Are you familiar with FBI Special Agents Kyle Serpent?
I'm familiar with the name. Is that.
Yes, I'm familiar with the name, familiar with the name, familiar
with the name. Let's bring in Kyle Serafin.
He's the FBI whistleblower who helped expose government
censorship of our First Amendment rights.
Now, we only have this memo because a recently suspended FBI
agent called Kyle Serafin brought it to the public.
And we're grateful that he did. Kyle, thank you so much for
joining us tonight. He's the host of something that
strangely is called the Kyle Serafish.
Kyle Serafi. I can't thank you enough for
speaking out. I knew you guys were out there,
and I knew it was just a matter of time.
But you got a lot of guts put in your face and your name to this.
You're doing a service on behalf of the American people.
And from the bottom of my cracked and broken heart
sometimes, thank you very much. Take a look.
Behind the curtain with a real whistleblower and American
patriot, Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this
program has no time for comforting lies.
Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment
defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin.
Well, hello my friends and welcome to the Kyle Seraphin
Show. Today is Thursday, it is
November the 21st, and I want to thank you all for being here and
joining us. We're going to be talking about
something that I'm calling Joe Biden's parting gift, but I
think it goes back a little further.
It is a instinct that the Democrat Party has, and those
who have been serving in Democrat offices as they took
over the presidency, one of the things they like to do is screw
things up on the way out the door.
It's a fundamentally unamerican way to operate.
And it is a very dishonest and dangerous thing to do in the
world. It's dangerous to our youth.
It's dangerous to our economy. It's dangerous to our sort of
sense of national cohesion. But it is something that the
Biden administration looks like they're doing, and it's also
something that the Obama administration did the last time
Biden was part of an administration.
You get it, There's a lot of danger out there.
We're going to talk about all that stuff in a second post.
I just want to make sure you guys know you can follow us in
various places if you can. If you're so interested, you can
follow us on Rumble. That's easyitsrumble.com/kyle
Serif. And you could also follow us at
our new X account and that's Kyle Seraphin pod.
It's just my name with the word POD for the podcast on X.
If you want to follow us over there, you're going to be able
to find the podcast and some clips that you're not going to
see other places. So make sure you are doing that.
Follow us over on X if you can. And lastly, if you want to keep
track of all the things that we talked about during every day, I
always post all the articles and some videos and things on the
back end at kyleseraphin.com for locals.
So you guys can check out that. There's also an entire community
of people who think probably the way you do.
If you listen to this program and you guys can interact with
them, I think you'll to kick out of it.
And last but not least, I'll just let you know the Kyle
Seraphin show on Spotify is a place where you can download the
episodes. You got to get the app and do
it, but you can watch our videos without any interruptions.
The ads are only the ones that I read and I try to make them a
little bit more fun than maybe what you're used to seeing in
some other places. So check us out there as well.
Let's go ahead and say thanks to one of our sponsors while we're
at it, and that is our friends at Catholic Vote.
You can follow them on social media while you're over on X or
if you're on true social, a Catholic vote.
It's just spelled out, all Catholic vote.
One of the biggest things that happened in this last election
season was a Catholic vote turned out, not just my friends,
a Catholic vote, but the actual voters who are in fact Catholic
turned out in favor of Donald Trump.
And not the least of which that came from some of the work, the
ground roots and the grassroots efforts of the folks at Catholic
Votes to follow them. If you want to get a fantastic
e-mail each day, that is not going to upset you.
It's simply going to inform you. They don't really try to sell
you much. They'll give you a little bit
about the Catholic history at the bottom, but the top probably
half dozen or so posts are going to be relevant news stories to
you. If you care about faith and
family and freedom, catholicvote.org is where you go
get the loop, and I recommend it.
It's something I get every morning and I'm glad that I do.
I'm glad that we get to work with them because they're
seriously great people. All right, let's get right into
this Biden parting gift, the twilight of the Biden
administration coming at us, and it's not good.
So the top story that I had yesterday that I didn't get to
really finish out and I wanted to is that they, the media is
focused on one thing while the Biden administration is doing
the other. Let's talk about the one thing
they're talking about, which is that he's going to break the
federal government. Can he do that?
You're seeing on the screen a picture of Elon Musk, who
obviously has started this thing called Doge and it's going to be
operated. 2 very, very wealthy men, Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon
Musk trying to figure out can we make the government more
efficient. And there is something ironic
about having an agency set up. It turns out it's going to be a
non governmental agency, which is something of political left
seems to love unless it goes against what they want to do.
ABC is lamenting the possibility of being able to RIP this thing
apart and being able to do the thing that Donald Trump kind of
promised in his first round, which is that he was going to
turn Washington on its head. That is what the spin is about.
And so I think that the Biden response to it has been to get
us more and more entrenched in sort of the classic governmental
boondoggles and mistakes that continue to happen and continue
to sort of plague the American pocketbook.
If you want to be real about it, This particular article saying
that Donald Trump's pick to lead the administration are talking
about abolishing entire federal agencies, firing 10s of
thousands of federal workers at a time.
This is obviously the thing that people wanted him to go and do
permanent. Washington seems to be the enemy
of the irregular American people, the sort of plumbers and
mechanics, the people that do construction work, the people
that have calluses on their hands and work outside, the
people that have hard and tangible skills, right?
That's what Americans wanted. That's why you got Donald Trump.
It's an FU to the establishment, to the people that wear suits
and try to make decisions but have never created anything in
their life. They've not created jobs, not
real jobs. They've never created a revenue
stream. They don't have a product or a
service that anyone wants to go out and do and spend their money
on. The federal government should
not be the single biggest employer in the world.
The United States federal government has something like 3
million employees. And the question is why?
I get that it's a federal jobs program.
I understand that a lot of these people wouldn't have jobs
without it, or they would have to go actually do something of
value. Maybe that's this, this the the
fundamental disconnect and the thing that people really hoped
that Donald Trump would bring is kind of a business person who
has created jobs, who has created an industry or a space
where people want to come in and work that has paid out people's
paychecks and supports families. The federal government thinks
they do, but they only do so as long as there are people that
are actually earning an income like you who are paying for it.
It's very weird. In any case, for some reason,
the political left, and I think the reason is, is that they're
dependent on this establishment status quo if they want to
continue to exist in the way that they do.
And we're getting all of the signals that people don't want
this from viewership disappearing from MSNBC and CNN
and so on and so forth. Some of these have some of these
shows that are on mainstream media.
They have it takes millions of dollars to produce them.
They have these huge control rooms.
They've got dozens of employees. They've got cameras that are
north of $100,000. Meanwhile, we're doing it here
and giving you at least as high quality and maybe better
information half the time, and we're doing it for a fraction of
the budget of 1 of their cameras on an annual basis.
What does that tell you? It's pretty wild and that's why
they're focusing on things that don't matter.
That's why they're going to be really up in arms.
Here's another little story that came from the New York Times at
a legacy media outlet. What does Andrew Klavan like to
call it? A so-called newspaper or a
former newspaper? The New York Times is being
mocked because they went after RFK Junior.
You guys have probably already heard the story.
I'm going to try to put it in a larger context here though.
The story was is that they're really mad at RFK Junior because
he's not a doctor. It turns out most of the people
in the Biden administration and many of the people in their
cabinets had 0 credentials to be hired on into that space.
What did Pete Buttigievs had to do with being a Secretary of
Transportation other than he's a smart guy, he's a weird guy.
He's a effeminate, nerdy, policy wonk kind of guy, but he was a
mediocre mayor in a tiny little town that doesn't really matter
on the national scale. So maybe give RFK Junior, who
spent the last 20 years of his life as kind of a crusader on
food and health and actually in his 70s, looks like an absolute
stud. That's why we played that video
the other day of sort of the joke of him going out and
protecting you from your own bad decisions, drinking Diet Coke or
Coke 0 or whatever is in, you know, the aspartame stuff.
They're they're mocking RFK Junior about his take on fruit
lips. Because what you do, if you want
to be a good sycophant of the regime is you hone in on a micro
piece of information and you say that this is not accurate or it
requires context when in fact it actually is accurate.
So the the paragraph in particular that they kind of
honed in on this one. And it's just a it's a microcosm
for what is going on in our media right now, defending sort
of the status quo and attacking anybody that would come in and
change. It is as follows.
This is a a piece from the Daily Wire reporting on it.
The article quoted Kennedy when he was asked in an interview
with MSNBC, quote, why do we have Froot Loops in this country
that have 18 or 19 ingredients and you go to Canada and it has
two or three? Now, if any of you have ever
lived abroad, you do know that food is different there.
And generally speaking, it's not as colorful.
It doesn't look as much like a poison dart frog that's living
in the Amazon rainforest, but it probably has more ingredients
that you can pronounce and understand.
And so they made fun of him. The writer just said that
Kennedy was wrong on the ingredient count because they
have roughly the same number of ingredients and that the cereals
in the United States and Canada are roughly the same.
They're roughly the same, but then they have to be followed on
by the following. This is a direct quote saying,
but the Canadian version does have natural colorings that are
made from blueberries and carrots.
OK, just put that in your head. Canada blueberries and carrots,
by the way, the UK and, and other European nations have the
same kind of things. They can have, you know, natural
flavorings that are made from natural items. the United States
products have red dye #40 yellow #5 blue dye number one as well
as this one. I'm not even sure if I can
pronounce it, but it's butadolated hydroxycholine.
I remember using like tolene products.
They were like organic solvent that you used to be able to pull
things out when you were doing extractions in my organic
chemistry lab. So that's good to know.
It's known as BHTI. Remember as a kid reading it and
finding it that it was always in every single food that I ate.
And I was like, oh, BHT. It's just, it's just a thing
that they use for freshness. And when you're nine years old
or 10 years old, reading it on the back of the box, you think
it's refreshness. That must be important.
And then when you're an adult and you're like, I don't need
whatever this is, either give me a fresh product or I don't want
it. Why in the hell are we buying
things that are not possibly fresh?
Toluene is a is a is a organic solvent used in all kinds of
different processes and various different derivatives of it.
It doesn't seem like a thing based on my use in the chemistry
lab where I had to have like a mask over my face and wearing
goggles. It doesn't seem like a thing
that I want to throw in the breakfast cereal to feed my kids
and my kids who have probably eaten like maybe two or three
boxes of what we call sugar cereals in their entire lives.
You know, we went out and got a couple of, I actually did like
one of those dad moves where mom was rehabilitating from having
baby #4 and I went to the grocery store and I let them all
pick out like whatever the most wild cereal they was.
Because you could eat a little bit of poison in your life, it
turns out, and you'll be OK. Most of us did.
But is that the kind of thing that when I go out there and I'm
shopping for ingredients and yes, I do.
I, I look and I go, oh, it has 100% organic milk and gargum and
carrageenan, which is a derivative of like this, like
seaweeds. These are thickeners and
products that are necessary for not the actual thing that you
want. I regularly have to turn away
products that should be otherwise fine.
They have nice packaging. They look pretty.
They might be in a glass bottle, but they're garbage.
And that's what RFK Junior talking about.
And that apparently is something that very much upsets the
mainstream media. Why would that be?
Is it because they're advertisers are cereal
companies? Is it because their advertisers
make a lot of money by making cheaper and less healthy
products that are ultra processed?
You've seen defense by like Time magazine, which I think is up
for sale right now because they are also going bankrupt.
All the wild stuff that you're seeing pushed by these, by these
editorial boards, they kind of have like a financial stake in
it. We had a funny conversation
behind the scenes the other day, a favorite Blaze reporter of
mine asking, you know, what do you think the position is of
Julie Kelly on RFK Junior? Because RFK Junior has been very
clear that bioengineered foods and putting pesticides and other
sort of dangerous things in the products that we eat is not good
for American health. Of course, Julie Kelly, who is
now ultra MAGA person, gave a bunch of money to Democrats,
shows up on Bandit all the time. She sort of is conspicuously
absent on talking about the cabinet, probably because it
interferes with her husband's business because he's a big AG
lobbyist. And so you just see there's
these all these overlapping things, these people, they've
conflicts of interest. It's the upside of being what we
do completely independent. You'll notice the people that
support us are sitting here on the on the table with me.
It's a it's a cooler company. It's a, it's a patriot food
company that says, yeah, these may not be the most healthy
things in the world, but we put them out there because you have
the opportunity to hold on to them and not be starving.
And there is a place for ultra processed foods.
Anybody who's ever eaten Mr. ES or has been in the military and
had or if somebody who's gone on long camping trips knows you
might need that thing in an emergency, but it's not like the
default food that you're going to eat.
It's certainly not something you live off.
How interesting. The other thing that's kind of
fun to watch is this, this question that they're worried
about doge, They're worried about the federal workers.
Why is it? Well, because the federal
workforce is pretty reliably Democrat voting.
They basically vote for a living.
They vote for the agencies and they vote for the people that
are going to keep them in a paycheck, even though they're
kind of like not necessary for most Americans.
The joke that we used to make is that you can shut down the
federal government. Most people wouldn't notice.
It's the reason why I was in the sort of like camp of no one for
speaker. I don't need a federal
government to function because I've seen what the federal
government did in 2020. And so did you, by the way.
You just didn't know that people didn't show up.
And during that 2020 COVID sort of insanity, which was rolling
out all over the place, I happened to see it from
Washington. DCI got to see exactly how few
people were what we call essential workers in the federal
government. They all got paid, by the way,
but they all went home. And one of the things that DOGE
is going to try to do, it's something that the private
industry has been doing, some of you may have experienced it
yourself, is they're trying to drag people back into the
workplace. We did a story about this maybe
a couple months back, talking about how many federal buildings
are left vacant. It's like paying farmers not to
plant their field with farm subsidies.
These buildings are paid mostly not owned by the federal
government, but actually just rented out their office space
That is paid for by the federal government.
It's kind of a subsidy to people that own property in DC, but
they're not actually working in those spaces.
So we spent all the money to set them up.
And you've got maybe somewhere between 10 and 25% of federal
workers actually filling up the spaces.
And then they're trying to build new headquarters for places like
the FBI. They're trying to to get new
buildings that are cleaner. Why?
Because everyone wants to work in a new building.
It's nicer to work in a nice, pretty place, isn't it?
But why? And who pays for it?
It turns out when you put people that run businesses that are
trying to make a profit, that are trying to scrape by and turn
some sort of good or service into something they can return
to their shareholders in the form of dividends or profits.
Yeah, they they may not think that makes a lot of sense.
And it doesn't make a lot of sense to most Americans.
Most Americans have this kind of idea of fairness.
And it says if you're going to get a paycheck, you should show
up and do the damn job. I had an experience the other
day which I think we talked about here on the program where
I called in to get help on a package that was marked
delivered but wasn't delivered from the United States Postal
Service. And it's kind of a semi
government agency. It's a weird animal the the
Postal Service, but I got a girl in the background who and had
her fire alarm that was going off.
Now, I'd never heard the chirp as we call it.
I've never heard the chirp of a fire alarm go off in a
government building without it being addressed.
Because that's something that the facilities people can
handle. And that's what's something that
you'd have these sort of workers that sit there with their space
heaters on and their blankets and watching Oprah on TV or The
View or whatever the heck it is they watch.
Those people are very, very acutely aware of their own
safety. Even if they're not doing their
job, they're going to make sure other people do their job,
including changing the batteries on the fire alarm.
But it turns out at your home, you can do whatever you want.
And so we've outsourced these people to do, like, pretty
critical jobs, like call center work for the federal government.
You want to be a private industry, and they don't want to
rent out the call center space. They want to send calls to your
cell phone and have mediocre things where there's a dog
barking in the background or you can hear kids playing.
Like, whatever. I may or may not choose to use
your product. We're talking about animals that
we all pay for and are subsidized by federal tax
dollars. And that seems absurd.
So this crackdown on remote work, one of the easy things to
do is say your job is no longer in Washington, DC.
And the other thing you can do, which they've also lost their
minds about, is say you got to come back into work.
I'm going to play you a, I'm going to play you a little clip
of the kind of people that I would like to see eliminated
under all of this. And it's going to play into a,
it's going to play into a bigger, a bigger story about
what's going on in the DOJ. This is Merrick Garland.
He's one of those people that's going to be leaving.
And he's kind of telling the folks that have been doing a
terrible job at DOJ that have been attacking American citizens
that have been following orders when they should have been
questioning them, that they're the heart and soul.
It's the reason that the, the, that Trump got in, I think is
that they want to see this changed.
They want to see this dismantled.
They don't want to see more of the same.
Here is an old man who sounds like an old woman crying about
how the DOJ is the people that work there are the heart and
soul of the agency that the institutional knowledge of it.
Just take a little taste of this.
You tell me if you want more of this or if you want to see
disruption. Now, for myself, I may be coming
to the end of my tenure at the Justice Department, but I know
that all of you will continue. You will continue in the
department's mission, what has always been its mission, to
uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect
civil rights. You, the career lawyers of this
district, the career lawyers of all the US Attorney's offices,
the career all lawyers of the Justice Department as a whole.
You are the institutional backbone of this department.
You are the historical memory of this department.
You are the heart and soul of the department.
You are the Justice Department. I could not be more proud of
you, and I could not be more grateful for all of the work
that you have done to protect the American people.
Thank you. Is he about to cry?
Because I felt like I was going to cry listening to him.
You are the Justice Department. You are the institutional soul.
Why is it that so many of them are scared and getting ready to
disappear and walk off their jobs?
Is it because they've been doing stuff like this?
So this is what was inevitable, And this is the thing that I've
been most worried about. January 6th, defendant is
convicted of conspiring to kill FBI agents investigating the
capital attack. There are plenty of FBI agents
that are garbage, and some of whom probably should be tried
for some really aggressive abuse of the statues that they've been
abusing against others. But what I don't want to see is
people writ large killed, especially by people that don't
know what the hell they're talking about.
This is ACNN article, which I think is it's worth remembering.
It's worth talking about. Is that this Tennessee man was
found guilty of assaulting a police officer.
It's been my contention that people that were violent on
January 6th, they should probably be dealt with.
I've actually sort of tempered my thoughts on this because at
this point, the way that they went after these people, the way
that Merrick Garland and the heart and soul of the Justice
Department, the institutional knowledge in the backbone of the
Justice Department went after people.
It's so incongruous with the way that they handled the people in
the BLM riots that went on for months in 2020.
They just didn't do it this way. And it's sort of understandable
that if you put someone to a decision for all their chips and
you find somebody that has been convicted of assaulting a cop
and they go in and they come out of, of the Justice Department or
they're waiting on a sentencing hearing and they don't see any
other options. Then they are eventually going
to turn to the thing that men do when they are backed up into a
wall, which is to turn to violence.
This guy, Edward Kelly, 35, was found guilty in a District Court
in Tennessee conspiracy to murder federal employees.
Again, it's an ugly, ugly look. Even though I understand where
the instinct comes from. I don't want this.
I don't want this for Edward Kelly.
I don't want this for the people that work in the, the, the
Knoxville office, The FBI, which is a, my memory serves, I think
it's a, a resident agency. So it's a satellite office
outside of Nashville. It's also interesting that I
couldn't find the criminal complaint on this.
For some reason, DOJ didn't didn't process it.
But I do have the public release of what they had to say.
And it sounds like they had a cooperating defendant.
So I don't know if that means that they found somebody early
on that said, hey, I've got this guy and he's talking about doing
something really dangerous and you know, I'm willing to wear a
wire kind of thing. Or if they actually just put a
cooperating defendant in that was there for some other reason
and turned him. But there are recordings of this
guy saying some really dumb, stupid, dangerous stuff, proof
that he had a kill list of various different FBI agents.
He was involved in surveillance. Some of this stuff doesn't sound
like what normal people would do.
It does sound like getting wrapped up in kind of the
playbook that we talked about here a lot.
So I'm kind of going to reserve judgement on the on the DO JS
case. But he was convicted of it.
And there are recordings of them saying things that are
objectively terrible like that he wanted to assassinate the FBI
employees in their home and wanted to follow them to places
like movie theaters. I don't know any FBI agents that
are going to movie theaters. Most of us tend to have kids and
that kind of thing. You know, that was I, I can't
remember going to a single movie theater the entire time that I
work for the Bureau and my wife and I had a few minutes to
ourselves. It was it was rare.
In any case, he's going to be sentenced in May of 2025.
So he may get a life sentence for that, but also at the same
time get pardoned for the underlying reason under Donald
Trump. Again, desperation makes people
do various things. And it turns out that, see, this
is the other piece of it. It says it was it was processed
by the Joint Terrorism Task Force out of Knoxville, which
again, makes me feel more like the playbook.
We're going to reserve judgement for a minute.
But Merrick Garland and the way that he ran this agency pushed
Americans over the edge. It pushed them into this place.
And it's been my ongoing fear that we are going to see a
justification for much more aggressive enforcement when
their answer should have been back the hell off.
We're seeing it in a lot of the the cases of these judges that
are not slowing down. They're not willing to take a
moment and and breathe while we wait for new priorities to come
in because the American people voted and they spoke.
And that is not just happening on the domestic front.
It's also happening on the, let's say, the international
front. So we're going to cover down on
that as well. The biggest thing that's budding
right now is the potential conflict with Russia, which we
spoke about a little bit the other day, but we're going to
talk about a little bit further. Probably a good time for us to
break over here, say thanks to our sponsors.
And also, as we talked about preparedness, it's worth
considering folks, you can go to prepare like kyle.com if you
want to check this stuff out. It is.
It's the best value per calorie, which is, by the way, how I
chose to go with them in the first place.
I even priced them against Costco.
So consider that. All right, let's get into the
weeds of the ugly thing. I want to go back in time a
little bit, if you don't mind. This is something that most
conservatives are aware of, but I don't think a lot of people on
the left are black. Jesus, Barack Obama had this to
say. And this is an article that only
goes back to 2023, and it's referencing a conversation that
Obama had in 2020 when he was speaking to the various
Democrats at some sort of AI don't know.
He was in front of some kind of audience talking privately.
And the story is he said, don't underestimate Joe's ability to F
things up. And Barack Obama was, in fact,
right to be wary of Joe Biden's ability to F things up.
This was written in 2023 by Michael Goodwin.
There's evidence all over the place in the Biden
administration. And you're seeing on the screen
a picture of what that's Solinsky sitting along there by
Joe Biden. They're holding the flags for
some reason. We love to put the Ukrainian
flag at the same level as the American flag.
It is a, it is a subservient nation that exists only by our,
you know, by our charity. And that seems problematic.
Now, Obama did his own sort of parting gift for the first Trump
administration. And some of you may not be all
that aware of it. We have talked about it on this
program, but I want to touch it a little bit further.
This is it. This is coming from, I believe
this is from the New York Times. The Obama administration is
spent to expand the sharing of data that the NSA intercepts.
All right, the NSA, the National security and Agency, has broad,
sweeping access to American telco and lines and is able to
exploit information. We had an NSA embed sitting on
my floor when I worked counterintelligence for the FBI
in Washington, DC. But we've had George Hill on
here, who's a former NSA analyst, and then afterwards was
an FBI analyst, the senior sort of supervisory type that handled
counterintelligence and counterterrorism.
And he said the single most dangerous thing that the Obama
administration did was on the way out the door, the parting
gift to trump #1 which is that they allow the FBI to access a
database of things called Seven O 2 FISA, Seven O2.
FISA is incredibly dangerous because it doesn't require a
true FISA warrant. It's a very, very light lift in
order to get it. Do you know who's in favor of
that kind of stuff? Mike Rogers, potentially the
next FBI director. If you believe what the leftist
media and the mainstream media are reporting, there's a reason
why we are only cash here. We're only cash because cash
understands the danger that exists and that FISA is not in
fact, a law enforcement tool. It's an intelligence tool.
It's used for developing intelligence and you must keep
intelligence tools away from law enforcement agencies unless you
want what Black Jesus gave us and that is called a secret
police force. The FBI dramatically went
downhill from the time that I started there.
And if you didn't work there not only in the post 911 era, but if
you didn't work there in the post Obama era, then you don't
know what we're talking about. We're talking about a thing that
Mike Rogers accurately stated is expressly against the law and
it's done every single day. It's called reverse targeting.
And that is to say that if you were a criminal investigator, as
I used to be, if your job is 1811, which was what my job
title was, there is no such thing as a as a federal special
agent. That's a category of people who
do a thing known as 1811 criminal investigations.
The weird thing is if you take criminal investigators and you
train them investigative minds that are looking for crimes,
that want to prosecute people who have done bad things and you
give them tools and tell them they can only use them in one
way, but they could possibly use them in a way that's illegal and
nobody would really know about it.
And by the way, your boss is telling you to use it in a way
that's illegal, but telling you that it's not, that the training
is inappropriate, that the safeguards and the and the
guardrails are non existent. I am a pretty smart guy, folks.
I'll just go out there on a limb and just tell you that I can
objectively say it based on all the test scores for a long, long
time. And I got training on how to
handle the FISA tools that we got.
And I did my damnedest to do them properly, to use what we
call mitigation techniques properly.
And I went through a FISA audit somewhere in 2018, beginning of
2018, and after good faith efforts in order to properly
follow the mitigation tactics and techniques that the Bureau
teaches with the mediocre training they have in a very
complex software system called DWS, the data warehouse system.
I had no ability to do it properly.
I sat down there with the chief division counsel from the
Washington Field office and an outside lawyer from DOJ.
We sat there and we watched, how did you do?
And they went, let's do this query and see if you minimize it
properly. And I went, oh, OK, this should
be no problem. I remember doing this boop and
it popped at the results and it was wrong.
And I went, oh, and they said, well, that's OK, sometimes you
people get things wrong. Let's see, every single damn
instance that they audited my ability to mitigate as you're
supposed to do, to mask Americans and so on, failed.
Even though I tried, even though I did the best I could and I was
doing what I thought was correct.
There was no hands on training. It was like, welcome to this
incredibly dangerous tool. Go do whatever the hell you want
with it. And if you're trying to do it
the right way, you still might not get it right.
Do you know how scary that is? The only reason that was
possible is because of this, because the Obama administration
allowed the sharing of the NS as raw data, not analyzed, not
mitigated, not not masked information.
Straight up, I would look right into your e-mail box if you were
in my list. And then we would go out there
and we would search because you're told, hey, go find the
people that are doing espionage. Find the people that are in
contact with your various targets, whether they be from
Iran or China or Russia or take your pick.
And when you would go out there and try to do that, that's
actually illegal. And if you ask questions about
it, they would tell you that it wasn't because you had
authorization for some reason, even though you knew you didn't,
even though you're reading in the media, right?
Then reverse targeting, going after Donald Trump and all of
this stuff, the Carter Page stuff.
How crazy. This was one of those parting
gifts. This was Barack Obama effing it
up prior to Trump 1. And so not to be outdone and not
to be just doing it on the domestic level, Joe Biden seems
to be doing it at an international level.
Here it is. This is coming from my buddies
over at Catholic Vote. It's a story they put out
yesterday and yesterday's loop. But you can go find Russia says
that Ukraine's use of American made missiles signal a new phase
in the war. What would that phase look like?
We covered it briefly, did we not?
Imagine arming your neighbor, training your neighbor,
equipping your neighbor, giving them ammunition, giving them a
rifle scope and then showing them how to point it at the
neighbor across across the streets, house into the windows
and letting them know when the most likely time was that it
would be effective and then going I have nothing to do with
the fact that they're using it. It turns out the Russians don't
think that. And here is one of their foreign
ministers stating this is on RT saying y'all you can't just arm
the other team and act like you have no say in it.
The Russians rightly take it as a kind of an affront to to the
piece that we would have between each other.
If long range missiles are going to be applied from Ukraine into
Russian territory, it will also mean that they are operated by
American experts, military experts.
And we will be taking this as a qualitatively new face of the
Western war against Russia and will will react accordingly.
Uh oh, they said they'll react accordingly.
The other interesting thing is that Americans couple weeks ago
elected Donald Trump, which was a vote for peace.
One of the things that he was campaigning on is no new wars,
which is the thing that happened under his first administration,
right? No new wars, a timetable and a
plan to get out of wars. So the Biden administration has
now got a couple of wars going. They're brewing one in the
Middle East, which we keep seeing.
We just had the international courts issue a arrest warrants
for people like Netanyahu. I don't have a lot of faith in
what goes on to The Hague. It seems very political.
It seems very left-leaning. And we've also got this sort of
escalation going on right now in Ukraine in a very, very scary
way. So the Ukrainians decided to
take the US up on the offer. They were authorized.
The question that I always have too is did the Ukrainians say,
hey, hey, can we, can we fire long range missiles into Russia
and piss them off more? Or did the United States say,
Hey, we gave you all those missiles, it's time for you to
use them? We sent you special advisors and
United States Special Forces operations troops to come in and
teach you how to use those. We showed you how to target
them. We gave you the munitions.
We, we moved them in. We physically moved them to you
because they had no ability to get them themselves, right?
And it's time for you to start using some of our munitions
because it's time to feed our war machine.
Is that what happened? Because it seems most likely.
Do you guys want to know what it looks like when this is what it
looks like when Russia doesn't like it, When they decided that
long range missiles supplied by the United States is going to
develop a warning system? What you're seeing on the screen
right now is absolutely terrifying.
There's no audio to it. Those are ballistic missiles
with multiple re entry warheads hitting a Ukrainian city.
How scary is that? We're looking at a clouded sky,
looking through the night from a distance.
Security camera footage of some kind and we are dropping
massive, massive ordnance coming out of the sky.
Multiple re had one single missile and they're just showing
the Russians are just saying, hey guys, do you know who you're
messing with You're messing with the wrong people.
There is a European perspective on this.
We'll cover that in a second. Let's cover the United States
perspective. Wouldn't it be nice if we had
somebody in office that could reach out that actually had an
established relationship. I listened to something on Joe
Alban's program which I think will air today.
It was a, it was Vladimir Putin through translator saying, you
know, say what you like about Donald Trump, but he took a
bullet to the head and he stood up and he, he revealed his core
character, which is one that is honorable and masculine.
It is an alpha male type attitude.
It is the opposite of what we see Joe Biden do, isn't it?
So wouldn't it be nice if the somebody who had a mutual like
stood on mutual terms of respect instead of looking at some frail
doddering old man that's going out there and going to
accidentally lead us into World War 3.
Trump had something to say about it too.
We're going to do Cash Patel talking about it.
You know, the guy that's totally unqualified to lead things
because he doesn't know what he's talking about Per to the
left. Then we'll get into a European
perspective who kind of have some skin in the game if they're
going to be really close to a nuclear war.
And then we'll go and see what Donald Trump said because he's
been releasing more and more of his videos and they're pretty
good. And it's going to lead us to
kind of like a final thought, which is that the Biden
administration keeps doubling down on some of the most
retarded ideas. Like DEI ought to be able to
call the Putin's of the world, who has the largest nuclear
arsenal outside of America and say, yo, we are not going to war
and you are not invading the Ukraine.
I mean, just think about the power of someone who's in the
position of the Oval Office to effectuate that call and say,
uh, uh, we're standing up for global peace.
And now the mainstream media wants to attack Trump for having
the audacity to have a relationship with these guys and
avert another World War. I mean, these people are the
biggest hypocrites in Washington, DC, and what they
see is, as you alluded to, their nest egg, their contracts being
taken away because Trump is saying we're not going to
another war. It seems pretty obvious that
this is about money. This is about a Piggy Bank.
This is about making sure that the things that they've profited
from, I know that those of you who are Dan Bongino listeners
are very familiar with the insane and the Ukraine kind of
thing and the follow the money. This is a very common theme for
those of us that are kind of watching from the outside going,
like, what the Hell's going on over there?
Why is it that all this money gets put in?
Why are they driving Bugattis around when they ought to be
theoretically trying to defend their nation?
Because this corrupt practice has been pretty, pretty
ubiquitous for at least. Oh yeah, going back to the Obama
era, right. One of those other little fun
things. I like listening to the cash say
it. I like listening to what Donald
Trump has to say about it. And can we just talk about one
thing real quickly about Cash Patel that never gets mentioned.
He would be the first non white male to take over the FBI
director position. Shouldn't the the radical like
gender and race focus left just be 100% behind a cash battelle?
Wouldn't that be a big deal for them?
None of us really notice it because he's just a bro Because
he's wearing a hoodie and he's got a MAGA hat on.
Like we don't recognize it but don't Don't the political
leftist like just relish the idea of the first Indian
American being in office? How racist are these people?
They always, they always let you know who they are.
All right, here's Donald Trump's take on this, which I don't
think is wrong. And it's worth noting he doesn't
say it perfectly. He's kind of like he's doing
that kind of Trump thing where he kind of meanders off a little
bit. But one of the things he gets
into is about DEI, which is crazy and the fact that we've
become sort of this godless nation, not wrong.
But here he is talking about the prospect of World War Three.
Are we the closest ever? Maybe so.
We have never been closer to World War Three than we are
today. Under Joe Biden, a global
conflict between nuclear armed powers would mean death and
destruction on a scale unmatched in human history.
It would be nuclear Armageddon. Nothing is more important than
avoiding that nightmare. We will avoid it, but we need
new leadership. Every day this proxy battle in
Ukraine continues, we risk global war.
We must be absolutely clear that our objective is to immediately
have a total secession of hostilities.
All shooting has to stop. This is the central issue.
We need peace without delay. In addition, there must also be
a complete commitment to dismantling the entire globalist
neo con establishment that is perpetually dragging us into
endless wars pretending to fight for freedom and democracy abroad
while they turn us into a third world country and a third world
dictatorship right here at home. The State Department, the
defense bureaucracy, the intelligence services and all of
the rest need to be completely overhauled and reconstituted to
fire the deep Staters. And put America first.
We have to put America first. Yeah, Isn't that just simple
stuff? He goes on to talk about the
fact that the those people are trying to institute a godless
policy, that they are out there destroying sort of the the
boundaries of the United States where we should and shouldn't
get involved. All that stuff seems totally
accurate to me. And here you have reporting from
CBS talking about Russia firing missiles at Ukraine.
It's kind of a little warning. That warning comes in the form
of destroying an entire city. Some of the pictures are
absolutely insane. The claim was is that that that
it was under an ICBM. The CBS is saying that it wasn't
an ICBM. That doesn't necessarily mean
that it was a a nuclear ICBM. They have the ability to send
ballistic missiles that have different payloads.
Sounds like they were conventional payloads.
Pretty terrifying, multiple re entry vehicles, multiple strikes
getting in and just being destructive.
It's time to realize that although Russia may not be a
first rate power and the same way the United States is, it has
all of the vestiges of the Cold War.
And we keep getting told this thing that the Russians are
something they're not. The Europeans don't want this.
By the way, isn't it funny? The Europeans don't want
anything to do with this? Because having this on their
doorstep equals a lot. Like, look, look at the map
you're seeing on there. Look at all the different sort
of Central European and Eastern European countries that are
surrounding it. A tactical nuclear strike is not
going to be something that is going to leave the rest of the
areas unaffected. And so we keep having these sort
of debates about it. I love listening to people's
perspective on this. Here's a a professor of
political science having a discussion saying essentially
what we talk about here all the time, that the United States
never left the Cold War even though we thought we would.
And so this conflict is not what is being presented by.
There's a fundamentally disingenuous nature to it.
And it seems like Donald Trump's is sort of like the mitigating
factor. He's sort of bringing a a softer
touch to it, understanding that the Russians actually have
something to argue for and it wasn't just some random
aggression. Here's a little taste on a
little historical perspective coming from a TikTok video, but
I found it useful. This is not an attack by Putin
on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day.
This started in 1990. February 9th, 1990, James Baker,
the third our Secretary of State said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO
will not move one inch eastward if you agree to German
unification, basically ending World War 2.
And Gorbachev said that's very important, yes, NATO doesn't
move and we agreed to German unification.
The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when
Clinton signed off on a basically a plan to expand NATO
all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so-called
neocons took power and Clinton was the first agent of this.
And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland,
Hungary and Czech Republic. At that point Russia didn't much
care. There was no border other than
with the Koerningsberg, but other than that there was no
direct threat. Then the US-led the bombing of
Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way,
because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital,
Belgrade, 78 straight days to break the country apart.
The Russian. There's more to it, I will post
this over on our local channel if you guys want to hear this.
It's a pretty decent little like synopsis of a lecture. the US
keeps getting involved in these things.
And yeah, look, 1999 who was in charge?
Clinton, the neo con sort of push that you've got the Obama
allowing certain things to happen, moving further when
someone says, hey, we're not going to come any closer.
Think about the the the type of aggression.
We see these in like law enforcement videos all the time.
It's like, don't take another step closer.
And then they do and you're like, I'm going to have to shoot
this guy and you're like, just stay where you are.
Put your hands up and they're like, yeah, yeah, yeah, I got
you, I got you. I'm going to keep coming closer.
They test, test, test. We are the ones that are kind of
doing the aggression on this. We being NATO, we being the
people that are benefiting from sort of conflicts and wars and
sending all of our munitions around, doing military training
exercises. I don't want that.
Turns out they kind of let the bag, the cat out of the bag when
you ask him point blank, what's the most important thing in this
war. Here is Kern Starmer, who's the
PM of, of Britain. He's like, it's Russia's fault.
And the biggest deal, the most important thing is we must
support Ukraine. I'm going to show you another
thing that Biden's doing to, quote UN quote, support Ukraine
to the detriment of Americans in just a second.
Let's do this little video first, kind of enterprising
reporter asking the quick questions.
To do that, just quickly, Russia's also threatened nuclear
escalation. Are you comfortable with that
when people at home are watching this, worrying that you could
put Odin at risk? Well, it's very important.
It's very important that we're steadfast in our support for
Ukraine. Russia is the aggressor and
Russia, Russia has to be the one that makes the move to stop this
war. It's within their gift.
But we must support Ukraine. It's impacting not just Ukraine,
it's impacting the rest of the world, including the UK.
It's your message to viewers back home that there will not be
a nuclear war because that is what Russia is threatening.
My message is that we need to ensure that Ukraine is put in
the best possible position. This is 1000 days of conflict
and there is a very high cost if Russian aggression is seen to
pay off. Oh, there's a very high cost.
If it pays off, is it going to be the nuclear war?
Yeah, The very high cost is is you guys keep doing this thing
makes no sense whatsoever. Incredibly dangerous.
It bothers me. Let's hear what the actual
Europeans have to say. You know, the ones that might
actually have to deal with the conflict.
How about this? Because they understand it needs
to be peace. And we are in a very dangerous
time for the next few days. Here.
Here comes a major concern, although the American people
have decided, although it is a clear interest of the European
people as well, that peace should come back to Central
Europe, but I think that the two months ahead of us up to the
20th of January are the two most dangerous months comparing the
last couple of decades. Why?
Because those who have carried out.
This failed pro war strategy are not only not giving up, but they
try to create a situation until the 20th of January where
peacemaking will be extremely, extremely complicated their.
Goal is definitely to make it impossible by the 20th of
January to make peace. Look at the measures.
Allowing the long range missiles to be applied against the depth
of the territories of Russia. Allowing the mines to be
applied. And the High Representative of
the European Union is calling for the European Union itself to
allow long range weapons provided by European countries
to be used against Russian territories.
While European Union does have nothing to do with that, since
European Union does not deliver weapons, it's only member State.
Who do so? You get it.
The people that are sitting in power are trying to provoke this
thing. And then the last little FU gift
as Biden starts going towards the twilight is that the
administration has been moved. They are trying to forgive $4.7
billion in loans to Ukraine because all the stuff we gave,
some of it was given in loan format and some of it was given
in simply military aid. They're trying to forgive these
things. How does that benefit the United
States? How are you A, doing things that
are for the best in the American people's interest when $4.7
billion of our money is forgiven to a country that got itself
into its own conflict, that has been pushed along, sure, by CIA
cutouts and so on. And now you want to make sure
you forgive our money? You want to give it away even
though they've already given away 10s of billions of dollars?
Funding bill passed the United States Congress in April.
It included $9.4 billion in forgivable loans for the
economic and budgetary support of Ukraine's government.
And it's forgivable as long as it signed off on it was
appropriate, a total of $61 billion, six 1B with a billion
dollars to help fight the full scale invasion of Moscow, to
fight the full scale engagement. Moscow launched, sorry, in
February 22. Two, remember 2022.
We're going to come back to that in a second.
So if we've taken steps to outline the law to cancel these
loans, we said that it could be done and now we're going to do
it. Now Congress could block the
move sentence due to vote on it on Wednesday.
It's important that everybody shows up and does the thing.
You can let your Congress people know.
You can let your senators know. Republicans like Rand Paul,
frequent critics of this support, are trying to get it.
Of course, senators from both parties seem to support the aid
programs to Ukraine because it's most important, most important
that we support Ukraine, nevermind what's going on with
Americans. I found this little thing too as
well. This is an older article coming
back from October. It says in the twilight, his
turn, Biden greets the global audience weary of war and weary
of US politics. And So what they've done is
they've allowed it to basically turn and focus on Donald Trump's
cabinet and they are trying to do the crazy stuff.
The other thing that was sort of big news that happened yesterday
was the conviction and maybe the like kind of the nail in the
coffin on one of the reasons why I think the Biden slash Harris
administration failed in the re election attempt.
And that was that this porous and open border caused a real
problem for them. Nobody has been a better
representative. The family of Lake and Riley who
was was hideously murdered by a guy named Jose Ibera.
Jose Ibera was convicted yesterday.
I'm going to tell you something about that in a second.
First, just for this for a moment, it actually feels kind
of good to listen to This is the jury reading the verdict in
English to a non-english speaker sitting in our courts.
Again, we give them due process at a speedy trial and we paid
for his defense, but he was dead to rights when it came to the
conviction. And you guys will hear that in
one second. We're going to go back and talk
about how Joe Biden honored the the memory of Lake and Riley and
her family just after the video. One malice murder, I find the
defendant guilty. Count 2, felony murder, I find
the defendant guilty. Count 3, Felony murder, I find
the defendant guilty. Count 4.
Felony murder, I find the defendant guilty.
Count 5. Kidnapping with bodily injury, I
find the defendant guilty. Count 6, Aggravated assault with
intent to rape, I find the defendant guilty.
Count 7, Aggravated battery, I find the defendant guilty.
Count 8, obstructing or hindering a 911 call, I find the
defendant guilty. Count 9, tampering with
evidence, I find the defendant guilty.
Count 10, Peeping Tom, I find the defendant guilty.
I certainly will allow both sides to look at this if you
want to do it. Yeah, guilty.
All counts now. Interestingly enough, the DA
down there decided that it would be bad for illegal immigrants
because those are the people we care most about in this country,
just like we care most about giving our money to Ukrainians.
It would be bad for other illegal immigrants if they
sought the death penalty. So he's going to be going
probably looking at life in prison and multiple concurrent
sentences. So be it.
We'll see how that works out for him.
You shouldn't have to ask for the inmates in a prison to
provide the kind of justice that family probably needs and wants.
This is a predator. He's going to be in good
company. He's going to be in a prison
system where he can go and enjoy that sort of thing.
Well, the sad thing is that we keep seeing these sort of local
types obstructing and attempting to obstruct, keeping the
keeping, keeping the wheels of justice at Bay, right?
We're seeing mayors, we're seeing local district attorneys
and so on. They've all kind of done this.
Even Californians are a little bit less crazy than they used to
be in the era of Trump 2.0. They actually voted against a a
comprehensive proposal in California to raise the minimum
wage, which would go to, of course, to illegal aliens as
well. People who are working like
nominal jobs. Imagine if your first job paid
$18.00 an hour out of the gate. That's what they were looking to
do in California. It's $16.00 an hour right now.
They wanted to raise it by $2.00.
And finally, people in California even said no to that.
They said yes to criminalizing actual felonies, like stealing a
bunch of stuff. And they said no to raising the
rates on jobs that are not supposed to be able to feed your
family. In the meantime, the question
has to come up, what's going to be different?
How's Trump going to do it differently?
You mentioned, we mentioned earlier, he was talking about
like a godless society and the people at the neocons doing this
thing. Here's Tom Holman who's saying
exactly what he thinks should happen to politicians that want
to get in the way of the mission of mass deportation, which
should happen. And I think this is very
interesting. Real.
Quickly what happens to mayor? Or local Police Department chief
that is under a Democratic leadership that obstructs ICE in
your federal agents that are helping get these deportation of
what happens to them. Well, first of all, if they want
to help us get the hell out of the way, we're going to do it.
If I got sent twice amount of resources to that city, that's
what we're going to do. If if they would give us access
to the jail, that would mean less agents in the community for
them pushing back and not let us into jail.
It just means more agents are going to be in the community.
So they're hurting themselves. Finally, I'll say this, they
need to educate themselves. They need to review this title 8
United States Code 1324 triple. I read about that and don't
cross that line because it is a felony to harbor and conceal an
illegal alien from ICE. Read the statute.
Don't cross that line. Wouldn't it be nice if we had a
Justice Department that would go out there and prosecute 18 USC
1324 that he's talking about? I think so.
Here's how Joe Biden, Joe Biden went ahead and celebrated the
victory in our court system or let's just call it the
administration of justice of someone being found guilty after
being let into this country illegally by his bad policies.
Joe Biden says on Twitter, quote today on Transgender Day of
Remembrance, we mourn the transgender Americans who lost
their lives that were taken in horrific acts of violence.
Every American deserves to be treated with dignity and live
free from discrimination. Today, we recommit to building a
country where everyone is afforded that promise.
That was tweeted out at 6:00 PM Eastern Time yesterday.
No mention of Lake, Lake and Riley.
I went and looked at his page. The only other thing that he
brought up is the other piece of the culture of death that he's
been out here fostering, he said.
Today I had the honor of awarding Cecil Richards the
Presidential Medal of Freedom. With absolute courage, she
fearlessly leads us towards the America that we say we are.
A nation of freedom, a nation free to murder its babies.
Cecil Richards is the former president of Planned Parenthood,
so he celebrated it by talking about trannies and talking about
baby death because that's the person that we have sitting in
the office. The American people are sick of
it. They're tired of it.
They're I think they're tired of being hit.
When you say that it wasn't the woke left that lost the election
for them, I think that you're out of your minds and I'm going
to give you an example. There are two examples.
One comes from Jaguar, which is a British car manufacturer.
You would think it turns out they're actually just an
exporter of what was it, Frappuccino Fragine.
Also, Jasmine Crockett talking about DEI hires.
I wanted to play something. She's screaming about racism and
I wanted to give you kind of the side by side what what Americans
should be seeing every single day.
If we had an honest media, they would be playing this.
This is what happens when you focus on DEI.
You get a congresswoman saying crazy things like this which has
nothing to do with anything and it certainly doesn't help the
American people. How about you stop giving away
our money to Ukraine? Or you could just cry about like
slavery and things that you don't know anything about since
you are a privileged black lady from Texas America who lives
free and has plenty of money to pay for like Chanel earrings.
It's because you can then misuse words like oppression.
There has been no oppression for the white man in this country.
You tell me which white men were dragged out of their homes.
You'll tell me which one of them got dragged all the way across
an ocean and told that you were going to go and work.
We are going to steal your wives.
We are going to rape your wives. That didn't happen.
That is oppression. We didn't ask to be here.
We not the same migrants that y'all constantly come up
against. We didn't run away from home.
We were stolen. So, yeah, we are going to sit
here and be offended when you want to sit here and act like
and and and don't let it escape you that it is white men on this
side of the aisle telling us people of color on this side of
the aisle that that y'all are the ones being oppressed, that
y'all are the ones that are being harmed.
What we doing oppression speeches in 2024?
Keep running that game. Here she was only two years ago
and change not sounding like a complete lunatic who's crying
about people getting dragged out of their home.
She doesn't know a single person that's been dragged out of their
home. Not a single person, I guarantee
it. Jasmine Crockett, thank you so
much. Really appreciate it.
You're a state representative and now you are running for
Congress. Why is that and what are your
priorities? Absolutely.
First of all, it's good to see you in the new year.
You know, no one could have told me that when I went down to
Austin. Now looks like a little bit over
a year ago that I would be running for Congress.
So it's not what my plan was, but what I've always decided is
that I would step up when there was a need.
And so I fully anticipated that our Congresswoman would serve
out at least one more term, if not more than one term, in
Congress. She would step up when they had
a need and there was a need apparently for someone to be a
racist dollar store Cardi B. And so that's what she is for
the Democrat Party. Sad because she's obviously
smarter than that and she's obviously just doing a race
hustling grift. It's very effective for people
like Sheila Jackson Lee. It just turns out it lands you
in hell at the end of the game. That's OK.
Hopefully that's not her aspiration.
Hopefully she straightens out her course and she realizes that
Americans are going to get sick of it.
The other thing that we're seeing is, like I said, this
push for the ridiculous and here's the last little taste of
that. I'll just play it because it's
out there running around. For some reason, they haven't
gotten the message. Go woke, go broke.
It sounds like if any of you are looking for a luxury car, you
should probably consider something else.
And that Jaguar. We are passionate about our
people. And we're committed to fostering
a diverse, inclusive, and unified culture that is
representative not only of the people who use our products, but
in a society in which we all live, a culture where our
employees can bring their authentic selves to work.
And we are on a transformative journey of our own, driven by a
belief in diversity, inclusion, creativity, policy, and most
importantly, action. We've established over 15 DEI
groups such as Pride who are here tonight.
Let me just stop you right now. 15 Well, that just barely beats
out the FB is 9 Diversity Advisory Council.
So congratulations, you're doing really well.
They got, I shit you not, there's no other way to say it.
They got a man wearing a mesh shirt that belongs in like a
German nightclub and a sequin jacket.
That's what you're missing if you're just listening to us to
go out there and talk about that when they're a luxury car
manufacturer that sells luxury cars to a audience that looks
decidedly not like that, but whatever keep running that game.
I hope these people continue. It is my favorite there is one
of the thing we're going to make fun of as we end here.
Before we do that, let's just say thanks to our friends over
at Shield arms. If you guys want to get
something that is a fantastic product, an American
manufacturer of of arms and accessories, go to
shieldarms.com. Use promo code Kyle save
yourself 10% site wide. They are a Montana America based
weapons manufacturer. They also make accessories for
things like your micro glocks. If you want to have a higher
capacity you can check them out. They've got base plates and so
on. Fantastic stuff.
I carry their products every single day.
I use their magwells, I use their magazine releases and I
also use their S 9 environment of of magazines to hold 15 in my
little Glock 43 X. It allows me to carry a much
smaller gun. Couldn't carry it when I was on
the FBI, but I sure as heck do today because I don't need to
have a full size gun. I'm not out there trying to
arrest people. If you guys are in the world
where you're a concealed carrier and you want to up your game, go
to Shield arms use promo code Kyle.
The link's always in the show description.
We appreciate them stepping in and being part of our team.
All right, so let's throw the last little thing up there.
We talked about cars just briefly.
We're going to end it on a little pallet cleanser,
something kind of funny and making fun of my buddy Joe, and
Joe bought a cyber truck. I think the market on this is
not going to be the same as it was previously.
Even if Elon Musk is in the Doge, you're going to find out
that there's just not an environment or an infrastructure
for a lot of the stuff. You just kind of look like a
douche. And sometimes you have to create
a symbiotic relationship with a tow truck, don't you?
Here we see the cyber truck has formed a peculiar symbiotic
relationship with the larger flatbed trailer species.
Evolutionarily disadvantaged, the cyber truck has come up with
a clever way to transport itself long distances.
By attaching itself to the flatbed trailer, the cyber truck
can reliably move about without risking injury to its fragile
exoskeleton or internal organs. What the Flatbed trailer gets in
return for this kindness, science has yet to discover.
It is unclear why you are driving the cyber truck, but you
do you folks. That's the brilliance of
America. Thanks for being part of our
program today. For all those in the live chat,
we really appreciate you. Sorry that you guys had your
disillusions about Russ Watt and make sure you're following us
rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. You can find the X pod, which is
going to be Kyle Seraphin pod at Kyle Seraphin Pod over on
Twitter X if you guys want to do that.
And lastly, you can check us out on Locals at Kyle Seraphin.
Just go to kyleseraphin.com. And you can also get this
podcast after some of you are listening on Spotify.
If you listen on the app, you'll be able to watch the video there
without any ads as well. Appreciate all of it.
Appreciate all of you, and God bless you.
We'll see you again on Friday morning.
We'll see you tomorrow. Hope you have a great Thursday.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin Show streamed live
weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle
Seraphin.