Are you familiar with FBI Special Agents Kyle Serpent?
I'm familiar with the name. Is that?
Yes, I'm familiar with the name, familiar with the name, familiar
with the name. Let's bring in Kyle Serafin.
He's the FBI. Whistleblower who helped expose
government censorship of our First Amendment rights.
Now, we only have this memo because a recently suspended FBI
agent called Kyle Serafin brought it to the public, and
we're grateful that he did. Kyle, thank you so much for
joining us tonight. He's the host of something that,
strangely, is called the Kyle Serafish.
Kyle Serafi, I can't thank you enough for speaking out.
I knew you guys were out there and I knew it was just a matter
of time. But you got a lot of guts put in
your face and your name to this. You're doing a service on behalf
of the American people. And from the bottom of my
cracked and broken heart sometimes, thank you very much.
Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower and
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello, my friends, welcome
to the Kyle Seraphin show. I don't know why I'm holding
back a grin, but I am. Today is Wednesday, it is
October the 16th, and we are live.
So thank you so much for joining us, all of you in the live chats
in the various places that you join us.
Really appreciate that today is one of those shows that I'd
rather not have to do, but I think it's necessary.
And I apologize upfront for those of you that are watching
this for the sort of salacious thumbnail, martial law, the
title, It conjures up all kinds of images.
And I don't know how to talk about this without sort of at
least laying that part on the table.
I don't want you to think that we're going to be disingenuous,
but I do think that people on the political right right now
are farming outrage in the same way that they always do, which
is to say the government's coming to kill you.
And that's not exactly the correct answer.
That doesn't mean that I think the government is good.
You guys know better than that. And it doesn't mean that the
government is a good answer and that it's a good actor.
So those things we could just throw out the window as well.
But we should have a little bit of nuance when we approach
things like deadly force and talk about these things in that
way. So we're going to approach this
like the serious topic it is today.
I want to talk about the the updated DoD directives
indicating that there is now this new authorization for
deadly force on US soil. And I don't want to give away
too much of it, but I've gone and looked into it and I don't
have the fear factor that other people do.
And it's possibly because I went and looked at the second
document that the primary document references.
And that's really important. This is actually a continuation
and a normalization of something that was in conflict previously.
It's still not good for our domestic troops, domestically
based troops to be engaged in law enforcement activities.
But we're sort of used to the idea of quote UN quote, call out
the National Guard, OK? We are used to that idea.
And most of you are not going to be freaked out by the idea of
saying, hey, we've got riots in Minnesota, let's call out the
National Guard. We have riots going on in
Washington, DC, let's call out the National Guard.
Those are DoD assets. They may answer to the states,
but this is not something completely new.
There's a reason why I'm more concerned about people like the
FBI because they always have this authority granted to them
and they walk around with it at all times.
Usually what you don't see is the military involved in law
enforcement, and I think it's a wrong use of the military.
There's a huge historical precedent for that.
We're going to get into all that.
I also want to coat and touchback.
We're going to run back and hit the bases because do you
remember how much has happened in the last couple weeks?
We were just talking about a dockworker strike the other day.
I went back and updated the YouTube page with some of the
thumbnails that were out there, and there are an awful lot of
crazy stories that have happened, so we're going to
touch that. I'm also going to get a little
bit personal. I hope you don't mind, but my
friend Gerardo Boyle just went head to head with the federal
government in federal court yesterday in Washington, DC.
And we're going to talk a little bit about what the deep state
actually looks like. Because the evil garbage that
populate the US court systems are a real problem for Americans
and for American Civil Liberties.
Before we get too deep into the weeds, I'm going to go ahead and
let you know that we pay the bills by recommending products
to you that I think are useful. You guys might as well start
thinking about it in a big way. And if you watch this program,
you don't even need an answer this question.
I already know it. But if you think this country is
going the right direction, you're probably not paying
attention. Does it feel like things are
falling apart? If you're feeling alarmed,
obviously you're not alone. And if you're watching this
program, you're not alone as well.
In fact, many Americans from all walks of life have decided to
take action, to pursue and to prepare for whatever's coming.
That starts with emergency food. Storing emergency food in your
home is the right thing to do. It's what we do with the
Seraphin household because we're living in these wild times.
They're unexpected, they have chaos, which is why so many
people are preparing. You can get ready as well with a
three month emergency food kit from My Patriot Supply.
It comes with all kinds of different foods from creamy
stroganoff, honey, wheat bread, mushroom rife, peel off.
I don't know why I always have a hard time saying that one, but I
really do. Maybe it's because mushrooms
aren't my jam. The entire kid has over 2000
calories every single day. The food will last for up to 25
years. Who knows what this country's
going to look like in 25 years. God, I could not have predicted
it 25 years ago, but if that day comes, you're going to be ready.
Go ahead and go to prepare like kyle.com.
Check it out. It's what we did.
Prepare like kyle.com. Order your three month emergency
food kit. Prepare like kyle.com.
Check them out. My Patriot Supply folks, it's
the one that we have stacked up. We have an entire coat closet
full of their buckets and then another half of it is filled
with food with with water to purify.
You got to make sure you're ready for this kind of
weirdness. It'll also make you feel less
anxious and it'll make you less concerned about the weird stuff.
Now, I promise you, we're going to touch base on some older
stories and we're going to start with that right here.
Documents show What is this article from?
What is the name of this article?
The Rhode Island, the Rhode Island current OK documents show
lavish spending on pay and benefits for officials at the
dock Workers Union. You remember those a holes that
wanted to hold the United States hostage like a bunch of
mafiosos, The ILA, the International Longshoremen's
Association, they got their deal that they wanted a 60% pay raise
over a period of five years, and they haven't approved it yet.
As far as we know. They've got a little bit of time
to do that, but this is just another little touch because I
saw this this morning. It's only a couple days old.
Some of the things in here are truly staggering, and they
probably should be staggering to the people that work in the
longshore business. I had some of you reach out and
tell me, Kyle, you don't know what you're talking about when
it comes to unions #1 yes, I do. Let me just stop you right
there. I've had unions as clients and
I've spent time around people that are actually in not the
part of the union that you know, where you're the daily laborer
or the person who is getting the benefits of the union argument.
I've seen it from the political side of it, which is where the
money is, which is why these things are a such a massive
grift. There was a three day dockworker
stike. We'll just go ahead and touch
base with that story. They threatened to stall the
American economy in a dramatic fashion.
They were 45,000 East Coast longshoremen who were in there
interested in the the pay hikes and they basically didn't stand
to collect a 60% pay hike between now and 2030.
That's the tentative deal. It lifts the top pay to $45.00
an hour next year, which means that people working just the 40
hour week, which they don't usually do, would make $93,000 a
year. That's not a bad salary working
on it. Even in the East Coast, you can
get away with it. I lived in Virginia on way less
than that, and we had a home and we had kids, all the normal
things, and we had a vehicle. All right.
But here's the thing that I thought was really wild.
In 2023 alone, top executives we touched about Harold Daggett's
dollar amounts. It's not just that one guy.
It's also nepotism, OK? In, in 2023 alone, 30 top
executives within the union classified as working for the
headquarters unit were paid more than $9 million in total salary
and compensation. That's 25 vice presidents with
an annual pay reaching $554,000 a year.
So it's always about that top little percentage that makes the
big money. And the part that I threw on
the, on the the screen here is the most staggering part of it.
We've gotten the indication that he'd made at least like maybe
$900,000 in the last couple years.
Apparently he was making $855,261.00 for his leadership
duties for the union. That's the 70 something year old
man who's out there with the gold chain and wearing the polo
shirt. But he was additionally paid
194, a $194,155 as the quote UN quote president emeritus, like a
figurehead position. He made $194,000 of the union
locals money. They paid him simply for being
who he was, 1,000,000 bucks a year.
It's good work if you can get it.
This is the crazy part of how unions work.
And then additionally because why would you let that go to
waste? His son was paid $785,877,
almost almost 800 grand a year for his dual leadership roles in
the local that his dad is getting an additional 200,000
from and his executive vice president job.
And then another son John Daggett was paid 642,000 and
change for his 2 executive positions.
What they talk about in this article is that many of these
people hold multiple executive positions and get the full
salary for both. That's what the the mob tactics
look like. That's where this thing, this
nepoteptic garbage is. And the and not to be left out,
his daughter is also the public affairs director and makes
$210,000 a year for the same union.
So the man has not just brought himself into a position of
making 1,000,000 bucks a year, he's bringing in his children.
This is the definition of corruption.
That's what it looks like. It's no different than what we
we yell about with Joe Biden. So if you are a union member and
you're crying about people being mad about unions, it's because
we see the corruption when we open our eyes and look for it.
And if you're a union member and you're a conservative, the odds
are your union is probably supporting things that are
antithetical to your political beliefs.
They are extorting you for money out of every paycheck.
They're giving some moderate benefit maybe, which you may or
may not get from the federal government anyway, because
there's all kinds of stupid pro union and pro labor stuff that
goes on when it really should be an open marketplace.
And you're seeing big, big, big business money and big dollars
that are given to political parties that you don't like and
then also scumbags like this. And if you think somebody's
worth 1,000,000 bucks a year that you couldn't get someone to
do the same job for 200 grand, I think you're out of your damn
mind. And he's been paying off his
kids. Like you're talking what,
$2,000,000 worth of salaries just for a couple of members of
the same family that basically are doing nothing, some of those
jobs literally doing nothing. It's wild to me.
Anyway, I didn't want to let that one go.
Another thing popped up today that I think is touching base
with some older stories. It's so funny how some of these
names continue to pop up. And if you guys have been
following politics for the last couple years, what you see is
the same evil actors tend to raise their evil heads at the
same time for the same types of things.
How about this story? Georgia's controversial hand
count law was blocked by a judge.
It's too much too late. The judge highlighted the
already heightened division in the election season.
This story coming from ABC News. And you think, wait a minute,
What's controversial about a triple checking hand count law
in a state where they were all these questions about election
integrity? OK, who is this judge is what it
comes down to for me. This is what he wrote.
Because the hand count rule is too much, too late.
It's enforcement is thereby enjoined while the court
considers its merits. So wrote Judge Robert Mcburney
last night in his order that suspended this rule where we
heard that name, Mcburney, before.
It sounds so familiar. Oh yeah, he was the guy that
said that the Georgia abortion law that the people, the
representatives in the State House wanted to push out there.
Remember the representative said that the there's going to be a
six week heartbeat bill in Georgia.
That's what the people elected them to do and that's what they
went and decided to put out. He said women's body are not
Community property. Same guy.
He's decided to suspend that rule.
He was overturned by the Supreme Court of Georgia.
We just covered that. And who is he?
He's also the guy that helped him panel the grand jury that
indicted Donald Trump on that farcical stuff that was going on
with Fanny and Nathan Wade. This is a Fulton County judge
who apparently cannot help himself by weighing in on
political stuff. And again, as we just said, he
said that the idea of hand counting, which is basically the
most non technologically advanced thing that you can do,
counting it by hand, something they've done for all of American
history until very recently, that's too much.
But I do tend to agree with him. It's too little too late in some
ways. We should, we should hold these
politicians accountable. They decided to do a
controversial hand count law, which is not controversial.
That's just ABC editorializing in the headline.
They decided to do a hand count law and they passed it weeks
before the election. Are we out of our flippin minds?
This is why I keep telling you I don't expect to see anything
fair. There's no reason.
Nothing has changed. The mechanisms have not changed,
and I think I covered it yesterday, but I'm going to do
it one more time because it's worth, and it bears repeating,
The way that these things can be manipulated has been sort of
shared to me in some ways. We're just seeing some reporting
from our friend Brianna Morello talking about how the FBI is not
going to investigate fraud. We already knew that, but that
was going back to 2020 and people who brought that up
within the FBI, my old agency, the place where I was working,
Washington Field office, they actually removed people that had
questions about election integrity.
They're fine with going after people that are suppressing the
vote like that's actually happening like some sort of Jim
Crow style poll taxes being pushed down on black people,
which is essentially what they're trying to act like.
The the suppression of the vote is the interest of DOJ, but
defrauding the electors that actually live underneath the
system is not interesting to them at all.
And theoretically the DOJ and by extension the FBI would be the
ones who would do it. The way that it works
mechanically, as it's been explained to me, and it makes
perfect sense, is they have complete voter rolls.
They know who votes and who doesn't vote, and by the time
the polls close on any Election Day, whenever they do, they can
basically already see who has not voted.
And then they can generate from that pool of non voters votes
that go in the favor of the preferred candidate.
Because it's done in the computer.
It could be flipped like this. And then because we have this
new ridiculous expectation that they're going to take their time
and give us days, if not weeks of counting to be able to
certify the election, they have all the time in the world to
generate those fake ballots. And those fake ballots, they
can't be hand counted, at least not in Georgia.
And they often times won't even be shown.
They'll be kept under lock and key.
And the forensic audit is being turned down because the people
who control the state also control whether or not there's
going to be funding for this forensic investigation after the
fact. And the DOJ has already agreed
they're not going to get into it.
That's what the mechanism of theft would look like.
And that makes perfect sense to me.
I don't have the evidence of it. I know people claim they do.
I don't doubt them. I just haven't evaluated it.
But what I can tell you is, is that we have not seen serious
action on behalf of the red states that out there or the
swing states to actually fortify these elections against this
fraud. And you've also seen the
mainstream media pushing as hard as humanly possible against any
efforts. They are backing the government.
You remember when they used to talk about holding the powerful
to account and speaking truth to power and all this other kind of
nonsensical, you know, leftist ideas, They abandoned those
immediately when the government actually is giving their
preferred outcome. Here's Jake Tapper trying to
enforce this idea that they are removing people from the roles
that are not, you know, that are that that should be voters or
should at least be allowed to be considered voters in Virginia.
And Glenn Younkin basically straightening this guy out
because non citizens are not allowed to vote.
And if you indicate you're not a citizen, that's it.
That's the end of the game. Meanwhile, California still has
me on their voter rolls. And the last time I voted in the
California election was 2008. I've lived in I think 5 states
since then. I've registered to vote five
different times and I'm only registered to a vote in Texas
and in California and I haven't lived in California since O 9.
I moved out in June of O9 when I enlisted.
For whatever it's worth, some states really really want to
preserve those those voter rolls.
And some states are really good about purging them.
It turns out it's a one to one comparison.
The ones that want to preserve ridiculously long term voter
rolls, like New York. My wife found she was registered
in New York as well after she's lived in five different states.
This is what goes on the blue states.
Hold on to those extras so that maybe Kyle Seraphin will vote
for their preferred candidate. If they need more elections, if
they need more ballots to stack up.
That's the only way I can. I can fathom it.
And there's no good reason why you would make me sign a sworn
affidavit and have to go and swear it out in front of a judge
that I no longer live in California and spend money and
time when every other state has figured out how to just reverse
it. The minute somebody registers
for for the election in the state of Texas, they send it out
and I'm no longer registered in New Mexico.
The end. That's it.
It just takes one time. Same thing in Virginia,
automatic. And I checked it.
The only one I can't get out is California.
And for all of you that keeps sending me like, oh, go to this
link, go to this link. None of these things should have
to happen. It shouldn't take any additional
work. They already actually said, per
their own guidelines, that after the third presidential election
cycle, I'm automatically purged from it.
I've gone through three and I'm not purged from it.
So I'm just telling you, it's very obvious to me that
California has this corrupted system.
Here's Glen Younkin talking about it and fighting back
against CNN. Because we have to fight to just
get honest answers out there against the media who
theoretically are in the business of answers, but we know
better. Why not just honor that 90 day
period? Well, let me just first begin.
It's anything but a purging program.
It begins with someone identifying themselves as a non
citizen. And I guess I would pause it
back to you. Do you think that non citizens
when they've had self identified as a non citizen should stay on
the voter roll and therefore be in a position to potentially
vote in a presidential? I don't.
Think I don't. I don't think any non citizen
should vote. How are they self identifying?
How does that happen? They actually tick a box that
says I am a non citizen or they do not answer the question that
they are a citizen and therefore they self identify that they are
not a citizen in the United States of America.
And This is why this is so out of bounds in my mind from the
Justice Department. They fully understand this.
They understand the process starts with a person self
identifying as a non citizen and then there is a match with that
person's name on the voter rolls.
And they are given not just one, but up to three times in order
to try to cure it. And This is why I find this to
be a very, very unreal moment. That is stunning that they filed
this suit 20 five days before a presidential election, when in
fact this has been going on in accordance with our
Constitution, the federal Constitution and state law since
2006. And there it is.
Look at that shocked face. Jake Tapper's like, Oh my
goodness, is that true? This can't be right.
The DOJ would never do something weaponized to go out there and
get a political outcome. And yet that's what they do.
Of course it's what they do. I want to show you another
video. This is the other piece of it.
Not only are these people in here and self identifying as not
voters, they're also just running around doing things like
Donald Trump keeps talking about, Like there's a lot of
these people that came in to be criminals.
He just sat down with an Economic Forum in Chicago was
talking about there's like a half million people that are
identified as criminals that have come in, in the 111520
million illegals that have rolled into this country.
We know that. It makes sense to me.
I've seen it, folks. I've seen that a percentage, and
I don't know how big the percentage is, but it's a
sizable percentage, a real whole number percentage of people that
sneak into this country illegally, do things against the
law. They don't come here with our
values and our morals. They don't come here with any
understanding of what is the law.
And if they didn't understand it, they're simply going to
flout it. And here's a great example of
how that happens. New York City, apparently people
are now starting to get fed up. Are they still going to vote
Democrat? Probably.
Is this a direct problem because they have a sanctuary city
situation going on? Yeah, it is.
It's not going to change the way they vote.
For some reason. They're just going to complain
about it. But here's what good day, New
York. Shocked that criminals who broke
the law coming into this country would come and do criminal
things in the United States, flouting all of our criminal
laws. And then because they have
really, really bad policies, they're let out on the streets
to do it again. Think about a string of 50
robberies. This is going to be good.
This is Trans de Agua again. This is the the exciting
Venezuelan gang. That is the flavor of the month
right now. It used to be MS13.
They're still there. They still suck.
They're still doing illegal things.
They're still like terrorizing people that moved here
illegally. I'll talk about that more in
just one second. Watch this video.
What started out as a robbery crew, upwards of 50 robberies,
20 individuals arrested for upwards of 50 robberies with an
out of those 20 individuals, every single one of them is on
the streets today. So it's crazy.
Now there are reports that they're operating the Roosevelt
Hotel, which used to be a very nice hotel in New York City.
Now it's a migrant shelter. How what?
What are we talking about? What's going on inside this
hotel that is now spilling out into the Times Square area?
Yeah. I mean, there's actually a
recruitment process and there's a recruitment process within
these things. You've centralized all the
people. Then they can go, they can pick
up folks to be part of the gang. They can pick up people that
don't want to be part of the gang.
They can add people into the trafficking operations.
This is how it usually works. What we would see is like 1615
year old girls would be hanging out with their 1615 year old
girlfriends. The one of those friends is a
runaway, the other one is aspiring runaway.
They want to run away from their family because it sucks because
their family is here illegally and living in a house that has
like, I don't know, 40 or 50 guys in it.
And it's probably really threatening.
So they're like, hey, come out and hang out with my friends who
all just happened to be MS13. Fill in the blank gang, could be
any part of it. And so the 16 year old girl goes
and hangs out with a friend, meets the gang members and the
gang members are like, hey, you want to join the gang?
And she's like, yeah, I guess I do.
That's, that's cool. That's literally how this stuff
goes down. That's what the recruitment
looks like for women. And then a couple days later
she's like, I, I don't think I want to do this.
And then they beat the hell out of her and then they rape her.
And then they continue to traffic her, which means being
raped anywhere from 5 to 20 times a day on a filthy mattress
in the woods somewhere in Maryland, just outside of DC in
Virginia. Take your pick.
These things happen. And that girl is basically going
to be living in a living hell for the rest of either her short
life or until she's rescued by law enforcement.
Generally, the short life action, that's mostly what
happens. That's what quote UN quote
trafficking, which is a really nice term that we have looks
like. And it happens because you
brought these scumbags into this country and you're really soft
on them and you allow them to be a crew that does 50 robberies in
New York City and they're still back out on the streets.
It's the reason why things like deadly force are really
important because these people don't want to lose that money
stream and they're armed with knives and machetes and baseball
bats. And every one of those things
could do significant damage to you.
Before we get into a discussion of deadly force, which I will
show you, I will lead up to it with a video that we saw the
other day came out of Virginia of all places.
I want to do kind of an analysis of some deep state evil.
I don't know these people personally, but this woman and
this man now on the screen are the folks that are overseeing.
Well, let me be real specific. The woman is the judge who is
listening to Gerardo Boyle's court case in the District of
DC. Her name is Florence Y Pan PAN
and her husband is also pictured and his name is Max Stier St.
i.e. R.
Now, the reason they're interesting to me is because
she's hearing a court case in the District of DC of a
plaintiff who is suing the Department of Justice and the
FBI for illegal employment practices.
This is a simple employment thing.
The FBI acted in a way that is not allowed to act.
Why did I bring the two of them up?
Here's what Wikipedia has 'cause she has a Wikipedia page, she's
filled in the judgeship that was vacated by Katenji Jackson
Browne, who was elevated to the Supreme Court.
She is now the judge that backfilled that position.
But I always find it interesting when someone is in a federal
judge position and then you go find out what do they do for a
living? Obviously, they didn't just
spring out of the the Prairie grasses.
So who is this lady? She graduated from law school.
She began to clerk in the Southern District of New York.
So she worked for a judge, OK. Then she worked for another
judge in the US Appeals for the Second Circuit, OK.
And then she went to DOJ as a Bristow Fellow in the Office of
the Solicitor General. She worked there for two years
as an attorney in the Appellate section of the Criminal Division
from 96 to 98. So from 1995 to 1998, she was
working in the Justice Department, the DOJ, you know,
the people that are actually defending against the court case
that Gerardo Boyle brought. And then she went to the
Department of Treasury, first as a senior advisor to the
Secretary on Financial Markets, and then she moved as a senior
advisor to the Under Secretary for Domestic Finance.
That's a couple years. And then from 99 to 2009, she
served as a line prosecutor for the United States.
Here it is. This is the DOJ.
It's the United States office of the, I'm sorry, United States
Attorney's Office for the state, for the District of Columbia.
That's the Matthew Graves currently, that's who is the
current US attorney for the District of DC.
So she spent 10 years as a federal prosecutor and then she
was the deputy chief of the appellate Section.
So still working for DOJ, she was the deputy chief, which
means she was still a, a USA of sorts.
She's working as a like a higher prosecutor for another two
years. All right.
And now she's the judge that is overseeing the case that the
United States attorney's offices and the the DOJ and the FBI, the
people that she used to work with.
She's literally seeing a case where her former buddies and the
her former employer is the defendant and that's not
considered a conflict of interest.
What about her husband? He's interesting.
There's some stuff about here. The thing that I found most
interesting, I included his early life and education.
They both have Wikipedia pages, so you can just look this stuff
up open source. This is something that's in his
early life and education. I'm, I'm not making this up.
I'm going to read it directly. While attending Yale University,
Steyer allegedly saw Brett Kavanaugh, now Supreme Court
Justice, now an associate justice on the Supreme Court,
with his pants down at a drunken dorm party where friends push
Kavanaugh's penis into the hands of a female student.
That is on his official, like, open source Wikipedia page.
Can we just take a moment? He graduated from Yale in 1987
and so sometime before 1987, he was apparently at a dorm room
party and saw Brett Kavanaugh, who he recognized when he was
elevated to the Supreme Court under Donald Trump.
Like in what, 2018? How many years is that?
97, 2007, 30 something years later, he recognized that Brett
Kavanaugh is the man that he saw with his pants down as a child,
as a like a like a 19 or a 20 year old young man.
That must be some penis, don't you think?
Folks, I hate to say that over and over again, but it's really
funny to me. How impressive would a penis
have to be that you remember it 30 something years later from a
drunken dorm party and you know whose it was?
That's really something. That's Max Steyer.
Yeah. None of you believe it either.
Obviously I don't. In 1982, he worked for a
Republican and their staff. This is before he went to to
Yale. I don't know, like all this
stuff is crazy to me. And then they don't list it on
his career here, but he was the general counsel.
He was the general counsel for Housing and Urban Development.
How do I know that? Because I have his political
donations, which you're going to be shocked to find out that even
though he worked for Republicans and congressmen at one point,
they're all Democrats. He was also given a $25 million
grant to start up a not-for-profit that was supposed
to grab capable young people and recruit them into government
service. And the $25 million grant was
given by another DOJ veteran who worked under Democrats in the
DOJ. They now have, like, something
upwards of $50 million in their endowment.
So he worked in a private law school or law firm in 95.
And his law firm also made him part of the Bill Clinton defense
team during the Clinton Lewinsky scandal.
It's these names that just keep popping up that you've never
heard of before. This is why I think it's very
interesting. And yes, that's his home address
on there. No big deal.
He put it out there. It's public record.
This is coming directly from the Fe CS government website, Obama
for America. They gave 1010 bucks for some
reason. He gave $1000.
Then he gave like a $10 donation.
I don't know why you do that. He lists, of course, his actual
job, Partnership for public service.
Both of them have been giving to Democrats before they realized
that they had to probably keep that thing under wraps.
We've got 2000 in the year 2000. They gave a little bit of money
he did to the DNC in 2000. What is that for Florence, who
is, oh, Boyle's judge gave money to John Kerry's presidential
campaign and then they gave money to Obama in 08/07 and 08.
So there you go. These are the kind of people
that totally don't have any any conflict of interest and they're
allowed to decide cases between private citizens that have a
problem with their government, even though they used to spend
their entire life working for the government and currently do,
and their buddies still work there.
Now this kind of stuff is what basic corruption looks like.
And meanwhile, while all that's going on, we have Kamala Harris
talking to Charlemagne, a radio host in New York, about how
Donald Trump is actually a fascist.
I'm going to break down again what I think fascism actually
is. Before we do that, let me just
say an appreciation to our friends that are not fascist and
they are not under the government thumb.
They are patriot coolers. You can go to
theirwebsite@patriotcoolers.com. They have released a
suspendables collection. It's listed as the Kyle Serafin
collection. But you guys know that the brand
represents more than just me. And it represents my buddy
Gerardo Boyle, who was just in court yesterday.
It represents Steve Friend who is now without a job simply
because he's part of our team and he won't bow to left or
right. You guys can quite simply go to
patriotcoolers.com, use promo code Kyle.
The link is in the description. It'll take you directly to our
little collection of all the tumblers.
They're pre set up so you don't have to be a graphic designer.
It's a one click add to cart. You can buy it and just add that
promo code Kyle to save yourself 10%.
You get 10% off. If you get more than one, you'll
probably end up with free shipping because anything over
50 bucks is free shipping. They're competitively priced to
the other stuff in the market. If you guys don't have the money
to buy it, don't buy it because you're just like trying to
please me. But if you want something, if
you're in the market right now to replace a Tumblr or a cooler,
if you want to use one like we do everyday in the back of our
minivan when we go shopping, check them out, Patriot
coolers.com promo code Kyle. They've been with us for what,
18 months now? They're fantastic.
And I use them literally every single day.
Here's what fascism looks like. That's when the government comes
in and tells private businesses how to work.
You know, like the Biden Harris administration has been doing
the censorship apparatus. We've heard it from her mouth.
We've heard it from the surrogates in the Clintons.
We've heard it from all these people that they think private
businesses, which they kept touting private businesses to do
what they want, except that they've got some like government
agents in there recruiting sources and trying to tell them,
hey, this looks like it's probably a violation of your
terms of service. We know that guys like Elvis
Chan in the San Francisco field office who probably put my name
on a list based on the minimal traction that we have over on
YouTube, probably put my name on a list.
We've had, I think just under 100,000 total views for all the
entire time that we've done the podcast over on YouTube.
We've had more than that in some weeks on Rumble.
Rumble is a significantly smaller place, so why would it
be that our name is so crushed over there?
I just got my video blocked yesterday because we showed a
little bit from SNL, which is obviously fair use.
Showing a 92nd clip is fair use when you have an hour long
commentary. But we get targeted for all this
kind of stuff. That's what fascism looks like,
folks. That's actual fascism.
Meanwhile, you've got Kamala Harris agreeing with
Charlemagne, who said Donald Trump's campaign is all about
fascism. What an interesting time to be
alive to see that the two campaign options we have are
fake fascism and real Marxism, which is to say totalitarianism,
which is at the same thing. I don't see a major difference
between communism with a capital C, Marxism with a capital M, the
sort of insane authoritarian leftism, and fascism with a
capital F. I'm not even sure that people on
the left can mostly identify it. But for whatever it's worth,
real fascism is private ownership of companies that are
so heavily leaned on by a government that they do what the
government says without them taking ownership.
And that's exactly what we've seen in the last four years.
That's what the Twitter Files revealed.
It was one of these things. The fact that it's not brought
up every single day is mind numbing to me.
It's truly crazy. And also during this interview,
she basically has been trying to punch down on Donald Trump
saying that he's not mentally fit.
This is a lady who hid the mental acuity of Donald of, of,
of Joe Biden from her own party because those of us who have
been watching have seen him get more and more stumbly, less and
less reasonable. This is the same guy, this
interview that that she just did is the same guy where Joe Biden
yelled, if you don't vote for me, you ain't black.
So I don't know how mentally deficient you have to be to make
that argument. But here you go again, CNN
trying to actually get some reasonable ratings from people
that listen and what are like, hey, can somebody push back?
They've got Scott Jettings. They got a couple others that
are on there that are actually saying things that are honest.
Here's a little taste of that. Maybe you don't want to punch
about mental acuity if you're living in the glass House of
Kamala Harris. If I were Harris, I wouldn't be
leaning too heavily into who's hiding what kind of medical
conditions of people who are want to be the president.
Given her role in lying about the condition of Joe Biden for
the last four years. That's number one.
Number two, I, I don't think this works for her.
I think I'm I'm back in the same bucket I was earlier.
You're not selling your own candidacy.
You're punching Donald Trump in the same way every other
Democrat we've ever heard from for the last 8-9 years has
punched this guy. That's not the problem with your
campaign. We've heard all the attacks on
Trump. If she cannot sell her own
candidacy any better than just punching on him, I'm for her.
If I were in her, can't. I just don't know.
It's going to be enough. That's my part for the Kamala
Harris campaign to continue to remind people just to be
lectured by Democrats about you have to have mental acuity to be
the president of the United States after what we just lived
through for the last four years. I love that.
Don't lecture me about mental acuity presidency, but when
Democrats are who all you included, who all assured us
that Joe Biden was riding unicycles and juggling knives in
the Oval Office, when we know that wasn't true and Harris was
the chief cheerleader for that whole don't, don't the lectures
about the mental acuity come on. He's exactly right about that.
By the way, can one of you use your AI tools and generate a
picture of Joe Biden juggling knives on a unicycle in the Oval
Office? Because I think that is pretty
fantastic. That's good stuff.
He's exactly right. They're trying to make this a
referendum on Donald Trump's age.
That doesn't work. We've already seen what that
looked like and it doesn't look good.
It looks bad on them because they already tried to push out a
candidate who was useless. And by the way, for some reason,
now I'm never going to be thank you Saturday Night Live, but I'm
never going to be able to say Joe Biden the way that I just
did. It's going to always be in my
head as Joe Biden, which is J apostrophe BIDENJ Biden is a
really good name. They hit it on the head.
OK, Speaking of Joe Biden, this is that kind of mental acuity
where the guy has a hard time just like landing the attacks.
But we're going to pivot to weaponize government right now.
We're going to talk about the the main topic of the day.
And that main topic specifically is, are we dealing with a
situation where martial law is on the ticket?
Is that what's going on? Is that what Democrats have just
done the the DoD directive or the.
Yeah, the DoD directive is called 5240.01.
I want to cover down on that. And then also the accompanying
directive, which actually defines what deadly force is and
when it can be used because it's very, very important.
But that's not to say that you shouldn't be concerned.
I think that there are concerns can be tempered a bit.
I think the people that are running out there and lighten
their hair on fire or doing the Blackbeard where they're putting
candles in their beard and want to light that thing up, I think
that's a little bit too soon. Because I do think that what
this does is actually just harmonize an already bad
position. However, when you see what
they've done already and how they've weaponized the
judiciary, it's not impossible to imagine them weaponizing the
military against Americans. We've done the the discussion
about how he's been trying to normalize how F fifteens and F
sixteens could be used against Americans.
And that's a truly crazy position.
Let's at least hear him bragging about this.
Again. This is the guy who the woman
who's who's running works with this guy and she's talking about
mental acuity. It's an awkward position.
He's also straight up saying Donald Trump's got a lot more
problems and I basically created them.
He's he's bragging about it. Same guy.
There's three other major cases waiting for him and he loses.
And by the way, 34 felonies so far.
He had to get sentence. He got the sentence kicked back,
but I want to watch that sentence.
Look, Donald Trump's not running.
He's running for himself. I think he's running.
Stay out of jail. All right, so here's the the
so-called red alert moment. All right, this is the let me
let me throw it on the screen here too, because this is the
headline that comes in accompanying the, what's his
name, Ron Paul's sort of clip. Ron Paul read this information
out loud. I don't know why my headline
disappeared, but there it is. So he read a headline saying
that the United States military is authorized to kill Americans
on US soil. Question mark.
This comes from Zero Hedge, but it was written by Armageddon
Pros and it came out this weekend.
There's a Twitter account that follows me called the Patriot
Voice. Patriot Voice John saying this
is a red alert. the United States military is officially
authorized to kill Americans on US soil.
Imagine waking up to discover that the US military has quietly
been granted the authority to assist in domestic law
enforcement activities, including the use of lethal
force against U.S. citizens in certain circumstances.
The whole red alert, like people getting so amped up about
something, it makes me concerned.
So I'm going to show you what Ron Paul has to say.
I think he's a pretty reasonable dude.
I generally think that the guy makes excellent points.
I think that his take on this might need a little bit of
tempering. So as you guys know, I don't
like sensationalism and I don't like people getting riled up.
I'm going to show you a deadly force situation after all this.
That's going to show you exactly why being authorized to defend
yourself is a real thing and the actual DoD.
But we want to start off with a headline from Zero Hedge is
pretty hot. Hot headline.
U.S. military now is authorized to kill Americans on the US
soil. That's that can't be possible.
This would open up the door for the careless use and it's more
frequent and legal. It'll be legal now.
So nobody will have to worry about that.
Send in the troops. We need you to shoot a couple of
these people. They, they, they're opposing our
policies. They're demonstrating against
COVID rules or something they'll come up with.
So I think it's very, very dangerous.
So here it is now. Zero Hedge picked it up from
Armageddon Pros, which is a which is a sub stack which they
often run and it says U.S. military now authorized to kill
Americans on US soil. Question Mark OK, so here's the
quoted document. This is the Department of
Defense Directive 5240.01, updated September the 27th of
2024. The problem with going into
documents and diving into these things and then losing your
minds over them is that you don't necessarily have
historical context or precedent and you don't necessarily know
exactly what it is that you're talking about.
Let it be known that I pulled up this on the screen over here on
my left. What I have is the, this is the
originating component. It's the Office of the Under
Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security.
That's who generated this particular document.
It is a replacement from an older DoD Intelligence
Activities Directive of the same name from August 27th of 2007.
So it's been amended and it repeals, cancels and reissues
this guidance. On top of all that, it's a 22
page document of which people are very excited about.
Basically one paragraph, if not maybe two paragraphs tops, which
is going to be under paragraph 3.3.
The levels of authority, The levels of authority say under
subsection A that the requirement for Department of
Defense or Secretary of Defense approval is needed.
If the following things happen, it says that it may require
additional permissions as as described in paragraph 3.2,
which is the thing above it. The decision to approve requests
for these types are permissible as described in paragraph.
This is all really litigious language.
Here's section A that people highlighted.
This is highlighted by that account that we just showed you
on Twitter, provisions of personnel to support response,
FS4, and they're highlighting civil disturbances, which may
include presidential authorization.
Now, civil disturbances is a broad term, but most, most of us
will see this as civil unrest, as riots, things that we've seen
the National Guard called out for a long time.
This is fairly common. This goes back at least to the
1960s and maybe before that. I'm thinking of like Kent State,
I'm thinking of there has been a possibility for the DoD to
engage with the public on US soil in that terms.
Little Rock when they were going and they were allowing black
students into the, you know, the Little Rock Five.
I think that's the right name for it.
OK, So these are the times when they can do it.
The Secretary of Defense has to actually give for approval for
provisions to support law enforcement efforts and civil
disturbance or here's subsection C of this.
It says assistance in responding with assets to potential with
potential for lethality. That means armed assets of any
kind or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable
that providing the requested assistance may involve the use
of force that is likely to result in lethal force,
including death or serious bodily injury.
That part right there, the death or bodily injury part, made me
think about where does this reference?
It also includes all support to civilian law enforcement, which
we've seen plenty of times and they do it in DC all the time in
situations where confrontations between civilian law enforcement
and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably
anticipated. Now, here's the thing that most
people that are talking about this forget.
This is the part that is not highlighted, but I think it's
relevant. Use of such force may be used in
accordance with DoD Directive 5210.56, potentially as further
restricted based on the specifics of the requested
support. So this is not a carte blanche
open kill order on American citizens.
So I went to that document and here it is.
It's a 26 page document. And on page 17, if you want to
follow at home, we're going to see that the DoD originally
issued this, or at least the the thing that it's replacing was in
November the 18th, just before Donald Trump came in 2016.
And it was changed on November 6th of 2020.
So this is the deadly force policy, which we always talk
about when we talk about federal law enforcement.
If you've ever worked in local law enforcement, you know that
you either have a deadly force policy or what is broadly known
as a use of force policy. And use of force explains when,
how, and if you can use force of any kind, up to and including
deadly force. Here's what's really important
about this. The deadly force policy is still
in effect for for the DoD assets that would go and assist law
enforcement on the state level, on the federal level, or even on
the local level. And here's what it says.
This is part E, deadly force, subsection one.
The DoD component heads may impose further restrictions on
the use of deadly force. In other words, they can make
this, they can curtail this, but generally speaking, Part 2,
deadly force is justified only when there is a reasonable
belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger
of death or serious bodily injury to a person, or under the
circumstances defined in 30 in paragraph 34E4, which is
actually on the page as well, Deadly force may be used when
reasonable, including but not limited to the following
circumstances. There's an entire list of them,
which I can actually tell you if you really want, but the entire
list basically includes circumstances that are going to
protect national security assets.
They're not on the screen because it's a little bit wordy,
but otherwise, let's say they can use deadly force in the
defense of others when protecting assets vital to
national security. Think about like a skiff or
places where national security tools are.
If somebody is protecting inherently dangerous property,
if you're trying to gain access to a tank, they've done this.
I actually remember this when I was a kid in San Diego.
They shot a guy because he was driving around the tank.
That's inherently dangerous equipment.
So that's what we're talking about there.
Or inherently dangerous property, protecting national
security infrastructure, critical infrastructure, yes.
Can these things be abused? Yes, of course they can.
I'm just letting you know. Or when they are arresting or
apprehending or preventing the escape of someone whose unlawful
escape and fleeing will give probable cause to believe a
bunch of other things, which means that they're storing or
they are running off with things that would otherwise endanger
national security. It's a broad mandate.
There's no doubt about it. Should people be concerned?
Absolutely you should, but it's not a red alert moment in my
opinion, because all this does is it, it aligns the idea that
there is, if you're going to put the National Guard into a law
enforcement capacity, particularly law enforcement
people in the National Guard, that they are going to have the
exact same deadly force policy that I operated under as an FBI
agent. It basically aligns the two
problems. Now, the problem is that we're
talking about using DoD assets on US soil, and that's the
bigger piece of it in general. There probably needs to be a
better move for that. That's what mutual aid is about.
That's why on January 6th of 2021, when I was out in
Frederick, MD, shooting with a bunch of guys on the SWAT team,
and they were part of armed response for the state police
and some of the local counties and Arundel County was around
there. Who else was there?
PG County, Some of the DC adjacent counties, they all got
like their beepers or their text messages all went off and said
you have to help respond to the capital.
It's much better to see civilian law enforcement respond to other
civilian law enforcement for civilian law enforcement
purposes. Dragging out the National Guard,
which we have said is a thing, is very weird.
And having lived through DC in 2021 when Joe Biden was
inaugurated, it's very strange to see armed troops.
They have to have a deadly force policy if they have the weapon
system. Does it make sense they have to
have some rules of engagement on domestic soil?
This simply is correcting what that is, and it brings it in
line with other federal agents and other federal officers.
Which is to say, deadly force is only justifiable when it's
necessary, when the officer has a reasonable belief, or when the
troops have a reasonable belief that the subject of such force,
which means the person you're shooting, poses an imminent
danger of death or serious physical injury to the troops or
to someone else. That is in line with federal
rulings. That is what the DOJ has across
the board for the US Marshall Service, for the ATF, for the
DEA and for the FBI and any other components they're in.
So it's not out of line that they would have those same
rules. The problem is, is that we have
normalized the idea that the National Guard would be a
peacekeeping force on US soil, and we should be concerned about
that. Does it make sense?
I don't have the same red alert moment because this thing has
been done and they are going to have RO ES.
The problem is they mostly do not train in these RO ES because
if you're a soldier, an infantryman, even if you're a
military police officer, your rules of engagement are very
different. And the type of people you
engage with are very different. Being a gate guard or being a
gate guard, let's say in, in Iraq or in Afghanistan or in the
Philippines or anywhere else, you have a very different
tolerance for dealing with the public.
You're not going to be dealing with them in the same way that
like a cop does who deals with them every single day.
A regular cop and anybody who's been in the military police
knows that they're dealing with a totally different subset of
the population. You're not running around and
dealing with what this poor guy just dealt with.
This went viral everywhere. Talking about a, a shooting.
I think I've got a picture of it.
Why deadly force is so important.
Here it is. This is video #3 that I just
said, this is body Cam footage. So if you're listening, it's
actually worth tuning in to see this if you have not seen it.
This is a 6 foot six, what we thought was a transgender
person, but turns out to be a a female basketball star, a
college athlete of all things. There's been some absolute
dragging of the school. I think it was Georgetown.
I'll double check right now. But This is why deadly force
policies need to be given out and why Democrat policies that
have come in the wake of the George Floyd riots and even
before that the the Ferguson riots that happened.
These things are real problem, whether it be Freddie Gray or
anything else. They have made law enforcement
officers slow on the trigger when they should be quick, and
some of them are quick on the trigger when they should be
slow. It's more important to have good
training and good RO ES that people very, very clearly
understand what is a good shoot and what is not because this guy
is basically fighting nothing but a good shoot.
If someone slashes at you with a 10 inch kitchen knife and cut
your face open when they open the door, which is what you're
about to see, you should shoot them right then they have
forfeited whatever is going to happen next.
There's no courts that are going to sort this thing out.
So listen, you're going to hear a little bit of music.
You're going to the door open, you're going to hear a how you
doing in a slash. And then this cop basically goes
in to a fight for his life. He ended up very nasty and
bloodied. He did survive this.
The the woman did not. Here we go.
Back up, back up. Hey, man, what else they're
doing? Please.
Back up, Back up. Back up.
Back up by three.
One bubble. Single one shots fired.
What is your location? 322 Apartment 32211830, Sunrise,
Sunrise Valley Star Medic, please.
Yeah. Start medic, please.
Indeed. You guys can see the blood
dripping off his hand right there.
He got his face cut. He got his hand cut.
This woman, whose name was Sidney Wilson, I'm just looking
off screen here, 33 years old, was asked to be checked on for a
mental health check. This is the danger of trying to
send a social worker. Imagine opening the door.
How you doing? And a slashing knife coming at
you. Because that's what happened to
him. He was cut.
He was slow on the shoot. And this woman, Sidney Wilson,
decided right then and there he drew the gun and didn't shoot
her. I'm going to go with it that
it's a female. I've seen the pictures of this
of this gal who looked, it looks like a female at least as at a
younger age was a basketball player for Georgetown.
So I guess Ahoya Hoyas went Hoyas forever.
And they tweeted out this like, you know, rest in peace, sorry
you don't get to rest in peace when you go and attack a cop.
And that noise that you heard at the end of the hallway, as he
was very, very calmly relaying that information.
Like massive kudos to that cop for being very calm under fire,
probably too calm when it came to drawing and shooting that
that firearm. But massive kudos for him to
relaying information properly on the radio.
That noise you heard at the end of the hallway is a death
rattle. And some of you that have ever
heard it, you'll never unhear something like that.
That's the last gasp when you've heard that expression that
there's a last gasp at freedom or a last.
That's what an actual last gasp sound like.
That is the body relaxing all of the all the muscle tone that
needs to be kept. And so whatever air that was in
there just kind of rushes out. My understanding was that this
lady was 6 foot 6, so that makes sense for a college basketball
player. But imagine you're a regular
dude. His last name is Lou so I assume
he has some Chinese origin. You've got a regular Asian sized
man standing at a door the open how you doing and slashing
across the face. This is why there has to be a
justification. There has to be a deadly force
policy in place. I much prefer it be people who
do that for a living then soldiers.
I'd rather it be that than infantrymen dealing with this
kind of thing. And the reason why I think that
is because the federal government does a crap job at
basically everything. I'm going to play you one more
video here. This comes from my buddy Steve
Baker, who's doing in person report.
He is currently stationed in North Carolina, which is his
home state. He's reporting on behalf of the
blaze and he's talking about that, that moment when you know
that civilians who care about their neighbors do a far better
job than any federal government agency ever will do.
He's covering the FEMA response to the hurricane hit than and
the devastation in North Carolina.
Baker doing an on the ground analysis and I think he's spot
on. We can always talk about the the
20 foot rule and deadly force a lot more, but this is just more
evidence that people who care about their neighbors will
always be better. Which is why I say the
government is the worst solution to every problem that it has to
answer, even when it's the only solution to the problem.
And it may be the only solution when it comes to law
enforcement. I probably agree with that, but
man, I really dislike it and I always disliked it.
I disliked it when I worked for the government.
I said the exact same thing. This is not a new phrase for me.
Here's Steve Baker crushing it in person.
I saw him land in the helicopter.
He sent me a video of that. So I'm going to show you his
reporting on the blaze last night.
And this is true of every disaster.
There's always somebody, there's always some criminal element
that wants to take advantage of that.
And it's happening here with Savage Freedom, this operational
center that you see right here behind me that has taken over
the Harley-Davidson center and has set up this incredible
distribution supply byline for relief.
I mean, we're talking about they're able to air limp,
they're able to get it in with ATV's and all other matters of
relief to get it in there. And because of the reputation
that these guys have, it's growing daily because of how
well organized they are. They are operationally, I mean
they're they're all ex military and they, it's run like a really
finely tuned special operations operation.
And as a result of that, other people are now starting to use
their name to perpetrate their they're scams.
They're going to other operation relief operation centers telling
them that they're with Savage freedoms to try and get
additional equipment, whatever. And they're so essentially the
government has come in and said, well, these people are dangerous
because there are people that are misusing the name.
At the end of the day, the federal government has no
business interfering with civilians, trying to help out
other civilians, military or otherwise.
Like they just, they just stay away.
And if a bunch of vets who are now able to live on a pension
that they've got from military service want to volunteer their
time and their skill set to go out there and help their fellow
man, this is what we should expect.
This is what has always happened in America and we are dealing
with the opposite of it, where people want to lay back and say
the federal government will handle it.
The federal government is objectively terrible.
It's objectively terrible at almost all the things that it
has to do, including the things that there's no other choice.
You need some more evidence? I'll give you something.
It's kind of like a weird Wednesday.
Let me give you a weird Wednesday moment.
Former FBI agent just sentenced for gambling away government
cash in Las Vegas, of all things.
A former special agent with the New York Field Office took more
than $13,000 in government money meant to be used in undercover
operation and turned around and lost it gambling at the Bellagio
Resort and Casino. Guy's name is Scott Carpenter,
which is a funny name for those in my family 'cause we had a
family friend named Scott Carpenter.
I guess it's more common than we think.
Everybody argued for probation, but he was sentenced to three
months in federal custody and he'll do that in home
confinement. How many of you think that you
could steal $13,000 from your publicly funded job and get away
with three months of probation and or hanging out at home?
Very interesting. Carpenter and three other agents
traveled to Las Vegas, NV with $135,000 in government cash that
was supposed to be used in a sting, bribe payment and
incidental expenses. The government agents conducted
an operation in the Hotel Cabana and afterwards went to the
Resort Casino at the Bellagio for their last night together.
Before leaving the hotel room, Carpenter took $10,000 in
government money from a safe. The agents went back to the High
Roller Resort room where Carpenter brought $10,000 in
chips. He played blackjack for several
hours and lost all $10,000, the average size of his bets over
those two to three hours. With 721 dollars, most of us
cannot afford to do a $721.00 average bet per hand.
But turns out if it's not your money, you don't care.
Yet another argument against giving people OPM, also known as
other people's money. Yes, he did lose his job over
all of this. All right, since we've been kind
of on a serious kick and there's a lot of serious topics I want
to do ADOD video. I love people in the Dodi love
soldiers I love. Airmen, I love sailors, Coast
Guard, ease, whatever you coasties are called, right?
Even the Space Force. We love all of you all.
We appreciate the service that people do.
Doesn't mean you're a St. And in fact, the one thing that
I think is most funny, there's this guy I played a video clip
from the other day, the funniest thing that I've ever been a part
of as an adult. Because I entered when I was 27
years old is the weekend safety briefing.
If you are in the military, you all know about this.
If you've been in the military, you've gotten a weekend safety
briefing and it includes all kinds of crazy funny stuff.
So I've got 2 pallet cleansers for you today, both of which I
couldn't figure out which one was better.
So we're going to do them both. Here's something that we cannot
allow our troops to get near caffeine suppositories and a man
in uniforms take on such a thing.
This is a caffeine. Suppository it's a.
Caffeine. What?
I'm not sure I'm understanding you correctly.
You understood me correctly. It's caffeine for your.
It is what I thought it is or was.
Keep this away from the infantrymen and and combat jobs
in the military. Keep it away from all service
members. Right?
You don't want you want normal service members.
Not but caffeine service members.
That is a dangerous service member.
One minute you've got a normal 1, then you give them some butt
caffeine and then they'll show you the meaning of speed.
Do not give service members but caffeine.
I think that is a pretty simple statement.
This would be part of your weekend safety briefing.
Once it became aware that the command structure was aware that
such a risk existed, they would let you know not to go to
certain strip clubs. They would let you know that
there are certain areas that are off limits to all military
members and personnel. And they would also let you know
that you cannot take but caffeine for performance
enhancement on or off duty. Very, very important stuff.
Lastly, a little discussion. Since we've been talking about
race in this election season quite a bit, I want to discuss
that there is nuance to everything.
It's not just nuance to the deadly force policy.
How about some nuance with the idea of something that most
people would overtly refer to as racist, and that is blackface?
This is one of the greatest comedians, I think, of our
current time. His name is Andrew Schultz.
He's fantastic, and here's a little piece from his special
talking about the overt nature of blackface.
But are there some exceptions? Maybe in the instances of
national security? Again, nuance is everywhere.
Blackface is wrong. Racist cannot do it.
We agree. We agree.
OK, good. Blackface is wrong.
Cannot do it. Blackface is wrong.
Well, I have to ask the black faces.
I can't ask the fucking rest of y'all.
Blackface is wrong. It's racist.
You cannot do it. Under no circumstances cannot do
it. Then you see them Navy Seals
commercials, you're like, all right, well, kind of sometimes
we could do it. The whole Navy Seals commercial
is like, look how cool black faces on a helicopter, Look how
cool black faces on a boat, Blackface in the water, they can
swim. I don't know if they say that.
I that I might have added that
part. I might have added that part.
That's on me. But I'm just saying life or
death situation has changed the stakes.
Let's say, for example, me and you, we're going on a mission to
save America. The mission takes place at 1:00
AM. That is an important piece of
the information on the call sheet.
You. Have your complexion.
I have the complexion of an iPhone flashlight.
If you don't give me blackface, we're fucking dead.
I'm a disco ball in the desert. They're going to see us from a
mile away. It's head shots for the both of
us. You want to see her again?
You got to paint me the fuck up, bro.
Full thing you don't have to do the lips in the tap shoes.
That's a little bit much, but you got to paint me up.
You gotta pay me the fuck up. You're not gonna let me go on
that mission with you without putting on blackface for your
safety, Just like I'm not gonna let you smile.
There's certain things, guys. You can't let him smile too.
Have you guys ever seen this? The fun thing about people that
have been in life or death jobs, and it doesn't matter if you're
in a fire department, if you're an EMS service, if you're in law
enforcement, if you've been in the military, if you've been in
a life or death job, if you're part of a rescue group.
This kind of humor between races is 100% not just normal, but
necessary because it breaks down all the stupid and all of that
ridiculous programming that the media would try to have.
You believe that there's some big difference.
There is a difference in how dark your face is in the night.
If you're doing a night op and your body smiles and he looks
like just a pair of teeth sitting out there.
And we had black guys on my squad doing surveillance where
we would have this talk all the time.
Everybody has to blend differently based on what they
do and based on what they look. These are basic observational
humors that used to be acceptable in this country, and
that's why it's so good. That's why I like seeing this
stuff. It's bringing back like normal
comedy. I appreciate that.
Since we've been talking about feds quite a bit on this
episode, federal on all levels, let's do a five star review from
someone who is a federal employee, kind of the US Postal
Service. They're a weird animal, aren't
they? Here we go.
This is coming from our Spotify folks.
Cheap fakes and hot takes. Episode 331, Jay Bird said.
I confess as a letter carrier for the United States Postal
Service, I have the same mentality as the two FBI agents,
but at least I don't have to infringe on anybody's right.
I get my gold when the golden eagle SHITS, when the golden
eagle turns in your bank account, that's how it works.
Yes, That's exactly what happens.
Just saying federal employees, they're just like the rest of
you. They like to see that that
dollar amount hit their paycheck because that's why they're doing
the job. They probably wouldn't do it for
free. Most people wouldn't do any job
for free. I might do this one for free.
I did when we started. Really appreciate all of you
guys. If you want to support my buddy
Garrett who is going through this federal court case and it's
kind of a pain in the butt, this is the merch store.
You guys can always go to the dash suspendables links in the
description. The dash suspendables.com.
You can get the last line shirt like I'm wearing today.
You can get the the very cool looking one that is on this side
of me. There it is.
Bam. Look at that.
That is the last line sub stack. That's where his sub stack is.
I wear that all the time. I wore it yesterday.
I wear it where it makes people uncomfortable.
It's got a picture of an AR15 with a feather coming out the
end of it. Very cool.
The don't forget the dash suspendables.com promo code
Kyle, and I'll make a little short plug on the Locals
channel. I will post both of those DoD
documents should you like to peruse them or have them on your
phone. We'll post them in the thread on
our locals community and that is at kyleseraphin.com.
Again, Kyle, seraphin.com for the Locals channel.
You can be either a paid member, you can be an unpaid member.
I'll make this thing one of the the public things.
I think it's in public interest. It's public documentation, but I
pulled down both those PDFs. If you want the 22 and the 26
pagers, we'll throw that up there today.
Feel free to check us out at kyleseraphin.com.
Really appreciate all of you for being part of the program.
If you listen to us live, if you watch us after the fact, if
you're on video, if you're on audio, you're equally
appreciated. I really do appreciate that.
Make sure you guys are sharing this thing if you think that
this is good nuance that people should have.
I want people to turn down the temperature on things that sound
crazy, and I really want you to know that just because the
federal government is terrible and it's totally terrible, not
every single one of these outrage headlines is something
you should fly off the handle on.
And you should probably focus on the most important thing, which
is building that small little local community.
If you hate big government, you should love your local
community, your small neighborhood, the people that
live right next to you on your left and your right and to the
front and to the back. So go out there and make sure
you know who those people are. Take care of them, take care of
each other. God bless all of you.
I hope you have a wonderful day. I'll see you again tomorrow.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin Bobble Kyle on Twitter,
Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.