Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends and
welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
And today is Thursday. It is February the 19th.
It's about 8:38 central time right now.
I feel like I get further and further away from my start goal
of 830 some mornings. And it's not because there's not
enough to talk about, it's that there is so much coming this way
and and I have so much that I want to try to string into the
time that we spend together. I want to do that justice.
And it ends up being like an editorial nightmare 'cause it's
really wild. Like I'm just going to tell you
from where I'm sitting right now, got a couple screens in
front of me. Some of you guys have seen this
before, but if you guys are watching, you can see I got
screens. They're covered in video clips
and information and tips that come in from some of you.
Little, little kudos to our friend Rose, who is our our chat
moderator over on Rumble sent me a story that I'm going to cover
today 'cause I understand the context of it.
And it's a long, long game. Some of these, these con jobs
that are being done on folks have been going on forever.
So long, five years, eight years, 10 years, just playing
the attention span of the American public.
And it's pretty wild. And then some of them are
really, really short pushes where you got Fox News that is
ramped up its coverage. Apparently we are going to get a
war in Iran. I guess the Trump administration
gave up peace for Lent. That is my sarcastic sort of
disappointment being pushed out there.
So we're going to talk about national security priorities.
We're going to talk about war with Iran.
We are not going to have Steve friend tomorrow for friendly
Friday. So I'm going to see if George
Hill will join me and give the maybe the, the more geopolitical
end of things. Someone who spent a lot of time
in the Intel community that looked at terrorism and and
foreign threats and nation state actors and so on.
So we'll have some commentary about that.
But it's it's really interesting to see the differential between
the way that the American public is handling something, the way
that the American media is pushing it on us, and then maybe
the way things are going overseas, which is a totally
different animal. And so we'll get into some of
that. I'm going to do less commentary
today, more video evidence and, and I'll let you decide 'cause I
want you to be a skeptic. I want you to question, you
know, what biases I'm bringing to it.
If you're seeing something different, let me know what it
is. I'm going to try to give you
both sides. It's very heavy to one side.
If you're a conservative person, especially if you happen to be
one of those folks, or maybe you're just surrounded by people
that watch Fox News for, for God knows what reason, they're
getting fed like a pretty exciting dose of war boner
Viagra right now 'cause they got they're excited.
I think you must be if you watch this coverage, it sounds like
we're about to do some good things.
Still aggressive, still America first to go and worry about
something that I'm not sure is our problem.
So that's what we're going to get to.
If that concerns you, maybe the best time to prepare for
anything is when there is no immediate emergency.
You guys check out my friends over at My Patriot Supply.
It's mypatriotsupply.com/K YLE Doesn't really matter what the
concern you might have, whether it be major storms that you just
saw happen and come through and now you're recovering from it.
And you saw people around you, maybe a family members who lost
power, maybe for a couple hours, maybe for longer.
And you're worried about blackouts.
Or you worried about some mission critical function,
whether it be a refrigerator with medicine in it or maybe it
be a podcast studio like in the case of this place.
Maybe you want to be able to broadcast the apocalypse the way
that we've thought about it. Get yourself an off grid power
system. That's something that's kind of
important, whether it be a backup generator or whether it
be a solar generator like I have, where if everything goes
down and you can't get fuel, I can still get the sun.
It's one of the smartest moves because it protects you from
severe weather. You can kind of hedge against
skyrocketing electrical costs. It's a universal power supply.
If you need uninterrupted power for certain things, I've got the
Grid Doctor 3300 sitting directly outside of the studio.
It's quiet enough to run inside it.
It doesn't put off any kind of fumes because it's running on
nothing but electricity. I don't use the solar capability
right now, but it's something that I can always use if I
choose to fire it up. Right now I'm using it as a
universal power supply, so I have it plugged in to my wall
power, I'm getting power fed into it, and then it's feeding
clean power to the entirety of the studio.
So if that sounds like something that would benefit you, you want
a huge battery system that can be recharged by the sun with
long cables and all the capabilities that go with it.
It's stackable. You can build additional battery
boxes to it. Check out the grid Doctor 3300,
check out the the preparedness bundle that they put together
with I think it's like $800 in free gifts and so on.
There's four weeks of survival food and water filtration, a
cook stove and a bunch of other stuff.
The, the website is actually this little time.
I don't know why I haven't fixed this yet.
I got to, I got to swap it out. Prepare like kyle.com.
They changed this on me like almost never prepare like
kyle.com. It's the old website that they
were using for a little bit. Prepare like kyle.com.
I'll fix it in the show description today so you guys
can check it out. I'm sure that the other one will
probably take you to the same place too, but just in case,
They are the Mount Rushmore of preparedness.
If you guys want to get a big pile of things to solve problems
because I don't know, maybe we'll go to war with Iran and
then who knows, maybe we'll have some kinetic strikes back here.
Or maybe you just were worried about the stupidity of Mother
Nature coming at you because we have politicians running things.
Scan the QR code on the screen. Let's get into today's program.
I'm going to cover a whole bunch of ground and we'll see where we
go. Changing websites on me,
Changing websites on me, These guys.
All right, let's start off with breaking news that happened this
morning. Pretty exciting.
How about what's the UK doing about the Epstein files?
And we have some breaking news, some stunning news out of
London. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, the
former Prince Andrew has been arrested, presumably in
connection with his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
I want to go straight to our foreign correspondent, James
Longman. Hi George.
Yes, extraordinary news out of the UK this morning.
The former Prince Andrew Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, has this
morning been arrested on the Sandringham estate where he was
living after having been removed, of course, from the
home he was living in Windsor. The Thames Valley Police, the
police here in the UK, put out a statement.
They haven't named him specifically, but they are
saying a man in his 60s has been arrested as part of the
investigation. They say we have today arrested
a man in his 60s from Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in
public office and are carrying out searches at addresses in
Berkshire and Norfolk. They say the man remains in
police custody at this time. They are not, like I say, naming
Andrew, but we know that it is him.
This pertains to emails, we believe that were published
recently in the most recent Epstein files published by the
Department of Justice, which seemed to suggest they allege
that Andrew was forwarding emails to Jeffrey Epstein whilst
he was trade envoy here in the UK.
Now as a public official, that is misconduct.
That is what the police are alleging.
That's the the charges that they presumably are bringing to him
if they do indeed charge him. He is under arrest and remains
in custody for that. We will wait and see what
further details they are yet to give us.
But, you know, as trade envoy, he spent more than 10 years
travelling around the world on behalf of the British government
to kind of ferment relationships with other countries to better
Britain's kind of economic outlook, if you like, that was
seen as a member of the royal family could do this, You know,
this. His status would provide Britain
with that kind of heft on the world stage.
But the emails from the Department of Justice suggest
that when he was in these conversations in places like
Singapore, Hong Kong. I've got a list here in front of
me. Other countries that he went to,
he would then have these kind of confidential documents in these
emails and then it looks like he was forwarding them on to
Jeffrey Epstein, another one here from Vietnam, another from
China. So if you look at the date on
some of these emails as well, that is what is interesting.
One of them here in front of me from 2010.
Of course, that's well after Jeffrey Epstein had already
faced charges for soliciting sex from a minor.
So that is goes to the heart of this entire issue around Andrew
and Epstein. The relationship that he had
with that convicted sex offender went far beyond the time which
he said that he had broken all contact with him.
People at home might remember the the disastrous interview he
gave in 2019 to the BBC, where he said that he had travelled to
the United States in New York to sever his ties with Jeffrey
Epstein, That he was there to basically explain to him that he
no longer wanted to be in communication with him.
These emails from the Department of Justice suggest that that was
not true, that he. OK, well, that's enough about
that. Thanks.
ABC Guy thanks people who speak with British accents.
So he's been arrested for sharing documents, right.
That's, that's the gist of what we believe is going on right
now. That's the, that's the
information that's come out. So one guy's name in the file
who people have wondered. This is not about, it's not
going to be about sex offender registries.
It's not about doing sexual acts with, with underage children,
you know, girls or anything like that.
That's not what this is about. That's not what the apparent is.
It's embarrassing on the, on the, the, the world stage for
the British family. That's Part 1.
And he shared documents that were sensitive to the
government. And so let's look back at what
the allegations always were. There were some allegations
about what happened and why was it that Jeffrey Epstein was a
problem. The claim was is that he was
involved in hurting young women. So that was really problematic
to the American psyche. And that he was doing so for
very specific reasons, which related to what?
Information gathering, blackmail, the ability to trade
in data, lean on certain people to get favors.
Like this was the allegation that went on.
And this is not an allegation that just like I made-up, you
know, that's not that's not where I come from.
They were people inside Donald Trump's circle.
They were people that had access to a lot more information than
any of us. They were people that were
fermenting this information. They were talking about it even
while Donald Trump was in office.
How about Steve Bannon? Steve Bannon was a confident of
the president in a lot of ways. People give him credit for sort
of giving birth to the MAGA movement and even sort of
branding it and, and, and publishing it.
He spends 4 hours a day essentially doing PR for Donald
Trump in a big way. This is what he had to say.
This was last year. This was while Donald Trump was
president. And he's making certain claims
in here which all of us sort of believe.
The only way this thing, the firestorm passes is if the five
to 10 to maybe 15% of the Trump movement, the Pepes and the
hardcore's, many of whom are in this audience, just say I've had
enough of it. The Epstein situation gets down
to one basic question, one basic question.
Who governs this country, right? Who governs this country?
Is it a shadowy network of intelligence, MI 6, Saudi
intelligence, the Mossad, CIA, elements of DNI with other
international financiers and corporations and governments?
Or do the people of the United States govern?
All that information has come out and the people have to weigh
and measure itself. This is the most populous thing
we can do right now. Steve went Vladimir Putin, is
that true? Is that is that it's not about
just a pedophile ring and all that.
It's about who governs us, right?
And that's why it's not going to go away.
For this to go away. Can we blow the brake, by the
way? Can we blow the brake guys for
this to go away? You're going to lose 10% of the
MAGA movement. If we lose 10% of the MAGA
movement right now, we ain't. We're going to lose 40 seats in
26. We're going to lose the
president. They only have to steal it,
which they're going to try to do in 28 because they're going to
sit there and they go. They've disheartened the hardest
core populist nationals. It's always been who governs us,
Jack, when Vladimir Putin. When Vladimir Putin came out and
he was in that interview and Tucker went over there was there
was a line in there that's always stuck with me.
And he said you can't negotiate with the presidents.
He said, I've, I've been here for a lot of presidents.
You can't negotiate with the presidents.
I used to try to, but then I realized something, that the
presidents weren't the ones in power, He said the United States
is controlled by the men in dark suits.
All right, so whether that's conspiratorial BS or whether
that's reality, there are some serious claims by MAGA proxies,
by Donald Trump confidants, people who have been in his
circle, who have access to him, certainly more than I ever
would. I've never spoken to Donald
Trump. Isn't that interesting?
They're making some pretty big claims.
This is last year before the Epstein files were likely to get
published because it was before they shut down that
investigation very interesting. Our chat is going nuts right
now. If you guys are listening after
the fact, first of all, you should be watching on Spotify
because you get the better look on it.
It sounds like Apple is about to open up a video platform as
well. So that'll be kind of fun.
But here, here is the the chat that's been running wild because
our video stream, it didn't drop here.
I get real time updates on our Internet connection here and I
have two different Internet connections, a failover
connection, both fiber and and cable.
No problems on my end, but the feed disappeared from all of our
video channels as we were starting to talk about this
again. I don't know why that is guys.
I really don't and and it seems stupid to think that anybody
would care enough about what I have to say or the way that I'm
structuring this. I haven't even said anything
salacious yet. Like I haven't made the appeal
to the folks that listen from the FBI.
I know there are there are many of you out there that are former
federal agents with the FBI federal, you know that that
worked in the the Intel gathering space as an IA or
something else. Maybe just worked in
professional staff. Maybe one of you knows if Cash
Patel is taking a trip to Italy to go watch US hockey is do you
guys know that? Do you guys want to?
If you do, info@kyleserifin.com would be really helpful.
You guys can hit me up if you ever want to just send me snail
mail anonymously and give me tips about certain things.
You're welcome to 9073 W State Highway 29, Suite 110, Box 5 O
9, Liberty Hill, TX 78642. Info at at kyleserifin.com.
I do get throwaway emails from people that work in the Bureau
on occasion. It's kind of funny, yeah.
If you guys want to give me tips about what's happening, knock
yourself out. I know people are scared.
I actually reached out some of my buddies and I go, hey, you
hear about this? And his his immediate statement
was, dude, I'm an insider threat because I know you people don't
want to talk to me. Well, as my insider threat
threatens, no, maybe that's why our feed just cut.
Or maybe it was just some random glitch that happened and you
know, Rumble and YouTube just couldn't feed.
Very strange. In any case, I got banned in
there talking about it. I've got Jack Pozo talking about
the men in dark suits. We had Tucker Carlson very
recently talking about something very similar.
He said that he believes that there may be a thing that he's
calling like a supra, like an above government agent, you
know, not an agency, but like a conglomerate of a bunch of
really well connected, very powerful people that say what
can and what can't happen. Marjorie Taylor Green more or
less said that the other day. She was on a podcast, the same
one that we, we took a clip from and it she said, you know,
everybody thinks that they go to Congress, they're going to be
able to pass bills and they're going to be able to go and do
reform and they're going to be able to change things.
And then, oh, what is actually goes on?
There are Uber powerful, very wealthy individuals who have a
ton of money and a ton of political connection.
And they say what you can or can't do.
And they will tell you whether or not you're actually allowed
to do the thing that you thought you were going to do.
And often times the answer is no.
I'm going to draw a line here. I'm going to ask some questions
real quickly. So Prince Andrew Epstein aside,
I think Epstein kind of colors all of the stuff that's going on
right now because the Trump administration is looking for
anything that will be APR win because they can't get ahead of
this because they refuse to do the right thing, which is just
like, you know, on F the situation.
So how about this? This looks like a long game to
me. I'm not making specific
allegations. I'm drawing a line between two
dots and things that I've seen for quite a while.
And it all ends up being very personal in my world,
unfortunately, because this is an article that was written by a
woman named Julie Kelly. Julie Kelly is the wedge that
shut down my, my connection to Dan Bongino.
That was the final straw that broke the camel's back.
Because after I started looking into who the heck Julie Kelly
was, since she was the the the thorn and and she was the one
that instigated this like nonsensical conflict between me
and Gerardo Boyle, FBI whistleblower and Steve friend
and FBI whistleblower and others who were just trying to point
out like obvious and honest things about the way that our
federal government works. Like there are times when
federal law enforcement is the worst.
There's also times when they're just doing the procedure.
And if you want to fix the procedure, it's not it's not
unexpected. This op-ed.
And yes, it's a it's an opinion piece.
It's an opinion piece written by a guy named Henry I Miller
MDPHD. You know 10 LB brain that people
like to allege. And Julie Kelly midwitted multi
millionaire board housewife turned food Blogger.
This was her food blog by the way.
Her food blog was propaganda for the pharmaceutical.
I'm sorry for the the GMO and the big agricultural companies.
She was a pro GMO advocate. That was what her food blog was.
As far as I can tell, she never actually blogged about food or
recipes or anything else. She was like some midwitted chef
woman who brought over like super wealthy women to make
crappy cupcakes in her, in her her huge house 'cause she has
like a 10,000 square foot house. That's one of them.
But this story has been something that's always been on
my radar because there was this time period when this woman got
out and started shilling for this out of nowhere.
And she simultaneously was doing like MAGA grifting and fluffing
up Donald Trump, who by the way, by the time April 2017, Donald
Trump was in office, she wrote her first pro Donald Trump piece
out of nowhere with no particular background in the end
of 2016. So Julie Kelly wrote this piece
called No California Roundup Won't Give You Cancer.
And it's an entire piece about defending glyphosate, which is a
weed killer most commonly sold under the brand name Roundup,
and saying that it's fine on your food and it's no big deal
and you shouldn't be upset about it.
And so it's totally safe. Now, the conflict of interest in
this problem is that Henry I Miller was being paid by a group
called the Genetic Literacy Project, which was in fact
founded by money that came from Bayer.
And Bayer is the owner of the patent and the the brand
Monsanto. So the company that owns
Monsanto, which produces Roundup, founded this thing
called the Genetic Literacy Project to spread information
that is true, also known as propaganda.
And then they basically ghost wrote a bunch of these these
articles that were published under Julie Kelly's name.
And they were so junk that they were published in all kinds of
places like this one is in Los Angeles Times.
They were some that were done in the New York Times, Wall Street
Journal. There were some done in Forbes,
Forbes and and New York Times. And all the others have
basically retracted all of their pieces.
So the only place you can find all of these stories are either
in Internet archives or there's a couple of them that are left
up there. But they essentially were able
to match one to one that the the ghost written garbage that was
coming from Mossanto was. A1 to one match with talking
points and language that Julie Kelly stuff put out.
And so it's pretty clear that these were astroturfed and they
were never about anything honest.
Now here's the other really fun part Julie Kelly's husband is a
is a lobbyist. He's one of the most powerful
lobbyists out of Chicago. He owns a company called all
Circo, ALL Dash Cir. Co, all Circo and at the top of
all Circo's client lists are Agri businesses, big, big
agriculture type businesses. One of them is like Admi want to
say it's been a little while since I looked at them, but it's
all out there. I'll I'll re loop it again for
people who want to see it on X. So interestingly enough, a woman
whose husband and whose breadwinner in her household
advocates on behalf of big agriculture was writing a bunch
of agricultural propaganda for pharmacy, you know, not for
pharmaceuticals, but for for chemical companies.
And then we had this happen. We had a big change over, I
thought we had RFK Junior confirmed in as the HHS
secretary. He was going to do an agenda
called Make America Healthy Again, right, The Maha agenda.
And this is something that he published last year while he was
at HHS. Quote, this is RFK junior
speaking here. Quote, Did you know that the
commercially made bread and cereal that you have for
breakfast every day are full of glyphosate and other pesticides
and herbicides? And they are likely the cause of
your autoimmune disorders and diseases from irritable gut to
eczema to asthma and thyroid problems.
The root of the issue goes deep into Agri chemical and seed
companies. Bayer, Monsanto, Cortiva,
Syngenta, like these are all evil numbered names that I don't
even know. It's like you just, you can just
hear them. You're like, I probably wouldn't
want to side with whatever they're into that dominate the
seed and pesticide herbicide markets and significantly
influence farming practices. Their contractual agreements
with farmers mandate the exclusive use of their GMO
seeds, which are engineered to withstand heavy use of chemicals
and unnecessarily excessive use of their herbicides and
pesticides. Farmers facing economic
pressures are forced to adopt these pressures.
The HHS will collaborate with other departments, including the
USDA and the EPA, and they will implement policies that limit
pesticide use and support organic farming.
FDA will impose the strictest limits on pesticides and
herbicides and food. Now Julie Kelly, who we know is
a big buddy of Dan Bongino was a proponent of not just GMOs but
also anti organic, called it a scam, called it an issue.
RFK Junior very clearly states that this was the the priority
under the Make America healthy again agenda.
She's a cat. He's a cabinet level official.
And here's where it gets really interesting to go to my feed for
a second here. You can see right here is the
the op-ed piece that was written.
I did a little screenshot of it. And then I want you to see what
the White House said yesterday. The White House, under
presidential actions, these are executive orders, did a
executive order promoting the National Defense by ensuring an
adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate based
herbicides. I got all this coming out of Tom
Renzi's report discussing these things and this is where it gets
really wild. The things that are in there
include immunity. It confers immunity for section
seven O 7 under Title 50 of the US Code 4557.
Additionally, domestic producers of elemental phosphorus and
glyphosate based herbicides are required to comply with this
order in provisions. But it it it provides immunity
from from any sort of liability these people would have saying
that there is no one for one chemical alternative to
glyphosate based herbicides. The lack of access to glyphosate
based herbicides would critically jeopardize
agricultural productivity. They went after and used it
under the under the name of national security.
This is one of the National Defense powers that the
president has. And so nobody shall incur any
sort of damages, penalties. They will not have any sort of
court cases against them. They are, they are given
immunity simply because of an executive order under the powers
that the president previously had that were given under Title
50. That's a long game from 2017 to
2026 to make sure that your husband's, you know, lobbying
clients are squared away. I don't know if that's what
happened, but I can see that this woman was advocating on
this stuff. She got herself into the the
MAGA movement. She pushed out this kind of
information for a long time and it was clearly propaganda.
And now at the end of or at the, the, the end of the first year,
going into the second year of the Trump administration, you
got to pay off there. That's pretty nice.
She also was pushing false stories that had everything to
do with whether or not Donald Trump was going to be
assassinated by the FBI. And then they claimed that they
re they, they re grabbed it. Isn't that fun?
So I'm just looking and seeing some of this wild stuff that's
going on. Anything to distract from
Epstein. Or maybe we're already getting
hammered for Epstein. So we can do anything else we
want right now. Maybe that's what's happening
there. But it is nauseating to see it
and there's a lot of people that don't realize it.
I saw this guy, his name is Alex Zeck.
And I'm going to put his his page up real quick here.
This is something that that struck with me because I've got
a couple other videos that I want to show you guys that when
I point out failures of this administration, it's not because
I didn't want them to succeed. It's because I wanted them to do
the thing that they did like I what they said they were going
to do. I have Agenda 47 sitting on my
desk every single day and I refer to it, I go, what's going
on? Are we good?
This this guy? Mr. Zack says back in 2021 and
2022, I repeat, I was repeatedly attacked and ostracized by MAGA
and conservatives from Connie Inc pundits because I
consistently called out the way that the the reality of MAGA
being a psyop, Donald Trump being a false hero from the get
go. Now, I don't know if Donald
Trump was a false hero. I don't know if he actually
didn't realize he could do this like MTG style.
He thought he was going to get in there and be able to solve
problems. But there's a real issue when
somebody makes promises and then they don't deliver on them.
And the issue is not for us noticing some of you guys are
not big fans of Nick Fuentes. I actually don't really care.
Nick Fuentes is a talented broadcaster.
He has some really, really dumb ideas about things.
Mostly they are because he doesn't have the life
experience. He's not married.
He doesn't have children. So whether he is, you know,
secretly attracted to men or he's celibate for whatever
reason, like, all fine, but you lose perspective.
Do you actually learn a little bit more when you have kids,
when you have some skin in the game, a little bit more age?
You've worked some different jobs.
You need to get more time and experience that.
This is why, generally speaking, like people under the age of 30,
like, I just don't care what you think.
It's not that you didn't have interesting experiences.
It's just that it's not enough people in their 30s.
I'm very cautious about when you start getting to your 40s.
Yeah, you got some things going on.
This is a young man who is exactly right.
So forget what you think about the messenger.
I want you to consider the message.
Only you tell me that this man is not correct and this is not
why there's going to be a midterm failure.
And probably the same reason why we're going to see ourselves go
to war, because we got to get people riled up about something.
And traditionally and historically, the FBI does it by
getting people excited about the terrorists they just took down,
which is always BS. And at the federal level, at the
highest level, the chief executive picks a war and goes
after someone they think they could beat.
Here's point to saying things that are true whether you like
him or not. It's really simple.
All we're asking the GOP to do is what it promised its voters
it would do. It's not my fault you didn't
hold up your end of the bargain. It's not.
But that's the thing. They think I am doing this to
them. They think I am doing this to
America. I'm not doing that.
You did it to yourself. You promised to release the
Epstein files. Then you covered them up.
I didn't do that. I didn't create that problem for
you. You promised mass deportations.
Then you refused to do job site raids because big business
didn't want it. You did that, not me.
You promised to cut $2 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse.
Then you packed it up after three months.
I didn't do that. So a couple things he just said
the job site raid things, right? That's a problem because you
made promises. The promises were that you were
going to get something done and you didn't get it done.
And and I had a couple people that were really mad because I
re I shared this yesterday and they were like, there were in
fact job site raids. Yeah, they were until there
weren't. There were a couple of stories
about them. And then immediately went to
who? The big businesses and the kind
of big money that it was going to cost probably Donald Trump
donors, if we have to guess. People that were in the
development business, people that are in construction
industries that he's pretty well familiar with.
They're like, hey, man, we're not going to be able to continue
doing what we need. Same story with agriculture.
It's like, go rate all the fields and they're like, yeah,
but who's going to pick the crops?
And then they're like, oh, OK, yeah, we got to make sure that
the Agri businesses are going to be taken care of, so we can't go
and pick all their workers up. Does it mean that we didn't get
some of them? I'm sure we did.
Did we get enough of them to be able to go to a 20 or 30 million
person deportation? We did not promise number one to
the American people. Seal the border, Stop the
migrant invasion. Great check.
Step one. Stop the bleed.
Step 2. Carry out the largest
deportation operation in American history.
I am reading from Agenda 47. Fuentes is citing it.
Then they did a thing about making America affordable and
inflation. The funny thing is, they say,
and inflation. To make America affordable
again, you got to deflate. You got to bring prices down,
which would mean that you have to strengthen the dollar.
They didn't do that either. Dominant world energy provider
is #4 stop outsourcing. Manufacturing is number 5.
Tax cut for workers is number six.
Then we had this really critical, scary one for me #7
defend the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the fundamental
freedoms, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right
to keep and bear arms. I think they've done a mediocre
at best job and #8 is prevent World War 3 #8 it's in the top
ten was how do we do this? How do we fix the, the situation
that we are like cruising towards World War three?
And there's other stuff in there like getting rid of government
waste and fraud and abuse and, and, and Doge and he's talking
about those as well. Remember they packed up Doge
after what, like 3 months? So I didn't do this, Nick
Fuentes didn't do this. People that are recognizing
like, hey, how about #9 and the weaponization of government
against the American people. I've got some evidence that that
has never been done. You put in guys like Cash Patel
and Dan Bongino who decided to have a, a like a lemon party
yesterday. You guys remember lemon party?
It was like that horrible website of like 2 old men that
were together with each other in a inappropriate way to talk
about. So they had a lemon party
yesterday of two former fed dudes.
That was really gross. But they didn't end the
weaponization. And I'll show you the evidence
of it because they'll ongoing lawsuits.
Judicial Watch has 1 and I have one.
How about that? All right, let me finish this
Nick Fuentes clip because all of this stuff is 100% correct.
What he's saying. Whether you like him or not,
it's totally irrelevant, OK? And it goes on and on and on.
You said we were going to get tariffs, then you fucked it up
and walked them all back. After two weeks, you promised no
new wars. Now there's two aircraft
carriers in the Middle East getting ready to bomb Iran.
But it's my fault. You made promises, you broke
them. You say you're something, you're
something else. You say you're America first.
And every single time you're on the same playbook.
And you betrayed the voters and then you expect them to come
back for more. And I'm the patriot.
I'm the independent American independence.
I'm the one that says I won't vote for it anymore.
I I'm not going to vote for it. I'm not going to tell other
people to vote for. All right, that's it.
There's no obligation. I don't like when people say I'm
a patriot. I never say that kind of stuff.
I think that's weird, but I'm an independent.
You know what I did last night? I hopped into a Twitter space,
an X space, and it was people saying that they're disappointed
with Donald Trump. And it was almost entirely
made-up of libertarians. Those are your gettable voters.
Libertarians basically decide between the screw it, the system
sucks, and I'm going to put my vote towards someone who's never
going to get elected because I'm making a statement.
I'm going to write in Ron Paul. You know those people or they
vote for a lesser of two evils that mostly aligns with what
they need because they're being pragmatic.
Libertarians are your gettable voters.
They may not be registered as as independents, but they are.
They are functionally independent.
And libertarians are a weird animal for all of you guys that
have ever been. I went to Pork Fest with with
Vivek Ramaswamy and I walked around there and I was like,
some of these people are almost my people.
They're like fractionally retarded, but they're almost my
people and they're like, oh, they're into guns, but they're
open carrying an AR like at a political rally.
That seems dip shitted to me. I like I just don't do that.
And I'm like, Oh, we're like, we probably agree on smaller
government and freedoms fundamentally, but they're like
really obsessed with decriminalizing weed, which is
not in my top priorities. So it's like or they they or
like we need limited government. We less government bothering us.
And that's because I want to take off my clothes and run
around and be naked around kids and I'm like, dude, I want to
punch you in the face, you fat, weird, ugly person.
Pork Fest is super weird. If you guys have I've never been
to Pork Fest, which is a it's the Porcupine festival in New
Hampshire. I've only been one time.
I don't think I'll make it something I go to again.
I was randomly invited. They're like almost they're,
they're unserious people, but they don't know they're
unserious people, but they are gettable voters because if you
pitch it correctly, you can get a lot of cheers and applause and
people can do it. And like right after that, then
they'll be like, Kyle, like you were in DC.
DC is not actually part of America.
It's an unfederated part of the corporation of the global
enterprise of the and it's like just stop whatever weirds like
because you're so close to not being completely foolish.
But listening to 100 and something people that were
libertarians last night that we're all sitting there talking
about it. They had the same complaints
that Nick Fuentes does. They have the same complaints
that I have, which is that they wanted the things that were
promised. They were OK to accept Donald
Trump is not being a perfect entity and he wasn't going to
bring all of it. But they really wanted focus on
that and they were really big on no new wars, which I'm a lot of
Americans are into. We've been war weary my entire
generation. From the time I was a teenager
on, we were at war. You know, I was in college at 19
when the when the towers went down.
And from that time on for my entire adult life, we were
picking fights in places that are not America for reasons that
didn't seem all that related to America, Certainly not to like
the average person, like of the average person in America did
not feel like they were at war. So there's this entire separate
group of people that are veterans that experience
violence overseas and they're here in the United States and
they're like, what the hell did I even fight for?
You got guys like Shawn Ryan saying I didn't believe in that
shit when I was there. I knew it was.
I was just there for the guy on my left and my right.
I was there because I was there for the adventure of it.
There's plenty of people that signed up for that.
I got friends who are Green Berets.
They're like, I'm into war because I'm into war, not
because the cause of war is so just or righteous so that
America does it correct. That's why you're going to lose
people that are gettable voters. And it has nothing to do with
me. And if you keep failing on the
20 basic promises you made on Agenda 47, which I keep bringing
up, people are going to keep noticing that this is a problem.
And one of them #8 prevent World War three, restore peace in
Europe and the Middle East, build an Iron Dome missile
system. We're not building an Iron Dome
missile system all made in America.
We're like sending aircraft carriers to go fight Iran for
some reason that that's mind blowing to me.
All right, we're going to go into the Fox News fluff job,
which is basically pushing war aggressively.
And it's, it's, it's gross and I can't help you guys if you're
watching on YouTube or Rumble and we're losing feed.
It's not on my end as far as I can tell.
I don't know where the hell it is.
To be fair, I have absolutely no idea where it's dropping, but
it's not happening here and I can still see the chat run.
So anyway, check us out on Spotify.
That's the best place to do it. Go to
spotifyitskyleseraphinshow.com. Make sure you're liking wherever
you're at. We'd appreciate that.
Nothing I can do to fix the feed.
But what I can do is keep pumping out this information.
We'll just upload it clean and pure to the audio and the video
platforms. If you want to catch them all at
once, go to kyleseraphinshow.com on Spotify.
Make sure you follow us there. Subscribe to Rumble, subscribe
to YouTube. Give yourself a backup.
Sometimes intermittently, the platforms either screw with us
or have their own problems. I don't know what they are.
We'll play it a Spotify ad right now anyway.
Like it? Share it with a friend, Share it
with a friend, share it with a friend.
How about that, huh? OK, let's do let's do some video
evidence. The first thing was, is there
was breaking news. They've arrested somebody over
Epstein. So if anything, I do want to
also point out that I don't think the political left is like
the winners. Nick in his podcast that had
that on there also mentioned something kind of interesting
about how he thought that if the Democrats had won in 24 that we
would have got like some limp wristed weirdos and they would
have gone soft and weak. But now because we're
radicalizing people against ICE and a bunch of other things
here, because people got animated and they're mad about
the idea of going to war and all this kind of stuff, you have the
possibility of bringing in like a hyper, a hyper crappy Democrat
candidate that might run it even faster.
I'll give you an example of what Democrats think is important.
We have Epstein files happening. We've got no accountability.
We've got at the very minimum, people feel like they're being
lied to by the administration, that they wanted to come in
looming war. So what's most important to
people like Representative Jayapal?
She's really, seriously frustrated that we don't have a
transgender Bill of Rights. To trans people everywhere, I
also want you to know this. Those people are threatened by
your strength, by your joy in being fully who you are.
Those who fight against trans people are just jealous of the
freedom that they have taken to be fully who they are, and so
those people just want to destroy that rather than imagine
what it would be like to be fully who they are.
Wise words from our young people.
So today, the Trans Bill of Rights makes those freedoms we
all deserve as clear as the paper they are written on, and
we intend to continue this fight until we win this fight.
Just out of curiosity, have you ever seen a clear sheet of
paper? Did she actually know what she
was saying? Did she just say the wrong thing
on accident because she's a moron?
Probably, Yeah, I think so. How about if we could get an old
timer like Ed Markey, who doesn't even?
There's no chance in his lifetime.
This was a regular thought growing up about transgender
rights. But maybe if you put a podium in
front of him and you wave some whatever lobbyist money, I don't
know where it's coming from. I don't know what I don't know
what makes a a man who is like my father's age go.
You know what's real men dressing up like ladies and then
getting weird gender surgeries and pretending that they're a
lady so they can go hang out with ladies.
Like that's what I want around my wife and my daughters and my
granddaughters and my great granddaughters because I'm so
old, I shouldn't be in office anymore.
Here's Ed Markey saying things like I get crazy lefty women.
I don't necessarily get this guy.
We're going to fight every single day to put trans rights
into the law of our country because trans rights are human
rights. And that's why my colleagues and
I have laid out a simple yet powerful truth in the Trans Bill
of Rights. Trans people have the right to
live free from discrimination. Trans people have the right to
live free from violence. And trans people have the right
to live free from government intrusion into their bodies and
into their lives. Trans rights are human rights
are just words that are strung together that don't mean
anything. Of course you have a right to
live free of violence, But let me just say something because a
lot of the violence that they always try to act like is not,
you know, they're like, it's totally it's unnecessary.
This dude just put on a dress, put on a bunch of lipstick, put
on some hooker boots, shaved his legs, walked around, sold his
body as a woman. And then some dude found a penis
when he was paying for sex. And that guy who was already
willing to pay for sex, then beat the living crap out of that
man who was pretending to be a lady.
Everybody's a bad guy in that story.
Like, you're paying for sex, you're pretty gross.
You are a transgender prostitute.
You're pretty gross. That's pretty much where the
violence happens. It's when you lie to somebody,
pretend to be something you're not, and then somebody finds a
penis where there shouldn't be a penis.
Like they all need Jesus, right? Maybe you could give up being a
weird creep for Lent. Since we're going to give up.
We're going to give up peace for Lent.
Maybe give up something good like stop dressing like
something you're not and acting like a complete freak and then
acting like it's someone else's problem for noticing it.
You don't get to not be discriminated against for being
a weirdo. If you show up and you don't
wear clothes around kids because you're at Pork Fest and you're a
libertarian. You believe in nudism like
you're gross. I'm going to make you stop.
I will make you stop if my kids are at the park and you decide
like, hey, man, I just want to spread my balls across across
this, the swing set. They'll choke you out and throw
you in the pond. Period.
The end. Like that's my job as a dad.
Sorry, you're not free from that discrimination.
We are going to discriminate as some weirdos being around our
kids. So weird.
Like, like, why is Ed Markey defending this stuff?
We're going to get it codified into law because blah, blah,
blah. All right, so that's the weird
other side, right? And then let's get the scary
thing, which is that Fox News is talking to people his age, the
ones that don't think that men dressed up like women are
totally normal and need to be protected.
And these are the people that apparently need some convincing.
So let's get a live report from the Middle East.
If we were going to report from the Middle East and not pick up
any additional allegations that would make people that are kind
of suspicious of the motives of the United States government of
going to war with Iran, where would you do it from?
Maybe you could do it live from Tel Aviv.
Here we go, Fox News from Tel Aviv, Paris.
Good morning. A massive amount of U.S.
military equipment continues to flood into the Middle East in
preparation for action against Iran.
Reports indicate the US has moved more than 50 fighter jets
to the region over the past 24 hours alone, along with the USS
Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group already in place and the
USS Gerald R Ford on the way. There are a variety of other
U.S. Navy assets in the Red and
Mediterranean seas. While talks on Tuesday left both
sides saying that progress that was made, there are still major
questions about Iran's willingness to curb their
nuclear program or address the growing regional ballistic
missile threat. Yesterday on Fox News, Vice
President JD Vance was asked about the negotiations.
They agreed to meet afterwards. But in other ways, it was very
clear that the president has set some red lines that the Iranians
are not yet willing to actually acknowledge and work through.
So we're going to keep on working it.
But of course, the president reserves the ability to say when
he thinks that diplomacy has reached its natural end.
We hope we don't get to that point.
But if we do, that'll be the president's call.
OK. All right.
Well, that sounds reasonable. We want diplomacy.
And it'd be good if the president could come to a
conclusion. We'd like to be able to work
this out. But if not, does Fox News draw
any conclusions, do you guys think?
Tell me if this is a conclusion. As negotiators gathered in
Geneva, Iran's supreme leader spoke from Tehran.
Amid a crowd that chanted and cheered, the Ayatollah Khamenei
issued a new threat against the US Navy.
They keep saying we have sent warships toward Iran.
OK, Of course a warship is a dangerous device, but more
dangerous than that is a weapon that can send that warship deep
under the sea. You have President Trump
offering diplomacy and Iran's supreme leader threatening to
sink U.S. Navy assets.
Martha, Trey, thank you. Donald Trump is offering
diplomacy while sending in 2 carrier groups and the the
people who are going to receive these carrier groups and see the
threat have responded with a counter threat.
Martha, Yeah, totally on bear. That's totally unbiased.
Maybe we could just talk about, like, when the Olympics are
over, we're just going to turn them to cinder and ash.
Maybe that would be that. Let's hear what Bill O'Reilly is
1000 years old. He knows a lot of things.
He's seen all the other. Kind of like he was a no spin
guy, wasn't he? No spin whatsoever.
And Bill O'Reilly, here it comes.
So Mr. Trump offered Maduro a deal.
You can go to Cuba. You can go to Paraguay.
You can take some money. You can take your family.
Maduro gave him the middle finger.
And now Maduro will never get out of prison in his entire
life. The Ayatollah Khomeini, the
second Ayatollah, is doing the same thing.
We're going to do this. We're going to do that.
Hey, listen, pal. And I'm talking to you now, OK?
You are toast after the Olympics, OK?
You are cinder. You are gone.
No one is going to help you. No one the deals are being made
with China spy oil outside of Iran at this moment.
So if this guy with his little hat wants to be bellicose, word
of the day. OK, but the over under is 2 days
after the Olympics. He's gone.
You guys. Bill O'Reilly is so freaking
tough. That guy is like the toughest
man that you've ever seen. The biggest threat to Bill
O'Reilly right now and his age bracket is a rug that is out of
place in his house, which will call him 'cause him to fall and
break his hip and then end the rest of his natural mobility and
life. You are, I'm talking to you,
Ayatollah. Yeah.
Trump gave the president of another country an option.
And that that guy said, and he said, get out, run away, take
your stuff. And that guy gave him the middle
finger. And so Donald Trump went in and
did a kidnap mission. Look, I like I'm all fine with
projecting American force at the end of the day.
Like I actually think it's kind of cool as a guy, it's like,
hey, can you go do that cool thing?
And the answer's like, yeah, we could do that cool thing.
What is it going to be? Oh, we're going to send a bunch
of helicopters in. We're going to spend some like
high speed dudes in. We're going to use technologies
no one's ever seen before. We're going to make their heads
explode with like, Sonic weapons.
We're going to grab some dude in the middle of the night that
nobody could even see while he's like in his PJS.
And we're going to kidnap them. We're going to bring them back
here. And we're going to just tell
him, like, gotcha, bitch. I'm like, that's pretty cool.
Like the military guy and me, the the like that masculine male
version of me is like, yeah, like nothing.
Nothing tells somebody that you're stronger than them by
showing like how strong you are as a country.
That is that's kind of a guy move.
But then the constitutional version of me looks back and
goes like, hey, I thought we were going to make America great
again. I thought we're going to de
weaponize government. I thought we were going to stop
World War Three and prevent all the dangers and we're going to
try to protect people and not waste our military men's lives
and scary stuff, right. So like, what if you just went
to Congress and you were like, hey, man, I know that previously
we didn't really care about the Constitution, but I'm big on the
Constitution. That's what I thought MAGA
meant. I thought it meant make America
constitutional again. And you were like, I'd like a
declaration of war that broadly gives me abilities to go out and
do that. I want you guys to agree that
these are the reasons why we need to do this stuff.
And, and if so, like on my own timetable after diplomacy may or
may not fail, like we're going to offer them the alternative.
But we'd, I'd like a declaration of war sitting ready to go so
that when I'm ready to send these guys in, you guys can vote
on it in quiet session and then we can go do what we got to do.
Because I believe that Americans also will agree with what I say.
I'm going to make my case to the American people.
How about that? We can do the same thing in Iran
right now. Donald Trump could March his
little butt down or not bit little butt.
It's probably big butt compared to mine.
He can March down to the to the US Capitol.
He can call and ask for a joint session of Congress and he can
say we are we. I would like a declaration of
war. These are the reasons why.
This is why it's in America's interest.
Never mind the fact that Fox News is broadcasting live from
Tel Aviv to tell you how it's going.
Never mind that Bill O'Reilly said it's going to be cinder.
Never mind that I actually promised you no more wars.
We were going to be the president of peace.
Here's the deal. It's Lent.
I've given that up for Lent for 40 days.
I need a declaration of war we got to go accomplish, and these
are the missions. And This is why it's in your
interest. Can I get a vote?
Can we get that done? Nope.
The best we can do is Sean Hannity feeding Ted Cruz an
answer. And I don't know how many times
this happens on Fox News when Sean Hannity has a show and he
has a guest on. But they're like, you're
absolutely right, Sean, Because what Sean Hannity does is he
gets the the talking points before he he does the show.
So he can read what your answer is going to be to the question
that he's going to ask that his staff gave him.
So the staff gives him the question and then then the guest
will be waiting for the answer. He will ask the question in the
form of an answer and then the person agrees with it.
Here is Ted Cruz agreeing with Sean Hannity, who read off his
answer beforehand on why we need to go to war.
It's super important because regime change was totally on the
list of the 20 promises to the American people.
If regime change is the answer, well, it sounds like you got Ted
Cruz's vote. You don't need that many others.
Let's get it done. Let's go ask for a declaration
of war. If you guys are going to be
serious. That'd be really constitutional.
I, I, I think that's exactly right.
We are in at an extraordinary moment in history.
It is entirely possible, Sean, that in the next 6 months we
will see the regimes fall in Iran, in Venezuela, and in Cuba,
and we could also see governments replace them that
want to be friends with the United States of America.
Now, let me be clear, I'm I'm not being Pollyannish about
this. There are 1000 things that can
go wrong. But if that happens, this would
be the most consequential geopolitical shift since the
fall of the Berlin Wall, since America won the Cold War without
firing a shot. I spoke with President Trump the
day before yesterday and and we talked in particular about Iran
and, and I said this moment, the regime is teetering.
The Ayatollah is in his last days.
And I said do not let this opportunity pass.
We haven't of Iran. So I pray and hope that 2026
will be the year that we make Iran great again.
Yeah. Can we make a wrong great again?
I got hats made. I'm Lindsey Graham.
My war boner is basically throbbing out of control at this
point. Like we're we're we're so close.
We almost got it. Ted Cruz is on board.
Is there any, like, differing opinions?
Do I have to go to like a doughy week British guy who's going to
do like a a contrasting opinion? Is that where we have to go?
Oh, it is. We have to go to Piers Morgan to
get a contrasting opinion on this nonsense.
But the idea that a country like Iran, which is no threat to the
United States, or a country like Venezuela, which is.
No, Iran is no threat to the United States.
No, it's not. Why is it a threat to the
United? States, maybe because the
Ayatollah has repeatedly threatened the United States
publicly. He can repeatedly.
He could repeatedly threaten the United States till he's blue in
the face. Who cares?
The question is, does he have the military capability to do
harm to us? What he's having the answer is
the military care. But what they have done, they
funnelled a huge amount of money into propping up terrorist
organisations all around the Middle East, all of whom are
wedded to the obliteration of Israel, which is America's main
ally in the region and has a lot of interest, mutual interests.
Now you may not like it, but that's the reality.
And so the yes, they do present, they represent a threat to one
of America's main allies and to American Americans who live in
Israel, for example, to American service people who work with
Israelis. Of course they do.
But you're making the argument that they're not a threat to the
United States, they're a threat to Israel.
And because we're joined at the hip with Israel, anything that's
a threat to Israel is a threat to the United States.
I don't buy that argument. I'm an American firster.
I care about the US national interest, and it is not in our
national interest to have this conflictual relationship with
Iran. And if it weren't for the fact
that the Israelis have so much power in the United States and
insist that we keep Iran as an adversary, we would otherwise
have good relations with the Iranians.
That sounded really sensible. Who is this man?
Who is this man saying sensible things, by the way?
The the, the the principal under the Agenda 47 that this would
fall under for me, in addition to preventing the World War
Three, which is agenda piece #8 would be #7 defend the
Constitution if you want to go to war.
I understand that they've outsourced a bunch of their
powers, but how about you reiterate that the president
gets a declaration of war under the Article 1 powers that come
from Congress? That would be defending the
Constitution and spirit. That would be doing the right
thing, right? Isn't that where we'd go?
Who's this man making the sensible argument here?
He seems awfully sensible for what we're doing.
John Joseph Mearsheimer, 78 years old.
He did, in fact, write a book in 2007 called The Israel Lobby.
And US foreign policy argues that Israel wields
disproportionate influence over US foreign policy in the Middle
East. A lot of people tend to agree
with that thing. It is something that the right
is now pushing back against. They don't like it.
So, okay, he's a, I wanted to give you a contrasting voice.
By the way, he sounds much better than we're going to turn
you into cinder after the Olympics, or we have an
opportunity for regime change or somebody gave somebody the
middle finger. Oh, he's an academic.
How about that? Has a PhD from Cornell.
Doesn't necessarily mean something except back when he
got it, it probably did. Went to USC and guess what?
He's a West Point grad, so he had time in the military.
So we put some skin in the game. He served in the military,
served in the Air Force, left as a captain.
Anyway, it's just interesting to hear, like, different voices say
different things and they're not beating what we call the
allegations when Fox News is doing their coverage directly
from Tel Aviv. At least they're not beating it
with me. It's like, what is this all
about again? Oh, it's it sounds like the
arguments that are being made. All of these things don't
necessarily benefit me. I don't know how it changes my
day to send a carrier group or even some of my friends to go
get involved in a war in Iran, but can warn Iran's not messing
with me. I don't think they have the
ability to project strength and to say that, well, they're
threatening our aircraft carriers.
It's like, well, who put the aircraft carriers there?
And again, if you want to do it, I'm all behind American military
might. I've always, I, I always have
that sort of like instinct. There's a reason why I signed
up. Hey, why did you join my
military? Why did you come here?
I was like, I want to kill bodies overseas.
Like, that's what I can't do. I want to, I want to hurt bad
people and not go to jail for it.
And they're like, well, you're in the right place for it,
right? That's what it.
Isn't that what men signed up for the military for?
Isn't that what you train for? Sure, everybody wants to go do
that thing that they train for. But the myth should also be
grounded in constitutional principles.
That's what you're defending in theory.
And that theory is, is that, well, there's some Article 1
powers, we have civilian oversight of our military, and
it should actually be authorized military.
You should be authorized by the people's representative.
That's just what I want to see. Call me crazy.
I don't know. Feels like a constitutional
position, folks. If you're new to the program and
you've never signed up and you're having issues on YouTube
or on Rumble, first of all, give us a like over there and then go
join us over on Spotify at kyleserifandshow.com.
The app is free. There is no subscription cost
for you to do it. It literally is funded just by a
couple of ads that pop up. There'll be one that pops up
right about now. That was it probably if you're
listening on the audio, if you're listening on the on the
video platforms, you don't see it if you are make sure you
subscribe there too. Give us a like on YouTube.
Give us a a share to one of a friend.
If you're like, hey, this guy's making a lot of sense They're
like, hey that guy's an A hole. He says mean things about
transgender people and men in dresses are real women because
women can have penises. Maybe you believe that.
Share it with a friend. You can get outraged with them
too. I don't mind.
And and if you guys have never seen what our live chat looks
like in the morning, this is it. We appreciate all of you guys.
Thanks for listening live. This does make it a a fun thing.
And I'm always, I'm always dismayed when we have streaming
issues that I can't control because then I know you guys are
having a sub optimal experience and that is not what I'm going
for. Do we have more fun stuff to
talk about? I think we do.
We're not done here yet, are we? If only we had a press corps,
you know, people that were sitting in kind of Myspace, but
had a lot bigger audience and a lot bigger access and they were
sitting there at the White House and they were like, hey, is this
really good? Should we really be doing this
thing? Are you meeting and and matching
up to the the promises that you made to the American people?
20 promises under Agenda 47, White House spokeslady.
What do you think? Or are we just getting really
cozy? Are we only letting people in
that ask nice questions that we like?
By the way, the Obama administration did that too.
So did the Biden administration. How about, how about a press
corps that asks hard questions and then you have to do hard
answers? Nah, that sucks.
Let's just do friendlies. Thank you, Michael.
Garrett on Iran, I'm not asking you for like military secrets
here, but can you? Can you share?
Unless you want to give up, can you share a little bit about the
president's thinking on whether or not to strike Iran, who he's
talking to, what information he's consuming, and why a strike
might be necessary on a nuclear program he says was obliterated
by the last US strike? There's many reasons and
arguments that one could make for a strike against the against
Iran. The president had a very
successful operation as commander in chief with
Operation Midnight Hammer, as you know, as you just said,
totally obliterated Iranian nuclear facilities.
The president has always been very clear, though, with respect
to Iran or any country around the world.
Diplomacy is always his first option.
And Iran would be very wise to make a deal with President Trump
and with this administration. He's talking to many people, of
course, his national security team first and foremost, and you
know who the members of that team are.
And this is something obviously the president takes seriously.
He's always thinking about what's in the best interest of
the United States of America, of our military, of the American
people, and that's how he makes decisions with respect to
military action of any kind on the.
Flip side of that, I heard Operation Midnight Hammer went
swimmingly, that we smashed their nuclear capabilities and
their ability to reach here is now gone.
So then what? If you're going to make an
alternative justification, I'd love it if you did it in front
of Congress and you got people to agree that are backing your,
your play. That's what our Constitution
said. I do mean, if only, if only
there was some sort of promise that we were going to #7 defend
the Constitution, our Bill of Rights, our fundamental
freedoms, including the freedom of speech and religion and the
right to keep and bear arms. That would have been cool.
And maybe we could also do #8 prevent World War Three, restore
peace in Europe and in the Middle East.
We're going to restore peace by going to war.
We're going to make Iran great again by having a war with them
so that we can depose the regime once in a lifetime opportunity
that Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz are excited about.
Because we have a really good track record in America of
deposing regimes and bringing in administrations that are
favorable to American foreign policy and what we like.
Those never backfire on us and we never have to go back and
reconquer them again, right? There's not like a like an,
there's not like an entire history of the US getting
involved, meddling, pushing in on somebody and then finding out
that we left the power vacuum. And then like, I don't know,
like a huge terrorist organization pops up.
Now. Maybe that is the move in Iran.
I'll talk to George Hill about it tomorrow.
I'm just saying I'd like to see it proposed to people that
actually represent us. More than one guy and I'd really
like to make it think that it's not about trying to distract
from a from a cripplingly bad and under underwhelming sort of
delivery on the domestic agenda. A lot of the stuff that is on
this promises to the American people that he made their
domestic agenda. Very little of it is about
overseas stuff by the way. It's almost all about America.
Let's read through them again. Seal the border.
That's American focused largest deportation operation.
American focused and inflation make America affordable again.
That's domestic as hell, isn't it?
Make America the dominant energy producer.
Who could make America the dominant energy?
I guess there is an argument to be made that if you want to make
America the dominant energy producer, you bomb the other
energy producers and you get rid of them.
So you like, get like, I don't know, Venezuela and Iran off the
map. So then we're like #1 like you,
you could do the, the Tonya Harding version.
Is that what we're doing right now?
Are we doing the Tonya Harding version of making America the
dominant energy producer? Where we're going to go and like
knock the legs out of Nancy Kerrigan, AKA Iran, And then
we're like, well, it's a shame that you're no longer a dominant
energy producer now that we bombed the living crap out of
you. Sorry about your leg.
Hope you do well. Silver medal.
No, I that's not, it's not a domestic thing, right?
Like you just do it internally. You're like, oh, OK, we're going
to do more drilling. We're going to do more oil
refinery subsidy, you know, whatever.
We're going to approve more permits, stop outsourcing, and
turn the United States into a manufacturing superpower.
That sounds like fascism. To be fair, I don't know how you
do that. I don't know.
You know, I thought that was the tariffs, but we backed off on
that tax cut for workers. Domestic.
Defend our Constitution. Domestic.
Prevent World War 3, not domestic, and the weaponization
of government. Domestic.
Stop the migrant crime epidemic. Demolish foreign drug cartels.
That's both sides. Rebuild American cities.
I have no idea what the federal government has to do with that,
but there you go. Domestic modernize our military.
Mostly domestic. U.S. dollar is world currency.
I don't know if you can do that but sounds good.
Not domestic. It's like 85% of these things
are domestic to include the last one.
Unite our country by bringing it together with new levels of
record success. I think what we're doing is
actually we're uniting our country so that the freaking
libs and the non war independence and the people who
are disaffected and, and, and irritated MAGA folks who who
Bannon was talking about. It's not going to be 10% of
people from MAGA that are irritated.
It's like 50 or 60%. They're like, hey dude, what
happened to the freaking promises?
Where'd you go? Well, let's talk about one of
the other big promises. We're going to make America
affordable again. I see that make America
affordable, but #3 on the promise list and then also
record levels of success #20 how we going to do that?
We're going to end inflation #3 how's this going to happen?
I think we're going to show you that prices.
Here's a goes, OK, one guy was president, he was bad.
And then on average, prices went up by $15,000 a year for
housing. That seems like a lot.
And we've done an amazing job. We've brought them down by 4000.
So they are now only $11,000, a $1000 more a month than they
were previously. Here's Karen Levitt making this
sort of like, is this really what you want to brag about?
This is what she's bragging. About a key part of the American
dream is buying a home. It's and that is finally
becoming more affordable under this president.
This past week it was announced the annual mortgage cost for a
new home has fallen by $4000 so far under President Trump after
rising by roughly $15,000 under Joe Biden.
As a result, mortgage affordability has reached a four
year best following recent bold action by the President to make
home ownership more attainable for American families, not large
Wall Street corporate institutional investors.
Now, I don't know about you guys, maybe you have different
kind of neighbors than I do, but I don't know that many of them
are like, you know what? I was thinking about buying a
home and I was like, oh, I can't afford $1300 more a month, but I
can't afford $1000 a month more than what I would have paid a
couple years ago. The other problem is that those
housing prices are still super inflated.
So oops, it was the right way to be able to drive a lot of the
stuff down. It also seemed like was that
sort of migrant thing the number one, seal the border to carry
out the largest deportations. How about you free up places
that shouldn't even have people in them?
That would be good. And then people were like, hey,
I'm not getting the rental income from having like 15
illegal alien families living in them.
I can't, I can't justify that. So I'm going to have to turn and
sell it. And guess what?
I'm going to sell it based on the market prices.
That'd be good if we actually like flooded the supply because
there's 30 million people that don't belong in this country.
That was one of the big pieces of it.
I thought this all kind of worked together.
That was like the agenda that kind of meshed.
Shame on us. Shame on me for thinking that.
Anyway, at least they did the most important thing to me,
which is the thing that makes me worried every night when I go to
sleep, that they ended the weaponization of the American
government against the American people.
Right, That at least happened. Tom Fenton seems to think
otherwise. Now, Tom Fenton is a pretty
right wing kind of guy. And he was, he was pretty useful
in the previous administration pointing out a lot of the bad
things. One of the nicest things he said
about me, we're in AX space like right after I went public with
my story and he said the stuff you're doing right now, calling
out the government and pointing out their their failures is way
more important than anything you could have ever done at the FBI.
So that was a nice thing that Tom Fenton said about me at that
time. I don't know what he thinks
about me now, but I know that I agree with him on this and I'm
going to show you some evidence. Here's him talking about having
to sue our current DOJ and FBI. The federal law enforcement
agencies are still hiding the same crap that they were hiding
under the Biden administration. It's almost like they didn't
actually get these agencies back under control.
And the dudes that were put in there, the Cash Patel, the Dan
Bongino's, even the Andrew Bailey's, for whatever it's
worth, is still there. It's like they didn't actually
grab a hold of those agencies and quote, UN, quote,
deweaponize them priority #9 of Agenda 47.
Here's Tom Fenton of Judicial Watch.
We repeatedly have to sue the law enforcement agencies of the
federal government, government because they're violating the
law on transparency. We have a new lawsuit against
the Biden FBI again and Justice Department.
I just want you to just focus on that.
We repeatedly have to sue the law enforcement agencies of the
federal government, government, because they're violating the
law on transparency. The law enforcers are law
Breakers when it comes to transparency.
Usually, not only are they directly breaking the law, but
in the case of the Justice Department, they're usually
defending, almost always defending the agencies that are
breaking the FOIA law elsewhere. So they break the law, defend
the break the breaking of the law.
And in this case, they're hiding records about any payments made
by the FBI to Twitter. Yes.
Did you know the FBI have been paying Twitter?
I did know that, but I forgot. Yeah.
Wait, didn't I just do a whole thing about the Twitter Files
yesterday? Didn't we go and we talked about
it and we were like, hey, let's do a little refresher on the
Twitter Files, because that was pretty outrageous that the FBI,
on behalf of the rest of the federal government, was paying
money to Twitter for things. And you can't get records on
that because the FBI still hides it.
Why is the cash Patel FBI, this FBI, not that FBI, Why are they?
Why are they hiding information from the people that are looking
for transparency? And I, I heard this was the most
transparent FBI in American history, the most transparent
Justice Department that ever existed.
That's what I heard from the people that run it.
So I guess be careful how you choose your sources.
Tom Fenton just said they violate the law when it comes to
transparency. He's talking about FOIA, the
Freedom of Information Act. I know a little something about
that. We recently had a settlement, I
guess the FBI refused to give information and they had to pay
my attorney out a couple $1000 for his time.
Didn't cost me a penny and they refunded my filing fee.
It cost me $405.00 to file Every time I want to file a federal
lawsuit that's that's the cost. Just so you guys know, plus some
filing fees and paperwork. It ends up being about 430 to
450 bucks. So I've done that a few times.
I don't have a ton of money. I'm not I'm not independently
wealthy. I am not what is what is the
thing here? Well, there's oh, I'm not able
to achieve record levels of success at this point, but
working on it, we'll get there. But I do have $405.00 to go and
try to sue for transparency from my own government when they
decide not to give us things that we're entitled to get.
So I sued over some information that I told Cash Patel was super
damning and would have been really useful.
It was. It was the FBI senior
leadership, many of whom are still there, making fun of the
last Congress's Republicans like Jim Jordan and others.
And the Republicans didn't want to be embarrassed that the FBI
was making fun of them. So it turns out Cash fought that
tooth and nail, and we ended up getting paid out a couple $1000
to my attorney for his time. And now we're in another one.
And we've sued for records about what Cash Patel is emailing on
his government work stuff. We want to know, what did he say
to Alexis Wilkins on his government devices?
What sort of conversations is he having with the Banal Law Group,
which is not a government agency, and he shouldn't be
doing business that way? What is he saying on Twitter
using my name? What sort of information has
been exchanged on the FBI side referencing Kyle Seraphin?
You know, because they're suing me, which is weird.
So we have this lawsuit here. There's Seraphim Media, LLC.
You guys saw the PO Box earlier. That's who you address it to
versus Federal Bureau of Investigation defendants.
This is a civil action. We have paid for a lawsuit.
We're suing them again. This is like the third time that
I've had to sue them. By the way, I have another
ongoing lawsuit where we're suing them over COVID
transparency, where we said, hey, assholes, excuse my
language. Hey guys, you fired the guy that
we are suing you because of and you fired him for the things
that we've alleged that they that they did.
The FBI violated 33 FBI employees, federal, federally
protected religious freedoms under Title 7, violated
aggressively. And in my case, which is the
most egregious by the way, go shocker.
But I have all three. I've got all three of the of the
main charges they failed to accommodate.
They engage in religious discrimination and I have
wrongful termination because of it.
And it's, it's black and white guys.
It's so black and white. The FBI did not do a religious
accommodation investigation as required under Title 7.
They just flat out denied me because of my COVID vaccine
status. And then they put that in
writing because they're dumb. They're really dumb.
Like the people that work there are just like atrocious human
resources people. So I said, can you accommodate
me? I'm not going to put a thing up
my nose because I'm a Catholic. And I'm not going to just tell
everyone I'm Catholic because you want me to do something up
my nose that everybody can get COVID.
This was in this was in 20 late 2021 and going into 2022 when
everybody could get COVID and everyone knew it.
And they go, no, we're just looking at your vaccine status.
And even though you work remotely and that your office
that you report to is 100 miles away from FBI space and you have
a laptop that allows you to work from like anywhere in the world,
including your own home and access our servers.
And you literally never need to come into the FBI space until we
change these rules up. You would be the only person
that we're aware of in the entire FBI that could be
actually accommodated. We're not going to accommodate
you. We're actually going to put you
on a wall. We're going to remove you.
And by the way, we denied it before we even looked into who
you were. So they, they denied my
religious accommodation. They didn't even put my name on
it or where I work. That's a violation of Title 7,
right? Then they decided to do the
investigation. And then they sent it all to me
in order. So I knew that they denied it
first, did the investigation second.
They've already violated Title 7.
And they did so for reasons that were completely illogical and
that they couldn't actually justify.
And then I wrote back and said you guys were probably shitty
agents because you did your paperwork in the wrong order.
Who does that? You know, people that work at
the FBI. Let me go back to this lawsuit
real quick for you guys to see it.
This is Serafin media versus FBI.
OK, You want to know why some of my beef with some of these
people? We did a FOIA.
We asked for certain information.
I told you what the information was looking for.
They went through and have multiple questions.
They say that there are no legal conclusions that are required to
respond here. We agreed that the defendant is
in the right sort of jurisdiction to be able to claim
this. These are the parties.
They don't do that. Statement of facts number number
six, they admitted these are them.
Just like pushing back against our facts, a bunch of them are
just them just citing like litigious nonsense.
My attorney says this is all standard.
This is what they always do. And then they have these
arguments and they're like, there's there's no legal
response required here. Over and over again.
They don't need to respond to anything we said.
And here's their defenses. The first defence, they're not
entitled to compel the production.
This is me. I'm not entitled to propel
compel the production of any records or portion of any
records protected by disclosure. There's all these exclusions and
exceptions to FOIA people here. Let me put it on screen.
All kinds of exclusions to FOIA. They also say that the court
lacks the subject matter jurisdiction.
The court doesn't even know enough about what I've asked for
them to be able to authorize any kind of relief.
So they're telling the courts they're not good enough.
The defendant has done their due diligence and they're doing the
best they can and there are exceptional circumstances and
they require additional time. Even though they're required to
do it in 30 days. They never do Ever.
They freaking never do. And this is something if you've
ever done a FOIA, you'll find this happens every single time.
They haven't improperly withheld records.
That's why we're suing them though.
So we know that they have OK. Same thing with Tom Fitness
saying the plaintiff's request failed to comply with the FOIA
requirements to extend the request or that that it
reasonably, what does it say the, the plaintiff's request
fails to comply with the requirements of FOIA to the
offend to the extent the request fails to reasonably describe the
record sought. No, we said we want all
communications and then we gave examples of what those were and
they, we've made it undue or unreasonably burdensome for them
to be able to look for it. That's literally what they're,
there's an entire office that does this.
OK. And here's where it comes down
really fun. So they have a couple others.
I'll, I'll probably publish this on X later.
The best part of it is, oh, it's it's respectfully submitted by
Jeanine Pirro's office, and it's done by this person, William
Thanhouser. OK, who's the AUSA that's
handling this in DC? Whose office?
Jeanine Pirro. Who are they defending?
Cash Patel. Did we de weaponize government?
Nah. So some of you are probably
wondering, you're like, well, but didn't they do a good job?
I mean, I heard they did a good job.
They said they did a good job. Were they not actually doing a
good job? More on that in one second here.
And make sure you guys like the videos now that we're streaming,
OK, It seems like we've shaken out some of our issues over on
Rumble and on YouTube and so on. So give us a like on Rumble,
give us a like on YouTube. Subscribe to either channel,
subscribe to both channels. That'd be fun too.
Let's find out. Let's find out if you were going
to ask people. You ever ask your kids like if
they did a good job on something and they're like, yeah, I did a
pretty good job. And you walk and you're like,
Nope, it was a crappy job. This is a really bad job.
You didn't do anything that I asked you to do, and now it's
time for you to get back to work.
That's kind of how I feel about this, but let's have two people
interview each other about how great they did, hence my
description earlier. If you guys have never seen what
Lemon Party is, count your lucky stars that you didn't know what
it is. For those of you who got the
reference, Lemon party, like I said, is 2 gross old men doing
unmentionable things to each other.
This is like the middle-aged version of Lemon Party.
I think you and I did a pretty good job, but you know, it
really isn't hard when you focus them on the bad guys.
Well, it's not hard, Dan, as you know, as an 1811 and a former
police officer, it's not hard to do the job you signed up for if
you're allowed to do the job you signed up for.
And President Trump in this administration backs law
enforcement and gave us the resources at this FBI and gave
us the autonomy and you and I and running this building to
remove the red tape, to remove the unnecessary approvals and to
get 1000 extra agents. That's what we did, Dan.
We put 1000 agents into the field from Washington, DC.
We permanently, permanently remove them from the National,
national Capital Region and sent them across to every single
field office. And what did that do?
It allowed people to hit the streets and investigate crimes.
And it led to this. And I know you've seen this, but
this is one year in the making of true historic reductions in
crime, and you're talking about it.
Did you notice the sniff that he got in right after he said the
thing? That was complete bullshit,
Which it was. So let's start with #1 these two
men are both in their like late 40s and early 50s, and they are
fighting on who gets to slob the knob of Donald Trump first.
So that's the lemon party for you.
They're not even slobbing each other's knobs, although they do
that a little bit too. They're actually fighting to get
a piece of Donald Trump in their mouth.
So yuck #2 He just said that we historically got 1000 agents
back into the field. And we did that because we're so
awesome and we're so good. What they did was they
discontinued a long term, like decade plus long.
I think this was a comedy era policy of doing TD wise or
temporary duty assignments to the Hoover building or the FBI
headquarters now that they're at Reagan.
And So what they did is they said you're no longer going to
renew any of the TD wise. The way that that, that the FBI
headquarters historically staffed up was they sent out
these temporary duty options for people in the field.
People like at my level where I was at GS13, and they said,
would you like to make a pay bump and skip 10 years worth of
required promotion years so that you can bump your salary up by
10 years in 18 months. And people are like, that sounds
awesome. What do I have to do?
Oh, you have to just live on per diem, get paid rent money and
per diem money and come work at headquarters in this program.
And you do that for 18 months and then when you go back to the
field, you'll be AGS 14 or you'll be maxed out as AGS 13.
So there's ten different grades within 13.
So you basically pick up 10 years worth of dollar
promotions, which is a ton. You could never get that in most
people's careers. You get to either be a
supervisor somewhere else now. Now you can apply for supervisor
jobs and you serve the FBI by doing this.
Now what they really would do is they would get these people that
would come in there on that TDY. They would buy a place and then
they would just bounce back and forth between Washington, DC's
office in Baltimore or headquarters and so on.
And then they would just stay in that little power circle.
So then you got the worst people that wanted to go to
headquarters staying there. Meanwhile, the people who
actually wanted to do work would stay out in the field.
So what Cash did is he discontinued that TDY?
I'm sniffing because that's his tell when he lies.
They just said we're no longer going to renew these TD wise and
as they run out, we're not going to just one up them and we're
not going to bring more people back.
So the people that would that were supposed to be assigned
that were technically already still assigned to the field.
We're going to just go back to their technically assigned
offices. And then they took credit for
it. Hurray, everybody wins.
That's that's what you just heard.
And then he went out and touted how awesome they are because
they brought down like local crime by sending a bunch of
useless people that wanted to be at headquarters.
Do you know how many useless people are at headquarters?
Most of them, people from headquarters and Steve would
talk about this all the time. They'd call you up on almost
almost no chance that they knew anything about the violation you
were working on. They would see your case.
They would recognize that maybe your case could help, like fluff
their career up a little bit, that they'd be able to promote
on it and put in what's called the 954, the internal resume,
resume. And so they would go and they'd
call up a case agent. They'd be like, hey, I see that
you're doing this thing. Have you ever thought about
flying drones over them? And you're like, oh, I don't
know, do we even have drones? And they'd be like, yeah, let me
connect with aviation section and get a drone up over here and
do some drone based surveillance.
And the case agent would go, that's cool.
Yeah, that'd be really helpful. Like they have this compound,
it's kind of inaccessible. That'd be hard to get.
Yeah, drones would be cool. So they reach out to the
aviation thing, They get the drone guys.
The drone guys are like, holy crap, we have all these really
expensive drones and nobody even knows we exist and nobody wants
to fly drones. You can get us a case and
they're like, yes, we can. So then they would fly the
drones out there and they'd fly around your target and they'd
like take pictures of the house and they'd watch some people for
a couple days. And then the dude who was at
headquarters would be like, you know, introduced, introduced
like totally exciting new innovative technologies like
drones and cutting edge, high speed cost cutting to go do
surveillance on high impact drug case or whatever.
And then they would promote like like this person's an outside
the box thinker. Like look how awesome they are.
They know about drones. And then they would, then they
would get a promotion out of it. Meanwhile, the case agent was
like, hey, can I get those drones again?
And they're like, no, bro, that was like last year, like this
year, like I'm already promoted. I'm out.
I'm doing something else. The drone guys are back to
flying around and just showing the executives what they do.
That's that's the FBI for you. I just told you what happens.
But listen, if a decision came to cash or Dan, it was a level
10. Now mind you, that's not a real
FBI thing. That's not a real number that
anyone made-up. Dan just made that number up and
that, you know, he made it up because he has to explain to
Cash because Cash doesn't listen to Dan's podcast appearance as
much as I sometimes do. So we're going to talk to you
first. We're going to define our term,
a level 10 decision, which is made-up.
There are tiered decisions in the FBI.
They're tier 1-2 and three threats.
There are national tiers, there are local tiers.
These are the threat levels in both counterterrorism,
counterintelligence, criminal, etcetera.
So they actually do have a a ranking system.
But whenever a question would get to Dan Bongino, it was
always a level 10. And the reason we know it was a
level 10 is because Dan Bongino defined all questions that came
to him as a level 10 as such. People have real opinions.
I understand that, but I'm just telling you, I and I'm, and I
mean it from the bottom of my, you know, sometimes broke it
hard, man. I did.
I traveled around, I never heard, I never heard anything
but but good news from people about the progress that was
being made. Of course, there's a lot to fix.
No one's suggesting everything's done.
There's a lot more work to be done.
As you know, I was explaining to the audience, so in my first
show, how when, when actors are at your level in the government,
you know, when people are principals and, and deputies and
a cabinet level or cabal and kind of a cabinet kind of
equivalent positions. Everything's a level 10
decision, cash a level 10, meaning there's a, pardon the
language, but a shitty decision and a shittier one.
Because if it was in, if there was a good decision to be made,
someone else made it. So now we've defined what a
Level 10 decision is, right? And most importantly, we also
got the Sean Hannity experience where Dan is giving him the
answer and he's trying to lead him along so that he says the
right things from his cracked and broken heart.
I seem to remember that our intro used to have his cracked
and broken heart in it. Anyway, let's go on a little bit
deeper. And by the way, shocking, Nobody
ever said anything negative to the deputy director or the FBI
director who were firing people that said anything that was
negative about them. Can't imagine why they would do
that. Why would somebody not just be
honest with these guys even though it would probably result
in them losing their jobs? Alright, anyways, let's let's
see what these two fluffers are going to come up with.
And then when when those decisions, that's every day.
I know you know this because I would knock on your door and you
be like, what now? And I'd be like, here we go
again, like something else will come up, but I just want to put
into perspective for. I just want to put in
perspective that people would knock on the door and then there
would be like bad things happening that needed their
level 10 decision. Like like apparently Dan didn't
know what the job was going to be.
We've we've covered that quite a bit here.
And I guess Cash was too busy like setting up his whiskey bar
or this new podcast office that he has, by the way, really OK
looking. He kind of looks like kind of
looks like he's got a fart in this little freeze frame.
Anyway, yeah, so these two guys are going to basically just like
talk about their old times. Remember the old times when we
used to work together for like 9 months?
It wasn't very long and it was only a few seconds ago.
And how impressive the work was that we did.
That was level 10s. Remember when I used to knock on
your door when you were actually there?
But most of the time you were not there because you were like
hanging out with your girlfriend or whatever and try to do things
like you're flying around the country or like maybe you were
trying to go watch the US hockey team play hockey in Italy or
whatever. Like you remember those times?
Man, those were good days. Those were good days.
Just a few seconds ago, for just a few seconds.
Folks out there when, when that decision can't even be made by
by, by by me, it goes to you. When it doesn't go to you, it it
goes like to the president's test.
He's dealing with like Level 11 decisions.
Just just so we can be clear, Dan Bongino just asserted that
decisions at the FBI go from Dan Bongino to Cash Patel to the
President of the United States. And, and they are not actually
handled by the next person in line, which is Todd Blanche, the
deputy attorney general, and then the next person in line,
which would be the attorney General of the United States.
They just skipped that. That's kind of interesting
stuff. I didn't know that before that
they had a Direct Line to a guy that theoretically, you know,
Cash actually swore underoath. It was going to be a clearly
independent organization that just did investigations where
the facts LED. So I guess they were getting
from Donald Trump, by the way, they probably should do, but
it's just interesting that they admitted it.
And that's the thing in DC is that's why the batting average
isn't always going to be 1000. There are, there's no good call
to be made or someone else would have made it.
There's just really tough decisions where you know there's
a shit call and a shittier call and listen, that's what we
signed up for. That's.
Listen #9 and the weaponization of the government against the
American people, 20 promises, the American people, Agenda 47.
There was like this, like you could do it or you could just
not do it. So like there was a good call
you could do it. And then there was like the not
good call that you couldn't do it.
That's why we're all suing you to try to get transparency how
it rolls. Look, yeah, these are difficult
decisions, Dan. That's why you volunteered to
jump back in. It wasn't just going to be, hey,
we're going to do this job. It's going to be super easy.
We're not going to have to make any hard decisions, and we're
not going to have to combat a press corps that has largely
been biased and full of inaccurate reporting.
Guys, it's not the fault of Cash Patel for doing a shitty job,
it's the fact that the press corps didn't record exactly what
they wanted. One of you in the chat just said
these guys are the airsoft version of real law enforcement.
That is the best comment of the day.
But we made those decisions collectively in the best
interest of the nation. And if we hadn't, then none of
this would be true. None of this would be possible
if. President, I mean, I agree with
him because none of that is true and it's not actually possible.
You just made things up. You just claimed that there were
these changes in America that didn't actually happen.
Numbers are not real. By the way, crime has been
trending down for the last like 4 years.
It's been trending down since 20/21.
It had a big spike in 2020. And then it's been slowly
trending down. And some of it because of like,
not enough reporting. And some of it is because better
tactics and techniques. And some of it is because people
are just ignoring certain crimes.
And none of it has to do with the FBI, it turns out, because
the FBI doesn't investigate local crimes, which is what
they're actually reporting on. They're like, homicides are
down. How many homicide cases did the
FBI take on? None except Nancy Guthrie, who's
probably dead. And like, now we're trying to
see if we can get ourselves in that because maybe it was an
Interstate kidnapping. Except she's probably going to
be found in Arizona. Oh, so they don't do homicides,
generally speaking, When do they do homicides?
Oh, only in cases of like, Rico and transnational organized
crime and like on Indian reservations and military bases.
And you're like, how often is that?
And you're like dozen, dozens of times a year, dozens of times.
Anyway, really appreciate that. That's pretty cool.
So this was a fun interview. And I'm fairly confident that
the FBI director who apparently was an attorney and apparently
he was a United States, he was an assistant United States
Attorney. Some really scathing stuff about
his time as US attorney, by the way, or Assistant United States
Attorney. I'm not sure he understands what
how law enforcement works. Guys, I'm going to define this
so that it's real clear before we play this.
And then I'm going to have you make up your own mind whether he
just said the wrong word or maybe he just doesn't know.
The legal process is as follows. Investigations can lead to
either. They can lead to an arrest, and
the arrest is done either by information or by indictment.
And information is like a criminal complaint where I write
it up on the agent and I swear and attest to it to a federal
judge. The judge goes, OK, you have
enough probable cause to believe this person did the crime.
Boom. We go and arrest them.
The other way is we take it in front of a grand jury. the
United States Attorney's office comes in some AUSA goes, hey,
man, recount the facts of the case as follows.
And you go, OK, here's what I have is what it is.
OK. Like, what's the what's the law
that they're violating? Oh, they're violating this law
Then like, do you believe that they did it?
Yeah. OK.
How? And then then the grand jury
goes, oh, can you answer this question?
I'm confused. Yes.
Can you answer this? And then you leave the room and
then they take a blind vote that I can't see.
And then they come back and they go, cool, we got a true bill.
Like you can arrest them. You have an indictment.
So information is a complaint that I write.
Indictment is something that is generated by a grand jury.
They agree that the fact pattern that we presented to them is
good enough for an arrest. It's not the next step, which is
when we bring them in for proper sessions and we discuss with
them and we see if they want to do a plea deal or turn on
somebody else. And then sometimes it ends up in
a court case where you actually end up in, in court where you're
going to go through not preliminary procedures because
you've already had your, your indictment, but you could have
one and you could fight it tooth and nail like they do in the
pipe bomber case. Then they're going to move
through various different hearings and motions and all
this kind of stuff. And eventually you may end up at
this place where a jury decides that even though this person
contested it and they pleaded not guilty and they said they
didn't do it, that the government is able to prove its
case beyond a reasonable doubt. And you get this thing called a
conviction. The alternative is an acquittal
and the person goes free. So the path looks like this
investigation information or indictment.
Then you're going to have all these motions and hearings and
then you either get conviction or you get acquittal.
And then there may be some appeals.
That's it, right? I don't think Cash Patel
understands that maybe this is the Valhalla School of Law
enforcement. But apparently, in his mind,
convictions and indictments are the same because you can read
the convictions and the story in the indictment.
You guys tell me if you hear the same thing. 19 people have been
convicted for acts of violence related to Antifa.
It's in the indictment. You don't got to believe me or
you. Everybody can go read the
public. What was that?
19 people were convicted. You can read the indictments in
the indictment. 19 people have been convicted for acts of
violence related to Antifa. It's in the indictment.
You don't got to believe me or you.
Everybody can go read the public indictment.
And it didn't just happen there. It happened in Cop City in
Georgia where we have to go rearrest everybody because the
state authorities couldn't get their act together to produce
the enough, enough information to take that to trial.
So we did. And it's not a creative.
Big sniff right there. He doesn't believe him either.
That tell is really funny. I love it when people have a
good tell. It's really good for you if
you're a poker player and you're like, Oh my God, I'm about to do
the, I'm about to do the Oreo trick.
I'm about to pull the rounders trick where Matt Damon takes all
the Teddy KGB's money. I know you're full of shit.
I can take this out and I could ask you under underoath and then
I can prove to you that you're wrong.
He got 19 hole people from Antifa in an indictment.
Now maybe they'll plead guilty. I think they're actually going
further than that. It's still ongoing.
By the way. I went looking for the
convictions. I couldn't find them.
Maybe they exist, but nineteen whole people.
Really. How many people did you get that
were Epstein Co conspirators? Consider this, this current FBI
has arrested more people for their anti-Semitic everything
then they have arrested Jeffrey Epstein Co conspirators.
So he put that in a meme yesterday and it really hit me.
It was a picture of a guy trying to go to sleep and his brain
still like he's like hey man, you still up?
And the guy's like yeah I'm trying to go to sleep, leave me
alone. And the brains like consider
this, the FBI has arrested more people for anti-Semitism then
they have Epstein Co conspirators.
Yikes. That should be kind of
bothersome to some of us. We shouldn't like that.
Go check out Cop City, which was done under Biden, by the way,
the Cop City thing that was under Biden.
At least we can get a little bit of like, can we lean this
forward for us? Can you, can you tease us out
something? Would you like to do the
ultimate podcast? Wait till next week because
we're about to drop the bomb on you.
Yeah, let's do that. Let's drop a bomb on people, but
not now. Let's drop it on later.
This is why I tune into these kind of things.
This is why I love the clips and being able to dissect it.
Cash and Dan TuneIn next week. You're not going to believe what
we have. I'm not going to tell you what
it is. Either it's just a willingness
that you and I and this buildings new leadership took to
say we're going to look at the facts that exist.
We're not going to try to make up facts that don't so we can
serve a political narrative and wait till you and I know you
know this, but wait till you see what's coming in the next month
or two on the funding streams related to this.
You and I have launched a serious investigation.
We had said these organizations don't operate alone, don't
operate in silence. They operate with a heavy, heavy
stream of funding. And we started looking into it
and guess what, Dan? We found them.
Director, your thoughts on this I, I.
Director. Guess what, Dan?
We found them. Stay tuned.
More to come. I've been teasing the story for
several weeks. I think I can get a couple more
weeks out of it. Also, I'm on my way to Italy,
possibly to go watch something. Anybody want to come with me?
Anybody want to go see hockey? Who loves hockey?
Who wants to volunteer to go to Italy?
Anyone. If you happen to know that's
true, confirm it info@kyleseraphin.com.
I'll delete upon read or send it from one of the random anonymous
e-mail things that you guys sometimes do.
FBI people, you know who you're talking to.
Cool. So he just said that there's
going to be a huge network of Antifa funding that's revealed.
But stay tuned because guess what, Dan?
We found it. But guess what, Dan?
I'm revealing it on a podcast, sort of.
How about we get some convictions or indictments,
whichever 1 is coolest for you. That'd be cool.
Yeah. And don't worry about the
Epstein stuff. Like that's all silly.
Like we shouldn't we're we're definitely not flubbing the
Epstein files. Sometimes people just tell you
like, hey, I just want to do propaganda.
Sometimes people tell you that they're just there are causes
that are far more interesting to them than you can even imagine.
And and that's where their heart lies, I think.
Isn't that true? Didn't, wasn't there that one
guy who said that there was this thing that was really important?
Causes dear to my causes dear to my heart.
I have this file some, but there's that file.
You guys want to see what it's about?
Yeah, let's go. Let's go to this file real quick
here. Ready.
All right.
Where were you born? Flushing Hospital, Queens, NY.
Who would you want to play you in a movie?
I said the guy from American Pie, that kid Crisp, but you
think the rock. The audience is going to agree
with me. The Rock, if you agree with me,
please. I'm 230 lbs, though the Rock is
20 lbs heavier. I think he's like 250 so he may
have to slim down. What is your biggest fear?
Clutch. I'm intensely claustrophobic.
Big time. Who makes you laugh the most?
Oh you, Gosh, you make me laugh. Are you kidding me?
Some of the stuff you've done right.
That dance last. Night the dance was awesome.
If you only, If we would, you know many books we'd sell.
If you got up and did that dance right now, we would be #1
everywhere we'd be #1 For if you did that dance, we'd be #1 in
perpetuity. There would never be another
book sold on Amazon. What is the one thing you need
to have in your fridge at all times?
Lenny and Larry's protein cookies.
Oh, Mike, Right. Oh man, are they good.
I tear. Them out all the time I eat.
Those things like crazy, they're so good.
Cookies What is your favorite hobby?
Brazilian Jiu jitsu no doubt. I don't think is that even a
question, you know? No, it drives her crazy.
I watch Brazilian jiu jitsu videos all day.
Sometimes it drives. I just still watching this, I
can watch them over and. Over.
What is the last gift you gave? The last gift I gave.
What is the last gift? I only buy you stuff.
What do I give you last. Oh, the earrings.
Yes, the earrings. That was a good hint.
I like you. You did that.
I. Know I know right?
I did David Yarmuth. I read this, I got put a piece
on. Yeah, that was it.
And then we got you that that Chanel people love.
What causes dear to your heart? Causes dear to my Israel defense
of Israel. What is #1 on your bucket list?
What, why was that? Why did anybody who's ever seen
that clip, if you've never seen, there's 6 minutes of them just
asking questions. He's like, hey, like honey, like
let's do a get to know you on this couch with this weird
little elevator music in the background.
And, and he's like, he's like, yeah, do do, do, do, do, do.
And they're like, what, what are some things?
Like, you make me laugh, girl. Like, oh, oh, that's cute.
Like, yeah, that's, that's what couples do.
Hey, what was the last gift you gave?
I don't know that I give a gift. What about these things on my
ears? Oh, great hit.
Honey, you're so good at doing this stuff.
Remember when you were dancing? People would love that dancing.
I loved you Jiu jitsu. I'm just like all you guys.
You know what? What's something that's dear to
your heart? My family, love.
Love of Jesus, my Savior. You know, teaching 'cause that's
dear to my heart is teaching people how to defend themselves
with Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. Nah, fuck all that Israel
randomly, the defense of Israel. You know, it's fun.
It's fun when people finally learn their actual purpose on
this earth and God speaks to them and tells them what it is,
right? Glenn Beck didn't do that just a
second ago, did he? I at times have felt impressions
from God and sorry. Well four or five weeks ago I it
was overwhelming. I know why I was born.
This is why you are here. This is why you were born.
And it is to stand at these times and to stand for the truth
and to stand not to sound grandiose, but to to stand as
other people in history have stood, especially for the Jewish
people. And it it is.
God spoke to you and said your job as a, as a Mormon is to
stand especially for the Jewish people.
Like, what are we, what are we doing here?
Listen, I'm not I, I can't help but see all this weird stuff.
And so when I see people that get really riled up about these
things and they're just like the Jews and everything, I'm like,
no, it's clearly not the Jews, but like, what on the earth?
Like, I've never seen such a not important thing to me be
mentioned by people that I listen to regularly to find out
what they think is going on. Because I'm like, and why do
they all work, work at Fox? Like, why are they trying to go
to war with Iran right now? As negotiators gathered in
Geneva, Iran's supreme leader spoke from Tehran.
Amid a crowd that chanted and cheered, the Ayatollah Khamenei
issued a new threat against the US Navy.
They keep saying we have sent warships toward Iran.
OK, Of course a warship is a dangerous device, but more
dangerous than that is a weapon that can send that warship deep
under the sea. You have President Trump
offering diplomacy and Iran's supreme leader threatening to
sink U.S. Navy assets, Martha.
Trey, thank you very much. All right, I'm convinced those
people look like a holes. All those dudes with beards,
they were like cheering on that guy that I hate that also has
the beard and the dumb hat. Like let's get on, let's go.
I'm on board. Like what?
What are we doing here? Guys?
Seriously. So if people attack our founding
judeo-christian belief system, which is the core of the
declaration, they're attacking our country.
They're attacking the very essence of our country.
They're attacking what took place 250 years ago.
They're attacking our history. So if you're Tucker Carlson and
you're a constantly trashing Jews.
Or Israel, Zionism. And Zionism simply means what?
A Jewish homeland, you know. Nobody cares if there's a Jewish
homeland, homie. I just don't want to pay for it.
I don't have anybody there. That's fine.
Like do whatever you want, go to your own wars.
Stop telling me that I'm anti American founding or
constitutional because look, you have this strong desire to get
my country to do something like what the hell are you talking
about? And honest to God, I actually
don't care. I've never cared.
I've never once been interested in this at all except when you
start shoving it down my throat. Like I think if you say that the
defense of Israel is a cause dear to your heart or that I am
somehow like anti American. Because I think that the
founders were not freaking Jewish, which they weren't, and
that they didn't care about like Israel, which didn't exist as a
as a state at that time. And that there's not this this
direct lineage because it's 2000 years ago.
We diverged. Here's the difference between
Judeo and Christian as far as I can tell.
Call me crazy, but never have I seen teachings from my church.
Which has been around for 2000 years that says like we need to
support this government that doesn't exist right now, but one
day in like the 1940s, in 2000 years, there will be this like
Jewish state and we should try to protect them because we start
at the same place. But then they denied everything
that we believe. And so it's our job to to stand.
That's what God is coming to tell you like Glenn Beck weird.
That's a really weird one, buddy.
Dan Bochino. It's freaking weird.
Do you know what I hate? Weirdos.
That's what we started the show off, didn't we?
Freaking weirdos telling me that you need to care about men who
are wearing dresses to. Trans people everywhere.
I also want you to know this. Those people are threatened by
your strength. Yeah, you're a weirdo too,
Jayapal. Weirdo Ed Markey Weirdo.
Glenn Beck being a weirdo. Dan Bogino being a weirdo.
Cash Patel being a liar. OK, Are we having fun?
OK, I'm having fun. At least there's not like a
mainstream media push to, like, make really, really scary bad
things pop up. You know what the worst thing
would be if we had a country that recognized why it was
founded, what it was about and that men are required to look
after women, you know, protect women.
What if we could show you the dark side of the patriarchy?
And here's where we're going to end it because I went into this,
this Twitter discussion last night.
X discussion and my my basic statement was I hate both of
these parties. I don't like any of them.
None of them represent my position and my position, which
thanks to to donut patrol over on X sent me one of these.
Well, I got a mug. We'll we'll make these available
at some point. I'll figure it out how to get
them there. I'm a bacon cheeseburger
nationalist. I eat bacon and I don't care if
you don't if you're kosher, I'm not that if you're halal, I
don't know what that is either I eat meat.
If you're Hindu or you're vegan or you're vegetarian, you're
weak. I know you're weak because you
don't have enough protein. I'm like, I don't care.
I'm not trying to be, I'm not even trying to be salacious with
this. It's so simple.
The American average human being is right of both political
parties. And I know that because the
people that used to represent the balance have moved so far to
the left that they are now in the position that the people on
the left were 2530 years ago. And maybe that's why you can't
figure out how to do your 20 promises to the American people.
It should be super easy. You said them, they all sounded
good. People in the middle were like
100% bro. I'm not 100% in on all this
stuff, but I'm in on no war, more prosperity, focusing on the
domestic agenda, reducing the the inflated dollar.
I'm I'm into getting rid of people that don't belong here.
I'm, I'm into prioritizing American citizens over not
American citizens. Like that all makes sense.
I'm into less crime, I'm into the federal government not
coming into my business and screwing with me so deep
weaponize that I'm into a return to the Constitution and I'm into
like understanding that the Constitution has a leash called
the Bill of Rights. The anti federalists were
correct and that they had to overstepped their boundaries.
So let's go back and reaffirm and rededicate ourselves to the
fundamental freedom. Let's let let's let freedom of
speech of all kinds. Let's not have the FBI
director's girlfriend sue somebody over words.
Let's not have any impingement or abridgment of free speech or
free religion or the right to keep and bear arms.
Let's not fight and have a a United States Attorney who's
fighting my lawsuit against the FBI for what I want to get from
them where they should be transparent.
Let's not have her go out and say that I'm going to arrest you
if you show up in DC without the right kind of paperwork because
the government doesn't require any paperwork for you to carry a
gun at the federal level. How about all that?
No, you're not going to do that. You don't want to do that.
You just want to be weirdos. You want to love Israel.
You want to go to war with Iran? You want to give up peace for
Lent. OK, dude.
Because, like, that's why people are out.
That's why regular people are just, they're just sick of it.
That's my take on it. You can tell me yours, let me
know. I don't mind.
You can agree with me or not agree with me.
There's every, every time people be like, I don't agree with you
on on the Israel thing. I'm like, that's fine.
I don't have a strong opinion about Israel one way or another.
I just know I don't want to pay for it the end ever at all.
And whenever I see people making messaging like Ben Shapiro going
out and saying, look, we only give them like $3 billion a
year. I was like, hey, pretty sure
it's actually quite a bit more than that.
You know why? Because I read the bill that Tom
Massey just tried to protest and it was 3 1/2 billion plus
another couple 100, you know, 1.5 billion.
There's a lot more money in there.
That seems like a lot. We could be taking care of vets
at the VA, but we're not. We're making sure that American
dollars are buying military equipment from American
companies to go to Israel so that we can do more war.
So Israel can use some of our war products and then we can use
some of our war products. And then Lindsey Graham's
throbbing war boner can explode and ejaculate all over us with
like, I don't know, dead American young men.
That'd be cool. That's what they want, it sounds
like. Tell me I'm wrong let me know
all right if you didn't like any of this stuff then fine give me
a thumbs down I don't care, but if you if you thought that was
at least interesting and it made you think or it made you laugh,
that'd be cool rumble you can give me a like over there you
can do the same thing over on YouTube.
It's youtube.com slash at Kyle Seraphin for our channel.
It's rumble.com/kyle Seraphin on X, I'm at Kyle Seraphin, hit me
up, bug me. Tonight is going to be the call
in show. It's Thursday night, which means
you guys get to weigh in. If you are a member of our local
community, if you are a member on X or if you are a member over
on YouTube, you, you too can say whatever you like to say and you
can say as weird as you like, or you can disagree with me or you
can tell me that you think that what I said was on point.
That's fine too. Whatever you're into.
Appreciate all of you guys that are subscribers to the channel.
I have multiple, multiple palate cleanses for you.
How about that? I have several because today is
the day when we need it. So let's start with women.
Women, you get radicalized when you have babies.
Tell me I'm wrong. When you start being responsible
for other miniature little people out there in the world,
your brains change. You go from certain thoughts
that sound good, and then suddenly all of that suicidal
empathy that you have gets focused in on people that really
freaking matter, and everything else goes out the window.
Here's a woman talking about her big change.
Having babies made her want to have coyote eyeball earrings
ready you. Know I've always been a very
liberal person maybe even a Lib tard but once you have a kid you
start like having thoughts that have been characterized as
conservative. As soon as I had a kid, I was
like, I need a gun now. Not for myself cause I've got
coyotes in my yard. I've got coyotes everywhere.
And before I had a kid I was like, they coexist with us.
Coyotes were here first. Like I'm in the coyotes home
now. I'm like, let's make hats out of
them. Let's make hats, Let's make
coyote boots, coyote earrings out of their eyeballs.
Like it's just. Boom.
It turns out motherhood could really, really radicalize you.
And some of you women, you have a hard time.
You're like, I don't understand. How do I get a man?
What is it going to take for me to understand?
What do men actually want? And so I have a little way to
help you that are in the dating pool.
Maybe you're a little bit younger than I am and you're
aspiring to find a masculine dude who wants to take care of
you, who will give you earrings made of coyote eyeballs.
This is what men want. It's not that hard.
It's actually pretty straightforward.
What? The hell do men want?
Everything drawing from the town capability.
You have Blackhawks, right? You want two of those.
I need logistics communications equipment compatible to
so-called JCU first phase. I need a strike team and two
snipers. I need a demolition team, strike
team, demolition 2 Blackhawks. We want drones with attack
capabilities. We need all that.
I want everything. I want 2 sniper team for the
first stop. We want all that.
And then once you guys get together and you you get your
space in the world, then it's real simple.
All you got to do is tell your husband to get off Reddit and
stop asking people questions on Quora because.
They're going to expose what your capabilities are I.
Live on a heavily armed compound in Montana.
Can I legally use DIY land mines on my property to stop invaders
who breach the perimeter of my territory?
This guy is. Already using them.
Men already know if you're asking questions about stuff
like can I use make my own land mines?
Like come on dude, you're just looking for an accomplice.
We already know you have them. Just post signs.
Just says danger, super aggressive attack, explosive dog
or something. So we kind of know not to come
on to your property anyway. Ladies, gentlemen, that's how
simple it is. We just want to be left the hell
alone. We just want the government to
not come after us. We want to end the weaponization
of the federal government against the American people and
be able to live a free life where we may or may not have
landmines on our own property and we can own whatever the hell
guns we want. Because we actually are going to
protect all of those things like defend the Constitution and our
right to keep and bear arms and express ourselves through a 50
Cal. Maybe a belt fed, I don't know,
seems totally easy. God bless all of you guys.
We're not going to have Steve friend tomorrow.
Maybe I'll have somebody who understands why we should go to
a war with Iran and why I should change my mind on tomorrow.
George Hill may join me if he's so inclined.
And if he heard this, he just got his invitation onto the
show. And if not, we'll just do what
we normally do, which is like point out how stupid a lot of
things are and we'll just laugh about us heading into war for
Lent because that's what Jesus would want.
I think I'm being sarcastic. God bless all of you guys.
Thanks for listening and I'll see you again tomorrow.
We'll do. We'll do some kind of Friday
friendly or otherwise. See you then.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin show, streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin Bobble Kyle on Twitter,
Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.