Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraf. Hello my friends.
Welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is July the 21st. It is Friday.
It's been a wacky, wild week. There's been a number of very
important congressional hearings.
Whether they do anything is another animal, but I think they
were of interest. And we're going to talk about
all those. We've got my buddy Real Steve
Friend on here. He's already interacting in the
chat. So those of you who have been
asking, are we going to do Friendly Friday?
We are going to do Friendly Friday 100%.
And as many of you know, I heard some people in the chat saying
that this is Casey's theme. It is Casey's theme.
My brother Casey, very talented. And then you may not know this,
but the the voice that actually introduces me each time, that's
actually my dad. So that's kind of fun.
This is the family show. We're going to be talking about
some things that are not very familyfriendly only because the
left doesn't like families. They don't like reproduction.
They don't like you, most likely.
Let's let's talk to our sponsors real quick.
I I want to do something different.
What I've often done is I tell you about Catholic vote, which
are fantastic. Check this out.
Here I've got my Catholic vote mug.
I actually told them I don't like the mug you sent me.
It's written on the wrong side and they sent me another mug
with Catholic vote written in all black and white, which is
great. I'm going to read from the loop
today. I'm going to give you a couple
of just tastes of what's on the loop.
I think it's one of the best. One of the best emails you could
actually get every day. I actually mean that like, it's
not just that they're taking care of us.
They they actually have a really good product here.
So go to catholicvote.org and to your e-mail address and this is
what you'll get at about 5:00 AM everyday.
So this is for Friday, July 21st, it says.
DeSantis urges senators to back Tommy Tuberville.
They're talking about whether or not they're going to be funding
military. We don't see the Catholic vote
screen. I'm sorry, I'm just reading it,
folks. I'm not showing you the inside
of my e-mail box, but this isn't my e-mail.
So he's talking about funding abortion and abortion tourism
and making sure that we don't do that.
There's another one here about the FBI and the informant file
on 10/23. So that is something that Chuck
Grassley released. We're going to be talking about
that today. There's a discussion about the
the implosion of the attacks on Justice Thomas.
If those of you have been following this, they're trying
to smear Alito and Justice Thomas, Clarence Thomas.
About supposedly money that they've gotten that were
donated. So that's interesting.
There's a Christian designer who just had a Supreme Court
decision that's been getting death threats.
That's pretty interesting. There's a story about what's
going on in Virginia schools and how they now empower parents to
keep their kids out of transgender bathrooms.
Really interesting. A piece about Jason Aldean and
this this hit country song that we brought up on Wednesday.
And if you saw that, try that in a small town.
Apparently that's caused a big backlash because they don't like
BLM and Antifa riots. Go figure.
And RFK censorship and more, a whole bunch of.
Stuff that's actually in that particular e-mail every morning,
Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, every single day of the week.
You get in there and you're going to get good information.
So check out catholicvote.org. I know that was a little bit
long on our promo, but it actually is is really good.
It if you're not out there checking the stuff out, you're
you're going to be sort of less informed.
So if you're not actively curating your own news feed,
Catholic Vote will give you something good.
All right, folks, let's bring on my buddy Steve Friend.
This is the real Steve Friend, author.
He is a fellow at the Center for Newing America.
He has a new background, as many of you can see here.
They sent him a popup banner so that he can do it, and we're
going to get him a better camera, even.
But we watched him out just a little bit less.
He looks more like Steve and less like an alien.
Somehow. These cameras, man, there's
something else, this audio video game.
I thought it was the Florida sunshine, that I was just
working on my tan too hard. I know you're Tanner than that
in real life. That's the thing.
I think you're actually Tanner than I am, or you're redder than
I am in real life. It's unavoidable, man.
You go outside and you just melt.
But it's fantastic for an iguana like me.
I enjoy every minute of it. I weep a little bit in the
winter time when it drops to like 73.
He starts moving slower. His runs are about 1/4 mile
quarter second off each mile. How was your run this morning?
Did you go run 1000 miles this morning?
Yeah man, I knocked it out, got my, my 12 miles in.
I actually got stopped by a passer by one of the my regular
guys. I always do the head nod and he
actually stopped me. He's like, hey, were you running
by the Home Depot the other day? And I was like, yeah, and I'm
almost in track every day. He didn't.
He didn't stop you and say, hey, are you the guy that's been
fighting the FBI and going in front of Congress?
He said. Do you run in front of Home
Depot? That's right.
I've been waiting on that like maybe because I'm in pretty
pretty blood red area and and I haven't been recognized I got
but I'm kind of Incognito. I have a nice ball cap on the
kind of hold the sweat up off on my eyes and have been been
flagged down. But mostly like is it safe to
run here or did I see you outside the hardware store?
Do you pack heat when you run? Do you carry?
No, I can't man. It would fall out of my pants.
It would just like it's. I sweat so much that they it
would just it. It might cause some corrosion to
the. To the firearm.
That's what you do so bit that's it's just a tool you can replace
barrels. I'm going to I'm going to get
you carrying on your runs That's what I think needs to be there
needs to be an armed Steve friend doing 12 miles every
morning in the dark in Florida. We can we get you there.
I would love to do that. I mean it.
And I actually got stopped. Can we get a chest?
I got. I have.
I have a rig. Yeah.
So I could probably make that happen.
I got stopped by local law enforcement because they said I
violated the crosswalk violation and they they were going to cite
me. That's that's the type of
policing that goes on in my area.
I'm really thinking about running for mayor, just so I can
fire the police chief for that. That seems reasonable.
All right. What do you got going on?
You've got you've been putting out a series of videos people
can follow you at Real Steve Friend on Twitter or at Real
under score Steve Friend to make it complicated on True Social
and your your employer CRA has been putting out some videos
interviewing you. I know people are going to want
to see these there 10 fixes for the FBI.
What are give people some highlights.
Yeah, it's it's kind of derivative for this policy
proposal that we we came out with a few months ago and it's
these top ten systemic issues that are within the FBI and we
filmed some video shorts and it'll be every Thursday at noon
time. We're going to drop one of them.
So yesterday was the first one. It's been pretty well received.
And it was talking about the the quota system that exists through
the integrated program management.
That's sort of been the thing that I've been pushing out super
hard and get people to get an understanding of it in a
digestible format. So every week you can look
forward to to something new. It's I think they, I've looked
through the first five of them and none of them are more than
about like 2 1/2 minutes. So it's not not too much of A
time commitment to actually learn some valuable information.
So 1015 minutes worth of your time over a period of a couple
of weeks, 10 weeks or so and you can learn what Steve Friend
thinks should be done at the FBI.
Obviously we all had some input on that.
So that's fantastic. You are kind of a policy wonk
guy. Do people know that you're an
accountant? Do your your employers know that
you have that background? I try to keep that as quiet as
possible because I don't want to be thrown into like budgetary
stuff because just I feel like my eyes are going to roll over
and I'm just going to die of boredom.
But it does, I think, give me the sort of analytical mind that
allows me to dig into other issues that I think are probably
more interesting and more important and say, well, that
doesn't make sense because and and actually on the back end
say, well, it'll actually save money because I did, I actually
did run the numbers secretly because I didn't want you to
assign that test to me. Very good.
You did it. If you do it, it's not work.
If they ask you to do it, it is work right.
Exactly. Which is why I say like hey if
you get rid of all the special agents that saves you 25% on 1st
salary. So saying.
Yeah, but then you have a bunch of Intel people, like neutered
Intel people. I don't know if that's any
better. All right, so this has just made
me reflect on something. I think God puts us where we
need to be. Often times, you're exactly
where you need to be. You have the right mind for the
thing that you're doing. You went from guy who was
refusing bad policy to guy who is now recommending good policy.
You've made some recommendations about some line items that could
be eliminated from the FBI. You want to talk to people a
little bit about that? Yeah, So the House Freedom
Caucus, I think it's come to realize after the hearing that
they had this week with the IRS whistleblower, that kind of went
nowhere and. We could probably get into that
catastrophic failure from the GOPI.
Think we should probably dig into that a little more.
And then there's really just been no fallout even since
Garrett and Marcus and I went there and you know we had our
our few hours there to get reamed by the Democrats and have
the Republicans say yo, you guys are heroes of the Republic.
And then what? What actually happened?
And hopefully this, this group of 20 that held out with the
McCarthy Speakership that tried to get a coalition style
government. Has come to the realization that
they need to use the budget process to bring the FBI to
heal. So they came yesterday some
conversation with Chip Roy about what the what they can actually
argue for with the September budget debate to 0 out defund
from the FBI like meaningful actual things that can impact
the agency. And I know there's a temptation
to go for like the low hanging fruit.
Like I I was saying like we should just remove Chris Ray's
protective detail because he's not that important.
And if he thinks that he is, then.
We have a ego problem that we need to address well.
Nobody even recognizes Chris Wright anywhere, despite what
the FBI employees may think, That doesn't happen when he goes
out in public. Yeah.
So I so they actually want to come up with like a top five
list. So I I came up with more than
that. So like they could you know pick
some whatever that would get to their fancy.
I would, I think they can argue for and then submit it to and I
sent it to you last night. I think there's some some good,
good eating in there if you want to go through a few of them.
Obviously a touchdown like that, that quota system, that
integrated program management, that's been my my big bugaboo
and George Hills as well, because I think that it's sort
of been set it. It creates that perverse
incentive where the FBI is a law enforcement agency is trying to
bring crime numbers up as opposed to bringing them down.
And that's just not what you're supposed to do if you're in a
situation where you know, you're upholding the law.
You would think, Let me, let me have you dig into just that one.
I don't have the graphic up and and I think that we're going to
let the the members of Congress do what they do rather than
advertising something that they're not ready to do yet.
We'll we'll see it when it comes out and then you can take all
the credit and I'll let you come back on and talk about it more.
Let's just dig into the the metrics thing.
I think if we pound the same drum over and over again for
people that we can share these things and we'll try to share
this as a clip even because it is so important that they are
perversely incentivized. Go ahead and just like dig into
that that that topic maybe an expound upon it.
I know you've got some pretty good metaphors.
Yeah, I mean and then this is what the first week's video was
from CRA. So it's it's probably a apropos
integrated program management. It's very McKinsey Consulting
style. It's the ticket quota for the
traffic cop. The FBI establishes it.
It's a negotiation between the field and headquarters every
single year where they prioritize what they need to be,
the threats that need to be addressed and how many.
Resources and man hours need to get thrown towards that and
devoted towards it and then they set goals for themselves.
So it's how many cases are we going to open over this
particular violation. If it's number of white collar
cases or public corruption cases or domestic terrorism cases, the
number of arrests that we have to get and achieve more than
we're going to invent certain categories like disruptions, I
know you've talked about like the the 600 domestic terrorism
disruptions that they only got 397 for the year.
But that's a completely contrived and arbitrary number
that they invented for themselves to pat themselves on
the back as saying look how awesome that we are.
Yeah, made-up word. Because what is the disruption
anyway? Other than some arbitrarily
defined word? It doesn't necessarily mean an
arrest. It doesn't necessarily mean that
there was actually something that was going to happen.
Yeah, and and and the way that they set the rules up for that
is is ridiculous. I mean I had really the only big
public corruption case I ever worked.
It involved 9 subjects and I was told to issue the summons to
each one of them on a different day.
So I could claim 9 disruptions, but if I issued summons to all
them on the same day, I could only claim one disruption
because the rules state you can only claim one disruption for
calendar day. Yeah.
So important. We'll say thanks to what we've
got a $50 rumble ran here from real is rare.
Thanks so much. Looks like prayers to both of
us. I can appreciate that.
Thanks so much. Real is rare.
Not, not required by any means, but I'll always appreciate it if
you want to put your message out there.
It sounds like Ryan's got the the ability to toss it up on the
screen. So thanks, Ryan.
Steve, I've got something. We we we had an experience.
We did a live stream. Earlier this week we live
streamed a pretty long hearing you.
You gave most of your day to that, which I think is the only
way that you and I are going to be able to sit through a six
hour hearing. Sitting by yourself is tough,
but we had a kind of an an experience this this particular
episode that we're doing today is called The Trouble With
Censorship and we had kind of an experience that you want to tell
people so I don't have to toot my own horn about getting on the
radar. Yeah, we we were going to do the
Suspendables Mystery Science Theater for Congressional
hearings where we commented on this hearing that they had with
the IRS. Whistleblowers were Gary Shapely
and Whistleblower. X was Mr. Ziegler who came out.
It was kind of a kind of a badass.
I mean, I agree he, he was like he was like MJ in the fourth
quarter demanding the ball. I jumped in and answered
questions that weren't even addressed to him, which respect.
Yeah, I think this is the thing. I mean, he's actually set in the
precedent. It's the way the Democrats
actually do these things. They go on the attack.
They get after it. They share the points that they
intended to share. And he was really, really good
about that. I, like I said, Joseph Ziegler,
a total bro. He's apparently a Democrat
married to a man. So take that for what it's
worth. And and it had nothing to do
with the way that he did his job.
And that's those the kind of people that I signed up to work
with, Guys like you, guys like him.
Doesn't matter what their political persuasion was.
Thank God. But yeah, like you say, total,
bro. Yeah.
So I mean and we and we we need to talk about the hearing in
general. But the what we experienced was
this live stream that you guys put out across all different
platforms to hopefully an audience.
It's, you know, it's a public hearing, it's using taxpayer
dollars to put this out. Obviously it's it's necessary as
a citizen to pay attention to. But the the fact that it was on
YouTube and it was you who's doing the live stream, I think I
got the sensors that they are kind of spun up and they took
down your, your channel, gave you a strike and said it was I
guess like a copyright infringement.
So I guess public information is now proprietary, you can't share
it. Well, they they reneged.
That's the best part, because I told them, hey, I'm a
congressional whistleblower and I look forward to them listing
you as a publisher instead of a platform.
And magically the strike has been removed.
For a small YouTube channel with 5000 people on it, I'm not going
to keep you all day. I have one little segment.
I've got a special surprise for you.
It's something I think you're going to really appreciate and
I'm going to need your reaction to.
If we can cue up the hot dog day video, Ryan, let's get let's get
our friend Steve to to take his pick on this.
Well, as you all know, today is National Hot Dog Day.
And perhaps you also know that hot dog is my favorite meat.
I love hot dogs. I love them in buns.
I love them outside of buns. I love them with baked beans.
I just like hot dogs. It's the best, you know, best
meat there is without question. So to all of you who like me,
are celebrating National Hot Hot Dog Day, congratulations to you.
And may there be many, many more hot dogs served in our wonderful
land. OK, for people that are watching
on the Rumble Channel, you just saw something incredible.
But for those of you that are listening on the audio show
afterwards, that was Mitt Romney, the senator from Utah
wearing a hat with an embroidered hot dog on it,
carrying a hot dog that was uneaten with some very
theatrical ketchup on it. And he was strolling down the
halls somewhere in maybe the Rayburn building or some other
some office building. He's strolling around with a
visible mic up, lapel mic or lab mic and.
Is possibly the most awkward human being holding an ocdog.
So what do you think of that Doctor Seuss?
Hot dogs? Sort of.
Sam. I am routine And you think he
ever ate that thing? Would he eat them on a lake?
Would he eat them? With a rake.
You know, this is a guy who do you remember when he was running
for president and he wouldn't eat the Chickfila sandwich?
And that that was it was the easiest ground ball.
You just, you know, look like you're one of the people.
And he was so stuck up. And this is the exact opposite
of that where he's he's trying to learn that lesson.
Everybody knows that Mitt Romney's favorite meats is hot
dog. Meat.
When I eat meats, I eat hot dog meats because I love it in a
bun. I love it with my Hun.
I love it with the sun. I just want to eat hot dog meats
all day long with baked beans, with the fox in a box.
He doesn't. He speaks a different language.
He lives in a different life in that.
Video which Which? Brilliant at like does he have
1000 year old PR people? Because Ryan and I were talking
about this before the show. Are his PR people 1000 years old
and have never met a human being?
They just live on a mountaintop somewhere.
They're like hermits. Or is it like a 17 year old
who's like we need to make you relatable?
Let's have you hold a cartoon hot dog with the hot dog hat.
You notice he said the hat instead of hot dog at one time
because he's not used to wearing hats.
Ryan's dying over there. He has such a nick.
And help myself, man. This is, you know, I heard this
comparison made. They said nobody hates the
Republican voter base. The Democrats hate the
Republican voter base, but they're elected.
Republicans hate them way more because they have to seek their
votes. And this is the perfect example
of this guy is this is what they probably eat.
I have to seem relatable to them.
And it's like this guy who's on spring break vacation in Cancun
and took Spanish one in high school when he thinks that he
can obla. Yeah, he's trying to obla.
He's trying to do the how do you do patriots?
Like, I also enjoy meats made of.
Hot drugs? It's so awkward.
It's so uncomfortable to watch. Easily the weirdest thing.
I just wanted to leave on a high note because that's that's about
the best news that we have. Is that Mitt Romney?
Pretending to be a human being, Pretending to be a relatable
guy. If anybody thinks that guy
doesn't just eat steak all the time or whatever else he eats
just and and let me say this. If you are someone who lives in
Utah and you voted for Mitt Romney, please put in the
comments why you like Mitt Romney.
I got questions. I have concerns.
I would like to know what is it about Mitt Romney you love, and
especially if you are Mormon, if you're an LDS person who voted
for him because he's also LDS, what is the benefit of a Mitt
Romney? In the Senate to you.
I just want to know if there's something there so I can
understand it. Because man, I cannot, Like
everybody I've ever met from Utah would head butt that guy
and knock him out. Agreed.
I mean, but I guess they would argue the alternative is Evan
Mcmuffin. Evan, right, Muffin.
That was Evan McMullen. He was the third party candidate
who? It was just the CIA plant like
you want to talk about like Deep State plant.
I know it. So somebody, somebody in Utah
that wants to run, let me know and Steve and I will come and
campaign for you. We'll help or I'll get Garrett
out there and we'll get George and we'll just sell it.
We we need to fix this. This is so gross and weird.
I need less fake hot dog eating guys walking through the
hallways. Steve, I appreciate you joining
me for this little segment of Friendly Friday.
We'll do it again every Friday as possible and do the updates
folks follow. Steve, how's your book sales by
the way? Outstanding still.
Yeah, still going good, man. I'm doing some live events here
and they were telling me there's going to have like 600 people
there, so my hand might fall off when I go do that.
You have your own special pens though to write it, so thank.
God, I got to get the the president pen that automatically
does the signing for you. Yeah, the A I pen, that's what.
We need I I know Kyle's our friend.
He he's all about the high tech stuff.
I will find that if that pen exists, we will get the self
signing pen for you. Steve, thanks for coming on
today folks. Follow Steve at Real Steve
Friend on Twitter and Real under score Steve Friend on True
Social. Thanks bud.
We'll catch you again later on this week or next week.
OK, folks, so we're going to dive into some of these things.
This has been a gross week for a lot of things.
Like I said, that the Catholic loop vote has given me some some
insight. The first story that they had
and that's actually where we're going to go first.
Ryan, if we can bring up the the first story here, This is the
sacred obligation of the federal government.
Many of you may be familiar with the sacred obligation and the
obligation is we need to promote abortion.
I think we actually have a video of John Kirby.
Let me set this up. John Kirby is the National
Security spokesperson. He's at the White House often
times giving press conferences and he's been one of the most
vocal supporters. Obviously, if you are a
spokesperson, that is your job to defend the agency, defend the
administration that you're part of.
But I feel like this is just a step too far.
We want to talk about lizard people and and fake hot dog
eaters. This is another one of those
moments. Let's drop that video clip of
John Kirby talking. You just tell me if that sounds
like a real person to you folks. Why is the new DoD?
Policy on abortion critical to military readiness.
I'm really glad you asked that question.
No, I mean, I really am one in five members of the US military
or women 20%. We're in all volunteer force.
Nobody's forcing you to sign up and go.
People volunteer to go. You raise your right hand and
you say, I'm going to, I'm going to do this for a few years or
even for my life, and it might cost me my life to do it.
And when you sign up and you make that contract.
You have every right to expect that the organization, in this
case the military, is going to take care of you.
And they're going to take care of your families.
And they're going to make sure that you can serve with dignity
and respect no matter who you are, who you love or or how you
worship or don't. And and our policies, whether
they're diversity, inclusion and equity, or whether they're about
transgender individuals who qualify.
Physically and mentally deserved to be able to do it with
dignity. Or whether it's about female
service members, one in five or female family members being able
to count on the kinds of healthcare and reproductive care
specifically that they need to serve, That is a foundational
sacred obligation of military leaders across the river.
I've seen it myself and it matters because it says we're
invested in you because you. Or being willing to invest in
us. You're investing your life, your
family's livelihood with us. We owe you back that back in
return. I had a chance a couple of weeks
ago to meet with some military spouses here at the White House.
Some were active duty members, some were spouses, All were
women and 201. They told me that abortion laws
in this country that are now being passed are absolutely
having an effect. On their willingness to continue
serving in uniform or to encourage or discourage, in this
case, their spouses from continuing serving.
OK, so there you go. It is a sacred right.
And then here's the other thing. I always tell my fatherinlaw,
kind of jokingly, that when he wakes up and his head hurts that
that. Migraine that he awakes with is
sort of the sound of cognitive dissonance.
Those are his thoughts that don't agree with themselves,
that are banging into his head. If you're a Democrat right now
and you believe that men can be women and women can be men, that
there is an interchangeability of the biological sexes, And
then you're also going to tell me that it's really important
that biological women have access to abortion when they
join up to the military or that their spouses do, that we have
an obligation to kill, I guess, military spouses, babies.
That they haven't invented birth control in some way, shape or
form that they can't figure out how to keep their, you know,
they're, we know how babies are made.
Let's just leave it at that. We know how babies are made.
It's 2023. The science is settled.
There's a, there's a technique that you can use and you can
pretty much assuredly know that if it's done correctly, a baby
is the result. That is the eventuality of it if
you do it enough times, right. And so when that's the case,
this guy out here talking about, oh, I talked to women and you
know, they were women. How do you know they were women,
my friend, How in the world do you know?
That's the sound of cognitive dissonance.
That's the headache that he must have.
That's a great if you're looking at a rumble channel, you're
seeing this very uncomfortable smile.
It has to be the discomfort of dealing with the headache, the
cognitive dissonance. And and this all does actually
relate to censorship. You're going to see why, because
this is the message that they want want you to hear.
They're putting out this crazy nonsense about how, you know,
military spouses need abortions, that the government has a sacred
obligation. These are the words of religion.
We're going to come back to that.
So keep that in your head. The words of religion.
The sacred requirement to go ahead and kill babies, This is
their religion. And then meanwhile we have this,
this nonsensical piece of, you know, defining what a woman is,
which they can't do. And since we're talking about
women, and since we're talking about that, Ryan, if you'll
bring up our next article here. This is what I'm calling trans
in uniform. So there's a confidential memo
that was released. This came out in February, but
it actually was just released on the 18th.
So that would have been, earlier this week, confidential Biden
memo. Reveals, quote UN quote
transgender service members can skip deployments and receive
indefinite what's it called, physical fitness standard
waivers. So they can get out of like
their their uniform standards and they can get out of their PT
readiness standards. And skip deployments under the
the banner of being a transgender person.
If you want to just kind of scroll that memo, I know we've
got a kind of a slide deck of it, folks.
I'm going to kind of show you just a couple of pieces of this
memo. They're going to just be kind of
dancing through the screen here. But essentially I'm going to
read through it for you. This is from the Defense Health
Agency. This is at Womack Army Medical
Center at Fort Bragg. And this was written in February
of 23. Basically, it just tells you
sort of who it's for. The purpose is to establish
uniform guidelines regarding the medical and mental health.
Of service members who identify as transgender.
And so we've got a couple of you know, we want to show you kind
of the receipts of it. Moreover, I'm just going to kind
of hit the high points for you. We're talking about sources that
reference things like the world professional Association for
Transgender Health is one of the the reference standards that
they have as well as some DoD pieces and some regulations from
the army about physical fitness and mental health standards and
and medical standards. The other thing that's really
interesting is they have a a explanation of terms and
definitions and I found this to be very interesting.
It says transgender TG is a person whose gender identity and
expression are different from the cultural and social
expectations of the sex which they were designated with at
birth. One males identifying as female
is a transgender female. Females identifying as males are
transgender males. Now many of us have heard these
terms. I know that if you have to go
back and try to figure out what it means, the gobbledygook
nature of these things is in fact the tip off.
And it's more important. There's a little piece in this
actual in this document which I actually had on the screen just
a second ago that shows you that the Deer system, which is the
the defense sort of readiness for all these different it's a
technical background of their of their human resources stuff.
It actually States and I'm going to pull it up here in one second
it says. That there are only two
biological sexes that are accepted by the Department of
the Army, and yet we have to make all this nonsense that we
can kind of dance around this, it says.
I'm trying to find the exact quote here.
If you'll give me just a one moment.
The overarching goal here is that transgender service members
provide a safe and effective pathway for a lasting personal
comfort. I didn't realize that the
military was about personal comfort.
They also highlight that there's in fact some some potential
problems. With being transgender because
there's obviously side effects to doing these transgender
hormone treatments. And so when you get into the
background that we are actually going to reduce military
readiness, the only purpose of the military is essentially to
break things and hurt feelings overseas.
Here's where you see this kind of funny little piece.
It says while it's understood that many transgender
individuals identify as gender nonbinary and or gender fluid.
Service members are required to choose a dears gender marker of
male or female and that is not meant to misgender or disrespect
that service members gender identity.
However, the current medical and army system views gender as a
dichotomous variable. I want to say that again, the
current medical and army system views gender as a dichotomous
variable. There are only two options, male
and female, and the army actually knows it because the
army is in fact one of those groups that is involved.
In sort of the hard reality of humanity, which is that
sometimes there is violence and sometimes we have to get
involved in things that are unpleasant, and yet they're
going to play along with the charade.
It should hurt your mind. It certainly is hurting the
minds of the people that wrote this stuff.
And it is part of this, this overall push to do things that
make no sense, to make you doubt your own lying eyes.
We're going to bring up the next article here, which is a an
actual bill in front of Congress.
Fox News covered a little bit. We can talk about that in a
second. But essentially there are
Democrats that are trying to introduce an amendment to the
code for the Marriage Equality Act of 2021 and they are trying
to amend replacing references to wife and husband with spouse
genderless. They're trying to get rid of
married couples from to marry persons instead of saying things
like hobbsman or wife. They want to make sure that they
are removing the gendered language from the federal law
because this federal government. Under Democrat control is trying
to actually legislate A genderless society, even though
it makes no sense because they're out there putting their
spokesperson in a place to to advocate on behalf of the sacred
right of abortion, which can only affect women.
All of the stuff should blow your mind.
And then it says there's currently penalties.
For persons who threaten to kill, kidnap, or inflict bodily
harm on the former president's wife, I don't know why they want
to update that. They wanted to say former
president's spouse or surviving spouse.
Because, you know, it's possible that that spouse is a nonbinary.
Isn't that right, Ryan? They could be a nonbinary spouse
of the president. I don't know what that thing is.
Ryan says yes folks, if you're watching this and you're
enjoying what you're seeing by the, we'd ask you to go ahead
and hit that like button too on the Rumble channel.
And if you're listening online, you can always leave us a 5 star
review on any of the places that you're hearing it.
So we're just going to couple shameless plugs.
I want to continue marching on because the main topic that we
were going to talk about today, and I did get here halfway into
the show, is censorship. It's censorship of.
You and me and people that were known as the disinformation
doesn't. So what you're seeing on the
screen right now is a Washington Post article.
It's actually a smear job in some ways, says the GOP
bolsters. Robert F Kennedy junior in the
hearing while Democrats tear him down.
Got it. That's what it was.
How about Robert F Kennedy came in to speak about something,
testify about his experience, and the Democrats basically went
out there and took potshots at him and called him a racist and
said that he should be censored again while we're at a
censorship hearing because that's the nature of the beast.
I'm going to read a couple pieces of this.
This is written by John Wagner. I don't think this was written
in good faith. It just says he's a member of a
story political family who's been making a longshot
Democratic presidential bid. To be fair, I think his shot is
as good as anybody. If the system was was was not
rigged against him, but it appears to be he was bolstered
by Republicans. This is not blow anyone's mind.
This is a lifelong Democrat from a Democrat family that has been
in American history for 100 years and he's bolstered by
Republicans. Why is that?
Because he's telling something that is obviously true and good
for all Americans. He cites a history of espousing,
oh, citing his history of espousing conspiracy theories
and making racist and antisemitic sentiments.
It always comes down to those you got to be racist and
antisemitic if you're going to disagree with the Democrat
policy. Even though he said nothing to
of the of the sort, Not even close.
OK, he's been banned by social media, so look at they're
highlighting on this once again, it's not what the story is, it's
how they present the story. They're presenting that he was
banned by social media companies because he was spreading
misinformation. Sorry, this information.
We're going to get into that definition a second on vaccines.
And he was a panelist that was invited on behalf of the
Republicans. Why are Republicans having star
witnesses that are Democrats, gay Democrats that are, that are
federal agents and lifelong Democrats that are against a
vaccine, 1 vaccine in particular, and against the
antitransparency sort of tactics that the government's been
involved in? I think all of that should be
concerned to pretty much everyone here.
How this is actually going on, but the fact the matter is, is
that censorship is what is at stake here.
They need to control the messaging.
They need to control what goes into your mind.
Otherwise they are not going to be able to control that
cognitive dissonance, that cognitive infrastructure that we
talked about when we're when we're looking at these three
terms of Miss Dis and malinformation.
Can you bring up that little picture for me, if you would?
What do you got there? Right there it is.
So I was going to say something. Go ahead, I'll come in after.
Okay. So folks, this is from Sisa's
website. SISA is the Cybersecurity
Infrastructure Security Agency. They have the word security in
there more than once, and it says SISA defines Miss Diss and
Mal information, or MDM. It's always got to have a sexy
government acronym. I'm reading off it directly here
and you guys are seeing on the screen as information
activities. They put that in scare quotes.
This type of content is referred to as either domestic or foreign
influence depending on where it originates.
Let's just take a second and digest that piece.
Miss this and malinformation are information activities, okay and
they are either foreign and domestic.
That's everybody. That's everything that you ever
heard. You are either foreign or
domestic. That is a that is a twofold,
that is a perfect dichotomy. Either you live in the United
States or you don't live in the United States.
You can't be neither one okay. So they're now talking about all
information, but they said it in kind of a governmenty way, made
you think that it was about something that was interesting.
Now we're going to define these terms, misinformation.
It's false, but it's created. I'm sorry, but it's not created
or shared with the intent of causing harm.
So misinformation is you got it wrong, but you didn't do it on
purpose. And so it's dangerous because
you are spreading false information on accident,
misinformation. These words are important
because they are making the terms.
So let's use them the way they did.
The next one, disinformation, is deliberately meant to mislead,
harm, or manipulate a person. It's also false.
Disinformation is false, but it's intentional.
So that's the combination there. Misinformation.
False on accident. Disinformation, false on
purpose, with the intent to harm.
Here's the last one, malinformation, And this is what
Robert F Kennedy Junior was accused of.
Malinformation is based on fact. I want you to hear that again.
Malinformation is true. Michael Shellenberger has done
really good work on this. Matt Taibbi has done really good
work on this. Malinformation is true, but it
is used out of context. You know how the fat checkers
work. It's out of context, and it's
meant to mislead, harm, or manipulate by giving you true
information that you're too stupid to understand.
Unfortunately, Americans, you are too stupid to digest the
information yourself. I saw someone on Twitter
describe it this way. Chew the meat, Spit out the fat.
That's what's always happened. When we talk about how news is
consumed, there's always an editorial bias.
But you're too dumb to understand it.
You're not allowed to make those decisions.
Luckily, we have a center, the Cybersecurity Infrastructure
Security Agency, the SISA. People are going to help you
out, and they're going to make sure that you don't get true
information that you're too dumb to understand, and they're going
to protect you from things that are false.
On accident and things that are false on purpose.
So that's what you're paying for with your tax dollars when they
talk about cognitive infrastructure.
And that's a term that Tracy Beans helped bring to light.
There's a guy named named Redacted who's been doing some
good reporting and sharing that on Twitter as well, in fact, has
been quoted by Congress. So that should tell you that
these people are at least giving really relevant information that
you should have access to. Name and Tracy Beans are talking
about your brain, the Gray matter between your ears.
Are part of the infrastructure. The government is claiming that
they can police, and they do so under this term of MDM, miss
diss and malinformation. Again, I'm going to say it one
more time. I don't mean to repeat, but it's
worth hearing that you have to have this drummed into your head
so when you hear the words they're saying, you know what it
is, what they're saying. Misinformation, Accidentally
wrong. Disinformation.
Intentionally wrong malinformation, which is the
stuff they accused Robert F Kennedy Junior of.
It's it's correct, but we don't like it and you can't handle it.
Brian, go ahead and interject while you pull up the next one
here. Yeah, I just wanted to say, I
want to get your thoughts on when we I was watching Fox News
last night and they were attacking Robert Kennedy.
One of the Democrats on the five was actually attacking him and
she kept going after him about his stance on vaccines.
But not one person on that panel commented on the fact that what
RFK was saying is saying. He was not saying all vaccines
are bad. He's saying that we have no
studies done on these vaccines, correct?
There is no research done. There's no placebo studies.
And I think that that should be the attention or the focus of
this. You know, RFK and vaccines.
It should be all. Vaccines aren't bad, but let's
at least get these things tested.
Placebo studies done. Yep.
Let's get this man in his own words.
You have some videos that are going to show him testifying to
what his position are. Unfortunately, what we're seeing
in these congressional hearings is that they're attacking the
messenger, not the message. They are smearing the individual
that is out there testifying because what they're saying is
so damaging. And the and the damaging part is
this, and it's why the the thumbnail for today's video.
Is malinformation. That's the real dangerous piece
to them. Things that are true but you're
too dumb to understand and they don't want you to be able to
deal with it because they don't like the context they need to
shape the narrative. We have a narrative driven,
totally bizarre federal government.
And then even their witness that came in from I think NBC, this
woman would not answer a single question about whether the
government should be in the business of policing speech in
any way, shape or form. So let's pull up the first RFK
video, if you would. We're going to do about 50
seconds here. This is a short little take of
RFK defending himself. Let's have it in his own words.
If you've never heard of, if you never heard RFK speaking, he's
kind of an acquired taste. We'll talk about that in just a
second. But Ryan, if you up that video,
it's that video #3. 3rd to suppress information not the
into fact if you read the Twitter files and the e-mail
correspondence at up between. Facebook In the White House,
there was an acknowledgement that they were being asked and
they were complying with censoring information that
everybody knew to be true or highly likely to be true of the
purpose. And in fact, the term
misinformation did not denote falsehood or or veracity.
Rather it was a. Euphemism or any information
that departed from government orthodoxies and.
So there you go. He's talking about exactly what
we just said. Now he's using the term
misinformation and and they actually were falsely claiming
that things were untrue because that was part of it.
And the second piece of it was that they were claiming that
things were actually true, but but they were dangerous.
So he's calling it misinformation at some point.
He actually does define this, so.
And if you've never heard RFK speak, one of my buddies said
that actually rules him out as a candidate for president because
the way that he speaks, he has a he's got a condition, it's a
neurological condition. It's generative.
I had to look at the name of it again because I always forget
it's spasmodic dythnia this dysphonia.
Sorry. And and it is a an issue of the
lyrics of the of the voice box. It's it's a you know, it's a
neurological condition. He's fine.
He's not hurting. He hasn't screamed his voice
out, although he could at this point because he's being
censored in such weird ways. RFK went in there and he's not
afraid to come at these people aggressively, but they did
attack him. They actually, he was going to
do a 10 minute opening statement and they asked to censor it to
5:00 so that black people and Jewish people and Asian people
would not be offended by his existence as he spoke because
he's obviously a racist antisemite.
That's the only things they have.
They attack the messenger. They don't attack the message.
They they saw that his remarks were not even going to be a
problem. They tried to argue that he was.
Anti black for some reason because he was arguing that
black people shouldn't get vaccinated.
And of course he pushed back and said, you know, I vaccinated up
to everything, including all things that were recommended
prior to COVID. And my children were all
vaccinated the same way that almost everybody in that room
was. And yet I have real problems
with this because as he's become more educated and he tells a
good story about it, you can actually read his book The real,
I think it's the real Anthony Fauci tells you some of the
stuff and he was on talker. So I won't belabor this point.
Let's do the second video there about another 90 seconds or so
of him talking. I want you guys to get this guy
in his own words because. You're going to hear.
Depending on what news source you get, you're going to get
different versions of it, and this seems like the most
relevant pieces that we heard. Our country at the worst and one
of the highest vaccination rates in the world and the worst
health outcomes. We have 4.2% of the global
population. We have 16% of COVID deaths,
Blacks in Haiti with a 1% vaccination rate.
Were dying at a rate of 15 per million population and same in
Nigeria. Had a 1.3 vaccination rate.
They were dying at one in 14 per million population, 14 per
million population in our country.
Blacks were dying at 3000 per million population, 200 times
death rates in other countries and this holds throughout the
world. We needed information.
We should have all been sharing information openly and and
talking to the 15 million doctors through the Internet and
we're treating patients on the front line all over the world
and channeling the best therapies, the most successful
treatments so that we can all figure it out.
This is not a time in a pandemic.
To to to, you know, I just say this one thing, trusting the
experts is not a function. Of science.
It's not a function of democracy.
It's a function of religion and totalitarianism.
And it does not make for a healthier population.
What did I just say? It's about religion.
It's about the sacred obligation to offer abortions as the
military, which has nothing to do with abortions or anything
else. It's about believing that these
experts, climate experts, gender experts.
Vaccine experts, public health experts, those are the people
that you must trust because the government has ordained it to be
so. Those are the tenants of a
religion. We're staying on this program
over and over again. I love that I'm hearing it from
the other side of the aisle. And RFK is, you know, he's a guy
that said he would be happy to sign a assault weapons ban.
We don't have a lot of common cause, but we can agree on this.
The American people should be entitled to see free
information. They do not need to be censored
by the government. They do not need to have the
government curate the data that goes in between their ears and
police, that cognitive infrastructure.
It's not necessary. That is not the type of world
that we should be living in. And if you can think about this,
I want you to just picture, close your eyes if you like.
Think about a single regime in history that is censored.
Information from their population will not allow people
to know certain things. Picture that.
Are any of those regimes the good guys?
Historically speaking, are they on the side of truth?
Are they on the side of democratic process?
Are they on the side of free exercise of religion or free
exercise of speech or thought? The mere act that you're getting
involved in censorship, which is in fact the problem.
This is the First Amendment for a reason.
In our Bill of Rights, it is a violation of the constitutional
oath that every service member and every member of the federal
government that swears in and says that they will protect the
Constitution. That's what they're supposed to
abide by. It's so simple when you swear in
and raise your hand. I've said this a couple times on
other programs, but I'll say it on mine now as well.
When you swear in and say that you will protect and defend the
Constitution, you're not necessarily saying that you're
going to protect the the Article 1 powers of Congress.
You're not saying that you're going to protect the Article 2
powers of the presidency of the executive branch or the Article
3 powers of the judiciary, although those things are part
of it. What you're really saying, in my
opinion, and I could be, I can be open to being criticized on
this. But when you swear in,
particularly in federal law enforcement, which was what I
did, you're saying that you're going to protect the Bill of
Rights. The government is an
organizational document. The the the Constitution is an
organizational document. And then secondarily it is a
leash on those powers of the federal government to get
involved in your business. They have no business policing.
What's between your ears? They have no business telling
you how to think or shaping what you think by letting you have
only certain information that is quote, UN quote approved.
That is not the job of the government.
And historically what they used to call the 4th estate, which is
the press, was out there to hold the powerful accountable.
They were actually running up until very, very recently, as
hard as they could to find all the stories that would embarrass
the official position because that was how you made your bones
as a journalist. You were able to out the
powerful and those who were trying to keep information away
from the public by sharing it. That was the highest cause.
And so that's why journalists were always blue collar.
That's why we brought on guys like Frankie and we bought on
guys like Sean the other day and we'll bring on more.
The reason that we want journalists that are blue
collar, that are regular people that didn't go to elite either
journalist schools or elite Ivy League schools is because those
people are part of the same group think they're no longer
bastions of independent thought. They are being censored in the
same way. And a lot of that's because
there's federal dollars involved.
Think about how much money goes in We just had a our young
friend Daniel Schmidt come in from the University of Chicago,
and he was talking about how there are actually billions of
dollars in in endowment and that the the amount of money that
that school has is significant. And yet people are still paying
a huge amount of money that they're borrowing from the
federal government for the most part.
And Joe Biden is actually trying to forgive pretty shocking
stuff. RFK is spot on with this stuff,
you know? And then I'm going to read
another piece of the article over here, if you would.
This is still from the Washington Post.
I want you to actually hear how ridiculous this thing is.
So one of the things that he says is it says the Democrats
cited several past statements by Kennedy.
That's RFK, including an episode in early 2022 in which he
invoked Anne Frank to suggest that Jews had more freedoms
during the Holocaust than Americans who are choosing not
to get vaccinated. It's probably an overstep, but I
think hyperbole is appropriate in political speech.
And then it says Anne Frank died in a Nazi concentration camp
after hiding with her family in a secret annex in Amsterdam for
over 2 years. He apologized for the statement.
Here's really the funniest part because we just talked about the
male, female sort of delineation.
Look at this Debbie Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Many of you will know her as ramen noodle hair from watching
our live stream. Ramen noodle hair.
The the Repub, the Democrat from Florida.
Said said something and asked him if he stood by his statement
and he said, Congressman, what you're saying is a lie.
And she said, I'm a congresswoman.
Well, how do we know congresswoman?
How would we even know when you've tried to get rid of the
distinction? How about Congress person?
You're a Congress person is what she should have said.
Because we're trying to get rid of gender.
Her colleagues are trying to get rid of gender.
I just think that stuff's very funny, he said.
If the views that you and others have applied to me and have been
attributed to me were actually true, then I could see why I
wouldn't be able to testify here.
But those things are not the case.
That is not the case. He's not actually saying those
things. What he's doing is he's freaking
them out. Because he's just simply saying
we should have access to some information about vaccines.
We should have access to the the the entire purpose that the FDA
actually exists. And it exists for one reason
alone. It exists to make sure that food
and drugs in this country are properly tested and that we're
not backing corporate interest in favor of putting out
dangerous medicines and dangerous food products.
Very easy. That's what the FDA's purpose
is. It doesn't do that anymore.
But that's what it's supposed to do.
Ryan, we've got another video. I think this is video #5.
Let's play it. This was another probably 90
seconds or so. Like I said, I want to give you
guys pieces from the guy's own words.
So let's hear Robert F Kennedy. Saying we have looked for many
years to find a pre licensing safety trial of any of the 72
vaccines doses that are now essentially mandated.
They're recommended but that's effectively mandated.
For American children, and we have not been able to find any
and I and every other medication requires prior to licensing by
FDA at the company perform a safety trial that compares
health outcomes and placebo in a placebo group and a similarly
situated vaccine group. My assumption was that was done
for vaccines. We found out that it hadn't been
that it was not, it was they were exempt.
And I made that statement publicly.
Dr. Fauci contradicted me. And when President Trump ordered
him to meet with me, him and Francis Collins and a group of
my colleagues, I said to them at that time, you've said publicly
that I've been dishonest about that.
Can you show us a single pre licensing safety trial,
placebo-controlled safety trial for any of the 72 vaccines
required for American children? And he made that show of looking
through a file and he said, well, they're back in Bethesda
and I said, will you send them to me?
And I never heard from him again.
So we sued the HHS under the Freedom of Information law.
After year of litigation, they sent us a letter, which is
posted on Chd's website and acknowledges that they are now
not able to locate. A single pre licensing safety
trial to see the control for any of the vaccines that are now
mandated for children. These are 0 liability vaccines.
So under Reagan, the liability for any kind of failures, the
bars, you know, data set is all basically a post Reagan
phenomenon because they remove the ability to sue if you get
these vaccines and that's why they're so profitable because
they're liability free. That's what RFK has actually
been going out and crusading against.
He's not saying they shouldn't exist.
He's not saying that you shouldn't use medicine.
What he's saying is very specifically that you should
have medicine that is approved under the type of laws and and
government agencies that exist for their own purpose, which is
to to put out safe products that have been tested.
It's expensive. It's unpleasant.
That's why American drugs cost more than anybody else.
Because we believe in safety here that we don't believe that
you should just be able to take snake oil and it comes out of a
long tradition of people doing cons.
In the American West, in the developing part of America,
people thought would would it be nice if we could actually stand
by and say that these things are good?
And here's the test. The test do not exist,
apparently, for vaccines. I think RFK is likely.
I think he's being an honest operator in this stuff.
He's testifying under penalty of perjury.
And that's the thing you have to realize.
And he's a big enough figure, that they would actually come
after him for that sort of thing.
So let's take him at face value for what that is.
Why can't they produce those studies?
This was brought up on Dan Bongino show maybe 2 weeks ago,
but it's worth continuing to bring this thing up.
And he just testified saying exactly the same thing.
So I want you guys to be aware of that.
Now all that is to say, censorship is a big problem.
It is an issue for all of us. And when they are curating the
information, they are changing actual real results.
If we can bring up the topic five, which was the the laptop,
it was always real. Those of you who watched our
live stream found out this. You'll see there's a picture
here if you're watching the stream showing.
Joseph Ziggler, he's the the IRS special agent that ran that
investigation, like I said, look like a total bro.
I would absolutely work with that guy every day of the week.
He sounds honest, credible, and he's incredibly on point.
And the fact the matter is, is that testimony has revealed and
there's actually been some subsequent documentation that's
come out to show the thing that we all knew was true.
And we've known it since 2020, since before the election of
2020. But apparently the FBI knew it a
lot earlier and there's some credible information.
That's coming out now in the New York Post saying that there was
actually four days after this this laptop went public.
They were, you know, when they were doing the socalled like
hack and dump operation telling that the the people at social
media that this was going to be Russian disinformation, they
actually told him it was true. And so the New York Post was
censored from Twitter. The story was repressed
dramatically for two days as it broke because the FBI lied and
told people that we weren't going to comment on something
they knew was true. And that should be a problem.
Let's play the video. This is Elise Stefanik from New
York questioning Emma Joe Morris, who was the actual
editor at the New York Post at the time that the Socalled
Laptop from Hell story came out. You got the video #2, I believe.
Isn't it true that your October 2020 Hunter Biden laptop from
hell story has proven to be 100% factually accurate?
I was 27 when I published that story.
It better have been. Isn't it true that the FBI
obtained Hunter Biden's laptop a full 10 months before your story
broke? That's correct, according to the
subpoena that I published. Isn't it also true that we now
know that the FBI's Foreign Influence Task Force coerced
social media companies into an alleged forthcoming Russian
quote hack and leak operation and as a result, illegally
censored the Hunter Biden laptop story?
Isn't that true? Yes.
And this for censorship by government agencies like the FBI
was paid for by the taxpayer, since the taxpayers fund the
FBI. Isn't that true?
Yes, and Hunter Biden's laptop from hell.
It has everything. It's a hellhole and cesspool of
corruption and criminal conduct. It has hard drugs, prostitution,
pornography, money laundering. It has Biden family, shell
companies, communist Chinese, corrupt foreign government deals
from 10s of millions of dollars in exchange for access to the
Biden family. The Hunter Biden laptop from
hell has all of this correct? Yeah.
And the American people are smart.
They know that this was not a hack and dump.
This was illegal government censorship to protect and prop
up Joe Biden on the eve of the 2020 election and according to
poll. There it is.
OK, there we have it. Can I can I jump in and say
something on there? Kyle, please.
It was funny. You could hear her demeanor on
how she was responding to these questions.
It was almost like, are you serious?
Are we really gonna ask these pointless questions that
everybody knows the answer to? And she was almost like she was
cynical about it. Well, she's young.
I think she's got that kind of going for her, but now she's the
the editor over at Breitbart for their politics desk and.
Yeah, it's shocking. But here's the thing.
And I've recorded the story. This is the personal inside
info, I guess. But when I was working for the
FBI in April of 2022, sitting in the office of my supervisor, I
had another agent who was assigned to national security
matters walk in and not know anything about the Hunter Biden
laptop. Had never heard of it.
Two years after it had been public, it was totally news to
him. And he wanted to know, did this
just get released? And that shows you the
pervasiveness of censorship. It shows you the pervasiveness
of sort of the willful ignorance that happens with the people
that are supposed to be doing the right thing.
One hand is over here doing the wrong thing involved in the
censorship, and the other hand is doing the good, the good
American thing, which is what I always call the the analogous
piece when you start following through and acting like the
Nazis did, which is to say that you did your job, you followed
orders, and you didn't question anything.
We had a lot of good Americans in this country in 2020 and 2021
that did the thing. Allowed these mechanisms to take
place. They didn't ask those relevant
questions, and many people are still not asking those questions
within the federal service. That's really scary stuff.
I'm going to play this piece from Josh Halley.
This guy is the former deputy chief of staff for the FBI, one
of the top five guys in the Bureau, and he will not answer
questions about the Hunter Biden laptop.
If you'll bring up the video #8 real quick.
It's starts at, I think, 12 seconds and it's a short video.
But she asked you if you participated in any meetings at
all related to the Hunter Biden laptop.
Was that a yes or a no? Senator, as a Department of
Justice employee bound by Section 1-7 of the Justice
Manual, as well as a judicial nominee, it's it's not
appropriate for me. And I'm.
I'm bound now. Wait, wait, wait.
Why? Why isn't it appropriate for
you? It's a judicial nominee.
This has anything to do with any, any case that you have,
right? I'm asking you what you did in
your former employment. As the deputy chief of staff to
the FBI Director, did you participate in any meetings
related to the Hunter Biden laptop?
Senator, again, as a a Department of Justice.
And it sounds like you're not going to answer me.
Is this going to be a I'm not going to answer you.
So, folks, shameless plug here for Ryan Matta.
If you go to Ryan Matta Media at Ryan Matta Media on Twitter, you
can see a lot of these videos in longer form.
You can play them for your friends.
You can share them around, and we'd appreciate it if you did.
You'll see that he's got his banner on there.
He's also got his show on LFATVLFATV here on Rumble.
You can watch him there. He comes on at 2:00.
O'clock Eastern Time. They get their time, right?
I feel like that's right, 2:00 o'clock Eastern.
Yeah, there it is. So come check out Ryan at that
time. This is yet another DOJFBI
official who is refusing to answer simple questions, doing
the thing that they are required to do.
Imagine any of you imagine going for a job interview that you're
not guaranteed to get and sitting down and when someone
asked you about your previous employment, refusing by citing
some gobbledygook like that guy just did.
It's just, it's shocking, The arrogance.
And the impotence to go on there and just refused to answer
simple questions. But it leads you to exactly what
happened. The FBI interfered in the 2020
election in no uncertain terms. It was not a free and fair
election because our government weighed in on it.
And as Miss Morris just said in the testimony that you just
heard, she specifically stated that.
And there's there's longer videos of this where she talks
about the the polls, but essentially 61% of Democrats
said they might have voted differently had they known about
all the stuff going on with Hunter Biden.
Now here's the real smoking gun. Because Chuck Grassley has
released the very slightly redacted version of the 1023
source document from an FBI informant from June of 2020
before the election. And on the third page of that
document, we don't have to bring it up.
We can just. I'll I'll refer you to Chuck
Grassley's Twitter page and it's going to be online.
There it is. The third page there brings up
one very specific piece and what it says is in in air quotes.
The big guy. They refer to Joe Biden as the
big guy, the exact same thing that we see on the Hunter Biden
laptop in the descriptions of how he was going to get him get
money from a Chinese energy company.
The question that I always had was this, did they use the term
big guy? Because that's what Marjorie
Taylor Green wanted to say when she was out there talking for
the people, Because that's what we've decided to call Joe Biden.
Or was it actually a quote from the CHS?
That would be independent cooperation, in my opinion, Two
different unrelated sources. One first person, Hunter Biden
and his laptop, which has been independently verified as being
legit. And the second is this document
that is contemporaneously describing a a bribery scheme by
a former Burisma official or Ukrainian coming in using the
exact same term, which tells you that that is the term being used
by Hunter Biden in these schemes.
Okay, that's how he gathered money.
And it's not surprising to anybody watching this, but it
should be shocking that we were hiding the stuff that the FBI
was 100% involved in it. All this stuff is nauseating.
This is the trouble with censorship.
If you don't give the American people the information, they're
going to make bad decisions. They're not going to be able to
make the right decisions. They won't be able to make their
own decisions. And that's what this country is
founded on. The right to make your own
decisions with whatever information you want.
You want to vaccinate your kids? Do it.
You should have the information available to you.
You want to vote for a president?
You should know what he's all about.
If you want to do any of these things, it's 100% reliant on our
ability to make. Informed consent, and we talked
about that on some other places. I I continue to bring it up.
You can't make informed consent if you don't have the
information. And that's what our government
has been involved in hiding in a big way.
I think we're out of time for today.
I want to say a couple quick things here.
You've been listening to the Kyle Seraph and show streamed
live from Liberty Hill, TX. That's where we are.
We're here in Texas, America. All right.
Don't forget to like this video on Rumble if you are sitting in
the live chat. We've had a couple hundred of
you out there watching this thing live.
We love that with these videos are getting more and more views,
so share them around on your favorite social media platform
and. I know that we do have some
people to thank. The first one is you.
You're the listener. Thanks for listening.
We do appreciate it. The show continues to grow
because of y'all and because of the five star views like this
one. We got a fun one today.
We've got more than 600 reviews on Apple podcast.
So please get on there and we will read the good ones here.
Here's one that came in Monday from Zeb Prox.
It says a real patriot. Kyle put it all on the line to
uphold his oath to the Constitution.
We were just talking about that oath.
He's been attacked by the left incessantly and is not back
down. I'd like to see a guy like Kyle
in the White House in some capacity.
How about FBI Director? As my buddy Phil Kennedy has
said, I'm overqualified for that when it comes to scruples.
But I do appreciate the sentiment.
We do really appreciate it folks.
You can get your five star review read if you go and put
them on Apple. The link is in the show notes,
so by all means put it on there. I want to say thanks to Steve
Friend for jumping on. Please check out his book on
Amazon. It's called True Blue.
And again, this show is only possible because the hard work
and the skill of technical producer Ryan Matta.
Follow Ryan at Ryan Matta Media on Twitter.
You can find him at Ryan Matta on True Social, if you like that
better. He's been putting out some great
videos. And again, our opening theme
composed and performed by the very talented Casey Seraphin, my
younger brother, a great guy. Folks, please consider
subscribing to Rumble if you're not doing it or wherever you get
your podcasts so you get them fresh and hot every Monday,
Wednesday and Friday, 8:30 Central Time at 9:30 Eastern
Time. We will see you again after the
weekend. I hope you have a great weekend.
Thanks for listening to The Kyle Seraphin Show streamed live
Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter and True Social at Kyle Seraphin.