Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower and
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the
uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for
comforting lies. Here is civil liberties
enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI
agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome
to the Kyle Seraphin show. Today is Friday.
It is June the 20th. It is no longer a federal,
federal holiday, but it is federal Friday.
And so we have Steve, friend, former Fed, never again joining
me. You know, this morning Brain was
a little bit scrambled. The eggs were fried.
We're going to talk about a kind of a mixed bag of stuff going on
in the news. I want to cover a little bit on
the Iran, Israel stuff because why not?
We're going to talk about some FBI stuff because that's kind of
what we do in a new push to kind of make Dashpongino do the thing
that they said they would do. And it sounds like my buddy
Steve spent a little bit of time over on Blaze dropping some
napalm on these dudes and putting their feet to the fire.
Some real strange comments coming out of the Trump
administration talking about their overwhelming support and
why we need to go and do military actions against Iran,
which seems to have divided the mega base.
We did a whole show on that. We're going to do a little bit
more on that because I think it's still relevant.
What else? People in Georgia are very upset
that they couldn't kill a baby after the mom was found brain
dead. That I was actually one of the
ugliest stories. We talked about abortion the
other day and sort of this need and this push by OBGY NS not
just to deliver babies, not just to bring human life in and make
sure that women are covered with sort of maternal care.
But also if they don't get a chance to kill babies, they're
going to have to go pay out of their own pocket and learn how
to do it because they are so desperate to be part of the
abortion complex, which is very, very weird.
This story that I saw was actually really gross, and it
goes to an underlying problem. Like where the heck are the
dads? Shouldn't the dad have a say in
this? Don't moms by default want to
have babies? That's why they are pregnant and
that's why they are trying to carry a child.
I don't know. It just seems really important
to me. Like the next generation before
we get into all of that wild stuff and there's going to be
all kinds of contentious things that we're going to talk about.
We're going to say something about my friends over at Patriot
Protect website is in the in the show description.
If you guys want to find it is Patriot Dash Protect dot com
slash Kyle. There's a couple of little
phrases in there, but you can find it very quickly.
Scroll down and click through it right now. 84,000,000 passwords
have been leaked and you have to ask yourself if you're going to
be the next target. A newly uncovered data breach
from AT&T reveal these millions of logins, their credentials
with complete usernames and passwords and emails left
unencrypted and open wide on the Internet.
The data is already circulating around the dark net where
scammers can shop for their next victim.
They can buy batches of these things and then target you.
The breach includes access to bank accounts and e-mail
providers, healthcare portals, government services and so on.
Criminals don't need to hack. They just simply log in if they
can buy access to your information, if you want to keep
your passwords secured, if you want to keep your digital data
and your money, which is probably where all of us are
keeping our money now, very few people are keeping them in the
mattress, under the bed. Yeah, you might want to do
something about that. You can use Patriot Protect to
help remove your personal information from the dark web,
from public websites. They'll let you know what's
being sold on the dark web so you can actually change those
things so you're not a victim. And the website
ispatriot-protect.com slash Kyle, get your phone number,
your e-mail address, and all the other things out there off the
public data broker websites. Make sure that the stuff that
might be sold is something you're aware of so you can
change them up And don't become a victim.
Make yourself harder as a target and therefore let somebody else
be the one who has to deal with this problem.
Not everybody's going to do it. It's going to cost you very,
very little. It's just a couple bucks a
month. Check it out.
You'll save 15% on an annual subscription.
patriot-protect.com slash Kyle. Check out our long form that we
did with one of the Co founders too on the Sunday special a
little while back. His name is Skip.
Check that out. And let's get into today's
program with my buddy Steve Fran.
We're going to be talking about all kinds of other things too,
maybe even cyber attacks, maybe not from dark web scammers,
maybe our government. What do you think about that?
OK, Steve, friend, welcome to the program.
Can you testify what happened just before we started going
live, since you got to see it happen in real time?
No disavow, no knowledge whatsoever.
I actually saw you melting down, and rightfully so, as all of the
images that you had pre staged and set up and spent scrupulous
effort and time preparing to put forward a show.
Because you're definitely not 100% of fed Boy, OP disappear in
front of my eyes. Which, I mean, it's pretty
appropriate for a federal Friday, but there's a lot of
tech malfeasance afoot. I just got a message from a
friend of ours, Brianna Barella. Her website just went down
minutes after she posted a video supporting Garretta, Boyle and
myself on social media. So maybe the tech guys came in
on Juneteenth preparing for an assault.
Well, that's kind of interesting.
All this stuff is actually kind of launched from a little
interview. I think I actually played it the
other day, but I was at the end of the show, so maybe people did
not catch it. You're back upsetting people.
You've got people in your corner over at the Blaze.
You just did you want to talk about the interview?
And then I'm actually going to play this little clip that Tom
Fenton dropped on where he's sounds like you got Robert
Barnes now stepping into the arena.
You've got the folks over at Blaze that are realizing like
the stuff that we were early adopters on, it doesn't seem
like Dashpon, Geno are getting it done.
And it's starting to upset some people on the conservative
right. I had an invitation to come on
to Pat Gray Unleash this morning.
His is a show that immediately is in front of Glenn Beck.
So pretty, pretty prominent guy. And they interviewed me for a
full hour and they asked me sort of what my experience was, his
background. But then also like what my
assessment is of what's going on and things that you and I have
talked about before, particularly about like the
Hogan's Alley ninjas coming out of the ceiling, concerns that we
have and how they've gone in with winning hearts and minds
instead of shock and all. But then really I wanted to hone
in on the talking point that we're seeing put out there all
the time. And I'm kind of in your camp
like America, only Israel, Iran, I don't weigh in on it because
I'm not a foreign policy expert it whereas everybody online
apparently is when last week they were a due process expert,
before that they were a tariff expert and then they were
virologists. But what my point was the Iran
is trying to assassinate Donald Trump point we have highlighted
how the Asif merchant assassination plot was a
playbook case and that name I keep seeing put out there all
the time. But he tried to kill Donald
Trump. No that that wasn't he was just
a vulnerable person and not a good guy.
I don't think I'd want to be friends with him, but they
completely the FBI facilitated his arrival and travel into the
interior of the country where he was going to try to bring about
this scheme to have fake protests outside politicians
houses and a woman descending into through the ceiling Mission
Impossible style to steal classified material and recruit
hit men from nightclubs for the low price of $500 that he was
going to have to have his cousin from Pakistan loan him so.
That's not all right. So that's the same case that
we're talking about. This is the guy that was driving
around with a federal informant or was it a federal agent?
I can't. Remember if it was New York
Police Department undercovers? OK, so there's a JTTFUCS then
that were driving this dude around to Brooklyn nightclubs so
that he could find potential assassins.
And that's the story that like, you know, that means that Ted
Cruz is actually correct that the that the the hitman from
from Iran are actually not even competent.
And and so there was this sort of outrage.
I think Tucker is doing faux outrage on that too.
I think they're both right, by the way, I think that Israel is
the good guy in the fight compared to the Iranians.
And I also think that like we have no business in it either.
Is that? I think.
It's the America. Only position, frustrating to
see a debate like that word. You want them to have an honest
debate and present it, but they're doing like the gotcha
thing too. So at the same time, it doesn't
come off as genuine positions. And you can have a debate and
disagree on things and just present the information as
opposed to just trying to like own the other guy and get a
viral clip, which they're both sort of endeavoring to do.
So it's like an inauthentic approach to an authentic debate
where they do have legitimate policy differences of opinions,
but they just don't present it in the way that I, I don't feel
comfortable watching it because it's just too much of like the
Borat style. I'm uncomfortable.
We've got I've got. OK, so I didn't know where we
were going to work this in, but here's actually the clip of the
Tucker and and Ted Cruz thing. I'm going to tell you why I
think this is really interesting.
And it's not because of the men who are talking.
It's because who shared it? There's this really interesting
push that we keep seeing, and it doesn't matter if it's a Mark
Levin or Laura Loomer or if it's Owen Shroyer and Alex Jones or
if it's Robert Barnes and Beaver.
Frey. Is that how you say his name?
Frey, Frey. Whatever Canadian or whatever.
I kind of don't care either. Yeah, People are pushing their
side of the issue. And so this was shared.
This clip this morning was pushed out by Dinesh D'souza.
I don't know what his dog in this fight is either, but he was
like, look, Ted Cruz owns Tucker Carlson.
So I can tell what side you're pushing based on who you're
saying won the debate. Chosen your fighter, you've
chosen your fighter, they've chosen Ted Cruz.
In this one, it did seem like Ted Cruz actually was shown flat
footed on a lot of different topics.
But here he is talking about AIPAC and he was like, even
Tucker has to admit it. And now you're hearing all this
nonsense about Tucker Carlson was given $200,000 by the Qatari
government. I read the Ferra form that Laura
Loomer published. It doesn't say anything about
$200,000, and it doesn't say anything about Tucker Carlson
getting paid. And she was like, well, now you
have to prove that he didn't get paid.
It's like, no, no, no, no, no, honey, this is not the reality.
You have made a claim and you can't back it up with facts.
So all that's kind of goofy. Anyway, this is the clip again
shared by Dinesh D'souza, who was part of the movie Police
State. So we have like a pretty strong
familiarity with the Dinesh, I'll say it that way.
Also, one of the reasons why we spent some time around Bongino
and his wife, which I've got a clip about that is weird.
All of that is strange that these people have decided to go
all in. And it just seems like it's
probably backing Donald Trump's position.
Is that is that check with you? Yeah.
I think ultimately they they kind of paused where they're
going to stand on things and then fired an arrow and then
afterwards drew the target around it depending on where
Donald Trump was going to fall. That's actually really good
analogy. All right, Here's Ted Cruz and
Tucker Carlson, shared by Dinesh.
The Obama White House told every Democrat pick, you either stand
with Israel or you're a Democrat and you stand with the Obama
White House and almost every single Democrat member of
Congress said I'm a Democrat first, to hell with Israel.
And then I watched as AIPAC, every one of those Democrats got
reelected and AIPAC did nothing about it and and it dramatically
reduced AIPAC's influence. I agree.
I watched it and. And by the way, I told AIPAC, I
said, look, the analogy of the NRA was supporting a bunch of
politicians and cared about the Second Amendment, and you had
politicians that vote to confiscate people's guns, and
the NRA turned around and raised money for the people who voted
to confiscate guns. You know what?
No one would ever care what they said again.
Sure. You're making the case that
AIPAC is not as powerful as people say it is.
And I completely agree with you. I've, I've watched that and I'm
not, I'm not making the case that AIPAC is all powerful and
they're running everything and putting flour in the water.
I'm not making the case at all because it's not true.
So that's that's the claim, that's the push I'm resizing
Steve Friends thing. It was bothering me.
Steve, you just, you know, this is just the way that I work.
I can't handle this stuff. OK.
So we'll put you back on the screen here.
Does that argument land for you and is it more interesting the
source of it, of it being pushed out there versus the actual
discussion being had? Yeah, And I think that that sort
of the way that the exchange was going on between those guys, it
was pretty clear to me in that that give and take that back and
forth between Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz that there wasn't
really a gotcha effort. They weren't trying to like lull
the guy into being flat footed so they can spring the trap and
say, aha, see, I got you. And had it was actually just
seemed like information that they were being shared there.
It wouldn't. It was actually the one of the
more calm and and reasonable moments within that exchange
that they had the entire league. OK, now I've got one that I
think is totally weird. And since we we brought up your
Dash Pongino situation, I'll I'll play the Tom Fitton thing
in a second here, But I saw this.
This is OK. So for context, I've seen the
shared at least small, smaller bits of this by folks that I'm
not really big fan of, like Stu Peters, The people that are not
just like they they just hate Israel.
Like they're doing the anti Semite routine and there's a lot
of audience for that. Would we agree on that too?
Yes, they're. Increasingly becoming more and
more vocal online behind their keyboards.
OK, this is one of the weirder answers that I've ever seen.
This de censored news has pushed it out.
I've seen nine second clips of it over and over again.
I actually found an extended sort of context.
This is Dan Bongino. It's dated October 9th of 2018.
That's relevant because that's in the modern era.
That's while he was doing a podcast.
I don't think he was running for political office in 2018.
Nope. This is during Donald Trump's
first term, too, so he's not even going to be like the vocal
minority out of power. He's going to be probably a
little bit more outspoken. I don't know what would ever
make like you would never get this answer from me, not in a
million years. Not even if you made me go down
my entire list of all the things that are close to my heart, It
sure as hell wouldn't be the number one thing.
It's a really strange. This is probably why people keep
pointing it out there because it's kind of like without
without context or understanding why he was saying this or why
this was in his mind. I don't get it.
But here's Dan talking to supposedly his wife Paula.
I don't remember Paula looking like this.
Maybe she's maybe this is her like dressed down version.
She looks a little different in person when I met her.
But anyway, this is supposedly Paula.
Who makes you laugh the most? Oh you, Gosh, you make me laugh.
What is the one thing you need to have in your fridge at all
times? Lenny and Larry's protein
cookies. What?
What causes dear to your heart? Cause is dear to my Israel.
Defense of Israel. What is #1 on your bucket list?
Can you explain why anyone would answer that way?
No, that's a completely weird exchange.
I mean, you be having this conversation with your wife.
And if my wife asked me those sorts of questions, I mean, you
got to be the dutiful husband who makes you laugh.
Oh, you honey, of course. And you're, you're answering
questions that are about like your life together.
In that context, you wouldn't just immediately default to
foreign policy, even if it is a very important 'cause for you.
You would say something like the the rearing of our children or
ensuring that you have the best. Political life to your heart.
You're like a foreign nation that I've never lived in it and
for some reason that I can't fathom.
That that's the type of response that you get from a crazy St.
communist, right? What's the cause?
Stopping global warming and from the river to the sea and cut off
all the genitals of the children.
It's super weird, man. I just, again, I've seen it.
I don't get it. It doesn't make any sense to me.
This is kind of what spawned this.
This is why you guys are going back in there again.
A couple of folks are getting into your corner and they're
starting to talk about some real issues.
People are seeing whistleblowers not reinstated.
I also, I'm going to ask you later about it's always Garrett
and Steve. It's never Garrett, Steve, Kyle
and Marcus. We'll talk about that in one
second. But first let's hear what Tom
Fitton said about this. This is self-serving.
But also it's he's right. Can't they have it at least what
amounts to some kind of an honorable discharge so these
guys can go out and make a living again and be and be given
some form of recognition for what they did to come forward
and tell the truth? Because in many respects, they
helped to contribute to this last election win as well by the
things that they disclosed. So is it too much for me to ask
that on behalf of my friend Steve?
Friend, is that too tough of an ask?
No, it's not. And the fact that the
whistleblowers haven't been vindicated or provided justice
is a real, it's a real black mark on Cash's and Dan's tenure
thus far. There's no good reason for it.
I know all the reasons why it isn't being why it isn't done.
And because we've been representing whistleblowers and
working with whistleblowers for decades here at Judicial Watch,
because it's because the FBI culturally and institutionally
doesn't want to do it. And the leadership is not is
isn't going to buck it or haven't bucked it yet.
Isn't that kind of our perspective that the FBI is
being run by the FBI, but the guys that are in it?
Institution is forever. They come and they go.
Hobbes say meet the new boss, same as the old boss, because
that's what they're really expert at.
I mean, I can bang on and you bang on them all the time for
not having any sort of subject matter expert as it pertains to
what they're on paper responsibility of oversight is.
But what they are really competent at is kissing up to
the boss bubble, wrapping him, distracting him so that the
institution can go on without any sort of interference, no
speed bumps to regular standard operating procedure.
And then we're seeing some other weird kind of like
distractionary stuff because apparently we were supposed to
see videos, there was AI heard, there was going to be a wave of
transparency crashing over us. Have you witnessed this wave?
I mean, you didn't see who the the Dobbs leaker was.
You didn't see the the footage of of John Roberts leaking that,
by the way, not not illegal. I don't know why that was a
priority issue other than it's a headline grabbing thing.
We have the White House cocaine matter that's going to be
reinvestigated even though not solved.
If it's Hunter's, he's got a pardon.
And then we're going to continue going down the credibility Ponzi
scheme, like finding something more, something more.
I mean, I was glad that they did reveal about the the Intel
product that said the Chinese were going to try to stuff
ballots in 2020 and the FBI had that Intelligence Report and
that customs intercepted 19,888 fake driver's licenses in route
to the Midwest battleground states.
But then the FBI pulled it back and basically obliterated the
intelligence document because they had to reinterview the
source and tell him what he really was going to tell them.
To me, that's the worst election interference of anything more
than Russia, Russia, Russia more than James comedy honeypot
scheme, more than the 100 Biden laptop because those were
efforts to dissuade people from voting for Donald Trump or maybe
encouraging them to vote for his rival.
This case was actually stuffing the ballots and and we got
transparency on that. But my question is, who goes to
jail? We have to go beyond just
exposing things. When you're leading the premier
preeminent law enforcement agency for the entire country,
you would hope you'd have the capability to put handcuffs on
some somebody instead of just going on to either Fox News or
giving a a handout to John Solomon because he's your buddy,
because you and him have the loan access to classified
documents from Donald Trump. And then just saying, we'll see.
Look, I'm being transparent. Do you want to talk about that
just a little bit more with the John Solomon piece?
Because I feel like that's relevant.
Well, it is kind of funny how John Solomon and Casper Teller
are like the only guys they've gotten the the deputization from
Donald Trump to have access to classified documents that are
within his purview. Like it's just those two guys.
Now look, I don't have a problem with John Solomon as a
journalist. I mean, guys seems to be always
trying to dig things up. But I would think that you'd
want to go for somebody who has bigger access, particularly if
you're Donald Trump and you're like the PT Barnum of our time.
Like we're going to have a celebration for the Army, but
it's going to be the biggest and most beautiful parade of all
time. Like why is just the news the
the only outlet that you're going to go to with?
That well, let me let me show this on the screen because I bet
you nobody's ever seen this before, at least not in our
audience. I know that you probably have
Steve, I've got you hidden, but you they'll be able to hear you.
We're looking at a document right now.
It's got Donald Trump's presidential seal on it, folks.
If you want to tune into the show at 23 minutes in or 24
minutes in, something like that, or maybe it's 20.
Donald J Trump June 19th, 2023 So this is 3 years ago
yesterday. It's written to the Honorable
Deborah Steele Wall, who is the acting archivist of the United
States at the National Archives. If you recall, this is where all
of those cases that were about classified documents came out
of. And it writes, Dear Miss Wall, I
write to designate 2 individuals, Cash Patel and John
Solomon, as my representatives for access to the presidential
records of my administration pursuant to the Presidential
Records Act, 44 USC 22 O one. Kashep Prodman, AKA Kash Patel
can be reached at. There's his e-mail, by the way.
That's his real e-mail address. And it's publicly available out
on the web. It's a Gmail account.
There's his phone number. They're missing 1 digit, but
that's his real phone number as well.
And John Solomon can be reached at jsolomon@justthenews.com.
That's his real e-mail address. And there's this 2O2 phone
number also listed on here. This is a legit document in the
archives of of the Trump White House available by a simple
link. This is publicly available
information that you can find if you are so inclined, folks.
This is available by a Google search and it says thank you for
your attention to this request. And then it's signed Donald J
Trump. That's a legit signature.
Why on earth, Steve, would you have two people, one guy who's
like kind of a staffer that was doing investigations and one guy
who's a journalist, give specific access to the
presidential archives? Does that make any sense to you?
I can't come up with a logical reason for it other than they
seem to be good at handling the documents.
I mean, Cash Patel's reputation was that he was the big name on
top of the exposing the Russia gate, right?
So I could see that sort of lining up.
John Solomon, I mean, just a known journalist and tends to be
right of center. The only other theory that I can
come up with is I know John Solomon is very good friends
with Sean Hannity, who is very good friends with Donald Trump.
So maybe in some sort of consultation with Sean Hannity,
he got the name John Solomon and was like, oh, that's good enough
by Sean. Then consider him vetted.
OK. The problem is, is that that
story that you were just talking about, it didn't go anywhere.
Like we saw it dropped this morning, and that's massive
news. And you gave it to John Solomon,
which is immediately discrediting, by the way.
John Solomon in my book is a flippin snake.
John Solomon pitched giving the story that we had about Gerardo
Boyle. Let me just lay this out there.
When we went forward with the story that was released months
ago that I was actually the source of the James O'Keefe
interview and that Garrett O'boyle obviously never did it
because I knew that. And by the way, so did the FBI.
The FBI also knew that we were going to bring that forward with
Empower oversight and Chuck Grassley was going to bless off
on it and we were going to get a Tucker sit down and explain the
story of how Garrett was the good guy, he never did anything
wrong. That they came after me and I
was already suspended so I wasn't beholden to FBI policy
and we were willing to go through all of those things.
By the way, I submitted an affidavit saying that Garrett
wasn't the guy and if they had done the right job that they
would have interviewed somebody else.
This actually happened right when they suspended Garrett and
John's like, yeah, yeah, I've got the Tucker thing.
It's all good. We're talking to his producer.
And then it was like, oh, well, I can't get the Tucker thing.
We're going to get CBSCBS is going to send a crew down and
we're going to do this. And so they negotiate all the
stuff and we agreed to go forward with it.
He agreed he was going to write the story.
So they did. They dropped that whole story,
Steve. And the and the final thing was
we're going to get you on Sean Hannity for three minutes.
I told I told John Solomon to F off.
And so he's useless to me. And and I have talked to
multiple journalists that are left of center, let's say.
And they all think that he's discredited because of the
actions that he's taken over the years that he is such a he's
like, he's a con man. He tries to handle people like a
source. And so he's on the right what
like Ken Delaney and is on the left like Fusion GPS Ken.
He's an outlet for the government's mouthpiece.
And that's why he got that story, which is why it didn't go
anywhere. In his footprint, I mean, to a
completely different story a week ago when I was 100%
vindicated with what I brought forward in a whistleblower
disclosure about January 6th about how it was used to
manipulate domestic terrorist deaths to artificially boosted
80% of the arrest of domestic terrorism arrests for the FBI
were tied to January 6th misdemeanors, which weren't even
terrorism charges. So.
Who's the section chief that would have benefited from those
increased stats? Steve Jensen, Where's he at
right now? He's fired, right?
No, he's a Dick. The assistant director in charge
of the Washington field office elevated and per the current
director of the FBI who sat down with the sainted Fox News
Channel talking to Maria Bartiromo, answering for that,
said that Stephen Jensen had legitimate concerns.
He raised them, but ultimately he did what the American people
should expect from their FBI and he just followed orders.
He just followed orders and that's what we want from the
FBI. Is that right?
For the directors, so I mean, it's our, we're based now,
right? It's our FBI now.
So I guess that's fine. I guess Police Battalion One O 1
is based. That's troubling for me.
I'm looking for a clip because I was going to try to figure out
how that all worked. And I think that you're going to
be able to understand maybe once we get the right, maybe we just
need the right perspective on it.
Is there maybe someone we could talk to that would be able to
give us the perspective on that situation?
Is it this lady? We are.
That is not the right lady, but that is funny.
That's actually very funny. Where do you think I put that
clip? I just I did it while I couldn't
see it. Now it's gone.
Maybe it's this one does is no, we're going to just you know
what, Steve? I'm just going to go grab it
again. It's going to be fine.
Grab that all day. I'm telling you, I had this set
up and then some of these things disappeared.
But the what I did not have was my favorite the official
unofficial press secretary of the FBI here.
And I want to just reiterate, Steve Johnson's hands are dirty
on January 6th. There's in some cases, in some
ways dirtier than others because he did take a lead role.
So I'm not diminishing that. I'm not excusing it.
I'm not justifying it. But when you're looking for
people who know where the dead bodies are buried, who knows
where this information could be housed, who can explain how
everything went down and who was really responsible for it, you
have to have those inside sources to do that.
And so look, I was defund the FBI, you know, burn down the
building. I mean, I don't think I said
that. So I don't want to be in trouble
for that. But that was when the Democrats
were running it. So, OK, now we can shut down the
FBI. Sounds like a swell idea.
OK. I'm sure we can survive without
it. But with it goes all the answers
to the questions that we have. How many FBI informants and
undercover employees and other assets were involved in January
6th stocking the events of that day?
You saw Joe, Joe Kent so admirably talk to Mark, Senator
Mark Kelly about that yesterday and saying that the intelligence
community is looking into that. Where is the pipe bomber?
What happened to that? How, after more than four years,
did that remain unsolved? So many questions that we still
don't have answers to. We we're about to get the
answers, I assume. I mean it.
Well, today is day 119. We've been in place for four
months. It's our FBI.
Look, I was really worried about the weaponized FBI when the
Democrats had it, but now we got the ring of power and we're
going to bring about all Mattacombs of justice here.
And I'm going to tell you, just trust me, bro.
And it's only been four months. We have to wait.
I've 6 to 8 months apparently. I thought that we were supposed
to be interested in like, outcome.
Do not fall in love with Paul politicians.
Fall in love with what folks in the chat fall in love with what
outcomes? Outcomes.
Our chat knows what the what the answer to that is.
Well, the outcome is Stephen Jensen is now the assistant
director in charge of Washington Field Office.
The FBI removed the hyperlink on the Washington Field Office's
website to the press release that sort of gives his
background so that you would publicly know that he worked for
the domestic terrorism Operations section during
January 6th. I mean that that's a potential
outcome. And we've elevated that guy.
We've elevated the driz. Brian Driscoll, who was the
acting director for a time and refused to turn over the list of
January 6th and employees to the Department of Justice, he's been
elevated to assistant director. I guess we held a Dennehy, James
Dennehy sort of accountable when he refused to her hand over the
Epstein list, which we still haven't gotten four months into
this directorship at the FBI. And James Dennehy, I mean, he
was allowed to retire and collect his pension, walk out to
a color guard ceremony and the thralls of hundreds of employees
giving him a standing ovation. Outcomes matter.
And the outcomes that I'm seeing see, meet the new boss, same as
the old boss. Oh, by the way, on day 1005,
Garrett hits day 1000 this coming Sunday of his indefinite
unpaid suspension until the end of time.
I think ultimately this boils down to one question which I do
want to ask you. I want to get you a legitimate,
no tongue in cheek, not sarcastic response to this
question. Marcus Allen, the only
suspendable on record who came forward to Congress, was removed
from duty and he struck a deal to be reinstated upon the
condition that he would resign and get his back pay.
That happened last year under Joe Biden, Merrick Garland and
Christopher Wray. Joe Biden, Merrick Garland,
Christopher Wray, thank you. I think you've done a better job
than Donald Trump, Pam Bondi and Cash Patel.
Am I right or wrong? Yeah, you're right.
Yep, yeah, you're actually there.
And you know what the screwed up thing is, and I showed this is
so Brianna Morello, who's a friend of the suspendables,
broadly speaking, she's scared of my name now, which is very
interesting. I was going to bring that up for
you. And I don't mean to be too
selfless. You know what, let's just have
some coffee first. Let's do some coffee.
Let's do some coffee, Steve. Then we're going to do the
Brianna thing. And then I do actually have some
other stories that I think are just like broadly interesting
nationally. But we're going to, we're not
going to leave that I want to come back to.
People are losing access by simply trying to champion a
simple cause, which is should have been a no brainer and a
win. Let's talk about people that do
things the right way, that are not cowards, that are making a
good cup of coffee. It's my friends over at Blackout
Coffee Guys. I have some on the desk right
now. I need more of it today than I
have on other days. If you guys are interested in
checking out a coffee company that does it right and they have
done it right since the beginning, you can check out my
buddies over at blackoutcoffee.com slash Kyle.
Very easy to do. If you haven't tried it yet,
We're going to break it down. The company built on hard work
and grit and American values and kind of thumbing it to the man
starting in a garage, growing into a large warehouse,
employing 30 hard working Americans who are not going to
have an ice raid on them. No corporate nonsense, just a
damn good cup of coffee. It is a very good cup of coffee.
I like the branding. I like that it's simple.
It's black and white. That's all I can handle.
No Shades of Grey in the morning for me.
I just want to boil up water, grind up beans, toss in some
espresso mix, let it sit for 5 minutes, plunge it or let my
kids plunge it because they like doing that and pour myself some
cable cups of coffee. blackoutcoffee.com slash Kyle.
That promo code Kyle Kyle will save you 20% on your first
order. You're keeping the American
dream alive. You can support real coffee by
drinking blackout if you guys do not want to drink weak coffee
and you do want to kick in the beans to get you going.
I'm telling you when you're up all night because your kid is
potty training and so you're like waking up at 10:30 and then
11:45 and then your wife is up again at 2 1/2 and you're like,
when will I get to sleep? Never.
But you can get yourself motivated and awake with a cup
of coffee from Blackout coffee. blackoutcoffee.com slash Kyle.
By the way, you guys were the ones who first told me about
blackout, so I appreciate that. And we are espresso rose people
here. It does look like a good cup of
coffee and it is a cup of coffee that we can enjoy.
Steve doesn't drink coffee, but he is riled up.
You got actually warmed up on television.
Why can people not say the name Kyle Serafin in conjunction with
Steve Friend and Gerardo Boyle? I don't know that I've asked you
this before. Oh, you're too politically hot.
I mean, that's what Jim Joyce is that.
Is that all it is? I just hurt.
Feeling like Craig doesn't want to talk to you because you're
just like you're way too much on fire.
Steve. You are fiery but mostly
peaceful and you are not afraid to hurt feelings.
So baby, that's why I don't know and I'm ultimately though I got
to go back to it's the complexion.
It's the floor of sunshine face of the franchise.
Clean shaven is the way to go. Suspendables face at Real Steve
Friend. My, my buddy sent me a, a video
today and it was an Asian lady and she was like, listen guys,
if you're a white guy with a beard, I'm just going to call
you any one of the following names.
They're all good. Steve, Sam, Matt, Kyle.
And it was like 3 other names. I was like shoot and on the on
the text thread it was like me and my friend Matt, my buddy
Mick sent it over. He was like, Kyle, I'm mad.
You guys are just white guys with beards.
Is the beard the problem? Is it threatening?
It does make you lose access. It's a really good way to get
cut out of the deal. You have to mouth the party
line. And that's I think why you see
Dinesh D'souza sharing the Ted Cruz, like, dominated, dominated
Tucker when he was talking about this.
You're seeing some other people do it, too.
You remember Kaylee Mcinally? Former press secretary?
Sure. She is also now doing a tour,
mouthing the right things. You have to say the right things
if you want access. Somebody actually mentioned that
the other day, too. There is no penalty for
violating any federal rules in the in the Trump administration
as long as you're on the side of Donald Trump.
I I read that and I went like, that probably is true.
That's probably true because we saw yesterday Dan Bongino
violating the FBI social media policy, AKA using his personal
social media to talk about work stuff.
Even doing that in general is just a, it's kind of a general
no, no in the entire federal government.
You just, it's not a good look. You let someone else say that
stuff for you. And it's sort of an
unprecedented time and position for having a deputy director
who's an outspoken public figure who had this podcast with
millions of people who who know who he is.
So, yeah, that's never been unprecedented.
But yeah, I mean, theoretically, he's under now the same policy
that you and Garrett and Marcus and me were under, which and
also raises an interesting point of does Garrett A Boyle is still
an FBI employee? Is he violating that policy
every single time that he posts on that?
Anything, because the FBI gave Garrett the same letter that
they gave you and me, and the letter said that we were no
longer responsible for any of the duties or responsibilities
of an FBI agent or employee. So I don't know.
I assume that released me. By the way, they didn't stop
them from putting social media posts in the proposed
termination documents I got, which is funny anyway.
Or. Stopping my access to the
Justice Department's website or potentially hacking into my
phone overnight. You're not sleeping because of
potty training. I'm not because I'm potentially
having a remote access to say what happened.
Just just share people like how goofy this is.
I'm going to give you the full screen.
He's been complaining to us quietly about being woken up in
the middle of the night by a phone that should be quieted,
but it's not. I mean, I'll let the audience be
the judge here. If you put your phone on a
charger, silent Do not Disturb overnight and close down all the
apps on your phone before you do it.
Then in the middle of the night, when the American Radicals
podcast placeholder video goes on full blast on your phone,
waking both you and your spouse up, that might raise a little
bit of alarm bell, which it did for me.
And then the following day, the Department of Justice apparently
found my IP address, maybe with an administrative subpoena,
because they had remotely accessed my device and put child
porn on my computer, and then blocked my access from accessing
the Department of Justice's website.
And then the following day I'm hearing my phone chirping
overnight at 2:42 AM because I happen to be alive and awake and
expecting a SWAT team to come hit me at that time.
Because the suspendables are very much like the British
Empire were always awake at all times.
Somebody from the suspendables crew is always awake, and if
it's not you, it's either me or George Hill, so yeah.
I'm I'm either seeing digital ghosts or, I don't know, maybe
getting a preponderance of evidence accumulating that
something is about to go down. I had somebody say inside the
current FBI, at least I knew where I stood with Chris Ray's
FBI. I'm actually much more worried
about working in the current one.
But we do have character issues per current leadership.
All right, so anyway, you got to get in line if you want to
maintain access. If you want to be part of the
cool kids, you have to go out on Fox and make the argument that
just, you know, Israel is is strong, Iran is weak, the United
States is strong. Strong likes to beat up weak
when weak is bad. I agree that Iran is not cool,
but because Israel picked a fight with Iran, we also have to
be involved in that. She actually doesn't make an
argument other than like like peace through strength through
war because war is strength. Anyway, you guys tell me if you
understand what this is all. About and Trump his doctrine,
his peace through strength, an optimal word in that is strength
and identifying the moments to show American strength, as he
did with Soleimani al Baghdadi when he acted in Syria in 2017.
To the isolationist crowd, my question would be what makes
your position materially different than the beachside
foreign policy of Joe Biden? Sticking your head in the sand
is no different than sitting in the sandy beaches of Delaware
and saying don't when we just said don't, which is what Biden
said. What it got us was 2 global
wars, one in Israel, one in Ukraine, both of which are
raging. It got us the fall of a country
to the Taliban. These are the facts.
The facts are this. Iran is in the weakest position
they have ever been in. Not because of the United
States, because of what Israel has done.
This is a narrow window I don't believe we will ever have again.
A narrow window to conduct a pinpoint strike.
Not regime change, President Trump has said, I'm not taking
out Khomini, not ground forces. A precision strike to take out a
nuclear weapon site that only the United States can do.
That's the opportunity. That's the moment.
And here's the alternative. Political playbook says
meanwhile in Europe. OK, well, what's happening in
Europe? Foreign ministers of Germany,
France and Britain plan to hold nuclear talks with Iranian
counterparts. Who do I trust more, Germany and
France to conduct foreign policy on behalf of the world to make
sure nuclear proliferation doesn't happen?
Or the man that gave us peace through strength, decimated
ISIS? The man who doesn't want forever
wars. The man who made sure no wars
happened on his watch and four presidencies.
Russia did not invade under Trump's watch.
Does this work on boomers? Is that like who?
Who is the audience for this particular like, illogical
statement? We're going to have peace
through strength by doing a war. Peace through strength.
That's a Reagan argument. I mean that that's essentially
what it's for. I mean, look, I'm not going to
weigh in on the merits of one or another, but that they I'm going
to weigh in on the merits of her argument.
Her argument is that strength is a good thing, and you're going
to appeal to authority and say that the person who exercised
strength in the past is the person who should be in charge
of exercising strength now to carry out an attack on another
nation. We'll never have another
opportunity like this to do a pinpoint strike, even though
apparently America always has the ability to do that, because
America is America. Always have peace through
strength, and we're always the preeminent and strongest
military there. I mean, I think that China's
probably a strong nation, so are they justified if they go and
invade Taiwan because like, they're stronger than the weaker
1? Yeah, they have to show strength
and that's how they get peace. Anyway, I I agree with you.
Like I I kind of don't care except that I just.
I want a sound argument. I I want to know the the true
threat that exist and justify it, and I might agree or
disagree with you, but at least make the argument.
I'm just I don't hear the argument there by the.
Way the peace through strength argument historically was that
we're so strong that nobody will screw with us, and therefore we
have peace. That was like the pox Romana.
If you step out of line, we destroy you.
We will envelope you and make you part of the empire, and you
will no longer exist. We'll wipe you from the face of
the earth. So don't do that.
And then we have peace. It's not mutually assured.
It's like. If you tried to do hearts and
minds instead of shock and all, like if that was the case, then
why isn't Iraq the 51st state? Buddy why is the FBI not coming
to heal and still keeping like dudes who are grown men, you
know married to another man doing Disney vacations with
their with their beagles? Why is that guy have a job and
our buddy Chris Toompas is not back in West Virginia?
What's that all about South? Peace through strength should
mean you have the balls to even take over your own government.
We haven't even seen the Trump administration get all their own
people in and we don't even have a GOP.
They can't agree on confirming Trump's cabinet picks and or sub
cabinet picks or political positions, but they apparently
all agree that if it means spending billions of dollars and
dropping like precision munitions in a country that we
didn't pick a fight with, then that's something we have to do.
All of that makes me want to puke.
I I feel like we've lived this before.
I've lived this movie. We can't even get the GOP to
agree it to cut $9 billion in spending that the Doge, which
they were all on board for, said that you shouldn't give $9
billion to NPR and PBS and USAID, which has been exposed to
be a State Department boondoggle where the there was a recent
report about how, you know, there was the indictment the FBI
brought down $500 billion kickback scheme.
They were still giving that same guy who's giving kickbacks to
get a $500 million contract, $800 million on another no bid
contract because he was a black guy.
It was a no big contract to him and he partnered with somebody.
Else was that yesterday's program you guys did?
Yes. OK, I'm just trying to remember
where I heard you guys talk about this.
So folks, if you did not hear about like the con artist that
managed to scam like it's north of a billion dollars, is it not
a billion dollars worth of contracts?
It's actually a really wild story.
It's classic government. It's like, oh, are you
absolutely useless and have you been proven to be a nefarious
actor? We'd love to just give you
another opportunity to have it and.
By the way, can you write the policy for us for how we should
give you the money? You could probably generate
that. In the meantime, this is another
thing I threw on the screen earlier here.
The CIA politicizing information on China and COVID.
You talked about them the the FBI sort of disappearing and
recalling Intel notices showing that there was a potential
problem with the 2020 election. This was also another problem
with the 2020 election. The entirety of COVID, as far as
I can tell, had a massive impact.
Let's just leave it, broadly speaking, that we can 100% say
that COVID policies and COVID experiences change the way
people voted in 2020. And this is a story that goes
back. Who wrote this?
I think Wall Street Journal. It was written by John
Ratcliffe, by the way. I don't think it's the same John
Ratcliffe, but John Ratcliffe and Cliff Sims wrote that a, a
whistleblower who I know personally and I'm not going to
out because he currently works for the agency, but a
whistleblower went forward and exposed that there was a, a push
within the CIA to hide the lab leak theory at that time.
And they gave people financial incentives to do so.
They gave them better jobs and promotions and so on.
So the CIA was politicizing the collection of intelligence.
That's not shocking because Intel collection is always sort
of politicized. But we're talking about the
entire Intel community mobilized to do one thing.
And has any of that been corrected under this?
Like now that now it's our Intel community?
Does anyone seriously believe that?
Not until I I want the name. I mean, I know that that
politicization of did the virus come from the lab or from the
wet market where the bat flew 600 miles and didn't bite
anybody along the way, but then sort of gnawed on a pangolin and
puked into a Stew. There was like 6 out of seven
people that said it came from a lab, and they said, no, we're
going to give you bonuses, though, to say it definitely
came from a lab. Who were those people?
What are their names? When are they indicted and then
arrested and put into solitary confinement?
That's what I want. To know it takes 628 months. 6
to 8 months cutesy time happens twice a day, 628 and we're
coming up on June 28th, which is cutesy day.
Happy Juneteenth. Happy cutesy day.
Dude, actually I think I started with the FBI on June 26th though
that would be that would be on a it was.
So close it. Was so close I was so close to
the to the to the proper anniversary yeah I'm one week
away from what would have been how many years it is it we're in
2025 so we. Would have gone like 9 years.
We're really close to June 28th being the one day 100 of the
deputy director at the helm. It was really close too.
And we're like you said, we're coming up on day with 1000, a
lot of mile marks that are not being met.
But again, all these people are like where I at least I'm seeing
it in the social media, the people that are paying
attention. People are not letting this go.
You can't go out there and say that Epstein didn't kill
himself. Say we're going to show you a
video, then not show you the video, tell you that we're going
to solve all these cases, then not solve all these cases, Tell
you that we're promoting Steve Jensen, who was the guy that
literally he was the one that was benefiting from the
whistleblower disclosure that you were putting out.
You've been vindicated on it because the stories have come
forward showing that you were right about them juicing the
stats and that was a real problem.
The guy who got his stats juice and look great, he's promoted.
He was promoted supposedly to go after the pipe bomber.
The single most terroristic thing that happened on January
6th. No pipe bomber.
Let's do a pipe bomber story real quick 'cause I don't see
the FBI involved in this. This is a local news story that
should be national. If you're serious.
I'm guessing this guy has some right leaning implications.
This is a story. Have you seen this?
I think I saw this headline but I didn't read through it
because. He's a he's a 31 year old
Pennsylvania man, all right, and he was arrested at a no kings
rally. By the way, for those of you in
the chat, I did see you and I'm aware that they're going to redo
no Kings 2 point O. It was so good the first time
that it needs a sequel. They're going to do it on July
the 4th. That sounds brilliant.
I'm not going to be attending a July the 4th.
No kings. Rally with the Army parade and
then July 4th so they could have a counter that looks like great
like America Rod White and blue Lee Greenwood contrasted with
riots. Right.
And so listen, this is the guy's house that you're seeing on the
screen right there. So this is a local police going
in. You can see an American flag
hanging. He's got security cameras.
There's like it's a regular brick American single family
home. The 31 year old, he was arrested
on suspicion of carrying a gun near the No King protest outside
of Philadelphia. And then investigators went and
served a warrant at his house because and, and this one
bothers me just a little bit because he was wearing like some
sort of like fake police uniform.
So they got a search warrant for his house, and I'm not sure how
the probable cause follows unless he said something
specific. There's no indication that
that's the case. His name is Kevin Krebs.
He's of Malvern, which is a suburb.
He's facing charges of felony possession or manufacture of
weapons of mass destruction, not federal charges.
Steve Friend, these are county DA's charging this guy because
they found I think no less than 13 pipe bombs or improvised
explosives. They were alerted by a bystander
when they saw this guy strapping something akin to a tactical
vest, putting a handgun in his waistband and wearing it under a
like a neon yellow raincoat that approximated what police were
wearing. And so he was dressed like a
fake cop carrying a loaded. It's all, I don't know why they
always say like it's a loaded. I Do you not assume that all
guns are loaded? Isn't that one of the cardinal
safety rules? I would think so, but also like
does anyone carry unloaded guns around in their waistband?
Is that a thing? Maybe within the no kings.
Riots maybe in the No Kings riots by the No Kingers.
Anyhow they stopped him and found that he had AP 3/20.
He was lucky it didn't shoot his D off.
He had a bayonet knife. I have a bayonet knife over
like. It's just called a bayonet.
Yeah, but it's a bayonet knife. It's in court.
Like being like white Hispanic. He, yeah, he was also carrying
pepper spray and several magazines of ammunition
concealed under his raincoat and his clothes.
He had an AR style rifle that was at the floor of the rear
seat of his vehicle. None of those things apparently
are in and of themselves illegal.
But he didn't have a carry permit, which I actually think
is dumb. So the fact that you have to
have one anyway, he didn't have a carry permit so he was charged
with carrying a firearm without a license.
He was released on bomb on bond and then they made him stay at
his parents house so they could do a search at his house and
then they found explosives. That's really man.
It makes me have some kind of like playbook vibes.
I wonder if they just knew they were going to find explosives
there and how. Yeah, detailed that or I saw
something I mean completely different violation.
But the state of Michigan is partnering with the FBI because
there are pro Palestine protesters on the University of
Michigan campus and they think they might have done a
vandalism. So the FBI helped them execute a
search warrant on a vandalism charge.
And this is like show me a man and find me the crime.
Like, hey, we have this charge and we know it's weak judge, but
we need to go get fruits of the crime here.
That's look, look over here. But at the same time we're doing
the we're hoping to find something else.
Did the vandals also have a new shaped garage door pole so they
could really get a whole team of FBI agents to come in for?
That at least a Baker's dozen do to address that.
That's my understanding. The best part about this, the
pipe bombs contain nails and screws, which is what you do.
They found improvised detonators in a box labeled no touch.
Please PLSI often label my own. Have you ever been on like an
ATF search warrant? I have not been on an ATF
search. Warrant because I avoid the let
me just if you own a garage in America they found elements of a
bombing right. I'm like, I have bolts, I have
nails, I have, I have wing nuts that are sitting in my garage
right now. Those are well, those could be
used in an IED. So you have bomb making material
in. Constructive, constructive
intent. If you have things that could be
used to create a bomb, then you also, by definition by having
them, you actually had the intent to do it.
It's a thing they do about suppressors like oh do you have
a a mill and a lathe and some sort of tubular thingy.
You could also could you do you have a do you have an ability to
thread pipe? You also are constructively
creating. They actually consider the lathe
to be a suppressor, depending on how the ATF was interpreting
these laws. By the way, so broad they could
actually put thingy or bazooka in the charging document.
The judge would sign off on it. So my buddy has done that, I
think I've told you, but he worked bazooka in for six months
whenever possible. Instead of saying any other
weapon, he used the word bazooka and he put it in quotes and not
quotes and he got judges to sign off on it.
He got supervisors to approve his his, his three O twos.
You can get away with using the word bazooka.
It may or may not be on the list of words that I'm supposed to
say I got served. We'll just share this too,
because if I share it, then we have to disclose this podcast.
I got served yesterday or the day before?
I think yesterday, no maybe the day before by a process server.
I am. I am now being called as a
witness in the Project Veritas versus James O'Keefe civil
trial. Just sounds out of the Southern
District meaning like trying to have a riot on July 4th.
Well, it's James wants to be able to get depositions that he
can record. It's being requested by his
people. So I'm quote UN quote, like a
defense witness, I guess, or a counter counter suit witness.
And they want to be able to take footage from my deposition and
use it in his documentary the plot against James O'Keefe to
steal Project Veritas, of which I know nothing about.
So it was like at one of the one of the great questions in the
discovery was like, you know, like name every board member of
Project Veritas that you've interacted with and all your
comms with them. And I'm like, I don't even know
who the board was. Like, I don't care.
I don't work there. I've never been to Project
Veritas. I just knew that James was kind
of like a Nancy boy and so the kind of guy that doesn't need to
shave his chest because he never grew chest here in the 1st
place, that kind of guy does. That hit home.
You should just. You should do the deposition and
insert changes of Nancy boy in every other sentence.
I'm go, no, I, I think we're going to do some other weird
things. I'm going to, I'm going to, I've
got some plans. I'm going to work the word
bazooka in for sure. There's zero chance that I won't
work that in. And then also we're going to try
to live stream it. If possible.
I'm going to do a live, I'm definitely going to tape it
myself and I will share it with our folks on locals.
But if possible, I'm going to say some silly things that I
would normally say anyway. And so now they can look up this
podcast and they can play this clip back to us about me telling
them that I'm going to say things that are true but also
funny to me. Maybe now they'll serve me too.
Maybe they will, hopefully in all anyway, this guy had 13
improvised explosive devices and or constructively intended to be
explosive devices. He was rearrested on Monday.
Again, no FBI involved in this 13 felony charges for possession
and manufacture of weapon of mass destruction.
This seems like a like a like an FBI wet dream.
They can't even get the pipe bomber in DC.
They've got a real dude who was going to go do some sort of like
weird. Like that's a pretty good
indicator you want to do terrorist defense.
He went to a protest. He's got bombs that are in his
garage. Where's the FBI?
Rearrested, which means the FBI is claiming 2 arrests.
No, the FBI doesn't have anything to do with this.
This is 100% local. I know, but they're going to
have an open case on this. They're going to claim 2 arrests
for a WMD case. Dude.
They're. Raking on the metrics right now
when they finally take it. Yeah, it's just not there yet.
I found that to be weird. All right.
Should we should we hit this? Your your wife's an immigrant,
isn't she? Allegedly, yes.
Yes. Hold on, tell me more.
What do you mean allegedly? Is she not?
Well, I mean, she she does. I mean my wife comes from the
Ukraine, but you should say only Ukraine.
The Ukraine is insulting. I've.
Learned why? Is it insulting?
Did she come in a student visa originally or did she come here
before that? No, she came here as a 14 year
old because her mother married an American.
Like a legit immigration thing and they immigration Immigration
Services in this country are so great and fantastic.
They misspelled her name and she just never went back and
corrected it. So this day, her government
documents are misspelled. My my last name comes from my
grandfather not knowing how to spell before spelling was cool
like back in the 1890s I think when he got here.
Well my wife's name is Anastasia and they added AY in the middle
there just because it looked cool, so she's always had that.
Does she spell that way now? Yes, she had to learn this re
spell her name. That's outstanding.
I'm, I'm for that. That's, that's getting
Americanized. That's America putting its brand
right on you. And you say why?
Because we got to, we put it in there.
The State Department has issued new guidelines on Wednesday for
more extensive social media vetting of all applicants of
international student visas and exchange programs.
And this is very, very bad. The CBS is upset that they are
now going to look for any hostilities towards the
citizens, the culture, the government, the institutions of
the founding principles of the United States of America.
We are not going to just accept people to come into this country
without looking at it and see whether or not they, like, you
know, hate America before we bring them in.
Like, Can you imagine being outraged on this?
They are. Can you imagine being the guy
that presented this and thinking like this was a new and novel
concept? It's like, wait, wait, guys,
maybe we should vet them. And the jaw, the the slack jaws
you got around the conference room table.
Like this guy has middle management written all over him.
We totally need to promote him. So NBC has a similar story and
it says and and you read this headline this before we got
started. So I'm going to tell you what
the story actually says, but it says Trump pledges mass
deportations. He's creating more undocumented
people. And I watched your eyebrow kind
of go up with that. Do you want to know how Steve I,
I'm. Going to need you to square this
circle. OK, more than a million people
were granted legal entry to this country under different
programs, but they're now considered illegal.
They're considered illegal because the Trump administration
withdrew the temporary status that they had, the keyword there
being temporary. They go and they talk about a
woman. Yeah, it's a woman.
I'm trying to figure out what pronoun they used.
Had a bleak future in Haiti and then got a hope for a new life
as a cashier in Miami. After coming here legally with a
sponsor, Donald Trump just declared that she and more than
a million other people no longer have that permission to stay
here temporarily. In other words, your country's
fine. Go back to it, please.
Donald Trump is seeking to go down in history as the president
who carried out the largest deportation in U.S. history.
It's not even close. But he deemed that the Biden
administration has allowed these people to come in, and now they
don't want them here anymore. So they've rescinded this
temporary protected status, and they gave them time to deport.
They said it is now time for you to go home to the place where
you're from. The Trump administration has
created a larger class of undocumented people by literally
delegalizing them, says this woman, who is the director of
action, the Justice Action Center.
By delegalizing, what they mean is that the administration has
pulled the permissions that they were given, which is their right
to pull. So it's a contract when somebody
has a temporary status here, that there is a point where
where we're going to say that the time, the temporary time
that you're here is elapsed and you can go home.
So we're exercising that clause of the contract, which is a
legal document. But apparently that's delegal,
which isn't a word. Not without a fight they said,
though. On May 30th, with the Supreme
Court allowed the administration to strip more than 500,000
people, the Supreme Court agreed that this is the right of the
executive. These 5500 thousand people are
from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, also known as CHNV
and the CHNV parole program which was temporary is no longer
in effect. Christy Noem said that they
issued a notice that they terminated the parole of these
people and the work authorization, so they are no
longer allowed to work and they were directed to D deport or
self deport immediately. And, you know, like you're not
from here. And even the concept of a parole
in an immigration context was so bastardized under the Biden
administration because paroles are for like unique
circumstances. The best example is we need
somebody from Mexico to come and testify for this drug cartel
case. So we give them a this parole to
come in for testimony. And then the agent of the
government walks them back over the border or watches them get
on the plane. And the moment that the plane
gets into the air, they then withdraw their ability to be in
the country. Apparently the Biden
administration said this is just another mechanism that we can
flood in hundreds of thousands of people who do not want to buy
into our social compact and come into the melting pot.
They just want to create their own stand alone CHNV little town
in whatever spot in America we drop them.
And we're going to use this as a mechanism.
And the Trump administration rightfully came in with a
mandate that said we're not doing that anymore.
And we're what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
We're going to exercise another clause of the contract that says
the temporary time has elapsed. You gots to go.
So they didn't create any more people.
It just said how dare. You they're creating more
undocumented people. It would be almost the same as
if you said in an at will employment state, which means
that you could be fired for any reason or no reason at all that
the company that hired all these people is creating more
unemployed people after firing all these people.
It's the same exact sort. Of I would, I would say say it's
something different. Like a Biden administration says
that anybody can walk into a bank right now and just take
$100 and walk out. And then the Trump
administration comes in and says that was bank robbery.
So we're going to prosecute it. And now we've created a lot of
bank robbers. You can't do that.
It's it's mean families belong together.
So save the sign on the screen here, OK, That plays into the
second thing of here that an appeals court heard And in a
three O decision in California and the 9th Circuit, no less,
the appeals court agreed that Donald Trump has the ability to
deploy the National Guard Los Angeles over the powers and the
wishes of Gavin Newsom, which is pretty funny.
Got another story saying the National Guards that were
deployed to this is I think these are related because what
you have is you can deploy the National Guard or not.
What you're seeing is Gavin Newsom said we're not going to
deploy them at all. And Donald Trump's
administration came in and did so.
And the courts, including in the 9th Circuit, including in a
panel review of three, they were like, yeah, he can do that.
So Albuquerque, AKA New Mexico, which is a, a testing lab for a
lot of like really bad Democrat policies.
They do it in a very small space where nobody cares because
nobody even knows New Mexico is part of America.
They, I mean, it's true. Literally I moved out there and
people were like, oh, is that an Oconas post Las Cruces?
It does say Mexico, so yeah. Yeah, it says Mexico.
They just the Nuevo part is confusing.
National Guard troops are being deployed to Albuquerque, but
they're putting him out there, not in military uniforms and not
armed. Can you see anything wrong with
trying to do like some sort of peacekeeping, crowd control, law
enforcement function, Steve with no identifiers?
I can see only disaster happening because you would just
be like who you and what are me because you just look like a
regular person. Yes, they're going to just have
these people stand around since they've been trashing
businesses, putting bullet holes in all these places they call
the place. This is funny.
There are bullet holes in his shop's windows.
Gryce and officers from the Albuquerque Police Department
told the News that they have a name for this part of the city
known as Central Ave. Corridor.
It's also known as officially it's called the International
District. I used to live in Albuquerque,
but unofficially it's known as the War Zone and I pulled my
surveillance team down there when we were deployed to
Albuquerque in early 2020. Not too specifically.
We went down and followed a subject into the war zone, AKA
the International District, and I had guys that had spent time
being police officers in Baltimore.
We had dudes that had worked in Richmond, VA, which is not
particularly nice. We'd all spent a bunch of time
in Southeast DC and some of the other like rough areas.
We've been recently deployed to parts of Pittsburgh that were
100% Islamic and like really dark and scary kind of places.
Like not good things happening. And every single person was
absolutely flipping blown away with the war zone in
Albuquerque, NM because it is a special version of screwed up.
Two of my guys on a team of eight were approached by
prostitutes. Like wow, they were doing
surveillance. Did they have beards?
One yes, one no. OK, equal opportunists.
Equal opportunity. Listen, the ladies of
Albuquerque, the ladies of the night and or day in the war zone
do not discriminate. It was very wild.
They were like, dude, they're on the radio.
They're all blown away with how crazy it was.
And then when you drove in, they decided that it was like, you
know, like the cops were there. And so like a couple of
prostitutes got picked up, they all got rounded in.
They drove into this like this parking garage slash repo lot
thing and they closed the doors. So their compound, it was it's
Mad Max style. Anyway, it's pretty neat.
So they're going to deploy unarmed, UN uniformed National
Guard there. The interesting thing is I think
they're trying to set up like something dangerous happening.
Then they can show that Trump is really bad and he's putting our
troops in danger. If you can't get troops out of
the hands of people, then you just show that they're in
danger. This has always been about
presenting A narrative that these were peaceful protests.
They were lawful until the Orange man, literally Hitler
sent in the troops. And that's why all the footage
that you've ever seen before the National Guard was necessary.
Well, that was actually a cheap fake or we're going to say,
well, that happened after the the troops got there.
So it is the fault of this king. This would be tyrant despot who
tried to keep the peace and stop the riots from happening, to aid
local law enforcement, to actually allow local law
enforcement to this job. And the job is to allow you to
peacefully protest and assemble to exercise your First Amendment
right. That's why police is there.
That's why the National Guard is there.
It is to make sure that the law Breakers don't impede your right
to protest and speak. It's not to stop you from doing
that, but they're going to say that that's exactly what it was.
Well, and all of this, I think is reaction to the fact that
they're losing in court, which I don't think they expected to do.
Here's MSNBC. Look at the face of this lady.
She looks like someone slapped her with a wet fish.
And it's very surprised she didn't expect that kind of fish.
This decision in essence gives Trump's the green light to use
the National Guard in other states.
And and the administration has been hinting very publicly that
they're going to go into New York City, Chicago, maybe some
other states all happened to be blue.
What is the mood like, Elizabeth, that you that you
sense from talking to lawmakers, state officials about where this
goes from here now that the president does have the legal
green light to use the national. Guard, I can tell you that in
New York City, if he deploys the National Guard in New York,
there will be it will cause is going to it's going to cause it
giant outrage and create probably more violence than
there would be anyway. Isn't that what he wants?
Well, that's the office. That's, of course, one of the
working theories that he wants to, you know, create this all
over the country and then, you know, declare martial law.
How big was that fish? Man, she, she had sucked on a
lemon before being asked that question.
That was brutal. Watch, she did not like she did.
So let me get this straight. They're sending the National
Guard potentially into areas that are blue.
You mean every city in America? And and then they're sending the
National Guard into areas where there's riots.
So shouldn't you be saying thank you for allowing the peaceful
people to protest peacefully the way that the Constitution lays
out and getting the people who are breaking the law away from
you so that you can continue to exercise that right?
Oh, no. By sending in the troops, he's
actually going to create more law Breakers.
Well, then you should be grateful the troops are there.
Thank God. Yes.
And, and I do think that these are tied, and I don't think I've
seen this drawn together in anybody else's analysis out
here, but I'm just telling you, losing in California made them
try playbook #2. The first goal was, if Trump
brings people in, can we get instigation?
Can we show National Guard troops being undisciplined and
dangerous and causing violence? And so Donald Trump's
responsible for that violence, even if they don't provoke it.
The second thing is it sounds like he's actually authorized to
do so. And these guys are acting
professionally. Maybe we could put them in
danger by taking their weapons and their any of their like
uniforms which make them look like they have a status of
authority and move them into place.
And why not try it in Albuquerque since most people
don't know where Albuquerque is on a map?
I want to see them make the case that we're going to make it so
bad and uncomfortable or win legally so that the Trump
administration withdraws the National Guard, because that'll
be true victory for us. And that's why we'll see the
Chaz CHOP instead of being 6 square blocks over like 1 square
mile. So we can have lots of rapes and
murders and assaults and violent attacks going on and burning
ability. That will be total victory.
And we can present that on July 4th next to the Lee Greenwood
boomers who are waving flags and singing the national anthem.
That will be a winner for us. This is let's take the 1% of the
every 99 to 1 issue. Yeah, where everybody else just
wants safety. And by the way, the reason
they're doing this is because the the analysis is not shaking
out. You even got CNN over here.
Look at the. I can't remember what this
guy's, this host's name is, but he's also kind of a doofus.
He's getting a legal analysis that he's not prepared for,
which is to say, if I was advocating on behalf of
California, I would tell him not to take this to the Supreme
Court. You're going to make this thing
like you're going to make this a real case law situation.
If I was in California's legal position here, I would tell the
governor, you don't want to appeal this.
You don't want to bring this up to the Supreme Court.
Yes, you have the option to ask them to take it.
That's your sort of last best chance here.
But I think you're going to lose California.
I think if you look at this opinion, it was a three to zero
unanimous opinion from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
You had two Trump appointees and a Biden appointee on that court.
I don't see any way any of the six conservatives on the Supreme
Court say, sure, a trial level District Judge can overrule the
president on this issue just because he disagrees.
I even think some of the liberals might join with the
conservatives on this, as we saw with the Biden appointee.
So it's an interesting strategic decision if they do bring it up
to the Supreme Court. California.
And if the Supreme Court rules again in favor of the Trump
administration, then that's going to be nationwide binding.
An even bigger loss for California, maybe a bigger loss
for all states. Because I actually do want the
National Guard to be mostly and generally speaking, under the
control of. But I think it was brought up
that nobody would ever imagine that we would have such bad
faith actors, that they'd be willing to sacrifice their own
cities and their own safety of the citizens that live within
their borders simply to try to like own Donald Trump.
I don't think anybody could ever have fathom that when they wrote
some of these laws up. And take the exact opposite
position that they were taking four years ago when you had like
in my state in Florida or a governor tried to stand up the
state guard, which exists in dozens of states.
And they're saying, Texas, how dare a governor try to empower
the people to actually defend their own state?
And now they're saying, well, it should be up to the governor to
empower the people to defend their own state.
I mean, never let having a consistent argument get in the
way of making the political expedient argument for yourself.
That's. Where we're going to end it.
Oh, we got one more and I couldn't.
OK, so folks, I tried to put together a a quick visual of the
woman. Take my word on it.
This is a black female who has a a young child who looks like
he's probably somewhere between four and six years old.
This story blew my mind. I wanted to just end with this
because talk about not having consistent positions or even
like human positions. The story came from ABC News.
A brain dead pregnant woman in Georgia was kept on life support
and experts say that that raises ethical and legal questions.
The ethical legal question is Steve, how come we can't kill
this lady and the baby along with her?
Why can't we just let her die when she has a life that is that
is developing in within her? That's the story.
That's literally the story. They're very upset that they
couldn't do it, that the family members of this woman didn't
have the right to kill off the baby.
The only thing that was going to continue the life and the and
the lineage of this person who is now brain dead.
I can't possibly fathom, regardless of where you are on,
you know, what stage of the pregnancy is it okay to murder
the baby? Unless you are an absolute demon
Satanist who believes that at any point in any point of the
life, like, oh, we can abort a three-year old.
That you would take the position of it is wrong to keep a person
on life support so that the baby can properly gestate and be
delivered and have a life and saying like that's wrong.
There's an ethical concern there.
If you're on that side, you're an even smaller minority, or I
hopefully I pray that you're in a smaller minority than the
people that say that we should not allow peacekeeping National
Guardsmen to allow people to exercise their First Amendment
right. OK, here's the crazy part of the
story. First of all, it's a black
woman, as far as I can tell, unmarried, which is a problem.
So the kid doesn't have a dad in the future or in the picture, at
least not legally, as far as I can tell.
So I'm I'm reading because they don't care about that part of
the story. They don't actually care about
the fact that this is it. There's a child that's in play
who's losing a mother and potentially the one thing that
would outlive this, this situation.
And the situation's awful. And it makes me think about
vaccine injuries a little bit just 'cause I don't know one.
She's a nurse. She works at the Northside
Hospital where she did work in metro Atlanta.
She was 30 years old at the time.
Her name was Adrian Smith. Her name is Adrian Smith.
In February, she began developing severe headaches and
her mother, April Newkirk, said that they gave her medication
and she was sent home. She wasn't given ACT scan.
She wasn't kept overnight for observation.
They're going to second guess the doctors.
And then Newkirk said Smith's boyfriend woke up with her
daughter grasping for air. So that's the the woman who ends
up being braid dead. She was taken to another
hospital, Emory University Hospital.
CT scan showed multiple blood clots in her brain.
All really, really bad. She was declared brain dead on
February the 19th. So yes, boyfriend equals not
married. This woman basically had maybe
some suboptimal medical care or not.
Like, headaches don't necessarily mean one thing or
another. And then they said that the baby
has to be able to be continued. They actually delivered the baby
very, very early on as a premature child and then put
into a NICU. And that's bad.
And the family said they wanted, they didn't know that they
wanted the right to kill the baby, but they wanted at least
have the option. And then not having the option
to kill the baby made it more traumatizing to lose this woman.
Well, I not having the option gave you the opportunity to have
legal representative, legal representation coming in from
the Planned Parenthood's of the world who are going to promise
you lots and lots of dollar bills because that's where it is
from their perspective. And look, there's no argument to
be made here that this is a personal autonomy.
There is no person there because you don't believe it's a person,
right? There's you don't even believe
that the person who is on the outside is a person.
You can't even define if it's a woman at that point.
It's just a a birthing unit from your perspective, But they're
going to go with this side of the argument because if there is
any victory that the pro-life side can say, say like, hey,
look, this is an awful medical circumstance, but look at this
baby. We should name this baby Miracle
because he or she was born. We can't let the pro lifers have
any sort of argument at all, even if that includes we're
going to murder the person who's brain dead so that the baby can
be murdered and say that's that's their right.
It's it's almost the most pure case of what would a mother
want? There's a concept called implied
consent, which means that if you're not able to say, we just
assume the normal thing that people would want.
So if I come upon Steve friend and he's been running and he has
decided that he's not going to eat an almond for a full week
and he still runs his 12 miles and I find you and you are
incapacitated and you're hypoglycemic.
The standard of care is regular people would want me as a medic
to treat them, including you. I can assume that you'd want to
be treated if you don't have DNR tattooed across your chest,
right? That I would want life saving
recitation to be done. And the same story would be that
a mother who is pregnant with a baby would want said baby
preserved, even if she has no more say in it.
She's brain dead. Her body will do nothing more
than bring a life into the world.
It's the perfect incubator situation and their thought is
what we also don't want to deal with this baby.
It's like inconvenience instead of protecting the.
Implied consent it would it's on par with this is a brain dead
individual who is pregnant. Of course they would want the
baby to be born. It would be like if you came
upon Steve friend who hadn't eaten an almond in a week and
was passed out. You say, well, I can't
definitively say that he doesn't want me to amputate both arms
and both legs, so we're going to go with that option as opposed
to trying to resuscitate him. That's exactly right.
Yeah. Completely illogical things that
mothers don't wish. Mothers who have babies don't
wish to have their babies killed when they're no longer able to
make their decisions out loud. Anyway, all of this stuff is
super gross. And again, it also belies a
problem about fatherhood and the fact that, like, apparently the
boyfriend has no say in it. I'm assuming the boyfriend's the
dad. But like, maybe we shouldn't
assume that the family just wanted the right to be able to
kill, quote UN quote, terminate the pregnancy and cause the
death of the fetus. But the state law doesn't allow
it. So again, don't give any sort of
wins the pro-life crowd. It just shows you people that
are willing to take the worst position, sacrifice our cities,
do the dumbest things, maybe put our troops in harm's way.
I think the right is also guilty of this.
I don't think the left is like unique and they're building.
That's how tribal and stupid we are as a country right now.
I just want my team to win. Steve just want him to win.
We're so back, baby. We're based.
It's. Really gross.
All right, I do have something funny to play because we're
going to need it. It's been like one of those
weeks. Why don't you tell people what
you're going to see on American radicals if they want to join
you for the Saturday morning broadcast, just do your grab bag
tomorrow. What's coming up?
Saturday, Grab Bag on the American Radicals podcast on
rumble.com/amradpod, 10:30 Eastern Time, we got just
pulling a whole bunch of different stories.
Going to talk about how artificial intelligence is
driving up electricity, electricity costs, talk about
how the FBI is not being transparent, have some fake sob
stories about deportations, and we'll get into what is the most
popular restaurant in America. And I was surprised.
So join us tomorrow, Saturday, 10:30 Eastern Time on Rumble.
I don't want to blow anybody's mind, but the most popular
restaurant in America is actually the subject of today's
palette cleanse as we go into the weekend.
Before we do, let's just say real quickly folks, you can
follow us over on rumbleitsrumble.com slash at
Kyle Serif. And if you're watching over
there and I see so many of you, including Mr. Friend Stevens
dad, who's making generous donations into our our pot of
money and also funding Dan Bongino because that's where
that money goes to. Thanks.
Thanks, Gary. youtube.com/ahead, Kyle Seraphin support us over
there. Give us a like, subscribe to the
channel locals. If you guys want to get the
Sunday sit down a day early, you're going to see his name is
Shamgar Connors. He's a wild dude.
That's over at kyleseraphin.com. And Lassie, you can share
things. If you want to share the show
with somebody on Spotify, it's Kyle seraphinshow.com.
Yeah. Your dad is over there directly
funding Dan Bongino's pocket. We got to talk.
To him, my dad is also making threatening calls to Chuck
Grassley's office, which I have. To hear about I love your dad.
I don't even know your dad, but I love your dad because I think
it's great. Thanks.
Thanks, Gary, for being such a good a good guy.
Let's do something. America's top restaurant.
Is this the top restaurant? Steve Friend, this is a leaked
training video about how to be more successful in your work as
a Waffle House. Waffle House server.
Excuse me. These eggs are running.
Can it be cooked again? And my waffle is fine.
Can I get a new one? If a situation like this arises,
please do not throw hands. We know it's tempting, but court
dates cut into smoke breaks. Instead, try using de escalation
phrases like bar waffle. And eat around it, bitch.
Or my favorite, the you expect this is Waffle House.
Remember our goal is to reduce physical altercations by 12%.
We crushed the numbers and the only company to pay their
employees more to fight was the UFC.
So that means no uppercuts on the clock, and if you must
square up, clock out first like management does.
Now let's see how the associate handles a situation.
My waffle is burnt. Can I get a new?
10 Your waffle. Is burnt.
Then eat around it, bitch. Excellent.
The customer will receive exactly what they asked for and
a little extra. Congratulations, you've
completed our core training. Now let's take a look at a few
situations you'll be learning in our next training video.
What to do when a customer brings a raccoon inside.
Proper spatula stances during a brawl.
What to do when a waffle is used as a weapon.
How to tell if those are firecrackers or gunshots.
Safely retrieving a tip from an active crime scene.
How to properly scramble eggs during a race war.
Acceptable slurs for you to say after you've been hit in the
head with a coffee maker, where to ash your cigarette when
you're cooking on the grill, and is it acceptable to blow into a
customer's breathalyzer so their car will start?
Remember, it's not just a Waffle House, it's a Waffle Home.
I love Waffle House so much. Steve, if you come here, you're
going to have to eat some carbs. I'm going to take you to a
Waffle House. That's happening.
Either that or Cracker Barrel, we got to do it.
I don't do Cracker Barrel, I'm only into Waffle House.
I hope you have a great weekend. Thanks for joining me.
Have a great one. We'll see you tomorrow too.
Thanks. See.
You all right, buddy? Folks, that's it for today.
I don't know why I think it's so funny.
I love Waffle House, my daughters actually, and I did a
cross country trip from Virginia going out to New Mexico the
first time and we stopped at Waffle Houses every single
Saturday and we saw zero fights. It's almost no fights unless you
go in there after, I don't know, 10:00 on any weekday.
Nothing good happens after 10 or midnight or something.
So there's your dad advice for the weekend.
That's your safety briefing. Have a great one.
We'll see you guys over there for the Sunday.
Sit down or we'll catch you on Monday.
God bless you. See you then.