Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot prepared to embrace the uncomfortable truth.
Because this program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties enthusiasts, Second Amendment
defender and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphim.
Hello, my friends, and welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Wednesday, June the 21st.
It is just a couple minutes after 8:30 in Texas, America.
We had a little technical glitch.
Sometimes rumble gives us a challenge.
There was no audio coming through.
So thanks so much for sticking with us, folks.
I'm going to go ahead and tell the people in the live chat
refresh if you have not already, and then you'll get us here.
Folks. We're going to be talking about
Calvin Ball today. Calvin Ball is from the famous
Calvin and Hobbes cartoon. It was a comic strip and it has
to do with when things get boring in life.
I guess you can just change the rules and you make a game that
doesn't make sense based on the last game.
We're going to talk about all of that.
First, I want to get a quick thank you into our sponsors.
Let's start off right now with Catholic Vote.
Folks, you are aware Catholic Vote is an organization.
They are America's top Catholic advocacy organization and they
are in the fight for faith, family, and freedom.
Coincidentally, I found out that Faith, Family, and Freedom are
the same exact mottos that that uphold the little town that I
live in, Liberty Hill, TX outside of Austin, TX.
So it's kind of coincidental and fortuitous.
These folks are doing something great with the Loop.
You can go ahead and sign up for their e-mail and that will get
you a morning sort of update on what's going on in this country.
I actually looked at it doing my show prep today and they have a
lot of the same exact stuff that I am talking about in there.
They have multiple articles talking about Hunter Biden's gun
situation, which we're going to get into in long form.
They have some information about what's going on in the trans
movement and people trying to push certain trans rights and
also some of these doctors that are getting involved in cutting
off body parts of young children, sort of the atrocities
that we are dealing with in our day.
So check come out again, The Loop is an e-mail available by
catholicvote.org. You can go and sign up on their
website. And then while we're talking
about it, let's talk about my other friends over at Patriot
Coolers. You can go to patriotcoolers.com
using promo code Kyle. Kyle and you will be able to get
10% off. Again, Kyle gets you 10% off on
any of their fantastic products. I am using one right now.
In fact, I've got one right next to me, my Gen. 1 black Tumblr,
which I took on surveillance with me when I was working for
the FBI. It's gone with me in at least 18
states. I think I lost count, but it
goes everywhere. I'll be taking it with me to New
Hampshire when I go up to visit, sit down at the Porcupine
Festival with Vivek Ramaswamy. You can expect to see that on
stage next to me. Keeping hydrated.
And they also have fantastic hard coolers.
These are things that are going to rival folks like Yeti, Arctic
and so on, except they say Patriot on the side of them just
like you. They've got 13 stripes of
patriotic design. They give money back to vets,
and they support the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Again, promo code Kyle Kyle will get you 10% off.
And let's get rolling. You can see the live chat has
been going nuts for about the last 30 minutes or so.
We got people coming in from spin class.
We got people that are hyped up and they are interested in
watching. We got over 158 watching right
now live. So folks, if you are in the live
chat, please hit that thumbs up the like button.
If you are listening on the replay, two things you can do.
You can drop us a comment if you are watching on Rumble and if
you are listening on the audio replay on one of those devices,
whether it be Apple, Spotify, iHeartRadio, so on leave us a
five star review and we will try to get to read them on the on
the show. But more importantly, it really
does bump us up in the ranks and the rankings and it is highly
appreciated. That is what we do for this
content. So let's launch into what in the
world are we talking about? Let's talk about Calvin Ball.
The episode is entitled Calvin Ball because this was a game
invented by Calvin and Hobbes. That's the famous little boy who
wears a mask, runs around with his friend the Tiger, an
imaginary friend, and they come up with all kinds of shenanigans
and they give us lessons about what goes on in life.
Now the story of Calvin Ball is 1 where Calvin got bored with
organized sports, he got bored with all the games that were
going on so he created his own game.
Obviously his name is Calvin and he named it after himself.
And the rules are quite simple. We've got it up on the screen
right here. Calvin Hobbs has a fan Wikipedia
page or a fan wiki and what they say is that the rules can never
be used twice. The only rule is that the rules
cannot be used twice. That's the only rule of the
game. They're made-up as it goes every
single time. And so many of you will remember
this was something that could get dropped into any of the
strips. Talks about the fact that they
may involve wickets or mallets or volleyballs or additional
sports related equipment. Once again, the only thing is,
is that you have to change the rules.
And the one that's shown right here is 1 where Calvin is
running from his buddy Hobbs the Tiger.
He's got a flag hanging out of his hand just like you'd have in
flag football. And he says, I stole your flag.
But then you've got Calvin in the back saying, aha, but I hit
you with the Calvin ball. You have to put the flag back
and sing the I'm very sorry song.
So none of it has to make sense. This is the world that we're
living in right now. We are living in a time and a
space where the rules are getting made-up as they go.
And what are we talking about? What rules?
Yesterday in breaking news and very exciting news, we finally
got justice. Americans were able to see
justice in real time. That all of the powerful are
held to account. Not just Donald Trump, not just
a man who had documents that may or may not have been classified
and were defense related at his private residence.
No, the crack smoking, prostitute enjoying son of our
current president, A50 plus year old man who is treated like a
toddler by the national media. Here is Hunter Biden finally
going to pay the piper, Going to finally meet his his match when
it comes to paying for his misdeeds.
And so we can all feel good about it, except we're playing
Calvin ball. And so this article right here
comes from The Federalist. It's written by Jordan Boyd, and
it is entitled Hunter Biden's Wrist Slap on Gun and Tax Crimes
Is a Complete Smokescreen. And what we see there is a
photograph which is coming from the White House's feed.
It's Joe Biden with his hand in the air swearing in as
president. And he is, you know, on either
side. He has his wife.
And there is Hunter Biden, his son, the maybe former crackhead
man who's claims he smoked Parmesan cheese out of his
carpet. Everything about that is sort of
nauseating. This article is saying that many
Americans will be put behind bars for the exact same charges
that we see Hunter Biden receiving and yet he's getting
off relatively Scott free. So I'm going to read a little
bit of it. We're going to talk about it
pretty much the entire show because this is the biggest
thing going on right now and it is the biggest reveal.
I think it's the biggest sort of drop of the veil.
And, and I'll tell you why I think they're doing it as well.
So says President Joe Biden's corrupt Justice Department is so
desperate to distract from the Americans expose of the Biden
family bribery scandal. That's what this is all about.
We're dropping the talk about bribery so we can talk about
Hunter Biden's tax evasion and his gun charges serving under
the guise of equal justice. The Justice Department has
announced Tuesday that it would charge the youngest son with two
federal misdemeanors. No federal misdemeanors.
We know that from January 6th means you get to go to jail for
years and maybe await a trial or not.
And KET, you could also just get away with it completely and just
have somebody else pay your taxes.
Apparently, Hunter owed more than $1,000,000 in back taxes.
He's somehow been able to work out a deal where he's going to
pay $200,000 of that. And he was also charged with one
federal felony count for possession of a gun while being
an illegal drug user, an addict. The Biden lawyers are scrambling
and they are declaring this A5 year investigation resolved.
It is over. It is done with.
And as my buddy Gerardo Boyle says, the Ministry of Justice
has basically said that the resolution suggests the
prosecutors could not find cause to file charges against Hunter's
foreign dealings or other wrongdoings.
Apparently that laptop which was made public by the the the Mac
store, this guy who was in Delaware and received a drunken
Hunter Biden laptop that he made public.
Marco Polo has done great work. In fact, my buddy who's an FBI
agent sends me a link and asked me if I bought the Hunter Biden
laptop in in book format. Over and over again.
I told my wife that this morning we we keep getting these text
message. Hey, have you bought the Marco
Polo, the book of Hunter Biden's laptop?
No, I don't want that at my house.
I've got little kids I can't be putting out there anyway.
Nothing could be further than the truth when it comes to the
the wrongdoings or the foreign entities.
Because we are actually seeing in real time that the
Republicans, including James Comer, are investigating and
they are trying to run down the sources of money.
They're trying to decide what sort of evidence is available.
And apparently the Justice Department or the Injustice
Department, the Ministry of Justice are more than happy to
try to put this thing to bed with what's going on.
So let's let's kind of see this article was talked about a
smokescreen. I want to pull up a thing.
This is a tweet from Vivek Ramaswami.
I'm going to be meeting him at the end of this week on Saturday
in person. We'll be sitting on a stage and
discussing how to defang the administrative or the deep state
at Porcupine Festival. And so I've been kind of seeing
what he's been saying. I'll tell you this, I have some
very diverse circles of interesting types.
I talked to Joe Pags last night about this.
I talked to Owen Schreier from Infowars and everybody has the
same exact statements about Vivek Ramaswami.
He's saying all the right things.
He's saying the right things that make sense to those of us
who are looking for, you know, some honesty, some sanity.
That doesn't mean that he's going to be a front runner
candidate. It doesn't mean that he's going
to to take over the spot from from President Trump in the
primaries. But I do love the fact that he
is introducing the right information, the right questions
into the debates. And that is incredibly
important. That's why we have primaries,
folks. That's why primaries have to
exist. You're supposed to suss out what
the platform is. And Vivek Ramaswami is doing
excellent work. In that case, we'll just stay
here. He says the Hunter Biden plea
deal is a joke. It's a feigned retreat and it
reveals that they are more scared than ever of the scrutiny
for the real crimes. 100% agree with this.
He says the real target is the audio tapes of the alleged bribe
for Hunter and Joe Biden from the Ukrainian executive of the
oligarchy owned Burisma. And hundreds of billions of US
taxpayer payer dollars are being kicked into Ukraine to make good
on this favor. Don't buy the reflection.
It's just a smokescreen. Again, that word the smokescreen
pretty important and it's worth us considering.
So some commentary has been done on the right.
Particularly I like what the the take is by this guy named Brett
Tolman. Brett Tolman is a former United
States Attorney, and he did the work of making charging
decisions like this, particularly in what would be
known as a sensitive investigative matter.
And the Bidens are most certainly that.
He's a public figure. And so there's additional
scrutiny on how the case is done.
It's got to be buttoned up in a certain way.
But in this case, his statement is it's letting you know that
there is, in fact, A2 tiered system of justice, that Calvin
ball, they're making it up as they go along.
And Tolman's article, this is also from The Federalist, says
Hunter's, says Hunter Biden's charges are nothing but a
diversion. This was written, it looks like
yesterday and came back out. They're saying it's a slap on
the wrist. I think that's really correct.
This is a metaphorical slap on the wrist because he's being
basically charged with misdemeanors, which as we've
noted, could involve actual jail time, apparently under the new
DOJ rules, but not for Hunter Biden, and then also a felon in
possession charge. And I want to talk about the
felon in possession charge for just a second.
Essentially, Hunter Biden is accused of buying a handgun.
In this case it was a 38 revolver.
And to get nothing into the possible state charges of
abandoning property and leaving it near a school and all the
other things. And then also the possibility
that the federal government got involved in that investigation
to help the Biden's and cover it up, which is a real serious
allegation and a real possibility that this happened.
But let's just take the buying of a firearm while he was a
prohibited person. And so how does that work out if
you've never bought a firearm? And I'm sure there's some of you
that have not, some of you have only inherited them.
Some of you just don't own firearms and that's OK.
You go into a gun store, you pick out the thing you want.
And that could also happen at A, at a gun show.
By the way, if there is an actual licensed dealer, this is
someone who has what's called an FFLA, Federal Firearms License.
They can transfer that weapon to you under certain circumstances.
And one of those circumstances are there's a certain state
laws, there may be state background checks, but there's
always what's known as Form 4473.
And the 4473 is the federal firearms background check.
Most people who have bought a gun are familiar with it.
I, I will say that I've done it over 100 times.
It is a form that I am very, very familiar with.
You put in your name, you put in your identify fires, that's
going to be your address where you currently live.
They want to know the county that you live in.
That's also important. It used to be more important
because they looked at the sheriff of where you live, the
county you lived as the what they call Cleo, the chief law
enforcement officer. So sometimes there may be
prohibitions they'd have to notify in.
Apparently in Washington state, our friend Mark Crider, who's a
sheriff up there in Walla Walla County, gets a notification for
every single gun that's bought in in Washington state in his
county. And they mail it over to him.
And then he puts it in the shredder because he doesn't want
to keep those records because he's a constitutional sheriff
that believes in what he actually signed up for.
He's also a former FBI agent. So like I said, there were some
good ones for sure. And Mark is one of those.
Now, when you get that 4473 you filled out and there's a number
of different statements you have to make.
You have to say what your weight is, you have to say what your
height is, you say what your eye color is.
You have various personal descriptors.
There's not a photograph they allow you to put on your Social
Security number, which you can choose to do or not.
That's optional. If you are AI think if there's
even a space for like a legal alien, If you have a green card,
you can actually fill in all these little places.
So you kind of work down and then they have the series of go
no go questions. And these are the ones that they
are going to run against the NCIC, the the federal warrant
system to see if you are a felon, if you have a, a
prohibition from owning A firearm.
And they make this quick call, it takes a few seconds and they
come back with an answer, yes, you're good to proceed or not.
And those questions are as follows.
They are asking #1 is this a straw purchase?
Are you buying this gun for yourself or are you buying it on
behalf of someone else? If you're buying it for someone
else and they are the final end user, you cannot proceed.
You're only allowed to buy firearms and and do the
background checks for yourself. This is the so-called girlfriend
loophole that you'll hear about in the news media.
This is the straw man purchase, which is actually a felony.
If you choose to buy a gun and you lie on that part, that's a
felony. It's not just a false statement,
it's actually a felony, specifically called a straw man
purchase where you are buying on behalf of someone else.
And then there's some other questions on there.
They ask you, are you a fugitive from justice?
You can imagine the answer is going to be no, because who's
going to admit to being a fugitive of justice?
And that would include federal warrants, which are known as
unlawful flight to avoid prosecution or you FAP warrants.
It would also include state charges.
All these things are supposed to be in there, but this is not a
polygraph. It's not a lie detector test.
OK. When you fill out this form,
there's some of it is Scout's honor because there's some parts
of it that are not going to be uploaded into the FBI system
when they do the background check.
So they just have a basic record of a time and an answer to a
specific question that's really important.
They ask you some other questions.
Are you a prohibited person? Do you have a domestic violence
or a domestic battery conviction that would eliminate it?
Are you subject to a red flag law in another state?
There's there's all these little kind of pieces in there that
would keep you from owning A firearm.
And one of them asked specifically, are you a user of
illicit narcotics? Are you a user of illegal drugs?
And this is the question. That is the quote UN quote false
statement which is found under 18 USC 1001.
It is the weakest felony in the DO JS arsenal.
It is the thing that they charged General Flynn with and
we'll get into that in a second. It's the thing they charged Andy
McCabe with and 1001 is the false statement, not just to the
FBI, not just to any federal law enforcement officer, whether
they work for DHS or the Commerce Department or they work
for the VA Inspector General. These are all possibilities of
getting a false statement charge.
But it also includes falsely filling out a federal document
with a false statement that you know is false.
Now, why is Hunter in trouble is because he wrote a memoir that
came out, I want to say in 2021, stating that he basically was
struggling his whole life, his adult life, under a a cocaine
addiction or crack cocaine addiction.
And during that time when he was crawling around on the carpets
and smoking anything that looked like it might be a crack rock,
including Parmesan cheese that fell off of his pizza.
His words, not mine. He also bought this firearm.
He bought the firearm and he filled out the 4473, and the
only way that you get that firearm is you have to answer
that you are not, in fact, someone who was under the
influence regularly or an addict to illicit drugs.
So now we have his public statement in his book
conflicting with a statement that he swore and attested was
correct. And that was, you know, an
accurate statement when he filled the form out.
You have to sign your name at the end of it.
You swear to test, you put a date just like anything else,
and then you're hold account, held accountable to it.
So that's Part 1. He's got a false statement.
But the other thing is, is that actually owning A firearm,
having one on your person, being able to carry one and having one
in your possession is another felony.
That's known as a felony in possession, even you know that
it falls under the same statutes.
It's under 18 USC 9/22. And we use those charges very,
very frequently in federal law enforcement.
It's felons who have a state conviction.
It's people who are otherwise prohibited, and that includes
habitual drug users. I'm going to give you an example
from New Mexico. While I was in New Mexico, the
assistant United States Attorney, who was a very
aggressive prosecutor and and wanted to see certain people who
had been able to skirt and get away with a number of federal
crimes without charging, was able to charge an individual
that was arrested for having a single round of 22 long rifle.
Those of you who know what I'm talking about and shooting, you
know, 22 long rifle is probably the cheapest ammunition you can
buy. It goes for anywhere from, you
know, two to seven cents per round and it's very lightweight.
It's what most people learn how to shoot with.
This guy in this case had exactly one round, a single
round of 22 long rifle in a pocket, but he also was a
habitual drug user who admitted to it.
And he, I believe he was using methamphetamines at the time,
had paraphernalia and maybe even some meth in his possession.
When he was arrested because of that single round, he was
charged with felon possession because the statute covers not
just firearms but also ammunition.
And the ammunition in this case, one round was enough to put him
up for a felony of up to 10 years in prison.
I'm sure he didn't do anywhere near that, just so you know.
But you can actually charge based on the ammunition, and you
don't have to have a felony conviction.
You can be a prohibited person who in this case, like Hunter
Biden, admitted to being a drug addict and then having that
firearm. So that's a bigger felony than
the false statements. But I want you to kind of
consider how easily he was getting taken off the, you know,
taken off the charge here. Now, I want you to contrast this
to people who are law abiding citizens.
I've got a video that I want to show you.
This is what happens if you're a law abiding citizen who is a
bite, who's broken no rules, no laws except what the ATF has
generated on its own. This is a long video, so we're
not going to watch all of it. But some of you may remember
this, this story from Moonlight Industries.
And this guy's going to tell you exactly who he is and who's
going to come in and bother him about it.
So let's take a look at this video of the ATF confronting
someone who's not a felon, who's not a prohibited person, is a
person in good standing, and is in fact in the firearms
industry. So here we go.
I own the company Moonlight Industries.
So we make like low visibility. We specialize in like right now
we have a contract with Steel Team 6.
Actually we make their like low visibility MP7 rigs.
Yeah, OK. Cool.
So were you expecting us? Well, what?
Didn't surprise me when I saw a guy in a plague carrier showing
up at the Ultima Otbs on. Yeah, no.
So the reason why we're here is because I don't know, I'm sure
you're aware that just recently the ATF classified FRTS the the
four reset triggers as. I want to stop it right there
for one second. First of all, you notice the guy
in the plate carry with the blue shirt is looking down at his
feet, the shoes that this, that this individual who's filming
with his, his cell phone camera is calling out.
He called out those Altima Otbs. I don't know if you caught it in
the audio, but this guy is wearing a plate carry that says
police. He's obviously an ATF agent.
He's got some sleeve tattoos, probably a prior military guy
just based on the way he's standing and what he's got the
Ultima Otbs. I own a pair of those shoes as
well. They're, they're an actual shoe
that is designed for what's called OTB missions or over the
beach. They are a very popular military
style, almost like Converse All Stars.
That's kind of how they fit. And they have drainage in them.
They're actually made to be worn inside of a fin.
They have short and flat laces. If you can actually see in the
video, the laces are extremely flat so that they don't actually
ride in and 'cause you know, calluses or injuries when you
put on a set of like rocket fins.
So they're for dive missions. So they're kind of a cool guy
shoe. And he called this guy out
exactly for that. And this guy's like looking
down. He's wearing cool guy sunglasses
as well. So I just find that kind of
amusing. He's LED letting people, these
two agents know that he knows exactly what they are, how he
sized them up. And I think it's one of those
classic moves where he's he's demonstrating his knowledge of
both the firearms industry, but also he knows why this guy chose
those shoes, what he's wearing. You know how he got himself
decked out and and maybe this guy who's who's got the
sunglasses that's sitting on the left hand side of the screen is
embarrassed a little bit. I hope so, because I would be
ashamed if there's somebody called out exactly what I was
wearing and you know that I'm there to basically which try to
confiscate forced reset triggers, which are definitely
not machine guns, but the ATF has ruled that they are.
Now we're going to continue with the video.
As machine guns, so we are aware that you may have purchased some
of these FRTS. So now we are having like the
whole agency has, has is basically reaching out to these
purchasers. That's incredible.
And we have to pick them up, you know.
Thank you. So.
So I won't be answering any questions today.
I don't have any comments on this subject.
I won't be giving you anything. OK, so you are you.
Refusing to give us the trigger. I'm not refusing anything.
I won't be answering any questions.
OK. But OK, so we are aware that you
do you did purchase Fr TS again, you wouldn't be in trouble if
you just give those up to us or if you sold them, you can tell
me you sold them, you know, and you again, you're not going to
be in trouble for. That I understand.
So we're just here, honestly, like just to pick them up.
Sure, sure. It's a bigger, it's a bigger
conversation than what you're having right now.
You know you decide as you go the rules, right?
So he gets into his discussion about the ATF in this case and,
and I think that unfortunately, he says more than he needs to,
but he's not going to talk about that particular topic.
This is the right thing to say, by the way, and then end the
conversation. For those of you who are
wondering, hey, how do I do this sort of thing?
You shut it down right there. That's where it ends.
But what we're seeing is a very aggressive enforcement action.
These people came out to the house for the FRTS.
They've sent letters to my friends who are federal agents
that bought these products. I don't want to get into
specifics about it, but it it's completely indiscriminate.
And they've had similar rulings where they've decided things
that are not true. They're just not.
There's no factual findings that make any sense.
The ATF has a bunch of lab nerds that go out there and write up a
rule. And then because of the
Administrators Procedures Act, they are able to act like it is
in fact a law and enforce it, but it's not.
You can see that when this guy said it's incredible that you're
out here doing this. The agent that you see on the
left hand side of that screen with the with the green
sunglasses, the male, he looks down at his feet and he says,
yeah, it is incredible. I'm sure he's ashamed of what
he's doing. And yet he's still out there.
So this is my plea to federal law enforcement officers.
When you are given an order like this that's illegal, immoral or
unethical, your job is going to be two things.
One, you should try to refuse it.
If you are not going to refuse it and you are going to go out
there and talk to these people, you should be doing exactly the
right thing by saying I've been sent out here by my agency and
I'd like to talk to you about this thing.
Would you like to talk to me? And you need to be shaking that
head because there is no reason that person should talk to you.
You should say, would you like to speak to me about this
particular topic today? Because you have every right to
tell me to go away. And I'd be happy to do so if
that's what you say. And then go jot that down in
your book. You can put in subject you know
of the interview declined to make a statement that's it.
No further information, no further investigative activities
are warranted. And for those of you who wonder
when you don't engage with this person, like this female agent
is out there explaining that she's just going to take away,
I'll show this one more time, she's going to, there's the guy
kind of looking not real pleased with himself when the female
agent says that she's just there.
You're not going to be in any trouble. 1 I don't believe you
because you're the ATF and the things you say don't make any
sense. And thing #2 you're not going to
be in any trouble if you're Hunter Biden and the rules don't
apply to you. But there's certainly a
possibility that they decide to come after you for criminal
prosecution. Because what they are alleging
and what they are claiming with this particular ruling is that
by owning a device that was legally sold in the United
States, that was determined, determined by the laboratory
division prior to not be a machine gun, because it's not a
machine gun. There's a very specific
definition of what a machine gun is.
And this uses what's called force reset technology.
It's essentially placing a spring in the right place.
It's very much like what a bump stock did.
Instead of using inertia, it uses a spring.
But the mechanism is using engineering to overcome the
machine gun definition that is in federal law.
It is a brilliant way of getting around this sort of thing.
And when I say getting around it, the law has a specific
definition, and this doesn't meet that definition because it
has a similar rate of fire, which is interesting and totally
unnecessary for most people. But you should have the right to
do it in this country, particularly when you are inside
the law. So the ATF is using this ugly,
ugly move where they're trying to go out there and scare
somebody and then say, listen, you're not in any trouble.
You just have to hand us your property that you paid for, that
we have not gone through due process to confiscate, and we
are trying to scare you into removing.
This is unacceptable stuff. OK, In the meantime, we have
allegations that the Secret Service went out and actually
tried to find the gun that Hunter Biden's girlfriend, who
is his ex or who is his brother's widow.
OK, so just do the math on that. He was sleeping with the woman
who was married to his brother who died from cancer.
And that woman got mad at him and threw his gun out in a
dumpster, which was near a school and so on.
And they couldn't find a gun and all of this.
And so apparently there was a cover up.
My friend Steven Stambalea, who is a an attorney that works on
behalf of gun owners of America and also on behalf of just your
own individual freedoms. He's a great guy.
He was in our episode known as the machine gun lawyer.
Steven is has sued the ATF, has sued the the FBI and has sued
the Secret Service trying to get the records of the investigation
to recover Hunter Biden's gun and was able to do so.
In the meantime, you have these two agents and these are by far
not the only ones. I actually had agents like this
show up at my door. It wasn't a male and a female.
That woman, by the way, if you look, she has a plate carrier
on. I think her plate carrier has
the plates backwards. It's, it's facing outward.
I've only seen that one time. It was an old school FBI agent
who didn't understand how plates worked.
And so he had it set up like it was a like a satellite dish.
And I asked him what it was. And he was like, oh, I thought
like when the bullets hit it, they like spin out and come back
off. So what I'm getting at is that
it's a convex and concaved plate.
That means that it forms around your body and it's supposed to
go outwards sort of the way that your chest would and your belly
would. And instead she has it
backwards. So she has the she has the
convex side towards her body and concave away from her.
Like it's going to be receiving something in a bowl.
Very funny, really ridiculous looking if you're a kit person.
But it just shows you sort of the lack of professionalism and
that they're going to put this chick out here.
And I say chick because she's a young female telling a man who
runs a business that was able to cite from the driveway the type
of shoes that the agent walking up on him was wearing because he
is deeply involved in this industry.
In the meantime, you've got this gal wearing her body armor
backwards. I'm sure this guy was not not
unaware of the fact that she was a clown.
And, and if you act this way, it's really bad news for
America. It really is just one of the
worst things. Of course, the media response to
what's going on here is very specific and it's very partisan.
As you've seen from The Federalist and from Vivek
Ramaswami, we're hearing one side of the story.
This is a smokescreen. This is a problem.
I want to show you a quick response from Glenn Greenwald,
formerly of The Intercept Independent journalist.
He has a tweet up here showing a retweet from CNN.
And we'll play that video from CNN 'cause I want you to hear it
as well. But he said, who would have ever
guessed that CNN would immediately bring in a former
federal prosecutor who worked for Pret Bahara to defend Hunter
Biden and the Biden DOJ? It's so out of character for
them relying on United States security state or US security
state officials to defend the Biden administration.
And his point in this case is, is that who would imagine that
you would find this, this Biden administration being covered for
by CNN of all places? Of course they would.
So here's the CNN video. This is about a minute and 25
seconds. I do want you guys to see it.
This is a woman telling you that nobody would ever deal with real
consequences for what she's talking about.
And I'll tell you that that's sort of true.
But let's let's let's play the video real quick.
Let's pull this up. So this is from CNN yesterday.
Obviously you're already hearing a lot of shouting.
Oh, sweetheart, deal. Oh, this Oh, that.
None of us really knows the details of the possible charges
here and exactly what was agreed to as part of this plea,
Jennifer. But how do How does 1 assess
whether this is the type of deal that a normal person, not a
president's child, would get in this circumstance?
So you would look to other similar cases, right.
So on the gun form charge, it's very, very standard for someone
in this situation who lies on the form because they're an
addict. The gun is long gone, apparently
only had it for a couple of weeks.
It's very standard in these circumstances for this diversion
to occur and to to wipe out the charges assuming he successfully
completes it. So that's totally standard.
And the tax fraud is is similar as well.
I mean, he paid those taxes back a long time ago.
That's something that DOJ takes very, very seriously when
negotiating these deals. And I'll also say that Hunter
Biden was an addict at the time. And so there was discussion of
this back when this investigation got going.
When you're talking about a drug addict, you have to think about
whether you can prove the men's riot.
This goes to trial. Is he going to be able to
undercut their case about whether he knowingly and
willfully didn't pay his taxes? So given all of that and given
similar cases with tax fraud, this is not a sweetheart deal.
It's a deal. I think it's a good deal for
Hunter Biden in that he will stay out of prison and end up
with only two misdemeanors on his record, but it's certainly
not a sweetheart deal out of line with what happens in the
rest of the country. OK, so it's a deal and it's good
for Hunter Biden, but it's not a sweetheart deal.
Did you hear what she just said? It's good for Hunter Biden, but
it's not a sweetheart deal. That's what a sweetheart deal
is. Of course it's a sweetheart
deal. Of course it's a deal that
doesn't even allow for him to to have a missed.
I'm sorry for him to have a felony on his record.
He's going to plead guilty to misdemeanors.
So I want us to just think Calvin Ball here.
Let's just think about people who have had tax evasion
problems and have done jail time for it.
How about Wesley Snipes? How about Martha Stewart, who
also had to pay back taxes but was, you know, convicted of
insider trading and did and did prison time for it?
How about my friend Dinesh D'souza, who gave a basically a
verbal agreement that he would reimburse somebody if they
wanted to put $10,000 into a Senate campaign.
And they went after him for two $10,000 reimbursements of
donations, saying that he was basically trying to skirt
campaign finance laws. And he did something like 6 or 8
months with five years of federal probation.
He did 6 or 8 months in a community facility where he had
to go check himself in during the week, which was essentially
a jail experience for him. That kind of stuff is sort of
the opposite of what we just heard.
And and yet it's not a sweetheart deal, right?
So this is Calvin Ball. This is what happens when you
make up the rules as you go along.
I'm going to show you another thing from CNN Politics right
here. This is them saying that Hunter
Biden to plead guilty on federal tax charges, striking a deal on
the gun charges, blah, blah, blah.
There's a bunch of videos on him.
This what we were going to see is essentially they're claiming
that he owed at least $100,000 in federal taxes for 2017 and
then again in 2018, but he didn't pay them on the
deadlines. And so the judge will have the
final say whether or not they accept the deal.
The plea deals have been, you know, going to reverberate
through the 2024 presidential and they've already jumped
started criticisms with Republicans, of course, right,
Because they are basically trying to say, they're trying to
tell you that we've got this one system of of, of judicial
punishment, this one system of people facing justice and
everybody has to account. And that's why Hunter Biden, on
one hand, he is getting, you know, he's going to be serving
no time and he had to pay back the money he owed And his gun
charge is going to be dealt with, probably going through a
drug rehab program, something like that.
He's in a pretrial diversionary phase.
So he doesn't even have to have the felony.
And then that's why President Trump has to face charges on 31
counts of classified and or defense materials that were at
his house. And, and six additional counts
of potential conspiracy to hide those crimes.
So that's what they're trying to line up.
They're saying Hunter Biden, you know, he's going to account for
his sins. Now Trump has to do the same.
Except these are not the same types of deals.
You haven't seen a SWAT team go and take Hunter Biden down and
arraign him. We didn't see him go out.
Why is that? Because he's he was working
alongside with the DOJ that he went in and participated in the
interviews he had to. And when daddy is in charge of
the of the deep state there that that is actually going after
him. I don't know.
Is it like the new whistleblower allegations and I won't even
call them that. That's not accurate.
Let's call them the cover your ass allegations that Steve
Deantuano, the former assistant director of the FB is Washington
Field office, is coming out with under sworn testimony to the
oversight committees. What did he say?
He says we probably should have sought consent.
We like he would have got it. We probably should have waited
for Trump's lawyers to show up for the search warrant.
Admiral Lago, we probably would have got consent there.
It would have been a reasonable thing to expect that we would
have had cooperation instead of doing what we did.
And he apparently said, I don't think this is a good idea.
And then he was overruled by a DOJ official, right?
And he was overruled by his own underlings who are running the
national security side of the Washington field office.
This should be a very big concern When the top guy at the
office is overruled by those underneath him and the DOJ.
We have a serious problem. We are not playing by the same
rules. And I will tell you 'cause I
want to present this in a fair and and the least amount of bias
that I can, it's worth looking at this article from the Reload.
And this says Hunter Biden cops to gun charges gets diversion
program. That's what we've just been
talking about. This is folks over at the
reload.com talking about gun stuff.
And what they're interested in is the actual details of the
deal. Again, this was released
yesterday halfway through the day.
It says the second information charge is the defendant with a
firearms offense, namely 1 count of possession of a firearm by a
person who is an unlawful user or addicted to a controlled
substance in violation of 18 USC 9/22.
As we stated earlier, subsection E3 and 92422, these are two
different sections. Those are two different felonies
that we're talking about, under 922 and 924, and the defendant
has agreed to pretrial diversion with respect to the firearm.
Now, the only thing that's somewhat interesting in this is
apparently it will make it so that he is not able to own a
firearm for the rest of his life.
Apparently had a cult Cobra, which is actually a very nice
revolver 38 that he had that was dumped in by his brother's widow
and lover and thrown into a dumpster at a grocery store
which was near a school and all these other kind of things.
It was recovered by a man looking for recyclables.
That'd be kind of a score that's probably like a over $1000
handgun. So they're making reference here
in this article that he lied on this federal form.
As I said, the 4473, the question about habitual drug
use. So that would be a 1001
violation. So you have now 3 felonies
basically lined up. And what they are saying is that
he is likely to not own a firearm.
Even if he completes this, he'll never be able to legally own a
firearm again. That is at least of some
consolation to those of us that are in the space that know that
if we were to do the same thing, something pretty awful would
befall us and we would lose our gun rights.
We probably would end up in jail.
And that essentially has been the argument on the right, the
left making an alternative argument.
And so the question then becomes, why is he getting this
unfair deal or this fair deal that's beneficial to him?
And so let's go to U.S. news and World Report, because one of the
things that the Democrats are going to point to is that the
United States Attorney in the district of Delaware, I believe
there are 94 federal districts. And this particular individual
was sworn in and appointed by President Donald Trump.
He's a Trump holdover. Now, you first have to
understand what the United States attorney's system looks
like. They are political appointees
and they serve at the pleasure of the president and they are
confirmed by the Senate. Every president, when they, when
the regimes change hands, they basically get a resignation.
This is pretty standard practice.
The United States Attorney for every given district will submit
their resignation to the president should the resident,
the president choose to accept that resignation.
And and David Weiss was no exception in this case.
I'm sure he's out of the district of Delaware.
He's the top prosecutor. He gets to make, you know, go,
no go. He's the sort of guy that makes
the decisions. And then the people on the front
lines are in fact, you know, career employees and their jobs
will span presidencies. Those are known as assistant
United States attorneys or a USA.
So I just want the structure to be clear.
And in this case, David Weiss was appointed in 2018 under
Trump and he was the the guy who got to stick around in order to
appear in a non partial way. We found out that that the Biden
administration was going to keep him on to continue handling this
investigation. This was into the laptop and so
on and so forth. And so this was their appearance
or illusion that there is in fact fairness.
And I don't know that this is the case.
So I kind of dug into it a little bit.
We want to know this. What's the story?
This guy used to be a private partner.
He was working for Dwayne Morris LLP, which is a law firm in the
area outside of Philadelphia, as I understand it.
And so I looked into it, they have their own pack where they
actually can donate as partners and as as employees, and they
can throw money around to various political causes as they
see fit. This is from opensecrets.org.
And so for 20/22, which is going to be the most recent political
cycle that we care about, here's a breakdown of how the packs,
the pack from Dwayne Morris, this is this is David Weiss's
former employer moved money around.
And it's pretty even actually. It's 54% to Republicans, 45,
almost 46% to Democrats, and then to the tune of just over
$100,000 during that cycle. So that in and of itself shows
us that we're not talking about someone that's, you know,
overtly partisan. They are giving money basically
to some national Republicans. They gave some to some state
Democrats. That makes sense where they were
at. And so, you know, all of these
things seem on the level, but what about this?
This is from True Social. This is Tom Finton, who is the
president of Judicial Watch. I want to bring this sucker up.
I'm going to read a truth that he put out.
This came out yesterday and came out last night actually while I
was doing a show prep. And Tom Fitton says the United
States attorneys are usually nominated and confirmed only
with the approval of, quote, UN quote, home state US senators.
The US Attorney David Weiss, who gave Hunter Biden the scandalous
plea deal on behalf of the Biden administration, was appointed by
Donald Trump on the specific recommendation of the two
senators, the Democratic senators from Delaware.
Weiss had previously been appointed as an acting or
interim US attorney for Obama during the years 2009 to 2011.
And he says the more, you know, in sort of a snarky way, which
is which is sort of the way that you deal with things on social
media. But I think Tom Fitton's point
is very well received. This is a guy who at least was
considered neutral or not unfavorable by the Obama
administration. We keep seeing people that are
holdovers from the Obama administration that are now
playing ball in this current Biden administration.
There are a lot of the same names, a lot of the same faces.
So many people are calling this Obama's third term.
And I don't think they're wrong. I don't think they bargained on
a President Trump interrupting them at all.
I think they expected it was going to be Hillary Clinton
doing this for another eight years.
So they would have had that. And then who knew they had to
run Joe Biden because they couldn't get Hillary into
office. So we are dealing with a guy who
at least has the potential of being somewhat more
ideologically aligned with the Democrat Party.
I did want to bring this up since I talked about it.
This is Dinesh D'souza's press release from thefbi.gov stating
they're, they're proud sort of experience in getting him
sentenced to five years of federal probation, 8 months in
the first year of that had to be at a community confinement
center. My understanding of it is that
he was actually teaching and educating people while he was
there. I'm sure it was a formative
experience for Dinesh. And when we spoke about
firearms, he's very, very cautious because he has this
felony conviction that he had to plead guilty to.
He, he can't have a gun. He can't know where a gun is.
And so if there's a firearm in his house owned by his wife,
who's a legal owner, and she and I have talked about guns, then
he has to be extremely cautious that he doesn't know where it is
because you are actually in sort of a strange place.
I'm seeing now that Eric has just joined the chat.
So our buddy Eric, one of our moderators, a little bit late
getting in here. Thanks for joining us again,
folks. One of the questions was asked,
if you are if you are buying a weapon for a spouse, can you buy
that for them? And the answer is really
complicated if they are actually going to be the receiving party
and you know that you are buying it exclusively for that person.
So let's say a husband wants to buy a gun for a wife.
The wife has to come in and fill out the 4473.
However, if the husband buys it for himself and takes it home
and puts it in his own safe and then a few weeks later says this
would be a fantastic gift for my wife, It is now about to be
Mother's Day or her birthday or Christmas, and I would love for
her to have a concealed carry weapon.
Then he can give her that weapon.
And no 4473 has to take place unless you're in a state where
these things have to be documented.
So there are two ways to go about this.
Was a question out of the chat and I wanted to make sure I
addressed it. You can buy things for yourself.
And I've done this before where I bought a weapon, took it home,
literally held it for a day, decided this gun's not for me.
I thought it was cool. I've walked around with it for a
couple hours, It's not going to be my thing.
And I turned around and sold it to a Co worker who was not a
prohibited person and they wanted to buy it for cash on the
barrel. That's a Texas thing.
I've done that maybe hundreds of times where I've either bought a
gun, taken guns as a payment. I've actually took a gun as a
collateral for a truck at one point when I was selling an old,
you know, crappy truck. So you can do a lot of different
things. It depends on what your mindset
is when the weapon enters your hand, whether or not you are the
original, the, the intended user of that gun.
And then you're welcome to change your mind.
This is still America. So I want you to know should you
have to answer questions about that, how you frame your answer
is very important. You have to articulate it in the
way that is accurate for your situation situation.
If you bought the gun for yourself and then later decided
to give it as a gift, so be it. That's a thing you can do.
And many of us do that. Many people will go and buy a
car, right? They'll buy it for themself and
then they'll decide, you know what?
I'm not really a Lexus SUV kind of guy, but my wife really is
this is hers or she drives it and says, Hey, I want to take
this, take this vehicle. Also acceptable.
Your, your husband or your wife can buy a weapon and then you
can pick it up and decide this is a thing that I really like
instead, can I have it? Yes, you can.
Do you have to change ownership at that point?
No. And are you a straw purchaser?
You are not. Be very, very cautious about the
way you phrase it. Many people will get themselves
into trouble by not phrasing it properly, but that is the way
that you would explain that sort of situation.
Like you said, worth your knowledge.
We're here to educate as well as to promote sort of your, your
use of your constitutional liberties and defend you in some
ways against the way that it has to be articulated in a federal
scenario. I did have a, a pull up.
It doesn't really add anything of value to any of us right now,
but I did actually have Andy McCabe's deal.
I want to talk a little bit about Michael Flynn because he
experienced sort of a an equally ridiculous thing.
This is a false statement charge that took him three years to
resolve and a lot of money. So we'll pull this up on the
screen right now. This is coming from Vox, the
left wing outlet. They have a full transcript of
the statement of the offense and the charging documents that have
to do with General Michael Flynn.
Again, the violation for him with 18 USC 1001 false
statements. And we cover that fairly fairly
extensively earlier. But this is any false statements
in his case. What they allege was, and I
think it's really worth noting that he made materially false
statements and omissions during an interview to the FBI on
January 24th, 2017 in Washington, DC.
And at the time of the interview, this was the part
that was really critical. The time of the interview, the
FBI had an open investigation into the government of Russia's
efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.
Many of us remember this is the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.
And the fact that he came in and made materially false
statements, according to them and omissions impeded an
otherwise material impact on the FBI's ongoing investigation.
They are saying that those false statements heard because he had
conversations in December of 2018 and then three days into
the Trump administration, he was interviewed by the FBI on a
voluntary basis and made false statements about the asks and
the decisions that he had with with a diplomat named Kislyak
out of Russia. Now, here's the fun thing about
how presidential cycles work. Between the end of December and
the beginning of or the middle of January, when a president's
inauguration happens, I imagine there has to be an incredible
flurry of activity. Imagine starting a new job,
moving, resettling yourself, getting office space, all the
things that go on with this. And you're going to try to tell
me that one or two meetings that you had and some off sort of
political discussion you have with someone that you knew is
going to be grounds for you lying to the FBI if you don't
have a a strong memory of it? I've got to imagine that General
Flynn was stretched to the limit during that time.
And so you're going to have to worry about whether or not you
can actually make that claim, whether he has the Mens Rea, as
this lady mentioned on CNN that he was intentionally going
after, you know, a false statement to mislead the FBI And
and that's why they ended up withdrawing it.
Now, Flynn's case took multiple years, over three years to get
rid of. Now he's suing the FBI and the
US federal government over the stuff.
And the reason why it took three years is because after the DOJ
said, you know what, this is a crappy prosecution, Trump was
able to lean on a couple of people probably and tell them,
look, this is garbage. What are you doing here?
This was a a Obama holdover investigation trying to stop the
incoming president. And they agreed.
And so they withdrew charges saying that we've actually sort
of come to the bottom of our our questions about the Russia
investigation. And, you know, there was no
material investigation. We've closed it.
It didn't interrupt anything that we had to do.
Our original statement is no longer true.
He did not interrupt that investigation.
And the judge, whose name was Emmett Sullivan, who's AAUS
Circuit Judge in DC, was like, oh, well, I'm not going to allow
you to close this out. And so he fought this tooth and
nail until President Trump eventually pardoned him.
That's worth noting. This is the kind of ridiculous
double standard that we see Hunter Biden accused of
$1,000,000 in back taxes. He's able to settle it with
$200,000. It sounds like there's
allegations that somebody else even paid that money because
supposedly he didn't have it. And so they bought a favor with
the the Biden's doing that. He's making millions of dollars
running around the globe, picking up bags of cash in
Ukraine and maybe in China. And now they have the oversight
committee looking into 150 suspicious activity reports.
But on top of all that, Michael Flynn really was a bad guy
because he may or may not have lied to the FBI according to
them on this one thing. I want to pull up Michael
Flynn's Wikipedia. You guys are mentioning that
Tracy Beans has fantastic threads on this.
IA 100% agree on that. Tracy Beans has done a fantastic
job covering the situation. Let's just do a quick version so
that you are 4 armed as you walk into the world and you want to
discuss the the ridiculous nature of this.
Michael Flynn joined the Army in 1981 when I was born.
Michael Flynn served this country for as long as I've been
on the planet. And during that time they talk
about all the different places that he held, all the different
commands. He was assigned to you at Fort
Bragg, the 82nd Airborne. He was part of the JSOC, the
Joint Special Operations Command.
He was deployed for operation that invaded Grenada.
He was also part of the Uphold Democracy part in Haiti, where
we are doing humanitarian relief.
He was part of Schofield Barracks, which is interesting
because that's where Obama came out of, as I understand in that
area. He was in the at the Army
Intelligence Center in Fort Huachuca in Arizona.
He spent a lifetime doing work. Not to mention he served in the
office of the Director of National Intelligence.
In September of 2011, he was promoted to Lieutenant General.
He served there under Barack Obama, obviously spanned
multiple presidencies, including Reagan, including Clinton, both
Bushes, right, And then also the Obama presidency and, and
finally got out in 2014. It's worth noting that he was
the top guy at the DIA, right? So he ran the DIA as the
director over there for a two year period and then he got out
and retired. One of the things that's
interesting on this Wikipedia page, and I'll highlight it
right here for those of you who are looking on Rumble, you'll
see it says in October, sorry, in June of 2013, Michael Flynn
became the First United States officer.
They're talking about United States military officer to be
allowed inside of the Russian military intelligence
headquarters in Moscow. That's the Gru.
That's kind of impressive. That's why he was nominated as
one of Trump's foreign policy and national security advisors.
He had these connections and these back channels are exactly
why you hire someone like a Michael Flynn to come in and
work with you. So this was a fundamentally
unfair treatment, I would say, of Michael Flynn.
And in the meantime, you've got people like Hunter Biden getting
away with not just being a crackhead, but also ditching his
his gun in a, you know, because his girlfriend, who's his
brother's, in fact, his dead brother's wife was throwing it
away. It's even the mouthful of that
sort of soap opera drama is, is beyond me.
It's like a gun owner's nightmare or a gun store owner's
nightmare to have that guy come in and buy something from you.
We'll show this last little piece here.
This is the the judge, like I said, who took a parting shot.
And this was as recently as 2020 when they had to throw the case
away. He said that the DOJ was trying
to materially change the facts of the case.
And that's why they were able to let it go.
This is a judge who theoretically has no say, no say
whatsoever in the outcome. His job is just to mediate the
two parties. And he was trying to argue that
they were creating a newly minted definition of
materiality, of materiality rather.
And that's why they should continue the prosecution even
though the DOJ was dropping it against Michael Flynn.
Really, really unfair stuff. Pretty awful.
We're also hearing that Hunter Biden was able to settle some of
his child support issues. He was originally supposed to
pay $20,000 a month. We know that he was paying
$50,000 a month in rent to his dad for this like mediocre
house. There's obviously something
going on in that situation. But he can't afford $20,000 for
the Child Support. It was reduced to $5000 a month,
which is pretty incredible stuff considering the guy was making
$87,000 a month when he was having babies like this.
So, you know, just an interesting thing.
Last little piece I want to to show you this is a, this is a, a
piece of rather this is a job announcement on usajobs.gov for
the Assistant United States Attorney.
I just want to show you what it takes to be a Assistant United
States Attorney. This is not like a super highly
paid legal job starting off in a salary of 66,000 and a senior
person can make up to 176,000, which is the federal maximum on
the GS scale. Well, this one in particular is
talking about McAllen, TX, but they're all over the country.
And what it tells you is, is they have to have a security
clearance. It's a non supervisory position.
They have to have special sensitivities when it comes to
the the types of suitabilities they do.
So they do a background check obviously, and it's open to all
U.S. citizens and US nationals. This is the piece that I really
wanted you guys to see. Conditions of employment, the
requirements. They need a a juris doctorate
degree, They have to be a lawyer and they have to be an active
member of any bar in the United States.
It doesn't matter where you are, you must be AUS citizen or U.S.
National. There's a background check,
credit check, tax, crack check, and drug test.
This is standard for federal service.
The Selective Service, if you are male, is applicable.
And here's the required qualifications.
They're looking for someone with AJD who's an active member of
the bar, at least one year of post JD legal experience or
other relevant experience. You have been a paralegal most
likely. And they do hire brand new
attorneys. Ideally they're looking for at
least four years of civil litigation for this particular
announcement. But we are not talking about
senior attorneys. We're not talking about people
who make a ton of money. And so when we go after the sort
of the United States attorneys that are on the line that the
AUS as this is the one who cut this deal, I don't think he's a
guy to blame. This was brought up in a Twitter
space and his name is Derek Hynes.
So there's his LinkedIn right there.
Derek Hynes actually clerked under judges that were appointed
by George W Bush. He was the special counsel to
Louis Free. Louis Free was a famously
conservative FBI director. And for all the ties that he may
have to the Biden family, it sounds like they're pretty up
and up. I don't think this is the kind
of guy that is the issue. He is apparently the one of the
senior types in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was
the one who actually came forward with these this deal or
help put this deal together. I think we put the blame where
it lies, which is squarely on those who are at the top of the
chain and the top of the chain. Many people think that Merrick
Garland is the guy that runs the DOJ or the Ministry of Justice,
as my buddy Garrett calls it. But let's be real specific.
This is the person that runs the DOJ.
There's plenty of information about this.
If you want to follow Cash Patel, you have to follow him on
True Social. He is one of the board members
there and he's not on Twitter. You can follow him at Cash KASH,
a good follow, full of great information.
A friend of mine, friend of our show.
And this is Lisa Monaco. Lisa Monaco, born in 1968, an
American attorney, former federal prosecutor.
She's a national security official who served as the 39th
and current deputy attorney general since April of 21.
So she was brought up under the Biden administration.
She is a member of the Democrat Party.
If you want to know what the deep state looks like, if you
want to know what the deep state is, the deep state is Lisa
Monaco. There's no other way around it.
She graduated from Harvard and it looks like she's basically
been working at the DOJ for most of her adult life.
I think she was about 27 or 28 when she first came in.
She got the she went to the New York Bar Association in 1998.
Looks like she graduated from law school and maybe 96.
I could be wrong about that. Don't hold me to quote on this,
but she did some clerkship and then she started working under
Janet Reno in 1998. This woman has spent her most,
most of her professional experience working under DOJ and
spanned multiple presidents. As you can imagine, she's a
Democrat and in many ways, she's described as an activist.
Don't take my word for it. Go listen to what Cash Patel has
to say about her. And none of them are very
favorable, by the way. He has nothing nice to say about
them. Those of you that are sitting in
the chat right now, I see Ryan telling me that there are 320 of
you watching at the moment. We only got 60 people that hit
the like button. So please hit that like button.
If you are just finding our show for the first time, please hit
the subscribe. If you are watching and you're
watching on the repay or you happen to be listening on the
audio version of it, by all means give us that five star
review. We really do appreciate it.
Tell us what you liked. Tell us what you found out, what
that was news to you and let's keep bumping those things up.
We've cleared the 550 mark and my buddy, producer Phil would
love to see this thing hit 1000 by the end of the year.
I think that would be just a really an interesting mile
marker. But really it's just all about
you guys. In this case, this is your
doing. You guys are the ones who are
pushing the show forward and you're moving the envelope for
us. I do want to read one of those
five star reviews right now. This one is by CLK and a bunch
of numbers. Thirty 2/11/23 CLK you have to
send me Adm and tell me what that means.
It says brilliant. Out of the darkness comes a
light. Kyle and his frequent guest
shine the bright light of truth on an organization that has not
only lost its way but has become a hammer to anything it's used
to stand for. Thank you Kyle for having the
courage to step away from this dysfunctional band of bullies
and expose them all to us. Thank you CLK for the five star
review and thank you for listening.
I do appreciate it. This kind of support is what
makes this show happen. In between that and our good
sponsors, they are showing up because you are showing up and
that's why we're able to do what we're doing.
It's been a major boon to my family.
It has been a thing that that has really changed the game for
us. I'm working out of my house.
I'm doing this sort of prep. I spent all my time in the
information war and I do it because of folks like you that
are watching. So again, hit that that five
star review and go ahead and leave us a comment on there.
I'd love to be able to read yours next and I'm very, very
appreciative for all of you that join me in the live chat.
As you guys can see, if you're watching our Rumble, it is
streaming. It's been streaming the entire
time. I get some of the questions out
of there. I read them all after the fact
too. And if you have something else
that we didn't cover in the show or something that you'd like to
reflect on, put it in the comments below.
You can simply go down there. You have to scroll below the
live chat if you're watching live and if you're watching the
replay, you know where to go. Go ahead and leave those those
comments. I review them a day or two
afterwards and sometimes they can help us form answers that we
need to put on for the next show.
If there's something that's pressing and you don't get a
chance to ask it, please put it down in there.
I do look for them and sometimes we also will cover these on
Twitter Spaces. So if you're not following me on
Truth or you're not following me on Twitter, you can do so at
Kyle Seraphin. And I do appreciate those
follows. We're almost at 88,000 people
following those accounts. I don't know how social media
works, but that seems like an awful lot of people.
That is a, a college football stadium built to capacity.
And, and I am truly humbled that that many people of you out
there are seeing what I'm putting out in the world.
Might my snarky thoughts and some of my, my deeper
reflections and some of the other news that we break and
you're thinking this is a guy that I want to hear more from.
So thank you so much for all the followers.
Today is Wednesday. I will see you again on Friday
for Friendly Friday. We got Steve Friend coming on.
I tasked him with watching the Durham testimony.
I'm going to watch it. We'll bring you guys some
reflections on that as two guys who worked for the FBI and what
we think. Thank you so much for watching
the Kyle Seraphin Show, folks. We will see you on Friday.
Have a good safe next half of the week.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin Show, streamed live
Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter and True social at Kyle Serafin.