Prepare to hear the truth from a real whistleblower, an American
Patriot, here's civil liberties, enthusiasts, Second Amendment,
Defender and indefinitely suspended FBI agent.
Kyle seraphin. Hello, my friends and welcome to
the Kyle Serafin show for Wednesday.
The 22nd of March 20 23, the FBI cannot just get out of the news.
And for those of us, former or recovering FBI agents, it feels
like an ex-girlfriend who just can't stop texting us or calling
or getting into our business. Nothing would make me happier
than the FBI stopping what is doing, but instead it continues
to double down on the reasons why we broke up, which is stupid
almost every single day. I'm going to embrace the
situation. I'm going to give you some
information about the difference between the public perception.
May be only for the leftist. I think many of you probably
know better and what the FBI really does with its time and
hopefully that helps shed some light.
I'm going to also do a little bit of a public service
announcement about your social media.
I'm seeing some behavior that I think is worth noting and we're
going to use a special case that should really make your blood
run cold. This is a First Amendment case
that's absolutely terrifying and it's been going Not for two
years only starting to get a little bit of traction.
I've actually been aware of it since it started.
It bothers me to no end. So I'm going to share a little
bit about the Curious Case of Mr. Mackey, and since most of
that is pretty darn depressing. I'm going to end on a high note,
some good news out of California for gun owners.
So that's not nothing. Stick around for all that.
First of all, we're going to start quick word from our
sponsors which is Patriot coolers.com.
If you haven't been to Patriot coolers.com, Comm check them
out, go look for their hot and cold tumblers, check out there
hard and soft sided cooler options.
They've got some backpacks that you can use to keep things.
Cool, as you move around, you got all the standard sort of
Tumblr, options, and coffee mug, type shapes and bigger stuff.
I'm actually using the original one that I've got.
It's got a dead are thing on here.
This is for my silencers. This is from a buddy Who's In a
Special Operations unit from the Air Force.
And I've had this thing since 2017.
Number one, I haven't lost it. That's really impressive.
Number two, it's a fantastic piece of equipment.
Allows me to put a little drink straw in there, which I like
what I'm doing a smoothie from running the cold.
Beverage works great for hot stuff too but I tend to do this
one because this is a lot of volume of coffee.
Even for a surveillance guy like myself and I'll tell you what,
if any of you are buying these hot and cold tumblers, if you
got a cooler and you fill it with some elk meat, as one of my
buddies told me, he's going to be doing pretty soon.
Any of those kind of things, send me a picture, send it to me
in the DMS on Twitter, and we will add it.
On here and we'll put a little promo together of listeners of
the talk. I'll Serafin show using their
Patriot coolers. I'd like to see that.
I already know I've got a couple of cops that are across on the
East Coast, are going to be sending me some pictures of
using it on surveillance. It's a great tool.
So check that out. You can use promo code Kyle and
you'll get 10% off. Plus, you'll support our show
and you're making a difference for disabled vets.
They offer some percentage of their proceeds to Disabled Vets
post 9/11, guys and girls who need a little handout.
That's Figure out how to make their homes a little more
accessible. So check them out.
And we really appreciate you supporting our sponsors because
they're supporting us Patriot coolers again.
Promo code k yl e for 10% off. And if you spend 150 bucks free
shipping, it's really easy to do, even two of these things,
buy one for yourself by one as a gift, check them out.
All right, let's dive into a little bit of what has been
going on in this world and there are some wild things and I'm I
don't know what else to tell you except it's not great news.
Who's the only good news is that Matt gaetz the congressman from
Florida, who for some reason follows me on Twitter which is
quite funny. Maybe he listens to the cows are
up and show mad. If you do hit me up let me know.
I'm going to share with you a little story that he introduced.
This is coming from daily wire. If you haven't noticed, what I
like to do here, I like to use the reader function.
This is a little Pro tip for you all as a federal investigator
for the FBI, we have unlimited money to go after certain types
of people. But what we don't have is Money
to pay for subscriptions behind the pay wall of the New York
Times And The Washington Post and some of these other types of
things. So what I like to use is the
reader function. If you're using a Mac, you can
go and you can click on a thing. It looks like a piece of paper
up in the bar and you can actually read all of the text of
fill in your blind, fill in the blank stuff behind the paywall.
It also streamlines the reading experience for most people.
So anyway, something you could do is that's what we're seeing
here. If you're watching our humble
Channel, that's what you're looking at right now.
So the article is entitled, Matt gaetz, Announces resolution
dedicated to stopping FBI headquarters funds.
I don't know if it'll pass and I don't know if anybody in the
Senate cares, but this is something that should be done.
This is being reported on by Daniel chatlin on the 21st.
So, just a couple days back now that yesterday.
And so, what did he say? Says, Matt gaetz Republican,
Florida announced on Tuesday, that he is introducing a
resolution that calls for the halting funds dedicated to the
FBI's next headquarters, over concerns about the
politicization. The bureau, the congressman
specifically decries, the FBI's Washington field office.
That's my former home in the business Washington field
office. Abbreviated wfo also known as
worst field office. Just how we know it inside the
bureau which Gates that is weaponized and rotten to the
core. Again, rotten to the core is
that term that Jim Jordan likes to throw around or that phrase
and it comes from Geritol boil my buddy a fellow suspended oil.
Also who sat in on this sort of debrief that went down this
deposition in Congress, or I guess it was in the Rayburn
building that Gates was a part of when they debriefed Garrett.
Anyway, so Gates acknowledges, there are still good men and
women in the FBI whose purpose and tasks are whose task and
purpose are to defend the United States.
That's obviously true. You know, we're talking about an
organization with almost thirty seven thousand people.
There are clearly good people in there, it would be absurd to
smear all of them. That doesn't mean that the FBI
should get a new building and it doesn't mean the FBI should
continue to exist, right? I tried to like it the other day
to an analogy. Let's say you went to a discount
grocery store and you got fantastic deals.
Everybody who went in there, got a great deal, but one in 20
people were electrocuted and needed to be hospitalized
because of faulty wiring in, you know, one of the displays, if
one in 20 people were being wrong, Seriously, would that be
a good reason to keep going in there for the possibility of the
discount? Just because something is going
right? Doesn't mean you continue to do
it when enough of it is going wrong.
And there's a lot of things going wrong at the FBI and we're
going to talk about some of those in a little bit here too.
So I think Gates is on to something here.
He says, they acted, he did titled the FBI, Washington
field, office, house, arrest act.
I don't know why he called it that, but that's what he called.
It cases, resolution outlines a number of alleged misdeeds by
the satellite office. Including targeting parents
critical of school board decisions.
That's obviously true. That's things that we have
pointed out. They were more than two dozen
cases that Garrett brought to the attention of Congress and
the names of the subject of those investigations are with
Jim Jordans office, so that's been done.
There's no debate about that. And the FBI opened up
investigations on people under that threat tag.
Also mentions, including with private sector companies,
including elections, or during the elections to censor
information. This is going to be the Twitter
files. Matt Taibbi is great work,
shellenberger and Weiss, and who's the other one Lee Fang?
So there may be one other in there, but some great journalist
from the Independent sort of world getting after it and
showing the collusion with Twitter and obviously probably
the rest of big Tech was also involved in this sort of thing.
So we got a little weave. Got a little tweet from Matt
gaetz that's fine and says the resolution ultimately urges the
gop-led house to Rally around the sense that no money should
be appropriated to the general Services Administration, or to
the Federal Bureau of Investigation to either plan or
acquire property for a new Consolidated headquarters
outside of DC. Seems like he's real issue, is
375 million dollars. Three hundred seventy five
million dollars from last year's Omnibus which was set up to buy
the space and start building this construction.
They've been talking about this since I joined the bureau.
They were going to move it to Maryland, they were going to
move it to two Virginia. People in Maryland, are
attacking people in Virginia and vice versa.
All of them buying for this huge chunk of federal money.
But the gross thing is, I think in many ways is that that's a
huge chunk of money and if you're ever going to move the
FBI headquarters, you should move it to Gotta get it out of
DC, there's no upside to it being there, apparently, the
director of the FBI can fly back and forth in his private jet
whenever he wants. So it's very easy for him to
just pop into DC. Go to Reagan National where he
loves to fly. Anyway, you know take a
10-minute car ride, go and testify in front of the Hill, if
needed. And then go back to where he
works in Kansas City or in Omaha, or Oklahoma City or
anywhere in America that somewhere in the Heartland.
So he can get a sense of what regular people are like and stop
being around all these swamp creatures.
And think that it's normal All four people to make ten million
dollars a year as an attorney who does some sort of lobbying
work, whatever that is. So, anyhow gate says that
through our investigations, with the select subcommittee, on the
weaponization of the federal government.
We've uncovered extremely disturbing testimony from FBI
whistleblowers at the Washington field office, targeted,
Americans, who opposed their political agenda.
This is obviously the case. This is what is going on.
This is the world that we're dealing with and and that's
pretty gross. I don't think anybody should
want that. I don't think anybody should be
Accepting of this sort of behavior by the FBI and we're
going to talk a little bit more about some of the other awful
things they're doing. I'm going to skip ahead.
I want to talk about a piece that came out from the Heritage
Foundation. Apparently the Heritage
Foundation, has this little sub group called the oversight
project, the oversight project tweeted out.
Something I'm gonna show it to you briefly.
So you can take a look at what we're looking at here.
This tweet, which was on, March 20th if you're not following,
its Site PR. That's OV ER s IG HT P are like
public relations or pop a Romeo If you are a NATO phonetic type
and it says that the Heritage foundation's oversight project
obtained records from the at FBI showing agents in the Washington
field office. This is my old office work,
nearly 16,000 more hours after January 6th, then during the BLM
riots, that ravaged, the nation's capital.
All right. I'm gonna go back to a full
camera here and we're just going to talk about that for a second.
So what they show in this particular little snippet that
came from a lawsuit they were able to get this under sort of
like a foia type request or something they sued the bureau
to release it. All right.
The bureau uses a time card system called Web, ta web ta.
As far as I recall is actually owned by the company.
That does the timecard keeper called Kronos.
I actually use that Adele and 05.
So, It's a long time company, there's nothing magical about it
but the bureau does something that a lot of employees don't
have to do. They actually log their time
against specific threat codes known as Turks T urk.
It stands for time utilization and I don't know what the are in
the K stands for. It doesn't actually matter that
much for what we're talking about, Turks are an alphanumeric
that tag to specific types of threats.
And I don't know what the clout, why they people always act like
they're classified, but they might actually have some sort of
Vacation to some of them. I don't understand why but
they're like, you know, a number three digit number.
You know, 1 2 3 x, + 1 2 3. X means certain things and 123
why would mean something else and 1, 2, 3 Z would be a
different variety of those. Well the thing that I've
mentioned that people need to be looking at are 266 266 x-ray,
whatever the code is after it specifically Oscar.
So, 2660 is the anti-government anti-authority a violent
extremist tag. These are not criminal
investigations but that's what I'm seeing January, 6 stuff.
Being tagged under these are our counterterrorism, designations
the 266 in general are the violent extremists that are
domestic. So take your pick of what they
are, white supremacist anti-abortion protesters, you
know. They use these things and they
are tagging them as though these are possible terrorist I want to
know how many of those 16,000 XS, H are 266 investigations, I
suspect all of them, but here's what they actually revealed on,
they grabbed the time sheets from the pay period of what is
that? May 24th.
And then June 7th, June 21st, July 5th and so on.
And what they found is there's roughly 70,000 hours a week
during that two weeks that are build against all the web ta
pay. And I'm assuming that these are
agents the way that they've got it set up, but it's not entirely
clear actually who who these web ta Turk codes are set up against
Seventy-four thousand hours on 524 of 2020.
On 529 President Trump was forced into the bunker in the
white house. So during that pay period
halfway into it. But in the early part of it
rather because it's that's in the first week of it, we had
historic riots in d.c. at least damage was done to historic
buildings, I guess we could say in Lafayette Square and st.
John's Church was burned. I was there the day after this
happened. And like I said, the 29th they
sent President Trump Into the Bunker and the left cheered.
They were approximately maybe 3,000 excess hours worked during
that pay period compared to normal.
And then we've got basically right back down to seventy
thousand three hundred and sixty seven.
Seventy. 1800, it kind of, that's kind of within the
regular round range of about 70,000 hours per week that
continues on during that time period.
Now, let's look at January. 3rd 2021 is the paper And three days
later, January 6, 2021. And then the period after that,
which is 117. So that goes all the way up
until the end of January. So basically the entire month of
January 2021, the first month we had a T-1000, almost, 80 1500
hours where worked and the next week.
The next period eighty-six thousand two hundred, so that
excess counts for that. 16,000 hours if those hours are all
worked on the same, Type of case if there was nothing else going
on. And there's no reason to believe
otherwise and they're all working non criminal
investigations 266 has That should be a real, big problem.
Now, here's the other thing that the FBI is going to do, because
the FBI does this all the time, let's say you work
counterintelligence and you're working under a 200 code.
They will ask you to work 200 codes even when you're not doing
200s, which is time card fraud, because the special agent in
charge is incentivized to work X number of hours have X number
of, man, hours attributed to their specific type of work.
So if you're a counterintelligence agent
working on counterintelligence cases, but you Two weeks on a
TDY somewhere else, doing something else.
Like that's going to be a strike against the total number of
hours. Worked for that special
agent-in-charge. Particularly watching field
where they have five special agent in charge and one
assistant director above them. Most field offices, only have
one special agent in charge and everybody rolls up that guy or
girl more and more women are running field offices.
Which is bizarre considering how many females are actually in the
bureau. It's not that many and the
number of them that are in leadership is vastly over.
It's way more than ought to be based on the number.
Burrs that actually are represented in the Asian
population from what I can tell. And certainly when it comes to
competency, I don't know why it is.
That women in the FBI, there's a few women that I would trust.
I trust them as much as anybody in in the hole, you know,
government apparatus. But I'll tell you what, it's
like to women that I know not very many many the right now, so
we'll be fair about that as well, but I know where men that
I trust this little weird snippet and I'll kind of punch
it over here for you to look at if you're watching the rumble
Channel, You can see this is and it's unfortunately not very well
centered, but these are the hours and they are, they are
definitely disproportionately. Favoring January 6 versus the
response to the BLM riots, which is exactly what I've been saying
for a while now. Nothing fancy or new is
disconcerting? If you're not following oversee
project, check them out. I think that the stuff that's
coming out there. I've been talking to some of the
folks at work within it at Heritage and they are doing some
good work. So I'm hopeful that's going to
come somewhere out there. I'm going to go backwards in
time just a little bit or a little Backwards on this.
And I want to talk about some of the narrative coverage that's
going on. It's not just the 7th floor of
the Hoover building, which is what you kind of hear from the
Sean Hannity types. And if you've been paying
attention, you get to sort of like, you know, there's the good
men and women of the FBI. Obviously Gates has to feel like
he has to share a little bit about this, but I want to talk
to you about the public perception, which is very
different than what the bureau, actually does most people assume
and I probably have just say this a few more times in this
podcast, they The f.b.i. is a law enforcement agency. and I'm
going to tell you, it's not It is an intelligence agency.
The FBI is an intelligence agency that has Law Enforcement
capabilities because the majority of the work and the
majority of the focus and the majority of the people getting
promoted to the highest levels of the bureau have a background
in working intelligence investigations intelligence
investigations, do not require a criminal act to predicated
investigation. This is incredibly important to
understand if people even on the left who are defending the FBI
right now, for whatever reason and they are If people on the
left, could understand that the bureau has no love for them, it
has love for doing the mission, that it gets paid for and
continuing its salary, so that it can get a retirement.
That's the what the people in The Bureau are doing.
It does not matter, if they go after the left of the right, it
just turns out that the right is the, the target does your of the
moment. Alright, so a intelligence
investigation is a circle. It goes around it around.
Once it begins it, continues to generate Formation and it spits
off information and tangents and it continues to keep feeding
itself for its own sake. A criminal investigation is
linear something happens, a crime, we figure out who it is
the subject we get in evidence when it's enough evidence and it
looks like that person is, in fact, guilty of the thing that
they are known to have done or believed to have done.
Then, we can either indict them or we can use a criminal
complaint. They are arrested, they face
those charges, they go in front of a judge, the judge, Judge
tells him what those are at an initial appearance.
They go to a lawyer, the lawyer decides whether they're going to
plea or they're going to fight it in court.
There is Discovery as necessary. The information is presented to
them, they either get to make a defense or they don't because
they plead most of them plead. If you go up against the FBI,
most people plead it's just what happens over 90% And might be as
high as 98% in certain areas and then it ends.
If you plead out, you go to jail, you serve, whatever your
sentence is, you get probation, whatever.
If you are acquitted, you're done.
You can always appeal the sentence.
But for the for all intensive purposes, that's a linear
progression intelligence agencies, don't need to have an
end result. The end result is information.
The end result is also the input to the next Circle.
So it continues to go around and around and around.
This is a fundamental difference that people have to understand
when you have a intelligence agency with law enforcement
capabilities, they can rebuild these things through parallel.
Construction. I know I talked about that last
week. It's worth noting if you didn't
hear it, go back and listen to the week and find out about
parallel construction. But once, you know, something,
essentially, you cannot unknow it and you can build a case
knowing that it's already there. You can go find what it is.
It's so much. Imagine if you were in fact
there's actually a story in the Bible about this, you know, a
man finds a treasure in a field. And so what does he do?
He knows it's there. He knows the treasure is there.
So he goes out and he sells everything, he has to buy the
field to own the treasure. And then he's made hole right?
In the same way the bureau will. I'll know something because of
some intelligence process, whether it's 702 or fisa or any
other of the you know, techniques that that fall
underneath the sort of collections they can use on the
National Security side. National security, letters are a
secret subpoenas on, they go and rebuild that on the criminal
side parallel construction. It's allowed to happen.
It shouldn't be. This is why you have to divorce
these two, that's why the FBI's domestic intelligence Mission
must be destroyed. I'm saying it again.
It must be destroyed. Someone asked me on Truth today.
They said or yesterday. I guess.
They said what is your position on 702?
I will be very, very clear. It's my position.
It's George Hills position people who have used this thing
professionally. It has to go away.
It is a tool that cannot be used legally under the circumstances
for a law enforcement entity. It's got to go.
So if you're not lobbying your Congress people and letting them
know that renewing 702 is a no-go you need to let them know.
The by demonstration has made it a priority.
Why would that be? Why would the Biden
Administration? Be so comfortable doing
something that is so dangerous and can only be used improperly
and the only answer I can think of is that they want to keep
their pit bull that the FBI is acting on their behalf right now
and so they're going to keep it but the FBI, violates the civil
liberties of people on the left and on the right.
They do not discriminate on that way.
It is far more on the right at this moment but that is not
historically. The case historically, they've
been very comfortable just drink, Civil liberties on both
sides and we're seeing some of that spill over into other
people's thinking, some of this is because of President Trump
and he broke so many brains. Some of it is because of covid
because so many people just were able to roll over and accept
what were they were told and do what they were.
You know, what was suggested them.
It's worth noting, the mayor of New York City Eric Adams on
either Monday or Tuesday of this week.
Got up in front of a camera and stated that based on the idea
that Trump may be indicted. I'll buy this guy.
Alvin brag. Who's the prosecutor in
Manhattan? Based on the possibility of that
happening. The city of New York, and I
assume it means their Police Department are monitoring social
media. In direct violation, in direct
violation of the First Amendment.
There's no allegation or information that a crime is
going to happen, but they are monitoring social media.
This is not acceptable in this country.
We cannot accept law enforcement doing this sort of thing.
And they are doing intelligence work.
When they are doing that, They are not going after a specific
crime, they're going after the potential of a crime existing
and pre-crime, despite it being a lot of fun.
From the Philip K dick, Novella The Minority Report, which many
people saw as a movie, that Tom Cruise was in.
This goes back to 1956, he saw this as a dystopian possibility,
that when you try to predict human behavior, there's always
one variable, it's called Free Will.
And if you are a Godly person, or you're someone who believes
in Free Will is given to you by God, the Creator.
This is a real problem. You cannot hold people
accountable for things. They didn't do.
And essentially even the conspiracy charges.
I feel very uncomfortable with the idea that the government is
able to say that this conspiracy was going to be the case.
That actually planning to do certain actions is a crime
because the crime itself is never committed.
And what if Government actors are involved, that's when it
gets really, really spicy. If a couple of people are proven
to have done something and we interrupt them before the bank
robbery ever happens or before whatever.
This particular thing is this conspiracy to do this federal
crime. Has no government involvement
other than they were aware of it.
They found out about it, and then they arrested them before
it happened. Maybe that's fair play.
But more often, than not these days could criminal conspiracies
involved knowing about them because they are federal
investigators that are involved. There are federal informants
where there are undercover agents that are that are part of
it, from any, you know, whether it be DEA or FBI ATF, or you
take your pick, anybody that is involved in that game.
That's a really, really scary game to be playing because you
are now saying that under no circumstances His stances, could
that person have backed away from that idea, or that group of
people could have backed away at this was a, such an eminent
thing that had to be taken down before it happened criminal
conspiracy, that's pre-crime. That is enforcing a crime that
has not happened and forcing actions on violating a law.
When they, when the actual underlying predicate action has
not actually taken place very dangerous stuff.
Anyway, Adams has got the talking points, he's doing the
FBI routine. I want to show you something
else that's doing the FBI routine right now.
This is the good men and women problem.
So the good men and women of the FBI are they retire?
Many of them have been in touch with people like me and Steve
friend. I was a friend of the show and
been very supportive and some of them are like this this is
something that I posted on Twitter because I thought it was
necessary, I am going to call them a whistleblower but a
retired agent reached out and send this over to me.
Someone who has still direct contact with a lot of things
going on in the bureau and then also has something to do with
this Society. A former Agents of the FBI and
this is their newsletter that they put out to their chapter
chairs which are the people that are running all the regional
little groups of this. The society for former agents of
the FBI is also known as sock, ex-fbi SOC the letter X FBI and
I think they have a sock ex-fbi dot-org if you want to go visit
their thing, that's where their pages.
So this is what it says. It says below are the updates
regarding select issues of the border director should be aware
of and May want to disseminate to chapter chairs.
The information should also be beneficial for answering
questions. The most significant ongoing
issue will be the pending Congressional hearings headed by
Congressman Jim Jordan. And these are the issues that
the Society of former FBI agents thinks are relevant for their
members to get the following talking points.
This reads like something MSNBC could be reading on their
nightly newscast agents, taking a knee during demonstrations in
Washington DC, in June, 20, 20 10, interesting.
We just talked about that didn't work any extra hours there.
Here's the story, as they say it during the BLM demonstrations
conducted a nationwide following the death of George, Floyd in
June 2020. Agents from Washington field
office, were mandated by the Attorney General to protect
Federal property and buildings in Washington.
D.c., I'm just going to go out there and tell you the, the
position that should be taken about this is that this should
not have happened. FBI agents are not good at
protecting property. We have no training experience
or mandate to do such things. We don't do pre-crime.
We don't pre-pro. What is it preemptively stand in
front of buildings to make sure that they're not injured.
That's not a thing that FBI agents do their investigators.
The job code is 1811. It's Middle investigator.
That means there has to be a crime.
So, be it. Anyhow, these these guys go
here, the agents were harshly criticized by their peers for
their actions. Yeah, they were because they put
us all in danger when they did. What they did by dropping Annie,
they showed compliance to a mob that's incredibly dangerous.
They were subject to internal review, the FBI agents
Association provided the agents with hundred dollar gift cards
as a gesture of support. During the internal review, it
was intended for agents to take their families to dinner as a
stress. Reliever most are all the agents
had returned to give cards. Do you know why they had to
return them because Is there not a lot of receive a gift more
than twenty dollars? It's a de minimis or nominal
value. So they were given the gift and
they had to return it. Not because the agency
Association, didn't agree with it.
It's because it actually violated FBI policy to receive
such gifts. But it did look like a reward to
those of us who were sitting in the same office, who did the
same thing and didn't drop a knee and guess who's one of
those people, yours. Truly, I was one of the people
sitting there doing that thing, right?
I was involved in the same exact type of work.
I was marching around for no reason with my squad in the dark
and it's not a big deal, and it's not what we normally do in
early February, whoever this person is, that's the writer.
This woke activists inside the society for former FBI agents
received a series of emails and calls regarding this matter.
And that's why I want to address it in early February of what of
this year, two years later, okay?
Three years later, whatever. The issue came a few times in
Regional calls but it wasn't a returning theme.
Here we go. Now we're going to smear
somebody else's so former agent James gag, Leon, oh, wrote about
this issue of politicization in October 20, 22.
All right, James Gagliano is not a former FBI agent as he.
And I had a short conversation about this.
He is a retired supervisory special agent, he retired as an
SSA, a gs-14 and he retired. Not former former is people like
me. They didn't finish 20 years
where they didn't get to retirement.
It's a different animal. Jimmy gags did the time and he
deserves respect but he doesn't get the respect because he's not
agreeing with this narrative from this group.
And I think that's really important that they defame him
in that way. Or they are sliding him and the
only people that know what are people that are FBI agents
because we know the difference between former and retired and
it's a big difference, same thing.
For those of you in the military, you understand, you
can be ex-military, you can be a veteran or you could be a
retired at a rank. If you have that retired at the
rank, it means you win a certain distance.
It means something to the people that were inside of it.
It means something. This particular case to says in
addition Nicole Parker, who the abscissa spendables refer to as
FBI Barbie. No big deal.
An agent who resigned wrote a letter published in the media in
January and titled why I left the FBI.
I think she actually did it earlier but that's fine, no
doubt. These articles were a cause of
concern for members, who have since raised the issue among
other things G, they call them gee.
That's funny. Jimmy gags and Parker accuse,
the Agents of expressing political support for the
demonstrators, that's what they did.
Now, whether they agreed with that thing that they did is
another animal, they did a gesture of support whether it
was for D escalation, or otherwise is sort of irrelevant.
Because the thing that happened was that they showed support for
BLM on duty, while wearing FBI equipment.
So, this guy says, I neither condone nor do.
I criticize. The agents agents are not
trained for crowd control. This is actually true in this
location. I believe they were 23 agents.
I understand, they dealt with between 800 and 1,000
demonstrators. That sounds very Generated from
what I saw walking around. But maybe there were that many
people, it doesn't really matter.
You're 23, armed federal agents, you don't put in the and put
yourself at risk, you stand up because not everybody did it.
And nobody did it except for that group, on that day, which
was composed primarily of counterintelligence Agents
intelligence agents. Not the ones who do normal
criminal investigations that are used to seeing bad guys.
This is not a good decision and was a bad decision by the
management and a worse decision tactically on the ground.
It was a very stressful situation, so, Person.
Now decides to cover all the stuff, the agents, choose to
take a needed disc deescalate the situation deputy director,
David bowdich spoke about th the agents.
Everyone told him that you can e to deescalate.
Not everybody. There was kneeling even in that
picture of the Neal Team. Six.
As we call them, not everybody was kneeling the FBI agents
Association gave gift cards. It wasn't an award, but a
gesture of support. The society had nothing to do
with these particular gift cards agents, should not have been in
the crowd control business. They're not trained.
The order was from attorney general bar, the bureau
leadership should have pushed back, but didn't or maybe they
did and didn't work. Whatever going to scan through
some more of this. They want to talk about how law
enforcement officers in different jurisdictions around
the country. Also did this thing.
The FBI is under the Hatch Act, those law enforcement officers
are not, they can do things according to their police
department policies or their Sheriff's Office policies that
are different than the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
It turns out. Anyway, making it make a lot of
excuses, then they talk about Charles.
To go. This is the former special agent
in charge of counterintelligence in New York and the New York
field office. He was indicted by several from
grand, juries for receiving a bunch of money.
He was appointed by Jim Comey, not director way.
That's really funny. They literally call him out.
They say that some reporting has linked him to Crossfire
hurricane. Yeah, because he was involved in
crossfire hurricane and went after President Trump, but it
says in the last sentence here, He was appointed Special,
agent-in-charge by director Comey, not Chris Rea.
They are literally carrying water for Chris, Rea because
it's not like Chris. Rea was going to get rid of him,
it doesn't really matter who appointed him, he was a special
agent in charge of a field office.
I guarantee you he had time with the director, that's what they
do, particularly New York, that's an easy one.
Another story about a SSA or a, former special agent who's
giving stories about this Leonard Peltier, who's a Native
American guy Who was shooting, I guess he was involved in a
shooting in the 70s and he's up for parole doesn't really matter
to us for this purposes. These are not political things.
That's just an old story. January, 6 investigation, the
society board, secretary Mike Anderson pose.
The question raised to him about the number of people charged
with misdemeanors versus felonies, the inference being
investigative bias versus the right and not the left.
This is a recurring theme that the FBI special agents, former
special agent societies dealing with, yeah?
No kidding. The issue is timely again, here
we go. Are you ready for this?
This is a hot one Tucker Carlson was given exclusive access to
footage of the January, 6 breach, at the Capitol by house
Speaker. Kevin McCarthy, Republican
California. He selectively.
Edited the footage and reported on his evening, Fox News, show
that the violence was overstated and much of the demonstrators
were peaceful Okay, they've taken the position here.
That's pretty hard to bake to back up.
Carlson manipulated the January 6, security footage, giving the
false appearance that the Insurrection was mostly
peaceful. Now, I saw Tucker Carlson last
night. I think he does a really good
job. He's actually hammering this
home, good for him, he continues to show what's going on and
there were a lot more peaceful people than not by an like a
huge margin. that the people that even inside the capitol,
That walked around by and large are being charged with things
like parading illegal, parading and trespassing.
You know, a few of them are doing this are getting
threatened with this disruption of a Fishel proceedings, things
like that. But essentially we're talking
about people who are getting hit with misdemeanor charges, the
FBI agents Association is going to give you They're take or not,
the agency Association rather. This is the Society of former
FBI agents. Here we go again.
Alright, Carlson, manipulated the January 6 footage, giving
the false appearance at the Insurrection was mostly peaceful
next paragraph. The capital breach was an
Insurrection. Declarative statement there was
undeniable and significant violence.
This is nonsense because nobody's been charged with
Insurrection and these people should actually know that.
But this is the same group that recently put out a call to all
members saying they're looking Or a former agent of color to
star in a procedural TV, show about FBI agents, dealing with
crime, which is insane, because that's not the way the FBI
Works. Anyway, the demonstrators who
breached the capital, even if nonviolent did so illegally and
not by entering through normal security checkpoints at a
minimum, a minimum. Anyone breaching the capital was
willfully blind. This is a really, really gross
take. And it's a gross take, that's
not just The FBI management. These are the people that have
retired at all levels. That are getting these talking
points. Why are they circling the wagons
like that? I'm going to tell you why.
In just a second because the follow-up to this was They
invited the regional chairs and some of the people who are in
charge of this Society to meet with FBI director.
Chris, Rea at Quantico for a rare opportunity to sit down and
circle the wagons and talk in April and they're going to watch
a new employee, you know, a new agent class graduate and they're
going to have some nice time together so that they can get
everybody on the same page because the FBI understands the
management of it understands. And so do the people that have
given their life to it. They have no other identity.
It turns out so many of them do the people that follow me up
that back with me and Steve friend up they have other lives.
They have net worth that is outside of the FBI and the badge
and their identity, as a former agent, a lot of them, you
probably would never know. They were agents other than when
you bring up, what did you do? I'm retired, would you retire
from? I retired from the FBI, the
people that are involved in this organization, at least the
management leadership group of it, that's putting these kind of
talking points out. This is the only Energy they
have and if the FBI is besmirched, so is their life
work and their reputation because I got nothing else to
hang on. I met a lot of people like this
towards retirement in the FBI, like when I was working for
watching and field, I worked with guys that were on the edge
retirement. They had nothing else.
They were not interesting people, they were not people who
had another life going on, they gave everything they had to the
bureau sadly enough and they had nothing else to cling onto.
We've all met people like that guys who leave the military and
they can't stop wearing their veteran hat.
The guys that I like to me. Eat you find out they're a
veteran on the third or fourth time you met him, why?
Because it's not part of their life.
It's not something they have to share with you every single
second. This is a little different
animal. Now they're going to go in
there. Going to take a hot.
Take here regarding criminal charges.
Geogrid, Jay makes the prosecute of decisions.
Every one who breaks the capital could have been charged with
felony offenses. That is a hot take, by the way,
due to the anticipated. Number of people to be charged
doj opine to charge the less egregious offenders with
misdemeanor offenses, to clear, the anticipated criminal docket
backlog, know the FBI and the and the doj got together and
decided this was going to be the Case it's ever been worked and
that's why there were 16,000 hours in the the weeks just
after it and there weren't that on the BLM riots despite the
kneeling there's such an obvious and disgusting double standard
being taking. It's just it nauseates me.
I'm going to skip through some of this.
They talk about some of the trials.
Proud boys Oath, Keepers seditious conspiracy, you know,
all such a disgraceful situation.
It's there's like so much breathlessness and pearl
clutching. It makes you want to puke and
then they have a untier section. On whistleblowers for more than
a year, Senator Charles Grassley, this is great because
these are former Bureau agents and they can't even write or
keep the facts straight. It's pretty typical of
government work. So Senator, Charles Grassley
Republican, Jim Jordan have stated that numerous FBI
whistleblowers have come forward to report on the politicization
of the wrong doings at doj and the FBI representative, Jordan
issued a report blah blah blah on November 4th.
If you follow this podcast, I gave you a 30-minute primer on
that. This report will serve as a road
back to the Congressional hearing.
Earrings to be chaired by representative Jordan of the
next two years. It should be noted that neither
Senator Grassley nor representative Jordan our
objective. Oh well, that's an interesting
take. They are driven by partisan
motives which preclude them from letting the facts, get in the
way. Ready for this one, Senator
Jordan appears on Meet the Press in January of twenty
twenty-three and it was clear that he has a narrow focus and
predetermine the outcome of the hearings to be held.
So he just got promoted the senator.
That's interesting. These people make just simple,
stupid airs. The initial reports were that,
they were 19 whistleblowers. Subsequent report says, between
24 and 30, the keys to considering regarding the
whistleblowers coming forward. Their allegations are indicative
are their allegations indicative of systemic problems.
Where are they presenting one off grievances of individual.
Issues. This is there take, this is the
Society of former FBI agent saying this thus far issues
appear to be more one off. And, for the most part, lack
credibility, if you follow this podcast, you know, some of the
things that I've made allegations of things like,
directories jet. It's not up for debate that he
used it the way he did. The question is why?
And whether or not he's criminally culpable for misusing
600,000 to two million dollars of American taxpayer, funded
money on a jet. That he doesn't own that it
wasn't made for him, wasn't bought for him, that's a big
deal. Was the FBI targeting veterans
when they release the militia violent extremists symbols
guide, that has things like the Betsy Ross flag behind me things
like the Gadsden flag things like the 1835 Gonzales Battle
Flag. Was that a problem when they
went after people like Mike Glover who appeared on Tucker
last night, was that a problem when they named American
contingency and online militia group with a low History of
Violence? Is that a one-off grievance by
someone? If you think I'm not pissed
about being kicked out of the FBI.
Of course I am. That was a great gig and it's
all I wanted to do. But the think that the things
that we are saying have something to do with our
personal grievances. Know these things started long
before we had any kind of negative record.
I actually just got my termination of my, my security
clearance yesterday. They let me know that they
terminated my security clearance, but they're waiting
for me to say whether or not I agreed with them.
And since I didn't contest it, then they're going to agree with
themselves and they're going to definitely confirm their
termination, which they've already confirmed.
But now our Confirming. It's a useless organization when
it comes to the procedural things.
These people are not honest operators and this kind of
stuff, this fluff job, this sort of like masturbatory, oh garbage
from these, former agents should make everybody puke.
Here's another fun thing at the society conference in
Huntsville, on October 14th 2023.
It seems like people who get to these sort of leadership roles
that assume leadership within either former FBI Societies or
the current, they have a real hard time, like, doing real
dates. It's the same reason.
Reason. Why a deputy Assistant, Director
of Human Resources was referencing a letter that hadn't
been written yet on why he agreed with.
Why my religious accommodation couldn't be accommodated.
They hadn't even written a letter yet, but he knew in the
future what was going to be? And apparently, they know what's
going to happen in October of 2023.
I'm sure they had a typo because it's deputy director, Paul
Abate. Anyway, he said he strongly
supports those who come forward with protected disclosures as
whistleblowers and that retaliation will not be
tolerated. This is utter BS.
It is complete trash. It is a false statement.
It is a complete lie, they have 100% retaliated against
whistleblowers. If anybody tells you otherwise
they are lying to you. If the FBI says it, they're
lying. That's assumed.
But these people are lying to because they have no idea what
they're talking about now. They're going to go and talk
about two notable whistleblowers.
Have received media attention have been interviewed include
Steve friend and Nicole. Parker only one of those people
is a whistleblower, by the way. As you listen to the podcast
know why there is an actual definition of what a
whistleblower is Nicole. Parker does not fit it.
She has not done those things. I guess you could become a
whistleblower, but up until this point I have not heard of any of
the protected. She's disclosure she made and
Jim Jordan also was not aware of those things when he was on Sean
Hannity's radio before she went out in front of the the
Congressional committee no allegations made.
So they said that her Congressional testimony, lack
specificity and specific allegations.
That's all true agreed. Yeah.
Steve friend was interviewed by Jim Jordans committee and
various media Outlets he filed a whistleblower, complaint with
doj friends. Claims were rejected by both
entities, the office of special counsel and the doj Inspector
General That's false as you heard here.
They are opening those things up.
They actually just returned by sop standard, operating
procedure ad, like a declination letter to every single person
who sends it on. So that they don't get accused
of not following up on everything.
Totally insane. This is the self licking ice
cream cone of the federal government and then they quoted
the Washington examiner. They quoted know they quoted the
FBI statement in the Washington examiner making fun of Steve
friend. So Pretty disgusting stuff.
I don't know why these kind of things are there.
I'll show you real quick. But this is the, this is the
final piece of it. If you haven't seen my Twitter
account by the Oh, by all means, go check this out.
It was two days ago, I put it all out in long form.
There's way more of it and I don't know how much of it is
actually worth covering. There's something like eight
pages. This one thing I did think that
was pretty amazing. Is that Chris Rea said he's not
going to breathlessly follow every allegation.
That is thrown their way. Okay buddy.
Thanks for that. They're not going to
breathlessly follow. All the Allegations.
How about the allegations that you're going after people for
protected First Amendment activity?
That's been something that we've brought up quite a few times.
In fact, it's the First Amendment of the Constitution it
should hold some water. The FBI loves to put a caveat on
things like, listen, just because you have a Betsy Ross
flag behind you on your podcast, doesn't mean that you're a
domestic violent terrorist, okay, but the fact that we don't
like you does. So we're going to monitor your
first amendment protected speech, which is why I'm sure
the FBI security division continues to watch this part.
Podcast. I hope they're giving us a five
star review. Anytime guys, feel free.
I've seen your one star reviews are getting out Wade.
We've got well over 300 five star reviews coming in from
people who liked it. So anyhow, I'm going to bring up
an article here that should literally make your blood run
cold. This is actually from Justice
dot-gov. This is the actual press release
for the indictment that came out.
This is not a recent thing that's happened in January of
2021. Okay, this was right after the
by demonstration took over and suddenly somebody who did
something in advance of the presidential elections in
October and November of 2016 was indicted under this.
So if you're not watching our Rumble Channel and saying this,
once again, you can always go see the video there, but I'll
read the article here. It's entitled actually, it's a
press release or not an article, social-media, influencer charged
with election, interference stemming from a voter
disinformation campaign. This is really dark stuff.
Defendant unlawfully use social media to deprive individuals of
their right to vote. I'm going to say that again,
because that's patently insane. The defendant unlawfully use
social media to deprive individuals of their right to
vote. All right.
For those of you that are using Anonymous social media accounts,
for those of you that are out there and are sharing your
thoughts in snarky and fun ways, I want you to be very, very
cautious when you hear what this thing means because it should
scare the living hell out of you.
Number one and number two, I would like you to put your real
name out there and own your comments because if you think
the federal government can't find you you're wrong, they can
still find you. So you might as well own them.
It shows you that you have some spine.
That's the reason why I'm have Face and my name attached to
mine. I'm going to own all my
opinions. We're all responsible for every
round, we send down range verbally or otherwise, and you
might as well take ownership of it.
A Florida, man, why is it always a Florida, man?
Right? Anyway, a Florida man, was
arrested this morning. This is going back to 2021, so,
this is not current on charges of conspiring with others.
In advance of the 2016 US presidential election, To use
various social media platforms to disseminate misinformation
designed to deprive individuals of their constitutional right to
vote. I'm going to focus in on words
for a second because they matter disinformation is a intentional
use of things that are inaccurate.
Misinformation is something that you don't know is inaccurate.
But you're you're sharing it in accurately anyway.
These are their definitions, by the way.
Not mine. I think they're all Bs.
I think they're all called Free Speech.
Do. Whatever the heck you want?
The Story Goes Like This. Douglas Mackey.
AKA Ricky Vaughn, Ricky Vaughn. If you don't know was a famous
he's a famous character in the movie.
Major-league played by Charlie Sheen, one of the great fun,
Americana types, a picture that doesn't have.
Any nerve can throw a hard fastball but doesn't have any
control and he has to get in touch with his wild side and his
controlled side in order to be able to Be an Effective major
league pitcher. It's a great story Major League
even though it's a comedy. And so, his name is, Ricky
Vaughn already a serious. Start, I guess with his AKA 31
years. Old in West Palm Beach.
He is charged by criminal complaint.
The criminal complaint again. If you follow this podcast, you
know, they use the criminal complaint to get around having
to do a summons. This is how you can kick down
doors because you get an arrest warrant right off the bat in the
eastern district of New York, he was taken into custody this
morning in West Palm Beach. Made his appearance initial
appearance before a Magistrate Judge Bruce Ryan Hearts.
Huh, it's almost like we've heard that name before, right?
In the southern district of Florida.
I'll leave Reinhardt file alone for a little bit quote, going to
the allegations of the complaint, the defendant
exploited, a social media platform to infringe on one of
the most basic and sacred rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
The right to vote, never mind the other sacred rights given by
the First Amendment, to the Constitution, the right, to free
speech, and freedom of the press, this complaint
underscores, the Department's commitment to investigating and
prosecuting, Eating those who would undermine citizens voting
rights. Well let's let's restate that in
a real way. What this does is this
indictment was done to chill the social media activities of
people who have a sense of humor and also happen to be pro-trump
in this case. That's what's going on there.
If you think otherwise you are sorely mistaken, there's no
place in the public discourse for lies and misinformation to
defraud, citizens of their right to vote.
It sounds like you must have done something really serious.
If you're not following this case, by the way, you really
need to be tuning in pretty soon.
There's Bill Sweeney assistant director in charge in your
Fields office. He says, that protecting
American citizens, right? To cast a legitimate vote, is
the key to the success of our Republic.
What? Mackey?
Allegedly did to interfere with the process by soliciting
voters, to cast their ballots via text anybody here think that
somebody actually cast their vote by a text, that's really
strange. The people who did send the text
message, by the way, they don't think that they voted that way.
They don't even remember doing it.
They probably thought it was a gag as well, cast their votes by
tax amount to nothing short of vote theft.
It's a vote theft that nobody can prove because nobody knows
if those those actual votes were stolen.
That's incredible stuff. Okay.
Well, this is what we're going to be going with in this.
By the administration. This has been going on for two
years. This guy is actually facing
trial right now I'm going to read a little bit from The New
York Times article and just a second.
I just want you to know that the count, the complaint alleges
that in 2016, Mackay and established an audience on
Twitter of approximately 58,000 followers.
I've actually got more followers in that right now and Analysis
of 2016. I'm sorry in February 2016 by
the MIT. Media lab rank Mackey has the
107th most important influencer of the upcoming election.
That sounds like some shade. Ooh, science.
But okay, they ranked his account above individuals such
as NBC News, which was 114th, Stephen Colbert, who is a
comedian and an honor, particularly funny one at that
and Newt Gingrich, who hasn't been an active player in
politics for a little while. So this guy who was motivated,
not they're tweeting was a real big problem and the complaint
alleges that between September and November the lead-up to the
November 8 election in 2016. That's election.
He conspired to you social. Media with others, including
Twitter to disseminate fraudulent messages, designed to
encourage supporters of one of the presidential candidates to
vote, quote-unquote vote via text message on social media, a
legally invalid method of voting, a true joke and that's
what they went. After him for.
You can read more of this, you can go to doj, you can read if
you type in Justice, dot-gov, and type in Mac, ke why his name
is Mackey. Douglas Mackey.
Also known as Ricky Vaughn. Check this guy out because it's
nuts. I'm going to also bring up the
New York Times piece here, because I want to show you just
how nasty the coverage is. This is actually from just two
days ago. So here's the nasty coverage on
the New York Times. Oh, there it is trial of the
2016, Twitter troll to test the limits of online speech.
Douglas, Mackay tried to trick black people into thinking they
could vote by text in the Clinton Trump presidential
election. Prosecutor said, I don't know
about you. I have some friends who are
black people. I cannot imagine them thinking
they could vote by text. I can't imagine anybody of any
color thinking. They're going to vote for tax by
tax. This is insane.
This is a this is a crazy joke that is now going to land
somebody in prison because we are not dealing with it.
Fair process. This is a weaponized doj.
This is what it looks like when the federal government's coming
after you. Okay, images appeared in 2016,
vote, for Hillary people, standing boy, the line vote from
home, all this other nonsense, he called Self Ricky Vaughn, the
defendant, Douglas Mackey, tried to steal people's right to vote.
He didn't just steal their vote. He tried to steal their right to
vote crazy and he did it by spreading fraud.
This is what they're telling the jurors.
This is a this is a trial that's happening.
This week. This is ongoing stuff they
showed 5,000 people texted. The number that were showing a
deceptive image of a black woman standing in front of a sign
saying skip the line vote for Hillary.
With some number. None of these people are
actually lost their vote. Nobody can prove it.
It's a sneaky graphic, and it's designed to look very closely
like legitimate, add because it's a joke because it's a funny
joke, because the because the left hand meme as they say, and
yet this is what's going on. So the New York Times is
basically going to talk about how he's awful.
They're gonna bring up the deplorable, that's incredible
stuff and they're going to show that people were sympathetic to
him. You know, they're trying to act
like he's being attacked and they're wearing free Ricky
shirts but really you know he's just a good dude.
Yeah, he's just a guy who's an online, Twitter troll, which is
totally allowed in this country. You're allowed to have a sense
of humor, but not under the B Administration, it turns out.
So, that's all awful, bad news. And we need to be following this
one very carefully. And if there's a legal defense
fund out there, I haven't seen it, but I will try to look it up
and we should probably be supporting this guy in every way
you can you should be letting your Congress people know what
needs to be happening. This stuff is totally Banana
Republic. There's no other way around it.
I told you, I'd end on some good news.
I want to end on some good news out of California.
And that's pretty rare when it comes to the gun world.
As you guys probably know, the Second Amendment is my favorite
amendment. I have Within Reach of me right
now to rifles, three handguns and I have a suppressed 22
pistol. That is my favorite thing to
shoot right now, they are all illegal.
To own in the state of California.
And I think that is atrocious in the same way.
My father-in-law told me it was atrocious that I was allowed to
own an AR-15. I think it's atrocious that
people in California can't defend themselves with a modern
weapon. That's not on some stupid list
that the state of California vets based on people who don't
know about guns. So here's the good news, this is
coming from our friend, John Solomon at just the news, the
writer has been Whedon, and the article says entitled
Californians have the right to quote unquote, state-of-the-art
handgun. Judge rules.
Let's bring that home the California Rifle and Pistol
Association brought the suit, a federal judge has ruled that
California's handgun. Draw from froster unlawfully
restricts, the handgun purchases to a list of set models and has
effectively denied residents the use of modern Firearms, Kaboom
quote. This is from District Judge,
Cormac Jay Carney. What a great name Cormac Jay
Carney, says quote. Unions, have the constitutional
right to acquire and use, state-of-the-art hand guns to
protect themselves. They should not be forced to
settle for decades old models of handguns to ensure that they
remain safe inside or outside of their homes.
Oh yeah. Because California also has to
Grant a Concealed Carry Permits. Now, after the Bruin decision,
we are moving towards Freedom America.
God bless it. What does they say here?
Because enforcing those requirements.
Implicates the plain text of the Second Amendment and the
government fails to point any well-established historical
analogues that are consistent with them.
Those requirements are unconstitutional and their
enforcement must be preliminary Ali in joined the California
unsaved, handgun act or, uh, a was enacted in 1999.
It has a roster. If you've never been to
California and try to buy a gun, they have a roster of what you
can and can't buy. They've got ridiculous, waiting
periods. I don't even know how long they
are. But I remember that I went to go
buy a shotgun and this must have been Shoot, probably 20, 2005,
2006, something like that. I bought a coach gun, a cheap
one from a Big 5 Sporting Goods. And when I finally got it, after
the 14 day waiting period, I came and picked up my new gun.
I was super excited and I opened it up.
And on the stock was a huge scratch because they didn't let
me inspect the hand or the rifle, shotgun, whatever it is,
it's like a short long gun before wasn't able to inspect it
before buying it. And so I was like, oh can you
give me another one? And there were like, yeah, we
can but it's another 14 days because it's different serial
number than the one that you have.
And I was like, you've got to be kidding me.
And they said, no, we are not kidding you.
That is not what we do here. We just tell you the truth and
the truth is you have to do, another 14 days.
I said, give me my money back. I want nothing to do with your
stupid state and I don't want to buy stupid guns from your stupid
state. So, that's how it works in
California. It's not a good thing.
You shouldn't be happy about it but it is the nature of the
Beast. That being said, thankfully, we
are now getting a little bit of sensibility and we are catching
just a little bit more movement towards a free America.
I'm going to be bringing up something here real quick.
There we go. And folks that is our show for
the day. I'm very appreciative of all of
our listeners. We are getting more listeners.
All the time. We are getting a number of you
joining us at all times, and it is fantastic stuff.
See if I can pull up one of these five star reviews.
If you enjoyed the Kyle serif and show, please share with your
friends. You can like you can share you
subscribe, if you leave a comment.
I rip respond to almost all of them on Rumble.
If you leave a five-star review, we can read some of them on the
air. Here's a good one from Marcus
wragge. Rog GE, I don't know who that
is. I like that name Marcus.
He says wonderful show. I started to listen to you after
hearing you on. Dan bungee.
No-show Fair. My first experience with you
made me die with laughter regarding your wordplay Antics.
Very curious. What those were but I'm truly
enjoying your interviews and your thoughtful analysis of the
Situation's. You, and your colleagues have
brought to light. I really appreciate this
program, and I hope that will be a long-term success for you.
Thanks Marcos. I hope it will be 2, and it will
be if you visit our sponsors, and if you keep liking it,
sharing it subscribing, it moving it around, letting people
know that it is out there. We're going to keep doing them
on Mondays and Wednesdays and days.
You can expect another version of this on Friday.
And until that time, feel free to go back and listen to our
long-form interview, with Aaron Stephenson, DHS, whistleblower,
who came to project, Veritas and is also sharing some
information. I have never heard anywhere
else. I hope that you will consider
giving that a long listen. And we will see you on Friday
when you're done with it. Thanks so much for listening
y'all. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin. Show be sure to follow him on
Twitter and Truth at Kyle seraphin.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin.
Show be sure to follow him on Twitter and Truth at Kyle
seraphin.