Take a look behind the curtain with the real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serafin. Hello, my friends, and welcome
to the Kyle Serafin Show. Today is Friday.
It's December the 8th and it is a friendly Friday.
It's a friendly Friday. We're going to bring on a Steve
friend. He's been on the road, but he is
coming back to us. He's going to join us for
today's show. We're going to talk about what's
been going on this week. Feels like it's been a very busy
week and I was looking at all the topics.
We're going to cover a lot of ground today, folks.
I get this feedback. Yes, it's from my mother, but
it's feedback nonetheless. And I get this feedback that
always says that Friendly Fridays are not my favorite.
Most of you guys love Friendly Fridays.
She says. She doesn't get enough
information. It's too much jabbering.
It's too much cool guy talking. Where do we go, Ryan?
We disappeared. What do you mean?
I've just got this weird stream coming up.
It just looks like there's nothing going out.
Oh, I see you. OK, fair enough.
I just got. I just got the flashing lights
coming at me, which is like the the signal for complete failure.
All right, fair enough. So anyway, that's that's the
take for my mom. And we're going to just push on
because today is going to be a ton of information.
It just went away. That's bizarre.
Totally bizarre. We're we're playing with some
fun tech issues today, folks. We got a couple of false starts.
Let me just tell you, we ran the stream four times.
We do this every single day, every weekday, and for whatever
reason, it just wouldn't take and it wouldn't take and it
wouldn't take and then it took. We don't know why.
It's totally bizarre. All right, let's start with the
sponsor. I had my daughter come up here
earlier and hand me a piping Hut cup of coffee.
Luckily she didn't spill it because she had a spill proof
mug on her Patriot cooler payload.
There it is, the Patriot cooler. Go to patriotcoolers.com.
Use promo code Kyle Kyle. Promo code Kyle saves you 10%.
If you buy more than 50 bucks you're going to get free
shipping. That's a good deal.
Again, Patriot coolers with a promo code.
Kyle makes a great holiday gift. We don't really do holiday gets
here, do it. We do Christmas gifts.
If you're the White Elephant guy and you bring a Patriot Cooler,
you're going to be the person that's bringing the gift people
want. It's not going to be the White
Elephant. Also great, 'cause this time of
the year, it's nice to know that you're also sponsoring a company
that cares about other people and cares about people.
Like our veterans $370,000 donated to Veteran Mobility
Projects, helping vets who have served this country over there
come back and be able to move around better over here.
Making a wheelchair accessible, making them a peg leg
accessible. that Lady who had a really cool kind of peg, like, I
actually, I sort of don't hate the idea of it.
I know it's probably like the most horrific thing in the world
to lose a leg, but like the people that have met that are
vets that have one leg and are running around on that bionic
leg, some of them are faster than I am.
They have a lot lighter body and no muscle fatigue.
I I don't know, Steve. We'll talk about that later on
patriotcoolers.com promo code Kyle, Kyle, 10% off.
Go ahead and and support them. I got AADM on Twitter the other
day from one of y'all letting me know that you bought another one
as a gift and that you were supporting our sponsors.
We do appreciate that. It's a big deal.
Let's bring on Steve friend. Let's bring him on.
I can hear him kind of clicking in the background there.
There he is hiding in his new studio setup.
He's got a suspendables flag. Welcome Steve.
How you doing buddy? I'm a little bit wounded that
cross eyed Mama Bear Seraphin doesn't enjoy Friendly Fridays,
but if she wants more information she should
definitely tune into the American Radicals podcast.
Shameless plugs are always welcome.
Yes, your first episode of Americans Radicals doing solo
with a call in yesterday. It was all content non-stop
content. So folks, if you missed that you
can check that out at rumble.com/am AM rad RAD Pod for
American Radicals podcast. And here is that host and my
buddy Steve, Fred to talk a bunch of other stuff.
What do you think man? Has this been has this been a
busy week or is it just in my head?
You know I coming off of the traveling for a week, I was just
more into I I'll take a lot of stuff going on as long as I get
to sleep in my own bed. That was that was good for me.
And then my wife actually left midweek out of town.
So I've been doing daddy daycare which you know you you're there.
Dads are the worst moms. But we have all fingers all
toes. So she'll be at least not having
broken children when she comes back tomorrow.
That's the key. All present and accounted for is
the goal, regardless of what other people may think.
I agree with you, Dad. Best dad in the world.
Still not going to be a great mom no matter what.
Doesn't mean that dads can't overlap there, but that is not a
one to one Venn diagram, which I'm sure Kamala Harris would
really love. Let's get a rock and rolling on
one of our buddies who's been a friendly Friday.
Guess let's start talking about a story that Steve Baker brought
to our attention. I want to launch right into it.
This was kind of a kind of a little ground breaking stuff to
read. We're showing his Twitter feed
up here folks. If you're not following Steve
Baker, the what is it? The pragmatic Constitutionalist
says Thread. This anonymous letter on Capitol
Police letterhead was distributed to members of the
congressional press pool, and we're circulated by, of course,
Jamie Raskin's office to other members of Congress in the
evening of May 19th, 2021. But there's a few big problems
with it. We're going to read you the
letter because obviously you can't see it right there.
I've got the letter full screen over here on my side.
So it just says to members of Congress from members of the
United States Capitol Police, I don't know that you could do
this as a federal agency if you could just write to your bosses
this way. But they did subject January 6th
Commission. There's no date on this, by the
way. That's always suspect.
Maybe they didn't learn how to write business letters.
Maybe they didn't go to college the way, oh, maybe they just
didn't go to college. Because if you're in the Capitol
Police, a high school diploma or GED is just fine.
Just fine. Since we, the member of the
United States Capitol Police that seems pretty presumptive,
write this letter to express our profound disappointment in the
recent comments in both chambers.
Minority leaders expressing no need for a January 6th
Commission. The brave men and women of the
United States Capitol Police were subject to hours and hours
of physical trauma, which has led to months of mental anguish.
I'm sorry the the tone just comes through to me.
If you look around at the Capitol building, you still have
doors that are broken. We'll maybe get to fixing him J
holes. The windows are smashed, in some
cases missing. They missed a common there.
No big deal. Officers are forced to go to
work with the same daily reminder what happened on that
dreadful day. Nothing like emotional language
in a professional business setting.
On January 6th, some of the officers served their last day
in a Capitol Police uniform. Maybe because just doing their
job was too much, being a security guard sometimes could
have a little bit of craziness and not by choice.
Oh, are they talking about the fact that somebody died but not
related to January 6th? OK, we hope that members of who
took an oath to protect would at the very minimum support an
investigation to get to the bottom of everyone responsible
and hold them 100% accountable. The matter at the title of the
position they're held, it goes on to say a bunch of other
emotional stuff. It's unfortunate that our quote,
UN quote bosses, parenthetically Congress less you knew who their
bosses were, are not held to the same state of that we comma the
USCP missing a comma R OK, so other than it was written by
someone who's basically a borderline retard and has maybe
like a middle school level of competency when it comes to
literacy. Steve, what do you make of this
craziness? Can you imagine the FBI agents
in the like in any field office sending this up to, I don't
know, the president? I can't and I'm a little bit
confused. It says members of the Capitol
Police. I have to think that this is
just one person who then probably went to a congressional
staffer to have them proofread. Make sure that the commas were
in the right spot, or maybe make sure that there were complete
sentences and not written in crayon.
Yes, I would. So it actually was written
supposedly that's what Steve is kind of uncovered in this
thread. So folks, I highly encourage you
go to this thread. But yeah, 11 Capitol Police
officer apparently wrote this with significant help from some
member of the press. Was the allegation apparently
not a member of the press that was also an editor, since it
doesn't look very good and I don't know, I'm like, just.
One for one, like what would be stopping me?
So I was in the Bureau when we were having the Hillary Clinton
server investigation that James Comedy stepped in and said she
was negligent but reckless but or not careless.
Or however he phrased it to get her out of jail.
Well, what's what's stopping me from then writing a letter to
either call me or at that point the Attorney General and saying
I'm very unhappy with this. We need to have a hearing for
this or we need to have an investigation of this.
I would expect to lose my job if I did that, or if I disagree
with what was going on from what my my bosses did to that level,
I should just tender my resignation.
You think, OK, so here's the fun thing about it.
In my experience, when you are a federal employee, if you have a
political grievance, which is exactly what this thing is, it's
taking a political and partisan side, then you're responsible
for shutting your mouth and doing your job or resigning like
you said. That's what the Hatch Act
basically says. You can't get involved in
partisan politics. You can't advocate a position
that is explicitly partisan, which is what's going on here.
They are literally calling out the minority party, which is to
say they are making it partisan. It doesn't even need.
You could have phrased this in a way that was nonpartisan, but
they didn't. So that's very funny to me.
But the Hatch Act prohibits all only executive agencies, and I
think that highlights the problem with the existence of
the Capitol Police. Imagine trying to do the job of
a law enforcement officer not accountable to the Article 2
powers because they're responsible for Article 1
powers. I don't even know how Capitol
Police exists other than as security guards.
And shouldn't they probably be an executive agency?
If you're supposed to be enforcing the law, that is a
directive of being the executive because you're executing the
law. But it's a little bit like being
an intelligence gathering organization when you're
supposed to be law enforcement. It's just completely out of the
lane that they're supposed to be in.
Or they should just acknowledge what they are, a security force
without arrest authority and they can maybe do some sort of
citizen's arrest. If somebody is behaving in a way
that is violative of of the law and then they would need to
summon a federal law enforcement agency or metro police or
something like that. They can then just acknowledge
your security. They could be an arm of the of
the DC Metro PD, which would make a lot more sense.
It's the physical building in there and DC actually is a
subsidiary of the federal government and they get their
funding and stuff from Congress. So that might make some sense.
I just don't understand how that that agency exists.
It's always been really dumb to me and it continues to be dumb.
And this is one more example. You know we we talk about them
being a National Mall cops, which is to say that the the
Capitol building is part of the National Mall complex.
If you guys have never been to DC, this is a sort of a concept.
They'd be like, oh, you're on the National Mall, which is just
a big green space. It goes from Lincoln to
Congress. These are the big memorials and
then the big building there. So if you're going to be a
National Mall cop, which is what these guys are, they have
exactly. They should have Paul Blart type
authority. They should have a Segway and
they should be thought of in the same way.
They should have to wear a helmet to work, a little flashy
helmet that's made for a bicycle and and then that.
Could sustain a fire extinguisher blow to the head
because we don't want them dying.
Well, you don't want them hit them back of the neck.
It turns out if you get hit behind that space or you get hit
with a baton the way Steve has shown us, then that might be a
problematic. But yeah, I I just don't
understand why this is not an executive agency.
And it it, it points out the problems when we start crossing
the streams of the Article 1-2 and three powers of the United
States Constitution. There's a reason why we have an
explicit executive, a judiciary and a legislature.
Not in that order, obviously, but those 3 powers are meant to
be separated on purpose. That's what we see a failure of,
I think, in this letter. And then also the fact that
somebody takes it upon themselves to just like
represent their whole agency is kind of kind of.
All and they're they're also violating state autonomy too
because the capitol police are setting up a resident agencies.
They're they're putting one in Florida because they thought
that the the insurrection of January 6th was so bad and
Florida had the most suspects that they were going to actually
create a building in a a headquarters in Florida to then
have people saw assigned to Florida to investigate.
Yes, indeed. I'm going to have you adjust
your pop card or pop filter on your mic.
It looks like it just snuck up on you and it is.
It's choked up in a way that looks sort of suggested.
We're not trying to do that sort of thing in this on this show.
All right, Ben. Ben, kind of an interesting
thing. I want to I want to cover down
on a different topic. We're going to just move
directly forward. Always funny when when you do an
interview and then you make the news and somebody writes an
aggregate of the interview. I know you've had this
experience. We just.
Did a news. Yeah, we just did an interview
with with Don Junior and folks if you didn't see that, it was a
lot of fun for me. I enjoyed talking to Dodd Junior
and then Revolver ended up carrying it And I think it was
So interesting is that even though you and I have been out
here banging the drum on this and it may be kind of old news
for our our live chat folks. Anybody who's listening to this
for the first time, if you're just joining the Kyle Serafin
Show, this is something that we've been beating the drum on
and we can't actually say it enough.
So I want to I will cover down on the the thoughts on this in
just a SEC. But moreover if you guys are
listening on rumble.com/kyle Serif and give us a thumbs up a
like that is how we organically move up in the charts.
That's how we ended up as the number one podcast on the live
list yesterday. And even in the the live streams
that were recorded we were we were listed as #1 for a little
bit. So that's pretty cool.
We do appreciate you guys doing that.
So this Don Junior interview, you guys can find it on Rumble,
it's his Rumble page. Go to just type in Donald Trump
Junior on Rumble and you will find the one.
It was episode either 89 or 90. Mine is directly after Dinesh
D'souza. So I guess I'm coming up in the
world, that's pretty cool. And then Revolver, you want to
throw the article back up there one time.
I'm going to read a little bit of it because this is something
that Darren Beatty over at Revolver has focused in on.
The FBI whistleblower explained the dark circular model being
used against J6 prisoners. To be specific.
I actually think that it's not just J6 prisoners, it's all
people in America that may be conservative have the potential
of finding themselves at the root of an intelligence
investigation. And the difference between those
two, as you just alluded to Steve is a big deal.
The fact that criminal investigations are linear.
I'm actually going to have you lay out your belief on, on the
linear nature of a criminal investigation and I'll cover
down on the intelligence since you you had a lot more criminal
work than I did and I had more intelligence work than you did.
So maybe you could just go and talk about that and we'll we'll
lay this out for our audience as well as as revolvers audience.
So linearly a a crime occurs and then an investigation ensues and
whatever that requires, you're going to gather evidence, you're
going to interview people, get all the documentation, you write
your reports, you bring it to a prosecutor, they can accept or
decline it, and then we go to trial and the person has their
day in court. The process at that point is
basically complete from the government standpoint.
And to me, the most important part is at the end of that,
there's an end. It's case closed.
There's actually a case closing electronic communication that
you put into your case file and then it just disappears.
It goes into the to the cloud, to the ether.
And you never consider that case again unless you're going to be
reopening an investigation that you closed because you didn't
prosecute it. But for all intents and
purposes, the line has a beginning and an end.
That's it. Now the intelligence
investigation is totally different because in this, in
the case of the prosecution that Steve is talking about, there is
an end goal. That end goal is either
acquittal, A plea deal or a conviction.
Those are the three possible outcomes that happened from that
little branch, that linear branch that comes out from the
original crime, but there's no allegation of a crime in an
intelligence investigation. And that's hence the circular,
the dark circles that that kind of spin off.
I like to imagine, imagine a a waterfall coming down, folks,
and it hits the water and it starts making all those swirling
eddies. That's an intelligence
investigation. Something dumps in, it starts
spinning, and all these things spin off into their own circles.
So the fact that Steve friend and I talk means they're going
to investigate Kyle Seraphin. Now they're going to start
talking to Steve. They realize that Ryan is the
producer in the background, even though we don't see his face
right now. So what do they do?
They start investigating Ryan Mata and they start getting all
the information and they look at us as though we are criminal
subjects, but they use tools that are not admissible in court
and when you do that you are creating all these information
only investigations. We are now investigating persons
and not crimes and eventually should you happen to uncover a
crime, whether it's related to the topic or not, then they are
going to fulfil their other duty, which is as a law
enforcement. They will begin that linear path
and construct the investigation. And what I told Don Junior that
I think is so upsetting to most people, probably the worst part
of it is that once you begin doing that investigation, you
already know where all the bodies are buried.
You already know where all the illicit material is that you've
gotten through national security means.
This is not what the Patriot Act was designed to do.
But once you do, you're going to write a warrant up, and you're
going to be correct whether your warrant is very thin on probable
cause or not. Do you want to talk about the
deference that a judge shows you as an FBI agent, Steve?
Because I know that is a thing. Like we've read some pretty
awful arrest and and search warrant affidavits.
They seem light, but as long as they come up with the goods at
the end of it, I think the judge is not embarrassed and they sort
of just they just let it happen or like why is that?
Judges are people just. They might be lazy people.
Yeah. And.
And they are, they're they're inundated.
You know, you they they come in, they're like, hey, I got 15
minutes. I got a hearing coming up.
What do you got for me? And they do the same thing that
most people do. I would call up on the phone and
say, hey, I'm Special Agent Steve Friend with the FBI.
And then people will give me their Social Security number
because they just on good faith saying that the FBI, everything
they're doing is for the objective good.
These are the most competent, their premier law enforcement.
I assume that they have all the probable cause necessary for
them to have drafted this and put it in front of me.
And I I think in eight years I had one judge ask one question
and it was just not really a significant, I was not like
nervous about it. I think it was a clarification
question. How many?
Arrest warrants and search warrants.
Do you think you swore out during that time?
Ballpark Oh. Hundreds that's that's what I'm
getting AT and and only one follow up question that you can
recall. Yes, yeah.
I mean and and I mean the only other time that I could think of
the judge saying, well, he's like we actually said, wow, you
have a lot of probable cause here.
This is a pretty good warrant. I wrote one in New Mexico where
I literally had the judge say, I really like the way that you did
transcriptions of the of the voice recording that you had it
made. I could really hear his voice
all right and. That's good because, you know,
the judge actually did his due diligence and then just hand it
off to. That's right.
And I write with ellipses when there's pauses, and I write with
the, you know, exclamation points when people change their
voice and tone. I try to actually mirror the way
it sounds like a writer might. I don't do atmospherics and talk
about it was a dark and stormy night, and there I was, sweating
profusely from my left temple as it rolled down, you know, into
my beard. I don't say that sort of
nonsense, but I do try to paint a picture because I believe that
words convey meaning if you do it correctly.
So yeah, there's that. But I've never had a follow up
either. I did far less than you,
obviously, but it's worth knowing that you know one and
you actually remember it pretty specifically.
Yes, because it was an unusual case to me.
It was actually in in the Iowa side.
I was always in the Nebraska side.
So it was even the whole circumstance.
I was like well maybe the judges in Iowa are a little bit more
scrutiny involved. But yeah, one time in eight
years. And then the other thing I'll
add to your description about the circular nature of the the
intelligence investigation is it in itself creates the process.
It creates this because the process exists now, it's
something that you can obstruct. So now that gives another tool
in the tool belt of a energetic FBI that wants to then persecute
someone so they can, I don't know, send a couple agents over
to interview Mike Flynn on an intelligence investigation.
Right. And if you instruct the intent
of getting him to lie? It's not a criminal
investigation, but if you are actually obstructing that
process, then you suddenly find yourself on the wrong end of it.
I don't know if the statute says it has to be a criminal
investigation instigation or not.
But that is a really interesting kind of, you know, point that I
hadn't considered that they might be using these things as
actually like a setup, as the perjury trap or as the
obstruction trap, which 100% and and.
They're going to be wide in their interpretation.
They're going to go up and say, oh, Kyle Surf and I want to have
a conversation with you. What color is your shirt?
And you say Gray. And they say, well, he was
actually. Black He's a Heather Gray.
He lacks specificity. A year ago he lacked candor.
And we're going to come in with 1001 charge and a search warrant
because we want to make sure we have the the shirt.
So we're going to ransack his house, come in with the BearCat
at 6:00 in the morning, and then what DC Circuit Judge is going
to say, oh, that that that doesn't sound like it's not
probable cause for Kyle. Syrup.
And that guy is a real a hole. We got a problem with him.
They're familiar with their name.
They're. Familiar with the name, just
like Chris Wright. So we're actually going to cover
more of that. You didn't, I didn't tell you
the segue, but that was a perfect segue.
First, let's do a sponsor real quick.
Let's say thanks to our friends over at Patriot.
At fourpatriotsrather4patriots.com/kyle
Serif And there it is. If I could just remember words
and numbers, that's the thing. The number four
patriots.com/kyle Kyle. Check out their solar generators
right now guys. If the power goes out, what is
your plan, especially when it's cold out.
I just had my neighbor come over and sit at my counter yesterday
and let me know that his AC went out and that is a major issue
for us in the modern world. We are some gentle dogs.
He works all day outdoors. He wants to come home, do
something comfortable. You also want to come home to
your food not being spoiled. That'd be a big deal.
So check out some of these things.
They've got a solar go fridge that Ryan is showing you right
now on the 12 days of Christmas. You get a special deal off
there. Use my promo code.
Kyle, you can take things on the go with you.
Nothing better than a battery charged like self powered
cooler. So are they in direct
competition with our friends over at Patriot coolers?
I don't know. Maybe It's a totally different
kind of product. This thing is a machine that
keeps things cold for you, that charges on a solar battery.
Seems like a great idea. Checks out some of their great
gear for survival, for RV ING, their dual purpose, and then
maybe for your kids birthday party.
If you're my kind of guy, I'm always looking for a way to use
my tools. Sometimes those tools I'm I'm
stretching a little bit, I overkill it, I'm the guy who's
got way more gear than necessary for the for the moment that
we're doing it. So check out some of the stuff
at fourpatriots.com/kyle and before you go they'll try and
sell you a solar generator as you just saw there.
I'm not. I'm not mad about that.
You don't want to go in a world without power.
That's like literally they've made entire television shows
about what happens if we don't have electricity.
And you guys have seen this. They are not necessarily well
made. But I can tell you that the fear
of human beings in the modern era not having it is very, very
real. So Steve, you set this up
perfectly and I think we're going to, we're going to show a
tweet that I put out and then I'm actually going to read the
article. So if you want to throw the the
tweet up there, Ryan, the the story of Jags Gagliano.
So there it is. I just said retired supervisory
agents, like, like Jimmy Gags, who's a former HRT operator.
He was a supervisory special agent in New York and a retired
AD, the assistant director of Criminal division, Chris Wecker.
They're saying the same things that guys like Gerardo Boyle,
who had four years, and me, who had six, and you, who had eight
and change, like all of us are saying the same thing.
So when the retired guys and and the guys that got kicked out are
saying the same, things weren't a real problem.
This is Jimmy Gag saying what I witnessed at the FBI will be the
agency's Waterloo. Why does eroded trust in the FBI
matter? He wrote this two days ago.
I recommended it's on Fox News as an op-ed just said Americans
are losing trust and confidence in the FBI.
This directly impacts the national security mission.
A staggering 63% view the Bureau negatively and the reasons are
hidden in plain sight. Over the past few years, valid
criticisms have been leveled at the partisan decision making at
the upper echelon of the FBI dating back to 2016.
With the rush of Trump sham investigations, heavy-handed
overcharging of Trump campaign surrogates, blatant uneven
treatment of right wing and left wing protesters and rioters,
labeling angry parents at school board meetings as domestic
terrorist concerns, and adding big text suppression with 2020
seems disinterested in the Hunter Biden laptop.
And so on the Biden family's obvious influence peddling
schemes in the laughably absurd Richmond Richmond Divisions
intelligence product warning of radicalist, traditionalist
Catholics, The FBI has been raising eyebrows.
That is a pretty good category and we are involved in most, not
all, but most of those particular topics, says many
retired agents. To include the author, have long
caveated the criticism of the FBI by maintaining that bias and
partial concerns or partiality concerns are related to only
certain FBI senior executives. We justifiably lauded the hard
work and faithful service of the vast majority of the men and
women who comprise the street level case working special
agents, but that's becoming exceedingly more difficult.
He goes on to basically say that there is not a big difference
between them. And a lot of that is because of
the FBI recruitment process, which you and I have covered.
Long form, Steve, he said There's been a seismic this is
Chris Swecker saying the a retired AD.
So a senior executive service guy saying that there's been a
seismic shift in the FB is culture from Jim comedy and
continuing on with Chris Ray specifically because they're
bringing in recruits that are more opinionated, more
idealistic, more liberal, highly educated, more Ivy League.
And they tend not to follow the facts, but they insert their own
ideologies and their own opinions because they've been
indoctrinated in places like these schools.
And if you're virtuous and highly educated, you think you
need to do everyone else's thinking for them.
What do you you think about that?
Has that had the tables term now?
Is the tide turning, you think? I don't know.
I mean, I I don't when I when it comes to these retired guys, you
know, I've been disappointed in some of them because they're
just, you know, they're collecting the pension and they
don't want to admit the fact that the the agency that they
devoted 1/4 of a century to might be evil at this point, you
know, and and so they're loath to criticize it.
I'm I'm happy that some of the guys actually are publicly
coming out and saying it. I kind of chuckle with these
high-ranking former executives because I didn't realize that I
probably actually have more investigative experience than a
former deputy assistant director.
Why does this word matter more than mine?
That's right. We keep digging into their
backgrounds. You've got, you know, 7-8 years
of actual investigative experience how you had what your
last year was that Jacksonville. Not even your last full year.
A little over a year, 'cause I got there in June and they
walked me out in in September, so.
Let's call it six 5 1/2 to 6 solid years of running more
cases than probably almost anybody in the FBI when it comes
to criminal matters, because that's what Indian Country is.
Oh yeah, seven years in Indian country and yeah, and a year and
a half in child porn, 8 1/2 years.
I mean, I've. I've actual investigative work
the entire time. And you can't say that about
these executives because most of them punch their ticket at six
years, which means half a year of Academy then coming out
probationary agents for 18 months.
By the time they get their feet under them at two years, they're
doing 4 years of investigations, they're hitting tenure and they
are rolling out like I was hitting my prime when I was at
my Indian Country post. I was ready to go.
I can handle anything. I knew that if I didn't know the
answer, I knew how to find the answer.
I had subject matter experts that were friends that I can
reach out to. You know, all my friends had
been either working drugs or gangs or whatever.
I had guys that were like you that were doing other Indian
residents so I could reach out and do that game.
That's another battle building the Rolodex.
If it's able to call, you have to know.
Everything. The ponies.
Yeah, that and and here's the other aspect to it and I sort of
came out of this way of thinking about it because we call it
like, oh, you're going to climb the ladder, right?
It's not really a ladder, it's more of a pyramid, right?
Because as you ascend it, it the your circle is smaller and
smaller of your of your peers within the executive level.
And as a result of that you have a small collection of people at
the upper echelons that are politically captured.
And then the other thing they're able to do is as you go down to
the bottom of the period where pyramid where it's really
widespread out, you can compartmentalize
responsibilities to the point where even if you're not
ideologically aligned with the top of the pyramid, you your
responsibilities are so small that you can maybe rationalize
your actions and not take a step back and look at the whole.
So for for me, when they were saying, hey, we're sending SWAT
to this guy's house, even though he he was going to cooperate
with us, they said, Steve, you're just driving him.
He's going to get arrested. You're just going to drive.
It's. Just a minor.
It's just minor complicity in evil.
You're not really the guy who's going to be pulling the trigger
at the end of the gun at the deck.
Dropping the Zyklon B in the chamber, you're just putting
them on the train. You're just making sure they get
on the train and where they're going.
Yeah, you're just moving them to it.
Of of perfect sort of segue to that.
We've got a video here. This is a reflection.
I've been seeing this pop back up.
I don't know if James O'Keefe is lacking new material or if he's
just recycling it because it's relevant.
Both are fine with me. I don't really care.
But this video, number one, kind of a look back from some of the
stuff that happened just as you and I were getting public in
2022. Here's a little video from James
O'Keefe If you'll play video #1 Ryan So.
What you're saying is the paycheck and the pension leads
to the Holocaust. There's a reason why all FBI
Academy graduates have spent a day at the Martin Luther King
Memorial because they're acknowledging this is the
penance that this penance that the future is doing for the
past. And in the same way, we all have
to go and attend the Holocaust Museum.
You spend a whole day at the Holocaust Museum with a specific
program for law enforcement, with the whole idea that tyranny
happens incrementally, and it happens by a bunch of people
agreeing to small injustices over and over simply to keep
their paycheck and their pension.
You take the pension and the paycheck and you'll walk it to
whatever that darkest end is. And I don't have a problem with
people who believe that they're doing the right thing.
I have a problem with people who are doing the wrong thing and
they know it. What is your message to the
people in the FBI watching this? Because there will be a
considerable amount of people that watch this, and many of
them in the FBI. What's your message to those
people? You took an oath.
You got to live it. You're the only one who's going
to answer for it. But something is being done and
it's wrong. It's your job.
It's literally your job. It's within your job description
to stop. So it's it's so funny to me,
Steve, and maybe not funny but more quirky that every single
person that I've talked to in the whistleblower space has
honed in on that particular training, that particular moment
where they teach you that stuff at the Holocaust Memorial Museum
that that's like, it's it's so impactful.
I listened to an interview with Garrett O'boyle yesterday on
Fargo local radio and he said the exact same thing.
And I knew that was the case because all of the
whistleblowers that I was able to gather in my little group,
which you are unfortunately excluded from, not by no fault,
your own. You were just out there in the
wind on your own and you made the same decisions for the same
reasons. And we all saw the same problem,
that if you keep saying yes when you should be saying no, then
you lead yourself to be part of the thing that we were literally
trained that you're not supposed to do.
I mean, you hate using the word literally, but like the
training, it happens every single Academy class, you can't
do this thing. They tell you that, and then
they just go on and freaking ignore it.
They do. And I don't know if it's a
chicken and the egg sort of conversation, Did that trip
impact us because we actually were the few people of integrity
who got through the vetting process that we slipped to the
cracks, or did that actually impact us?
I I don't know one way or another.
But in other words, the fact that we all predisposed.
To know that. Independently, though, we all
came to that conclusion and we all specifically cited it.
So it did actually leave a mark. On our our.
Our mental state, when we analyzed what was going on, and
parenthetically, when I did my security division interview, the
SEC D interview, and I walked out, my lawyer laughed at me and
he said, you know, I think your one contribution to the FBI is
going to be them canceling the trip to the Holocaust Memorial.
Well, between you, you doing your interview at SEC D and the
fact that I wrote a letter to the deputy assistant director of
human resources that said you should, you know, basically
consider yourself like a Nazi, a good.
I called him a good American, which I think is amazing.
And I said you're following the same path as a good Germans.
And many of those people felt the noose around their neck at
Nuremberg. So not not nearly as many as
should have, by the way. That's the other wild thing.
You know, the the real message of the Nuremberg trials is that
far less people were held accountable than you'd expect.
And that might be the that might be a failure because everybody
is looking for compassion and we're looking to say, well, we
just want to hold the upper echelon responsible.
And the answer should have been actually, we should have hold
the lower echelon at the same standard because human beings
are human beings and all human life should be the same.
If you're going to round up the Jews or the Catholics, which
they did with the Gypsies or anything else they considered
under mentioned, threw them into the Degas chambers, like that's
the same like if you're part of the machine, you're part of the
machine, period. And that was the lesson I took
from it. If you swear an oath and become
a civil servant, the stakes should be higher because we're
we're giving you authority that the ordinary layperson does not
have. And ergo, if you mess up there,
there's higher stakes. It just it's a heavier sentence.
It's it's a it's a bigger cross to bear if you raise your hand
and swear that oath. And it's a it's a seriously
cross eyed bear. It really is not a cross eyed
Mama bear who I see joined the chat, so I do like a cross eyed
Mama bear too. So interestingly enough, that
video that we just played right there, that anonymous video that
was done James O'Keefe put out when he was with Project
Veritas. Obviously he's rebranded it with
his new company, but that was the video of all things that
they claimed Garrett O'boyle did and got him jammed up and
removed. And we we know it wasn't Garrett
O'boyle and so did the FBI at the time.
They knew it was not Garrett O'boyle, which is kind of
amazing to us. It's.
Obviously not Garrett O'boyle because there was no scripture
quoted. The dead giveaway would have
been he would have quoted scripture if they'd even known
Garrido Boyle or done a cursory look into the Garrido Boyle.
If they'd never even talked to him, they would have found that
out. Wouldn't.
They or read. His.
I had never reasonable combination request that was
just scripture littered throughout the entire thing.
Non-stop scripture quoting throughout his entire affidavit
stating that he had a reasonable belief that he couldn't he
couldn't take the COVID vaccine. So fantastic.
OK, so Speaking of people who did the right thing for the
right reasons, we're going to cover down.
This is kind of a sponsor read for Catholic Vote, but also it's
kind of a shameless plug for myself and my request to you as
watchers of the Kyle Serafin show.
Ryan, if you want to pull up the the actual donate Catholic vote,
OK, so here's the deal. I will put this out there.
Again, it's pinned to my Twitter page so you guys can find it.
It's the number one tweet that I have poked out there.
This is the 2023 Catholic Heroes Tournament.
OK. And I think I'm the only one on
here who has a podcast, so I'm cheating a little bit.
The the button, if you'll kind of hover over at Ryan where you
can do the vote now that's what you would click.
And you what you'll see is it'll give you the opportunity.
Can we actually vote? Vote for me.
Let's do it. They may tell you you've already
voted. Nope.
OK, We're not voting for Greg Abbott.
Right. OK, We are voting for Mark out.
Obviously, we're going to vote for Lila.
Get over there. What are you doing?
Yeah, Lila Rose. OK, cool.
You can do it again. You can vote two times.
Do it again. We're throwing some votes down
the line here, folks. Mark out is our guy.
Put two more for Kyle Serafin. That's.
Right. Yeah, just keep going.
OK. Lila is our girl.
She runs live action. So we're going to do kind of a
profile on each one of these individuals all 16, because
everybody here has a noteworthy story.
Click on Brian if you would the the competitor from the first
bracket to the first bracket pass without me even knowing.
If you click on the person, you'll actually find out their
story. I put a call into his restaurant
and I put a call into Xavier University where Brian is a golf
coach. He, he's actually a golf coach
at the at the Catholic University at Xavier.
Interestingly enough my best friend in the world that I've
known for the longest amount of time, who's one of the best
human beings I've ever met, went to Xavier also dropped out
because he got married and had a child and he started taking care
of his kid, which is interesting.
He went there on a full scholarship, folks.
That's the kind of guy that he is.
And one of my absolute sort of stalwart decisions when I was
younger was like, I want to be as good a person and a good a
dad as my buddy Nathan. Here's So here's Brian's story.
He's an ordinary Catholic guy. He's an entrepreneur.
He owns a restaurant which was called the Copper Blue.
And he put a sign up in there that said he wanted to vote no
on issue 1, which was the so-called Reproductive Freedom
Rights Act or it was called the, you know, the the reproductive.
It was essentially A codifying abortion in the into the
constitution of the state of Ohio.
That's what they were voting on. And he said, I don't want to do
that. And some of his staff members
walked out and they protested. And rather than cave to his
staff, he shut down the restaurant.
He just said that he's standing with the unborn and women.
And the price was is that he lost business, he lost money and
he almost lost his entire restaurant.
Now that sounds like they're open.
When I called him the other day, they were bustling.
And I hope that he got new staff that can accept the fact that
the owner might have different political opinions.
And if you want to earn money here, that's what you got to do.
But good for him. He was a man who stood on
principle. So that's the story of Brylin
Brian Arlinghouse and we'll try to get him on.
Actually, if he wants to Come on, I'd love to expose all these
guys stories in a long form interview 'cause I think you
guys will enjoy it, but that is our little our our feature.
I want you guys to go to the the Twitter page which we have
pinned. That's my biggest following
anyway. If you'll click through it and
do your votes, I'm not telling you who to vote for.
I'm just saying my pick to win it overall is Mark How, who we
will have on the show. He is running for Congress and I
like Lila Rose. I think she's a good one.
That's going to be a tough bracket for Mark later.
And if you want to vote for me, my competition right now is a
guy named Trevor Williams. And Trevor Williams is a
baseball player who stood up against the Sisters of Perpetual
Indulgence. Also seems like a pretty good
guy. Steve, you have any thoughts on
the on the Tournament of Champions for Catholic Hero of
the Year? I'm I'm very happy that our
voting patterns have been the identical so far.
Just watching you pick those. So that was good.
So I at least we know we're ideologically aligned.
And then as far as your current competition, like, good on him.
But he didn't give up his paycheck like Kyle Serafin did.
So I think this is a this is an easy select vote, early vote
often, yeah. Yeah, I think you can actually
vote every day, which is kind of funny.
The people at Catholic Vote sent me an e-mail and they were
giving me a hard time. They're like, oh, it's neck and
neck. Sounds like you better promote
the PA, You better promote it. And I was like, oh, he is.
He is a New York Met, right? Like he's a baseball.
Player who makes millions of dollars a year.
He kind of has a following. It's bigger than Kyle Serafin's
following, but I have a more reactive fan base, folks, so
watch yourselves. Anyway, go to the, yeah, the
Catholic vote link there. I will actually put it in the
chat here in just a second, 'cause I can and let's keep
moving forward. Let's keep, let's keep pushing
this along, some kind of breaking news that came out for
the week. Donald Trump is going to be
indicted for the 91st through the 130th indictment.
They're actually going to do a bunch more indictment, I'm just
assuming simply because Hunter Biden was invited indicted.
So when you indict Hunter Biden, I think that's when you do more
Donald Trump, Is that correct, Steve?
Tit for tat man, we got to make sure that we're having No2
tiered system of justice. There's no two tiered system.
It is simply totally fair. Let's go ahead and bring up this
piece from just the news, John Solomon.
So this was recommended by Steve, he said.
John Solomon's always pretty fair.
I think he is. In fact he might be too fair in
this. The article from Just the news
entitled Joe Biden vowed to crack down on Tax Cheats.
His DOJ just charged his son Hunter as one of them.
Sweeping jury indictment, 3 felony counts, 6 misdemeanors,
all charges against Hunter Biden carrying up to 17 years.
We can expect that to carry as much as $1700 in fines in real
life and maybe a spanking on the back, but only if it's done by
someone who is an underage prostitute.
Joe Biden made a crackdown. I probably shouldn't be that
flipping and glib about that, but so be it.
Joe Biden made a crackdown on tax cheating millionaires as a
centerpiece of his presidency, even securing the funds to hire
new IRS agents and auditors. And on Thursday, his Justice
Department branded First Son Hunter Biden as the
quintessential tax cheat. I'm not sure they said that.
I think that's pretty editorializing, but so be it.
I think it's true who chose to underwrite his, quote UN quote
extravagant lifestyle with millions in foreign monies
rather than pay his debts to Uncle Sam.
In a sweeping grand jury indictment, they levied 3 felony
counts and six misdemeanors that charge up to 17 years in prison.
This is by the special counsel David Weiss, markedly increasing
the legal peril for Hunter Biden, while also placing a dark
cloud over the president's own political fortunes just weeks
before the start of the presidential primary elections,
and also just before we expect either Gavin Newsom or what's
her name, Michael Obama. What?
What's her Michelle Obama? Mike, my bad.
Yeah, sorry about that. What do you think about all this
nonsense? Are we going to see More Trump
indictments? Probably.
I I do think that they just
haven't thought this through from the tax.
And all Hunter Biden really needs to do is have one of the
Democrat donor who's who's also professionally a professional
art appraiser, come in, appraise his work really high, He can
donate it and make a charitable donation of his $1,000,000
Campbell Soup. They just threw up onto a canvas
and then the debt will be gone. Solved.
No, what he did is he just got a millionaire to pay his bills.
That's way easier. Isn't it way easier to make
millionaire friends who just think you're so great that they
just want to pay your tax liabilities so that you can
continue doing like coke and blow and hookers in Vegas?
It is, it is. But it's clearly just they
didn't think this out they needed somebody like Bruce or
Phil to actually go through the fine lines of tax law and say
like this is how you could actually get away with it.
And and my other my other thought is the IRS must just not
be good at getting rid of whistleblowers.
That that must be it, because those guys are still working.
Why do you think that is? Just curious.
Well, I posted you this morning. I don't know.
Do they need a security clearance?
I suspect they do, but my my thought is this.
We're seeing that the FBI has basically hired a bunch of women
to be in charge of things that are weaponizing it.
I actually had a I'm not going to disclose the the party, but
you and I both know this female reached out to me and there was
a tweet that Dan Bongino put out about how people in the
conservative sphere could be just as bad or worse when
they're inside of our our own tent.
And theoretically part of our quote, UN quote, movement are,
you know, coming after you. And they can be the worst.
And my response to him was that crazy chick.
I can't remember the movie, but she's like holding up a sign
that says, do you want me to kill them?
You know she holds it up outside the.
Window. It's from the The water, boy.
That's right. So, like, that is my actual
instinct. If somebody attacks Dan like
you, people in the chat probably are going to know.
You might realize this, but my loyalty to Dan is based on Dan's
loyalty to his word, which I find to be utterly refreshing
and unlike most people in the world, let alone that you know
any, you know media circuit that he's just he's just a good
person that does the right thing because it's the right thing.
And he kept his word to me and to you, so I I love that.
And anyway like you know somebody his producer for the
radio show Jim Farity would reached out and he was like he's
like, hey bro, like be careful they're watching you.
And I'm like I'm not joking. I had a Sam Elliott, you know,
like another Jeff on there, probably.
Probably not joking, you know, Just depends on what the threat
is. If somebody made a threat on
Dan's life, yeah, I'd go to war with him.
There's very few people that I could say that, that I haven't
spent a ton of time around. Obviously you and Garrett, like,
I'll go to war with you guys any day.
I think I said that in our first phone call.
You know, you pick the door and I'll go through it with you.
I don't even need to know what's on the other end of it.
Just tell me we're going and I'll just ask you, you know,
whose car? Like, what's that?
What's that? The four brothers from that Mark
Wahlberg. The Mark Wahlberg movie.
I kind of feel that way about it.
There's very few people that could just say, like, hey, we
need to mount up. And I'm like, hey, is this going
to be a deniable operation or is this going to be something where
we're going to own it? Because I'm going to change
caliber based on that. That's.
Yeah, we, we all basically came to that conclusion where like
when we found out that they Democrats had proposed Garrett
for some some criminal charges because they said he'd lied in
his testimony. We're like, well, we're going to
the compound, We're going to go have an Alamo standoff with
Garrett if necessary. Just tell me what, what, what
caliber that you need me to bring.
That's it, yeah. Do you want me on Overwatch or
am I going to be on entry and let's do this.
So that being the case, kind of interesting there it is, See, is
that not the most fun? Is that not the most fun
response to somebody saying people are being crappy and and
coming at me? I don't know.
I just I sort of love it And and then speaking about the
injustices and sort of the sort of the weaponization and and the
fact that we are dealing with a clown world DOJ, we're actually
seeing a tiny bit of justice folks.
I do actually see an arc upward that is somewhat reassuring.
I want to bring up the story about Doug Mackie.
So we're going to read this from Daily Wire real quickly and and
here you go. So Doug Mackie, who many of you
guys will recall, he was Ricky Vaughn.
Two point O he was making memes that were mocking Hillary
Clinton and Hillary Clinton voters in the 2016 election,
magically in 2021 after Joe Biden took over.
You've got the story where they went after him, they convicted
him in federal court and they sentenced him to prison for
memes, for flipping memes, which seems like it would be protected
by the 1st Amendment. Brandon Dre writing here, who's
a friend of ours and I appreciate this, a couple days
old, but they've actually halted the sentence.
He's not going to have to show up.
And what's very interesting to me, and I think it's most
interesting, Mackie stated on Twitter, this ruling is huge
because because it means the appeals court decided that my
appeal presents substantial and debatable issues of law that, if
resolved in my favor, will result in my conviction being
vacated. In other words, if you guys
don't know it, when you do things through at least the
federal system, you go into the Circuit Court, which is where
the charges happen. That's where you actually argue
the facts of the case, but then you get a chance to appeal.
And the appeals court, which is above it, actually argues
whether or not the rule and law is that is at play, is being
properly applied. And what they're saying here is
that the law, which in this case I imagine is the First Amendment
appeal, is not being properly applied.
And so that there are substantial and debatable issues
of law. They may be in favor.
It says like, sure, the jury convicted him based on those
facts you guys presented, but those facts were based on law
that was misinterpreted. And that's really important
stuff. Have you, How much have you been
following Doug Mackie's case there, Steve?
I have been following it because I actually use his in the speech
that I was giving last last week that this was a a portion that I
I referred to. And I think it's important to
note he didn't actually create the meme that they convicted him
for. He shared a meme that wasn't
original to him. And that which is which is
probably beyond the capabilities of the court to even understand.
I mean it's sort of the the case I made with that we should
indict Jennifer Granholm for telling you to lease a Tesla and
well, she's encouraging you to go into debt and debt correlates
to criminality. So ergo she's encouraging you to
do something that would raise your statistical rates of crime
in your area. Anybody who retweeted that go
get a Tesla should be then a Co conspirator if we're going to
follow the Doug Mackey. This is why you listen to the
Kyle Serafin Show, folks. That was the most cerebral
argument you've ever heard about the problems there and you're
going to have to go back and rewind it.
So time stamp it. What is it about the 46 minutes
in go time stamp it. Come back and listen to that
argument again made by Steve. That was that was a that was
like a Democrat level sort of like cognitive dissonance
explanation. But I think.
It's the same PC that they have in Fulton County, right?
Yes, I'm I'm just just using best practices.
I guess the precedent when it has been set I'm more I'm
actually really interested to to the conundrum that the
government is for Douglas Mackie because they're in for a penny
in for a dollar, right. They they can't back off they
have to fight it. So they're you saying get back
by appeals court or they're going to back off and say oh
sorry, we got you convicted erroneously they they really
come up. They always double down.
But here's the question. The the that particular
idiomatic expression is in for a penny.
But we we say penny in this country, but it's actually in
for a pence, in for a pound. It's a British thing.
How have you decided it's penny in dollar?
What's going on here? You just.
I just, I'm I'm America, man. I'm America.
But like Russell Brand was saying that we say drop in the
bucket, it's supposed to be drop in the ocean, which I've now
altered in my vernacular. I think that that's that's a
more appropriate. I like A Drop in the Sea, which
is a little bit more of a romantic way of saying ocean.
How do you feel about that? I like 2 syllables. 1 syllables?
No, not so much. I'm not mad at you for it.
Let's do so. We're talking about arguments
and sort of favorability arguments.
A lot of the the Democrats sort of positions right now are
pushing gun control again because there have been some
mass shootings this week. So of course we've covered it.
Pretty long form on this week's shows, folks.
If you missed those, go back and listen.
I want to give you kind of an emotional appeal.
There's a pretty good, pretty good video that is circulating
here. This came from some testimony in
front of one of the hearings in front one of the House
committees. I think it's worth listening to
people who they always claim it's about saving the victims.
I don't think that's accurate and I don't think that their
solutions work. So let's give a video to a
listen. This is a mother of someone
who's who's this child was, was killed in so-called gun
violence. That's not really what happens.
There's no such thing as gun violence.
There's just people who use guns to kill people.
And let's go ahead and play this out.
I just want you to hear kind of an emotional appeal if you want
to play video #2. Ours can't describe how hard it
is to bury a child. I ache for anyone and all who
have done the same. My son death was a result of a
criminal with an evil heart and a justice system felon to hold
him accountable for the laws he had already broken.
You see, a convicted felon killed my son with an illegally
obtained gun. Our gun control lobbyists and
politicians claim that their policies will save lives and
reduce violence. Well, those policies did not
save my son. The laws being discussed are
already implemented in cities across this country.
We have decades of evidence proven they do not work.
Saint Louis, New York, Chicago, Washington, Atlanta are gun
control utopias and they are plagued with the most violence
10 more laws, 20 more laws, 1000 more won't make what has already
illegal more wrong or stop criminals from committing these
crimes. And y'all are delusional.
If you think it's going to keep us safe, how about letting me
defend myself from evil? I You don't think that I'm
capable and trustworthy to handle a firearm?
You don't think that the Second Amendment doesn't apply to
people that look like me? Who and you who would call for
more gun controls are the same ones that are calling to defund
the police. Who is supposed to protect us?
We must prepare to be our own first responders to protect
ourselves and our loved ones. That is it, right there.
I mean, that is an impassioned plea from someone who
understands isn't that strong. That was great.
Listen, I I was fist pumping, you guys couldn't see in the
background. But I'm like, yes, you need to
be your own first responder because you're responsible for
you. OK.
I want you to know something. So for those of you that are
listening to the audio podcast, they don't always call it out
there, but I want you to listen to that voice.
And if you would just take a second, you can.
You know, that was a woman because we're not fools and we
know that was a woman's voice and you know, that was a black
woman. If you're being honest, you
listen, you go, Oh yeah, that was a black lady speaking.
And she was saying something that was articulate and
intelligent and that was specific to her pain.
And she was giving a message, but it was definitely a black
way of saying it. And I want to say that because
it's contrasted what we're about to play, because when we say
that this other woman is a clown and she is a clown, you can tell
that both of them are black women.
One of them is a serious person that I'm interested in hearing
from. And the other one is a woman who
was elected to Congress to represent the state of Texas in
Dallas. And she is a clown.
And it's very disgusting to me. You'll also hear that the topic
is that she's going to actually, she's going to berate the state
that she represents, even though she represents only one district
of it. I want you to play a #4 if you
would. In contrast, I didn't know that
these were going to be the contrast that I was going to
find. I just knew these were two good
clips that I wanted to share with you.
Let's just do this this for comparison.
Back-to-back clip #4, if you would, Ryan.
In fact, Miss Perry, I know your organization, the Heritage
Foundation, loves Texas. Oh, they love Texas.
They always sending us some nonsense bills that somehow set
this country on the wrong trajectory.
They send them to Texas. They send them to Florida.
Every deplorable state that we can think about.
They usually. Coming out of y'all's.
Despise Dollar Store. Cardi B right there with a wig
and fake with fake nails. Steve just muted himself.
Are you good? Steve he.
Got her dollars to her Cardi B. She is.
She's trash. The the falsy, the falsy
eyelashes fake. Designer clothes, fake designer
thoughts, fake designer personality, and.
She's from Texas. She's.
A fraud, Yeah. She comes from Dallas.
She called her own state a deplorable state.
Correct. Isn't that awful?
Congratulations, Texas. Don't mess with Texas.
I I I tweeted out that, like, sometimes the stupid and
smallest tweets go the longest ways.
I just said this is not a serious person and you know,
we're not represented by serious people.
And of course, like, I don't need any commentary on that.
That woman represents herself as a clown, right?
And yeah. And she is.
She's trying to be, she's trying to be on the Real Housewives of
some trashy neighborhood, whatever that is.
And she's not interested in being a serious person.
She doesn't have a serious point or a debate.
Oh, they never did. Oh, they do this.
And then you go and you watch the other lady who's older,
wiser, has experienced real loss and grief, who has a legitimate
message and is making articulate arguments against something that
is useless, which is gun control.
She makes the the clear argument that we always hear and it just
coming from a different source the the the source that if you
you're going to stereotype. Nope she's she's going to be a
black woman. She's going to be a hardcore
Democrat. She's going to be all about gun
control. Nope.
She made a very articulate great case that and coming from her
and I mean it's just reality it's from that source it it has
more impact emotionally if you're watching her say it
especially because she is actually experienced a loss.
The only thing that I would criticize and this is not on her
this is just on the messaging entirely is the the Republicans
of the conservatives the pro pro Second Amendment people always
make the case we need firearms for our our home defense to keep
our family safe. We need but we have a tradition
of hunting in our family. Nobody ever says what it's
really about, and that is I need this gun because the government
has this gun and the government will shoot me in the face if I
don't have this gun. And I want that to be
articulated just as well. And it's the thing that we've
taken as a message out of the Holocaust, like the places where
that doesn't happen is places like America.
So far, even with the creeping and the insidious police state
that we're dealing with, it continues to not be as
successful as it would otherwise be.
Because somewhere back in the mind of whoever it is, every, I
mean, you've been a guy on a SWAT team.
You've gone through a door. The probability that somebody on
the other side of that door has equal weaponry to what you have
and has the ability to buy body armor in the same way and
potentially even has better experience and tactics should
you decide to go after some somebody who spent, you know 20
years at war with our military. Like there's a real the near
peer argument as you were. You and I laughed.
About that just immediately thought of that.
The only time that they ever presented that was with the
Gretchen Whitmer case. But tell people what that is so
they understand. Yeah, they they they gave us a a
OPS briefing before we went out there.
And normally it's the 30,000 foot view on the case to show
you an arrest photo or driving driver's license photo of the
guy. They showed us videos of these
guys. They had equipment, they had
training, the training was legit.
Their firearms were everybody as good as ours.
And as it came to pass, that was because the FBI provided them
the training and the firearms and the equipment and the
transportation, all of that. And they described them as near
peer. And in that briefing room, it's
very locker room environment as the 2016 Trump campaign would
describe it. It's guys just smoking and
joking. And it was you could hear a pin
drop. People were like, oh, this is
serious. And it was described to us that
we might not win this fight. So we have to be really squared
away. That's a real possibility that
should give the government. The government should constantly
have that sense when they are going against citizens to to
inflict whatever it is they're doing, even if it's a
justifiable force. They should at least know that
they are dealing with citizens, Free people, not subjects, not
servants. And that's a big deal to me.
I think that's what keeps things fair and balanced and righteous
and and upright, is that the the arbitrary use of tyranny at
least has the possibility of some serious pushback,
particularly in this country. That's not common in other
countries. You're not going to see that in
Ireland. You're not going to see that in
England they don't have the same tradition of not hunting and
fishing. They don't have the same
tradition of kicking the hell out of the government that was
tyrannically overreaching and going after them and said, oh,
you want to shoot somebody in the face?
You want to kill Christmas addicts?
We're going to throw all the tea in the harbor.
And also we're going to kick your ass off this continent.
So goodbye. Oh, you're going to come back in
1812. We're going to do it again.
Both times. We almost lost, by the way.
We did, but there's that that Machisimo, I guess you describe
it. It's not really an American
term, but it's a frontier. Spirit.
Let's call it that, right? Like, it's the American spirit
of willing to do hard things and being comfortable with being
uncomfortable. Be yes, willing to be
inconvenienced. Willing to be uncomfortable.
Not a leisure pursuit. We just want to rock that.
That we could worship and have our families and play with our
guns. Leave us the heck alone.
Which is why I think most American men, sort of I have the
fantasy of I just want to live on a mountain somewhere and just
do those things and he said Steve.
Friends Steve Friend wants to live on a warm beach.
Because he doesn't. Like if we can put the mountain
into a tropical climate and not have it be a volcano, it's.
It's called Hawaii. Yeah, most of those are.
Dormant until they have volcano. You could live on a volcano.
You love that it would be warm all the time.
The heat would come from the ground and from the sun.
Perfect for your iguana type. There's all kinds of lizards.
You have a background in sales. Now I'm starting to really think
about it. He's thinking, hey, is there
they're they're communists out there.
Unfortunately in Hawaii, unfortunately for all of our
Hawaiian listeners, all three of you that wake up at whatever it
is 2:00 AM to listen to us. Sorry about that.
Let me let me add one more piece of serious, then we'll do one
more piece of levity. We'll end this thing right now.
Let's do Missouri versus Biden. Some of you guys are familiar
with this case. I'm actually going to be doing a
very long form version of this. I've been asked to guess Hope
Dinesh D'souza's podcast for the end of this year.
I'm going to do that. We're going to do a coverage of
this with my friend Tracy Beans. But let's just listen to the
absurdity of our federal government.
These are not serious people. Again, you heard a member of
Congress. Now you're going to hear the top
advocate, the assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights
Division, which is theoretically in the business of policing
violations of civil rights by other government entities.
That's their job and other people.
Obviously she doesn't even know what Missouri V Biden is.
So let's just hear this real quick.
I think Dan Bishop is shocked by this answer.
This is going to be video #5 Missouri versus Biden Case in
the District Court, the court explained.
Quote, if the allegations made by the plaintiffs are true, the
present case arguably involves the most massive attack on free
speech in United States history. close quote.
Court went on to find that the plaintiffs were reasonably
likely to succeed on the merit at trial entered the preliminary
injunction. The 5th Circuit has affirmed
Supreme Court has taken jurisdiction of the case.
Course, that's all civil litigation is any criminal
investigation or prosecution of the persons responsible for that
activity in the FBI, CISA and at the White House and their Co
conspirators underway in the Civil Rights Division.
Congressman, I'm I'm not familiar with this litigation,
but happy to bring your question back.
Thank you. So let me just make sure I
understand that you are not aware of the Missouri versus
Biden litigation that is currently being taken up by the
United States Supreme Court, Is that correct?
Unfortunately, I'm I'm not Congressman.
Assuming not assuming that you're not aware of that, what
what reason would there be that the Civil Rights Division of the
Justice Department's leader is unaware of what a United States
District Court has described as the most massive attack on free
speech in the United States history?
If, if, if you could share more of the facts, that could be
helpful, Congressman. Otherwise, you're just you just
don't know. Is that correct that that's
correct? Unfortunately, I'm this does not
appear to be a case that I'm familiar with.
Does not appear to be a case that I'm familiar with Steve
Friend. What are the two possibilities
that she's not familiar with this?
There's like basically two that Garrett laid out the other day.
Willful ignorance or so. Incompetence.
I would call that. Yeah or yeah, Incompetence or
stupidity? I think she's incompetence or?
Or she's lying. Yeah, she's lying.
But I mean, I believe her. You 1000% believe her.
She's a communist. Communist.
And the communist will use the levers of power, the DOJ, to
reward their friends and punish their enemies.
And this is not going to cross this.
This is not going to come across her desk on the on the ticker.
She's not going to have that conveyor belt with that
particular case. The thing is, is that she should
have her emails subpoenaed. Not FOIA, but subpoenaed by this
committee, and they should determine that she doesn't know
it. And if she's incompetent enough
not to know about the single biggest violation of American
free speech civil liberties in history, then she should lose
her job and never be hired again as an attorney for incompetence.
And if she lied and she was familiar with this and she
perjured herself, then she should go to jail.
Yes, I feel about that. She should go to jail for
perjury or she should be prosecuted for violating civil
rights. Conspiracy.
Conspiracy to to violate liberties.
Oh, kind of like Douglas Mackie. Yeah, I mean this this no
different than what I was saying with the Josh Hawley in
statement that he made to Christopher Wray.
He was saying, have you fired anyone?
I was like have you prosecuted anyone?
That's a that's a civil rights violation, that's a color of law
violation. Anyone associated with that
document should be prosecuted. Color of law means that you
represent an authority that you don't have, and you do so under
your official capacity as a government employee.
I agree with you. Color of law.
Like I said, we sew it all up. We're sewing these things all
together. You guys are not watching.
I'm doing the sewing thing on our I don't know what the sewing
thing looks like. My daughters are better at that.
I got one thing to take you guys into the weekend with a little
bit of fun. I hate to be a downer and let
you know that our federal government is entirely corrupt
and stupidity and all your neighbors are too, because
you're not. You have neighbors that are
brilliant and funny, and some of them are not even people that
would otherwise necessarily agree with you, but they are pot
smokers with great thoughts. This guy, I think his name his
his handle on on TikTok is like smoking and thinking something
that affect. I got the impression that he's
vaping maybe something with marijuana in it.
I don't care. This is brilliant.
Steve. I'll get a cold reaction from
you and this you may have already seen it.
Let's go ahead and run our final video of the day folks and we
will close it out with this this is going to be and this video.
Hold on now, I've cheated up. This video is going to be
brought to you by the A Boyle family sweatshop, The Dash
suspendables.com, of which I'm wearing the night OPS PT shirt.
We're going to get some of those for Dan Bongino, producer who
sent me a picture of himself at the gym yesterday.
Kind of amusing and interesting. Go to thedashsuspendables.com.
thedashsuspendables.com. Use promo code Kyle again.
Always easy. You save yourself a couple
bucks, you can keep the sweatshop burning.
There it is. There's the website.
There's the logo. You know you've arrived the
right one if you put a dash between the and suspendables.
O'boyle is out of town, but we'll keep those going.
OK? Brought to you by the O'boyle
family sweatshop is this moment of levity they used to do.
The moment of Zen on Comedy Central where they would show
the guy getting his head squashed.
This is a moment of levity going into the Weekend Play.
Video #3, Video #3. My pronouns aren't preferred.
They are mandatory. OK, how the fuck am I supposed
to know when I'm only meeting someone on the go and I'm not
allowed to guess by how they look or how they dress or by
what they got? That's going on below.
See, on this topic, I'm a little Gray.
When meeting someone knew, what do I say 'cause if I have to
start or talk asking if you have a cock, then you're not my kind
of person anyway. And just one more little thing
before I'm gone. Respect is earned.
It's not demanded in a song. If you want to be a She or a day
Is or AZ, good for you, but you can't make me play along.
Steve, what do you think? I think he needs to be a
kindergarten teacher, that I would much rather have my child
go to his class then that person that preceded him.
I'd rather have a guy who day drinks on the subway and uses
the word cock appropriately, like that guy just did, to
explain how gender works. Then have that weird nose ring,
tranny person go do whatever the hell we just saw with the clap,
clap, Say my pronouns and they're mandatory, by the way.
They're only mandatory if you can make them mandatory.
Which, again, that's why we have the Second Amendment.
Come, come and force your pronouns, please.
Yeah. Yeah, come and take my pronouns
exactly. I I mean good on him.
I think he would. He would be an excellent nursery
school teacher. He would definitely have the
nice rhyme section, have everybody sit crisscross
applesauce. Can he?
Can he vape while he's talking to?
Him. Hey, man, it's.
We're in a we're in an era of moral decline, so our our
thresholds are lower than they would otherwise be like.
When we Yeah, I mean, look, it's it's first things here that's
like #666 on my list of concerns at school.
It's so low on the on this thing, there's just no reason to
worry about it. Anyway, folks, if you want to
see where that video is, if you want your own copy of you want
to share it. I actually put it in my Twitter
timeline. I retweeted a guy whose name is
Tim on point. He's a former Navy SEAL and his
comment on that was You Magnificent Bastard, which made
me smile. And then I went and watched it
and it made me smile even more. And then I've even listened to
that while I was in the shower, 'cause I was taking a shower,
listening like, you know, cleaning my hair along with it.
It's a great rhyme. I think it's pretty fun.
Sometimes you need to fight fire with fire or nursery rhymes with
nursery rhymes. So there it is, Steve Friend,
tell people what you got going on and where they can follow
you. Are you are you going to be
doing tomorrow? Are you doing a podcast
tomorrow? Oh, we're doing a podcast
tomorrow American Radicals Podcast on Rumble 12 Noon.
Be there. We're going to be talking about
our addiction to comfort. And we're going to be doing
Tuesday, Thursday, Saturdays at noon.
So I encourage everybody do that.
The Amrad Pod. You can follow me on social at
Real Steve Friend on X, at Real Under Score Steve Friend on True
Social. Kaboom and your book is still
for sale. People can stalking stuff it.
You can still grab it. It's still on Amazon.
They have all the remaining books that are in print.
How many do they have out there? You think enough.
Yeah. There's enough for now.
All right, folks, order them out.
Make them. Make them do another print of
it. Thanks for joining me today,
Steve Friend. Really appreciate it, buddy.
Good seeing you. It was nice talking to you
again, folks. Check out the Amrad pod.
That's rumble.com/AM RADPOD. Amrad pod.
You can find that tomorrow they're going to start uploading
it to all the places where they have audio.
So if you're listening to us on any of the Apple or the Spotify,
iHeartRadio and so on, you'll be able to find the same things
there. Let's do rumble rants first.
We're really grateful for all of you guys.
I saw a couple of them kind of tickling through the through the
live chat. So Ryan, if you want to throw
some of them, Ryan's got to go find him now cup of Joe said
liberals blaming hammers, a tool a vehicle for a person's crime
is really stupid. Dan Bongino is correct.
Liberals arguments are really dumb.
Or you could go with what Reagan said, which is to say that it's
not that they don't know anything.
Is that what they know is just not So that's a maybe a more
nice regular way to do attack penis with a with a comment on.
Do the government stormtrooper agencies realize that the
deplorable have a large number of individuals who just spent
two decades learning guerrilla warfare.
Do they indeed? I don't know, but they should.
There are an awful lot of boot boot on the ground and door
kicking types and people that have done very uncomfortable
things professionally on purpose.
Check that out. And Tech P also really liked my
dollar store Cardi B, although he called her dollar store
Carnegie, which is even funnier in some ways.
Can't get mad about that. Anything else we need to cover
down on? We can go to a five star.
One more coming up, one more coming up.
A couple more. Our buddy Eric.
Jason who you can follow at Eric Jason JASONJASON.
There's no E in there. Eric Jason.
You can find him on True Social. He runs R Suspendables group
there said smash the like button, do not comply.
God wins. Hold the room down while I'm
gone. I'm going to work.
I kind of loved Eric. Eric comes in here like it's his
job and he gets people whipped up.
If you guys, somebody said it on on Twitter earlier, they said
you, you come for the show but you stay for the chat.
If you haven't joined our live chat on Rumble, you're missing
out on a really great fun thing. The stuff that I see that runs
in there is equally funny and and great commentary as well.
And Chad Zodi with the last one saying suspendables have all the
candor. Yeah, of course.
That's why we don't have a job. That's why we don't work at the
FBI anymore. The candor is what gets you
kicked out. If you tell him the truth,
you're done. All right, let's do a five star
review from from Apple folks. We really do appreciate all of
you guys doing these things. We've cleared the 525I think we
picked up five or six yesterday. Some of the shows that have been
around for for years literally don't have as many as we do
clearing this number. So let's check this guy out.
This one says that this is coming from Lee T Francis.
November 28th. Keep the faith.
I've only recently discovered this podcast.
I think it's one of the most outstanding and honest shows in
this space because it's a podcast.
Because of this podcast, I found patriots like Steve Friend and
Garrett O'boyle. His show is one of the few must
watch shows that I found. God bless and thank you for your
work. Well, I really do appreciate.
That's really thoughtful. I'm glad that we are exposing
people like Steve to you, like Garrett to you, Some of my great
people that I've seen in my life.
And and I'm glad you guys get to see them too.
I always get a comment after I do one with Garrett.
O'boyle. My dad always says he loves
them. So that's it.
I'm really grateful for Steve joining me.
I'm grateful for you joining me. I hope you guys have a wonderful
weekend. I hope you're safe.
I hope you are reflective. I hope you have a prayerful day
and that we will see you again on Monday morning for another
Kyle Seraphin Show. Be safe out there folks.
It's getting weird and you guys know it.
See you soon. Thanks for listening to The Kyle
Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth,
Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.