Are you familiar with FBI Special Agents Kyle Serafin?
I'm familiar with the name. Is that yes?
I'm familiar with the name, familiar with the name, familiar
with the name. Let's bring in Kyle Serafin.
He's the FBI whistleblower who helped expose government
censorship of our First Amendment rights.
Now, we only have this memo because a recently suspended FBI
agent called Kyle Serafin brought it to the public.
And we're grateful that he did. Kyle, thank you so much for
joining us tonight. He's the host of something that
strangely is called the Kyle Serafish.
Kyle Serafi. I can't thank you enough for
speaking out. I knew you guys were out there,
and I knew it was just a matter of time.
But you got a lot of guts putting your face and your name
to this. You're doing a service on behalf
of the American people. And from the bottom of my
cracked and broken heart sometimes, thank you very much.
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiasts, Second Amendment defender and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, and
welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Monday, it's December the 23rd.
It is the week of Christmas. So a Merry Christmas to all of
you who will be celebrating Christmas and Merry Christmas to
all of you who will not be celebrating Christmas.
I'm sorry to hear about that too.
We're getting started here. It's always kind of weird coming
out of a weekend, particularly one where we were threatened
with a government shutdown and it didn't happen.
What happened to the government shutdown?
I thought we were going to get it.
I really did. That was going to be my
Christmas present. Was that the the FBI and all of
the animals that exist out there that are supposed to take a
little break and remember who they work for?
They didn't get that. That's because Mike Johnson did
the thing that he wanted to do, which means that he placated
Democrats. We're going to also cover down
on a bunch of other really wild stuff.
The first story we're going to cover today is something that is
not on any of the mainstream sites.
I went looking for it and it is buried deep in it, U.S. military
conflicts, and it's kind of a microcosm for the way that the
media has covered up for the Biden's administration and the
failures that they've had, which kind of started right away in
the disastrous withdrawal of Afghanistan.
We're going to get into all that and more.
I've got all kinds of stuff to cover down on because it's just
been one of those kind of weeks. I suppose.
Let's get into it. Before we do, Let's say thanks
to our friends over at the Wellness Company, folks.
Anish Kumar Jha, a former Biden administration official that
handled COVID-19 response, recently gave a chilling speech
at the University of Michigan at their School of Public Health.
He warned of a new age of pandemics fueled by bio weapon
development and natural threats. He called for a massive
investment in vaccines. We're going to talk about that
later today. And against pathogens that don't
even exist yet. He urged war against the
so-called misinformation. You guys know we have a problem
with that here. The question we need to ask is
who's working on these bio weapons?
How many laboratories are there globally?
And yeah, just because Trump got the win, it doesn't mean that
evil is not lurking in the background.
You need to be prepared with your best defense.
And the Wellness company's contagion emergency kit
engineered by Doctor Peter McCullough, a voice of truth and
his medical board have included five critical life saving
medications, which include things like ivermectin, Tamiflu
and nebulizer hydroxychlorine. Every household can now have
access to hard to get medications without the red
tape, without having to try to convince your doctor that you
need it. It's simple.
You fill out a digital intake form.
Your kit will arrive in one to two weeks.
Do not wait until the deep state puts their plans into action.
You can stay ready for the unexpected.
You can prepare instead of repair and you can head over to
TWC dot health slash Kyle, TWC dot health slash Kyle.
Use the promo code Kyle. Save yourself up to $32, plus
you'll get free shipping and you can get a digital code.
If you guys want to do a gift certificate, that's an option as
well, something you can still do in time for the holidays if
that's where you're at. You guys ready to get into it.
Let's do this. All right, sometimes our chat is
a really good way to kind of gauge what is out there.
How many of you, and I'm going to put the chat up here on the
screen. So if you're listening, just
imagine that there is a chat that is rolling by all of our
friends over on rumble.com/kyle Serafin chat.
Folks. How many of you knew that the
United States Navy shot down our own jets?
And then the next question is how many of you actually believe
that that's what happened? Because when the media gets its
ducks in a row and it kind of lines up everybody at the same
time, it does make you wonder, doesn't it?
Are they doing a cover up? Of course, a couple of you do.
We have a very informed audience.
For those of you who do not know, if you're sitting out here
listening to this, consider yourself under the very informed
category. This is what I want to show you.
This is ABC News and the reason why we're going to look at ABC
News homepage is one of the things I visit every single
morning. The reason we're going to do ABC
News homepage is because they were the only ones that I could
find it on the main page and it took this.
This is page #1 So what we call below the fold means you have to
scroll past the entirety of the opening page and there it is.
OK, No mention whatsoever of what I would say is a very
critical event, a pilot having to eject, actually 2 pilots.
And we lost about a somewhere between 55,000,000 and $66
million aircraft to apparently friendly fire.
Not a malfunction, but an actual human being screw up.
Here's page #2 they're covering down on trending videos.
You know, like holiday things. There's a, there's a sit down
with John Fetterman wearing a hoodie, which is also very
unsettling because he has bare legs.
Apparently he's still wearing shorts.
I always wondered, there's a, some, some comedy routines that
talk about who are the guys that wear jackets on the top, but
they wear shorts on the bottom. Like women find that to be
interesting. John Fetterman is that guy.
OK, so that's, that's screen #2 full Scroll down.
Nothing yet, including stuff that we covered last week.
LGBTQ people having a tough time at the holidays.
So this is not even new stories. These are old stories under
politics. And then we get to the third
page under the fold. And if you can't read it, I
circled it for you. I highlighted it for you because
that's how small it is. They've got stories from Hakeem
Jeffries. They've got things trying to
bash on Elon Musk, which is going to be kind of the main
focus, or at least towards the end of the show, we're going to
hit on how the left is so scared of Elon Musk.
They are trying everything they can to just pound a wedge
between Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
And the weirdest sort of comparison, which you probably
saw on our thumbnail, they're comparing him to, hold on, Rush
Limbaugh. Rush Limbaugh who was a
professional communicator, although he wasn't my preferred
radio guy, I didn't actually enjoy listening to Rush's show
until right at the end. For some reason.
I actually didn't mind it towards the end, but early on, I
didn't have any instinct to listen to him.
And then they think they're going to compare him to Elon
Musk, who is like basically on the autism spectrum.
I think he has a light case of Asperger's, and he's certainly
not the most talented communicator.
He's interesting because you never know what he's going to
say next because he's socially awkward.
But what a weird comparison. And they're essentially trying
to say that he is the new boogeyman that the left is going
to freak out about. But there it is, buried on this
page all the way 3 deep. Why?
Why are we not talking about this?
I had to go into this story to find out a little bit more and
I'm going to share it with you. This The military's doing a full
investigation, so I expect to hear everything in real time.
That means in a couple years we'll find out something. 2 Navy
pilots were shot down over the Red Sea in a friendly fire
incident. So say at the military they have
a full investigation because the F18 the FA 18 apparently had two
shot down by the USS Gettysburg. It's a guided missile cruiser.
It's part of the USS Harry Truman carrier strike group and
they supposedly fired on their own aircrafts which were
returning back after doing some kinetic actions in the Yemen
area. Now, what's interesting is, is
that the Iranian backed Houthi rebels in Yemen claimed credit
for this. They actually stated in some
social media posts, there are some articles saying it, that
they in fact were victorious against the, you know, horrible
United States government and they were able to shoot down
some of our aircraft. That would be kind of a game
changer for folks that are flying these types of missions
thinking that there is a capability in what is otherwise
kind of like a rabble out there. And I also put something on the
screen here that I wanted you to see because this is what CBS
thought was the most interesting thing in the air.
Drone collides and falls into crowd at holiday show in
Florida, which is a big deal. You don't want things falling
out of the sky. But it turns out when a 55 to
$66 million aircraft falls out of the sky, I'm a little bit
more worried because we're supposed to have unbelievable
air superiority. I found this on Twitter, which
is something I usually go to when I want to find out who's
got some knowledge in this space that is not getting normal media
read, and I'm going to share it with you.
This is unvalidated, but it sounds accurate based on what I
know about IFF, what I know about air traffic control, and
what I know about the United States military's parameters for
not doing this because we don't see this happen very often.
This guy goes by a handle at Catholic Squid.
You can see why I'd find that kind of charming and
interesting. And the Catholic Squid, a guy
named Jeff, the middle finger of honesty, another sort of a tip
of the hat, the stuff we like here at the Kyle Seraphin show.
He claims this. I was a missile systems
supervisor. I was on the same class of boat
with the same radar platform that shot the same missiles.
And Simply put, his old job, he shot down airplanes and, and
missiles #1 the FA 18 was squawking coded IFF that's
identify friend, foe. That is the way that you see
who's on your team and who is not.
When you are looking out into the information space, looking
over a battlefield #2 all units are linked real time by a system
that's called. And then he has a funny little
face, Link, which is kind of funny.
Sometimes you find out that the military uses these like really
goofy names. Apparently the system is called
Link in the same way that the system that captures drones when
they lose contact with the pilots.
A lot of times the pilots are based and let's say like Nevada,
and they're operating for airspace in Afghanistan, or
they're falling over Iraq or they're flying over Yemen.
And if they lose contact with them, if the comms go down, the
system that brings them back in is called Skynet, which is sort
of terrifying if you're a, you're a Terminator fan #3 He
says any engagement has multiple steps or queries that
communicate back and forth with the aircraft.
And #4 all units are briefed on ongoing operations, including
flight pass, Which is to say that you would know if these
things are flying in the space that they're supposed to be.
So when you look into the the information space over the
aircrafts or over the battlefield and you see flights
that are flying the places they're supposed to be flying,
that are supposed to be friendlies, you should have a
hot a whole lot more questions before you lose some missiles
and put down a 55 to $66 million aircraft.
All of this indicates to me, especially the part where the
media is not talking about it, that we have not gotten the full
story. And that friendly fire may not
be the case, but you have to figure out this.
What would be better for the American government to say we
blew it, which is a really, really terrible thing.
We shot down and almost killed some of our own pilots.
We put them in fatal danger in a friendly fire accident.
Or is it easier to say the Iranian backed rebels in Yemen,
the Houthi group that has been taking over, you know, ships and
kind of like running out there with speed boats, that they are
now more capable than we ever expected and that they have
advanced to the point where they are shooting down what should be
an air superiority situation. They're both really bad.
Imagine being in the Abide administration and having to eat
one of those kind of shit sandwiches.
I don't know any other way to say it.
You have to either try to go out there and convince them that
you're woefully incompetent, that your commander who they're
going to have to what, destroy because of this, because it was
a a friendly fire, or they hope that they can wait long enough
to be able to bury it. The only thing that's actually
going to save this commander, if he was not the one who did it,
is going to be Donald Trump coming in and and seeing a
change in regime where maybe some transparency comes out and
they can at least hold this guy blameless and say, no.
We, we got overrun because we let our foot off the gas and we
didn't keep our military doing the thing the military is
supposed to do. We failed to keep ahead of an
Iranian threat. And so an Iranian proxy was
actually able to shoot our planes out of the sky.
It's all bad news all around the all around the horn.
So hopefully we can experience a little bit of transparency in
the future. That's the I think Americans
hope. I think that's what even people
that were in the independent middle that don't love a Donald
Trump, maybe that's what they thought too.
In addition to the media kind of playing this game, they've also
been playing this little kind of this little kick around talking
about the would be shut down. That didn't happen.
The shutdown didn't happen. I thought the most interesting
thing that came out of it was sort of this quasi threat.
And maybe it explains a little bit more about why it looks like
Speaker Johnson walked away from the table losing.
Maybe this was also on the plan. And in which case there's always
more going on behind the scenes that we can hear.
I want you to listen to Karine Jean Pierre.
She's the White House press secretary.
She is our favorite Sideshow Bob in sort of DEI feminine form.
They're talking about the shutdown.
This is before they actually took the vote.
So this is before this press corps had that information.
And they wanted to know, will there be a transition of
government if the government is not funded?
It's actually not a bad question.
And we don't usually see that. It seems like it was almost like
a coded threat that came out there.
And then we'll play Hakeem Jeffries, who seems thrilled by
the way that he got everything he wanted.
Since you mentioned the shutdown, different angle on
that question, potential shutdown, I should say.
Could the American people be confident that in the event of a
shutdown, there would still be a smooth transition and
inauguration process? That has been the President's
commitment that had and that you've heard directly from him.
We want to make sure that there is a responsible, committed to a
responsible transition. And as you know, his team, he
and he and his team has certainly been working towards
that. The team has been preparing for
months to make sure that happens.
I will say though, if there is a shutdown and I don't want to get
too much into hypotheticals, but this is the reality.
Transition activities will be restricted and, and with limited
exceptions obviously, but such as prevent imminent threats to
the safety of human life or the protection of property.
Those are the things that we would, you know, that we would
have to be concerned about. And so we're doing everything to
ensure a smooth transition, But the choice to allow a transition
to move forward is within the hands of Republicans in
Congress. Oh, how empowering the choice to
decide whether or not we are going to allow a transition to
move forward is in the House Republicans hands.
All right, so that seemed to me like a little bit of a veiled
threat. Now obviously if you don't fund
certain parts of the government, then certain parts of the
government are not going to come to work.
And I think KJP knows just to like I do, just like anybody who
works in the federal government knows that there are two
different types of jobs. The non essential ones, which we
don't really know why they exist, but they do, and the
essential ones. And those people have to come to
work either way or they lose their job.
And those include things like the security apparatus, the ones
that are warding off imminent threats, that are doing the
analysis and the research and potentially the interdiction on
such things. You know, members in the
military, members of law enforcement, folks that have to
secure the capital, people that have to do all the jobs that
you'd expect that'd be necessary to be able to roll out.
But you might not have some of the event planners and you may
not have some of the people that want to go and do the
celebratory stuff. They're still going to, like,
hire and pay the local law enforcement in Washington, DC,
to go out there and block the streets.
I'm sure of that. Just an interesting kind of
little taste. Just want you guys to see it.
Anyway, that may be why Hakeem Jeffries was so excited.
It's a very short little clip, but notice all three people on
the screen here, They seem beaming, like they just got
everything. It's being framed as a win.
Mike Johnson is framing as a win.
But it's caused a schism within people who generally identify as
conservative and those people who are sort of like Republican
slash MAGA at all costs. We don't want to start off with
a loss. The problem is, is that we
actually are then accepting the framing that the media has done,
which is to say that House Republicans actually were the
ones who had this in their hands in the beginning.
This is still the Biden administration.
Everything from shooting down our own planes or losing
superiority, all of this kind of stuff.
It all stood fall under who the president is, who we've been
told is completely incapacitated.
And that's why he couldn't run again.
And that's why Kamala Harris was the right answer.
And how interesting because as an incapacitated guy, he's doing
some really interesting political movement.
We're going to talk about commutations of life sentences
in just one second because, listen, everybody wants to be
the most pro-life president in history.
Donald Trump claimed at first, Joe Biden, you know, a
practicing Catholic, a good person by his own standards, he
had to say the same thing. We'll get there in just one SEC.
Here's Hakeem Jeffries again, sounding like he won.
Tend to take him at his word. That smile doesn't look like
he's acting. I don't think any of these
people are particularly good actors.
Good evening everyone. House Democrats have
successfully funded the government at levels requested
by President Biden in order to meet the needs of the American
people in terms of their health, safety, and economic well-being.
And there you have it. They got what they wanted.
They win. That seems to me like a media
win. Again, the media acting as the
arm of the Biden administration pushing it out there.
I'm going to give you another example, which is very strange.
And this is one that I was tracking as of last week.
And then I found even a new kind of angle on it.
I didn't realize that this was an attempt to get an angle.
But once you start seeing how the the story start framing up,
you go, OK, here's what the OP looks like.
The story is Liz Cheney is the House GOP first sacrifice in the
Donald Trump revenge campaign. Now that comes from MSNBC.
That's our folks on the hard left, says in an interim report,
House Republicans suggest that the FBI should investigate
former congresswoman for her role in the January 6th
committee. No surprise to learn Tuesday
that House Republicans are investigating the previous
investigation of January 6th. The reason why they're doing
that, by the way, is because it was a lie that they omitted
information. They deleted information which
was supposed to be retained. They didn't do a fair and honest
thing. And people changed their
testimony apparently after meeting with people like Liz
Cheney, which seems very suspect.
So the question is, did she violate law?
Did she violate the parameters of her bar license?
And so on and so forth. They said we shouldn't dismiss
House Republicans decision to suggest that Cheney could be
investigated as just another round of cultish behavior.
It's not cultish behavior. It's actually posturing to show
a showcase of loyalty and they want to make a point of
attacking her. So this is kind of like setting
up, imagine a, a, a future if you were to go back to 2020 and
say in 2024 as Donald Trump is re elected and Joe Biden is
walking off his lame duck session in the last four years,
they're going to see Democrats. And not just Democrats, but the
hard left Democrats over at MSNBC defending Liz Cheney, who
voted with Donald Trump almost 100% of the time.
Because in the final days of the Trump administration, she
thought to save her own skin, and she sided with the House
Democrats and the Nancy Pelosi types.
And she went out there and did this sort of like sham show
trial where they investigated things that happened January 6th
of 2021. And they pushed forward this
wild narrative. And now she's in the crosshairs.
I wasn't seeing the angle until I see this.
They want to present it as a possibility this could happen.
It would be revenge. And then you've got the same
voices over at Newsweek, which is regularly used to cede
information coming from the DOJ, coming from sort of the deep
state actors trying to push forward what they really want to
see. Sometimes they're giving a
warning. You remember Newsweek was the
one that broke the story talking about the 266 Oscar delineation,
an FBI codification showing that people were considered agave,
anti government, anti authority violent extremists.
That's you and me. Those are those of us that think
that the federal government should stay out of our business.
So sometimes they use this sort of outlet to push forward what
they really want, not the scare tactic.
And it takes both pushes to be able to make it work.
Donald Trump wants to pardon Liz Cheney.
I'm going to read it again. It's on the screen.
But just in case Donald Trump wants to pardon Liz Cheney, this
is an opinion piece. And I thought, well, who is this
guy? Do they just have a voice of
sanity As a guest writer name is Ross Rosenfield.
I went and looked at his. I'm just going to read you some
of the articles that he's written recently.
So you're not going to be on the screen here.
He wants to, OK. Trump wants to pardon Liz
Cheney. Biden's biggest mistake was not
arresting Trump. Democrats should become liberals
again and learn how to fight. I don't know.
How do you solve a problem like Donald Trump in a debate?
His opinion, we should contend, condemn violence and also
Trumpism right after the the assassination and expand the
Supreme Court now are his July, July, September, November,
November and December offerings in Newsweek.
So that sounds pretty leftist, especially stuff like expand the
Supreme Court. We have to, you know, condone or
condemn Trumpism, all that kind of thing.
So here's what it says. Following a rather suspect
report, Georgia GOP Representative Barry Loudermilk
suggested that former Representative Liz Cheney could
be prosecuted for instigating or sorry for her poor investigation
of the January 6th attack. And Donald Trump said that she
could be in a lot of trouble on true social.
This is where Trump goes and puts his outlet.
He has his little take on it. While it might seem that Trump
is eager to see Cheney and others prosecuted for their work
on January 6th, appearances can be deceiving.
Because in reality, Trump is likely to have another goal in
mind. He wants Cheney pardoned.
I assume that they're acting like he's trying to get a pre
emptive pardon from Joe Biden and the reason supposedly is
counter intuitive but it makes sense because it's Donald Trump
and so therefore he doesn't make any sense.
He's acting like an aggrieved martyr when in truth he doesn't
want to re litigate January 6th. This is the point of the article
that they're saying the entire push is to say, can we get Liz
Cheney pardoned? And that's actually what Donald
Trump wants. So that if he, if she is
pardoned by, by Joe Biden, it's framed as a win.
Got it. Every op, every one of these
little OPS, It's not one-dimensional.
It's not like I say this and I hope that you'll do this.
It's layer upon layer. The way my buddy George likes to
describe operations, particularly information
operations, is that some information starts moving the
current clockwise and then some other information introduced to
other people, and that's moving counterclockwise.
When we break down the anatomy of an op, it's constantly moving
and there are swirls that are going in opposite directions at
all times as you get further and further away from the main
source of what they want, and the goal is to radicalize
certain people to do certain things and other people to do
other things. It's tiring, it's nauseating,
It's almost impossible to explain unless you were sitting
there and looking from the outside saying these are the
pictures that we are going to run, we are going to choreograph
the following people to dance like this.
And it does get done. And some of the best in the
world at it are the Israelis, the Mossad.
Actually, U.S. intelligence does a pretty good job.
We just have a disorganization because we don't have one single
fundamental principle, which is that at any moment we could be
wiped off the map and therefore everything is on the table. the
United States government has a lot more competing interests.
I do want to play this little 60 Minutes piece here about a guy
being interviewed about how the OP works as a Mossad agent.
They're talking about the pager operation, the walkie-talkie,
the two way operation that went on recently where Mossad slash
Israel was able to detonate and really precision strike a lot of
members of Hezbollah. Once you start seeing it in sort
of a big picture, like you are the director, the screenwriter
and the main actor, it starts making a lot more sense.
And that's exactly how this guy describes it.
You're going to hear a voice modulation.
He's sitting there wearing like a balaclava and some sunglasses.
Very theatrical. But it's not a bad explanation
for people to grasp. Everyone sort of thinks that the
information op is linear and in fact it is multiple circular and
often times you know opposing information OPS that are being
spun at the same time. Here we go.
How did you convince Hezbollah to buy this?
Well, obviously they didn't know that they were buying it from
Israel. Who did they buy it from or I
think they were buying it from? We have an incredible array of
possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no
way being traced back to Israel. Shell companies over shell
companies who affect the supply chain to our favor.
We create a pretend world. We are a global production
company. We write the screenplay.
We're the directors. We're the producers.
We're the main actors. The world is our stage.
Quite simple. You have to look at it from a
much broader perspective. Most of us are too far zoomed in
to really grasp that any individual thing might be some
part of an OP, but it's not the entirety of the OP itself.
That actually is the Kansas City Shuffle, which I've dedicated
entire podcast too. And I encourage you guys to look
through our Rumble channel or look through any of the the
podcast, whether it be on Apple or on Spotify, whatever.
Go look for the Kansas City Shuffle.
If you're not familiar with it, let me give it to you in brief
form and just encourage you to go back and look.
The Kansas City Shuffle is letting people know that they
are being conned. There is a confidence game being
played that they are being defrauded, but the shuffle and
the real fraud is letting people think that they're being
defrauded and that they know what the fraud is, when in fact
the fraud is something else. If I can get you to believe A,
but I'm really trying to accomplish B, allowing you to
believe A while I accomplish B is the OP.
And this happens all the time. Again, we are we're human beings
that are looking for proximate causes.
Somebody shoved somebody and that person fell down.
This is the way that our mind wants to work.
We want to see logical distinctions, the entire
intelligence sphere, and the reason why it's so dangerous to
work it into law enforcement is that the proximate cause is
almost never the actual reason or the original actor.
The original actor is standing far away, and the more removed
and insulated they can be, the better off the OP will run
because it's hard to see who's doing what.
And that's how you end up with Chip Rogers.
I'm sorry, Chip Roy rather Chip Rogers.
Speaking of Mike Rogers, Chip Roy is a big problem because
he's a big Rhino, because he's not conservative, even though
him and Thomas Massie and Nancy Mace and Eli Crane, all of these
people have continued to basically try to hold the same
lines. Andy Biggs is another one.
The folks that kind of vote the same way all the time, when they
feel like they're being conned by Hakeem Jeffries, by a Nancy
Pelosi type, they tend to be pretty consistent.
They go, this is not conservative.
That's not what's necessarily good for Republicans, which is a
different thing. There's a reason why that
distinction is constant, and it is very important to people like
me. It might be important to you as
well. It's why people feel sort of
politically homeless, because Republicans do things that
generate value for the big R, the party, the Republican Party.
And if you're not one of those people, then you were kind of
free to be able to open your mind up and say what is being
done, who's being manipulated? And how do I get myself out of
that manipulation? I was actually a little bit of a
victim of it earlier this weekend.
I made a comment on because I just as a knee jerk reaction,
dislike what Susan Collins has to say.
And it got some play on social media.
It's sort of an accident. It was, it was a a moment where
I was in the middle of getting my child ready for church and
dressing a toddler and trying to get shoes on my preschooler and
getting the things that need to be done.
And as that happened, I saw Susan Collins talking about
something about Social Security. And I went, no, no, no, no, I
don't think that's good. And so I read some short report,
bad summaries, and I got taken in by it.
And of course, then some people lost their minds.
This is something that can happen to anyone, including me,
who's constantly looking for it. The minute that you get
distracted and you can't get detached.
I just have a dislike for Susan Collins because when I see her,
I think she's lying. And it turns out it may not be
the worst thing in the world, even though it's going to add
like, $196 billion to the insolvency rate of Social
Security. When you get taken in on that
kind of stuff, the easiest thing to do is just admit it.
You go, oh, OK, I didn't have all the facts.
I should have looked into that further.
And when someone presents you a thing and it's exactly the
opposite and they are reasonable voice saying it in a reasonable
way, you say, well, do I know everything?
If you are a conservative, if you are someone who's
principled, you'd say, well, maybe I don't.
I have to go educate myself. And if it's the opposite of
that, where you just say I'm all about team, then you're going to
be in the tribal camp and you're going to just double down on
being wrong. It happens.
We can't be mad about it. Let's go ahead and take a quick
little breather. So thanks to say thanks to our
friends over at Patriot Mobile. They do have our principles in
mind. You guys are probably tired and
frustrated of a stalling economy.
It's the reason why Donald Trump was elected.
You sick of inflation and endless wars which don't seem
any better off? The relentless assault on our
values, our principles. Thankfully they're companies
like Patriot Mobile believe in America and the Constitution,
which is the underlying principles.
I'm proud to partner with Patriot Mobile because they are
on the front lines they're forwarding for the 1st and the
Second Amendment. More on that later.
Sanctity of life. Also more on that later and our
military and our first responder heroes.
Let's talk about more of the OP. This is something coming out of
with ABC. Now, if you guys listen to the
American Radicals podcast, you probably already heard this, but
this one is an interesting story.
Again, how much of this is being allowed?
I know for a fact, and there are very few people who can say this
definitively, but the people that are whistleblowers came to
me as well. There are whistleblowers within
the FBI that had prosecutable Chinese counterintelligence
cases around the country that we're being told no, this is not
a priority for the Biden administration.
Isn't that interesting? Man pleads guilty to operating
secret Chinese police station in New York City.
This op, which has been called Operation Skynet, it's been
called Operation Fox Hunt. It's got a couple different
names where the Chinese have located their intelligence
service and their law enforcement capabilities within
the United States with the awareness of the US government,
particularly the FBI. This goes back to Jim Comedy's
time. Chris Ray talked about it.
How would it be that in 10 years, theoretically, the
premier law enforcement agency in the United States is unable
to do anything about these unless it's being allowed?
That's the sort of read between the lines.
The FBI can prioritize it and learn about it and say this is a
big issue. And then someone at DOJ says
that we are not going to prosecute it.
And even worse yet, the members of Congress haven't passed any
laws to outlaw what they refer to as audacious activities on US
soil. This includes conspiracy to act
as an agent of a foreign government.
That's sort of the light version of it.
The real version of it is kidnapping and grabbing people
in what's called an extraordinary rendition.
In other words, pulling somebody from inside the United States
that this country does not have the legal ability to extradite
and shipping them back to China sometimes literally could over
like a like a movie, a kidnap movie, zip tie, grab them onto a
private airfield and then fly them out.
And once they get outside of US airspace, we have nothing.
We can't go after them. Some of them are legally allowed
to be here. And then there's all kinds of
extortion operations, either meeting in person or doing it
over the phone, attempting to scare these people about what
might happen to folks that are back home in China in various
places. I've personally met with people
while I was doing work for the FBI where they were playing me,
recorded tapes of folks inside China threatening their family
member. Oh, it's a shame.
It'd be really bad if something terrible happened to your aunt
or your uncle or your mother or your father who still remain
here. You absconded from our quote UN
quote justice system. We want to go ahead and get you
back. It's time for you to come back
in your face. The music and these people in
these quote UN quote, secret police stations, which were not
secret at all because they're well known.
They're well known to the those operating an intelligence spirit
and they're well known to people inside the FBI that they exist.
And sometimes they find him. And then you just see this sort
of figurehead. So what you're seeing on the
screen is a is a court rendition of one man who pled guilty.
And if you think that there wasn't a cover story in place,
if you think there wasn't an exchange or a deal made with the
Chinese government, I think that that is very naive.
Remember, they got no problem running OPS on you.
The American people, they don't mind.
They'll push it anytime they want.
There's this nominal idea that we're really worried about
China, but there's no operational end of it.
And that kind of gives me that story.
But remember that the whole thing about the TikTok bill,
Donald Trump said it wasn't a big deal.
It turns out that American intelligence services are
running the same. This is actually one of the more
telling exchanges that I found. This is Dan Crenshaw, who's been
kind of under fire of late. He's lost a lot of credibility
with a lot of people, not just because he's voted poorly, which
is one thing, but he's acted like a real Dick head just to a
bunch of people. He's gone out on social media.
He's using the F word. He's swearing from his
congressional account. It doesn't seem very appropriate
for someone who's a member of Congress.
Your job as a congressman is to take shots, and sometimes people
don't like your decision. He just doesn't seem to be
handling it well. He's cracking under the stress.
This little interaction is sort of amazing. 1, he dismisses a
reporter and just says you don't have a serious question, as
though he's the adjudicator of that.
And the second thing is he makes a bold and ridiculous claim that
the American intelligence services are not back running
information OPS on the American people.
As if we didn't pay attention and see the Twitter Files and
see that they were actually happening in front of our eyes.
That really aggressive reporters went and did the work of
reporters and found out the core source of information that not
only was the FBI paying money to places like Twitter, I'm sure
they were paying money to places like Meta and Google, Alphabet,
take your pick. Crenshaw sort of dismisses and
he also dismisses the 51 spies who lies situation, which is why
they covered up the Hunter Biden laptop.
If you want to discredit yourself, deny things that
people know happened and happened with their own eyes on
a national platform when you're a congressperson.
He's also a former Navy SEAL commander and the Navy's, the
Seals and particularly at the the officer level would have had
regular interactions with intelligence types that were
working overseas. So he should be able to spot,
even with one eye, he should be able to spot what's going on in
front of him, unless he has an agenda, a manipulation.
And he's one of those circles spinning either clockwise or
counterclockwise against it. Some people want to hear what he
has to say, but not probably his constituents who thought that he
was Republican. Here's Dan Crenshaw denying some
things that seem eminently obvious to most of us.
Again, the context is asking about TikTok government Chinese
spyware on your phone. Access to everything TikTok has,
which means data on all Americans.
And with data and with access to your, you know, app that you're
addicted to, you can vastly manipulate an entire population,
which the Chinese have done. Are you worried that our
intelligence agencies are doing the same thing domestically?
Am I worried that and I well, I know that they're not.
They're not manipulating Americans.
They're not, yeah, they're not in a flow of information.
Yeah. Did you have some evidence
otherwise that you'd like to share?
I mean. OK, before any serious customers
can. Fight, dance, were to say.
Congressman, you asked for an example of the US intelligence
agencies meddling in our information.
What about before the 2020 election when 50 members came
out and said the Hunter Button laptop was Russian
disinformation? Does that count?
No, because I mean they were, they were retired.
They were retired, but. The FBI, The FBI had the laptop
program, I think. Even close to what?
Tiktok. Oh, well, there's nothing even
close to what Tiktok did, So that's good.
You see how dismissive that is? close the door, drive off, don't
answer any further question. This is just a limited situation
where we're going to acknowledge some things, but we're not going
to talk about that because you're going to breakthrough.
It reminds me once again, I can't help it.
It reminds me of that liar, liar moment where Jim Carrey standing
in the courtroom and he screams objection to the judge.
The judge says on what grounds? And he said, because it totally
derails my argument. Not, not any legal basis, not
procedural or otherwise. It's just, I can't address what
you said because it's going to make me look ridiculous.
I saw this as well. Steve Friend talked about this
on Twitter earlier today and it made me interested in what's
going on here. And apparently they just want us
to forget the past. They want us to not remember the
things that have happened. That's the hope.
I think that's most of the OP is that Americans have a very short
attemption span. The news cycle moves very
quickly. And that's how you push out
stories like this from CBS. They're damning the quote UN
quote Iron River. Just look at who the bad guy is
in this story. Mexico's legal battle to stop
gun trafficking from the US. If you're wondering who the
battle is against, it's actually probably against you, the
American consumer that owns a gun.
You're a bad person because you own firearms.
This was published yesterday. There's an estimated 200,000 to
up to 1/2 a million firearms smuggled into Mexico every year,
and they call it the Iron River. I've been around law enforcement
I've been around guns for but I started buying guns probably 20
something years ago. I've never heard this term so it
sounds like a really good marketing ploy.
It also sounds like an information OP when you start
filing it that way. The Mexican government has filed
lawsuits against US courts and a handful of gun stores, one of
the largest manufacturers of guns in America.
They've gone and pushed all these things down because they
want to dam up the Iron River and fix the problems that
plagued the United States. Interesting.
What is this problem? It doesn't seem like a United
States problem. What it is, is the media finding
a victim, the victim or the poor people of Mexico who are being
victimized by you, the gun owners who continue to own guns
and maybe sell guns and don't have enough government
intervention in your gun selling and buying.
And if they can just get you to feel bad about it to help our
poor brothers to the South, then maybe Mexico won't have such a
problem with cartels. You follow the logic.
You own guns. That's your fault.
You're willing to sell guns without having government
background checks. You're not willing to fill out
all kinds of paperwork to get your private property to another
person in a private party to private party transmission.
And because you will not accept all of this government
overreach, which some of it is mandated not to exist, some of
those guns will be moved by nefarious actors who are
breaking laws, breaking not just US laws, but also Mexican laws.
And then they will take it down into Mexico, which causes them
to have a narco trafficking problem.
And a bunch of people get shot with US based guns.
So shame, shame, shame on you. I would go with that.
Let's just say, like, by default, I don't want people to
get hurt and I don't want them to get hurt with guns either.
Right up until the point where I have historical context.
In the same way Dan Crenshaw was just faced with 51 spies who
lie. Don't some of us remember this
thing called Operation Fast and Furious?
This is a Biden administration dream.
If we can just guilt you into giving up your rights, then
maybe you will. And the media is going to be all
in on it. Here's a really fun little story
about the fact that there's only one store that sells guns in all
of Mexico and the rest of them are you The Dirty American gun
owning populace who sells them off to them.
So this is a shame piece, but it's done really nicely.
I mean, it's done by like a lady with a nice voice and some
really good camera angles and a bunch of people that look like
they're doing the right thing. Enjoy this.
They're going to show you at the end all of the 50 cals I finally
found in this piece. So you got to listen to the end
of it. It's about 60 seconds long.
The definition of the word weapons of war.
We hear that a lot in the gun control argument.
I think we've actually found out what they are and we probably
can actually agree on it now. Unlike the US, Mexico's
constitution grants citizens the right to bear arms.
But unlike the US, that right comes with a long list of
restrictions. There's only one gun store in
Mexico, in the middle of a heavily guarded military base in
Mexico City. We were allowed in, But before
customers can enter, they have to show proof they've passed
psychological tests, drug screens and extensive background
checks. The store sells about 1000 guns
a month, mostly shotguns, small caliber rifles and handguns.
What civilians can't buy here are the weapons the cartel
favors. Those are not legally sold
anywhere in Mexico. Cartel's favorite weapons are
weapons of war Belt, Feds, 50 caliber rifles, the guns that
you can shoot from a mile away. The more expensive, the more
powerful, the sexier they think they are.
It's a trophy. It is a trophy.
My favorite is when someone at 60 minutes feeds the guest,
because this is an entire, this is a journalistic style.
I feed you my sound bite and then you give it back to me.
It's a trophy. It is a trophy.
Really. That's journalism.
OK, what's going on there? If you saw at the end the actual
definitions that apparently CBS is going to agree on for weapons
of war, which is my absolute favorite, it's 50 Cal long
rifles, bolt action and semi automatic.
It's belt fed machine guns. OK, yeah, those are definitely
used in war. They're certainly not the
problem like civilian AR fifteens are.
So there you go. Weapons that are used in war can
be called weapons of war. You still have a right to own
them, by the way, as an American.
It just turns out they don't get to the legislate that away, but
they'd like to. The guy that they were
interviewing was working with another guy named Jonathan
Laurie. So he's off screen.
There's a written component to this and there's a video
component. I want to read you from the
written component of the story because it's one of my favorite
little quotes. Again, we are going to diffuse
and put the blame directly on you.
This is how they're going to run the shame op.
And then, of course, there's the policy, op.
Everything has to be done. OPS inside of OPS.
Jonathan Lowry says if you think fentanyl overdoses are a
problem, oh, we're like, OK, yeah, we do.
If you think migration across the border is a problem, if you
think that the spread of organized crime is a problem in
the United States, then you should care about stopping the
gun crime pipeline to Mexico. That's it.
If you think the things that you think, then you should agree
with the thing that I say. And he says you need to stop it
at its source. No further information given.
Because all those problems, this is a bold statement.
All those problems are driven by the supply of US guns to the
cartel. And you know, he's a good guy
because he's been battling the gun industry in court for 25
years. That makes him a villain to me.
That makes him illiberal because owning firearms is a civil
liberty in the United States. It's a liberty that we are
protecting through our civil litigation process.
This guy thinks it's a problem. To me, that makes you illiberal.
And like I said, I just can't help but remember these guns.
What you're seeing on the screen here are dozens and dozens of AK
pattern and AR pattern weapons that were delivered to members
of the cartel under the watchful, not so watchful eye of
the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
Explosives under the Biden administration in 2009 and 10.
And it resulted in the death of federal agents who were American
citizens and other Americans because they did a crap job of
maintaining any kind of ability to watch them.
So were they intentionally arming the cartels or were they
trying to actually run an op and they just sucked at it?
Either way, I don't need the government trying to keep track
of my guns. They can't even keep track of
the guns that they were supposed to keep track of as part of
their undercover by walk operation that was funding all
these cartels. And how many of those guns went
there and are still being used? Because guns are durable
objects, folks. They don't go away.
How many of them stuck around? I would say probably a lot of
them. These A KS tend to be around for
generations. But of course, it's your problem
because you're not going to let the government watch everything
you do. So shame on you.
Yeah. If you believe that we got
something else to sell, you actually let me sell you a
Patriot Cooler instead. They're way better.
They're also a durable good. In fact, my folks came into town
and they were looking, and they're like, is that your
original coolers? It's like, yeah, we still have
the tumblers. They still stick around.
Since 2017, since October, Patriot coolers.com is the
website for now, until the end of Boxing Day, the day after
Christmas at midnight. You can save 15% on your own
Patriot Cooler. Go to patriotcoolers.com or
click the link in the show description which is going to
give you the Kyle Seraphin Show collection.
If you want the ones that are already pre engraved, it's Kyle
15. For a short period of time, you
can save 15% instead of 10%. It's a really good deal.
It's the second best sale of the year.
Since you've already missed Black Friday and it's a very
very short time, how about that one Kyle 15 KYL E15.
Save one 5% off them and you'll get free shipping if you spend
50 bucks in a mortar. So basically just get 2 coolers,
1 for you, one for someone you love.
You can get a 19 oz coffee mug. It fits nicely in the cup
holder. I just got my my truck in
finally and it fits in the cup holder.
And I took 2 Patriot coolers. One for the trip up to Dallas,
19 ounces of coffee, one for the trip back down to Austin area,
19 ounces of coffee. That's all I had all day you
guys. It could be your sole source of
nutrition if you are such a wild person.
Patriot coolers.com promo code Kyle 15 for a short period of
time. Save yourself 15% off neither
here nor there. But since it's it was asked in
our live chat the other day, I'm still doing this meat diet
thing. And some of you guys may have
stepped into that space where you want to do like a carnivore
diet or an elimination diet for just a small number of things.
I'm down like almost 17 lbs, which was not the purpose of it.
I actually just wanted to kind of feel better, but I do.
I will tell you, if you were thinking about doing this, wait
till New Year's. Don't do it over Christmas.
If you guys have like pies and stuff like that, it'll derail
you. It's a not good time to do it.
OK, I want to get deepest into the most fun part of the
information, OP. This is the thing that I've been
most excited about. Two things are getting thrown at
us right now. Number one, this is really
special and we can't help but be excited about it.
I found this pop up as one of the lead stories on MSNBC.
Musk's power over Republicans has an eerie historical
parallel. And I was thinking, oh, is there
a they're going to talk about what, like Soros?
Are we going to talk about the Koch brothers?
No, they're going to talk about Rush Limbaugh because Elon Musk,
a non professional communicator who happens to own a large
social media platform and communicates sort of semi
autistically. I don't say that in a me way.
I find him very interesting. He's very funny, he's quirky,
and he obviously has a very popular sensibility.
But to suggest that he's anything like a guy who sat
behind a microphone for hours and hours every single day and
broadcast in many ways the same show for something like 20 or 30
years. This is a a wild take.
And all of it is, is geared up to do one thing and one thing
only to drive a wedge between people who generally are going
like, OK, I sort of agree with some of Elon Musk's positions.
Like I don't think most of us agree with his morality.
He's been making babies with like a dozen women out there.
How many kids does this guy have at this point?
A lot. I don't even know.
I, I can't keep track of him. Like I remember it was like 7 or
9. And he just wants to go out and
make babies with any crazy wild lady.
A lot of them who are like loony leftist, some of them have trans
as kids and stuff like that, which is why he probably
radicalized. I said the specter of voters
whipped up into a frenzy by an outsider with a microphone is
nothing new to Republican politicians.
I guess they've never seen some of the wackos that they've got
on their own side. I guess they just have no
ability to do introspection. Look, if there was a reasonable
comparison here between these two, you got them on the screen
and I guess they kind of look alike.
If you just do black and white, can you ignore the fact that
they don't look anything alike? They said that his dozens of
posts on social media on X have sent a furious pace that have
changed the course of the last 12 hours.
This was done on December 23rd. So that's this morning they
wrote this. He's had a fury, a flurry of
false claims and threats of electoral retribution against
any Republican. People said their phone was
ringing off the hook. People who are elected have to
now listen to Elon Musk because he's because he's whipping up
people into a voter frenzy. I think it's actually a
misdiagnosis of what's happening.
People are using X, they're using Elon Musk's platform,
which he obviously monitors. They are saying what they think
and there's a groundswell of people saying what they think.
And Elon Musk goes like, yeah, that sounds pretty reasonable
and pretty sensible. We're talking about something
that Donald Trump is called the common sense revolution, where
you just have a bunch of regular people that previously were
unengaged previously under the Twitter one point O rules didn't
have any possibility of explaining themselves or sharing
their opinion without getting canceled or censored.
And they're going, hey, my voice actually has some resonation.
And by the way, there's a lot of other people that it resonates
with. And it turns out it also
resonates with the the wealthiest man in the history of
humanity who now has the ear of the incoming president-elect.
That's terrifying. God forbid that happened.
And so Scott Jennings kind of breaks it down as they're trying
to do this. Scott Jennings, the continual
voice of reason on CNN, He's like the perfect foil over there
because he's really nice about how he says it.
And he says this in a really nice way, but he just kind of
dismisses them. That's really nice if you're in
a position where you're kind of seeing the side win that you
want to back because you don't have to get emotional about it.
And he does that. So this is making more and more
compelling television. I think that CNN is now part of
the obviously because they're CNN, but they're they're
bringing on not controlled opposition, but tolerable
opposition. And in some ways, they might be
tacking back towards the middle because that's where the
audience actually believes things happen in America.
Scott Jennings talking about the whole lineup, President Musk and
trying to drive this wedge and why it's probably not effective.
Because as much as Donald Trump loves watching Fox News, he
instinctively looks at what these people says as being
malicious, nefarious and with an ulterior motive.
Is this going to wear thin with Donald Trump soon?
I don't think so. I mean, look, they they appear
to be getting along well. Musk was very instrumental in
his victory. And I hear Democrats, you know,
criticizing the idea that we have unelected people with too
much influence over the government.
I invite them to pick up the Wall Street Journal from this
week and find out that unelected people have been running the
government for the last four years.
I hear Democrats criticizing, criticizing the influence of
billionaires on our politics. When you've got this Soros punk
running around collecting Democrat politicians like my
kids collect Pokémon cards. So I, I think all the criticism
of Musk coming from the left is totally hypocritical, totally
over the top. And he is doing something
interesting, bringing some transparency to the federal
government. It's not a terrible but I but
it's a. But, but, but, but how do we
stop this? Well, you stop it by being
honest, which is really hard for them to do.
As I mentioned at the start of the show, the first thing that I
went looking for was where's the story about the F eighteens?
Why do we see the media covering for failures, which usually
would go right on the present? I guarantee you, if Donald Trump
was in office, they'd be like, he screwed up the military, all
of his things, his Defense Secretary is to blame, and so is
he and his policies and the fact that he's in this place and the
fact that we have conflict over there, it shows weak leadership.
Everything would trickle down and they would pin it on his
head because that's what they do.
And then you see the media do the opposite thing whenever the
Biden administration's in. It took me going to the New York
Post to be able to find this story, which some of you may be
tracking over the weekend, especially if you live in the
Northeast. An illegal Guatemalan migrant,
AKA illegal alien who snuck into our country, lit a woman on fire
and burned her to death. Probably the biggest fear that I
would ever have of dying would be being burned alive because it
looks horrific and I've dealt with burns and I've dealt with
it as a paramedic as well. He lit a woman on fire by taking
a lighter to her clothing. She was passed out, which is not
great. New York has problems with
homeless people. That's not new.
Especially all urban areas that have it.
You guys know what it looks like.
What was hard to find was anyone covering the story, and the ones
who did said that there was a person of interest with no
information about his background.
They didn't talk about how he had no right to be here and
killed a homeless person, which theoretically would fall into
the ears of the leftist. Sort of like bleeding hearts,
but they don't seem to have it. Again, some of the animals are
more equal than others. We always find out.
And that's the sad thing about being a Democrat, because it's
not about principles. It's also the sad thing about
being a Republican, for whatever it's worth.
This is why I think being a conservative and independent is
sort of superior to all of those.
It doesn't mean you don't vote for Republicans, generally
speaking, because you don't have a lot of choices.
But this is really a truly awful story, and it kind of falls into
this sort of disrespect for life that we've seen under the Biden
administration generally. More broadly, I'm going to bring
it in line with what he just did with federal death row inmates.
Again, I said Biden was trying to be the most pro-life
president and that's what he's going to claim.
He's going to try to claim he's trying to build some version of
a legacy. So he's he's throwing some
scraps over to his friends on the radical left.
I understand the reason for the death penalty.
I understand arguments against it.
If somebody around me was was taken by a violent criminal, I
would probably want the death penalty.
And I also understand that as Christians, we should probably
be fighting against it. It's a really difficult place to
be if you're a law and order type of person, a person who
understands that vengeance should exist, we feel and then
also trying to set ourselves against it because of our
religious beliefs. That's a really hard space to be
in. Biden seems to walk with
impunity through all of them and basically ignores all of it as
well. Of course, I'm going to play you
a clip at the end of this of showing how just how easily it
is covered up. So this is the story.
The story goes from CN NS politics page.
Biden commutes the most federal death row inmate sentences, 37
of the 40 people that are on federal death row just before
Donald Trump takes office. And this is his statement.
He said I'm commuting the sentences of 37 to 40
individuals in federal death row sentences.
They're going to have life without parole, all right.
He says these commutations are consistent with the moratorium
my administration has imposed on federal executions.
In other words, he didn't allow any executions to happen under
his with his DOJ in cases other than terrorism and hate
motivated mass murder. The majority of the 37
individuals were commuted on Monday.
The ones that they left out was the Boston, the Boston Massacre
bomber who was involved in the in that explosive device that
was set off the pressure Creeker bombs.
So that was one of the Servnau brothers, Dylan Roof, who shot
people in the church, allegedly, I guess because he was a white
supremacist and he seemed like a real, like a real dummy.
And then the guy who shot up the Tree of Life Synagogue,
synagogue in in Pennsylvania, those are the three that didn't
get commuted. Everybody else got commuted.
So they'll leave three there. And wouldn't it be nice if this
guy who's claimed to be a Catholic actually believed that
it was all about, like, promoting life and that even
people who are murderers and have been convicted and
sentenced to death should be able to live?
Because he's a Catholic, because he's a Christian, because he
believes that every person that it's not man's job to take life,
we believe that except three of those lives didn't matter as
much as the other lives. Those 3 lives he basically holds
in the same value as unborn babies because they've done
everything they can to push abortion.
Again, no principles whatsoever, and that's going to be Biden's
legacy. No principles, no answers, no
transparency, and a media that basically runs and falls all
over themselves to cover it up. This is the perfect microcosm of
a of a Biden story we've been hearing for years.
Whether you listen to people like Ryan Maddow, whether you
listen to other voices out there talking about this, that there
have been either 10s of thousands or hundreds of
thousands of children lost by the Biden administration and
sold into sexual slavery or trafficking.
This is CBS asking Alejandro Morjorkis.
He's sort of the the classic villain, a deep state long time
actor inside the federal government giving the best we're
not accountable and someone else did it.
And we take some investigations and just talking around the
problem and the media just goes like, Oh yeah, well, that's the
answer then. Never a critical.
Look, this is all part of that OP that goes on.
That's why you have people on the political left now saying
this doesn't even happen. Enjoy this ICE was also unable
to account for more than 32,000 unaccompanied kids who failed to
appear in court from 2019 to 2023, according to the report.
We read the incoming borders are Tom Holman says these children
are being exploited and trafficked.
Is that true? Well, we certainly, Margaret, we
certainly have received reports of children being trafficked,
even those as to whom we know where they are.
That is outside the responsibility of the Department
of Homeland Security. What we do is we turn children
over within 72 hours, as the law requires to the Department of
Health and Human Services, and then HHS places those children.
Of course we investigate. Yeah, of course we investigate
it, but we don't come up with any answers because the
government investigates the government and they found that
the government didn't do anything wrong.
They did everything according to the book that the government
wrote that is ineffective and the reason why the problem
exists in the 1st place. That's probably the easiest
summation of how this works. I'll put the whole clip over on
Locals if you guys want to go see that.
It's Kyle seraphin.com if you want to join a Locals channel
and you can be part of that. What we'll do, because I was
about to tell you all, we're going to take a couple days off
for the birth of our Savior. We'll be taking Christmas Eve
off Christmas Day and Boxing Day, which I just think is funny
because I don't know what it is, but it's, it's a holiday in
Canada, which we're about to make the 51st date, right.
You guys with me, We're going to take over Canada.
We're going to take off that I'll be back on Friday and we'll
bring Steve on to do a friendly Friday if we can get him in, if
we can talk him into it. We're going to take a little
time and celebrate the things that are important.
That hopefully you guys also get a chance to do.
We're going to be around family, but I want to open up.
I'm going to set up today's episode with all of the links
that we normally put over there on locals.
And I'm going to leave the live chat open.
So if anybody wants to get in there and gather and have a
little discussion, a lot of you guys don't exchange your phone
numbers and I totally understand that.
Join our locals if you guys want to join in the live chat over
there. And it'll be going for the next
couple days and we'll get back to you on Friday with the next
episode. Again, we're going to try to
live out those values said Joe Biden has pretended to live out,
which is that we care about children, we care about life,
and we're going to go celebrate the life and the birth of our
Savior, Jesus Christ. For those of you who celebrate
and for those of you who don't join a Christmas celebration
anyway, it might radicalize you. I'm finding out that we've
radicalized some people and made them get baptized, made them
show up and join a church. And I'm really happy that you do
because your life will be better.
I didn't know that when I was younger and the luck of being
born into a family that pushed it on me and then it became a
thing that I realized. This is why success happens.
You Orient your compass early on in your life and then you can
always go back and find true north, which is what we've done
here. God bless all of you that listen
to the program. God bless all of you that are
out there that are suffering and having a rough time because I
know there are some of you and I have some of your stories.
I've got a little inkling of it. We're in a much better place
this year in a much better place with our family and and
physically than we were the year before and certainly better than
the year before that when all of this wild stuff kicked off.
And I'm grateful because you guys, the audience are the
reason that we're able to do a lot of the stuff that we do.
The reason why I'm able to go walk downstairs in a few minutes
and go hang out with my kids is because of you.
It's because of this audience and it's because you continue to
support this program. So thank you so much and a very,
very Merry Christmas. I want to play kind of an
interesting thing. I often times I lean towards
sharing things about the average and everyday man got kind of a
cowboy piece of wisdom here that I think will be a nice little
palate cleanse. It's a little bit kind of a
emotional music, but I think it's right and I think it's
true. We all are dealing with
struggles, women and men. I think this is actually true
about women as well, although they need to support
differently. So as we say, kind of a goodbye
to you for the for the next couple days, consider that
there's someone out there that's carrying a burden.
They don't necessarily want you to pick it up.
They don't even want you to go solve their problem.
They just want you to know that they're carrying the burden.
And so I know a lot of you are carrying that burden and I say
Merry Christmas and God bless you.
Here's a little parting thought for the day.
Average man, I believe the average real man does not need
to go get therapy for the battles and the burdens he's
carried inside. What he needs is for those that
he's carrying them for, to recognize that they're there and
to respect it and to be grateful for it.
They don't need to talk it out to get rid of it.
They need the one that they're going through this hell for, to
recognize it's there and to be grateful that the man is
carrying this for them. They don't need therapy, they
need gratitude. We all could use a little bit
more of that. Go to church if you guys have
not done it and if you're thinking about it and you're
thinking maybe I would, but I don't know how I'll be accepted.
Watch Home Alone 1st and then go to church.
Everybody's welcome at church. Look forward to seeing you guys
there and we'll see you on Friday.
God bless you, have a great Christmas.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle
Seraphin.