longer recruiting
the best and the brightest to be special agents, but selecting
candidates based on race, gender and or sexual orientation.
This is an alliance of anonymous FBI reformers, including former
senior executives and agents. I guarantee you we know some of
them. Garrett and I have probably
talked to some of these folks. They are in from branches like
counterintelligence and counterterrorism who want to
warn that today's FBI lacks the fortitude and the skills
warranted to defeat the so-called existential threats.
If the current trajectory, this is a direct quote.
If the current trajectory of FBI special agent recruitment and
selection continues using DEI as the primary and sole measure,
our Homeland Security efforts will be significantly.
Hanford, that's a pretty sober way of saying such a thing.
How about that fewer people are applying?
We're saying that recruitment has become so-called
self-destructive and is setting up the FBI for a generational
failure. Another FBI former agent who
helped drafted said. Why are we funding an FBI new
headquarters if you're hiring second rate people?
There's a couple of great examples.
They basically quote this like a like a source document.
A current supervisor, S72, says the they disqualified a black
female applicant because she was more than 50 lbs overweight
using the FBI's body fat index and could not pass the physical
fitness standards. But headquarters ordered S72 to
push the candidate through the recruitment process.
Another said they had a candidate that was pushed
through that simply quit in the middle of the 1 1/2 mile run,
which is not very long. Another agent who was a
recruitment coordinator, known as S87, said the drug policy for
the new agents has been so liberalized to include
applicants who had a lifestyle of habitually using drugs.
And another candidate who was arrested and fought with police
officers was not disqualified. The candidates are not, nor are
the candidates disqualified when they have driving under the
influence convictions or documented mental illness.
Now, I have some issues with what they're calling mental
illness. We don't necessarily know, but
that seems like a problem. They said they've got another
applicant who was pushed forward and was disqualified initially
because of work experience only, including two years as a coffee
shop barista and having a bachelor's degree in art
history. The FBI headquarters ordered a
special agent to push that application packet through.
Another agent with four years in counterterrorism observed that
the new agents disappeared during the day.
Go home early, never want to work late for after hours
operations does not. They cannot be trusted with the
agents for their life because they have questionable
competence in tactical abilities and work ethic.
It goes on and on. It's in my Twitter timeline,
folks. I don't want to belabor this any
further. We know what we're talking about
here, Garrett. What do you think?
Well, for one, I love Miranda. This is, of course, great FBI
reporting that she so often does and, and brings out to the to
the forefront that article. It sounds even worse than we
know it to be because I think of my time in the FBI.
Or even after you hear, you know, one example and then maybe
a few weeks later, a few months later, you hear another.
When she lists them off like that, it's like, Oh yeah, all of
this is happening simultaneously.
Just this morning, one of our former colleagues I was texting
with and they told me that new agents in their field office are
being assigned to domestic terrorism, basically carte
blanche and being assigned January 6th cases.
And this former colleague, this is something we've probably
talked about before, believes that it's happening because they
simply will just do what they're told.
And it's like, yeah, you're precisely right.
That is exactly why. And then, man, I don't even know
which example to pull from. From what you read from Miranda,
there's so many the, the guy who fought with the cop, they
probably want to hire that guy because they want FBI Gestapo
type thugs who if the police are saying, hey, that maybe you
shouldn't do that, maybe that's a Fourth Amendment violation.
They want the FBI just to Stampede through and just do
what they want anyways. And then the other one that
stood out is this person with the art major who was a barista
that I had AI, had AI, had a guardian that I took in.
It was an elderly victim. OK, hold on.
So a guardian, E Guardian is a lead that comes in it, it
usually comes in from the headquarters division that
counterterrorism and it's a system where people can
basically report problems to the FBI and then we look into them
or don't. And so Garrett got one of these
leads. Go ahead.
Yeah, and so, you know, she was, she was scammed out of, I don't
know, I don't remember. Thirty, $50,000, all of her life
savings. You know her.
She's a widow. Widow.
Her husband's dead and it's a small town in Kansas.
I get contacted by a Lieutenant who really did a good job
investigating it and giving me like tons of already connected
dots to start from. Well, I just start looking in
FinCEN. I start piercing this together.
Turns out a lot of the perpetrators are college
students in Louisiana. And like, I get this thing all,
all packaged up, I send it off to Louisiana, I get contacted by
this agent down there basically saying we're not going to do
anything about it. And he ended up going and
basically tipping his hand. So one of the main perpetrators
ended up fleeing and going back to the Ivory Coast or wherever
he was from. And then it, dude, it's just,
it's almost. Like Trump was sort of right
when he says they're not always sending their best.
We definitely have some shady people coming in.
That's not to say that people who come here legally are a
problem, but there's a lot of illegal and people who come here
with nefarious intent because America is a land of tolerance
and there's less of that, you know, victory or death attitude,
although we might start getting there again.
Yeah, we might. And so anyways, and I'll wrap
this up, This guy, I find out because I checked, I kept
checking in on it every couple weeks, every couple months when
this Lieutenant would ask what the status was because like this
was one where it's like this is a slam dunk.
Like you have this turns out the local parish or I don't know
what they call them. It's a parish.
I don't know if it's, it's a Sheriff's Office in Louisiana.
They end up doing like a search warrant, but like a lot of the
evidence is already gone because the FBI tipped their hand.
And then I find out that this agent never like ended up taking
care of the case. He ended up going on a
headquarters TDY to the FB is art crime units or whatever it
is. And it's like, why does the FBI
even have that, for one? And so it's like this guy's
whole, his whole plan all along was to get to this art unit and
go and like ride out the rest of his career working on art cases,
I guess. Dude, I, I remember guys coming
out of my Academy class that got assigned to an art thing maybe
in Miami and they were miserable because they were criminal
investigators and they were pissed off.
And tac P just asked if I said every illegal is not a problem.
No, the illegals are a problem. I'm saying that people that come
here legally sometimes also come here for with nefarious intent.
They get a, you know, like a work visa or they stay over or
they do other things. There's all kinds of shady
people that come to the United States because we're a land of
milk and honey and, and many people want to just take that
milk and honey and run with it. So for whatever that's worth.
OK, let me do a sponsor read. And and then after that, we've
got another shot, which was brought up yesterday in the the
chat, but I was kind of holding on to it for a little bit.
Let me you know, we're talking about bad things happening in
the world. We're talking about all kinds of
chaos. Let's talk about what you can do
to hedge against possible uncertainty.
And there you can do it there by going to 4 Patriots, the number
4 patriots.com, the promo code is Kyle.
You can go to fourpatriots.com/kyle if you
don't like typing promo codes. If you only have one good typing
string in front of you, do 4 patriots.com/kyle.
And what are you going to find? You're going to find options for
continuity of comms. You're going to find all kinds
of interesting gadgets and gizmos for survival.
You can start fires. I don't know why my life, my
wife loves fire starters. By the way, I can always buy my
wife like flints and I can buy her like lighters.
And she would really be into it. But you know, she doesn't smoke.
She used to when she was younger.
Oops. Find yourself some emergency
food, find yourself ways to stay warm, find yourself ways to keep
your comms lit up and maybe even your major appliances going.
They've got a an option for a solar generator.
Looks really neat. At some point maybe they'll send
me one. What do you guys think?
They'll probably have to pay me for another month or two and
then maybe send it. Anyhow, Go to
fourthe#4patriots.com/kyle. Get yourself prepped up.
Don't make yourself the person who's on the street that's a
liability or a charity case. Look ahead, plan to succeed,
don't fail to prepare and be one of those people who is basically
planning to fail. All right, so we're going to
keep moving forward with another one of these little fun games.
Let's take another shot across the bow.
Look at this one right here. GOB, you may have seen this as
well. Libs of TikTok creator who
obviously is an extreme right wing extremist extreme extreme
extreme. Libs of TikTok creator inspiring
school bomb threats. Look at the way that NBC covers
this stuff, folks has been named to the Oklahoma library board.
Well, Oklahoma just said that they're throwing their lot in
with Texas. They have declared a state of
emergency. They are they are going to be
Texas adjacent both physically and politically on this border
situation. And they've also done this
little move where what's her name is Chaya and her I think
her last name is pronounced Radchik.
But she she pissed off a bunch of people on the left by saying
things that were true, like, hey, maybe don't put pornography
into school systems. And then now she's been named an
advisor to the state education department's library committee.
Simply a straight up, what does Dan call it?
The double barreled family friendly middle finger.
He's she's just sending it to these people and now Oklahoma is
participating in it as well. They refer to her as a far right
influencer. God, I hate that term
influencer. But she basically only takes
people's words, puts them back into circulation, says, oh, you
want to go ahead and publish? What a weird tranny.
You know, rainbow haired moron you are and you teach
kindergarten. Maybe people who are having kids
in kindergarten should know about this.
So that's all she does. She just boost the signal of
loonies. But what do they say?
They said that she's on the frontline.
This is the Oklahoma State Superintendent said she's on the
frontline showing the world exactly what the radical left is
all about, about lowering standards, just like we talked
about in the FBI, pornography in schools and pushing woke
indoctrination on our kids. And those kids actually end up
working for the FBI, some of them.
So there you go. Because of her work, families
across the country know exactly what's going on in schools.
Even if it's hyperbolic versions of that.
You should know what the worst looks like so you can at least
compare it against what you have going on.
And of course, NBC taking a political thing, saying that she
generally singles out LGBTQ people.
I like the LGBTQ people. I don't know why they came up
with writing it that way. Drag Queens and their employers
and criticize them for promoting diversity, inclusion and equity.
GOB, what do you think? Unfair or good?
Always unfair from the likes of MSNBCI mean.
It's like I, I think of one of these, one of these recent
tweets that I saw from, from Libs of TikTok.
It was a screenshot of a Snapchat of one of these LGBTQ
people who was a teacher in the government indoctrination camps
that we call public schools. And she's got like LGBTQ stuff
going on. And it's like a selfie and it
says like daily. It was something like daily like
brainwashing children to believe, you know, to be LGBTQ
or whatever. And it's like, oh, so like you
people, not only are you at a point in our culture where you
readily admit it, you are actively saying, yes, we are
brainwashing them on purpose and there's nothing you can do
about. It it's like those scumbags that
were marching through New York, they were like, we're coming for
your children, we're here, we're queer, we're coming for your
kids. It's like, guess what?
You can come from my kids. But first of all, they're safely
being educated and indoctrinated in Christian values at my own
house. And we're also teaching them how
to handle firearms safely. So knock yourselves out, you
creeps. But which makes you the far
right Christian extremist, white supremacist influencer and such
a nationalist? A hole.
Right. It's like OK, our our words have
lost all meaning at this point. I'm for it though I I quoted
myself as a far right podcaster per what the the the
implications of Media Matters, which covered us.
I've been on I've been covered by Media Matters twice now,
which means that I'm on the radar, which also probably is
going to segue nicely into what we got going on.
OK, let's start with a little story here from Daily Wire.
We're going to get into the weirdness.
Let me actually find it on the screen, So bear with me one
second, folks. Daily Wire story is number 12.
OK, so this is Luke Roziak. He just, he reached out to me
yesterday. I'll probably be talking to him.
Here it is. The FBI said that they were
quote UN quote pipe bombs on January 6th.
Evident points to a cover up. Congressman said that
congressman is Thomas Massey. OK, so if there were indeed 2
operable pipe bombs, that would be the single biggest threat
that existed on January 6th. That's what the congressman
said. He is not wrong.
The Democrats have strained to make the case that January 6th,
2021 was a violent insurrection. God I love that word.
Even resorting to false claims as that police officers were
murdered to make their 'cause we know that's the case.
We know that FBI officials went in with that.
They've gone out of their way to avoid one incident that would
seemingly best make their point. The two purported pipe bombs
outside the DNC and the RNC. Now Republican lawmaker who
spent thousands of hours view reviewing video footage.
He's gone over the footage. He's got his aides doing it.
He's been working Steve Baker as well, you know, getting this
information and other evidence from January 6 alleged that the
bombs may have been planted with the involvement of law
enforcement. That's a pretty interesting
thing. He also believes the Democrats
may have backed off from the incidents for fear that the
truth would be discovered. A good article worth your time,
go through Daily Wire. This was actually published on
the 22nd. This is in relation to what
happened with the releases that Steve Baker's doing.
Also, if you're not following Steve Baker, I highly encourage
you to do that. Follow Steve Baker today.
It's TPC, the number 4 USA. That's TPC number 4 USA.
Follow Steve Baker because he's got a release that's coming out
from the Blaze. He's doing a press conference
this afternoon and I'm going to be on Dan Bongino's radio show.
So if you guys are hearing this early enough in the day or
you're watching us live like many of you are, then you guys
can actually find me on Bongino's at 2:00 PM Eastern
Time for that block of the show. I look forward to talking to Dan
about this. We're going to mix it up.
I bet you that we don't think the same thing, but I bet you we
think some really close things. Garrett what's the biggest
single threat that happened to democracy on January 6th, if you
had to guess? It would be the pipe bombs if
they were legitimate, but. I don't think they were.
Let's talk about the word legitimate.
What do you take that to mean? You were in the Army, you were
in the infantry, you know stuff. You were a cop.
What's legitimate bomb to you? To me it is an actual bad actor
with the requisite skills, knowledge, and components to
build a working bomb and then to plant it.
One at the DNC and one at the RNC.
But this is where the rails really fall off in so many ways.
Like we probably don't even have enough time to cover all of the
ways in which this is doesn't seem legitimate.
It's planted in Plainview. It's got a kitchen timer from
1985 on it that you know you can set for an hour, and it was
planted the night before. One hour, 1 hour time.
Come on, one hour timers can go for 17 hours what you talking
about? Exactly, exactly.
And it's like, that's just like the tip of the iceberg.
There's so much more. I know we're going to unpack
some of it here, but for me that's legitimate, that's
viable. Is there an actual explosive
component in the the alleged bomb?
All right. And if the answer is no, then
this is a cover. Up.
Then it's not viable. OK, a couple things, folks.
If you're just joining us right now, make sure that you are
giving us the thumbs up here on rumble.com.
We are talking to Gerardo Boyle. He was my dear friend.
He runs the FBI. I'm sorry.
He runs the suspendable sweatshop at the dash,
suspendables.com. He's testified in front of
Congress. He is a former infantryman and a
police officer and an FBI agent and a SWAT guy and a
counterterrorism agent. He's seen all this kind of stuff
with me, and he is one of the people that called it out.
Garrett, I think that what you're trying to do is you're
trying to mess with women in America.
And if I don't play this again, I'm going to be really sad for
myself. So we're going to run this just
to get us started on the clownery.
And then I've got some real fun stuff.
So do stick around, folks. And if you're not sharing this
already, you should definitely share this show while we're
doing it live because we're about to drop some bombs on.
Here we go. First, let's hear what the
president has to say. We'll teach Donald Trump a
valuable lesson. Don't mess with the minimum,
America, unless you want to get the benefit.
All right? We're going to get the benefit,
whatever the hell that is. We're going to get the benefit.
OK, You know what I'm saying? The thing, right, The thing.
OK, Anyways, so the first start here.
Let me not lose it. OK, So we're going to talk about
this guy, Steve Dantuano. I'm looking over on the screen
to pull him up. Let's bring up the bio of the
gentleman who's going to be discussed here.
He is and and we'll tell you why in just a second.
Steve Dantuano, as I mentioned at the outset, was the assistant
director in charge at the top guy at the Washington field
office for the FBI on January 6. He was also the top guy in a
smaller office in Detroit that actually ran the witch, the
Whitmer fednapping case. Let's be real clear about what
he is and what he's not. When you are the SAC, the
special agent in charge, when you are the a Dick, which, yes,
it, that's how we pronounce it, ADICA Dick.
When you're the A Dick of the Washington Field Office, the
odds of you knowing what's going on in every single case is
extremely low. You will not know all the cases,
but what you will know is the things that require major
widespread arrest operations. If you're going to bring in
multiple SWAT teams from all over the place, you're going to
have to be able to at least articulate while you're signing
off on the resource that you're spending.
You should probably know when you're asking people to come
across the the country to go do this operation.
So Steve d'antwano is currently a partner at KPMG.
It's an extremely large accounting firm, and he's
working in their forensic advisory services practice.
Now, he's a partner there, which means he's supposed to be
bringing in clients. And what we're told, because,
yeah, we know people everywhere, especially in DC, we're being
told that Steve d'antwano can't even cover his own salary, which
is part of the gig you're supposed to do.
You're supposed to bring in. You're supposed to be a net
benefit to the company. They're not supposed to be like
a Leech that suckles at the teat of another group.
And I don't think that private industry takes it the same way
that the government does. So Steve d'antwano apparently
not pulling his weight over there.
He began as ACPA with the FBI as a forensic accountant.
So yet another person recruited in under a non agent type thing.
He started off his career working for the FBI.
He was promoted to special agent shortly thereafter.
Began working financial crimes and public corruptions.
With his 26 years in the FBI. He held several high-ranking
positions including some of the most high profile cases in the
FBI's history. I would also argue probably some
of the most embarrassing cases of the FBI's history.
He spent two years working with the financial crimes section
chief job, which is AGS 15 job at the FBI headquarters.
He oversaw the entire portfolio of white collar crimes.
He built a robust public private partnership.
We just know that's just a sort of a way that you get yourself
into a nice job later, including domestic and foreign
institutions, financial services industry, retail banks, blah,
blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. During his tenure at the FBI, he
developed expertise in financial crimes and white collar.
He was an instructor at the Academy, the renowned FBI
Academy at Quantico. He also honed his expertise.
BSAAMLI, don't know what that is, became a subject matter
expert, testifying several times for the Senate's Banking
Committee and the Finance Committee.
I'm going to ask you real quickly, DOB, did you hear
anything about counterterrorism in there?
Does he seem that he's like right guy to do after all these
big counterterrorism cases? Didn't hear it, didn't see it,
But hey, it sounds like he's a banking expert and whatever
this, whatever it is he did in his entire career coming out of
the prestigious Quantico Academy.
I mean, like, even the way they write these things makes me want
to throw up in my mouth. But yeah, it's a misnomer when
you see stuff like this, the addict, the SAC, the director
being like intimately involved. And, you know, 17 highly
classified terrorism cases, They're not.
They may be in on a brief occasionally, but.
What are you thinking? You need money for UC op?
No, we're not doing a UC op this time.
Oh, we need a UC op. OK, we're going to do a UC op.
I just found out I'm not green on that metric.
We need to go star, so let's do that.
Exactly, exactly like let me check, let me check my my TRP
real quick and and see how many UCE OPS we need and see if we
have those funding. Shy one, Yes, let's go ahead and
do some entrapment cases. Let's run them.
Exactly. Another autistic teenager.
Let's sign up because that's an easy slam dunk, Yeah, where we
can get a UCEACHS, an OCE, maybe multiple of all of those
involved. And you know, let's let's move
this kid towards white militia extremism or jihadi, you know,
Islamic terrorism. Like either one we'll take.
Do a skin color check and we'll decide what flavor of terrorism
we're going to push him towards. OK, I love this.
Let's throw this on the screen. This is what we got started
about. This happened yesterday.
This was dropped on us. So ladies and gentlemen, if you
haven't seen this already and that means you're not following
the the Twitterverse, which is probably not the worst thing in
the world for you, but I will encourage you to do so.
This is Tom Massey. He says this is AJ6 pipe bomb
thread. I actually like it when
congressman kind of get into the thread game.
So here it is, J6 pipe bomb thread.
On 6/7/23, the House Judiciary Committee interviewed Steve
Deantuano. You're seeing the cover sheet
for that transcripted interview. Gerda Boyle did one of those
interviews. So he can talk a little bit
about what that looks like, what the feeling is.
We're going to kind of get into that piece.
What he said is during most of the interview, the topics were
covered, such as the warrant served at Mira Lago, But I also
asked questions about the J6 pipe bomb.
Interestingly enough, the rate at Mira Lago was conducted by
FBI agents who were in fact from the Washington Field office.
So the same squad and, and I think Massey probably didn't
know this, but the same squad that actually was doing work on
the pipe armor. Whether that was the case squad
or they were just, you know, part of the, the, the case
squad, like a task force was CI 14, counterintelligence 14.
The Russian espionage squad that I used to work 3 squads over
from it was CI 14. And then there was like CI 20, I
don't remember, but it was the, the North Korean squad or the
Korean squad. Then after that was an embassy
squad that worked the Chinese CI 7 and then me CI 21.
So that's, that's the order that was on the floor.
I'm just telling you guys this because I worked with these
people every day for two years straight.
And that's not a long time, but that's, you know, 700 miles.
It's like 700 days. Yeah, and and this is this is
the thing too that people don't understand and and you'll get
this. And, and my Academy classmates
were in that squad, by the way, CI 14.
So they serve, they serve the search warrant at Mira Lago.
Then somehow they're working on the pipe bomber case.
A lot of people are going to look at that and go, what does
that even mean? I don't know what it means but
feel free. That is curious because why is
this CI squad working on a quote UN quote domestic terrorism,
right? That's that is that is curious
for sure, but part of the institutional knowledge part and
you'll get it anywhere, you know, like whoever the the guy
who watches the most NFL in a season, he doesn't understand
the intricate workings of like a team inside the locker room or
practice. It's the same at any, any place
and in the FBI, whether you're on the squad or not.
If you're on the floor like you end up, you know, knowing these
people and you do help out on their arrests or their OPS or
whatever. Or then you find yourself in
some specialty unit where it's got people from from all sorts
of different squads. And you learn about different
cases and you learn about different things going on in the
office. And when it's a major case in
your office and in this, in this instance, think about this, this
is a major case in the entire country like.
You. Know the I agents you know.
What else they had on that squad?
Let's hear it. They had the Snowden case.
Wow, look at that. The Snowden case was symbolized
by this monkey. It was like a toy ship, OK, And
it was a toy ship with some of those red like hanging monkey
things. The barrel of monkeys, right?
Because it was a shit show. It was always a shit show.
It's like a barrel of monkeys. It wasn't fun, but you just got
stuck. This like monkeys running the
ship. And they would literally whoever
had that case, whether it was like the most senior agent and
that guy would move on or something.
They hand it off to somebody more junior, and they would
literally put the monkey ship on their desk over there to let
people know, like, oh, you've got the Snowden case.
Like, oh, you know, it was never going to go anywhere.
Like he's not coming back to the US.
But for whatever it's worth, this squad is not a bullshit
squad. This is like one of the real
operational squads doing counterintelligence.
In theory. I've conducted arrests with
them. We actually grabbed somebody
that was a spy out of the State Department.
Maybe it was. I don't know why they were
working with that. Actually, now that I think about
it. Anyway, for whatever reason,
there was another Chinese espionage squad right next to
him. But for whatever reason, this is
a serious squad of people that were doing work that
theoretically matters. I mean, the Russians are a
geopolitical foe. They're not what they we act
like they are. But yeah, you know what's going
on in those squads because you're walking out by there on
the way to lunch. You're sitting in the break room
with these people. Washington Field is a much
bigger area than you were working out of it.
That being said, you know how it is you're you're on the floor
with these people. You see them every single day.
You're riding the elevators up to work, etcetera, etcetera.
All I'm saying is I don't know why they were the ones because
we actually do have manhunting squads.
They actually had criminal squads that interface directly
with the United States Marshals that all they did was find
people. I.
Mean think of that. So that is what makes sense
here. You've got this alleged
potential, you know, if one of these bombs would have exploded,
which again, I won't get into why I all of the reasons yet why
I don't think it never would have.
But this would this is like McVeigh level.
We got to find this guy because it's outside of the two main
political parties in the country.
Like, yeah, it's not an Oklahoma City type with the casualties
and everything, but it's we're being told it's pipe bombs,
viable pipe bombs outside of the DNC and the RNC.
Which the FBI considers a weapon of mass destruction, for
whatever that's worth. They consider that to be a WMD.
That's buzzword, that's funding. That's big time.
That's the, that's the like the Holy Grail.
Consider this too. Were you you were working for
the FBI when they had the the Austin bomber who was sending
things through FedEx, correct? I don't know if I was, but even
if I wasn't, I. I think it was like, I think it
was like breathing. By the 20. 19 I think it was
2019. Then yes, but the case agent on
that case, because I, one of the other hats I wore was assistant
WMD coordinator. And so I went to a bunch of
extra additional trainings and all that.
And the case agent on that case was, was at some of those and he
gave a very thorough case brief on that case.
So I'm well aware of it, maybe even more than than most people.
But anyways I I forget what I was going to say but.
But bombs are the single most terroristic act that happened on
that day. That's the number one thing.
That's the thing we have to we have to know that that's the
case. OK, so that's Part 1.
Part 2 is you've got a non bomb type squad, a non criminal
investigator, and a non CT squad that was apparently working on
this. That's really weird.
I want to dig into exactly what came out of this transcript
because that's where it's going to get fun, at least for me.
So let's throw some stuff on here.
Why? Because they they actually
dropped my name into this this interview, which I didn't know
until yesterday. And then maybe some of you guys
knew this, but I didn't. It's all news to me.
So here we go. Here it is.
And I got to pull the actual thread up.
So Steve d'antwano was apparently asked if I remember
the picture of the kitchen timer.
I think it was 60 minutes. It was rudimentary at best.
And Massey says, are you aware that former agent Kyle Serafin,
that he talked with the technicians working in the
office and said that they were not viable, that they couldn't
have been exploded? And Mr. D'antuano says this,
we're directly quoting. So I've seen the report from Mr.
Seraphin. First of all, why in the hell
has he seen the report from me? We're going to talk about that.
I want to know too why is he calling it a report like you
like like you typed up a three O 2 and here's my report on the
pipe bomber. OK, I've seen the report from
Mr. Seraphin. I won't dash.
Dash, I'm not going to discount Kyle's view.
He doesn't know me. Why is he calling me Kyle?
That's his view from where he sits.
And the people he talked to. I don't know who he talked to.
All I know is that we at the Washington Field Office received
a report from the Laboratory Division.
Which are the bomb experts? I don't know what Kyle's
expertise in bomb making is that they were viable devices.
So that's the only thing that I can go by is what my lab said,
not what Kyle said. On his face, it's like, OK, that
makes sense. I can't go by what Kyle said.
I don't know his expert, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
But again, remember our our talk about the knowledge and
intricacies you start to learn the people you're friends with
inside your office. That's right.
Which could include an SAB T, which is a special agent bomb
technician, which could include the the WMD coordinator in your
office or whatever, or your past historical knowledge and
training and experience or the type of cases you've worked.
All of these things come into play here and again.
So yes, on its face, he says I can't go off of what Kyle says.
I got to go off what the lab says.
Let me let me let me add to that.
I hit up one of my friends that I used to work on the special
operations group with, and I said I remember being briefed by
somebody that the bombs were non operational.
It was an officer safety question.
What I asked was, is there any chance that these bombs are
legit? And if so, we have to be
cautious because it adds a certain layer.
If we have an active bomber, it's different than if somebody
put out some devices to scare people, a hoax device.
And so that is a fundamental officer safety question that I
wanted answered. Why?
Because I was a team leader for a surveillance team, which means
that I had anywhere between 6:00 and eight people on any given
day that worked surveillance cases with me.
And this was one of the cases that we did.
OK, that's part one. Part number two.
I reached out to one of my buddies and said, were we
briefed on that or did I find it out through other sources?
And you're right. I do know S A/B, TSI know
special agent bomb techs. I used to work as a medic for
the FBI. I was 1 of 52 special agent
paramedics. In the entire FBI, there's
14,000 agents, give or take. I was 1 of 52.
A handful of those are basically scattered around the 56 field
offices and a couple of them are at the headquarters division for
HRT. So I'm one of the few guys that
has medical experience that could actually deal with like an
explosive blast. Also, I trained in the military
for that sort of thing. So I would go down to the bomb
range, which is known as the Charlie demo range at Quantico
and I would go and just sit around and hang out.
Sometimes they'd go, hey doc, you want to push the button and
it's like, OK, sure, fire in the hole, fire in the hole, fire in
the hole, boom. And do some electric demo.
We do the final shot. I'm familiar with bombs because
I went through demo school when I was in the Air Force.
I went through demolition training.
I've got maybe, I don't know, 100 and change hours, close to
100 hours with a demo training, which is not a ton.
I'm no expert, but I've touched a lot more C4 than a guy who did
white collar crimes. I think we could agree on that.
Yeah, for sure. And it's, it's, it's far more
training and experience than the vast majority of people even in
the FBI, you know, like I didn't have any training even to the
level you did. It was mostly like hip pocket
training in the Army. What you know, from the guy who
went to the, to the dynamic breacher course or whatever,
where he's coming back to the platoon now and saying, OK,
here's the some of the cool stuff I learned.
And my favorite thing was always these, we call them like door
knockers. It was a Copenhagen can or, or
whatever you're true of choice was right after it's gone, you
leave the lid off. You put a little square C4 in
there, a little loop D of a deck cord.
And then you'd hang it on, on doors in Iraq or Afghanistan and
poof, you know, ball off the hinge or whatever you need to
do. But it's coming from like a guy.
Oh, yeah, again, actually, this is this is the big point I want
to make from an officer safety perspective.
Go watch the video. So now we know which Kyle
mentioned Steve Baker earlier. We know that the quote UN quote
passerby, the quote UN quote Good Samaritan because these are
the things we've been told for the last three years was
actually a plain clothes Capitol Police officer.
We just learned that like a week ago.
So and then all of the people in that vicinity are government
officials, most of whom are law enforcement officials.
Were any of them moving with any sort of urgency, any sort of,
oh, man, there's a bomb. There's a bomb like right here
in our vicinity? To me, that is one of the other
pieces that stands out the most. They did.
Not behave. They did not behave as any
reasonable person would with the idea that there was an actual
bomb, which we're going to break into in just a second.
What I threw on the screen just for for folks to see.
If you're watching on the Rumble channel, I highly encourage it.
Again, it's rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
If you're watching anywhere else, come join us there.
If you're seeing us on GOB Actual, there's a couple people
watching on your Twitter feed. So that's always fun I.
I stream to your Twitter feed. I hope you don't mind some of
you guys watching over on X etcetera on mine and you guys
can come over to rumble, like I said, and make sure you've given
us a thumbs up on the, on the the video here.
Look at this. This is whoops, sorry, I got to
go back to the browser piece. So standby.
Look at this folks. This is the the the tweet that I
put up. It's pinned as my tweet right
now because it's funny to me. This is just some of my demo
training notebook stuff. These are my equations that I
was working through when I was building bombs.
So the fun thing is he asked what is Kyle's expertise in
building bombs? There it is right there.
I don't know what Kyle's expertise in bomb making is.
It's not high. I'll just admit that right up
front. That would be foolish not to,
but it's higher than Steve d'antwanos.
I've used, you know, electric. I've done non electric.
That means either fuses or using an initiating device.
I've run wires, I've built bombs, I've built improvised
explosives. I've built flichette charges to
be able to, you know, to destroy ATV.
We had this huge wide screen TV, one of those big projector TV's,
you know, they're like 8 feet wide and they weigh like £700.
We set one of those things up. We built up like a drain pipe
and we had the back of it welded.
So there was stuff. We filled that full of C4 and
then we sent to like a million nails and what they call Flichet
round. So like that's just a bunch of
like small projectiles. We just shattered this damn
thing. We hit one of them with a, we
loaded the back of a, we lost Garrett for a second.
We loaded the, the back of a, what do you call it, a drainage
pipe or a what do you call it? That's not what it's called a
manhole cover. We did a manhole cover with,
filled the back of it with C4 and punched that into a pipe
that was the right size and shot it off like a cannonball.
So we did all kinds of fun stuff.
I cut steel charges, you know, the, it's not a ton of like real
special work, but I've done wraps of decor to taking down
trees, push charges, etcetera, etcetera.
I know far more about demolitions than I would say Mr.
D Antwano did. In fact, I actually do have some
video of him talking in his own words, which I do want to play.
And this is clearly going to go off the rails.
We're going to, I, I told you an hour, but it's going to go off
the, the one hour mark. I hope you guys don't mind.
For those of you who are watching, we're just going to
keep rolling. I love demolitions, and I told
somebody this one time, the reason I love Demo and the
reason why I think it's so interesting is because, Garrett,
I'm going to try to get you back here.
The reason that I love demo so much is because it's almost the
pure applied application of force.
It's the pure applied physics because you basically overcome
almost every single thing out there when it comes to like
basic friction and resistance and so on.
You have something that is that is operating at a force of like
22,000 feet per second, which is almost instantaneous.
You barely can even find that anywhere else.
So that's kind of what's going on.
It's the why I think it's so interesting.
Let's let's play a little bit of Steve d'antwano.
I want to get you guys a little taste of this, of what he said.
This is just a couple of days after January 6th.
I want you to know the man that we are talking about in his own
words, in his own voice, with his own face.
We might as well hear that. And let me get Garrett back on
the line here. Good afternoon.
I'm Stephen D'antwano, Assistant Director in charge of the
Washington Field Office of the FBI, and I'm here to provide a
quick update on the FBI's activities since the violence
and destruction at the Capitol last week.
The FBI is quite familiar with large scale, complex and fast
moving investigations. We are, we are up to the
challenge. As Director Ray says, the FBI
does not do easy. To be clear, the brutality the
American people watched with shock and disbelief on the 6th
would not be tolerated by the FBI.
The men and women of the FBI will leave no stone unturned in
this investigation. Since these events, the FBI has
worked hand in hand with the United States Attorney's Office
and our law enforcement partners here in DC and across the
country to arrest and charge multiple individuals who took
part in the destruction. In six days, we have opened over
160 case files. And that's just the tip of the
iceberg. The significance of this
investigation is not lost on us. This is a 24/7 full bore,
extensive operation into what happened that day.
We cannot do our job without the help of the American people.
Since our call for tips, videos and pictures, we have received
more than 100,000 pieces of digital media, which is
absolutely fantastic and we are scouring everyone for
investigative and intelligence leads.
We continue to ask for more. If you have information, contact
1800, call FBI or submit photos and videos to fbi.gov/US Capital
and that's Capital with an O. Yeah, that's AUS capital.
That's capital with an O for all of you idiots out there because
he doesn't think you guys understand how to spell things.
No big deal. So that's Steve Deantuano.
He was the a Dick, as we said earlier, the the guy in charge
of the entire Washington field office and he's the guy that's
up here talking about whether or not I know what I'm talking
about. What's very interesting to me is
this, and we lost Garrett for a few minutes.
His connection is shoddy. I don't know what's going on
there, but that's not surprising to us.
That's kind of how these things work for us.
Let's consider this. D Antuano was the top level guy.
As we said, he's not going to know all the things that are
going on in a field office, but he knows what Kyle Seraphin is
saying in media. Why?
Why is that? And this is not just a one time
action. Interestingly enough, later on,
unprovoked in this exact interview, OK, he brings up a
little bit more. And this to me was weird.
So what they were talking about is the Geo fence location
warrant. This is the why couldn't you do
a tower dump and find out who this this particular bomber was?
And the answer is actually fairly riveting.
What he said is we did a complete Geo fence.
We have complete data, but not complete because there's some
data that was corrupted by one of the the providers, not
purposely by them, Right? It was just an unusual
circumstance, huh? OK.
He says, you know, with our luck in this investigation, that's
probably the provider that had the bomber in it.
So he goes on and on and he said again, you were, you know, I
think you were looking. I, I would love to have, I would
love to have given you a brief. I would have loved to given you
a brief on this stuff. Right now, these are direct, you
know, translations. I really would have because I
think it's important that everyone understands before
people like Kyle Serafin and others that are not a case agent
have no knowledge of the case and have no knowledge of what
happened to that case. He also makes another
accusation, by the way. Now this is totally unforced
error on his part, right? He doesn't, no one asked him to
that there was an individual with a metro card.
My understanding that there was chased down, that there was a
lead that was chased down. But he says we didn't chase it
down. He has no clue what we did.
OK, you guys have just heard that.
So he just said we had he had no clue what we did.
First of all, I was working on that case.
Second of all, when you are working on a case like that, you
get a big briefing and you can ask any questions you want and
they go back to the case agent and find out, hey, was it a real
bomb? No, it wasn't.
Why do you care? Because we want to know if our
guys are going to get blown up while we're following this idiot
around. OK, that's a relevant thing for
what we call officer safe here. Again, why would that guy think
I don't know what's going on? I, I worked cases like this for
years and all we ever did was get all the information we could
find out. Let here's the last piece.
You ready? I'm putting it back on the on
the screen. He has no clue what we did.
Thomas Massie says, but you didn't have a lead on who
discovered the second bomb. You didn't see that in the
video. Here's the best part.
One second after saying I didn't know what was going on, he said,
I'm not aware of that, Sir. I'm just like, you know, as the
a Dick, like over over. I'm I'm I'm up here and everyone
else is doing it. So I was never working the case.
No shit. I don't know how else to say
this. Like no shit.
We know you weren't working the case.
You were the a Dick. You have no idea what was going
on. And how shameful is that for
you? You're out there.
And why in the world did they bring my name into that?
Why did you bring it up again? He's trying to debunk something
that makes me even more suspicious about it was I've
only said it one time that I recall.
I said it to to Darren Beatty and a private conversation.
And I'm fairly confident that I discussed it on Dan Bongino's
radio show one time. This was not widely discussed,
the metro card lead situation. But since he brought it up and
since it's in this this deposition, let's lean into that
just a little bit, shall we? The Metro card scenario was we
were given a name. My team was put on it.
I've reached out to those members of that team.
They have never gone back to this doorstep.
We were put outside of the door and said this is a potential
person of interest in the bomb. We said, how have you come to
who this person is? We want to know, are we on a
goose chase? Is this legit?
Are you just wasting our time? They wasted our time all the
time. I got put on so-called terrorist
cases sometimes that we would be doing work in the snow when the
entire field office was shut down and the government wasn't
working because it was too cold outside and there was snow on
the ground and we were out there watching some guy who supposedly
a terrorist, no problem. That's what I signed up for.
Unlike the DEI hires, I'm there. I'm there for it.
And you know what we'd find out after doing it for like 4 or
five days, sitting in the cold, no engine running, you know,
freezing your butt off, bundled up inside of a truck in the in
the snowy parking lot somewhere in Northern Virginia.
Keeping an eye on a door that you think has a terrorist in it
who used to be AUS translator in the military and apparently has
lots of training and war and probably has an AK and all this
other kind of stuff that they've kind of briefed up.
And then you find out, oops, sorry, wrong door.
So when you do it long enough, you start asking, what is the
credibility of the information? How many people have actually
vetted this info that you are putting me and my team out there
to watch this guy? And are we likely to get blown
up? Because look, we signed up for
for the danger end of it. That's why we have body armor.
That's how we have weapon systems.
We understand, but we can be a little bit more cautious if this
person is an active bomber. We were told explicitly and the
team was briefed. So not just me, but like
probably like a half dozen agents plus the supervisor all
got the brief, not real bombs. Looked very bomb like.
Those are the actual words that I remember.
Looked very bomb like. OK, fine.
Looked very bomb like. How did you come to this
information that we are going to be in front of this guy's door?
And the answer is pretty straightforward and it's also
pretty troubling. The answer was this.
There was a pipe bomber supposedly who dropped off a
bomb in front of the RNC. That's the pictures that we've
seen lots of, you know, the person in the hoodie.
In fact, I think I can throw it up here.
It's going to go audio dead for a second, folks.
But this is what it looked like. OK, That's the picture that we
all have seen of the so-called pipe bomber of whatever was
going on. That person was apparently
tracked, had a cell phone, etcetera, etcetera.
The cell phone dump was not fruitful for whatever reason.
We'll speculate another time. I don't know.
I just, I, we don't have the information so we can't do
anything with it. But we do know is supposedly
that person was tracked by a CCTV footage of which there are
many in the United States capital and which many of them
actually are owned by the federal government and they were
able to track that person to a Metro station.
That metro station had cameras as well.
That metro station camera picked up that person going through on
a time stamp through one of the turnstiles.
That turnstile had a card. The Metro card was apparently
tied back to the financial records of whoever bought that
card. All right, so that's person A,
the person A bought the Metro card.
The Metro card was used. It hadn't been used for a year.
This is like explicit stuff that we didn't ask for.
It hadn't been used in a year. It was a brand new car that had
never been used, but it was sitting dormant for a full year
and then used for the first time.
Right. Then that person goes through,
gets on the metro, gets off in Northern Virginia at a stop.
That stop, same exit ties it. Same person coming out with the
with the video Cam footage uses the same Metro card to get out
again. Person A is the person that
bought the metro card. No idea who the unknown subject
is that's coming through. When that person gets out and
got into a car, that car had a license plate.
That license plate also was the same person.
It was registered to person A. So the the most reasonable
person would say OK either person A bought the metro card
and picked up someone that they dropped off.
Girlfriend, friend, boyfriend, family member, take your pick.
It doesn't matter some relationship to person A or it
was person A and someone else was driving person A's car.
Those are the 2 possibilities. We sat outside the door of
person A and we did that for a couple of days and we didn't see
person A. But person A was a former
veteran, was a veteran of the United States military who had
honorably retired. Did we get you back here?
I can hear you, Garrett. Now there you are.
Give me one SEC. Let me refresh your your screen.
Person A was a veteran of the United States military and also,
most interestingly, I think, was working with A with a current
clearance and was also a government contractor at that
time. So what's that all about?
And I'm not sure why. There you are.
OK, so I can bring you back on the screen.
There you are. Hey, Garrett, welcome back.
How about that? More Internet issues here.
Does anybody find that curious? I was watching your your
Internet. It suddenly just went from like
full green bars to just dropping out.
So there you go. Anyway, we got you back on here.
So we're just talking about this person A, which is apparently
the person tied to the Metro card.
You and I have talked about this quite a bit.
We get put on that case and we're sitting there on the case
looking at this door, and then inexplicably, we are told, no,
get away from that door. Why don't you come on back to
the field office and read bullshit leads, which I'm going
to play a little clip of D Antwano talking about the
American people. It's either in this clip or the
next one, but we'll play some more of D Antwano's words.
You can see this, folks. This is again a Dix DD Antwano
who now works for KPMG who thinks that Kyle Serfin knows
nothing about bombs or the case that he knows nothing about
either apparently. By the way his his entire
testimony is full of, I don't know, I don't remember, no
information here. He is talking about it just like
5-6 days after I think this was on January 11th.
I want to stress that the FBI has a long memory and a broad
reach. Agents and our partners are on
the streets investigating leads not only here in the DC area,
but also across the country through the FBI's 56 field
offices. So even like I've said before,
so even if you've left DC, agents from our local field
offices will be knocking on your door if we find out that you are
part of the criminal activity at the Capitol.
But before we do this, this is your opportunity to come
forward, as several individuals who have were involved in
Wednesday's riots have done, to volunteer about their
participation. In the weeks leading up to the
January 6th rally. The FBI worked internally with
every FBI field office to ensure that we're looking for that.
We were looking for any intelligence that may have
developed about potential violence.
During the rally on January 6th, we developed some intelligence
that a number of individuals were planning to travel to the
DC area with intentions to cause violence.
We immediately shared that information and action was
taken, as demonstrated by the arrest of Enrique Tario by the
Metropolitan Police Department the night before the rally.
Other individuals were identified in other parts of the
country and the travel subsequently disrupted.
The FBI receives enormous amounts of information and
intelligence, and our job is to determine the credibility and
viability of it under the laws and policies that govern FBI
investigations. We have to separate the
aspirational from the intentional and determine which
of the individuals saying despicable things on the
Internet are just practicing keyboard bravado or they
actually have the intent to do harm.
In the latter, we work diligently to identify them and
prevent them from doing so. Yeah, good.
So he's going to do some thought crime right there.
Folks, if you're just joining us on rumble.com, we've seen you
here live, it's at rubble.com/kyle Serafin.
If you're watching us on X, great.
We appreciate the monthly supporters that have jumped in.
Dodge, I saw you and there was another that was earlier.
Thanks guys. If you want to hit the follow
button and you want to hit the subscribe, that actually goes
directly to us and it's supports what we're doing.
You guys notice, Does this guy feel like he's like a terrorist
type hostage? Does he look like he's operating
under duress? Garrett you ever seen anybody
read off a script so cleanly and so worried?
So that's the thing. He's reading off this script and
then in his testimony, he's saying I don't remember, which
as we know, the FBI loves to hold 1001 over your head.
Why doesn't Congress start doing that to these people who say, I
don't remember, I don't recall? Well, while he's reading his
script, he clearly has a memory and a recollection of what was
going on and what was happening. Oh, and guess what?
The Internet saved it for all of eternity because a few years
later, Kyle Seraphin could pull it up so we could hear his own
words and, you know, right there before us.
And not for nothing too, while he is getting his, you know,
banking Secrecy Act training and experience in the FBI, there are
countless people who are working on terrorism cases and you know,
other learning about bombs like you were talking about before.
And then here he is, you know, in charge and and like you said,
talking about thought crime and pre crime and arresting Enrico
Tario the day before any crime was committed by him.
It's like dude. And and then he mentions my
favorite part. He mentions all of the
intelligence that they gather so much.
And he verified something that I have been thinking for a long
time, but I could never remember for certain.
I've always, I've long thought that we got canvassed prior to
January 6th. You did.
We did. And he just said it right there.
We reached out across all the field offices to gather
intelligence about what was going to happen on January 6th.
Let me drill on that real quickly.
What they said was anybody that has a source that they are
currently working that is going to be traveling to the National
Capital Region on January 6th, we want to know about it.
They tried to like to pull that information and I'm remembering
that that went out. I've got weird memories for for
emails like that. I remember exactly what every
once in a while. So folks, you need to understand
this. And I'll just kind of give you
kind of the the brief on it. When you're working as an agent,
you're you're handling sources. You may be working other things
like I didn't handle sources when I worked surveillance.
That wasn't part of my gig. But what we did do is we always
got all the all FBI emails that said, Hey, all you agents, We're
really interested in fill in the blank.
Does anybody have a source that looks, you know, Muslim or looks
like they're like from Middle Eastern country that speaks
Arabic and has a familiar charity with Islam?
Like you would get that one, They'd say, oh, does anyone have
a source that like knows about construction and has, you know,
whatever it is? So they would give you these
sort of like what they would call canvases.
A canvas is just an e-mail out to everybody.
We are looking for a thing. It's an ask.
And when they started right before January 6th, we got that
ask that went Bureau wide. Does anybody have folks that are
traveling to the National Capital Region because they were
trying to assess who was coming, who was not, what kind of
visibility would have in source coverage?
And, and those are almost always incomplete.
By the way, would you agree? Like if you're a real agent, you
don't have time for that shit. Right, often times you like
maybe read the the headline and you're like probably not any
this this isn't relevant to me any you know, you can it, but
that's what I've long thought I was like.
I'm pretty sure we got this canvas before January 6th.
I do remember the one we got after where they said, Hey, if
you had ACHS confidential human source in the NCR national
Capital Region between, you know, I don't know, January 3rd
and January 10th or January 5th and January, whatever it was, I
do remember that one because I was like, Oh well, after January
6th happened and all that, that's when the big push
started. And it was almost immediate
where it was either headquarters or WFO sent that, that canvas
out. But I have a long thought.
Like I think we got canvassed before and I was pretty sure we
did. I've never really talked about
it cuz I didn't remember for certain.
But him speaking there and then now you saying you remember that
e-mail? Yep.
Which of course, of course, of course they did.
Of course we got canvas for that.
Right. And then the other thing that's
interesting, Clay Higgins has been going out there saying
there were as many as 200 or 300 FBI sources that were in the
crowd. And they don't know the exact
numbers. And I'm fairly confident that
they don't know the actual numbers in the crowd because,
one, it was an incomplete reporting, so they wouldn't want
to go on record and say the actual numbers.
And two, it was a huge number. There was a bunch of people that
were in there and everybody should think about a source
that's going out. Like, imagine if you have
penetrated a group. Let's say there's a group of
like, you know, 50 guys at the Knights of Columbus meeting and
one of them is an FBI source. You now have 49 people that are
subject to FBI scrutiny and you can actually move the needle
with those 49 guys, especially if that person is respected and
that person is be able to like has a position of trust.
That's the whole point of the source.
That's the what we've talked about with the terror factory.
That's the way that we've kind of built this up so people can
understand that when we discuss the FBI moving the ball, they
don't need half of the people to be FBI sources to do a Gretchen
Whitmer move. They just need one person that's
trusted that everybody likes and everybody wants to do the
bidding of, and nobody wants to let that person down.
You can have everybody be involved like you can move.
It's a force multiplier is the word I'm looking for.
It's a force multiplier when it comes to building these
terrorism cases. So 200 people in the crowd may
affect times 50 if the group is that size.
Imagine what that means for the number of people that are
actually, like working, not under the direct control
knowingly, but under the influence of the FBI.
And it could be a lot. And I don't think the FBI
planned or made January 6th happened, by the way.
I continue to think that's not the case.
Yeah, me too. I mean, I know a lot of people
think it was like the plan was hatched by the FBI, like a
Gretchen Whitmer fed napping hoax.
I don't think that that was the case.
I didn't see anything that was indicative of that.
What I do think is that there were dozens and dozens and
dozens, if not hundreds of CHS is there.
And now to think across not just the FBI but now ATFDEA.
They all have CIS too. DHS so.
And DHS doesn't have any of the rules, which is the really big
thing they got none of the damn rules that we have.
We operate under a dialogue in the attorney general guideline,
the AGG Dom. So there are things that have to
be done when you're in the in the DOJ that you don't have to
do if you're DHSDHS has a totally different rule book of
which I don't know anything about it.
So maybe I'll talk to Dan about it today when I'm on the radio
show. On top of all of that, every
single one of those CHS is have their own CHS confidential human
source. This is your your federal
source. All those people have their own
sort of interest and their own benefit that they're looking
for. Maybe they're patriotic, maybe
they're looking for money. Maybe they're trying to build
cases, maybe they're trying to do any of this stuff.
And the second thing is every single one of those field
offices, which we just talked about, the stats, they're all
looking to get that Gold Star to get that like, oh, we, you know,
we have a big investigation. We're going to bring these
people forward. So every single special agent in
charge, all 56 field offices have their own independent, you
know, horizontally aligned interests in moving
counterterrorism cases. So you don't need everybody to
be like, OK, here's what we're going to do.
What you need is something to happen and a bunch of people
seeing the same opportunity at the exact same time, which is
what I think I've always argued. It was probably a bunch of color
lined interest. It's the same as every other
government. You don't need government
conspiracy if everybody kind is on the same sheet of music.
You just hand the sheet of music and everybody plays and if they
can sync up pretty close, it sounds OK.
That's what we're talking about. We're talking about a massive
number of people that had a very vested interest financially in
their careers. And then also in sort of like
they think they're doing the right thing because they're
uncovering terrorisms because that's what you see.
They're they're a hammer looking for a nail.
Exactly. And this is like the whole point
you touched on it earlier, like the psyche of, you know, like
the the Knights of Columbus meeting.
You got one CHS, the other 49 people respect that person a
lot. The FBI and the DOJ, they will
try to, to simplify this and say, well, no, that person, they
were predisposed to that crime. That's why it's not entrapment.
But they leave out all these other important factors about
human beings, about, about our mental psyche, about our innate
desire to be liked and respected and our innate desire to please
others. And I know it's a, it's a
pendulum for for all of us as an individual.
We're all different to, you know, by degrees.
Some people are more people please than others.
But often times in these group settings, you don't want to let
the group down. And so when the person that
everybody likes who's actually the government informant starts
coming up with really bad ideas, everybody's like, yeah, yeah,
OK, well, well, sure, yeah, maybe maybe we will do that
because you don't want to let you.
Don't want to let down your friend, That's the thing.
And, and, and a lot of these folks, they're targeted
specifically because they're low information, low IQ, low
finances, whatever it may be, like they're in a position of
desperation where they are susceptible to be influenced
into these operations. And that's what we found by
reading stuff like Trevor Aronson's Terror Factory.
That's what we've seen with the number of these cases.
The Newburgh, which the Newburgh 4, which I talked about the
other day, these guys were like down and out destitute,
financially bankrupt. And what do they need?
They need a friend and they need money.
And the FBI is willing to be both of those things.
And that happens for January 6th, 2.
Think about the way that things felt at the end of 2020.
People were furious. There was this instinct that
something had gone horribly wrong.
And I'm sure that we all feel that, but we don't have the
proof behind it in so much as the FBI has never adjudicated it
positively in court because they chose not to.
That's the the scary part of it. That's the other piece.
But on top of all that, everybody there is feeling this
way. And then it's like, well, they
just need a nudge. That's what your CHS job is your
job. They don't even have to plan
everything. They're like, hey, what if we
went to the Capitol and just like, kick down the doors and
people are like, good idea, Bob. Yeah.
And oh, maybe if that's your legal, maybe we should bring a
gun or two just in case, you know?
And there, there you got another crime right there.
And it's like and then that's. Just and the CHS is doing this,
they're like, oh, payday payday, payday, payday.
Because CT cases pay big time. You What's the biggest CT case
pay off you've ever heard of? I want to say it was around 200
Ki want to say it was that and it was one, it was a, it was a
case in Kansas that I it's, it's a public case.
I learned of it shortly after I got there.
It was, it was getting wrapped up like sentencing was coming.
I went to the sentencing hearing for my probation manual.
I forget what's it called, new agent handbook.
But yeah, I want to say that guy got paid 6 figures for that if I
remember correctly. I could be wrong.
It's not out of line. Yeah, I think the most I've ever
heard of anyone being paid was like $250,000.
But but CI and CT sources, your national security sources, they
can make big money anywhere from like mid 5 figures all the way
up to the, you know, low 6. And it's all paid in cash and
it's all deniable. It's all handed over sometimes
in a briefcase, sometimes in an envelope.
This is not a check from the US government.
This is like, like cold hard cash.
Count it all out, give it over to them.
You sign it. I sign it.
Your name is, you know what your name is Dothraki.
So you sign Dothraki. And now the FBI has paid
Dothraki $250,000. And Dothraki is not actually
good Dothraki. It's actually Gerardo Boyle.
It's it's GOB actual. And so, whoever the hell that
is, they don't go after anybody. Think of some of those.
The so CHS would know this because often times a case agent
or a handling agent will will say, yeah, you know, they're
one, They're going to pay you along the way.
If you're working on a case like an active case, you're going to
get paid along the way. Which we saw in the the Whitmer
thing, I think it was 50 or $75,000 for that.
And that was like a crap OP. And that's a lot.
That's a lot. Like that's more than, yeah,
that's a lot. But so, yeah, you're getting
paid along the way. And then because, yeah, often
times in the write up, you're saying, oh, this person wants to
do the right thing. This is why I want to open them
as a source. But in reality, they do just
want a payday. They may not tell you that.
They may not come up blatantly and tell you that.
And then as an agent, you're going to you're going to write
it in in a fashion that is indicative of like, yeah, maybe
this guy needs some money, but he also just wants to do the
right thing. So let's have him as a source.
He's got this information that he already brought to us even
before he was open as ACHS. And then the FBI is hard up for
numbers because it's a, it's a policy that every agent has at
least one CHS. And so they just want it's, it's
part of their Intel op. They just want Intel.
So they mandate that you have at least one source, and then most
people that I knew had at least one, especially if you're
actively working cases. And then an agent is going to
say, hey, we're working this case, we're almost there.
Just keep going. Just keep going.
And at the end of the day,
you're going to get an even bigger payday than I already
did. And then now let's put it in the
context of January 6th. OK, so you got Achs and you're
working DT and they're part of a militia in Kansas or, you know,
wherever. And they say, hey, yeah, my
group, you know, we got together a couple weeks ago and yeah,
we're all kind of bummed out that Donald Trump lost, but
we're going to we're going to go.
We we're talking about going to the capital and then you as the
agent say that's a great. Idea.
I'd love to pay. I will pay.
That's it. I will pay you to go.
I will cover your your expenses. I will basically give you a per
diem and hey, you know what? I'll throw in a 2 grand on top
of it just just because you're going to bring me information
when you come back. Quick example of that happening
in that, not that setting. I had a buddy that recruited a
source and he was working on outlaw motorcycle gangs and so
on. And so they were like, oh, you
know, do you want to go to Sturgis?
Because that's a good place to go see what's going on with
outlaw biker gangs. And he was like, yeah, but, you
know, like, I don't have a bike. And they bought him a bike, a
cheap one, but like one that was appropriate for a station 4 or
5000 bucks and gave him walking around money.
And they sent him in there to go report on what was going on at
Sturgis with these outlaw motorcycle gangs.
This is standard practice. And of course, he kept the bike.
The bike's all written off, you know, like nobody knows about
it. The the cash is his to do
whether he spends it or not or whether he steals things.
So we're talking about big time money potentially.
I mean, 4 or $5000, that was a criminal case.
That's why it was low. You know, 5000 bucks for a bike
is what they can afford for criminal because who gives a
shit. But we're talking about real
big, you know, national security priorities where the big where
the big pieces. And then the other thing is, is
all those those folks, do you know that there is actually a
metric that says how fast you address leads in your office?
I didn't know that, but of course, of course there's.
I mean, that makes complete sense to me.
So folks, we talked about a lead earlier.
I'm about to drop something on you guys.
It's going to change your mind about some things.
Number one, the way that you handle leads, the speed at which
you handle leads. Bookmark this spot here.
So what are we in? We are at about 75 minutes in.
The way that you handle or the speed that you handle your leads
will affect the way that your bonus structure works.
If you're a senior executive, like someone, I don't know, like
the a Dick in charge of Washington Field Office.
OK. When I was sitting on front of
that door watching for the potential pipe bomber with the
Metro card connection, which by the way, that is a slam effing
dunk when it comes to how close you can get to somebody and how
good the Intel is on that. As I've said, I've regularly
been on cases where they were like, this is a person.
We think they might be of interest.
We saw them coming out of this door.
Here's a 10 year old driver license photo.
They drive a white car with four doors and they live on the
street. They're they, you know, they're,
they're couch surfing or they're, they're like a not on
the lease and you go got it. And then you choke off that
area. Choking off is putting people on
every single exit. And we watch and we would find
those people. I would say 9 times out of 10 is
a light number. It might be more than that.
We would regularly find people with no information.
We had no business finding them because we either are lucky or
good, probably a little bit of both.
And we always found them. We got pulled off the door of
this slam dunk connection. That was very interesting.
And Steve d'antwano doesn't know all the details on he doesn't
know why. How come he doesn't say, Oh
yeah, we ran that guy down and he was actually clean because he
doesn't know and he's just doesn't want to make that.
He probably wasn't even briefed on this.
Let me drop this on you about why we got pulled off that door.
And now my opinion I've I've changed my opinion about why.
I used to think it was about something more nefarious.
It's never nefarious. It's always stupidity.
Check this out. As offensive as a statement can
be, the FBI cannot open an investigation without a threat
of violence or alleged criminal activity.
However, when that language does turn to a call of violence or
criminal activity, the FBI is able to undertake investigative
active action. And in this case, we had no
indication information was linked to any specific person,
but this is a matter of an online discussion.
This information was immediately disseminated through a written
product and briefed through our command post operations to all
levels of law enforcement. Part and parcel of our
investigation into violent actors is the fact that we
continue to gather intelligence that will aid in our ability to
disrupt possible future violent activity.
Suffice is to say, we are leveraging our relationships
with federal, state and local law enforcement partners, using
our tools at our disposal to find and bring everyone involved
in last week's criminal activity to justice.
They got over 100,000 leads sent in.
They got 100,000 leads in the first week y'all.
And we got pulled off because they needed to address those
leads and it was an all hands on deck.
Every single person needed to address the leads because a slow
addressing of the leads equals a red or a yellow.
Not good enough metric on the, what they call the was IPM, the
integrated Program management system and the threat response
matrix. OK.
All of those things needed to be addressed lest Steve Deantuano
lose his bonus. And the bonuses are like 30 to
$50,000 a year. It's like a big chunk of their,
their compensation. Otherwise they don't make much
more than somebody who's just a special agent in charge or
someone who's just AGS 15. You know, they probably are in
the like the $200,000 range, like 202 O 5, something like
that. So this is a big deal that's,
you know, it's 20% of your of your overall pay up to 20%, up
to 25%. That's why these guys are so
incentivized to handle leads and they got a Black Swan event
where 100,000 leads came in a week.
And Matt Taibbi has reported over 500,000 leads came in
through the system of E Guardian, which we touched on
earlier. All of those things incentivized
this guy, I believe to pull us off what would have been
otherwise a decent lead. And I mentioned earlier,
military contractor, active clearance, retired Chief Master
Sergeant of the Air Force was the person that was in there.
So high level guy turned out he also had dark colored skin, for
whatever that's worth. I don't know what it means.
I don't know. And I'm not, I'm not accusing
anybody of anything specific. I just know that we were briefed
specifically on all those those factors.
And why did that not get rundown aggressively?
Why did they not say this is a person of interest?
Why did they not let me just go talk to the guy?
Because I was like, look, I may not be the case agent on this,
but I'm a lot less of a retard than most of you all.
Which Garrett would you agree is that?
Is that true? Yes, that's a, that's a
charitable statement even to our most of our former colleagues, I
would say like. There's a lot of retards.
I was often times shocked at just the inability to to, to, to
talk to people, to to question them, even just at the door.
Just be a regular dude I like and I make this, this joke all
the time, so you'll appreciate it as well.
But like, look, you knock on the door.
It's like, hello, how are you doing?
And the person says, hey, you know, I'm, I'm Nick.
I'm I'm from the FBI and I would always role play with these
people and I'd say, hi, Nick, what can I do for you?
And they would go, well, you know, your name came across my
desk, right? Did you ever hear that at the
Academy? Your name came across my desk.
I don't know where they teach this thing.
Yeah, I don't like do they do they get it from like some some
old timey FBI movie where like you actually do get a name to
your desk. The clerk brings it and says
here's your lead because. Because the lead your.
Name is not coming across the desk.
Right. So I would always joke with them
and I would always catch them up.
I would say, listen, when you say that my name came across
your desk, do you have like a conveyor belt of names and you
just pick one? Or is it like a ticker like on
Wall Street that just runs across and you just decide which
one is your like? How do you know that my name is
the one that's supposed to go across your desk?
And what are you supposed to do with it?
How does it come across your desk?
And the guy's just like, can we, can we time out, Serafin?
Yeah, we can time out. Why?
32nd time out or full? I don't know the answer to this
question because you. Know how I would respond to
that? Because we're hiring social
retards that look good on paper, but in in reality, the FBI is
actually not even supposed to look at the interview for like
personability and the ability to connect with another human
being. They're supposed to actually
just ignore all that and just take your words at their face
value so that they don't make it about personality because God
forbid you have people with a personality that are capable of
going in like, you know, inspiring trust in the
citizenship that they're out there trying to protect
theoretically. So this is the real problem.
And anyway, I, I was like, let me go bump the guy.
A bump for you who don't know, it's an unofficial move where
you just tap somebody and you go, you go, hey, I, I bump
people. I used to do it for fun when we
were on surveillance. Like whether they said we could
do it or not, I would just go size up our, our, our subjects.
So I bumped a guy in Albuquerque one time and I'm talking to him.
He's in an ammo, he's in a sporting goods store looking at
an ammo. And I'm like, what kind of bump?
Literally bumped into him. Huge guy.
And I bump into him and I'm like, I'm like, what's up, man?
And he was like, oh, I was like, I was like, you looking for 556?
And he was like, yeah, I'm not sure if I can use 223, you know,
in my 556. And I'm like, yeah, you can use
223 and the 556. You don't want to use the five
5-6 and two 2-3. It's a chamber pressure issue.
And he's like, oh, thanks, man. So you would just like bump into
him and have that quick little conversation.
And then you get a little idea. He's like, OK, well, he's, he's
talking about his weapon. That confirms some of the stuff
we know about the weapon he bought.
You know, we know the caliber now that's confirmed based on
the paperwork. That's all really good stuff.
And then you just see how they are.
And I'm like, you know, you know, you, are you buying small?
Are you buying bulk, man? And he's like, oh dude, I'm.
Looking for bulk. I'm trying to find, you know,
they only have boxes of 150 and you're like, yeah, that's just a
training box, man. That's one range session.
He was like, right, yeah, you know, just regular dude stuff
that you do because you're not scared of human beings.
I asked to go do this to this, to this Air Force guy because I
was in the Air Force short time, whatever, four years, but I
wanted to go talk to him. I at least have that connection.
All I need is a touch point and we can have a conversation.
It's like, look, bro, I'm from the FBI.
I want to talk to you about something.
You're a person of interest in an ongoing case and and I think
you want to talk to me. And, and look, I always give
people the choice. It's like, you can tell me to F
off and I won't take it personally too.
And they wouldn't let me go do it for obvious reasons, because
they don't know who's out in the field and they don't know
anything about anybody. Like they never trust anybody in
the the counterterrorism guys. Like they hate talking to their
subject because then they would know that we're investigating
them. It's like, good we're in
America, assholes. I'm a secret agent.
Yeah, this is the thing too. They tell you all the time,
we're hiring you for your character, we're hiring you for
your integrity, we're hiring you for your experience.
And then you get there and it's like, no, they don't actually
care about any of that. And then I want to know a lot of
our former colleagues and, and look, it's not, it's not all,
but it's, it is a lot. And like, coming from my
background, especially when I think of like my time as a
police officer, I'm like, Oh, no wonder the FBI gets the rap that
it gets among local departments and, and, and state.
They're a bunch of nerds. Yeah, it was my, it was my
always statement whenever I was dealing with locals.
They'd be like, I'd be like, oh, you're not what I expected when
the feds showed up and I'd go, yeah, because a bunch of nerds.
And then everybody would laugh except the one fed who was there
who's my partner and they always their shoes and be like, I don't
want to be a nerd. Like, yeah, I would, I would.
I don't know how I've, I don't know how many times I said I, I
would lead with Special Agent Boyle with the FBII used to be a
cop, you know, like, or even on the phone, if I was calling, it
was always, I was always doing that because I was like, I know
it's going to hopefully help them realize like, hey, we're
not. Because you never know what
you're going to get. You're going to get that nerd
who doesn't know what he's doing and shouldn't be working the
case, who doesn't know how to talk to anybody, right?
Or you're going to get someone who does who doesn't know what
they're. Doing I called a lady one time
and I'm and my, and my statement was as follows.
I called her up and said, hey, I'm, I'm Special Agent Kyle
Seraphin. I'm calling you from the FBI.
If you'll give me 60 seconds, I'd like to make a case to you.
And if you're interested, talk to me.
And if not, you can just hang up.
And I, I won't take it personally.
And she was like, go ahead. And then I told her I was like,
here's what's going on. I watched this interview that
you did, you know, with a police officer.
If I were you, I would also be concerned.
I want to try to allay your fears and share some information
with you. I'm here to to try to make this
better. And then you might have some
information that could help me. Are you willing to talk to me?
She was like, yeah, go ahead. I'm like, OK, great.
Thank you. Appreciate it.
I was like, I want to. I want to tape the interview.
Are you OK with that? I don't want to get any facts
wrong. And I'll send you a copy of it
if you want. That'd be great.
Putting on my recorder. Beep.
Let's do it. I that's how I roll.
It's, it's strict transparency and you don't have to talk to
me. But like, that's because I'm not
a weirdo. It works.
It works so much better than let me go to my SSA and try to get
approval for like what's it called when you.
Recording. Yeah.
And it's like just go, just go talk to the person.
The vast, vast majority of the time, that's that's all you're
going to need to do. It's so dumb.
I'm going to throw this back up on the screen here.
I think this is the right one. Guys, one more time I'm just
going to tell you, Steve Deantuano, he doesn't want any
conspiracies, right? Right in the middle of the page
we're we're quoting here. I don't want any conspiracies,
right? To my knowledge, it wasn't
corrupted, you know, but that could have been good information
that we don't have right now. He's talking about the the data
dump. They don't want any
conspiracies. So maybe there are no
conspiracies. It's just stupid people doing
crappy work. George Hill dropped something on
the other day that the police officer that was killed after,
after the Boston Marathon bombing, the the, the guy who
was on the, the college campus, he was killed because the FBI
did a data dump and they got the azimuth wrong.
They did 180° of what it should have been.
So rather than picking up the people that would have been in
the area, they picked up the people behind it and set them
back 12 hours. That was cast going back to
like, you know, 2013 cast is actually really good right now.
I knew guys that were cast. They were super professional.
In fact, one of them, one of the national resources and assets
forecast, which is the cellular analysis survey team, if my
memory serves. But they basically are the cell
phone exploiting team. They one of them was in my
office and he was a super squared away guy.
I mean, really cared about his trade, was always going to
different trainings, you know, had all the tools on his desk,
was like a total, you know, gear nerd in that way.
Had to sell Bright, had all the different charges, always was
working cases, busted his ass, super functional.
And so the idea that they would have just dicked up the single
most important terroristic event of the day makes zero sense to
anybody. And also the fact that Steve
Deantuano was paying attention to Kyle Seraphin's interviews
and talking to Dan Bongino on the Radio One time and not what
his own case agents were doing is wildly weird.
It makes me think that everything he said was probably
a lie. I don't trust that guy for what
I can throw him at. And you just saw him.
He just read right off the page like someone else wrote that
statement for him. He didn't write that.
Yep, yeah, that, that's for sure.
It's like, oh, this guy did not write this.
Somebody wrote this. This is cannon fodder that they
shoved down his mouth and said go read this verbatim, nothing
else. Do what you're told.
And he did. And now he's, you know,
underwhelmingly performing at his new position in the in the
in the free world, which he probably landed at because of
the other connections from the FBI.
But it is bizarre. Think of all of the things, and
we probably haven't even touched on every single one yet
regarding this January 6 pipe bomb.
I just lose you up. Garrett just crapped out on his
connection, so we'll get him back on here.
No big deal, folks. I do want to actually get
closer. Are you coming, Gary?
Are you coming back to me? I'm back.
I was.
I don't know. I was in the middle of saying
something. Yeah, you were.
And you know what's even weirder is that I'll bring you up on
here, but you might disappear on me.
Your connection now looks red again, so.
You've lost. I don't know what's going on.
Yeah, you're getting cheated out of your signal.
Somebody has decided they didn't like what you're about to say.
That's how it goes anyway. Carry on.
But yeah, he's underwhelmingly performing.
He's not bringing in clients. He got that job because he was
finding a soft landing. For sure.
And now it's been three years plus that there's no
information. You know, think of how eager the
FBI was to elicit help to find Granny behind the velvet rope,
when this should be the. I knew it.
I knew that was going to go away, all right?
It should be 100%. It should be the 100% focus of
the FBI squads that deal with counterterrorism in the
Washington field office. Theoretically, we have someone
who is a bomber that dropped indiscriminate bombs.
Why did they stop after two bombs, by the way?
Why did they know on that day that they were only two bombs?
There was 1. There was another name me
another bomber that has thrown one bomb out.
Look at the Unabomber did it for years.
Look at the guy in Austin was sending bombs at an increasing
rate. You know, he was sending out
like bomb, bomb, bomb. And then it was like 2 a day and
they were blowing stuff up until he actually blew himself up
because they closed in on him. Because that's how you find
things. You you assume that somebody
that is going to bomb one place will bomb another.
Whatever they say when you're a police officer, you're in law
enforcement. They say if you ever find a gun,
look for the second gun because 2 is 11 is none.
Classic military mentality. If you're going to look for
something, go find the other one.
You should do an exhaustive search.
Did they sweep the entire city looking for bombs?
All the political places? I don't think so.
I think they stopped at 2. In fact, they really stopped at
one. There was one bomb that was left
outside of the RNC. They set up a cordon and a
protected area. And then they stopped doing that
because the second time when it was outside of the DNC where
Kamala Harris was in the building.
Y'all Kamala Harris is in the building and what do they do?
They just moved on. They didn't even stop children
from crossing the street. They had a cop who's apparently
he was an off duty police officer from Capitol Police, saw
a bomb, went and reported it and went back and took a flipping
picture of it with his cell phone instead of like running
for cover and hoping to get a bomb suit on.
That does not make sense to anybody.
All of this stuff is crazy. Dan Bongino was called it Plan
B. The question is what was plan A?
Plan A might have been the first freaking bomb.
The first bomb was basically discovered right at a time just
before the capital of, you know, barricades were breached.
What if that was the diversion to pull people away and Plan B
was actually just uncovered too soon?
Maybe that Capitol Police officer screwed up Plan B, which
could have been, you know, in case they don't go into the
capital, then we can always, you know, go and flip out about
Kamala Harris. It is what it is unknown.
I'm going to be talking about it with Dan later today.
If you guys want to check it out, it's going to be on the
radio show that's at two O 5 Eastern Time.
You guys could totally go there. If you're tuning in just now,
definitely watch the previous stuff.
We lost Gerardo Boyle again. He's had a solid connection
until right up in the time when he starts talking solo.
So who knows what it is. Carrot's in the chat right now
and he's giving you the WTFI. Don't know what it means.
It doesn't matter. We're coming up in the end here
anyhow, So let me go and do one more story.
I promise this in the show notes and I do want at least cover
down on it. And this is something, another
piece the FBI overstepped to ban when the 9th Circuit, when the
9th Circuit tells you something's wrong, something's
probably wrong. This is the 9th Circuit appeals
court. They are handling this, this
case that has been going on in the safety deposit boxes.
Some of you guys may know what we're talking about here.
The FBI overstepped its constitutional authority when
agents searched hundreds of safety deposit boxes without
warrants. This is reporting coming from
Sean Musgrave. It's coming from the Intercept.
You know, I like going to the Intercept because they're a
little bit on the political left, at least the very minimum
says the 9th Circuit compared the searches to the abuse of
power that led to the adoption of the 4th Amendment in the 1st
place. Yes, because the issue is the
government is supposed to only search things on probable cause
that there may have been a federal crime committed.
That's the only way that the the federal government supposed to
go. In March of 21, the FBI raided a
private place, a private business known as US Private
Vaults, a safe deposit company in Beverly Hills, CA.
The The company marketed its services as being anonymous and
discreet and full of privacy, which apparently, according to
this article, appealed to gambling rings and drug
operations, but also to people who just didn't want a safety
deposit box somewhere else and they just wanted to anonymize
it, as is their right. As Americans, you do have a
fundamental right to not have anybody get into your damn
business. The FBI sees millions of dollars
in cash from the safety deposit, plus a mixture of jewelry,
personal effects and documents such as wills and prenuptial
agreements did not give them back.
The court ruled. The FBI search flagrantly
violated the 4th Amendment rights, and in October 22, the
trial judge ruled that there was number 4th Amendment violation.
This is a big problem. The 9th Circuit of Appeals just
unanimously reversed a unanimous appeal on the 9th Circuit says
that the lower court's decision was wrong.
The court ruled that the FBI exceeded the bounds of the
warrant obtained prior to the search warrant, which explicitly
did not authorize the criminal search or seizure of any boxes.
The real problem is, and this is the best quote from it, if there
was any remaining doubt regarding whether or not the
government conducted a quote of, quote, criminal search or
seizure, that is put to rest. Or that that doubt is put to
rest by the fact that the government has already used some
of the information from inside those boxes to attain additional
warrants to further its investigation and begin nuance.
What does that mean to you guys? What it means is, is that we're
talking about a federal government that has absolutely
no problem stomping on the Constitution and particularly
the FBI, sort of the attack dog of the situation.
The FBI went in, they opened up based on what they believed was
probable cause. Initially, they only had access
to a couple boxes. They opened all the boxes and
when they open those boxes, they turned around and said, well,
now that we're here, we might as well run some additional
criminal cases. That's not OK.
That is the opposite of what our Constitution says.
That is fruit of the poisonous tree.
Those people need their stuff back.
There are like people who lost their life savings in their
cash, which you're allowed to have in this country.
You would think your personal property is not the business of
the federal government unless it becomes the federal government's
business, and it was not. It was not in this case.
It's atrocious. And the people who went along
with it, they should be ashamed of themselves.
They should become whistleblowers as well.
They can reach us anonymously. So you can go to
kyleseraphin.com. You can just e-mail me from
there. Do it from a library computer.
I don't care. Come out here and tell us what's
going on. We know some of the stuff.
There's a lot more going on. We know that there's more
information. If you're a bomb tech and you
want to push this out there, go ahead, jump on kyleseraphin.com.
Contact me. It goes right to me.
You guys can e-mail me right there.
It looks like a chat feature. OK, You can, you can access it
from any public computer. You can give me a way to get
back to a ProtonMail or whatever you want, whatever feels good.
Or you can just drop things anonymously and I'll run it
against my sources. Let's start pushing back against
this evil. We are starting this off with
William Travis. We are in the Alamo.
But the upside is, is the Alamo, even though they, they, they did
not get the victory, they got the death part of that of that
chair. They ended up getting something
more important, which is that they had the battle of San
Jacinto and they were able to finally win it all.
The Texas Revolution was successful, but there were some
losses and some of us lost our our careers.
No big deal, that's fine. If that's the Alamo, let's let's
go on and win the the major battles.
Let's go on and win the war against this.
I think there's a lot of Points of Light.
I think this stuff is undermining government narrative
and there's a lot of evil that is going to be exposed.
This year is going to be lit. You guys are going to want to
make sure you're watching the blaze a little bit later on
today with my buddy Steve Baker. You got to get that done.
Make sure you are watching his Twitter account, which is going
to be doing it, but it's TPC for USA.
He's dropping bombs on these people, figuratively speaking,
because we're talking about literal bombs that apparently
were viable according to the FBI, but we know that they were
not because watch this afternoon.
I'm fairly confident we're going to start seeing some of the
proof of that. These things were BS to begin.
Which means either he didn't know or he was lying.
Steve D'antwano, the aid take in charge of Washington Field
office. I'd like to see some of these
guys held accountable for some of their their misdeeds and
their misstatements to Congress. Congress needs to grow a set of
balls and then you start prosecuting people that lied to
them because there's some serious problems with the candor
Underoath. And anybody who's done this
should be disqualified from their security clearance based
on their lifestyle choices and based on their personal
integrity, which is what we just heard they are getting awfully
LAX about over at the FBI Academy.
By the way, I did have somebody who works down in a position to
know about the FBI Academy said they have the record smallest,
the record smallest classes that they've ever had and they are
incompetent to boot. So now we are getting 50% of the
size of the classes that I went through with there, about 200
agents and analysts going through when I went through in
2016. We are now catching like less
than 100 or around 100, which is a really precipitous drop.
And Chris Ray, if you guys remember, Chris Ray said we have
record numbers. Did he say low record numbers?
I wonder if that's what he meant.
Wouldn't it be interesting to find out if he said that they
had record numbers at the Academy, but they just meant
shitty record numbers, like the lowest numbers they've ever had
for this? That would be a real interesting
spin on it, wouldn't it? In any case, record numbers.
These guys always play games with words.
The word viability about the bomb, I guarantee they're
playing with that. We'll talk about it more on Dan
Bongino's show. I look forward to it.
All of you that have been watching, if you give us a
thumbs up, we really appreciate that.
Make sure that you've hit the like button here on Rumble.
Really grateful for all the folks that have joined us for
the live chat. It's really fun.
I appreciate you guys. I've been watching some of it.
I'll go back and read and I'll stick around in the live chat
after we shut down the stream. Let's do a couple of quick thank
yous out there once again, Garrett, Oh, Boyle, my buddy,
he's got kicked off the stream, but there it is.
Go to the merch store. It's the dash suspendables.com
again, the don't forget the dash suspendables.com suspendables
with an S on the end of it. You guys can check out the
merch. You can check out the shirts
that we're wearing. Garrett was wearing a different
1. He was wearing the power shirt,
which is on the top. Let's see top right hand side.
He was wearing it in red. Good looking shirt.
It's got some biblical verses on there.
We are working on some beanies and stuff like that.
It looks like some of the stuff is even sold out by the Ranger
panties. If you guys are looking for
freedom, if you're a man and you've never worn Ranger
panties, check those out. You'll love it.
They are my favorite. I wear them every single day.
I wear Ranger panties every single day since 2009 for
whatever that's worth. Now you guys can't unknown that
Sky's out, thighs out is the cheer when you put them on and
you will also feel that sense of freedom.
Lastly, let's go ahead and wrap it up with a 5 star review
coming in from Apple. This is a good one for today.
It says if this is Willemina, that's a cool name.
Willemina coming in from January 10th.
We'd be friends. Every time I listen to the show,
I find myself asking why don't listen more often.
It's very high quality. I think we'd be friends with
Kyle and his wife if they lived in our hometown and went to our
parish. Yep, the odds are yes.
You know why? Because if you go meet your
neighbors, you'll find out that most people are people.
That is the cheer of the show. It may actually become one of
our little hashtags. Make people people again.
Every single person, whether they think that there are
enemies out there that are lurking in America, what they
realize is that we have a good neighborhood.
Our neighbors are good people. That's because all the people
are pretty much like that. There's a very fringe minority
of people that are willing to do to evil.
Mostly they're decent and if you got to know him you could
probably talk him out of doing some of this evil shit that they
are involved in, you know most. People are far right extremists.
Is my man back? You want to say goodbye to
everybody? Oh, you didn't even show back
up. Hold on a second here, Garrett.
Let's see if I can refresh you. What I.
Don't even need to show me, I can say goodbye just like from
the ether. That's funny.
It's all, it's all bizarre that this all went down like, like if
you keep disappearing on me. And it totally was my Internet.
Like I, I don't know what the problem is.
I'll probably get cut off again, but not not really sure we're
not having bad weather today, but but yeah, no thanks for
having me. Sorry for my my lackadaisical
Internet connection. Or maybe we're getting messed
with like we were with the AT&T van a while back.
I got skills, man, I can do this while we're just talking.
I mean, I am, I am curious about all of these Internet issues I
seem to have almost, at least lately, almost every time I come
on with you. It's, it's very bizarre.
But hey, the process is the punishment.
So even my brain starts to wander a little bit here.
But no, thanks for having me. I saw you plug the store.
I I appreciate it. And I know you plugged it
yesterday with Owen Shroyer, so it's cool.
I've been, I woke up this morning and they were like 8
orders and yesterday, just yesterday, I was all caught up.
I was telling Heidi, my wife, hey, I'm all caught up.
I got everything caught up, but it's picking back up again.
So we appreciate it. It keeps me busy.
But yeah, it was a, it was a good chat today.
I, I love talking this stuff and, and just hopefully bringing
awareness to some of the inner workings of how things were done
in the FBI when we were there and just some of the shadiness
that continues to happen and what we see.
It sure does folks from me and from GOB actual thanks so much
for watching the Kyle Sarah show.
We look forward to seeing you again tomorrow for friendly
Friday. We'll bring bring Steve on in
the same way. We'll see if he get some
Internet issues. That'll be fun.
I can see that Garrett is actually in the yellow, so he's
probably going to drop out of send a let's let's shut it down.
But thanks so much for joining us.
God bless you. Be safe out there and go meet
your neighbors. You can do this.
We can, we can make America, America.
We can make people people again. Let's do it.
We'll see you again tomorrow. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin Show streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True
Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.