Take a look behind the curtain with the real whistleblower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Serif. Well, hello, my friends, welcome
to the Kyle Seraphin Show. Today is Thursday.
It is June the 13th and we are rolling live over on
rumble.com/kyle Serif and there is the live chat.
You guys can see it on the screen.
Make sure you've hit the like button wherever you're watching
us, especially if you're on Rumble.
But if you're over on YouTube or you're watching on X, please
join us over here on Rumble. I'll keep saying it.
There they are. Look at them all going.
Thanks to the Amrads, the American Radicals Podcast for
rating our stream and joining us on there.
Welcome all of you who are coming in for the first time.
Thanks for joining us. We're going to have a lot to
talk about today. Every single morning I get up
and I go like, what on earth is going on and out there?
What are we going to talk about today?
And there is an unlimited amount of ridiculousness.
We're going to be talking about the FBIA bit because we can't
help it. That's just the nature of our
crappy relationship. But Chris Ray took a trip to
Kenya. What's that all about?
Made me think about jets, made me think about Jill Biden.
So we're going to cover down on some of that.
The abortion issue is back up at front because it's possible
we'll see something from the Supreme Court about that today.
I'm keeping an eye over on SCOTUS blog.
It's on my screen to the left. So if you guys see me glancing
over there, that's what we're looking for.
They're going to be dropping some opinions today possibly.
So we're going to look for those.
Catholic Vote did a pretty good job covering down on a couple
things, including the sort of Republican stance, running away
from abortion as a winning issue.
And that's an interesting thing. I think there's some far
reaching consequences. We'll talk about those.
We talk about Border Patrol and the lack of suspendable
attitudes that they have. Don't be suspecting or expecting
any more whistleblowers coming out at this moment, folks.
It's just people are committed mostly to comfort.
It turns out. I'm not saying they're bad
people. I'm just saying it's a lot
easier to just keep plodding along and hoping someone else
steps up. And that's the nature of the
world. That's the way we live.
And the last thing is, of course, we're going to be
talking about Merrick Garland being voted and held in
contempt. What does it mean?
Just a little spoiler alert, It means nothing.
It's a shiny object. And I'll show you why, because
the DOJ already told us this, and we knew this for a little
while now. All right, before we get
launched into the real meat and potatoes of today's show, let's
say thanks to my buddies at Patriot Coolers.
It's Patriot coolers.com promo code Kyle.
You can get yourself a handsome Tumblr just like this.
You can find yourself a high quality rotomoted cooler.
We're getting into the hot season.
If you're going out on a boat, which sounds pretty nice right
now actually, if you're going to be rolling around and just
getting groceries and you don't want your frozen foods to melt,
there are many, many uses for your everyday cooler.
You could be like my buddy, my neighbor who's running around
with his 15 year old igloo that he bought when he was a college
freshman and needed something for the lake.
Or you could upgrade when it's time to the right tool.
Patriot coolers.com. It's a handsome product.
It works very, very well. It is smartly designed.
Sold out of Houston, TX. They ship almost immediately and
they are outstanding products. Highly recommend them.
Save 10% by using promo code Kyle.
Kyle you'll get 50 bucks. If you spend 50 bucks and more
you'll get free shipping. And why not whenever it comes
up, support a company that says the thing that you are right on
there. You know what?
I've been having these weird social media debates with people
and I've I've been trying to tune out of it a lot.
I think some of you guys probably see this in your lives
as well. Have you noticed that at some
point in time in this country? And I do think this actually
traces back to the advent of the Internet that disembodied, like
just being a crappy person to people that you can't see.
And you're never going to have to face down in real life when
you when you're like that, you don't tolerate dissent of any
ideas. I keep getting people that are
really mad. They're like, yeah, I just found
out you're not MAGA. It's like, yeah, no kidding.
I'm not. But like, that doesn't mean that
Trump is not a better solution. It just means like I don't have
the branding on my forehead. I also don't run around and talk
about Patriot all day long. And if you don't agree with me,
then you can't be a Patriot. It's stupid.
We used to actually know that in this country.
We used to have this understanding that we might
agree on a lot of things, but there are things that we don't
agree on and that's actually OK. When we stopped allowing our
friendships to have some minor disagreements on policy, on
procedure, when we couldn't agree to disagree and still be
civilized people. And that includes people on the
left and the right. But actually, it's really,
really prevalent on the right. On right, That's what this
cannibalism looks like. There's even more articles
coming out today from some of the goofballs that are on the
right side of things In general. They're just pissy.
They're just, they're just like pissing contests about how come
you don't agree with me all the way?
And if you don't, then you're my enemy.
It's foolishness. It's really petty, actually.
And that's I think why a lot of the people are seeing that the
Republicans don't win, why people on the conservative side
don't win things. It's not because we don't have
total agreement. It's because we actually are
trying to achieve total agreement, which is impossible.
The political left is brainwashed in that way.
They're fine with it. They're bought off.
Their outcomes are predetermined and they are fully comfortable
moving forward with all the cognitive dissonance knowing
that their ideas do not make sense to their other ideas and
they don't care. If you want to be a thinking
person, a critically thinking person who evaluates issue by
issue, who says, you know what? This person claims to be a
Republican, but they have really bad policies and they seem like
they're full of it. Or this person is saying
everything that I like and it's all red meat and there doesn't
seem to be any substance underneath.
I'm looking at that state secretary of State-run out of
Missouri, which just seems like a useful idiot to me.
This female, whatever her name is, it's she's pretty and she
jogs around and acts really tough.
It's like, you know who are actually tough people that don't
do whatever you're doing running around in a plate carrier in
Missouri. Like, come on, what what are you
doing? If they're telling you
everything you want to hear, that's the best time to be a
skeptic. You want to be a thinking
person? You want to do America.
As my buddy Steve friend says, Steve talks about America being
an action verb, as many of you guys just came in for the
American Radical podcast. So it's a really good time to
talk about it. Seriously.
You want to do America, you have to evaluate things critically.
You can't tell me simultaneously that there is a rhino and those
are the party, the people that are betraying the party and at
the same time that we are going to have to vote and stand behind
all the Republicans. Like, no, I don't do that.
I'm about outcomes. If your outcomes are garbage and
you vote in bad ways, I'm looking at people like Lindsey
Graham who seem only interested in trying to destroy this
country, piss off. And if you're just going to do
lip service, if you're going to be a Jim Jordan who's going to
talk about protecting people and trying to get to the truth, and
then your congressional investigations result in
nothing, I'm looking at Chuck Grassley there too.
These people that are heroes on the political right, like, what
are they doing? Are they doing anything for you?
I think the evidence is pretty overwhelming that they are not.
Let's launch into this craziness here.
Just a kind of a weirdo story from our friends ex-girlfriend
at the FBI. The this is really a good a a
good example of why we don't need this nonsense.
We don't need an FBI people. Do you know what the FBI needs?
They need the police. If you follow Steve Friend's
Twitter feed, I don't know why I've mentioned him twice in a
few minutes, but it's true. If you follow Steve Friend's
Twitter feed, what you'll find is that the majority of the
bragging rights that DOJ comes up with and the FBI takes credit
for are done by local cops and task force officers.
Pull the task force from the FBI and they are no longer
effective. They are no longer able to do
the job they do. And this is a great example of
it. This is an article coming from
Zero Hedge. I think it's really amusing.
It just says there are guns drawn outside the Seattle FBI
office after an armed woman apparently threatened suicide
and walked into the damn federal building.
There's a couple things at play here.
I don't have any real good inside to baseball other than I
understand why this started to happen.
First of all, we have created an environment where somebody is
going to do something really stupid.
And by the way, the FBI loves this.
The FBI management loves this. To the front office guys that
are are the the brick agents rather that are out there doing
the investigations of this, Probably not.
You know, they're not your enemy in the same way that people that
don't agree with me are not my enemy.
But this is inevitable. We are going to get an armed
conflict, something that is going to confirm the biases of
all those who said, look, it's really, really dangerous out
there for law enforcement. FBI is law enforcement.
Somebody's going to do something dangerous.
That's why we need to step up our domestic terrorism
investigations. I actually have something at the
end of the show we'll end with to hammer this point home.
A woman walked in and put a gun to her own head in the Seattle
field office. Apparently there's videos of it
you can find all over social media.
It's not that interesting to me. It's just a bunch of shots of
the local police responding to the FBI.
You have a building that has upwards of like maybe 200 people
carrying guns. I've worked with the Seattle
Special Operations Group, which is their surveillance team.
I've worked with their SWAT team guys and guys who were on the
SWAT team that were on surveillance.
And they are highly competent. Why are they not able to respond
to their own emergency if they're actually law
enforcement? And the fact the matter is,
because they're not, they're not law enforcement.
These people are not first responders.
They don't know what the hell to do in an armed standoff in their
own building. They called the police like you
would. What the heck?
These are armed federal agents with a deadly force policy.
They're supposed to do something.
Here's the real problem. When we're talking about the
deadly force policy in the DOJ, they made a really dangerous
addition to it. It's actually very permissive,
and that's actually what you want for law enforcement.
They need to make good decisions.
You need critical fingers on the street that are going to be
engaged in things, especially local cops.
They should have far more freedom to do the right thing at
the right moment. These guys that are out there on
the streets carrying guns are often second guessing themselves
to the point of their own physical danger.
I don't want that. And if you can read the Officer
Down memorial page, if you used to follow our show, you can
still see my buddy Alpha and Sal Greco doing the the roll Call
show. You know, we talk about cops
that die because they hesitate because they know they're not
going to get backed up by their department.
I knew when I was in Portland in 2020 that if I had to shoot one
of these Antifa idiots that was doing really dumb and dangerous
stuff. You don't like reaching for
their waistband while approaching a government
vehicle, knowing that I was in there and, and assuming that I
was a federal agent. And then they're trying to like,
provoke an action. I didn't shoot some people in
the face when I had the opportunity to.
And I probably could have justified it.
I think the FBI would have hung me out to dry.
And that's why that woman walked in there, put a gun to her head,
because DOJ added something that didn't used to be there.
DOJ added a little caveat at the bottom of their little caveat
list. There's a couple of things that
you can't use deadly force during.
It actually is just reminding agents how things work.
It's not telling you something new.
It says you can't do a warning shot unless you are in the
prison context, which means you have to be like a Bureau of
Prisons person. That's normal, OK?
They always say that you cannot shoot someone solely because
they're fleeing from you. There are ways when you could
justify that if that person is trying to get to cover and
they're trying to get behind a vehicle or something like that,
so they could shoot back at you and be in better shape and you
know that they are doing a tactical movement.
You have to articulate it, but you can shoot a person in the
back when you're doing that. And there's reasons why that's
good for law enforcement to survive.
By the way, this is all Supreme Court decisions is all well
within previously legislated stuff.
The thing that they added that is different from the train that
I went through in 2016 and even Garrett O'boyle went through in
2018, they added in the last two years this little caveat that
says if somebody only presents a danger to their own life and not
to anybody else, then you have to basically do a mind reading
job and discern whether a suicidal person is also
homicidal. And there are, there's actually
a scenario that every law enforcement officer has probably
seen where somebody takes a gun, puts it to their own head and
you're like, hey, don't do that, whatever.
Then they turn, they shoot their secretary and they shoot
themself and they're, if you're homicidal, you know, if you're
suicidal, you're homicidal too. You're willing to kill a person.
You've already decided to give it up.
This is a really dangerous thing.
That's why you ended up, by the way, with the lady walking into
that thing and the FBI being paralyzed because they added a
caveat in there that's really dangerous.
So now you got local police responding to an armed federal
agency. It just tells you where the real
work is being done. I think it's important to note
that. I think it's important.
Let me give you another little piece here.
I found this article kind of at random as I was clicking through
things that I do in my background races.
This is coming from The Economist, and I think it's a
decidedly sober view of polling. We keep hearing on the political
right, Trump is way up and all these things.
What they're doing is they're actually averaging it out across
like the certain states that they believe are going to be the
most important when it comes to the 2024 election.
But across the board, this is a little piece, This is an average
of latest polls. And if you're looking on the
screen, what you're seeing is Donald Trump, Republican, Joe
Biden, Democrat 4545, they basically are both sitting smack
dab in the middle with Joe maybe one point lower in the averages
against the poles. It's a 40 to 5040 to 49 type
split. And you cannot, you have to see
the graphic on the screen here. So tune in about 15 minutes.
And if you guys want to see it on the Rumble channel, they're
neck and neck. And it's it's the reason is
because this is not the best line up of candidates on either
side. Can we just be honest about
that? Like, really, is this really the
guy? We're going to see some
gaslighting from the political left?
I'll play you some Nicole Wallace acting like a complete
buffoon. She tells says, you know, Trump
basically goes off the rails when he has no teleprompter.
That's not true. Trump's tired and he talks a
lot. He says a lot of words, just
like me. You say a lot of words really
quickly and you're playing to a crowd and suddenly, you know,
you, you misstep. It's no big deal.
Joe Biden actually just freezes and gets completely full retard
stands out there and does nothing with his fingers just
twitching like a robot that's trying to reboot.
So this is not a one to one comparison.
There's no question who's more sentient between the two of
these people. But I did find this interesting
because this article actually writes it up, says November 5th,
Americans are going to go to the polls.
There you go. They're going to elect the next
president. The contest will feel familiar
because the main candidates did the same thing in 2020.
Joe Biden's the incumbent. He faced no viable competition
in the democratic process. Why is that?
Because the Democrats do not tolerate dissent.
They will not allow for any conflicting ideas.
That's the vantage, I think of critical thinkers on the
political right. We should be able to grab people
who are independents when you present to them two basic ideas.
One of these is better than the other.
One of these is a lesser evil than the other.
I'm fine with presenting either way.
Move people to a better outcome. That's the goal anyway.
Both these men are widely disliked.
This is actually fundamentally accurate.
They all they go on and they say some crappy things about Trump,
but it is what the left is saying.
It's what's worth hearing it. OK, the economist leans left.
There's no question about it. Based on this, Biden's
presidency has been defined by high inflation, big industrial
policy bills, and turmoil abroad.
OK, that actually encompasses a lot of it.
They actually missed out on the open border failures as well,
which means that they've undermined national security.
But I think they hit the high points.
The economy is in bad shape. They've tried to do a bunch of
big government, big industrial policies that actually favor
people who have a lot more money then the working class.
And then they've opened up the border to allow working class
people to basically compete with people who have no right to be
in this country. That's a big deal.
And then you've got turmoil abroad, which is to say that we
basically are on the verge of interceding into two big wars.
Conflict in the Middle East, that sucks.
Conflict in Eastern Europe, also not very good.
It's as Mr. Trump supporters have tried to overturn his
election laws in 2020. Did they though?
And he faces federal charges over his alleged participation
in that scheme. And it's until proven guilty.
I just have a big problem with the way they presented this.
This is truly slanted. And then he's also been
convicted of a felony related to his 2016 presidential campaign.
The election will be less of a popularity contest.
I think this is the most accurate than a referendum on
which man America thinks is the least bad option.
Maggot people, you're going to vote for Trump.
We know this Biden people, They're brain dead.
They want to vote for someone who's like them brain dead.
That's perfect. Let them do that.
The fight in this election is going to be for who's the least
bad character. For those in the middle that are
not otherwise motivated, that don't hear Donald Trump and
immediately feel their heart go pitter patter and they don't
hear Joe Biden and immediately just fall in line with whatever
stupid thing is being pushed out by the political left, which is
in fact stupid. This has to be a referendum on
who is the least bad option. I think Ben Shapiro is correct
when he says this kind of stuff. I know some people have like
sort of fallen off on Ben Shapiro, but the guy's smart and
you can't take away from him that he's correct.
If the 2016 election was about who's worse, it was about is
Hillary Clinton garbage? And she was, she loses this
election is going to be who's done the worst job.
We've had four years of each and I think that it's pretty clear
even with the COVID hiccups, which are significant, even with
some of the anti gun policies which we're going to talk about,
that's what SCOTUS is actually weighing right now.
One of the things they're weighing is the bump stock ban.
That was not a good one. Donald Trump still comes out
much, much heavier as a benefit to the average person in
America. More money in their wallet,
economy functioning more functionally, you know, no new
wars. All these things are the things
that I want to see hammered home on.
So I'm sort of OK with this pragmatic approach.
But I'm a little bit concerned because they're running away
from the life issue. And there are some values issues
that if we on the on the political right here, and I'm
concerning concerning myself as a conservative and not a
Republican. If we're on the political right
and we're not going to be involved in critical thinking
and downstream effects of some policy changes, then we're also
missing out. Like let the other side be the
party of zombies and fools. Let the other team just blindly
follow some leader the way that they think that you follow
Donald Trump. And there's certainly some
people that make that argument pretty hard to fight.
There's some very cult like behavior that I keep seeing, but
we can do better than that. Let me just do a plug here for
my friends at Catholic Vote because we're going to cover a
couple articles that I think are very salient to this discussion.
catholicvote.org. You guys want to get the loop.
It's a very good e-mail. It's been a little bit more
Catholic focus than than of late because there's a lot of these
issues, especially in the pro-life movement that are
really dangerous I think, and I think their analysis is spot on.
So we're going to cover two stories from them from the loop
today, catholicvote.org/loop. If you just want to read it,
catholicvote.org, the main page. You can sign up for the loop,
follow them on social media. And if you're not following them
on wherever you're watching us, whether it be
youtube.com/catholic vote, add that to your list.
Check them out, give them a follow.
And same thing on Rumble, catholicvote.sorryitsrumble.com/catholic
Vote. That's where you're going to
find Between the Lines. We've got a new episode coming
out today. I think it's going to be a value
to you. These are short little snippets,
you know, 810 minute long commentaries that are from a
faith position, but they're also just kind of broadly touching on
very important topics when it comes to values.
So if you guys want to check them out, I recommend it.
And I do it everyday. I read their stuff.
And This is why we're going to get into this particular set of
articles. All right, you're seeing two
things on the screen right now. Analysis.
A new Internet privacy bill would undermine the pro-life
movement. And you're like, why in the
world is that? It actually has broader context.
And Tom McCluskey, who is the sort of legislative director, I
think I'll, I'll, I'll get his actual title correct.
But Tom McCluskey is very, very bright.
He's very connected over on the Hill.
And I think his analysis is, is what it takes to be an actual
conservative, someone with critical thinking skills that
sees, OK, here's what something says, here's what that means,
here's what that does. And we're going to talk about
the Internet privacy bill that's actually kind of floating around
supposedly bipartisan. And the second thing is that
there's a sort of movement by House Republicans to abandon
pro-life protections in spending bills.
They've they've notably removed these protections in the new
budget. They're basically trying to do
this trade off. We're like, hey, we're not going
to talk about abortion, but we want to actually reduce some of
the budget by a certain amount of money.
And I don't know if that's a good trade off because it shows
a values weakness. When you show the the left
weakness, you deal with real problems.
Let's talk about spending bill first.
The Republicans are no longer considering adding a provision
protecting unborn children from chemical abortion and spending
package. Essentially, the goal of the
spending package language originally was aimed to nullify
the Biden administration rule allowing MILP, Prednisone or
Miss Milprisone. Sorry, I'm terrible at saying
medical names. I was actually terrible at that
when I was a paramedic too. I hate, I hate the way we name
medicines. Maybe you guys are the same way
as me. Anyway, sold retail pharmacies.
They wanted to be able to dispense by mail.
The bill was going to allow the Department of Agriculture.
Why not, you know what, 10th Amendment revolution still on
the thing and the USFDA that at least it makes a little bit more
sense. More than $25 billion in
discretionary funding for the fiscal year 2025, which would be
a lower amount than they previously spent.
So they're trying to do this sort of like trade off.
Can we spend less money? But we'll also give you a little
bit of what you want, which is to say we're not going to
explicitly outlaw this Biden administration rule.
I don't think it's good. It's the director of government
affairs. That's what Tom Mccluskey's
position is over at Catholic Vote.
Like I said, sharp guy, met him, like him a lot, very sane, very
sober. He's constantly saying things
that make sense. He's saying that the larger
issue here is that Republicans are abandoning the life issue.
They're doing it slowly, but they are abandoning the life
issue. And and that is a weak response.
It shows melting. It shows that the left is
continuing to actually control where the Overton window is.
We've got to hold principles. This was a part of the argument
that I made when I was on John Burke show the other day.
I was on the All American Savage podcast and we had about a two
hour conversation. And one of the things we got to
the end was a big question. Hey, is this about, is this
about winning? Is it about principles?
Do we just give it up? And the problem is, is the
minute that you give up going after principles where you know
things are correct, it means that you're willing to give up
on the entire process of what we think we can do here.
My wife and I actually had this discussion this morning.
She's changing the baby. It's like people, Do people even
have a say in how the government works anymore?
Well, the minute we stop doing that, then it becomes violence.
That's the only way you can sway them.
So we're kind of holding on, kind of hoping against hope, I
think, on the right, because people don't want to get into an
armed conflict. If you're not prepared to see
your loved ones shot in some sort of guerrilla attack in your
own neighborhood, then I don't want to hear about civil war.
I don't want to hear about you're ready to be, you know,
tough it out. Let's bring it to these Lib
idiots. Because if you want to get into
a fight with your neighbor and you're willing to take on all of
what that is about, that degree of violence, that turning the
military on our own people. And that means us shooting at
our own military, by the way, people who I otherwise will
ideologically, you know, agree with all the time.
Why? Because they signed up to serve
this country and they had some idea of what that look like,
even if it just meant getting their college paid for.
They understood that there was a trade off and that trade off
included danger. They signed up, most of them in
a time of war. I don't want to fight those
people. I don't want to fight my
brothers and my sisters and my neighbors.
I don't want to fight other Americans.
But that's what's on the table. If you give up on the process,
and that means that you either have to stand with principle or
you don't do anything at all and you get ready to just start
making war, you're not preparing and keeping keeping the peace.
You've given up. So I think it is a problem.
And McCluskey says this thing here, he said it's a dangerous
trend to assume that pro lifers are loyal to a single party.
That should definitely be true. We're loyal to life.
The problem is, is there's only one party that actually seems to
care at all about it, and it's not doing a really good job.
So that's not ideal suboptimal position.
Here's the other piece, the Internet privacy bill.
What you would think, Why on earth would that have anything
to do with the pro-life movement?
And there's some really interesting downstream effects
when you start doing things like passing this thing that is
called the American Privacy Rights Act.
Now, theoretically, we would think Internet privacy is pretty
good. Good.
I'm more of a fan of dangerous freedom.
And so I will always tell you that I side on the fact of less
bills passed equals a better Congress.
I want less of them doing whatever it is they think that
they're doing because they're always going to spend our money
to do something that is imperfect.
The federal government is a terrible tool to use almost
always, even when it's the only tool to use.
So stay out of this stuff. That's my take on it.
Federal lawmakers are considering and reading this
memo. It's distributed by the House
Freedom Caucus saying that these this bill basically threatens
unborn life in the bill and it's puts an undue burden on pro-life
movements in the name of protecting children online.
So the idea is, is that once they overstep, they open this
Pandora's box of government legislation that also makes
people potentially able to sue pro-life organizations.
The thing that I found to be the most compelling argument against
it, and I think it's strong, again, coming from Tom
McCluskey, he's quoted in both of these pieces 'cause this is
something he's really good at doing.
He said the big issue is about inhibiting law enforcement.
So you should perk up on this if you're part of the rule of law
in general, maybe not FBI, but you want people to be able to
hold the evil in this society accountable by the third party
that we have all elected to give away.
We're not going to do vigilante justice if we're going to have
the government function the way it's supposed to.
It says the bill would hamper pro-life states from
investigating criminal abortions.
OK, now we're talking about federalism.
Criminal abortions in pro-life states means the states,
according to the Dobbs decision, are doing what they want to do.
They are setting up laws. If they're not able to prosecute
those laws simply because the federal government stepped in
and overreached and said that they are going to basically
eliminate the ability for certain information to be shared
with law enforcement, we've got a real problem here.
He says it would hamper the criminal abortion
investigations. If a 30 year old soccer coach
gets a 13 year old pregnant on his soccer team, takes her for
an abortion. The law protects the rapist the
way that it's written as currently and not the 13 year
old girl. That's a compelling argument to
me. I don't want to see children
sacrificed be, you know, because of some adults privacy concerns
when they may have been violated the law.
And also you're on the Internet, you're in the public when you
walk around in the world, somebody can come up and film
you at any time. Why?
Because you're in the world, you have a public face and no one
can stop it. They could write anything about
you. They can say where you went.
This should not be and does not consider, should not be
considered a real threat. Like going into the world has
some consequences to it. Going and acting like a fool in
a McDonald's in public, people may video you, you'll go viral
for trying to throw something over the top of the counter.
That's just the nature of human interest.
We have the ability to do it more than we used to.
But you could have made the local news when you were in the
80s too. This idea that people think that
they are protected from having their public action shared with
the public is false. And I've even talked about this
like in some of my first Fox interviews, I went on on Gino's
program, what is it called Unfiltered, and we talked about
it. Your expectation of privacy
online is very, very low. Almost none.
You want to protect it, Do your own work.
Go out there and spend money, VPNs and so on.
Go out there and get end to end encrypted apps, but you're not
entitled to privacy. That's not real, not on the
Internet. You're going through another
person's apparatus, another company, and you're running all
the stuff out there anyway. These things are dangerous if
you're going to start using tools that sound good and get
everybody on board because Internet privacy sounds like a
thing we want, and then you realize it's actually going to
protect pretty bad stuff. It's bipartisan, so it's likely
to pass. If you guys want to reach out to
your representatives and say you've got concerns about this,
you can do that. And you can also read this
article at catholicvote.org, which I recommend 'cause you
might as well, you might as well be educated on it.
All right, All right. Should we get into the meat and
potatoes, this fun stuff? Merrick Garland, what did he do?
Oh, OK. So here's Daily Wire talking
about it. The House votes to hold Garland
in contempt for withholding the Biden document case audio.
What? That's not a good headline, is
it? Come on, Daily Wire, you can do
better. So what happened?
We got Republicans with only one dissenting vote, went 216 to
206, and they voted to hold him in contempt.
That's a big deal, being in contempt of Congress.
He now shares some common ground with Eric Holder.
And you'll remember Eric Holder and his long jail term that he
served right for being in contempt of Congress, or maybe
he didn't. Why?
Because nothing happens. This is a ceremonial thing.
This is a shiny object. This is the running after and
trying to get the raccoon type attention span that we have
holding on to the shiny Dimes. It's going to get them on Fox
News to talk about it and they can say Merrick Garland is very,
very bad and all this kind of nonsense.
You got people on the political leftover.
What is this at MSNBC saying it's an unfortunate stunt?
It actually is a stunt. They're actually correct in this
case. This is totally a political
stunt. There is no teeth in this.
Are they going to go to jail like Steve Bannon?
Are they going to go to jail like you saw Peter Navarro?
No, they're not. Now, why is that?
Because the wrong party is in power.
We are dealing with a completely weaponized government that is
working for partisan ends. And the guy who was appointed by
the current resident of the White House, that guy is Merrick
Garland. When you hold the head of the
Justice Department in contempt of Congress, which is a Co equal
branch of government, executive versus legislative right, and
Congress has ceded its powers and has been ceding its powers
for coming up on 100 years now, at least going back to 1946 with
the Administrative Procedures Act.
They made the executive agencies more powerful than them.
They ceded their authorities. They got nothing.
Think about this. If you're held in contempt in a
regular criminal case or even in a civil case where a judge gets
sick of your behavior, they'll throw you in jail.
The judge is not an executive. They just have the authority to
tell somebody who's standing within the courthouse, who's
carrying a gun, who can execute some sort of actual authority on
you under the threat of violence.
They'll take you, they'll throw you in jail, and you'll go do 30
days for contempt. That's not how it works in this
case. Congress has no one to do this.
Or do they? They got a Sergeant at arms.
Are they going to send the Sergeant at arms and the US
Capitol Police to go out and grab Merrick Garland and set up
this constitutional crisis? That sounds hilarious, by the
way. Let's do that.
We're already in the Banana Republic.
Let's start pitting. Who's got the strongest flex?
Who's got the best arm wrestling capabilities?
Congress does have an armed branch that has no right to
exist, as far as I can tell. Like, I have zero idea why the
Capitol Police exist. The what I call the National
Mall cops. They're terrible.
Maybe that's why they don't want to send them after a Merrick
Garland. Wouldn't it be fun to set up
that conflict? Merrick Garland and his his
DOJATFFBIUS Marshall Service, blah blah blah.
You know, Merrick Garland has an entire detail of FBI agents that
keep him safe and they follow him around everywhere.
You want to do some funny stuff? You guys want to cry about the
Merrill Lago thing? Let's do this for real.
Forget that with the Mira Lago thing is nonsensical that you
had DHS versus FBI. In theory, those are both
executive agencies. No, no, let me let me see
Capitol Police versus FBI security detail.
Let's go put that guy in cuffs for contempt of Congress.
It's not going to happen. You know why?
In the same way that the whistleblower complaints that
we've thrown have gone nowhere, They've gone nowhere.
And it's very simple why the government investigates the
government and determines that the government has done nothing
wrong. Here you are.
This is actually coming from the Hill.
This is not written that recently.
It was written the other day, but it's a month old at least
document. It's a 57 page memo coming from
the Office of Legal Counsel OLC in the DOJ.
And this internal memo said that Merrick Garland would be
protected from prosecution from Congress.
Given that Joe Biden has asserted executive privilege
over the tapes of Joe Biden being interviewed by a
theoretically nonpartisan organization that is obviously a
partisan organization in the interviews he did with the
special counsel's office, Robert her why are why are the
Republicans even asking for this?
By the way, if you don't know what happened was the the
special counsel interviewed Biden, right?
We covered this year and the decision was as they were not
going to indict him for any of the things, he clearly broke the
law, which they stayed in their findings.
But he's a kind of like sympathetic old man with a bad
memory. And that was kind of that whole
line of, of reasoning. And because of that, they don't
want to indict him. That's prosecutorial discretion.
They have that authority. Even if you don't like it.
I don't like it. I think it's absurd.
I think it highlights the the dual nature that we are dealing
with right now that we have this two tiered system of of
government and justice. That's great.
Actually for the arguments that Trump wants to make.
They're right there. Let them sit fine.
The problem is, is that they wanted to hear the actual audio
tapes. Republicans says, hey, we've
seen your transcripts. They look doctored.
And we can't tell how long the pauses are, how confused or the
tone or the tenor or how sympathetic or if you're like
nodding along or leading along. We want the audio.
Why do they want the audio? Because it'll make really good
sound bites. People, let's be real.
It's going to make awesome sound bites for the presidential
campaign that's going on. And they're not wrong.
But Congress, they're a feckless organization that ceded their
authority to the to the executive.
And now they want a piece of it and they don't get it.
And it's because they've been doing this for 80 plus years.
They weakened themself. Congress is supposed to be the
first among equals, the most powerful branch, because they
have almost all of the powers that are given.
The executive has very, very little and Congress gave it
away. Now they're going to see the
consequences of of of failing our American system by not
abiding by the oath that they had and not keeping the
Constitution the way it was supposed to be done.
The GOP has the transcript. That's all they're going to get.
They're not going to turn it over.
And this memo already says it. He can't be prosecuted.
Why? Because executive authority,
because Co equal branch of government, because Congress
doesn't actually have the balls to stand behind the courage of
their conviction, which is to say we want it.
We have an authorized right to it.
This is the reason we're going to go do it.
No checks and balances. Yeah, you're exactly right.
Sons of Liberty MAGA in the in the chat.
So much for checks and balances. That's exactly it.
When you give up the authorities that the the founders put in,
all of those checks and balances are hedged against each other.
It's the same thing you see in our derivatives market right now
where everybody is leveraging all these different things.
You screw up one of those leverages and you can drop the
entire House of Cards. The American House of Cards is
based on Co, equal branches of government.
That means you can't give up the authorities that make you Co and
equal. What's even more interesting is
that the whole idea of judicial review that the Supreme Court
asserted, they were actually kind of a pretty weak
organization. They were weak, but they went
out there and asserted a right, and now we have judicial
reviews. So they actually bolstered their
position, unlike the courts, which have bolstered their
position. Congress has been slowly ceding
ground to the executive since the beginning because it's hard
to do legislation. And that's how you get this kind
of overreach. That's how you get this kind of
stupidity. And we're going to get into
Chris Ray's stuff in just a second.
Seeing some of these guys. Some of you guys are ordering
Mad Hat Jerky. It must be a Father's Day thing.
I'm seeing some decent orders come through.
If you guys want to get some of the best snacks out there in
this country. An 11 year old kids recipe from
his grandfather. Transfer the kids 18 years old.
Right now. He is living the American dream,
employs up to 20 people making some of the best jerky in
America. It is superior to anything and
I'm a jerky fan. I used to be a surveillance guy,
so having you know, some like dried meat in your car is really
helpful. Mad hat jerky.com/kyle Matt with
two TS hat with 1tjerky.com/kyle.
Use my promo code Kyle for your first order.
Get 20% off there and then it will tag us.
And then once you figure out what it is you like and it's the
best is black truffle, which I keep telling you guys, and the
roasted garlic. Once you figure out what you
like, then you can go and get a subscription.
It's a little bit expensive for a snack, but it's high protein
and good food cost a little bit of money.
So that's what the deal is. If you can't afford it, No skin
off our back. We're the worst grifters in
America. You'll find out here at the Kyle
Serafin show. But check out Mad Hat
jerky.com/kyle, see what you think.
Check out their pricing. And the bigger the bag, the
better the deal. I think that's the way that it
usually works out anyway, right? So get yourself a good sized bag
of this. All right, let's talk about
spending money in ways that are really good.
FBI director Chris Wray, five day visit to Kenya Hua.
There's this moment in the in the movie Jaws, by the way.
It's one of my favorite moments and this I don't know why.
Hold on. Let me just go to the full
screen here. It's my favorite moment in the
jaws. My buddy and I used to do this
all the time. We used to watch Jaws before
we'd go deep sea fishing when I was younger, used to work for
Dell and we'd drive down to the coast and we'd go off there and
try to catch sharks and stuff. And I caught a bunch of sharks.
And there's this great moment where this guy's like, that
wasn't whatever that was not that was a tiger shark.
It was a shark. It was a tiger shark.
You know, they had that like, really funny, like little thing,
fifties, 60s, kind of talking about it.
And the guy goes. And whenever someone says
something so weird that I can't actually fathom it, like FBI
Director Chris Ray spent five days in Kenya, in my head, I
just hear the guy in from the from the jaws maybe going, yeah,
there he is. Why did he go to Kenya?
What the heck is he doing there? He's on an official mission for
an American law enforcement officer, a guy who's supposed to
be directing this agency that does what, like investigates?
Oh, because they're an intelligence agency and they're
going to go make connections with weird countries like Kenya.
There's zero reason why the guy should be hanging out in Kenya
unless he had like, maybe like a trip to Kenya that he was really
hoping to go on because God knows what, maybe he was taking
some people that really needed to go to Kenya for some fun.
I don't get it. He went on A5 day trip there.
The bed. The big news is that we always
pay for this. That means it was an FBI
security detail of like a dozen SWAT agents and people that work
for him 24/7 that have to keep him safe.
Because like, because someone's going to recognize Chris Ray
when he goes to flip in Kenya. You wouldn't recognize Chris Ray
if he was shopping at your grocery store.
I'm just going to tell you, even if he was in a suit, you'd be
like, who's that asshole? He just, he has so little
personal gravity. So that's what we've got.
And it made me think about jets and trips and misuse of
authorities. And I want to bring it back up
again because this is another one of these things.
This was like, this is Trump's guy, right?
He picked him. We're hopeful that he would pick
someone better. But this is one of those
missteps. And it's always funny.
It always gets thrown back in our faces on the right.
This is an article that you see there from Daily Wire as well.
It's an old article. And the reason I pulled it up is
because I contributed to it. Brandon Dre, who's a friend.
Yeah. I think he's now with Fox.
He wrote about how Grassy was drilling the FBI director based
on these daily, these Daily Wire investigations into Bureau use
of the jet. It was AG 550.
This is this Gulfstream, the $60 million aircraft that we, the
taxpayers buy that we let Chris Ray fly around in.
And that's his face that he has about it.
And it reminded me exactly why this contempt thing is
nonsensical. It's the same reason why
investing in the FBI, the FBI director about his jet use
doesn't matter. None of these things freaking
matter, do they? Because they've given the
authority to do actual oversight and they don't.
They don't stand by the courage or convictions by defunding the
things that they could defund. Imagine if you just pulled DOJ
funding. You're like, oh, you don't want
to give us our tapes? Fine, we stop paying for your
stuff, enjoy it. Not only are we not going to
have the tapes, we're turning off the lights in your dumb
building. Send your people home.
We're doing a government shutdown.
This is why I said no one for speaker folks.
This is my reasoning. Government is a terrible tool,
and whenever we cannot use it, we should not use it.
It won't surprise you if you see at the bottom of the screen
here. The Fact Check is the FBI chief.
He's not a chief, He's a director.
Is the FBI chief Chris Ray required to travel on government
planes? This is from November of 2022.
This is when I first went public with this stuff.
And you won't be shocked to find it's Newsweek.
Newsweek, a approved outlet for leaking information to the
public that is favorable to the government.
And so they go on this whole article, and they show that
picture of Chris Ray's face going, yeah, screw you.
This is after those famous exchanges with Josh Howley,
right, where he's talking about him going to Sarnac Lake and not
going to upstate New York. And he flies home to to Buckhead
every weekend. And also the kind of stuff
because Chris Ray uses the jet, like every week he's flying our
jet around. And the end of it is the Fact
Check is, yeah, of course he's required to use it.
Why is he recorded to use it? Because this is the actual
quotes that the FBI give. They, they're willing to give
statements whenever it's favorable to them.
The FBI says that explains the difference between the use of
the FBI crafts for personal reasons between the Attorney
General and the FBI Director. The FBI Director travels by
government aircraft due to the FB is national security mission
which necessitates specific communication abilities,
capabilities, and security considerations.
This is all crap. This happened in 2011 by the
way. And Chris Wray pays the least
amount of money possible for a private jet with a security
detail wherever he goes. Which makes you wonder, why do
these people act like kings? I did an entire episode way, way
back in the podcast that was called Politically Appointed
Princess because that's how they're being treated.
You get the perks of big government, big government
aircraft, big government security.
There's nothing more big time than having like a security
detail move everybody out of the way and check out your areas
before you go and have a burger at McDonald's, right?
What makes you feel more big time?
Nothing. And that's why we see this
article that came out yesterday, Jet setting.
Jill Biden saddles the Americans with $345,000 in private jet
use. Folks, that is nothing.
There are millions of dollars at play with Chris Ray doing it,
Jill Biden. And by the way, the reason I
think I said this the other day, but I absolutely hate first
ladies, all of them universally. You know why?
Because they're not elected. And I don't care.
I don't care who your wife is. You're like, name me another
organization where the wife or the husband of the person in
charge of a large organization makes any difference whatsoever.
It doesn't exist. Like who's the wife of the CEO
of Walmart like, and what policy does she make?
The only one I ever hear about is Jeff Bezos ex-wife 'cause she
gives away his money like crazy to like dumb liberal causes.
I mean, are we being really serious here as as a country?
The first lady's official position is nothing.
Why is there an office of the first lady?
And by the way, yeah, you guys are talking about Melania.
Yeah, includes Melania and includes Jackie Kennedy Onassis.
I don't care about any of them. Nobody elects these people.
They're just people in the background.
Should they be a decent human being?
Sure. Do they contribute to the values
that you're going to see in the candidate?
Yes. They're not on the ballot
though, So give me a break. The idea that we're going to pay
coming up on a half million dollars of this woman flying
back and forth between Delaware and Paris and DNC and doing
this. They don't pay for any of this
stuff. They bring security details.
They're always protected. And I get that, sort of, but Joe
Biden is irrelevant, and I don't want to see us paying for this
stuff. It's like the Obamas used to do
the same thing, right? They'd fly back and forth to
Hawaii. This cult of celebrity in
America is really gross, and it's bad on the right and the
left. It's idolatry.
It's quite the worst thing that we could do.
It's the opposite of American values, which is to say that we
try to have this like aristocracy, this noble class.
You want to know why people think that they're above the law
and why they're better than everyone else?
It's because they're treated like they're better than
everybody else. That woman who basically is a
crappy, you know, Community College teacher, she's not even
a professor, right? She's a Community College
teacher. Jill Biden is elevated to the
point where she's got a security detail of a bunch of armed men
and she flies around in a flipping private jet.
Of course, she feels like she's special.
Meanwhile, she's abusing her husband by making him go in
public and do this stuff, right? Hopefully we get demonetized for
that too. Joe Biden just standing there
aimlessly and confused. I'm just saying this stuff is
weird. So let's get down to the some of
the other issues that are going on.
I think we covered down that Merrick Garland's not going
anywhere. Oh, I, I actually threw this on
the screen here, too. I've been talking about this for
over a year, folks. This is actually from the Daily
Wire article going back a year with that picture of Grassley,
former FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Ah, yours truly tipped off Daily
Wire to the alleged misuse of the bureau's jet, right?
I talked about this stuff and here's what I said.
Then I'm going to quote myself. Why?
Because it's relevant and it's a year old and it's still correct.
The FBI continues to resist oversight from the statutorily
defined committees in the House and the Senate meant to serve as
guardrails for the FB is use of power and funding.
We need to look no further than the behavior of this agency to
see those running the Bureau believe they are above the
elected representatives in Congress.
And based on the increased budget year over year, there is
no reason for those at the FBI to expect much in the way of
consequences. I hope Senator Grassley follows
through with the consequences for this pattern of behavior.
Do you guys see any consequences coming?
Rhetorical question, right? The answer is no.
Have the Republicans done anything?
No. Holding somebody in contempt is
not consequences if they don't actually fall victim to the
thing that happens. When you're supposed to be held
in contempt, you're supposed to experience discomfort, a loss of
freedom, something that compels you to comply.
That will not happen and we talked about it over a year ago.
Many of you know this is just a pattern of belief.
I'm not saying something that is new to you.
I'm just saying that I went on record over a year ago talking
about this and these guys that we keep electing and women do
nothing. They get out on Fox News and
they think that is the victory because that's what you demand.
Memes and Fox News hits. It's time to demand more.
Otherwise, it gets violent. That's why I think speech is
important. That's why if we give them the
pass, that they're allowed to do whatever the heck they want and
nothing happens. These people need to be voted
out of office. Maybe not voted for it all, and
maybe the other side has to win in order for that to happen.
How dumb is that? You actually have to give these
people a real consequence where their grift of being politicians
doesn't actually continue to pay.
Not great, not a great thing. It's not a great look for any of
us folks. Not at all.
All right, Nicole Wallace, like I said, she gaslights.
I want to play a little bit of this.
This is the real comparison that should be made.
We talked about it earlier with The Economist when it says like,
what's the, you know, who's the lesser of two evils?
It's really obvious. And they're actually trying to
play on the same field that we continue to attack Biden on,
which is to say that he's basically a dead man walking.
His brain is not functional. And the people that want to vote
for him must not be either. They're hoping that they can
convince their voting group and and energize them enough to say
that Donald Trump is equally bad.
It's false. I'm going to play you a couple
minutes. I'm not sure how far I'm going
to go into this one. It's another one of those longer
clips. Actually, listening to Donald
Trump riff, you can just tell that he's like way more dialed
in. She talks about sharks.
I'm not sure I'm going to play the clip long enough.
So let me summarize it. She goes, he starts talking
about sharks. What he does is he starts
talking about a guy who makes boats, being forced into making
electric boats. And then he's like, what happens
if The thing is, you know, dropping down under the water
because these heavy batteries and nothing's working and the
batteries are going to get wet and there's a shark that's over
there. And we've had a lot of shark
attacks lately because that's what Trump does.
He just goes off on his tangents and he's like, people are
talking about the shark attacks and they're like, oh, there's so
many shark, they don't understand the sharks.
It's not a big deal. Just the shark just wanted to
chomp on some ladies arm. So he goes on this like little
silly, weird thing. He's tired, he's in the sun,
he's just riffing with people. And then he goes right back to
his topic. And he was like, yeah, anyway,
the batteries and the shark or whatever.
And they're like, we're not worried about the shark, we're
worried about the batteries. And then, you know, you could
get electrocuted or whatever, the blow up, whatever.
All right. He actually has a totally
coherent point. The only way that they can make
Trump sound crazy is these jump cuts of him saying stuff.
The way you make Joe Biden sound crazy is you just play him and
you just let him go and he just stops talking and he just blanks
out there. And his brain has that like
windows blue screen of death and the freaking, you know, turning
over of the of the sandbar of the hourglass and it just sits
there and spins. And he just, you know, he just
doesn't know what's happening around him anymore.
He tries to figure out what if he's still alive?
That's not Trump's problem. Trump just goes off on tangents.
They're objectively different in this way.
But let's do a Nicole Wallace gaslighting little thing here.
Game changer. What's the question today?
More specifically, what? If what?
If the 2024 presidential campaign cycle isn't actually
going to be fought on the ground that we today, right now, think
it is, what if the question isn't, are we really going to do
this? We're going to maybe elect a
convicted felon running explicitly on a platform that
ends the American experiment in democracy.
But on a more basic level, should we be asking a different
question? Like, is he all right?
Watch as the presumptive Republican presidential nominee
celebrates a deadly domestic terrorist attack he helped
incite on the United States Capitol.
As he openly shows contempt for and toured his own supporters
standing in front of him as he rambles on and on and on and on
about sharks, of all things. And rant so bizarre that
Unhinged doesn't come close to capturing it.
He just came up. Are the teleprompters not
working? So not even a little bit.
Great job. And then I don't pay the company
that does it right. And then I end up with a story.
Trump doesn't pay. I don't pay contractors that do
a job. And that's a job.
That's a job. This is the worst border in the
history of the world. There's never been no third
world country has a border like that and no third.
I'll tell you what and I hope the military, I hope the
military revolts at the voting booth.
I went to a boat company in South Carolina.
All. Right.
Then he goes on to the shark thing.
It's like you didn't even let the guy finish the thought.
You're trying so quickly to show that he doesn't know what's
going on. Like he's just a guy talking
live. That's what happens when you
talk live. I do it everyday.
I know a little bit about it. You want to know what also
happens when you talk live. You don't have any thoughts in
your head. You repeat the same thing and on
and on and on. Nicole Wallace is absolutely
just God awful and terrible. But listen to the music.
Listen to the propaganda feed, right?
It's very serious music. They're doing this news thing,
and it made me remember this funny little piece that I found
on the Internet. Yeah, I went on the Internet for
you. I went into social media.
I went into Instagram, which I despise.
I think it's full of online digital horse.
But we went there and found this.
And what it reminded me of is that with the right music, with
the right lighting, with the right serious faces and the
right kind of thing, that Scott Pelley kind of delivery, you can
make anything sound credible. So what we're going to do right
now is we're going to play a funny little experiment in in
propaganda, and it's also really funny, so we're going to enjoy
it too. Also, there's a terrible moment
at the end that I will call out when we're done.
If you're listening to the audio podcast right now, what you're
missing is wonderful cinematography.
Slow zoom, close in, fades, pivot rotations of the camera,
jump cuts to intelligent looking people making commentary that
sounds serious with nice words. OK, you're going to hear the
music. You're going to know that, but
the entirety of this video is a man who's just like a regular
dude. Like nothing more regular than
anybody like than than this dude.
Cooking a hot dog? He's just a dude cooking a hot.
Dog OK in a pan, not on a grill, not outdoors.
Know it like the least amount of work with the crappiest amount
of preparation. It's a dude washing a pack of
hot dogs, throwing a hot dog on his pan, and then eating a sad
hot dog and a bun with ketchup. That's that's the spoiler.
The spoiler is is ketchup, which is obviously incorrect.
You should do it with mustard. I'm just disgusted by the
ketchup people. They must be Canadian.
OK, but listen to how it's framed.
It sounds really serious. It sounds like a real thing.
Here we go. Connor is a model of who the
modern chef really is. If you didn't know him, you'd
think. This guy's just even the
cheapest food you can. Find.
But there's so much more to it. The magic of his food lies in
the simplicity. His flavor profiles are
nostalgic, almost childlike. His food feels attainable and to
me that's beautiful. So.
So a cheap meal with Mitt Romney's favorite meat.
Thank you for the chat reminding me that that his favorite meats
are hot dogs. Hot dogs are Mitt Romney's
favorite beats. You guys probably know that.
That's how billionaires love things.
A cheap meal with the cheapest meat possible of random things
thrown into a grinder that pop out into a sausage casing.
They're nostalgic flavour profiles.
They're almost childlike, aren't they?
It's a freaking bun made with some sort of like enriched
flower garbage and a crappy piece.
This isn't even like a nice hot dog.
We just saw. By the way, if you guys are
following the news about hot dogs, the the Nathan's hot dog
eating competition, the world champion forever and ever again.
This guy named Joey Chestnut, he stopped being in the
competition, I guess for pride month.
And and This is why you should have some veterans that are
friends of yours because my buddies are like, yo, the dude
who made a living eating hot dogs is not going to eat hot
dogs. My friends are from Long Island.
They're they're not going to eat hot dogs in the hot dog
competition. And you're like, oh, no, that
sounds like a real problem. And he's like, what did you
expect from a dude who eats wieners for a living?
And it's like, what did I expect?
Yeah, of course there's plenty of frotagene in that sort of
statement. I don't know if you eat hot dogs
for a living, Right. But I'm just telling you, this
is propaganda. It's music, it's lighting.
It's, it's making it look serious.
And they're all about trying to move you to some sort of
theatrical position where you believe what they say, just like
this. Biden just put out an executive
order, did he not? You guys may see this somewhere
else too. An executive order that's
supposed to curb the illegal aliens crossing the border.
And it's going to make people ineligible for asylum if they
break the numbers. You know what the numbers are,
y'all? Do you know what the numbers
are? It's 2500 people a day.
Illegally crossing is going to trigger a backlash into locking
them down. So they will lock down the
numbers from 2500 to 1500. Now let's just say people walk
right up to the limit and don't break the rule. 2500 people a
day is 912,000 people a year. That's the Biden
administration's version of locking down the border.
By the way. He's being sued by the ACLU over
this because the ACLU, the American, what is it Center for
Civil Liberties or what? ACLAC, American Center for Civil
Liberties, I don't know. I can't remember what they're
called anymore. Somebody put in the chat.
I forgot, sorry. The ACLU is suing him on behalf
of non Americans. I don't think you should be
allowed to use American in your name if you, I don't mean this
in a governmental way, I just mean that we should just all
reject you if you're going to use American in your name and
then you're going to basically use our laws to try to fight for
people who are not American. I just think there's nothing
American about that. It's really gross.
But that's the thing, right? And, and so that's why we got
this little piece coming out. You want to know why this is
going on? It's because the Border Patrol's
not suspendable. They're they've seen what
happens. The government investigates the
government and finds the government harmless.
The government says, oh, you've been holding them in contempt.
Well, we decided we're not going to do anything about it.
Merrick Garland's going to continue on.
But if you break our policies, you're done.
They know it and they don't have the courage of their
convictions. Here's a little Border Patrol
agent, a clip from CNN, Very interesting guy has his voice
modulated and they're pissed. But he doesn't want to lose his
job, which is my argument. Americans are addicted to
comfort. What do you think this executive
order is that going to do anything?
We're all only cooking water three years and seven months.
In a rare encounter, we meet a Border Patrol agent eager to
vent. He asks us to mask his identity,
worried he'll be fired for talking so openly.
Do the border. You don't have to babysitter.
Does it frustrate you when you hear that?
When you hear the narrative? Like, why aren't Border Patrol
doing anything? And.
Our hands and thoughts if I don't blow them across and they
call them for blame, no, I'm in trouble.
I'm going to lose market he. Blames the current
administration. What do you mean he blames the
current administration? It is the current
administration. By the way, the chat Kings week
you come through for me. American Civil Liberties Union.
Thank you. I know what it is.
I just don't know what it's called today.
That's just the way it works sometimes On this Thursday at a
a Joe Biden moment, maybe. All right, it is this
administration. What do you mean he blames this
administration? And think about this.
Your job is to stop people from penetrating the United States
border. But if you actually stop people
from penetrating the US border, you lose your job.
We're living in the upside down, folks, OK.
And that's what's on the that's what should be on the ballot.
Was it perfect under Trump? No, but those people come in and
they take jobs from people who have the least amount of money
that are most likely to be dumb and vote for Democrats.
They're actually voting against their interests, and they're
probably also voting against their values.
I cannot figure out why there is not more Republican outreach to
Black communities. I don't know Black people that,
you know, that I'm going to have conversation with.
I've been in urban areas that are really shitty and there's
like all kinds of drugs and gangs and bad, you know, there's
stuff. But even a lot of those people
go to church. Like there's a fundamental
Christian value system that exists for a lot of black people
because it's still the common thing for most Americans.
Turns out black people are Americans, too.
Who knew, right? Republicans get on it.
What are you doing? Start the outreach and do it
based on values. It's like, hey, do you want to
keep more of your money? Yeah.
Doesn't that sound better? Do you think the government
should provide for you? Would you like to be able to
earn on your own? Do you have hope and faith in
your own abilities 'cause we want to empower that.
Like, what's good for the goose should be good for the gander.
The policies are good on their face.
And by the way, do you care about babies or do you want
people spending money on Planned Parenthood and killing off Black
babies 'cause this could be a really good talking point?
We don't see Republicans making argues on the merit to the
issues. They always do these pandering
things and this is another one. The border, it's like, hey, when
we bring people in illegally, they're taking jobs that you
could go get that would help you step up in the world and make
more money. And by the way, we'd like you to
pay less taxes on that money. How you feel about that?
That should be the way it is. The argument should be good on
the merits. And that's what we talked about
with Dexter Taylor, who's now sitting in freaking Rikers
Island because he made guns in the so-called land of the free.
I'm just saying it should be easy enough to win this stuff
and it's not because we're not paying attention to the serious
stuff and we are being taken in by stuff like this.
Nicole Wallace, by the way, this article that that's where I got
this clip from. Voter ignorance is Trump's
superpower. It could also be his weakness,
relying on disinformation, ignorance and voter amnesia.
It's almost like a perfect projection.
If you say it was serious music, then you can actually believe
this stuff. This is coming from MSNBC.
So hard left loony leftists. But let me just say, she sounds
reasonable to people that want to believe this stupid stuff.
Why? They want to believe it?
Because look, she's got nice hair and she's smiling and she's
got the White House behind her. That's serious stuff they're
talking about there. They've got the music, just like
the damn hot dog video. And somehow I triggered a
condiment war in the chat. I'm correct.
It's mustard. And by the way, George Hill
agreed with me. He actually sent it out and said
that was the real travesty of the whole thing, which I agree
with. All right, couple of things that
are going on. It's worth noting this is non
action, but let's keep it in there.
I want to keep you informed on all the things. the Fed had a
chance to change interest rates. They chose not to.
The Fed's interest rate mistake, by the way, they called it a
mistake over at MSNBC because they're partisan advocates.
Sorry, this is just NB CS, not MSNBC, same logo.
The Fed's interest rate mistake is a gift for Trump.
What does it say? It says that the economy is not
good, which is what Trump is arguing, which is what people
who actually live in the economy, as they called in the
military, living on the economy. If you have to go out and buy
things, then, you know, things are expensive.
Inflation sucks. The housing market is terrible,
as we played yesterday, including the pallet cleanser,
which was really fun for me. the Fed decided austerity measures
are still here. We're going to have to keep the
interest rates at the rates that they've been at.
So we're not going to see them cut, which means that the next
time we could see this is maybe in September, just before we go
into before we go into the election cycle, where it's
actually going to be really critical.
But they're calling this a gift for Trump.
No, it's not a gift for Trump. It's just being honest.
For God's sake. Who knew?
Yeah. the Fed is doing the thing that has to be done, which is
like, act like an adult. And nobody likes the adults.
That's what I've realized about Democrats right now is that I'm
not mad at them because of the stupidity of it.
It's because they're adults that didn't grow up through
childhood. They want things like fairness.
And everybody have the same outcome.
Do you know who wants that? Toddlers, if you give one kid a
cookie and you give another kid 2 cookies, even though the other
kid is twice as big and work twice as hard that day and can
handle twice the calories, both kids look at it one's like, oh,
I got twice as many cookies, I must be better than you.
And the other one's like, why didn't I get 2 cookies?
It's because you're 3, dude. I'm talking about my own house.
Obviously here. You're three.
You don't get 2 cookies. Your sister who has 80% more
body weight than you is going to get the other cookie.
That's how it works. Democrats want.
The they want that that equality of outcome.
They want everybody to feel fair.
That's not how the world works. Who told you the world was fair?
It's a childish attitude. It doesn't mean that we don't
try to help, but still. But think about this.
The minute you get into be a teenager and something unfair
happens, What did your parents tell you?
They were like, yeah, the world's not fair.
Like, welcome to the reality. Oh, you had a consequence that
somebody else didn't experience when they did the same thing.
Yeah, that's how it works, dude. Not everybody gets everything
all the time. Now you are a grown up.
Welcome to the welcome to the difficulty of life.
It's universal suffering. Find some meaning in it.
Find some meaning in your suffering the way Jordan
Peterson talks about. And usually you do that by
picking up the cross and trying to follow Christ.
It works. Why?
Because you better find some reason to do it.
Otherwise you're just out there wondering why you have difficult
outcomes. Sometimes my wife and I talk
about it. Why is our road to hoe so much
more difficult than other people?
How come I felt compelled to say something when that Border
Patrol guy feels perfectly fine with just doing as he's told and
keeping his job? I don't know, sound wired.
I don't belabor it. I just offer it up.
That's what we should be doing. But if you don't know how to do
that, then you can vote Democrat because then you can be like,
well, fairness, it's very childish.
It's very difficult. It's difficult to overcome.
All right, last little thing, I want to throw this out there.
This is a funny little thing. This is like a celebratory piece
coming from also NBC, and they're talking about the
Republican National Committee is preparing for a convention that
Trump may not be able to attend. Why?
Because he might be in prison because of his legal issues.
That's what they're out there talking about.
I also contrasted it because Politico told us already that
Joe Biden's going to be nominated virtually before he
goes to the convention, just in case they have like, I don't
know, a race riot and they can't handle it.
And because they screwed up their order of operations, they
booked their convention on the wrong day.
And Ohio's ballot measure requires him to be nominated
beforehand, otherwise he's not going to make it on the ballot.
So he almost misses out on going to be on the ballot in Ohio
because he's a moron 'cause he's got brain dead people running.
His brain dead campaign where he says brain dead things.
Meanwhile, now you got them trying to say, well, the
Republicans may have to deal with no Trump 'cause he's a
convicted felon. They love that.
By the way, the convicted felon is all over the place.
So we're living in the dumbest timeline.
And these two guys, the contrast is pretty clear.
But man, I really wish I could go back upstream and talk Trump
into not running. I really do.
It would have been better for this country.
Find someone who didn't have all that baggage.
Doesn't mean they wouldn't attack that person.
I'm just saying throw the mag of vote behind the people.
There's so many Never Trumpers that are so angry.
They will never change their mind because they are also
irrational and they can't look at what's good for them.
It's going to be ugly coming up in November, folks.
Just get yourself tucked in for it.
The inevitability of whatever they decide to do when it comes
to prison or anything else, it's not going to be good.
You should prepare yourself mentally.
People are shocked that he was convicted in New York.
That was inevitable. And if you think that those
idiots that are running that kind of playbook, the people who
came from DOJ, that weaponized little organization, stepped
over into Alvin Bragg's office in the prosecutor's office in
Manhattan and then convicted a former president of nonsense,
think about what they had to do to get there.
They had to pass a law that allowed them to basically
overcome the statute of limitations.
They had to make some arguments of some underlying crimes at the
FEC or that the Federal Election Commission did not actually go
after in a federal sense. Then they had to go after and
convert and try to use a convicted liar to impugn the
honor of a guy who's not been convicted of anything up to that
point. And then they got 34 guilty
counts. You think they walked all the
way up to that edge, did not put this guy in prison?
You think that they're going to suddenly have like a moderation,
They're going to have retrospective and go, oh, this
is a bad step. We should probably let the
political process play out. You think that's what's going to
happen? Is there any evidence that
that's going to happen? Because I don't think so by I'm
just saying it doesn't seem like that's the way it's going to go
in my world. Last thing I'm going to show
you, I'm going to tell you why weaponized government is so
dangerous and scary because this is the other piece We started
off talking about the shooting or the woman putting her head a
gun to her head and going to the FB is office.
Here's the last little piece. I want you to see this.
We'll talk more about it with Steve friend tomorrow.
Arizona man charged with selling guns to use in the mass
shooting. I'm not I'm less interested in
the fact that he was charged, but more about what goes on.
We refer to it as the playbook, hashtag, the playbook.
The playbook is continuing. The FBI continues to do it.
That's DOJ prosecuting it. They're perfectly fine with it.
And that's Merrick Garland, who was just held in contempt.
They're totally cool with this. And what is he?
What was he indicted for and what was he arrested for?
You guys? Ready.
Firearms trafficking, transfer of a firearm for use in a hate
crime. I didn't even know that was a
crime. Transfer for firearm for use in
a hate crime. Get the hell out of here.
And possession of an unregistered firearm.
The indictment shows that this guy, whose name is Mark Adam
Prieto, he was in Prescott, AZ. He met up with two individuals
who happened to be working for the FBI.
What do we tell you on this program?
If you meet someone that agrees with all your worst ideas, they
want to help you carry them out for the exact amount of money
you got, That's a fed. They're not your friend.
They devised a plan to commit a mass shooting on African
Americans and other minorities to incite a race war before the
2024 presidential election. The FBI's boner is extreme when
it comes to race war people. We've seen them go after people
who are going to shoot up a power grid in order to trigger a
race war. God, they love the race war
idea, don't they? This is the playbook.
Somebody from the FBI reaches out to you and tries to get you
to do something stupid. You're stupid, so you agree to
do it. You sell them rifles.
So they got him on the gun charge.
He sold some a KS and some ARS. Even better, we can get into the
gun control game. Early in the investigation, they
were monitoring his movements and then they stopped him and he
was in possession of seven firearms.
He was taken into federal custody.
Then they did a search warrant, his home in Prescott.
They found more guns and luckily they were even able to find an
unregistered short billed rifle, AHA National National Firearms
Act violation. Now we've got all these
different felonies and now we're going to come after them.
And it's all about race war. Because people are racist
because they want to sell guns to kill people because guns are
racist. This is the FB is narrative.
Why? Because there's money behind it,
the stupidest possible thing. And did somebody go, hey, you
know what? This is entrapment and this is
crap. And like this guy wouldn't do
this if we weren't out there trying to like incite him into
it, that this would never have happened without the FBI being
involved in it. No, nobody has that sort of
sense. So they keep going along to get
along. They keep doing their job, just
like the Border Patrol guy. They keep letting people into
America even though it's against what their their rules are.
There's no fairness. There's no constitutional thing.
Did anyone stop and say, hey, this guy has a fundamental right
to sell people guns and whatever they decide to use them for,
that's their business. And if they if they're actually
federal employees, then what on earth was the actual possible
underlying crime? It doesn't exist.
Our court systems are pretty weak on this stuff.
Our Congress does nothing about it either, and they're just
refunding these people. There you go.
This is the danger of having weaponized government.
The government is seeking an outcome and then they go out and
they deploy it. OK, Should we do a palate
cleanser? It's Thursday.
Many of you are on a work travel.
If you're listening to this on a plane, you had this experience.
This, I think is also sort of the the cost of gaslighting is
that we don't believe these idiots anymore.
I hate travel, I hate getting on a plane, I hate going places, I
hate leaving my house. We're going to cover more of
that tomorrow because I think it's really funny.
I've got a good palate cleanser already queued up for this.
But here's one of those moments. How many things have we even
lied about on aircrafts in the last, let's say, I don't know, 5
to 8 years? You had to wear masks, but you
could take them down to eat and you could drink a coffee cup.
As long as you're drinking, then you could keep the mask down,
but then you had to put the mask back up.
And we are acting like that air was really dangerous even though
there was no transmission of anything because they have the
best filtered air, blah, blah, blah, right?
How many times have they told you we are in a 100% booked full
flight? We are overbooked folks.
And then you get in, you sit down like the people like in the
rows behind you, like they have like extra leg room and there's
no one sitting next to them. And you're like, what the hell
happened to the 100% overbooked flight liars.
Or you go and they go, we are completely out of the overhead
bins. The bins are all full.
There is no more room and you will have to check your bag.
And then you go, OK, fine. You check your bag and you walk
in and then you're like, and there's something like 8 or
different, you know, 10 different spots.
Folks, we are running out of overhead space.
We need to check your back. I hate those things.
I hate travel. I hate all of it.
This guy also understood it. So here's a song that will make
you guys laugh about this. You're constantly being punked
except when they're actually telling you the truth.
They should have a code for this time.
We're serious. I think these guys totally
understood it. It's a funny song, so enjoy.
The fighter did it at the gate. She wants everyone to know that
the plane is super full and she needs a volunteer to check a
bag. Now we have to wait and there's
nowhere we can go. So for now, we're stuck at home
until someone says goodbye. Walking around I can see some
suckers, hard to take the bait, but not me.
I'm built different. I'll know I'll find some space,
get it down the jet way. I give a thumbs up to the pilot.
I check the aisle. I look to my left, I look to my
right and sure enough I'm bust. There is literally no Rd.
There is nothing he can do. Now I gotta go back up the jet
way with my fucking bag while everybody waste.
That's my bad. I didn't think that they were
for real. If there was literally no more
room, they should have said there's literally no more room.
I don't know why I really like that.
It sounds like something from like an 80s air supply, the
style, the ballad, the rock ballad.
It's like that's my jam. If you guys think like I don't
like angry music, I like that kind of music.
I think that's great. Anyway, thanks for joining us
today on rumble.com/cal Serif and I hope you guys have given
us a like you're seeing the live chat.
Some people say they like to drive, Some people tell me like
to fly. I don't care.
I hate travel, I hate all of it. I don't even like driving.
But if I'm going to go somewhere, I'd rather drive than
not. So now you guys heard it here
first, let's do a 5 star review. That song is going to stick in
your head by the way. Go back and listen to it again.
It's really good. I'll have to try to post their
Instagram link because I enjoy. All right, here we go.
So here's a 5 star view coming from Stonko 17.
Stonko 17 says 100% real B5 stars.
Wildly interesting, provocative and well framed, articulated,
argued. But also what these reviews
don't mention enough is how funny this human being BEAN is.
I'm gut busted at least once an episode.
All right, can I give you guys the real story here?
I know who Stonko is. Stonko is a friend, but I'm very
flattered that my friend Stonko listens to the podcast
sometimes. And I really like human being
BEAN. So Stonko and I like to do
something that many of you guys will enjoy doing.
It's something I used to do in the FBI.
There are certain words that when I hear them, I correct
people to the incorrect word. If you were to say human being,
then Stonko would say human being just to screw with you.
And one of the things that I used to do in the FBI is that
when people would say horses for any reason, like, oh, my
daughter, she's she's in a horseback riding competition.
I would say horses horsey back and they would look at you like
what? I don't know why.
It's just like the cross eyed bear.
I always correct people when they say horse.
I say horses, including Mark Naughton, whose daughter rides
horses and it's very funny because they don't know what to
do. They don't know what to do with
a grown man with a beard and a scar on his head who says horses
with a straight face. That's the way that I, I, I play
it. So thanks for appreciating that
Stomco. We appreciate all of you.
Thanks for joining the program y'all.
I hope you guys had fun with us today.
We're going to do a friendly Friday tomorrow.
If you guys have any questions, comments, sarcastic remarks and
you do have some, some of them are super weird.
I try to respond to them if I don't just means I didn't get to
it or you said something that was too weird or you gave me
that crazy Afghan rant about how the surveillance team was
following you. Kyle serafin.com is where you
can go do that questions, the comments, the sarcastic remarks
on the contact me. You can also find all of the
links to the different stuff that we have going on in the
link tree. Don't forget to follow our
sponsors like Patriot coolers, Catholic vote, Mad hat jerky.
You can always use my pillows promo code Kyle and the dash
suspendables.com our promo merch code.
Don't sell me merch. I don't want to do that.
Like somebody was trying to reach out to me and spammy with
that. Nope, we have our own merch
short and scared of well, you guys can do it there.
OK, we'll see you again tomorrow.
Have a great day. God bless you.
See you in the morning. Thanks for listening to the Kyle
Serafin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle
Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth
Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.