Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends and
welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Friday, September the 26th, and I did not mean to be
so late, but as I got up this morning and started tearing
through, they were documents, they were false statements, They
were things that needed to be grabbed for today's program that
took a little longer than normal.
So that's what I did. It's a one man show, so it takes
as long as it takes to be able to get the information so that
we can be on point. And I think we're going to do
that. We're going to talk about James
comedy. Did he lie?
Does it even matter? He was indicted yesterday.
We got messages from that. We got some James comedy
statements. I don't think people even know
what they think that he was indicted for.
So I've got the indictment here. We're going to go through that.
I think it's, I don't think it's what you guys were hoping for.
There's not a single mention of seditious conspiracy or treason
or any of the other things that I kept hearing people say.
Even senators don't know what the hell they're talking about.
We had senators going on TV last night talking about Russia.
It's not what was happening, so we'll get into that.
I had a like a world class article dropped on me.
I think they were trying to paint me in a bad light, but it
ended up being quite hysterical for me.
So I'm going to go over something which I don't normally
do. When you're part of the news,
then sometimes you got to cover yourself.
So we're going to cover ourself up in something that one of my
buddies referred to as a framer, an article written that should
go in a picture frame on the wall.
I might do that. I might actually get a really
nice print out of this because it's pretty funny to me.
We're also going to talk about how we can no longer discuss
whether people are politically right or politically left now
that we've seen a number of shooters going out and killing
people that are on the left. I'm sorry, the shooters are on
the left. They're shooting people just
randomly, sometimes at an ICE facility or maybe a prominent
conservative political figure. So now we got to stop looking at
politics people. We just got to come together.
Maybe a little too late for that.
Kind of like a weaponized justice system that doesn't
really work well. So a lot of stuff to go on in
all those spaces and we'll try to make some sense of it.
I think we're going to do our best.
You guys know how we do it here before we get started, since we
can't trust anybody, we can't trust the news media, we can't
trust our government, we can't trust these institutions.
You can't even apparently trust Tile Doll, which has been around
for a long time, but it's always been kind of a dangerous thing
if we talk about pharmaceuticals in your drinking water and the
fact that we've got sketchy things coming out of the tap.
Folks Cove pure.com slash Kyle is the website.
There's a link in the show description.
The people in charge of our government at the local, state,
federal level, they can't fix a pothole.
How are you going to trust them to give you safe drinking water?
You can ask the people in Flint, MI.
You can ask the people in Albuquerque, NM where I used to
live. Lead, heavy metals, rust, liquid
poison coming straight out of the tap.
That's why we have a Cove Pure system.
It is sitting in my kids bathroom so that we can fill
that sucker up and they can have unlimited access at a kid height
to clean fresh, clear drinking water.
They do what the government ought to do, which is make sure
that our our tap water is actually safe from the heavy
metals and the toxins, the fallout of corroded pipes.
It should have been replaced decades ago.
In our case, there's tons of sulfur, which is actually just a
really terrible taste and a kind of a nasty smell.
Lead exposure just doesn't make the water taste like you're
chewing on a car battery can actually cause brain damage and
cancer and birth defects. There's all kinds of sketchy
things, pharmaceuticals and so on.
You guys want to make sure that your water is safe and pure to
drink. It actually has a massive impact
on the taste and then the health benefits.
You can't see them, but they're there.
Coke Pure is obvious fix. They're clear.
Wave technology will remove 99.9% of contaminants.
It's easy to set up. It gets rid of lead and PFAS and
pharmaceuticals, you name it. No plumbers, no drilling.
You just plug the sucker in on your countertop.
It's super easy. Even a child can do it.
Takes about 15 minutes to get the whole thing flushed through
and ready to go, and it's just pushing buttons.
I've done other water purification.
It takes a lot longer and it's actually a lot more sort of,
let's say, technically difficult.
Check out the Cove Pure system. Guys.
If you don't have something to do with you, can't wait around
for the government to solve it, go to covepure.com slash Kyle.
Right now. You're going to save $200 off
while supplies last on the system.
You see on the screen. We have one sitting in our
house. It has a very, very nice
function. It's easy enough for kids to
use. They select the water size.
You can take back control of your family's health and get
safe drinking water, which is something that we should
actually expect in 2025. But unfortunately, like so many
other things, you can't just assume it.
Anyway, if you guys want to take control of your own drinking
water, check them out Cove pure.com slash Kyle.
Here comes today's program. Right now you.
Know. What's also good about good
drinking water is it makes your tea and your coffee better.
And I'm just going to say that right now as I'm sitting here
drinking coffee out of my Patriot Cooler and let's go with
verse story of the day. It is a weird one.
It is a funny one. It is amusing to me.
Meet the ex FBI podcaster driving Cash Patel nuts.
He's a conservative, he's brash, and he's tormenting the FBI
director. Folks.
That is not the goal of this podcast.
To be fair, I actually thought we were going to be on the side
of the FBI director. I thought we were going to go
out there and be celebrating victories to the point where we
were no longer relevant. But as you guys know, as men
plan, God laughs. I guess I don't know.
Here we are. I'm just going to read some of
this stuff because it's quite funny.
Will Summer wrote this. There's been some various takes.
I think that the people on the political left that want to try
to smear me and they, they called me a MAGA guy.
You guys have to tell me if that makes sense to you.
I don't think I got the Red Hat on.
I don't think it's been the case.
Look, Donald Trump does some good things.
He does some bad things. And I don't feel like I'm
compelled to say one thing or another about it.
In April, FBI Director Cash Patel promoted an FBI agent
named Steven Jensen to the head of the prestigious Washington
field office. Almost immediately, Patel and
his deputy director Dan Bongino began to get heat from Trump
supporters online over the decision.
In social media posts tagging Patel and Bongino, critics let
the image conscious pair know that Jensen had been involved in
the January 6th investigations. No voice on the right was louder
than an ex FBI agent turned conservative podcaster named
Kyle Serafin. In a steady stream of social
media posts, Serafin dogged Patel's management of the
Bureau, including over Jensen's promotion.
It apparently irritated Patel to no end.
According to Jensen, Patel suggested that Jensen sue
Seraphin for defamation and even recommended some lawyers.
In Jensen's telling, Patel said a defamation suit would get some
pressure off him, Him being Patel, Jensen ultimately
declined to go after Seraphin. He told Patel that he was
unconcerned with the viewpoints of online personalities. 2
points to Steve Jensen, J6 warlord.
That's the thing you're supposed to do.
You just do the job. Those revelations about
irritation, Seraph and Cause Patel were buried in a lawsuit
that Jensen and other agents filed.
Again, we cover this a couple of days ago and it alleges of
wrongful termination. I actually do think they were
wrongfully terminated. I think it was a terrible
decision and I think that they are going to be vindicated.
It's probably going to cost them a lot of money and take a long
time. For example, the head of Las
Vegas field office was told to stop posting on social media and
ultimately fired after being criticized by Serafin, according
to the same lawsuit. Guys, for those who are
wondering how does this podcast punch so far above its weight?
It's because the things we're saying about the FBI are
accurate. Even the New York Times went out
there to try to say something which they didn't get my quote
correct. They said, well, Chris Meyer,
former FBI agent now, who was terminated in August, you know,
he wasn't the case agent on the Mona Lago case.
So do you feel bad about what you said?
And I said the actions by FBI management indicate the accuracy
of the report that I gave. Do you guys think that the FBI
director of forever, for all of his incompetence, and there's
plenty of it, you think that he's unable to go out there and
do a a Sentinel search for who, who were the case managers on on
the cases that were relevant? Do you know that the entire
squad that Meyer was part of was disbanded?
I don't know what happened to all the agents.
Maybe some of them actually lost their jobs, but The New York
Times is claiming that I presented no evidence.
I mean, yeah, I don't have access to the FBI case file.
Neither do you. What I have are good sources and
the result and the actions taken inside the FBI.
If you guys think that I get to just wave my magic wand over
here at this podcast and make people in the FBI go away,
that's not how it really works. I have no direct authority.
It is pretty wild, though, to see how much of this stuff keeps
hitting home, how many arrows that we pull out of our quiver
actually strike home. And here's another piece.
Are you really listening to this guy?
Former FBI acting Director Brian Driscoll asked Patel about
Serafin at one point, according to the Times report.
Driscoll is another of the people that were fired during
this lawsuit, and he's in the lawsuit against Cash Patel.
The incident offers a glimpse into the outside power wielded
by Seraphin in a moment of intense chaos and uncertainty
inside the FBI. In a matter of months, Seraphin
has become a mischievous boogeyman for Patel's operation,
using his experience, sources within the agency, and a
pugnacious online persona to constantly goad the director.
Should we just take a little moment and just be amused?
A pugnacious online personality that has become a mischievous
boogeyman. I I I am actually reveling in
that. They actually quoted that I I
don't think that I generally do this all day long, but after a
post like this and after a sub stack from from bulk work, I I
can't help but laugh. Serafin seems to be reveling in
the idea that he's got Patel spooked.
He told me he was happy to point out Patel's incompetent and
bumbling actions. Those are my words.
I said that for the whole world to see and agreed that he seems
to live in Patel's head. And when they say agreed, they
said, do you think that you live in cash, Patel's head, rent
free? And I said, yeah, it kind of
seems like that way, doesn't it? I said he's very much out of his
depth. He understands that he's out of
his depth. What else is in here?
Serafin's no liberal. Join the FBI in 2016, work
surveillance, counterintelligence suspended in
2022 / a dispute the FBI's COVID rules.
Partly true. Also the whistle blower stuff.
He rose to prominence as a right wing whistle blower after
complaining to Jim Jordan's committee about the FBI's
treatment of parents at school board meetings.
Not entirely accurate, as you guys may know.
I actually didn't complain about the treatment.
What I said is that I believe the attorney general committed
perjury and a bunch of other sort of violations of people's
civil liberties, which were actually unrelated to parents at
school boards. But that's for another time.
He was once on friendly terms with Patel.
You guys know that. He met him through a podcast and
Dan Bongino. All true.
My primary grievance, they believe, is that I haven't, that
he hasn't shaken the Bureau up enough.
I think I'm going to actually hone in on that just a little
bit more here people, because my primary grievance is not the
shake up of the FBI. What I'd like to see, we covered
this on last night's call in show and I did it discussing it
with you all. I'd like to see de weaponization
of this agency and it actually segues very, very nicely into a
story we're going to cover because a new after action
report from the Washington field office and the FBI in particular
was released about January 6th. And so there's this discussion
about what was the worst thing that's ever been done And how is
how is the, you know, the the federal judiciary being
weaponized right now against James comedy and political
enemies of Donald Trump. And people are saying this is
the worst thing that has ever happened in DOJ.
I'm actually going to push back and say that's not true.
The worst thing that the DOJ has ever done is they've dropped the
veil and they showed exactly what they were interested in by
going after folks on January 6th.
That was the single worst thing that our Justice Department has
done. It was worse than COINTELPRO in
many ways because what it did is it made it naked and raw for the
American people to see. All right, let's see what else
is on here. There's some other kind of funny
stuff. Sarah said he wasn't happy to
learn that Patel had allegedly asked subordinates to sue him
for defamation. He argued that the FBI director
telling an employee to sue him for speech and even offering to
help find a lawyer would be a clear First Amendment violation.
I don't think that's exactly how I said it, but it does look like
kind of a conspiracy against rights when a member of the
government is asking a subordinate who works in the
government to go out there and use private resources to come
after someone just because they don't like the criticism.
You're in the public role of FBI director.
You get criticism. You guys know that.
We'll criticize James Comedy for all the things that he did.
We'll criticize Chris Wray, and we did.
He actually used to lead out the podcast intro.
For those of you that are new here, there's a famous question
where Cela Jackson Lee asked him, ask Chris Wray, are you
familiar with FBI agent Kyle Sarah Penn?
He said, I'm familiar with the name.
Why was he familiar? Because I was a very, very vocal
critic of the FBI director, no matter who holds that role,
because I believe in Kennedy's rule #1 some of you guys may
know this Phil Kennedy who's going to be prominently featured
in a few minutes. Just so you guys are aware, Phil
Kennedy is responsible for Kennedy's first law.
And that says no matter who you nominate to be the FBI director,
you end up with James Comedy and that interesting.
You end up with a political activist who does things that
are not brilliant. Although James Comedy was
clearly smarter. And I think we'll end up being
in better shape than Cash Patel. This is a dangerous precedent
that we're about to walk into today's show talking about the
FBI director, a former FBI director, being indicted for
perjury and lying to Congress. Would you really want to live in
that glass house as an FBI director like Cash Patel, who
started off his first hearing, the confirmation hearing prior
to even being FBI director with lies, demonstrable lies,
provable lies that we can actually show you.
He claimed credit for doing things like personnel actions
prior to being in the FBI. Now there would have been a a
totally innocent explanation for it saying, hey, look, I'm part
of the transition team. There's an expectation that I'm
going to be confirmed into FBI director.
So of course I'm going to be out there talking to people that are
in that space and the and the president has asked me to go out
there and and interface with them.
That would be totally reasonable for a regular person to think
and to say Underoath if you were not a complete bonehead.
But instead what we had was an FBI director that went out there
and said that he never had any involvement in that.
I'm paraphrasing here a little bit.
Obviously you had the FBI director indicate Underoath to
Cory Booker and others, both in written form and in Word, that
he was not actually involved in personnel decisions and actions
prior to him becoming FBI director.
I have text messages that say otherwise.
So he would have to explain that there are people that were in
meetings that went to members of Congress or members of the
Senate specifically that said otherwise.
How do you make that work? How do you square that circle?
If you're an FBI director who started off your first official
act by engaging in what the FBI likes to call lack of candor.
Is that the is that the house you want to live in?
That the precedent is whenever somebody gets in there and
decides to to change the rules or go after like the guy who was
in the the office former, you're going to be on the chopping
block because that means Cash Patel is in real bad shape The
next time that we have a Democrat president, if they are
so inclined. Just saying that.
I also apparently said that the his actions reflected poorly on
Patel's competence quote. It's barely checkers.
It's certainly not chess moves is attributed to me.
I don't know that I said that exactly, but that sounds about
right. I mean, the guy's not playing
chess, is he? He's just barely getting back
into the king row. So there's other stuff that's in
here, but that's the biggest funny thing.
They also brought up the fact that I was willing to throw some
bombs at James O'Keefe. I don't know what this is, but
I've seen a bunch of people from the left that are now following
me. So folks, if you're new to the
podcast and you just started following us, I don't I don't
mind. We're not going to agree on
everything you're going to find out, but I do think that we cut
fairly, fairly, fairly fairly. You know, I saw a lot of people
with like anti gun stuff. I saw people on the hard left
saying things. I see a bunch of folks that are
that are clearly of a very different political persuasion.
And I'll tell you this, this is the promise that I make when we
do these types of shows in general, just as a general rule
on the podcast, you won't necessarily agree with
everything I had to say, but I'm going to present to you why I
think the way I do and then we can still be friends.
It turns out I grew up in the 80s.
You didn't have to actually agree with everything around
you. In fact, most people probably
didn't agree on a bunch of things like religion and
politics and they just thought it was not polite to talk about
it. Since we do talk about politics
here, the rule is we can agree to disagree.
While you guys are thinking about that, if you're following
us on Rumble, make sure you like the video bumps us up on the
leaderboard. If you're following on YouTube,
make sure you're liking us over there.
If you're on X and you're new welcome, hit the like button.
You guys can always join the community.
It's at kyleseraphin.com. That's where I go and give you
the articles that are referenced.
You guys will see a link to this article out there.
Make sure you're liking sharing and subscribing and the place
you can. And if you want to have the best
single way to check out our program, the best way to do it
is on Spotify. Spotify is Kyle
seraphinshow.com. If you're watching a replay on
any of the video platforms, you would be far happier with the
control you get on Spotify. It's the best monetized platform
for us. I get the best data, but also I
think the interface is you can switch between audio and video
and do a lot of control. So check out Spotify.
Just go to kyleserifandshow.com, kyleserifandshow.com.
Make sure you guys leave us a comment over there.
And again, if you're watching the video platforms, just hit
the like button, but don't worry about it so much.
OK, that's as much as I really want to do on this story, this
lawsuit story, but it is kind of funny.
Not the lawsuit, sorry, the the self coverage.
Let's go to the quote UN quote bombshell.
And this is what took me a little bit of time today.
Here's the bombshell as written last night by my friend Steve
Baker and Joe Hanneman over at Blaze.
And I got some issues with their story.
I'm a little concerned with how quick this reporting went out
and what it may or what it may not actually say.
The FBI had 275 plainclothes agents embedded in the January
6th crowds, congressional sources say.
I got a message from Steve Baker before we went Live Today.
And he said now what we're going to see, there's a big discussion
about dispatched versus embedded.
And he is exactly right. And that is the discussion.
And I actually think the Blaze may have come down on the wrong
side of this. You guys know that I care about
facts. I care about accuracy.
That's going to be the single most important thing in any of
this stuff. Let me read the story.
Disclosures by the FBI to Congress answer long simmering
questions but do not reveal what the agents did that day.
The FBI has acknowledged that they were 275 plainclothes
agents in the massive crowd on January 6th, 2021, more than 4
1/2 years after these questions were first raised about the
level of FBI involvement in the day.
Senior Congressional source said the number is not necessarily a
surprise, since the FBI often embeds counter surveillance
personnel in large events. But given the FB is now
steadfast refusal to disclose the level of presence in the
capital, the figure might be viewed with some skepticism, at
least in some quarters. The news comes in the wake of
claims by the US Justice Department Office of Inspector
General that the FBI had no undercover personnel in the
January 6th crowds. Quote, we found no evidence in
the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing
we're suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the
various protest crowds or at the Capitol on the day of January
6th. That's what the 88 page Office
of Inspector General report said.
So you guys come here for FBI analysis, particularly in
stories like this. I will give you the inside
baseball and how this works #1 the words FBI.
Sorry, undercover personnel or undercover employees.
That is a very specific program. They are used here in an like a
non air quotes way. They are not used in any sort of
a capitalized. But when we refer to undercovers
in the FBI and, and, and other law enforcements do the same
thing. We're talking about a program
and usually someone who is certified to be an undercover.
The DEA certifies almost all their agents and maybe all of
them to do undercover work. The FBI does not.
Your average FBI employee does not go through the undercover
coursework and therefore they are not listed as what's being a
UCE or undercover employee. It's a brand name product.
It is a certification that goes in like a resume item.
And so you're not going to find out that they were undercover
employees, AKAUCES, people specifically trained to act as
undercover agents in that January 6th crowd.
And so I believe the Office of Inspector General report,
because they're not saying the same thing that is commonly
meant in the same way that you and I will often talk and we'll
say certain things like this looks like entrapment.
Well, there's a legal definition of entrapment that the DOJ plays
with. And that legal definition is
antithetical to the moral definition.
When you look at it from the outside, you're like, obviously
what was going on? There was some sort of
entrapment. They were presenting a, you
know, a plan. They were presenting the means
to accomplish a plan. How is that not entrapment?
And the way that the entrapment definition works officially is
very different than what we would understand it to mean
colloquially. It's important.
It's a major distinction. And so when we say UC ES, brand
name, trademark, UC ES all, all capital letters, it's a
different animal. All FBI agents are plainclothed.
What does that mean? That means there's no uniform
for being in the FBI when you're an FBI agent, as I am, dressed
right now is perfectly acceptable for plenty of things.
Most of my work on surveillance was done in a T-shirt, sometimes
in shorts. You're blending into the
environment and FBI agents are allowed to have a several sort
of like deniable contacts in sort of a semi undercover type
role. They're allowed to do that a
certain number of times by policy without having to be
certified UC ES. So once you understand that
these words have very specific meanings, and this is going to
play into the comedy indictment, words have meanings.
They are very specific. And federal law enforcement,
because now federal law enforcement is so ingrained with
this broader context of intelligence work, they operate
in the fringes of technicalities.
I had someone comment to me last night about the military and
what they said was in the military, you're not able to
just shade around the edges and tell a partial truth or sort of
like a lie of omission. I would say that's the default
position of an Intel agency to do that because the word has a
specific meaning and as they understand it and, and by the
way, we do business here this way.
When I say the word agents and I'm talking about an
intelligence service, I'm not talking about W2 employees.
We talked about this the other day, but I'll continue to say
it. An agent working on behalf of an
Intel agency is a recruited source or asset.
Those are interchangeable words. An intelligence officer is
someone who actually works on behalf of fill in the blank
government or intelligence service.
So words are very specific and they have very specific
meanings. The problem is if you do not
define your terms openly and you go out there and you say in a 88
page OIG report where we're supposed to be getting accuracy
and honesty that there was no undercover employee, it doesn't
mean that there were no people in the crowd working for that
agency. Now, I would be surprised to
find out that the FBI actually has an accurate count of all the
people that were in the crowd that were FBI affiliated of any
level. Because I know that they were
professional staff. I know that they were FBI agents
that were on leave on that day that were out there in the
crowd. I have an alibi for whatever
it's worth. I was not there.
And this goes to a bigger problem and a bigger
presentation of what we should be talking about on that
specific day. On the day of January 6th, 2021,
something should have happened that did not.
There should have been what was declared as an NSSE.
And people who are even well versed in this, including my
friend Steve Baker, don't necessarily know top of mind
what that means. A national special security
event. Since we're talking about
January 6th, we should talk about that.
And I should remind myself again that not everybody understands
that the normal protocols for very large gatherings in
Washington, DC were not followed on that day.
And the answer would be why? And I think a congressional
hearing that actually queried people who were in a position to
decide whether we were going to have an NSSE on that day would
be really useful to all of us. We would actually learn
something. A National Special Security
Event is something that is by statute and policy executed by
the US Secret Service. It comes from the Department of
Homeland Security. Again, there are actually CFRS
that define the roles and say who does what, and an NSSE is an
all hands on deck call for all federal resources and it also
authorizes federal payment of local overtime and other teams
and so on. Nsses which are like July 4th.
I'm sure the inauguration is always one of them, but there's
also other ones that will be Nsses.
Like you'll have parades, large protests can be the March for
life is 1, the, the whatever the 250 year celebration they're
going to do on the White House lawn, that will be an NSSE.
And what they do is they bring in all of the resources they can
find. Everything will be brought in
from the DC Metro PD. The ATF will have teams out
there. They'll be doing bomb sniffing.
You'll have people from the Department of Energy, they're
driving around looking for a nuclear or radioactive waste or
or dirty bombs. You'll have the FBI, all the
dive team out there running around in boats looking under
the bridges. Everybody gets involved.
And generally speaking, you're going to have not undercover,
but what they would call counter, I don't know, counter
surveillance teams walking around in the crowds, making
sure that everybody is safe and doing the things that they're
supposed to do. And they actually are out there
theoretically to protect the liberties of the people that are
either protesting or enjoying a nice day.
And there's nothing wrong with that.
Here's the problem. What you're seeing on the screen
right now is this congressional report, which was given to John
Solomon at just the news, as far as I can tell, again, kind of
our our favorite sort of controlled outlet leak from the
Trump administration. I say that in air quotes because
I'm not a big fan of John Solomon, as many of you may
know, and this is what it says deployment date, personnel type.
You're looking at the top of the screen here.
It's in small type. So I'm reading it for you.
The event, the field office or headquarters division and the
total personnel count and then notes about that actual line
item. The the stuff you're seeing are
all from January 6th of 2021 and the position types go from
agents to attorneys to IA, which is your intelligence analyst,
other that's going to be your just regular professional
support staff. And then total numbers in the
incident. The line item people are
focusing in on is agent. The incident is January 6th or
1/6 incident. The field office is Washington
Field where I was assigned on that day.
And the total personnel count under agent is 274.
Hence our highline title of 275 agents were embedded in the
crowd. But that word embedded doesn't
seem right when you read the note.
That doesn't mean the FBI hasn't lied to us.
It means that technically speaking, they're talking about
something else. That's my belief and here's what
it says. Included agents that responded
to the Capitol grounds as well as inside the Capitol, the pipe
bombs and the red truck that was believed to have contained
explosive material, as well as CDC and ADCS.
A/C DC is a chief division counsel, so that's an attorney
and ADC as an assistant division counsel and so they're also an
attorney. They're almost always FBI agents
as well. So you might have them in an on
scene role. OK, the number.
Includes. Agents that responded.
That's a really specific. Way of saying things that does
not mean embedded in the crowd. And so as much as I love Steve
Baker and I do think that Johanneman they do very vigorous
work. I think this so-called bombshell
that they were 275 agents embedded is not accurate.
I bet you there are still people that were walking around in
those crowds, whether they were source handlers, whether they
were there for their own personal razors and so on.
That's one thing. But they did deploy agents.
There were many emails that went out in those deployment requests
and they sent a bunch of people to go do a response.
The response, that's a deployment.
That is not the same thing as being embedded.
That's not the same thing as being tasked on the day of to be
in the crowd in case something goes down in the way that we
used to have what are called I teams and then which are
investigative teams or interview teams.
That is not the same thing. And I've done those jobs.
I've done those jobs numerous times.
And again, because this was not an NSSE, because it wasn't
declared as such by the Secret Service, which is a really big
question. And you hear a lot of focus on
the FBI. You hear some focus on DHSI,
never hear them get to the sub agency and say, hey, Secret
Service, why was this event not an NSSE?
Because if it was an NSSE, what would happen is this, I would
not have been on leave on that day.
It's an all hands moment. They would have staged my
surveillance team, which was specialized in following bad
guys around and been doing so in a low visibility role.
We would have been staged somewhere nearby the capital to
be able to do any follow ONS and that was not asked of us.
So I know there are some real problems with this information
and I know we're not getting it. And I guess this goes to the
broader question and the broader effort issue that we've all seen
Mike Johnson. Came in with some.
Promises. One of them was that he was
going to release all the J6 footage.
They haven't done that yet. They were going to have some
sort of truth reconciliation on that day because the question
should actually offend people on the left and the right.
No matter what side of the political aisle you're on, you
should not see a politically targeted operation by our
government. Whether it was by negligence,
whether it was intentional malfeasance, whatever went on,
we should unpack that day. Because if it was the biggest
attack on our democracy, shouldn't we know all the facts
about it? And it shouldn't be in a
partisan way. And if it wasn't, and I don't
believe that it was, I think it was a riot that got out of
control and the people that fought cops probably belonged in
jail for a period of time. But I also believe that
shouldn't we have seen something like that happen during 2020
'cause I did work in DC and I did see the amount of civil
unrest that was going on, and I did see Donald Trump driven into
a bunker. You don't have to like Donald
Trump to say that a disturbance on the North Lawn of the White
House is wrong and it was violent and it was dangerous.
This shouldn't be a partisan issue if you go and destroy
American federal property wherever you are.
We shouldn't tolerate that as a nation because it brings on a
lot of other ugly things that we don't want to face down.
And, and, and you know, broken window pane policing does
actually work effectively. If you let a bunch of small
things go and people build up a steam head of energy behind it,
that inertia could be incredibly dangerous.
That's that's my. That's my.
Even handed take, if you will, but I think it's actually really
problematic. There's another story that was
written by a disclosed TV and they basically covered these 274
agents. And so if you guys want to find
some of the stuff, it's on social media.
They started getting into some of the comments and the comments
are really wild because what many of you may not know is that
the FBI is constantly doing like every military unit or law
enforcement unit, they're doing what's called an after action or
a self-assessment. So they go on a hot wash is
another word for it. They go in and they and they
say, hey, this, this just happened.
Whatever it was, we had an event, we had a response, we had
deployments, we had action on target.
How did we do? Can we look at ourselves
critically and figure out what are the things that we should
improve? What are the things that we
should sustain, or in other words, keep doing?
What are some outside the box criticisms or problems?
What resources might we need to add to what we're doing?
Those are all pretty good. You want to do that?
My team used to do it. After every single shift, we
would have one positive and one negative from every single team
member because we always wanted to improve as a investigative
unit. How can we do our thing better?
What do we do really well that we should continue to emulate or
even add as a as an SOP? So they did this and I'm going
to cover some of these stories because one of them in this
story stood out like a sore thumb.
I thought, I know those words. I've seen those words.
I've read those. Words before and.
We're going to do it in one second before we do.
How about my friends over at Patriot coolers?
Guys, you're seeing the cooler on the the on the screen if
you're watching on Spotify or if you're watching on the video
platforms, they make an outstanding product.
They put stars and stripes on them just like you're seeing on
there. I actually have my own.
I have the wood grain going right now.
There are 50 stars on the bottom.
There is coffee in here that is not leaking on me.
That's fantastic. Got a great spill proof lid, 20
ounces of a of a hot liquid that's staying hot during the
entire show. And I we've made this coffee
like 6:00 AM, so couple hours still going strong.
Check out my friends at Patriot coolers.
The website is Patriot coolers.com slash Kyle.
Actually I'm not sure if you put the Kyle there's actually a link
in the show description that takes you to the Kyle Seraphin
thing. Use the promo code KYLEKYLE 4
letters 10% off. That's the deal.
That's the rule. You'll get free shipping over I
think 75 bucks Find yourself or maybe it's over 50 bucks.
Find yourself something you like, find something for someone
you love. Just do that, check them out.
If you guys are in the market, don't spend money.
You don't need to. You don't need to do that for
us. But I know that people are
constantly looking. We're moving into the the
outdoor season for people that are going into deer camp and elk
camp. You're doing hunting and things
like that. You get a lot of stuff in those
50 quarts and they will keep ice for a very long time.
They're also just a really good looking product.
You're not going to be sad about it.
OK, I want to get into this thing right here because I'm
telling you this. Was pretty wild to me.
This is the number 11 comment in the feedback for the future.
And so I might even have let me see, I think I've got it right
here. This is it right there.
OK, folks, let me read to you the number 11 comment feedback
for the future. Goodness, here we go.
What can the FBI do better investigate credible threats of
election fraud so Americans don't get so upset in the 1st
place. Parenthetically, look, I know
you're not going to take any of this feedback seriously.
WFO is a hopelessly broken office that's more concerned
about wearing masks and recruiting preferred racial and
sexual groups than catching actual bad guys.
The front office is comprised of yes men who've never opposed a
single thought from the Good Idea Fairy.
We had an addict. That's what Steve Jensen was.
That's the assistant director in charge.
Retire on a Friday afternoon at 4:30 PM with nothing more than
an e-mail and a deputy director. Suddenly retire in the midst of
the largest manhunt in the history of mankind, and yet
we're supposed to pretend that everything is just fine?
Emails from the director with focus group language are not
going to cut it anymore. It's time for someone to admit
that WFO has serious problems so the trust can be repaired.
That's. Pretty strong language, don't
you think? Coming from an internal person
at the FBI, isn't that something?
We don't have any trust from the American.
People, we know that you don't take this feedback seriously.
You're more interested in people wearing masks and and recruiting
preferred racial and sexual groups than catching actual bad
guys. Who would be so bold as to say
something like that? You think?
Well, it turns out the person who said that is one of your
suspendables. The writer of that comment was
Philip Kennedy, the original the first producer of this podcast.
What you're seeing here is. A couple of little snappy, nasty
snapshots. In the middle is that language
from comment #11 and below it is a screenshot that Mister Kennedy
held onto when he left the FBI. They are exactly the same.
I knew that I had read it before.
I knew that it was familiar language to me.
Because sometimes you just know how your buddies say things,
right? And there it is, right there in
black and white. Phil Kennedy shared exactly the
problem. Now let's consider If you look
at his Twitter bio, you'll see that he calls himself the
Canary. That's my term for Phil.
Phil. Is the Canary.
Because he was the first person that tested, Can you say
something true about the FBI and still work there?
And what he proved was the answer is no, you cannot.
You cannot. And so I actually have his
entire. I have his entire response to
the WFO command post questionnaire, the hot wash
section, and I want to read some of it to you.
The part that is not actually visible in this particular
thing, but it is interesting that it made it into a findings
that made it into the Congressional Record.
What did WFO do well? During the Reese's crisis and
command post implementation. Here's his answer.
WFO did a great job of continuing the Crossfire
Hurricane investigation. Trump's presidency started with
the FBI investigating his supporters, and it ended with
the FBI investigating his supporters.
Maybe the case should have been given a name like Gravelly male
movie announcer voice crossfire hurricane 2 the redemption the.
FBI also did a great job. Of maintaining its obvious bias
that Americans have continued to witness since James Comedy's
first famous July 5th, 2016. No reasonable prosecutor's
speech. One could head down to the first
floor training room and witness CT 4 as a case squad watching
the disgraced former deputy Director Andrew McCabe, a known
liar and alleged criminal, described the riot as an orgy of
violence. And why is CNN allowed to be
viewed in a federal building this way?
This propaganda outlet campaigned against Trump for
four years and it propagated the myth of Russian collusion.
Washington Field Office did a great job.
I'm masking the fact that Officer Brian Sicknick did not
die at the hands of a Trump supporter, but rather due to a
cardiac incident caused by an allergic reaction.
That may not be accurate, but this was a pretty tight in when
we didn't have all the facts. It did a great job of ignoring
the death of an unarmed veteran named Ashley Babbitt while
lionizing a criminal named George Floyd.
Washington Field did a fantastic job of sending leads to other
divisions to interview Trump supporters who were nowhere near
the Capitol, some of whom were not even in Washington, DC on
1/6/2021. Guys, do you see this?
The Division did a great job of using the Capital riot as a
pretext for investigating the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers,
and Parlor while giving Marxist radical leftist Antifa a pass
during the DC Summer Riots of 2020.
And finally, Washington Field Office continues to do an
excellent job of protecting the government and its preferred
servants from accountability. For example, Kevin Kleinsmith
was quietly sentenced to probation after manufacturing
fraudulent evidence in Crossfire Hurricane.
One other not so fortunate employees to face harsher
sentences for abusing something so simple as the government
travel card. This is not an acceptable.
Thing my friend was talking about this in 2021.
I began talking about what the FBI was doing inappropriately in
2021 and when that when that stuff came out, what do they do?
Do they say holy crap, we should we should review ourself and
figure out where we have error? No, they did not and they
decided to go after, and I bet you a real serious investigation
into weaponization would evaluate how many of the
employees that had negative comments or constructive
feedback for their agency were actually removed from their
jobs. I bet you the instances of
disciplinary actions like Phil Kennedy got and, and, and these
comments are very closely aligned and I'd be surprised to
find that some of these people are still working there.
Very surprised. There's a bunch of really
aggressive statements in here. How about this one?
I wish. You would all would pay more
attention to our safety than what types of masks we're
wearing. If you're going to deploy us
into a riot situation, then give us the proper damn safety
equipment, helmets, face Shields, protective clothing,
and training. I've told you many times the FBI
was not trained to go and deal with riots.
They're the wrong tool. This is the second time that the
whole office has been deployed to handle a situation and
nothing was learned from the previous crisis over the summer.
That would be the summer that I've told you that the FBI
deployed a bunch of people out there on president's patrols.
The only difference are new inept leaders who just want to
push us out there for a photo op for the media.
It's a miracle that no one from the FBI was seriously hurt or
worse. Are you going to wait until
something like Miami happens for us to to one of us at WFO?
It's on your conscience if it does.
Miami is a reference to two agents being shot and killed and
A and a third being a very seriously wounded.
How about this? The FBI needs to.
Be politically impartial. It needs to treat all crimes
with an equal hand, whether from the left, the right.
And it needs to have its final goal ultimately be the integrity
of our Republic. That's.
The very source of our. Transparent electoral system and
it is not so now. Isn't this really simple?
Focus on the investigation is what we do well.
Stop trying to throw agents at a problem.
Listen to your followers and supporters inside this at this
office. There is so much criticism in
here and a bunch of these people, I can almost guarantee
you do not work there anymore because of the way that they
phrased it, because they were critical and you're not allowed
to do that, this guy said. Generally speaking, I have
little interest in the political preferences of FBI leadership or
whether the agency as a whole is more supportive of one political
party than another. However, the FBI irreparably
damaged its credibility among the American people and a great
percentage of its personnel by abandoning its mission and
priorities. Guys, this stuff is termination
type material inside the Bureau. For those of us who didn't think
it, how about this little bombshell dropped in a freaking
anonymous survey? In approximately 2008, the FBI
stopped an ongoing public corruption investigation
operation, board games and into the Illinois governor just shy
of potentially implicating a sitting United States Democrat
President due to the damage it might cause to the United
States. Approximately 8 years later, the
FBI began actively and publicly investigating and attempting to
unseat AUS President Republican through deceit and abuse of its
authorities. Crossfire Hurricane.
In 2020, WFO Washington Field Office assumed the mission for
which the personnel were untrained and under equipped to
provide and defend a Plaza dedicated to a group of domestic
terrorists that's a left-leaning with a history of violence and
criminal activity during its First Amendment activities and
then took a knee on command in January of 2021.
Washington Field Office immediately and aggressively
began targeting anyone accused by the public of having been in
the geographic vicinity of similar crimes perpetrated by
another group of so-called domestic terrorists who are
right leaning with little or no history of violence or criminal
activity during these activities.
This. Stuff is damning.
Is it? Not this ongoing, obvious,
unapologetic, and for all intents and purposes legally
sanctioned bias has thoroughly demoralized the FB is personnel
and the American people, further endangering the agents as they
interact with the public and conduct their official duties
and jeopardize the ongoing safety and the security of the
United States and its citizen. That folks, might be the single
most damning thing that I've seen written.
I'd be shocked to find out if that person still has a job.
If they did not have retirement available to them already, they
probably do not work at the FBI and I'd be desperate to find
out. If anyone knows who that person
is, please let them contact me info@kyleseraphin.com.
If you want a voice, I will give it to you and unlike.
Some of the others I. Don't care what you have to say.
You can say anything you like, whatever your perspective is,
because that is utterly true. And that was very fair and
balanced and accurate. There's some institutional
knowledge there. We know that cases were walked
away from that were Democrats because it was too political, it
was too close. We know that the FBI got
involved in politics in ways that it should not have.
And that should not be an. Acceptable thing.
So for everyone who's claiming oh, Jim comedy like it's too
much, listen, I don't have any love for Jim comedy.
I also don't have any any illusions about this being a
serious undertaking to go out there and indict the former FBI
director. It is a truly stupid and
dangerous decision that was made truly stupid.
Let's talk about the ice shooting first, because.
That is also the other piece that everybody wants to get
involved in. And I'm going to, I'm going to
go out there and tell you that everybody who is talking about
it, and I mean everybody in all the mainstream voices, they're
suddenly all on the same page. We cannot look at left or right.
We cannot look at political ideology.
What we need to do is just focus on the problem.
And apparently the problem are white men with rifles.
This is alleged Republican, I would say actual Republican.
You're the rhino. If you guys are actually
conservative people. This is a real Republican
telling you it's white people with rifles that are the real
thing to look into. You guys ready for this?
It's CNN. It's nauseating.
It's Adam Kissinger. Listen, the thing that we need
to be looking at is not, is this the right?
Is this the left? Is it whatever?
It's why are young white males doing this?
Why do they feel so disconnected from society that they have to
turn to violence? And that's not what the
president's talking about. Instead, he's talking about it's
the left. And I got to tell you, we're
missing the. We're missing the point.
Oh, is that so OK. ABC News reports as a motive
still remains under investigation in the fatal
sniper type shooting in the Dallas Immigration and Customs
Enforcement office that took place this week.
Law enforcement experts said the incident is part of a
frightening trend of rifle wielding shooters targeting
politicians, police and others from long distances.
Now I just want you to take a second and listen to what those
words were one more time and I'd like you to figure out, can you
also be put in this group? Are you ready?
Rifle wielding shooters are targeting who?
Politicians, police and others from long distances.
So that's all of. US apparently since the alleged
would be assassination attempt to kill Donald Trump in July of
2024 at a campaign rally in Butler, PA.
There have been 7 sniper type incidents that have unfolded
across the country including the September 10th shooting that
claimed the light of conservatives conservative
political activist Charlie Kirk. While such shootings have been a
part of American history, including the assassination of
JFK and Martin Luther King Junior in the 1960s, law
enforcement experts told ABC News that they have never seen
so many sniper type incidents occurring in such a short amount
of time. I believe that this is the next
chapter, if you will, in our history of violence, said Jesse
Hambrick, a retired Georgia deputy sheriff and counter
sniper expert. Especially in our active shooter
type situations. Quite interesting.
The latest incident which happened on Wednesday morning,
as we reported here as well, was when a 29 year old suspect
identified by federal law enforcement officers to be
Joshua Jahan or Jahan JAHNI, don't know how you pronounce the
name of Fairview, Texas. He opened fire in a Dallas ICE
facility, killing a detainee and leaving two others critically
wounded. The victims were shot in an
uncovered sallyport near the facility.
You guys can go back and listen to our coverage on that.
The other day. He allegedly planned the attack
for months. He opened fire on the roof using
an 8mm bolt action. I guess it wasn't a 30 ought 6.
I guess it was an 8mm. That was the other speculation.
FBI Special Agent charge of the Dallas field office brought this
up. Interesting.
In a really sad.
Way isn't it? There's no political
affiliation. We just have to focus on the
fact that it's white men with rifles.
That's the thing that we need to talk about.
Is political violence acceptable?
Everybody needs to just tone it down.
It does seem that it is more 1 sided in this particular type of
violence, specifically all of the instances that were listed
right here. And here's the other thing that
I would like you to consider because it's really worth
considering right now. If we pay 11 billion.
Dollars a year for an intelligence agency that also
has law enforcement capabilities, AKA the weaponized
FBI that I used to work at that I have just read you some
damning indictments of from inside that FBI.
Aren't they supposed to be able to do the thing?
Like know who's coming for you now?
I would also argue to you that they're unable to do that.
That's not physically possible for them to do pre crime.
And it's also antithetical to American liberties.
We cannot have pre crime. We can't go out and go and
decide that you're going to do something until you were
actually in the act of. And disrupting that is very hard
to do in real time. And we shouldn't be monitoring
people to. The point where we know exactly
what they're going to do before they do it.
I saw that movie. It was written about by Philip K
Dick. It was portrayed in a wet 2004
movie with with Tom Cruise. The end result is this is super
dangerous behavior. The government should not be
surveil you to the to the point of secret police status where
they get you with thought crime. That means you have to inherit a
certain. Amount of risk.
That means that the solution is actually cultural, that you
value human life. A culture that values life is
not going to go out there and take life from a rooftop.
Or we can go out there and just try to condemn.
Political violence very nebulously and not actually
address the real problem. How important is it for leaders,
especially at the very, very top of the government, to set the
tone? Listen, it should not matter
whether the radicalization comes from the right or the left or,
you know, sort of the non. Ideological deep, dark recesses
of the Internet. This president, this vice
president has had a chance now since the assassination of
Charlie Kirk to bring the country together to try to stamp
out all sorts of violence, including political violence.
And they refuse to do that with. They're trying to do is exploit
these murders and these shootings in order to silence
only dissents and political opposition on the left.
No, criticizing the way that ICE is rounding up people in this
country in a deeply inhumane and immoral way is not an incitement
to violence. There is a moment where you
cross the line. But what they are trying to do
is to destroy the ability for people who oppose their policies
to legitimately. Engage in political debate and,
and, and we are not going to let them do that.
Listen, you can have legitimate political debate, no doubt about
it. But there is also a moral
framework being constructed by some people on the political
left. And I would not say it's
everyone, it's certainly not. But there are some people that
are very deliberately doing something.
They are setting up a moral framework in which they can
actually justify that violence. And then what you hear them say
is we condemn violence on all sides while they are
simultaneously using very specific language that is going
to justify a moral framework within some people, usually
those who are not mentally with it, that do not have value for
life, that do not care about the consequences, that maybe don't
want to continue on in life, that are going to go out there
and end their own lives over this stuff.
That was a very dishonest. Talking point there from Chris
Murphy. I disagree with what he said
vigorously. And it has been a trend.
And these are the same people that once something violent
happens, then they're all like, oh, shut down the mean rhetoric.
Right, using the word shutdown. Reminds me that we are nearing a
government shutdown in a couple of days, October 1st, if there
is not ACR passed, which means that we're going to get a
continuing resolution and there's going to be a bunch of
caving because nobody wants to own the idea of a government
shutdown. NBC News is saying they've got
to fight back. Democrats pressing leaders not
to cave in during the shutdown fight.
The White House is threatening to carry out mass firings of
federal workers if the government is shut down.
I do like this. I do hope they shut down the
government only because I don't need this government to protect
me and honestly, neither do you. Your local governments, state
governments, they are more than adequate to solve the problems.
And as this country was originally designed, we are
meant to have United States and they're supposed to be a small
federal government that overseas the Interstate part of it.
What we've seen is the Commerce Clause and Interstate
communications all kind of stepped in.
The the idea of federal government involvement in
everything you do is relatively new and it certainly was not the
way that this country was designed.
Just look at the name. We were meant to be the
functional unit of, of our Republic was supposed to be
state to state. We were supposed to have, you
know at this point, 50 individual laboratories for
freedom and democracy, for freedom and your representation.
And the federal government wasn't supposed to necessarily
be that. You're only supposed to have one
elected federal representative, one, not the president, not your
senators, just your congressman or congresswoman.
That's the only person that was supposed to be out there doing
that. The Senate was supposed to
represent the states, the upper house, the lower house is the
people. The upper house is the states.
The executive was actually supposed to be picked by and
still has the ability to be picked by our state houses.
It is supposed to be an amalgamation of filtration of
power that goes up and represents the majority of the
states. And they're not supposed to be
making policy as an executive. This king like executive, it's
not good. It's not good for America.
It's a failed experiment. We've seen far too much power
seated over the last 120 years, starting at the turn of the last
century, and it just continues to move on and on and on.
And now we are demanding certain things.
Now we have a president out there demanding individual
actions and prosecutions. The most minute thing that our
Justice Department does. That is the worst case scenario,
folks. It is not good.
I would love to see the Republicans own a shutdown and
use it as an opportunity to actually make smaller
government. I don't think they'll do it, and
I don't think any of us think that that's very likely.
But wouldn't it be nice to imagine a government that
actually served like the ideological purposes that they
were put there for and then maybe they could get to work by
doing single, single issue, turn on the lights one at a time.
You know, sometimes when you're trying to do troubleshooting in
a house, you turn off all the circuits and you find out which
one is going to either blow the fuse.
You're going to find out which one is actually causing the
problem. So you shut down everything all
the way across. All of your fuse is off now it's
completely dark. Now we turn them on one at a
time. We figure out what works.
That's the idea that Mike Johnson actually ran as speaker.
That was what he that's what he put forward in the in the
public. He was going to do single issue
appropriations. Well, let's do it.
Let's figure out how long it takes.
Write your single issue. Turn on the government one
single office at a time, line by line, one page bills.
Very, very simple. Give them what the tasking is.
Give them the purpose of the tasking less they need to
interpret some of it and give them the funding that you are
going to agree to. That's what you came on to do.
Republicans will never do it. I think we can all agree on
that. We're going to see ACR and then
eventually they'll push another omnibus bill.
But that's what they actually said they were going to do, and
we should demand better. Let's get.
Into the the Jim comedy. Stuff here because you know it's
time. It's time.
It is just before I'll remind you again, Spotify is Kyle
serifandshow.com that is our preferred and it is probably the
easiest way to watch the replay. So if you're watching this
replay and you want to watch it again, Kyle serifandshow.com
will take you right to Spotify. It's free and you may hear a
pause right now. If you're listening on the audio
platform, you'll get one additional canned ad that
happens right now. You guys can always be a
Spotify. Premium member, which means that
you don't get those ads and also I think we get paid for them
too. So even better, like we
appreciate all that stuff. We get some sort of revenue
share. If you want to be Spotify
premium, if you're listening on Apple or or any of the other
places, you may hear that stuff, but the best place because you
get audio and video and you can swap between them again.
I I was never a Spotify user until I started hosting with
them and I'm a big fan and they don't give us anything to say
that I'm I'm literally promoting their their platform because I
think it's the best. All right, let's do the Jim
comedy stuff. We have to here it is baboom.
There's Jim comedy. Jim Comedy was underoath many
times. Jim Comedy is, in my words, a
middle finger to the American people.
He's almost 7 feet tall. He has become like an action
figure for the Democrat Party of late.
It's sad. He talks a really good game.
He handed me up my credentials when I joined the FBI and I
heard the speech that he gave at my graduation ceremony at the
FBI Academy 4-5 times. It's just a canned speech.
He's a good actor. He's certainly smarter than the
current FBI director. He was very, very big on
recruiting, cult of personality, and people really bought into
what he did. I'll tell you something kind of
funny. I think I said this the other
night 1. Of the things that I left.
Of the of the very few things that were personal I left in the
FB is office. When I was suspended, I left two
books as a box set. One of them was Seamus Bruner's
book, which was given to me by a family friend.
That was called Compromise, how money and politics ended up
compromising the mission of the American, you know, the FBI.
And the other one was Jim Comedy's A Higher Loyalty.
And I thought they were a box set because A Higher Loyalty and
Compromise ran side by side. They're perfect.
The argument being made right now is that the thing that is
being done to Jim Comedy, and I'll show you why I think it's
scary because this is not good, The thing that's being done to
Jim Comedy is crossing a line that can never come back.
Here's Donald Trump's true social post about this.
Whether you like corrupt James Comedy or not, I cannot imagine
too many people liking him. He lied.
That is a factual statement. He is now asserting something
that's going to be kind of dangerous because he represents
the top of the executive. It's not a complex lie.
It's very simple, but an important one.
There is no way he can explain his way out of it.
He's a dirty cop and he's always been that.
He was assigned to crooked, but he was assigned a crooked Joe
Biden appointed judge. So he's off to a very good
start. Nevertheless, the words are
words and he wasn't hedging or in dispute.
He was very positive that there was no doubt in his mind about
what he said or meant by it. He's left himself 0 margin for
error. That's a big claim.
It's a real big claim when you say that, there's no doubt in
anyone's mind what was being said.
We got a problem because some people don't know what he said.
This is Lindsey Graham, this is a sitting United States senator.
This is a man who doesn't know what was being discussed,
doesn't know what the indictment was about, and is making claims
that are completely irrelevant to the actual indictment that
was done. We'll do the indictment one
second. First, let's hear Lady Graham
say his piece. Everything he says here is
wrong. By the way, as far as what the
indictment was alleging, The question for this country, and I
believe this for five years, did the FBI director have
information he should have given the FISA court that were to stop
this madness? And the answer is yes, he did.
And the madness continued. And why did it continue?
Because James Comedy and a bunch of others wanted to destroy
Donald Trump. That, to me, needs to be looked
at. OK, he missed the point.
He. Doesn't know what was going on.
The claims on the on the political left coming from like
MSNBC are saying that this has crossed a boundary.
This is a Rubicon. This is a, you know, a line that
no one has ever crossed before. That's also not true.
And I'm going to give you the evidence of it.
The worst thing that the Justice Department did was January 6th.
That's what I that's what I'm sharing.
With you, you not just broke faith with the American people
and people on the political left and the right, what you saw was
very disparate treatment of leftist and right leaning
ideologies in a very short period of time.
One of whom was basically ignored and almost no
prosecutions happened. The other one resulted in the
largest manhunt in the history of the FBI.
And then you had to have an election to.
Overturn it and you had this big piece where you were.
We were getting presidential. Pardons to stop the Justice
Department. It has been my overwhelming
sentiment that what Donald Trump did with the pardons, including
people that probably didn't deserve like a true pardon in
that way, what he did was not a rebuke of or or a condoning of
the actions of those who participated in, in the riot
activities of, of, of January 6th.
What I think Donald Trump was doing with those pardons, at
least the way that I've read it, it was a rebuke of the federal
government's actions against those people which were unfair.
They were unbalanced. They were incredibly biased.
They were truly not about justice.
They were about seeking an outcome.
And that's what I've been arguing against, weaponized,
weaponized government where we have a a goal, we have a process
that is supposed to be fair and blind.
And what we've done is we've said, I'm going to get to this
goal and I'm going to make the process work for me to get
there. That is the same thing they just
did to Jim Comedy. It was requested that he be
indicted and then he was indicted.
The look is tragic, but this has been done before and to act like
this is new. And of course, everybody wants
to make the 1:00 to 1:00 comparison Donald Trump to Jim
Comedy. I actually think that the
situation with the J Sixers was first and more accurate.
That's my take on this. Here's MSNBC saying that we
should protect the Process and people inside should be very
offended. And also the kind of nonsense it
stands for. Joyce, if it is such a dire
moment, what is your advice, your message right now to those
people inside the Justice Department, inside these US
attorney offices, the, you know, rank and file prosecutors that
are doing the work to bring cases like this one?
What do you say to them? So the mission inside of.
US Attorney's offices across the country is to keep their
communities safe. And in difficult times like
this, the traditional advice to federal prosecutors is to keep
their heads down, do the important cases in front of
them. Because the cases that we're
talking about on a, that's maybe 1% of what's going on in the
Justice Department. But every day there's violent
crime, there's drug crime, there's civil rights violations
and white collar crime that prosecutors and agents across
the country are working on. The issue prosecutors are
hardwired to understand, and I hope Americans will understand
this too, is that when you become an assistant United
States Attorney or a political appointee in an office, you
check your politics at the door, you walk in and you do your job
looking at the facts and the law without fear or favor.
And that's what I believe Andrews and my former colleagues
across the country are trying their hardest to do right now.
There may be a moment for difficult choices coming for
many prosecutors, and I hope that when those moments come
that the American public will stand up and support these
people. I think if there is a move to
indict Jim Comedy, we will likely see resignations out of
Alexandria. And she's right.
People will resign. That's already started, but to
act like there's some sort of like pure as the driven snow
attitude in these people that work at DOJ, that's absurd.
That's not true. There's great AUSAS, there's not
great USAAUSAS. There's some that are highly
political and they can't shake it, and there's some that are
not. And we already saw them go
along. With J6 prosecutions to keep
their jobs and we know that a bunch of these people, they,
there's nothing in the mission set of the DOJ that's supposed
to keep the American people safe.
That is not an opportunity that law enforcement has.
That's the intelligence apparatus.
That's the secret police game. All of that stuff is terrifying
to me. It should be terrifying to you,
no matter what your politics are.
If you hear a government say that we are going to keep you
safe. The mandate is tyrannical and
it's very, very like nature. It has to be.
It's tyrannical because you cannot predict human behavior.
You're not authorized as a federal law enforcement officer,
as an investigator. It's called criminal
investigator, not criminal preventer and protector.
Your job is to investigate after crimes, the allegation or
information that a federal crime is taking place.
This whole idea of getting into the threat landscape and
stopping threats before they happen, that's crazy talk.
We know it doesn't work. Why?
Because there's still violent crime and we always find out,
oh, they were on the FBI's radar.
That's not fair. There are 1,000,000 people on
the FBI's radar, whatever that means.
There are all kinds of people that are inappropriately
reported. The law enforcement.
There's mental illness that rings the phone all day long and
makes allegations that are crazy.
The FBI can't protect you from anything.
There's 14,000 agents. There's 350 million people in
this country. Just do the math.
The pre crime doesn't line up and DOJ, those are attorneys.
They can't protect anybody. There are their job is to go out
there and create a a punishment situation where they go and say
here's the evidence. A jury of your peers will decide
it. And the hope is, is that there's
a deterrent effect. The deterrent effect is the only
piece of it that can matter because.
If you go, do fill in. The blank crime, you see that
the following actions will happen to you and then you go,
ah, I don't want to do fill in the blank crime.
I don't want to do the time, right?
Do the crime, do the time. That's what it's supposed to be.
Bill Shipley said it during the J6 prosecutions.
The entire job of the government is to ensure fair process.
That's it. The outcome should be irrelevant
that the ability to convict or not evict.
You should basically not bring cases that are not going to be
strong enough to convict. You certainly shouldn't have
like any interest in whether or not a jury says one thing or
another. All you should do is care about
fair process. Are we doing it right?
And I know that's not what's going on.
And I know that's not what's going on with Jim Comedy.
And so do you. Former FBI Director Jim Comedy
indicted Thursday, 2 counts making a marking a major
escalation, says CBS News, in President Trump's effort to
target his political opponents and use the Justice Department
as part of his campaign to seek retribution against his most
ardent critics. You know what the best way to
prove that wrong? Not say anything.
Do you know what Donald Trump is not capable of of?
He's not capable of not saying something.
Comedy was charged with one count of making false statements
and one cart of obstruction of justice.
Let's do what that looks like. Here it is on the screen.
I will read you. The indictment is very short.
There's a criminal case. It's brought the Eastern.
District of Virginia, United States versus James B Comedy
Junior, Defendant Count One false statements within the
jurisdiction of a legislative branch of the United States
government on or about September the 30th of 2020 in the Eastern
District of Virginia. The defendant, James B Comedy
Junior, did willfully and knowingly make a materially
false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement in a matter
within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch of the United
States government by falsely stating to AUS Senator during a
Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that he, James B Comedy
was had not, quote, authorized someone else at the FBI to be an
anonymous source in news reports regarding an FBI investigation
concerning person 1. I believe that person one is, is
is Donald Trump this? Statement was false because.
As James B Comedy junior then and there knew he had in fact,
authorized Person 3 to serve as an anonymous source in news
reports regarding an FBI investigation concerning Person
One. If Person 3 is not an FBI
employee, I don't think this holds any water.
I don't have to love James Comedy.
I think that he's, like I said, I think he's cartoonishly silly
and partisan at this point. And still this actually matters
for all of you saying things like, well, they got Al Capone
on on tax evasion, right? This is not a conviction.
This is an indictment. And the indictment seems weak.
And they went for three indictments and they got two of
them to come back with a true bill.
Here's the other one. Count to obstruction of a
congressional proceeding on or about September the 30th, 2020
in the Eastern District of Virginia.
The defendant did corruptly endeavor to influence, obstruct
and impede the do and proper exercise of the power of inquiry
under to which an investigation was being had before the Senate
Judiciary Committee by making false and misleading statements
before the committee. It's a violation of 18 USC 15 O
5. So that's what we've got.
We've got a 1001 charge which carries up to one year in
federal prison. It is the lowest level felony
that the US government has. The second one is a 15 O 5
felony and it carries up to five years.
That's pretty weak tea, people. That's not that impressive.
And I don't know if I, I, I'm trying to find the actual
verbiage of where this was discussed.
I believe this is being presented to me online right now
as the actual interchange where he lied and I can actually hear
that he just danced out of it and that this is not going to
be, this is not going to be a successful prosecution on the
actual facts. If this is in fact the exchange,
then this thing is DOA. Just so you guys can tell.
Listen, this is Chuck Grassley. Remember, this is going to hinge
on the specifics of the word. Grassley says an an FBI
employee. If if person #3 is not an FBI
employee, it's dead because the factual pattern is not going to
be able to line up. Director, Comedy, have you?
Ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters
relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton
investigation? Never.
Have you ever? Authorized someone else at the
FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump
investigation or the Clinton investigation.
No, I needed to get. That out into the public square.
And so I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo
with a reporter. Didn't do it myself for a
variety of reasons, but I asked him to because I thought that
might prompt the appointment of a special counsel.
OK, he said. No.
Authorize someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in
news reports. I'm pretty sure that this is the
exchange, this is Chuck Grassley.
I'm going to play it one more time for you.
Someone else at the FBI are the actual words that Chuck Grassley
seems to say in this. You guys listen real closely.
And then he says a friend of mine was that friend an FBI
employee is the real question. As I understood it, it was a
journalist. It was not.
Or it was a friend from like law school or something.
So person 3 is where this is going to come up.
Here we go. Director comedy.
Have you ever? Been an anonymous source in news
reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or
the Clinton investigation? Never.
Have you ever? Authorized someone else at the
FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump
investigation or the Clinton investigation.
No, I. Again.
Person three, that's going to be what it hinges on.
There's going to have to be this 1001 statement has to be true
for the 15 O 5 to be true, I believe.
And if that's the case, if that's what we're looking at,
this seems terrible. That doesn't mean Jim Comedy is
a good actor. It doesn't mean that he's a good
guy. It doesn't mean that we like
him. It doesn't mean that he's not
completely deranged under what people call Trump Derangement
Syndrome. There's a little bit.
Of that this. Is I'm going to go 20/24/2021
2018 2017. He's too smart to get.
Caught Underoath saying things that are factually untrue, at
least in my experience of watching him.
Chris Ray did the same thing where the things he are saying
are materially false but he's going to be able to dodge behind
technicalities in specific words.
Why? They were very competent and
intelligent people. They just weren't necessarily
ethical and forthcoming people. And that means you're not going
to probably see what you guys think is going to happen here.
That's just going to be my take on it.
Here he is with Jen Saki 2024, talking about whether or not you
could put Donald Trump in prison.
Remember, that was the discussion happening a year ago
right now, would you put Donald Trump in a prison cell?
And he says, oh, yeah, we could do it.
Here's how you do it. So a lot of people have
suggested that there are a range of factors that would make it
difficult to put a former. There's not.
The system has not been tested in this way.
Do you agree with that? That would be difficult or
nearly impossible for the law enforcement institutions to put
him in in actual jail? No.
And we just put him in a. Double wide somewhere out near
the fence, out in the grass, and he would eat there, he'd shower
there, he'd exercise there. He'd be away, as Danya Perry
said, from general population, but it's obviously doable.
So what? OK, so all all he's saying is
that's technically possible. What?
He wasn't wishing for it, right? No, of course he was.
He was actually wishing for this.
Here he is in January 2021. He wants to see bad things
happen to Donald Trump. I can understand the animus.
I really can. I understand why people would
say this. But to act like this was like
that, this is not somehow very personal for both men, Trump and
comedy. It's this is a this is a
personal feud being carried out with mechanisms of government
kind of relates to what I saw with this lawsuit that's going
on with people coming at me and the FBI director on duty asking
his own employees. It's not great.
We don't have to love the people involved.
You're not like me to still believe that fair things are
supposed to happen in this country.
We're not supposed to use our weaponized government against
individual citizens. Which Jim Comedy?
He got fired. He's a private citizen.
He writes crappy books and find shells on the ground.
Now convict him Bar. Him from future service, have
the prosecutors, the local prosecutors in New York pursue
him for the fraudster that he was before he ever became
president. Lock him up for the garden
variety frauds he did there. But don't give him that center
stage, that dominant role in our national life, just down the
street where Joe Biden is trying to heal this nation.
Oh, Joe. Biden was trying to heal this
nation. I'm pretty sure Joe Biden was
part of the team that was a really 100% in assuming he was
actually awake or sentient enough to do it.
He was 100% there to make this nation heal.
That's what I felt. I actually felt most healed.
I think when Joe Biden and Coe wished me and my family a winter
of serious injury, serious sickness and death, that's when
I felt best. What about you guys?
Come on now, don't gaslight me again, he went on.
Shows he can't be held accountable for statements he
made in the public that were false.
He made all these statements about.
The Steele dossier. He went public in 2018.
Here he was in April. My wife was asking a question
real simple. Hey, why?
Why is this guy out there talking?
Why is he out there talking to like a comedy late night host?
Because he's a private citizen. You do whatever the hell he
wants. Is it common?
Have we seen other FBI directors go do this?
No, we have not. You ever see Bob Mueller sit
down and try to do the Late Show?
No, you see Louis Freeh go out and do that.
No, we're entering a new era. Chris Wray has been smart enough
to stay quiet, by the way. You're not hearing anybody
scream about him. And he's the one who's not going
to be outside of the statute of limitations on anything he did,
probably because he also was too smart to get this.
If this is all they have, this is the weakest tea.
Anyway, here he is doing the 2018 pee pee hoax.
You went in in January of 20-17 to tell President Trump about
the Steele dossier. How did you tell him that there
was a, and I want to put this delicately pee pee tape?
How did you tell him about that rumor I spoke?
About information unverified, They're related to an allegation
that he was with prostitutes in a hotel in Moscow and that the
Russians had videotaped it. I didn't go into the rest of it.
I thought that was notice enough they didn't mention.
The salacious detail of of the two prostitutes getting up on
the bed that the Obamas had stayed in because it was the
presidential suite and and, you know, engaging in some water
play. You didn't.
You didn't mention that at all.
I thought I'd I'd. Served enough notice without
going to that party. And what did he super?
Funny, right? Of which it all that was
completely unsubstantiated. It's terrible.
And Stephen Colbert obviously doing political hackery there as
well. And yet it's not criminal, just
means you don't like him. We're not supposed to go after
people we don't like just because we don't like him here.
He isn't in June of 2017. Again, I'm sure the statements
he's making here are probably factually accurate, even if they
are overplaying the amount of relevance that they have to say
that other nations actually tried to meddle in this in our
elections. They do it every year, every
election. Foreign foreign nations will do
what they can to try to interrupt or influence or put
their operations and kind of weigh in on the scale as best
they can because we're free and fair and open society in
general. That's our goal.
So we accept a certain amount of risk here.
He is underoath in 2017. Nothing he says here can be
prosecuted. But people are trying to comply,
like act like everything he said is going to be on trial simply
because of something that he said in September of 2020.
The fact of the matter is it's going to go very specifically
and very tightly, which is probably why the United States
Attorney's office didn't want to bring this because they don't
like losing. There should be no fuzz.
On this whatsoever, the Russians interfered in our election
during the 2016 cycle. They did it with purpose.
They did it with sophistication. They did it with overwhelming
technical efforts and it was an active measures campaign driven
from the top of that government. There is no fuzz on that.
It is a high confidence judgment of the entire intelligence
community and and the members of this committee have seen the
intelligence. It's not a close call that
happened. That's about as unfake as you
can possibly get and is very, very serious, which is why it's
so refreshing to see a bipartisan focus on that,
because this is about America, not about any particular party.
OK, great. It's about.
America doesn't mean that they had any effect, doesn't mean
that they were able to actually dial it into that.
And then we got this. Asinine statement from our
current FBI director. Again, Kennedy's Law.
Number one, no matter who you get in there, you get somebody
that's going to be a partisan actor right now, you're going to
get a Jim comedy cult, a personality.
Here's Cash Patel saying the following.
I'll quote this directly because I don't want to get this one
wrong. Career FBI agents, Intel
analysts, and the staff led the investigation into comedy and
others. Notice he doesn't say who called
for it. They called balls and strikes
and will continue to do so. The wildly false accusations
attacking this FBI for the politicization of law
enforcement comes from the same bankrupt media that sold the
world on Russiagate. It's hypocrisy on steroids.
They're baseless objections tell us now more than ever that we
are precisely over the target and will remain on mission until
completion. Thank you to this brave FBI
team. Mission first America emoji
flag. Are you kidding me right now,
dude? Patel, are you serious?
This FBI, it's the same people that were working January 6th
you clown. It's the same FBI.
To act like this is something different is so disingenuous and
foolish. It's the entire point of what I
pointed out in August. This guy who is the director
doesn't have any institutional knowledge and he's backed up by
someone named Dan Bongino who also doesn't have any
institutional knowledge. Consider the following.
We're in September, he came in. So seven months.
Let's add five months. Let's call that a year.
I have 600 plus percent more FBI experience than the current
director and deputy director of the FBI combined.
And that's not even to say the time afterwards where I still
know more people in the FBI that I can trust.
I guarantee you that I can trust more people in the FBI than
these two guys can. That's absurd.
No wonder you're screwing up to act like this, though.
OK. They led the investigation.
Career FBI agents did. Isn't that the entire problem?
That they're willing to go do anything?
The Seraphin message to you all will continue to be the same
here. Where am I?
It's this one here. Driving Cash Patel nuts.
That's fun. The Seraphin message is as
follows. The FBI doesn't necessarily go
to one party or another party. What they do is what they're
told. And so the leadership and the
middle management of it matters, and you're about to see what
it's going to look like. This is Senator Blumenthal.
Talking about exactly what will happen next, because when it
changes hands, instead of treating the FBI and the DOJ as
it currently stands like the Ring of power and understanding
the message that came from the Lord of the Rings and all of
these sort of allegories that explained human failing when
trying to grasp absolute and God like power, what do they do?
They fail. So what is the answer?
You keep it out of reach of man. There were two arguments that
got made during that time. One was destroy it.
That's what should be done. Does that mean that we have no
DOJ and no FBI? No, what it means is destroy the
weaponization, the possibility of it mostly that lives inside
the intelligence branch and the mission to do intelligence, that
should be done. It should be done forthwith for
everyone's safety, for the left and for the right, because
you're going to hear what the left's going to do with it too.
And now the right's doing it right now.
Trump said it in his his post. Patel is saying the same thing
whether he likes it or not. You should cast it into the
fire. The alternative is what the Men
of Gondor did. And yes, it's a little bit
nerdy, but I spent a lot of time reading Christian allegory when
I was growing up, so here it goes.
Very simply, the Men of Gondor wanted to keep it, retain it,
and wield it against their enemies.
When you do that, eventually your hand with that ring gets
cut off and somebody else picks it up on the battlefield and
wields it against you. And that will be what happens
here. And Blumenthal is telling you
and Swalwell are telling you, the Democrats know exactly They
started this game. There's no question in my mind
that they drew first blood on this.
None. But that problem goes back 120
years, and it goes back to a Democrat that's not even alive
right now. And even the institution of the.
FBI currently, as it exists, has always had institutional rot and
has always been a some segment of it violated the
constitutional liberties of regular Americans, mostly by the
way they went after people on the political left, whether you
like that or not, because those people were thought of as being
UN American in their descent and their dissident status.
Did you realize that, do you realize that like the Palmer
Raids and going after the communists and going after the
civil rights movement, like all of these people like would be
what the left would consider their folks right now?
I guess the civil rights would be kind of a a toss up in some
ways, but the. The the concept of going.
After the right, they went after Muslims who the the left would
defend after 9-11. But there are spots in there
where they've gone after the other side.
Because the FBI is not about 1 institutional left or right.
What they're interested in is how do I get my budget?
How do I justify my own existence?
What is going to work in favor of me getting to retirement?
And I'm just going to tell you, we are now three years and two
days after my first interview ever went public with Dan
Bongino, the current deputy director of the FBI, is insane
as that is. I left the FBI to go talk to a
man who is now at the FBI. And I explained to him this
exactly. And my message has not changed
in three years of doing this publicly.
Is that crazy? We talked about the golden.
Handcuffs in Part 1 of the first interview I ever did with Dan
Bongino out in public and yesterday, which you guys do not
know. Trevor Aronson, the author of
The Terror Factory, a liberal and a friend.
I would say we're friendly for sure.
We talked fairly frequently. He sat in the studio.
He sat right over there in a chair that you could not see.
He sat right here in the empty chair that I did not put on the
screen while we did this podcast.
And afterwards, we spoke for hours about exactly what I just
told you because the two of us agree that the danger is if you
narrowly focus in on a time frame, you're going to see that
the FBI is targeting people on the left.
If you narrowly focus in on the 90s, you see they were going
after the Pat Con and they were going after the patriot groups
and the militia movement. So they were focusing in on
people on the right. But in the reality, when you
zoom out, what you see is the FBI focuses on who the FBI is
most likely to be served by focusing on.
And that is not ideologically driven.
That is self-serving. That is the turd that drops a
turd that drops a turd. If you guys see me over on
social media, that is the self licking ice cream cone and it is
antithetical to American liberty.
Here's here's Blumenthal telling you what's going to happen next.
Let's just go ahead and say it. We're going to get ACR
eventually we'll have another Democrat organization come in
and they will take over and use this weapon just this way.
The old saying, what comes around goes around, you know,
today it's a Republican president, but degrading the
democracy and ruining, literally perverting the great ethos and
tradition of the Department of Justice, where I was in awe when
I walked through those halls as a federal prosecutor.
I think it's time for Republican colleagues to say enough is
enough and we are going to push them and do it hard.
The real problem is is that. People on the right, they love
it. You're CNN.
People on the left think they understand you can't talk to us
if you're not one of us. I'm not one of either.
But I do think that I can talk to people on the right.
I'm just going to give you the warning that this is a very
dangerous path that you walk. Holding on to the ring of power
and trying to wield it the way you want will not go well.
The problem is there are people on the on the right that are
like, this is what I voted for that are ready for retribution
and they are ready to see government power seized and used
against the enemy. And that argument's being made.
I think this is Ben Ferguson talking about it.
This woman tried to claim, hey, people I know that don't want
this smart people don't want this, but not for the reason
this lady is saying not it. It's because of principle
because we care about actually looking forward and saying, oh,
this will obviously if you turn against us all the this is what
I voted for and just like let the let the man cook.
It's real bad. It's just dangerous on every
level. Here we go.
It feels good, but only for a short while.
I agree, gentlemen, that Trump is trying to flex a muscle here,
but the average American, my hometown, Galesburg, IL, the
people who voted for Donald Trump want them to flex muscles
for them, not for a political persecution.
And right. I don't know this.
I'm asking, did you vote for Trump?
No, I didn't raise your hand if you voted for Trump.
I did not, Frank. No, I have.
I talked to very regularly. No, that's not.
He literally ran on saying his manufacturing plants in Iowa
literally ran on saying that he's gonna be accountability for
the abuse of justice. And here we've got he literally
ran for. We have a long time family.
Can you just give her a second, please?
Thanks. He literally ran for four years
saying that political persecution was awful, that he
was a victim. It didn't hurt him.
He ended up as president of the United States.
And now he overturned. He has no outstanding
indictments. And now nobody wants him to go
after more people. That's absolutely not what he
said. Yeah, it's absolutely not true.
There are plenty of people that 100% want him to go after people
A. 100% there are people. That are screaming this is what
I'm all about. I'm just going to warn you from
someone who also did vote for Donald Trump, that.
This is a bad A. Bad road to walk down.
It doesn't play well. I can already look into the
future and so can you. I think Eric Swall was talking
about it in this clip here. Let's play this real quick.
And by the way, the president's. Saying he has no control here.
He has all of the control here. He's the one who has been
tweeting to the attorney general that comedy needs to be
indicted. He's the one that fired the US
attorney who would not indict comedy.
And so this is a, you know, very, very corrupt, corrosive
act that the president is taking.
And, and what I would just say to any prosecutor at the
Department of Justice is it's not going away, is as a member
of the Judiciary Committee, I promise you when Democrats are
in the majority, we are going to look at all of this.
And there will be accountability and bar licenses will be at
stake in your local jurisdiction.
If you are corruptly indicting people where you cannot prove
the case beyond a reasonable doubt, there you go and.
That's where it's going to go. It's going to go down to the
line level. So you've got politicians that
will have authority making threats and they're going to try
to go after bar licenses. And so everybody now is in the
battlefield and that's what happens when you start making
this stuff happen. It's all dangerous and stupid.
I'm going to give you a final thought from from Jim Comedy.
This is what he actually said in his response.
I think it's nauseating. I think it's self-serving.
I think it is. It's pretty lame.
But let's at least give you guys what he said after being
indicted. Listen, he says he's not walking
in fear. I can tell you when somebody
comes after you legally and they have way more authority and
power and capabilities. Even as bright as Jim comedy is,
and he's bright, it's not at the goal, but he's bright.
It is a big, big weight. But even this feels very
performative. He went out and read a CAN
statement. This is what it sounds like.
My family and I have known for. Years that there are costs to
standing up to Donald Trump, but we couldn't imagine ourselves
living any other way. We will not live on our knees,
and you shouldn't either. Somebody that I love dearly
recently said that fear is the tool of a tyrant.
And she's right. But I'm not afraid, and I hope
you're not either. I hope instead you are engaged,
you are paying attention, and you will vote like your beloved
country depends upon it. Which it does.
My heart is broken. For the Department of Justice.
But I have great confidence in the federal judicial system and
I'm innocent. So let's have a trial and keep
the faith. So, I mean, he's probably right.
Whether you guys like it or not, you probably didn't do the thing
that they actually did. Based on what I just read and
what I just listened to that interchange, I think he's
probably clear. I think this is weaponized.
I think it's going after it. That's not in a popular position
for people on the right to hold. Do I think that he said that?
Wrong. Yeah, I sure do.
Because what did he say? Standing up to Donald Trump?
Do you guys see how bad it is when you say I'm going to stand
up to one side? The answer is I will stand up
for American principles and they are universal and they are
irrelevant to whoever it is holding that office.
That's the right answer. It continues to be the right
answer because nobody swore allegiance to one side or the
other. When you go out there and you do
that federal oath for all of you that served, you know what I'm
talking about, Military or civilian service, you swear
allegiance to the Constitution, which is the basis of a brick
and framework of of laws. And there are principles and
there is a governmental leash on what you may and may not do.
We saw that leash broken and snapped and ignored in 2020, in
2021 under a lot of the Biden administration.
As I continued to make points to Trevor yesterday while we were
talking, I stated some real simple things.
Do you have any idea how many FACE Act violations were engaged
in and how many of them only went after people that were on
the right that were standing up and saying, I want to pray in
front of this abortion clinic? And they even had it Like, one
of the worst ones was the rebuke of the Justice Department for
doing politicized attacks on what Mark Howe, the Catholic
father, was. He have like 7 kids, maybe 9
kids. I have to double check.
I think it's 7. He was indicted.
He was arrested. He was brought in and tried in a
federal courtroom, and it took one hour for a Philadelphia
federal jury to acquit him after Larry Krasner and a Soros back
DA office decided to not even charge him locally.
Do you guys get how dumb this stuff is?
It's obviously political, but the answer is certainly not more
politics. But I didn't listen.
At the end of the day, I'm going to keep doing what I'm doing.
You guys keep doing what you do. Make sure you guys are prepared.
Make sure you're getting your fitness done.
Make sure you're stacking up on food and water and weapon
systems and training and knowing your neighbors and building a
community that's going to be resistant to whatever crazy
nonsense comes from the outside. Because this stuff is actually
just as scary as what I saw before the election in November
last year to me. We'll get into more about what.
The heck that that server farm was about the fact that we saw
Pete Hegseth call in like 800 generals and said, you know,
we're going to have a private meeting face to face.
What that might be, I don't know enough about it.
So maybe we'll hear about it later on, but I didn't want to
cover much about it without any information.
It is being covered in the mainstream news.
That's where we're going. Get yourself prepped up for your
own sort of ability to survive locally.
That doesn't mean violence. What that means is that you
forge community bonds so that whatever's happening on the
national scale is less, less relevant to you.
Here's the palate cleanse of the day.
Let me just actually, before we do the palate cleanse, let me
just hit this here again, make sure you guys are following us
over on Rumble on YouTube where we are.
We're almost at 14,000 Subs over there.
So I appreciate that. New followers on X welcome to
the program. Kyle serafinshow.com if you want
to see us over on Spotify and Kyle serafin.com if you want to
join the Locals channel. Let me do a palette cleanse here
to kind of go into the weekend. This is the way I feel about all
government right now. And the way the government talks
to us, this is as accurate as it gets.
We might have played this before, but it's still true.
You have nothing to worry about. I mean, there's nothing like
strange or nefarious going on. I mean, And even if there was,
you'd never know it, right? Yeah.
And sorry. Wait, what?
Anything that may or may not be afoot shouldn't concern you
because anything that would or wouldn't happen would do so
without your knowledge or awareness.
And even if it did happen, you wouldn't understand what it was
or wasn't. So it's all perfectly fine as
far as you're concerned. What?
That's us. Right now, yeah.
So we're not going to be able to solve that problem.
It's too big. But we can do things locally and
we can go out there and meet our neighbors.
God bless all of you. Get off the Internet this.
Get off the Internet this weekend.
Go hang out with your kids. Love your families.
And I look forward to seeing you after the next couple days.
We'll see what happens on Monday.
It'll be it'll be exciting for everybody.
Have a good weekend y'all. Thanks for listening to the
Kyle. Serafin Show streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle
Serafin.