Are you familiar with FBI Special Agents Kyle Serpen?
I'm familiar with the name. Is that?
Yes, I'm familiar with the name, familiar with the name, familiar
with the name. Let's bring in Kyle Serafin.
He's the FBI whistleblower who helped expose government
censorship of our First Amendment rights.
Now, we only have this memo because a recently suspended FBI
agent called Kyle Serafin brought it to the public.
And we're grateful that he did. Kyle, thank you so much for
joining us tonight. He's the host of something that
strangely is called the Kyle Serafish.
Kyle Serafi, I can't thank you enough for speaking out.
I knew you guys were out there, and I knew it was just a matter
of time. But you got a lot of guts
putting your face and your name to this.
You're doing a service on behalf of the American people.
And from the bottom of my cracked and broken heart,
sometimes, thank you very much. Take a look behind the curtain
with a real whistle blower, an American patriot.
Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth, because
this program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties enthusiast.
Second Amendment defender and recovering FBI agent Kyle
Seraphin. Well, hello my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show.
Today's Monday. It's October the 7th and we are
rolling live right now on Rumble and on X and so on.
Thanks for joining us for the program.
I had a strange reflection and I'm coming in under the wire
with our time limit right now because I wanted to be on time,
but I also wanted to make sure that I grabbed all the little
pieces that we should be talking about.
Kamala Harris did a very, very serious interview with a very,
very serious podcast that's called Call Her Daddy.
It's a blonde 30 year old woman whose claim to fame is that
she's a blonde 30 year old woman on TikTok, on Instagram and so
on. And she runs the single biggest
podcast for women and gay men in America as far as I can tell, on
Spotify. So that's exciting.
Kamala Harris seems to have this issue, was saying things that
she doesn't mean to be true, and they turn out to actually be
both insightful and true, against sort of her better
judgement, I think. So we're going to talk about
something she said, which was that she doesn't have any
biological children. But this isn't the 1950s
anymore. It's not the 1950s, so who cares
if she has biological children? It turns out it made me think
about the 1950s, and when I did, found some interesting things
out about the way the 1950s worked, some of the numbers as
they ran. The president in the 1950s was
preceded by another president we've talked about a lot, FDR
from 1933 until 1953. We had Democrats in office
almost like what we've been dealing with right now and what
they hope to accomplish with the Kamala Harris, which would
basically be from 2009 until 2028 to 2029.
Actually in the in the early part of the year, they're hoping
to have a 20 year run of Democrats.
Donald Trump has been the only fly in that ointment.
Quite interesting to me. I think that's interesting.
We're going to talk about that. We're going to talk about a
bunch more. I've got some videos that we're
going to share about what's been going on.
We're going to talk briefly about October the 7th and the
significance of this date, which is to say that the intelligence
communities are really, really hoping that there will be an
attack. I'm going to give you a reason
why that doesn't happen ever. It's never happened on any of
the anniversaries of these big things, not in a long time.
So we'll cover all that. Before we do, let's get started
by saying thanks to one of our sponsors, and then we're going
to lead into a video to get us kicked off to think about
things. Folks, you guys can check out my
Patriot Supply. They are one of the program
sponsors here. Actually, I've got something on
the screen I got to get rid of. Stand by here.
How did that get on here? Go away.
There it is. All right.
If you think the country's going in the right direction or do you
think it's falling apart, you have to ask yourself that
question. And are you prepared?
Are you feeling alarmed? If so, you're not alone.
Many Americans from all walks of life have taken actions to
prepare themselves. I just bought a bunch of water
the other day. It starts with an emergency food
supply. We did that first storing food
in your home. It's the right thing to do
because we are living in these crazy times which you guys can
probably appreciate. It explains why so many people
around you are probably preparing and right now you can
get ready to with a three month emergency food kit from my
Patriot supply comes with all kinds of different foods.
Creamy stroganoff, that's actually one of my buddies
favorite foods in the world. Stroganoff go figure a honey
wheat bread and a mushroom Rife pilaf.
The entire kit gives you over 2000 calories per day.
It lasts up to 25 years and who knows what the country's going
to look like, even the next couple.
So when the day comes, you'll be ready.
Go to prepare like kyle.com. You saw it on the screen.
Prepare like kyle.com. Order your emergency food kit
today. The shipping is free.
Prepare like kyle.com. Get yourself squared away,
folks. I have a video that I want to
set the tone. And then we're going to get into
what's going on around us, like sort of like the current events.
And then we're going to get back to the 1950s.
Here's a tone video. I saw this weeks ago and it
stayed with me and I think it's correct.
And I had an experience on the playground outside of our
church. We went to Mass on Sunday like
we normally do. At what time do we have to go
there? It's at 8:00 Mass.
And then sometime, you know, around 9:00, we're sitting out
there. The kids have Sunday school.
My wife was filling in as a teacher, and we're standing on
the playground. And I encountered a family that
we've met before, and they're really nice people.
So I got no beef with them as people.
I've got no beef with them except what they kind of implied
to me about the way this country is going.
And that's, that's kind of a lot to extrapolate.
But I, it's, it's like a, a single microcosm that can be
expanded out into a trend I see everywhere.
And who knows, they might even be listening right now.
So I'm not going to name them just to kind of keep them
anonymized. But I think the message that I
took away from our little conversation is universalized.
And part of it is this video. So listen to this for a second.
And women who are going to be immediately sort of irritated by
the concept that we're going to be talking about the differences
between men and women and that women cannot do all the same
thing that men can do. Try to hear what this man is
really saying. And then we're going to reflect
on it for a moment. You can go back to say the
Victorian era, and men used to treat women with an extreme
amount of deference because the generations living then
remembered a time when the world was a lot more difficult than
people now remember being. So the physical inequality
between men and women was emphasized because the world was
a much more difficult place. Men took a paternalistic and
patriarchal view on how women should be treated, and women
wanted men to take that. They wanted to be safe.
They wanted to be provided for. They wanted to make sure their
children were safe, and men did what they could.
Now men have won. They've, you know, the fact
we've got airplanes flying overhead and the fact that we're
not about to be invaded is the victory of Western man.
Then for some reason, women decided, OK, well, I don't.
I'm not afraid anymore. I want what you have.
You don't do the things that we do, so you can't have what we
have. But men just want women to be
happy. They want them to love them.
They want their approval. And so if gaining woman's
approval means pretending women are equal to men, or, you know,
saying this, that the other whatever it is, they'll do it.
And it's completely taken men off of the throne that they sat
on. This throne was never imposed by
authority. Actually, it's imposed by
consent. And the second women withdrew
their consent for the man to be on that throne, the the throne
collapses and the men are just standing around and going, OK,
well, I guess I'll just play video games and drink beer all
day. It's no weed.
If you don't need me, I won't do anything because that's really
the whole Raisin letter of being a man just being needed by
someone else. And it's always been wounded.
It's always been women and it's always been that if men are not
needed then they just go away. That is the reason why we see
hard times come up when soft men are around.
The soft men are simply reacting.
Women have a lot more leadership because of their their requests
then then maybe they think So maybe there is something
insightful about the idea of Call Her Daddy as a a name for a
podcast. Although I despise the name and
it made me think about this. This is something that pops up
public service announcement. This was announced on Friday, I
want to say by our intelligence agencies that work domestically,
DHSFBI and the IC3, which is a piece of the FBI sort of
Internet complaint department. They said that we should be
aware that Hamas attacks might motivate individuals to violence
in the United States. No evidence for this by the way.
This is just like the fever dream of folks who do this for a
living. Like they write term papers,
position papers, they do analysis.
I, I got a message, a verbal message from George Hill, who
spent years with the NSA and over a decade with the FBI doing
this kind of work. He said every single year the
intelligence agencies call this out.
They say that there could be a copycat attack, a inspired
attack on the anniversary of things like 911 on the
anniversaries of things like this October 7th, the, the, the
Hamas kind of push an invasion into a Israel that happened last
year that kicked off another round of fighting between the
Hamas folks and, and folks in Israel.
And he said it's never it never materializes.
There's no, there's no basis for it.
It's simply people projecting value on a date.
And because everybody sort of steps up their awareness, it
makes it the worst time to actually carry out one of these
attacks. But it doesn't stop them from
saying things. This is the stuff that I found
very interesting because they can't even agree with why
somebody might do this, whether it was like a retaliation or a
copycat. It's all just nonsense.
So here you have it. The FBI says that they have a
potential threat. the United States, various actors.
This is the variety of actors in response to the one year
anniversary and consistent calls by foreign terrorist
organizations to for their supporters to seek and provoke
violence in the West. I mean, they're doing this all
the time. That's what foreign terrorist
organizations do. They assess that these attacks
that were initiated may cause further significant escalations
in the contact and may be a motivating factor for violent
extremists and hate crime perpetrators.
Notice how they slipped that in hate crime perpetrators has
nothing to do with it, by the way, like what?
Like people are going to go attack gay people on October 7th
because reasons. There's just it's not there.
There never is anything there. But they want to engage in
violence and threaten public safety.
Over the past year, they've observed violent extremist
activities and hate crimes in the United States.
They have a link which basically is not going to show anything
other than the definition of hate crimes against Jewish,
Muslim or Arab institutions, including synagogues, mosques,
Islamic centers and community centers where there are large
gatherings. Do you guys see this?
They conflate things all the time.
This is why our intelligence services at this point are not
serious people. They can't even they can't even
like claim one thing is a problem without trying to do the
what about ISM? This is my other favorite part.
It could motivate threat actors across ideologies, including
those who espouse violent anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.
Like don't forget that it could go either way.
Could be mean people they engage in violence, blah, blah, blah,
blah. Anyway, this could be inspiring
online messaging and you know what your resources are.
This is actually probably the best part of the whole thing.
The resources, which I've cut off on the screen, but actually,
you know, I'm going to try and put it back on there.
Watch this. The, the resources are call 911.
If you got any problems, just call 911.
So the FBI wants you to know, but if there's an issue, that's
who you should call. Call the actual first
responders. This is a kind of a theme that
we're seeing right now. People that are in North
Carolina are seeing that theme as well.
The federal government is more than happy to act like they are
in charge, that they are going to do things, that they're going
to handle business. And when it comes right down to
it, who's going to do it? Is it going to be the local
police, the fire department? Who's going to get there?
The feds, we're now seeing that the, the 101st Airborne or the
82nd Airborne, I can't remember which one of them is actually
deployed, but there's there are parts of guard units that are
assigned to that and there are some active duty folks that are
getting spent up to, to try to help out there like 8 days late.
The federal government is the slowest actor.
It's on purpose, by the way. We want that.
We don't want our federal government to be nimble and
reactive. It's terrifying to think of a
big animal that big like coming at us.
But we also don't need to fund them in the way that we do
because your resources are called 911.
Again, there it is. Call 911 to report emergencies,
including imminent threats. If it's imminent, the federal
government is not going to be able to help you.
It's crazy. It's crazy that people think the
federal government is the solution.
I've got multiple examples of this, by the way, and that is
the leftist position. The leftist position is trying
to build that largest power, the thing that is furthest away from
you. Over and over, they are trying
to make that animal be the one that is the biggest in the fight
when it really ought to be your your community centers.
It should be your cities, your counties.
It should be your state. Your state should be almost the
final authority. That's what the 9th and the 10th
Amendment were put in place for in the Bill of Rights.
Notice, 20% of the Bill of Rights means something very
specific. It's trying to keep these things
out. Another sort of inefficiency.
We'll cover down on 'cause this is not particularly related, but
I did want to keep covering the story of Ryan Ralph.
I haven't seen it in the news as much, but here's something kind
of interesting. You remember that there was a
second attempt on Donald Trump. Someone tried to kill the guy
that's running for president. We're just a couple days out
now, what, 30 days or so? 31 days.
Worth noting, the prosecutors are going to try to not
introduce anything in this. The federal prosecutors have
decided to request an indefinite delay, which by the way, Ryan
Ralph's people, his, his attorneys, they agreed to it.
So they're fine with this. They've requested an indefinite
delay. This is being reported by a
local ABC station, but there are others that did it as well.
They did this on Wednesday of last week, scheduling the trial.
They don't want to put a date on them on the map at all, citing a
massive amount of evidence they've gathered in the 17 days
since Ryan Ralph. The joke inside the suspendables
chat was they need more time for him to commit suicide.
I don't know if that's true or not.
Just something that we are kind of joking about.
You guys probably have the same sense is that we're not about to
get there trying to keep this thing out of the news.
They're trying to keep this thing so that it doesn't have
any sort of bearing on the election.
Because it actually is a big deal when one person shoots a
guy running for president in the ear and then another person
posts up outside of his golf course and tries it again.
And we don't have swift and and open and transparent justice.
This is the reason why Florida had to open their own had to
open up their own investigation to this kind of interesting
Florida District Judge, Judge Eileen Cannon.
There's only going to be so many district judges.
So she's the one who actually has it.
She of course had the documents case with Donald Trump as well.
They revealed new scope the prosecutors did about the the
investigation they've amassed trying to gain insight into
Ralph's action. The funny thing is, is I'm not
confident all that stuff is necessary.
He said it. He had a weapon system, he was
posted in a place where he would have been able to encounter the
former president. And they have two strong charges
on the gun stuff. Because he's a felon, he's not
allowed to have the the weapons that he bought.
So the 922 charges seem like a slam dunk.
The, the serial number was either obliterated or it wasn't.
And it was obliterated, apparently, which means that
they, you know, scratched out the serial number.
SO2 out of the three things that they've charged him with, seem
pretty straightforward. In any case, in the past two
weeks, the United States, that's going to be the FBI, has
interviewed hundreds of witnesses, hundreds, hundreds of
witnesses, and executed 13 search warrants in Florida,
Hawaii and North Carolina. They've received hundreds of
items of evidence, including multiple electronic devices.
Yeah, none of this stuff is dissuading us that the Intel
community was involved with this guy's work over in Ukraine or
whatever the heck he was doing. Apparently they are still
waiting on 100 outstanding subpoenas in connection with the
investigation, and they estimate that there have thousands of
videos to review from the large volume of electronic devices
that are collected thus far. Totally normal.
It's totally normal for someone to have amassed 4000 terabytes
of data that requires review. You guys read.
That's 4 million gigabytes of data.
Holy moly, that's a ton of stuff to review.
Why? Why is this case so complicated?
Now you know, at least all right, you now you are aware
that they are going to sit out here and try to run the clock
out on this thing until we never have to hear about it.
That seems to be the way it'll work in any case.
I just think it's very interesting when the government
is doing its thing, pushing things back.
We talked about October 7th briefly.
How about this one? Because this also got memory
hold just a little bit. We talked about in this program,
we'll do it again. Lee Smith running a piece
talking about the Iranian man who entered the United States on
the FB is watch who came into this country and and the FBI
sponsored his visa so that he could set up a terror plot,
which was garbage. It leads me to that thought that
when they say the PSA is watch out for terrorist attacks on
this day, Monday, October the 7th, it reminds me that the FBI
is actually incentivized to have a terrorist plot kick off.
So they can say, look, we predicted it.
Yes, obviously we also facilitated it, but then we
interrupted it. So we've saved you from the
terrorism that we created. That's the story here that Lee
Smith is reporting on, which we covered previously.
The day after they arrested this dude who was a Pakistani
national name Asif Merchant. If you guys go back, you can
find the day just after, just after we talked about Trump's
first assassination attempt and the guy Matthew Thomas, Matthew
Crooks. Crooks was dead one day
afterwards. They arrested this other guy on
July the 12th after they let him in and run around the country
for several months in this fake scheme to go to like clubs in in
Brooklyn and drive around the Bronx trying to report people
and get them signed up to be killers with him so that he
could make $1,000,000. Some other kind of nonsense.
This is what the government does.
It's incentivized to do its own thing.
It's incentivized to have created problems and then be the
solution for said problem. And October 7th is just one more
example of that. It's just worth knowing we're
living in an unserious time. They're taking our money and
they're doing wild stuff with it.
The wild stuff is specifically. It's specifically set up so that
they can justify their own existence.
Here's the thing we heard was not happening.
Apartment buildings are definitely not being taken over
by gangs coming in from Latin America, from Central America
and South America that have come in and taken over due to the LAX
border policy. We were told this didn't happen,
that the Aurora stuff was a, was a hoax, right?
Just in the same way that that Haitians going after and living
by non cultural American standards was a, was a hoax.
All these things are hoaxes. One of the things that I had in
that conversation that I had yesterday, little thing came up
was that the the female, First of all, I had the the
conversation with the female, not the male.
In this married couple, they had one child.
They saw that we had four and they said it looked really
difficult to have four kids. It's actually not that
difficult. I mean, it's not easy, but
life's not easy. And so she said, she said she
couldn't vote for Donald Trump in good conscience because he's
really mean. And he said things during about
Springfield, OH, that resulted in bomb threats.
Now, those of you who follow this program also probably
follow a lot of the other news. And we know that a lot of those
bomb threats are not being resulted in invest
investigations that are going to result in arrests and
indictments and prosecutions because the people who called in
those bomb threats were overseas, that they were
outsourced through some sort of a call center.
So this is all sort of astroturfed and faked.
But she didn't know that. And so it leads to this ongoing
thing that I I keep saying like, just because you know some of
the information doesn't mean that you have the truth.
It's what we're always trying to get here in the same way that
maybe Kamala Harris didn't have the questions to the debate that
she did with Donald Trump. But if she had the answers,
she's still saying it correctly, isn't she?
She has a leg up. She could be cheating and still
not saying things that are false.
Just because you know some of the things that are true doesn't
mean that you know the truth. And that's the shading that we
get here. So here's a little taste of
what's happening in San Antonio, TX.
This is only just, what, 2 hours down the road for me.
It used to be that we were like, oh, it's in.
It's out in in Aurora, Co. Here's the San Antonio PD giving
a press conference talking about Trans de Agua taking over a
apartment building with 300 different units in it.
Huh. I thought we were told this
stuff wasn't happening. And yet it turns out when you
bring in a bunch of people that are illegal, some of them are
going to be predators. And they do things that
predators have always done which take advantage of our kindness.
That's not it. There it.
Is I say PD we've received several complaints from an
apartment complex in the 13 in the 1000 three 100 block of
Sahara Dr. about multiple narcotics violations, human
trafficking and threats to apartment personnel.
So over this morning, the task force, including members of SAPD
Covert Unit, the Human Exploitation Unit, the Texas
Anti Gang Unit, members of Department of DP, Texas
Department of Public Safety, and the FBIUS, Border Patrol and
Homeland Security began an operation at this apartment.
We had information that members of the of the transnational gang
trained at AGUA were in control of the area and committing
various crimes. SCPD officers and DPS troopers
cleared nearly 300 vacant apartments at the complex this
morning. The task force processing over
20 individuals that we arrested. We've confirmed that four TDA
members are in custody. Trendy Iowa members are in
custody. 1 TDA member is a confirmed enforcer for that
gang. Currently, there's 19
individuals arrested with 15 detainers.
HSR, Homeland Security and the Emergency Removal Operations
have taken custody of the four confirmed TDA members.
All right, it goes on and on and he's just reading out there in a
in a sort of a windy space. But we're being told by San
Antonio PD that they just did the thing that we had the White
House say was not happening, that this is not a real problem.
Yes, you guys said vacant apartments in the chat.
It is interesting that there were 300 vacant apartments.
I don't know if they just built the building or if it was
something that was getting out there.
So when Trump starts talking about border issues, when you
hear people on the campaign trail talk about misuse of
federal funds and you hear otherwise that it didn't happen,
Here's a here's the problem. Your government has no problem
lying to you. They don't mind.
And this takes me back to this sort of thing from the 1950s.
I looked at the numbers. Our government was so much
smaller. It was probably not doing great
stuff back then either, but the numbers were infinitely smaller.
Here's a little taste because one of the I'll, I'll play a
clip in a second about Kamala Harris.
Talk about the 1950s. And it's important, but the
national debt in 1950 was $257.4 billion.
We've given more money to Ukraine than we were in debt in
1950. We've given more money this year
and obviously our money is not worth nearly as much.
I find that interesting. I like this.
I want to put this historical context out there as we look at
there from March of 1933 until January of 1953, for that 20
year period, which is almost what we'd be dealing with
without a Donald Trump, you have unbroken Democrat control.
And during that time, the infringement on civil liberties
are shocking. They went after guns.
Anybody who knows about the National Firearms Act of 1934
knows that they did things that were probably illegal and should
not be allowed to stand. In fact, my friends that work
around the ATF said that that's the expectation is that the 1934
Firearms Act, the the way that they've actually limited machine
guns and suppressors and some other things may actually fall.
The ATF has that instinct and that's why they're processing a
lot of the tax stamps faster than they ever have because they
want to get as much money out of it because they're facing budget
shortfalls. Our government does tons of
things with four more money than it needs to.
I threw this on the screen just for funsies.
Individual income taxes, these are measured in 1,000,000 by the
way, 15.7 thousand million. It's really hard because the
numbers are so big, but 50, let's just look at 15.7000
versus 1.9 million. The difference between almost
16,000 and nearly 2 million, that's in millions of dollars.
That's how much individual income taxes have been
collected. One, it shows you the value of
our dollar has declined so much, and two, that our our country
takes 75 years later so much more cash in and still finds
itself in a massive budget deficiency.
Because we used to be a kind of a proper country.
We used to be a place where they took in less money and they took
less of our money and knew that money was supposed to stay more
local. But as the federal government
has grown, we've gotten more inefficient and we've gotten
nastier about it. I think this video clip of this
one, I forgot the label, but I believe that this is going to be
our little taste of Kamala Harris talking about the 1950s
and why this kind of popped up. She's upset that people are
evaluating her based on whether or not she has children.
I don't think it's an unfair comparison.
Most people in America, for most of American history have had
children on purpose because it was necessary and it gave you
skin in the game. And I know that upsets some of
you, but it's true. And when you see people that
don't, or they have just one and they're overwhelmed by a single
child, meanwhile I've got a neighbor who's got 7 and some of
the people I've met at Catholic Vote have like 789 kids and
they're standing just fine. They're doing it.
It's always been doable. It's a shift in values, and that
value shift probably happened about when she said in the
1950s. I want to ask you a question
because they're again, in speaking about women, there has
been a very big fixation on biological children,
stepchildren, women that have children versus women that don't
have children. It's like a huge point somehow
of this entire election, right? I saw the governor of Arkansas
said my kids keep me humble. Unfortunately, Kamala Harris
doesn't have anything keeping her humble.
How did that make you feel? I don't think she understands
that there are a whole lot of women out here who one are not
aspiring to be humble. 2A Whole lot of women out here who have a
lot of love in their life, family in their life and
children in their life. And I think it's really
important for women to lift each other up.
You know, I'll tell you, Alex, one of the things that I have
really enjoyed about where the discussion has gone, one of the
places it's gone. We have our family by blood and
then we have our family by love. Oh that feels so good.
I just love hearing about back on Higher.
So nice. She's trying to run the clock
out. By the way, she's also waiting
for like applause and smiles breaks.
She's looking for validation. And the person she's talking
about, she's really bad at this. A little example of that is when
she has her teleprompter go out in front of a mainstage.
I'm going to play you this. I don't know how you look at
this person. Like I said, the, the folks that
were sitting next to me on this playground said they're going to
vote for her. We just got out of mass.
And all I said was she said, what's the, you know, I don't
know how you would vote. Are you are you planning on
Donald voting for Donald Trump? And you don't have to answer
that question if you don't want to.
And I was like, oh please throw me a softball.
This is what I do for a living. And the fact the matter is we
just got out of mass. So theoretically you're a
Catholic. How do you vote for someone that
says they want to codify Roe V Wade into law?
How do you do that? You've got a childless 30 year
old woman multimillionaire wearing a hoodie, sitting and
talking to a childless 60 year old woman multimillionaire who
wants to be president and doesn't have any kids.
Neither of them have an and they don't understand why that would
be a problem. They're disconnected from all of
the lineage of human history completely.
And they've got, you know, a guy like you all don't don't even
get started with the sort of like the conflicts or the, the,
the scandals that are being hidden up about Doug Emhoff, who
seems like a real, real Peach. This is what happens.
This is why she's trying to run out the clock because she can't
do serious interviews because she's not a serious person.
Here she is talking to a friendly crowd and her
teleprompter doesn't work, so she just repeats the line.
She's doing Joe Biden, but she's what, 20 years younger?
22 years younger. And I would be able to get.
That's not the right one. Where's the video here?
Sorry, teleprompter fail #4. Remember his #32 today we got 32
days until the election. So 32 days, 32 days, OK, we got
some business to do. We got some business to do all
right, 32 days and we know we will do it and and this is going
to be a very tight race until the very end.
This is going to be a very tight race until the very end.
If you don't know what to say, just say it again.
If you don't know what is, if you don't know what the speech
was supposed to be, then just say it again. 32 days.
Do you hear that? That's a person who doesn't have
a serious brain that can't construct sentences on the fly.
That needs to have it written out for her.
That's why she waits for applause.
That's why she's waiting for a reaction from this lady.
The funny thing is, is that people get this like it's known.
Here's Andrea Mitchell talking about how Kamala Harris needs to
do more serious interviews. Maybe because when she does,
even when she does softball interviews, she's terrible at
it. I'm going to play the Andrea
Mitchell. I've got another follow up from
this little caller, Daddy, where she says something that's so
obvious. Every single person who
responded to her post 'cause Kamala posted this on her
official, you know, whatever Twitter account or her, her ex
account thinking that this is a win again about abortion.
She thinks that she nailed it. And it's so obvious to anyone
that actually lives in America that has, you know, interactions
with men starting at the age of 18.
You'll see in a second here. Let's do Andrea Mitchell talking
about she needs to do more serious by the way she's lined
up some more serious ones. Let me tell you what they are in
just a. Second, Andrea, I think they've
got to double down on doing more interviews and serious
interviews because when I'm hearing from Democratic and
Republican business people and a lot of men and she's got such a
big problem with men, I think there's an undercount of the
Trump vote. I think there is misogynation in
in all of this, black and white men, big problem.
But also the business world. They don't think she is serious.
They don't think she's a heavyweight and a lot of this is
gender, but she's got to be more specific about her economic
plan. Yeah, she's not a heavyweight
and she's going to go out there and prove it by going on very,
very serious interviews. She's going to show up on The
View, she's going to do the Howard Stern Show, and she's
going to do Late Night with Stephen Colbert, and she's also
going to do 60 Minutes. So there you go.
It's misogyny to say that this woman who has no kids, who has
no connection, who has no humility, who says she doesn't
aspire to be humble, that's disqualifying for me as a
Christian. It should be disqualifying for
you. If you go to Mass on Sunday and
sit in the pews next to me and you want to vote for someone
that's going to encourage abortion and lie about it, that
should be a big problem. And let's just take her on the
merits. She didn't do a great job.
Even with the softball interview.
Here she is talking about something that's going to be so
obvious to you who are listening.
She said that there are, you know, are there any laws that
that dis appropriately affect men versus women?
You guys are going to be shocked.
This ties to the 1950s as well or certainly ties to the
presidential sort of lineage there.
Let's play this one again. I want to take a moment and can
we try to think of any law that gives the government the power
to make a decision? I know what you're going to ask
about a man's body. No, No.
Can you think of any laws that give government the power to
make decisions about the male body?
Yeah, unfortunately, it's really, really easy.
Oh, there it is. From women in our chat, no less.
It's the draft people. There it is, the Selective
Service. It became part of American law
in 1917, but it became mandatory in 1940.
How interesting. Mandatory in 1940.
And it was during that period that I just showed you on the
screen here, but it was during, see, 1940 is between 1933 and
1945 under FDR. And FDR, it turns out, is the
guy that we kept hearing about. Joe Biden was just like FDR and
Joe Biden. By the way, I typed in FDR, Joe
Biden. I got dozens and dozens of
articles. I'm only going to show you one
later. They really wanted this
transitional period of 20 years where they fundamentally
transformed the country. And between 1933 and 1953, the
attack on civil liberties was extreme.
The numbers of things and the growth of government.
I told you, I think the APA, the 1946 Administrative Procedure
Act was the death blow to our Republic.
It's fundamentally changed the way the executive and Congress
interact. So there you have it.
What it yet another little tie in there.
It's very interesting that she said it's not the 1950's.
The 1950s came right after this period of time and it continued
into it. The only kind of saving grace
from the 50s which made it like tolerable.
I think you had Eisenhower who was a lifelong Democrat and
changed just before running. And he's the one who warned us
about some of these these neo con policies right now, the
military industrial complex, the endless wars and all this kind
of stuff. Very interesting that all these
sort of these pieces all come back to each other.
They want you to trust the federal government.
They want you to put faith in the federal government.
They want you to get away from a faith in God and something
bigger than yourself over and over.
And maybe that's why they have to lie about how bad the
government is at doing. What it does here is just like
peak leftism And excuse. This is the FEMA administrator,
the top official in FEMA, telling George Stephanopoulos on
a weekend program that the comfort of the employees of the
federal government is really important.
Sounds familiar, doesn't it? It's the same reason why FBI
agents don't want to show their credentials, even though the
purpose of the credentials is to show the public who they are and
justify that they are there on official business.
It's this idea that the comfort of the people that are doing the
mission of service, it's fundamentally the opposite of
Christianity and, and, and, and that is a problem.
Even if you're not Christian, you understand that doing things
for the sake of others is important.
That's like a humanitarian position as well.
The humanitarian values all come from Christianity as well, by
the way. But they, they've just lost the
thread. So the purpose of the government
again, is for the comfort of the employees of the government.
The mission of the government fulfills the existence of the
government. It's the same thing we repeat
here over and over again, but they'll say it out loud to your
face and they're absolutely shameless about it.
So much is going viral online as well.
One user suggested yesterday that a militia should go against
FEMA. Got more than half a million
views. What kind of impact?
Has this had on the recovery effort?
It has a tremendous impact on the comfort level of our own
employees to be able to go out there.
But it's also demoralizing to all of the first responders that
have been out there in their communities helping people, FEMA
staff, volunteers, the private sector that are working side by
side with local officials to go out and help people.
I need to make sure I can get the resources to where they're
needed. And when you have this dangerous
rhetoric like you're hearing, it creates fear in our own
employees. We need to make sure we're
getting help to the people who need it.
So much is going. We need to get help to the
people who need it, but really we need to make our employees
feel more comfortable and so that they're able to do what
they want to do, which is their job poorly, which is to say give
money away to their political causes.
Interesting how that always works too.
The, the scandal that's been going out there right now is
that tons of money, like $66 billion in FEMA funding, the
Federal Emergency Management Agency.
You think that their job would be handling emergencies, not
plans, by the way, plans where you bring in a bunch of people
that don't belong here. The goal should be that you
handle emergencies. And what they've done is they
created an emergency. Biden, Harris's thing, the
borders, our situation, this poor lady who now is running for
president and has no business being in the race, She's not
talented enough. They've given all their money
away, so they're not able to help the people.
We're being told that the $750 that you keep hearing about,
that's that's available for the folks who need, you know, need a
desperate that it's a loan. You're supposed to pay the
federal government back for it. What is the purpose of us
spending all of these taxes with this theoretically safety
blanket that we've created? If the blanket is going to be
given to people who are not Americans, not people who pay
for it, It's ongoing. And now they're saying that
that's a lie. Of course it is.
Because it's really, really bad for their position.
It's bad for what they've been trying to argue that they've
been doing. But the numbers are really
clear. Here's a little taste.
This is Korean Jean Pierre saying the thing that she said
is not true. They're all getting hit with
facts because they say stuff like praising one thing and they
just hope that Americans have no memory.
And I will tell you based on this little conversation that I
had on Sunday, Americans not only don't have a memory, they
don't even go look for the information in the 1st place.
So most of them didn't hear it the first time around and they
sure as heck aren't going to hear it the second time around.
It's the reason that these sort of side by sides are so
important. It's just categorically false.
It is not true. It is a false statement.
No, Biden did not take a female relief money to use to use on
migrants. Funding is also available
through FEMA's Emergency Food and Shelter Program to eligible
local governments and not for non for profit organizations
upon request to support humanitarian relief for
migrants. Like, that's it.
It's right there. And then.
Look, you have all the headlines snatched up here.
These are all FEMA releases. These are all this is compiled
by Brianna Morello, who's a friend of our show who's been,
I've been on her program a number of times.
Look at this. Homeland Security announces 380
million in additional funding to communities that are receiving
migrants, $110 million for emergency food and shelter to
assist migrants. New York City, 104.6 million
FEMA asylum seekers, $300 million in direct funding from
DHS, which is a FEMA announcement to communities that
are receiving migrants and another 340 million for new
competitive awards process. Department of Homeland Security,
$12 million in funding distribution, blah, blah, blah,
blah, blah, 77 million receiving for communities that are
receiving migrants. This is non-stop.
They've taken all this money and they've thrown it all out there.
I've got another video that I'm going to show you guys in a
second, which is, which is a, a woman named Lisa McCain just
pushing these administrators and they're smug and they don't
care. Before we get to that, I'll say
thanks to people that do, my friends at Patriot Coolers.
How do they care? They give a portion of every
single sale back to veterans, the kind of people you're going
to be hearing about in the next video clip.
They help veterans who have mobility issues make their homes
accessible. You guys can get your own at
patriotcoolers.com. You can get the official
tumblers of the Kyle Seraphin program.
You guys have seen the various ones we have.
I've got a new link which I will put out.
I will correct the show notes. They're not on there right yet,
but they will be for the audio. We have a link you guys can go
to. It's got basically direct links
where if you want to buy a suspendables mug, they are
preconfigured so you don't have to mess around.
I told them we need a one click link for my folks and they've
got them. You'll save 10% by using promo
code Kyle. Kyle, again, it's at
patriotcoolers.com. Look in the show description if
you want to link directly to sort of like the suspendables
cups and Kyle's favorite stuff that I'm using, it's going to be
under there. And again, promo code Kyle will
save you 10%. Support our sponsors if you're
in the market. They are the best.
And like I use them all the time.
I can't even tell you. We go out to Costco and we just
make sure there's a 50 quart cooler in the back because I
fill it up with frozen goods and it's most people don't think
about using their coolers except when they're camping, maybe when
they have some friends over. I think I use it probably three
times a week. My wife is like furious if I
leave it out. She's not furious, but she's
frustrated with me if I don't, if I don't leave it in there
because it limits how far you can go.
If you can keep your frozen stuff frozen for longer, you
should be doing that. OK, here's a really good
example, right? It continues to happen that
these people do not care and they don't know the answers and
they're like totally comfortable with it.
Our government actually has the ability to have a lot more
answers than they want to. They want to lead on to, I got a
little text message today, by the way, from a friend of mine
who works for the FBI. And this is not like a
disclosure of any kind, but the the Republicans approved $20
million worth of funding to re Plumb the J Edgar Hoover
building and they didn't get it all done.
So they've just, the FBI just reauthorized another $10 million
in a no bid contract to fix plumbing.
If you think these people don't hate you, they don't care about
you at all $10 million to fix J Edgar Hoover building plumbing,
$750 on a loan to people that just had their entire lives
wiped away when they've been paying into federal taxes for
quite a while. This is the issue.
How come we're not spending the money where we need to?
We. Did.
But do you know the answer? Because I do.
So you might want to get a pencil and paper and take some
notes because I'll help you do your job.
The federal government spent over $66 billion on illegal
immigrants in 2023, according to the Federation for American
Immigration. Does anyone here want to guess
how much we've spent on homeless veterans in 23?
Yes. Hi.
Well, let's just start higher. Lower the same.
Anybody want to guess? Fractional.
Thank you. 33 billion, 66 on
illegals. 3 billion on people who have laid down their lives
for this country. Can anyone explain up there why
that makes sense? Well, one is including all sorts
of benefits and one is just looking at a very, very narrow
no, I'm using the same numbers. I'm Sir, Sir, you are in.
I am using apples to apples. Different.
I'm using apples to apples. So since you know, why don't you
share with me, we don't track US veterans in the census.
So that that would be very helpful.
If we did, then I would be able to give you a very, you know the
answer because I do, I do. So I appreciate your opinion of
what you have no facts on, but let me continue and let me
educate you some more. I don't think she got through to
that guy. I don't think she's getting
through to anybody, but isn't it interesting that they don't have
the data on the things that would be helpful to do their
job? What they do have is the things
that make them look OK. Again, the federal government's
job is mostly shoring up the need for the federal government.
That is what a self licking ice cream cone is.
Most of us would be just fine if we experienced a complete
government shutdown. It's one of the questions we
asked on our call in show. And for those of you who are
supporting us over on locals, you guys can do that at
kyleserafin.com. I see there's new supporters and
subscribers every single day. Totally, totally great.
We get to chat about certain things.
And most of you, we talked to one of our our original
supporters and, and I was like, Hey, do you remember any time
that the federal gun shut down and did it screw up your
business? Did it screw up your life?
It's like, no. Do you remember when the federal
government stepped in and put some demands on men's bodies and
women's bodies when they said that you had to get a vaccine
shot and it just, like, destroyed businesses?
Yes, it's a net harm. This is another little piece
from the 1950s. This is just like sort of an
amalgamated answer through Google.
I found it interesting. In 1950, the United States
federal deficit was around $3 billion.
In other words, they spent $3 billion more than they took in
in taxes. And at the end of the year, at
the end of that fiscal year, the total debt that the United
States owned, the public debt, was $257 billion.
We are now like coming up on $40 trillion, right?
We're talking about three extra zeros being on like from
billions to to 10s of trillions of dollars.
It's shocking, it seems quaint that when I was graduating high
school, there was this big discussion about our problem.
And our problem is that we are coming up on $10 trillion.
We are now 4X that. In not very much time, we've
taken on so much debt because none of these people have any
concept of how to run a business.
They have no concept of what they're what they're actually
supposed to be doing. What is the purpose of
government? The government would tell you is
that people need jobs. And what's even more incredible
is that they didn't actually increase the deficit that much
even during times of war when we went to Korea, because it was,
it was financed through taxation.
So I had this little interesting piece here.
I've just, in general, I just want people to know some facts.
As you go out there in the world, you're hearing this
discussion about the quote UN quote, the rich need to pay
their fair share. That seems to be an overwhelming
push from people on the political left.
That's definitely 1 of Kamala Harris's talking points.
By the way, she would be considered in the rich.
But if you look at the top quintile of all income tax
payers in 2022, and this is always the case, by the way, if
you distribute this across in the 1950s, we had like a 91% tax
on people in the top 1%. The top 1% of all income
taxpayers in this country pay 31% of all the income taxes,
which is 54% of all the taxes taken in.
And then you start looking at that, that the other piece of
the big of the pie there, which is going to be on the bottom
right, 54% of the federal government's budget that comes
in from taxes. 54 percent is income taxes from individuals,
30% are payroll taxes, which are taxes that the companies that
employ you have to pay just for the right to to employ you.
So those are also generally paid by people who are in the top 1%
or the top 20%. That top quintile includes 25%
more. We're talking about 56% of all
the taxes paid are paid by the top 20% in this country.
Most taxes are paid by the wealthy.
Overwhelmingly. You have a small percentage of
that are corporate income taxes, like 9%.
You've got something listed as other.
There's another one that's like customs and duties that are
pretty small. Excise taxes are 2%.
The overwhelming majority of taxes in this country are paid
for by people who run businesses and who have high net worth and
high incomes. So I'm just tired of these
people saying things that are false.
But that's how you end up with a administrator in the federal
government talking about the job of people who are trying to
provide help to those around them.
It's their job to get out of the way so that the FEMA people, the
useless government employees that showed up late and showed
up barely at all and don't want to do the job.
By the way, Glenn Beck went out there with Corey Lewandowski and
they were rolling around knocking on trailers and saying,
Hey, why aren't you in a more prominent location?
And they're like, well, we, this is the place that the manager
said that we should be because, and, and it's always women.
I don't know why, but it is. We're just looking at the world
very, very differently. And my belief is, is that we've
basically allowed a lot of these women to get into positions and
they, they look at the world differently than men do.
Men see problems and solutions. In fact, every single one of you
that's married knows this thing. Your wife brings you something
and tells you she's upset about something.
What are you doing? You're trying to figure out how
to solve it. She might just want you to
listen, but it'd be really helpful if she said that up
front because if you start telling me a problem, my job is
problem fixing. And you'll notice that when you
feminize things like we're just supposed to listen to the
problem. That's not how we're wired.
Get militias out there. Get people out there to start
cutting down trees. Get people out there with
trucks. Get out of the way.
Federal government, stop trying to protect me.
I understand that there's a risk.
Going out in floodwaters is never safe.
But guess what? People are going to die.
That's what your job is as a man.
You go out there and you face down nature and the threats.
So for me, it was very telling that not only that I hear people
on on the playground that didn't know about actual facts, that
thought that the problem that Donald Trump was that he was
divisive. That was the other thing that
was said. I can't vote for Donald Trump
because he was so divisive during his presidency.
And what you never saw was anyone discuss.
And I asked her, I said, did does it look like it was his
fault that he was devices or the fact that he was covered in such
a way that everyone felt like he was divisive?
Because I don't think he's a nice person all the time.
That's pretty clear. What did that have to do with
governance? Where in the, in the
Constitution does it say the president must be nice and make
people feel good? Like his job is to just execute
the policies of Congress, the laws that are passed underneath
him, sign them in the bill, you know, sign them in the law or
veto them based on what he what he claimed.
We're asking for things that don't make a lot of sense.
And it reminded me, I played you guys this the other day.
I'm going to play just the beginning of it.
You guys want to go back. You can watch it from I think it
was from Friday show Bill Burr talking about first ladies
getting too chatty. It seems to kind of tie together
because I got another first lady who got pretty chatty and and
seems to represent a lot of the issues we have here.
We play this one more time, Bill Burr talking about the real
problem each presidency, like these first ladies they've just
gotten. More and more like, like like
chatty, you know, more and more. Chiming in like leaning into the
frame, spitting out their ideas. It's just like what?
Why are you talking right? You weren't elected.
Shut up. Your husband's not running a
lemonade stand here. He's running the country.
You don't just chime in. Let me guess, is this considered
sexist? Right.
It's misogyny, like Andrea Mitchell just said.
That's the real problem here. Men are being sexist and they're
mean and they're not validating the opinions of women.
Women, you get to say it's just not in public when you are not
in the role that you're supposed to be dealing with this.
Remember who the ultimate example of that was?
The most chatty first lady ever, who stepped into a place that
nobody needed her and found out when she went on the national
stage that nobody liked it. Hillary Clinton, here she is
talking about something that she wants to fix.
It's the Section 230 of the Federal Communications Act or
the she wants to, she wants to revoke the protections that
platforms have because she wants control.
It's interesting that this original mechanism of control
and and allowing pass through happened under FDR.
It happened in 1934. Like I said, those kind of
attacks on civil liberties, they, they want to finish the
job on a lot of this stuff. They want to push through.
They were like, hey, we had some restrictions, but it wasn't
enough. We've obviously seen that people
have adapted to it. So here is the original chatty,
the OG chatty first lady, for those of you who are begging not
you have to hear what she says, Listen to what she says about
social media censorship and how badly they need it.
It's another thing I brought up yesterday, sitting on a
playground. I said that the Harris regime,
the Harris Biden regime, one of the nastiest things they've
done, abortion for all, opened up our borders, devastated the
economy for various reasons. But they've also imposed
censorships, which I think are fundamentally UN American.
They hate guns, which is sort of that last line of defense that
Americans personal sovereignty rests on.
And they hate the idea that you're allowed to have your own
opinion that disagrees with a government when the government
is not very good at anything. And they prove it over and over
and over again that they're happy to lie to you.
Here's the best. Here's Hillary Clinton.
We should be in my view repealing something called
section 2:30, which gave, you know, platforms on the Internet
to immunity because they were thought to be just pass throughs
that they shouldn't be judged for the content that is posted.
But we now know that that was an overly simple view, that if the
platforms, whether it's Facebook or Twitter X or Instagram or
tick Tock, whatever they are, if they don't moderate and monitor
the content, we lose total control.
And it's not just the social and psychological effects, it's real
harm. Yeah, it's social and
psychological effects, and it's real harm, and we lose total
control. And we need that control if we
want to do the things like tell you what to think and make sure
that you're squared away with that.
She did actually say something later on in that interview that
I agreed with. She said that kids shouldn't be
having phones in schools. But the problem is, as usual,
she thinks that the government should be the ones who decide
that because these people don't believe in your right as a
parent. This is the whole idea of It
Takes a Village, which was also referenced in this interview.
She doesn't want parents to be able to have the ability to send
or not send their kids to school with phones.
I don't think they should be in school either.
They didn't have when I was in school.
It wasn't reasonable. It wasn't something that it
would took away from the from what you were trying to
accomplish in the school. But that's a parent's job, not
the government's job, certainly not Hillary Clinton's job, and
definitely not Kamala Harris's job, who doesn't even have kids
and who became an adoptive parent when the kid was 16 and
didn't even make it to her high school graduation.
For all the people out there that want to defend her and the
whole mamala thing, which is nauseating, she basically
married in and then is claimed to be a parent for optics from
everything we can tell. And then just look at the fruit.
The fruit is pretty gross. Ella Emhoff is like not a very
healthy looking kid. She doesn't look like someone
that was, she looks like someone who's whose father didn't love
her. She looks like she's, I mean,
she's doing modeling right now, which is nasty.
But she's like this far away from dancing on a pole looking
for attention from men. That's what it looks like from
my end here. Anybody who's ever seen women
that look like they, they had bad parenting and mostly
absentee fathers, that's what it looks like.
It looks like a bunch of face piercings trying to go
androgynous, sitting on your dad's lap awkwardly when you're
in your 20s. Like hard pass and all that.
In any case, the idea that we we're not the 1950s, I would say
the sad thing is, is that we're not the 1950s.
She's right. Democrats did their fundamental
transformation between 1933 and 1953.
They changed this country forever.
We're still reaping the whirlwind.
They thought they were going to get another shot at that same.
It was 75 years later. That's when Barack Obama popped
up and they thought they had another 20 years.
Donald Trump's been the only four year break in that that
plan. And it was more of a speed bump
than it was a reversal for those who have seen it and anybody
that's out there saying Donald Trump's going to fix all this, I
got a problem with that too. But darn it, someone's got to
hit the brakes. So I don't mind telling people
outside of church that that's my intended.
You know, that's where my vote is intended.
And I definitely don't mind disagreeing with them politely.
The question is, is can any of them hear it?
And we're, as Kamala said multiple times, we're 30 days
away, right? We're 32 days away.
We're right on the edge of this
thing. I don't think a lot of people
are going to change their minds. And I think there are far more
uneducated and and incapable of voters in this country, which is
why I keep saying, even though I retweeted something earlier
today saying go out and register.
If you're in PA or Georgia, these are your last couple days
to register to vote. Do it like row for the Shore.
But I don't think the voting is going to save us this time.
I think it's prayer. It's prayer for the people that
are in the pews next to us that still somehow have managed to
make it through the last couple years and are nominally
Christian and think that voting for someone that is not just
like wishy washy on abortion, but is for it all the way up to
the point of birth. I don't get it.
I don't understand how you can do that.
All right, when I have a little bit of a light hearted kind of
end here. Let me also say thanks to my
buddies, a Catholic vote who just had a piece on how they if
we can win the Catholic vote, we actually can can take the entire
country. There are more Catholics that
are squishy, confused, not getting the hard line.
Catholic vote is out there trying to reach them where they
are in the pews and get them into the the voting boxes.
Faith, family and freedom are the governing
principlescatholicvote.org. Make sure you guys get in the
loop. You'll get more stuff, you'll
get more news, you'll get more information.
You don't have to be Catholic. You don't have to be Roman
Catholic to do that. If you're Christian, if you're
conservative, generally, you will benefit from getting the
loop. And I recommend you guys do that
at catholicvote.org. Just jump on their website, sign
up for the e-mail. You'll never be sad.
You do. You may not read it every single
day. I don't have to grab it every
single day, but whenever I do, I'm like, Oh yeah, there's a
bunch of good stories in here. They're covering things the way
I want to see it. There's some good stuff from
Daily Wire in there today as well.
They don't just do their own news, although they do their own
as well. All right, follow them on social
media at Catholic Vote. Let's go ahead and wrap this up
with something kind of silly. I saw this.
We should still laugh. We should still make fun of
things that are dumb, even though I like to think that we
are more of a proper country. In the 80s it was still a bunch
of dumb stuff. One of the dumbest things that I
remember from being in the 80s was this fixation on karate.
How many movies were made about like karate guys?
They were really bad. Like they were so silly.
Here is a fat guy who's out of breath in a karate.
I don't know, Ghee, and he's getting knocked over by an
energy pulse. That some lady.
This is another one of those upside downs.
Women. You can't fight men.
Not reasonably. The average man is stronger than
an exceptional female, just accidentally.
That's just the way the genetics work.
That's just how God built us. That doesn't mean you're not
valuable. It just means that you can't get
into fist fights with men unless you could throw an energy pulse.
This is an ER doctor. I'll let you decide how serious
he is about it. He's trying to help this poor
man who just got knocked out by an energy blast.
It seems very strange to us Westerners that we think that a
simple sound or a phoneme would have the ability to affect a
person in that way. What's even stranger is the idea
that using the sound and projecting energy can actually
knock somebody out. Oh, it absolutely.
Samantha is going to try for her first time to actually knock me
out using just the sound and the energy.
Projection. OK, Samantha, he's she's
harnessing too much Samantha's. No, no, no, no, no shit.
Flip him. Flip him.
Cross his legs and sit him up. Sit him up.
Get behind him so you could hold him up.
Slap him in the kidneys. Yes.
Massage his scalp and then slap his neck.
Both sides. Slap him in the other side of
the neck. Good.
Coming to starting to wake up. He's not there.
Pop the knuckles on his fingers. OK, OK.
Good, Samantha. Damn.
Ease up. Probably blown his pupils.
Samantha, if you. Can shoot it tight.
You should be able to see that that the pupils are actually
dying Yep, as a result of the. That push, that push was insane.
Samantha, you've got to ease up. So dangerous.
And the guy who's worked in an emergency room, ER physicians
have some of the strangest sense of humor.
And that guy did a really good job with that.
He's giving that fake emergency. He's basically commenting all
the stuff to do to slap him in the neck and massage the scalp.
Don't do any of those things. If somebody passes out in front
of you, don't cross their legs and sit him up and punch him in
the kidneys and slap him in the neck or a pop their knuckles.
Like everything there is so weird.
The Internet is full of so much stupidity.
For some reason that connected with me today because it was a
woman not touching a man but knocking him over.
Ladies, you can't do that. You do it with emotions.
You don't do it with like your chi and blowing the pupils out
of some poor fat guy who was already out of breath anyway.
All right, that's what I got for the day.
If you guys are seeing I'm wearing the all black T-shirt
and I'm supporting my buddy Garretta Boyle.
If you guys want to support my friend, you guys can do that by
going to our merch store. Doesn't benefit me financially
at all, but it does give my friend Garrett something to do
on the down days so he can slam out some T-shirts for you, some
hats and so on. It's the dash suspendables.com.
The dash suspendables.com, just like everywhere else.
We asked to use the promo code Kyle.
That'll save you 10% on whatever
the listed price is. You can still get the
suspendables pins. Can I just say one more thing
about this too? Look, this is the way the badge
is worn. Just remember this if you're
getting suspendables merch eagle down, the eagle is down.
The badge is upside down to your eye, which is right side up the
way that we do it. Why?
Because the agencies in the federal government are under
duress. Just like we fly the flag upside
down. We're flying and we're wearing
the badge upside down to let people look at it and go.
Something is wrong and there is something wrong with our
government. And this is just a little
reminder. That's what the suspendables
badge means. That's why I just had a friend
of ours who reached out and said, look, I've got my
suspendable stuff. And I'm like, bro, they're
upside down. Which is to say the eagles up.
The eagle is down right now. It's true across the government.
We're we're in an upside down time.
All right, that's all I have to say for today.
We'll see how this week goes. I know we're coming into the
tight space. If you guys are not prepping and
getting yourselves ready for something weird, just like at
least for a couple of days of interruption, I don't see this
going peacefully no matter who wins.
And I just don't think that Donald Trump is going to get a
shot. I don't think they're going to
let the man back in. I'm so happy to be wrong about
this. Nothing will make me happier, by
the way, than me being wrong about that.
But it just doesn't look good. And you should prepare for that
by insulating yourself locally. Not not karate, by the way.
Like, go meet your neighbors. Shake real hands, break actual
bread together, spend real time forging relationships in those
neighborhoods that you have. That's going to be the hedge,
not the federal government. They're not going to come save
you when something bad happens. They're not going to pull you
out of your car when the floodwaters get up over the
window or the windshield. All right, that's all I got.
I really do appreciate you. We'll see you guys again
tomorrow. God bless you and have a
fantastic start to this week. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Seraphin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Seraphin. Follow.
Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.